0% found this document useful (0 votes)
93 views5 pages

Lets Know The Comparison of RT

The document compares MC, RT-flex, and ME marine diesel engines, highlighting their differences in fuel injection, exhaust valve control, and automation systems. The MC engine features mechanical control with fixed injection timing, while RT-flex and ME engines utilize electronic control with variable injection timing for improved efficiency and lower emissions. Overall, the evolution from MC to RT-flex and ME represents a shift from mechanical to digital control, leading to better performance and fuel flexibility.

Uploaded by

ma12.ma863
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
93 views5 pages

Lets Know The Comparison of RT

The document compares MC, RT-flex, and ME marine diesel engines, highlighting their differences in fuel injection, exhaust valve control, and automation systems. The MC engine features mechanical control with fixed injection timing, while RT-flex and ME engines utilize electronic control with variable injection timing for improved efficiency and lower emissions. Overall, the evolution from MC to RT-flex and ME represents a shift from mechanical to digital control, leading to better performance and fuel flexibility.

Uploaded by

ma12.ma863
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Lets know the comparison OF RT-FLEX engines, And ME Engines

Metta Naveen Kumar June 05, 2025 0

The MC, RT-flex, and ME series represent evolutionary steps in large marine two-stroke diesel
engine technology, primarily differing in fuel injection, exhaust valve control, and automation
systems. Here's a detailed comparison:

1. MC Engine (Mechanically Controlled)

• Technology: Traditional camshaft-driven mechanical control.


• Fuel Injection:

Camshaft-operated individual fuel pumps.

High-pressure fuel lines to injectors.

• Exhaust Valves: Camshaft-actuated (hydraulically or pneumatically).


• Control System:
Mechanical/hydraulic governor.

Limited electronic oversight (e.g., safety alarms).

Key Features:
• impler construction, robust for HFO.
• Fixed injection timing (adjusted manually).
• Lower initial cost, but less efficient under partial loads.
• Manufacturer: MAN B&W (e.g., MC-C, MC-C2 series).

2. RT-flex Engine (Common-Rail Hydraulic-Electronic)

• Technology: Hydraulic common-rail system + electronic control (pioneered by


Sulzer, now WinGD).
• Fuel Injection:

The common-rail system supplies pressurised fuel to all injectors.

Solenoid valves control injection timing/duration.

• Exhaust Valves:

Hydraulically actuated via common rail, controlled electronically.

• Control System:

Full electronic control (WECS – Wärtsilä Engine Control System).

No camshaft – uses "crank angle" sensors for timing.

Key Features:

• Flexible injection(multiple injections/cycle). Smoother operation, lower emissions


(NOx/soot).
• Optimised for variable loads and slow-steaming.
• Higher complexity but fewer moving parts than MC.
• Manufacturer: WinGD (e.g., RT-flex84T-D, RT-flex96C).

3. ME Engine (Electronically Controlled)

• Technology: Electronic common-rail with hydraulic actuation (MAN's answer to RT-


flex).
• Fuel Injection:
Common-rail fuel supply.

Electronically controlled injectors via FIVA valves(Fuel Injection Valve Actuation).

• Exhaust Valves:

Hydraulically actuated, controlled by electronic signals.

• Control System:

ECS (Engine Control System) with full automation.

Retains a simplified camshaft (for timing reference only).

Key Features:

• Precise injection/exhaust control (adjustable per cylinder).


• Integrated with ME-C/ME-GI systems for fuel flexibility (HFO, LNG, methanol).
• Real-time optimisation for efficiency/emissions.
• Manufacturer: MAN Energy Solutions (e.g., ME-C, ME-GI, ME-LGIP).

Let's see the Comparison Table

Feature MC Engine RT-Flex ME Engine

Mechanical Electronic (no Electronic (minimal


Control core camshaft camshaft) camshaft)
Fuel System
Hydraulic common- Hydraulic common-
Individual pumps rail rail + FIVA

Exhaust valve Cam-driven Hydraulic Hydraulic


activation hydraulic +electronic +electronic

Lower (~15-20% Lowest (Tier III


Emissions Higher Nox/soot reduction) compliant)

Load Flexibility Poor at low loads Excellent Excellent


Advanced
diagnostics,
Simpler but manual Complex hydraulic,
Maintenance adjustment fewer parts predictive
HFO/MDO/LNG/
HFO/MDO/LNG
Fuel Options HFO/MDO (retrofit) methanol/ammonia

Key Differences Explained

1. Elimination of Camshaft:

• MC: Relies entirely on the camshaft.


• RT-flex: Fully camshaft-free (uses crank-angle sensors).
• ME: Retains a camshaft for timing, but no mechanical load.

2. Injection Precision:

• MC: Fixed injection timing.


• RT-flex/ME: Variable timing, multiple injections/cycle (better combustion control).

3. Emissions & Efficiency:

• RT-flex/ME optimises fuel burn, reducing NOx/soot and improving low-load


efficiency by 5–10%.

4. Fuel Flexibility:

• ME-GI/ME-LGIPengines lead in dual-fuel (LNG/methanol) readiness.

Evolution Summary

• MC → ME/RT-flex = Transition from mechanical to digital control.


• RT-flex(WinGD) and ME (MAN) are competitors with similar goals:
• RT-flex uses a hydraulic common-rail.
• ME uses electronic-hydraulic FIVA valves.
Modern Equivalents:
• WinGD: X-DF (dual-fuel) and X-Engines(flexible fuel).
• MAN: ME-GA(ammonia), ME-LGIM(methanol).

Practical Impact

• Operators: ME/RT-flex reduce fuel costs by 3–8% and simplifies Tier III compliance
(via EGR/SCR integration).
• Newbuilds: ME/RT-flex dominate (>90% market share); MC is legacy/retrofit.
• Retrofits: MC engines can be upgraded to ME-B (MAN) or RT-flex Retrofit.

You might also like