To improve children's lives, mothers and fathers should attend parenting

and child development courses every year. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction:
"The well-being of children is paramount for the future of society. While
parenting is a natural skill, formal training can greatly enhance its effectiveness.
I strongly agree that parents should be required to attend parenting and child
development courses annually."

Body Paragraph 1: Supporting Argument 1

"Firstly, attending parenting courses equips parents with the latest knowledge
on child psychology and behavior management. (Topic Sentence) These
courses often cover crucial topics such as effective communication strategies,
understanding developmental milestones, and managing challenging behaviors.
For instance, a study by the National Institute of Child Health found that
parents who completed such courses reported a significant decrease in
disciplinary issues and an increase in positive interactions with their children.
(Example) Therefore, regular training ensures parents are well-informed and
capable of creating a supportive environment for their children."

Body Paragraph 2: Supporting Argument 2

"Secondly, mandatory courses can foster a sense of community and shared
responsibility among parents. (Topic Sentence) These courses often involve
group discussions, peer learning, and the sharing of experiences. This
collaborative environment can reduce feelings of isolation and provide parents
with a support network. For example, support groups facilitated by parenting
course instructors have been shown to improve parental mental health and
reduce stress levels. (Example) Consequently, this sense of community can lead
to more stable and nurturing home environments for children."

Body Paragraph 3: Counterargument & Rebuttal (Optional, if you want to

reach Band 8.0):
"Some might argue that annual courses place an undue burden on parents' time
and resources. However, while the initial time investment may seem significant,
the long-term benefits, such as improved family relationships and reduced
behavioral issues, far outweigh the costs. Furthermore, many courses are now
offered online, making them more accessible and convenient for busy parents.
Thus, the benefits of such courses undeniably justify the commitment."

Conclusion:
"In conclusion, the evidence strongly supports the need for parents to regularly
attend parenting and child development courses. These courses enhance
parental skills, foster community, and ultimately contribute to the well-being of
children. Therefore, mandating such courses represents a crucial investment in
the future."

Some people think that climate change could have a negative effect on
business. Other people think that climate change could create more
business opportunities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction:
"Climate change has emerged as a defining challenge of our time, with
significant implications for various sectors, including the business world. While
some foresee primarily negative impacts, others believe that it presents new
opportunities. This essay will explore both viewpoints before offering a
personal perspective."

Body Paragraph 1: Negative Effects on Business

"One perspective highlights the potentially detrimental effects of climate
change on businesses. Extreme weather events, such as hurricanes and floods,
can disrupt supply chains, damage infrastructure, and lead to significant
financial losses. For instance,..."

Body Paragraph 2: Business Opportunities

"Conversely, climate change can also create new business opportunities. The
growing demand for renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power,
has led to the rapid growth of related industries. Moreover,..."

Body Paragraph 3: Your Opinion

"In my view, while climate change undoubtedly poses challenges, the potential
for innovation and growth is significant. Businesses that adapt to changing
environmental conditions and invest in sustainable practices are likely to thrive.
For example,..."
Conclusion:
"In conclusion, climate change presents both risks and opportunities for the
business sector. While the negative impacts are undeniable, the shift towards a
more sustainable economy offers significant potential for growth and
innovation. Ultimately, businesses that embrace these changes are best
positioned for success."

Some people think a job not only provides income but also a social life.
Others think it is better to develop a social life with people you do not work
with. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction:
"The role of employment extends beyond mere financial gain, as it often shapes
individuals' social lives. While some believe that a job inherently provides
social connections, others advocate for cultivating relationships outside the
workplace. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my own
view."

Body Paragraph 1: Social Life at Work

"Proponents of the view that jobs foster social lives highlight the frequent
interactions and shared experiences among colleagues. The workplace provides
opportunities for teamwork, collaboration, and informal socializing, leading to
the development of friendships and support networks. For instance,..."

Body Paragraph 2: Social Life Outside Work

"Conversely, those who advocate for a social life separate from work emphasize
the benefits of diverse perspectives and experiences. Friendships outside of
work can provide a broader range of social interactions, free from the pressures
and politics of the workplace. Furthermore,..."

Body Paragraph 3: Your Opinion

"In my opinion, while workplace friendships can be valuable, cultivating a
social life outside of work is more beneficial. It allows for greater diversity in
social circles and reduces the risk of professional conflicts affecting personal
relationships. Moreover,..."

Conclusion:
"In conclusion, both perspectives hold merit. However, I believe that
developing a social life independent of one's job offers a richer and more
balanced experience. It fosters diverse connections and reduces the potential for
professional pressures to impact personal relationships."

It is better to be unemployed than to do a job that people don't like. To

what extent do you agree or disagree?
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
“ It is often debated whether enduring an unsatisfying job is preferable to the
insecurity of unemployment. While the latter can present significant challenges,
I believe that the potential for personal and professional growth, alongside the
negative impacts of job dissatisfaction, makes unemployment a more desirable
option.”

Body Paragraph 1: Arguments for Unemployment

- Topic Sentence: Firstly, a job one dislikes can have detrimental effects on
an individual's mental and physical health.
- Elaboration: Discuss stress, anxiety, and potential for burnout.
- Example: “The constant stress of a job that doesn't align with one's
values or interests can lead to chronic health problems. For instance, an
individual trapped in a monotonous role might experience heightened anxiety,
leading to decreased productivity and overall well-being.”

Body Paragraph 2: Advantages of Unemployment

- Topic Sentence: Secondly, unemployment can provide an opportunity for
self-reflection and skill development.
- Elaboration: Explore the chance to pursue education, training, or
entrepreneurial ventures.
- Example: “Being unemployed can be a catalyst for positive change.
Individuals can use this time to identify their passions, acquire new skills, and
potentially transition into more fulfilling career paths. For example, someone
unhappy in a corporate job could use unemployment to learn coding and start a
tech-related business.”

Body Paragraph 3: Arguments Against Unemployment/Counterarguments

- Topic Sentence: However, the economic realities of unemployment
cannot be ignored.
- Elaboration: Acknowledge the financial strain and potential for social
stigma.
- Example: “It is undeniable that unemployment brings financial
instability, which can lead to stress and erode self-esteem. The lack of income
can make it difficult to meet basic needs and can also create a sense of social
isolation due to reduced social opportunities.”

Conclusion:
“ In conclusion, while unemployment presents financial and social challenges,
the negative impacts of job dissatisfaction on well-being and the potential for
personal growth make it a preferable alternative. Ultimately, the pursuit of a
fulfilling career path should be prioritized, even if it means facing the
temporary difficulties of unemployment.”

Nowadays, many people change jobs quite regularly, rather than working
in one company for their entire careers. Why do you think this is
happening? How can people be encouraged to stay in one job?
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
“The trend of frequent job changes is increasingly common in today's
professional landscape. This essay will explore the primary factors contributing
to this phenomenon and suggest strategies to promote employee loyalty and
longer tenures within companies.”

Body Paragraph 1: Reasons for Job Changes

- Topic Sentence: One significant reason for the high turnover rate is the
pursuit of better career opportunities and higher salaries.
- Elaboration: Discuss the allure of better pay, more challenging roles, and
career advancement.
- Example: “Employees often seek roles that offer a more attractive
compensation package or better opportunities for career progression. For
instance, a software developer might switch companies to gain experience with
cutting-edge technologies or secure a promotion.”

Body Paragraph 2: Reasons for Job Changes

- Topic Sentence: Another contributing factor is the changing expectations
of employees regarding work-life balance and job satisfaction.
- Elaboration: Talk about the importance of work environment, company
culture, and personal fulfillment.
- Example: “Many employees now prioritize a positive work environment,
flexible working arrangements, and a sense of purpose. If these needs are not
met, they are more likely to seek employment elsewhere. A toxic work culture
or a lack of recognition can easily prompt employees to seek opportunities that
better align with their values.”

Body Paragraph 3: Solutions for Job Retention

- Topic Sentence: To encourage employees to stay in one job, companies
need to invest in creating a positive and rewarding work environment.
- Elaboration: Suggest strategies like competitive salaries, benefits,
training programs, and a supportive culture.
- Example: “Offering competitive salaries, comprehensive benefits
packages, and opportunities for professional development are crucial.
Moreover, fostering a supportive and inclusive company culture where
employees feel valued and appreciated can greatly increase job satisfaction and
loyalty. For instance, implementing mentorship programs and recognizing
employees' achievements can boost morale and create a sense of belonging.”

Body Paragraph 4: Solutions for Job Retention

- Topic Sentence: Furthermore, companies can promote long-term
employment by providing clear career paths and opportunities for growth.
- Elaboration: Discuss internal promotions, training, and opportunities to
take on new responsibilities.
- Example: “Establishing clear career paths and offering opportunities for
internal promotion and training encourages employees to see their current role
as a stepping stone to their long-term career goals. Providing employees with
the chance to take on new responsibilities and develop new skills can also help
them stay engaged and motivated.”

Conclusion:
“In conclusion, the frequent job changes observed today are primarily driven by
the pursuit of better opportunities and changes in employee expectations. To
foster job retention, companies must focus on creating a positive work
environment, providing competitive compensation and benefits, and offering
clear career development pathways. By implementing these strategies,
organizations can cultivate a more loyal and productive workforce.”

Some people think a job not only provides income but also a social life.
Others think it is better to develop a social life with people you do not work
with. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
“It is a common belief that a job can serve as a significant source of social
interaction, while others advocate for cultivating friendships outside of the
workplace. This essay will explore both perspectives before offering my own
view, which leans towards the benefits of maintaining a social life separate
from one's professional life.”

Body Paragraph 1: Viewpoint 1 - Social Life at Work

- Topic Sentence: Proponents of the idea that a job provides a social life
often point to the ease of forming relationships with colleagues.
- Elaboration: Discuss shared experiences, common goals, and the
convenience of workplace social activities.
- Example: “Colleagues often share common goals and spend a significant
amount of time together, which can naturally lead to the development of
friendships. Moreover, workplace social events, such as team lunches and after-
work gatherings, can facilitate social bonding.”

Body Paragraph 2: Viewpoint 2 - Social Life Outside of Work

- Topic Sentence: Conversely, those who favor building social connections
outside of work argue that it offers greater diversity and freedom.
- Elaboration: Discuss the benefits of meeting people with varied
backgrounds and interests, and the ability to maintain work-life balance.
- Example: “Developing friendships outside of the workplace can
introduce individuals to a broader range of perspectives and experiences.
Additionally, separating one's social life from work can help maintain a healthy
work-life balance, avoiding potential conflicts or strains on professional
relationships.”

Body Paragraph 3: Your Opinion

- Topic Sentence: While workplace friendships can be valuable, I believe
that cultivating social connections outside of work is generally preferable.
- Elaboration: Provide reasons for your preference, supporting with
examples.
- Example: “Maintaining friendships outside of the workplace allows for a
more balanced and objective perspective on life. It also reduces the risk of
workplace drama influencing personal relationships. For instance, relying solely
on work for social connections can be problematic if one loses their job or
experiences conflicts with colleagues.”

Conclusion:
“In conclusion, while both workplace friendships and social connections
outside of work have their merits, the benefits of a diverse social circle and a
clear separation between work and personal life make the latter more desirable.
Ultimately, cultivating a social life that extends beyond the workplace can lead
to a more fulfilling and balanced lifestyle.”

Some people believe that the government should fund and support the arts,
while others think that it should prioritize other public services such as
healthcare and education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
“The role of government funding in supporting the arts is a subject of ongoing
debate, with differing opinions on whether it should be prioritized over essential
public services such as healthcare and education. This essay will explore the
arguments for and against government funding for the arts, ultimately arguing
that a balanced approach is necessary.”

Body Paragraph 1: Arguments for Government Funding of the Arts

- Topic Sentence: Proponents of government funding for the arts argue that
it is essential for cultural preservation and societal enrichment.
- Elaboration: Discuss the role of the arts in preserving cultural heritage,
promoting creativity, and providing educational opportunities.
- Example: “Funding can support museums, theaters, and other cultural
institutions, ensuring that historical artifacts and artistic traditions are preserved
for future generations. Additionally, the arts can foster creativity, critical
thinking, and emotional intelligence, enriching society as a whole.”
Body Paragraph 2: Arguments Against Government Funding of the Arts
- Topic Sentence: Conversely, those who oppose government funding for
the arts often argue that other public services, such as healthcare and education,
should take precedence.
- Elaboration: Discuss the importance of these essential services and the
potential for limited resources to be misallocated.
- Example: Healthcare and education are fundamental to the well-being
and development of citizens, and inadequate funding can lead to serious
consequences. Moreover, some argue that arts funding is a luxury, and that in
times of economic hardship, it should be the first area to be cut.

Body Paragraph 3: Your Opinion and a Balanced Approach

- Topic Sentence: While both sides of the argument have merit, I believe
that a balanced approach is necessary.
- Elaboration: Explain your reasoning, suggesting that both the arts and
essential services are important, and how funding could be allocated.
- Example: Both the arts and essential services contribute to a thriving
society. A government should allocate sufficient funds to both areas, perhaps
through a combination of general taxation and specific taxes or grants for the
arts. Furthermore, private funding and philanthropy can supplement
government support for the arts.

Conclusion
“ In conclusion, the debate over government funding for the arts versus
essential services highlights the complexities of resource allocation. While the
arts are crucial for cultural enrichment and societal well-being, healthcare and
education are essential. A balanced approach, ensuring adequate funding for
both, is the most sensible path.”

In many cities, green spaces and parks have been replaced with houses. Is
this a positive or negative development?
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
“The increasing urbanization of cities has led to the conversion of green spaces
and parks into residential areas. While this development offers certain benefits,
I believe that it is, on balance, a negative trend.”
Body Paragraph 1: Negative Impacts - Environmental Concerns
- Topic Sentence: One of the most significant negative impacts of this
trend is the environmental degradation it causes.
- Elaboration: Discuss loss of biodiversity, increased pollution, and the
urban heat island effect.
- Example: “Replacing green spaces with houses reduces the natural
habitats of various species, leading to a decline in biodiversity. Furthermore, the
construction of houses often involves deforestation and increased emissions
from vehicles, contributing to higher pollution levels and the urban heat island
effect.”

Body Paragraph 2: Negative Impacts - Social and Health Concerns

- Topic Sentence: Moreover, the reduction of green spaces has adverse
effects on the health and well-being of urban residents.
- Elaboration: Discuss the lack of recreational areas, reduced opportunities
for exercise, and the impact on mental health.
- Example: “Parks and green spaces provide essential recreational areas for
people to exercise, relax, and connect with nature. The absence of these spaces
can contribute to a more sedentary lifestyle, increased stress levels, and mental
health issues. For instance, studies have shown that access to green spaces can
reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety.”

Body Paragraph 3: Acknowledging the Positive and Why it's Overwhelmed

- Topic Sentence: While increased housing may address the need for
accommodation, these benefits are overshadowed by the negative
consequences.
- Elaboration: Briefly acknowledge the need for housing and discuss the
economic benefits, but emphasize the greater importance of green spaces.
- Example: Increased housing can accommodate a growing population and
stimulate economic growth through construction and related industries.
However, the environmental and social costs associated with this development
are often greater than the economic benefits. The long-term health and
environmental impact outweigh the short-term gains of increased housing.

Conclusion
“In conclusion, the replacement of green spaces with houses is a detrimental
trend, primarily due to its negative impact on the environment and the well-
being of urban residents. While the need for housing and economic growth is
important, preserving and expanding green spaces should be prioritized to
ensure a sustainable and healthy urban environment.”

Some people believe that children who commit crimes should be punished.
Others think that their parents should be punished instead. Discuss both
views and give your own opinion.
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
“When a child commits a crime, the question of who should be held
accountable arises. Some argue that the child should bear the consequences,
while others believe the parents should be punished. This essay will explore
both perspectives, ultimately arguing that both children and parents should
share responsibility, though in different ways.”

Body Paragraph 1: Punishing the Child

- Topic Sentence: Those who advocate for punishing the child argue that it
is essential for accountability and deterrence.
- Elaboration: Discuss the importance of the child understanding the
consequences of their actions and the potential for this to prevent future
offenses.
- Example: “Punishing the child directly, through measures such as
detention or community service, can help them understand the seriousness of
their actions. This approach aims to deter future criminal behavior and teach
them about the legal consequences of their deeds. For example, a child involved
in vandalism might be required to repair the damage or perform community
service.”

Body Paragraph 2: Punishing the Parents

- Topic Sentence: Conversely, those who believe the parents should be
punished emphasize parental responsibility and the influence of upbringing.
- Elaboration: Discuss the role of parents in shaping their children's
behavior and the potential for parental neglect or lack of supervision to
contribute to criminal activity.
- Example: ”Parents have a fundamental responsibility to provide a safe
and supportive environment for their children. Punishing parents can serve as a
deterrent against neglect, poor supervision, or a lack of discipline. For instance,
parents might be required to attend parenting classes or face fines if their child’s
actions are the result of parental negligence.”

Body Paragraph 3: Your Opinion - Shared Responsibility

- Topic Sentence: In my opinion, a balanced approach is most effective,
with both children and parents sharing responsibility.
- Elaboration: Explain why you believe both parties should be held
accountable, outlining how this might be achieved.
- Example: ”Children should face consequences for their actions, but also
receive support and rehabilitation. Parents should be held accountable for any
neglect or lack of supervision that contributed to the crime. A system of
restorative justice, involving both the child and the parents, can be used to
address the root causes of the crime and prevent future offenses. This may
include counseling, educational programs, and restitution.”

Conclusion
”In conclusion, while both punishing the child and holding parents accountable
have their merits, a balanced approach that considers shared responsibility is the
most effective. By addressing the actions of the child while also addressing any
parental failures, a more comprehensive and just outcome can be achieved.”

Some people think keeping health is a basic need of humans, thus medical
care should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages
of private health care outweigh the advantages?
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
”The debate over whether healthcare should be a for-profit industry is a
complex one, with differing views on the role of private companies. While
private healthcare offers certain benefits, the potential disadvantages,
particularly regarding access and equity, outweigh the advantages.”

Body Paragraph 1: Disadvantages - Cost and Access

- Topic Sentence: One of the most significant disadvantages of private
healthcare is the potential for increased costs and reduced access to care.
- Elaboration: Discuss how profit-driven companies might prioritize profits
over patient needs, making healthcare less affordable and accessible.
- Example: ”Private healthcare providers are often driven by the need to
maximize profits, leading to higher costs for patients. This can result in many
people being unable to afford necessary medical treatments or procedures. For
instance, individuals with pre-existing conditions might be denied coverage or
charged exorbitant premiums, effectively limiting their access to care. ”

Body Paragraph 2: Disadvantages - Prioritizing Profits over Care

- Topic Sentence: Another key disadvantage is the risk that profit-making
companies may prioritize profits over the quality of care.
- Elaboration: Discuss potential issues like reduced staffing, shorter patient
visits, and the incentive to perform unnecessary procedures.
- Example: ”To increase profits, private healthcare providers might reduce
staffing levels, limit the time spent with patients, or encourage unnecessary
treatments. This can lead to lower-quality care and poorer patient outcomes. For
instance, hospitals might face pressure to discharge patients quickly, even if
they require more extensive care, to free up beds and increase revenue.”

Body Paragraph 3: Advantages - Efficiency and Innovation (and counter-

argument)
- Topic Sentence: While private healthcare does have some advantages,
such as potential for efficiency and innovation, these are often outweighed by
the disadvantages.
- Elaboration: Acknowledge potential benefits like improved efficiency
and access to new technologies, but quickly counter-argue why these are not
enough.
- Example: ”Private healthcare providers may have an incentive to operate
more efficiently and invest in new technologies. However, these benefits are
often limited to those who can afford them, and the focus on profits can
undermine the core principles of healthcare, which is providing care for all.
Innovation can also be driven in public healthcare systems. For example,
government funding can support research and development and allow for the
introduction of new technologies.”

Conclusion
”In conclusion, while private healthcare may offer some advantages, such as
increased efficiency and innovation, the disadvantages, particularly concerning
cost, access, and the potential for compromised quality of care, outweigh these
benefits. Prioritizing patient well-being and ensuring equitable access to
healthcare should be paramount, which is best achieved through public or non-
profit healthcare systems.”

Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary

employees do. Some people believe it is necessary, but others think that it is
unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinions.
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
”The disparity in salaries between directors and ordinary employees in large
organizations is a subject of considerable debate. Some argue that such high
executive pay is justified, while others view it as unjust. This essay will explore
both perspectives, ultimately arguing that while high salaries can be justified,
they should be commensurate with performance and social responsibility.”

Body Paragraph 1: Arguments for High Director Salaries

- Topic Sentence: Those who believe high director salaries are necessary
often argue that they are essential to attract and retain top talent.
- Elaboration: Discuss the skills, experience, and responsibilities of
directors, and the need to incentivize them.
- Example: ” Directors of large organizations typically possess specialized
skills, extensive experience, and bear significant responsibility for the
company's performance. High salaries are seen as a way to attract and retain
individuals with these qualifications and incentivize them to make decisions
that benefit the organization. For instance, a highly skilled CEO might be
crucial for navigating complex market conditions and driving significant
growth. ”

Body Paragraph 2: Arguments Against High Director Salaries

- Topic Sentence: Conversely, critics of high director salaries argue that
they are often excessive and unfair, particularly when compared to the wages of
ordinary employees.
- Elaboration: Discuss income inequality, the impact on employee morale,
and the potential for unethical behavior.
- Example: ” The vast disparity in pay between executives and employees
can exacerbate income inequality and erode employee morale. Moreover, there
are concerns that high salaries can incentivize unethical behavior, such as
prioritizing short-term profits over long-term sustainability or engaging in risky
financial practices. For instance, in some cases, directors have been criticized
for receiving massive bonuses even when the company is underperforming or
facing financial difficulties. ”

Body Paragraph 3: Your Opinion - A Balanced Approach

- Topic Sentence: In my opinion, while high director salaries can be
justified, they should be carefully managed and aligned with performance and
social responsibility.
- Elaboration: Explain your reasoning, suggesting a need for performance-
based pay, transparency, and consideration of social impact.
- Example: ” High salaries should be tied to the company's overall
performance and the creation of value for all stakeholders, not just shareholders.
Transparency in compensation practices is essential to ensure fairness and
accountability. Furthermore, executive pay should also consider the social and
environmental impact of the company's operations. For example, a director’s
compensation should be reviewed regularly, and they should be penalized if the
company fails to meet certain social and environmental standards.”

Conclusion
”In conclusion, the debate over high director salaries highlights the tension
between attracting top talent and ensuring fairness and social responsibility.
While high salaries can be justified in certain circumstances, they must be
carefully managed, linked to performance, and aligned with the broader
interests of the company and society as a whole.”

Some people say free-time activities for children should be organized by

parents. Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in
their free time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
“ The question of how children should spend their free time is a subject of
ongoing debate. Some believe that parents should organize their children's
activities, while others advocate for allowing children to choose their own
pastimes. This essay will explore both perspectives before offering my own
view, which favors a balanced approach, allowing for both parental guidance
and child autonomy.”
Body Paragraph 1: Viewpoint 1 - Parental Organization
- Topic Sentence: Proponents of parental organization argue that structured
activities offer numerous benefits for children.
- Elaboration: Discuss the potential for structured activities to promote
skill development, provide safety, and ensure children are engaged in beneficial
pursuits.
- Example: Organized activities, such as sports, music lessons, or
educational programs, can help children develop valuable skills and interests.
Parents can also ensure their children are engaged in safe and age-appropriate
activities, reducing the risk of exposure to negative influences. For example,
enrolling a child in a swimming class can not only teach a valuable life skill but
also provide structured exercise.

Body Paragraph 2: Viewpoint 2 - Child Autonomy

- Topic Sentence: Conversely, those who support child autonomy in free-
time activities emphasize the importance of fostering independence and self-
discovery.
- Elaboration: Discuss the benefits of allowing children to explore their
interests, develop self-direction, and learn through their own experiences.
- Example: “Allowing children to choose their own activities encourages
them to explore their interests and develop a sense of self. It fosters
independence, creativity, and the ability to make decisions. Children can learn
from their experiences, both successes and failures, and develop problem-
solving skills. For instance, a child who chooses to read books independently
can develop a lifelong love of reading.”

Body Paragraph 3: Your Opinion - A Balanced Approach

- Topic Sentence: In my opinion, a balanced approach, incorporating
elements of both parental guidance and child autonomy, is the most beneficial.
- Elaboration: Explain why you believe both parental guidance and child
autonomy are important, providing examples.
- Example: Parents can provide guidance and suggestions, but ultimately
allow children to make their own choices. This allows children to develop a
sense of responsibility and make choices that align with their interests. For
example, parents might suggest various activities, such as sports, art, or coding,
but allow the child to choose which ones they want to pursue.

Conclusion
“ In conclusion, while both parental organization and child autonomy in free-
time activities have their merits, a balanced approach, allowing for both
guidance and choice, is the most effective. This approach promotes skill
development, fosters independence, and allows children to discover their
passions.”

Some people say that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the
minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent
do you agree or disagree?
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
“ The effectiveness of raising the minimum driving age as a means of
improving road safety is a subject of debate. While this measure may offer
some benefits, I largely disagree that it is the most effective approach.“

Body Paragraph 1: Disagree - Ineffective on its own

- Topic Sentence: Raising the driving age alone is unlikely to be the most
effective way to significantly improve road safety.
- Elaboration: Discuss other factors contributing to accidents.
- Example: Many accidents are caused by factors unrelated to age, such as
drunk driving, distracted driving (texting), poor road conditions, and vehicle
maintenance issues. Simply raising the driving age doesn't address these factors.
For instance, a 20-year-old driver who is distracted by their phone is just as
dangerous as a 16-year-old.

Body Paragraph 2: Alternative Solutions

- Topic Sentence: There are several other measures which might have a
greater impact on road safety.
- Elaboration: Discuss stricter enforcement of traffic laws, improved driver
training, and public awareness campaigns.
- Example: “ Implementing stricter penalties for speeding, drunk driving,
and distracted driving could deter dangerous behavior. Comprehensive driver
education programs, including both theoretical and practical training, can equip
drivers with the skills and knowledge needed to navigate safely. Public
awareness campaigns that promote safe driving habits are also essential. For
example, more advanced driving courses, such as defensive driving, can better
prepare drivers for real-world situations.“
Body Paragraph 3: Potential Issues with Raising the Age
- Topic Sentence: Furthermore, raising the driving age could create some
practical problems.
- Elaboration: Discuss potential impacts on teenagers' independence,
access to jobs, and rural communities.
- Example: “ Raising the driving age could limit teenagers' independence
and mobility, especially in areas with limited public transportation. This could
also impact their ability to access employment opportunities or participate in
extracurricular activities. For instance, teenagers in rural communities might
face difficulties getting to school or work if they are unable to drive.“

Conclusion
“ In conclusion, while raising the driving age might contribute to road safety to
some extent, it is unlikely to be the most effective measure. A more
comprehensive approach, focusing on stricter enforcement, improved driver
training, and public awareness campaigns, would likely yield better results.“

Some people believe that children who commit crimes should be punished.
Others think that their parents should be punished instead. Discuss both
views and give your own opinion.
HOW TO WRITE.

Introduction
“ When a child commits a crime, the question of who should be held
accountable arises. Some believe the child should be punished, while others
think the responsibility lies with the parents. This essay will explore both
perspectives, ultimately arguing that both children and parents should share
responsibility, though in different ways.“

Body Paragraph 1: Punishing the Child

- Topic Sentence: Those who advocate for punishing the child directly
argue that it is crucial for accountability and deterrence.
- Elaboration: Discuss the importance of the child understanding the
consequences of their actions and the potential for this to prevent future
offenses.
- Example: Punishing the child directly, through measures such as
detention or community service, can help them understand the seriousness of
their actions. This approach aims to deter future criminal behavior and teach
them about the legal consequences of their deeds. For example, a child involved
in vandalism might be required to repair the damage or perform community
service. 🔨

Body Paragraph 2: Punishing the Parents

- Topic Sentence: Conversely, those who believe the parents should be
punished emphasize parental responsibility and the influence of upbringing.
- Elaboration: Discuss the role of parents in shaping their children's
behavior and the potential for parental neglect or lack of supervision to
contribute to criminal activity.
- Example: Parents have a fundamental responsibility to provide a safe and
supportive environment for their children. Punishing parents can serve as a
deterrent against neglect, poor supervision, or a lack of discipline. For instance,
parents might be required to attend parenting classes or face fines if their child’s
actions are the result of parental negligence.

Body Paragraph 3: Your Opinion - Shared Responsibility

- Topic Sentence: In my opinion, a balanced approach is most effective,
with both children and parents sharing responsibility.
- Elaboration: Explain why you believe both parties should be held
accountable, outlining how this might be achieved.
- Example: Children should face consequences for their actions, but also
receive support and rehabilitation. Parents should be held accountable for any
neglect or lack of supervision that contributed to the crime. A system of
restorative justice, involving both the child and the parents, can be used to
address the root causes of the crime and prevent future offenses. This may
include counseling, educational programs, and restitution. 🤝

Conclusion
“ In conclusion, while both punishing the child and holding parents accountable
have their merits, a balanced approach that considers shared responsibility is the
most effective. By addressing the actions of the child while also addressing any
parental failures, a more comprehensive and just outcome can be achieved.“