0% found this document useful (0 votes)
186 views3 pages

Assignment Solution Week 3

The document outlines various quantum algorithms and their efficiencies compared to classical methods, highlighting specific cases like Deutsch-Jozsa, Bernstein-Vazirani, and Grover's algorithm. It discusses the number of queries required for different algorithms, success probabilities, and circuit representations involving Pauli operators. Additionally, it addresses the measurement patterns and optimal iterations for Grover's algorithm.

Uploaded by

chittoras
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
186 views3 pages

Assignment Solution Week 3

The document outlines various quantum algorithms and their efficiencies compared to classical methods, highlighting specific cases like Deutsch-Jozsa, Bernstein-Vazirani, and Grover's algorithm. It discusses the number of queries required for different algorithms, success probabilities, and circuit representations involving Pauli operators. Additionally, it addresses the measurement patterns and optimal iterations for Grover's algorithm.

Uploaded by

chittoras
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Detailed Solutions: Week 3 Assignment

1. Quantum speedup
(a) Deutsch–Jozsa (DJ). Quantum needs a single oracle query to distinguish constant vs.
balanced functions, whereas any deterministic classical algorithm requires 2n−1 + 1 queries in
the worst case (see Q4). This is an exponential reduction in query complexity.
(b) Bernstein–Vazirani (BV). Quantum uses exactly 1 query; the best classical deter-
ministic method uses n queries. This is a linear (not exponential) improvement.
(c) Integer factorization. Shor’s algorithm runs in polynomial time in log N , while
the best known classical algorithms are sub-exponential but super-polynomial in log N . This
is commonly reported as a super-polynomial (often described as “exponential”) speedup in
n = log N . √
(d) Unstructured search. Grover gives a quadratic speedup O( N ) vs. classical O(N ),
not exponential.
Correct options: (a), (c).

2. 3-qubit Grover: initial angle θ0


3 qubits, N = 2n = 8 basis states and one marked state |101⟩. The equal superposition
With n = P
|s⟩ = √1N x |x⟩ decomposes into “solution/non-solution” as
E
|s⟩ = sin θ0 |w⟩ + cos θ0 w⊥ , where, |w⟩ = |101⟩ is the solution state.

Now, we have,
1 1
sin θ0 = ⟨w|s⟩ = √ = √ .
N 2 2
Hence
 1 
θ0 = sin−1 √ .
2 2
Correct option: (c)

3. 3-qubit Grover: success probability after two iterations


After k Grover iterations, the success probability is
 1 
pk = sin2 (2k + 1)θ0 , θ0 = sin−1

√ .
2 2
For k = 2,  1 
p2 = sin2 (5θ0 ) = sin2 5 sin−1 √ ≈ 0.97.
2 2
Correct option: (d)

1
4. Classical queries to decide constant vs. balanced (DJ)
Classically (deterministic), to be certain a function is constant, you must see both a 0-output
and a 1-output not occur after enough queries. In the worst case, an adversarial constant
function can make the first 2n−1 inputs all return the same value; only at the next query can
you be sure. Therefore,
2n−1 + 1 queries
are necessary and sufficient in the worst case.
Correct: (d).

5. BV: number of queries to learn a


The BV oracle computes fa (x) = (a · x) mod 2. With phase kickback (prepare the ancilla in |−⟩
and the n inputs in |+⟩⊗n ), a single query imprints the phase (−1)a·x , and Hadamards recover
a exactly in one shot.
Correct: (a).

6. Circuit equalities with Pauli Y


CNOT gate in outer-product notation : P0 ⊗ I + P1 ⊗ X, where P0 = |0⟩⟨0| and P1 = |1⟩⟨1|, and
X is the Pauli-X .
Therefore the circuit
• Y •

can be written in the outer product notation as : (P0 ⊗ I + P1 ⊗ X)(Y ⊗ I)(P0 ⊗ I + P1 ⊗ X)


Performing the multiplication we get : P0 Y P0 ⊗ I + P0 Y P1 ⊗ X + P1 Y P0 ⊗ X + P1 Y P1 ⊗ I
Note that : P0 Y P0 = |0⟩⟨0| (−i|0⟩⟨1| + i|1⟩⟨0|) |0⟩⟨0| = 0
Similarly : P1 Y P1 = |1⟩⟨1| (−i|0⟩⟨1| + i|1⟩⟨0|) |1⟩⟨1| = 0
And , P0 Y P1 = |0⟩⟨0| (−i|0⟩⟨1| + i|1⟩⟨0|) |1⟩⟨1| = −i|0⟩⟨1|
Also P1 Y P0 = |1⟩⟨1| (−i|0⟩⟨1| + i|1⟩⟨0|) |0⟩⟨0| = i|1⟩⟨0|
Therefore, (P0 ⊗ I + P1 ⊗ X)(Y ⊗ I)(P0 ⊗ I + P1 ⊗ X) = (P0 Y P1 + P1 Y P0 ) ⊗ X = Y ⊗ X
Circuit for Y ⊗ X is :
Y
X
Similarly in the outer product notation the circuit

• •
Y

can be written as : (P0 ⊗ I + P1 ⊗ X)(I ⊗ Y )(P0 ⊗ I + P1 ⊗ X)


Performing the multiplication we get : P0 ⊗ Y + P0 P1 ⊗ XY + P1 P0 ⊗ Y X + P1 ⊗ (XY X)
Note that: P1 P0 = |0⟩⟨0|1⟩⟨1| = 0, and XY X = −Y
Therefore, P0 ⊗ Y + P0 P1 ⊗ XY + P1 P0 ⊗ Y X + P1 ⊗ (XY X) = (P0 − P1 ) ⊗ Y = Z ⊗ Y
The circuit for Z ⊗ Y is :
Z
Y
Correct: (b), (c)

2
7. DJ: measurement pattern indicating “balanced”
DJ computes Uf |x⟩ |−⟩ = |x⟩ (−1)f (x) |−⟩. Starting from |+⟩⊗n |−⟩ and ending with H ⊗n on
the first n qubits, the amplitude of |0⟩⊗n is
1 X
(−1)f (x) .
2n
x∈{0,1}n

• If f is constant, this sum equals ±1, so the final state is |0⟩⊗n with certainty.
• If f is balanced, exactly half the terms are +1 and half −1, so the amplitude of |0⟩⊗n is
0, and some other bitstring is observed.
Thus: balanced ⇐⇒ the measurement outcome is any string other than |0⟩⊗n .
Correct: (b).

8. DJ: best-case number of oracle calls


As above, the DJ algorithm needs only one call to Uf to decide constant vs. balanced with
certainty.
Correct: (d).

9. How many Grover iterations?


j √ k
π
For N = 2n with one marked item, the optimal number of Grover iterations is 4 N , which

is O( N ).
Correct: (d).

10. BV oracle circuit: identify a


In the standard BV oracle Uf : |x⟩ |y⟩ 7→ |x⟩ |y ⊕ (a · x)⟩, the implementation uses CNOTs from
input qubit i to the ancilla iff ai = 1. Reading the given diagram (controls on the 1st and 3rd
input qubits only), we get
a = a1 a2 a3 a4 = 1 0 1 0,
Correct: (a) .

You might also like