Group Discussions
Group Discussions
12 Group Discussions
discussion
leader in a group
learn how to perform as a team player and also emerge as a
1 2 . 1 INTRODUCTION
to
change their stand if they find themselves and Kashmir is the prob
unrest in Jammu
convinced about the other side of the terrorism and
perspective. Friends,I think itis wrong to assume that statistics from 1985 to 2001, you
can
This kind of alteration in the stance does not find look at the
alone. If you take a
lem of the last one decade of innocent people were
killed
a place in debates where those who tens of thousands
even during those years,
speak for the easily observe that over 75,000
Kashmiris had been killed
motion or against it Pakistan once claimed that
prepare their argument well in such incidents. In fact,
casualties was around 30,000.
In
the total number of
in advance, and the
contestant is not supposed to between 1985 and 2001. India holds that
proves that the problem is of a chronic
argue for both the sides. Such is not the case in number of casualties conclusively
any case, such a large
GDs, where the discussion just evolves naturally nature.
without anything to be proved, from the onset.
has said.
The very nature ofGD, therefore, demands flex statistics lends credence to what the participant
As you can see in this situation, citing facts and
ibility on the part of the participants, and a lack awareness. So, supporting your arguments with
It also shows the speaker's general
of it, or a
consequent stubbornness or igidity is figures always helps.
Group Discussion seen as a serious flaw in their
personality.
12.4 NUMBER AND DURATION 12.5.2 Leadership
on all its nuances and tries
to
An effective leader discusses the topic assertively by touching
In a formal GD, there are in GDs is n e v e r pre-defined. It is
six to fifteen members in a group and they are asked to sit in a cir- help the group reach the objective of the GD. Leadership
cular, semi-circular, or U-shaped seating style (senate room in a GD. A person aspir
through the person's performance that he/she emerges as leader
a
12.5.3 Openness
12.5.1 Reasoning Ability In GDs, you must be open to the ideas of others as well as to the evaluation of your own
If you possess good reasoning skills, it helps you express your ideas and opinions in a con ideas-that is what fiexibility is all about. For example, presume that the topic of a GD is
Vincing and ralional manner.
"
golden rule is that when you present your ideas with proper Military Services are Notjor Homen. While discussing a controversial topic such as this, some
reasoningand argurment, you have a better score.) otc be0Pirg participants tend to get emotional about the topic and take a stand either in favour or against the
The
following example serves to suggest how to rationally express your viéys on the topic topic, that is, announcing "Yes, omen are not meant for military services', or declaring 'No,
Democracy is the Best Form of Government. Women to0 can contribute significantly even in military services.' Whatever stand you might
have taken, if you encounter an opposition with a very strong point, you end up in a typical
hckle-minded whimsical
catch-22 situation. If you change your stand, you are seen as a or a
person. If you do not change your stand, you are seen as an inflexible, stubborn, and obstinate
Friends, in my view, compared to any other form of governance, there is a greater possibility of peace, and not averse to either side of the view,
person. However, if you maintain a stand that is open
justice, and ha mony in a democratic set-up. In democratic governments, people are connected with
the system directly as well as indirectly at every level, and it provides maximum opportunity to people
it will reflect your openness. In fact, denying the possibility of a change is always suggestive of
for development. Above all, the people In authority are answerable to the common people. I think
dogmatism.
that is why, a bg portion of the world today happens to be under a democratic system of governance.
GROUP DISCUSSIONS 289
already.
who kncw how to do it. Times have
changed and a lot of men around you are doing it GDs of two types:
are +heualey oow end
1. Topic-based 2. Case-based
Topic-based GDs can be divided into three types: Crenåuhec)
Avoiding peer discussion A GD is to test your team skills. Hence, whatever
meant
infor
mation you intend to share, it should be addressed to the entire
i) Factualtopies i y Abstract topics i i ) Controversial topics
group and not to one or two
members. Don't start talking or arguing with one or
two members ignoring others, something Factual topics Mostly groups are given topics which are factual in nature. These are related
that the two participants are doing in the following GD: to day-to-day socio-economic facts or environmental issues. For example, Growth of Tourism
in India and Higher Education in India factual topics.
do T ore trn ub Arou are
GAOUP DIScussiONS 293
292 cOMMUNICATION SKILLS
conscious? Is the
Abstract topics Abstract topics are in India? Are we not quality
given at the higher level. These are usually intangible in competition. Is the change quality really happening
in
What is our mindset
towards quality?
nature. You need to approach these topics with innovative and lateral thinking. For example. trade not reflection of our quality goods?
growth in our foreign
a
away with substandard
of'chalta haY lets people get
topics such as Blue is Better than Green, All are Egual but Some are More Equal than Others our Indian attitude
We also need to see how far to adhere to global
stand-
is forcing our industry
Money Makes You Poor, etc. are some abstract topics. products and services. So friends! Today competition
are getting there in terms of quality..
ards, so we
Controversial topics These topics are controversial in nature. Participants are bound to have
divided opinions. These topics are given so as to observe the maturity level of participants on
such issues. You should not lose your temper or give a narrow interpretation of issues being dis-
12.9 SUMMARIZING A DIScUSSiON
cussed. For example, you may be asked to discuss debatable issues such as Reservation should the GD,
so isits ending.
If you plan to conclude
be Abolished in India or Women are Unfitfor Defence Services. Just the beginning of a GD is crucial,
as only your
n e w points. You
should not state
Case studies-based discussion These are real-life simulated situations. Usually, these involvec You should avoid raising
keep it brief and conciseshould discussed by the whole group.)
try include to major points
the
some kind of problems which are to be resolved. The key to such topics is that there is no right viewpoint. In fact, you and annoying
Moreover, án abrupt ending in a GD is perplexing
or wrong answer, but your approach to the solution is highly important. comes to an end:
discussion
See how badly this
fact, despite your zeal to start the discussion on a fiyer, you should openthe GD only when you
and abrupt? Consider
have enough points to set it in motion. Any of the partic1pants can initiate
the discussion, but discussion to be choppy, unconvinzing,
Don't you find the ending in this
always try to speak and contribute as early as possible. Many GDs fail to develop because of a better one:
poor beginnings or hasty endings. Many a time, a speaker initiates the discussion without real-
zing that he/she does not know enough about the topic. Take a look at how an opening sounds us believe
enough facts and instances which make
when the speaker begins without any preparation: Participant 2: Friends, I guess we have explored ethics in modern times, the task is both
that though it is not easy.to.harmonize business and
together
I think we
sacrifice, and patience. On this aote of optimism,
possible.and desirable with some efforts,
Participant 1: Good morning, we are here to discuss the topic Cloning should be Banned. In this regard, can bring the discussion to an end. Thank you! .
I feel that cloning as such is not bad. I don't think it needs to be banned.
Participant 2:Friends, good morning. We are here to discuss the topicCloningshould beBanned.Aswe
Take a look at this example on the topic Formation
of Telanganc:A New State.
all know, doning is a
technique of producingidentical copies of cells ör organisms
first animal to be successfully cloned was Dolly, the sheep. In light o
from body cels The
we need tó discuss points
: T
discussed the back-
of the group discussion
Participant 1: Nowit's time to sum up: At the outsetback
we
such as-Does cloning hold new promises for the future? If yes, whar are they? if no, what are the in December 1953, the States Reorganization
ground of the problem. As we have discussed, way
major threats it may pose to humanity? Are the fears so great that cloning should be banned?
Commission was appointed to prepare for the
creation of states on linguistic liries. The States
Reorganization Commission (SRC) was not in favour
of an immediate merger of the Telangana region
had a
Here, the participant has not only introduced the topic by providing the background but also with the Andhra state, despite the common language bétweeñ the two. The Telangana people state
raised pertinent questions to steer the discussion. Given below is another such beginning that
number of complaints. However, the Bharatiya Janata Party (8JP)promisada separateTelangana
if they came to power in 1990.The Congress party MLAs from theTelanganaregion, supported a sepa-
sets a GD moving appropriately: rate Telangana state and formed the Telangana Congress Legislators Forum.In another development,
a new party caled Telangana Rashtra Samithi (or TRS) was formed with the single-point agenda of cre-
ating a separate Telangana state. While tracing the history, we have also found that there was pressure
Participant 1: Good morning friends! We have been asked to discuss the topic Quality is a Myth In
tndia. In other words, it means that we are unable to sustain our products and services agalnst global (Contd)
(Contd)