Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Then the first sentence of the two-sentence "apology" states the obvious: "On behalf of my client, Don Raymond, this letter will confirm the fact that neither you nor your campaigns nor anyone associated with your campaigns, ever had any advance knowledge of, or participation in, telephone calls made by Conquest Communications in connection with the primary election." Well, no kidding. Absence of remorse The letter concludes that Raymond "regrets any misperception that you authorized the calls or that the calls may have created." That's an apology? Nowhere does the lawyer's letter acknowledge there's anything wrong with disseminating deliberately untruthful and misleading campaign messages. And nowhere does the lawyer state his client accepts responsibility for the calls. Raymond's only stated regret is that what was done might have caused a "misperception." It's as if he's blaming the voters for being gullible enough to believe the phone calls. If the calls had helped Harley defeat Creighton, the public outcry would have endangered Harley's chances of winning the general election. In the end Harley lost, but that doesn't mean no harm was done. The kind of dirty, cutthroat politics that Raymond engaged in deters good people from running for office and turns voters off. Harley should do more than try to distance himself from Raymond. He should insist that Raymond provide voters a full and candid explanation of the decision to smear Creighton and Lemon. Harley should also insist that Raymond apologize -- and mean it.