Company Law Study Notes: New Revised Kasneb Syllabus
Company Law Study Notes: New Revised Kasneb Syllabus
2023
CPA
CS
INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
COMPANY LAW
NOTES
LEARNING OUTCOMES
A candidate who passes this paper should be able to:
Apply legal principles relating to formation of companies
Evaluate the rights and obligations of members and shareholders
Comply with the legal principles governing liquidation of corporates
Comply with the legal principles governing restructuring of companies
Comply with the legal principles relating to companies incorporated outside the
country
Comply with the legal requirements relating to the financing of companies.
CONTENT
1. Nature and classification of companies
Nature and characteristics of a company
Types of companies
Principle of legal personality and veil of incorporation
Distinction between companies and other forms of business associations sole
proprietorships, partnerships and cooperative societies.
2. Formation of companies
Promoters and pre-incorporation contracts and deeds.
Process and drafting documents required to form a company.
Rules relating to company names
Memorandum and articles of association
Certificate of incorporation
Effects of incorporation
Execution of a company’s documents
Alteration of status of companies
3. Membership of a company
Acquisition of membership
Register of members
Rights and liabilities of members
Cessation of membership
Register of a company’s beneficial owners
Derivative actions.
4. Shares
Classes of shares
Variation of class rights
Share certificates
Issue and allotment
Transfer and transmission
Transfer of shares under central depository system
Mortgaging and charging of shares
5. Share capital
Meaning and types of share capital
Raising of share capital
Prospectus/information memorandum
Maintenance of capital
Alteration and Consolidation of share capital
Dividends
6. Debt capital
Borrowing powers of a company
Company assets that can secure a company’s borrowings
Company debentures
Company charges
Meetings and resolutions in respect of debt capital
Registration of charges
Remedies for debenture holders
7. Company meetings
Nature and classification of company meetings
Types of company meetings held to execute various functions of company
meetings
Methods of holding company meetings
Essentials of a valid physical, virtual and hybrid meeting Voting
Resolutions
Drafting resolutions
8. Company Directors
Qualifications, appointment and disqualification
Powers and duties of directors
Removal and vacation of office
Register of directors
Remuneration of directors
Loans to directors
Compensation for loss of office
Disclosure of director’s interest in contracts
The rule in Turquand’s case/Indoor Management rule
Insider dealing
10. Auditors
Qualification, appointment and removal
Remuneration of auditors
Powers and duties
Rights and liabilities
Inspector’s report
TOPIC 1
NATURE AND CLASSIFICATION OF COMPANIES
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 8
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
Introduction
A company can be defined as an association of people who contribute resources
into a business and in return acquire shares or ownership of the business and
they share out the profit that is generated by the business.
A company is considered to be a legal person and therefore the persons who
have created it are always considered to be separate from that company.
In Kenya majority of companies are registered governed by the Companies Act 2015.
CHARACTERISTICS OF A COMPANY
1. Legal personality: A registered company is considered to be a legal
person that is separate from the person who formed it. The concept of
legal personality was explained in the case of reference salomon vs
salomon co lts 1897.
In this case salomon had converted his sole trade business into a
company where he was a majority shareholder together with his family
members. He had also given the company a loan that was not secured by
the company’s assets making him a secured creditor. When the company
went into liquidation the other creditors argued that Salomon should not
be paid as a secured creditor before them because according to them he
and the company were the same. The court held that Salomon and the
company were separate and according to the court once a company is
registered it becomes a separate legal person different from its owners.
2. Limited liability: The liability of members of the company is limited up
to the extent of any amount that remains unpaid on the shares that are
taken by the members. Therefore where the member has fully paid for his
shares he cannot be called upon to contribute to the debts of the company
if the company is unable to pay its debts.
3. Ownership of the property: A registered company can acquire and own property
under its registered name .Such property does not belong to the members or
shareholders. This was explained in the case of Macaura vs Northern Assurance
Co Ltd 1925. In this case Macaura had converted his timber business into a
company. He took an insurance cover to protect the timber against fire. However
the policy was registered in his own name. When the timber was destroyed by fire
Macaura made claim for compensation but the insurance company refused arguing
that Macaura had no insurable interest on the timber .When he sued the company
the court held that Macaura could not be compensated because the property he
insured belonged to the company. The court explained that companies properties
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 9
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
Disadvantages of a company
TYPES OF COMPANIES
holding &
chartered statutory registered foreign
subsidiary
corporations cororpartions companies companies
companies
public private
companies companies
limited by limited by
shares guarantee
1. Chartered corporations
- These are corporations created by a charter that is granted by the president.
- Only private universities are created through charter in Kenya.
- Under university’s act, the president is empowered to grant a charter to any private
university intending to be set up to benefit the country.
- The charter must set out the name, membership and also the powers and functions
of the universities e.g. mount Kenya University.
2. Statutory corporations
- They are created by an Act of parliament or an order of the president in
accordance with the state corporations Act.
- These are government corporations especially parastatals.
- The Act creating the corporation gives it a name, management structure and also
prescribes the objects i.e. Kenya pipeline, Kasneb, NSSF, NHIF, Central Bank etc.
3. Registered corporations
- Are created in accordance with the provisions of companies Act.
- Certain documents must be delivered to the registrar of companies for registration
i.e. MOA and AOA. Examples include public and private companies.
Public company
This is a company with the following features:
N/B: A public company is required to include at the end of its name the words-public
limited company (PLC) e.g. Safaricom PLC
Private company
A private company is a company with the following features.
1. Members are a minimum of 1 and max of 50 persons excluding employees.
2. It requires at least 1 director.
3. Restricts the right to transfer its shares.
4. It prohibits any invitation to the public to subscribe for its shares i.e. doesn’t issue
a prospectus.
5. Not mandatory to publish its accounts.
6. Required to have a Company secretary if it has a share capital of 5million.
N/B: A private company must include the word limited or Ltd at the end of its name.
Companies Limited by Guarantee in Kenya are mainly registered for the purpose of
operating non-profit organizations that require a legal personality.
c) Unlimited companies
These are companies where member’s liability is unlimited.
Such members may lose their private assets, in case the company is declared insolvent.
Can only engage in transactions stipulated in Can only engage in transactions set by
memorandum and articles of association the statute.
COMPANIES PARTNERSHIP
LEGAL Is a legal person distinct from Is not a legal person in eyes of
PERSONALITY its members law
MEMBERSHIP 1-50 members for private Requires a min of 2-20 persons.
companies and minimum of
7 and no maximum for public
companies.
REGISTRATION Registered under Companies Registered under partnership Act
Act
CAPACITY TO Has capacity to own property Property is jointly owned by
OWN PROPERTY under its own name. partners
MANAGEMENT Managed by directors. Managed by partners
MEETINGS A legal requirement to hold It is not a legal requirement.
AGM.
PERPETUAL Has perpetual succession. Death, bankruptcy or insanity can
SUCCESSION lead to dissolution of partnership
DOCTRINES OF Ultra vires means beyond Not bound by doctrine of ultra
ULTRA VIRES power. A company is bound vires
by this doctrine since any act
beyond AOA is beyond
power.
Must appoint auditors to Is not a legal requirement.
AUDITORS audit books of accounts.
LIABILITY Limited by shares or Members liability is unlimited i.e.
guarantee partners may lose personal assets
in case of insolvency.
i) Corporation sole
ii) Corporation aggregate
1. Corporation sole
This is a legally established office distinct from the owner and can only be occupied
by one person after which he is succeeded by another e.g. the president’s office, chief
justice office etc.
It has the following features
1. It is a legal person with limited liability.
2. It can own property.
2. Corporation aggregate
- This is a legal entity formed by two or more persons for a lawful purpose.
2. Foreign company
This is a company incorporated outside Kenya but having a place of business in Kenya.
Ordinarily these companies are known as multi-nationals because they operate in many
countries outside their country of origin.
Unincorporated association
This is a group of people who have come together to promote/pursue a common purpose
but without going through the various legal procedures of registering a company. These
associations are not body corporate.
They include:
1. Trade union
2. Societies
3. Partnerships
4. Staff union
1. Trade unions
Are organisations whose primary objective is to regulate the relationship between
employer and employees e.g. COTU, KNUT etc. A registered trade union has special
privileges
i) It may sue/be sued under its registered name.
ii) Its offices are immune from civil prosecutions for acts committed in furtherance of
a trade dispute.
iii) All properties of trade unions are vested on trustees for benefits of its members.
2. Co-op societies
It is basically an independent organisation of people who have come together voluntarily
to meet a common economic, social or cultural needs.
Cooperative principles
1. Voluntary and open membership
2. Democratic membership control i.e. one man one vote
3. Economic participation by members.
4. Autonomy and independence
5. Education, trading and information.
6. Cooperation among cooperatives.
7. Concern for the community in general.
Advantages of co-operatives
1. Mobilization of savings
2. Marketing of agricultural produce
3. Provision of credit to members.
4. Creating employment both directly and indirectly
5. Training, education and information to members. E.g. technology
6. Collection, transportation and process of agricultural produce
Veil of incorporation refers to the situation where the real identity of the owners of the
company is hidden by the concept of legal personality
As a result the company is able to deal with parties in its own identity hiding the real
identity of the shareholders or people behind that company.
A company is a legal person and it is separate from its members. This principle is
regarded as a curtain/veil/shield between the company and its members.
There are some exceptional instances where a company and members may be treated as
one and the same thing.
These instances are known as lifting the veil of incorporation or exceptions to the case
of Salomon vs. Salommon
However there are certain circumstances when the veil of incorporation can be lifted or
The concept of legal personality is disregarded in order to know the real identity of the
persons behind that company. This circumstances can be classified into two categories as
follows
i) Lifting the veil by the statute/Act of parliament.
ii) Lifting the veil by court.
These are circumstances when provisions of Company Act are not adhered to. They
include:
1. Reduction in number of members has fallen below statutory minimum
- Where the membership of a company falls below the statutory requirement and
members do business for more than 6 months
2. Non-publication/mis-description of companies name
- Every company is required by the Company Act to publish its name in legible
roman letters on all official publications e.g. cheques, invoices, bills exchange.
Failure to comply with those provision may lead to lifting of the corporate veil.
3. Group accounts
- The holding company is obligated to incorporate into its balance sheet the assets
and liabilities of the subsidiary as it was as their own asset and liabilities.
- This is also regarded as lifting the veil of incorporation.
4. Investigation of the companies affair by an inspector appointed by court
- Company Act requires an inspector appointed by the court to investigate
company’s affairs. This investigation may go beyond and investigate the
company’s members.
5. Investigation of companies membership by inspector appointed by registrar
of company
- The law empowers the registrar to appoint an inspector to investigate the
membership of any company for the purpose of determining the true person who
are financially interested in the success of the company.
6. Take-over bid
- A scheme of take-over bid requires that 90% of the shareholders of the transferor
to approve.
- The dissenting and minority shareholders may apply to the court within one month
to restrain compulsory acquisition of their shares.
- The court may be in appropriate situation lift the veil of incorporation and
investigate members in protecting interest of minority.
7. Fraudulent trading
- The law requires that if it appears that any business of the company has been
carried on with the intention to defraud creditors during winding up, the court may
lift the veil of incorporation and hold those involved personally liable.
1. Determination of character
- This is in order to determine whether a company is an enemy in times of war i.e. a
company whose members behind it are foreigners who come from a country which
at war with Kenya is also declared an enemy to Kenya.
2. The company is a sham
- This is where the company is used to carry out illegal or improper activities or to
perpetuate fraud, corruption, crime, sexual immorality etc.
3. Where the company is acting as the agent of the shareholder
- The company is not in law an agent of the subscribers. If the court holds that a
company acted in as particular instance as an agent of its shareholders, the veil of
incorporation would be lifted.
4. Protection of revenue
- The court would disregard the corporate entity where its used for tax evasion or to
circumvent tax obligation
5. Prevent deliberate evasion of contractual obligation
The veil is lifted where members are using the company to evade contractual
obligation.
PARTNERSHIP
It is a relationship which exists between persons carrying out a business with a view of
making profit.
Duties of partners
1. Contribute capital.
2. To be accountable and not make secret profit.
3. To be honest and have full disclosure.
4. Not to compete with the firm.
5. Duty to share loss.
Rights of a partner
1. To participate in decision making of the firm.
2. To participate in sharing profit.
3. To be informed in case of admission of a new partner.
4. To inspect or access partnership records.
Dissolution of partnership
- It may be dissolved under the grounds:
i) By court order
ii) Without court order
1. By court order
- A partner in a partnership may apply to the court for the dissolution of partnership
under the following grounds.
i) Insanity
ii) Permanent incapacity
iii) Pre-judicial conduct/unfairness.
iv) Persistent breach of partnership agreement.
v) Continuous carrying of business at a loss
vi) Just and equitable grounds i.e. continuous disagreement.
QUESTION 1
Distinguish between a company limited by shares and a company limited guarantee.
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 20
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
QUESTION 2
a) Outline the circumstances under which a company is deemed to be a subsidiary of
another company.
b) Upendo Company was registered five years ago as an unlimited company. Its main
object was to offer humanitarian services to the less privileged members of the
society. The company has since grown into a large undertaking. The members wish to
convert the company into a limited company and seek your legal advice
QUESTION 3
Kimoli and Anjere wish to venture into business. However, they are not sure of whether
to trade as a partnership or a private Limited company and seek your advice.
QUESTION 4
Distinguish between a company and a co-operative society.
QUESTION 5
a) Distinguish between a corporation sole and a corporation aggregate
b) Tim and Tom wish to establish a business jointly. However, they are not sure
whether to establish a limited liability company or an unlimited liability company; as
they know little about these types of companies.
i) Explain to them the differences between a limited company and an unlimited
company.
ii) State the provisions of the Companies Act regarding the re-registration of
unlimited company as limited.
c) Outline the documents that are normally kept at the registered office of a company
QUESTION 6
Akinyi Mburu and Mrs. Jerotich Sirniyu intend to start a business in the tourism industry.
Mrs. Mburu considers a partnership to be the best form of business while Mrs. Jerotich
prefers a private company.
Advice Mrs. Mburu and Mrs.Sirniyu on the following;
QUESTION 7
a) Explain the advantages of private companies over public companies
b) Outline the formalities and requirements that a private company is allowed to
dispense with through an elective resolution.
QUESTION 8
(a) Compare and contrast a corporation created under the Companies Act and a
corporation created under an Act of Parliament.
(b) Mr. and Mrs.Matanguta intend to form a limited company known as M and M
Hardware Limited. They approach you and seek you advice.
TOPIC 2
FORMATION OF COMPANIES
A PROMOTER
This is a person who undertakes to form a company with reference on certain project and
who takes the necessary steps to accomplish that purpose.
A person who plan for business nature and who takes the necessary steps for the
formation of the company.
Since the company is yet to be registered there exist no contractual relationship between
the company and the promoter. Legal relations such as agency and trusteeship only exists
between legal entities. i.e. Persons capable of establishing a contractual relationship
amongst themselves. Promoters are therefore neither a trustee ,an agent nor an
employee of the company and the activities he carries out do not bind the company.
However, over the years the court have explained that there exist a fiduciary relationship
between the promoter and the company .A fiduciary relationship exist where a person
puts all his confidence and trust on another person in relation to given issues or matters
DUTIES OF PROMOTER
1. Fiduciary Duties
Promoters are required to explain the application of money or assets they apply
during formation of the company.
3. Disclosure
They should disclose any personal interest they may have on the contracts entered
by the company.
4. They should not make secret profits.
5. They should exercise care and skill when carrying out their duties.
6. They must not act fraudulently or negligently in their performance of duties.
7. They should ensure the prospectus is not misleading.
Remuneration of promoter
Note: Notwithstanding the above legal position, a company may remunerate promoters in
appreciation for their efforts/services under the following ways:
Quiz: Can the promoter make profit in the process of promotion? YES
A promoter is not prohibited by law to make profits in the course of promotion
provided he makes a full disclosure of such profits to an independent
body/board through the prospectus.
A promoter may also sell their own property to the company at a profit,
provided they disclose.
Disclosure is necessary because such secret profits is one way of remunerating
them.
Liabilities of a promoter
In case promoters make secret profits and they fail to disclose to the company, the
company has the following legal remedies:
1. Can be sued for damages for breach of fiduciary duty either the company or 3rd
party.
2. They can be sued for damages for the fort of deceit if they acted in a fraudulent
manner.
3. They can be made criminally liable for including misleading statements in the
prospectus.
4. The company may rescind contract entered into by the promoter.
5. Accounting back the secret profit.
PRE-INCORPORATION CONTRACTS
These are contracts entered into by the promoters with 3rd parties on behalf of the
company which is to be registered.
The general rule is that such a contract cannot be enforced against the company
The courts have also laid down a number of rules in relation to such contracts which are
commonly called the rules of pre-incorporation contracts.
held that the promoters were liable since at the time of making the contract the
company did not exist legally and could not contact
2. At common law a person who purports to contract as an agent but the principal
does not exist at the time will be held personally liable for the contract. This is
direct from law of Agency
3. At common law a person who purports to contract with a non-existence person
such a contract is void
4. At common law a company cannot after incorporation ratify a pre-incorporation
contract
5. At common law mere adoption or confirmation of pre-incorporation contract by
the directors does not create contractual relationship between the company and the
other party
6. Promoters are held personally liable for any pre-incorporation contract that they
enter into
7. At common law a pre-incorporation contract can be enforced against the company
if the company once it is registered enters into a new similar contract
Past paper question: (November 2016 Question Two A: December 2010 Question One B)
1. A company cannot ratify a pre-incorporation contract since the company was not
in existence at the time the contract was being made. It cannot approve such a
contract or ratify such contract. (Ref Kelner vs Baxter).
2. The company cannot sue 3rd parties in pre-incorporation contract. Under the
doctrine of privity of contract, no person can sue or be sued unless he/she is a
party to a contract.
Pre-incorporation contracts are made at a time when companies are not in
existence and the company cannot be a party to such contracts.
Ref case Newbone vs Sensolid (Britain 1953).
3. Third parties cannot sue the company on pre-incorporation contracts, even if the
company had taken the benefits of the contract. Ref case, English and colonial
produce co. ltd
4. The company may after incorporation enter into a new contract to carry on the pre-
incorporation contract. This principle is known as Novation.( Entry into the
contract afresh)
These are contracts entered into after incorporation before the trading certificate is issued
for a public company.
These contracts are not void, they are merely provisional but do not bind the company
until after the certificate is issued.
If the directors fail to get the trading certificate within 21days of being called upon to do
so by 3rd parties, the company becomes jointly liable to indemnify the 3rd party, when loss
resulting due to failure to perform the contract.
CONSTITUTIVE DOCUMENTS (COMPANY’S CONSTITUTION)
The company secretary must ensure that the constitutive documents are in order.
The promoter after identifying name of the proposed company must search at the
company’s registry to check if the name is desirable for registration. The company’s act
states, ”No name shall be reserved and no name shall be registered if its considered
undesirable in the opinion of the registrar.”
h) Names similar to churches or a holy place of worship i.e. All Saints Cathedral
i) Names of individual who are not directors to the company e.g. Kamau Ltd yet
Kamau is not a director of the company.
j) Names promoting violence
k) Initials are not accepted unless their full meaning are written out e.g. NBK Ltd
National Bank of Kenya
2. Assembly of resources
The promoters have a duty to assemble various resources which may include capital,
human resources, to enable the company to be operational after registration.
MOA was judiciary defined in the case Ashbury Railway carriage company limited
vs Richie as the companies charter.
It defines the limitation of the powers of a company to be established under the act.
It is the company’s external constitution.
It enables the members of the company, its creditors and public to know the powers
of the company.
It regulates relationships between the company and its outsiders.
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 30
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
Purpose of MOA
1. It informs the investors about the various activities their money shall be involved in
2. It defines the boundary with the creditors.
3. It is the foundation upon which the structure of the company exists.
4. The provisions of the company’s existing memorandum shall become a part of its
articles of association under company’s act 2015.
Contents of MOA
1. Name clause
2. Registered office
3. Limitation of liability clause
4. Capital clause.
5. Association clause
A. The name clause
Once the companies name is approved by the registrar, it will be reserved for 30days, this
period may be extended for a further 30days.
Thus maximum of 60days.
2. Its intended that its profits if any or other income would be used in promoting
its objects i.e. profits are ploughed back
3. Payment of any dividend to the association members is prohibited.
N/B: Any existing company may apply to obtain a license in order to omit the word ltd if
it’s a private company and it meets the above conditions.
Check: May 2014 QN B
N/B: Penalty: - Failure to publish the companies name or any mis-descriptions the
companies name shall render the company liable and every other officer of the company
in a default fine, of sh. 500,000 or conviction of 3 years.
Change of name
i) Special resolution
A company may pass a special resolution to change its name and must obtain a
written approval from the registrar.
iii) License
A private company can obtain a license from cabinet secretary to dispense with the use of
the word ltd. In such a case it must pass an ordinary resolution supported by single
majority (50 + 1 person)
Compulsory change
b) Court of law may compel the company to change name on the following grounds:
1. When confirming the reduction of capital by a company. It may order it to add
the word-and reduced-to its name.
2. When the court issues a liquidation/ receivership order to the company, it
compels it to add to its name- under receivership-to its name.
N/B: After the company changes its name, it shall give to the registrar a notice within
14days. Upon receipt of the notice, the registrar shall:
Enter the new name on the register in place of the former name.
Issue to the company a certificate of change of name
Publish the change of name in the Kenya gazette.
Company Act states that the registered office of the company to be situated in
Kenya.
Company is required to give notice to the registrar of its registered office within
14days from the date of its incorporation.
Rights of inspection
ii) Debenture holders of the company are entitled free of charge during the period
beginning 14day before the companies AGM and ending 5 days after the date of
conclusion.
iii) Any member of public is entitled to inspect the register of directors and secretaries
and the register of debenture holders upon payment of prescribed fee.
D. Capital clause
- The act provides that in case of a company having a share capital, the MOA shall
also (unless the company is unlimited) state the amount of share capital with
which the company proposes to be registered and a division there off.
- Reason to stating share capital – it acts as a security to creditors for any money
they lend to the company.
E. Association clause
Deals with relations of the promoters and the company.
F. Object clause
The memo must state the main objects, incidental and ancillary to the main object.
Categories of object
i) Main object
ii) Subordinate objects
iii) Incidental objects/implied objects
Main object
This is the 1st business mentioned in the object clause. It is assumed that from the
company point of view, it is the most important of all and that is why it is mentioned. (It
is the substratum of the company)
Subordinate object
Any other business mentioned in the memorandum after the main object shall be
subordinate object of the company. (They are important in attaining the main object)
Incidental object/implied objects
The incidental objects are not written anywhere in the memorandum. They are implied
from the nature of the business. Courts have implied powers to companies on the
following:
1. To acquire similar business.
2. To sell the company assets but not the entire undertaking.
3. To issue bills of exchange and cheques.
4. To engage and dismiss employees.
5. To sell the undertaking of the company for shares in another company or for other
consideration.
6. To pay gratitude and pension to officers and employees of the company and their
dependant.
7. To institute and defend legal proceedings.
Exception of the ultra vires/ when can Act that are ultra- vires be ratified
1. If an act is ultra vires in regard to the directors only e.g. Their borrowing powers,
the shareholder can ratify it in the AGM making it intra vires.
2. If an act is ultra vires in regard to the articles, the company can alter its articles in
the proper way by passing a special resolution.
3. Where a company obtains property from a 3rd party under ultra vires contract, the
3rd party has no claim against the company on the basis of the transaction but has a
right to follow his property if it exists in original form.
4. Where the company has power to borrow money, a lender is not bound to inquire
into the purpose for which the loan is to be used.
5. An act which is intra vires to the company but irregularly done may be ratified by
the consent of the shareholder.
6. Certain acts are deemed implied within company authority and are not deemed
ultra vires.
i) Injunction – This is a court order restraining the company parting with the
possession of the property.
ii) Tracing and identification – since the company does not acquire any title on
a property from ultra vires, the property remains the property of the owner and
if he can take it and identify he has a right to take it back.
iii) Subrogation- The party whose rights are taken away, takes over the right
iv) Personal suit against directors
v) Quantum meruit- This is part payment. If the party has completed part of the
work of the contract, he is entitled to payment in relation to the part of work
completed.
Articles of Association
This is a company law rule to the effect that any person who is transacting with the
company is taken to be aware of the contents of the company’s public documents and
therefore even the transaction turns out to be ultra vires then the person cannot blame
anybody
Public documents in this context refers to all those documents that the company is
required to file with the registrar which is a public office .such documents can be
accessed by anybody and therefore they are open.
These documents are:
MOA
Articles of association
Shareholders agreement
Special resolution
Annual returns
These documents are available for public inspection in the registrar of companies office
upon repayment of prescribed fees.
The rule in turquand provides that once a third party has actual or constructive notice
about the contracts and the meaning of the memorandum, articles and special resolutions
of the company he is entitled to assume that the contract is regular and he is entitled to
proceed with the contract, if it is ultra vires and if there is no fact that puts him on enquiry
(raises doubt)
The 3rd party is not entitled to look behind the management doors (the boardroom) hence
it is presumed that he does not have any knowledge of any irregularities behind mgt
doors. Accordingly the contract will bind the party with or without any irregularities.
The articles empowered the company to borrow. They provided that a resolution should
be passed in case of any excessive borrowing. A director borrowed excessively and court
said that the company was bound to repay the amount because the contract to borrow was
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 38
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
intra vives and there was no possibility of 3rd party being aware of any irregularities in
procedures behind the management doors.
The rule in Turquand as such derives from the case of Royal British Bank ltd Vs
turquand.
1. Knowledge of irregularity
If the 3rd party is aware of any irregularity behind the management doors the rule in
turquand shall not be applied i.e. he cannot rely on the rule to bind the company e.g. in
the case of Howard Vs Patent ivory company .The articles empowered company to
borrow £1000 and that a special resolution should be in case of any excessive borrowing
.a director borrowed an amount in excess of £1000 without a special resolution being
passed. Court said that the company was only entitled to repay the £1000 and not the
excessive amount since the director had knowledge that in the special resolution had not
been passed and since the 3rd party was presumed to know the irregularities since no
special resolution had been registered with the registrar.
Sec 143 requires every special resolution passed by the company to be filed with the
registrar for registration therefore the excessive borrowing without the sanctions of
special resolution clearly manifested an irregularity in the contract and the 3rd party was
presumed to have actual or constructive notice (knowledge)of the irregularity.
A person is negligent if he does not act us prudently as a reasonable person ought to (i.e.
if he acts below the standard of care expected of a reasonable person) The rule in
Turquand does not protect negligent person hence they cannot rely on it to bind the
company. e.g. in the case of Underwood Vs Bank of Liverpool a director deposited a
cheque drawn in favour of the company into his own personal account. Court said that the
receiving bank had acted negligently i.e. below the standard of care expected of a
reasonable banker that it had failed to enquire whether the director had express authority
to deposit company cheques into his own personal account given that according to
Salomon case the company and the natural members are separate and distinct legal
persons capable of entering into contracts and owning property in their own name among
other rights.
3. Doubt
In the case of Turquand court said that the rule in Turquand will apply if there is no fact
that raises no doubt or does not put the 3rd party on enquiry. Accordingly if there is any
matter which raises the eyebrows of the 3rd party he ought to act prudently to clarify the
matter failing which he cannot rely on the protection given b rule in Turquand i.e. the
contract will not bind the parties.
4. Special resolution
Sec 143 requires every special resolution to be filed with the registrar hence a 3rd party
dealing with a company is presumed to have constructive notice of its contents. In the
case of Turquand the articles required a resolution to be passed, it did not specify that a
special resolution ought to be passed, court therefore said that it was not possible for the
3rd party to confirm if an ordinary resolution had been passed. Court observed that if the
articles had required a special resolution to be passes it would have been easy for the 3rd
party to know about it. Accordingly the contract would not have bound the parties if a
special resolution had not been passed, In total disregard of the articles.
5. Illegality /forgery
The rule in Turquand applies where the transaction is genuine except that it has some
procedural irregularities. The rule does not apply where the transaction is unlawful e.g in
case of forgery thus in the case of Ruben Vs Great fingall company. A company secretary
forged the signature of 2 directors and the company seal to transfer their shares. Court
said that the forged transfer was not effective because the rule in Turquand was never
created to promote forgery that if only applies to genuine transaction which might
otherwise have procedural irregularities.
6. Estoppel
In the case of freeman and lockyer court said that the presumption is that the 3rd party
relied on the memorandum and articles to enter into an intra vires contract and having
done so he is prevented from claiming that the same contract is ultra vires contract and
having done so he is presented from claiming that the same contract is ultra vires.
Similary if the 3rd party did not rely on the memorandum and the articles he is stopped
prevented from claiming that he relied on them and as such he cannot rely on the rule in
Turquand to bind the company.
7. Ultra vires
The rule in Turquand applies where the transaction is intra vires. Accordingly the rule
with not be applied if the transaction is ultravires. The 3rd party is presumed to know that
the company is bound only to enter into the transaction set out in the object clause. He
cannot vest the company with powers it is not capable of exercising .In case of an ultra
vires transaction
(Refer to Ashbury’s case and the doctrine of ultra vires)
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
This is a document issued by the registrar on registration of a company .it is the birth
certificate or right of the company.
N/B: The certificate is a conclusive evidence that the requirement of a company’s act
relating to the registration have been complied with.
Certificate of trading
- A private company is entitled to commence business at any time after
incorporation i.e. after issuance of certificate of incorporation
- Public company requires certificate of trading to commence business’
- A certificate of trading issued by the registrar is a conclusive evidence that the
public company is duly authorised to commence business and exercise
borrowing powers.
3. Contractual capacity
- Company contracts on its own name through its agents known as directors. Such
contracts are binding on company itself and not the directors. Ref. Lee vs Lee Air
Farming co. Ltd
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 42
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
5. Perpetual succession
- Once a company is formed, it continues to operate indefinitely until corporate
insolvency. Death of members does not affect continuity of a company.
6. Common seal
- After formation, it acquires a common seal similar to company’s hand for signing
important documents.
7. Limited liability
- Members liability to company’s debt is limited to shares held by them i.e. personal
assets cannot be lost in case the company is declared insolvent.
8. Independent management
- Shareholders are not involved in management of a company. Management lies
with the directors, not shareholders.
b) Is accompanied by:
A copy of the special resolution converting the company into a public
company, unless a copy has already been lodged with the Registrar;
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 44
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
Conversion of Public Company into Unlimited Private Company with Share Capital
Section 89 provides that a public company limited by shares may convert itself into an
unlimited private company with a share capital if:
e) All the members of the company have assented to its being so converted;
f) The company has not previously been registered as a limited company or as an
unlimited company.
g) An application for registration of the conversion is lodged with the Registrar
The company shall make such changes in its name; and in its articles, as are necessary in
connection with its becoming an unlimited private company.
Section 90 provides that the Registrar may not register the conversion of a private limited
company into an unlimited company unless the application for registration:
a) Contains a statement of the company's new name on conversion; and
b) Is accompanied by:
The assent to the company's conversion, authenticated by the members of the
company; and
A copy of the company's articles as proposed to be amended.
Section 91 provides that if the company complies with all the requirements the registrar
shall issue a new Certificate of Registration.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
(a) (i) Explain the meaning' of the term “promoter” in the context of company law.
(ii) Discuss three duties of a promoter of a company.
(b) Explain the restrictions imposed on promoters of a company in relating to choice of
name.
QUESTION 2
(a) Discuss five ways in which the veil of incorporation might be lifted under statutory
provisions.
(b) Tom and Harry were in the process of incorporating a company called Foot Shoes ltd.
The objects of the company were to make and sell shoes. Before the process of
incorporation were complete, Tom entered into a contract with clean Leather Ltd
under which Clean Leather Ltd agreed to supply Foot Shoes Ltd with leather worth
one million shillings.
The price was to be paid in four instalments of two hundred and fifty thousand
shillings cash, over a period of one year.
Tom signed the contract as follows: “Signed by Tom, on behalf of Foot Shoes Ltd”.
By the time the leather was delivered, Foot shoes Ltd had been incorporated.
However, after the second instalment had paid, Foot Shoes Ltd was unable to pay the
balance.
Advise Clean Leather Ltd on how to recover the outstanding amount of five ,,
hundred thousand shillings.
QUESTION 3
List five registers that must be maintained by a company
QUESTION 4
Sidebottom Ltd is a private limited company that intends alters its article of association.
Explain to the directors of the company, five conditions which the company must comply
with when exercising its powers to alter the articles of association.
QUESTION 5
Jeremy Kilamat bought shares from Kikwao Company Ltd on, he discovered that his
name was missing in the registrar of members of the company. The company has
neglected, delayed and refused to rectify the omission.
QUESTION 6
Distinguish between “a public company” and “a private company”.
QUESTION 7
Describe six circumstances when the rule in Royal British Bank v Turquan (1856) might
not offer protection to the creditors of a company.
QUESTION 8
Discuss five differences between the memorandum of association and articles of
association
QUESTION 9
Summarize the four statutory forms of memorandum, and articles of association.
QUESTION 10
Ann Abwapi is the managing director of Potelea Mbali Company Ltd. She borrowed Sh.
100 million from Bahati Njema bank on behalf of the company. The bank granted the
loan to the company to be used for the expansion of the Company's operations into the
textile business.
Unknown to the bank, the textile business was not within the company's objects in the
memorandum of association.
QUESTION 11
Describe five ways through which a promoter might receive his remuneration.
QUESTION 12
"The chorus of the advantages of incorporation of a company should not make us
unaware of the disadvantages of this device".
QUESTION 13
The principle of legal personality was first formulated by the House of Lords in its
famous decision in Salomon v. Salomon (1897) where Lord MacNaghten was emphatic
that the company is at law a different person all together from the subscribers to the
memorandum.
However, in exceptional circumstances, the law ignores the separate legal personality of
the company in favour of the realities behind the legal facade.
Discuss ten exceptional circumstances when the law could ignore the principle of, legal
personality.
QUESTION 14
(a) A promoter is not entitled to remuneration for incorporating a company. This is
because there is no contractual relationship between him and the company. However,
promoters may be rewarded in other ways.
Describe the ways in which promoters might be rewarded.
QUESTION 15
In Brady V. Brady, Nourse L. J observes that: "Unanimous of all shareholders authorizing
a company however solvent to perform an ultra vires act can no more withstand the
liquidator's trumpet than could the walls of Jericho. No matter how unworthy his conduct
may be or discreditable his motives, a shareholder who afterwards regrets his votes may
shout as loudly as the creditors".
Required:
(i) Interpret the above ruling.
(ii)Argue the case against the position taken by Nourse L. J.
QUESTION 16
Highlight the statutory registers and records that must be kept at a company's registered
office.
QUESTION 17
Describe the duties of a promoter
QUESTION 18
If one finds that a body not incorporated can discharge all its duties and exercise all its
rights without it as an incorporated body, one has no right to treat it as incorporated.
In high of the above statement, discuss the characteristics of;
i) Incorporated bodies
ii) Unincorporated bodies.
QUESTION 19
a) Explain the meaning of the term ‘articles of association’ as used in a company law.
b) Once signed and registered, the articles of association of a company have effects on
both the shareholders and the company itself.
Describe these effects as provided in the Companies Act.
c) Outline the provisions of the Companies Act which govern the alteration of the
articles of association of a company.
d) Highlight five advantages of a private company over a public company.
QUESTION 20
a) A company is regarded as a legal person distinct from its members. The fact that a
person holds on substantially all of the shares in a company does not make the
company’s business that person's business in the eyes of the law. Discuss the above
statement.
b) Explain the legal provisions governing pre-incorporation contracts.
QUESTION 21
Highlight the legal consequences of incorporation of a company.
QUESTION 22
Citing relevant decided cases, explain the circumstances under which a court would lift
the veil of incorporation.
QUESTION 23
Explain the restriction imposed on the choice of name of a company
QUESTION 24
a) Whether person is or not a promoter is a matter of fact than law.
Explain the ways in which a promoter may escape personal liability on pre-
incorporation contracts. '
b) Clause 8 in the articles of association of Alpha Company Limited provides that;
'Every shareholder who intends to transfer shares shall inform the directors of the
company and offer the shares to the directors or the other shareholders and those
directors and shareholders may purchase the shares.' One Of the shareholders of the
company, Mr. Suleiman Matata has informed the directors of his intention to sell
some of his shares. However, none of the director’s shareholders is willing to
purchase the shares.
Discuss the legal implications of Clause 8 of the articles of association of Alpha
Company Limited with reference to section 22 of the Companies Act and advice Mr.
Suleimani Matata.
QUESTION 25
a) Mr. Ananeas Kipkemboi and Mr. Josiah.Tum have for several years been trading in a
partnership in the logging business in the Rift Valley Province. The partnership has
continued to prosper and the two partners have decided to convert the partnership into
a registered private company.
Advised Mr. Kipkemboi and Mr. Turn on the legal effect of registration of a company.
b) The partnership referred to in [a] above has been registered as a private company by
the name of Timberland Company Limited with Mr. Kipkemboi and Mr. Turn as
directors. The two directors wish to take advantage of a government offer for financial
assistance to farmers willing to invest in agricultural products.
QUESTION 26
You were appointed the Company Secretary of Alpha Company limited two months ago,
During the AGM, the shareholders appointed new directors. The new directors have
informed you that they do not wish the company transacting business with Omega
Company Limited.
- Omega Company Limited used part of the loan from Alpha Company Limited to
pay off ordinary trade creditors and the remaining amount to buy shares in a
company controlled by the directors of Omega Company Limited. The
memorandum, of association of Omega Company Limited permits the company to
invest in shares of another company.
- Alpha Company limited rendered services to Omega Company Limited. The
services are ultra vires.
- Omega Company Limited has carried out work for Alpha Company Limited
which is ultra vires
With reference to the objects clause and the doctrine of ultra vires, advice the directors of
Alpha Company limited on the action they intend to take.
QUESTION 27
With reference to company law explain:
a) The meaning and consequences of the doctrine of separate legal personality
b) The situations where the doctrine is likely to be ignored by the courts.
QUESTION 28
a) Explain the preliminaries incidental to promotion of a company.
b) Explain the ways in which promoters can be remunerated.
QUESTION 29
Abel and Boaz have been carrying out business as a partnership. They have both been
employed on full time basis in the business and have shared profits and losses equally.
Abel wished to bring his son David into the business and Boaz accepts the proposal.
They wish to convert the partnership into a private limited company, ABD Company
Ltd., in which Abel and Boaz will each hold 40 per cent of the shares and David will hold
20 per cent. All the three shareholders will be directors of the new private company.
Advise the three shareholders of ABD Company Ltd. on the documents which they are
required to submit to the registrar of companies for approval in connection with the
formation of the private company.
QUESTION 30
(a) Define the term “promoter.”
(b) Mr and Mrs Karanja, who intended to form a limited liability company known as
Central Construction Company Ltd, approached Jijenge Bank for a loan to purchase
office furniture and stationery. A loan of Sh.l million was given by the bank.
Subsequently, the company was incorporated. However, the business did not flourish
and the company was unable to pay the loan as and when the instalments fell due.
When the bank sent a demand notice to the company, Matata, a shareholder who
opposed the demand notice, said that he company was not liable to repay the loan. Mr
and Mrs Karanja, now want to alter the objects clause in the memorandum of
association to include a clause authorizing the company to effect the payment but
Matata is still opposed to the proposal.
Discuss the legal position of the bank and the validity of the proposed alteration.
QUESTION 31
With reference to company law, discuss the proposition that a company has Separate
legal personality from its members and the exceptions thereof.
QUESTION 32
(a) Outline the distinctions between the memorandum and articles of association.
(b) Explain the statutory provisions under which a company may alter its articles of
association.
QUESTION 33
What are the legal restrictions imposed on the choice of a name of a proposed company?
QUESTION 34
(a) “The rule in the(case of Ashbury Railway Carriage Vs. Riche (1875) stated that if an
act has not been authorized by the objects clause of a company’s Memorandum of
Association is ultra vires to the company and the members cannot ratify it.”
Discuss.
(b) Explain the various ways in which persons intending to form a company may avoid
personal liability on contracts they make on behalf of the proposed company.
(c) It has been held that the memorandum and Articles of Association of a company shall,
when registered, bind the company and the members to the same extent as if the
documents has been signed and sealed by each member and contained covenants and
the part of each member to observe all the provisions of the memorandum and the
articles.
Explain the effect of this provision on the relationship between shareholders and their
company and between shareholders themselves.
QUESTION 35
(a) The principle of corporate legal personality is an important and fundamental aspect of
company law.
Discuss this statement citing relevant decided cases,
(b) Ropoff Company Ltd., a private limited company, has been under inquiry on alleged
fraudulent financial transactions. The officers of the company under suspicion have
denied any association with the company.
At the inquiry it was suggested that the corporate veil be lifted and the realities of the
company in question be looked into.
Explain the instances when the veil of incorporation may be lifted.
QUESTION 36
Martha is engaged in the promotion of a company. She seeks your advice on several
matters relating to the promotion of a company. You are required to advise her on the
following matters:
a) The restrictions upon the choice of a corporate name with which a promoter must
comply.
b) The legal duties of a promoter with regard to her responsibility where she sells her
own property to the company she is promoting.
c) The promoter’s right to payment for her services by the company after incorporation.
TOPIC 3
MEMBERSHIP OF COMPANY
ACQUISITION OF MEMBERSHIP
A member is any person whose name appears in the register of members.
A shareholder is any person who has or claims some proprietorship or ownership rights in
the company share.
It is therefore possible for a person to be a member without being a shareholder or a
shareholder without being a member.
Upon the issue of share warrant, the company removes the name of the member
from the register of members and indicates the fact that the share warrant has been
issued.
Subscriber to the companies MOA shall be deemed to have agreed to become members
of the company and registration of the MOA shall have their names entered in the register
of members.
Failure to enter the name in the register by mistake does not affect pre-existing
membership.
A subscriber to MOA cannot rescind (withdraw) the contract to take shares on the ground
of misrepresentation made by the promoter because:
i) By his own act, he brought the company into existence.
ii) The company could not appoint an agent before it came into existence and it is
therefore not liable from the promoter’s acts (pre-incorporation contracts).
iii) By signing the MOA, he became bound on registration of the company.
A person whose subscribes to MOA for a certain number of shares is bound to take that
number of shares and pay for them.
2. Personal representative
On death of a member, his personal representative is entitled to be registered as a
member unless the articles provides otherwise.
3. Trustees in bankruptcy
When a person is declared bankrupt, his membership passes to his trustee who
may be registered as a member.
Bankrupt
A bankrupt may become a member either as a subscriber to MOA, alottee or
transferee until his name is removed from the register of members.
Foreigner
A foreigner friend can be a member of a company, however foreigner enemy of
the state cannot be a member
4. Minor
Is a person who has not attained the age of 18 years
A minor has common law right to enter into a contract to buy shares in a
company and thereby becoming a member of the company.
The contract is voidable i.e. it is optional and the minor may avoid the
contract during his infancy or within reasonable time after attaining the age
of 18 years.
A minor who may repudiate the contract is entitled to get back the money
Contents of the register of members Check Past Paper Question: (June 2011 Q 4b)
Outline the details contained in the register of members of a company
1. Name and address of members.
2. A statement of shares held by each member, distinguished by its numbers if it has
one.
3. The amount paid or agreed to be paid as stated on the shares of each member.
4. The date at which each person was entered in the register as a member.
5. Date of cessation if the member has ceased to be a member.
N/B: Failure to keep a register of members, lenders the company and every officer of the
company who is in default to a default fine of sh50, 000.
If the company has more than 50 members it is required to maintain an index of members
which shall
Index of members Check Past Paper Question: June 2013 QN 3A
Highlight five rules governing the maintenance of an index of the register of members by
a registered company
In respect of public company, which have more than 50 members, the company, must
maintain an index of the register of members, which must contain similar details
to those contained in the register of members.
The index must be altered within 14days if there is any transaction in respect of the
shares.
It must contain sufficient indication to enable the account of each member to be
easily found.
The index should be kept where the register is kept.
Inspection of register
Company’s register of members and debenture holders are public documents and
open to public inspection
The law provides that the register and index of members shall during business hours
be open to inspection of any member, without charge any other person on payment
of fees prescribed by a regulation.
Any person may require a copy of the register or any part thereof on payment of a
prescribed fee.
In case a member requires a copy, it must be supplied within 14days of receipt of
such demand.
If a company officer refuses an inspection or fails to provide a copy, the company
and every officer of the company in default shall be liable to a fine not exceeding sh
75,000.
When the company is preparing for annual general meeting in order to determine
the members who are entitled to be paid dividend
Incase the company is engaged in restructuring e.g. mergers ,acquisition ,take
over, receivership etc
- Section 119 states that no notice of any trust expresses or implied or constructive
shall be entered on the register.
- Thus the company is entitled to treat anyone in the register of members as
beneficial owner of the shares and is not liable for any sale of shares in breach of
contract
Example
X, a shareholder dies appointing K as the executor shares to G a minor ‘K’ will hold the
shares for G until he attains maturity. K is a trustee and G is the beneficiary. K’s name is
entered in the register and the dividend is paid by the company, he votes and attends in
meeting. K is under an obligation to hold the dividend payable to him in trust for G but
the company is not obliged to take notice of the relationship between K and G. K will be
liable for all calls but G the beneficiary will be entitled to indemnify K for any expenses.
- Court of law will not generally interfere with the internal management of the
company.
3. Irregularity principle
- A member of company cannot generally sue to rectify an irregularity or
informality, which the company can by its member internally correct.
Corporate rights
Rights centred upon the company by law and exercisable by the company as a legal
person. If violated, the company is prima facie the proper plaintiff for seeking redress i.e.
it is the company to sue and not shareholders.
LIABILITY OF MEMBERS
Check Past Paper Question;
June 2011 Question 5A: Discuss the liability of a member of a company (past and
present) in the event of a company being wound-up
May 2016 QN 4 A: Indicate five liabilities as contributories of present and past
members of a company.
It is defined in articles: for ltd company, liability is either ltd by shares or guarantee.
For unlimited companies their personal properties can be sold to pay for the debts of the
company (similar to partnership)
CESSATION OF MEMBERSHIP
Past Paper Question; September 2015 Question 3A: State five ways in which a person’s
membership in a company might cease
Ways in which a person membership might cease to be a member of a company
A member ceases to be a member of a company if his name is struck off the register of
members for any sufficient reason/cause.
A person whose name is removed without any law justification from the register of
members retains of the rights and liabilities in respect of the shares and remains a
member; such a person may apply to the court for rectification of register through sec 118
of companies act.
A person may cease to be a member of a company by:
- Operation of law
1. Operation of law
a) Death
When a person dies his membership of a company will come to an automatic end
under law of succession. The shares will be transmitted to his personal
representative.
b) Bankruptcy
When a person becomes bankrupt, his membership of a company will end, his
membership will be transmitted to his trustee in bankruptcy.
A bankrupt shareholder will remain a member of the company until the name of
trustee is entered in the register.
c) Liquidation/winding up
A company liquidation or winding up terminates all former members from the
moment it becomes effective.
2. An act of the parties
e) Rescission of a contract
If a shareholder rescinds (withdraws) a contract of purchases, transfer or allotment
of shares because of misrepresentation within reasonable time, the person ceases
to be a member of a company.
f) Redemption of redeemable preference shares
A shareholder whose redeemable shares bought back by a company ceases to be a
member.
g) Repudiation by infant
If an infant avoids the contract of membership during infancy or within reasonable
time after attaining the age of majority, he ceases to be a member of the company.
Holds at least ten percent (10%) of the issued shares of the company;
Exercises at least ten percent (10%) of the voting rights in the company;
Holds the right to appoint or remove a director of a company; or
Exercises significant influence or control over a company.
Significant influence or control under the regulations means participation in the finances
or financial policies of the company.
A company is required to enter the following particulars of the beneficial owner in the
register
Telephone number
The email address
The occupation or profession
The nature of ownership or control
The date the person became the beneficial owner
The date the person ceases to be a beneficial owner and any other information that
may be required by the registrar from time to time.
4. Fraud or minority
The majority rule will not apply if the conduct complained of amount to fraud or
minority i.e. breach of duty by directors or expropriation of assets
If a company fails to hold an AGM in accordance with the act, any member of the
company may petition the registrar to convene or direct the convention of an
AGM.
Such an AGM is duly constituted by one member present in person or by proxy.
If the director does not convene the meeting within 21 days of requisition, the
requisitionists may convene the meeting.
The high court may appoint one or more competent inspector to investigate the
affairs of a company upon application by members.
f) Take-over bid
offer, the offeror is required within two months to notify the dissenting
shareholders of its intention to acquire their shares compulsorily.
However, the dissenting shareholders may petition the court within one month for
cancellation of the offer. The court may appropriately cancel the offer in
protecting the minority.
In such a case, minority may petition the court to wind up the company on the
ground of oppression or in case, they have lost confidence in management.
h) Alternative remedy
- This is the remedy entitled to minority on winding up.
- This remedy is available to minority in case of oppression.
- The alternative remedy may take any of the following:
- A court order to regulate the conduct of the company affairs in the future.
- An order to compel the oppressor to purchase the shares of the oppressed.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
Sometimes a corporate entity works like a boomerang and hits the man who was trying to
use it.
With references to the above statement, describe five exceptional circumstances under
which when a shareholder could institute proceedings as the plaintiff instead of those
proceedings being instituted in the name of the company.
QUESTION 2
Discuss three effects of the ultra vires doctrine
QUESTION 3
State five ways in which a person’s membership in a company might cease
QUESTION 4
QUESTION 5
a) In the event of a company being wound up, every past and present member shall be
liable to the assets of the company to an amount sufficient for payment of its debts
and liabilities.
Discuss the statutory provisions governing the liabilities of the said members.
b) Explain the exceptional cases when a member might be held liable beyond the
limited liability which he undertook when he became a member of a company.
QUESTION 6
(a) In Foss v Harbottle (1843), the anxiety of the law was to strike an optimum balance
between the principle of the majority rule on the one hand and safeguarding minority
shareholders against abuse of power on the other. It can neither give more support to
the majority as the minority will then be prejudiced and nor to the minority who
would then object on every action. With reference to the above statement, discuss the
three principles emanating from the rule
(b) The directors of NovaGift Ltd. had been accused of being negligent in selling a drying
machine of the company at a price which was much lower than its true market value.
A resolution had been passed by the majority of the shareholders to sell the machine
at that price. The directors did not in any way benefit from the transaction.
i) State the two elements that must be present for the minority shareholders to
successfully sue the company.
ii) Advise the minority shareholders who have sued the company on whether they are
likely to succeed in their representative suit.
QUESTION 7
Explain four categories of membership rights.
QUESTION 8
Explain three instances when an individual shareholder could sue in his capacity as a
member instead of the suit being instituted in the name of the company.
QUESTION 9
Highlight five rules governing the maintenance of an index of the register of members by
a registered company.
QUESTION 10
Describe six ways which a company could acquire company membership.
QUESTION 11
Briefly outline the rights conferred on a shareholder by the companies Act.
QUESTION 12
Discuss the liability of a member of a company (past and present) in the event of a
company being wound-up.
QUESTION 13
Describe the ways in which a person may become a member of a company without being
a shareholder.
QUESTION 14
a) State the rule in Foss V. Harbottle and the exceptions thereof: -
b) The directors of Pengo Limited have resolved to invest the company’s funds in
property development an activity which is not authorized by the company’s object
clause.
In furtherance of this resolution the directors have caused Pengo limited to enter into a
contract with Ziba limited to purchase the latter’s land for purposes of property
development.
A number of shareholders of Pengo limited have Written letters disserting from the
director’s action. She dissenting shareholders control twenty five percent of the share
capital of Pengo Limited. They argue that the director’s actions are ultra-vires the
company’s memorandum of association and have demanded that the directors cancel
the contract with Ziba limited. The directors of Pengo Limited are however adamant
that the contract was in the best interest of the company.
The parties seek your advice
QUESTION 15
Miss Tishie Mulu has received a letter from a company in which she is a shareholder
informing her that the company is to make a call in accordance with the provisions of the
articles of association.
Miss Tishie Mulu has approached you for advice on the matter.
Advice Miss Tishie Mulu on the following;
a) The difference between an instalment and a call.
b) The rules relating to making calls on shares.
c) The consequences of payment of a call in advance.
QUESTION 16
Explain the ways in which a person may cease to be a member of a company.
QUESTION 17
(a) Outline the qualified minority rights of a member which can only be enforced by the
joint efforts of a membership group as defined under the Companies Act,
(b) The Articles of X Company Ltd provide that every member is entitled to one vote for
each of the first ten shares and thereafter to one vote for each additional ten shares.
Jane owns one hundred shares. She transfers ten of her shares to her nine nominees to
increase her voting powering general meetings. Joseph, who is the chairman at the
general meeting, refuses to accept the votes of Jane’s nominees.
Advise Jane on the validity of the Chairman’s, action and her right as a member.
QUESTION 18
(a)(i) Citing decided cases state and describe the characteristics of a “derivative action.”
(ii) Explain the disadvantages to a minority shareholder in bringing a derivative
action.
John Daudi is the managing director and majority shareholder of Tuzo Company Limited.
Jane Wangokho has discovered that John Daudi has breached his duties as a director by
purchasing goods from the company at a gross undervalue. A general meeting of the
company at which John Daudi attended and voted has ratified the
TOPIC 4
SHARES
Introduction
The companies act provides that shares or other interests of any member in a company
shall be a movable property
This provision does not define what a share is. In practice however a share can be
described to be the interest of a shareholder in the company that is measured by a sum of
money for the purpose of liability in the first place and of interest in the second place
From the description the following should be noted about the share
A share is a yardstick of the shareholder’s liability to the company
It is a yardstick of the shareholders rights in the company particularly in relation to
dividends, voting rights and return of capital during winding up
Characteristics of Shares
Primary rights:
Right to dividend
Right to vote in companies general meetings.
Right to capital in winding up of the company
Secondary rights:
Check; June 2011QN 4c: Compare and contrast ordinary shares and preference shares
1. Ordinary shares.
2. Preference shares.
3. Deferred/ founders shares.
4. Employer shares/ corporate shares.
5. Treasury shares.
a) Ordinary shares
Also called equity capital/ common shares. Members holding ordinary shares are said to
be the owners of the company.
b) Preference shares
Cumulative are shares whose arrears of dividend are not lost but carried forward to
subsequent years when dividend will be declared (cumulative) while non-cumulative,
such arrears are not carried forward but are lost.
Check Past Paper; November 2017 QN 4b: Distinguish between “participating'’ and
“non-participating” preference shares
Participating preference shares after earning a dividend at a fixed rate participate in the
balance of profits with ordinary shareholders. They also have a right to share in the
surplus assets of the company in the event of winding up. Non-participating preference
shares after earning a dividend at a fixed rate do not participate in the balance of profits
with ordinary shareholders. They also do not have a right to share in surplus assets of the
company in the event of winding up.
N.B: Dividend paid to preference shareholders is fixed but the below points should be
remembered as regards to priority.
1. Payment of dividend is entirely at the discretions of the directors and if they decide
to transfer the whole of the profit to capital reserves no one can questions the
decisions.
2. If the dividend was not declared and the company goes into liquidations even
preference shareholder will not be paid.
3. Payment of the dividend to preference shareholders only becomes due once the
dividend has been recommended and approved and the date of payment is due.
4. If it was declared before the company went into liquidation and was not paid then the
right will not be lost i.e. they will be paid.
Irredeemable: They are shares not supposed to be bought back by the company. They
retain their status and can only be redeemed when the company goes into liquidation.
Redeemable shares are shares whose dividend is fixed but are issued for a specific
period. These are shares that the company agrees to buy back at a future date. A limited
company may issue redeemable preference to be redeemed of the option of the company
or the shareholders.
Check; December 2013 QN 3b: Explain five legal provisions governing the issuing or
redeemable preference shares
Convertible preference shares are issued on a condition that on a future date they shall be
converted into ordinary shares or other securities.
Non-convertible shares maintain their identity and are not liable for conversion by a
company into other different classes of shares
- These shares do not carry any voting rights but they are entitled the holders to
some dividend after other classes are paid.
- The particulars of founder’s shares and the interest of the shares in the company
must be stated in the prospectus.
Class of shares: - shares are in the class if the rights attached to them are in all respects
uniform.
- A company may agree to accept some other form of payment other than cash for
shares issued.
- Such consideration should be legal and mostly consist of consideration inform of
property.
- Private company may issue share for consideration other than cash.
- Public company may not allot shares in return for performance of work or
services, however, it may issue shares in extension for transfer of property
provided there is valuation report regarding the property which must be done
property is valued within 6 months preceding the issue and allotment of such
shares
- The valuation report should be registered with the registrar of companies
SHARE CERTIFICATES
Every person who is entered as a member in the register of members of a company has a
right to receive a share certificate in respect of shares he holds in the company.
A share certificate is a document issued by the company under its own common seal
specifying the number of shares held by the registered holder and the extent to which
they are paid up.
Failure to comply renders the company and every officer in default liable to a default fine
not exceeding ksh 500,000. If the offence continues, a default fine not exceeding ksh
50,000 per day is imposed.
SHARE WARRANTS
The holder can therefore be able to negotiate and transfer the shares without going
through the formal process of share transfers.
However, the name of the bearer of the warrant is removed from the register of members
and therefore they are not considered to be members of the company.
Before a share warrant can be issued, the following conditions must be fulfilled
1. The company must be a public company limited by shares
2. The issue must be authorized by the articles
3. The shares must be fully paid for
4. The company must get permission from the treasury or ministry of finance
Once the company issues a share warrant, then the name of the member will be removed
from the register and instead, the company will indicate that the shares are held under
warrant.
Procedure of issuing share warrant
When a company wishes to issue shares to the public, there is a procedure and rules that
it must follow. A Public Company issuing its shares privately need not issue a prospectus.
However, it is required to file a “statement in lieu of prospectus” with the register of
companies. The prospectus contains relevant information like names of directors, terms
of issue, etc. It also states the opening date of subscription list, amount payable on
application, on allotment & the earliest closing date of the subscription list.
1. Issue of Prospectus
Before the issue of shares, comes the issue of the prospectus. The prospectus is like an
invitation to the public to subscribe to shares of the company. A prospectus contains all
the information of the company, its financial structure, previous year balance sheets and
profit and Loss statements etc.
It also states the manner in which the capital collected will be spent. When inviting
deposits from the public at large it is compulsory for a company to issue a prospectus or a
document in lieu of a prospectus.
2. Receiving Applications
When the prospectus is issued, prospective investors can now apply for shares. They
must fill out an application and deposit the requisite application money in the schedule
bank mentioned in the prospectus. The application process can stay open a maximum of
120 days. If in these 120 days minimum subscription has not been reached, then this issue
of shares will be cancelled. The application money must be refunded to the investors
within 130 days since issuing of the prospectus.
3. Allotment of Shares
Once the minimum subscription has been reached, the shares can be allotted. Generally,
there is always oversubscription of shares, so the allotment is done on pro-rata bases.
Letters of Allotment are sent to those who have been allotted their shares. This results in
a valid contract between the company and the applicant, who will now be a part owner of
the company.
If any applications were rejected, letters of regret are sent to the applicants. After the
allotment, the company can collect the share capital as it wishes, in one go or in
instalments.
provisions of the Companies Act relating to the reduction of the share capital of a
company shall, apply as if the capital redemption reserve fund were paid-up share
capital of the company.
ALLOTMENT OF SHARES
The allotment of shares is the issuing of new shares to the existing shareholders or to
third parties.
Or
It means an appropriation of a certain number of shares to an applicant in response to his
application for shares. Allotment means distribution of shares among those who have
submitted written application.
Reasons for allotment of shares
by directors is the ‘acceptance’ of that ‘offer’ and, similarly, the notice of acceptance
which is sent is the ‘acceptance of the offer.’
(c) Conditional offer and Acceptance for ‘Offer’:
Usually, the conditions are printed in the application form, e.g., in case of over-
subscription of shares, shares will be allotted on pro-rata basis etc. Conditions for
acceptance is practically invalid.
(d) Proper Authority:
It should be remembered that allotment of shares should always be made by the proper
authority e.g., by the board of directors, and allotment made without proper authority is
void. Although allotment can be delegated to some persons if the Articles so provide.
applications for shares in respect of the minimum subscription has been received by the
company.
(d) Returns of Money:
States that if the minimum subscription has not been raised or if the allotment could not
be made within 60 days from the date of publication of the prospectus, the directors must
return the money received from the applicants. If the money is refunded within 75 days
no interest is payable, beyond which the directors are liable to pay interest @ 5% p.a.
from the 75th day to the day of repayment.
(e) Statement in lieu of Prospectus:
Public company which has not issued any prospectus must deliver to the Registrar for
registration a statement in lieu of prospectus signed by every director or proposed
director or his agent in the form prescribed in the Act.
(f) Opening of the Subscription List:
No allotment can be made until the beginning of the 5th day after the publication of the
prospectus or such later time as may be prescribed for the purposes in the prospectus.
(g) Revocation of Application:
Application for shares cannot be revoked until after the expiration of the 5th day after the
time of opening of the subscription list except in one case, i.e. if any responsible person
gives public notice of withdrawal of the consent to the issue of the prospectus, any
applicant can revoke his application.
(iii) Fine
Validity of an allotment shall not be affected by any contravention of the foregoing
provisions, but, in the event of any such contravention, the company, a fid every officer
of the company who is in default, shall be punishable with fine.
(iv) Void
If any allotment is made in violation It is treated as void.
For public
Shares are freely transferable however the directors may declare to register the shares.
(Not being a fully paid shares)
To a person of whom they shall not approve.
On when the company has a lien (right to retain share as a security for debt)`
For private
Transfer of shares is restricted by:
Pre- emption clauses that require directors to offer the shares to existing members
at the first instance.
Conferring upon directors, total discretion to refuse to transfer a share.
N.B it is important to note that article of a company restrict but not forbid the
transfer of shares since it is a statutory right of member of a company which
cannot be taken away by the articles since the article is subordinate to companies
act.
The rules on the exercise of the discretion to refuse to register transfer of shares by
directors
Check; June 2020 question 2b: Highlight the circumstances under which a company
would decline to register a transfer of the shares
1. To exercise their power, the directors must consider the transfer and take a
decision to refuse to register it.
2. The directors in reaching their decision must act to borne tide for the best interest
of the company.
3. Where articles specify grounds of refusal
4. The power of refusal must be exercised within a reasonable time from the receipt
of the transfer.
5. Company is required to give a notice of refusal within 60 days.
1. A registered holder
2. A personal representative of a deceased shareholder (administration executor).
3. Trustee in bankruptcy of an undischarged bankrupt
Restriction on transfer of shares
Shares are movable property transferable in manner provided by the article of association
A transfer of shares to a state corporations (parastatals) without prior written
consent from the treasury is void.
For a transfer of shares to be effected, a proper instrument of transfer (transfer
form must be presented to the company)
a) Total transfer
- The parties enter into an agreement to sell and buy shares.
- They execute the proper instrument of transfer.
- The executed instrument of transfer must be presented for stamping and
payment of tax.
- The executed instrument of transfer and share certificate are presented to the
company for registration of the transfer
- On registration of the transfer the share certificate is cancelled and another
issued in the name of the transferred (the buyer)
b) Partial transfer
- The parties enter into an agreement to buy and sell shares.
- They execute the proper instrument of transfer (transfer form)
- The executed instrument of transfer and share certificate are presented to the
company for certificate.
- The share certificate is retained by the company for cancellation.
- The certified instrument of transfer is presented for stamping
- The certified instrument of transfer is presented to the company for
registration.
- On registration, the share certificate is cancelled and two others are issued in
the name of transferred and the transfer for the shares retained and acquired
respectively.
Circumstances under which the company would decline to register a transfer of its
shares
If the documents were not properly prepared.
If the transferee has not been approved by the board in accordance with the
articles.
Where the court has issued an order to prevent the transfer
If the transfer can change the nature of the board putting to risk the interest of the
company.
If the transfer is discovered to be a forgery
CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER
3. Where the transferor has not yet received a certificate from the company but has
been issued with the document of title to the shares (allotment letter).
4. Where the transferee is not satisfied with the transferor title to the shares.
ELECTRONIC TRANSFERS
With coming in to force the central depositories Act 2001 all tradeable securities or
shares ought to be:
Immobilised and shareholders who desires to transfer shares are required to open a
securities account with the central depositing and settlement corporation(CDSNC)
To transfer shares in a members account the shareholder must give written
instructions to the broker or investment bank, which confirms that the shareholder
has shares in his account.
The stock/broker or the investment bank offers the shares for it at the NSE when
the shares are sold the s/holders account is debited and the proceeds are credited to
the stockbroker or investment bank (client account).
UNREGISTERED TRANSFER
If two or more transferee are beneficiaries, over an unregistered transfer, the equities are
said to be equal and the first in time prevails.
FORGED TRANSFER
Past paper Nov 2015 QN 3c: Explain six effects of a forged transfer of shares
The transfer is null and void and does not give legal title to the transferee
If the true owner is removed from the register then he has the right to have his
name restored and continue to be a rightful owner.
The company will be required to compensate the true owner for any dividends that
were paid when his name was removed from the register.
Where shares acquired through forgery are sold to third parties then the third party
has no right to have his name entered in the register as a member.
Where by reasoning of forged transfer the company issues a new certificate then it
will be held liable for any losses that a person may suffer as a result of relying on
the new certificate.
If the company has been put at a loss by a reason of forged transfer then it can
claim those losses from the person who procured the forged transfer.
ORAL TRANSFER
Effects of transfer
Property in shares remains with the transferor until the name of the transferee is
entered in the register. The effects include:
1. The transferor continues to be the legal owner of the shares but holds such
shares in trust for the transferee.
2. The transferee cannot exercise the rights of a shareholder.
3. The transferee has an equitable claim on the shares.
4. If calls are made, the transferor must pay for them but they can recover the
amount so paid from the transferee.
5. If dividends are paid, the transferor is entitled to them however, he holds on
trust for the transferee.
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 93
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
6. The transferor must vote as the transferee directs him since the voting rights
attaching to the shares have passed to the transferee (acts as a proxy).
TRANSMISSION OF SHARES
Transmission by death
Upon death, the shareholder ceases to be a member and his shares passes to the personal
representative who becomes a member when his name is entered in the register of
members.
However, he is free to transfer the shares to a third party before his name is entered in the
register.
Transmission by bankruptcy
When a member is declared bankrupt, his shares passes to the trustee in bankruptcy but
remains a member as long as the name remains in the register.
The trustee in bankruptcy may transfer the shares to a third party before his name is
entered in the register.
NB: if the company refuses to register, transfer or to give the transferee a notice of
refusal, the company and every officer in default is liable to a fine not exceeding ksh
500,000. If the offence continues, the company and every officer in default are liable to a
fine of 50,000 every day.
Transfer Transmission
Voluntary process Involuntary process
Consideration is required during transfer The issue of consideration does not arise
The parties must execute formal transfer Instruments of transfer are not needed
documents
In case of a public company where shares are freely transferable the transfer is conducted
through central depository system account.
A central depository system account is a form of online ledger that is used to record
transactions of shares sold or bought by players in the stock market.
The system was created and maintained by the Nairobi Stock Exchange.
Any person therefore who wishes to participate in the stock market must open and
maintain a central depository systems account usually through stock brokers.
The transaction in the central depository system account is then transmitted to the
company to update its records.
Equitable mortgage
There is a deposit of share certificate and a blank instrument of transfer with the
lender (mortgagee).
The borrower retains title and membership rights. A blank transfer is a transfer
signed by the mortgagor as registered mortgagor but without the name of a
transferee inserted in it.
Stocks
Stock is one unit of a company’s capital comprising several numbers of shares put
together i.e. Consolidated shares put into one mass
5. The company must give a notice of conversion to the registrar within 30 days of
the resolution.
6. Share certificate should be substituted with a stock certificate.
Shares Stock
A unit of capital several number of shares put together
Shares are issued directly by the company Stocks cannot be issued directly by the
company.
They need not to be fully paid Stocks must be fully paid
Shares may be numbered Stocks are not numbered
Fractional transfer is not permitted Fractional transfer is permitted
N.B: Under companies, Act 2015 conversion of shares into stock by companies is
prohibited.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
a. Describe six matters which might be included in the code of best practices of a
company to ensure equitable treatment of shareholders of the company.
b. Bob Kuto and Ben Zawadi wish to jointly acquire shares in Miereka Company Ltd.
Advise them on the legal status regarding joint ownership of shares.
c. Explain six effects of a forged transfer of shares.
QUESTION 2
State four special rights conferred to holders of preference shares of a company.
QUESTION 3
(a) Discuss five statutory restrictions that allotment of shares and debentures of
companies are subjected to.
(b) Distinguish between “issuing shares at a discount” and “issuing shares at a premium”.
QUESTION 4
Rose Tendo was allotted two hundred shares during the initial public offer in Babolat Co.
Ltd. However, her central depository system account erroneously indicated that she was
allotted two thousand shares.
Subsequently, Rose Tendo transferred the shares to Jean Bahati who is currently enjoying
dividends.
Analyse the legal principles applicable in the above case and advice on the consequences
or the error in Rose Tendo’s central depository system account.
QUESTION 5
Explain five legal provisions governing the issuing or redeemable preference shares
QUESTION 6
Discuss the rules governing redemption of redeemable preference shares by a company.
QUESTION 7
Arrivals and Departures Ltd. was indebted to its sole director and majority shareholder,
Ken White In the amount of Sh. 150,000,000.
Ken White knew the prospects for the company were bleak but after discussing the matter
with the Manager of Pity Bank, an arrangement was arrived at. The bank agreed to avail
an immediate facility of Sh. 150,000,000to the company in exchange for what was
described as a "first fixed charge" over the company's fixed assets and all books debts
and other receivables as well as a floating charge over the company's entire undertaking.
The floating charge contained a restriction prohibiting the company from creating any
other charges which might rank in priority to or equal with the floating charge. It also
contained a clause to the effect that the floating charge would crystallize automatically by
the initiation of the company to create any prohibited charge. Both the fixed charge and
the floating charge were created in May 2007 and were duly registered.
During the period June to December 2007, the company received Sh.200,000,000 but
instead of holding this for the benefit of the bank, Ken White used it to repay the
company's indebtedness to himself and to engage in further speculative ventures.
During the same period, the company also made use of the overdraft facilities to the
extent of Sh. 100,000,000.
The company has movable assets worth Sh. 10,000,000 and debts owing to it amount to
Sh 40,000,000. The company's debts including those mentioned above are in excess of
Sh.200,000,000.
a) Larry Black, a creditor has presented a petition for the winding up of tire company.
Evaluate the validity of the automatic crystallisation clause.
b) Outline the order of payment in the above case.
c) Discuss the legal principles applicable with regard to the charges created and the
director's actions.
d) Highlight three examples of actions that constitute misfeasance in company law.
QUESTION 8
MwapaChepeo is a registered shareholder in Mpya Company Limited, a blue chip
company that deals in the importation of securities and allied products. MwapaChepeo
has for some time not been able to trace his share certificate and also recalls that for a
number of years he has not been receiving dividends from the company.
On inquiry from the company, MwapaChepeo was informed that his name was no longer
in the register of members of Mpya Company Limited. Investigations revealed that
indeed his certificate had been stolen and his. signature forged to transfer his shares to
Elijah Roimen.
With reference to the facts given in the above case, explain to Mwapa Chepeo the
consequences of a forged transfer of shares.
QUESTION 9
ABC and Sons limited was incorporated in 2009 with a capital of sh. 3 million divided
into 30,000 shares of shs. 100 each. Its main object was to acquire and carry on the
business of hardware and any other businesses and 'transactions which the company
might consider to be in any way conducive or auxiliary thereto. The company has gone
into liquidation. James Fine, a former shareholder has made a claim against the company
for the balance of the price of shares which he had sold to the company but which had not
been fully paid for.
With reference to the above facts and in light of the ruling in Trevor V. Whitworth
explain
i. The rule in Trevor V. Whitworth
ii. The exceptions to the rule n (c) (i) above
QUESTION 10
Compare and contrast ordinary shares and preference shares.
QUESTION 11
a) Describe the procedure that a person should follow in order to transfer his shares to
another shareholder
b) Sharp Kioko transferred his shares in Mwamba limited to kazuri six months ago. The
shares were partly paid for nine months after the transfer. Mwamba limited went into
liquidation. You have been appointed the liquidator of Mwamba Limited Analyze the
case and advise Sharp Kioko on his liability for the debts of Mwamba Limited
QUESTION 12
a) Explain the implied terms in a contract of sale of shares between the seller and the
buyer
b) Highlight the circumstances under which a company would decline to register a
transfer of the shares
c) Amos Kwetu bought shares from ABC limited. Upon inspection of the register of
members of the company, Amos Kwetu realized that his.name was missing. The
company has refused to rectify the amomally. Amos Kwetu is aggrieved and seeks
your legal advice.
Advise him on the legal provisions which govern the rectification of the register of
members of a company.
QUESTION 13
“The general rule is that a company should not offer financial assistance to any person for
the purchase of its own shares.”
Explain the exceptions to this rule.
QUESTION 14
a) Describe the contents of a trust deed.
b) Outline the advantages of a trust deed.
QUESTION 15
An allotment is the company's acceptance of an offer by the allot tees to buy shares in the
company.
With reference to the above statement:
a) Explain the common law rules that govern allotment of shares.
b) Briefly explain the statutory provision regarding:
i. Void allotment
ii. Voidable allotment
c) Explain the returns that a limited company must make when allotting its shares as
provided for under section 333 of the companies Act
QUESTION 16
a) Define the term "Floatation" and explain the procedure to be followed by a private
company which intends to float its share to the public.
b) Legally, a company's shares are like "goods". Consequently, the common law of
"caveat Emptor" applies to the sale of share by a company. The company as the
seller is not obliged to disclose anything to potential buyers which would enable the
buyers to assess the risk involved in the proposed purchase. There are however
regulations which a company is required to comply with in a public issue of shares.
These regulations constitute an attempt to impose on the company a duty to
disclose the relevant facts.
Discuss the regulation to be complied with in a public issue of shares in your country.
QUESTION 17
(a) Enumerate the sequence of events to be followed by a shareholder who intends to
transfer his shares to another person.
(b) Mwinzi, a holder of shares in Hewa Airways Company Limited deposited his share
certificate with a broker, Otieno, Otieno forged Mwinzi’s signature on the share
certificate and transferred the shares to Kuria. When the share certificate and the
transfer document were presented to the company for registration, the secretary wrote
to Mwinzi advising him of the transfer. Mwinzi did not reply to this letter and Kuria
was registered as the new shareholder. Kuria then transferred the shares to Wafula
who was registered as the shareholder and a new certificate was issued.
Explain the effect of the forgery.
QUESTION 18
(a) With regard to investor protection, explain the meaning of inside information.
(b) In relation to allotment of shares in a company, discuss the legal position in each of
the following situations:
(i) Sarah applied for 4,000 shares in a public company known as ABC Ltd. She was
allotted only 2,000 shares. She intends to sue the company.
Advise Sarah.
(ii) Meshack was recently appointed an accountant of Economy Departmental Store, a
public limited company. The company intends to issue shares to the public.
Meshack seeks your advice on whether there are any restrictions imposed by the
Companies Act upon allotment of such shares.
Advise Meshack.
QUESTION 19
Shadrack Ruto owns 500 shares of Sh. 20 each in Alpha and Omega Ltd. and 500 shares
of Sh. 10 each in the Beginning and End Ltd. Both companies are regulated by Table A -
articles of association. ShadrackRuto has agreed to sell all his shares in Alpha and Omega
to Albelnego Soi and 300 shares in Beginning and End to Meshack Mamba. He has been
informed that both companies use the form of transfer that is generally used by brokers,
who are members of national stock exchange.
TOPIC 5
SHARE CAPITAL
From the law point of view, the capital of a company refers to the nominal/ authorized/
registered capital and it is a fixed amount, which remains constant until some steps are
taken to alter it.
From the accountant point of view, it is the net worth of the business. (ASSETS-
LIABILITIES)
RAISING OF CAPITAL
The method of raising the capital will depend whether the company is a private or public
company.
In the case of private company, the capital is raised privately without involving the
general public. This is because a private company is not allowed to invite the general
public to subscribe for its shares.
In the case of public company, it is allowed to invite the general public to subscribe for
its shares and therefore raising of capital is highly regulated by capital market authority.
A public company can raise capital using any of the following methods
1. PLACING
Under this method the company will enter into agreement with the a registered stock
broker whereby the stock broker will take up the shares and look for people to subscribe
for them
If the stock broker only invites his own clients, then the process is called private placing
If the broker does not undertake to keep any shares that may not be sold within the agreed
time. Such shares will be returned back to the company.
For the services that the broker provides he is going to earn brokerage fee
Features of prospectus
- Every prospectus must be in writing. This means that any oral communication
through radio, interviews, TV is not prospectus even if it invites public to
subscribe for the share. Prospectus is an invitation to treat but not an offer
document.
- The prospectus must be addressed to the public i.e. prospectus must make its
shares available to the public without any discrimination.
Contents of a prospectus
2. Formation expenses
a) Preliminary expenses.
b) Promoters’ remuneration.
c) Particulars of options on shares or debentures.
d) Underwriting commission and brokerage.
3. Investor information
ii) A report by named accountants on the profits or losses of the business for the last five
years, Its assets and liabilities at the date of the last account
1. Failure to include matters and reports that are supposed to accompany the
prospectus stating that the prospectus includes an expert’s statement and the
Expert has not given a written consent.
2. A prospectus containing an expert's statement 'and the expert -has not endorsed
such a statement
3. Issuing a prospectus without delivering a signed copy thereof to the registrar
for registration.
4. Omitting to include material contracts.
5. Including false statements in the prospectus.
The general rule is that a prospectus must disclose all material facts accurately; it
must not misrepresent facts thereby improperly influencing and misleading a
prospective investor into becoming an alotee of shares or debentures in
consequences of which he suffers loss.
A misled investor has the following remedies:
Rescind the contract of allotment, return the shares to the company, and recover
the money.
.Recover damages from the company for fraud by proving that the statement was
fraudulent.
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 108
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
The persons who can be made liable for misleading prospectus are:
Brokerage commission
This is a payment made to issuing house and brokers, in return for their placing the
companies or securities but without under taking to subscribe for them.
Exceptions to the rule of Trevor vs. Whitworth. (Where a company can purchase its
own shares)
Check; December 2014 QN 6b, December 2009 QN 3c, December 2011 QN 3c.
i. Where it is a purchase of redeemable preference share.
ii. Where the share are acquired because of a resolution of reducing the company’s
share capital.
iii. Where the shares are purchased because of court order in protection of minority
interest.
iv. Where the share are forfeited for non- payment of a call.
v. Where the shares are surrendered in lieu of forfeiture.
vi. Where the companies acquires its own shares otherwise than for a valuable
(cash) consideration.
1. The company and every officer in default is liable to a fine not exceeding sh 1
million.
2. The company that has lent the money to finance purchase of its own share
irregularly it cannot recover that loan.
3. Any share or debentures issued in connection with financial assistance stands
invalid.
4. The agreement to purchase the shares is not enforceable.
5. The company may sue the directors for breach of duty, to recover any loss resulting
from the financial assistance.
6. The directors are liable for damages for breach of trust since directors are trustee of
the company’s resources including money.
i. Where lending of money is part of the ordinary business of the company and the
money is lent by the company in the ordinary course of its business e.g. financial
institutions like banks.
ii. Where the loan is to trustees to enable them purchase fully paid shares to be held
under employees share scheme
iii. Where the loan is to employees other than directors to enable them purchase fully
paid shares by way of beneficial ownership.
iv. Where the company is advancing such monies or financial assistance to a director
to enable him perform his duties efficiently.
6. It is unlawful for the company to give a loan to a person who is its director,
guarantee such a loan, or provide security for such a loan.Exceptions to the rule
that a company cannot make out a loan to its directors.
i. When the company is for the time being private.
ii. When the lending company is the subsidiary and the holding company its
director.
iii. When lending money or giving guarantee is part of the ordinary business of the
company and the same is given in the ordinary course of that business.
iv. When the funds are necessary to meet expenditure incurred or to be incurred by
the
director for purposes of the company or enabling him to properly perform his
duties as an officer of the company.
v. When such payment has been approved at the general meeting and the particulars
of the payments have been disclosed.
Director’s rights with regard to recovering remuneration and compensation for loss
of office- December 2012 question 3A
Prima facie, directors are not entitled to any remuneration apart from that which is
provided in the articles of association of the company
Where the articles make provision for such payment, directors can claim
remuneration out of the funds of the company if the company is not able to pay out
of profits.
Particulars of the proposed payment including the amount has been disclose to
members of the company
The payment has been approved by the company in general meeting
Amount of remuneration should not be varied except through a special resolution.
It is unlawful; for directors to be paid compensation for loss of office unless the
particulars thereof have been disclosed and approved by members of the company
Companies Act 2015 permits public companies and private companies to exercise
pre-emptive rights.
Private companies may restrict pre-emptive rights on its article.
A member’s pre-emptive rights means that the existing members are given priority
for consideration to buy new shares or towards transfer of shares between
members before they are offered to the members of the public.
The pre-emptive rights on the issue of shares do not apply if:(Nov 2016 Q 7B)
The memorandum or articles of a private company exclude them or provide
alternative Provisions, e.g. To make more detailed provisions in respect of different
classes of
The company passes a special resolution to exclude them.
The shares are issued for non-cash consideration;
Shares within employees' share scheme
a) REDUCTION OF SHARE CAPITAL
The general rule is that it is illegal for a company to reduce its share capital
Reduction in this case means any attempt by a company to return or to refund part of the
monies already received as share capital to share holders
However, a company can reduce its share capital subject to the following conditions:
Special resolution:- The companies Act requires that a company limited by shares
or guarantee may by special resolution passed by members at General meeting
reduce its share capital, this resolution if passed is known as Special resolution of
Reducing of share capital.
Confirmation of reduction
- The Act provides that if the court is satisfied that every creditor entitled to object
has consented or that his claims has been discharged or secured, it may then make
an order confirming the reduction on such terms and conditions it may deem fit.
- The court may for any reason if it thinks fit to do so order the company to add the
words “and reduced” at the end of its name for a specified duration.
Notification to the registrar and registration of reduction
- The Act states that upon production of certified copy of the court order
confirming the reduction, copies of the special resolution, minutes approving
the same and other document as may be required, the registrar registers the
reduction and issues the certificate confirming the reduction of companies capital
and this certification acts as a conclusive evidence that the requirement of the
companies act in respect to the reduction of capital have been complied with.
- A reduction of capital takes effect when registered by the registrar.
N.B:- A private company’s resolution for reducing the share capital (if the company is
limited by share) must be supported by a solvency statement (that the company is able to
pay its debts in the next 12 months.)
2. Companies creditors
3. Companies members.
a) General public
- The general public are potential shareholders or creditors in future and must be
informed the truth regarding the reduction of the capital.
- The general public is protected by the high court order which requires the
company seeking to reduce its capital to compulsorily change its name to add the
words “and reduced” at the end of its name for a period of at least 2 months or as
the circumstances may deem fit .
- It enables the public to make enquiries to ascertain the reason for reduction of
capital to make informed decisions.
b) Companies creditors
- Where the reduction involves the cancellation of unpaid up capital or repayment to
shareholder payback capital, the creditors have statutory right to object to the
proposed reduction.
- Upon such objection, the company is required to prepare list of creditors to
forward to the high court, the high court after considering the risk may reject or
confirm the reduction.
- It can only confirm the reduction if satisfied that Check; June 2010 Qn 1(c):-
1. Creditors have consented to the proposed reduction
2. Creditors have been given alternative security
3. Creditors’ claims have been discharged or paid off.
c) Companies members
Minority membership
Minority members can seek court protection where they are of opinion that the resolution
passed by the majority is not fair and equitable at all
Majority membership
They are protected by Act, which provides that the membership must pass a special
resolution. It is most unlikely that (2/3 or 75%) or ¾ of the majority members can agree
to pass a resolution for reducing capital against their interest.
1. Protection of creditors.
The court will only allow a reduction of capital if it is satisfied that the creditors have
consented creditors have been given security creditors have been paid off
2. Protection of members
Although the majority of members of the company may not need protection from the
court, the minority who may not agree to a resolution to reduce the capital may require
the court to protect their interests especially if the majority acted in a manner that is
oppressive to the minority.
1. Extinguishing the liability on any of its shares in respect of share capital not
paid up. E.g. par value of share is sh 10, shares are 1 million paid amount is per
value sh five, balance not paid is par value sh. 5. A company may pass a special
resolution to eliminate/ extinguish liability of balance of sh.5.
2. Reducing the liability on any of the shares in respect of the share capital not
paid up. E.g. (the balance of sh 5) the company may pass a resolution to reduce the
liability on share I.E the shareholder may be required to pay only sh 2.5 per.
3. Cancelling any paid up capital, which is lost or unrepresented by available
assets without extinguishing and reducing liability of members.
4. Repayment to shareholders of the paid up capital in excess of the companies
wants without reducing or extinguishing liability on shares.
5. Paying off paid capital, which is in excess of the companies need and reducing
the liability on any shares.
6. Paying off paid capital, which is in excess of the companies need and
extinguishing the liability on any shares.
Ordinarily, where company reduces its capital, the members are no longer liable to pay
the reduced amount on share capital.
The Act provides that if the company goes into liquidation within 12 months from the
date of reduction of capital, then the member’s liability shall be reviewed and shall be
liable to meet the claims of the creditors who were never aware of the reduction of share
capital and did not consent to it.
A public company limited by shares may at any time increase its subscribed share capital
by issuing new shares from any unissued share capital within the limits of its authorised
share capital. This type of issue is known as further issue on share capital.
Where a company makes a further issue of shares, an obligation is imposed upon the
directors by the articles to offer such shares, first to the existing shareholders before they
are offered to the public. This right of existing shareholder to have new shares in priority
to the public is known as members pre-emptive rights.
Companies Act 2015 requires every public company to exercise pre-emptive right
whereas a private company may restrict such a right under its articles.
CONSOLIDATION OF SHARES
When subdividing, consolidating or dividing its shares, a company shall ensure that the
proportion between the amount paid and the amount if any unpaid on each resulting share
is the same as it was in the case of the share from which that share is derived.
DIVIDEND
They are profit of trading company distributed among members in proportion to their
shareholding.
a) Losses of previous years need not to be provided for when determining the profits
available for distribution.
b) Profits of various years will be brought forward to be distributed as dividend even
if there is a revenue loss in current years when company make.
c) Unrealised capital profits on revaluation of assets can be distributed by way of
dividend or used to finance a bonus issue.
d) Dividend must not be paid out of capital (capital impairment rule)
e) Dividend cannot be paid if it will result in the company being unable to pay its
debt as they fall due. (solvency rule)
f) Losses of circulating assets (current assets) in the current attaining period must be
made good before payment of a dividend. (case number 46 exchange banking
company ltd)
g) The company financial statement as a role must be taken into account before
determining the amount available for distribution as dividend.
h) A shareholder cannot enforce payment of dividend even if company is making
huge profits.
i) In the absence of dividend being recommended by directors, the general meeting
has no power to declare dividend as available for payment. ( case 47 Scott vs
Scott)
j) Once dividend are properly declared it becomes a debt due against the company to
each shareholder the company of which a shareholder can sue the company.
k) Dividend are payable in cash unless the AOA provides otherwise. (Case 21 Wood
vs Odesa water works company.)
l) Dividend must only be paid to the registered shareholder or members.
m) A realised profit on sale of fixed assets may not be treated profits available for
distribution.
Dividend should not be paid out of capital. It is a basic principle of the company law that
dividend must not be paid out of funds realized by issue of shares and debenture i.e.
dividend must not be paid out of capital unless under the following condition/
requirement:-
N.B: The registrar by approving such payment may appoint a person to inquire and report
to him on the circumstances leading to such payment and may require that a company
register a guarantee for the payment of the cost of inquiring. If a dividend is improperly
paid out of capital, all the directors who are knowingly part of the payment are jointly
liable and the dividend so paid shall be recovered from the recipient if they knew that it
was paid out of capital.
Circumstances when a dividend could become a debt against the company. (May
2014 Q 5 C)
1. If the articles so expressly provide, dividend will become payable and
enforceable.
2. In case of preference shares which carry a limited dividend and in respect of
which there are no voting rights.
3. When the company declares the dividend as a final dividend.
The reasons why a company might seek to control the funds from which dividends
are paid. (May 2014 Q 5 D)
CAPITALIZATION OF PROFITS
FLOATATION
1. Prospectus issue
2. Offer by tender
3. Right issue
4. Bonus issue
5. Placings
6. Offer for issue
7. Conversion issue
For a company issuing shares for the first time, it must be licenced by the CMA.
b) Offer by tender
The company invites tender for its share and sells turn to the highest bidder.
c) Right issue
The company offers its share to the existing shareholder to buy at a reduced price.
d) Bonus issue
It is an alternative to pay dividend.
Its where company issue fully paid up share to current shareholder for free
It involves capitalization of reserves into share capital
The company may use the following funds in financing bonus issue:
e) Placing
The company arranges with its broker to sell shares on behalf of the company. This
method is mostly used by the private companies. The broker then places the shares
with its client privately. There is no direct invitation of the public.
g) Conversion issue
Conversion issue the holders of one type of shares are given a chance to convert to
another type.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
Discuss four regulations governing redeemable preference shares under the Companies
Act.
QUESTION 2
Outline the contents of a prospectus issued in Kenya by a foreign company.
QUESTION 3
(b) Explain four acts or omissions which might give rise to criminal liability in respect
of a prospectus.
(c) Outline three conditions to be fulfilled before the court can approve a reduction of
capital of a company
QUESTION 4
Ben Nyotu and MlaChake are directors of BankiYetu Ltd. Each of them holds forty
percent of the ordinary shares and the reminder is held by MlaYote. In addition to the
shares, Ben Nyotu holds debentures issued by bankiYetu, redeemable on 9 Septemer
2015 benNyotu wishes to dispose of his shares and debentures to MlaChake and MlaYote
on priority basis.
BankiYetu Ltd intends to raise funds and lend the samo to MlaYote to enable him
purchase Ben Nyotu’s debentures. MlaYote will also arrange for a private loan
guaranteed by Bank Yetu Ltd to enable him purchase ben Nyotu’s shares and debentures.
Advise bankYetu Ltd on the legality of its arrangement with MlaYote regarding the
purchase of Ben Nyotu’s shares and bentures.
QUESTION 5
In Trevor v Whitworth (1887), it was held that a company cannot purchase its shares or
be a member of itself.
However, a company could purchase its shares in certain circumstances.
(i) Evaluate three circumstances in which a company could purchase its own shares. ,
(ii) Identify three instances when a company might give financial assistance to facilitate
purchase of its shares.
QUESTION 6
(c) Explain the circumstances when a dividend could become payable and enforceable
as a debt against the company.
(d) Examine three reasons why a company might seek to control the funds from which
dividends are paid.
QUESTION 7
Advise a group of shareholders on the distinction between the following types of capital
(i) Nominal capital.
(ii) Reserve capital.
QUESTION 8
A company may alter the objects clause in so far as it may be required to carry on its
business more economically.
Explain the classes of persons who might object to the alteration of the objects clause.
QUESTION 9
Discuss the actions and omissions that are deemed to contribute to criminal behavior in
relation to preparation and issuing of a prospectus.
QUESTION 10
Explain five ways in which a company might alter its share capital.
QUESTION 11
The prospectus has stated that the seeds produced by this company yield 20 bags per acre
"even on arid land and that the company was the only one with such kind of seeds. There
was also a publication in the local newspaper about the shares.
Maureen Mwikali did not read the prospectus but had applied for the shares and was
allocated 4,000 shares at Sh.40 per share.
Olive Omute read the prospectus and was not allocated the shares. She bought 6,000
shares at the securities exchange at Sh.50 per share.
Mary Mpito read the publication in the local newspaper about the shares and BP bought
10,000 shares at the securities exchange at Sh.55 per share
An actual analysis of the seed and it was discovered that the seeds were not as productive
and only produced 5 bags per acre and could only thrive in wet land The shares of
Wakulima Company Limited dropped in value to Sh. 9 per share. Mercy Matu had held
the shares of the company from the time of inception and in her opinion; it was the
publication that had caused the drop in the value of the shares
i) Explain three types of misrepresentation.
ii) Explain five elements of misrepresentation.
iii) Advise Maureen Mwikali, Olive Omute, Mary Mpito and Mercy Matu.
QUESTION 12
(a) Paradise Company Limited is the largest producer and seller of passion fruits in
your country. These products are used in making fruit juices and fruit cakes by
both commercial takers and homemakers.
The company announced a net income of Sh.12, 233,270 for the year ended 31
December 2011 compared to Sh.6, 981, 380 for the year ended 31 December
2010. The board of directors declared an annual dividend of Sh.20 per share of
Paradise Company Limited's common stock, payable on 20 April 2012 to
shareholders on record at the close of business on 13 April 2012.
QUESTION 13
Uzuri Company Limited, was registered two years ago. The company has uncalled up
capital of sh. 1 million. The company also has two directors Steven Meta and Paul Mailu.
Recently, Steven Meta in the absence of Paul Mailu and other shareholders held a
meeting and passed resolutions to make a call. The meeting scheduled for 28 October
2011 was only attended by one member and the company secretary who was not a
member.
The member acted as chairman and the “meeting” resolved that calls be made. Paul
Mailu was sued for failure to make good the call. However upon hearing the case the
court held that the purported proceedings were invalid.
i) "Outline the rule which the court relied on to make its decision
ii) Citing relevant provisions, discuss any five expectations to the rule in (a) (i) above
QUESTION 14
a) Describe the legal principles that govern the following classes of persons in relation
to the membership of a company:-
i. A minor
ii. A bankrupt
iii. A deceased member / personal representative.
b) Outline the details contained in the register of members of a company.
QUESTION 15
Modem technology limited issued a prospectus inviting subscribers to acquire shares in
the company. The prospectus stated that “the company had made a break-through by
discovering a cure for a dreaded diseases and that the company had successfully patented
the drug.
In addition the marketing manager of the company published an article in the daily
newspapers to the effect that the company was the only one with the registered patent for
the drug. As a result the shares of the company were over- subscribed.
Alpho Mwanzo who read the prospectus was allotted 4,000 shares at Sh.50 per share. It
has now become apparent that the patent claimed by the company had been registered by
another company and was revoked. Consequently, the price of the shares dropped to Sh.5
per share.
OmegoMwisho on the other hand, had a total of 5,000 shares before the issue. He feels
aggrieved that the information contained in the prospectus had led to the eventual decline
in the price of the shares of the company.
With reference to the facts given in the case above, explain the following to
AlphoMwanzo and OmegoMwisho
a) The persons who would be held liable for the particulars contained in a prospectus
s of a company
b) Circumstances under which persons would be exempted from liability on a false
prospectus
c) The remedies available to AlphoMwanzo and OmegoMwisho against the company
d) Circumstances under which the remedies in (c) above might be lost
QUESTION 16
(i) Highlight the ways in which a company may reduce its capital
(ii) Outline the circumstances under which a court would confirm the reduction of capital
of a company
QUESTION 17
The general rule of company law is that dividends must not be out of the money raised
through the issue of shares or through debentures. Explain exceptions to this rule. •
QUESTION 18
(a) "A company's shares can be issued at a discount, premium or par value".
Discuss this statement
(b) Explain the provisions which govern the issue of shares of a company for purposes
other than raising capital.
QUESTION 19
A public company in the mining business made an issue of its shares to the public at
Sh.10 per share.
In the prospectus, the Company stated that “the company has discovered a booming
market in the European Union member countries for its minerals."
The company had never market its' minerals in the European Union member countries.
Timothy, without reading the prospectus applied for shares and was allotted 1,000 shares
at Sh10 each.
Mary read the prospectus applied for the shares but was not allotted any shares. Later on,
Mary bought 2,000 shares at the stock exchange at Sh.25 each.
Peter, an old shareholder in the company owned 500 shares even before the company
made the new issue. He is disappointed with the price at which the new offer for sale was
made claiming that this had destabilized the price of the company's shares.
Required:
a) Explain the legal principles applicable in the above case and advise Timothy, Peter
and Mary.
b) Timothy prepared a transfer form to transfer 100 shares only 10 his wife Rose and
presented the form to the company. The company erroneously transferred the entire
1,000 shares to Timothy's wife. Timothy is aggrieved and seeks your legal advice.
Discuss the legal principles in the case and advise Timothy.
QUESTION 20
Explain the circumstances when a prospectus is not required in an issue of shares or
debentures.
QUESTION 21
With reference to the companies Act explain the provisions of the Act which ensure that
the majority shareholders do not conduct the affairs of the company with complete
disregard of the interest of the minority shareholders.
QUESTION 22
The share capital of a company may be altered under Section 404 of the companies Act
provided the company follows the procedures set down. '
Explain the rules and procedure governing the alteration of share capital.
QUESTION 23
a. State and briefly explain the conditions which must be fulfilled before a company
limited to shares can issue redeemable preference shares.
b. Outline the rules governing payment of dividends.
c. It is a basic principle of company law that dividends must not be paid out of funds
raised by issue of shares or debentures.
QUESTION 24
A prospectus is required to contain the matters and reports specified in Part I and II of the
Third Schedule.
Explain these matters as outlined in the Third Schedule.
QUESTION 25
Outline the provisions of the Companies Act, relating to civil and criminal liability in
respect of non-compliapce with provisions relating to a prospectus on the Company and
the directors.
QUESTION 26
a) Explain the circumstances when a dividend may become payable and enforceable
as a debt against the company.
b) Give reasons why a company may seek to control the funds from which dividends
are paid.
TOPIC 6
DEBT CAPITAL
A registered company has implied powers to borrow. The powers can also be provided
for by the company’s constitution. All companies have an implied power to borrow for
purposes incidental to their trade or business.
The company’s articles of association may also contain provisions on how the directors
can carry out borrowing including the internal procedures to be followed and the
maximum amount that the directors can borrow.
If any borrowing exceeds those internal procedures and requirements then it is said to be
ultra – vires borrowing and such a borrowing can be rectified by the members of the
company.
Where borrowing is beyond the overall powers of the company then it is said to be ultra –
vires borrowing .
borrowing
powers
implied expressed
intra vires
intra vires ultra vires
Types of borrowing
1. Express borrowing
Arises where the power to borrow is specifically mentioned in the company’s
constitution I.e. AOA
2. Implied borrowing
In this case the amount and the purpose of borrowing is authorised by the company’s
constitution but the directors have adopted a wrong procedure in exercising the
borrowing powers e.g. failure to convene a board meeting in order to pass a resolution to
such borrowing.
This can be ratified in order to have a company assume the responsibility of borrowing
the payment of such debts towards the lenders.
Remedies for lenders against the company in case of ultra vires borrowing
If lender has acted in good faith. i.e. without the knowledge that the company borrowed
the money beyond its powers, he may have the following remedies:
1. Injunction: - if the company has not spent the money borrowed, the lender may
obtain an injunction order against the company restraining from spending the
amount and recover the same.
2. Subrogation: - if the money has been applied in paying off debts of the company,
the lender is entitled to step into the shoes of the creditors so paid off and rank as
creditor of the company to the extent of the money so applied. If the money has
been invested in some particulars assets, he may claim the assets
3. Sue for breach of warranty:- lenders may sue the directors personally for breach
of the implied warranty of authority and claim damages for the same
4. Identification and tracing: -If the lender can identify his money where the money
is still in the hands of the company in its original form or any property purchased
with it, he can claim the money or property purchased with it.
COMPANY DEBENTURES
A debenture is the written acknowledgement of a debt by a company normally containing
provisions as to payment of interest and terms of repayment of principal.
Debenture stock
Debenture stock is a group of fully paid up debenture put together into a large mass,
generally secured by a trust deed.
TYPES OF DEBENTURES
Redeemable debenture stipulates that repayment shall be made on or before fixed date.
Redeemable debentures may be issued unless the AOA provides to the contrary or the
company has shown an intention to cancel them by passing a resolution to that effect.
Advantages of debentures
i. Debenture is easily traded
ii. it’s terms are clear and specific so that a company can be certain of its true
position.
iii. Debentures secured by floating charges are popular instruments, they give the
holders a security of a charge but the assets charged can be freely traded by a
company.
iv. They offer to potential investors the security of guaranteed income.
v. They are more popular than preference shares,
vi. Their requirements are more relaxed in the company’s Act e.g. There is no
restriction by the company to buy them.
Disadvantages of debentures
i. A Company may have to offer a relatively high rate of interest in order to make the
debentures attractive.
ii. Payment of debenture interest is mandatory and not discretionary.
iii. Interest payment results in a reduction of dividends payable to shareholders and
cause a fall in share prices
iv. Debenture holders remedies include 'appointment of receivers, which may have
disastrous consequences on the company,
v. Crystallization of a floating charge means that the same security is swiftly enforced
since that security will often be of a trading assets and its enforcement can cause
major problems for the company
Characteristics of debentures
Interest rates
Extent to which they are paid
Common seal of the company
Signature of the directors
TRUST DEED
When debentures are offered for public subscriptions, the company usually enters into a
trust deed with trustees. The trustees are appointed and paid by the company to act on
behalf of the debenture holders. The charge securing the debentures is 'made in favor of
the trustees who hold it in trust.
Under the deed the company undertakes to pay to the debenture holders their principle
and interest and normally charges its property to the trustees as security.
h) Priority of debentures
i) Convening of meeting of debenture holders by trustees so as to take instruction.
j) A covenant or promise by the company to pay the debt.
k) A description of the property charged.
l) A provision empowering the trustees to take possession of the property charged in
the event the security becoming enforceable and to carry on the company’s
business and even to sell the property charged.
Advantages of trust deed (Nov 2015 Q5b (i) May 2017 Q4 (I)
i. The trustees have a legal mortgage over the company’s property. It enables the
security by way of a specific mortgage/ charge on the company's land. The
creation of a legal charge gives a legal interest to the person in favor of whom it is
drawn
ii. It facilitates protection of security on behalf of all creditors. The interest of
debenture holders are safe guarded more efficiently by a small group of trustees.
iii. The trustees are often empowered to call meeting and inform the debenture
holders of the position and receive Instructions.
iv. The trustees act quickly if there is default in terms of the debentures: e.g. appoint
receivers, sell the secured property etc.
v. Obligations can be imposed on, the company which otherwise can be
impracticable e.g. to insure and repair the premises. The trustees are in a position
to see that the company carries out these obligations.
vi. The, deed carries the circumstances with which the principal sum may become
repayable.
vii. The appointment of trustees facilitates efficient administration of the trust since
they are there and exercise continuous supervision of the debenture holder's right's
and to take prompt action if need arises (act as a watchdog)
viii. If there is to be a specific mortgage/ charge in shares in a subsidiary company,
trustees are needed in order that someone independent on the holding company
can exercise any right to vote.
Liability of trustees
A trustee is liable for any breach of trust where he fails to show the of care and diligence
required of him as trustees, having regard to the provisions of the trust deed conferring
him any powers, authorities or discretions. In particular, they cannot purchase the
debentures without, the consent of all debenture holders,
Any provision in a trust deed or in a contract with the holders of debentures secured by a
trust deed exempting a trustee from, or indemnifying him against, liability for breach of
trust where he fails to show the degree of care and diligence required of him as trustee
shall be void (companies Act 2015)
Companies Act provide that, every company which issues a series of debenture is
required to keep at its registered office a register of holders of such debentures.
If the work of making up the register is done at some other office of the company or of
another person, it may be kept at that office.
A company shall register an allotment of debenture as soon as is practicable and in any
event within 2 months after the date of allotment.
The Registrar shall be notified of such place and of any change thereof.
Every company to keep at its registered office a register of charges with the following
particulars
a) A short description of the property charged
COMPANY CHARGES
A charge is an encumbrance upon real or personal property granting the holder certain
rights over that property.
A charge secured over a company's assets gives to the creditor (called the chargee) a prior
claim (over other creditors) to payment of their debt out of those assets.
It is a right to the lender to sell the property charged or otherwise the case may be,
Types of charges
a. Legal charge
A legal charge or mortgage is created, when the assets charged are transferred by the
company to the lender subject to the company's equitable right of redemption.
b. Equitable Charge
An equitable charge or mortgage is created when the company deposits a document of
title to the property to the lender to hold it until the mortgage debt is redeemed. Here, the
lender does not acquire any title to the property.
c. Fixed Charge
Is a charge mortgaged on a specific property such as a plant and machinery, land and
buildings or uncalled capital.A fixed charge passes legal title to certain specific assets and
the company loses the right to dispose the said property.
d. Floating charge
This is an equitable charge securing a debenture on the assets of a going concern. The
company gives to the charge rights over its assets while retaining freedom to deal with
them in the ordinary course of business until it crystallizes.
1. The content of the security fluctuates and therefore the value is uncertain until it
crystallizes
2. The company has the freedom to deal with its assets before the charge crystallizes.
3. The rights of the holders are postponed to other interest
4. The charge may be avoided if it is not registered within 42 days from the date of
its creation.
5. If created within 6 months before the commencement of winding up, it is deemed
to be a fraudulent preference and it is void.
6. It is subordinate to a fixed charge.
7. A floating charge will not crystallize on certain grounds
8. The charge is avoided during liquidation unless it is proved that the company was
solvent at the time the charge was created.
A floating charge is said to crystallize when it becomes fixed or fastened on the assets
charged. A floating charge will crystallize on the following grounds:-
Sometimes a combination of legal and equitable charges or fixed and floating charges
are created in the same assets. It is necessary on such cases to ascertain how these
charges would rank in the event of company’s liquidation. The following rules apply in
ranking of charges:-
1. Where a series of fixed charges are created on the same assets, they shall rank on
the basis of the date of creation unless there is an express agreement among the
lenders that 'they shall rank "parripassu" i.e. they rank irrespective of their dates of
creation.
2. Where a series of fixed charges and floating charges are created on the same
assets, the fixed charges shall have priority to all floating charges Irrespective of
the dates of creation. However, an earlier floating charge shall take priority to a
later fixed charge if:
(a) The floating charge contains a "negative pledge clause" which prohibits the
company from later on creating a fixed charge with priority over it
(b) The holder of the subsequent fixed charge actually knew of the prohibition.
3. If two floating charges are created over the general assets of the company, they
rank in order of creation since the equities are equal and first in time must prevails.
4. If a company creates a floating charge over a particular kind of assets e.g. book
debts, the charge shall rank before an existing floating charge over the general
assets.
5. A registered charge takes takes priority over unregistered charge.
Avoidance of charges
A fixed charge/ floating charge is void and the holder treated as unsecured creditors if
(i) The charge is not registered within 42 days from the date of its creation.
(ii) If the creation of the charge was a fraudulent preference
REGISTRATION OF CHARGES
The law provides that every company must keep a copy of every instrument creating a
charge required to be registered at the registered office of the company. These copies and
register of charges must be open for inspection by any creditors or member of the
company during business hours. Companies Act provides that the prescribed particulars
of the following charges created by the company together with the instruments creating
them must be delivered to the Registrar within 30 days after creation.
The purpose of registering the aforesaid particulars is to enable the would be creditors to
know the company existing indebtedness and tine assets available for their settlement.
Certificate of registration of charges is issued upon registration of charges.
Failure to register a registrable charge within the prescribed period shall attract the
following consequences: -
i. The sums lent shall become payable immediately i.e. the lender can demand the
balance of the loan immediately even if the borrower is complying with other terms
of the agreement e.g. paying instalments on due dates.
ii. The charge shall be void as against a subsequent lender/ the liquidator i.e. the charge
shall be unsecured creditor and if the company were to charge the same property to
subsequent lender shall have a supreme claim to that asset.
iii. Similarly, if the company goes into liquidator, the liquidation shall have a superior
claim over the creditor whose charge was not registered.
REDEMPTION OF DEBENTURES
Redemption of Debenture
Discharging or extinguishing the liability on account of debenture and in reference with
the terms of redemption states in the debenture trust deed is called redemption of
debentures. A company has to keep in mind the following three aspects regarding
redemption that it:-
(i) When the debentures are not secured by any mortgage or charge:- the remedies
available to the holder when the debentures are not secured by any mortgage or
charge are either:-
1. To sue the company for the recovery of the money secured by the debenture and
execute the decree against the company’s property; or
2. To present a petition for the winding up of the company on the ground of the
company inability to pay its debts. If winding up is already in progress, than the
holder has to prove in which winding up the amount due to him like any other
unsecured creditors.
(ii) Where the debentures are secured by a mortgage or charge: When the
debentures are secured by a mortgage or charge the holder who wants to realize his
security and recover the money due to him may apply to all or any of the following
remedies:-
5. An application can be made to the court for the closure of the company’s right to
redeem the debentures. But in such an action all debenture holders of the company
in contradiction to those of a class as well as the company should be joined as
parties.
6. After the date of the liquidation of the company the debenture holder will not be
entitled for payment of interest, only the value of security will be raised, and debt
for the balance is proved. He is not entitled to recover the interest out of his
security when arriving at a balance for which he can prove in the winding up.
1. They can file a suit against the company for the principal as well as for the
interest.
2. They can file an application to the court regarding compulsory dissolution of the
company.
3. If the company is under the process of winding up, they can claim their principal.
1. They can file a suit against the company for the principal as well as for the
interest.
2. They can file an application to the court regarding compulsory dissolution of the
company.
3. If the company is under the process of winding up, the can claim their principal.
4. These debenture holders can file a suit against the companies for its compulsory
dissolution through the debenture trustee.
5. They can file a suit against the company for the sale of property.
6. It can get injunction from the court to restrict the right of the company to sell its
property for redemption of the debenture.
7. If the trustee is so authorized, the debenture holder may appoint liquidator,
through the trustee and get the charge sold for the purpose of repayment.
8. If the charged assets are unable to make the full payment, it can file a suit against
the company for the balance payment.
In the event of company's default either in the repayment of interest or principal sum, the
debenture holders as creditors may exercise the following:-
i. Appoint a receiver to carry on the business of the company
ii. Petition the High court for compulsory wilding up on the ground of inability to
pay debts.
iii. Sue the company for arrears of interest, principal sum or both
iv. Apply for an order of closure. i.e. the effect of an order for closure is to extinguish
the company's equitable right of redemption and vest the property to the creditors
absolutely.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
Discuss three events when a floating charge might crystallize.
QUESTION 2
Summarize four particulars of the register of charges.
QUESTION 3
Shares may be disposed of as a security for a loan. Such a transaction is referred to as
mortgage of shares and may be legal or equitable.
With reference to the above statement distinguish between a legal and an equitable
mortgage.
QUESTION 4
According to the decision of Romer L.J in.Re: Yorkshire Woolcombers Association
Limited one of the characteristics of a floating change |s “it hovers over all the assets of a
company until some event occurs which causes the charge to crystallize”.
In reference to the above statement, explain the events that cause the crystallization of a
bearing charge.
QUESTION 5 '
(b) Debentures may be collaterally secured by a trust deed.
Explain the main clauses in a debenture trust deed.
(c) Mashariki bank Limited has a standard debenture form, duly registered and thereby
giving the bank a fixed charge of Mashaka Limited ‘s factory and machinery and a
floating charge over other assets and whole undertaking Mashaka limited has
defaulted in the payment of the principal sum and interest The directors of Mashariki
Park Limited seek your advice on the remedies available to the bank as a debenture
holder.
QUESTION 6
d) Explain the meaning of the term ‘floating charge’ as used in company law.
e) Discuss the factors that distinguish a debenture from a share.
f) Every trading company is deemed to have borrowing powers. However, the law
imposes some restrictions on these powers.
With reference to the above statement explain
i) The restrictions on borrowing by a company
ii) The legal effect of ultra vires borrowing
QUESTION 7
Sahara Company limited created a fixed charge over its premises in favour of Omega
Bank Limited. The registrar of companies issued a certificate stating that the charge had
been registered.
When the particulars of registration had been sent to the Registrar, the date of creation of
the charge was stated as being 30 December 2007, although in fact it had been created on
1 May 2007. The entry of charges in the registrar was made on 1 February 2008. The
certificate states that the charge was registered as covering and advance of sh. 15 million
to the company Sahara Company Limited though in fact the charge extended to other
sums owned to Omega Bank Limited by the company in respect of goods supplied.
Explain the legal principles applicable in the case and advice Sahara Company limited
QUESTION 8
In relation to floating charges;
a) The characteristics of a floating charge.
b) The events which would lead to crystallization of a floating charge.
c) The legal effect of crystallization.
QUESTION 9
(a) Section 878 of the companies Act requires the prescribed particulars of specified
charges on a company's property or undertaking to be delivered to the Registrar for
registration.
i. List and briefly describe the specified charges as provided for by the Act
ii. Outline the prescribed particulars of registered charges.
(b) Central Park Company Limited submitted an application for an overdraft facility from
Unity Bank Limited in July 2007. The overdraft was secured against a title deed of
some of the company's property. Thereafter, a memorandum of charge on the security
was executed but was not dated and neither was the charge registered with the
registrar.
The overdraft facility was approved by the bank. In the course of reviewing the
securities held by the bank, the credit manager, on 10 January 2008, discovered that,
the charge was undated. He subsequently filled in the date as 10 January 2008 and a
submitted the memorandum to the registrar. The memorandum was thereafter
registered on 31 January 2008 and a certificate of registration was duly issued to the
bank.
QUESTION 10
(a) Explain the similarities and differences between shares and debentures.
(b) Wheels Limited issued a debenture to East Bank years ago. The debenture was in the
standard bank form described as a fixed and floating charge over all the assets of the
company. However, due to inadvertence, the charge was not dated nor registered
within time. The company is now in liquidation and the loan is in arrears. The bank
seeks your legal advice as to whether it can rely on the charge to prove its claim in
the winding up proceedings of the company.
QUESTION 11
(a) (i) A basic fundamental rule of company law is that a company may not purchase its
own shares. Explain the exceptions to this rule.
(ii) Explain the advantages of a company purchasing its own shares.
(a) Outline the circumstances under which, a company may give financial assistance for
purchase of, or subscription for its shares.
QUESTION 12
Explain the various types of securities that must be registered under the Companies Act,
Section 878, as registerable charges.
QUESTION 13
The Board of Borrowers Company Ltd. has applied for a loan from Uchumi Commercial
Bank. The Bank has advised that any loan will be conditional upon the bank being
granted security in the form of a combination of fixed and floating charges on the
company’s assets. The bank has also advised Borrowers Company Ltd. that the charges
will be contained in the bank’s standard form debenture document. This contains a
“negative pledge clause” and a term which enables the bank to place the company in
administrative receivership in the event of default by the company.
(a)
i. In numbered paragraphs distinguish between a fixed and a floating charge.
ii. What are the disadvantages of a floating charge to the bank?
(a) Explain the meaning of a “negative pledge” clause. ,
(b) Explain how administrative receivership differs from liquidation.
QUESTION 14
Distinguish between the following classifications and debentures:
(a) Bearer debentures and registered debentures.
(b) Redeemable debentures and irredeemable debentures.
(c) Debentures and debenture stock
(d) Unsecured debentures and secured debentures
TOPIC 7
COMPANY MEETING
Exceptions to the rule of Sharp vs. Dawes are those circumstances in which one person
may constitute a meeting. They include:
In this case, the court may order the holding of a meeting may be held and that one
member present shall be quorum. This actually happens when it seems impracticable
to hold a meeting where some members deliberately absent themselves so as to defeat
quorum.
3. Class meeting
One person may constitute a particular class of shareholders if the person holds all
shares of that class. Any meeting held by him in respect to the shares he solely holds
is a valid meeting.
4. Adjourned meeting.
This is continuation of an earlier meeting. If a meeting summoned by the directors has
no quorum present within 30 minutes of the appointed time, it stands adjourned to the
following week on the same day, time and place unless the directors otherwise
resolve. The adjourned meeting is duly constituted by one members present in
person or by proxy.
5. Creditors meeting
In a creditors winding up meeting where a company has only one creditor, one person
constitute a valid meeting and the resolutions thereafter are valid.
The meetings of the companies involving the shareholders are called general meetings
and are usually held for the following reasons
TYPES/CLASSIFICATION OF MEETINGS
1. STATUTORY MEETING
This is the first meeting of the shareholders of a public limited company with a
share capital.
Companies Act 2015 provides that an existing company which came into
existence before 2015(under the Repealed companies Act 1948) and has not held
statutory meeting has to meet the requirements of the repealed Act in the stated
sections. However for companies registered under the 2015 Act, there is no
requirement that this meeting be held.
The meeting is held once in the lifetime of a company. The object of the meeting
is to accord shareholders an early opportunity of obtaining material information as
to the circumstances of the company’s promotion and its immediate prospects.
The members have a statutory right to discuss any matter relating to the formation
of the Company or arising out of a statutory report whether previous notice has
been given or not.
Statutory meeting discuss statutory report
Private companies are not required to hold statutory meetings
Statutory report
The directors are required to send a statutory report to every member of the company at
least 14 days before the date of the meeting. The report must be certified by at least two
directors of the company.
In the event of default in convening a statutory meeting, every director of the company
knowingly and willfully guilty of the default is liable a fine up to Sh 1,000.
Similarly, default in delivering the statutory report and holding the statutory meeting is
one of the grounds for winding up order against the company although in. practice, the
court may direct the report to be delivered or the meeting to be held and the costs
incurred to be paid by persons in default.
Every public company is required to hold Annual General Meeting every year.
Private companies are not required to have an AGM each year and therefore their
business is usually conducted through written resolution.
Failure for a public company to hold AGM is a criminal offence punishable by a
maximum fine of KES 1,000,000/=
Any member may apply to the registrar to call or direct the calling of AGM.
- This is a general meeting which a company may hold at any time when need
arises. It generally considers special business and may be summoned by directors,
requisitionists, or pursuant to a court order.
- Requisionists convene EOGM if directors fail to convene the meeting within 21
days upon request by requisionists.
- When making a requisition, requisitionists must state the purpose of the meeting
- All requisitionists must sign the requisition.
- All business transacted at this meeting is called special business.
4. CLASS MEETING
These are meetings of a particular class of shareholders. They are convened by either the
company or by the court to effect variation in the rights of .a particular class of
shareholders or in connection with a scheme of arrangement or at the time of winding
5. DIRECTORS MEETING
This is a meeting of members of the board and may be held at any time when need
arises
The meeting may be summoned by a director or the company or the company
secretary if instructed by a director.
Quorum for such meeting is fixed by the directors failing which is two for public
companies and one for private companies.
The meeting must have a chairman within 5 minutes of the appointed time
a) Borrowing,
b) Recommending dividends
c) Payment of interim dividends
d) Appointment of the managing director
e) Appointment of company secretary
In order to transact legally binding business, the meeting must be validly held.
Theessentials of a valid meeting include:
2. Proper notice
3. Requisite quorum
4. Proper person to be the chair
5. Maintenance of minutes
PROPER AUTHORITY
The following are proper authority in convening respective meetings:(DEC 2014, Q2A)
1. Director
2. Shareholders
3. Auditor
4. Personal representative
5. Trustee in bankruptcy
Service of Notice
REQUISITE QUORUM
MAINTENANCE OF MINUTES
Minutes refer to a concise and accurate official record of the business transacted at
company meetings. They only include resolution actually passed. The minutes signed by
the chairman of the meeting at which the proceedings took place or by the next chairman
in the succeeding meeting, are evidence of its proceedings and are presumed correct.
Contents of minutes
Section 320 requires companies to keep it records available for inspection at its
registered office and open for inspection by members without charge for at least
two hours every business day, subject to restriction imposed by the Articles or the
general meeting.
A member who applies for the copies of any minute is entitled to be furnished
with the same within 14 days of the application.
It is a criminal offence for the company to deny any member the right to inspect
the minute book or furnish copies thereof.
The company and every officer in default are liable to default fine. The high court
has jurisdiction to compel the company to;
VOTING
Methods of voting
1. Show of hands
2. By poll
Show of hands -Each member present in person has one vote and each proxy present
who has been duly appointed by a member entitled to vote on the resolution has one vote.
It is the duty of the chairman to count the hands and decide the outcome.
By poll -This is an equivalent of ballot voting where members vote with their shares.
each shares carries one vote Therefore the number of votes that a member is entitled will
depend on their shareholding. In most cases one share will be equivalent to one vote or
any other way that may be provided for by the articles.
The chairman
At least two members present
Holders of not less than 5% of the voting rights.
1. Polling papers
2. Register of members
3. Attendance register
4. Proxy register
5. Specimen signature of members
6. Proxy forms received
7. Board resolutions
1. Persons whose names appear on the register are prima facie members and are
entitled to vote,
PROXIES
A Proxy is a person who is appointed by the member to attend general meetings on his
behalf if the member will not be attending .In public companies the regulations requires
that the notice that is convening
A general meeting must indicate that every member has a right to appoint a proxy to
attend general meeting on his behalf if he will not be attending. A member therefore will
complete a proxy notice which should contain the following details
1. General proxy; This is a proxy empowered to vote as he wishes having regard to the
discussion at the meeting
2. Special proxy; This is a proxy appointed to vote either for or against a particular
resolution before the meeting. He votes as instructed by the appointing authority.
Rights of a proxy
RESOLUTIONS
Decisions of the company are made by resolutions of its members passed at meetings of
the members.
Kinds of resolutions
i. Ordinary resolutions
ii. Special resolutions
iii. Resolutions requiring special notice
iv. Written resolutions
1. Ordinary resolution
A special resolution is needed for the following matters: (Dec 2010 Q 5a(ii)
The Act requires special notice for the following resolution: (June 2009 Q3)
Written resolution
Registration of resolutions
It is provided that a certified copy under the signature of an office of the company
of the following resolutions and agreements must be registered with the registrar,
within 30 days of passing the resolutions.
Failure to register a registrable resolution renders the company and every officer
in default liable to a default fine.
MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS
In Kenya, the Companies Act does not at any point define who may qualify as a minority
and majority shareholder. However, the Black’s Law Dictionary defines a majority
shareholder as an individual who has more than a half of the company shares. A minority
shareholder may be defined as an Individual owning less than half of the total company
shares and as such cannot be in a position to control the corporation.
The Companies Act is the principal legislation that provides for the rights of
shareholders, however, the same may be modified to suit the preference of members of a
company through Articles of Association. The rights include but are not limited to the;
regulations. Also, Section 550 of the Act provides that members have a right to
inspect copies of reports during the official working hours of the company free of
charge.
2. Right to require the directors to convene general meetings: Section 277 of the
Companies Act provides, that shareholders have a right to intimate to the directors
that a general meeting ought to be convened. Subsection of the aforementioned
provision requires that the request ought to have been put forth by members who
make up the required percentage of a company’s paid up capital. In essence they
have the right to personally attend the said meetings or through the use of proxies.
At such meetings, the shareholders have a right to pose questions to the board of
directors and have them answered. This is particularly helpful in promoting
financial accountability as the court in the Agricultural Development Corporation
of Kenya v Nathaniel Tum & another case stated that such meetings provide
shareholders with an opportunity to query the company’s financial matters.
Additionally, the participation of the shareholders is also extended to the right to
demand a poll at the general meeting.
3. Shareholders have a right to appoint proxies: In this regard, the Act has gone to
an extent of allowing shareholders of a certain company to appoint proxies who
may represent them at any meeting called by the company. Additionally, sub-
section 2 of the above provision states that a member is given an opportunity to
appoint different proxies in relation to the exercise of different shares held by
them.
4. The Right to have their Name and Shareholding entered into the Register of
Members: Any person who may want to be a member of a company, can only do
so by having subscribed to the companies’ article of association and the
memorandum of association. A company is required to have a register which
contains the contact details of the members which include but not limited to; their
names, contact addresses and the date they become members. The register ought to
be kept at the company’s registered offices or if kept in other branches of the
company, it ought to keep a copy of the said register. If at any one time, the
company fails to keep such a register, the Act provides that it will be held liable as
it has committed an offence and is to be fined not more than Kenya Shilling Five
Hundred Thousand. Also, the members of a company have a right to inspect the
details imputed at the said register free of charge and keep a copy of the same.
5. Right to Receive Dividend: Minority shareholders are entitled to dividends which
may be simply described as profit shares paid out by the company to its
shareholders. This often declared by the company’s directors at the end of every
financial year. In the payment of dividends, the company makes its first payment
to preferential shareholders and subsequently to the ordinary shareholders.
6. The Right to Vote: Minority shareholders have a right to vote when called upon
to do so by the company. The court in the North-West Transport Co. Ltd v
Beatty[15] affirmed this by reiterating that all shareholders have a right to vote as
they are legally competent to do so. Despite this entitlement more often than not,
the minority shareholders often get their opinions swept under the rag. In such
instances, especially when the majority shareholders have carried the day, the
minority shareholders ought not to feel discriminated especially if the decision
was arrived at in good faith.
Courts of law have not gone far enough to champion minority interest. However, they
will interfere with a majority decision in certain circumstances e.g.
Minority protection has for the most part been realized through statutory provisions. The
Companies Act contains numerous provisions which expressly safeguard minority
interest:
1. Alteration of the objects clause: Under Section 8(1) of the Act, a company may by
special resolution alter the objects clause of its memorandum. However, the
alteration may be objected to by: (a) Holders of not less than 15% of nominal value
of the company’s issued share capital (b) Holders of not less than 15% of any class
of shares of the company. (c) Not less than 15% of the number of members of a
company. The court may cancel the proposed alteration.
2. Variation of class rights: Under Section 74(1) of the Act, a company whose share
capital has been divided into different classes of shares e.g. ordinary, preference,
deferred e.t.c. may if authorized by its articles or memorandum, vary the rights
attached to any class of the shares either by a special resolution or written consent of
holders of not less than ¾ of that class of shares. However, holders of not less than
15% may within 30 days of the consent or resolution, apply to the court for the
variation to be cancelled.
3. Convention of an AGM in cases of default: Under Section 13(2) of the Act, if a
company fails to hold an AGM, pursuant to Section 131(1), any members of the
company may petition the registrar to convene or direct the convention of an AGM.
Such an AGM, is duly constituted by 1 member present in person or by proxy.
4. Requisitioning of an Extraordinary General Meeting: Under Section 132(1) of
the Act, holders of not less than 1/10 of the paid up capital or total voting rights of
the company, may requisition an extra-ordinary General Meeting by depositing a
requisition with the company. If directors do not convene a meeting, within 21 days
of the deposit, the requisitionists or not less than 1/12 of them may convene the
meeting.
5. Convention of General Meeting: Under Section 135(1) of the Act, if for any
reason, it is impracticable to call a company meeting or conduct a meeting in the
manner prescribed by the articles or by the Act, the court may either on its own
motion or upon application, by a director or a member entitled to attend and vote,
direct convention or conduct of a meeting in accordance with the Act or Articles.
Such a meeting is duly constituted by 1 member present in person or by proxy.
6. Investigation of company affairs by inspectors: Under Section 165(1) of the Act,
shareholders may instigate the appointment of one or more competent inspectors to
investigate the affairs of the company. The investigation is made by an application
to the court by:
a. Not less than 200 members
b. Holders of not less than 1/10 of the issued shares.
c. Not less than 1/5 of the number of members in the register.
The applicants must furnish the court with sufficient evidence to justify the
appointment.
7. Take-over Bid: Under Section 210(1) of the Act, if a scheme involving, the transfer
of shares or any class of shares in a company to another is proposed, and within 4
months of the offers, holders of not less than 90% of the shares or class there of
have accepted the offer, the offering company may at any time within 2 months after
the 4 months notify the dissentient shareholders of the offering company its
intention to acquire their shares compulsorily. The dissentient shareholders may at
any time within 1 month of the notice apply to the court seeking cancellation of the
takeover bid and the court may disallow the same as was the case in re Buggle Press
Ltd where the majority shareholders had formed a new company to enable them
acquire the minority interest in their other company by the use of Section 210. The
take over bid was disallowed.
8. Winding up under the Just and Equitable Ground: Under Section 219(f) of the
Act, a company may be wound up by the court if the court is of the opinion that it is
just and equitable that the company should be wound up. The minority may have a
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
(c) In Foss v Harbottle (1843), the anxiety of the law was to strike an optimum balance
between the principle of the majority rule on the one hand and safeguarding minority
shareholders against abuse of power on the other. It can neither give more support to
the majority as the minority will then be prejudiced and nor to the minority who
would then object on every action. With reference to the above statement, discuss the
three principles emanating from the rule
(d) The directors of NovaGift Ltd. had been accused of being negligent in selling a drying
machine of the company at a price which was much lower than its true market value.
A resolution had been passed by the majority of the shareholders to sell the machine
at that price. The directors did not in any way benefit from the transaction.
iii) State the two elements that must be present for the minority shareholders to
successfully sue the company.
iv) Advise the minority shareholders who have sued the company on whether they are
likely to succeed in their representative suit.
Suggested Answers
(a) Three principles emanating from the rule in Fosi v Harbottle (1843):
- Proper plaintiff principle- This principle is to the effect that when a wrong is
done to a company, the company is prima facie the proper plaintiff for redress.
- Internal management principle - Courts of law will not generally interfere with
the internal affairs of the company.
- Irregularity principle - A member of a company cannot generally sue to rectify
an irregularity or informality which the company can, by its members internally
correct.
b)
(i) Elements that must be present for the minority shareholders to sue.
- Fraud - Conduct complained of must involve some fraud on the minority.
- Control- it must be evident that the wrong doers are in legal or factual control of
the company.
With reference to the companies Act explain the provisions of the Act which ensure that
the majority shareholders do not conduct the affairs of the company with complete
disregard of the interest of the minority shareholders.
Suggested Answers
If the order for winding up will be prejudice to the interest of the oppressed
minority, the court may make such order with a view to bringing to an end the
matters complained of as it thinks fit.
Such an order may provide for the purchase of the shares of the prejudiced
minority.
To alter the rights given to any class of shares by the memorandum or articles of
association of the company
The minority can petition the court on the ground that it is just and equitable to
wind up the company.
Dissentient holders of 15% of the issued shares can apply for the cancellation qf
alteration of the objects.
There are also certain rights given to the minority in regard to meetings, thus the
tight given-to 10% minority to require the convening of an extra ordinary
general meeting.
The right of 20% minority to requisition members' resolution at the annual
General Meeting. As regards investigations, a right given to 10% minority to
request the Registrar on the basis of evidence submitted to order an investigation
of the company's affairs or compel an investigation into its ownership.
The minority have a right to petition the court On the ground of unfair prejudice
or for winding up
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
Outline the roles governing the following:
(i) Entitlement to notice of a meeting.
(ii) Four contents of a notice of a meeting.
QUESTION 2
Discuss five exceptions to the rule in sharp V. Dawes (1876) 2 QBD 26.
QUESTION 3
In relation to meetings:
(i) Explain four reasons why companies hold meetings.
(ii) List eight persons who are entitled by law to call for a meeting.
QUESTION 4
State four ways in which a company meeting might be adjourned.
QUESTION 5
The company being an artificial person conducts its business through a meeting or the
owners who are the shareholders of the company. The conduct of meetings is therefore
crucial to the operations of the company and the manner in which such meetings are
called is important.
The Companies Act provides guidelines on the calling of the meetings of a company.
In light of the above statement, explain the provisions of the law with regard to:
i) The service of notice of a meeting of a company.
ii) The parties to whom the notice of a meeting should be issued.
QUESTION 6
The articles of Gorgeous Garments Ltd. provide that every member is entitled to one vote
for each of the first ten shares and thereafter to one vote for each additional ten shares.
Jane Wanja owns one hundred shares. She has transferred ten of her shares to her nine
nominees to increase her voting power in the general meetings. Joseph Wanga, who is the
chairman at the general meeting, refused to accept the votes of Jane Wanja's nominees.
Advise Jane Wanja on the validity of the chairman's action and her right as a member.
QUESTION 7
Distinguish between a "general proxy form” and a "special proxy form”.
QUESTION 8
Explain the purposes of company meetings.
QUESTION 9
With reference to meeting of members of a company, explain the following;
i. Meaning of the term ‘special resolution’
ii. Matters that require a special resolution
QUESTION 10
With reference to the law which govern company meetings explain;
a) The circumstances under which one person would constitute a valid meeting
b) The methods of serving a notice of a company meeting to a member
c) Three types of meetings which may be held by a company
QUESTION 11
In relation to the law relating to meetings under company law, discuss the rules which
govern the following:
QUESTION 12
Write explanatory notes on the following types of resolutions indicating the business
requiring each type of resolution
a) Ordinary resolution.
b) Special resolution.
c) Resolution requiring special notices
QUESTION 13
a) Explain the purpose of company meetings
b) Explain the rule in Sharp Vs. Dawes and the exceptions thereof.
QUESTION 14
(a) Advise the Board of Directors of Excellent Home Care Agencies Ltd. on the
following matters:
(i) The length of notice to be given before an annual general 'meeting can be held.
(ii) The ordinary business transacted at such meetings.
(b) As you are leaving a meeting of the board of directors, you meet Mr Shida, a
shareholder, who is aggrieved that since the time the company was incorporated three
years ago, no annual general meeting has ever been held by the company. He seeks your
advice.
Advise him.
QUESTION 15
Outline the purposes for which a special resolution is required.
QUESTION 16
Advise the directors of Tangaza Company on the following issue:
When a company is compelled to call an extra ordinary general meeting.
QUESTION 17
a) Explain the rules that govern quorum and the exceptions thereof
b) In relation to proxies, write brief notes on:
i) General proxies.
ii) Special proxies.
QUESTION 18
(a) In relation to special notice, state the following:
i) Objects of a special notice.
TOPIC 8
DIRECTORS
The companies act does not define who a director is but rather provides that director
include any person occupying the position of a director by whatever name he is called.
In practice however a director refers to any person who is appointed by the shareholders
to manage the affairs of the company on shareholders behalf.
In most cases directors are also shareholders in the company but there is nothing that
prevent the articles from allowing an outsider to be appointed as the director.
Types of directors
In most cases an executive director also has a separate employment contract meaning that
he is both an employee and also sits in the board.
Such individuals usually have big shareholding but do not want to sit in the board
themselves but through representatives or proxies.
QUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS
The companies Act does not specify the qualifications that somebody should have to be
appointed as directors.
APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS
Directors are appointed in accordance with the provision of the articles and of the Act as
follows
If the article does not indicate the first directors then all the subscribers to the
memorandum are considered to be the first directors of the company.
Such a director will serve until the next Annual General Meeting when he will be eligible
for re- election /re-appointment
DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS
Directors may be disqualified either by the Act or by the articles on the following
grounds
Where a director has failed to take up share qualification
Where a director is undischarged bankrupt
If he becomes a person of unsound mind
If he is restrained by the court after been found guilty of fraud or mismanagement.
If he resigns from office by giving a written notice to the company
If he has not attained the age of qualification
If he is absent without permission for more than six months
Directors are considered to be agents of the company and therefore they can enter into
transactions and contracts on behalf of the company.
This means that the actions of the directors will bind the company .
However there are certain circumstances when a director will be held personally liable to
third parties for any contract they enter into. These are
Directors are considered to be trustees of the company’s assets and money and therefore
there exist a fiduciary relationship between the company and the director where the
director is required to act honestly in good faith and for the best interest of the company.
DIRECTORS' POWERS
Under various sections of the Act the following powers, subject to any restriction placed
by the articles can be exercised by the board only by means of resolutions passed at
meetings of the board and not by circulation:
i) The power to make calls
ii) The power to issue debentures;
iii) The power to borrow moneys otherwise than on debentures;
iv) The power to invest the funds of the company; and
v) The power to make loans.
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
These duties arise due to fiduciary relationship that the directors have with the company
as trustees. These duties include
Duty to always act honestly
Duty to always act in good faith
In case of breach of fiduciary duty company and the members can have the following
remedies.
Removal of director from office.
Sue for damages/compensation.
Sue for injunction order to prevent continuous breach.
In case of a contract the company can sue for rescission of the contract.
In case the director has made secret profit he may be required to account for the
profit to the company.
This duty was previously highlighted or explained in the case of city equity fire insurance
company co ltd (1925)
Facts
The directors of an insurance company left the entire management of the company’s
affairs in the hands of the managing director. They never enquired about what was
happening in the company .Due to the managing director fraud and negligence the
company’s assets and money were lost .When they were sued the court held that the
directors were protected from the liability by the company’s articles and therefore the
court did not hold them accountable. In delivering his judgment the court explained the
duties of the directors in the following propositions
A director need not to exhibit /show in performance of his duties a greater degree of skills
than may reasonably be expected from a person of his knowledge ,experience or the law
that expects from him is to serve the company honestly and to the best of his ability.
A director is not bound to give continuous attention to the affairs of the company because
his duties are alternating in their nature and can be performed periodically.
The director can delegate his duties to the officers of the company provided there is no
suspicion that the officer will not perform his duties honestly.
Vacation of office
The office of the director can be vacated under the following circumstances
If the director becomes disqualified
If the director retires
If the director resigns by giving a written notice
If the director dies while in office
If the company is dissolved after liquidation
If the director is removed through a resolution by the members
Removal of a director
The members of a company can remove a director from office by passing a resolution to
that effect.
The procedure of removing the director is as follows
The proposal to remove the director should be sent to the company as a special
notice .A copy must be given to the director concerned.
The company will convene a general meeting with the business to remove the
director
The resolution to remove the director is discussed. The concerned director must be
given an opportunity to make presentations either orally or in writing.
The resolution is voted for and if supported by simple majority then the director
stands removed.
Within 14 days of his removal the company must notify the register.
REGISTER OF DIRECTORS
NB if the director of a company is a corporate body or firm then the following details
should be included in the register
The firm /corporate name
The firms registered office
The legal form of the body example whether a partnership ,cooperative etc
The law under which it is registered and governed
Details of its registration
Since directors are not employees of the company they are not entitled to any
remuneration.
However the articles of association can make a provision for directors to be remunerated.
Such remuneration must be authorized by the members who will pass an ordinary
resolution during the Annual General Meeting.
In addition any remuneration that is paid to directors must be disclosed in the company’s
financial statement in accordance with financial reporting standards.
The companies Act does not prevent a company from making payment to directors as a
compensation for loss of office. Such payment must however be disclosed and approved
by the members.
Directors are personally liable to outsiders if they do not act within the powers that have
been given to them by the company’s articles. For example if they contract in their own
capacity or they fail to indicate that they are acting on behalf of the company
Criminal liability
This arises where directors commit crimes either under the companies act or under any
other law .For example where they have committed insider trading.
LOANS TO DIRECTORS
Under the companies act it is unlawful for the company to make loans to a director
including guaranteeing loans to directors.
These restrictions do not apply under the following circumstances
b) It’s unlawful, in connection with the transfer of the whole or any part of the
undertaking or property of a company, for any payment to be made to any director
of the company by way of compensation for loss of office or on retirement unless
particulars are disclosed and approved. If such a payment is not disclosed, the
director holds it upon trust for the company.
c) If a payment is made to a director as compensation for loss of office or on his
retirement where the shares of the company are being transferred, he must take
reasonable steps to ensure that the particulars of the proposed payments are
disclosed in the offer. If this is not done, the director holds the payment on trust
for the persons who have sold their shares as a result of the offer.
d) Payments made to any director by way of compensation for loss of office do not
include any bona fide payment by way of damages for breach of contract or by
way of pension in respect of past services.
Directors of a company are required to make certain disclosures as required by the act
and for the purpose of promoting good governance in the company.
This doctrine is to the effect that a third party who is dealing with the company is not
obligated to inquire whether the company’s internal procedures have been followed or
not.
The law only requires such a person to have a constructive notice about the contents of
the company’s public documents.
Turquand was a liquidator of the company that had taken a loan of 2000 pounds from the
Royal British Bank by issuing a bond to that bank. However the amount had not been
paid when the company went into liquidation. According to the company’s articles the
directors had the power to borrow that was authorized by an ordinary resolution. In this
particular case however no such a resolution had been passed even though the bond was
issued under the common seal of the company and signed by the directors and the
company secretary. Turquand had refused to pay arguing that the loan was not properly
authorized due to lack of resolution. The court held that the company was liable to pay.
The court explained that a person dealing with the company is only required to have a
constructive notice but is not obligated to enquire whether the internal procedures of the
company have been followed or not.
This rule is to the effect that the majority in a company will always have the say in terms
of decision making as long as those decisions are made within the provisions of the
articles and of the companies act.
Where the majority makes decision that are within the law then the court will not
interfere with the majorities decision.
The majority rule is also called the RULE IN FOSS VS HARBOTTLE (1843)
The defendants on the other hand were directors and other shareholders in the company.
The plaintiff alleged that the defendant had defrauded the company in various ways and
in particular some of them had sold their own land to the company at an exaggerated
price.
They therefore requested the court to order the defendants to make good the losses that
the company had suffered.
The court held that it was incompetent for the plaintiffs to bring such case because the
right to do that belonged to the company in its corporate character.
The court explained that when a wrong is committed against the company then the proper
plaintiff is the company itself.
Irregularity principle
If what is complained of is an internal irregularity which can be confirmed by the
majority then the court will not interfere.
Minority protection
Where the decision of the majority violates rights or amounts to oppression of minority
then a member of the company can take action against the majority and the directors
It is called derivative action because a member will derive the right to sue from the rights
of the company.
The companies act has a number of provisions whose impact is to protect the members
and their interests.
These provisions include
Where the decision is made by the majority to alter the company’s articles .The
member can make a petition to prevent the alteration.
Variation of class rights
If the decision is made to vary the rights of a given class of shares then holders of
that class have a right to stop the variation.
If the directors fail to convene an Annual General Meeting the members can make
a petition to the registrar or to the court to have the Annual General Meeting
convened.
Members can require the directors to convene a general meeting. If the directors
refuse or fail then the members can convene the general meeting on their own.
Members have powers to pass a resolution to appoint an inspector to investigate
the affairs of the company.
During a takeover bid a member can make a petition to the court to stop the
takeover even where it has been approved by the majority.
A member of the company has a right to file a petition in court for compulsory
winding up of the company if they have a good reason to do that.
Insider dealing occurs where an individual or organisation buys or sells securities while
knowingly in possession of some piece of confidential information which is not generally
available and which is not likely, if made available to the general public, to materially
affect the price of the securities. For example, where a company director who is aware
that the company is in a bad financial state sells his shares knowing that this information
will be made public with an announcement of a cut in dividend payment.
It is argued that the use of insider information is unfair to those who deal with the insider,
though it is difficult to identify the looser since the transaction takes place on the stock
exchange. However, a person who buys something which turns out to be worthless than
the price paid for it may feel aggrieved. In principle, dealings in a market generally
reflect the value of the security if all the information used in valuation is available to both
buyers and sellers. Information generally used by those involved in company securities
relate to:
(i) World trade in the particular market in which the company is trading
(ii) Economy of the country
(iii) How the company is handling its affairs.
With the expansion of dealings in stock exchange, it has become evident that taking
advantage of inside information is fraudulent on other investors and could lower public
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 185
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
confidence in the stock exchange, and for officers of the company, this amounts to a
breach of trust since the information is obtained in the course of their employment.
In such a case, the officer’s decision and his own desire to trade advantageously in the
company’s shares may conflict and such conduct is likely to bring the company into
disrepute. It is thereof recognised that it is wrong for a director or another to deal in a
company’s securities knowing of some development which is likely to affect the price of
the securities, which other members of the public are generally privy to.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
Wanyoro Ltd is a public company. Its directors have decided to venture into transport
busihesi by acquiring a fleet of public service vehicles. They did not notice that this
activity is outside its objects clause. The company’s chairman, Ann Omesa who owns
10% of the voting shares negotiated a loan which was in excess of the company’s issued
capital from Joan Mekonge, a financier.
Joan Mekonge did not refer to any of the company’s registered documents nor did she
inquire into the purpose to which the money would be put. The money is used by the
directors to pay part of the purchase price of the vehicles. The test of the purchase price
remains unpaid. Some members who hold a substantial amount of shares in Wanyoro Ltd
intend to move a resolution to insert into the memorandum, an object permitting the
acquisition and use of the vehicles. One of the directors of Wanyoro Ltd announces that if
this is done, he will apply to court to have the new object clause quashed.
QUESTION 2
Explain four circumstances under which the office of a director might be vacated.
QUESTION 3
Angela Wanjiku and Christabel Ochieng’ had been carrying on business as a partnership,
sharing profit and losses equally. Christable Ochieng’ wished to introduce her son Abel
Ochieng’ into the business and Angela Wanjiku consented. They converted the
partnership into a limited liability company now known as ACA Company Ltd. Angela
Wanjiku and Christabel Ochieng’ each hold 40% of the total shares issued and the
balance is held by Abel Ochieng’. They are also directors of the company.
Soon after the company was formed, misunderstandings arose between Angel Wanjiku
and Christabel Ocheng’ regarding the day to day management of the business. Christabel
Ochieng and her son Abel Ochieng’ decided to expel Angela Wanjiku from the board of
directors. They have now resolved to remove her from the board of the company.
Advise Christabel Ochieng’ and Abel Ochieng on the steps they should take in order to
remove Angela Wanjiku from being a director of the company.
QUESTION 4
(a) It is unlawful for a company to make a loan to any person who is its director or
director of its holding company or extend a guarantee or provide security in
connection with a loan.
Discuss the exceptions to the above rule.
(b) In relation to the duties of directors:
(i) Summarize the facts in Re City Equitable Fire Insurance Co. Ltd. (1925).
(ii) Discuss three propositions of care, skill and diligence as enumerated in the above
case.
QUESTION 5
Outline four circumstances under which a director would become personally liable.
QUESTION 6
The articles of association of Xanadu Ltd. authorised the appointment of a managing
director who is entitled to exercise all the powers of the board.
Simon Sixte assumed the duties of managing director, although no formal appointment to
that position had been made.
The other directors have no knowledge of Simon Sixte's activities, largely because they
do not concern themselves with the day-to-day running of the company.
In the course of executing the duties of a managing director, Simon Sixte commissioned
David Dunga to install a new heating system in the company factory. This act is intra-
vires. The work is carried out satisfactorily but the company refuses to pay for it.
With reference to decided case, advise David Dunga on the action to take again the
company
QUESTION 7
(a)It was held by Greer L. J in Shaw v Shaw (1935) that "they cannot themselves usurp
the powers which by the articles are vested on the directors any more than the directors
can usurp the powers vested by the Articles in the general body of shareholders."
Discuss the exceptions to the above rule.
(b)Warren Lomi was the Chairman of a company who with two other directors, agreed to
buy shares from Anne Omesa at Sh.120 each. Anne Omesa found out that the directors
had been negotiating with Ben Kigo for the sale of the whole company at far more than
Sh.120 per share. The directors had not disclosed this information to Anne Omesa, Anne
Omesa claimed breach of fiduciary duty.
Discuss the extent to which Warren Lomi might be regarded as a trustee to Anne Omesa
as an individual shareholder.
QUESTION 8
Discuss the rights of a director with regard to recovering remuneration anc compensation
from the company for loss of office.
QUESTION 9
Chengo Ltd., a public limited company whose articles are in the form of Table A decided
to purchase tankers to transport wine to Burundi.. However, its directors failed to
recognise that this purchase falls outside the company's objects clause. The company's
chairman who owns 10% of its shares negotiated for a loan which was in excess of the
company's issued share capital from Iko Bank, a financier. The Bank did not refer to any
of the company’s registered documents nor did it inquire about the purpose into which
the money would be put.
The directors of Chengo Ltd. used the money to pay part of the purchase price for the
tankers, and the rest in the purchase of a wine store. While on its way to Burundi, one
tanker exploded thereby damaging a trailer owned by Triple H,
Some members of Chengo Ltd. who holds large blocks of shares in the company intend
to pass a resolution to alter the memorandum of association retrospectively to insert an
object permitting the acquisition and use of the tankers.
However, one of the directors has dissented and maintairis that if this is done, he will
move to court.
Discuss the legal principles in the above case and advise the directors of Chengo Ltd.
QUESTION 10
Boaz Tito was appointed as director of Bantex Limited in the last annual general meeting
of the company. Boaz intended to invest in a piece of land and therefore applied for a
loan for the purpose. His loan application was not approved.
Boaz Tito feels aggrieved after learning that a junior employee who applied for a loan at
about the same time was granted the loan.
Advise Boaz Tito on the circumstances under which a company could grant a loan to a
director of the company
QUESTION 11
a) “Directors are trustees of the company's assets as well as agents of the company. This
position as trustees is however different from that of ordinary trustees, though similar
in some aspects”
Elaborate on the above statement
b) Jairo Mandevu a director of Holiday hotel limited signed an agreement not to solicit
for the hotel’s customers upon leaving the company
Jairo Mandevu, who has since retired from the company established his own company
in the hotel industry to carry on business, which if he had done so personally would
be in breach of the agreement with Holiday Hotel limited.
Citing relevant case law advice Holiday Hotel Limited on the available remedy
against Jairo Mandevu.
QUESTION 12
Highlight the circumstances under which a director of disqualified from holding office
QUESTION 13
a) “A person dealing with a company is entitled to assume in the absence of facts
putting him on doubt, that there has been due compliance with all matters of internal
management and procedure required by the articles”
With reference to the rule in Kenya British Bank vs. Tarquand (1856) discuss the
above statement
QUESTION 14
John Makori is a non-executive of Kuzi limited, a listed company, shortly after attending
a board meeting where arrangements were finalized for an agreed take-over bid of the
company by Bama Limited. John Makori bought shares in Kuzi Limited from the listing
in the stock exchange.
John Makori thereafter bought shares of the same company from Jane Amani, a
shareholder.
Immediately the takeover was made public, John Makori sold all the shares he had
bought at a profit
a) Discuss whether Kuzi Limited Jane Amani and Bama Limited have an action
against John Makori for recovery of the profit.
b) Explain whether or not John Makori has committed the offense of insider dealing.
QUESTION 15
With reference to company law; discuss the provisions which govern the removal of a
director from office before expiry of his tenure.
QUESTION 16
i. Discuss the circumstances under which providing financial assistance by a company
may be held to be lawful.
ii. Outline the legal requirements that the directors of a company should comply with
in order to protect creditors before providing financial assistance to any recipient.
QUESTION 17
Discuss the duties of directors in relation to disclosure of interest and state the legal
consequences of non-disclosure.
QUESTION 18
Abel and Boaz have been carrying out business as a partnership. They have both been
employed on full time basis in the business and have shared profits and losses equally.
Abel wished to bring his son David into the business and Boaz accepts the proposal.
They wish to convert the partnership into a private limited company, ABD Company
Ltd., in which Abel and Boaz will each hold 40 percent of the shares and David will hold
20 per cent. All the three shareholders will be directors of the new private company.
After ABD Company Ltd. was formed, there arose a disagreement between Boaz and
David regarding the day-to-day management of the business. Abel and David decided to
remove Boaz from the board of directors.
Explain the procedure that Abel and David should follow to effect the removal of Boaz as
a director of the company.
QUESTION 19
In pursuit of good corporate governance practices by directors, enumerate the best
practices relating to directors which would promote and protect the shareholders rights.
QUESTION 20
a. What are the directors’ rights with regard to receiving remuneration a compensation
for loss of office?
b. Outline the procedure that a company must follow if it wishes to offer a directly a
service contract for more than five years.
c. Although the directors of a company are its agents, they are also held trustees of the
company’s money and property. However, their position trustees of the company
differs from that of ordinary trustees.
Discuss.
QUESTION 21
In what circumstances can a court make a disqualification order against a director of a
company?
QUESTION 22
The procedure to be followed to remove a director from office.
QUESTION 23
In relation to company law, explain the powers and fiduciary duties of the board of
directors of a company.
TOPIC 9
This is the officer appointed by the directors of a company as responsible for ensuring
that firm's legal obligations under the corporate legislation are complied with. The office
of the Company Secretary, Corporate Secretary or Board Secretary is in charge of legal
and regulatory compliance at Board level. A company secretary is not automatically an
employee of the company but remains a principal officer under the Act.
The office of the Company Secretary is created by the Section 198(1) of the 2015
Companies Act which states that every company must have a Company Secretary.
Specifically however, Company Secretaries are provided in Part XII of the 2015
Companies Act of Kenya.
Section 243 provides that a private company is required to have a company secretary only
if it has a paid up capital of KES 5,000,000 or more.
Under Section 243, if a private company does not have a company secretary:
1. Anything required to be done by the CS may be done by a director or any other
authorized person
2. Anything required to be served on the CS may be served on the company itself or
on any authorized person
Under Section 178 (2) if the office of the Company Secretary is vacant, its function and
duties may be discharged by a deputy or assistant Secretary or delegate of the Board of
Directors.
Section 244 is clear that every public companies are required to have a company
secretary or joint secretaries. Where the AG is satisfied that a company is not complying
with the rule in section 244, he may give direction, under Section 245 as to:
• What the company is required to do in order to comply with the direction;
• The period within which it is to comply (between 1 and 3 months); and
• The consequence of failing to comply with the direction.
Under Section 245 (4) the company shall then comply with the AG’s direction by:
• Making the necessary appointment; and
• Giving notice of the appointment under Section 249, before the end of the period
specified in the direction.
Failure to comply attracts an default fine of KES 500,000 to the company and its officers
and a subsequent daily fine of KES 50,000.
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 193
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
Under the Companies Act the Company Secretary is appointed by the Board of directors
for such term and such other conditions as the board may deem fit. The board is
empowered to remove the Secretary subject to the terms of the appointment.
Under Section 246, the directors of a public company shall take all reasonable steps to
ensure that the secretary or each joint secretary of the company:
a. is a person who appears to them to have the requisite knowledge and experience to
discharge the functions of a secretary of the company; and
b. is the holder of a practising certificate issued under the Certified Public Secretaries
of Kenya Act .
A director of a public company who fails to comply with S.246 commits an offence and
on conviction is liable to a fine not exceeding KES 200,000.
The following persons are disqualified from being appointed company secretaries:
If, in the case of a public company, the office of secretary is vacant, or for any other
reason there is no secretary capable of acting, anything required or authorized to be done
by or to the secretary can be done by or to:
a) An assistant or deputy secretary (if any);
b) Any person capable of acting; or
c) Any person authorized generally or specifically for the purpose by the directors.
Under corporate governance rules, the Company Secretary is tasked with ensuring legal
and regulatory compliance by the Board of directors. His role here includes:
Ensuring good information flows within the Board and its committees
Facilitating the induction of newly appointed Board members
Assist with the professional development of Board members
Advising the Chairman and the Board in general on all governance issues
As a fiduciary, he is liable in damages for breach of any fiduciary duties. He must act in
good faith and must not make a secret profit. He may be held liable to account for any
secret profit made in breach of these duties.
He is criminally liable for:
Failing to publish the company’s name as required.
Failing to register charges.
Failing to make the annual returns.
Failing to make returns on allotment.
Destroying or falsifying the company’s books with intent to defraud.
Particulars in the register of secretaries if the secretary of a public company is a
Natural person
If the secretary of a public company is a natural person, the company shall ensure that its
register of secretaries contain the following particulars
The name and any former name of the secretary
The address of the secretary
a) Directors must pass resolution to remove a secretary; this can be done at a board
meeting or by written resolution.
b) The directors must immediately give the notice to the secretary concerned
c) Record the removal or resignation in the company's register of secretaries.
d) Notify the bank that the secretary is no longer an authorized on the business bank
account.
e) Notify the registrar of the removal within 14 days.
Under Section 248, a public company shall keep a register of its secretaries containing
the required particulars of the person who is, or persons who are, the secretary or joint
secretaries of the company.
Under Section 252, a person who knowingly or recklessly authorizes or permits the
inclusion of misleading, false or deceptive particulars in register of secretaries commits
an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years
or a fine not exceeding KES 1,000,000 or to both
The register of Secretaries is open for inspection at the company’s registered office –
subject to the company’s regulations, by:
Section 248(4) prescribes a fine of KES 500,000 to the company and its officers for
default in maintenance of the register.
A default fine of KES 200,000 applies under Section 249(3) and a further daily default
fine of KES 20,000 under S.249 (4).
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 198
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
NB: Section 254 states that a provision requiring or authorizing a thing to be done by or
to a director and the Secretary of a public company is not satisfied by its being done by or
to the same person acting both as director and as, or in place of, the Secretary.
The Legal position of the Company Secretary
He stands in a fiduciary position in relation to the company and owes it the basic
fiduciary duties i.e. must act bonafide and avoid conflict of interest. He is in a position of
trust, confidence and good faith.
During the 19th century the Company Secretary was regarded as mere servant of the
company with no powers to bind it. In the word of Lord Esher in Barnett Hoarses and
Co. V South London Tramways Co Ltd (1887):
However his status has since changed and he is today regarded as the Chief
Administrative Officer of the company with extensive duties and responsibilities.
“… but the times have changed. A Company Secretary is a much more important person
than he was in 1887. He is an important office of the company with extensive duties and
responsibilities. He is no longer a mere clerk. He is certainly entitled to sign contracts
connected with the administrative side of the company’s affairs.”
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
Explain four duties of a company secretary.
QUESTION 2
Outline the provisions governing the following matters as related to the company
secretary.
(i) Appointment of the company secretary
QUESTION 3
List four omissions for which a company secretary might be held to be criminally liable.
QUESTION 4
Identify four circumstances under which a person might be disqualified from holding the
office of company secretary.
QUESTION 5
Describe the responsibilities of the company secretary.
QUESTION 6
As a fiduciary, a company secretary is liable on damages for breach of this fiduciary
obligations
QUESTION 7
WajuziLtd, was incorporated fourteen months ago. The company has a nominal capital of
sh.80 million.
The directors of Wajuzi Limited are not sure of how to proceed with the operations of the
company Advise the directors on the following matters.
i. Appointment of a company secretary.
ii. Holding of annual general meetings
QUESTION 8
You have been appointed the Company Secretary of Maarifa Company limited Prepare a
memorandum advising the directors on the following matters;-
i) Disclosure of interest in a contract by directors
TOPIC 10
AUDITORS
A natural person or firm is eligible for appointment as an auditor only if the person, or
each partners of the firm-
Is the holder of a practicing certificate issued under the Accountants Act Has a
valid annual license issued under the accountant act.
Statutory auditor, who, at any time during the auditor’s tern of office, becomes
ineligible for appointment as such, shall immediately resign from office, and give
notice to the audited person that the auditor has resigned as a result of having
become ineligible for appointment.
Person may not act as statutory auditor of the company if the person is
An officer or employee of the audited company
A partner or employee of the audited company, or a partnership of which such a
person is a partner
An officer or employee of an associated undertaking of the audited company
-Partner or employee of the audited company or a partnership of which such a
person is a partner.
Disqualified Auditors
A body corporate.
An officer or employee of the company.
A partner or employee of an officer or employee of the company
REMOVAL OF AUDITORS
The provisions of the Companies Act confer upon a company the power to remove an
auditor from office by a resolution at general meeting. Under section 160 (1)
A special notice of the intended resolution to remove an auditor from office must
be given to the company.
Upon receipt of the notice the company must send a copy thereof to the auditor
concerned.
The auditor is entitled to make written representations not exceeding reasonable
length as his defense and may request the company to notify its members the fact
that he has made representations.
The company must convene an extraordinary general meeting to determine the
issue. A special notice of the intended resolution must be sent to every member
and members must be notified that the auditor has made representations if any.
Copies of the representations must be enclosed with the notice of the meeting and
sent to the members. If this is not possible by reason of lateness or default by the
company, the auditor is entitled to have them read out at the meeting. However,
copies of the auditor’s representations need not be sent to members or be read out
at the meeting if upon application by the company or any other aggrieved party,
the Court is satisfied that the auditor is abusing the right to be heard to secure
needless publicity for defamatory purposes. The Court may order the company’s
cost of the application be paid wholly or in part by the auditor.
Within 14 days after a resolution to remove the auditor from office is passed
company shall lodge a copy of the resolution with the registrar for registration.
Resignation of auditor
An auditor of a company may resign office by lodging a notice to that
effect at the registered office of the company
The notice is not effective unless it is accompanied by the statement of the
circumstances connected with the auditor’s ceasing to hold office ,unless the
auditor considers that there are no circumstances in connection with the
cessation of office that need to be brought to the attention of members or
creditors of the company.
An effective notice of resignation ends the auditor’s term of office on the date
on which the notice is lodged or on such a later date as may be specified in the
notice
Within 14 days after an auditor of the company has resigned the company shall
lodge with the registrar for registration a copy of the notice of resignation
REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS
The term “remuneration” refers to any sums paid by the company in respect of his
expenses. The auditor’s remuneration may be fixed by:
Functions of auditors
An auditor shall make a report to the members of the company on all annual financial
statements of the company of which copies are ,during the auditor’s company tenure
in office-
a) In the case of a private company –to be sent out to members
b) In the case of a public company-to be presented at a general meeting of the
company
The auditor shall clearly state in the report whether, in the auditor’s opinion
,the annual financial statements
c) In the case of a group financial statements of the financial position as at the end of the
financial year and of the profit or loss for the financial year of the undertakings to
which the statements relate, taken as a whole ,so far as concerns members of the
company.
Has been prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting
framework.
Has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the companies Act.
State in the report whether the report is unqualified or qualified
Include in the report a reference to any matters to which the auditor wishes to
draw attention without qualifying the report.
the auditor shall state in the auditor’s report on the company’s annual financial
statement whether the auditor’s opinion ,the information given in the director’s
report for the financial year for which the financial statement is prepared is
consistent with that statement
In reporting on the annual financial statement auditor’s of a quoted company,
the auditor shall report to the company’s members on the auditable part of the
director’s remuneration report and state whether in the auditor’s opinion that
part of the director’s remuneration report has been properly prepared in
accordance with this Act.
An auditor shall sign and date the auditor’s report and ensure that the auditor’s
name is prominently displayed in the report.
1. Duty to examine the accounts of the company: it is the duty of the auditor to
examine the accounts of the company, its balance sheet, profit and loss account
and any group accounts vouchers and other material information and make a
report for submission to members at general meeting during his tenure of office.
The auditor’s report must be read out before the company in general meeting and
must be accessible to members.
2. Duty to acquaint himself with his duties: He is bound to acquaint himself with
his duties under Companies Act and the Articles of the company.
3. Duty to execute his task with an inquiring mind: It is the duty of the auditor to
execute his task with an inquiring mind and not with a pre-gone conclusion of
dishonesty. In the words of Lopes L.J Re Kingston Cotton Mills (No. 2 1896), “An
auditor is not bound to be a detective… to approach his work with suspicion or
with a foregone conclusion that there is something wrong. He is watchdog but not
a bloodhound.”
4. Duty to satisfy himself that the company’s securities exist: An auditor is
obliged to satisfy himself that the company’s securities exist and are in safe
custody. However whether he must inspect the documents or accept the assurance
of the officer of the company in possession depends on the circumstances of the
case in the words of Romer J in Re: City Equitable Fire Insurance Co. (1925): “It
is the duty of a company’s auditor in general to satisfy himself that the securities
of the company in fact exist and are in safe custody and whenever an auditor
discovers that the securities of a company are not in proper custody it is his duty to
require that the matter be put right at once.”
5. Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and caution: An auditor is bound to
exercise reasonable care, skill and caution. The standard of care and skill expected
of an auditor is that of a reasonably competent careful and cautious auditor. In the
words of Lopes L.J in Re: Kingston Cotton Mills (No 2 1896):“… it is the duty of
an auditor to bring to bear on the work he has to perform that skill care caution
which a reasonably competent careful and cautions auditor would use. What is
reasonable care, skill and caution must depend on the particular circumstances of
each case.”
6. Duty to Act honestly: An auditor is bound to Act honestly. He must not certify as
true what he does not believe to be true and must take reasonable care and skill
before certifying something as true. In the words of Lindsey J in Re: London and
General bank (1895) “An auditor however is not bound to do more than exercise
reasonable care and skill in making inquiries and investigations… he must be
honest, he must not certify what he does not believe to be true and he must take
reasonable care and skill before he believes that what he certifies is true.”
7. Duty to provide professional advice whenever called upon: It is the duty of the
auditor to provide professional advice whenever called upon to do so. It was so
held in Tomenta v. Selsdon (Foundation) Pen Co Ltd. It is not the duty of the
auditor to take stock. In Re Kingston Cotton Mills Lopes L.J observed, “It is not
the duty the duty of the auditor to take stock. He is not a stock expert. There are
many matters in respect of which he must on the honesty and accuracy of others.
He does not guarantee the discovery of all fraud.”
1. Has a right of access at all times to the company’s accounting records and
financial statements, in what form they are held.
2. Right to attend any general meeting of the company
3. Right to be heard at any general meeting that the auditor attends on any part of the
business of the meeting in the capacity of auditor
4. Entitled to receive all notices of and other communication relating to, any general
meeting which a member of the company is entitled to receive
5. In relation to written resolution proposed to be agreed to by the private company,
the company’s auditor is entitled to receive all such communications relating to the
resolutions as required to be supplied to the member of the company
6. Right to require any of the following persons to provide with such information or
explanations as the auditor thinks necessary for carrying out the responsibilities of
auditor-
7. An officer or employee of the company
8. A person holding or accountable for any of the company’s accounting records or
financial statements
9. A subsidiary undertaking of the company that is a body corporate incorporated in
Kenya
10. An officer ,employee or auditor of any such subsidiary undertaking or any person
holding or accountable for any accounting records or financial statements of any
such subsidiary undertaking
11. A person who at a time to which the information or explanations required by the
auditor relates or relate
LIABILITY OF AUDITORS
Liability to the company
i. Damages for professional negligence
The company has an action in damages against an auditor who has failed to exhibit the
care and skill of a reasonably competent, careful and cautious auditor.
The company must prove that some other auditor would have acted otherwise.
ii. Damages for misfeasance
Although an auditor is not an officer of the company properly so called, case law
demonstrates that he may be held liable in damages for misfeasance committed or
omitted in the course of discharging his obligations.
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 209
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
This was the case in Re: London General Bank where an auditor had failed to detect that
certain items had been over valued resulting in dividends being paid out of capital and it
was held that the auditor was liable in damages for the misfeasance.
There is sufficient proximity of relationship between the defendant and the pursuer
It is fair, just and reasonable to impose a liability on the defendant.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
Outline four matters that are required to be expressed in an auditors’ report.
QUESTION 2
Explain three grounds for removal of an auditor of a company.
QUESTION 3
Highlight four rights of an auditor of a company.
QUESTION 4
Outline four persons who are disqualified from appointment as auditors of a corporate
body.
QUESTION 5
In Hedley Bryne Co. Ltd. V. Heller and Partners Co. Ltd. (1964), the court held that as
long as it could be established that a special relationship existed between parties, it was
possible for a person to sue for having suffered a financial loss even though no
contractual relationship existed between the parties.
With reference to the above ruling:
i) Enumerate six rights accorded to an auditor to enable him perform his duties.
ii) Describe three factors that should be established in' order for a third party to
successfully sue an auditor for professional negligence.
QUESTION 6
Describe how an, auditor's remuneration is fixed
QUESTION 7
XYZ Company limited has been sued severally in the past by individuals who suffered
losses after relying on the audited accounts of the company.
The boards of director have resolved to remove the auditor and have approached you for
advice.
QUESTION 8
Highlight the provisions of the companies Act which govern the rights and duties of the
auditors
QUESTION 9
Analyze the provisions of the companies Act which govern the appointment of auditors
of a company
QUESTION 10
An auditor has been described as “a watchdog but not a blood donor” Re; Kihgsto:
Cotton Mills Company (1896)
With reference to the above statements describe the duties of an auditor and thi remedies
available to a company whose auditors have been- negligent.
QUESTION 11
Explain the rights of auditor of a company.
QUESTION 12
Section 721 (I) of the companies Act stipulates that every company shall appoint an
auditor or auditors to hold office.
a. Discuss the main obligations of an auditor
b. Explain the ways in which the auditor’s remuneration is fixed
QUESTION 13
Briefly explain the grounds on which a person may be disqualified from being appointed
as an auditor of a company
QUESTION 14
Discuss the ways in which the traditional role of an auditor has been affected by recent
demands by regulatory authorities and shareholders.
QUESTION 15
a) Compare the position of directors with that of auditors in respect to the standard duty
of skill and care expected of them.
b) Explain the rules that govern the appointment and removal of an auditor of a
company.
QUESTION 16
(a) Explain the category of persons to whom an auditor owes a duty of care in the
preparation of his audit report.
(b) Enumerate the rights accorded to an auditor to enable him perform his duties as the
auditor of a company.
(c) In Hedlev Byrne V. Heller (1964) the court held that provided that it could be
established that a special relationship existed between parties it was possible for a
person to sue for having suffered a financial loss even though no contractual
relationship existed between the parties.
Highlight the factors that should be established in order for a third party to successfully
sue an auditor for professional negligence.
TOPIC 11
COMPANY ACCOUNTS
Introduction
As a safeguard to creditors, investors and shareholders, there is a statutory
obligation placed upon every company to keep proper books of accounts and to
make an annual return to the registrar giving certain information regarding the
financial position. The books must give a true and fair view of the state of the
company’s affairs and to explain its transaction.
Under the provisions of the Companies Act, companies are obliged to keep
certain books of accounts known as the Annual Financial Statements in the
English language.
Every company must keep proper books of accounts with respect to:
• All sums of money received and expected by the company and the
matters in respect of which the receipt and expenditure takes place.
• All sales and purchases of goods by the company.
• The assets and liabilities of the company
Under the 2015 Act, regulations on companies and small companies as concerns
Company Accounts vary. Under Section 623, a company is deemed a “small company” if
any two of the following conditions apply:
a) It has a turnover of not more than KES 50Million;
b) The value of its net assets as shown in its balance sheet as at the end of the year is
not more than KES 20M; and
c) It does not have more than 50 employees on average per year.
However, S.626 excludes the following companies from the small companies regime
identified above:
a) A public company
S.628 is clear that every company shall keep proper accounting records i.e. records
which:
a) show and explain the transactions of the company;
b) disclose with reasonable accuracy, the financial position of the company at
that time; and
c) enable the directors lo ensure that every financial statement required to be
prepared complies with the requirements of the 2015 Companies Act.
Default fine: Company = KES 2M fine; Natural person = KES 1M fine and/or 2yrs
imprisonment
S.630 dictates that these are to be maintained in the company’s registered office.
Default fine: Company = KES 2M; Natural person = KES 1M fine and/or 2yrs
imprisonment
S.636 dictates that the AFS so prepared must give a true and fair view of the assets,
liabilities, profit or loss of the company, failing which a default fine of KES
500,000 applies.
BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS
Section 628 imposes a strict obligation upon the company to keep proper
books of accounts of respect to:-
All sums of money received and spent by the company and the matters in
respect with which the receipts and expenditure take place (cash book).
All sales and purchases of the goods by the company.
The assets and liabilities of the company.
The books of accounts must be kept in English language at the registered
office of the company or at such other place as may be determined by the
directors. If kept at a place outside Kenya, returns regarding the business
recorded in such books are to be made to the registrar at interval not exceeding
six months.
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 216
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
The books and returns are to be open for inspection by the directors.
The articles also make provisions for the inspection of the books by members
of the company but no members shall have the right except as conferred by
statutes or authorized by directors or by the company’s general meeting. The
responsibility of preparing the books of accounts rests on the directors and
default in this renders the directors liable to a fine.
Default in laying the financial statements renders the officers of the company
liable to a fine not exceeding sh.500, 000.
Exception
1. A member of a company without share capital
2. Where the shareholder’s address is not known
Any loans made to any officer of the company or by its subsidiaries during the
financial year.
Particulars of employees’ salaries.
GROUP ACCOUNTS
Section 639 imposes an obligation on a holding company to present to its
members alongside its own annual accounts group, accounts relating to the state
of affairs of the company and its subsidiaries. This is one of the occasions when
the veil of incorporation is lifted by statute so that the holding and subsidiary
companies are treated, though separate as one entity.
When the financial years of a group of companies do not coincide, the registrar may
relieve a holding company or a subsidiary company from holding an Annual General
Meeting in a calendar year where it is desirable to extend financial year to coincide
with that of its subsidiary or holding company. However, the directors are required to
There must also be attached to the holding company’s books laid before the General
Meeting a report by the directors. The report must show:-
The state of the company’s affairs
The amount, if any, they recommended to be paid as dividends
The amount, if any, they propose to carry to reserves
A fair review of the business during the year and at the end of the year. The
names of directors who have held office at any time during the year.
Details of any acquisition by a company of its own shares.
Directors’ interests in the shares or debentures of the company at the
beginning and end of the year if not shown elsewhere in the accounts.
DIRECTORS REPORT
Under Section 653 of the Act, the directors of a company shall prepare a
directors’ report for each financial year of the company. For a financial year in
which;-
(a) The company is a parent company; and
(b) The directors of the company prepare a group financial statement; the
directors shall prepare a group director's report relating to the undertakings
to which the financial statement relates.
If appropriate, a group directors' report may give greater emphasis to the matters
that are significant to the undertakings to which the group financial statement
relates, taken as a whole.
(a) The names of the persons who, at any time during the financial year, were
directors of the company; and
(b) The principal activities of the company during the course of the year.
the directors shall specify in the report amount (if any) that the directors
recommend should be paid as a dividend.
Business Review
The directors will have to include also in the report a business review, so that
their performance can be assessed by the stakeholders of the company.
In the case of a quoted company, the directors shall specify in the business
review (to the extent necessary for an understanding of the development,
performance or position of the company);-
- the main trends and factors likely to affect the future development,
performance and position of the business of the company;
- information about environmental matters (including the impact of the
business of the company on the environment);
- information about the employees of the company;
- information about social and community issues, including information on
any policies of the company in relation to those matters and the
effectiveness of those policies; and
- Information about persons with whom the company has contractual or other
arrangements that are essential to the business of the company.
As soon as practicable after the directors have finished preparing their annual
report for the company, they shall approve the report and arrange for one of
them or the secretary of the company to sign it.
TOPIC 12
AUDIT OF COMPANY ACCOUNTS
AUDITORS’ REPORT
Section 162 provides that the auditors shall make a report to the members on the accounts
examined by them, and on every balance sheet, every profit and loss account and all
group accounts laid before the company in general meeting.
This is provided for in the seventh schedule to the Companies Act and includes the
following:
1. Theauditorsshouldstatewhethertheyhaveobtainedalltheinformationandexplanations
which to best of their knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of
their audit.
2. Whether, in their opinion, proper books of account have been kept by the
company, so far as appears from their examination of those books, and proper
returns adequate for the purposes of their audit have been received from branches
not visited by them.
3. Whether the company’s balance sheet and (unless it is framed as a consolidated
Profit and Loss account) Profit and Loss account dealt with by the report are in
agreement with the books of account and returns.
4. Whether, in the auditors’ opinion and to the best of their information and
according to the explanations given to them, the said accounts give the
information required by the Companies Act in the manner so required and give a
true and fair view:
5. In the case of the balance sheet, of the state of the company’s affairs as at the end
of its financial year
6. In the case of the profit and loss account, the profit or loss for its financial year,
7. Or as the case may be, give a true and fair view thereof subject to the non-
disclosure of any matters (to be indicated in the report) which by virtue of Part III
of the Sixth Schedule are not required to be disclosed.
8. In the case of a holding company submitting group accounts whether in their
opinion, the group accounts have been properly prepared in accordance with the
provisions of this Act so as to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs and
profit or loss of the company and its subsidiaries dealt with thereby, so far as
concerns members of the company, or, as the case may be, so as to give a true and
fair view thereof.
The report drawn up by the auditors must be attached to the accounts when sent to
the members (Section 156) and it shall be read before the company in general
meeting and shall be open to inspection by any member. (Section 162(2)).
ANNUAL RETURNS
Section 705 of Act states that every company having a share capital must file an annual
return (report) with the register once every year.
The return shall consist of the information required to be given to the registrar at the end
of the year.
The return must be prepared and filed with the registrar within 28 days after the date to
which is made up. If a company fails to lodge an annual return as required, the company
and each officer who is in default shall be liable to a fine not exceeding sh.200,000.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
Group accountants need not deal with a subsidiary of company.
QUESTION 2
Summarize the provisions of the Companies Act which govern the content of books of
account of a limited company.
QUESTION 3
Highlight the circumstances under which group accounts need not deal with a subsidiary
of the company.
QUESTION 4
b) Explain the purpose of a profit and loss account of a company
c) With reference to company law, outline the books of account that a company is
required to maintain
QUESTION 5
Explain the provisions of the Companies Act, that govern the maintenance of books of
account of a company
TOPIC 13
COMPANY INVESTIGATION
b) In case of a company not having share capital by not less than 1/10 of the members.
The court before acting may require members to file convincing evidence of matters
requiring investigation.
Before acting on members’ application, the court will require evidence of matters they
require investigation. The court may require such members to deposit an amount not
exceeding sh.500,000 to meet the costs of investigation.
a) The business of the company is being conducted with intent to defraud creditors
or for some other fraudulent/unlawful purpose
b) Where persons concerned with formation of the company have been guilty of
fraud or other misconduct towards a company or its members
c) Where members of the company have not been given all the information with
respect to its affairs.
POWERS OF INSPECTORS
1. An inspector is empowered to investigate the holding or subsidiary company of
the company under investigation if such investigation is necessary.
2. The inspector also has the power to administer oath to witnesses e.g. company
members and officials.
3. Examine persons under oath.
4. Require officers of the company to produce books and furnish such information or
explanation as may be necessary.
5. Apply to the Court to have persons whom he can’t examine, examined by the
Court for purposes of the investigation.
Expenses of Investigations
Section 799 is clear that the costs of investigation shall be borne by:
If satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for doing so, the Attorney General shall
appoint one or more competent inspectors to investigate and report on the membership of
a company for the purpose of determining the persons:
a) who are or have been financially interested in the success or failure, real or
apparent, of the company; or
b) who are able to control or materially influence the policy of the company.
The inspector may be required to prepare interim and/or a final report of the
investigations to the Court – S.797.
As soon as practicable after an interim report, or the final report, is submitted to the
Court, the Court shall:
The Court may also order that the report be published in such publications (including a
website) as it may direct.
The Court may, under S.798, submit a copy of the report to the office of the DPP if it
appears, from the investigations and the attendant report, that a person has committed an
offence for which the person is criminally liable.
Expenses of Investigations
Section 799 is clear that the costs of investigation shall be borne by:
If satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for doing so, the Attorney General shall
appoint one or more competent inspectors to investigate and report on the membership of
a company for the purpose of determining the persons:
a) Who are or have been financially interested in the success or failure, real or
apparent, of the company; or
b) who are able to control or materially influence the policy of the company.
The Attorney General must consider that such proceedings are in the public interest.
Applicable offences
a) Destroying, mutilating, or falsifying
Fine not exceeding KES 1M; or
company documents.
S.818
Imprisonment not exceeding 7
b) Making a false entry in company documents
years; or Both
1. Noncompliance with provisions of the Act: If the Registrar has reasonable cause to
believe that the provisions of the Act are not being compiled with by the company, he
may initiate an investigation into the Company’s affairs.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
Describe five persons who are responsible for meeting the expenses of an investigation
by an inspector appointed by the court.
QUESTION 2
Outline three powers of an inspector appointed to investigate the affairs of a company.
QUESTION 3
Outline four persons to whom the court might forward a copy of the report made by a
company inspector.
QUESTION 4
Highlight the conditions to be satisfied in order for the court to appoint competent
inspectors to investigate the affairs of a company in the following instances:
i) In a company having a share capital.
ii) In a company not having a share capital.
QUESTION 5
(a) Explain five duties of an official receiver.
(b) Describe five ways through which a person could cease to be a member of the
committee of inspection.
QUESTION 6
Discuss the legal provisions relating to investigation of company accounts, audit and
investigation by the registrar,
QUESTION 7
The law requires that certain statutory books must be kept in the registered offices of the
company.
Explain the contents and matters relating to inspection of the following statutory books:
a) Register of members.
b) Register of directors
c) Register of directors’ interests.
d) Register of charges.
e) Register of secretaries.
TOPIC 14
CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
Restructuring refers to a process that involves changing the company’s structure to make
it more viable and a going concern.
The change can either be on the capital structure or the overall business structure.
Capital restructuring can be done for the following reasons
To improve the competitiveness of the company in the market or industry
To prevent the company from going into liquidation
To overcome financial difficulties that the company may be facing
To enter into a compromise or arrangement with the creditors over the company’s
debts
To reorganize the overall company capital structure
To improve the capacity or the objectives of the company
MERGERS
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 232
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
Merger means an arrangement whereby the assets of two or more companies become
vested in or under the control of one company.
It involves combining the original social technical systems of the merging organizations
into one newly combined system
Disadvantages of mergers
RECONSTRUCTION
This is a procedure that involves the alteration of the capital structure and rebuilt it again.
This can be achieved through reduction of capital, increase of capital, variation of class
rights etc.
The procedure of reconstruction involves the following steps
The company should do away with possible objections by the creditors either by
paying off the debts, providing the security for debts or obtaining consent from
them.
Company can convene a general meeting with the agenda of presenting the
proposal to the members of the company to approve
During the meeting the members will consider the proposal and vote for it .
If the proposal is supported by a minimum of 75% of the votes then the proposal is
passed.
A copy of the resolution must be filed with the registrar
SCHEMES OF ARRANGEMENT
This involves a reorganization of the company share capital by entering into a
compromise with the company’s creditors and members.
Steps/procedure for a scheme of arrangement is as follows
An application is made to the High Court ,so that the court can allow a meeting of
the members and creditors to consider the scheme
If the court authorizes, separate meetings of members and creditors are convened
to consider the proposal.
If the scheme is approved by members and creditors with a vote of 75% or more
then the scheme is passed.
Another application is made to the court so that it can approve and allow the
implementation of the scheme.
If the court approves the scheme of arrangement then it can make the following
matters
1. The transfer of the whole or part of the undertaking ,property and liabilities to a
new company
2. Continuation of any legal proceedings.
3. The allotment of shares and debentures.
4. Dissolution of the whole company.
5. Provision for the opposing members/dissenting members.
6. Provision for any incidental and consequential matters that may be necessary to
secure the scheme.
7. A copy of the court order must be delivered to the registrar for registration.
Advantages of a scheme of arrangement
2. The scheme is approved by a majority in number representing not less than 3/4 in
value of creditors or members.
3. The scheme is sanctioned by the court in which case the court will have to
determine
whether the schemes complies with the law
4. Where a scheme of arrangement involves a reduction of capital, the court must not
sanction it unless a special resolution for the reduction of capital is passed in
accordance with the provisions of the Act.
5. A certified copy of the court order and resolution is filed with the registrar
Every creditor or member shall be furnished with a copy of the statement by the company
free of charge. It is the duty of each company director and any trustee of debenture
holders of the company to give notice of his interest in the scheme.
RECONSTRUCTION
It involves transfer of assets of an existing company to a new company. There are two
types of reconstruction namely: (June 2011 Q6B)
- External reconstruction refers to the sale of the business of the existing company
to another company formed for that purpose. In this case, a company is liquidated
and another new company is formed.
- Internal reconstruction refers to internal re organization of financial structure of
the company. It permits the existing company to be continued. Generally the share
capital is reduced to write off the past accumulated losses of the company.
Modes of reconstruction
1. Scheme of arrangement
2. Reduction of share capital
3. Variation of class rights
4. Resale of assets to another company
A takeover scheme involves making an offer for the acquisition of all the voting shares in
that company.
In Kenya takeover bids are governed by the Capital Market Authority and the provisions
of the Companies Act and the Competition Act of 2010.
For public listed companies an entity is assumed to have an intention to take over a listed
company where such an entity or person
Holds more than 25% but less than 50% of the voting shares of the listed company
and acquire more than 5% in any year.
The person holds more than 50% of the voting shares and acquires additional
shares in the listed company.
Where the person acquires the company that holds effective control in the listed
company
The capital market authority can grant exemptions from complying with procedural
regulations under the following circumstances.
PROCEDURE OF TAKEOVER
(i) The offeror is required within 24 hours of making a decision to make a takeover
bid announce the proposed offer by a press notice and serve a notice of intention
in writing of the takeover scheme.
The notice of intention must contain all the information that is required by
CMA,NSE and competition authority and should be delivered to the target
company.
(ii) Within 10 days from the date of service of notice of intention the offerer must serve
the target company with an offeror’s statement which should contain the following
Whether the offer is conditional
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 238
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
(iii) Within the 24 hours of receiving the offeror’s statement ,the target company must
inform the Nairobi security exchange and capital market authority and put the
proposed takeover in the newspapers.
(iv) After receiving the offeror’s statement the target company must appoint an
independent advisor. The independent advisor must prepare an advisor’s circular
and sent a copy of CMA and other copies are distributed to the shareholders of the
target company.
The offeror’s stated intention regarding the continuation of the business of the
offeree
The offeror’s stated intention regarding major changes to be introduced into the
business
The offerors long term commercial justification for the proposed takeover
The offeror’s stated intention with regard to continued employment of the
employees of the offeree
The reasonableness of the takeover including accuracy of the profit forecast of the
offeree
(v) Within 14 days of serving the offeror’s statement the offeror is required to submit
to the Capital Market Authority for approval a takeover offer document which
should contain the following details
Whether the offer is conditional upon acceptance of the offer under the
scheme
Where the shares are to be acquired in whole or in part for cash then the
period with which such payments will be made
Where the shares are acquired through share exchange or swap then the
proportion of share exchange and the period with which the offeree’s
shareholders will receive the new shares.
Whether the offeror is engaged in the same line of business as the offeree and
whether the offer has been approved by the competition authority
(vi) The Capital market Authority should approve the takeover offer document within
30 days after which a copy is sent to the target company.
(vii) After receiving the takeover offer document the target company is required to
circulate the document together with the advisor’s circular to the shareholders .The
shareholders of the target company will consider the document and will be
required to accept the offer within 30 days
(viii) Once the offer is accepted by the shareholders of the target company then the offer
will be closed and the offer must inform capital market authority and Nairobi
security exchange about the closure of the offer.
Period Event
1 day-decision to make a takeover bid is made .
2day -Press notice and notice of intention are made a copy given to capital
1st month market authority and competition authority
12th day-Offeror serves offers statement to target company
13th day-target company informs CMA.NSE and CA about the offer .It also
appoints independent advisor.
26th day-offeror submits offer document to CMA for approval
26th day CMA approves take over document 29th day-CA approves take
over document
30th day-offeror serves approved takeover offer document to the target
2nd month company
3rd month 14th day-the target company issues board circular and circulate approved
take over document and independent circular to the shareholders
29th day –CA approves the takeover proposal
4th month 13th day –closure of the offer
-offeror informs CMA and NSE about the closure and announces the results
through press notice
This is a form of take over where the offeror seeks to acquire a target company whose
management is unwilling to agree to the takeover.
It is also applied where there is in fighting among the shareholders with an intention of
kicking out the current management and shareholders who are troublesome.
There are a number of defences that the management of the target company can use to
defend themselves against the hostile takeover.
Types of mergers
1. Horizontal merger: This is where two or more businesses that are offering the
same products and services in the same market combine their business operation.
2. Vertical merger: This is a merger that involves businesses that are at different
stages or points of their supply chain usually with an aim of controlling the supply
chain.
3. Conglomerate merger: This is the merger that involves businesses or companies
that are in different industries and are offering different products or services to
different customers/markets .
4. Concentric merger: This is a merger that involves business or companies which
are offering different products and services but to the same customers
This refers to all the processes that requires to be done after companies agree to merge in
order to bring together their operations and systems.
Their activities are intended to realign the employees and the system of the merging
parties into one operation.
Post merger integrations may end up having different post merger objectives depending
on the merging parties.
The four main merger integrations that come out of post merger integration includes
(i) Preservation: This is where the dominant party in the merger preserves the other
party making it autonomous. Only financial reporting and financial processes are
integrated.
(ii) Holding: In this case the dominant party in the merger just keeps the ownership of
the other party without integrating anything into its system.
(iii) Symbiosis: In this type of merger the dominant party will only integrate those
processes that will help it to reach its merger objective.
(iv) Absorption: This is where the dominant party fully absorbs the other party in the
merger with all its systems and processes.
REVERSE MERGER
This is the term that is used to refer to a process in which a private company go public
without offering shares directly to the public but through an intermediary.
Such as the investment banks who help the company to sell the shares to the public. It is
also called the reverse initial public offer or reverse takeover.
Since no prospectus is issued not many members of the public may know that the
shares are on offer
There is no guarantee that once the shares are listed their value will improve
The cost of compliance with various regulations is higher
Companies are forced to make a lot of disclosures thereby losing confidentiality.
REVISION
1. Information regarding the offeror- the names of its directors and shareholders who
hold notifiable interest in the offeror and the extent of their holdings.
2. Whether the offeror has any intentions regarding the continuation of the business
of the offeree and if so, stating the offeror's intentions,
3. The offeror's stated intentions regarding major changes to be introduced in the
business, or strengthening the financial position of the offeree
4. Whether there are any long term commercial justifications for the proposed
takeover offer, and if so, stating the long term commercial justifications
5. Whether the offeror has any intentions with regard to the continued employment
of the employees of the offeree company and of its subsidiaries and if so, stating
the offeror’s intentions.
6. A confirmation by a financial adviser of the offeror that the offeror has the
financial capability to accept and carry out the take-over offer in full, where cash
is involved.
7. A statement that the offeror and the offeror’s financial advisers are satisfied that
the take-over offer would not fail due to insufficient financial capability of the
offeror and every shareholder who wishes to accept the take-over offer will be
paid in full.
8. Reasonableness of the take-over offer, including the reasonableness and accuracy
of profit forecasts for the offeree, if any, contained in the offer document,
Legal redress: The targeted company may apply to the regulatory authority
contending that the acquisition will make the predator a monopoly thus breaking
the anti-monopolist laws.
Use of golden parachutes: These are the generous retirement packages to be
granted to the management and employees of the targeted company in the event
the company is taken over. This will significantly reduce the value of the target
company.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
In relation to corporate restructuring, explain the statutory provisions relating to schemes
of arrangement and compromises.
QUESTION 2
Discuss various types of alternatives to corporate insolvency as provided for under the
companies Act.
QUESTION 3
Discuss the information that should be included in an independent adviser’s circular
during a takeover offer.
QUESTION 4
The High Court may make an order whose effect is to implement an approved scheme of
arrangement.
Explain four matters which the court will make provision for when making such an order
QUESTION 5
Discuss the main reasons for facilitating mergers, takeovers and reconstructions as
alternatives to winding up.
QUESTION 6
Distinguish between "a scheme of arrangement’’ and "a reconstruction''.
QUESTION 7
Bubanda Company Limited which is listed on the securities exchange came in with an
offer to buy Helio Company Ltd. The threshold for the deal to go through was that 80%
of Bubanda shareholders should agree.
Seventy one per cent of the company's shareholders agreed to the offer but twenty per
cent declined the offer. After more negotiations Bubanda-Company Limited was able to
convince eighty per cent of the shareholders.
Describe the procedure that Helio Company Ltd. would follow in order to affect the take-
over bid as per the Companies Act.
QUESTION 8
In order for a scheme of arrangement to be effective, the court must make provisions for
certain matters. With reference to the above statement, highlight four matters that the
court must make provision for in a scheme of arrangement.
QUESTION 9
Discuss the various modes of reconstruction as provided for in the Companies Act.
QUESTION 10
b) Distinguish between a scheme of arrangement and a reconstruction of a company
c) Discuss the right of the disserting shareholders under an amalgamation by purchase
of shares
QUESTION 11
(a) Explain the reason why a company would resort to a takeover, merger or a
reconstruction
(b) Highlight the advantages of instituting a scheme of arrangement.
TOPIC 15
The term corporate insolvency refers to a situation where a company is unable to meet its
financial obligations as and when it is required to do so.
Technically the company’s liabilities far exceeds its assets and therefore its not
able to pay its debts when it is required to do so .
Where the company falls into corporate insolvency it can be dealt with in two
major ways which are provided for by the insolvency act of 2015.
Administration/receivership
Winding up/liquidation
APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATOR/RECEIVER
When the court issues an administration order such an order has the following effects
No insolvency proceedings shall be made against the company as long as the order
is there.
The existing legal cases for or against the company can only proceed
with the consent of the administrator.
All the official documents of the company must always indicate the
company is under administration.
The powers of the director will cease during the period of administration.
a person can take steps to repossess goods which are under the
possession of the company if the goods were acquired through hire
purchase
This is a legal procedure by which the life of a company is dissolved and put
into an end . Liquidation process in Kenya is governed by the insolvency act of
2015.
The insolvency Act recognizes the following methods of
liquidation
a) Winding up by the court/Compulsory winding up
b) Voluntary winding up
members voluntary winding up
creditors voluntary winding up
c) Winding up under the supervision of the court.
This is winding up that is initiated by the court after issuing a winding up order.
The order is issued after a petition is filed in court to have the company wind up
compulsorily.
Where the number of members have fallen below the statutory minimum.
Where the company has failed to commence business within one year of
incorporation
Where the company has suspended its business for a whole year.
Where the company is unable to pay its debts
Where the court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable to winding up the
company
Some circumstances which may lead to liquidation on just and equitable grounds
are
the majority.
Where the company is found guilty of engaging in illegal and fraudulent activities.
Where there is complete deadlock in the management of the company
such that the board cannot operate.
Where it is proved that the company is sham/bubble ie it exist only on paper.
LIQUIDATION PROCESS
LIQUIDATOR
body.
Minimum of 2 years experience in insolvency practice.
Minimum of 4 years experience as an apprentice/understudy under an insolvency
practitioner.
Fulfill the requirements of chapter six of the constitution.
Where a liquidator is appointed by the court then his position can be explained as
follows
The liquidator will be an officer of the court
The liquidator is an agent of the company
The liquidator is a trustee of all the creditors
Liquidator is a fiduciary. Therefore he is required to always act honestly and in
good faith
Once the liquidator has realized the assets of the company, paid all the debts
and has distributed the surplus then he can make an application to the court to
be released from his obligations.
The court will require the liquidator to prepare a final report and if there is no
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 255
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
Committee of inspection
This is a group of creditors who are appointed to work with the liquidator during
the liquidation process.
Their main duty is to supervise the work of the liquidator and to fix his remuneration.
VOLUNTARY WINDING UP
It can only be done when the company is solvent and therefore before it
commences the directors are required to make a declaration of solvency.
(i) Two separate general meetings are convened simultaneously for the
members and creditors .The agenda of the meeting are as follows
-Members meeting
Pass a resolution to wind up the company voluntarily Propose a
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 257
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
liquidator
Appoint members of the committee of inspection. Creditors meeting
Receive a statement of affairs from the directors of the company Appoint
a liquidator
Appoint members of committee of inspection
(ii) Where both members and creditors agree on the liquidator then he will
commence his work .If they disagree then the one appointed by the
creditors will become the liquidator.
(iii) if the winding up continues for more than one year then at the end of
each year the liquidator will be preparing a report and convene a general
meeting of both members and creditors and present the report.
(iv) When all the affairs of the company are wound up then the liquidator will prepare a
final report, convene a final general meeting and lay the report for approval.
(v) If the report is approved then a copy will be sent to the registrar together
with an application for the dissolution of the company.
(vi) The registrar will dissolve the company and remove the name from the register of
companies.
This is the form of winding up which usually begins as a voluntary winding up but after
sometime disagreements may arise forcing the members and creditors to seek the
court’s intervention.
When the case comes up to the court the court will issue orders for the winding up to
continue under the supervision of the court thereby converting it to compulsory
winding up.
The court may add another liquidator if there is need. otherwise the existing liquidator
will become an officer of the court as if he had been appointed by the court.
Differences between winding up and receivership
If the company has been dissolved or it has ceased to carry on its business.
Those debts that are proved will be paid in accordance with the priority of the claims as
follows
(a) All the costs and expenses that are properly incurred in the winding
up process including liquidator remuneration.
(b) the preferential debts will be paid next. This includes
Desktop/Laptop Access https://desktop.masomomsingi.com Page 260
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
All taxes and local rates that are due from the company for not more than one
year.
All government rent in arrears for not more than one year.
Wages and salaries payable to the servants of the company up to four months
preceding winding up.
The amount payable under the NSSF and NHIF Act.
Any amount payable under the work injury benefit Act.
(c) Secured creditors will be paid next-this refers to creditors whose debts
were secured by the assets of the company.
Secured creditors have a number of options during liquidation process. These options
are
They can rely on the security and not proof the debt.
They arise the security and proof the balance with the liquidator.
You can value the security and proof the balance with the liquidator
Surrender security to the liquidator and proof all the debts.
Preferential Creditors
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION 1
With respect to corporate insolvency:
i) Highlight three ways in which a liquidator’s power might be terminated
ii) Explain four contents of the official receiver’s report.
QUESTION 2
Sweetwaters Ltd is a private limited company which was incorporated in 1992. The last
annual general meeting (AGM) was held in 2005 and the directors of the company have
refused to convene one. The company is uncontrollable as the directors have become
sworn enemies. Habbakuk Kiprotich, Micah Kimanzi and Obed Kamau have filed a
compulsory winding up petition which has been objected to by John Wanjunji, Luke
Manamba and Peter Nyakach.
Micah Kimanzi and ObedKamau are children of -deceased shareholders while Habakuk
Kiprotich and Peter Nyakach are the only surviving shareholders. Luke Manamba and
John Wanjunji are the legal representatives of their deceased parents.
QUESTION 3
Explain four grounds under which a court might deem it just and equitable to wind up a
company.
QUESTION 4
In the context of companies in financial difficulty, distinguish between “winding up” and
“receivership”.
QUESTION 5
Distinguish between creditor’s voluntary winding-up and members voluntary winding-up
of a company.
QUESTION 6
After 30 days of passing the resolution to wind up through a members voluntary winding
up. Begasoft Co. Ltd gave a notice of the resolution by advertisement in the gazette and
also in some newspaper circulating in the region.
Subsequently, the directors of the company prepared a statement of affairs to that effect.
A liquidator was appointed and exercised the following powers with the sanction of the
court:
• Sold moveable and immoveable assets of the company.
• Employed agents to perform tasks that he was unable to perform.
• Appointed an advocate to assist him in the performance of his duties.
ii) Three powers that the liquidator could have performed without the sanction of the
court
c) During the winding up process, the liquidator realized that the company could not
pay its debts in full within the stated period.
Explain to the liquidator two things he must do.
d) Describe the duties of the liquidator in conclusion or the winding up.
QUESTION 7
Citing the action which should be taken in each case, describe two circumstances when
the official receiver as a liquidator might apply for early dissolution of a company.
QUESTION 8
Highlight the circumstances under which an unregistered company might be wound up.
QUESTION 9
a) Wamati Company Ltd. is a private company incorporated in the year 2000 with ten
shareholders. The last annual general meeting was held in 2008. The directors have
been unable to call for another annual general meeting as they are not on talking
term's.
Three shareholders have filed a petition for winding up of the company. The petition
has however been objected to by some of the other shareholders.
Citing relevant cases, advise the shareholders on the appropriate method of winding
up the company.
b) Describe the legal effects of an appointment of a receiver by the court in the case of
compulsory winding up.
QUESTION 10
Explain six effects of a winding up order.
QUESTION 11
With reference to the law governing dissolution of companies explain:
i) The circumstances under which a company is deemed unable to pay its debts.
ii) The circumstances under which the commissioner of insurance might petition to
wind up an insurance company.
iii) The grounds upon which a contributory is entitled to process a winding up petition.
QUESTION 12
A winding up order for Radar Co. Ltd. was made in October 2011 and a liquidator
appointed to wind up the company.
In September 2010, Pesa Bank Ltd. had granted an overdraft facility of Sh.5 million
secured by a legal charge over the company's freehold factory premises.
In April 2011, the company, which was experiencing financial difficulties, requested the
bank to extend the outstanding overdraft of Sh. 1 million, subject to the bank taking a
floating charge over all the assets of the company.
Advise the liquidator on the legality of each of the above two transactions between Radar
Co. Ltd. and Pesa Bank Ltd.
QUESTION 13
Explain the persons who could present a winding up petition to the court.
QUESTION 14
Explain the powers of the liquidator of a company that are exercisable with sanction of
the court.
QUESTION 15
Describe the procedure to be followed in a members' voluntary winding up of a company.
QUESTION 16
Highlight the circumstances under which a company would be wound-up on just
equitable grounds
QUESTION 17
Sand harvesters limited intends to petition for the winding up of Delta Construction
Company Limited. You are requested to advise them on the following matters
i) The procedure for winding up of a company by the courts
ii) The consequences of a winding up order
QUESTION 18
a) Explain the reasons which could lead to dissolution of a company by a court- order.
b) The directors of Carpets limited wish to cease trading and close down the company
QUESTION 20
a) Explain the circumstances under which a company shall be deemed to be unable to
pay its debts as provided for under the insolvency Act.
b) Discuss the powers of a liquidator, which he may exercise with or without the
sanction of the court as provided for under the insolvency Act.
QUESTION 21
Your former class mate, Mrs. Timrninah Seki, is an investor in one of the quoted
companies in the country. There are speculations that the company is in financial distress
and may be wound up.
QUESTION 22
a) Outline the resolutions which may be passed for voluntary liquidation of a company.
b) State the persons who may petition for the liquidation of a company by the court.
c) Explain the consequences of a voluntary liquidation of a company limited by shares.
QUESTION 23
(a) A court of law has a right to order liquidation of a company.
Explain the grounds for liquidation of a company by the court.
QUESTION 24
Outline the circumstances under which a company may be wound up by the court on just
and equitable grounds.
TOPIC 16
FOREIGN COMPANIES
It is registered
It has applied to be so registered and the application has not been dealt with within
the period prescribed for the purposes of this Act.
Carrying on a business in Kenya includes (but is not limited to)
Contains the information prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of the Act.
Demonstrates that at least 30% of the company’s shareholding is held in Kenyan
citizen by birth
It is accompanied by the prescribed fee ,if any ,and the required documents
Complies with the requirements of the act with respect to the company’s name and
the appointment of the local representative.
Information that a foreign registered company should submit with the Registrar
(Dec 2011Q 5A, May 2014 Q 4A)
Upon delivering the above documents, a foreign company shall have the powers to hold
land in Kenya.
Under section 371 of the Companies Act, every foreign company shall cause the name of
the company and of the country in which the company is incorporated to be stated:
3. In all bill-heads and letter-heads, and in all notices and other official publications
of the company; and
4. If the liability of the members of the company is limited, cause notice of that fact
to be stated in the places mentioned above
Rules governing stating the Name of a foreign company (DEC 2012,Q 2A)
The company shall be liable to a default fine. The liability shall be imposed on the
local representatives.
The company shall be compelled by the registrar to comply.
Within one month after a registered foreign company has ceased to carry on
business in Kenya
,each person who ,on the day when the company’s business in Kenya ceased ,was
a local representative of the company in Kenya shall lodge with the registrar for
registration a notice to that effect.
As soon as practicable after receiving a notice the registrar shall strike the foreign
company’s name off the foreign companies register
If a foreign company’s name is strike off the register the company ceases to be
registered under this act.
If the foreign company is placed in liquidation in its place of origin –
Each person who, on the day when the liquidation proceedings began was a local
representative of the company in Kenya shall ,within one month after the day ( or
within that period as extended by the registrar in special circumstances),lodge with
the registrar
Every foreign company shall state in legible roman letters, the following particulars as
concerns its directors:
His present Christian name, or the initials thereof, and present surname
Any former Christian names and surnames; and
His nationality, if he is not a Kenya citizen
Where a foreign company has delivered to the Registrar the documents, the Registrar
shall, if such documents and particulars are so delivered after the appointed day, certify
under his hand that the company has complied with the requirements; and such
Where a foreign company has, after the appointed day, delivered to the Registrar the
documents and particulars mentioned in Section 366, it shall have the same power to hold
land in Kenya as if it were a company incorporated under this Act.
REGISTRATION OF CHARGES
It shall not be necessary to produce to the Registrar the instrument creating the
charge if the prescribed particulars of it and a copy of it, verified in the prescribed
manner, are delivered to the Registrar for registration; and
The time within which such particulars and copy are to be delivered to the
Registrar shall be 60 days after the date of execution of the charge by the company
or, in the case of a deposit of title deeds, the date of the deposit
Under section 370 of the Companies Act, every foreign company shall, make out a
balance sheet and profit and loss account and, if the company is a Holding Company,
group accounts.
The foreign company will be required to make the accounts out and lay them before the
company in a General Meeting, and deliver copies of those documents to the Registrar
for registration.
However, a foreign company shall not be obliged to comply with the provisions of
section 370 if:
If the accounts are not written in the English language there shall be annexed thereto a
certified translation thereof.
Any process or notice can be sent by registered post to the address which has been
delivered to the registrar if:
The company makes default in delivering to the registrar the name and address of a
person residing in Kenya who is authorized to be served on behalf the company
If the persons whose names and addresses have been so delivered are dead or have ceased
to reside in Kenya or have refused to accept service on behalf of the company or for any
reason cannot be served.
Additionally, the company is also meant to make a return to the Registrar within 30 days
if:
APPLICABLE PENALTIES
Under Section 374, if any foreign company fails to comply with any of the foregoing
provisions of this Part, the company and every officer or agent of the company who
knowingly and wilfully authorizes or permits the default shall be liable to a fine not
exceeding KShs. 1,000 or, in the case of a continuing offence, KShs 100 for every day
during which the default continues.
The registrar has reasonable cause to believe that a foreign company has ceased to have a
place of business in Kenya, he may send by registered post to the person authorized to
accept service on behalf of the company
If the registrar receives an answer to the effect that the company has ceased to have a
place of business in Kenya or does not within three months receive any reply, he may
strike the name of the company off the register.
Any foreign company which has carried on business in Kenya is and is unregistered
within section 357 may be wound up by a Court under section 359 if it ceases to carry on
business in Kenya.
A foreign company may also be wound up by the court under section 358 if:
It is dissolved or has ceased to exist or is carrying on business only for the purpose
of winding up its affairs, or
It is unable to pay its debts, or
The court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company should be
wound up
REVISION QUESTION
QUESTION 1
(c) Explain three matters that a foreign company’s certificate of registration must comply
with.
(d) Outline two liabilities of a local representative appointed by a foreign company.
QUESTION 2
Basil Peters, a Canadian National intends to register a branch office in Nairobi. The head
office will be based in Canada. The company once established will carry out Biometric
research and does not intend to declare profits. All proceeds of trading will be used for
further research. The company is proposed to be a small scale company with about ten
specialist researchers. The company once registered hopes to raise shillings sixty million
over a two year period from a selected group of 9 investors to meet the company’s
research needs.
QUESTION 3
i. Discuss the legal obligations of a foreign company with respect to stating its name.
ii. State two consequences of contravening the legal provisions discussed in (a) (i) above
QUESTION 4
Discuss the information that a foreign registered company should disclose to the registrar
QUESTION 5
Outline the particulars of a prospectus of a foreign company.
QUESTION 6
In relation to companies incorporated outside Kenya, describe the circumstances that
would prompt the registrar of companies to strike off the name of a foreign company
from the register.
QUESTION 7
Explain the legal provisions relating to the display of the name of a foreign company
www.masomomsingi.com Contact: 0728 776 317 Page 275
COMPANY LAW STUDY NOTES
QUESTION 8
Maridadi Company Limited was incorporated in the United States of America. The
directors wish to open a branch in another country and seek your legal advice on the
documents and particulars required to be delivered to .the registrar of companies for the
registration to be effected.
QUESTION 9
i) Identify two types of foreign companies recognized under the companies Act
ii) Outline the legal provisions which govern the issues of a prospectus for subscription
of shares of a foreign company.