Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I
<I11
L+.!+JJ^.+
<JJJ.
|IGUH!fG
r!Yt!LA1
OItAtI1IJY
If ANtH!LAf LUIJUHt
AfO LIJt!A1UHt
HS1^A111 |A11A1 J^S
UOlumUl UnlvCr5l!y|rC55 NCw OrK
Cover photo: Frida Kahlo, "Self-Portrait with Portrait of Doctor Farill," 1951. !Banco de
Mexico, fduciary of the Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo Museums. Reproduced with permission
from the Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes y Literatura (INBA), Mexico.
Columbia University Press
Publishers Since 1893
New York Chichester, West Sussex
Copyright !1997 Columbia University Press
All rights reserved
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Thomson, Rosemarie Garland.
Extraordinary bodies : fguring phy sical disability in American
culture and literature /Rosemarie Garland Thomson.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-231-10516-9 (cloth: acid-free paper).
ISBN 0-231-10517-7 (paper)
. American fction-19th century -History and criticism.
2. American fction-20th centur-History and criticism.
3. Phy sically handicapped in literature. . Body, Human, in
literature. 5. Body, Human-Social aspects. 6. Phy sically
handicapped-Social aspects. 7. Women in literature. 8. Popular
culture-United States-History. 9. Sideshows-United States
History. 10. Feminism and literature-United States. . Title.
PS374.P44T49 1997
813' .0093520816-dc20 96-21998
Casebound editions of Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent
and durable acid-free paper.
Printed in the United States of America
c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
p10 9 8 ` 6 5
CO !1 t !1S
Preface and Acknowledgments I
Part 1 POLITICIZING BODILY DIFFERENCES
1 Disability, Identity, and Representation: A Introduction 5
The Disabled Figure in Culture
The Disabled Figure in Literature
The Gap Between Representation and Reality
An Overview and a Manifesto
2 Theorizing Disability
Feminist Theory, the Body, and the Disabled Figure
Sociocultural Analyses of the Extraordinary Body
The Disabled Figure and the Ideology of Liberal Individualism
The Disabled Figure and the Problem of Work
Part 2 s e e e s CONSTRUCTING DISABLED FIGURES:
CULTURAL AND LITERARY SITES
5
'
JZ
J
19
J'
^
+J
+U
3 The Cultural Work of American Freak Shows, 1835-1940 55
The Spectacle of the Extraordinary Body
Constituting the Average Man U^
Identifcation and the Longing for Distinction UU
From Freak to Specimen:
"The Hottentot Venus" and "The Ugliest Woman in the World" 70
The End of the Prodigious Body 78
e e e e e Contents
4 Benevolent Maternalism and the Disabled Women
in Stowe, Davis, and Phelps
The Maternal Benefactress and Her Disabled Sisters
The Disabled Figure as a Call for Justice:
Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin
Empowering the Maternal Benefactress
Benevolent Maternalism's Flight from the Body:
Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom' Cabin
The Female Body as Liability
Two Opposing Scripts of Female Embodiment:
Rebecca Harding Davis's Life in the Iron Mills
The Triumph of the Beautiful, Disembodied Heroine:
Elizabeth Stuart Phelps's Te Silent Partner
5 Disabled Women as Powerful Women
in Petry, Morrison, and Lorde
Revising Black Female Subjectivity
The Extraordinary Woman as Powerful Woman:
Ann Petry's The Street
From the Grotesque to the Cyborg
The Extraordinary Body as the Historicized Body:
Toni Morrison's Disabled Women
The Extraordinary Subject:
Audre Lorde's Zami: . Ne Spelling of My Name
The Poetics of Particularity
Conclusion: From Patholog to Identity
Notes
Biblio
g
ra
p
h
y
Index
81
^J
^
^^
'
'Z
'
'^
103
J^
J
JJJ
JJ
JZU
JZ'
135
139
173
191
JI+II1?I
<I11
!1!1 1\11118
Thisbookisthcconscqucnccolacoming-outproccss Asisoltcnthccasclor
pcoplcvithdisabilitics, l hadlcarncdto sccmybodilydillcrcnccasaprivatc
mattcr, anaspcctolmyscllthat l acknovlcdgcdandncgotiatcdinthcvorld
vithamiturcolcomposurcandcmbarrassmcnt l kncvthatmybodymadc
pcoplc uncomlortablc tovaryingdcgrccs and that itvas myj ob to rcassurc
thcm thatlvasgoingtobchncthatvcvcrcgoingtodohnctogcthcr ldid
notidcnti|withdisabilityculturc, nordidlhaveanylriendswithdisabilities
Likcmanyvomcnbclorclcministconsciousncss-raisingor somcblackpcoplc
bclorcthccivilrightsmovcmcnt,lsavmydillcrcncclromthcvalucdnormas
apcrsonalsituationrathcrthanasapoliticalorsocialissuc
Ncvcrthclcss, inmyvorkasalitcrarycritic, l alvaysrccognizcdand idcn
tihcd vith thc myriad ol critically unnoticcd disablcd charactcrs scattcrcd
throughoutthcvvorkslrcad Putbccauscthcidcaoldravingattcntiontodis-
abilitycontradictcdalilctimcoldisavovingit, mycritical comingoutvasat
hrst quitctcntativc andunscttling Withoutthcboldlcministasscrtionthat
thcpcrsonalis politicaland its authorization olidcntitypolitics as a critical
pcrspcctivc, vithoutthc rcccntbroadcningolour scopcolacadcmicinquiry,
l vouldncvcrhavcallovcdmysclltocmbarkonaprojcctsuchasthis lpcr-
sistcdbccauscthctimcvasripctointroduccdisabilityintothcacadcmysin
tcrrogati on ol thc politics ol rcprcscntation l am indcbtcd, thcn, to this
momcntinthchistoryolcriticalthoughtandculturalstudics Pcingoutabout
disabilityhascnablcdmcbothtodiscovcrandtocstablishahcldoldi sability
stud|csvithinthc humaniticsand to hclpconsolidatcacommunityolschol-
arsvhoarcdchningit
ThisbookovcsitsbcingtothccncouragcmcntolMichaclCilmorcandto
myintroductionbythclatclrZolatothcbodyolscholarshipandsupportivc
groupolscholarsvorkingindisabilitystudicsinthc socialscicnccs |orgcn
crous supportandhclplulcommcnts onthcmanuscript atvarious stagcs, l
amgratclul to mycollcagucs Pob Pogdan, Mary Campbcll , Lcnny Cassuto,
X e r e e e Preface &Acknowledgments
LennyDavis ,VaiCheeDimock,TracyFessenden, SkipCates, CarolineCeb
hard, Nancy Coldstein, David Cerber, Cene Coodheart, Harlan Hahn, Phil
Harper, Liz Hodgson, AmyLang, ClaudiaLimbert, Simi Linton, Paul Long-
more, Lric Lott, Helena Michie, David Mitchell, Llisabeth Pantajj a, Karen
Sanchez Lppler, and RobinVarhol andtothe l 992Commonvealth Center
PostdoctoralFellovship CommitteeattheCollegeolVilliamandMaq
Severalinstitutionssupportedthisproj ectalongthevayvithresearchand
vritinggrants l vishto thankthe National Lndovmentlor the Humanities
loraFellovshiplorniversityTeachersin l 99+-9 , theVoodlnstituteolthe
College olPhysicianslora researchlellovship in l 99 , the Massachusetts
HistoricalSocietyloranAndrevV MellonResearchFellovvshipin l 99 , the
AmericanAssociation olniversity Vomenlora dissertation lellovship in
l 99 l -92, the lrandeis niversity DepartmentolLnglishlor anAndrevV
Mellon Dissertation Fellovship in l 99 l -92, and the lrandeis niversity
VomensStudiesDepartmentlortheirdissertationlellovshipin l 99 l -92
lamalsogratelultotheVomensCommitteeoltheModernLanguageAs-
sociationloravardingthe l 939FlorenceHoveAvardlorFeministScholar-
shiptomyessayentitledSpeakingAboutthenspeakableTheRepresenta-
tionolDisabilityas StigmainToni hIcrrisons Novels , vhichisan earlyex-
plorationolapartolchapter lappreciateasvelltheencouragementolthe
SocietylorDisabilityStudies, vhichavardedmeitsLmergingScholarAvard
in l 990 Portionsolchapters2andappearinadillerentlorminanessayon
AnnPetryin\omensSuJiesInerncionc| , andaversionolchapter+ispub
lishedinAmericcnLiercure l appreciate theeditors permission to reprint
this material l also vantto thank|ennilerCreve and Leslie Kriesel at Co-
lumbianiversityPresslortheirgeneroussupportandcarelulediting
Theconstancy, emotional sustenance, patience, encouragement, andsup
portollob, Rob, Lena,andCaraThomsonmakethisprojectandmanyother
things possible l alsovanttoacknovvledgemysustainingrelationshipsvith
lriends scattered across the country and to thank the many vomen vho
helped carelormy childrenovertheyears so that l had some quiettime to
vriteandread
ln1 I
Politicizing Bodily Diferences
Nature is only the raT material of culture, appropriated, preserved,
enslaved, exalted, or otherwise made flexible for disposal by culture in
the logic of capitalist colonialism.
-Donna Haraway, Primate Visions
Representation is the organization of the perception of [actual bodily
differences] into comprehensibility, a comprehensibility that is al
ways frail, coded, in other words, human.
-Richard Dyer, Te Matter of Images
Anomaly appears only against the background provided by the para
digm.
-Thomas b. Kuhn, Te Structure of Scientifc Revolutions
O!t
Disability Identity and
Representation: An Introduction
The Disabled Figure in Culture
ln its broadcst scnse, this book invcstigatcs hov rcprcscntation attachcs
mcanings to bodics Although much rcccnt scholarship cxplores hov dil-
lcrcnccandidcntityopcratcinsuchpoliticizcdconstructionsasgcndcr, racc,
and sexuality, cultural andlitcrary criticismhasgcncrally ovcrlookcd thc rc-
latcdpcrccptionsolcorporcalotherncssvcthinkolvariouslyasmonstrosity,
mutilation, dclormation, cripplcdncss, or physical disability ' Yct thc
physicaIlyextraordinaryhgurc thcsctcrms dcscribcis as csscntial to thccul-
turalprojcctolAmcricanscllmalngasthcvaricdthrongolgcndcrcd, racial ,
cthnic, and scxual hgurcs olothcrncssthatsupport thc privilegcdnorm. My
purposchcrcistoaltcrthctcrmsandcxpandourundcrstandingolthccultural
construction olbodics and idcntity by rclramingdisability as anothcr cul -
turebound,physicallyjustihcddillcrcncctoconsidcralongvthracc, gcnder,
class, cthnicity, andscxuali ty lnothcrvords ,lintcndtointroduccsuchhgurcs
as thc cripplc, thc invalid, and thc lrcakintothc criticalconvcrsationsvcdc
votc to dcconstructinghgurcs likc the mulatto, thc primitivc, thc quccr, and
thcladyTodcnaturalizcthcculturalencodingolthcscextraordinarybodics , l
go bcyondassailingstcrcotypcs to intcrrogatc thc convcntions olrcprcsenta-
tion and unravel thc complexitiesolidcntity productionvithin social narra-
tivcs olbodilydillcrcnccs ln accordanccvithpostmodcrnismsprcmiscthat
thc margin constitutcs thc ccntcr, l probc thc pcripheral so as to vicv thc
6 e + e e e Politicizing Bodily Diferences
vholc in a lrcshvay Py scrutinizing thc disablcd hgurc as thcparadigm ol
vhat culturc calls dcviant, l hopc to cxposc thc assumptions that support
sccminglyncutralnorms Thcrclorc,llocushcrconhovdisabilityopcratcsin
culturcandonhovthcdiscourscsoldisability, racc, gcndcr, and scxualityin
tcrminglctocrcatchgurcsolothcrncsslromthcravmatcrialsolbodilyvaria
tion, spccihcallyatsitcsolrcprcscntationsuchasthclrcakshov, scntimcntal
hction,andblackvomcnslibcratorynovcls. Suchananalysislurthcrsourcol
lcctivcundcrstandingolthccomplcxproccsscsbyvhichc||lormsolcorporcal
divcrsityacquircthcculturalmcaningsundcrgirdingahicrarchyolbodilytraits
thatdctcrmincsthcdistributionolprivilcgc,status, andpovcr
Oncolthisbooksmajoraimsistochallcngccntrcnchcdassumptionsthat
ablcbodicdncss and its conccptual oppositc, disability, arc scllcvdcnt
physicalconditions Myintcntionistodclamiliarizcthcscidcntitycatcgorics
bydisclosinghovthcphysicallydisablcdarcproduccdbyvayollcgal ,mcd
ical, political , cultural , andlitcrarynarrativcs that comprisc an cxclusionary
discoursc Constructcdas thccmbodimcntolcorporcalinsulhcicncyanddc
viancc, thcphysicallydisablcdbodybccomcs arcpositorylorsocialanxictics
aboutsuchtroublingconccrnsasvulncrability, control, andidcntity l nothcr
vords , lvanttomovcdisabilitylromthcrcalmolmcdicincintothatolpolit
icalminoritics , torccastitlromalormolpathologytoalormolcthnicity Py
asscrtingthatdisabilityisa rcadingolbodilyparticulariticsin thccontcxtol
socialpovcr rclations , l intcnd to countcrthc acccptcd notions elphysical
disabilityas an absolutc, inlcrior statc andapcrsonalmislortunc l nstcad, l
shov that disability is a rcprcscntation, a cultural intcrprctation olphysical
translormation orconhguration, and a comparison olbodics thatstructurcs
socialrclationsandinstitutions Disability, thcn, isthcattributionolcorporcal
dcvianccnot so much a propcrty olbodics as a product ol cultural rulcs
aboutvhatbodicsshouldbcordo
Thissociallycontcxtualizcdvicvoldisabilityiscvidcnt, lorcxamplc, inthc
currcntlcgal dchnition oldi sability cstablishcd by thcAmcricans vith Dis
abiliticsActoll 990.This landmarkcivilrightslcgislationacknovlcdgcs that
disability dcpcnds uponpcrccption and subjcctivcj udgmcntrathcrthan on
objcctivcbodilystatcs altcridcntiingdisabilityasanimpairmcntthatsub
stantiallylimitsoncormorcolthcmaj orlilcactivitics, thclavconccdcsthat
bcinglcgallydisablcdisalsoamattcrolbcingrcgardcdashavingsuchanim
pairmcnt Lsscntialbutimplicittothisdchnitioni sthatbothimpairmcnt
and limits"dcpcndoncomparingindividualbodicsvithunstatcdbutdctcr
miningnorms, ahypothcticalsctolguidclincslorcorporcallormandlunction
arisinglrom culturalcxpcctations abouthovhumanbcings shouldlookand
Disability, Identity, and Representation 7
act Although thcsc cxpcctations arc partly loundcd on physiological lacts
aboutt_icalhumanssuchashavingtvolcgsvithvhichtovalkuprightor
havingsomccapacitylor sightorspccchthcirsociopolitical mcanings and
conscqucnccsarccntirclyculturallydctcrmincd Stairs ,lorcxamplc,crcatca
lunctional impairmcntlorvhcclchairuscrs thatramps do not Printcdin
lormation accommodatcs thcsightcdbutlimitsblindpcrsons Dcalncss is
not a disablingcondition in a community thatcommunicatcs by signing as
vcllasspcaking. `Pcoplcvhocannotliltthrcchundrcdpoundsarcablcbod
icd, vhcrcas thosc vho cannot lilt hlty pounds arc disablcd Morcovcr,
such cul turally gcncratcd and pcrpctuatcd standards as bcauty, indcpcn
dcncc, htncss , compctcncc, andnormalcycxcludcanddisablcmanyhu
man bodics vhilc validating and allirming othcrs Lvcn though thc lav
attcmpts to dchnc disability in tcrms ollunction, thc mcanings attachcd to
physical lorm and appcarancc constitutc limits lor many pcoplcas cv
dcnccd, lorcxamplc, byuglylavs , somcrcpcalcdasrcccntlyas l 9+, that
rcstrictcdvisibly disablcd pcoplc lrom public placcs Thus, thc vays that
bodicsintcractvith thcsociallycnginccrcdcnvironmcntandconlorm to so
cial cxpcctations dctcrminc thcvarying dcgrccs oldi sability orablcbodicd
ncss, olcxtraordinarincssorordinarincs s
Conscqucntly, thc mcanings attributcdt ocxtraordinary bodics rcsidc not
ininhcrcntphysicalllavs ,butinsocialrclationshipsinvvhichoncgroupislc
gitimatcdbyposscssingvalucdphysical charactcristicsandmaintains its as
ccndancyanditsscllidcntitybysystcmaticallyimposingthcrolcolculturalor
corporcalinlcriorityonothcrs Rcprcscntationthussimultancouslybuttrcsscs
ancmbodicdvcrsionolnormativcidcntityandshapcsanarrativcolcorporcal
dillcrcnccthatcxcludcs thoscvhoscbodicsorbchaviorsdonotconlorm So
by locusing on hov rcprcscntation crcatcs thc physically disablcd hgurc in
Amcricanculturc, lvillalsoclarithccorrcspondinghgurcolthcnormativc
Amcricanscllsopovcrlullyctchcdintoourcollcctivcculturalconsciousncss
Vc vill sccthatthcdisablcdhgurcopcratcsas thcvividlycmbodicd, stigma
tizcdothcrvhoscsocialrolcistosymbolicallylrccthcprivilcgcd, idcalizcdhg
urcolthcAmcricansclllromthcvagaricsandvulncrabiliticsolcmbodimcnt
Oncpurposcolthisbook,thcn, istoprobcthcrclationsamongsocialidcn
titicsvalucdanddcvalucdoutlincdbyouracccptcdhierarchicsolcmbod
imcnt Corporcal dcparturcs lrom dominant cxpcctations ncvcr go unintcr
prctcdorunpunishcd, andconlormiticsarcalmostalvaysrcardcd Thc nar
rativc oldcviancc surroundingbodics considcrcd dillcrcntisparallclcdbya
narrativcolunivcrsalitysurroundingbodics thatcorrcspondtonotionsolthc
ordinaryorthcsupcrlativcCulturaldichotomicsdothcircvaluativcvorkthis
8 Politicizing Bodily Diferences
body is inlcriorandthat onc is supcrior, this onc is bcautilul orpcrlcctand
thatoncisgrotcsqucorugly lnthiscconomyolvi sualdillcrcncc, thoscbod
ics dccmcd inlcriorbccomc spcctaclcsolothcrncssvhilc thc unmarkcdarc
shcltcrcd in thc ncutral spacc olnormalcy l nvcstcdvith mcanings that lar
outstrip thcirbiologicalbascs, hgurcs suchas thc cripplc, thcquadroon, thc
quccr,thcoutsidcr,thcvhorcarctaxonomical ,idcologicalproductsmarkcdby
socially dctcrmincd stigmata, dchncd through rcprcscntation, and cxcludcd
lromsocialpovcrandstatus Thus, thcculturalothcrandthcculturalscllop
cratctogcthcrasopposingtvinhgurcsthatlcgitimatcasystcmolsocial, cco
nomic, andpoliticalcmpovcrmcntjustihcdbyphysiologicaldillcrcnccs `
Asl cxamincthcdisablcdhgurc, lvillalsotroublcthc mutuallyconstitut
inghgurcthisstudycoins thcnormatcThisncologismnamcsthcvcilcdsub
]cctpositionolculturalscll, thchgurcoutlincdbythcarrayoldcviantothcrs
vhoscmarkcdbodicsshorcup thc normatcsboundarics Thc tcrmnormce
usclully dcsignatcs thc social hgurc through vhich pcoplc can rcprcscnt
thcmsclvcs as dchnitivc human bcings Normatc, thcn, is thc constructcd
idcntityolthoscvho, byvvayolthcbodilyconhgurationsandculturalcapital
thcyassumc,canstcpintoapositionolauthorityandvicldthcpovcritgrants
thcm lloncattcmptsto dchncthc normatc positionbypcclingavayallthc
markcdtraitsvithinthcsocialordcratthishistoricalmomcnt, vhatcmcrgcs
is avcrynarrovlydchncdprohlcthatdcscribcsonlyaminorityolactualpco
plc LrvingCollman,vhoscvorkldiscussingrcatcrdctaillatcr,obscrvcsthc
logicalconcIusionolthisphcnomcnonbynotingvrylythatthcrcisonlyonc
complctcunblushingmalcinAmcrica: ayoung,marricd,vhitc, urban, north
crn, hctcroscxual, Protcstant lathcrolcollcgc cducation, lullycmploycd, ol
goodcomplcxion, vcightandhcight, andarcccntrccordinsports lntcrcst
ingly, Collmantakcslorgrantcdthatlcmalcncsshasnopartinhisskctchola
normativc humanbcing Yct thisimagcs ubiquity, povcr, and valucrcsonatc
clcarly Onc tcstimony to thc povcr olthc normatc subj cct position is that
pcoplcoltcntrytohtitsdcscriptioninthcsamcvaythatCindcrcllasstcpsis
tcrsattcmptcdtosqucczcthcirlcctintohcrglassslippcr |amingthchgurc
olthcnormatcisoncconccptualstratcgythatvillallovustoprcssouranaly
scsbcyondthc simplc dichotomicsolmalc/lcmalc, vhitc/black, straight/gay,
or ablcbodicd/di sablcd so that vc can cxaminc thc subtlc intcrrclations
amongsocialidcntiticsthatarcanchorcdtophysicaldillcrcnccs
Thcnormatc subjcctpositioncmcrgcs , hovcvcr, onlyvhcnvc scrutinizc
thcsocialproccsscsanddiscourscsthatconstitutcphysical andculturaloth
crncss lccausc hgurcs olothcrncs s arc highly markcd i npovcr rclations ,
cvcn as thcyarcmarginalizcd, thcirculturalvisibilityas dcviantobscurcsand
Disability Identity and Representation r 9
ncutralizcsthcnormativchgurcthatthcylcgitimatcTo analyzcthc opcration
oldisability,itiscsscntialthcntothcorizcatlcngthasldoinpart labout
thcproccsscsandassumptionsthatproduccboththcnormatcanditsdiscor
dant companion hgurcs Hovcvcr, l alsovant to complicatc any simplc di-
chotomy ol sclland othcr, normatc and dcviant, by ccntcringpart 2 olthc
bookon hovrcprcscntations somctimcs dcploydisablcdhgurcs incomplcx,
triangulatcdrclationships orsurprisingallianccs, andonhovthcscrcprcscn
tationscanbcbothopprcssivcandlibcrating lnpart2, mycxaminationolthc
vaydisabilityisconstitutcdbythclrcakshov, scntimcntalhction, andblack
vomcns libcratorynovclslocuscsonlcmalchgurcslortvorcasons hrst, bc
causcthc links bctvccn disability andgcndcrothcrncss nccdinvcstigating,
and sccond, bccausc thc nonnormatc status accordcd disability |cminizcs
all disablcdhgurcs hatl uncovcrbyclosclyanalyzingthcscsitcsolrcprc
scntation suggcststhatdisability lunctions as a multivalcnt tropc, though it
rcmainsthcmarkolothcrncss Althoughccntcringondisablcdhgurcsillumi
natcs thc proccs scs that sort andrankphysical dillcrcnccs intonormaland
abnormal, atthcsamctimc, thcscinvcstigationssuggcstthcpossibilityolpo
tcntiallypositivc,complicatingintcrprctations lnshort,bycxaminingdisabil
ityas a rcadingolthcbodythatis inllcctcdbyracc, cthnicity, andgcndcr, l
hopctorcvcalpossibiliticslorsignihcationthatgobcyondamonologicintcr-
prctation ol corporcal dillcrcnce as dcviancc Thus , by hrst thcorizing dis-
abilityand thcn cxaminingscvcral sitcs that construct it, l can uncovcrthc
complcxvaysthatdisabilityintcrscctsvithothcrsocialidcntiticstoproducc
thccxtraordinaryandthcordinaryhgurcsvhohauntusall
The Disabled Figure in Literature
Thcdiscursivcconstructolthcdisablcdhgurc,inlormcdmorcbyrcccivcdat-
titudcs than by pcoplcs actual cxpcricncc oldisability, circulatcs in culturc
andhndsahomcvithinthc convcntionsandcodcsollitcraryrcprcscntation
As PaulRobinsonnotcs ,thcdisablcd, likcall minoritics, havc cxistcdnot
as subj ccts olart, but mcrcly as its occasions Disablcd litcrary charactcrs
usually rcmain on thc margins olhction as uncomplicatcd hgurcs orcxotic
alicnsvhoscbodilyconhgurations opcratc as spcctaclcs , clicitingrcsponscs
lromothcrcharactcrsorproducingrhctoricalcllccts thatdcpcndondisabil
itys cultural rcsonancc lndccd, main charactcrs almostncvcrhavc physical
disabilitics Lvcnthoughmainstrcamcriticshavclongdiscusscd, lorcxamplc,
thcimplicationsolTains|imlorblacks ,vhcnlitcrarycriticslookatdisablcd
charactcrs, thcyoltcnintcrprctthcmmctaphoricallyoracsthctically, rcading
1 0 e e e e e Politicizing Bodily Diferences
thcmvithoutpolitical avarcncss as convcntionalclcmcnts ol thc scntimcn-
tal,romantic, Cothic, orgrotcsquctraditions `
Thcdisparitybctvccndisablcdas anattributcd, dccontcxtualizingidcn
tityand thc pcrccptionsandcxpcricnccsolrcalpcoplclivingvithdisabilitics
suggcsts thatthishgurc olothcrncs s cmcrgcs lrompositioning, intcrprcting,
andconlcrringmcaninguponbodics Rcprcscntationyicldsculturalidcntitics
andcatcgori cs, thcgivcnparadigmsAllrcdSchutzcallsrccipcs, vithvhich
vc communally organizc rav cxpcricncc and routinizc thc vorld ' Litcrary
convcntions cvcn lurthcrmcdiatccxpcricnccthat thc vidcrculturalmatrix,
includinglitcraturc itscll, has alrcadyinlormcd llvcacccptthc convcntion
that hction has somc mimctic rclation to lilc, vvc grant it povcr to lurthcr
shapc our pcrccptions ol thc vorld, cspccially rcgarding situations about
vhichvchavclittlc dircctknovlcdgc lccauscdisability is sostronglystig-
matizcdandiscountcrcdbysolcvmitigatingnarrativcs , thcli tcrarytrallicin
mctaphorsoltcnmisrcprcscntsorllattcnsthccxpcricnccrcalpcoplchavcol
thcirovnorothcrs disabilitics
lthcrclorcvanttocxplicitlyopcnupthcgapbctvccndisablcdpcoplcand
thcirrcprcscntationsbycxploringhovdisabilityopcratcsintcxts Thcrhctor
icalcllcctolrcprcscntingdisabilitydcrivcslromsocialrclationsbctvccnpco-
plcvhoassumcthcnormatcpositionandthoscvhoarcassigncdthcdisablcd
position |rom lolktalcs and classical myths to modcrn and postmodcrn
grotcsqucs, thcdisablcdbodyisalmostalvaysalrcakishspcctaclcprcscntcd
bythc mcdiatingnarrativcvoicc Most disablcdcharactcrsarccnvclopcdby
thcothcrncssthatthcirdisabilitysignalsinthctcxtTakc, asalcvcxamplcs,
DickcnsspathcticandromanticizcdTinyTimol ACarismcsCcro' , | M lar-
ricsvillainousCaptainHooklromPeerPcn, VictorHugosCothicQuasimodo
in1aeHunca|cc|o]NoreDcme, D H LavrcnccsimpotcntClillordChat
tcrlcy in LcJy Cacer|eys Lover, and Tcnncsscc Villiamss longsullcring
LauraVinghcldlrom1ae C|cssMencgerie. Thcvcryactolrcprcscntingcor
porcalothcrncssplaccsthcminalramcthathighlightsthcirdillcrcnccslrom
ostcnsiblynormatcrcadcrs Although suchrcprcscntationsrclcrtoactualso-
cial rclations, thcydonotolcoursc rcproduccthoscrclations vith mimctic
lullncss Charactcrs arc thus ncccssarily rcndcrcd by a lcv dctcrmining
strokcs thatcrcatcanillusionolrcalitylarshortolthcintricatc, undillcrcnti-
atcd, and unintcrprctcd contcxt in vhich rcal pcoplc cxist Likc thc lrcak
shovsthatlvilldiscussinchaptcrl , tcxtualdcscriptionsarcovcrdctcrmincd
thcyinvcstthctraits , qualitics, andbchaviors olthcircharactcrsvithmuch
rhctoricalinllucnccsimplybyomittingandthcrclorccrasingothcrlactors
ortraitsthatmightmitigatcorcomplicatcthcdclincations Adisabilitylunc
Disability Identity and Representation e e e e e 1 1
tions onlyas visual dillcrcncc that signals mcanings Conscqucntly, litcrary
tcxtsncccssarilymakcdisablcdcharactcrsintolrcaks ,strippcdolnormalizing
contcxtsandcngullcdbyasinglcstigmatictrait
Not only is thc rclationship bctvccn tcxtandvvorld notcxact, butrcprc
scntation also rclics upon cultural assumptions to hll in missing dctails All
pcoplcconstructintcrprctivcschcmatathatmakcthcirvorldssccmknovablc
and prcdictablc, thus producingpcrccptual catcgorics that may hardcn into
stcrcotypcs or caricaturcs vhcn communally sharcd and culturally incul
catcd ' `As Aristotlc suggcsts in thc Peics , litcrary rcprcscntation dcpcnds
morconprobabilityvhatpcoplctakc tobcaccuratcthanonrcality Cari
caturcs andstcrcotypicalportrayals thatdcpcndmorc ongcsturc than com
plcxity arisc ncccssarily out ol this gap bctvccn rcprcscntation and lilc
Stcrcotypcsinlilcbccomctropcsintcxtualrcprcscntation |orcxamplc, M ar
iannaTorgovnickdcscribcsthctropcolthcprimitivcasadiscursivcconstruct
inthcbroadcstscnsc,avorldthathasbccnstructurcdbysctsolimagcsand
idcas thathavc slippcdlrom thciroriginal mctaphoric status to control pcr
ccptionsolactualprimi tivcs ' ' Suchportrayalsinvokc,rcitcratc,andarcrc
inlorccd by cultural stcrcotypcs A highly stigmatizcd charactcristic likc
disabilitygainsitsrhctoricalcllcctivcncss lrom thc povcrlul, oltcnmixcdrc
sponscsthatrcaldisablcdpcoplcclicitlromrcadcrsvhoconsidcrthcmsclvcs
normatcs. Thc morc the litcrary portrayal conlorms to thc social stcrcotypc,
thcmorccconomicalandintcnscisthccllcct, rcprcscntationthuscxaggcratcs
analrcadyhighlightcdphysicaldillcrcncc Morcovcr,Vcstcrntraditionposits
thcvisiblcvorldasthcindcxolacohcrcntandjustinvisiblcv orld,cncourag
ingustorcadthcmatcrialbodyasasigninvcstcdvithtransccndcntmcaning
lnintcrprctingthcmatcrialvorld, litcraturctcndstoimbucanyvisualdillcr
cnccsvith signihcancc thatobscurcs thccomplcxityolthcirbcarcrs
Pcsidcsstrippinganynormalizingcontcxtavaylromdisability, litcraryrcp
rcscntation sctsup static cncountcrs bctvccn disablcdhgurcs andnormatc
rcadcrs , vhcrcasrcalsocialrclationsarcalvaysdynamic |ocusingonabody
lcaturctodcscribcacharactcrthrovsthcrcadcrintoaconlrontationviththc
charactcrthatisprcdctcrmincdbyculturalnotionsaboutdisability Viththc
notablc cxccption olautobiographical tcxtssuch as Audrc Lordcs Zcmi ,
vhichladdrcssinthclastchaptcrrcprcscntationtcndstoobjcctidisablcd
charactcrs by dcnyng thcm any opportunity lor subjcctivity oragcncy Thc
plotorthcvorksrhctoricalpotcntialusuallybcnchtslromthcdisablcdhgurc
rcmaining othcr to thc rcadcridcntihably human but rcsolutcly dillcrcnt
Hov couldAhabopcratccllcctivclyilthcrcadcrvcrcallovcdtoscchimas
anordinarylcllovinstcadolasaniconolmonomaniacalrcvcngcilhisdis
1 2 4 Politicizing Bodily Diferences
ability lost its transccndcnt mcaning Vhat vould happcn to thc purc pity
gcncratcdlorTinyTimilhcvcrcportraycdassomctimcsnaughty,likcanor
malchildThusthcrhctoricallunctionolthchighlychargcdtraithxcsrcla
tionsbctvccndisablcdhgurcsandthcirrcadcrs lldisablcdcharactcrsactcd,
as rcalpcoplc vith disabilitics oltcn do, to countcrthcirstigmatizcd status,
thcrhctoricalpotcncyolthcstigmavouldbcmitigatcdorlost llHavthorncs
Chillingvorthmadcmanylricnds ,lorinstancc, orappcarcdlovablctoHcstcr,
his rolc in 1e Sccr'e Leer vould bc diminishcd ll |lanncry O Connors
HulgaHopcvcllvcrcprctty, chccrlul, andonclcggcdinstcadoluglyandbit
tcr, Cood Country Pcoplc vvould lail So, likc c|'ecux vivcns, bcauty
pagcants , andlrcakshowsall rclatcd lorms olrcprcscntation groundcd in
thc convcntionsolspcctaclclitcrarynarrativcs oldisabilityusuallydcpcnd
onthcob]cctihcationolthcspcctaclcthatrcprcscntationhascrcatcd
The Gap Between Representation and Reality
Vhcthcronclivcs vvithadisabilityorcncountcrssomconcvhohasonc, thc
actualcxpcricnccoldisabilityismorccomplcxandmorcdynamicthanrcprc
scntationusuallysuggcsts |ustonccxamplcillustratcsthcsklldisablcdpco
plc oltcn must lcarn in managing social cncountcrs l nitial or casual
cxchangcs bctvccn normatc and disablcd pcoplc dillcr markcdly lrom thc
usualrclationsbctvccnrcadcrs anddisablcdcharactcrs lna hrstcncountcr
vithanothcrpcrson, atrcmcndousamountolinlormationmustbcorganizcd
and intcrprctcd simultancously cach participant probcs thc cxplicit lor thc
implicit, dctcrmincsvhatissignihcantlorparticularpurposcs,andprcparcsa
rcsponscthatisguidcdbymanycucs, bothsubtlcandobvious Vhcnoncpcr
sonhasavisiblcdisability, hovcvcr,italmostalvaysdominatcsandskcvsthc
normatcsproccssolsortingoutpcrccptionsandlormingarcaction' Thcin
tcraction is usually straincd bccausc thc nondisablcd pcrson maylccl lcar,
pity,lascination,rcpulsion, ormcrclysurprisc, noncolvhichi scxprcssiblcac
cordingtosocialprotocol Pcsidcs thcdiscomlortingdissonanccbctvccncx
pcricnccdandcxprcsscdrcaction, anondisablcdpcrsonoltcn docsnotkncvv
hov to act tovard a disablcd pcrson hov or vhcthcr to ollcr assistancc,
vhcthcrtoacknovlcdgc thc disability, vhat vords, gcsturcs, orcxpcctations
touscoravoid Pcrhaps mostdcstructivctothcpotcntiallorcontinuingrcla
tionsisthcnormatcslrcqucntassumptionthatadisabilitycancclsoutothcr
qualitics, rcducingthccomplcxpcrsontoasinglcattributc Thisunccrtainty
and discord makc thc cncountcrcspcciallystrcsslullorthcnondisablcdpcr-
son unaccustomcd to disablcdpcoplc Thc disablcdpcrson may bc anxious
Disability, Identity, and Representation 1 3
aboutvhcthcrthccncountcrvillbctoouncomlortablclorcithcrolthcmto
sustainandmaylcclthccvcrprcscntthrcatolrcjcction Lvcnthoughdisabil
itythrcatcnstosnapthcslcndcrthrcadolsociability, mostphysicallydisablcd
pcoplcarcskillcdcnoughinthcsccncountcrstorcpairthclabricolthcrcla
tionsothatitcancontinuc
To bcgrantcd lullyhuman statusbynormatcs, disablcdpcoplcmustlcarn
tomanagcrclationshipslromthc bcginning ln othcr vords, disablcdpcoplc
mustusccharm,intimidation,ardor,dclcrcncc, humor,orcntcrtainmcnttorc
licvcnondisablcdpcoplcolthcirdiscomlort Thoscolus vithdisabiliticsarc
supplicantsandminstrcls, strivingtocrcatcvalucdrcprcscntationsoloursclvcs
in our rclations vith thc nondisablcd majority This is prcciscly vhat many
ncvly di sablcdpcoplccan ncithcrdo noracccpt, itis a subtlc part oladjust
mcntandoltcnthcmostdillicul t ' ` llsuchcllortsatrcparationarcsucccsslul,
disablcdpcoplcncutralizc thcinitial stigma oldisabilitysothat rclationships
can bc sustaincdanddccpcncd Only thcn can othcraspcctsolpcrsonhood
cmcrgc and cxpand thc initial locus so that thc rclationship bccomcs morc
comlortabl c, morcbroadlybascd, andlcssallcctcdbythcdisability Onlythcn
cancachpcrson cmcrgcasmultilacctcd,vholc ll, hovcvcr, disablcdpcoplc
pursucnormalizationtoomuch, thcyriskdcnyinglimitationsandpainlorthc
comlortolothcrsandmaycdgcintothcscllbctrayalassociatcdvithpassing "
Thisisnottosuggcstthatalllormsoldisabilityarcintcrchangcablcorthat
alldisablcdpcoplccxpcricnccthcirbodics orncgotiatc thciridcntitics in thc
samcvays l ndccd,itisprccisclythcvariationamongindividual sthatcultural
catcgoricstrivializcandthatrcprcscntationoltcndistorts Disabilityisanovcr
archingand insomcvaysartihcialcatcgory that cncompasscscongcnitaland
acquircd physical dillcrcnccs, mcntal illncss and rctardation, chronic and
acutc illncsscs , latalandprogrcssivc discascs, tcmpora( and pcrmancnt in
jurics, andavidcrangcolbodilycharactcristicsconsidcrcddishguring,suchas
scars, birthmarks, unusualproportions, orobcsity Lvcnthoughthcprototypi
cal disablcdpcrson positcdin cultural rcprcscntations ncvcrlcavcs a vhccl
chair, is totally blind, or proloundly dcal, most ol thc approximatcly lorty
millionAmcricansvith disabilitics havcamuchmorcambiguousrclationship
tothclabcl Thcphysicalimpairmcntsthatrcndcrsomconc disablcd"arcal
mostncvcrabsolutcorstatic ,thcyarcdynamic,contingcntconditionsallcctcd
bymanycxtcrnal lactors and usuallyHuctuatingovcrtimc Somcconditions ,
likc multiplcsclcrosisorarthritis ,arcprogrcssivcand chronic,othcrs , suchas
cpilcpsy,canbcacutcLvcnsccminglystaticdisabiliticslikcamputationallcct
activiticsdillcrcntly,dcpcndingonthcconditionolthcrcstolthcbody
Olcoursc, cvcryonc is subjcct to thc graduallydisablingproccss ol aging
1 4 e e e e e Politicizing Bodily Dif erences
Thclactthatwcwillallbccomcdisablcdilwclivclongcnoughisarcalitymany
pcoplcvhoconsidcrthcmsclvcsablcbodicdarcrcluctanttoadmit' Asphys-
ical abilitics changc, so do individual nccds, and thc pcrccption ol thosc
nccds Thc pain that oltcn accompanics or causcs disability also inllucnccs
boththcdcgrccandthcpcrccptionolimpairmcntAccordingtoLlaincScarq
bccauscpainisinvisiblc,unvcrihablcandunrcprcscntablc,itisoltcnsubjcctto
misattributionordcnialbythoscwhoarcnotcxpcricncingit ' ` Disability, thcn,
canbcpainlul, comlortablc,lamiliar,alicnating,bonding,isolating,disturbing,
cndcaring,challcnging,inluriating,orordinary Lmbcddcdinthccomplcxityol
actualhumanrclations , itisalwaysmorcthanthcdisablcdhgurccansigni
That anyonccanbccomcdisablcdatanytimcmakcsdisabilitymorcHuid,
andpcrhapsmorcthrcatcning,tothoscwhoidcntithcmsclvcsasnormatcs
thansuchsccminglymorcstablcmarginalidcntiticsaslcmalcncss,blackncss,
ornondominant cthnic idcntitics ' lnaddition, thc timc andwayi nwhich
oncbccomcsdisablcdinllucnccitspcrccption, as dothcvays oncincorpo-
ratcs disabilityinto oncs scnscolscllorrcsists i t Forinstancc, thcgradual
disablcmcnt ol aging or a progrcssivc illncss may not bc considcrcd a dis-
abilityatall lncontrast, ascvcrc, suddcnimpairmcnt, aslromanaccidcnt, is
almostalwayscxpcricnccdasagrcatcrlossthanisacongcnitalorgradualdis
ability,whichdocsnotdcmandadj ustmcntsoabruptlyAdisabilitysdcgrccol
visibilityal soallccts social rclations Aninvisiblc disability, muchlikc a ho-
moscxualidcntity, alwaysprcscntsthcdilcmmaolwhcthcrorwhcntocomc
outortopass Oncmustalwaysanticipatcthcriskoltaintingancwrclation-
shipbyannouncinganinvisiblcimpairmcntorthccqualhazardolsurprising
somconcbyrcvcalingaprcviouslyundiscloscddisability Thcdistinctionbc-
twccnlormalandlunctional aspccts ola disability allccts itspcrccption as
wcll Pcoplcwhoscdisabilityisprimarilylunctionalbutnotvisiblc oltcnarc
accuscdolmalingcringoroldisappointingcxpcctations aboutthcirphysical
capabilitics Yct thosc whosc disabilitics arc largclylormal oltcn arc consid
crcdincapablc olthings thcy can casily do Furthcrmorc, lormal conditions
suchaslacialdishgurcmcnt, scarring,birthmarks , obcsity, andvisual orhcar-
ingimpairmcntscorrcctcdwithmcchanicalaidsarcusuallysociallydisabling,
cvcnthough thcycntailalmostnophysicaldyslunction Morcovcr, asthchis
toryolthclrcakshovthatappcarsinchaptcrlrcvcals ,nohrmdistinctioncx
ists bctvvccn primarily lormal disabilitics and racial physical lcaturcs
considcrcdatypicalbydominant, whitcstandards
thoughcatcgoricssuchascthnicity, racc, andgcndcrarcbascdonsharcd
traits that rcsult in community lormation, disablcd pcoplc scldom considcr
thcmsclvcsagroupLittlcsomaticcommonalitycxistsamongpcoplcwithdil
Disability Identity and Representation 1 5
lcrcntkindsoldisabiliticsbccauscnccdsandsltuationsarcsodivcrsc Ablind
pcrson,ancpllcptic,aparaplcgic,adcalpcrson, andanamputcc, lorcxamplc,
havcnosharcdculturalhcritagc,traditionalactlvitics , orcommonphysicalcx-
pcrlcncc Only thc sharcd cxpcricnccolstigmatizatlon crcatcs commonality
Having bccn acculturatcd similarly to cvcryonc clsc, disablcd pcoplc also
oltcnavoldandstcrcotypc oncanothcrlnattcmptingto normalizcthcirown
social idcntitics Morcovcr, many disablcd pcoplc at onc timc considcrcd
thcmsclvcsnondisablcdand mayhavchadvcrylimitcdcontactwithdisablcd
pcoplcbclorcjoiningthclrgroupAswithallculturallyimposcdcatcgoricscx
trapolatcdlrom biological dillcrcnccs, thc ldcntlty has a lorccdquality that
lcvcls intragroup variatlons |or cxamplc, thc now crumbling institution ol
spccial cducationcnacts this culturalimpulsctowardghcttoizationbyscg
rcgatingpcoplcvithdisabiliticslromnondisablcdstudcntsrcgardlcssolindi
vidual nccds |inally, most disablcd pcoplc arc surroundcd by nondisablcd
lamilicsandcommuniticsinwhichdisabiliticsarcunanticipatcdandalmost
alwayspcrccivcdascalamitous nlikcthccthnicallygroupcd,butmorclikc
gaysandlcsbians, disablcdpcoplcarcsomctlmcslundamcntallyisolatcdlrom
cachothcr,cxistingoltcnasalicnswithinthcirsocialunits '
Yct rcprcscntation lrcqucntly obscurcs thcsc complcxitics in lavor olthc
rhctoricalorsymbolicpotcntialolthcprototypicaldisablcdhgurc,vhooltcn
lunctionsasalightningrodlorthcpity,lcar,discomlort,guilt, orscnscolnor
malcyolthcrcadcroramorcsignihcantcharactcr lintcndhcrctoshiltlrom
this usual intcrprctivc lramcworkolacsthctics and mctaphor to thc critical
arcna olcultural studics to dcnaturalizc suchrcprcscntations Pycxamining
thcdisablcdhgurc, rathcrthandiscussingthcgrotcsqucorcripplcordc-
lormcd, l hopctocatapultthisanalyslsoutolapurclyacsthcticcontcxtand
lntoapoliticalonc Pyopcnlngup a critl calgap bctwccn disablcdhgurcs as
lashioncdcorporcalothcrsvvhoscbodicscarrysocialmcanlngandactualpco
plc wlth atyplcal bodics in rcal vorld soclal rclatlons, l suggcst that rcprc-
scntationinlorms thc idcntityandoltcnthc latcolrcalpcoplcwithcxtra-
ordinarybodics
An Overview and a Manifesto
ln ascnsc, thisbookisamanilcstothatplaccsdisabilitystudicswithinahu-
manitics contcxt Although disability studics has dcvclopcd as a subhcld ol
scholarly inquiry in thc acadcmlc hclds ol soclology, mcdical anthropolog,
spccial cducation, and rchabilitativc mcdicinc, almostno studics in thc hu-
maniticscxplicitlysituatcdisabilitywithinapoliticizcd,socialconstructionlst
1 6 Politicizing Bodily Diferences
pcrspcctivc' ` Oncolmyaimsinthisbook,thcn
istobcginlormulatingwhat
disabilitystudicsmightlooklikcasasubhcldinlitcraqcriticismandcul tural
studics lwillthcrclorcoutlincinsomcdctailhcrcthccontcntsandthcargu-
mcntsthatappcarin thclollowingchaptcrs
Thisproj cctcntailstwotasks hrst, thcorizingthcopcrationoldisabilityin
culturalandlitcraryrcprcscntation, and sccond, locusingon cxcmplaqsitcs
thatconstructdisabilityinculturcandintcxts Thus, part l olthcbookincor-
poratcs a rangc olthcorctical worklrom various acadcmic arcnas, most ol
which docs not addrcss disability dircctly but instcad conccptually danccs
arounditscdgcs Havingcxamincdinthisintroductionhowthcdisablcdhgurc
opcratcsin litcraqrcprcscntation andhavingprobcdaswcl l thc dillcrcnccs
bctwccndisabilityinlilcandinrcprcscntation, lcxplorcinchaptcr2thcways
thatscvcraldiscourscsaddrcssthcconstructionoldisability First,ldctailthc
culturalintcrtwiningollcmininityanddisabilityandrccruitlcministthcoryas
arclatcddiscourscolothcrncssthat canbctranslcrrcdtoanalyscsoldisabil
ity Sccond, l cnlistthrcc sociocultural thcorics, Lrving Collmans notion ol
stigma, MaqDouglassconccptoldirt,andMichclFoucaultsidcasonpartic-
ularityandidcntity, inordcrtouncovcrthcproccsscsthatconstructdisability
Third,lcritiqucthcrolcolthcdisablcdhgurcwithinthcidcologyollibcralin-
dividualism Finally, l analyzc howthcidcologyolworkhas constructcd thc
disablcdhgurcovcrtimcasthcmcansoladdrcssingdisabilityhasshiltcdlrom
acompcnsationtoan accommodationmodcl Thcscthcorctical spcculations
laythcgroundworklorthcanalyscsthatlollow,cacholwhichccntcrsonnar-
rativcsolcorporcalothcrncssthatraiscbroadqucstionsolhowscllhoodisrcp
rcscntcdinAmcricanculturc
Part 2 shows how thc idcologicsolscllrcliancc, autonomy, progrcss, and
work,aswcllasthcproccsscsolstigmatizationandthclormationolthcmod-
crnsubjcct, inHucncchovthcdisablcdhgurcandthcculturalscllarcrcprc-
scntcd at spccihc litcrary and cultural sitcs As l havc suggcstcd, thcsc
particularsitcsallowmctoprobcthccomplcxiticsinculturcsuscoldisablcd
hgurcs Lachculturalandlitcraryproductioncxplorcdhcrccmploysdisablcd
hgurcs inways thatsomctimcsrcinscribcthcirculturalothcrncssbutalsoat
timcscxploitthcdisablcdhgurcspotcntiallorchallcngingthcinstitutionsand
politicalpolicicsthatdcrivclromandsupportanarrownormThcscnarrativcs
ol corporcal/cultural dillcrcncc thus simultancously conhrm and challcngc
thcrcccivcddchnitionolphysicaldisabilityasbodilyinadcquacy
ChaptcrlcxamincsAmcricanlrcakshowsaspopularsocialritualsthatcon-
structcdanddisscminatcdahgurcwhosccrucialculturalworkwastocxhibit
tothcAmcricanmasscswhatthcyimagincdthcmsclvcsnottobc Suchshows
Disability, Identity, and Representation v 1 7
choreographedhumanvariationintoaspectacleolbodilyothernessthatunited
theiraudiencesin oppositionto the lreaksaberrance and assuredthe onlook-
ersthattheyvereindeednormal Highlystructuredconventionsolrepresen
tation sculpted exoticized lreaks lrom people vho have vhat ve nov call
physicaldisabilities, asvellaslromotherpeoplevhosebodiescouldbemade
tovisuallysigniabsolutealienness Ciants, dvarls,visiblyphysicallydisabled
people, tribal non-Vesterners , contortionists , lat people, thin people, her-
maphrodites, thementallydisabled, andtheveryhirsuteallsharedtheplat-
lormequallyas humanoddities Theironlycommonalityvasbeingphysically
dillerent lrom theiraudiences Forthe priceola ticket, the process olwhat
DavidHeveycallsenlreakment ' 'olleredtothespectatorsaniconolphysical
othernessthatreinlorcedtheonlookerscommonAmericanidentityverihedby
abodythatsuddenlyseemedbycomparisonordinarytractable, andstandard
lalsosuggestthatlreakshovsat the sametimeolleredacounternarrative
olpeculiarityaseminence, thekindoldistinctiondescribedbyPakhtinsand
Foucaults notions olthe particularized pre-Lnlightenment body Straddling
the ideologies olthe traditionaland the modern, the lreakshovmanilested
tensionbetveenanoldermodethatreadparticularityasamarkolempover
ingdistinctionandanevermode thatllatteneddillerencestoachieveequal
ity lnsuchaliminalspace, thedomesticatedlreaksimultaneouslyembodied
exceptionality as marvel and exceptionality as anomaly, thus posing to the
spectatortheimplicitpoliticalquestionolhovtointerpretdillerencesvithin
anegalitariansocialorder
Chapter + centers on sentimental social protest novels vritten by mid-
nineteenth-century middleclass vhite vomen, in vhich disabled hgures
lunctionasdiscursivelightningrodslorcomplexsocialtensions l arguethat
HarrietPeecherStoves |nc|e1omsCc|in, RebeccaHardingDavissLi]e in
aeIronMi| |s, andLlizabethStuartPhelpss1aeSi|enPcrnerconstructgen-
deredandracialized disabledhgures asicons olcorporealvulnerabilityin an
attempttospotlighttheconllictbetveensocial]usticeandindividuallreedom
inherent in theAmerican liberal tradition Thi s cluster ol texts introduces
vhatl callacompensationmodel, invhichdisabilityi sinterpretedasalack
thatmustbecompensatedlorbyvhatltermthebenevolentmaternalismol
themiddle-classvomenVhereaslreakshovsliterallydisplaythedisabledto
conhrmthenormal , thesetextsdisplaydisabledhguresinordertomobilize
and validate social relorm agendas Although the disabled hgures invoke a
rhetoricolsympathytoachievesociopoliticalrelorm, theyalsodehne andle-
gitimizethenormalized, genderedroleolthematernalbenelactressthatthese
novelspromotelorvomenoltheemergingmiddleclass, vhoveremarginal-
1 8 Politicizing Bodily Diferences
izedvithin the changingsocialorder The increasinglynegativeportrayals ol
disabledvomenhguresasthegenremoveslromStovethroughPhelpscom
prises an anxious subtext thatsplits the disabled vomen and the benelac
tresses , paralleling the displacement ol middle-class vhite vomen lrom
meaninglulvork Thisescalatingrenunciationolthe disabledhgure teststhe
limitsoldomesticitysscriptolmaternalbenevolenceasasolutiontotheprob
lemsollemalerolesinlatenineteenthcenturyAmerica
Chapter discusses several tventieth-century, vomencenteredAlrican
Americanliberatorynovelsthatusethedisabledhgureandotherextraordinary
bodies to elaborate an identity that insists upon and celebratesphysical dil-
lerence lnthesetexts ,theextraordinarybodyinvokesaprincipleoldillerence
oversamenessthatservesapostmodernpoliticsthatisnationalistratherthan
assimilationist Vhereas the nineteenthcentury sentimental novels ol the
previouschaptercastthedi sabledhgureasantitheticaltothelemalerolethey
soughttodelineate,theseblacknationalisttextsincorporatesuchahgureinto
theirvisionoloppositionalidentity Ann Petrys l 9+onovel1eSreetenta
tively initiates this type olrepresentation, and is lolloved bythe postcivl
rightsversionolblacklemalesub]ectivityarticulatedbyToni Morrisonshrst
hve novelsandbyAudreLordes biomythographyZcmi A^ Sje||ing o]
MyNcme lsuggestthatonerhetoricalaimolthesevorksistoestablishanar
rativeoltheparticularizedbodyasasiteolpoliticizedhistoricalinscriptionin-
steadolphysicaldeviance DisabledhguressuchasMorrisonsLvaPeaceand
PabySuggs , lorexample, revise a historyolassignedcorporealinleriorityso
that bodilydillerencesbecomemarkers olexceptionality to beclaimed and
honored This ideologyolidentityasparticularityre]ectsthe culturalimple-
mentationoldemocracythatnormalizessamenessandstigmatizesdillerence
Suchastrategyolidentitylormationvalidatesvhatl callanaccommodation
modelolinterpretingdisability,asopposedtotheearliercompensationmodel
Myhnalpointisthatthisappropriationoltheextraordinarybodyrehabilitates
the premodern narrative ol the vondrous lreaks by casting the disabled
vomenaspoliticizedmarvelousmonsters ,inthemedieval sense)vhosesin
gularbodiesbeartheetchingsolindividualandcollectivehistory
Althoughnoneoltheseculturalortextualsitesemploysthepoliticizedterm
physicaldisabilitythatisatthecenterolthis study thelreakshov, this sen
timentalrelorm hction, andtheseblackvomens liberatorynovels allpartici
pateinvaryingvaysintheculturalvorkoldehningthedisabledsub]ectasan
ob]ectolvisual dillerence Thisbookthusbeginsvhatl hopevillbe alively
conversationvithinthehumanitiesnotonlyabouttheconstructionoldisabil
itythroughrepresentationbutalsoabouttheattendantpoliticalconsequences
1 VO
Teorizing Disability
Feminist Theory, the Body, and the Disabled Figure
The Female Body and the Disabled Body
Manyparallelsexistbetveenthesocialmeaningsattributedtolemalebodies
andthoseassignedtodisabledbodies Poththelemaleandthedisabledbody
are castas deviant and inlerior, both are excludedlrom lull participationin
publicasvellaseconomiclile,botharedehnedinoppositiontoanormthat
is assumed to possess natural physical superiority lndeed, the discursive
equation ol lemaleness vith disability is common, sometimes to denigrate
vomenand sometimestodelendthem Lxamplesabound, lromlreuds de-
lineatinglemalenessin terms olcastrationtolatenineteenth-centuryphysi-
cians dehning menstruation a disabling and restricting eternal vound to
ThorsteinVeblensdescribingvomenin l 399asliterallydisabledbyleminine
rolesandcostuming Lvenleministstodayinvoke negativeimages oldisabil-
ity to describetheoppressionolvomen, lorexample, |anellaxasserts that
vomenaremutilatedanddelormedbysexistideologyandpractices '
Perhaps the lounding association ollemaleness vith disability occurs in
thelourthbookolCenerciono]Animc|s ,Ari stotles discourseolthenormal
andtheabnormal , invhichherehnesthePlatonicconceptolantinomiesso
thatbodilyvarietytranslatesintohierarchiesolthe typical andtheaberrant
A]nyonevhodoesnottakealterhisparents , Aristotleasserts,isreallyina
vayamonstrosity, sinceinthesecasesNaturehasinavaystrayedlromthe
generictype Thehrstbeginningolthisdeviationisvhenalemaleislormed
insteadolamale Herethephilosopher,vhomvemightconsiderthelound-
20 Politicizing Bodily Diferences
inglatherolVesterntaxonomy, idealizesbodiestoproduceadehnitive,seem
inglyneutralgenerictypealongvithitsantithesis ,themonstrosity, vhose
departure lrom such a type i s a prolound deviation Aristotles spatial
metaphorplacesacertainhumanhgure,thegenerictype, atthecenterolhis
systemOntheoutermarginisthemonstrosity, thephysicalconsequenceol
Natureshavingstrayedontoapatholdeviance, thehrststopalongvhichis
thelemalebody Aristotle thuscon]oinsthemonstrosityvhomvevould
today term congenitally disabledand the lemale outside the dehnitive
norm ln PookTvo, Aristotle alhrms this connectionoldisabledandlemale
bodies bystatingthatthelemaleisasitvereadelormedmale orasitap-
pearsinothertranslationsamutilatedmale
More signihcantthanAristotlessimpleconllationoldisabilityandlemale
nessishisdeclarationthatthesourceolallothernessistheconceptolanorm,
ageneric typeagainstvhichallphysicalvariationappears as dillerent, de-
rivative, inlerior, andinsullicient Notonlydoesthisdehnitionolthelemale
as a mutilatedmale inlorm laterdepictions olvoman as diminishedman,
but it also arranges somatic diversi ty into a hierarchy olvalue that assigns
completenesstosomebodiesanddehciencytoothers Furthermore,bydehn
inglemalenessasdeviantandmalenessasessential ,Aristotleinitiatesthedis
cursivepracticeolmarkngvhati sdeemedaberrantvhileconcealingvhatis
privilegedbehindanassertionolnormalcyThisisperhapstheoriginalopera
tionolthelogicthathasbecomesolamiliarindiscussionsolgender,race, or
disability male,vhite,orable-bodiedsuperiorityappearsnatural, undisputed,
andunremarked, seeminglyeclipsedbylemale,black,ordisableddillerence.
Vhat this passage makes clearest, hovever, is that vithout the monstrous
bodytodemarcatethebordersolthegeneric,vithoutthelemalebodytodis-
tinguishtheshape olthemale, andvithoutthepathological togive lorm to
thenormal , thetaxonomiesolbodilyvaluethatunderliepolitical, social , and
economicarrangementsvouldcollapse `
Thispersistentintertviningoldisabilityvith lemalenessi nVestern dis-
courseprovidesastartingpointlorexploringtherelationshipolsocialidentity
to the body As Aristotle`s pronouncement suggests, the social category ol
disabilityrestson the signihcanceaccordedbodilylunctioningandconhgura
tion,]ustas the social categoryolvoman does Therelore, leministtheorys
recentinquiriesintogenderas acategory, the bodysrolein identityandsell-
hood, and the complexityolsocialpoverrelations canreadilytranslertoan
analysisoldisability Moreover, applyingleministtheorytodisabilityanalysis
inlusesitvith leminisms insistenceon therelationship betveenthemean
ingsattributedtobodiesbyculturalrepresentationsandtheconsequencesol
Teorizing Disability e e e e e 2 1
thosemeanings in thevorld As l bringleminismtodisabilitystudies , l vill
alsosuggesthovthecategoryoldisabilitym:ghtbeinsertedintolemini stthe
orysothatthebodilyconhgurationsandlunctioningvecalldisabledvillbe
includedinallleministexaminationsolcultureandrepresentationThisbriel
explorationaimsthenatbeginningtoalterthetermsolbotllemini standdis
abilitydiscourses
Feminist Theory and Disability Discourse
Contemporaryleministtheoryhasprovedtobeporous , dilluse, andperhaps
mostsignihcantsellcritical Thus , ve speaknov olleminisms , conllicts
in leminism, hyphenated leminisms , and even postleminism ` Histori
cally, academicleminismcombinesthehighlypoliticalcivilrightsandaccom
panyingidentitypolitics impulsesolth l 9o0sand l 90svithpostructural
ismstheoreticalcritiqueoltheliberalhumanistlaithinknovledge,trutl, and
identity, olten adding an insistence on materiality gleaned lrom Marist
thought Thelocusolleministconversationhasshiltedlromearlydebatesbe
tveenliberalandradicalleminisms , vhichlocusedonachievingequality, to
laterlormulations olcultural andgynocentric leminisms, vhichhighlighted
andrehabilitatedlemaledillerence s Mostrecently, thedebatebetveenthcse
vho vould minimize dillerences to achieve equ+lity and those vho vould
elaboratedillerencestoval orizethelemininehasbeencomplicatedbyanin-
terrogationolgenderconstructionitsellandarecognitionolmultipleaxesol
identity,botholvhichproloundlychallengetheverynotionolvomanasany
knd ol unihed identity category ` lemin:sins insistence that stanpoint
shapespolitics, thatidentity, sub]ectivity, andthebodyareculturalconstructs
tobequestioned, andthatallrepresent+tionispoliticalcomprisethetheoret-
icalmilieuinvhichlvanttoexaminedisability
The strands ol leminist thought most applicable to disability studies are
those that go beyond a narrov locus on gender alone to undertake a broad
sociopoliticalcritiqueolsystemic, inequitablepoverrelationsbasedonsocial
categories grounded in the body leminism thus becomes a theoretical per-
spective andmcthodology examininggenderas a discursive, ideological , and
materialcategozthatinteractsvithbutdoesnotsubordinateothersocialiden
tities or the particularities ol embodiment, histo and location that inlorm
sub]ectivity Priellyput, leminismsoltenconHict.ngandalvayscomplexaims
olpoliticizing the materialityolbodies and revriting the category olvoman
combineexactlythemethodsthatshouldbeusedtoexaminedisability
lvanttoextendinalresh]uxtaposition, then, the associationoldisability
22 e e e e e Politicizing Bodily Diferences
and lemalenessvithvhichl beganthissection Putratherthansimplycon
llatingthedisabledbodyviththelemalebody, lvanttotheorizedisabilityin
thevaysthatleminismhastheorizedgender Pothleminismandmyanalysis
oldisability challenge existing social relations , both resistinterpretations ol
certain bodily conhgurations and lunctioning as deviant, both question the
vaysthatdillerencesare investedvithmeaning, both examinetheenlorce
ment ol universalizing norms , both interrogate the politics ol appearance,
both explore thepolitics olnaming,bothlorge positive identities Neverthe-
less , leminismhaslormulated theseterms andprobedtheseconcernsmuch
morethoroughlythandisabilitystudieshas
LveKosolskySedgvicksdistinction,lorexample,betveenaminoritizing
andauniversalizingvievoldillerencecanbeappliedtodisabilitydiscourse
AccordingtoSedgvickshybridolleministandqueertheory, oneminoritizes
dillerencebyimaginingits signihcanceandconcerns as limited to a narrov,
specihc, relativelyhedpopulationorareaolinquiry ln contrast, auniversal
izingvievseesi ssuessurroundingaparticulardillerenceashavingcontinu
ing, determinative importance in the lives olpeople across the spectrum ol
identities ` Disabilitystudies shouldbecomea universal|zingdiscoursein
thevaythatSedgvickimaginesgaystudiesandleminismtobe Disability, or
gender or homosexuality) vould then be recognized as structuring a vide
rangeolthought, language,andperceptionthatmightnotbeexplicitlyarticu-
latedasdisability lamproposing,then, auniversalizingvievoldisabilityby
shoving hov the concept ol disability inlorms such national ideologies as
Americanliberalindividualismandsentimentalism, asvellasAlricanAmeri
canandlesbianidentities Suchtermslromleministtheorycanbeenlistedto
challenge thepersistentassumptionthatdisabilityis asellevidentcondition
olphysicalinadequacyandprivatemislortunevhosepoliticsconcernonly a
limitedminority
Auniversalizeddisabilitydiscoursethatdravsonleminismsconlrontation
viththegendersystemrequiresunderstandingthebodyasaculturaltextthat
is interpreted, inscribed vith meaningindeed maJevithin social rela-
tions Suchaperspectiveadvocatespolitical equitybydenaturalizingdisabil
itysassumedinleriority, bycastingitasdillerenceratherthanlack Although
thisconstructionistperspectivedoesthevitalculturalvorkoldestigmatizing
thedillerencesvecallgender,race, ordisability. thelogicolconstructionism
threatensneverthelesstoobscurethematerialandhistorical ellects olthose
dillerencesandtoerasetheverysocialcategoriesveanalyzeandclaimassig
nihcant Thus, the poststructuralist logic that destabilizes identity can lree
marginalized people lrom the narrative ol essential |nadequacy, but at the
Teorizing Disability 8 8 8 8 8 23
sametimeitrisksdenyingtheparticularityoltheirexperiences ' Thetheoret-
ical bindis that deconstructingoppressive categories can neutralize the el
lectsolrealdillerences
Adisabilitypoliticscannotatthis moment, hovever, allord to banishthe
categoryoldisability +ccording to the poststructualistcritique olidentityin
the vay that some leminists have argued lor abandoning the concept ol
vomanashopeles slyimprisoningandabstract
U
Thekindolaccesstopublic
spacesandinstitutionsthatvomengainedinthenineteenthcenturyandhave
expandedsincethe l 9o0svasonlylullymandatedlordisabledpeoplebythe
Americansvith DisabilitiesActol l 990, a broadcivil rights lav thatis only
beginningto be implemented And vhile in the movement tovard equality,
race andgenderaregenerallyacceptedas dillerencesratherthandeviances,
disability is still most olten seenasbodily inadequacyorcatastrophe tobe
compensated lor vith pity orgood vill, rather than accommodated by sys
temicchangesbasedoncivilrights On the one hand, then, itis importantto
usethe constructionistargumenttoassertthatdi sabilityis notbodilyinsulli
ciency butinsteadariseslromtheinteracti onolphysicaldillerencesvithan
environmentOntheotherhand,theparticular,historicalexistenceolthedis
abled body demands both accommodation andrecognition ln otherwords ,
the physical dillerences ol using a vheelchair or being deal, lor exampl e,
shouldbeclaimed, butnotcastaslack
Poth constructionism and essentialism, then, are theoretical strategies
lramings olthebodyinvokedlorspecihcends , such aspsychologicallylib
erating people vhose bodies have been dehned as delective or lacilitating
imagined communities lrom vhichpositive identities can emerge Strategic
constructionism destigmatizes the disabled body, makes dillerence relative,
denaturalizes socalled normalcy, and challenges appearance hierarchies
Strategic essentialism, bycontrast, validates individual experience and con
sciousness, imaginescommunity, authorizeshistory, andlacilitatessellnam
ing The identity disabled operates in this mode as a pragmatic narrative,
vhatSusanPordocallsalile-enhancinghctionthatplacesthe realityolin-
dividual bodies and perspectives vithin specihc social and historical con
texts
Z
Imagining Feminist Disability Discourse
Put il the category disabled is a uselul hction, the disabled body set in a
worldstructuredlor the privilegedbodyis not Disability, perhaps morethan
otherdillerences, demands areckoningviththemessinessolbodilyvariety,
24 e e e e Politicizing Bodily Diferences
vith literalindividuationrun amok Pecausedisabilityis dehnednotasaset
ol observable, predictable traitslike racialized or gendered leaturesbut
ratherasuU] departurelromanunstatedphysicalandluctionalnorm,disabil
ityhighlightsindividualdillerences ln othervords, the conceptoldisability
unites ahighlymarked, heterogeneous group vhoseonlycommonalityis be
ingconsidered abnormal As the norm becomes neutral in an environment
createdtoaccommodateit, disabilitybecomesintense, extravagant,andprob
lematic Disability is the unorthodox made llesh, relusingto benormalized,
neutralized, orhomogenized More important, inaneragovernedbythe ab
stractprincipleoluniversalequality, disabilitysignalsthatthe bodycannotbe
unlversalized Shapedbyhistory, dehnedbyparticularity, andatoddsvithits
environment, disabilityconloundsanynotionolageneralizable, stablephysi
calsub]ect Thecripplebelorethestairs, theblindpersonbeloretheprinted
page,thedealpersonbeloretheradio,theamputeebelorethetypevriter,and
thedvarlbelorethecounterareallproolthatthemyr|adstructuresandprac
ticesolmaterial, dailylileenlorce the culturalstandardolauniversalsub]ect
vithanarrovrangeolcorporealvariation
Disability, asalormalidentitycategoq canpressure leministtheoqtoac
knovledgephysicaldiversitymorethoroughly Perhapsleminismsmostuselul
conceptlordisabilitystudiesisstandpointtheoryvhichrecognizestheimme
diacyandcomplexityolphysicalexistence Lmphasizingthemultiplicityolall
vomensidentities, histories, andbodies, thistheoryassertsthatindividualsit
uationsstructurethesub]ectivitylromvhichparticularvomenspeakandper
ceive ' ` lncorporatingpostmodernisms challenge olthe unsituated, ob]ective
Lnlightenmentvlevpoint,leministstandpointtheoryhasrelormulatedgender
identityasacomplex,dynamicmatrixolinterrelated, oltencontradictory, expe
riences, strategies, styles , andattributionsmediatedbycultureandindividual
history Thisnetvorkcannotbeseparatedmeaninglullyintodiscreteentitiesor
ordered into a hierarchyAckovledgingidentitys particular, complex nature
allovs characteristics beyond race, class, and gender to emerge Standpoint
theoqandthe leministpracticeolexplicitlysituating onesellvhenspeaking
thusallovlorcomplicatinginllectionssuchasdisabilityor,morebroadly, body
conhgurationattributions such as lat, dishgured, abnormal, ugly, or de
lormedto enterintoourconsiderations olidentityand sub] ectivity Sucha
dismantlingolthe unita(categoryvoman has enabledleministtheorytoen
compassalthoughnotvithoutcontentionsuchleministspecializationsas,
lor example, Patricia HillCollinss blackleministthoughtormyovn explo
rationsolaleministdisabilitystudies ' So]ustasleministtheorycanbringto
disability theory strategies loranalyzingthe meanlngs olphysical dillerences
Teorizing Disability 2 5
and identi|ngsites vhere thosemeaningsinHuenceotherdiscourses, itcan
alsohelparticulatetheuniquenessandphysicalityolidentity
Aleministpoliticalpraxislorvomenvithdisabilitiesneeds , then, tolocus
attimes onthesingularityandperhapstheimmutabilityolthellesh, andat
thesametimetointerrogatetheidentityitsupports Forexample,inexploring
thepolitics olsell-naming, NancyMairs claimstheappellationcripplebe
causeitdemandsthatothersacknovledgetheparticularityolherbody Peo-
ple vinceatthevord cripple , Mairscontends Lventhoughsheretains
vhathasbeena derogatoryterm, sheinsists on determiningits signihcance
hersellPerhapslvantthemtovince lvantthemtoseemeasatoughcus-
tomer, onetovhomthelates/gods/viruseshave notbeenkind, butvhocan
lacethebrutaltrutholherexistencesquarely As acripple, l svagger Here
Mairsis notsimplycelebratingthe termolothernessorattemptingtoreverse
itsnegativeconnotation,rather, shevantstocallattentiontothematerialre-
alityolhercrippledness, toherbodilydillerenceandherexperienceolit For
Mairs , thesocial constructionistargumentrisks neutralizingthe signihcance
olherpainandherstrugglevithanenvironmentbuiltlorotherbodies ' `
Disability, hovever,isleltoutolseveralmainstreamleministassumptions
Forinstance, vhileleminismquitelegitimatelydecriesthe sexualob]ectihca-
tionolvomen, di sabledvomenoltenencountervhatHarlanHahnhascalled
asexualob]ectihcation, theassumptionthatsexualityisinappropriateindis-
abled people One vomanvho uses a vheelchair, lor example, andi s also
quitebeautilulreportsthatpeopleoltenrespondtoherasilthiscombination
oltraitsverearemarkableandlamentablecontradiction The] udgmentthat
thedisabledvomansbodyisasexualandunlemininecreatesvhatMichelle
FineandAdrienneAschtermrolelessness, asocialinvisibilityandcancella-
tionollemininitythatcanpromptdisabledvomentoclaimthelemaleiden-
tity that the culture denies them Forexample, Cheryl Marie Vade insists
uponaharmonybetveenherdisabilityandhervomanlysexualityinapoem
characterizinghersellasTheVomanVith|uice ' AsMairssexplorationol
sellnamingandVadesassertionolsexualitysuggest, aleministdisabilitypol-
iticsvouldupholdtherightlorvomentodehnetheirphysicaldillerencesand
theirlemininitylorthemselvesratherthanconlormingtoreceivedinterpreta-
tionsoltheirbodies
VdespoemolselldehnitionechoesMairsbymaintaininghrmlythatshe
i snotoneolthephysicallychallenged Rather, sheclaims , l m the Cimp/
l mtheCripple/l mtheCrazyLady Allirmingherbodyasatoncesexualand
dillerent, sheasserts ,lmaFrenchkssvithclelttongue Resistingthecul
turaltendencynotonlytoerasehersexualitybuttodepreciateandob] ecti
26 e e e e e Politicizing Bodily Diferences
herbody, shecharacterizeshersellasasockintheeyevithgnarlcdhst This
imageolthedisabledbodyasavisualassault,ashockingspectacletothenor
mate eye, captures a dehningaspectoldisabled experience Vhereaslemi
nistsclaimthatvomenareobjectscltheevaluativemalegaze,Vadesimage
olherbodyasasockin theeyesubtlyremindsusthatthedisabledbodyis
theobjectolthestare llthemale gazemakesthenormativelemaleasexual
spectacle, thenthestaresculptsthedisabledsubj ectintoagrotesquespecta
cleThestareisthegazeintensihed, lramingherbodyasaniconoldeviance
lndeed, asVadespoemsuggests, thestareisthegesturethatcreatesdisabil-
ityasanoppressivesocialrelationshipAndaseverypersonvithavisibledis-
ability knovs intimately, managing, dellecting, resisting, or renouncing that
stareispartolthedailybusinessollile
ln addition, disabled vvomen must sometimes delend againstthe assess-
mentoltheirbodiesasunhtlormotherhoodorolthemselves asinlantilized
objectsvhooccasionotherpeoplesvirtueVhereasmotherhoodisoltenseen
as compulsorylorvomen, disabledvomen are oltendenied ordiscouraged
lrom the reproductive role that someleminist thinkers hnd oppressive The
controversial leminist ethic olcare has also been criticized by leminist dis-
abilityscholars lorunderminingsymmetrical, reciprocalrelationsamongdis-
abledandnondisabledvomenasvellaslor suggestingthatcare isthesolc
responsibility olvomen Making disabled vomen the ob]ects olcare risks
castingthemas helplessin ordertocelebratenurturingas virtuousleminine
agency PhilosopherAnitaSilvers explainsthatlarlromvanquishingpatriar-
chalsystems,substitutingtheethicsolcaringlortheethicsolequalitythreat-
ensanevenmoreoppressivepaternalism '
Perhaps more problematic still, leministabortion rationale seldomques
tionsthepre]udicialassumptionthatdelective letusesdestinedtobecomc
disabledpeopleshouldbeeliminated Theconcernsololdervomen, vhoarc
olten disabled, tend also to be ignored byyounger lcminists ' ` One ol the
most pervasive leminist assumptions that undermines some disabled
vomens strugglei stheliberalideologyolautonomyandindependencethat
luelsthebroaderimpulsetovard lemale empoverment Pytacitlyincorpo-
ratingtheliberalpremisethatlevelsindividualcharacteristicstopositanab
stract, disembodied sub]ectoldemocracy, leministpractice otten leaves no
spacelor the needs and accommodations that di sabledvomen s bodies re-
quire ' ' Prominentdisabilityrightsactivist|udyHeumannsangrand disap-
pointed vords reHect an alienation not unlike that betveen some black
vomenandsomevhiteleminists henlcomeintoaroomlullolleminists ,
all they see is a vheelchair These conllicts testi that leministslike
Teorizing Disability e e e e e 27
everyoneelse, includingdisabledpeoplethemselveshaveabsorbedcultural
stereotypes
Femininity and Disability
Although l insist on disabled womens identity even vhile questioning its
sources , l alsovantto suggestthatahrmboundary betveen disabled and
nondisabled vomen cannot be meaninglully dravnj ust as any absolute
distinctionbetveen sexandgenderisproblematic Femininityanddisability
are inextricably entangled in patriarchal culture, as Aristotles equation ol
vomenvithdisabledmenillustrates Notonlyhasthelemalebodybeenla-
beleddeviant, buthistoricallythepracticesollemininityhaveconhguredle
malebodies similarlytodisability Footbinding, scarihcation, clitoridectomy,
andcorsetingvere ,andare) sociallyaccepted, encouraged, even compulsory
culturallormsollemaledisablementthat,ironically, aresociallyenabling,in-
creasingavomansvalueandstatusatagivenmomentinaparticularsociety
Similarly,suchconditionsas anorexia, hys teria, andagoraphobiaareinasense
standardlemininerolesenlargedtodisablingconditions, blurringthelinebe-
tveennormallemininebehaviorandpathology '
The disciplinaryregimes ollemininebeautyolten obscure theseemingly
sellevident categories olthe normal and the pathological For example,
thenineteenthcentury Luroamerican prescription lor upper-class leminine
beautypaleskin, emaciatedbody,videeyespreciselyparalleledthesymp-
tomsoltuberculosi s, justas the cultolthinnesspromotedbythe lashionin-
dustry today mimics the appearance oldi sease ln a similar example, the
iconography and language describing contemporary cosmetic surgeq in
vomens magazines persistently casts the unreconstructed lemale body as
havingabnormalitiesthatcanbecorrectedbysurgicalproceduresthatim-
prove the appearancebyproducingnatural looking noses, thighs , breasts,
chins , and so on `This discoursetermsvomens unmodihedbodies as un-
natural andabnormal , vhilecasting surgicallyalteredbodies as normaland
natural Although cosmetic surgery is in one sense a logical extension ol
beauty ptactices such as usingmakeup, permingorrelaxinghair, lightening
skin, andremovinghair, itdillers proloundlylrom thesebasicallydecorative
lormsolsellreconstructionlikeclitoridectomiesandscarihcation,itinvolves
themutilationandpainthataccompanymanydisabilities
Allol thesepracticescannot, ol course, beequated, hovever, eachtrans-
lorms an inhnitely plastic body in vays similar tothe ellects oldisability
Peautihcationchangesareimaginedto bechoicesthatvillsculptthelemale
28 + Politicizing Bodily Diferences
bodysoitconlormstoaleminineideal Disabilities , incontrast, areimagined
toberandomtranslormationsthatmovethebodyavaylromideal lorms ln
asocietyinvhichappearanceistheprimaryindexolvaluelorvomen, and
increasinglylormen) ,beautihcationpracticesnormalizethelemalebodyand
disabilitiesabnormalizeit |eminizationpromptsthegaze,disabilityprompts
the stare |eminization increases a vomans cultural capital , disability re
ducesi t
PutasAristotlesequationollemalesvithmutilatedmalessuggests, even
the ideallemalebodyis abnormalcomparedto the universal standard olthe
malebody Thenormativelemalethehgureolthebeautilulvomanisthe
narrovlyprescribedopposite olthe ideal mal e llheis tobe strong, active,
large, hirsute,hard, thenshemustbeveak,passive, small ,hairless , soltThe
ncrmativelemalebcdy, then, cccupiesadualandparadcxicalculturalrcle it
isthenegativetermopposingthemalebody, butitisalsosimultaneouslythe
privileged term opposingtheabnormalized lemale body |orexample, the
nineteenthcentury obsession vith scientihc quantihcation produced a de
taileddescriptionolabsolutebeauty, laidoutbyHavelockLllis, vvitha Dar
vinian ranking determined entirely by physical characteristics and ranging
lrom the beautilul Luropean voman to vhat vas considered to be her
grotesqueopposite, theAlricanvoman ` Moreover, scientihcdiscoursecon
ceivedthisanatomicalscaleolbeautyassimultaneouslyoneolpathologThe
lurtheralemalebodydepartedlromabsolutebeauty, themoreabnormalit
became The markers olthisindubitablepathologyveretraitslike darkskin
andphysicaldisability, orbehaviorslikeprostitution,thatvereoltenlinkedto
bodycharacteristics Vithinthisscheme,allvomenareseenasdeviant,but
some more sothan others Sothesimple dichotcmyolob]ectihedleminine
bodyandmasculinesub] ectiscomplicatedbyotheroppositions lndeed, the
unleminine, unbeautilul body dehnes and is dehned by the ideal leminine
body This aberrant hgure olvoman has been identihedvariously inhistory
anddiscourseasblack,lat,lesbian,sexuallyvoracious ,disabled,oruglyVhat
isimportanthereisthatthishguresdevianceandsubsequentdevaluationare
alvaysattributedtosomevisiblecharacteristicthatoperatesasanemblemol
herdillerence, ]ustasbeautyhasalvaysbeenlocatedinthebodyolthelem
ininevoman
Asonemanilestationoltheunbeautilulvoman, then, thehgureolthedis
abledvomandisruptsopposi tionalparadigms Thi sculturalhgureolthedis
abled voman, not theactual vcmanvitha disability, isthe sub]ectolthis
study Pecauserepresentationstructuresreality,theculturalhguresthathaunt
us olten must, like VirginiaVoollsAngel olthe House, bevrestled to the
Teorizing Disabilit 29
lloorbelore evenmodestselldehnition, letalonepoliticalaction, can occur
Thehgureolthedisabledvomanllocusonhereisaproductolaconceptual
triangulation She i sa cultural thirdterm, dehnedbythe originalpairolthe
masculinehgureandthelemininehgure Seenastheoppositeolthemascu
linehgure, butalsoimaginedastheantithesis olthenormalvoman,thehg
ure ol the disabled lemale is thus ambiguously positioned both inside and
outsidethecategoryolvoman
Disabled Women Figures
Mypurposehere is totracethecomplexitiesthatariselrom the presenceol
theseambiguousdisabledvvomenhguresvithinculturalandliterarytextsin
vhich, lorthemostpart,theyoccupymarginalpositions lnalmosteverycase,
thedisabledvomanhgurelunctionsasasymbololotherness , eitherpositive
ornegativeThepresenceoltheseoltenmultiplymarginalizedhgurescompli
catesandunbalancesseeminglystablenarrativeeconomiesinthetexts lnthe
account ol lreak shovs in chapter l, lor example, exhibitions ol disabled
vomen ol color introduce race, gender, and ethnicity into lreak discourse,
vhich seemsinitiallytoturn upon thesimple opposition betveen normal
andabnormalbodies Freaks alvays appeared not]ust asmonsters , butas
genderedandracializedmonsters
Thecomplicationprovokedbythe disabledvomanhgureisperhapsclear
est, hovever, intheliterarytextsexaminedhere Shiltingtheanalyticallocus
lrom maincharacters andcentralplots to the secondary, oreven incidental ,
disabledvomenrevealscomplexalignmentsandotherviseburiedtensionsat
vorkinthe texts lnchapter+, lorinstance, the clusterolnineteenthcentury
sentimental hction setsa leminine narrativevoice and perspective againsta
masculinepointolviev ll, hovever, verecognizethetriangle oltheimplic
itly masculine cultural sell, theleminine voman, andthedisabledvoman,
lreshperspectivesemerge Lxaminingthe oppositionthatthesesocialrelorm
novelspositbetveenthelemininevomanandthedisabledvomanbetveen
LlizabethStuartPhelpssheroine, Perley, andherdealandmuteantiheroine,
Catty, lorinstancerevealsthetexts otherviseobscuredentanglementinlib-
eral individualistideology Similarly, the primary discourse in the tventieth
centuryAlrican-Americannovelsdiscussedinchapterisoneolrace Yet, as
viththeearliergroup oltexts ,examiningthedisabledhgures rhetoricallunc
tioncomplicatestheprimaryoppositionbetveenblackandvhitecultureon
vhich the novels turn ln Toni X1orrisons 1crBc, lor example, the blind
Thereses narrative empoverment mustbecontrastedvith thebeautilul|a-
30 e e e e e Politicizing Bodily Diferences
dines loss olpover in orderlor the novels socialcritique to be lully appre
hended Thus , thepresenceolthedisabledvomanhgurechallengesanysim
ple textual reading that arranges dominant and marginal positions along a
singleaxis olidentitysuchasgender,race, orclass
Sociocultural Analyses of the Extraordinary Body
Ering Goffman's Stigma Theor
As l have suggested, the contemporarytheorymostsuitedto examiningdis-
abilitylusesidentitypolitics viththepoststructuralistinterrogationoliden-
tity, truth,andknovledge,placesitsconcernsinhistoricalcontext,andlorms
a complex analysis of the relationship between society and the body. Although
leministtheorys attentiontothe bodyand identityis uselul in thisregard, to
satislactorilylormulatedisabilitytheoryit is necessaqtoinvokeseveralother
theorists, though theirmain locusis neithergendernor disability Toclari
hovrepresentationattachesmeaningtothephysicaldillerencesvetermdis-
ability, l discusshere theintersectionsolbodyandcultureprobedbyLrving
Collman, MaryDouglas, andMichelFoucault, amongothers Olthese, only
Collmans sociological stigma theory directly addresses disability, to utilize
Douglass , loucaults , and others vork, l have extrapolated hov disability
couldbe included in their analyses This brielsurveyhighlights the aspects
olthese theorists ideas thatpertain to the vays the disabledbody emerges
lromculture
LrvingCollmans dehnitive l 9olanalysis , Sigmc Noes on ae Mcncge
meno]Sjoi|eJIJeniy, lays outatheoryolstigmatizationasasocialprocess
that attempts to accountloralllorms olvhat Simone de Peauvoirs earlier
study olvomen called Otherness Despite its curiously insensitive title
anddisturbinglyhostile tonetovardits sub]ectsperhapsin thetraditionol
FreudCollmans vorkunderpins the nascent held oldisability studies in
the social sciences Likeleministtheory, stigma theoryprovidesa uselulvo
cabularylorplacingdisabilityinsocialcontexts Vhereastermssuchasoth
ernessoralteritydominateliterarycriticism, botharelimitedlorexplaining
marginalizedidentitiesbecausetheyarenouns lncontrast, thetermstigma,
takenbyCollmanlromtheCreekpracticeolbrandingormarkingslavesand
criminals and lrom Christian notions about the vounds olsaints, can take
manygrammaticallormstomatchthecomponentstrandsolacomplexsocial
process Thetransitiveverbstigmatize, lorexample, suggestsaprocessvith
botha sub]ectand anob]ect SuchsemanticHexibility can callto accounta
Teorizing Disability e e e e e 3 1
stigmatizer, identianinstitutionthatis stigmatizing, isolateastigmaas
onlyoneaspectolavhole, complexindividual , ordescribepeopleortraitsas
stigmatized Some socialpsychologists have extendedCollmans theoryby
usingthetermmarktonameapotentiallystigmatizablephysical orbehav
ioraltrait Thissubtledistinctionstressestheseparationbetveenactualchar
acteristicsorbehaviorandtheprocessesoldevaluingthem lndividualsare
markablebecauseolparticulartraits ,andmarkersarethosevhointerpret
certaintraitsasdeviant Stigmatheorythusprovidesameansolpreciselytrac
ing the production ol cultural minorities or others ln short, stigmatize
describes distinctions among people, their physical traits , vhat is done to
them, vhodoesit, andvhatitmeans
lnessence, stigmatizationisaninteractivesocialprocessi nvhichparticu
larhuman traits aredeemednot only dillerent, but deviant lt is a lorm ol
socialcomparisonapparentlyloundinallsocieties, thoughthespecihcchar
acteristicssingledoutvaryacrossculturesandhistory Mostimportantisthat
these social devaluations are collective, part ol a communal acculturation
process Stigmatizationcreatesashared, sociallymaintainedanddetermined
conceptionolanormalindividual, vhatl earliertermedanormate, sculpted
by a social group attempting to dehne its ovn character and boundaries
Though anyhumantraitcanbestigmatized, thedominantgrouphastheau
thorityandmeanstodeterminevhichdillerencesareinleriorandtoperpetu
atethose]udgments `Thustermslikeminority, ethnicity, anddisability
suggest inlusing certain dillerences vith negative value Stigmatization not
onlyrellectsthetastesandopinionsolthedominantgroup, itreinlorcesthat
groups idealized sell-descriptionas neutral , normal , legitimate, andidentih
ablebydenigratingthe characteristics olless poverlul groups orthose con
sidered alien Theprocess olstigmatization thus legitimates the status quo,
naturalizes attributions olinherent inleriority and superiority, and obscures
the sociallyconstructedqualityolbothcategories
Recentelaborationsolstigmatheorybysocialscientistsprobethe motiva
tionlorthisapparentlyuniversalsocialprocess Aphenomenologicalaccount
suggeststhatstigmatirationariseslromthehumanimpulsetocategorizedil
lerencesandimposesomekindolmeaninglulorderonexperience llpeople
apparentlyneedtoroutinizetheirlivesvithinterpretiveschemata,orvhatAl
lred Schutz calls recipes, that make theirvorlds seem knovable andpre
dictable Putstigmatizingismorethanorganizingexperience lnthiscomplex
process, certainhumantraitsbecomesalient,suchas the physiologicalchar-
acteristicsveusetoanchorsex, race, ethnicity, anddisability Collman
identihes three types olphysical and behavioral characteristics lrom vhich
32 e e Politicizing Bodily Diferences
stigmataare usuallyconstructedbya given socialunit hrstare physical dis-
ability, delormity, oranomaly,nextareindividualbehaviorssuchasaddiction,
dishonesty, unpredictability, lackoleducation ormanners , orcertain sexual
habits ,hnallyarerace, religion,ethnicity, orgender 'Complexhierarchiesol
assignedsocialstatusareloundedonsuchactionsandcharacteristics
Collmanlurtherrehneshisanalysisol socialstigmatizationbyrecognizing
thatmostpeopleinthissocietypossesssomestigmatizedtraittosomedegree,
making the group v
TOIO I1MO O IO 1O BS C1 JNO
O1O BOOJ @O1DuO N ONOY 1NO-
Tb|e rarkable gid is 00W 17 yean o 8g6, bom a s!avc in C!u
emQ, North Caro!na, Is ofa ngbt Mu!atm compIexop wm
TW0 b08t8I0, W0 0V0000
*
f ||ll lJ Jll | || | ll |||
AtI ef WNte& 0eu0 t&to M&o MeG
AudaomIlytorms bu|one persou, physcalIy apeakug. 8be 1ALb5, 8INU,
XAT5 aud DRIN]Swith bothouths, oothcravugmet tbe omethingatmc
same time. She has four feo|, and o!k HQ0D aU of the, or cn waIk upon
tWO of tHCm with C88C. \YilI C | \ VBt8u witb lWo persona ouaia-:-at sat-::s8
ID 80mC tie. Bing VCy bcau.ituIIy twc parts of 0D air 3I 0HUC, Ot coaver
8UC smg toetLer. Sne I8 nteIIgent aud p!easIng iu couvotsa|ion, an1 bas 0
nnc, Lappy dispcsiticn. 5U! IS IO M0NS1I0SITY, hrs D0 rop.usivc !ook
abonther nthe Ieast, Iut0H tho contr=r i VtY INTB3TING. 8be h
DCBD eriticaIlyexamiaed, D3D bysIcaIy rnd au|omicahy,y tbc Ieadiug phya-
IC\0D8 of Jc6evson MedicaI OoIIege. at Iu|Iad:Ihia, who uuhesItatngly pro-
nonncc her tie MOST LSTUNlSUING, bMARKABL and INT8Ld11NU
MWM O
M M2
sirce thc creanon o OUt 6rstarents. Iar D0I0 -urprsing B0U ondeHuI thm
tIe 5iameee J`wms. Io pctcn s!ouId ai! to 8PP er 8 >igLt o! wbiob &
, IiIe time w never c !crgottcn.
33 C1 M3 $ ]
J!fD Jt0Ht U t I :3- m-. fO , DOu 7 I0 U . - "CIIOFMBOC
tvty U . OHI.
Freak di scourse cast the extraordinary body as "wonderful , " I' astonishing, " and
"remarkable . " Testi moni es of physi ci ans authenticated freaks , and infated
descriptions testi fied to the freak' s appeal and ordinari ness whi l e simultaneously
proclaiming the singularity of the freak body.
The llassach usetts Historical Society
The freak sho\v exhi bi ted exoti cized racial ot hers in order to defi ne by staged
vi sual contrast the \vhi te, mal e subj ect of democracy as civi l ized, sel f- control led ,
and rational . JIarl rd TheCter Collecti o1l , 1|c Houghton Li brary
JnC cont rast h et\veen t hi s Ubangi \!voman and thi s Euro- An1eri can establi shes t he
tenns of beauty and ugli ness i n Areri can cul t ure. Li p di s cs, d pi pe, and an androgy
nous cost unle render t hi s Afri can VOnlan the grotesque oposi te of the \vhi t e
\\'H11an, presented i n standard, se?ualiZed CmlnlnC gJrb, hJl r, and makeup .
Ci rc ls \ \r||i[usel ll , BamlJOo, vscmlsill
l. J. BarnUlT'S "vhat | | l , created fr0 l11 tTi crocephal i c 'l oCl .:un, chal l enged
vi ev'ers to detern1 i ne vvhet hc r t hi s "lTOst rnarvcl oLl s CICdIUIC h\ |ng ''c c ` l o\.cr
orde r of c or " hi gher orde r of +iOnlc
\
|rco- \vere often staged o- hybri ds i n
order t o provi de t he i r audi ences v",i th c opportuni ty t o exerci se thei r experti se at
defi ni ng truth.
S/el H +/5t H Hl , ' | .| | c. \t|u|. |' ! ' | |c| l iH|||
1uDru
au ITT
.., ,
Ni se !0 Ur>. IIUIU |` \\ 5IH^CTU^, (t|c lo!brof0uI |ouoIq,)
\\l|I D Sl^ ^
t1 t 1tttu Mt C ,
\ n |!l ^ . un ` !1, !hc 1 \ h . J 7|h
ol .cmucr, ` ` uud !`!`!^L
JL1'' ! ITH .-uii gut l !Ju' I I' uu~l a-|oni-i uguuu cmios|
y iuHo .
1ml d ! >l: 1 (ii ! - vn uI A tti+ ~I i t i u l;. ,i|c I.it| wro| \o|mgton,)
ai i l I\ | | |.| pt'r,1) 1 1 'hu pH c i |clI luC | cu| , vo,iu ocrdaa,Ied
Our!tr| c ltl u I > Ou IO l |y, lu vt l|}, auJ t\|uO|. O Uu PI U\B |+agcagcvv |eu
ut0K| |2 ol !h|.: : | . u-t ii o | - !uI | | + u u \uUf | II], '-hcr:dl u' J0| C! H1TU
as Uu!n i ll \ t r l ( , und u, tOti:i:tumI | , ooa:rivdt||toui:litg
E I
Ou IY|g| -lu l I0F1Y- c| X 1\l' 1', and_c| ! S \0r clccJ.t | and i nieresI:ng. 5h::
te|tio ' : ae1J l l i,", tti unpal ll l lt> itd d''grN). t|\ \t:t:- IIt_, -ug mi crou hymos,
Ir!0|- n t i i y i.|, r:ttIi_tni0| t t /ltu0_ u-htn_|Ou. a:co0. |augucati |yattet
Owu\Ci I n\rl, | |i-t O Ut tsc| + cr . 1 theh 1= Qr| c! | gOud, 0n l lm 0|PmuC6
Y^I] ! ` + i I - u uu|I -luu lul icull 0-\!rC ncunvi|-n_ W| | m| U|8|II>BD0reIgi-
OuS r6 I. Jht uuurt|c ot| .smi l rv cl !il uofdif ofunl iqui ! y -' rIK |t |Hmldrwith
utD0=' II | I | , und Uti viLcnu I u1 |u! hi- tS ulc rcs. c O| !t ul t! specuwn | Dur-
tal i l Y I \ '' ! :lr: ui i d 0| g| u+|uuIhtu!It; und i u-u|ut Utt\Ii | UB\S B0U~
a,.|ir r vi, hnwf<yr)l' u-lOi I- | II ! t!uCI mayup(aI, thaI oll`! HtJ1i- n
uVI t-tsl l ii: ttOn >l1c |ri lid.
| i in! . . : . o,:. t h,I t: ut+ un! | ot | l | geut mcn n ' ia ^-
Yor|. o-| n, aul I ir \iu. | i u\ i utuu u ! h|+ bo 8rrtto:t| Iht nutumcuI8 0C-
Comjutr j| i\_ htr, t ud all . :nrInhlg, +uiuUc0 lct IO 0u, 0- . l l qt0`4g
P |ni l i' iu Cun| t rm, uHtit\iuct' , u| U wil l giVH t\ty uIIrUl|uu !O !h uUI08 W0Vm
lh8 c' . u| h-_Ont
| .. hn.- |)i i t! Phibdt: l l' hi a, Ncw'OrK, !os| ou. c., ly
JYl ^1 \\' \ ^\ ili:- uuu Genl l i' men. V ! I n Ihu \| lhttO
H:csj !r/||:|:oucomU/ Io l 1.M .e slu O cwI|i J.
MWZ72MOM 2 Cons, OJJMMW MM& * Ms
:.::t-b J. 6+u++
The first freak l. J. Barnum exhi bi ted \vas Joi ce Heth, the supposed 1 6 1 -year-ol d
nursemaid to George \Vashi ngton. Heth, a bl ack, ol d, toothl ess, bl ind, crippl ed
sl ave \VOn1an \vas c dOI1esti cated and trivialized versi on of what the ideal Ameri can
sel f \vas not , thus assuring her audiences of thei r i dentities .
Somers Historicrd Societ) Somers, lew Yrh
O ci rc us s i desho\vs , text ual , spat i al , and oral di scourses made up o
f
l uri d banners, s i gns , sho\;\/lTen on stands, 11usi c, pi t chmen, and
stages
f
ramed t he
f
reak
f
i gures as extraordi nary and exaggerated thei r st rangeness.
Ci rClf S \!+|J .\USel f1l , Barul)o, \Visconsin
Sartjee, " ' The O||Cn|O|
\Cnu , HJnCd hCrC by c
d7arf and an albino ,;oman.
Fen1ale freaks 'I' ere created
by publ icly di splaying vomen
\vi |h extraordi nary bodies to
establ i sh by contrast the
contours of the ideal Euro
Ameri can "Toman, who
remuined in priVatC -
Librar ofthe College of
Physicians of Philadelplria
o
,. ., . I'u lrtmnt
u
J
rrr, f /. rIo: /A
.----____ .._._'.,,.' w,"<,.,.,,,.<,<, . ...
Sci ent i fi c i l l us t rations s uch a s |hl - one of c fenld l e "Caucasi an" and hcr tnut ucdl y
defi ni ng count erpart , a " Hot t entot" \\'Olnan, at ten1 pt ed |O bi ol ogi ze c u l t ural di ffer
ences a nd est ahl i s h a n i .rc
|
u|ull c h. crurcl\ of en1bodi rnent , Lnarki ng the pol es of
hU111ani ty for the ni neteent h- cent ury \stern rni nd. Scient i sts recruit ed " Hottentots"
l i ke Sar tj e Baart rna n | O enl body an | n
|
tr Or| |\ that affirnl ed European s uper| or| ty-
|r| || | |t |a(
Souveni r life narratives sol d at shovls fused medi cal \ii th ent ertainment
di s courses. These pan1 phlets augmented vi s ual di spl ays by provi di ng detailed
descri pti ons and sci ent ifi c authenti cati ons of the extraordinary body as well as
exaggerated accounts of the freaks ' lives .
Li hrmy (d t he Col lege of Physi cians of Phi ladelphia
Jhc | nt crl or- ol di ii1 c
\>LL ` ad si desho\vs
us uall y di s pl ayed O seri e`
of frea ks , each surrounded
y a hyperbol i zi ng
envi ronnlent designed
IO |roduce |hc great est
i l l usi on of di fference ond
di st ance froIll t he vi c\vers .
| /Cl \J \|ucit+ti
Iaa|, \|.oii/ i
The freak show stage brought together people whose bodi es coul d signi(the enormous , the miniature, the exoti c, the excessive,
the l acking, the profuse, the i ndeterminate, or the alien to produce a motley chorus line of physi cal difference that made the
onlookers' bodi es seem ordinary and banal by comparison.
Circus \Vorld Museu11, Baraboo, Vsconsin
Freaks [nade fr01 n peopl e \vi th congeni tal di sabi l i ti es usual ly performed 11 undane
tasks l n al t ernati ve Inodes choreographed to anlaze a udi ences . Here C harl es Tripp,
; fanlous Annl<ss \\'onder, \\' hi t tl es wi th hi s toes \yhi l e surrounded \vi th other props
s uch as a teacup dnd \\Ti t i ng and c ut t i ng i lTI pl ernent s, al l of \Vh1 Ch he us es vi th hi s
t oes as a part or t nc exhi bi t .
||cUx \\J |'!|tl! l l , |a| \'|c|H
B:' j uxtaposi ng the very large \vi th the very small , freak exhi bi ti ons crcated wondrous
giants and lni dgets , fi gures ncnv vani shed-" c ured" by modern medi cal treatlnent .
Ci rcus ' Vrle \!ac. n/ RnrulJOo, tbsconsi n
l a n 1 I I
Constructing Disabled Figures:
Cultural and Literar Sites
1 n n t t
Te Cultural Work of American
Freak Shows, o3 - V+
The Spectacle of the Extraordinary Body
ln l S22 a native Prazilian voman calledTono Maria vas exhibited in Lon-
dons PondStreetastheVenusolSouthAmerica Herbodyborenearlyone
hundred scars , each ostensibly representingan actoladultery Accordingto
herpitchman,herculturessocialcodeallovedamaximumoll 0+suchscars
butpunishedthe onehundredhlthsexualtransgressionvithdeatb Hersex
ualityvasthuspurportedtohavereachedtheedgeolevenherovnostensibly
savagesocietysstandards Complementingthe displayolthisVenusssigni
ingscarsvasherperlormance, vhichconsistedoleatingto satietydespite
the encumbrances ola large lips tretchingdevice and toothlessness A con
temporary] ournalistsummedherupaslazyandnasty, describingindetail
theemeticspectacleolhersybariticachievement Regardlessolhisdisgust,
theobserver gleanedlrom Tono Marias shov a uselullesson havingprevi-
ouslylailedtolullyappreciateLnglishvomen, hevouldloreveralterpaythe
homage due totheloveliestvorksolcreation, enhancedinvaluebysovon-
derlulacontrast '
Strippedolherovn cultural context and lramedbythe luridinterpreta-
tions ol the Lngli shman and his society, Tono \l arias body became a mal
leableimageuponvhichheraudiencepro]ectedculturalcharacteristicsthey
56 e e e e e Constructing Disabled Figures
themselves disavoved Follovingconventions oldisplayingandinterpreting
theextraordinarybodythatgobacktothebeginningolhumanhistory, thisrit-
ual spectacle combined and exaggerated lemale characteristics in order to
sharpenthedistinctionbetveentheidealEnglishvomanandherphysicaland
cultural opposite. Tono \larias perlormance testihedto aninherentlemale
sexualdeviance, indolence, carnality, andappetitetemperedonlybyVestern
civilization Personiingcultural and sexualaberration,Tono Marianotonly
conhrmedtheLnglishmanssenseolphysicalsell-mastery, butalsoprovideda
cautionarytaleolthenaturallemaleappetite, unmanagedbysocialsanctions
lnAmerica, lreeenterpriseandtheriseolademocratizedandlluidmiddle
classlosteredtheprolilerationolexhibitionslikeTono Marias ininstitution-
alizedshovsthatHourishedandthenladedbetveenabout l S+0and l 9+0
Anintegral part olmuseums and circuses olthe time, theAmerican lreak
shovaphenomenon thattoday is almostsynonymous vith badtastede-
scendedlromatraditionolreadingtheextraordinarybodythatcanbetraced
backtotheearliesthumanrepresentation StoneAgecavedravingsrecordthe
birthsolthemysteriousandmarvelousbodiestheCreeksandearlyscientists
vould latercallmonsters, the culture olP T Parnumvouldcall lreaks,
andvenovcallthecongenitallyphysicallydisabled Ourunremittinglasci
nationviththeextraordinary, especiallyasmanilestinourovnbodies , isevi-
dent in explications that begin as early as the seventh century . L. vith
cuneilormtabletsatNinevehdescribingsixty-tvohumancongenitaldisabili-
tiesandtheirreligiousmeanings,andculminatesinscholarlytreatisessuchas
|uliaPastrana, theNondescript AnExampleolCongenital ,CeneralizedHy-
pertrichosisTerminalisvithCingivalH_erplasia, inthe l 99volumeol1e
Americcn]ournc|o]MeJicc|Ceneics
Scrupulously described, interpreted, and displayed, the bodies ol the se
verelycongenitallydisabledhavealvayslunctionedasiconsuponvhichpeo
pledischargetheiranxieties, convctions ,andlantasies .lndeed, theLatinvord
monsrc, monster, alsomeans signand lorms therootolourvordJemon
srce,meaningtoshov `Alerventandpersistenthumanimpulsetoaccount
lorcorporealexceptionssurlacesinnearlyeveryvriterhocastshiseyeonthe
naturalvorld, beginningvithCiceroslinkingolmonstrousbirthstodivination
andculminating todayvith Oliver Sackss vondermentatmenvho conluse
theirvives vith theirhats Lvery historical era reinterprets thehgure olthe
prodigiousmonsterornaturescaprice, thelreakPlinycataloguesbodilyanom
alyasproololnaturesmarelousabundance, andAugustinedelightsincurious
andinexplicablebodiesassignsolhisChristiangodsbenevolentpurposeand
constant intervention in the universe lnstrikngcounterpoint topremodern
American Freak Shos + 5 7
narratives ol ave and vonder inspired by bodies that dehed the presumed
natural law, AristotleinitiatesintheNicomccaecnLaicsthedevaluationrec
ognizabletoday, claimingthatanormdependinguponameanrepresentsvirtue
andsuperiority, v hilean excessolordeparturelromthatstandardconstitutes
vice |ohnPlockFriedmantellsusthatduringtheMiddleAgesamonstervas
aprodigy, ashovinglortholdivinevill adisruptionolthenaturalorder,
bodingill andinChristianity theyvereasignolCodspoverovernatureand
Hisuseolitlordidacticends Pythethirteenthcenturyronsrcbegantoshilt
inmeaning,lromportenttovonder, designatingvhat |riedmancallspartol
thestockexoticismoltheliteratureolentertainment `Marvelousnarrativesol
these extraordinarybodiesvere disseminated popularly in the sixteenth and
seventeenthcenturiesvia |renchcanards , Lnglishchapbooks, vonderbooks,
+ndthecommonbroadsideballadthatoltenaccompanieddisplaysollreakson
thestreet Commercetheprecursorolcapitalismandcuriositythepre-
cursorolsciencebroughttheprodigiousbodyintosecularlile, enrichingthe
exclusivelyreligious interpretations Pythe eighteenth centuz the monsters
pover to inspire terror, ave, vonder, and divinationvas beingeroded bysci-
ence, vhichsoughttoclassiandmasterratherthanreveretheextraordinary
bodyThescientistsandphilosopherscabinetsolcuriositiesveretranslormed
into the medical mans dissection table The once marvelous body thatvas
takenas amap olhumanlatenovbegantobe seen asan aberrantbodythat
markedthebordersbetveenthenormalandthepathological
Physicallydisabledbodiesthatqualihedasprodigiestheconjoinedtvins ,
the spectacularly delormed, the hirsute, the horned, the gigantic, and the
scaledverealvayspresentedbypriests ,greedyordesperateparents ,agents,
philosophers , scientists, shovmen, and doctors Consequently, the concerns
and careers ol these mediators determined the narratives and the lates ol
theseuniquepeople lndeed, extraordinarybodieshavebeensocompelling
sovaluableas|oJiesthroughouthumanhistorythatvhethertheyverealive
ordead hadlittleconsequence llliveexhibitionvasenhancedbyanimation
andperlormance, thedisplayoladeadprodigyembalmedasaspectacle,pick-
ledas a specimen, ortextualizedas ananatomicaldravingderivedlrom dis -
section vas equally prohtable, and olten more readable and manipulable
Freaks andprodigies vere solely bodies , vithout the humanity social struc-
turesconleruponmore ordinarypeople Notonlyvere thesebodiesasource
olproht, butthenarratives olpathologyderivedlrom monstrousbodiesbuilt
reputationsattheRoyalSocietyandtheAcadmiedesSciences |orexample,
the embalmedbody ol|uliaPastrana, knovn as ThegliestVoman inthe
Vorld, vas displayedon thelreakshovcircuitlorvellover l 00yearsalter
58 e e e e e Constructing Disabled Figures
her deathin l 3o0 Suchpracticesmoved RobertVadlov, thevorlds tallest
man,vhoresistedduringhisliletimevhatDavidHeveyhas calledenlreak
ment, torequestathis death in l 9+0thathebeburiedina reinlorcedcon
creteslabtodiscouragegraverobbersvhomightseektodisplayhisskeleton
Thecentury longheydayolAmericanlreakshovsrepresentedadramatic
resurgence olthe tradition olpublicly displaying and reading extraordinary
bodies Fueledbythedevelopingentrepreneurialspirit, dramaticsocialinsta
bility, and increasing mobility, these itinerant exhibitions institutionalized
earlier lorms and conventions in the service olpresent concerns lrom the
|acksonian Lra through the Progressive Lra Lven as the lreak shov bur
geonedinAmericaas akindoldemocraticversionoltheeighteenth-century
scientistscabinetolcuriosities, itvasbeingdiscreditedbytheveryinstitution
olscience thathad shapedit since the Renaissance Though still an oracle,
theextraordinarybodyvastranslerredlromthepublicgazetothesequestered
scrutinyolexpertsbythemid- tventiethcentury Thusthevondrousmonsters
olantiquity, vho became the lascinating lreaks ol the nineteenth centu
translormedintothe disabledpeopleolthelatertventieth century Theex
traordinarybodymovedlromportenttopathology Todaythenotionolalreak
shov thatdisplays the bodies oldisabledpeoplelorprohtandpublicenter
tainment is both repugnant and anachronistic, rejectedbutneverthelessre
centand compellinginmemory
P T Parnum, the apotheosis olAmerican entrepreneurship, brought the
lreakshovtoitspinnaclein the nineteenthcenturybycapitalizingonAmer
icashungerlorextravagance, knovledge, andmastery, alongvithitssimulta
neous questlorsell-apprehensionAs NeilHarris haspointedout, Parnums
lreakshovs vere populartests olknovledge thatparalleledandintersected
the halting emergence ol scientihc quantihcation as the elite, dominant
methodolsubduingthematerialvorldbynamingandmeasuringit lnaddi
tion to its penchant lor inlormation, especially numerical calculation, the
nineteenthcenturyvasaneraoldisplay Truthneeded tobedemonstrated
and understood objectively science measured and counted, vhatThorstein
Veblen called conspicuous consumption proved status , photography cap
turedthe real , andlreakshovs dehned and exhibited the abnormal ` Py
highlighting ostensible human anomalyolevery sort and combination, Par
numsexhibitschallengedaudiencesnotonlytoclassiandexplainvhatthey
sav, buttorelate the perlormanceto themselves, toAmericanindividualand
collective identity Vithbeardedladies, lorexample, 8arnumandhislollov
ers demanded thatAmerican audiencesresolve this allrontto therigid cate
American Freak Shos + 59
gories olmaleandlemale thattheirculture imposed Vith LngandChang,
thelamousSiamesetvins, thelreakshovchallengedtheboundariesolthe
indiv|dual , asklngvhethcrthlscntityvasoncpersonortvoVithdvarls as
vellas armlessandleglessvonders , thepitchmencharged theiraudiences
to determine theprecise parameters olhumanvholeness and thelimits ol
lreeagencyThelreakshovthrivedinaneraolunboundedconhdenceinthe
humanabilitytoperceiveandactupontruthThesecollectiveculturalrituals
provideddilemmas olclassihcationand dehnition uponvhichthethrongol
spectators could hone the skills needed to tameorldand sellinthe ambi
tiousproj ectolAmericansell-making Furthermore, lreakshovsveretothe
massesvhat science vas to the emergingelite an opportunityto lormulate
thesellintermsolvhatitvasnot
ThehrstlreakParnumdisplayedvas|oiceHeth, ablackvomanalreadyon
exhibit in Philadelphia in l S : as Ceorge Vashingtons l o l -yearold nurse
maidandTheCreatestNaturalandNational CuriosityintheVorld Par
num boughttheright to shov herlor one thousanddollars , hve hundred ol
vhichheborrowed, turninghisnevpossessionintothehrstactolalongand
prohtablecareer. ' Dismissedbythepublicasahoaxandlaterrenouncedvith
amixtureolchagrinandpridebyParnumhimsell,|oice Hethisnevertheless
the quintessential American lreak A black, ol d, toothless, blind, crippled
slave voman, sheluses a combination olcharacteristics the|dealAmerican
sellrejects |oice Heth thus representsAmerica`s composite physical other,
the domesticated and trivialized reversal olAmericas sellimage Droll and
mundaneasthis oldvomanmightseem, herbodylunctionsas themonster
manilestin the ordinary ratherthan the extraordinary She becomes a lreak
notbyvirtueolherbodysuniqueness, butratherbydisplayingthestigmataol
socialdevaluation lndeed, |oiceHethis the directantithesisolthe ablebod
ied, vhite, malehgureuponvhichthedevelopingnotionoltheAmericannor
matevas predicated Thisblack, disabledvomancommodihedasalreakish
amusementtestihestoAmericasneedtoratiadominant, normativeidentity
byrituallydisplayinginpublicthoseperceivedastheembodimentolvhatcol
lectiveAmericatookitsellnotobe
Astheinaugural exhibitolAmericas ColdenAge ollreak Shovs , |oice
Heth exemplihes the cardinal principle olenlreakent that the body en
velopsandobliteratesthelreakspotentialhumanity Vhenthebodybecomes
puretext,alreakhasbeenproducedlromaphysicallydisabledhumanbeing
Suchaccumulationandexaggerationolbodilydetailsdistinguishesthelreak
lromtheunmarkedandunremarkedordinarybodythatclaimsthroughitsvery
60 Constructing Disabled Figures
obscurity to be universal and normative ' ` ln Srugg|es cnJ 1riumjas, Par
nums autobiography, theshovmans descriptionolHeth exemplihes this ac
cretionolbodilydetailthatgeneratesthelreaknarrative
Joice Heth "vas certainly a remarkable curiosity, and she looked as if she might
have been far older than her age as advertised. She was apparently in good
health and spirits, but from age or disease, or both, was unable to change her po
sition; she could move one arm at will, but her lower limbs could not be straight
ened; her left arm lay across her breast and she could not remove it; the fngers
of her left hand were drawn down so as nearly to close it, and were fxed; the
nails on that hand were almost four inches long and extended above her wrist;
the nails on her large toes had grown to the thickness of a quarter of an inch; her
head was covered with a thick bush of grey hair; but she was toothless and to
tally blind and her eyes had sunk so deeply in the sockets as to have disappeared
altogether.
I I
|oiceHeths storyillustrates inanothervaythisprocessolbeingreduced
topurebodythroughrepresentation Pecausemedicinevaseagertoestablish
itsauthority, andbecauseParnumsoughtcontroversyasvellaspublicity, the
shovmanpromisedDavidL Rogers ,therespectedNcvYorksurgeon, thathe
could dissectHeth alterherdeath Vhen she died in l 3lo, a muchpubli
cizedand disputedpostmortemvasconductedbelorealatgecrovdoldoc
tors ,medicalstudents , clergymen, and editors , eacholvhompaidhltycents
toobserveAlthough chargingtovatchautopsiesvascommon, vieversvere
dismayed vhen Rogers announced that Heth vas probably not yet eighty
Heths handlers made seven hundred dollars lrom the autopsy and ten to
tvelve thousanddollars lrom the entire allair, all olvhichvas actively dis
cussed in thepapers As this accountmakes clear, lreaks arecreatedvhen
certainbodies serve asravmateriallorthe ideological andpracticalends ol
boththemediatorsandtheaudiences
Freakshovslramedandchoreographedbodilydillerencesthatvenovcall
race, ethnicity, anddisabilityinaritualthatenactedthesocialprocessol
making cultural otherness lrom the rav materials olhuman physicalvaria
tion ' The lreak shov is a spectacle, a cultural perlormancethatgives pri
macytovisual apprehension increatingsymboliccodesandinstitutionalizes
therelationshipbetveen thespectacleandthe spectators '` ln lreakshovs ,
the exhibited body became a text vritten in boldlace to be deciphered ac
cordingtotheneedsanddesires oltheonlookers Theshovs conventionsol
display situatedtheextraordinarybodyboth spatiallyandnarratively Forex
ample, the elevated lreak platlormsometimes , particularly in circuses , it
vas a pit insteadheld the observers gaze like a magnet, not only lore
American Freak Shos 6 1
groundingthebodyondisplay, butexposingitinsuchavvaythatthephysical
traitspresentedasextraordinarydominatedtheentirepersononexhibit
On thelreakshovstage,asingle,highlightedcharacteristiccircumscribed
andreducedtheinherenthumancomplexityolsuchhguresastheDvarl,the
Ciant,the8eardedVoman,theArmlessorLeglessVonder,andtheFatLady
Shovmen barked embellishing ad]ectives like vild or vondrous and
anachronistic, ironic pseudo-status titles like King, Queen, orCeneral
,as in the case olCharles Stratton, thelamousCeneralTomThumb) that
emphasized the extraordinary qualities olthe body on display Posters and
broadsides extravagantlyproclaimed the peculiarity olthe lreaks body, pro-
vokingthespectatorscuriosityvithtaunts suchasVhatlsltthatheight-
enedthedillerencebetveenthecommonobserverandthemarvelousbody ll
hyperbolic assertions such as The Most X1arvelous Creature Living en-
hancedexpectations , thecrudeillustrationson advertisementsimaginatively
distortedthe lreaksbodiesintogrotesque caricatures Anillustrated, printed
narrative pamphletalmostalvays accompanied the actual exhibit, authenti-
catingthelreakvithatruelilestoryandmedicaltestimoniesthatservedas
bothadvertisementandsouvenir,augmentingthepitchmansoralspiel These
souvenir narratives embelli shed the lreaks exotic history, endorsed the ex-
hibitsveracity,anddescribedthelreaksphysicalconditionlromascientihcor
medical perspective, as titles like History and Description olAbomah the
AlricanAmazonCiantessandPiography, MedicalDescription,andSongsol
MissMillie/Christine, theTvo HeadedNightingalemakeclear lnaddition
to staging and cos tuming, narrative transhgured vhat, lor example, vould
have been in a mundane context an ordinary delormed darkey into the
PeastolPorneo ' Together,thestaging, thepitchmansmediatingspiel ,the
scientihctestimony, andthevrittennarrativehxedthemutelreakasahgure
olotherness upon vhich the spectators could displace anxieties anduncer-
tainties about their ovn identities Lmbroidered by such elaborate conven-
tions, the sideshov lreakvas made to exceed vildly the common, lamiliar
expectationssetbythespectator`sovnordinarybody' `
Thenevtechnologyolphotographyhelpedtranslormextraordinarybodies
into lreak exhibits , its development intertviningvith the shovs evolution
Lxtremelypopular during the Victorian era, photographic portraits ollreaks
represented the extraordinary body in a mode similar to Parnums lecture
room vhere lreaks vere displayed Poth conventions claimed proolol au-
thenticityvhile producingmeaning through visual images and studied con
texts ln a description strikingly evocative ol the lreak shovs mode ol
presentation, |ohn Tagg characterizes the photographic images used in the
62 8 8 8 8 8 Constructing Disabled Figures
nineteenth centurytodocument and identithe trutholcaseslike pris
oners ,beggars ,andtheinsane Vehavebeguntoseearepetitivepattern in
thesephotographs thebodyisolated, thenarrovspace,thesub] ugationtoan
unreturnablegaze,thescrutinyolgestures, lacesandleatures , theclarityolil
luminationandsharpnessollocus ' Asdualculturalmethodsolproducing
the legible body vitnessing its ovn deviance, both photography and lreak
shovslrequently mergingin photographs ollreakscreated an iconogra
phy ol otherness set in a manipulated, yet naturalized, context olob]ective
lact Forexample, the conventionalVictorianindividualorlamilystudiopor
trait,manyolvhichveremadebyMatthevPradyandCharlesLisenmannin
theirPoverystudios , highlightedtheincongruityolthelreaksextraordinary
bodyby]uxtaposingitvithlormalsocialproprietyandordinarylamilylile' A
p+tticul+tlyintetestingconjunctionbetweenphotogtaphyandlteakshovsoc
curred in the ccres Jevisie, extremely popular photographic portraits col
lectedvidelylromthel So0sthroughthe l SS0s Formandcontentclashedin
astunningironyasthepopularccresolcelebratedlreaks disseminatedanit
erated, mass-producedimageolaniconthatstoodlorpreciselythereverseol
theinhnitelyreproducibleprint thesingular,astonishingbodyolthelreak
Thelreakshovconsequentlycreatedalreak, orhumancuriosity, lrom
anordinarypersonvho had avisiblephysicaldisabilityoranotherviseatypi
calbodybyexaggeratingtheostensibledillerenceandtheperceiveddistance
betveenthevieverandthe shovpieceontheplatlorm Thespatialarrange
mentbetveenaudienceandlreakritualizedtherelationshipbetveenselland
cultural other As in the social relations ol domination and subordination
based on raceandgender, here too the dillerentiatingstigmataliterallytook
centerstage,magnihedandintensihed, vhiletheunmarkedpositionolpover,
agency, and voiceremainedveiled The lreaksimultaneously testihedto the
physicalandideologicalnormalcyolthespectatorandvitnessedtheimplicit
agreement assigning a coercive deviance to the spectacle This determining
relationbetveenobserverandobservedvasmutuallydehningandyetunrec
iprocal , asitimposedonthelreakthesilence, anonymity, andpassivitychar
acteristic ol ob]ectihcation Vhat the spectator assumed vas a lreak ol
nature, vasreally,asSusanStevartobserves, alreakolculturevhosebody
hadbeen enlisted and paidat the expense olengullmentby his orherovn
stigmatizationinordertoconhrmthe spectatorsstatusand |dentity' `
Perhaps thelreakshovvs mostremarkableellectvas toeradicatedistinc
tionsamongavidevarietyolbodies, conllatingthemunderthesinglesignol
the lreakasother Freaks are above all products olperception theyare the
consequenceolacomparativerelationshipinvhichthosevhocontroltheso
American Freak Shos 63
cialdiscourseandthemeansolrepresentationrecruittheseemingtrutholthe
body to claim the centerlor themselves and banish others to the margins
Nothingbetterillustratesthisthanthe lactthatthe tvomaintypesolpeople
presentedas lreaksverenormalnonVesternersandabnormalVestern
ers As in the ancient and medieval traditions olimaginingloreign races as
monstrous, allthebodilycharacteristicsthatseemeddillerentorthreatening
tothedominantordermergedintoakindolmotleychoruslineolphysicaldil
lerence on the lreakshov stageActuallycalled|ig shovsin circus lingo,
lreak shovs traded indiscriminately in both cultural and corporeal other
ness ' 'Hence,anondisabledpersonolcolorbilledasthe Fij iCannibalvas
equivalenttoaphysicallydisabled, LuroAmericancalledtheLeglessVon
der. Ciants, dvarls ,visiblyphysicallydisabledpeople, tribalnonVesterners,
contortionists , lat people, thinpeople, hermaphrodites, conj oinedtvins , the
mentally disabled, and the very hirsuteall shared the platlorm equally as
human oddities , playing the assignedrole ol aberrant other to their audi
ences Nevertheless, themostsuccesslullreaks meldedbothbodilyandcul
tural dillerence For example, loreign exoticism apparently intens|hed the
physicalexceptionalityolChang,theChineseCiantorPiramalandSami ,
theconj oinedtvinsbilledastheHindooLnigma ChangandLng,theorig
inal Siamese Tvins, vere probably the most lamous lreaks , notorious lor
their merged extraordinarybodiesandmysteriousloreignness Simil arly, tvo
microcephalic CentralAmericannatives vere staged andcostumedas The
LastoltheAncientAztecs, theiratypicalphysicalappearanceandnon Luro
peanleaturescombiningtocreatetheantithesisoltheidealAmericansellim
age and promptingdebates about the comparative capacities oltheirbrains
andtherelative statesoltheirsouls `lnan eraolsocialtranslormationand
economic reorganization, the nineteenthcentury lreak shov vas a cultural
ritual that dramatized the eras physical and socialhierarchyby spotlighting
bodilystigmata thatcouldbe choreographedas anabsolute contrastto nor
malAmericanembodimentandauthenticatedascorporealtruth
Constituting the Average Man
Theconstructedlreakoccupiesthealarmingandchaoticspaceattheborders
thatdelimitthe average man, a conceptlormulatedbythe Pelgian statisti-
cianAdolpheQueteletin l S+2 Enthusiasticallyadoptedalthough notun
contestedin America, the notion ol | aomme ooyen jaysique and the
knottieri ssueol|aommemoyenmorc|mathematicallylormalizedtheegalitar
ian political idea ol the |acksonian common man and laid the theoretical
64 Constructing Disabled Figures
groundwork lor scientihc norms that dehne our modern concept ol de
viance ' Theculturaldilemmaregardingtheextenttovhichindividualvari
ationscouldbetoleratedvithinasocietybasedonlreedomandequalityvas
solvedbyinstallingtheaveragemanacommonversionolLmersons Repre
sentative Maninthepositionpreviouslyheldbythe dethronedexceptional
man, thearistocratortheking Anabstractconstructmandatedbythe ideaol
democracy, themultiplymeasuredaveragemanembodiedhumanitysregular-
ity and stability, around vhich particul arities ranged on a short leash The
lreakshovsprevalencealteraboutl S+0canbeseen,then, asservingtocon
solidate aversion olAmerican seluood thatvas capable, rational , and nor-
mative,butthatstrovetovardanontologicalsamenessuponvhichthenotion
oldemocraticequalityispredicated Lxtravagantinitsrepudiationolthetyp
ical , the displayed lreak Hattened the spectators peculiarities and aligned
themviththelamiliar
Thelreakshov thus quelledarangeolanxietiesaccompanyingthesocial
disorder in the nited States Americas great experiment in democracy
positeda social systemlreelrom the stagnantstratihcation olthe Luropean
patriarchy,butrequiredanevbasisolsocialorganizationconsonantvithegal
itarianindividualismandostensiblylimitlessgeographicandeconomicoppor-
tunities. Thisideological levelingolclassdistinctions setthestageloranev
socialhierarchybasedonabilityexpressed, lorinstance, inthe|ellersonian
idea olnatural leadershipand produceda distinctaristocracyol the body
TheAmerican ideal sellat thetop ol thishierarchyvas an autonomouspro
ducersellgoverningandsell-madeageneric individualcapableolcreat
inghisovnperlectedsell
Put recognizing that abstract ideological construct in onesell or ones
neighbor vas impossible vithout material markers Since identiing and
claimingstatusisperhapsthegreatestanxietyinatheoreticallyegalitarianand
volatilemodernorder,theboundariesolpovermustbeclear Thebodysma-
terial authorityprovides a seemingly irrelutable loundation upon vhich the
prevailingpoverrelationscanthusbeerected Thehgureolthelreakiscon
sequentlythenecessaryculturalcomplementto theacquisitive andcapable
Americanvhoclaimsthenormatepositionolmasculine, vhite, nondisabled,
sexuallyunambiguous , andmiddleclass Asl suggestedinchapter2, suchan
exclusive, idealized selldevelopsvithinanexpanding market economyas a
sell-controlledindividualresponsiblelorshapinghisdestinyandthesocialor-
derbycompetentlymanipulatinghis acquiescent, standardbody, alongvith
personalskllsandtechnologicaltools Freakshovsactedoutarelationshipin
vhichexoticizeddisabledpeopleandpeopleolcolorlunctionedasphysical
American Freak Shos 65
opposites ol the idealized American explicitly and implicitly delineated in
such cultural representations as Lmersons intellectual man in SellRe
liance, theindependentThoreauol\c'Jen,andthelolkheroDavyCrockett
Salely domesticated and boundedby the shovs lorms and conventions,
thelreak soothes the onlookersselldoubtbyappearing as their antithesis
The American produces and acts , but the onstage lreak is idle and passive
TheAmerican looks and names , but the lreakis lookedat and named The
Americanis mobile, enteringandexitingthe shovatvillandrangingaround
thesocialorder,butthelreakishxed, conhnedbythematerialstructuresand
theconventionsolthestagingandsociallyimmobilizedbyadeviantbodyThe
American is rational and controlled, but the lreakis carnal and contingent
Vithinthislantasy, theAmericans selldeterminestheconditionolhisbody,
justas thelreaksbodydeterminestheconditionolhissell Thisgrammarol
embodimentculturallynormalizestheAmericanandabnormalizes thelreak
Atthelreakshovv, culturalsellandculturalotherhoversilentlyloranhi stori-
calinstant, lacetolaceindim acknovledgmentoltheirunspokensymbiosis
The immense popularity ol the shovs betveen the |acksonian and Pro-
gressive Lras suggests that the onlookers needed to constantly reallirm the
dillerencebetveenthemand usata timevhenimmigration, emancipa
tionoltheslaves, andlemalesullrageconloundedpreviouslyreliablephysical
indices olstatusandprivilege suchas malenessandVestern Luropeanlea
tures Themoreheterogeneousthebodilytraitsolthe enlranchisedbecame,
the lessclearlymarkedpovervas intheegalitariansocialorderThosevhose
socialrankvasmosttenuousimmigrants , theurbanvorkingclass, andless
prosperous rural peoplelrequented the shovs , vhich vere alvays onthe
lringeolrespectabilityandoltenverevehementlycondemnedbysuchicons
olthestatusquoasHenry\\ardPeecherinhisLecuresooungMen The
extravagantandindisputableothernessolthelreaks physiognomyreassured
thosevhosebodiesandcostumingdidnotmatch thelullyenlranchisedand
indubitablyAmericanideal
Onemight speculate lurtherthat the lreakshovs popularityatthis time
vasalsoaresponsetoseveralspecihchistoricalsituations PoththeCivilVar
and escalatingindustrial accidents lrom machineryproducedmanydisabled
personsamongthevorkingclasses Perhapstheheightenedanxietyolactual
or possible disablementamongthat group drove them eithertovard an en-
counterviththephysicalotherasdistancedanddomesticatedortovvardsym
pathetic identihcation vith the stigmatized body ln addition, expansionist
acts like lndian removal andthe Mexican Var, as vell as slavery, required
propagationolavhitesupremacistideologythatthelreakshovenactedinits
66 9 9 9 9 4 Constructing Disabled Figures
display olcultural others The vhite vorking classes vho vere competing
vithimmigrants andpeople olcolorlor scarce resources during this period
alsobenehtedlromthesellimageolablebodiednessandracialnormalcythat
thelreakshovprovideditsspectators `
Freakshovsallirmedtheirnevlydemocratizedaudiencesi nothervaysas
vell Freaks embodied the threat ol individuation running rampant into
chaosthelearolantinomianlogicthatlurkedundertheoptimisticsurlace
ol ardent American egalitarian democracy The lreaks body mocked the
boundariesandsimilaritiesthatavellordereddemocraticsocietyrequiredto
avoidanarchyand createnationalunity Pyexoticizingandtrivializingbodies
thatvere physically nonconlormist, the lreak shov symbolically contained
thepotentialthreatthatdillerenceamongthepolitymighteruptas anarchy
Heightenedbythemodes olexhibition, the lreaks extraordinarinessinvoked
thetensionsbetveenuniquenessandunilormity, particularityandgenerality,
randomnes s andpredictability, exceptionandrule, byextendingthelormerso
larastodisruptthelatter The spectatorvas atonceshakenbythelimitless
possibilitiesunleashedbythelreaksanarchicbodyandmollihedbyhavinghis
ovn seeming ordinariness verihed and the peril ol dillerence restrained
Hence, domesticatingthelreaklorentertainmentandprohtbecameonevay
toellace suspicionsthatthevorldmightindeedbeintractable, chaotic, and
opaque Asthesubduedtokenlorallthatisinexplicableandunpredictable,
thecolonizedlreakmakesdemocracysalelorthevorldbysigni|ingthean
archicpotentialolindividualitycontainedandmastered
I dentification and the Longing for Distinction
AlthoughAmericanideologyencouragedthecitizentobecome| aommemoyen,
thelreakas| aommeexrcorJincireclearlyheldmuchattractionlorthosevho
enthusiastically llocked to see the shovs and buy the photcgraphs Freaks
vere celebrities as vell as spectacles, theirpopularity suggesting that audi
encessimultaneouslyidentihedvithandvererepulsedbytheperlormers . `
Pecomingordinaqerasedthemarkersthatemblematizedpoverandprestige
intherepudiatedLuropeanaristocracy, soasiconsoltheextraordinary, lreaks
vereanachronismsinanineteenthcenturydemocracyAsve savinchapter
2, aculturalreversalinthe signihcanceolindividuality occurredaroundthe
LnlightenmentasVesternsocietyshiltedlromaleudalto amodernorder
Z6
lnthepremodernera, themarksolindividuationbothenhancedandidenti-
hedpersonalpover Ceremonialcostumes, genealogies , eventhestigmataol
Christian saints testihed to exceptional status , lorexample, aristocratsvere
A1nerican Freak Shows 67
highlymarkedbyritualanddecorationcrowns , vigs , andsimilardillerenti
atingtokens Criminal s, heretics, andvitchesroutinelyverelorcedtoappear
inpublicinapenitential , ordinaryshirtthatsymbolicallystrippedthemolall
markers olindividual personhood and status ln the gradual move lrom a
highlystratihed, stablelormolsocialorganizationto the modernorderchar-
acterizedbyisolatedindividualsandlluidsocialrelations, uniquenesscameto
beread as deviance, vhile the common became the basis olnormalcy The
nineteenthcentury Vcstern cultural preoccupation vith measuring and
quantiinghumandillerencesillustratessomeoltheanxietyprovokedbythis
culturalreversal Thisvalidationolthecommoni sconsonantasvellviththe
riseolmasculinistegalitariandemocracyandthedemiseolpoliticalandreli-
gious hierarchical patriarchy Taking itsell as the apotheosis ol the modern
egalitarianimpulse, |acksonianAmerica, lorexample,deeplyopposedthecer-
emonies, insignia, and lineage that had separatedthecorruptLuropeanari s-
tocracylromtheundillerentiatedmassesithopedtoempover `
Alongvith that distrustoltheexceptional , hovever, camean apparently
insatiablelascinationviththeextraordinarythatmade menlikeParnumrich
Forinstance, VictorianAmericas obsessionvviththe curious, thegrotesque,
and the anomalous is vell documented ' Playing to that obsession, lreak
shovs vere vestiges olpre-Lnlightenment Luropean culture lashionedinto
entrepreneurialandcommunalrituals thatboth verihedandquestionedthe
orderolthings Theextraordinarybodys display lormalizedtherelativelyre-
centreversalolprestigeandpovermarkersinrelationsbetveenordinaryand
unusualcitizens Thelreakshovolleredthosevhoidentihedthemselves as
theAmericancommonman a trivializedparodyolthe old orderasvell as a
nos talgic respite lrom modern pressures tovard standardization The lreaks
indeliblephysicalmarkingsmockedtheinsigniaandconventionsthesacred
stigmata, sotospeakthatdistinguishedtheextraordinarymanlrom theor-
dinaryoneinthehxedsocialhierarchythatAmericaimaginedresistingPseu-
donymoustitlessuchasKing, Queen, Prince, andPrincess, asvellas
aristocratic-soundingstagenamesandthepretenseolelitepursuitslikevrit
ingpoetryandspeakingmanylanguagesvereintendedtosuggestthatlreaks
vere luminaries or perverse aristocrats ` As an ironic celebrity, the lreak
seemedatoncetoburlesque, vitiate,reproduce, andbovdovntoanaristoc
racy thatAmerica rhetorically denigrated during its cultural oedipal phase
Freak shovs thus conllated kings andlools in a tavdry, satiric extravaganza
thatinvertedtheoldceremonialspectacleolroyalpompandpoverbyritually
displayingapersonstigmatizedbybodilyparticularity, silencedby the pitch-
mansimposednarrative, andmanagedbytheshovman
68 4 Constructing Disabled Figures
This cultural ritual thus served more complex and compelling purposcs
than simply dispelling its patrons sell-doubts Like the di sabled hgure dis
cussedinchaptcr2, thelreakprovidedasitevherealundamentalparadoxat
the hcart ol egalitarian democracy could be probed Vhile the ideology ol
lreedomrecommendscultivatingindividualdillercnces ,1heidcologolequal-
ityencourages samenessolconditionandexprcssionamongdemocraticciti -
zens So even as Lmersons representative voice dehned the individual as
independent and exhorted hislellov countrymentoresistconlorming, Toc-
quevillc obscrvcd thata remarkablc conlormityvastheAmerican vay De-
spite the rhetoric ol individualism so basic to our national sell-image, the
individual ,as|ohnV Meyerhasobserved, achieveslreedomandpovcronly
undertheconditionthat hcbecomeisomorphic, orsimilarinlorm, toall the
otherindividualsinthesociety ` ' Snaggedbythecontradictionbetvecnlrec-
domandequality, Americans vere apparentlyat libertytobecome stiHingly
alikc, shorn oltraditions and contemptuous olauthority, thcy had only one
anotheras examples Sovhile achicvinga nationalidcntityrequircdAmcri
canstoimaginethemselvesasindependent, sell-determiningindividual s, the
cultureitsellincreasinglystandardizcdindividualsthrougharangeolinstitu-
tions universaleducation, massproduction, interchangeableparts, mechani-
cal reproduction ol images, advertising, and mass print culture Lvidently,
dcmocracyinpracticedoesnottoleratedissimilarity
Soalthough theanarchicbody ol the domesticated lreakreassured audi
encesolthcircommonality, atthesametimethe extraordinarybodysymbol-
ized a potentiallorindividual lreedomdenied by cultural pressures tovard
standardization Oneexplanationlorthenincteenth-centurylreakshovsim-
mcnse popularitycouldbe thatitprovideda sale, ritualized opportunitylor
banaldemocratstovoyeuristicallyidentivith nonconlormity X| anyspccta
torsvho verc disabledbyvaroraccidentorexcludedbyethnicityvcrcno
doubtdravntothescdisplaysbyanidentihcationviththelreaks cxtraordi
nariness Sympathyandalliliationsurelyllovedalongvithsmugnessanddil
lerentiation, assomc onlookcrsprobablyusedtheshovstoexplorc thelimits
olhumanvariation llthcnineteenthcenturyvasatimeolidentitycrisislor
Americans , itvas partlybecausetheintensiingcapitali stimperativetodis-
tinguishoneselleconomically and to markthat distinctionclashed vith the
egalitarian, antiaristocraticsocialimperativetocmulatetheidealizedcommon
manorycomanlarmer`Yet, asthepersistentrhctoricolnonconlormitylrom
Thoreauandotherssuggests , achicvingsomemeaningluldillcrentiationmay
havc beendillicult, inspite oltheiraniouscllortstodistinguishthemselves
economicallylromtheirneighbors Therepudiationolauthority,therelusalto
American Freak Shos r 69
lollovtraditions , andthedisavovalollineagesuggestedbythelreaksextrav
agantlydillerentbodymayhavelascinatedtheonlookervhoseegalitarianor
dinarinessseemedtobetraythepromiseoldistinctioninherentintheconcept
olindividual lreedom Sothespectatorenthusiasticallyinvestedhisdimein
thelreakshovnotonlytoconhrmhisovnsuperiority, butalsotosalelylocus
anidentihcatorylonginguponthesecreaturesvhoembodiedlreedoms elu
siveandthreateningpromiseolnotbeinglikeeverybodyelse
Notonlyvastheimageoltheindependentcommonmaninvhom|eller
son, Crcvecoeur,andVhitmanplacedsomuchlaithbeingthreatenedbythe
standardization vrought bymass culture and mechanical reproduction, but
hisputativeautonomyvasunderminedbythedivisionollaborthatcededau
thority to the specialists and experts olthe nevmiddle class The lreakish
bodylunctionedasakindolegalitarianshrinevheretheunderclassandthe
immigrantscouldloradimeoraquarterexercisetheirauthorityasreadersol
this extraordinaryphenomenon Americashationon the extraordinarybody
revisited the notion olthe prodigy, the ambiguousbodyinvhichpeoplehad
|orcenturiesloundthemeaningsandexplanationsthatverihedtheirperspec
tives ``Thelreakplatlorm bothmappedtheboundaries olhumanphysical
and culturalothernessand generatedaliminal spacevhere ontologicalcate
gories mingled The lreaks body conlounded the classihcation systems that
organize collective cultural perceptions, yielding hybrid exhibits like The
lrogManandThe CamelCirl `Alittleboyvithabnormalpigmentation
became The Leopard Child, vhile a hirsute Russian vas |o-|o, the Dog
lacedPoy Suchstagenamesillustratehovaninterpretivegridplacedthem
in relerence to anxiously hed social categories such as human and animal
HermaphroditessuchasPobbyKirk, theHall-andHall, compelledbecause
theyv1olatedtherigidculturalboundariesbetveenmaleandlemale Several
physically and mentally disabled black men vere displayed under the title
Vhat ls lt, a name that expressed the lreaks ambiguous umanity and
challengedspectatorstoresolvethedisparitybetveenthisbodyandtheirex
pectations Parnumsadvertisingposterchallengedonlookerstomakethedis
tinction lsita loverorderolMAN Orisita higherorderolMONKLY
Nonecan tell Perhapsitisacombinationolboth Pilledasmissinglinks,
theVhatlsl thgurescomplementedaltermidcenturyagrovinginterestin
Darvinian di stinctions betveen humans and gorillas lorinstance, in l So0
ParnumintroducedVilliamHenry|ohnson, ablackmicrocephalicman,asa
Vhat ls lt, depictinghimasamostsingularanimalvhovas neitherhu
mannorbeast, butamixtureolboththeconnectinglinkbetveenhuman
ity and brute creation `` Human exhibits like these, hose lreakdom vas
70 e e e e 4 Constructing Disabled Figures
loundedon ambiguity, providedaudiencesvitharichiconoldirectedmean-
ing Perhaps even more provocative vere conjoined tvins Vhile Lng and
Changveretvo completebodiesjoinedatthechest, more transgressive in-
stancesolvhatthemedicalvorldnovcallsmajorterataupsetthebound-
ariesoltheordinaqhumanbodyTheTocciProthers ,lorexample, verelrom
the vaistuptvo boys and lrom thevaistdovn onlyone,vhileMrs Pvas
lromthevaistdovntvobodiesandlromthevai stuponlyoneThelamous
LastlndianLaloo, asvellasseveralothermonstersrecordedlrommedieval
timeslorvard, hadparasiticminiaturetvinsgrovinglromtheirabdomens
Suchbeings inadvertentlyllaunttheerratic and spurn the stable, becom-
ingemblems olphysical andcultural anarchyand magnetslorthe anxieties
andambitionsoltheirtimes lnvestedviththeliminalitythatVictorTurner
suggeststhreatensbothtotranslormandtodisruptthesocialorder,extraordi-
narybodiescarryarangeolattributedculturalmeaningsproj ecteduponthem
byastonishedonlookers `Alter l S+0, lreakshovsmayhavebeenoneolthe
lastsitesvhere theordinarycitizencouldexercisetheauthoritytointerpret
thenaturalvorld, arightbestovedbytheRelormationthatvasbeingincre-
mentallyrevokedbytheclassdivisionollaborvhatParbaraLhrenreichand
DeirdreLnglishhavecalledtheriseoltheexperts `Theinstabilityoltradi-
tional lileundercutthelaymansbelielintheauthorityolhisovnsenses ,mak
ingordinarypeoplemorereceptivetotheprolessionalcontrololscientistsand
doctors ln lact, the consolidation olmedical authorityoccurred during the
lreakshovera ``LxistingasdehnitiveexamplesoltheLmersonian notme
renderedlreaks malleabletospectatorsspeculations Theshovsveretheh-
nalopportunitylorepistemological speculationavailablein a laycontext Py
l 9+0theprodigiousbodyhadbeencompletelyabsorbedintothediscourseol
medicine, andthelreakshovsvereallbutgone
From Freak to Specimen:
HThe Hottentot Venus" and HThe Ugliest Woman in the World"
To tracethe developmentollreakshovs through the nineteenth centuryto
theirvirtual extinction by the midtventieth century, ve can locus on tvo
lreaksvhosedisturbingculturalimages andpersonalhistoriesexempliand
claritheprocessolenlreakment Theconstructionaslreaksolboththenov
relativelyvellknovn Sartj e Paartman and the muchmoreobscure|uliaPas
tranavasinextricablylinkedtoculturalproductionsolgenderandrace Cast
inoppositiontotheidealAmericansellvhois,amongotherthings,maleby
dehnitionthe lreakis representedmuchlike thevoman both are ovned,
American Freak Shos 7 1
managcd, silcnccd, andmcdiatcdbymcn, botharc sociallydchncdasdcvia-
tionslromthcidcalmasculincbody, botharcmarginalizcdinthcrcalmolcco
nomic production, both arcappropriatcdlordisplay as spcctaclcs , both arc
sccnas subjugatcdbythcbody ThccxhibiticnsolSartjcPaartman, billcdas
ThcHottcntotVcnus , and|uliaPastrana, billcdas ThcLglicstVomanin
thc \\orld, lunctioncd as invcrtcd, parodic bcauty pagcants Lxhibition
lramcdthcscvomcnsbodicsasgrotcsquciconsoldcviantvomanhoodthat
conhrmcdthcVcstsvcrsionollcmininity Displaying ThcLglicstVomanin
thc Vorldsuggcstcd to hcrvicvcrs vhat thc prctticstvomanin thcvorld
shouldlooklikc, vhilcparading Thc HottcntotVcnusinstructcdhcraudi-
cncchovappropriatclcmalc scxualityshould appcar Sanctioncdlcmininity
vasatonccvcilcdandclaboratcdbyvayolitsoppositionalspcctaclc
Thcscvomcnstitlcstcstito thc csscntialrolcthatthc scxualizcdphysi-
calstandardvccallbcautyplaysindchningthclcmalc lnbothtitlcs, onc
tcrmpcrvcrtsthcothcr Hottcntot, vhichsignihcdtothcVcstcrnmindsav
agcry and irrcdccmablc physiological inlcriority, is paircd vith Vcnus, thc
Vcsts apothcosis ol lcmininity, Lglicst canccls out bcauty, thc dchning
csscnccolthcsubj cct Voman ThcprcscntationsolPaartmanandPastrana
asgrotcsqucvcrsionsolrcccivcdvomanhoodamplihcdthisparadox,dcstabi-
lizingthcvcrycatcgoryolvomancvcnvhilcvalidatingthcstandardnotionol
vomanhood Thc cxhibitslorccdthcir cnrapturcdaudicnccs to cxplainhov
thcsccrcaturcs couldgcsturc atoncc to lamiliarvomanhoodandits unsct-
tling, thrcatcning oppositc Posing this qucstion gavc thc onlookcrs vho
llockcdtosuchdisplaysthcauthoritytoprovidcspcculativcansvcrs
Thc publiclivcs and dcaths, indccdthcpublic|oJies, ol Sartj claartman
and ]ulia lastrana cxposc hov gcndcr, scxuality, colonization, racc, and
pathologyintcrrclatcinthcproccssolconstructingculturalicons laartman
vasanativcAlricanindcnturcdscrvantbroughtlromSouthAlricain l S l 0to
bccxhibitcdlorprohtinLondonandlatcrinParisuntilhcrdcathlromsmall -
pox, complicatcdbyalcoholism, in l S l : `AlthoughamcmbcrolaSantribc,
shcvasbillcdaHottcntot, thccxoticlabclthatstoodlorcvcrythingthcLng
lishmanconsidcrcdhimscllnottobc Lmcrgingscicntihcdiscourscidcntihcd
thcHottcntotsasthcmostprimitivc spccicsolhumans, thcmissinglinkin
thcchainolbcingthatscic
_
vasrclorgingandlatcrmanilcstcdinDarin-
ianthought Scicnccsobscssionvithmcasurcmcntandclassihcationscrvcd
vhitcsuprcmacismandlcgitimatcdcolonialcxploitation, itspovcrlulcvalua
tivclcnslocatingthcHottcntotsonthcvcrycdgcolhumanity, cquallyhuman
and bcstial ' ln thc Luropcanvicv, thcn, laartmanvas not only a Hottcn
totahumanlikc apc oranapclikc humanshcvas alsoa lcmalcbodydc
vhiskcy To Ha-
lcys astonishmcnt, thc mothcr dclcndcd thc child j cst likc a tigcr, hnally
pitch ing hcadhrst, youngun andall, intothcrivcr , |1C l 2 )
Vith thcsc tvo childrcn, Stovc initiatcs thc critical stratcgy Davis and
Phclpslollov usingdisablcdhgurcstoportraythc clashbctvccncgalitarian
conccrnviththccqualvalucolallpcoplcandcntrcprcncuriallaissczlaircin
dividualism Thclogicolslavcrysunimpcdcdcconomiclrccdomcquatcshu
manvaluc vith potcntialproductivity, j udgingthcdisablcd childrcn usclcss
anddclcctivc, thcir bodics liabilitics rathcr than asscts in a laborintcnsivc
cconomy According to thc libcral idcalrcprcscntcd and cxaggcratcd by
Marks and Halcyol autonomous, scllintcrcstcd individuals compcting
lrcclyinthcmarkctplacc, thcscphysicallydisablcdchildrcnarcnotlullyhu-
man Suchanassumptionviolatcsthcbcliclininhcrcnthumancqualitythat
undcrpinsStovcsnovclolsocialrclorm
Thcscdisablcdchildrcnlikcthcirmorclullydcvclopcdcountcrparts ,thc
disablcdvomcnintroduccthcdilcmmaolcorporcaldillcrcnccintothcnov-
cls Thcyplcadthccascolthoscvhoscbodicsprcvcntthcmlromactingout
thcrolcolthc scll-madc manvholrcclypursucsvcalth, status, andpovcr
lndccd, Stovc, Davi s, andPhclpspcrsistcntlyinvokc thcphysicallydisablcd
86 r Constructing Disabled Figures
bodytosignisubjcctiontocxtcrnallorccstovhichcmbodimcntinlactscn
tcnccsallpcrsons lmpcrsonalinstitutionsorothcrsscll-dctcrmination con
strainthclatcandcontrolthcbodyolcachdisablcdvoman Slavcryscparatcs
Pruc and Hagar lrom thcir childrcn, thc cconomic hcgcmony ol thc mill
bosscs mocks Dcb s lccblc attcmpt to scizc a chancc at vcalth lor Hugh,
Cattyslilcanddcatharcdictatcdbythcinhuman, mcchanizcdvorkingcon-
ditionsinthctcxtilcmill s Morcovcr, thcdisintcrcstcdlcgalsystcmcnlorccs
cach unjust situation Thc institutions thcsc novcl s castigatc litcrally shapc
thcscvomcns bodics, causinglrucs dcbilitylromhcrmastcrs bcatings and
Cattys blindncss lrom cxposurc to cotton rcsiduc As cmblcms olimposcd
andinnatcinlcriority, thcscvomcnsbodicsarcnotonlythcproductsolthcir
opprcssion, butarcthcvchiclcsolthcirvrctchcdlatcsasvcl l Thcirsubju
gatcdbodics dcmandacknovlcdgmcntthatthclibcralidcalolautonomyand
scll-dctcrmination dcnics physical dillcrcnccs and limitations to crcatc a
myth olthcbodyas anacquicsccntinstrumcntolthc individualvill
llStovvcssccncbctvccnthcslavctradcrsandthcslavcmothcrsisthcpro
toticalrcndcringollibcralisms troublingcontradiction, |nc|e1omsCc|in
also ollcrs a rcsolution matcrnal dcvotionasamcans olpcrsonal cmpovcr
mcnt Stovcs slavc mothcrs rclusc to dcprcciatc thcir Havcd and hclplcss
childrcn, undcrscoringthcprinciplcolunivcrsal ,unconditionalacccptanccol
allhumanbcings thatsupportsthcnovcls condcmnationolslavcry Likc|c
sus, thcmothcrrcgardshcrchildrcnascquallyvorthyrcgardlcssolthcirma
tcrial and physical circumstanccs Rcspcctingnovorldly social hicrarchics,
matcrnal allcctiondistributcs its rcsourccsaccordingto nccd, notmcrit As
typcslorthcundcrvalucdandhclplcss, thcscdisablcdchildrcns nccdlorac-
ccptancc and lovc lar cxcccds thcir ability to inspirc it, in Stovcs sccncs ,
mothcrlovc compcnsatcslor socictys practiccol ratingpcoplc accordingto
notionsolphysicaladcquacyrathcrthaninhcrcntvorthAlcminizcdrcalmol
idcalcquality thus cmcrgcsilonlymomcntarilyandinprinciplcinoppo
sitiontothcdominant, masculincmarkctplacc morality Dismi sscdbylibcral
individualisms cthos olautonomy and productivity, thcsc disablcd childrcn
and thcir dcvotcd mothcrs occupythc highcstrungon thc laddcr olrcgard
thcscnovclsollcrasanaltcrnativcvisionolhumanvalucThcdisablcdbody,
thcn, isabadgc olunvorthincssin thcmarkctcconomyandoncolultimatc
vorth in thc moral onc ` Stovcs namclcss inlants and thcir othcr disablcd
countcrparts scrvc ascxclamationpointsin ambitious argumcnts lor a morc
cquitablc sociocconomicordcr, a morc humanccntcrcdvaluc systcm, and a
lullcracknovlcdgmcntolphysicalnccds
Suchmatcrnalagcncyis thc narrativcvchiclclorvhatPhilip|ishcrcalls
Benevolent Maternalism and Disabled Women e e e e e 87
thc romancc ol thc objcct, vhich cxtcnds lull humanity to hgurcs lrom
vhich it hasprcviouslybccnvithhcld 'Vith thisromancc, Stovcaddsto
hcrrhctoricolprotcstthc suggcstionthatmatcrnaldcvotiononbchallolthc
vulncrablc anddcvalucd othcrproduccs a lcmininc scllrcminisccntolthc
libcralindividualvhosccxccsscsStovc soardcntlycondcmns Halcys mi s
guidcdattcmpttosvapollthcdisablcdinlantclicitsavigorouslyollcnsivc
rcsponsclromthcslavcmothcr,vhoupsonacotton-bal c, likcacat, kctchcs
akilclromoncolthcdcckhands, and makcs]allllyloraminitbclorc
shcrccognizcsthclutilityolrcsistanccanddrovnshcrscllandthcchild, dc
privingHalcyolhis invcstmcntinhcr, |1 l 2 ) lnthisnarrativcminit ,
thcprcsumablydocilcslavcasscrtshcrvill, assaultshcropprcssor,armshcr
scll,andboldlydctcrmincshcrovnlatcjustlikcLlizadocsbycrossingthc
Ohio, rcscuingHarry, andcludinghcrcaptors ,andasCas sydocsbycscaping
lromLcgrcc altcrLmmclincs arrival Thcmothcrtranslormslrom thcslavc
tradcrs passivc pavn into an asscrtivc hgurc chargcd vith an indcpcndcnt
vill , dclyingcxtcrnallorccsloratlcastamomcntinanattcmpttoshapchcr
ovndcstiny ThcmatcrnalcmpovcrmcntStovchintsathcrccrcatcsahgurc
rcscmblingthcidcalizcdlibcralscllvcassociatcvi thLmcrsonscllrcliant,
villlul, unimpcdcdbyphysicallimitation Putthislcminincscllhooddillcrs
lromindividualisticscllhoodin thatitdocsnot claimdctachmcntorscllin
tcrcst, but instcadadmits thcncccssityola dcpcndcntobj cctloritslulhll
mcnt ' lndccd, Stovcs cxtcnsion to slavcs ol this humanc, lcminizcd
vcrsion ol libcral scllhood rcinlorccs hcr abolitionist argumcnt bccausc
slavcsarccapablcolsuchlccling, thcyarcinlactlullyhumanandvorthyol
cmancipation
ll Stovcs abolitionistprojcctaccordslull dignityand agcncyto hcrblack
mothcrs,itsimultancouslyvritcsacomparablcscriptlorvhitcvomcn Asma
tcrnalbcnclactrcsscs, thcyarctothcundcrvalucdandvictimizcdvomcnvhat
thcslavcmothcrsarctothcirthrcatcncdchildrcn Stovercitcratcsthispattcrn
invaryinglcvclsolcomplcxitythroughouthcrnovcl Mrs ShclbydclcndsTom
and Harry, Mrs Pird protccts thc pursucd Lliza, Rachcl Halliday mothcrs
LlizaYctthcprinciplcvhitc, lcmalchgurcsvhogainpcrsonalauthoritythis
vayarcthcangclicLvaandStovcsardcntnarrativcvoicc, vhosccompclling
andcontrollingprcscnccsulluscsthcnovcl Vhcrcasthcslavcvomcndisplay
thcvalucdqualiticsollibcralindividualismthrough thcirhumanizingrolcsas
mothcrs, thc vhitc vomcn accruc dignity, agcncy, and sclldctcrmination by
acting matcrnally tovard mcmbcrs ola dcvalucd group Although both Lva
andStovcsnarratoractonbchallolavidcrangcolimpcrilcdcharactcrs,llo
cushcrconthc rclationbctvccnLvaand Prucand thc oncbctvccnStovcs
88 Constructing Disabled Figures
narratorandHagar,lorhcrcStovvcprcscntsthcmodcllorthcrclationbctvccn
ancmpovcrcdmatcrnalbcnclactrcssandhcrdisablcdcountcrpartthatDavis
andPhclpstakcuplatcr ltisimportant, hovcvcr,tocxaminchrsthovthchg-
urcolthcmatcrnalbcnclactrcssopcratcsinthcscnovcls
Empowering the Maternal Benefactress
Pchind thc cxplicit social rclorm thcscnovcls callloris thc implicittask ol
lramingascmipublic, sociallyandmorallycmpovcrcdrolc lorhcroincs , nar-
rators, andrcadcrs Thisvhitc, bcncvolcnt, matcrnalrclormcrvas ancvso-
cialpositionlormiddlcclassvomcnvho, asthcprivatcandpublicrcalmsin
ninctccnth-ccnturyAmcricabccamcincrcasingly scparatc, vcrc shutout ol
cconomicproductionandstatus '' Lxcludcdbygcndcrlromthcstatusolthc
libcral individual, middlcclass vomcn cultivatcd this rolc partly to launch
thcmsclvcs into public lilc as thcir program ncgotiatcd tcnsions cmcrging
lrom imposingdomcsticity onavorldthatincrcasinglymarginalizcdthcdo-
mcsticsphcrc'Arisinglromvomcnstraditionalcarctakingandallcctivcdu
ticsandappropriatingChristiancthics , bcncvolcntmatcrnali smgaincdvirtuc
andlcgitimacybylocusingonthcnccds andsullcringolothcrs andpublicly
advocatingonthcirbchallThcnarratorsbcspcak,andthcvhitc,middlcclass
hcroincs cnact, a lcmininc libcral idcntity that blcnds traditional noblcssc
obligc,matcrnalallcction, sororalalliliation, millcnnialoptimism, cvangclical
lcrvor,rcsistancctopatriarchy, andpcrsonalsalvationAlicnatcdlromthccco-
nomicandpoliticalsphcrcs, thcscdomcsticvritcrsconsolidatcanddisscmi
natcvhatNancyCottcalls thcrhctoricalmagnihcationolvomcnsdomcstic
occupation ' ` As thcyattcmptcdto rcshapcthcpublicvorld andthcirovn
imagcvithinit,middlc-classvomcnsoughttocxtcndthcirinHucncclromthc
homctothcvorldlyrcalmolhumanitarianvork
Thcrolcolmatcrnalbcnclactrcs s , scparatcdlromitsrccipicntbyraccand
class, couldgcncratclorninctccnthccnturymiddlcclassvomcnalcmininc
scllthatposscsscdmanyqualiticsolthclibcralindividualvhilcstillconlorm-
ingtothcmaintcnctsoldomcsticidcology Matcrnalbcncvolcncclulhllsdo
mcsticitys mandatc that lcmininc idcntity bc loundcd upon sclldcnial
Prccludcd lrom sccking status or povcr on thcir ovn bchall, middlcclass
vomcn couldonly asscrt a lorm ollibcral scllhoodbyidcntiingvith, nur-
turing, andactingon bchallolothcrs llmatcrnal bcncvolcncc conlorms to
domcsticitys dcmandlorlcminincscll-rcnunciation, italsodcpcnds upon a
notionolscllthatapproximatcsthc scll dctcrmining,sclladvancinghgurcol
thccntrcprcncur' Suchastratcgycnablcsthcmatcrnalbcnclactrcsstocnvi-
Benevolent Maternalism and Disabled Women 89
sionhcrscllrcsponsiblclorthctroublcsolstrangcrsandcapablcolallcv|ating
thcm, usinganindividualimaginationandvillthatcould rangclarintotimc
and spacc, sculpting and subduingthc vorld Yct vhcrc capitalismposits a
markctcconomybascdon contractualrclations amongindividuals rcgarding
laborandmatcrialrcsourccs, bcncvolcnccpositsamoralcconomyolcontrac-
tual obligat|ons bascd on thcplcdgc olhuman sympathyinhcrcntin Chris-
tianity Matcrnalbcncvolcncc, thcn, amountstoasocialcontractcnactcdbya
voman vho vicvs hcrscll, hcrcovcnants vith Cod and hcrlcllov humans,
and hcrcapacitics lor innovativc action cxtcnding lar bcyond thc rcalm ol
dailynccds andkinship circlcs Thusthc bcncvolcntmatron sccurcsalcmi-
ninc libcral scllhood thatmaintains cmotional conncctions and thc appcar
anccolscllsacrihccsocsscntialtothcidcaloltrucvomanhood
Thcdisablcdvomcnnotonlyactivatcthcirrcscucrs , butthcyalsoautho
rizc thc bcncvolcntvomans passagc lrom thcconhninghomc to thc public
rcalmlltrucvomanhoodgrantcdvomcnthcpotcntialtobcmoralcxcmplars
vhocmanatcdsalvihcChristianlovc,italsocnsconccdthcmincottagcsthat
shcltcrcd thcm lrom thcvcrycorruption lorvhich thcy hcld thc curc Thc
novclsposition cach disablcdvoman, notathomcvhcrc disablcdpcoplc
vcrcusuallyloundinninctccnth-ccnturysocictybutatriskinsidcthcmas-
culincinstitutions thc novcls criticizc ' ` Stovc placcs Hagar on thc auction
blockandPrucundcrthcvhipolacruclmastcr, Davissituatcspoor, naivc,
mothcrlcssDcbaloncatthcironmill ,PhclpsallovsmothcrlcssCattytovan-
dcrthcstrcctsolthcmilltovn Castingthcsccharactcrsascndangcrcdchil-
drcnandgrandmothcrsdcmandsintcrccssioninthcpublicrcalmandinvitcs
vomcnrcadcrstorcspondascithcrmothcrsorgrovndaughtcrstothcimpcr-
ilcd disablcdvomcn Thc disablcd hgurcs thus lcgitimatcdthcmiddlcclass
vomans movc outol thc scqucstcrcdbomcvhilcrcmainingvithinthcma-
tcrnalrolc
l lthc moral social contractolmatcrnal bcncvolcnccdcmandsarccipicnt
vho is dcpcndcnt upon hcr supportcr, thc disablcd hgurc sccn as unhtlor
bothlaborand socictycxactlyhts this script Thcsccharactcrs calllorth thc
rcadcrs compassionandinvitc hcrtohghtjcstlikc atigcronbchallolthc
sullcring,vulncrablcothcr,vorknglorsocialchangcandsccuringlibcralscll
hoodvithinthcdomcsticrol c Rcplicatingthcuncvcnpovcrrclationshipbc
tvccnmothcrandchild, thcconncctionsbctvccndisablcdvomcnandthcir
matcrnal bcnclactrcsscsarcccmcntcdbysharcd gcndcrbutunbalanccdby
racc and class dillcrcnccs lcncvolcnt, vhitc, matcrnal hgurcs such as
StovcsLva, DavissQuakcrvoman, andPhclpssPcrlcyachicvclrccdom, in-
dcpcndcncc, and sclldctcrmination through a rclationship vith an othcr
90 Constructing Disabled Figures
vhoscdcpcndcnccis sccurcdbydisability, blackncss, and/orlovcrclass sta
tus LvahasPruc,PcrlcyhasCatty, thcQuakcrvomanhasDcb,thcnarrators
havcHagar, Pruc, andDcb Andthcrcadcrshavc thcmall
I
This lcmininc libcral scll gains strcngth in part bccausc thc discnlran
chiscd, vulncrablcdisablcdhgurcs arclorccdtooccupythcpositionvvomcn
traditionallyholdinrclationtomcnThcdillcrcncc, olcoursc, isthatthclcm-
ininc libcral sclladmits dcpcndcncc on thc othcr, namingit sympathy and
idcntihcation, vhilc thcmasculinc libcral scllclaims autonomy, dcnyingrc-
liancc on lcmalc support and thc dchning boundarics that it providcs mas
culinity Ncvcrthclcs s, thcprcscnccolthcsympathctic,marginalizcddisablcd
hgurcscrcatcsatrianglcamongthcmasculinclibcralscll,thcvhitcmatcrnal
bcnclactrcss, andthcblackorlovcrclassdisablcdvomanAsathirdtcrmin
thcgcndcroppositionsolundamcntaltothcscnovcls, thcdisablcdhgurcpar
tiallydiscngagcs thc matcrnalbcnclactrcsslrom hcrstatusas subordinatcto
vhitcmcn, providinganothcrsocialrclationaroundvhichshcmightorganizc
a morc cmpovcrcd and prcstigious scluood ' This discursivc rclationship
thussccurcslorthcvhitclcmalcavaytogain somcolthclibcralindividuals
status, vhich patriarchal idcology and industrial capitalism dcnicd vomcn
Lcgitimatcd, likcLmcrsonsidcalman,bythcdchningprcscnccolaninlcrior,
thcbcnclactrcssacquircsagcncy, status , and invincibility, all sccurcdbythc
disablcdvomcnspassivity, marginalization, andvulncrability
Benevolent Maternalism's Flight from the Body:
Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Toms Cabin
Thc lcmalc body, vhcthcr dcgradcd or idcal, bccomcs thc sctting lor this
dramaolcmpovcrmcntandagcncyThcvirtucStovcsvhitcmatcrnalbcnc
lactrcsscsdcrivclromthcirrclationsviththcdisablcdvomcnmanilcstsitscll
in an idcalizcd, cthcrcal bcauty and transccndcnt authority that is ncvcrso
lully achicvcd by thc slavc mothcrs Although thc sccming scll- sacrihcc ol
mothcrly dcvotion makcs all olStovcs matcrnal hcroincs bcautilul in thcir
rightcousncss, no bcncvolcnthgurc is morc rcsplcndcntthan Lva ' ` As thc
pcrlcction olchildishbcauty, Lvas dying body is castas strangclyincorpo
rcalinlact, asanangcl Amodcllittlclady, shchasacloud-likctrcad, a
buoyanthgurc, andavisionarygoldcnhcad, thatmakcbcautilulLvainto
thcpicturcolsomcbrigbtangclstoopingtorcclaimasinncr, |TC 2l0-l2,
26l, + l 0) Notonlyi s Lvaalwaysdrcsscdi nvhitc, buthcrassociationvith
thcprivilcgcd, bcautilul, vhitcpurityolbcncvolcnccgrovsstrongcrashcrin
llucnccovcrothcrs cxpands , culminatingwith hcr dcath andtranslormation
Benevolent Maternalism and Disabled Women 9 1
|nto an angclic, |dcalizcd hgurc Lva out-mothcrs cvcqonc, bccoming thc
apothcosis olmatcrnaldcvotion, l|tcrally sacrihcing hcrsclltorcl|cvc Prucs
and Tomsphysical sullcring and Topsys hcathcnism, and bccomingcxaltcd
and lrccd lrom thc body in thc proccss Vhcrcas Tom and Topsy inspirc
salvihclovcin Lva, Prucs grucsomctalcolphysicalmiscryandvulncrability
makcs Lvapalc, and adccp, carncstshadovpassc s| ovcr hcr cycs, acccn
tuating hcr bcatihc vhitcncss, vhich |s complctc in hcr dramatic, vhitc-
drapcdc||ecumourcnbcncathanangclhgurc, |1C l2 , +29)
l n dircct opposition to Lvas progrcssivcly idcal|zcd, cthcrcal bcauty is
Prucs incscapablc physical avlulncss A lov crcaturc vhosc grunting,
scovling, andsoursurlyvvaysconhrmhcrovn convictionthatlsugly,
lsvickcd, Prucisapoor,old, cutupcrittcr, anoltcnabuscd, suicidalalco-
holic touchingly gricvinglorhcrlost child , |1C l l 92l ) Prucs body is a
liabil|tylromvhichshccannotcscapc lt is thc mcdiumolhcrvictimization,
producing thc childthatshccannotdclcnd, bccomingthc instrumcntolhcr
drunkcnncss, compromising hcr labor, and hnally provo|ng hcr mastcr to
bcathcrtodcathLvcnthoughthcnondisablcdslavcmothcrssuchasLliza,
Cassy, and Halcys and Markss unnamcd slavcsarc humanizcd and gain
scll dctcrminationthroughmothcrhood, PrucsandHagarsdrcadlullatcsac-
knovlcdgcjusthovpotcntiallyvulncrablcmatcrnitymakcsvomcnundcrthc
patriarchalslavcsystcm
Stovcs discmbodicdnarrativcvoiccolbcncvolcntmatcrnalismollcrs Ha-
gar tothc rcadcrs asthc tragic cpitomc ollcmalc impotcnccin thclaccol
masculincsubjugation Hagarispartiallyblind, andsomcvhatcripplcdvith
rhcumatismsothatshcrcspondsvithshakinghands, |ntcnsctrcpidation,
andsobbingvhcnconlrontcdbythcvillsolothcrs, |1C l 9+-9 , l 9) On
thcauctionblockvhcrcshcistorn lromhcrgrovnsonbccauscshccan no
longcrvork, Hagarisapoorvictim, adcspairingoldmothcr, vhoscagony
is| pitilultoscc, andvhoscdisabilitysummarizcshcrincapacityanddclcat
, |1C l 9) Poth Pruc and Hagar lall prcy to thcir ovn bodily conditions ,
thcirdiscomlortingvarninguncasilyrctractcdbyStovcalcvpagcsaltcrthc
charactcrs introductions
Thcscdisablcdslavcmothcrsbriclbutrhctoricallyvitalappcaranccscom-
priscacountcrnarrativcin |nc|e 1omsCc|inthatundcrcuts Stovcsprocla
mationthathomcandmothcrhoodcanrcdccmavorldcorruptcdbysccular
and cconomic pursuits Mothcrhood docs not lrcc Pruc and Hagar, but in-
stcaditholdsthcmhostagctoitsattachmcntsandcmotions ,cvcnvhilcithu-
manizcsthcmThcsccharactcrs disabiliticss|gnicxactlyvhatthcmatcrnal
hcroincsmanagctocscapc aphysicalvulncrabilitythatundcrmincsthcvill
92 Constructing Disabled Figures
bchindsclldctcrmination VhilcLlizamiraculouslycrosscsthcOhioonthc
i cc, Hagarstrcmbling,crying,andbcggingchangcnothing, andPrucsdrink
ing, though itiscxcuscd, only dcstroys hcr llStowc lcavcs hcr rcadcrs mo
mcntarilyhcartbrokcnandwaryatHagarsandPrucslatcs , shcbriskymovcs
bcyond thcir hclplcssncss to Llizas and Cassys hcartcning hcroism Vhilc
thcindomi tablcwhitc matcrnalbcnclactrcsscsandnondisablcdslavcmoth
crshcrcbccomcmistrcsscsolthcirlatcs, thcdisablcdhgurcslackthcagcncy
and sclldctcrmination that rcgulatc and ncutralizc thc bodys vulncrability
Lnvclopcdbylorccsthcycannotcontrol , HagarandPruclackthcvilltorc
sist and thcabilitytoanticipatcthcprcscnts conscqucnccs on thc luturc
both traits ol thc libcral scluood csscntial to matcrnal bcncvolcncc Thc
disablcd vomcns incapablc, impotcnt bodics opcratc not as ncutral instru
mcnts olsovcrcignvills , butasimpcdimcntssub]ccttoincxorablc latc orir
rcsistiblclorccs, bothcastasmasculinc VcrcPrucandHagarorlatcr, Dcb
andCattytoactinthcirownbchall,thcnarrativclramcolapowcrstrugglc
bctwccn invinciblc matcrnalbcncvolcncc and masculinc markctplacc prac
ticcsvouldcollapscThcirvulncrabilitymarkcdbyadisabilitythatsimulta
ncously ] ustihcs and cnlorccs thcir matcrial and psychological dcstitution
rhctoricallyactivatcsthcbcncvolcntmatcrnalismthcnovclscckstoinspirc
inrcadcrs
The Female Body as Liability
AsthcsharpcontrastbctwccnLvaand Prucsuggcsts, thclcmalcbodyclicits
muchanxictyin thcscnovcls Thc shilt in rcprcscntationlromStowcs sym
pathctic but promptly crascd disablcd slavc mothcrs , to thc rcpulsivc but
touchingDcbandthcbcstialandpathcticCatty, suggcsts agrovinguncasi
ncssaboutthclcmalcbodyandthcscriptolbcncvolcntmatcrnalism Vhilc
thclcmalcbodyhadalwaysbccninsomcscnsccastasaliability, thisbccamc
cspcciallysolormiddlcclasswomcn, whowcrcbythc midninctccnthccn
tury prcsscdintoncwrolcsandculturallyrcstrictcdbythcinstitutions that
crcatcdwhatCcrdaLcrncrtcrmsthcmiddlcclasscultolthclady ' ' Thcrisc
olindustrialcapitalism, thccmcrgcnccolthcmiddlcclass, thcnotionolscp
aratcprivatcandpublicsphcrcs, thcprolcssionalizationolwork,thcincrcas
ing hcgcmony ol thc scicntihcmcdical pcrspcctivc, and thc cscalation ol
consumcrismintcractcdtoproduccanidcologyolwomanhoodthatrcquircd
thcwhitc, middlcclasslcmalcbodytobcidl c, lrail, andbcautilul `Lachol
thcscculturaldcvclopmcntsloundanidcologicalsitcinthcncwlyconhgurcd
middlcclasslcmalcbody |orcxamplc, asthclactory, thcsvcatshop, andthc
Benevolent Maternalism and Disabled Women 4 4 4 4 4 93
puttingoutsystcmlorpicccvorkrcplaccdthcindcpcndcnthomcasthcprin-
ciplcsitcolproduction, middlc-classvomcn, novcxcludedlrom thc trans
lormcdmarkctcconomy, bccamcornamcntsandconsumcrs, markcrs olthc
status thcirhusbands andlathcrsvcrc toiling to achicvc Panishmentlrom
the vorkplacc, amandatc to consumc, and alocus onappcaranccthus crc-
atcdthcstandardolthclrailandidlcbcauty Thatstandardvaspoliccdbyan
authoritativc scicntihcmcdicaldiscoursc thatnotonlypathologizcdlcmalc
ncss itscll, but enlorced thc rcstrictions olmiddlc-class domcsticity bydc-
claringcducation, vork, andcrcativityothcrthanrcproductionasphysically
dangcrousanddcstructive olvomanlincss Assuchsociocconomicdcmands
and povcr rclations vcrc litcrally inscribcd on the bodics ol middlcclass
vomcn,thcvomcnmusthavcstrugglcdvithahcightcncdscnseolthcirovn
vulncrabilityasthcidcallcmalcbodyshiltcdlromahcartymothcrandvorkcr
toadclicatc, cxpcnsive, indolcntornamcntbarclyhtlorreproduction '
Manyvomcnrcbcllcd, olcoursc Locatingthcissucsquarclyi nthclcmalc
body, Stovcrcspondcdbydravingasharpcontrastbctv ccnanidcalizcdbut
losthgureoldomcsticproductivityandthccurrcnt, dcnigratedsucccssorvho
vas unhtlorusclulphysical vork Lamcntingin an l -e+cssay thclragilc,
casily latigued, languid girls ola modern agc, shc nostalgically rccalls thc
strong, hardy, chccrlul girls olold timcsvhocould vash, iron, brcv,
bakc, harncssahorscanddrivchim, asvcllasbraidstrav, cmbroidcr, drav,
paint, and rcad innumcrablc books |or Stovc and hcr collcagucs vho
championcda domcsticitybascdin lcmalevork, thcbanishmcntolmiddlc-
classvomcnlromproductivcactivitycrcatcdanoltcndclcnsivcanddcspair
ingvision ollcmalc cmbodimcntAnxictyovcrcconomic changcs rcndcring
thcmiddlcclasslcmalcbodycsscntiallyadccorativcornamcntrathcrthana
productivcimplcmcntmayhavccontributcdtothcpcriodicbrcakdovns, ncr-
vousdisordcrs, andchronicboutsolillhcalththatthcscauthorsandmanyol
thcir contemporarics expcricnccd ` Thc cxamplc ol Phclps illustratcs thc
schizoid rcsponsc thatambition couldproduccinvomcn acculturatcd lor a
limitcd, domcsticrolc Phclpsasscrtsinan l --eHcrjerscssaythatthcno-
tionthatvomcnarcmadctobctakcncarcol, to dcpcnduponsomcbody, to
betoilcdlor, toplayamongthcroscsollilcvhilcthcirhusbandsandlathcrs
arc on its battlc-hclds, is dcgradingto thc lastdcgrcc Yetaltcrvriting1e
Si|enPcrner, shc cndurcdahvc-ycarillncssthatwasprobablyarcactionto
hcrlathcrs disapprovalandanti-lcminism
To bccxcludcdlrom carninga livingi na socicty thatcquatcsvirtucvith
vorkis proloundly diminishing Yct thcimagc olthc lragilcvoman in thc
dcgrading position olnecdingto bctakcncarc ol bccausc shcis outsidc
94 Constructing Disabled Figures
mcaninglul productionis prcciscly that olboththc disablcdhgurcs in thcsc
novclsandmiddlcclassvomcn Sovhilcthcnovclscxtcndanarrativc hand
olsympathyacrossa chasmoldillcrcnccto thc disablcdhgurcs, thc actual
distinctions bctvccn dcpcndcnt and dcgradcd Hagar, Pruc, Dcb, and
Cattyandthcirmiddlc-class sistcrsmaynothavcsccmcdsoclcartothcau-
thors orthcirrcadcrs Rcdundantand displaccdinthctranslormingmarkct
placc, castasdcpcndcntandlrail,sccnasvictimsolthcirutcruscs, vulncrablc
to institutional subjugation, and posscsscd ol bodics that vcrc incrcasingly
dccmcdusclcss, middlcclassvomcnvcrcinapositionparallcltothatolpco-
plcvithphysicaldisabilitics `
Thisculturalclligyolvomanhoodvascxactlyvhatarticulatc,ardcnt, and
ambitiousvomcnlikcStovc, Davi s, andPhclpsvcrctryingtoovcrthrov Pc
ingin a parallcl position to hcrdisablcd countcrpart produccs both a com
pclling compassion and a potcnt thrcat thatgcncratc an cscalating, uncasy
ambivalcncc culminatingin a rcprcscntationalbrcachbctwccnthcmatcrnal
bcnclactrcssandhcrdisablcdbcnchciaq lncrcasinglydivcrgcntinthcirhgu-
ration, thc tvogroupspcrsonithcpolcsin anarrativcollcmininccmbodi-
mcnt in vhich thc disablcd vomcn ollcr a talc ol admonition vhilc thc
nondisablcd vomcn stand as apothcoscs olvomanly physicality Pcginning
vithStowc,andmorclullyvithDavisandPhclps, thcscnovclsoucrtvopos-
siblc scripts lor vomcn, onc disablcdandonc cnablcd, toinstruct rcadcrs
about thc pcrils and potcntial olbcinga voman in midninctccnth ccntury
Amcrica Vhilcthc matcrnalbcnclactrcsscsarccmpovcrcdvithvoicc, scll-
dctcrmination, and agcncy, thc vulncrablc hgurcs languish on thc narrativc
margins ,cnsnarcdbythclimitationsolthcirovnbodics Thcnovclssimulta
ncouslycmbraccincompassionandrcsistindrcadthcscrcmindcrsolbodily
impotcncc and victimization Thc disablcdvomcn bccomc discursivc light-
ningrodsloragrovingscnscollcminincvulncrabilitythatthcauthors darc
not lully conccdc Thcir shadovy, tcrriblclatcsconstitutc amutcdcountcr
narrativcollcmalcsub]ugationandbodilyliabilitythatthcmatcrnalbcnclac
trcsscsllcc
Two Opposing Scripts of Female Embodiment:
Rebecca Harding Davis's Life in the Iron Mils
Asthisrclormnarrativc dcvclops, tbcdisablcdhgurcs bccomcprogrcssivcly
morc promincntandmorc dcgradcd, vhilc thc matcrnalbcnclactrcsscsbc-
comc morc idcalizcd and discmbodicd As Davi s and Phclps cxpand and
complicatc Stovcs rhctorical uscoldisablcdhgurcs tomobilizcbcncvolcnt
Benevolent Maternalism and Disabled Women 95
matcrnalism, thcyintcnsithccautionarytalcollcmalcvulncrabilityinthc
storicsolDcbVollcandCattyCarth DcbsandCattysmarkcdbodicslunc-
tionhrstasdcbascdinstrumcntsolincllcctualvillsandsccondasliabilitics
thatcondcmnthcmtodcspcratc situations Thcdisablcdvomcn rcprcscnt
prccisclythcpossibilitythatlibcralindividualismrcluscstoconccdcthatthc
bodymightimpcdc rathcrthan implcmcnt thc dcvclopmcntolscllhood ln
starkcontrast, thc matcrnalbcnclactrcsscsDaviss sccmingly guilt-ri ddcn
narratorandhcrcthcrcalQuakcrvomanasvcllas Phclpss idcalizcd, bcau-
tilul Pcrlcy Kclsoarc lrcc lrom thc vulncrability that cndangcrs thc di s-
ablcdhgurcs
Pyccntcringits rcprcscntationolvomanhoodonthcvulncrablcbody ol
thcsympathcticbutmiscrablcandincpthunchback DcbVollc, Li]e inae
IronMi||srcvcrscsStovcslocuson thchcroincsinordcrtohighlightthcvic-
tims Davis convcrts Stovcs Southcrn racial hicrarchytoa morc Northcrn
conccrnvith classdillcrcntiation, hcrlcsssanguincnarrativcvoiccolbcncv-
olcntmatcrnalismcxposingthclailurcoldomcsticitytoimposcmoralordcr
VhcrcasthchomccndurcsasasitcolsalvationinStovcsvorld,Davispoints
cxplicitlytohovindustrialcapitalismsplitsvhitcsintoaclasshicrarchythat
dccimatcs vorking-class lamilics, squclchcs individual lulhllmcnt, and rcn
dcrshomclilcinconscqucntial AbarrcnrcmnantolStovcs idcalizcdlamily,
thcVollcssubsistinahovclolimpotcntmiscryandvrctchcdncss Thcmoth
crlcss Dcbis onc olStovcs disablcd and dcvalucd childrcn, grovn up and
castoutlikcHagarandPruc,dclcnsclcssbclorchcropprcs sors Althoughshc
scrvcsasacarctakcr,Dcbisdcnicdmothcrhood, thatconduittodignity, idcn
tihcation, andsympathylorStovcsslavcs Strongcronculturalcritiqucthan
domcsticsolution,Li]e inaeIronMi||slocuscsonthcmillandprison, cllac-
ingboththcmiddlc-classhomcandthc Quakcrcommunitylromvhichthc
matcrnalbcnclactrcsscsspring
Vhcrcas Stovvc locuscsonanidcalizcd Lva, Davis obscurcshcrbcnclac-
trcsscs ,althoughshcgrantsthcmthcstorysonlypositivcpovcr Poththcnar-
rator and thc Quakcr voman arc strikingly insubstantial , comparcd to thc
vrctchcdmillvorkcrsvhoscbodilysullcringlloodsusvithvividdctail Likc
Stovcs narrativc voicc bclorc hcr, Daviss narrator is not uncquivocally a
voman,yct thc toncolbothvoiccsis sostronglyaligncdvi thlcmalcbcncvo-
lcnccasto sccmlcminincVhilcthc narratorshapcsrcadcrsrcsponscsvith
provocativc dcscriptions and goadingjudgmcnts , shc rcvcals almostnothing
abouthcrscll, particularlythcdctailsolhcrovnbody Vc lcarnonlythatshc
hasknovnthccommunitysinccchildhoodcvcnthoughshcsccmstobcquitc
apartlromit,narratinglromavindovabovcthcvorkcrsmasscd, vilc, slimy
96 4 4 4 4 4 Constructing Disabled Figures
livcs,LIM l l) Onlyat thc cnd is thc prcscnccthathasguidcdus through
thcpoorVclshpuddlcrs] drcadlulstoryrcvcalcdasthatolavritcrvhosc
librarynovhouscsHughskorlstatucolthcvoman,guiltilyhidbchindacur
tain ,L!M o+) A vast rhctorical disparity looms bctvccnthc middlcclass ,
prcsumablyvhitc,vritcr,vhosccntirccharactcrizationconsistsolactsolvill
h l l d l l k l l h ld d suc as opcn, can ctcct, , vant, c oosc, arc, an
most importantl vritc, and thc mill vorkcrs, vhosc miscrablc matcrial
livcsanddcgradcdbodics, dovninthclog, andmud, andloulclhuvia, shc
solranklydcpicts,LIM l l -l +)
ThcunnamcdbcncvolcntQuakcrvomanvhoappcarsatthccndol Dcbs
prisontcrm is ascllcctualas, and morccmbodicdthan, thc narrator ln total
command ol hcrscll and thc tragic situation, this homcly body coarscly
drcsscdingrayandvhitc, vithastrongarm andastronghcart, appcarsto
rcscuc Dcb andtotransportHughscorpsctoapropcrburialamongthchills
and trccs ,LIM o2-ol ) ln this idcalizcd Quakcr vomanso similar to
Stovcs Rachcl Hallidayno dissonancc cxists bctvccn body andvill , hcr
body lunctions cllicicntly and capably so that shc arrivcs , clcans, lcads,
burics, and bcgins hcr vvork olrcdccming Dcbvithout thcslightcst hin
drancc,LIM o+) Pcrpctuallyin thc scriccolothcrs ,yctmistrcssolhcrscll,
hcrbody, andthcconscqucnccsolhcractions , shcis Dcbsoppositc, thclib
crallcminincsclllrcclromthcliabiliticsollcmalccmbodimcnt
Dcbi s, bycontrast, tcthcrcdtoabodythatlrustratcscvcnpcrcrtsvo
litionasvcllas obstructingthcachicvcmcntolhcrdcsircs A| tc olhcr
class, shcis thcvrctchcdmilllilcmadcHcsh ,LIM2 l ) Adcgradcdvcrsion
olHugh,vhoscartisticcommitmcntrcdccmshisbodilyrcstrictions ,Dcbcm
blcmatizcs thc unrcdccmcd, subj ugatcd bodythat impcdes hcrvill Vhilc
Hughs hncrnaturc rcmains unsullicd bccausc olhis gropingpassion lor
vhatcvcrvas bcautilulandpurc, Dcb,rcduccdtoabodyspoilcdbylatcand
socictysdislavor,is m| iscrablc likcalimp,dirtyragyctnotanunhtting
hgurc to crovn thc sccnc ol hopclcss discomlort ,LIM 2 l -2l) Vhcrcas
cruclmastcrsthvartPrucandHagar, Dcbsbodyitscllishcrprimaqopprcs
sor, hcrdchninglcaturc, summinguplor Hugh andthcnarratorcvcqthing
ugly, rcvolting, and conhning about mill vorkcrs livcs Dcscriptions likc
vatchdogandlaithlulspaniclrclcgatcDcbtothcstatusolananimalatthc
mcrcyoldominatingmastcrs , hcrovncrudcinstincts , andahostilccnviron-
mcnt,LIMo l , 2l)
AlthoughDcbssolcmotivationthroughoutthcstoryi s tolovcandbclovcd
byHugh, hc issickcncdvithdisgustathcrdclormity, andshcispathcticto
cvcqoncclsc,LIM2l) RcjcctcdandpiticdinhcrcllortstogainHughslovc,
Benevolent Maternalism and Disabled Women e e e e e 97
shcrcprcscnts thc ultimatc thrcatt oninctccnthccntury lcmalc scluood a
bodythatprcvcntshcrlromattachmcnttoaman,vomcnsconduittopovcr
andstatus Rcpulsivcto thc malcgazc, Dcbsbclcagucrcdbodyvitncsscsthc
domcstic sclls prccarious dcpcndcncc upon a body that mustbc approvcd
and lulhllcd bymalc sclcction Lvcn morc alarming, Dcbs only momcntol
bold agcncy, thc scll-sacrihcing, quintcsscntially lcmininc act ol stcaling
MitchcllsmoncylorHugh, ironicallyncithcrsavcsnorplcascshimbutlcads
instcadtohisdcathThus , Dcbvarnsolthclcmalcbodysvorstpossiblcbc-
trayal thatitprcvcntsalldcsircsandnccdslrombcingrcalizcd Ahgurclorall
thcvulncrability, abcrration, rcjcction, andimpotcncc attributcdto lcmalcs ,
Dcb, victimizcdby andbccauscolhcrthvartcd vomans lorm, i s at oncc
sympathcticandmonstrous, hnallycontaincd in,rathcrthancmpovcrcdby,
thc Quakcrhavcn ,LIM2 l ) Vith Dcb, thcn, thisnovcllacontinucsStovcs
proccss ol scaling oll thc disablcd hgurc vho signihcs lcmalc vulncrability
intoanarrativcspaccolinsurmountablcbodilydillcrcncc, lrccingthc matcr-
nalbcnclactrcsslrom agrovingvarincssolthclcmalcbodys limitationson
agcncyandvill
Davis and Phclps intcnsi bcauty and uglincss as opposing signihcrs ol
lcminincvirtuc l nStovcthcdichotomylollovsraciallincs , butinDavisand
Phclps dillcrcnccsinphysicalappcaranccrcllcctclass discrcpancics Vhilc
Stovc uscsmatcrnal cxpcricncc to Hattcn outphysiological dillcrcnccsbc-
tvccn Pruc and Hagar and Lliza and Rachcl, Davis and Phclps cxpungc
mothcrhoodanddillcrcntiatcthcirsctsolvomcnbyaligningbcautyvithso-
cial status ln thc gcncration that scparatcs Davis and Phclps lrom Stovc,
classdistinctionsamongvomcncontinucdto solidi, andlcmalcbcautyas
an industq and idcology intcnsihcd ` Py midccntury thc lilc pattcrns ol
middlcclass and lovcrclass vomcn vcrcvcry dissimilar, cxccpt that thcy
vcrc cqually marginalizcd and discnlranchiscd ' That disparity is rcprc
scntcdhcrcbybcauty,acommoditythatvasmuchmorcavailablctomiddlc
class vomcnthantothcirvorking class sistcrs For cxamplc, cvcn though
Daviss matcrnalbcnclactrcsscsarc toophysicallyvaguc tobcthoughtolas
bcautilul , thc novcl doggcdly undcrscorcs thc mill vorkcrs uglincs s dc-
lormcd Dcb is thc apothcosis olvorkingclass grotcsqucncss, cvcn morc
ghastly, hcrlips blucr, hcrcycsmorc vatcry, than thc rcpcllcntdrunk, Old
Vollc ,LI! l o-l ) SovhilcHagarhasonlyshakinghandsandismcrcly
pitilul to scc, Dcb is a vcak, llaccid vrctch, vhoscuglincss clcarly is a
markandproductnotonlyolphysicalinlcrioritybutalsoolclas s distinction
, TC l 9, LIMl )
Daviss|ancyalsohgurcsinthiscconomythatcquatcsphysicalbcautyvith
98 . . . . . Constructing Disabled Figures
lemalevalue, virtue, and power
`
Although subduedbythe milllile thathas
madeDebsougly,|aneysbeautyshowsthroughenoughinherdarkblueeyes
and lithehgurethatHughloves herinsteadoltherepugnantDeb ,LIM2l)
Debs recognitionthatHughloves|aneyslragile andladingbeautyproduces
inDeba] ealousythatthenarratorusestoencouragethereadertoidenti
withDebdespiteclassboundaries Arepainand] ealousylesssavagerealities
downhere inthisplace l amtakingyouto, thebenevolentnarratorcharges,
thaninyourownhouseoryourownheart Thenoteisthesame, llancy,
be theoctavehighorlow` ,LIM, 2l) Thisallusiontoallwomensdependence
on male approval lorlulhllment and status suggests that the threat olthe
uglylemalebodycannotbesalely sequesteredbehindthewallDavis con
structsbetweenmillgirls andmiddle-classwomen Sowiththeintroduction
olphysicalbeautyanditslinkstoclassdillerencesasavaluesystemimposed
onlemalebodies , theleminineliberal sellassertedbybenevolentmaternal
ismbecomes still more vulnerable, and mustbebolsteredrepeatedlybythe
aniousoppositionbetweenthedisabledhgureandherbenelactress
The Triumph of the Beautiful, Disembodied Heroine:
Elizabeth Stuart Phelps's The Sient Parner
Appearing in l 3 l , nearly twentyyears alter |nc|e1omsCc|in, 1e Si|en
Pcrnerseems to acceptas its premise CoJs LcJy' Boo|'s l 3 2assertion
that lt is a womans |usiness to bebeautilul, and to ampli|that assertion
withboththedomesticpropositionthatbeautyequalsvirtueandtheleminist
proposition thatwomencanlive independentlylrom menandmarriage
`
' A
knd ol hybrid ol Stowes Lva and Daviss Quaker woman, Phelpss Perley
Kelsoisalull-blown hgure oltranscendentalbenevolentmaternali smwhose
Hawlessbeautyandunmitigatedcapabilityiscontrastedwiththeuglinessand
ineptnessolthewretchedCattyCarthAswithDavi s, classdistinctionsman
ilestasbeautyanduglinessseparatePhelpssultimateheroine, Perley,andul
timate victim, Catty A sellmade woman in the leminine economy ol
benevolence, the indomitable Perley repudiates marriage, instead usingher
inheritancetoestablishanall-lemalehomecenteredonsororalallection, sup
posedlyuncompromisedbyeitherpatriarchyorclassdivisions
`
Opentothe
millworkers, Perleyshomeservesasastageuponwhichaclassbasedhierar
chyequatingbeautyandvirtueisrepeatedlydisplayed Capableolshapingher
owndestiny,Perleyi sasuperiorwoman, devotedtothelesscapableandless
appealing, a swilt, strong, helplulhgurewitha womanly, wonderlullace,
whosevirtueandphysicallaultlessnessincreasei nproportiont ohergeneros
Benevolent Maternalism and Disabled Women 8 8 8 8 8 99
itytovardthcmillworkcrs ,SP l ol , 2 l , l02) Shc isagrown-up, strcngth-
cncdvcrsion olLva whoscbcauty and goodncss makc hcrinvulncrablcand
usclul, ancarthlyrathcrthanahcavcnlyangcl Scvcralc||ecuxvivcns] uxta
poscPcrlcysidcalizcd, capablcbodywith Cattys dcbascd, incptonc Thcy
wcrcastartlingpairtobcstandingsidcbysidc Pcrlcyshnc,hnishcdsmilc
sccmcdtoblotoutthis miscrablchgurc, who ishabitually charactcrizcdas
anuglygirlwitharcpulsivclacc, SP3o-33, l 90) LchoingLva, Pcrlcy
ashcrnamcsuggcstsisassociatcdrcpcatcdlywithwhitc MissKcl sosclc
gantvhitcdrcss ,withoutHaw, orpuckcroltrimmingprcscntcdabroadand
shiningbackgroundtothcpoorcrcaturcspuzzlcdhgurc, SP2l0)
Phclpscomplicatcsthiscontrast, howcvcr,bycrcatingatrianglccomposcd
ol Pcrlcy, thc humanitarian hcircss , Sip Carth, Cattys oldcr sistcr and a
nondisablcdmillgirl , andCatty, thcdisablcdwomanwhoschclplcssncssclic-
itsthcirdcvotionandcmphasizcsthcirpowcrSipisaligncdwithCattybylow
socialclassand its attcndantlackolbcauty, andwith Pcrlcybythcsclldctcr-
minationwithwhichshcovcrcomcsthcliabiliticsolthcbodytowhichCatty
succumbs Asiltosuggcstboththclimitsand thcpossibiliticslorupwardso-
cial mobility, Sip stands midway bctwccn Pcrlcys capabilitycmbodicd as
bcautyandCattysincptitudccmbodicdasdi sability Dcspitcthissuggcs-
tionolcl asspcrmcability, classdistinctionsappcarmainlyasbiologicaldillcr
cnccs akn to racial catcgorics Sip is justa littlc rough, brown girl with a
pinchcd lacc, whilc thc prccious Pcrlcy has a radiantly whitc, hnc, rarc
lacc, SP29+, 3 , l02) Ncvcrthclcss , Sipswilllulncssand scll controlallow
hcr to bccomc Pcrlcys undcrstudy in thcir scllcrcatcd, ambitious world ol
Christian bcncvolcncc indcpcndcntolmalc inHucncc ln contrast, Catty is
blindcdanddcalcncdbymillworkandhnallyswcpt awaybyanapocalyptic
Hoodollogs, thcmillshnaldcstructivccllcctonhcrbody Viththistriangu-
lation, thcn, Phclps shapcs Stowcsmodclolrclations bctwccnthcdisablcd
hgurc andthc matcrnalbcnclactrcssintoa class-bascdhicrarchythatcorrc-
latcswiththcbchavioralvalucsystcmollibcralindividualismandislinkcdto
physicalcharactcristics
Pcrlcys bcautyi snotonly thcvisiblcmanilcstationolhcrvirtuc, i tlunc
tionsaswcllasasynonymlorthcscllcontrolthatCattylacks |ustasPcrlcys
bodyis thc hnishcdandHawlcss productollcmininc moral usclulncss,
Cattys body is illcontrollcd and uncontrollablc , SP 3 ) Pcrlcys asccti-
cismcontrasts vithCattysviccs thcdcalandmutcgirldrinks, runswildin
thcstrccts, andworscisprobablyscxuallypromiscuous , SP 3+) Lntircly
physical, withnorcstrainingwill, shcconstantlyriskscxploitationandscxual
appropriation Likc Davi ss Dcb, Cattyis a miscrablccrcaturc, a t ypcol
1 00 Constructing Disabled Figures
thc vorldlromvhichshc sprang, SP2S) Ashcrnamcimplics, Cattyis
also bcstial , covcringandvhining likcahurtbrutcandsnarl ing| likc
anannoycdanimal,SPl SS, l 0) SuggcstingasocialDarvinistvicvolclass
anddisability, Cattys laccappcarssimian nothavingmanagcdthatdillicult
cvolutionolbrainlrombcast, shcisagirlvithalovlorchcad, vithvandcr
ingcycs, vithadullstoop to thchcad, and| a thickdroopingundcrlip
, SPSo)
``
Cattyis thcbodyincarnatcthatlrustratcsandoblitcratcs thclibcralindi
vidualsnarrativcolprogrcsstovardphysicalmastcry Rathcrthanlunctioning
as,lorcxamplc,thccompliantimplcmcntthatlrccsThorcaulromarcstrictivc
socialordcr, Cattys bodyis aliability, impcrilinghcr and provokingthc lcral
bchaviorimplicdbyhcrnamc Hcrvandcringandappctitcssuggcstprototyp
ical malcbchaviorthatis sclldcstructivclor avomanvithoutmalccntitlc
mcnt Cattyis thcvomanPcrlcymustsavc, butalsomustncvcrbccomc Py
dcpictingPcrlcyasthc sovcrcignvillinthccompliantbodyvhilcCattyisthc
sovcrcign body thatobviatcs thc autonomousindividualvill, Phclps lastcns
allphysicalrcstrictionsandpcrilstoCattysbody, lcavingPcrlcyaspurc soul
andvoiccattachcdtoa transccndcnt, tractablc implcmcntollcmininc scll
dctcrmination
`
s
and unadorned beauty, the vain and self-indulgent Marie is "gorgeously dressed" and
wears "diamond bracelets" while all around her suffer ( UTC, 275 ) .
1 9. See Laqueur, Making Sex; Barbara Welter, "The Cult of True Womanhood:
1 820-60, " American Quarterly 1 8 ( 2) : 1 5 1 -74; Gerda Lerner, "The Lady and t he Mill
Girl : Changes in the Status of \Vomen in the Age of Jackson, " Midcontinent American
Studies Journal 1 0 ( 1 969) : 5-1 5, quotation at p. 1 1 .
I want to make a distinction here between Barbara Welter's often cited "Cult of
True Womanhood" and what I mean by using Lerner's term, "the cult of the lady. "
While Welter emphasizes behavior and attitudes, I stress the class-bound effects of be
ing a "lady" on the body itself, even as I acknowledge that these views of womanhood
are not discrete. Thus, I focus upon physical restrictions to work and on the discourses
that name the female body pathological as well as ugly.
20. For discussions of this process's socioeconomic effect on women see Lerner,
"The Lady and the Mill Girl"; Richard D. Brown, llodernization: The Transformation of
American Life | e00-| Se( New York: Hill and Wang, 1 976) , especially chapters 6 and
7; Rodgers, The 10rk Ethic in Industrial America | S 0| 920, especially chapter 7;
Stuart Blumin, Te Emergence ofthe Middle Class: Social Experience in the American
Cit | e0| 900(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1 989) , especially pp. 1 79-
9 1 ; and Veblen, The Theor ofthe Leisure Class, especially pp. 1 25-3 1 .
For discussions on the impact of scientifc and medical discourses on women, see
Ehrenreich and English, For Her On Good, especially chapters 3 and 4; Smith
Rosenberg, Disorderly Conduct, especially the chapters on hysterical women and on
abortion; Judith Walzer Leavitt, ed. , Women and Health in America (l1 adison: Univer
sity of Wisconsin Press, 1 984) , especially part 1 ; Herndl, Invalid Women, especially
chapter 1 ; Tuana, Te Less Noble Sex; and Gould, Te Mismeasure of lIan, pp. 1 03-07.
Martha Verbrugge, in Able-Bodied Womanhood: Personal Health and Social Change in
Nineteenth- Centur Boston ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1 988) , examines the
paradox created by the cult of invalidism and the demand that women be ft enough to
manage domestic duties .
For discussions of the institution of female beauty and its relation to consumerism
1 64 . . . . . 4. Benevolent Maternalism
and leisure, see Banner, An'erican Beauty, especially chapters 1-4; Wolf, The Beauty
Myth; and Veblen, Teor of the Leisure Class.
2 1 . Testimonies to this sense of bodily restriction and vulnerability abound; two of
the most powerful are, of course, Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "The Yellow Wallpaper, "
The Net England Magazine (January 1 892) ; and Florence Nightingale's "Cassandra"
( 1 928; reprinted in Ray Strachey, ed. , The Cause: A Short Histor ofthe v0men(s Move
ment in Great Britain ( London: Virago, 1 978) , pp. 395-4 1 8.
22. Gail Parker, The Oven Birds: American Women on Womanhood) | S20| 920
(Garden City, N.J . : Anchor Books , 1 972) , p. 1 97.
23. Tillie Olsen, Silences ( Nevv York: Dell Publishing, 1 965 ) , pp. 1 1 7-1 8; Susan
Coultrap- McQuin, Doing Literar Business: American Women Writers in the Nine
teenth Centur (Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press, 1 990) , p. 1 75 .
24. Elizabeth Stuart Phelps, "Why Shall They Do I t?" Harpers 36 ( 1 886) : 2 1 9;
Carol Farley Kessler, Elizabeth Stuart Phelps (Boston: Twayne, 1 982) , p. 1 5 .
2 5 . By 1 899, Thorstein Veblen had asserted that the market economy's demand
that women display "conspicuous waste and conspicuous leisure" enforced female
habits and dress that amounted to "voluntarily induced physical disability" (Theor of
the Leisure Class, p. 1 27) . Cultural discourse described the female body as inferior,
frail, and limited-precisely the same way that it framed the physical characteristics of
disabled people.
26. See Amy Schrager Lang, "Class and the Strategies of Sympathy," in Samuel s,
ed. , The Culture of Sentiment . Lang argues that the dilemma of representing class i n
both Life in the Iron NIills and Uncle Tom' Cabin is solved by substituting gender, leav
ing art as the fnal subject of Davis's novel .
27. Sharon Harris ("Rebecca Harding Davis") suggests that the Korl woman is a revi
sion of Deb. If one accepts that reading, it is interesting that the statue appears to cor
rect Deb's disability, releasing the idealized version of Deb from the physical limi
tations of the real, disabled woman (LIM 1 9) . I fnd evidence in the text to suggest
that the Korl woman is a self-portrait of the feminized Hugh, who is described as a living
version of the statue, "mad with hunger; stretching out his hands to the world" (LIM 45 ) .
28. Gerda Lerner ("The Lady and the Mill Girl") shows that by 1 840-shortly be
fore Phelps's birth, when Davis was a small child, and when Stowe was 30-class strat
ifcation among women was frmly in place. This division is what Stowe apparently
resists in both her attempt to unite women through maternal experience for social
change and to nostalgically portray the classless home. In their novels, Davis and
Phelps both accept a more hierarchical arrangement between the workers and their
middle-class supporters, although the guilty defensiveness and hopelessness that per
meate Life in the Iron Mills may reflect Davis's suspicion that the gap was unbridge
able. Lois Banner (American Beauty) and Naomi Wolf ( Te Beauty 1yth) assert that by
1 840 the maj or features and institutions of American beauty culture were also in plaCe
and were fueled by the growth of consumerism, the mass production of images, and
the continuing emergence of the middle-class lady.
5. Disabled Women as Poweiul Women . . . . 1 65
29. Lerner, "The Lady and the Mill Girl , " p. 1 1 .
30. See Banner, American8eauty,for a discussion of this economy.
3 1 . CcaeysLaays8cc|, 1 852, quoted in Banner, American8eauty, p. 1 0.
32. Phelps's repudiation of marriage in Te Si|ent Iartner contrasts with Stowe,
who seemed to assume marriage as a natural element of benevolent maternalism. At
the beginning of Phelps's novel, the indulged, frivolous Perley (reminiscent of the early
Marie St. Clare) is engaged to her father's rich partner, Maverick Hayle, whom she re
jects in order to set up something akin to a settlement house after meeting the spunky
but oppressed mill girl , Sip Garth. Although Perley refuses marriage to devote herself
to the mill \orkers, she is validated as a woman by the adoration of the Christian
Stephen Garrick, a man "she might have loved" , SI260) . Her response to the implor
ing and awestruck suitor is "I have no time to think of love and marriage . . . That is a
business, a trade, . . . I have too much else to do . . . I cannot spare the time for it" , SI
260) . Both hi s love and her self-sacrifce constitute part of the beatifcation that ren
ders her more like Eva than Marie in the end.
33. Burgdorf relates disability to social Darwinism CA History of Unequal Treat
ment, " p. 887) ; for a discussion of social Darwinism, see Richard Hofstadter, Sccia|
DarinisminAmericanTcug|t.
34. The strategy of disembodiment suggested by splitting off the physically disabled
fgures is similar to the self-imposed female "passionlessness" Nancy Cott identifes
among nineteenth-century middle-class women as a response to their vulnerability and
an alternative to being an obj ect of male desire , Te8cnasc]\cman|cca,p. 239) . The
ideology of passionlessness offered women empowerment through self-control rather
than sexual attractiveness. It also promised to release them from some distinctly femi
nine liabilities, such as unwanted pregnancy, sexual and physical subj ection, and asso
ciation with the carnaL Although Cott sees an ethic of self-control primarily in sexual
terms, the disabled women illustrate female liabilities including slavery, wage labor,
motherhood, marriage, and the role of the decorative woman.
3 5 . Lerner, "The Lady and the Mill Girl , " p. 1 4.
5. Disabled Women as Powerul Women in Petr Morrison, and Lorde
1 . Audre Lorde, Zami A Nev Sje| |ing c] My Name ( Freedom, Calif. : Crossing
Press, 1 982) , p. 1 5 . All future references are to this edition and will be given paren
thetically in the text.
In \ritinga \cmansLi]e (New York: Norton, 1 988) , Carolyn Heilbrun discusses
the lack of language and narrative forms with which to analyze the lives of nontradi
tional women. Like Lorde's "third designation, " Heilbrun's term, "ambiguous woman, "
allows one to appropriate the strengths of gender identity and reject the liabilities . Both
terms attempt to affirm and amend the concept of womanhood.
2. Ann Petry, T|eStreet ( 1 946; reprint, Boston: Beacon, 1 974) ; Toni Morrison, Te
8|uest Fye ( New York: \shington Square Press, 1 970) ; Toni Morrison, Su|a ( New
1 66 . . . . . 5. Disabled Women as Poweiul Women
York: New American Library, 1 973) ; Toni Morrison, Scngc]Sc|cmcn (New York: New
American Library, 1 977) ; Toni Morrison, Tar8aby (New York: New American Library,
1 98 1 ) ; Toni Morrison, 8e|cvea (New York: New American Library, 1 987) . All future
references are to these editions and will be cited parenthetically as Street, 8F, Su|a,
SS, T8, and 8e|cvea,respectively.
3. In her essay "When vVe Dead Awaken: Writing as Revision" (in OnLies, Secrets,
ana Si|ence [ New York: Norton, 1 979] ) , Adrienne Rich defnes "re-vision" as reading,
writing, and interpreting \omen's lives "with fresh eyes. " More than simply cultural
history, literary criticism, or autobiographical writing, Rich's well-known feminist con
cept is "an act of survival" that enables women to refute the "self-destructiveness" in
herent in conventional womanhood (p. 3 5 ) . The African-American novels discussed
here revise black female identity in precisely Rich's sense. However, this study compli
cates the notion of simple racial or gender identity, "re-visioning" it by highlighting the
sociohistorical categor "physically disabled. "Each of these novels approaches the dis
ability category only obliquely, unselfconsciously; none confronts the disabled identity
directly. The relationships among the stigmatized identities of blackness, femaleness,
and physical disability are never explicitly enunciated.
4. Some examples of physically disabled characters in other African-American
women's writing are the protagonists in Harriet Wilson's OurNig, crS|etc|es]rcmt|e
Li]e c] a Iree 8|ac| ( 1 859; reprint, New York: Vintage Books, 1 983) and Harriet Ja
cobs's Inciaentsint|eLi]e c]A S|ave Cir|( 1 86 1 ; reprint, Cambridge: Harvard Univer
sity Press, 1 987) ; Miss Thompson in Paule Marshall's 8nvn Cir|,8rcvnstcnes( 1 959;
reprint, Old 'Testbury, N. Y. : Feminist Press, 1 98 1 ) ; Uncle Willie i n Maya Angelou's I
Kncv |y T|e Cagea 8ira Sings (Toronto: Bantam, 1 969) ; the protagonist of Alice
'Talker's Meriaian (New York: Pocket Books, 1 976) ; and llilkman Dead-Morrison's
only disabled male-from Scngc]Sc|cmcn. The prevalence of such fgures is perhaps
due more to historical accuracy-disability occurs more frequently under conditions of
poverty and oppression-than to metaphorical intent.
5. These rhetorical fgurations of disability roughly correspond to a broad historical
shift in cultural sensibility that can be briefly characterized as follows: the rhetoric of
sympathy assumes unity (e:ressed, for example, in millennialism) , a cultural and cos
mic principle that dominated nineteenth-century American thinking but was questioned
by the secularized and naturalist aesthetic of the century's end. The modernist rhetoric
of despair that displaced and mourned the loss of such faith yielded the grotesque, the
antihero, and existential thinking. The postmodern rhetoric of difference no longer
mourns unity even though it grapples with multiplicity; it is the most congenial cultural
mode in which disability is represented. The terms modern and postmodern are used
here in Fredric Jameson's sense, as "cultural dominants" that can be resisted but not
transcended ("Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, " NevLe]Ie-
view 1 46 [July-Aug. 1 984] : 53-92) . The transition from one cultural dominant to the
next would necessarily be perceptible not only in literature but also in politics.
6. This historical shift i n interpretation of disability is suggested i n several studies of
5. Disabled Women as Poweiul Women 1 67
the history of disability legislation; see Scotch, Ircm Ccca \i||tc Civi|Iig|ts, Stone,
T|eDisab|eaState, Liachowitz, Disabi|ityasaSccia|Ccnstruct, and Shapiro, NcIity.
7. For example, Robert Bone in TeNegrcNcve|inAmerica( New Haven: Yale Uni
versity Press, 1 958) sees Petry's novel as a successor to NativeScn.Addison Gayle, Jr. ,
analyzes T|eStreetas a naturalist novel in T|e \ayc]t|e.` e \cr|a T|e8|ac|Ncve|
inAmerica (New York: Anchor/Doubleday, 1 97 5 , pp. 1 92-97) .
8. Defnitions of True Womanhood and New Womanhood can be found i n Barbara
Welter's essay "The Cult of True Womanhood: 1 820-1 860, " and in Smith-Rosenberg's
Discraer|yCcnauct , pp. 245-96.
9. Sharon Harris explicates Li]e int|eIrcnMi||sas the forerunner of the naturalist
novel in "Rebecca Harding Davis: From Romance to Realism, " AmericanLiteraqIea|-
ism2 1 ( 2) : 4-20.
1 0. Deb and Lutie are parallel i n this respect: their actions accomplish exactly the
opposite of what was intended, defeating both women. For Mrs. Hedges there is no
disparity bet\veen intention and effect.
1 1 . Baym, \cmensIicticn,pp. 1 1 -1 2.
1 2. In T|e8cndsc] \cman|cca, Nancy Cott analyzes the nineteenth-century ide
ology of feminine "passionlessness" as a functional cultural reformulation of the belief
in female carnality as weakness and moral turpitude. passionlessness placed nine
teenth-century women on a higher moral plane and increased their status and inde
pendence, it has now outlived its usefulness, tending to alienate women from their
own sexuality.
1 3 . Marj orie Pryse, in " ' Pattern Against the Sky' : Deism and Motherhood in Ann
Petry's T|e Street, in Marjorie Pryse and Hortense J. Spillers , eds . , Ccnuring 8|ac|
\cmen,Iicticn,anaLiteraqTraaiticn( Bloomington: I ndiana University Press, 1 98 5) ,
pp. 1 1 6-3 1 , explores the implications of Lutie's identifcation with the Ben Franklin
script, analyzing the novel and 11rs . Hedges in terms of deism. Pryse also suggests that
Lutie's actions and attitudes are self-defeating and notes how she might have used
Mrs . Hedges and others as models of survival, but Pryse does not go on to elaborate
Mrs. Hedges's potential for becoming the new heroine.
1 4. John Berger, \aysc]Seeing( London: British Broadcasting Corporation, 1 972) ,
p. 47.
1 5 . Wolfgang Kayser i s quoted i n Michael Steig, "Defning the Grotesque: An At
tempt at Synthesis, " ]curna|c]Aest|eticsanaArtCriticism29 ( 2) : 2 5 3.
1 6. William Van O' Connor traces the grotesque as "an American genre" from the
gothic Poe, through the naturalists Crane and Norri s, to Faulkner and the southern
writers who are read through his work, and fnally to the absurdist moderni sts such as
Nathanael \st and Nelson Algren ,T|eCrctesqueAnAmericanCenre,anaOt|erFs-
says [ Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1 962] ) . I would argue that the
canon of modernist alienation is to some extent self-perpetuating; it promotes the trope
of the grotesque by-like any other canon-selecting and reinforcing representations
that support its theses .
1 68 . . . . . 5. Disabled Hbmen as Poeiul Women
1 7. One typical example is Gilbert H. Muller's analysis of Flannery O' Connor's
"grotesque" disabled characters : "the protagonist, possessing a physiognomy that paral
lels her distorted spirit, is completely alienated from the world" ,Nig|tmaresana Vi
sicns I|anneq OCcnncrana t|e Cat|c|ic Crctesque [Athens : University of Georgia
Press, 1 972] , p. 27) . O' Connor's critics seem unable to go beyond this type of reading;
the term "grotesque" prevents their seeing her work as perhaps an exploration of phys
ical disability. An exception is Kathleen Patterson's perceptive exploration of O'Con
nor's work in terms of a politicized disability awareness ("Disability and I dentity in
Flannery O' Connor's Short Fiction" [ unpublished manuscript, 1 99 1 ] ) . Ann Carlton
also goes "Beyond Gothic and Grotesque" in her feminist analysis of Carson Mc
Cullers, although she does not treat disability directly ("Beyond Gothic and Grotesque:
A Feminist View of Three Female Characters of Carson McCullers, " Iembrc|e 20
[ I 988] : 54-68) .
1 8. For like-minded discussions of the grotesque, see Philip Thomson, Te
Crctesque ( London: Methuen, 1 972) ; Frances K. Barasch, "Introduction, " in Thomas
Wright, /Histcqc]CaricatureanaCrctesqueinLiteratureanaAn( 1 865 ; reprint, New
York: Frederi ck Ungar, 1 968) ; Harpham, On t|e Crctesque (quotations at pp. 30 and
1 1 ) ; Stallybrass and \Vhite, T|eIceticsanaIc|iticsc]Transgressicn, Bahktin, T|eDia-
|cgicImaginaticn, and Cassuto, T|:eIn|umanIace Like every other theorist I cite ex
cept Goffman, these theorists of the grotesque never make an explicit connection
between their theories and actual disabled people. Although Harpham, for example,
mentions "the various cripples and amputees" in Flannery O'Connor's fction, he never
explores the distinctions between fantastic and human grotesques. Considerations of
disability as a social category are limited almost exclusively to scholarly works that an
nounce themselves as disability studies. Also see Turner, T|eIcrestc]Symbc|s, quota
tion at p. 97.
1 9. I want t o stress that this refguration i s different from the us e of disability as a
trope. These disabled fgures are not metaphors ; rather, their representation mediates
both the life experience and the social identity of disability, potentially recasting its cul
tural meaning. Murphy's ethnography of disability as liminality , Te 8cay Si|ent ) fo
cuses primarily on loss of role and status because this vvas his own experience of
becoming disabled. However, Fine and Asch suggest that disabled women's roleless
ness can be freeing ,\cmenvit|Disabi|ities,pp. 1 -3 1 ) . I n any case, women, particu
larly black women, often have less cultural capital to lose by becoming disabled than
do previously normate white men such as Murphy.
20. Donna Haraway, "A Manifesto for Cyborgs : Science, Technolog, and Socialist
Feminism i n the 1 980s, " Sccia|istIeviev80: 67.
2 1 . Identifcations such as "powerful woman" and "disabled person, " which I am
calling oxymoronic here, function similarly to the hyhenated ethnic i dentities, such as
African-American, that W. E. B. Du Bois famously notes express the "double-con
sciousness" of their bearers . See T|e Scu|s c] 8|ac|Ic||s ( 1 903; reprint, New York:
New American Library, 1 982) , p. 45 .
5. Disabled Women as Poweiul Women . . 1 69
22. Haraway, "A Manifesto for Cyborgs , " quotations at pp. 65 , 9 1 , 73, and 95 . Al
though Haraway does not develop a connection between cyborgs and disabled people,
she notes in passing when discussing computers that "paraplegics and other severely
handicapped people can . . . have the most intense experiences of complex hybridiza
tion with other communication devices" (p. 97) . Although she refers to prosthetic de
vices as "friendly selves, " she does not go on to acknowledge that a wheelchair is a part
of the self, or that disability brings together two ostensibly mutually exclusive states.
23. For a discussion of prosthesis as a cultural concept, see David Wills, Ircst|esis
( Stanford: Stanford University Press , 1 995 ) .
24. Claudia Tate, ed. , 8|ac|\\cmenritersat\or|( New York: Continuum, 1 988) ,
p. 1 29.
25 . Susan Willis's essay historicizing Morrison's frst four novels cursorily discusses
"lack, deformity, and self-mutilation as fgures for liberation" CEruptions of Funk: His
toricizing Toni Morrison, " in Sjeci]ing 8|ac| cmen riting t|eAmerican Lxjeri-
ence [ Madison: University of Wisconsin Press , 1 987] , p. 1 04) . Although Willis's main
argument concerns the novels' resistance to bourgeois culture, she recognizes a rela
tion between disability and social otherness in Morrison's fction, suggesting that self
mutilation redefnes the individual as a "new and whole person, occupying a radically
different social space" (p. 1 03 ) . While my reading of disabled fgures agrees with her
brief explication, this study extends and focuses the analysis much further, treating dis
ability as a socially constructed identity that complicates racial and gender categories,
not simply as a physical condition.
26. Henry Louis Gates Jr. , "The Blackness of Blackness: A Critique of the Sign and
the Signi(ing Monkey, " in Henry Louis Gates Jr. , ed. , 8|ac|Literature anaLiteraq
T|ecq( New York: Methuen, 1 984) , p. 287.
27. Asch and Fine, eds . , "Disabled Women: Sexism without the Pedestal , " ]cua|
c]Sccic|cgyana Sccia|e|]are 8 ( 2) : 233-48.
28. Denver, Baby Suggs's granddaughter and Beloved's sister, also is physically dis
abled, having become deaf for two years in a psychological refusal to hear the truth
about her sister's death. I have chosen, however, not to include her in this analysis, al
though she conforms fairly well to the pattern, because her disability is temporary.
Sethe, Denver's mother, whom I do include because of the scar on her back, also has a
temporary disability that should be noted: she stutters from the time that her mother is
hanged until she frst sees Halle, her husband-to-be.
29. By encompassing formal aspects such as birthmarks and functional conditions
such as mobility impairments in the single category of "disability, " I do not mean to pro
pose an equivalence among all physically stigmatized conditions, but to suggest instead
the interrelated sociopolitical interpretations of these marks. I am asserting as well that
Morrison's narratives frame femaleness, nonwhiteness, and disability not as natural,
inherently limiting biological conditions, but as identities shaped by the physical, in
stitutional, and social aspects of an unaccommodating environment.
30. Tate, 8|ac|cmenritersatcr|,p. 1 28 .
1 70 . . . . 5. Disabled Women as Powerul Women
3 1 . Goffman, Stigma,p. 1 ; Gates Jr. , "The Blackness of Blackness, " p. 300.
32. Tate, 8|ac|cmenritersat cr|,p. 1 29.
33. I am grateful to Mae Henderson for having pointed out this detail about Sethe's
mother to me.
34. Susan Stewart, Ncnsense Asjects c] Intertextua|ity in Ic|||cre ana Literature
( Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1 978) , p. 2 1 .
3 5 . Ibid.
36. Pauline, like the other ideal servant and the respectable lady characters such as
Ondine and Jadine Childs in Tar8aby, Helene Wright in Su|a,and Ruth Dead in Scng
c] Sc|cmcn, is excluded from mythic representation to the same degree that she ac
cepts her values and defnitions from the dominant order.
3 7. Stewart, Ncnsense, p. 62.
38. Kriegel, "The Wolf i n the Pit i n the Zoo, " p. 22; Marshall, 8rcwn Cir|, 8rcwn
stcnes,p. 28.
39. Tate, 8|ac|\omenritersat cr|,p. 1 1 5 .
40. Biddy Martin's essay "Lesbian I dentity and Autobiographical Difference[ s] " in
Bella Brodzki and Celeste Schenck, eds . , Li]e/LinesTecrizingcmensAutcbicgraj|y
( I thaca: Cornell University Press, 1 988) , pp. 77-1 03, makes similar claims for the
iconoclastic potential of the lesbian perspective in autobiography, asserting that " [l] es
bian autobiographical narratives are about remembering differently, outside the con
tours and narrative constraints of conventional models" (p. 85 ) . Audre Lorde is quoted
from SisterOutsiaer,p. 40.
4 1 . This poststructuralist/feminist effort i s, of course, similar to |LcritureIeminine
produced by Helene Cixous (see, for example, "The Laugh of the Medusa, " Sqrts]cur-
na|c]cmeninCu|tureanaScciety 1 [ 1 976] : 875-93) . Lorde's attempt here, however,
seems grounded more in material experience and less in linguistic theory than Cixous's
writing the body. For an elaboration of Lorde's poetic theory see Lses of the Erotic: the
Erotic as Power" in SisterOutsiaer(pp. 53-59) .
42. This articulation of self is remarkably consonant with the theories of psycholo
gist Jean Baker Miller and her associates at Wellesley College's Stone Center, who as
sert that women tend to develop a sense of self through relation rather than differentia
tion ( see Miller's TcwarasaNewIsyc|c|cgyc]cmen [ Boston: Beacon Press, 1 976] ) .
For discussions see also Judith Jordan et aI . , cmensCrcwt|inCcnnecticn \\ritings
]rcm t|e Stcne Center (New York: Guilford, 1 99 1 ) and Nancy Chodorow, Te Iejrc-
aucticnc]Mct|ering Isyc|cana|ysisanat|eSccic|cgyc]Cenaer( Berkeley: University
of California Press, 1 978) .
43. Claudine Raynaud, " 'A Nutmeg Nestled Inside Its Covering of Mace' : Audre
Lorde's Zami , in Brodzki and Schenck, eds . , Li]e/Lines,p. 226.
44. Lorde, SisterOutsiaer,p. 42.
45. Although gender and racial essentialism are now being questioned vigorously by
theorists of both subjects, the occasional emphasis on difference to ground a positive
identity politics or nationalism is important politically for both movements . See my ear-
5. Disabled Women as Poweiul Women . . 1 7 1
lier discussion of feminism in chapter 2 for an examination of the role of physical dif
ferences in political movements.
46. Jacobs, Inciaentsint|eLi]e c]aS|ave Cir|, p. 56.
47. Stowe's advocacy i s fervently contested by such critics as James Baldwin in
Nctes c] a Native Scn (Boston: Beacon Press, 1 95 3) , QQ. 1 3-23; and Hortense J.
Spillers, "Changing the Letter: The Yokes , the Jokes of Discourse, or, Mrs. Stow, Mr.
Reed, " in Deborah E. McDowell and Arnold Rampersad, eds . , S|aveqanat|eLiteraq
Imaginaticn Se|ectea Iajers]rcm t|eLng|is| Institute, 9S ( Baltimore: Johns Hop
kins University Press, 1 989) , who claim that her portrayals of black people are nega
tive, condescending, and self-serving.
48. Tate, 8|ac|cmenri|ersatcr|, p. 1 29.
49. Lorde, SisterOuts|aer,p. 42.
5 0. Ibid. , p. 1 1 2.
l l n i l O G n a r n Y
Ainl ay, Stephen, Gaylene Becker, and Lerita M. Coleman, eds . T|e Di |emma c]
Di]erence AMu|tiaiscij|inaq\iec]Stigma. Ne,' York: Plenum Press, 1 986.
Alcoff, Linda. "Cultural Feminism Versus Post-Structuralist Feminism: The Identity
Crisis in Feminist Theory. " Signs 1 3, no. 3 ( 1 988) : 405-36.
Altick, Richard D. T|e S|cws c] Lcnacn. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard
University Press, 1 978.
Anderson, Benedict. Imaginea Ccmmunities Ie]ecticnscnt|e Origin anaSjreaac]
Naticna|ism. New Yrk: Verso, 1 99 1 .
Angelou, Maya. IKn\\|yt|eCagea8iraSings.Toronto: Bantam Books, 1 969.
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. InMy Iat|ers Hcuse. New York: Oxford University Press,
1 992.
Aptheker, Bettina. Tajestries c] Li]e cmens cr|, cmens Ccnsci cusness, anat|e
Meaningc]Dai|yLxjerience.Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1 989.
Arieli, Yehoshua. Inaiviaua|isntanaNaticna|ismi nAmerican Iaec|cgy. Cambridge,
Mass . : Center for the Study of the History of Liberty in America, 1 964.
Aristotle. Ceneraticn c]Anima|s. Trans . A. L. Peck. Cambridge: Harvard University
Press , 1 944.
Aristotle. Niccmac|eanLt|ics. Trans. Terence Irwin. Indianapolis : Hackett Publish
ing, 1 985 .
Aristotl e. "The Poetics. " I n Hazard Adams , ed. , Critica|TecqSinceI|atc. New York:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1 97 1 , pp. 48-66.
Asch, Adrienne and Michelle Fine, eds . "Moving Beyond Stigma. " ]curna| c] Sccia|
Issues 44, no. 1 ( 1 988) .
Bakhtin, Mikail M. T|e Dia|cgic Iotaginaticn. Ed. Michael Holqui st. Trans . Caryl
Emerson and Michael Holquist . Austin: Texas University Press, 1 98 1 .
Bald"Tin, James. "Everybody's Protest Novel . " In James Baldwin, Nctesc]aNativeScn.
Boston: Beacon Press, 1 95 5 , pp. 1 3-23 .
Balsamo, Anne. "On the Cutting Edge : Cosmetic Surgery and the Technological
Production of the Gendered Body. " CameraObscura 28 (Jan. 1 992) : 207-36.
Banner, Lois W. American8eauty. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1 983 .
1 74 Bibliography
. " Religious Benevolence as Social Control : A Critique of an Interpretation. ))
]curna|c]AmericanHistcq 60, no. 1 (June 1 973) : 23-4 l .
Barasch, Frances K. "Introduction. " In Thomas Wright, A Histcq c] Caricatureana
CrctesqueinLiteratureanaArt . 1 86 5 . Reprint, New York: Frederick Ungar, 1 968.
Barker- Benfield, G. J . T|e Hcrrcrs c] t |eHa|]- Kncwn Li]e Ma|eAttituaes Tcwara
cmenanaSexua|ityinNineteent|- CentuqAmerica. New York: Harper o Row-,
1 976.
Barnum, T. Strugg|esanaTriumj|s. 1 869. Reprint, New York: Arno Press, 1 970.
Barrow, Mark \ "A Brief History of Teratology. " In T. \ N. Persaud, ed. , Ircb|emsc]
8irt|De]ects Baltimore: University Park Press, 1 977, pp. 1 8-28.
Baym, Nina, e t aI . , eds . NcrtcnAnt|c|cgy c]American Literature 4th ed. New York:
Norton, 1 994.
. cmens IicticnA Cuiae tcNcve|s by anaabcut \\cmen inAmerica, | S20
| S 0. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1 978.
Baynton, Douglas C. "A Silent Exile on Thi s Earth: The Metaphorical Construction of
Deafness in the Nineteenth Century. " American_uarter|y44, no. 2 (June 1 992) :
2 1 6-43 .
de Beauvoir, Simone. TeSeccnaSex. Trans . H. M. Parshley. 1 95 2; reprint, New York:
Vintage, 1 974, p. xix.
Becker, Ernest. T|eDenia|c]Deat|. New York: The Free Press, 1 973.
Beecher, Henry Ward. Lectuestc\cungMen,cn\aricusImjcrtantSubects.New York:
J. B. Ford, 1 873.
Bellah, Robert N. , et al . Habits c] t|e Hear| Inaiviaua|ism ana Ccmmitment in
AmericanLi]e. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1 98 5 .
Berger, John. \uys c]Seeing London: British Broadcasting Corporation, 1 972.
Berger, Peter and Thomas Luchmann. T|e Sccia| Ccnstructicnc] Iea|ity. New York:
Doubleday, 1 966.
Biklin, Douglas and Lee Bailey, eds . Iuae|yStamjaImagina|Disa|i|ityanaIreuaice
Washington, D. C. : University Press of America, 1 98 1 .
Biklin, Douglas and Robert Bogdan. "Media Portrayals of Disabled People: A Study in
Stereotypes . " Interracia|8cc|s]crC|i|aren8u||etin 8, nos . 6, 7 ( 1 977) : 4-9.
Blumin, Stuart. T|eLmergencec]t|eMiaa|eC|ass Sccia|Lxjerienceint|eAnterican
Cit, | e0| 900 Cambridge: Cambridge Universi ty Press, 1 989.
Bogdan, Robert . Irea| S|cw Iresenting Human Oaaities]crAmusementanaIrc]i t
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1 988.
Bogdan, Robert and Steven Taylor. "Toward a Sociology of Acceptance : The Other Side
of the Study of Deviance. " Sccia|Ic|icy 1 8, no. 2 ( Fall 1 987) : 34-39.
Bondeson, Jan and A. E. W. Miles . "Julia Pastrana, the Nondescript: P Example of
Congenital , Generalized Hypertrichosis Terminalis with Gingival Hyperplasia. "
American]curna|c]Meaica|Cenetics47 ( 1 993) : 1 98-2 1 2.
Bone, Robert. T|eNegrcNcve|in^merica New Haven: Yale University Press, 1 95 8.
Bordo, Susan R. "The Body and the Reproduction of Femininity: A Femi ni st
Bibliography e e e 1 7 5
Appropriation of Foucault. " In Alison Jaggar and Susan Bordo, eds . , Cenaer/8cay/
Kncw|eage Ieminis|Ieccns|ruc|icns c] 8eing anaKncwing. New Brunswick,
N. J . : Rutgers University Press, 1 989, pp. 1 3-3 1 .
. lnbearab|e eig|| Ieminism, es|ern Cu||ure, ana ||e 8cay. Berkeley:
University of California Press , 1 993.
Boucht, Brigitta, et al. Ics|]eminism. Esbo, Finland: Draken, 1 99 1 .
Bowe, Frank. HanaicajjingAmerica 8arriers |c Disab|ea Iecj|e. New York: Harper
and Row, 1 978.
Boydston, Jeanne, Mary Kelley, and lnne Margolis . T|e Limi|s c] Sis|er|cca T|e
8eec|erSis|erscn \omens Iig||sana cmans Sj|ere. Chapel Hill, N. C. : The
University of North Carolina Press , 1 988.
Bradford, Phillips \Terner and Harvey Blume. O|a8enga T|e Iygmyi n||eZcc. New
York: St. Martin's Press, 1 992.
Brown, Gillian. Dcmes|ic Inaiviaua|ism Imagining Se|] in Nine|een||- Cen|ury
America Berkeley: University of California Press , 1 990.
Brown, Richard D. Mcaerniza|icn TeTrans]crma|icn c]American Li]e | e00| Se
New York: Hill and Wang, 1 976.
Buckland, Francis T. "The Female Nondescript Julia Pastrana, and Exhibitions of
Human Mummies, etc. " In Curicsi|iesc]Na|ura|His|cq.vol . 4. London: Richard
Bentley and Son, 1 888.
Burbi ck, Joan. Hea|ing ||e Iejub|ic T|e Language c] Hea||| ana ||e Cu| |ure c]
Na|icna|ism inNine|een||- Cen|uqAnterica. New York: Cambridge University
Press , 1 994.
Burgdorf, Marcia Pearce and Robert Burgdorf, Jr. "A History of Unequal Treatment:
The Qualifcations of Handicapped Persons as a ' Suspect Class' Under the Equal
Protection Clause. " San|aC|araLa:jer 1 5 ( 1 975 ) : 8 5 5-9 1 0.
Butler, Judith. 8caies T|a| Ma||er On ||e Discursive Limi|s c] Sex. New York:
Routledge, 1 993 .
. CenaerTrcub|eIeminismana||eSu|ersicnc]Iaen|i|y. New York: Routledge,
1 990.
Canguilhem, Georges. T|e Ncrma| ana ||e Ia||c|cgica| Trans . Carolyn R. Fawcett
with Robert S. Cohen. New York: Zone Books, 1 989.
Carlton, Ann. "Beyond Gothic and Grotesque: A Femini st View of Three Female
Characters of Carson McCullers. " Iembrc|e 20 ( 1 988) : 54-68.
Cassuto, Leonard D. T|eIn|untanIace T|eIacia|Crc|esqueinAmericanLi|era|ure
anaCu||ure. New York: Columbia University Press, 1 996.
Chernin, Kim. T|eHungqSe|j cmen,La|ing,amIaen|i|y. New York: Times Books,
1 98 5 .
. TeObsessicn Ie]ec|icnscn||e Tyrannyc]S|enaerness. New York: Harper o
Row, 1 98 1 .
Chodorow, Nancy. T|eIejrcauc|icnc]Mc||ering Isyc|cana|ysisana||e Sccic|cgyc]
Cenaer Berkeley: University of California Press, 1 978.
1 76 Bibliography
Cixous, Helene. "The Laugh of the Medusa. " Signs]curna|c] cmeninCu|tureana
Scciety 1 ( 1 976) : 875-93.
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome, ed. McnsterT|ecqIeaaingCu|ture. Minneapolis : University
of Minnesota Press, 1 996.
Cohen, Patricia Cline. ACa|cu|atingIecj|eT|eSjreaac]Numeracyi nLar|yAmerica.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1 982.
Collins , Patricia Hill . 8|ac|Ieminist T|cug|t Kncw|eage, Ccnscicusness, ana t|e
Ic|iticsc]Lmjcwerment . Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1 990.
Compton, Tom. "The Brief History of Disability. " Berkeley, Cal . : unpublished manu
script, 1 989.
Cott, Nancy F. T|e 8cnas c] cman|cca cmans Sj|erei nNew Lng|ana, | S0
| S3 . New Haven: Yale University Press, 1 977.
Coultrap- McQuin, Susan. Dcing Literaq8usinessAmerican cmen riters i nt|e
Nineteent|Centuq. Chapel Hill , N. C. : University of North Carolina Press, 1 990.
Cummins, Maria. T|eLamj|ig|ter. Boston: Houghton, Osgood, 1 879.
"Curious Hi story of the Baboon Lady, Mi ss Julia Pastrana. " Pamphlet. Cambridge:
Harvard Theater Collection.
Daly, Mary. Cyn/ecc|cgy TeMetaet|icsc] Iaaica|Ieminism. Boston: Beacon Press,
1 978.
Davi s, Fred. "Deviance Disavowal : The Management of Strained I nteraction by the
Visibly Handicapped. " Sccia|Ircb|ems9 ( 1 96 1 ) : 1 20-32.
Davi s, Kathy. Ies|ajingt|eIema|e8cayT|eDi|emniac]CcsmeticSurgeq. New York:
Routledge, 1 995 .
Davi s, Lennard J . Ln]crcing Ncrma|cy Disabi|ity Dea]ness, ana t|e8cay. New York:
Verso, 1 995 .
, ed. T|eDisabi|ityStuaiesIeaaer. New York: Routledge, 1 996.
Davi s, Rebecca Harding. Li]e i nt|e Ircn Mi ||s . 1 86 1 . Reprint, New York: Feminist
Press, 1 972.
. MargretHcwt|. 1 862. Reprint, New York: Feminist Press, 1 990.
DeBord, Guy. Sccietyc]t|eSjectac|e. Detroit: Black and Red, 1 983.
Dimock, Wai Chee. Lmjire]crLiberty Me|vi||e ana t|e Icetics c]Inaiviaua|ism.
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1 989.
Donovan, Josephine. IeministT|ecq. New York: Continuum, 1 992.
Douglas , Ann. T|e Ieminizaticnc]American Cu|ture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf,
1 977.
Douglas, Mary. IurityanaDangerAn Ana|ysisc]Ccncejtsc]Ic||uticnanaTabcc. New
York: Praeger, 1 966.
Drimmer, Frederick. 8crnDi]erent AmazingStcriesc]\eqSjecia|Iecj|e. New York:
Atheneum, 1 988.
. \eq Sjecia|Iecj|e. New York: Amj on Press, 1 983.
Du Boi s, W. E. Burghardt . T|e Scu|s c] 8|ac|Ic||. 1 903. Reprint, New York: New
American Library, 1 982.
Bibliography e e e e e 1 77
Dyer, Richard. T|e Matterc]Images Lssays cnIepresentaticn. New York: Routledge,
1 993.
Ehrenreich, Barbara and Deirdre English. IcrHerOwn Ccca | 0\earsc]t|eLxperts
Aavice tccnen. Garden City, N. Y. : Anchor Books, 1 979.
Eisenstei n, Hester. CcntempcraqIeministTcug|t . Boston: G. K. Hall, 1 983.
El shtain, Jean Bethke. Iub|ic Man, Irivate cman cmeni nSccia| anaIc|itica|
T|cug|t . Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1 98 1 .
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. T|e cr|s c] Ia|p| a|ac Lmerscn. Boston: Houghton
Mifflin, 1 865 .
Erkkila, Betsy. "Ethnicity Literary Theory, and the Grounds of Resistance. " American
_uarter|y47, no. 4 ( Dec . 1 995 ) : 563-94.
Evans, Sara M. 8crn]crLibertyAHistcqc] cmeni nAmerica. New York: The Free
Press, 1 989.
Faludi, Susan. 8ac||as| T|e lnaec|area arAgainstAmerican cmen. New York:
Crown, 1 99 1 .
Fiedler, Leslie. Irea|s Myt|s ana Images c] t|e SecretSe|]. New York: Simon and
Schuster, 1 978.
. LcveanaDeat|int|e^mericanNcve| . New York: Criterion Books, 1 960.
. "Pity and Fear. " Sa|magunai 5 7 ( Fall 1 982) : 5 7-69.
Fine, Michelle and Adrienne Asch, eds . cmenwit|Disabi|ities Lssaysi nIsyc|c|cgy
Cu|ture, anaIc|itics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1 988.
. "Di sabled Women: Sexism without the Pedestal . " ]curna|c] Sccic|cgy ana
Sccia|e|]are 8 ( 2) : 233-48.
Finger, Anne. "Claiming All Our Bodies: Reproductive Rights and Disability. " In Rita
Arditti , Renate Duell Klein, and Shelley Minden, eds . , Test-Tube cmen \|at
Iuture]crMct|er|ccaBoston: Pandora, 1 984.
Finkelstein, Vi ctor. Attituaes anaDisab|eaIecp|e Issues]crDiscussicn. New York:
World Rehabilitation Fund, 1 980.
Firestone, Shulamith. T|e Dia|ecticc] Sex T|e Case]crIeminist Ievc|uticn. New
York: vVilliam Morrow, 1 970.
Fisher, Philip. HaraIacts SettinganaIcrmi nt|eAmericanNcve| . New York: Oxford
University Press, 1 985 .
Foucault, Michel. T|eArc|aec|cgyc]Kncw|eageanat|eDisccursecnLanguage.Trans .
Alan N Sheridan- Smith. New York: Pantheon, 1 972.
and Elizabeth Gross, eds . Ieminist C|a||enges Sccia| ana Ic|itica| T|ecq.
Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1 986.
Patterson, Kathleen. "Di sability and I dentity i n Flannery O' Connor's Short Fiction. "
Unpublished manuscript, 1 99 1 .
Petry, An. T|e Street . 1 946. Reprint, Boston: Beacon Press, 1 974.
Phelps, Elizabeth S. DcctcrZay. 1 882. Reprint, New York: The Feminist Press, 1 987.