Professional Documents
Culture Documents
7 Canada 6,385
8%
210
132
174 62
49 Sweden 668
56 Finland 606
179
23 Netherlands 2,850
63
54 Denmark 644
80 104 88
Arrows show dierence in countrys annual carbon emissions between 1997 and 2007
8 UK 6,281
-1%
27 Belgium 1,619
95
52 Belarus 649
6 Germany 9,487
-6%
35 Uzbekistan 1,237
12 France 4,466
105
1 US
61
43 Austria 781
83
17 Spain 3,740
48 Portugal 678
55 Hungary 641
10 Italy 4,997
78
85
37 Romania 1,112
519
101
7%
120
57 Bulgaria 559
Europe 50,370m 5%
growth in emissions over the period
135
36 Greece 1,124
140 209 103
24 Turkey 2,313
2 China
4 Japan 13,342
9%
79
13 Mexico 4,302
173 98 113 167 112 122 115 89
121 73 217 153 84 93 185 71 211 90 181 204 212 147 206 144 188 199 194 156
70 192 133 119 177 191 163 146 186 159 166 110 116 183 154
197
40 Algeria 941
161
60 Libya 518
196
30 Egypt 1,497
102 107 168
15 Iran 4,128
34 Pakistan 1,240
148
22 Taiwan 2,909
45 Hong Kong 735 42 Philippines 794
114
58 Syria 550
81
92
28 Venezuela 1,589
72
155
152 164
150 175
39 Nigeria 1,028
158
47 Israel 701
134 189 69 96
182
53 Vietnam 647
136
123
51 Colombia 651
76 74
162 195
139
77
66
5 India 11,870
60%
25 Thailand 2,194
31 Malaysia 1,454
21 Indonesia 3,049
130 202
16 Brazil 3,881
97 128
50 Chile 656
29 Argentina 1,544
111
87 75
32 UAE 1,429
176
94
33 Singapore 1,307
203
14 Australia 4,203
214 193
CO2 emissions
Annual global emissions from fossil-fuel burning and cement, million tonnes of CO2
20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 1850 1875 1900 1925 1950
Global warming
Change in global average near-surface temperature trend, relative to 1861-1900 average
0.75 0.5 0.25 0.0 -0.25 1850
67
1975
2000
1875
1900
1925
1950
1975
2000
Emissions from fast-growing economies such as China and India are surging, yet their citizens have small carbon footprints and millions live in poverty. So theyll argue they need to be allowed to pollute for a while yet as they improve their citizens lives.
All agree that the poorest nations need urgent aid, having done nothing to pollute the atmosphere. It will also cost a lot to create the clean technology essential for slashing global emissions. In both cases, rich nations will be expected to pick up the tab.
Poorer nations want to continue Kyotos top-down approach, with clear responsibilities placed on rich countries. Developing nations also want climate funds distributed by the UN, whereas developed countries would prefer the World Bank.
About 17% of the carbon emitted by human activity comes from razing forests. But paying people not to fell trees soon becomes complex... Who really owns them? Were they actually going to be chopped down? How do you verify the whole process?
Paying for clean technology is just the start, as the products and services required must be developed and deployed rapidly and eciently all over the globe. But nations dier on whether a strong international body is needed, or just an advisory one.
Clean technology
Checklist of success
Rich nations commit to a combined reduction in greenhouse gases of 25-40% by 2020. Chance of success: Middling Developing nations commit to a 1530% cut on the emissions levels expected in 2020. Chance of success: Good Richer nations commit to funding poorer ones, and clean technology, to tune of $200bn+ per year. Chance of success: Low Deal done on who monitors countries carbon emissions and distributes the money. Chance of success: Low Agreement which delivers cash to forested nations, meaning far fewer trees are cut down. Chance of success: Good Deal that delivers a radical overhaul in the deployment of clean technology. Chance of success: Fair
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
United States China Russia Japan India Germany Canada United Kingdom South Korea Italy South Africa France Mexico Australia Iran Brazil Spain Ukraine Saudi Arabia Poland Indonesia Taiwan Netherlands Turkey Thailand Kazakhstan Belgium Venezuela Argentina Egypt Malaysia United Arab Emirates Singapore Pakistan Uzbekistan Greece Romania Czech Republic Nigeria Algeria Iraq Philippines Austria North Korea Hong Kong
64,166 45,301 17,360 13,342 11,870 9,487 6,385 6,281 5,059 4,997 4,504 4,466 4,302 4,203 4,128 3,881 3,740 3,722 3,663 3,308 3,049 2,909 2,850 2,313 2,194 1,790 1,619 1,589 1,544 1,497 1,454 1,429 1,307 1,240 1,237 1,124 1,112 1,045 1,028 941 883 794 781 769 735
46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Kuwait Israel Portugal Sweden Chile Colombia Belarus Vietnam Denmark Hungary Finland Bulgaria Syria Serbia & Montenegro Libya Switzerland Norway Ireland Azerbaijan Slovakia Qatar New Zealand Turkmenistan Bangladesh Morocco Puerto Rico Trinidad & Tobago Cuba Peru Oman Ecuador Bahrain Croatia Tunisia Estonia Jordan Angola Slovenia Dominican Republic Bosnia & Herzegovina Lebanon Yemen Lithuania Panama Virgin Islands, US
703 701 678 668 656 651 649 647 644 641 606 559 550 519 518 497 471 456 430 428 426 410 387 375 370 364 362 345 310 277 249 249 234 223 200 186 185 184 181 170 169 166 164 148 148
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
Zimbabwe Netherlands Antilles Jamaica Sri Lanka Luxembourg Burma Bolivia Guatemala Armenia Kenya Macedonia Sudan Cyprus Latvia Mongolia Moldova Cameroon Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan IvoryCoast Uruguay Honduras El Salvador Brunei Costa Rica Ghana Gabon Georgia Senegal Gibraltar Bahamas Nicaragua Botswana Congo (Brazzaville) Ethiopia Tanzania Albania Paraguay Mauritius Papua New Guinea Equatorial Guinea Iceland Mauritania Nepal Malta
-23 3 24 46 41 98 70 72 48 68 -16 204 41 16 25 -12 8 -22 42 31 43 105 37 178 53 82 -23 -6 64 41 44 61 40 51 212 131 138 29 73 71 185 23 -8 78 11
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180
Cambodia Guam Congo (Kinshasa) Reunion Serbia Zambia Namibia New Caledonia Martinique Madagascar Benin Guadeloupe Macau Fiji Djibouti Mozambique Suriname Haiti Togo Guyana Barbados Uganda Palestine Guinea Wake Island Niger Swaziland Burkina Faso French Guiana Afghanistan Sierra Leone Aruba Eritrea Malawi French Polynesia Seychelles Rwanda Belize Faroe Islands Somalia Maldives Mali American Samoa Greenland Bermuda
31 29 29 28 27 25 25 25 24 23 22 21 21 21 20 20 20 18 18 17 17 16 16 15 14 13 13 12 11 11 11 11 9.4 9.3 8.9 8.7 8.5 8.3 7.7 7.7 7.0 6.7 6.4 6.4 6.2
111 -44 -35 48 -9 113 67 22 100 170 29 57 144 -4 108 36 26 300 44 -4 84 637 13 -1 12 24 18 16 -42 37 16 -33 41 48 83 22 123 19 36 157 28 6 16 26
181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218
Antigua & Barbuda Laos Liberia Burundi Cayman Islands Guinea-Bissau Central African Republic Saint Lucia Bhutan U.S. Pacic Islands Gambia Western Sahara Antarctica Grenada Lesotho Chad Cape Verde Solomon Islands St Vincent & Grenadines Nauru Samoa East Timor Tonga Saint Kitts & Nevis Comoros Dominica Sao Tome & Principe Vanuatu Montenegro St Pierre & Miquelon Virgin Islands, British Montserrat Cook Islands Falkland Islands Kiribati Saint Helena Turks & Caicos Islands Niue
6.1 5.6 5.5 4.2 4.2 4.0 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
15,000
40,500
Tonnes of carbon dioxide predicted to be emitted by those delegates while at the summit
Cost in euros of replacing outdated brick kilns in Bangladesh, paid for by Danish government to oset those emissions
The data is the latest available compiled by the Environment Information Administration, part of the US Department of Energy. Although newer data is available from other sources, the EIA is the only credible source of carbon emissions for every country in the world.
Minimum proportion of food and drink provided to delegates that will be organic
DATA: SIMON ROGERS, GRAPHIC: PAUL SCRUTON