0% found this document useful (0 votes)
451 views24 pages

Freud Analysis Terminable Interminable

The document is part of the Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, specifically Volume XX, which includes 'Moses and Monotheism' and 'An Outline of Psycho-Analysis.' It discusses Freud's paper 'Analysis Terminable and Interminable,' highlighting his skepticism about the therapeutic efficacy of psychoanalysis and the challenges it faces. Freud emphasizes the biological and physiological factors influencing psychoanalytic therapy and reflects on the limitations of treatment outcomes.

Uploaded by

dpolyak00
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
451 views24 pages

Freud Analysis Terminable Interminable

The document is part of the Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, specifically Volume XX, which includes 'Moses and Monotheism' and 'An Outline of Psycho-Analysis.' It discusses Freud's paper 'Analysis Terminable and Interminable,' highlighting his skepticism about the therapeutic efficacy of psychoanalysis and the challenges it faces. Freud emphasizes the biological and physiological factors influencing psychoanalytic therapy and reflects on the limitations of treatment outcomes.

Uploaded by

dpolyak00
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
THE STANDARD EDITION (OF THE COMPLETE PSYCHOLOGICAL WORKS OF SIGMUND FREUD Translated frm the German ner the General Etorship of JAMES STRACHEY Assisted by ALIX STRACHEY and ALAN TYSON VOLUME Xx (4937-1959) ‘Moses and Monotheism ‘An Outline of Psycho-Analysis ond Other Works THE HOGARTH PRESS AND THE INSTITUTE OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS WH ANALYSIS TERMINABLE AND INTER MINABLE (1937) EDITOR'S NOTE DIE ENDLICHE UND DIE UNENDLICHE ANALYSE (2) Geax Eorroxs: 1937 Ju. 2 Pychoanal, 28 (2), 209-40. 1950 GV, 16, 39-99. (0) Exouun Traxsuarion “Analysis Terminable and Interminable” 1937 Iu. J. Pyelo-Anal, 18 (8), 373-405. (Tr. Joan Riviere.) 1950, CH, 5, 316-57. (Revised reprint of above.) ‘The present trandation is a modified version of the one ppublished in 1950, ‘The last eight and a half paragraphs of ‘Section VI ofthe original German were reprinted in the automn (of 1937 in Almanack der Prchoonayse 1938, 44-50, ‘This paper was written early in 1937 and published in June, Teand the following one, on ‘Constructions in Analyst’ (19874), ‘were the last strictly peycho-analytic writings by Freud to be brought out in his lifetime. Neasly twenty years had passed since he had published a purely technical work, though quet= tions of technique had, of course, been dealt with in hit other writings, Freud’s main earlier discussion of the workings of psycho- analytic therapy was in Lectures XXVII and XXVIIL of the Untrodctry Lectes (1916-17). He bad returned to the subject ‘very much more briefly in Lecture XXXIV of the New Ino- ducioy Lectres (19332). Readers of these easier writings are sometimes struck by what seem to be differences between the present work and it predecesors, and these apparent diver- ‘gences call for examination. ‘The paper as a whole gives an impression of pessimism in segard tothe therapeutic efcacy of psychoanalysis ts Timita- ‘tons are constantly stressed, the dificultes ofthe procedure and the obstacles standing in its way aze insisted upon. These, indeed, constitute its principal theme, In fact, however, there 2) a2 EDITOR'S NOTE fc mathing revolutionary in thi, Peeud eas alwenys well aware of the barriers to success in analysis and was always ready to fnvestigate them. Moreover he was always eager to direct stienton to the importance of the non-therapeutic interests of| psycho-analysis, the direction in which lay his own personal [references particularly in the later part of his life. Tt will be Femembered that inthe shart dacussion of technique in the Naw Tatradstory Lectures (19834) he wrote that he had “never been a therapeutic enthusiast. (Standard Ed, 22, 151.) Thus there is nothing unexpected in the cool attitde shown in this paper ‘wards the therapeutic ambitions of psycho-analysis or in the numeration of the difficulties confronting it. What may per- Ihaps cause more surprise are some features of Preud’s examina- tion of the underlying nature and causes of those dificult. tisnoticeable, inthe fist place, that the factors to which he largely draws attention are of a physiological and biological ‘nature, They arethus in the main unniseeptble topsychological influences. Such, for instance, are the relative ‘constitutional strength ofthe instincts (p. 2242) and the relasive wealmess of the ego owing to physiological caus ‘menopause, and physical lines (p. 226))But the mast powerful Tape ‘nd one tally beyond any possibility ‘of control (to which some pages of the paper are 242 £1.) is the death instincefFreud here suggests that this is ot only ie Be Rad pointed out in earlier writings, responsible for much of the resistance met with in analy, but that itis Actually the ultimate cause of conflict in the mind (p. 244). Tn. all of this, however, there is once again nothing revolutionary. Freud may be laying more stresi than usual on constitutional factors among the dificulties confronting paycho-analyss, but the had always recognized their importance ‘Nor are any’ of the three factors new which Freud selects here a being ‘decisive’ for the access of our therapeutic efforts (p. 228): the more favourable prognosis for eases of ‘traumatic? sather than ‘constitutional origin, the importance of ‘quantita- tive? considerations, and the question of an ‘alteration of the go’, Leis on thie third point that vo much fresh light i thrown, in the present paper. In earlier accounts of the therapeutic process an exential place was always allotted to an alteration. in the ego which was to be brought about by the analyst as & preliminary to the undoing of the patient's represions. (See, EDITOR'S NOTE, a3 {or instanes, the Aeseription in Lactnen XCXVIEE of the Inro= sdutory Lectures, Standard Ea, 16, 455.) But as to the nature of this alteration and how it could be effected very litte was Iknovin, The sooent advances in Freud's analysis af the ego now mace it possible for him to carry the investigation farther. The therapeutic alteration of the ego was now seen rather as the undoing of alterations already present as renults ofthe defensive ‘process. And itis worth recalling that the fact of alterations ff the ego brought about by defensive proceses had been mentioned by Freud ata very early date. The concept isto be found in his discussion of delusions in hs second paper on the nneuro-psychoses of defence (18906), Standard Bi, 3, 185, and at several points in his even eaclier Draft K (Freud, 1950a) of January 1, 1896, Thereafter, the notion seems to have been in abeyance and the connection between anticathexes, reaction formations and alterations of the ego is stated plainly for the fiat time in Taibitions, Smploms ond Ansiesy (19264), Standard Ed, 20, 157, 159 and 164, Te reappears in the New Inrodutory “Leste (198%), tbi., 22, 90, and, afer the long discussion of it in the present paper, in Masts and Monothim (19894), p. 77 sbove, and, finally, iu the Outine of Prycko-dnalyis (1940e), p-178 above. ‘There is oxe respect, however, in which the views exprested by Freud in this paper do seem to to ‘contradic, his eatlier onesf-aamely in the scepticism expressed by him here iar lacie hon is ‘extend (0 the prospects of preventing aot fythe occurrence ofa fresband different neurosis bat even a retum of'a neurosis that has already been treated. ‘The apparent change is shown if we recall a sentence in Lecture XXVII ofthe Introductory Lectres (1916-17) Standard Ea, 16,4452" person ‘who has become normal and free ftom’ the operation of re presed instinctual impulses in his relation to the doctor will remain so in his ova life after the doctor has once more with drawn from it! And again, in Leoture XXVIII (ibid, 451), ‘where Freud is comparing’the effects of hypnotic suggestion and prycho-analysis: ‘An analytic treatmentdemandsfrom both ‘doctor and patient the accomplishment of serious work, which is employed in lifing internal resistances. ‘Through the over- coming of these resistances the patient's mental ie is per ‘maneatly changed, is raised to a higher level of development au EDITOR'S NOTE and remains protected against Gh posible of filing 2? Similarly, in te losing sentences of Lecture XXXI ofthe Ver ‘ioduiny Laure (18380), Freud wstes that the ineaton of poycho-ansysis iso strengthen the ego, to make i more Independent ofthe superego, to veden is eld of perception and enlarge is organization, so that it can approptite fesh portions ofthe id Where i was, there 2 (Standard "Baa 1) Te Coy undeng te pamage one fo be ‘he same, and ie seems lo dlfer in tmportant respects rom the {theory implied inthe present work* “The is ofthis increased sceptiia of Frou’ seems tobe a conviton ofthe impossibilicy of dealing with a confit that is not ‘current’ and of the grave objections to conversing & ‘latene conic itp a ‘current one. This postion appears (0 imply a change ofvew not merely about the therapentic process bt aout mental events more generally. Here Freud seems £0 be regarding the ‘eurrenly sctive conflict as something Solated, something, as it wer, ia a watertight compartnent. ven the egos helped to cope wih ths confict,itseapacity to deal with caller conict wil be unaffected. ‘The intinctsal fore too seen to be thought of as loated in dhe same sort of ways the fact that their pressure hasbeen eased in the current Cenlict throws no light oa their subsequent behaviour. By con= teat according tthe earlier view the analy proces seems to have een considered as capable of altering the ego in a more _gsterl sente and oe Which would persist after the end of the nals and dhe instinctual forees seem to have been regarded fu deriving Gee presure fom an aniferentatd reervor of Dover So that in propartion a the analyss had been sucess, any fcc inrad by the instinctual fees would have had some fis presure reduced by the aualyss and they would be eon fronted by an ego which the anayuis had mate more capable of dealing with them Thus there would be no abyolatesegrega~ tion of the “curent conflict fom the “latent” enes; and the prophylactic power of an analysis (like its immediate outcome) Yrould depend on quantitative comsideratons—on the relative Increase Brought about by tin the strength of he ego and the relative decrease in that of the instincts “1 ust be added hat i apober of th New utr Lats (XXXIV) Feud empliatic fo iting on the linfatios of pyehow Spal therapy (ii 158-4). EDITOR'S NOTE 28 Te may be remacked that the account of the therapeutic effects of analysis written by Freud about a year after the pre- sent paper, in his Outline of Pocho-Anabris (19400 [1938]), ‘hough it agrees clesaly in general withthe account given here, soem (0 revert perhaps to his earlier view on the particular ‘question we have just been considering. For instance, he writes, there, after commenting on the great trouble invalved in over- coming resistances: ‘Tt is worth while, however, for it brings bout an advantageous alteration of the ego which wil be ‘maintained independently of the outcome of the transference and will bold good in life” (P. 179 above.) This would sppear 0 saggest an alteration of a general kind, Te is of interest to note that at the very beginning of his practice Freud was worried by very much the same problems as these, which may thus be said to have extended over the entire Tength of his analytic studies, Here isan extract from a letter written by him to Withelm Flies on April 15, 1900 (Freud, 1950a, Letter 183) on the subject of Herr E., who had been ‘under treatment certainly since 1897 and. probably at least since 1895, and to the ups and downs of whose cage there are repeated references in the correspondence: ‘E.'s carcer as a patient has at last come to an end with an invitation to spend an evening here, Hig riddle is almist completely solved, bis condition is excellent, his whole being i altered: atthe moment ‘residue of his symptoms remains, I am beginning to under- stand that the apparently interminable nature of the treatment is something determined by lav and is dependent on the trane- ference. 1 hope that this exdue will ot preudice succesSSTt Tay only with me to deaide whether the treatment p farther prolonged; but it dawned on me that such 4 prolongation is a compromise between being ill and being well ‘which patients themselves desir, the physician should not consent he asymptote termination ofthe treatmcat i subsiantally a matter of indifference to me; itis for outeers rather that it isa disappointment. Im any case shall keep an eye on the man, ANALYSIS TERMINABLE AND INTERMINABLE 1 LExpensexor hae taught ue that peycho-analytic therapy—the {recing of someone ftom his neurotic symptoms, inhibitions and abnormalities of character—is a time-consuming. busines. Hence, from the very Sst attempts have been raade to shorten the duration of analyses. Such endeavours required no jusifica- ‘son; they could claim to be based on the strongest ebnsidera= tions of reason and expediency. But there was probably still at ‘work in them as well some trace ofthe impatient contempt with which the medical ssience of an earlier day regarded the ‘Reutosce as being tmcalled-for consequences of invisible injuries, Ifithad now become necessary to attend to them, they should at east be disposed of as quickly as possible. ‘A particalarly enengeti attempt in this direction was made by Outo Rank, Zllowing upon his book, The Trane of Bint (1924). He supposed that the true source of neurosis was the ‘act of birth, sce this involves the possibility ofa child's “primal {Gsation’ to his mother not being surmounted but persisting 25 ‘2 ‘primal repression’. Rank hoped that if this primal trauma were dealt with by a subsequent analysis the whole neurosis twould be got rid of. Thus this one small piece of analytic work Would save the necessity for all the rest. And a few months ‘Should be enough to accomplish this, If cannot be disputed that Rank’s argument was bold and ingenious; but it did not stand the tet of eritical examination, Moreover, it was «child of is ‘ie, conceived under the stress of the contrat between the post ‘war misery of Europe and the ‘prosperity’! of America, and ‘designed to adapt the tempo of analytic therapy to the haste of ‘American lif, We have not heard much about what the implementation of Rank’s plan has done for cases of sickness. Probably not more than ifthe fire-brigade, called to deal with a house that had been set on fre by an overturned oil-lamp, ‘contented themselves with removing the lamp ftom the room, * (Jn English in the origina] nis | | | ANALYSIS TERMINABLE AND IVTERMINARLE 217 in which the blaze hadstarte, Nodoubt a considerable shorten- ing ofthe bigad’s ctv would be effected by this means, ‘he theory and practice of Rank’s experiment are now thingy of the pat—no est than American "prosperity ite” Tmyrlf had adopted another way of sesding up an analytic treatment even before the war. At that time The taken onthe ‘se of young Ruan, a man spall by wealth, who had come fo Vienna in s sate of couplets hdplosoes, socompanied by 2 private actor and an attendant" Inthe course ofa few years itheas porible to give him back a lange amount of hs ine dependence, to awaken hi interet in hfe and to adjust his ‘lations tothe people os important t him. But there pro- tgs came (> a stop. We advanced wo furtber in dearng Up the neurosis of his childhood, on which his later illness was based, and it was obvious that the patient found his presat postion highly comfortable and had no wish to take any step Terwvard which would bring hte neazer tothe end of his teat tuent, Te was a cave of the Seaument ihn alt wast AdengeP orang Sa role af Ts—partal—suces, In his preaicament I resorted tothe heroic measure of fing atime. int fr the analyas® At the beginning of a years work T {informed the Patient thatthe coming year was fo be the last ‘one of his treatment, no matter what he achieved in the time [al eft to him. At frst be didnot believe me, but once he was convinced that Twas in deadly eames, the deed change set dn. His restance shrank up, and in these lst months of his fecatment he wat able to reproduce all the memories and ‘0 Alscover all the connections which seemed nceesary for under- Nanding his early neurods and mastering his present one ‘When ite lef'me in the midsummer of 1914, with a4 Tie suspicion asthe res of sof what ly go shorty tend, Tbebeved {hat his cure was radial and permanent Tn a footnote added to this patent's case history in 19284 2 [Thi was writen oon afer the get Hanalei the United seier'A sanded cca of Rens they had bea gen oy rel in fain, Spon nd ney (926, See, pera, Binder 24,38, 8-@ and 120-3] Bea ay paps, pushed wil the podens coset, ‘rom te Hisoey oa iebcal Nem (i8h) Reoste dette soos, cfr Young a's at nem, whist s osc on oly wen com Sposa edad meres abzlecly ranges SiSee anlad Bt, 17, OIL] TBD lag a ANALYSIS TERMINABLE T have already reported that I was mistaken. When, towards the end of the war, he retumed to Vienna, @ refugee aud destitute, I had eo help hita to master apart ofthe transference ‘which hiad not been resolved, This was accomplished in a few months, and T was able w end my footnote with the statement that ‘tier thea the patent has fet normal and has behaved unexceptionahiy, inspite ofthe war having robbed him of his home, his pemesions and all his family relationships. Fifteen years have passed since then without disproving the truth of this verdice but certain reservations have become necesary. ‘The patient has stayed on in Vienna and bas kept a place in society, if humble one. But several times during this period his good state of heats has been imerrupted by attacks ofilnes Which could only be construed as ofthoots of his percanial neurosis. Thanks to the skill of one of my pupils, Dr. Ruth Mack Brunswick, a short course of treatment has on each occasion brought these conditions to an end. I hope that Dr. Mack Brunsiick herself will shordy report on the cium: stances." Some of these attacks were stil concemed. with reidual portions of the transference; and, where this was 20, Shortlved ehough they were, they showed a dstnely paranoid character. In other atiacls, however, the pathogenic material ‘consisted of pies of the patient's childhood history, which had not come 10 light while T was analysing him and which sow ‘came away—the comparion is unavoidable—like sutures ater sn operation, cr small fragments of necrotic bone. Ihave found the history of this patient’s recovery scarcely lest interesting than that of bis ines. Thave subsequendy employed this Sxing ofa [Link] in other cases as well, and T have algo taken the experiences of other analysts into account. There can be only one verdict about the value of this blackmailing device: i is effective pro- Vided that one hits the right me forit. Butt cannot guarantee to accomplish the task completely. On the contrary, we may bbe sure that, while part ofthe material will become accessible ‘under the presure ofthe threat, another part wil be kept back and thus become buried, as it were, and lotto our therapeutic ‘efforts. For once the analyst has fixed the time-limit he cannot * [Her report ain fact already appeared several years caer Besnvik To) or fae ratio te fer Saar of sicaee an etal omote, Sunard Bd, 1h 122) ( { AND INTERMINABLE 219 ‘extend its otherwie che patient would lose all faith in hi. The ‘most obvious way out would be for the patient to continue his treatment with another analyst, alchough we know that such a change will invelve a fiesh los of time and abandoning fruits fof work already done. Nor can any general rule be lad down 28 to the right time for resorting to this forcible teclnieal device; the decision must be left to the analyst’s tact. A miscalculation cannot be rectified. The saying that a lion only springs once must apply here. uw ‘The discusion of the technical problem of how to accelerate the slow progress of an analysis leads us to another, more deeply interesting question: s there such a thing a9 a natural end to an analysis—is there any possibilty at all of bringing an analysis to such an end? To judge by the common talk of analysts it would seem to be so, for we often hear them say, when they are deploring or excusing the recognized imperfections of some fellow-mortal: “His analysis was not finished? or he was never analysed to the end” ‘We mast first of all decide what is meant by the ambiguous phrase “the end of an analy’. From a practical standpoint it is eay to answer. An analysis is ended when the analyst and the patient cease to meet each ether for the analytic seision. This hhappens when two conditions have been approximately ful- filled: frst, thac the patient shall no longer be suffering from his symptoms and shall have overcome his anxieties and his inhibi- tions; and secondly, that the analyst shall judge that #0 much represed material has been made conscio, so mich that was ‘unimelligible has been explained, and so much internal resist= nce conquered, that there is no need to fear a repetition of the pathological processes concerned. If one is prevented by external difficulties from reaching this goal, iis beter to speale of an iwomplste analysis rather than of an unfised one. ‘The other meaning ofthe ‘end’ of an analysis is much more ambitious. Ta this sense oft, what we are asking is whether the Analyst has had such a far-reaching influence on the patient that no further change could be expected to take place in him this analysis were continued, Tet as though ie were possible by means of analysis to attain to a level of absolute psychical x0 ANALYSIS TERMINABLE normality—a level, moreover, which we could fol confident would be able to remain sable, as though, perhaps, we bad {cesde in revolving everyone of he patients represions and in ling nl the gun is memory. We may Set cons one Ccxpeience to enquire whether such things do infact happen, Sd then turn fo oor theory to aacover whether theres any sibiiy ofthis bappening. Pcyery analyet wl have ented afew caer which have had this grauhing outome, He hae siccended im elesring up the ‘patient's neurotic disturbance, and fe has not retroed and has Zot been replaced by any other such dinurbanee, Nov are we tthout some inght into the determinants of these sucess. ‘The patient's ego had not bean nocesby altered! and the ‘etiology of hie diturbance had boen ewentally waumatic. The Stilogy of every nearotic trance iy aftr all a mixed tne, tis 2 question ether of the instincts beg excessively Strong that to say, reafltrant to taming® by the ego—or of the ellce of eal (Le. premature) traumas which the immature eo was unable to master. As are there Is «combination of Toth fctrn the constational aad the accidental. The stronger the constitutional factor, the more readily will a wauma lead toa fsation and leave bebind a developmental discurbanes the stronger the toma, the more cen vl ausious eft become maf even when the tinct station formal ‘There sna dob that am aetoogy ofthe traumatic sor offers by faethe more favourable eld for analy. Only when a case ‘a predominantly trsumade one will nays accel in doing ‘vt it so supetlaively able wo do; ony then wilt thanks to having strengthened the patfent’s ego, suceed in replacing by a correct sation the inadequate deckion made in Ma easly LE Only in such cases can one speak of an anajishaving been ceitvely ended, In them, analysis Bas done all nef Mould and doce not need to be continued, Teis rue haf he patient who has been restored in this way never produces Inotae order calling fr nays, we do not Know how meh ih immanlty may not be de tos land fete oie as spared ‘im ordeals that are too severe, ‘A constnonal saength of fstinet and an unfavourable * [Te dea ofan sera of the godine at lege blow, paras Soton Serio te eatore Now, p20 above] * [de word i conietd blow om 295] AND INTERMINABLE mi alteration of the ngn aequieed in ity defensive struggle in the sense ofits being dislocated and restricted—these are the factors which are prejudicial tothe effectiveness of analysis and which ‘may make its duration interminable, One is tempted to make the first factor—strength of instinet—responaible as well for the emergence of the second —the alteration ofthe ego; butit seems ‘that the latter too bas an aetiology of its own. And, indeed, it must be admitted that our knowledge of these matters is as Yet insufiient. They are only now becoming the subject of analytic study. In this field the interest of analysts seems to me to be quite wrongly directed. Instead of an enquiry into how a cure by analysis comes about (a matter which I think has been suficiently elucidated) the question should be asked of what are the obsticles that stand in the way of such a cure. ‘This brings me to two problems which arte directly out of analytic practice, as I hope to show by the following exarmples. Avcertain man, who had himself practised analysis with great ‘succes, came to the conclusion that his relations both to:men and women—to the men who were his eompedtors and to the woman whom he loved—were nevertheless not fee fom neurotic impediments; and he therefore made himself the sub- Jectofan analysis by someone else whom he regarded assuperiot ‘to himself This critical illumination of bie own self had a completely succesful result, He married the woman he loved land tuned into a fiend and teacher of his supposed rival, Many years pasied in this way, during which his relations with his former analyst also remained wnelowded. But then, for 20 assignable external reason, trouble arose. The man who had bbeen analysed became antagonistic to the analyst and re- [proached him for having filed t give hia complete analysis, ‘The analyst, he said, ought to have known and to have taken into account the face that a transference-relation can never be purely postive; he should have given his attention tothe possi- Dilities ofa negative transference. The analyst defended hirselt by saying that, atthe time of the analysis, chere was no sign of a negative transference, But even if he had failed to observe "(According to Emest Jonet this relat to Ferenc, who was analysed by Heud forthe? weels ia Octobe, 1014, and for another ‘Duce weeks (vith two sessions daily) im Jone 1916” See Jones, 15), 156, apd 1855, 185"and 213. CE alo Freud's obicuasy ot erence (A988), Sand 2, 228)) mm ANALYSIS TERMINABLE some urey Taint signs af t—which was not altogether red out, considering the Limited horizon of analysis in those early days ‘it was stl doubtful, he thought, whether he would have had the power to activate a topic (or, as we say, a complex’) by merely poiuting it out, 90 long as it was wot currently active ia the patient bimse at he time, To activate it would certainly have required some unfriendly piece of hebaviout in reality on the analysts part. Furthermore, he added, not every” good relation between an analyst and his subject during and after analysis wae to he regarded at a transferences there were also ‘Giendly relations which were based on realty and which proved. tobe viable. T now pass on to my second example, which raises the same problem. An unmarried woman, no longer young, had been Cut of from lif since puberty by an inability to wall, owing to severe pains in the legs, Her condition was obviously of a hyrterical nature, and it had defied many kinds of treatment. ‘An analysis lasting three-quarters of a year removed the trouble and restored to the patient, an excellent and worthy person, hace right to a share in lif. Inthe years following her recovery the was consistently unfortunate, ‘There were disasters in her family, and financial lowes, and, as she grew older, she saw ‘every hope of happiness in love and mariage vaniah. But the ‘one-ime invalid stood up to all this valiantly and wasa support to her family in dificult tines. I cannot remember whether it ‘was twelve or fourteen years after the end of her analysis that, wing to profuse haemorshages, she was obliged to undergo a ‘gynaecological examination. A myoma was found, which made a complete hysterectomy advissble, From che time ofthis opers- tion, the woman became il ance moze, She fll love with her surgeon, wallowed in masochistic phantasies about the fearful ‘changes in her insde—phantases with which she concealed her romance-and proved inaccessible toa further attempt at fualysit. She zemained abnormal to the end of her life. The Successfal analytic treatment took place so long ago that we ‘cannot expect fo0 much from i; it was in the earliest years of ‘my work as am analyst. No doubt the patient's second illnes ‘may have sprung from the same source as her fist one which had been succesflly overcome: it may have been a different ‘manifestation ofthe same repressed impulses, which the analysis isd only incompletely resolved. But {am inclined to think that, wes ut fe we trams, thee woud hive ben Gk othe o ear "Toe two cre whch have bien purposely eleced fom large namo ima on i ale oat 2 ron athe top eae cnseing Th wep the pti an the siti ae ie dren eon of them. The fs wil sey tats now proved ht on 9 stecaf ana weanent done oe poche pay who Ae tine haben cures om ang ar oo nace earner noc, aero dered om the ae ne tinea wotthat to sys om secarene of he ld rouble The ode il omer tt thot poe They wbjert tate wo aap dat ote ry ap tray tent and thy years a0, Nope ak Bice cen we have sequed deeper ndght and ide ke eg and that ow tecsqu at Change in score with turn dcveis Tvs they wily we may Seman od expect hat an antic shal prove permanente that pan fl sa Sewers toto toca roa of hearer tnt drt manag {eal in new forms, Our experenes they wl ne oct not sige ws to sesso matrly he demands that ah be made upon oe thereat shod My eto fr chong that two eal of coe, peste bec chy ea ar bac in te pt eons tha the more seen the uel ose fan sal the les tnt fr our aca nce ve have ea sf preicing what the lt sey the Tcvery wl be ‘Ta opt” expectations dey {Mag wth as no presse steident ey mame, y, eae ay oy ogo aa toate or, mote cone, «confit betwen the goat a feodnt) dtaily and ral tne ccna that wile we CE) te retng somone for on tatu conf we cay tenets agate penta nyo Sec and ty that ve hve the power x pared J strona tose ip x stops conte of aso wil ES torbeayng tu atthe time by ny incision and hat {ibe dom, Theo ou than quo witht prope tanner them sow Pthapa ita note le st Pet tev any etn ewer oem a all au ANALYSIS TERMINABLE Some light may probably be thrown on them by theoretical considerations, Bot another point has already become clear: 5 we wish to full che more exacting demands upon analytic therapy, our oad wil not lead us to, a by way of a shortening of ite duration, ur An analytic expeionoe which now extends over several decades ana change whic ha aken plac inthe mare and Ide of ny acy encourage me to aterpt to answer the Gastons Defoe us In caer days T treated. gute a large Shomer of patients, who, a8 wan nataal, rented to be dealt witha guys pe OF ae yes ave besa may Gneaged in taining analysers a rlatvely small nu ‘ee ewe lle: rained with me fer eoninuos tee ten, lnteruped, however, by longer or share intervals Wins them the thenpeuse atm wat no longer the mame. There was bo question of shoresing the teatment; the pute ove was radially fo exkscst the, poses of lines in thom an to ring bout 3 ep-gong altradon of thelr ersonalty. ° * Of the three factors which we have recognized as being decisive forthe veces ov other of analy entinentthe fnfacnceof rua he conststonl suength of the insines an sltoraons of the ego-what concerns ts bere i oaly the Second, the stength of the intial A momen? relation ‘see dutch erative of rahe come $itudooal” or ‘ongentl) Ss exental. However ue fe may Fett he ont lor of deve mportanee om the wry begining, tie never coneivable Gat ae. tnbrecment ef sect coming later ne might prec the Stine ects. Iso, we should have to modify ove frmsta aed faye etcagh ofthe nates te in! stead a the coe Shull rengh ofthe asiacs. ‘The ft of our questions ip. 228] was sit posible by means of snalyietherpy 10 Ligoe of a conictbeencen an instinct and the ego oF of @ puthogent asinetual demand pon the go permanently and {einitvely? To aved mieandenanding tiv not wanecesay, patlups toexplin move exactly what istmeent by permanent {Upon of a nsnetaal demand Cray no aug he is AND INTERMINABLE ms demand to disappear sn that nathing mores ever heard from it again’ Thisisin general impossible, na sit at all tobe desired, 'No, we inean something else, somezaing which may be roughly described as a ‘taming’ + of the instinct. That ie to say, the instinct is brought completely into the harmony of the exo, becomes accesible to all the influences of the other trends in the ego and no longer secks to go its independent way to satis- faction. Ifwe are asked by hat methods and means this result fs achieved, its not easy to find an answer. We ean only say: “So muss denn doch die Hexe dran!" "the Witch Metae psychology. Without metapsychological speculation and theo- rizing—I had almost said “phantaying —we shall not get another step forward. Unfortunately, here as eliewhere, what ‘our Witch reveals is neither very elear nor very detailed, We hhave only a single cluc to star fom—though it sa clue of the highest value—namely, the antithesis between the primary and the secondary processes; and to that antithesis T'shall a this point tara. If now we take up our first question once more, we find that ‘our new Line of approach inevitably leads tur to a particular conclusion. The question was whether iis possible to dispose of an instinctual conflict permanently and definitvely—i.e. to ‘tame’ an instinctual demand in that fashion, Formulated in ‘hese terms the question makes no mention at all ofthe strength of the instinet; but it is precitely on this that the outcome depends, Let us sart fom the asumption that what analysis achieves for neurotis is nothing other than what normal people bing about for themselves without its help. Everyday experi= ‘ence, however, teaches us that in 2 normal person any sobition ‘of sn instinctual conflict only holds good for « particular strength of instinct, or, more correctly, only for a particular relation between the strength of the initinet and the strength 2 (Bindigang? Freud bad, amang other place, wed the word in The anionic Problem of Maioehim’ (19242) to describe the action by ‘whlch the Ubido can make the death isin innocuous Sunurd EE Bo I6k Mic ae a Sen Tot Pat oft 16, alo owing tothe ittervetion of he ego veud,19500)) [We must cll the Witch to ou help te ll ‘Goethe, Feu, Part 1, Scene 6, Foo insench ofthe see of yout, ulin ssa eh Wis 26 ANALYSIS TERMINABLE of the ego.t IF the strength of the ego dishes, whether Uhrough illness or exhaustion, or from some similar caus, all the instincts which ave on for boon sucowsflly tamed may renew their demands and strive to obtain subrituivesaface efutable proof of this statement is supplied by our nightly dreams; they react to the seeping attitude asumed by the ego with an awakeniog of instinewal demands. ‘The material on the other side [he strength ofthe instincts] is equally unambiguous, ‘Twice in the course of individual development certininsincis are considerably reinforced: at pubercy, an, in women, at the menopause. We are not in the Teast surprised if person who was not neurotic befare becomes so at tee times, When his intinels were not 80 song, he sicoveded in taming thems; but when they are reinforced he can no longer do a0. The reprssions belave like dams against the presare of water. The same eects which are produces by these khco pliyilogical reinforcements of iestinet, may be brought about in an iregular fashion by accidental causes at any other period of life. Such reinforcements may be act up by fresh Iraumas, enforced Frustrations, or the collateral influence of instincts upon one another. The ett always the same, adit underlines the iresistble power ofthe quaniteive factor inthe ‘casation of lines, fee a though I oaghé wo be ashamed of so much ponderous ‘exporition, seeing thae everything T have tad has long beee familiar and selkevident. Tt i a fact that wo have always Ipchaved a8 if we Knew all this; but, for the most pert, ou theoretical concepts have neglected to attach the same im- portance to the eanamic Hine of approach as they have tthe “Oy, tbe petty acct, wher tha einton fl within etn ve ere we havea jutlicton of Un clan tosetiolaislimpartance of uc noneapeie factors a err, sec, ste, Tee ator ave fhe tre of pean bu ha le paed IE thebuckground pea nin Tw imple Seine as act feted tere Le by erence © ie hain ltr betwen age o he tal apart ‘which ave been tengnsedor if ate prefered) nerd o oe Jetucdby ts ti Sepreciadon ‘by. Brood of thr alse SSopotance in teurads Of uch ftore a ‘overwork’ el be foul at fy atin Dealt A ithe Fes popes, ding perhaps fom 1092 {on Stand Et) Ry amen eee ieee ‘

You might also like