Module 1 Notes
Module 1 Notes
PERIODIC PROPERTIES
HSAB PRINCIPLE
Coordination number and geometries
The number of atoms or ions immediately surrounding a central atom in a
complex is called coordination number.
Crystal Field Theory (CFT)
It was proposed by the physicist Hans Bethe in 1929. Subsequent modifications were
proposed by J. H. Van Vleckin 1935 to allow for some covalency in the interactions.
These modifications are often referred to as Ligand Field Theory
The octahedral arrangement of six ligands surrounding the central metal ion is as
shown in the figure.
In an octahedral complex, the metal ion is at the centre and the ligands are at the six
corners of octahedron. In the figure, the directions x, y and z point to the three
adjacent corners of the octahedran. The lobes of the eg orbitals (dx2-y2 and dz2) point
along the x, y and z axis while the lobes of the t2g orbitals (dxy, dzx and dyz)point in
between the axes. As a result, the approach of six ligands along the x, y z, -x,-y and –z
directions will increase the energy of dx2-y2 and dz2 orbitals (which point towards the
ligands) much more than that it increases the energy of dxy, dzx and dyz orbitals (
which point in between the metal-legand bond axis).
Thus, under the influence of an octahedral field, the d orbitals split into triply
degenerate orbitals with less energy and another as doubly degenerate orbitals with
higher energy. The main energy level between these two sets of orbitals is taken as
zero, which is called bari centre. The splitting between these two orbitals is called
crystal field splitting. The magnitude of stabilization will be 0.4 Δo and the magnitude
of destabilization will be 0.6 Δo.
Depending upon the nature of ligands, either transition metal complex is high- or low-spin in
nature.
The d orbital energy splitting is influenced by how strongly the ligand interacts with the
metal.
Ligands that cause a transition metal to have a small crystal field splitting, which leads to
high spin, are called weak-field ligands. Ligands that produce a large crystal field splitting,
which leads to low spin, are called strong field ligands.
Low Spin, Strong Field (∆o˃P) High Spin, Weak Field (∆ o˂P)
Splitting for a d4 complex under a strong field (left) and a weak field (right). The strong field
is a low spin complex, while the weak field is a high spin complex.
According to the Aufbau principle, electrons are filled from lower to higher energy orbitals.
Following Hund's rule, first 3 electrons are filled in order: dxy, dxz, and dyz orbitals. If one
were to add an 4th electron, however, it has the ability to fill a higher energy orbital ( dz² or dx²-
y²) or pair with an electron residing in the dxy, dxz, or dyz orbitals, this pairing of the electrons
requires energy (spin pairing energy). If the pairing energy is less than the crystal field
splitting energy, ∆₀, then the next electron will go into the dxy, dxz, or dyz orbitals due to
stability. This situation allows for the least amount of unpaired electrons, and is known
as low spin. If the pairing energy is greater than ∆₀, then the next electron will go into
the dz² or dx²-y² orbitals as an unpaired electron. This situation allows for the most number of
unpaired electrons, and is known as high spin.
Spectrochemical series
CFT is based primarily on symmetry of ligands around a central metal/ion and how this
anisotropic (properties depending on direction) ligand field affects the metal's atomic orbitals;
the energies of which may increase, decrease or not be affected at all. Once the ligands'
electrons interact with the electrons of the d-orbitals, the electrostatic interactions cause the
energy levels of the d-orbital to fluctuate depending on the orientation and the nature of the
ligands. A series of ligands arranged in the order in which they cause splitting of the energy
levels of d-orbitals in metal complexes is called as spectrochemical series.
I− < Br− < Cl− − < F− < OH− < C2O42− < H2O < NCS− < py < NH3 < en < bipy < phen
< NO2− < PPh3 < CN− < CO
Crystal Field Splitting of Tetrahedral Complexes
The tetrahedral arrangement of four ligands surrounding the metal ions is as shown in
the figure.
A regular tetrahedron is a cube. One atom is at the centre of the cube and four of the
eight corners of the cube are occupied by ligands. The directions x, y and z point to
the face centres. The dx2-y2 and dz2 orbitals point along the x, y and z directions and
dxy, dzx and dyz orbitals point in between x, y and z directions. The direction of
approach of ligands does not coincide exactly with either the e or t2 orbitals. The t2
orbitals are pointing close to the direction in which the e orbitals are lying in between
the ligands. As a result, the energy of t2 orbitals increases compared to the energy of e
orbitals. Thus, d orbitals again split into two sets- triply degenerate t2 of higher energy
and doubly degenerate e orbitals of lower energy. That is, t2 orbitals are raised by 0.4
Δt in energy and the e orbitals are stabilized by 0.6 Δt in energy. The energy difference
between the two sets of orbitals (Δt) will be about half the magnitude of that in an
octahedral complex (Δo). The d-orbitals will thus split as shown below:
Effect of Crystal Field Splitting
Calculation of CFSE
CFSE for octahedral complexes = [-0.4 t2g e- + 0.6 eg e-]∆o + mP
∆o = 10 Dq
m- No. of paired electron; P- Pairing energy
eg
eg
∆oct ∆oct
t2g
t2g
∆ small
∆ large
The variation in the color of the Cr(III) complexes can be explained following
similar argument
dx2-y2
dxz dyz
dxy
Complexes that contain metal ions of d10 electron configuration are usually
colorless. Examples are [Cu(PPh3)4]+ and [Zn(H2O)6]2+. One would expect a
metal complex with no d-eletron to be colorless as well. However, a few of such
complexes are strongly colored, for example, MnO4- or [Cr2O7]2-. The origin of
the color in these complexes is not the d-d transitions, rather due to ‘charge
transfer’ that we will briefly discuss later.
Multi-electron systems exhibit multiple transitions and the assignment of
absorption bands is not straightforward. The complexity arises due to inter-
electron repulsions that we will not discuss in this course but will take a simpler
approach to understand the color of coordination complexes.
Problems related to colour of coordination complexes:
Strong field ligands like NH3, CN- cause large splitting so those complexes
absorb high energy/low wavelength and appeared as Orange or red.
Weak field ligands like F- and H2O cause small splitting so those complexes
absorb low energy/high wavelength and appeared as Green or Blue.
Problems:
Problem 2:
Problem 3:
Solution
The ligands for each complex ions are: (a) CN− (b) NH3, (c) F− and (d) H2O, which
are ranked in increasing Δo magnitude:
From the complementary color wheel, we get the following relationships (arranged
from highest energy absorbed to lowest):
MABXL
[MX2L2] [MX2L2]
But octahedral complexes do show cis trans isomerism. In complexes with formula [MX2L4] type, two
ligands X may be oriented cis or trans to each other.
This type of isomerism is also observed when bidentate ligands L–L [e.g.,NH2 CH2 CH2 NH2 (en)] are
present in complexes with [MX2(L–L)2] type formula
There is another type of geometrical isomerism which occurs in octahedral coordination entities with
[Ma3b3] type formula. Examples is [Co(NH3)3(NO2)3].
If three donor atoms of the same ligands occupy adjacent positions at the corners of an octahedral face,
we have the facial (fac) isomer.
When the positions are around the meridian of the octahedron, we get the meridional (mer) isomer
Facial Isomers: A set of three ligands (similar) arranged on an octahedron in all cis – fashion.
Meridional Isomers: A set of three similar ligands arranged on an octahedron with one pair trans
[MX2L4]
[MX2(L–L)2] [Ma3b3]
Optical Isomerism
¨The complexes which are non-superimposable on their mirror images are optically active.
Optically active complexes are asymmetric in nature i.e. not divisible into two identical halves.
o Levorotatory (l) – the compound which rotates plane polarised light to left hand side.
o Dextrorotatory (d) – the compound which rotates plane polarised light to right hand side
o d and l isomers of a compound are called enantiomers
Octahedral complexes with coordination number 6 involving 2 or 3 bidentate ligands show optical
isomerism.
TUTORIAL
TUTORIAL
TUTORIAL
Aufbau Principle (Building-Up) TUTORIAL
n+l
1s 1+0 = 1
2s 2+0 = 2
3s 3+0 = 3
3p 3+1=4
3d 3+2 = 5
4s 4+0=4
4p 4+1 = 5
4d 4+ 2 = 6
4f 4+3=7
5s 5+0 = 5
Expected Order
1s < 2s < 2p <3s < 3p < 3d < 4s < 4p < 4d < 5s
< 5p < 5d < 5f…
Actual Order
1s < 2s < 2p < 3s < 3p < 4s < 3d < 4p < 5s < 4d
< 5p < 6s…
Electron build-up using Aufbau Principle
Pauli Exclusion Principle
In a single atom no two electrons will have an
identical set or the same quantum numbers (n,
l, ml, and ms).
1s 2s
n=1 n=2
l=0 l=0
ml=0 ml=0
ms=-1/2 ms=-1/2
Hunds Rule of Maximum Multiplicity TUTORIAL
Atomic Radii
Ionic Radii
Ionization Energy
Electron affinity
Electronegativity
Atomic Radius
Technically atomic radius is calculated as half of the distance
between the nuclei of identical atoms that are bonded together.
The units for atomic radii are picometers, equal to 10−12 meters.
As an example, the internuclear distance between the two hydrogen
atoms in an H2 molecule is measured to be 74 pm. Therefore, the
atomic radius of a hydrogen atom is 74/2=37 pm.
Trend of Atomic radii in periodic table
The trend of atomic radius across Period
The atomic radius of atoms generally decreases from left to right across a
period.
Within a period, protons are added to the nucleus as electrons are being
added to the same principal energy level.
These electrons are gradually pulled closer to the nucleus because of its
increased positive charge.
Since the force of attraction between nuclei and electrons increases, the size
of the atoms decreases. The effect lessens as one moves further to the right
in a period because of electron-electron repulsions that would otherwise
cause the atom’s size to increase.
Trend of atomic radius along the Group
The atomic radius of atoms generally increases from top to bottom within a
group.
As the atomic number increases down a group, there is again an increase in
the positive nuclear charge. However, there is also an increase in the
number of occupied principle energy levels. Higher principal energy levels
consist of orbitals which are larger in size than the orbitals from lower
energy levels. The effect of the greater number of principal energy levels
outweighs the increase in nuclear charge and so atomic radius increases
down a group.
Factors affecting Atomic Radius
Number of Shells:
Atomic size increases with the increase in the number of electronic shells. Thus atomic
radius is directly proportional to the number of electronic shells.
Nuclear Charge:
As the nuclear charge increases the atomic radius decreases due to an increase in
the attractive force on the outermost electrons. Thus atomic radius is inversely proportional
to the nuclear charge.
Screening Effect:
In an atom having more electrons and particularly more electron shells, it is observed that
the inner orbits decrease the attraction between the electrons in the outer orbit and
nucleus. Thus they act as a screen or shield between the nucleus and electrons of outer
orbit. This effect is known as the screening effect. As the screening effect increases, the
atomic radius increases. Thus atomic radius is directly proportional to the screening effect.
For a given quantum shell, the shielding ability of inner electrons decreases in the order of
s > p > d > f.
Effective nuclear charge: The effective nuclear charge is the difference between the actual
nuclear charge and the screening effect [Link]. Zeff = Z – σ. The atomic radius is
inversely proportional to the effective nuclear charge.
Exceptions in the trend of atomic radii in periodic table
This is because noble gas atoms are held together by van der waal
forces (which are weaker and hence the atoms are apart from each
other) while the halogen atoms are bound together by covalent bonds
which are much stronger than the van der waal forces and hence held
the atoms closer.
Thus we can modify the trend as “ The atomic radius of the atoms
decrease on going from left to right upto group 17, then it increases in
group 18.”
Why the atomic radii of Al and Ga are same?
Ionic radius
Atom Na Mg Al Si
Atomic
number, Z 11 12 13 14
(or) # protons
# electrons 11 12 13 14
Ion Na+ Mg2+ Al3+ Si4+
# electrons 10 10 10 10
Z /e 11/10 = 1.1 12/10 = 1.2 13/10 = 1.3 14/10 = 1.4
Na+ > Mg2+ > Al3+ > Si4+ or Si4+ < Al3+ < Mg2+ < Na+
Which of the following is the smallest in size?
1) N3- 2) O2- 3) F- 4) Na+ TUTORIAL
Atom N O F Na
Atomic
number, Z
7 8 9 11
(or) #
protons
# electrons 7 8 9 11
Ion N3- O2- F- Na+
# electrons 10 10 10 10
Z /e 7/10 = 0.7 8/10 = 0.8 9/10 = 0.8 11/10 = 1.1
H(g) → H+(g)+e−
The more electrons that are lost, the more positive this
ion will be, the harder it is to separate the electrons from
the atom.
1st, 2nd, and 3rd Ionization Energies
The symbol I1 stands for the first ionization energy (energy required to take
away an electron from a neutral atom)
Symbol I2 stands for the second ionization energy (energy required to take
away an electron from an atom with a +1 charge.
I1<I2<I3<...<In
Mg(g)→Mg+(g)+e−I I1 = 738kJ/mol
Mg+(g)→Mg2+(g)+e− I2=1451kJ/mol
Trend Variation of Ionization energy in group and period
F, Li, N, Rb
TUTORIAL
F, Li, N, Rb
Fluorine (F)
Nitrogen (N)
Neon (Ne)
Electron affinity
− 2−
Electron affinity
electron affinity of fluorine is less than chlorine; However fluorine is more reactive
than chlorine because of its higher electronegativity
Electronegativity
1. Size of an Atom:
A greater atomic size will result in less value of
electronegativity, this happens because electrons being
far away from the nucleus will experience a lesser force of
attraction.
2. Nuclear Charge:
A greater value of nuclear charge will result in a greater
value of electronegativity. This happens because an
increase in nuclear charge causes electron attraction with
greater force.
Factors Affecting Electronegativity
For example,
- electro-negativity value of P atom in PCl3 molecule is different
from that in PF5 molecule
.
Three types of hybridisation − sp, sp2 and sp3, are seen in
carbon atoms depending upon how many atoms are
linked to the carbon.
According to HSAB concept, hard acids prefer binding to the hard bases to
give ionic complexes, whereas the soft acids prefer binding to soft bases to
give covalent complexes.
The large electronegativity differences between hard acids and hard bases
give rise to strong ionic interactions.
The electronegativities of soft acids and soft bases are almost same and
hence have less ionic interactions. i.e. the interactions between them are more
covalent.
The interactions between hard acid - soft base or soft acid - hard base are
mostly polar covalent and tend to be more reactive or less stable. The polar
covalent compounds readily form either more ionic or more covalent compounds
if they are allowed to react.
Drawback of HSAB principle
2) Since hydrogen ion, H+ is a hard acid and hydride ion, H- is a soft base,
according to HSAB principle the interactions between them must be polar
covalent and H2 must be unstable. Indeed H2 is a stable molecule with
pure covalent nature.
Hard-soft trends for acids
Acids
Hard-soft trends for bases
Bases
Suggest which of the following Answer a:
ions is harder. Zn(II), because it is smaller and less
polarizable.
a) zinc(II) or mercury(II)
Answer b:
b) potassium(I) or copper(I) K+, because it is less electronegative.
Answer a:
Answer c:
c) amide (NH2-) or azide (N3-)
Azide, which has a more polarizable,
delocalized pi bonding system.