Scribd
Upload
242 views3 pages

Complex Interdependence

The document discusses two main approaches to International Relations: Realism and Liberalism, with a focus on the concept of complex interdependence as presented by Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye. It highlights three key aspects of complex interdependence: the existence of multiple channels connecting societies, the lack of a clear hierarchy in issues of importance, and the limited role of military force in non-security related matters. The document suggests that these insights have significant implications for understanding global interactions.

Uploaded by

Afzal Khan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
242 views3 pages

Complex Interdependence

The document discusses two main approaches to International Relations: Realism and Liberalism, with a focus on the concept of complex interdependence as presented by Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye. It highlights three key aspects of complex interdependence: the existence of multiple channels connecting societies, the lack of a clear hierarchy in issues of importance, and the limited role of military force in non-security related matters. The document suggests that these insights have significant implications for understanding global interactions.

Uploaded by

Afzal Khan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

INTRODUCTON

Two broad approaches of IR


1. [Link] [Link]

What is interdependency?
COMPLEX INTERDEPENDENCY

The concept is championed by Liberalist scholars Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye
in their book: “Power and Interdependence” (1977)

[Link] Channels Connect Societes : apart from govt-to-govt


interactions, there exists “transgovernmental” and “transnational” relations.

2. There is No Clear Heirarchy : security is not always the most important


agenda, other issues are also important.

3. Military is often not considered a viable tool of policy : in dealings


that have little to do with security, use of military force is considered
inappropriate.
IMPLICATIONS

What we have learned from this


phenomenon?

You might also like