Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTENT Introduction Comparision of Standards Technical Issues Particular approach for heavy plates Conclusions
SA 387 gr.11 : Cl.1 vs. Cl.2 Industeel Production Lower thickness range ( < 3") SA 387 gr.11 Cl.1 200 T en 2002 300 T en 2003 SA 387 gr.11 Cl.2 1600 T en 2002 1600 T en 2003 Higher thickness range ( > 3") exclusively SA 387 gr.11 Cl.2
CONTENT Introduction Comparision of Standards Technical Issues Particular approach for heavy plates Conclusions
13 Cr Mo Si 5-5
A 387 Gr 11
13 Cr Mo Si 5-5
S: P: Ni: Cu: N: 0.005 max 0.015 max < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.012 S: P: Ni: Cu: N:
A 387 Gr 11
0.035 max 0.035 max as SA 20 ( 0.40) as SA 20 ( 0.40) none
Degressivity of tensile properties with thickness in EN. Acknowledged difference between QT & NT in EN
API Roundtable on 1-1/4Cr , ATLANTA, May 18h 2004 1-
13 Cr Mo Si 5-5
Complementary requirements on tensile properties
Extract of Table 4 thickness < 60 60 - 250 50 300 290 Proof strength as a function of tC 100 285 276 150 272 263 200 260 252 250 250 241 300 240 232 350 231 224 400 223 216 450 215 208 500 -
This part of the standard is not informative, this is an actual requirement The values are similar to those required by the ASME code In practice, high temperature yield strength values can be met. This is not true for tensile strength.
API Roundtable on 1-1/4Cr , ATLANTA, May 18h 2004 1-
500 450
Stress (MPa)
400
350 300
250 200
CONTENT Introduction Comparision of Standards Technical Issues Particular approach for heavy plates Perspectives in Europe Conclusions
API Roundtable on 1-1/4Cr , ATLANTA, May 18h 2004 1-
10
TECHNICAL ISSUES
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
For Phosphorus levels typical of Industeel production (<0.010%, target < 0.007%), there is no real influence of J-factor
API Roundtable on 1-1/4Cr , ATLANTA, May 18h 2004 1-
11
TECHNICAL ISSUES
CLASS 2
10 0, PC < C iM H
C Lo <0, M 10 PC
Conv. Joint design Q+T and Cont.Temper 06-.08C% Filler Moderate Heat Input
PWHT 1300F
PWHT 1275F
PWHT 1250F
12
TECHNICAL ISSUES
TECHNICAL ISSUES
P=0,007
P=0,012
10 5 0 1000 10000
API Roundtable on 1-1/4Cr , ATLANTA, May 18h 2004 1-
100000
Time (h)
14
TECHNICAL ISSUES
CREEP STRENGTH
15
TECHNICAL ISSUES
DISBONDING
Weld overlay - all results
1,25Cr-1Mo 2,25Cr-1Mo 3Cr-1Mo 2,25Cr-1Mo-V 3Cr-1Mo-V
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
D C B A
A : 225+6 ; 454C ; 180bar B: 254+6 ; 454C ; 150bar C: 200+6 ; 454C ; 150bar D: 150+6 ; 454C ; 150bar
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
H2 cal (ppm)
API Roundtable on 1-1/4Cr , ATLANTA, May 18h 2004 1-
16
TECHNICAL ISSUES
DISBONDING
SA 387 gr.11 would appear to be slightly more sensitive than SA 387 gr.22 Possible reason : Greater hydrogen trapping in SA 387 gr.22
In both cases, low CARBON content (0.15% max) is essential to protect against the Disbonding Risk: softening of the structure at the interface.
API Roundtable on 1-1/4Cr , ATLANTA, May 18h 2004 1-
17
TECHNICAL ISSUES
CONCLUSIONS
The problems normally encountered are : Creep Ductility Step cooling resistance reversible Temper Embrittlement LOW P CONTROL IS ESSENTIAL TO LIMIT THESE PROBLEMS J factor target for INDUSTEEL is most of the time < 120-150 This value should help to select high cleanliness steels For the %P content For Mn+Si+Sn% considered as increasing P segregation
API Roundtable on 1-1/4Cr , ATLANTA, May 18h 2004 1-
18
CONTENT Introduction Comparision of Standards Technical Issues Particular approach for heavy plates Conclusions
19
PARTICULAR APPROACH FOR HEAVY PLATES Industeel Production, HDS projects in 2003/2004 (> 3")
Belgium 188 T, 118mm, KCV 18C, PWHT 660C/16h France 225 T, 109mm, KCV 18C, PWHT 670C / 13h Saudi Arabia 132 T, 78mm, KCV 18C, PWHT 665C / 16h 116 T, 96mm, KCV 18C, PWHT 680C/18h 500 T, 150mm, KCV 18C, PWHT 670C / 16h South Korea 635 T, 134mm, KCV 18C, PWHT 670C / 17h China 260 T, 160mm, KCV +20C, PWHT 675C / 26h 200 T, 95mm, KCV 10C, PWHT 690C/20h USA 700 T, 180mm, KCV 7C, PWHT 675C / 17h
20
PARTICULAR APPROACH FOR HEAVY PLATES For high thickness (> 4"), TOUGHNESS is the main issue Toughness guarantees (54/47J) limited to 18C / -10F PWHT almost always < 690C / 1275F WHY ? slower cooling rate leads to a mixed bainite ferrite/pearlite microstructure excessive heat treatment leads to coarsening of carbides and enrichment in Mo
21
P355Q Example of a 200 mm thick plate Quenched Microstructure contains a significant rate of Perlite + Ferrite
22
23
PARTICULAR APPROACH FOR HEAVY PLATES 3 Parameters to be controlled F+P Content Carbide coarsening Grain Size EFFECT OF PWHT+Tempering on Grade 11 Toughness
24
100 80 60 40 20 0 600
33 J
620
640
660
Temperature of SR during 10h (C)
680
700
720
25
26
21000
20000
19500
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
19000 230
Plate thickness in mm
27
CONTENT Introduction Comparision of Standards Technical Issues Particular approach for heavy plates Perspectives in Europe Conclusions
API Roundtable on 1-1/4Cr , ATLANTA, May 18h 2004 1-
28
CONCLUSIONS
Cl.2 is more widely used than Cl.1 Above 2, SA 387 gr.11 Cl.2 is provided as NACT / QT For improved resistance to embrittlement, low P levels are essential For high thickness (> 4), toughness is the primary concern At such thicknesses, it is necessary to limit the maximum tempering parameter This may require tempering below PWHT, and performing PWHT < 690C
API Roundtable on 1-1/4Cr , ATLANTA, May 18h 2004 1-
29