A and S Processes Matrix 1 Mar 08

To report problems with any of the links in this document contact HQ AFMC PRODUCT SUPPORT CAMPAIGN DSN 674-2758
ORG/PLAYERS SAF, HQ, LOG MECHANISMS CONTROLS IT Systems TRIGGER
AFMC A4A Product Support Campaign@wpafb.af.mil

SDD (INTEGRATION) DEVELOP & ACQUIRE SUPPORT RETIRE PRODUCTS SDD (DEMONSTRATION) DESIGN SUPPORT IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES DETERMINE SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS FIELD SUPPORT PLAN SUPPORT PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONS & SUPPORT TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MANAGE CAPABILITIES CONCEPT REFINEMENT RESOURCES CONSUMED CYCLE TIME
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
Enterprise Information Capabilities Review & Capabilities Review & Technology Data Risk Assessment Risk Assessment Repository (EITDR) (CRRA) Outputs (CRRA) Process MAJCOM/Wing Identify Capability Gaps N/A Changes to National Military Strategy, Defense Planning Guidance, etc Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Process
National Military AF/A5, MAJCOM Strategy, Defense Requirements Planning Guidance, etc. Organizations
Potential Material Solutions for inclusion into Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Process Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Process
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in FSA
ANALYZE REQUIREMENTS FROM SOURCES OTHER THAN THE CAPABILITIES REVIEW AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) (INCLUDE LOG EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
DEFINE SUPPORTABILITY OBJECTIVES
N/A
Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Development
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Process
Updated National Military Strategy, Defense Planning Guidance, etc (Top Down directed Capability Requirements) Potential materiel solutions
Functional Capability Boards, Combatant Commands, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in FSA X X
INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY OBJECTIVES IN INITIAL CAPABILITIES DOCUMENT (ICD)
N/A
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Process DoDI 5000.2 (Requirements for Alternative of Action (AOA) for ACAT I programs)
INCLUDE PRODUCT SUPPORT CAPABILITIES IN ALTERNATIVE N/A OF ACTION (AOA) PLAN
Decision to proceed to Concept Decision point or Appropriate Milestone
ACQUIRE CONCEPT DECISION FROM MILESTONE DECISION AUTHORITY (MDA)
N/A
Concept Decision Point DoDI 5000.2 Review by Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)
EVALUATE PRODUCT SUPPORT CAPABILITY IN ALTERNATIVE N/A OF ACTION (AOA) FOR THE BEST MATERIAL APPROACHES
Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Begun
Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Plan
Functional Capability Boards, Combatant Commands, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations Potential materiel Functional Capability solutions Boards, Combatant Commands, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations DPA&E, Supportability OUSD(AT&L), Objectives that need to AF/A5, MAJCOM be addressed in Requirements Alternative of Action Organizations, any (AOA) Acquisition Leads identified, Office of Aerospace Studies Documentation Milestone Decision Required by DoDI Authority (MDA), 5000.2 Whatever Acquisition Leads identified, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations Initial Capabilities OUSD AT&L, DPA&E, Document (ICD) FSA AF/A5, MAJCOM Analysis and Alternative Requirements of Action (AOA) Study Organizations, any Plan Acquisition Leads identified, Office of Aerospace Studies Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) FSA Analysis and Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Plan OUSD AT&L, DPA&E, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations, any Acquisition Leads identified, Office of Aerospace Studies OUSD AT&L, DPA&E, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations, any Acquisition Leads identified, Office of Aerospace Studies Acquisition Lead, MAJCOM Requirements Org
Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Process MAJCOM Led Process
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in Alternative of Action (AOA) Planning
Approval to Proceed Into Concept Refinement Phase
Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) Led Meeting
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in Documentation Developed to Support CD Review
Alternative of Action (AOA) Results
MAJCOM Led Alternative of Action (AOA) Process
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in Alternative of Action (AOA) Studies
PARTICIPATE IN AND DOCUMENT THE INITIAL TECHNOLOGY REVIEW
N/A
Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Begun
Understanding of Technology issues, maturity for each potential Alternative of Action (AOA) solution.
MAJCOM Led Alternative of Action (AOA) Process
INCLUDE PRODUCT SUPPORT CONCEPTS IN PREFERRED SYSTEM CONCEPT
N/A
Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Draft Results
Identification of Preferred Concept
Initial information MAJCOM Led related to PS Concept Alternative of Action for Alternative of Action (AOA) Process (AOA) preferred system concept
PARTICIPATE IN DEFINING, ANALYZING & SELECTING COURSE OF ACTION (INCREMENTS & PROGRAM STRATEGIES) (PER AFI 63-101)
Reduction inTotal Ownership Cost (RTOC)
Preferred System Concept Identified
AFI 63-101
Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach
PARTICIPATE IN TEST & EVALUATION STRATEGY
N/A
AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2
Acquisition Lead, MAJCOM Requirements Org, Test Community Acquisition Lead, any Engineering Support ( eg. Center EN Staff)
MAJCOM Agreed Course of Action (COA) for delivering capability. (Evolutionary Strategy or Single Step to Completion) Initial Test Strategy for Program at MS A
Acquisition Led Process
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in Development of Course of Action (COA)s
Test Community Participation in Development of Initial Test Strategy
PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEM ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP) DEVELOPMENT
N/A
AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2
Initial Systems Engineering Plan (Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)) for MS A TDS
Engineers Participation in Development of Initial Systems Engineering Plan
DEVELOP TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (INCLUDING PRODUCT SUPPORT)
N/A
AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2
Acquisition Lead
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of TDS X X
DEVELOP INITIAL PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) (PERFORMANCE-BASED LOGISTICS , PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPP), LOGISTICS ELEMENTS, ETC)
Logistics Planning and Preferred System Requirements System Concept Identified (LOGPARS) Army System
AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S
Acquisition Lead
Life Cycle Management Acquisition Led Plan (LCMP) or Acq Process Plan depending on ACAT level
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)/Acq Plan
REVIEW REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS/ INITIAL CAPABILITY OBJECTIVE (ICD)
Acquisition Lead
REVIEW STRATEGIES FOR SIMILAR PRODUCTS/ STRATEGIES
Acquisition Lead
DEVELOP ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY
Acquisition Lead
Life Cycle Management Acquisition Led Plan (LCMP) or Acq Process Plan depending on ACAT level X X
CONDUCT RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ALTERNATIVES
AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S
Information concerning Acquisition Lead Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach
DEVELOP COST ESTIMATE FOR ALTERNATIVES
EDIT AND COORDINATE WRITING OF LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP)
REVIEW ENTIRE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) FOR DISCONNECTS
AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S AFI 63-101
APPROVE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY(S) (ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP))
FINALIZE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) BASED ON ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP) RECOMMENDATIONS
ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY INCLUDED IN EXPECTATION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS (EMAs)
N/A
Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach
Acquisition Lead
Acquisition Lead
Acquisition Lead
Acquisition Lead, Lead MAJCOM Requirements Org
Expectation Acquisition Led Management Process Agreement (although since you don't have a Capability Development Document (CDD) yet an Expectation Management Agreement is really premature at this point.)
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Expectation Management Agreement
INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE SOURCE SELECTION PLAN N/A (SSP)
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) / AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)s
PARTICIPATE IN ACQUISITION STRATEGY REVIEW
N/A
AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AFFARS
ENSURE ACQUISITION STRATEGY PLAN SUPPORTABILITY TEMPLATE COMPLETED
N/A
AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Guide, AFFARS
INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
Pre Award Information Preferred System Exchange System Concept Identified (PIXS) ConWrite FEDBIZOPS
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)/AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)s
Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach
Acquisition Lead, Source Selection Plan Acquisition Led Center Contracting Org (if required at this point) Process
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Source Selection Plan (SSP)
Acquisition Lead. OSD IPTs, Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE)
ASR (Only ACAT ID and IAM programs)
Acquisition Led Process and IPT process
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Acq Strategy X X
Acq Lead
Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Charts (if Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) req'd at this point)
Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Process
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Acq Strategy X X
Acquisition Lead, Request for Proposal Center Contracting Org (RFP)
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Request for Proposal (RFP)
1 OF 156
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
ORG/PLAYERS SAF, HQ, LOG
DEVELOP & ACQUIRE SUPPORT
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE DATA MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW INCLUDE RIGHTS IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (RFP) (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
Unique Identification (UID) Registry
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)/AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)s, Public Law
REVIEW BERRY AMENDMENT FOR APPLICATION TO YOUR PROGRAM AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE IN ALL CONTRACTING ACTIONS INCLUDE OPTIONS FOR RADIO-FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) INCLUDE OPTIONS FOR UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION (UID) IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PARTICIPATE IN RISK MANAGEMENT N/A
Contractual actions
Public Law 10 USC 2533
Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Contractor and Organic design data
Acquisition Lead, Request for Proposal Center Contracting Org (RFP)
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Request for Proposal (RFP)
Acquisition lead, Contractor, Legal
Contractual language, Compliance data
Compliance with law, support National Security Strategies
INCLUDE LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES IN THE INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PLAN / INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE (IMP/IMS)
N/A
PARTICIPATE IN SOURCE SELECTION (LOGISTICIAN)
EZ Source, Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS) Navy System
ENSURE COST ESTIMATE INCLUDES LIFE CYCLE SUPPORT COSTS
Logistics Composite Model (LCOM)
PREPARE DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR MILESTONE A
N/A
AFI 63-101, DoD 5000 Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Integrated Master Plan / Information concerning Integrated Master Preferred System Schedule (IMP/IMS) Concept from Guide Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Federal Acquisition Source Selection Plan Regulation (FAR)/AF (if required at this point) Federal Acquisition Information concerning Regulation (FAR)s Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach AFI 63-101, DoDI Information concerning 5000.2 Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach AFI 63-101, DoDI Information concerning 5000.2 Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach
Acquisition Lead, Appropriate Logistics Rep
Program Planning, Including Risk Management
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in Risk Management Planning X X
Integrated Master Plan / Acquisition Led Integrated Master Process Schedule (IMP/IMS)
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS)
Source Selection Decision
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in Source Selection X X
Program Documentation
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in Program Cost Estimating X X
Acquisition Lead, Appropriate Logistics Rep, MAJCOM Requirements Org, AF/A5, Test Community, Cost Community
Program Documentation Required at MILESTONE A
Various Functional Lead processes depending on Document
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in Developing Program Documentation X X
MILESTONE A DECISION VERIFY THE MISSION ASSIGNMENT DECISION FOR ACQUISITION & SUSTAINMENT MANAGEMENT
N/A
Milestone A decision
AF process on mission assignment (old XOX?)
ENSURE ADEQUATE LOGISTICS RESOURCES ARE ASSIGNED Sustainment / Milestone A decision FOR PROGRAM Acquisition Composite Model (SACOM), CMS
ESTABLISH A TECHNICAL ORDER ACQUISITION PROGRAM
Command mil/civ/ktr manning and control process (entitlements from AFPC), Contract Estimating & Pricing (CEP), $$ TO 00-5-3, Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document TM-86-01
ASR, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP), Alternative of Action (AOA), any program direction documents Milestone Decision, Mission Assignment, New Work package
was AF/XO, will now include AFMC/A8
Mission Assignment direction
Paper/MS Office
60 days
HQ AFMC, AF, SAF
Making the decision this early IS THE improvement X X
Prod/Log Centers
New Work Command and center Package/Program processes Objective Memorandum (POM) input
6 months
Prod/Log Centers
Opportunity to centralize this work in a new work Group/ACE/XR
Initial Capabilities Document (ICD), Draft Capability Development Document (CDD), Maintenance Strategy, Product Support Strategy
Program Office, MAJCOM, Technical Order Manager, Prime Contractor, TO Integrated Program Team
Technical Manual TO Planning & Contract Requirements Requirements (TMCR) Document TM- Conference 86-0, Updated Initial Capabilities Document (ICD), Draft Capability Development Document (CDD), Maintenance Strategy, Product Support Strategy
Program Office, MAJCOM, Technical Order Manager, Prime Contractor, TO Integrated Program Team X X
ASSIGN TECHNICAL ORDER MANAGER INITIATE DEPOT SOURCE OF REPAIR (DSOR) PROCESS AND THE DEPOT MAINTENANCE INTERSERVICING (DMI)
N/A
HQ process
Mission assignment, technical data
Prod/Log Centers, HQ AFMC/A4
DETERMINE CORE & ASSIGN CANDIDATE DEPOT (REF NEW SOURCE of REPAIR ASSIGNMENT PROCESS (SORAP))
N/A
HQ process
Mission assignment, technical data
Prod/Log Centers, HQ AFMC/A4
ESTABLISH DEPOT MAINTENANCE ACTIVATION WORKING GROUP (DMAWG) TEAM
N/A
HQ process for Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) and Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE) Contracting process, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Policy
Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP), Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), Program Data Technical information, studies, $$, lab input Requirements, Acquisition Strategy, Contractor Data
Prod/Log Centers, Contractor
Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP)/Depot Maintenance Interservicing (DMI) started Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP)/Depot Maintenance Interservicing (DMI) started Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG) team officially names and responsible
Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) process
Prod/Log centers, HQ AFMC
Doing it this early is an improvement X X
MS Office, face to face 30 days meetings
Prod/Log Centers, contractor
Establishing this early AND having them meet X X
ESTABLISH PERIODIC LOGISTICS PLANNING AWARD THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
X Navy Air Force Interface (NAFI) Milestone A decision, $$ Program Office Cadre Contract AMOS, Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS) IT System approval process, Acquisition Strategy approval process 150 days total Program Office Cadre MAJCOMs Prod/Log Centers, contractor Standing Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) for multiple efforts Reduce proliferation of IT systems X
X X
ENSURE WEAPON SYSTEM PROGRAM COMPLIES WITH AIR FORCE POLICY FOR NO NEW MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT AF/CIO APPROVAL. THIS EXCLUDES MISSION CRITICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES (MCCR) AND NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEMS ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY INCLUDED IN EXPECTATION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (EMA)s
Enterprise Information Contractual Actions Technology Data Repository (EITDR)
Acquisition and Sustainment Organizations, Base IT Organization
Contractual direction, Technical requirements, Approved new IT System
N/A
Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) required or update
Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) process
Technical information, Prod/Log Centers, studies, $$, lab input, MAJCOM's Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) mission assignment, Required Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) if available Technical data, Prod/Log Centers, Prod/Log center MAJCOM's assessment, FM status, issues, risk assessment Data from site visits, MAJCOM/log center info, Technical data, $$ Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM's
Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s
Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) process and templates
60 days
Prod/Log Centers, MAJCOMs
Work Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s a single process initiative where feasible to have umbrella Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s
INITIATE SUPPORTABILITY REPORTING TEMPLATE FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS
N/A
Program Executive Sustainment Template, Officer (PEO) review or controlled by HQ any review AFMC/A4 requirements Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) planning, MAJCOM planning Preferred System Concept Identified $$$
Sustainment template chart with backup
Template
<30 days
Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM This is an improvement X X
PARTICIPATE IN OPERATIONAL SITE REVIEWS
N/A
Site plans, input for TDY's, meetings, facilities reports, MS Office budgets/Program products Objective Memorandum (POM) Inputs to SEP, LCMP, TEMP, ICD, CDD, CPD, MER, LCCE, Training Plans IPT Meeting with Government and contractor on supportability, manpower, and personnel
30 + days
Prod/Log Centers, MAJCOMs
Need a better sharing mechanism for site data (politics of Base Realignment and Closure Comittee (BRACC) an issue) Minimize life cycle cost while maximizing system readiness and personnel and system effectiveness
DETERMINE MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS
REMIS, CAMS
AFI 10-601, AFI 10602, 10 USC 2434, DoD 5000.2, AFI 38201, AFI 38-202, Defense Acquisition Guide Book AFH 32-1084, AFI 321021,
System Requirements, ICD, CDD, CPD, SEP, LCMP, Functional Baseline, , TAD, CARD
DEFINE AND IMPLEMENT MILITARY CONSTRUCTION (MILCON) REQUIREMENTS
N/A
Facility requirement Identified
Logisticians, Acquisition Lead, Systems Engineering, Sustainment Engineering, Training Personnel, Manpower personnel ICD, CDD, Site Survey, MAJCOM, Product / SATAF, Facilities Logistics Center, Base Requirements Plan from Civil Engineering, Contractor Contractor
Pre source selection through end of program
Site plans, input for TDY, Meetings, facilities budgets / International Building MILCON, Programmatic Code, Environmental Environment Safety and Compliance, Health Evaluation (PESHE) Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) MS Word 30 - 60 days
MAJCOM, Product / Start planning as early as Logistics Center, Base Civil possible due to MILCON lead Engineering, Contractor time X X
INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN DEFENSE N/A CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA)
Contract award
Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) mission cope
Previous Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) & Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)s in force at that plant location
Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA), Program Office, ALC, Prime Contractor, MAJCOMs
PM team, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC, Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA)
Apply single process initiative philosophy X X
REVIEW LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES IN THE INTEGRATED MASTER N/A PLAN / INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMP/IMS)
Requirement for Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) identified Continuous Risk Mitigation Activities
Integrated Master Plan / Identification of required ALC and Product Integrated Master logistics activities and Center logisticians, Schedule (IMP/IMS) associated timelines Procuring Contracting Data Item Description Officer (PCO) (DID) Risk Management Guidelines Identified Supportability Risks and Current Assessment Contractor, ALC and PC logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Engineers Program Office, Contractor
Completed Integrated Integrated Master Plan / 45 days Master Plan / Integrated Integrated Master Master Schedule Schedule (IMP/IMS) (IMP/IMS) Data Item Description (DID)/Template Updated Risk Status/Mitigation Plans Meetings with contractor and Govt IPTs Continuous
ALC and PC logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
PARTICIPATE IN RISK MANAGEMENT
N/A
Govt and Contractor Logisticians, Engineers, PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) Increased risk less oversight/ Navy model
PARTICIPATE IN CONTRACT OVERSIGHT AND REVIEW
N/A
Contract award
Details of contract, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, AFI's, Contractor, security reqts
Contract
Accepted contract MS Office tools deliverables, briefing charts, studies, reports, System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART), Management Asset Review (MAR), Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE), Program Executive Officer (PEO) review Study reports Disciplined scientific approach, contract vehicles
On going life of contract Program + Office/ALC/Contractor, MAJCOMs
ADVOCATE PROPOSED LOGISTICS ENGINEERING DESIGN CHANGES & TRADE STUDIES (NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION (NDI), CORROSION, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, PRECIOUS METALS) CONSIDER THE LIFE CYCLE IMPLICATIONS OF TECHNICAL ORDERS EVALUATE TECHNOLOGY DEMO FOR SUPPORTABILITY
Environmental Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH)
Engineering review identifying areas for trade studies, any design reviews
$$, AFI's on system engineering, Mil Std, CDRL
Technical data, $$
Contractor, ALC and PC logisticians, , Engineers, lab personnel,
On-going
Prod/log center, Lab, contractors
Master data base to share info X X
N/A
Contract, milestone direction, Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Air drop requirement, Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s, Operational Requirements Document (ORD), contract, program schedule Preferred System Concept Identified
$$, AF procedures
Technical data, demo plan
Prod/Log Center, MAJCOMs, test centers, contractors
Report
Various
Average less than 120 days
Prod/Log Center, MAJCOMs, test centers, contractors
CONTACT AIR TRANSPORTABILITY TEST LOAD AGENCY (ATTLA) FOR AIR TRANSPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS / ISSUES (AIR DROP AND TEST LOADING I.E. G-FORCE)
N/A
DoD 4140.7
Performance spec, technical data, funding, tech orders
ASC/EN, Contractor, Program Office personnel
signed Air Worthiness certification
manpower and dollars, ATTLA equipment, weapon system platform,
target 6 months
ASC/EN, Contractor, Program Office personnel X X
ADDRESS HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION (HSI) FACTORS
REMIS, CAMS
AFI 10-601, AFI 10System Requirements, 602, DoD 5000.2, AFI ICD, CDD, CPD, SEP, 63-107, AFI 63-111, LCMP, Functional Defense Acquisition Baseline, TAD, CARD Guide Book, MIL-HDBK502
Logisticians, Acquisition Inputs to SEP, LCMP, Lead, Systems TEMP, ICD, CDD, Engineering, CPD, MER, LCCE, Sustainment Training Plans Engineering, Training, Personnel
IPT Meeting with Pre source selection Government and through end of program contractor on supportability/training/sy stems engineering, manpower and personnel 2 OF 156
Minimize life cycle cost while maximizing system readiness and personnel and system effectiveness X X
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
DETERMINE SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT
OPERATIONS & SUPPORT
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW REFINE SUPPORTABILITY OBJECTIVES AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
N/A
Potential materiel solutions
Functional Capability Boards, Combatant Commands, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations Government, Contractor and MAJCOM personnel
Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM, contractor, HQ AFMC X X
CONSIDER APPLICATION OF MODELING AND SIMULATION TOOLS
N/A
Requirements for analysis in preparation for decision making Preferred System Concept Identified
Individual model, Instructions and Operations, DoD 5000.2 E5.1.1.10 AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2
Government and Contractor Data
Analysis results
Applicable models to be used (see checklist)
Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM, Better decision making contractor, HQ AFMC
REVIEW TEST & EVALUATION STRATEGY FOR SUPPORTABILITY CONSIDERATIONS
N/A
Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Information concerning Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Acquisition or modification that involves software and computer systems Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data
Acquisition Lead, Initial Test Strategy for MAJCOM Program at MS A Requirements Org, Test Community
30 days
Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM, Test Centers, Contractor X X
PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP) DEVELOPMENT
N/A
AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2
Acquisition Lead, any Engineering Support ( eg. Center EN Staff)
Initial Systems Acquisition Led Engineering Plan (SEP) Process for MS A
30 days
Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM, Test Centers, Contractor X X
PARTICIPATE IN THE COMPUTER RESOURCES WORKING GROUP (CRWG) OR THE COMPUTER RESOURCES INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM (CR-IPT) INCORPORATE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN DRAFT CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT (CDD)
N/A
Acquisition or modification that involves software and computer systems
Best Practice (rescinded AFI 800-14 & AFMCI 800-21)
Prod/Log Centers, MAJCOM's, Contractors Prod/Log Centers
Computer Resources Lifecycle Management Plan (CRLCMP)
Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)
Prod/Log Centers, MAJCOM's, Contractors
Life Cycle Support for computer resources
N/A
Capability Development AFIs, DoDIs Document (CDD) development
Capability Development The document, meeting, 60 days Document (CDD) emails
Guides and AFI should require logistics participation for Capability Development Document (CDD)s
DEVELOP SUPPORTABILITY KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS (KPPs)
N/A
Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s development
AFIs, DoDIs
Prod/Log Centers
Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s
The document, meeting, 60 days emails
Prod/Log Centers, contractor X X
INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION
N/A
SYS Performance Spec AFIs, DoDIs
Prod/Log Centers
SYS Performance Spec The document, meeting, 60 days emails
ENSURE CONSIDERATION OF DESIGN INTERFACE FOR LIFE CYCLE LOGISTICS CHECKLIST
INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE COST ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION (CARD), PROGRAM OFFICE ESTIMATE (POE), COMPONENT COST ANALYSIS (CCA), INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE), AFFORDABILITY ASSESSMENT
N/A
Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment
AFIs, DoDIs
Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data
Prod/Log Centers
Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment, ensure that support equipment replacement costs are included
INCLUDE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) IN LIFE CYCLE COST DOCUMENTS INCLUDING REPLACEMENT COSTS
N/A
AFIs, DoDIs
Supportability Concept, Prod/Log Centers Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data, any support equipment available, cost data
INITIATE THE STRATEGIC SOURCE of REPAIR (SSOR) PROCESS
N/A
SECA Policy Memo (pending - currently at HQ AFMC/A4 for coord); AFI 63-107; Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Implementation Guide Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Guidelines
Program data to fill in Template A, Phase 1 data elements
System Program Manager (SPM)s, PGMs
Request for candidate depot/core analyses; Template A, Phase 1 data
Automated Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Electronic Manager (in work); Emails
30 work days
System Program Manager (SPM)s, PGMs
INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE ACQUISITION PROGRAM BASELINE (APB)
N/A
Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)
Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data
Prod/Log Centers
Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)
The document, reports, 60 days meetings, presentations
INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MEMORANDUM (POM) SUBMISSION
CMS
Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Data Call
FM regulations
Prod/Log Centers
Program Objective Memorandum (POM)
Future budget, reports, 60 days meetings, presentations
REFINE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) (INCREMENTS, PERFORMANCEBASED LOGISTICS , PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPP), LOG ELEMENTS, ETC)
Logistics Planning and Program cycle/major Requirements System changes dictates need (LOGPARS) Army for update System
Life Cycle Management Updated acquisition and Plan (LCMP) Guide, product support AFI63-107 strategy; cost schedule, performance, supportability data; updated Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s
PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants
Approved updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)
Established guidance, regulations; Protocol Process
120 days
REVIEW REQUIREMENT DOCUMENT/ CAPABILITY OBJECTIVE (CDD)
Program cycle/major changes dictates need for update
PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants Life Cycle Management Updated acquisition and PM Team including Plan (LCMP) Guide, AFI product support logisticians, Program 63-107 strategy; cost schedule, Executive Officer performance, (PEO), ALC/CC, Test supportability data; org; SAF/AQ, updated Expectation Acquisition Strategy Management Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Agreement (EMA)s Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants Life Cycle Management Updated acquisition and Plan (LCMP) Guide, product support AFI63-107 strategy; cost schedule, performance, supportability data; updated Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants
120 days
PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants
120 days
REFINE ALTERNATIVE (S) FOR PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY
120 days
PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants
UPDATE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ALTERNATIVE (S)
Life Cycle Management Updated acquisition and Plan (LCMP) Guide, AFI product support 63-107 strategy; cost schedule, performance, supportability data; updated Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s
120 days
UPDATE COST ESTIMATE FOR ALTERNATIVE (S)
120 days
UPDATE WRITING OF LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP)
120 days
REVIEW ENTIRE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) FOR DISCONNECTS
120 days
APPROVE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY (ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP))
120 days
FINALIZE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) BASED ON SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS REVIEW (SRR) AND ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP) RECOMMENDATIONS
Life Cycle Management Updated acquisition and Plan (LCMP) Guide, AFI product support 63-107 strategy; cost schedule, performance, supportability data; updated Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s
120 days
3 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZESUPPORTABILITY MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW ENSURE INCLUDED IN EXPECTATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (EMA)s (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
N/A
Receipt of Customer Requirement; annual update in conjunction with Program Management Directive (PMD) update
Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Guide; System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART) Guidelines
Customer Requirements; discussions/agreement s with customer; contract terms and conditions; Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Guidelines
Customer (Operator, Signed Expectation Maintainer and Management designated SES/GO); Agreement (EMA) System Program Manager (SPM) / Depot Supportability Manager (DSM) / System Supportability Manager (SSM); Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander Prod/Log Centers Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s
Meetings; System minimum once per year. Metric & Reporting Tool Initial Expectation (SMART) System, Management Guide Agreement (EMA): 6 months, 160 manhours; follow-on Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s 2 months; 60 man-hours
PM Team, Customer, PEG, CAG, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander, Customer Staff X X
ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT (CDD) (REFINE KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS (KPP)s
N/A
Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s development Determination of competitive acquisition
AFIs, DoDIs
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, SS Guides and Template
Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data Risk Assessment Results, Key Supportability Requirements
ALC and PC logisticians Approved Source Selection Plan (SSP)
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Guides, Templates
180 days
ENSURE ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP) SUPPORTABILITY TEMPLATE COMPLETED
N/A
Notification of Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)
PARTICIPATE IN ALTERNATIVE OF ACTION (AOA) UPDATE
N/A
Notification that update is required
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) part 7, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Guides and Templates, local Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) procedures Alternative of Action (AOA) Regulations/Guidelines
Risk Assessment Results, Key Supportability Requirements and Strategy
ALC and PC logisticians Completed Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Briefing; Action Items Completed
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Guides, Templates, Protocol
180 days
PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC and PC logisticians, Source Selection Plan (SSP) approval chain of command, warfighter PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC and PC logisticians, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Secretariat and Panel, warfighter
DT&E/OA assessment, Program Team including Completed Alternative Alternative of Action LMI Data Logisticians, warfighter of Action (AOA) Update (AOA) Regulations/Guidelines
Program Team including Logisticians, warfighter
X X
X X
PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS REVIEW (SRR) (DEMO CONCEPTS) REFINE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION
N/A N/A SYS Performance Spec AFIs, DoDIs Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data Draft Capability Production Document (CPD); Supportability Data from DT&E; Acquisition Strategy Prod/Log Centers SYS Performance Spec The document, meeting, 60 days emails Prod/Log Centers, contractor
Pre Award Information Notification to develop Exchange System Request for Proposal (PIXS) ConWrite (RFP) FEDBIZOPS
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
ALC and PC logisticians Defined/Approved Request for Proposal (RFP) Supportability Requirements
Request for Proposal (RFP) Template, Clauses
120 days
ALC and PC logisticians; Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) X X
DEVELOP AND ACQUIRE SUPPORTABILITY DATA ADDRESS AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS (ATS) ACQUISITION ADDRESS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT ADDRESS CALIBRATION SUPPORT FOR NEW ACQUISITIONS PROVIDE RECOMMENDED SUPPORT EQUIPMENT Pre Award Information Notification to develop (SE) CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)s Exchange System Request for Proposal (PIXS) ConWrite (RFP) FEDBIZOPS
Draft Capability Production Document (CPD); Supportability Data from DT&E; Acquisition Strategy Contractor Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) list, program data
ALC and PC logisticians Support equipment Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s
120 days
ALC and PC logisticians; Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) X X
REVIEW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION DATA (SERD) CHECKLIST
N/A
Contractor Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) list
MIL STD 300, selection priority, Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) tracking system
Program Office, ALCs, users, contractor
Approved Form 9
Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) checklist, allowance source code
DEVELOP A TECHNICAL ORDER DATA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) INCLUDING THE TECHNICAL MANUAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS (TMCR) DOCUMENT TM-86-01 DEVELOP TECHNICAL ORDER MANAGEMENT PLAN (TOMP) INVOLVE GAINING ALC, USING COMMAND AND SAFETY PERFORM SUPPORTABILITY ANALYSES TO ACHIEVE PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISTICS (DoDD 5000.1 E1.17) -- SYSTEM ENGINEERING ANALYSES WHICH WILL MINIMIZE TOTAL OWNERSHIP COSTS WHILE DELIVERING REQUIRED MISSION CAPABILITY PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISTICS STRATEGY. THE PM SHALL IDENTIFY OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY ORIENTED MEASURABLE SUSTAINMENT REQUIREMENTS TO BE TRACKED DURING OPERATIONS THESE SHALL BE THE BASIS OF MEASURES OF SUCCESS FOR THE PRODUCT SUPPORT INTEGRATOR WHO SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY ORGANIZATION AT MILESTONE B. THESE SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A DRAFT PRODUCT SUPPORT AGREEMENT WHICH WILL BE NEGOTIATED WITH THE O&S EXPECTATION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. THE PRODUCT SUPPORT AGREEMENT SHALL BE DRAFTED IN PREPARATIO FOR THE MILSTONE B DECISION ENSURE INCORPORATION OF CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE PLUS (CBM+) D220, Defense Preferred System Logistics Agency Concept Identified (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Advance Planning System (APS, Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS) Shared Data Warehouse, Program initiation, Notification to develop Request for Proposal (RFP) AFI 63-101, AFI 631201, DoDI 4151, AFPD 63-14, DoDI 4151.22 System Requirements, ICD, CDD, CPD, SEP, LCMP, Functional Baseline Acquisition Lead, Systems Engineering , Sustainment Engineering Inputs to SEP, LCMP, System Specification, Aircraft Information Program IPT Meeting with Government and Contractor engineers on supportability/RCM/SO RAP/FMECA analysis and prognostic data needs Pre source selection through end of program Minimize life cycle cost while maximizing system readiness through the performance of just in time maintenance and inspections Product Life Cycle Management data systems System Spec MIL PRF 49506 CDD, EMA.APB, Program Office, ALCs, users, contractor Supportability Analysis data, Source data for maintenance plans etc System Engineering Analyses, FMECA, RCM, RLA, maintenance task analysis, etc. 1 year SPO, Contractor, User, ALC, Stakeholders X X X
DEVELOP A DIMINSHING MANUFACTURING SOURCES AND MATERIAL SHORTAGES (DMSMS) PROGRAM
DoD 4140.1-R
Engineering Data, Industry Data, Shared Data Warehouse, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) alerts
DEVELOP SUPPLY SUPPORT STRATEGY
ADDRESS THE NEED FOR A FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS PLAN IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
D220, D200, D155, D035, D043, D0143C, DSOR, D040 WSSP workbench, D169, DoD eMall Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS) ConWrite FEDBIZOPS
Acquisition Strategy Panel, Request for Proposal, ICD, CDD, EMA
AFMAN 23-110, DoD 4100.39M Vol II, DoD 4160.21M, Title 10 USC
Contractor Data, User Requirements, Contract, Provisioning Parts List (PPL), DLA data, CONOPS Draft Capability Production Document (CPD); Supportability Data from DT&E; Acquisition Strategy
Notification to develop Request for Proposal (RFP)
AFRL/RXME, Program office, Acquisition & Sustainment Logistician, Contractor, OEM, System and Commodity level engineers, Other DoD Services, DLA Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services, DLA, AFMC/A4SM, ALC, SSM ALC and Product Center logisticians
DMSMS program, Engineering resolution projects
Advanced Component Obsolescence Management (AVCOM)
AFRL/RXME, Program office, Acquisition & Sustainment Logistician, Contractor, OEM, System and Commodity level engineers, Other DoD Services, DLA Quarterly computation cycle Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services, DLA, AFMC/A4SM, ALC, SSM ALC and Product Center logisticians; Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Clean Data
Provisioning Item Order Provisioning (PIO), Contract, Conference, SORAP, Spares, Requirements / PBL, Program reviews general data to DLA,
WSSP data to DLA, Updated policy and guidance, X X
Defined/Approved Request for Proposal (RFP) Supportability Requirements, CDRLs
120 days
ADDRESS MAINTENANCE PLANNING INCLUDE DATA RIGHTS IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
UID Registry
Notification to develop Request for Proposal (RFP)
Federal Acquisition Data Rights, UID Regulation (FAR); Data requirements Rights memo, UID Regulations
Logisticians
Defined/Approved Request for Proposal (RFP) Data Rights and UID Requirements
30 days
Logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) X X
REVIEW BERRY AMENDMENT FOR APPLICATION TO YOUR PROGRAM AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE IN ALL CONTRACTING ACTIONS INCLUDE OPTIONS FOR RADIO-FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) INCLUDE OPTIONS FOR UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION (UID) IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) ENSURE COMPLETION OF THE STRATEGIC SOURCE OF REPAIR (SSOR) PROCESS N/A Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) POC receives Candidate Depot/Core analysis and other Service Interest from Maintenance Specialists (HQ AFMC/A4BC) Requirement for Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) identified Schedule in Source Selection Plan (SSP) SECAF Policy Memo (pending - currently at HQ AFMC/A4 for coord); AFI 63-107; Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Implementation Guide; HQ staffing guidance AF Candidate HQ AFMC/CC, A4, and Strategic AF depot SOR Depot/Core analysis; HQ Staff Determination; Other Other Pertinent analysis DoD Service interest (for example, 50/50, other DoD Service interest) Automated Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Electronic Manager (in work); Emails 80 work days HQ AFMC/CC and/or A4, HQ Staff; Estimated persons hours: 60 hours Annual review of current guidance; updates
INCLUDE LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES IN THE INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN / INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMP/IMS)
N/A
Integrated Master Plan / Identification of required ALC and PC Integrated Master logistics activities and logisticians, Procuring Schedule (IMP/IMS) associated timelines Contracting Officer Data Item Description (PCO) (DID) Source Selection ROE, Source Selection Plan (SSP), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Source Selection Criteria/Standards (Sec L&M of Request for Proposal (RFP)); Source Selection Plan (SSP); Contractor Proposal Documentation Required by DoDI 5000.2 ALC and PC logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Completed Integrated Integrated Master Plan / 45 days Master Plan / Integrated Integrated Master Master Schedule Schedule (IMP/IMS) (IMP/IMS) Data Item Description (DID)/Template Source Selection Decision Source Selection ROE, 180 days Source Selection Plan (SSP), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Templates, EZ Source Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) Led Meeting
ALC and PC logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) X X
PARTICIPATE IN SOURCE SELECTION
EZ Source, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)S Navy System N/A
PREPARE DOCUMENTATION FOR MILESTONE DECISION AUTHORITY (MDA) REVIEW (OLD MILESTONE B)
Concept Decision Point DoDI 5000.2 Review by Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)
Milestone Decision Approval to Proceed Authority (MDA), Into Concept Whatever Acquisition Refinement Phase Leads identified, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations
MILESTONE DECISION AUTHORITY (MDA) REVIEW (OLD MILESTONE B) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (PMD) ISSUED INCLUDING SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS STAND UP PROGRAM OFFICE WITH LOGISTICS PERSONNEL Sustainment / Acquisition Composite Model (SACOM), CMS (INPUT) Program Management Directive (PMD) or SAF/AQ direction, M/S B AFI 63-101, Product Support Sustainment/Acquisition Concept, Sustainment Composite Model Strategy (SACOM) Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM), and supporting Centers Program Office Org structure, Manpower positions & personnel Core "XR" group expanded to effectively execute Acq + Supp strategies Pre-M/S B Manpower, facilities More interdependency between acquisition and logistics centers
X X X
4 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO REVIEW AWARD SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & CAPABILITIES DEMONSTRATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS CONTRACT (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
Navy Air Force Interface (NAFI)
Final Evaluation Briefing Federal Acquisition Capability Development and Source Selection Regulation (FAR), Acq Document (CDD), Authority (SSA) Strategy and Life Cycle Request for Proposal Decision Management Plan (RFP) (LCMP) (ACAT I & II rqmt), Source Selection Plan
System Program Manager (SPM), Program Executive Officer (PEO), Source Selection Authority (SSA)
System Development & Source Selection Demonstration (SDD) process Contract
Capability Development Manpower Document (CDD) --> Source Selection Authority (SSA) decision
Early identification of product support strategy and integration of appropriate support center personnel in Capability Development Document (CDD) development and System Development & Demonstration (SDD) source selection process
ENSURE WEAPON SYSTEM PROGRAM COMPLIES WITH AIR FORCE POLICY FOR NO NEW SOFTWARE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT AF/CIO APPROVAL ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY INCLUDED IN EXPECTATION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (EMA)s N/A Establishment of ACAT Program Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP); Integrated Prod Support Planning (AFI 63-107); Log Support Readiness Rqmt (AFI 10-602); System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART) Acquisition Program Baseline (APB); Capabilities Document; Funding Expectations; Risk Identification, Strategies and Acceptance; Changes in expectations relating to cost, schedule and performance; support strategy and sustainment. SAF/AQ, Program Executive Officer (PEO); Acquisition Program Office and Warfighter (User) Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) and executable program Face to face meetings; VTCs; Telecons At establishment of Manpower ACAT program and at a minimum, an annual review thereafter Increased credibility in the acquisition system
INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN DEFENSE N/A CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) MEMORANDUM of AGREEMENT (MOA)
Program Office standup
Product Support Concept, Sustainment Strategy, Program Office - Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) capability discussions
Depot Supportability Memorandum of Manager (DSM), Agreement (MOA) System Supportability Manager (SSM), and applicable Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) office
Conduct Program Office - Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) discussions matching Product Support concept & Sustainment strategy with Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) capabilities. Capture agreements in Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
Program Office stand- Manpower up to first Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) deliverable
Integrate Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) into the acquisition team as early as possible. Insure supportability, besides the typical cost/schedule/performance criteria, is highlighted as a watch area.
Program planning; Proposal Preparation; Source Selection; Sole Source Negotiation; Program Execution
Entry/Exit Criteria measurable indicators; Critical Path
Work Breakdown Structure; Statement of Work (SOW); EVMS data; Technical Data Key Performance Parameters
Government and Contractor Personnel
Roadmap; Integrated product development and systems integration; Efficient method for evaluating maturity of the program
Post Award Program Milestones Conference; Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)/Award Fee; What If Exercises Complete a Team risk Pre-Source Selection assessment and follow- through the end of the up with risk program management plans to address significant known risks
Manpower
Improved program and project insight by both Government and Contractor personnel; Decreased risk; Increased probability of program success
N/A
Acquisition Strategy development
5000.1, Risk Mgmt Guide for DoD
Program technical assessment, market research, past experience
User, Program Office, Support Center, and Contractor (If already on contract). ACE assistance is available
Integrated Risk Assessment and ongoing risk management
Manpower
Enlarge the Team completing the assessment, utilize ACE tools and insight, and follow through with active risk management. This active management can include incorporating risk management plans into the Integrated Master Schedule Enlarge and thoroughly integrate the cross-functional IPT overseeing the contract. Insure automated, integrated tools are available to all Team members.
N/A
Contract Award
Contract, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Contract requirements Program Team (Statement of Work (SOW), Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN)s, and special clauses)
- Program understanding - Successful program execution - Contract & award fee payments - Possible corrective actions and penalties
IPT integrating various Contract award to end Govt and contractor of program organizations, focused on program success. Generally utilize progress measurement tools, such as EVM, IMS, Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s, to focus attention on problem areas; plus Risk assessment to help avert up-coming pitfalls
Manpower
ACCOMPLISH SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) GUIDANCE CONFERENCE PROVIDE LOGISTICS SUPPORT DURING THE DEFICIENCY REPORTING (DR) PROCESS G021, Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) System deficiency TO 00-35D-54 Submission of Deficiency Report Product & Logistics Centers, MAJCOMS, Contractors Disposition or correction Deficiency Review Board, Materiel Improvement Process, Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) Approved Configuration Management Process Product / Logistics Center, Contractors, MAJCOM (Operators & Maintainers) Improved Weapon System operations, performance and support
PARTICIPATE IN THE CONFIGURATON CONTROL BOARDS (CCB)
N/A
Any Change Proposal required to meet the Configuration Control Board (CCB) Acquisition Strategy Panel, Contract
MIL HDBK 61A, EIA 649
Change proposal, Support considerations
Product & Logistics Centers, MAJCOMS, Contractors Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services if joint, DLA, ALC, SSM, MAJCOM, Vendors
Disposition
Product / Logistics Center, Contractors, MAJCOM (Operators & Maintainers)
Improved Weapon System operations, performance and support
ACCOMPLISH SPARES PROVISIONING GUIDANCE CONFERENCE
AFMCI 23-101
Contractor Data, User Requirements, Contract, Provisioning Parts List (PPL), DLA data, CONOPS, Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS)
Approved AFMC Form PBL, Program reviews, 718 Provisioning warranties Performance Schedule, Official minutes, any required contract modifications
Program office, Acquistion Updated policy and guidance, Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services, DLA, ALC, SSM, MAJCOM, Vendors
ESTABLISH PERIODIC LOGISTICS PLANNING MEETINGS
IMP/IMS, ILS Plan, ICD, CDD, Funding, Contract DoD 5000.2, CDRLs, AFI 63-107, AFI 63-101
Prod/Log Centers, Minutes, Action Items, Contractor, MAJCOMs, Program DLA, HQ AFMC, Other Documentation Services and Agencies as required
MS Office, face to face meetings, TDY
Prod/Log Centers, Contractor, MAJCOMs, DLA, HQ AFMC, Other Services and Agencies as required
Establishing this early AND having them meet X X
ADVOCATE LOGISTICS ENGINEERING DESIGN CHANGES & TRADE STUDIES (NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION (NDI), CORROSION, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, PRECIOUS METALS)
Environmental Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH)
Source Selection
Contract, AFPD 20-5, Contract requirements, AFPD 63-1, DODI sound system 5000.2, AFI 63-107, ILA engineering practices
Most cost effective, logistically supportable end product
Day-to-day involvement Source Selection to end Manpower with technical team, of program active participation in technical and program reviews, and participate in configuration control board process
Enlarge and thoroughly integrate the cross-functional IPT participating in technical decisions. Insure all Team members are aware of design changes and their long-term impacts.
CONTACT AFMC/LSO FOR FEE-FOR-SERVICE PACKAGING SUPPORT (FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIALIZED CONTAINERS FOR TESTING)
Specialized item, fragile item, item without existing packaging, contractor notification, field requests
Funding (fee-forservice), tech orders, DoD regulations, international regulations, HAZMAT
Technical data, physical AFMC LSO/LOP item, funding, engineering support
Prototype specialized containers, test report, container drawings
Disciplined engineering process
6-9 months
Funding, metals, plastics, gases, water, items X X
BASELINE PS STRATEGY IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) (PERFORMANCE-BASED LOGISTICS , PUBLICPRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPP), LOG ELEMENTS, ETC)
Logistics Planning and Pre-Source Selection Requirements System (LOGPARS) Army System
AFI 63-101, AFI 63-107 Product Support Concept, Sustainment Strategy, available resources, product and maintenance structure maturity
Program Team, Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM), Program Manager (PM), and Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) Program Team, Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM), Program Manager (PM), and Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)
Life Cycle Management Integrate experience, Plan (LCMP) product support concept, sustainment strategy, and program acquisition strategy
Manpower
REVIEW REQUIREMENT DOCUMENT/ CAPABILITY OBJECTIVE (CDD)
Pre-Source Selection
Manpower
Program Team, Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM), Program Manager (PM), and Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)
Manpower
REFINE ALTERNATIVE FOR PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY
Manpower
UPDATE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ALTERNATIVE
Manpower
UPDATE COST ESTIMATE FOR ALTERNATIVE
Manpower
UPDATE WRITING OF LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) (if req'd)
Manpower
5 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW REVIEW ENTIRE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (LCMP) FOR DISCONNECTS (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
Manpower
APPROVE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY (SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS REVIEW (SRR) ASP)
Manpower
FINALIZE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP) BASED ON ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP) RECOMMENDATIONS
Manpower
EVALUATE AND MAINTAIN LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Seer MANAGE TECHNICAL ORDER ACQUISITION Joint Computer Aided PROGRAM Acquisition and Logistics Support (JCALS), Electronic Technical Order Management System (ETOMS)
Contract Award
Contract and Contract Contract, Supportability Data Requirements List Plan, Program (CDRL)s Schedule; applicable program plans, reports and briefings
Program Office, ALCs, Prime Contractor, MAJCOMS
Update Supportability Plan
Meetings with Govt and prime, plans, schedule and contract
60 days
Program Office, ALC, Prime Contractor
Contract Award
Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s Technical Order Management Plan (TOMP), TO 00-53, Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document TM86-01, AFI 61-204, MILPRF 32216, Technical Order Verification Plan (TOVP), TO 00-5-18, AFI31-303, AFI 65-601 Vol. 1
Contract, Supportability Plan, Program Schedule; applicable program plans, reports and briefings
Program Office, ALCs, Prime Contractor, MAJCOMS, Technical Order Manager
Formal Technical Orders
Meetings with Govt and prime, plans, schedule and contract Validation and Verification
Program Office, ALC, Prime Digital T.O.s, Interactive Contractor, MAJCOMs, Electronic Technical Manuals Technical Order Manager (IETMS)
CONDUCT TECHNICAL ORDER GUIDANCE CONFERENCE 3.19.1.2 START TECHNICAL ORDER DEVELOPMENT CONDUCT TECHNICAL ORDER IN 3.19.1.3 PROCESS REVIEWS (IPR)s REFINE TECHNICAL ORDER MANAGEMENT 3.19.1.4 PLAN FINALIZE TECHNICAL ORDER 3.19.1.5 VERIFICATION PLAN (TOVP) 3.19.1.6 REVIEW PRE-PUBS EVALUATE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS N/A DOCUMENT (SERD) (PECULIAR SE, COMMON SE, TO, SPARES, TRAINING, PRECISION MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT LABORATORY (PMEL) REQUIREMENTS 3.19.1.1
MIL STD 300, selection priority, Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) tracking system MIL STD 300, selection priority, Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) tracking system AFI 36-2251
Contractor Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) list, program data Contractor Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) list, program data
Approved Form 9
Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) checklist, allowance source code Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) checklist, allowance source code Life Cycle Management up to 10 years Plan (LCMP), contract requirements Program office personnel, contractors, MAJCOM, dollars, ALC
REVIEW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (SERD) FOR DEPOT ACTIVATION (DMAWG)
N/A
Approved Form 10
ESTABLISH AND MANAGE TRAINING SYSTEMS
N/A
Weapons platform contract award or requirements
Training Systems Program office, Requirements Analysis MAJCOM, prime (TSRA), Capability contractor Development Document (CDD) DT&E/OA assessment, ALC and Program Supportability Office logisticians Requirements, Test Requirements Reference DAG Sect 4.5.1, "Approach for Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Updates" (site was down when attempted to access) Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data
Guaranteed student training capability
IDENTIFY & PLAN SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE N/A TEST & EVALUATION MASTER PLAN (TEMP)
Notification update required
Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Guidelines
Updated Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)
Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) template
60 days
Logisticians, Engineer, Test Org X X
PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP) UPDATE N/A
SAF/AQ Policy Memo 05A-001, 7 Oct 05, Attachment 2 and the Systems Engineering Planning Effort in Concept Refinement Phase SYS Performance Spec AFIs, DoDIs
Government/Contractor Fully coordinated Personnel Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) which is fundamental for technical and program execution Prod/Log Centers
Update annually or as requested by Program Executive Officer (PEO)/Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)
Manpower
Development of a structured process that proceeds from concept to production to operation.
REFINE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION
N/A
SYS Performance Spec The document, meeting, 60 days emails
PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS REVIEW (SRR) (SYSTEMS FUNCTIONAL SPEC) CONTINUE TO EVALUATE CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA (INCLUDING COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF (COTS) & CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)s) (LEVEL OF REPAIR ANALYSIS (LORA), MAINTENANCE TASK ANALYSIS (MTA), RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM), MAINTENANCE, ETC)
N/A D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Seer N/A Contract Award Contract and Contract Contract, Supportability Data Requirements List Plan, Program (CDRL)s Schedule; applicable program plans, reports and briefings Program Office, ALCs, Prime Contractor, MAJCOMS Update Supportability Plan Meetings with Govt and prime, plans, schedule and contract 60 days Program Office, ALC, Prime Contractor
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT (ILA) AND TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION
Pre-M/S C
Air Force ILA Handbook Current program documentation, such as Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)/Capability Development Document (CDD)/Capability Production Document (CPD), Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), contracts, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), EVMS data, technical and logistics performance measures Systems Engineering Plan, test plan, Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), technology readiness model Dollars, test facility, Systems Engineering Plan, test plan, Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), technology readiness model
Program Executive ILA Officer (PEO), Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM), Program Office, ILA Evaluation Team
Compile input data, plus Approximately 3 months Manpower an overview program prior to M/S C, to be presentation. After the complete by M/S C ILA Evaluation Team is familiar with program, provide cross-functional discussions with evaluation members. Evaluation team completes draft ILA and Program Office then has opportunity to comment and/or make corrections. Then Final ILA is submitted.
Provide the ILA Evaluation team all the input data up-front, including a good program overview briefing and program organization chart with phone & email contact information. Insure the entire Program team is aware of the ILA intent and scope. Involve a good crossfunctional program team to support the ILA.
EVALUATE PROTOTYPE / ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT MODEL FOR SUPPORTABILITY
N/A
Contractual deliveries, test plan, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS)
Contractor, Program office, ALC, Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC), MAJCOM
Technical data, test report, technology readiness levels, supportability data, Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) info, risk reduction plan
Early operational evaluation, test instructions and procedures, manufacturing readiness levels, system engineering assessment model, Probability of program success (POPS)
3-12 months
Dollars and manpower to execute the technology, MAJCOM, ALC, Program Office and Prime Contractor X X
PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL REVIEW (SFR) PARTICIPATE IN PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW (PDR)
N/A N/A
X X
X X
CONTINUE TO EVALUATE CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA (INCLUDING COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF (COTS) & CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)s) (LEVEL OF REPAIR ANALYSIS (LORA), MAINTENANCE TASK ANALYSIS (MTA), RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM), MAINTENANCE, ETC)
D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Seer
Contract Award
60 days
UPDATE DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR NEW MILESTONE N/A B
Upcoming milestone decision
Milestone Decision ROE, Templates
Program Data
PM Team (Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM)); Wing Commander; Product Center, AFMC, SAF and OSD Staff; Program Executive Officer (PEO); SAE; ALC Commander; Customer
Documentation Complete
Milestone Decision Templates; CAGS; Action Officers
180 days
PM Team (Program Manager (PM), DSM, System Supportability Manager (SSM)); Wing Commander; Product Center, AFMC, SAF and OSD Staff; Program Executive Officer (PEO); SAE; ALC Commander; Customer
6 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZECOST MATERIAL SOLUTION CAPABILITIES REVIEW UPDATE ESTIMATES FOR TO SUPPORTABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
Reduction inTotal Ownership Cost (RTOC), ATOC
AFIs governing costs, preparation for new milestone B, update program schedule
Costs, AFIs and procedures
Contractor data, Program Objective Memorandum (POM) data, engineering evaluation, DoD cost model, inflation rates and procedures Contract, funding, schedule
Financial managers, product centers, ALCs, Air Force Center for cost analysis, MAJCOM, HQ AFMC
Program Office Dollars and manpower. Estimate (POE), ALCs, MAJCOMs, Lifecycle cost estimate, Program Office budget estimates
3-6 months
Financial managers, product centers, ALCs, Air Force Center for cost analysis, MAJCOM, HQ AFMC
DEVELOP PRODUCTION DOCUMENT FOR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) (USED FOR FORECASTING)
Program schedule, funding
AF Regulations, budget drill, Program Objective Memorandum (POM) drill, contract Agenda; Meeting ROE; Program Executive Officer (PEO) Review Template
Program office personnel, ALC, MAJCOM
Production Document
Regulations
Budget cycle X X X
*NEW MILESTONE B DECISION COMPLETE SUPPORTABILITY REPORTING TEMPLATE FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS
N/A
Notification of Review
Program Executive Officer (PEO) Review Template, Program Data
ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY INCLUDED IN EXPECTATION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (EMA)s
N/A
Receipt of Customer Requirement; annual update in conjunction with Program Management Directive (PMD) update
Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Guide; System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART) Guidelines
Customer Requirements; discussions/agreement s with customer; contract terms and conditions; Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Guidelines
INITIATE DEPOT SOURCE OF REPAIR (DSOR) PROCESS AND THE DEPOT MAINTENANCE INTERSERVICING (DMI) IF THIS IS FIRST ACQUISITION DECISION POINT
N/A
ENSURE DETERMINATION OF CORE & ASSIGN CANDIDATE DEPOT (REF NEW SOURCE OF REPAIR ASSIGNMENT PROCESS (SORAP)) IF THIS IS THE FIRST ACQUISITION DECISION POINT
N/A
Exit Milestone A System Program Manager (SPM)s/PGMs Initiate within 30 days after MS A to HQ AFMC/A4BC (Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) POC) Receipt of Request for Candidate Depot/Core from Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) POC
SECA Policy Memo (pending - currently at HQ AFMC/A4 for coord); AFI 63-107; Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Implementation Guide
Program data to fill in Template A, Phase 1 data elements
PM Team (Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM)); Wing Commander; Product Center, AFMC, SAF and OSD Staff; Program Executive Officer (PEO); SAE; ALC Commander; Customer Customer (Operator, Maintainer and designated SES/GO); Program Manager (PM) / Depot Supportability Manager (DSM) / System Supportability Manager (SSM); Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander System Program Manager (SPM)s, PGMs
Completed Briefing Charts
CAGS, Action Officers, 2 x per year, 2 months CoP, System Metric & per each occurrence Reporting Tool from notice of review to (SMART), Templates review held; 140 manhours per program
CAG, PEG, Front Office Group (FOG), PM Team, Air Staff Action Officer, AFMC Action Officer, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander, Customer, SAE
Signed Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)
Meetings; System minimum once per year. Metric & Reporting Tool Initial Expectation (SMART) System, Management Guide Agreement (EMA): 6 months, 160 manhours; follow-on Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s 2 months; 60 man-hours Automated Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Electronic Manager (in work); Emails 30 work days
PM Team, Customer, PEG, CAG, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander, Customer Staff X X
Request for candidate depot/core analyses; Template A, Phase 1 data
System Program Manager (SPM)s, PGMs; Estimated person hours: 4 hours
Annual review of current guidance; updates
Title 10 2464; Biennial Phase 1, Template A Maintenance Core Report; TRC data; Request Memo; Specialists (HQ Designations Document TRC Designations AFMC/A4BC) document; 10 USC 2464; Biennial Review (to include any analyses done); Miscellaneous additional info (for example, web or other research) SECAF Policy Memo (pending - currently at HQ AFMC/A4 for coord); AFI 63-107; Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Implementation Guide; HQ staffing guidance AFMAN 23-110 Vol 1, Part1 Chap 11AK
Strategic Core Assessment and Candidate AF Depot Determination to Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) POC (HQ AFMC/A4BC)
40 work days
Maintenance Specialists (HQ AFMC/A4BC)
ACCOMPLISH SOURCE OF REPAIR ASSIGNMENT PROCESS (SORAP)
N/A
ENSURE WEAPON SYSTEM SUPPORT PROGRAM (WSSP) ACCOMPLISHED WEAPON SYSTEM DESIGNATOR CODE (WSDC) Merry to provide post Feb 08 RIE ENSURE FACILITY CONSTRUCTION ON TRACK
D040 WSSP workbench,
Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) POC receives Candidate Depot/Core analysis and other Service Interest from Maintenance Specialists (HQ AFMC/A4BC) Decision to use DLA parts
AF Candidate HQ AFMC/CC, A4, and Strategic AF depot Depot/Core analysis; HQ Staff Source of Repair Other Pertinent analysis Determination; Other (for example, 50/50, DoD Service interest other DoD Service interest)
80 work days
HQ AFMC/CC and/or A4, HQ Staff; Estimated persons hours: 60 hours
N/A
MILCON budget, facilities plan,
AFI 32-9005, AFI 10503, AFI 10-501, AFI 16-403, MILCON process
EVALUATE AND MAINTAIN LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA Contractor systems, Legacy Logistics IT systems (EITDR), Product Life Cycle Management (PLM), PARTICIPATE IN CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW (CDR) N/A
Organic & Contract Data generation
Site survey, program schedule, MAJCOM direction, contractor recommendations, environmental impact statement, program environmental safety health evaluation (PESHE) Applicable IT systems in Data, information, use requirements
Program office, MAJCOM, contractor, base civil engineer
facilities plan, MILCON budget, physical buildings, environmental impact statement, environmental study,
AFI 32-9005, AFI 10503, AFI 10-501, AFI 16-403, MILCON process
On going
Program office, MAJCOM, contractor, base civil engineer, dollars X X
Product & Logistics Centers, Contractors, MAJCOMS
Various reports, analysis output
Instructions and Policy
Product & Logistics Centers, Contractors, MAJCOMS
Better weapon system oversight & management X X
Contract Terms and Conditions and Documentation; CDR ROE
PDR results; Eng Development Models/Prototypes; Proposed Drawings; Refined System Spec; Systems Engineering Data; LMI documentation
Contractor and Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer Reps including Maintainers; Test Org
Approved Specs and Drawings; Functional Baseline; Updated Systems Engineering/LMI data
CDR agenda; Contractor Engineering/Data Systems
75 days (30 days prior for prelim review of data; 45 days after for finalization of minutes, action items, etc)
Contractor and Government PM Team, Customer, Test X X
ESTABLISH TECHNICAL ORDER PRODUCT BASELINE PREPARE DOCUMENTATION FOR DESIGN READINESS REVIEW (DRR) N/A Notification of Review Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) Required Documentation/ROE CDR Results; Capability Development Document (CDD); Updated Acquisition and Product Support Strategy; Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) plan PM Team (Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM)); Wing Commander; Product Center, AFMC, SAF and OSD Staff; Program Executive Officer (PEO); SAE; ALC Commander; Customer; Test Org Contractor and Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer Reps including Maintainers; Test Org PM Team; Customer; AFMC/AF/OSD/Custom er FM Approved Design Milestone Decision Templates; CAGS; Action Officers 90 days (non OSD) CAG, PEG, Front Office Group (FOG), PM Team, Air Staff Action Officer, AFMC Action Officer, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC Commander, Customer, SAE; OSD Staff
ANNOTATE THE PRODUCT SUPPORT CAPABILITIES
N/A
Approved DRR; System Contract Terms and ready for demonstration Conditions and Documentation; System Demo ROE
Revised Sys Eng and LMI Data; Test Data/Reports; Test Plans and Procedures; System Demo Articles Previous Cost Estimates, Funding Profile; Customer Budget; Program Changes
Assessment Data
UPDATING SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN COST ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION (CARD), PROGRAM OFFICE ESTIMATE (POE), COMPONENT COST ANALYSIS (CCA), INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE), AFFORDABILITY ASSESSMENT
N/A
Validated Functional Design
INCLUDE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) IN LIFE CYCLE COST DOCUMENTS INCLUDING REPLACEMENT COSTS
N/A
Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment
Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment Regulations AFIs, DoDIs
Updated Funding profile; Funding disconnects
Test Articles, Test 75 days (30 days prior Procedures and Plan, for prelim review of Assessment Templates data; 45 days after demo for finalization of assessment, action items, etc) Established Guidance 120 days for processing these documents
Contractor and Government PM Team, Customer, Test X X
PM Team; Customer; AFMC/AF/OSD/Customer FM X X
Supportability Concept, Prod/Log Centers Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data, any support equipment available, cost data
CONTINUE PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MEMORANDUM (POM) INPUTS FOR SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS
CMS
Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Data Call
Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Guidance
Customer Budget; Updated Funding profiles; Updated Funding Disconnects
Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE, Affordability Assessment, ensure that support equipment replacement costs are included PM Team; Customer; Approved Program AFMC/AF/OSD/Custom Objective Memorandum er FM, Program (POM) inputs Objective Memorandum (POM) Panels/Boards/Councils Contractor and Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer Reps including Maintainers; Test Org Contractor and Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer Reps including Maintainers; Test/Live Fire Org Approval to conduct Test
Established Guidance, 365 days Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Panels, Boards, Council
PM Team; Customer; AFMC/AF/OSD/Customer FM, Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Panels/Boards/Councils
PARTICIPATE IN TEST READINESS REVIEW (TRR)
N/A
Contract T&C,
ENSURE SUPPORT FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION (DT&E), LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION (LFT&E), EARLY OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENTS (EOAS), AND OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENTS (OAs)
Notification of DT&E, LFT&E, and OA
Contract T&C; DT&E, LFT&E, OA ROE
ANALYZE DATA FROM DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION N/A (DT&E), EARLY OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENTS (EOAS), AND LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION (LFT&E)
DT&E/OA Data Received
Contract T&C; DT&E, LFT&E, OA ROE
UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE ACQUISITION PROGRAM BASELINE (APB)
N/A
Time to update Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)
UPDATE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP)
Logistics Planning and Program cycle/major Requirements System changes dictates need (LOGPARS) Army for update System
Determination of competitive acquisition
Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer reps including maintainers; Test Org Acquisition Program Updated cost, schedule, PM, Program Executive Baseline (APB) performance, Officer (PEO), PEM, Guidelines supportability data; SAF/AQ updated Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s Life Cycle Management Updated acquisition and PM Team including Plan (LCMP) Guide, AFI product support logisticians, Program 63-107 strategy; cost schedule, Executive Officer performance, (PEO), ALC/CC, Test supportability data; org; SAF/AQ, updated Expectation Acquisition Strategy Management Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Agreement (EMA)s Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants Federal Acquisition Risk Assessment ALC and PC logisticians Regulation (FAR) 15, Results, Key SS Guides and Supportability Template Requirements
Detailed Test Plan (including test for supportability), Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), SPEC, Test Articles Capability Development Document (CDD), Test Plan, Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), Systems Spec, LMI Data, Supportability Requirements, Test/LF articles DT&E and OA Data
Test Articles, Test 60 Procedures and Plan, Assessment Templates
Contractor and Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer Reps including Maintainers; Test Org Contractor and Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer Reps including Maintainers; Test/Live Fire Org
Validated Functional Test Articles, Test Design; Demonstrated Procedures and Plan, supportability, Assessment Templates Demonstrated Live Fire Survivability
Documented results of analysis; action items
Test Procedures and Plan, Assessment Templates
45 days
Government Program Team including Logisticians; Customer reps including maintainers; Test Org PM, Program Executive Officer (PEO), PM, CAGS, SAF/AQ
Approved updated Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)
Established guidance, Protocol process
90 days (non OSD)
120 days
PM Team including logisticians, Program Executive Officer (PEO), ALC/CC, Test org; SAF/AQ, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)/Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) approval authorities participants PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC and PC logisticians, Source Selection Plan (SSP) approval chain of command, warfighter PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC and PC logisticians, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Secretariat and Panel, warfighter
Approved Source Selection Plan (SSP)
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Guides, Templates
180 days
ENSURE ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP) SUPPORTABILITY TEMPLATE COMPLETED
N/A
Notification of Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP)
PARTICIPATE IN ALTERNATIVE of ACTION (AOA) UPDATE
N/A
Notification that update is required
Pre Award Information Notification to develop Exchange System Request for Proposal (PIXS) ConWrite (RFP) FEDBIZOPS
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) part 7, Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Guides and Templates, local Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) procedures Alternative of Action (AOA) Regulations/Guidelines Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Risk Assessment Results, Key Supportability Requirements and Strategy
ALC and PC logisticians Completed Acquisition Strategy Panel (ASP) Briefing; Action Items Completed
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Guides, Templates, Protocol
180 days
DT&E/OA assessment, Program Team including Completed Alternative Alternative of Action LMI Data Logisticians, warfighter of Action (AOA) Update (AOA) Regulations/Guidelines Draft Capability ALC and PC logisticians Defined/Approved Request for Proposal Production Document Request for Proposal (RFP) Template, (CPD); Supportability (RFP) Supportability Clauses Data from DT&E; Requirements Acquisition Strategy
Program Team including Logisticians, warfighter 120 days ALC and PC logisticians; Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
7 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW COORDINATE WITH ALCs ENSURE PACKAGING, AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS HANDLING, STORAGE & TRANSPORTATION (PHS&T) (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM) REQUIREMENTS (INCLUDING DATA) ARE ON THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
Pre Award Information Program schedule and Exchange System Request for Proposal (PIXS) ConWrite (RFP) development FEDBIZOPS, SIS D035T, Special Packaging Instruction Retrieval & Exchange System (SPIRES), Automated Contract Purchasing System (ACPS)
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S, DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
PHS&T data
ALC packaging specialists, ALC transportation specialists, HQ AFMC/A4RD, program office personnel, contractor
PHS&T data
PLACE PACKAGING DATA , TRANSPORTATION, AND TRANSPORTABILITY DATA REQUIREMENTS IN THE CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL) ON CONTRACT
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), MIL STD 129, MIL STD 2073-1
PHS&T data, DI-PACK- ALC packaging 80120B/T, DI-PACKspecialists, ALC 80121B/T transportation specialists, HQ AFMC/A4RD, program office personnel, contractor
Federal Acquisition 1-15 days Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)S, DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMC form 158, DD form 1653, SIS D035T, Special Packaging Instruction Retrieval & Exchange System (SPIRES), Automated Contract Purchasing System (ACPS) PHS&T data, DI-PACK- Federal Acquisition 30 days 80120B/T, DI-PACKRegulation (FAR), 80121B/T AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMC form 158, DD form 1653, SIS D035T, Special Packaging Instruction Retrieval & Exchange System (SPIRES), Automated Contract Purchasing System (ACPS)
Manpower
Manpower
DEVELOP A TECHNICAL ORDER DATA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) INCLUDING THE TECHNICAL MANUAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS (TMCR) DOCUMENT TM-86-01 INCLUDE DATA RIGHTS IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) N/A Notification to develop Request for Proposal (RFP) Federal Acquisition Data Rights, UID Regulation (FAR); Data requirements Rights memo, UID Regulations Logisticians Defined/Approved Request for Proposal (RFP) Data Rights and UID Requirements Request for Proposal (RFP) Template, Clauses 30 days Logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
REVIEW BERRY AMENDMENT FOR APPLICATION TO YOUR PROGRAM AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE IN ALL CONTRACTING ACTIONS INCLUDE OPTIONS FOR RADIO-FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) INCLUDE OPTIONS FOR UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION (UID) IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY INPUTS TO THE TEST & EVALUATION MASTER PLAN (TEMP) N/A Notification update required Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Guidelines DT&E/OA assessment, ALC and PC logisticians Updated Test & Supportability Evaluation Master Plan Requirements, Test (TEMP) Requirements Design for Supportability Assessment Identified Supportability Risks and Current Assessment Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) template 60 days Logisticians, Engineer, Test Org X X
UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY INPUTS TO THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP)
N/A
Notification update required
Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Guidelines, Regulations Risk Management Guidelines
ALC and PC logisticians Updated Systems Systems Engineering Engineering Plan (SEP) Plan (SEP) Template
60 days
Logisticians, Engineer X X
N/A
Continuous Risk Mitigation Activities
Contractor, ALC and PC logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Engineers
Updated Risk Status/Mitigation Plans
Meetings with contractor and Govt IPTs
continuous
Govt and Contractor Logisticians, Engineers, PM, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) Warfighter, ALC and PC Logisticians, Engineer, AF/XO
ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS ARE IN THE CAPABILITY PRODUCTION DOCUMENT (CPD)
N/A
Capability Production Document (CPD) required
Capability Production Document (CPD) Regulations
DT&E/OA assessment, Warfighter, ALC and Supportability PC Logisticians, Requirements, Updates Engineer, AF/XO from User DT&E/OA assessment, Warfighter, ALC and Critical Supportability PC Logisticians, Requirements, Updates Engineer, AF/XO from User
Approved Capability Production Document (CPD)
Capability Production 180 days Document (CPD) Template, meetings with warfighter and AF/XO Capability Production 180 days Document (CPD) Template, meetings with warfighter and AF/XO
UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS N/A (KPP)S
Capability Production Document (CPD) required
Capability Production Document (CPD) Regulations
Approved Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s
Warfighter, ALC and PC Logisticians, Engineer, AF/XO
PARTICIPATE IN THE FUNCTIONAL CONFIGURATION AUDIT (FCA) AND MONITOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR SUPPORTABILITY PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS PARTICIPATE IN FUNCTIONAL CONFIGURATION AUDIT (FCA), SYSTEM VERIFICATION REVIEW (SVR), PRODUCTION READINESS REVIEW (PRR) INCLUDE LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES IN THE INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN / INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMP/IMS) N/A X N/A Requirement for Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) identified Schedule in Source Selection Plan (SSP) Integrated Master Plan / Identification of required ALC and PC Integrated Master logistics activities and logisticians, Procuring Schedule (IMP/IMS) associated timelines Contracting Officer Data Item Description (PCO) (DID) Source Selection ROE, Source Selection Plan (SSP), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Source Selection Criteria/Standards (Sec L&M of Request for Proposal (RFP)); Source Selection Plan (SSP); Contractor Proposal Logistics Data/Status ALC and PC logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) Completed Integrated Integrated Master Plan / 45 days Master Plan / Integrated Integrated Master Master Schedule Schedule (IMP/IMS) (IMP/IMS) Data Item Description (DID)/Template Source Selection Decision Source Selection ROE, 180 days Source Selection Plan (SSP), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Templates, EZ Source ILA Handbook ALC and PC logisticians, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) X
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT (ILA) AND TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION PREPARE DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR MILESTONE C
EZ Source, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)S Navy System N/A
Upcoming milestone decision Upcoming milestone decision
ILA Handbook
ILA Team, PM Team, Contractor PM Team (Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM)); Wing Commander; Product Center, AFMC, SAF and OSD Staff; Program Executive Officer (PEO); SAE; ALC Commander; Customer
N/A
Milestone Decision ROE, Templates
Program Data
Completed ILA Assessment; Action Items Documentation Complete
ILA Team, PM Team, Contractor 180 days PM Team (Program Manager (PM), Depot Supportability Manager (DSM), System Supportability Manager (SSM)); Wing Commander; Product Center, AFMC, SAF and OSD Staff; Program Executive Officer (PEO); SAE; ALC Commander; Customer
Milestone Decision Templates; CAGS; Action Officers
MILESTONE C DECISION DEVELOP INITIAL MIGRATION PLAN (AEROSPACE MAINTENANCE and REGENERATION GROUP (AMARG))
X N/A Milestone C decision AFI's and AFMCI's Program technical data, Program Migration Plan signed planned life, spares Office/ALC/Prod data, Center, AFMC, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), MAJCOM Request for Proposal Program Signed contract (RFP), responses, Office/ALC/Prod Center discussions Data system 1-6 months Program Office, AFMC, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC Publish core items much like Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) plans to do X X
AWARD LOW RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION (LRIP) CONTRACT
Source Selection Authority (SSA)/Program Executive Officer (PEO) approval
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause PK regulation
AMOS, Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS)
Award is one day
Contracting officer, PM team, CFO X X
ENSURE WEAPON SYSTEM PROGRAM COMPLIES WITH AIR FORCE POLICY FOR NO NEW SOFTWARE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT AF/CIO APPROVAL INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN DEFENSE N/A CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) Contract award Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) mission cope Previous Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) & Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)s in force at that plant location Contract Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA), Program Office, ALC, Prime Contractor, MAJCOMs Program Office, Contractor Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) MS Word 30 - 60 days PM team, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC, Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) Apply single process initiative philosophy X X
N/A
Contract award
Details of contract, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, AFI's, Contractor, security reqmts
Accepted contract MS Office tools deliverables, briefing charts, studies, reports, System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART), Management Asset Review (MAR), Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE), Program Executive Officer (PEO) review
Increased risk less oversight/ Navy model
ACCOMPLISH SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) GUIDANCE CONFERENCE PROVIDE LOGISTICS SUPPORT DURING THE DEFICIENCY REPORTING (DR) PROCESS G021, Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) System deficiency TO 00-35D-54 Submission of Deficiency Report Product & Logistics Centers, MAJCOMS, Contractors Disposition or correction Deficiency Review Board, Materiel Improvement Process, Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) Approved Configuration Management Process Product / Logistics Center, Contractors, MAJCOM (Operators & Maintainers) Improved Weapon System operations, performance and support
N/A
Any Change Proposal required to meet the Configuration Control Board (CCB) Acquisition Strategy Panel, Contract, Provisioning Guidance Conference,
Product & Logistics Centers, MAJCOMS, Contractors Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services if joint, DLA, ALC, SSM, MAJCOM, vendors
Disposition
ACCOMPLISH SPARES PROVISIONING CONFERENCE D220, D155, D169
AFMCI 23-101
COMPLETE PROGRAM TRANSFER TEMPLATE AS REQUIRED FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS ENSURE ADEQUATE RESOURCES PLANNED FOR PROGRAM TRANSFER (ALC)
N/A
Prod contract award
Standard format
Minutes from Guidance Conference, Contractor Data, User Requirements, Contract, Provisioning Parts List (PPL), DLA data, CONOPS, Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS) Program Office/ALC, WS plan (spiral)
Official minutes, any required contract modifications, PIO, Supply Support Request (SSR), AF Form 86 Cataloging Request, Refined cost estimate and budgeting
PBL, Program reviews, warranties, AF Form 86 Cataloging Request, NIMSR, AFMC Form 918
Prod Center, ALC Program Office/ALC
Program Transfer Chart PowerPoint New work package for ALC
Ongoing (30 days months)
Program Office/ALC HR/DP, FM , PM Center level CD's/CC's
Establish transfer policy at AFMC and AQ level Policy from AFMC on non transfer of slots
Sustainment / Agreed to Program Acquisition Composite Transfer Template Model (SACOM), CMS N/A Contract Award
$, billets, authorizations, Program Office/ALC req'd
DP councils, Program 2-3 years Objective Memorandum (POM) cycle MS Office products 1-3 Months
Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Process Format
Supportability Plan Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)
COMPLETE SUPPORTABILITY REPORTING TEMPLATE FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS (SEMIANNUALLY)
N/A
Contract award, Program Executive Officer (PEO) review Contract award, contractor deliverable
Program Office/ALC, contract, Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Integrated Master Plan / Contract schedule, plan Program Office, ALC, Integrated Master itself MAJCOM Schedule (IMP/IMS) in place
Program Office and target Org for Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Program Office, ALC, MAJCOM
Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s
Target Org, Program Office
Single process initiative by targeted org X X
Sustainment chart for Program Executive Officer (PEO) review Updated or new Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS)
PowerPoint
30 days
Program Office, ALC
This is huge improvement X X
Integrated Master Plan / 15 days - 60 days Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) IT software in use
Program Office, ALC
Standard Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) to modify X X
UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN COST ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION (CARD), PROGRAM OFFICE ESTIMATE (POE), COMPONENT COST ANALYSIS (CCA), INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE), AFFORDABILITY ASSESSMENT
N/A
Contract Award
Format
Cost Analysis Requirement Description (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), ICE
Program Office, ALC, FM, MAJCOM
Updated documents
Comprehensive Cost & 30 days Requirements System (CCaRS), other databases
Program Office, ALC, HQ AFMC X X
8 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW EVALUATE AND MAINTAIN CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS SUPPORTABILITY DATA (COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM) (COTS) & CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)s)
ENSURE CONTRACT FOR SUSTAINMENT (ORGANIC, COMMERCIAL & PARTNERSHIPS) CONDUCT SITE ACTIVATION TASK FORCE (SATAF)
D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), seer Navy Air Force Interface (NAFI) N/A
Contract Award
Contract and Contract Contract, Supportability Program Office, ALCs, Data Requirements List Plan, Program Schedule Prime Contractor, (CDRL)s MAJCOMS
60 days
Contract Award
Contract Award
Contract and Contract Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s AFI 10-503 HHQ Beddown Plan, Operational Site reviews, Table of Allowance, Facilities Plan (Contractor), Status of Base Readiness, and P Plan
Program Office, ALCs Prime Contractor, MAJCOMS MAJCOM, Base Personnel, Contractors, Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM), Wing Cmdr, MAJCOM CC/CV
Contract
60 days
Program Office, ALC, Prime Contractor MAJCOM, Base Personnel, Contractors, Program Office and System Supportability Manager (SSM) representatives
Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Team Outbrief, Status of Base Readiness, Schedule, Action Items, Mitigation Plan, Training elements, parking lot, fences, supply sources
ESTABLISH SITE ACTIVATION TASK FORCE (SATAF) TEAM FOR EACH LOCATION
Contract Award
AFI 10-503
HHQ Beddown Plan, Operational Site reviews, Table of Allowance, Facilities Plan (Contractor), Status of Base Readiness, and P Plan
MAJCOM, Base Personnel, Contractors, Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM), Wing Cmdr, MAJCOM CC/CV
PERFORM OPERATIONAL BASE SURVEY
Contract Award
AFI 10-503
DEVELOP SCHEDULE & ACTION ITEMS
Contract Award
AFI 10-503
COMPLETE ACTION ITEMS & MITIGATION PLAN
Contract Award
AFI 10-503
EXECUTE SUPPORT PLAN (Ref 4.6.2.1 - 4.6.2.9 APAT)
Contract Award
AFI 10-503
ACCEPT ASSETS DELIVERY
Contract Award
AFI 10-503
CONDUCT SITE ACTIVATION TASK FORCE (SATAF) OUTBRIEF
Contract Award
AFI 10-503
ACQUIRE INITIAL SUPPLY SUPPORT
N/A
Contract Award
Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan, AFMCMAN 23-1
EXECUTE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
Contract Award
Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan
MONITOR CONTRACTOR SPARES PROGRESS
Contract Award
MONITOR CONTRACTOR DELIVERY
Contract Award
MONITOR SPARES UTILIZATION
Contract Award
ADDRESS DIMINISHED MANUFACTURERS SOURCES ISSUES
Contract Award
RESPOND TO DEFICIENCY REPORTS (DR)s
Contract Award
Funding and Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (ISSL, PPL), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Contractor parts data Contract delivery order, DRs, Receiver utilization data Funding and Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (ISSL, PPL), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Contractor parts data Contract delivery order, DRs, Receiver utilization data Funding and Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (ISSL, PPL), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Contractor parts data Contract delivery order, DRs, Receiver utilization data Funding and Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (ISSL, PPL), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Contractor parts data Contract delivery order, DRs, Receiver utilization data Funding and Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (ISSL, PPL), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Contractor parts data Contract delivery order, DRs, Receiver utilization data Funding and Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (ISSL, PPL), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Contractor parts data Contract delivery order, DRs, Receiver utilization data Funding and Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (ISSL, PPL), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Contractor parts data Contract delivery order, DRs, Receiver utilization data
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Prime Contractor w/govt oversight, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs
Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions, item marking instructions, evaluation of contractor progress, adjusted requirements, input for Advanced Planning System (APS), spares, mitigation plan
Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 250 Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 250 Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 252 Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 250 Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 250 Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 250 Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 250 Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 250 Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), UID Registry, PHS&T, Export license, SSIPT, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Advanced Planning System (APS), DD250
12 months planning; 6 weeks Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), all actions completed 3 months prior to FAA
MAJCOM, Base Personnel, Contractors, Program Office and System Supportability Manager (SSM) representatives
12 Mos
Performance-Based 12 Mos Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), UID Registry, PHS&T, Export license, SSIPT, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Advanced Planning System (APS), DD250
Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions, item marking instructions, evaluation of contractor progress, adjusted requirements, input for APS, spares, mitigation plan
9 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW RECEIVE SPARES AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
Contract Award
ENSURE INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ALC TO COMPLETE AFMC PACKAGING FORM 158 and DD 1653 (FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION (FAR) CLAUSES FOR TRANSPORTATION)
Contract and Contract Funding and Contract, Data Requirements List Contract Data (CDRL)s, Supportability Requirements List Plan (CDRL)s (ISSL, PPL), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Contractor parts data Contract delivery order, DRs, Receiver utilization data Federal Acquisition PHS&T data Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
ALC packaging specialists, ALC transportation specialists, HQ AFMC/A4RD, program office personnel, contractor
PHS&T data
ACQUIRE INITIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
N/A
Contract Award
Funding, Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan,
CDRL (Support Equipment Requirements Document), Funding & Contract, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Receiver utilization data, Contractor SE/Test Data, DRs
Contractor w/govt oversight , Program office, ALC and MAJCOMs, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Equipment & IM specialist
Federal Acquisition 1-15 days Regulation (FAR), AFMCI 24-201, AFMC Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), AFMC form 158, DD form 1653, SIS D035T, Special Packaging Instruction Retrieval & Exchange System (SPIRES), Automated Contract Purchasing System (ACPS) Delivery Schedule, Contract, UID/RFID, Lead-time from delivery shipping instructions DMS, DRs, PHS&T, date 12-18 mos Support Equipment Export license, MIL Requirements STD 1519, Document, (GFE/CFE) Performance-Based List of hand tools, Logistics, Public-Private support equipment, Partnerships (PPP), evaluation of contractor SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk performance, adjusted 300, Defense Logistics requirements, input for Agency (DLA) systems, forecast (Advanced Reliability and Planning System (APS)) Maintainability mitigation plan Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions Support Equipment Requirements Document, (GFE/CFE) List of hand tools, support equipment, evaluation of contractor performance, adjusted requirements, input for forecast (Advanced Planning System (APS)) mitigation plan Contract, UID/RFID, Lead-time from delivery DMS, DRs, PHS&T, date 12-18 mos Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, Lead-time from delivery DMS, DRs, PHS&T, date 12-18 mos Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, Lead-time from delivery DMS, DRs, PHS&T, date 12-18 mos Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, Lead-time from delivery DMS, DRs, PHS&T, date 12-18 mos Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250
Manpower
Contract Award
MONITOR CONTRACTOR SUPPORT EQUIP PROGRESS
Contract Award
Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions Support Equipment Requirements Document, (GFE/CFE) List of hand tools, support equipment, evaluation of contractor performance, adjusted requirements, input for forecast (Advanced Planning System (APS)) mitigation plan
Contract Award
RECEIVE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE)
Contract Award
Funding, Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan
DEVELOP LIST FOR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) (PM) WEAPON SYSTEM SPECIFIC
N/A
Support Equipment Requirements Document
Funding, Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), TO
4.24.4.1
SEND APPROVED SUPPORT EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (SERD) TO ASC WR-ALC,/585 CBSS
D039
4.24.4.2
ASC DEVELOP ALLOWANCE SOURCE CODE LIST
Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS)
4.24.4.3
LOAD INTO AIR FORCE EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (AFEMS) AND PUBLISH ALLOWANCE STANDARD
4.24.4.4
10 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW MONITOR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) UTILIZATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
Contract Award
Contract, UID/RFID, Lead-time from delivery DMS, DRs, PHS&T, date 12-18 mos Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, Lead-time from delivery DMS, DRs, PHS&T, date 12-18 mos Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, Lead-time from delivery DMS, DRs, PHS&T, date 12-18 mos Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Forms
ADDRESS DIMINISHED MANUFACTURERS SOURCE ISSUES
Contract Award
Contract Award
ACQUIRE INITIAL TRAINING/TRAINING EQUIPMENT
N/A
Contract Award
Contract Award
MONITOR CONTRACTOR TRAINING MATERIAL / EQUIPMENT PROGRESS
Contract Award
Contract Award
RECEIVE TRAINING MATERIAL / EQUIPMENT
Contract Award
ACQUIRE FORMAL TECHNICAL ORDERS
Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS)
Contract Award
MONITOR CONTRACTOR TECHNICAL ORDERS / MANUALS PROGRESS
Contract Award
RECEIVE TECHNICAL ORDERS / MANUALS
Contract Award
VERIFY TECHNICAL ORDERS
Contract Award
RESPOND TO DEFICIENCIES
Contract Award
DELIVER INITIAL SUPPLY SUPPORT
DD250/J018
Contract Award
DELIVER INITIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE)
DD250/J018
Contract Award
DELIVER INITIAL TRAINING/TRAINING EQUIPMENT
DD250/J018
Contract Award
DELIVER FORMAL TECHNICAL ORDERS
FIRST ASSET AVAILABLE (FAA) AND SUPPORTABLE CONTINUE DEPOT MAINTENANCE ACTIVATION WORKING GROUP (DMAWG)
DD250/J018, Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS) DD250/J018 N/A
Contract Award
Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan Contract and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Supportability Plan 50-50, Clinger Cohen
Funding and Contract
Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs Prime Contractor, Program Office, ALC and MAJCOMs
Purchase Order
Lead-time from delivery Program date Office/PK/FM/PM/Logistics
Purchase Order
Forms
Purchase Order
Forms
Purchase Order
Forms
Purchase Order
Forms
Purchase Order
Forms
Purchase Order
Forms
Purchase Order
Forms
Purchase Order
Forms
Purchase Order
Forms
Purchase Order
Spares Delivered
Rail, Trucks, Planes
Incremental deliveries based on schedule
Prime Contractor, MAJCOMs, ALCs, Program Offices Prime Contractor, MAJCOMs, ALCs, Program Offices Prime Contractor, MAJCOMs, ALCs, Program Offices Prime Contractor, MAJCOMs, ALCs, Program Offices
Purchase Order
Support Equipment Delivered
Purchase Order
Training Materials and Equipment Delivered
Purchase Order
Tech Data/Orders Delivered
X X
X X
Schedule set during initial development 2.20
PLAN FOR DEPOT STAND-UP
N/A
IMP/IMS, DSOR Process,
Core, 50/50,
Depot strategy, Level of Repair determinations, Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) Depot strategy, Level of Repair determinations, DSOR Process, Funding, Equipment, Material, Tech Data, Manpower Phased requirements by dollar and year
System Program Director (SPD) , using command, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC A4, System Program Director (SPD) , using command, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC/A4, DMAWG, Contractor FM, System Program Director (SPD) , Log Manager
Required depot maintenance capability
System Development & Manpower Demonstration (SDD) through O&S
Combine with other working groups, X X
Depot maintenance capability plan
Personnel, Technical Data
Manpower, Funding X X
CONTINUE PERIODIC LOGISTICS PLANNING CONTINUED PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MEMORANDUM (POM) INPUTS FOR SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE ACQUISITION PROGRAM BASELINE (APB) PARTICIPATE IN OPERATIONAL TEST READINESS REVIEW (OTRR) ENSURE SUPPORT FOR INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION (IOT&E) AND FULL UP LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION (LFT&E) PARTICIPATE IN INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION (IOT&E) ANALYZE DATA FROM INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION (IOT&E) / VALIDATE SUPPORTABILITY
X CMS FYDP - PBD Cycle timing cont from 2.36, 3.42 On-going from 2.35, 3.46 MS C - Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR) Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E) AFI 65-601 R-Docs, P-Doc and Financial Plan 2 year cycle for budget preparation Manpower Eliminate Colors of money, more guarantee of resources X X Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Production Readiness Review (PRR) Initial Baseline Review (IBR) X X
X X X
N/A
X Full Rate Production (FRP)-Decision Review Performance-Based Logistics X
X X
PARTICIPATE IN PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION AUDIT (PCA)
Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS) Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS)
Test results, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB), Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)
Performance-Based Logistics implementation
Test results, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB), Correction of Deficiencies (COD) , product support plan System Program Director (SPD) , Log Manager Draft Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Acq Strategy
Production baseline, Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), PESHE, Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Request for Proposal (RFP)
UPDATE PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY IN THE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP)
Logistics Planning and On-going from 2.05, Requirements System 2.37, 3.18, 3.47 (LOGPARS) Army System ENSURE SUPPORTABILITY INCLUDED IN EXPECTATION N/A On-going from 2.06, MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (EMA)s 2.22, 2.38, 3.12, 3.33, 4.16 INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY IN THE SOURCE SELECTION PLAN N/A Acq Plan ENSURE ACQUISITION STRATEGY PANEL (ASP) SUPPORTABILITY TEMPLATE COMPLETED INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) N/A Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS) ConWrite FEDBIZOPS Unique Identification (UID) Registry On-going from 2.08, 2.40, 4.02 Acq Strategy with Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Source selection plan
X X X
X X X
Source Selection Plan
Request for Proposal (RFP)
INCLUDE DATA RIGHTS IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
LSMP, Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP),
Technical Order Management Agency (TOMA), Log Manager, System Program Director (SPD)
Request for Proposal (RFP), Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s,
REVIEW BERRY AMENDMENT FOR APPLICATION TO YOUR PROGRAM AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE IN ALL CONTRACTING ACTIONS INCLUDE OPTIONS FOR RADIO-FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) INCLUDE OPTIONS FOR UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION (UID) IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY INPUTS TO THE TEST & EVALUATION MASTER PLAN (TEMP) UPDATE SUPPORTABILITY INPUTS TO THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP) PARTICIPATE IN RISK MANAGEMENT INCLUDE LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES IN THE INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN / INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMP/IMS) N/A N/A N/A N/A On-going from 3.20, 4.05 On-going from 2.03, 2.32, 3.21, 4.06 On-going from 2.03, 2.32, 3.21, 4.06 On going from 2.12, 2.26, 3.06, 3.14, 4.08, 4.18 IMP/IMS, DSOR Process, MRRB Core, 50/50, Funding Test Reports Test Reports Risk Assessment Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Risk Management Plan Integrated Master Plan (IMP) X X X X X X
X Personnel, Technical Data, Funding Depot Capacity X
ENSURE DEPOT REPAIR CAPABILITY INITIATED
N/A
PREPARE DOCUMENTATION FOR FULL RATE PRODUCTION (FRP) DECISION REVIEW PARTICIPATE IN FOREIGN MILITARY SALES (FMS) ACTIVITIES (if applicable) FULL RATE PRODUCTION (FRP) DECISION REVIEW
N/A
Beyond Low Rate Production
Depot maintenance capability plan, DSOR Process, Funding, Equipment, Material, Tech Data, Manpower, Facilities Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR)
System Program Director (SPD) , using command, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC/A4, DMAWG, Contractor
Initial Depot Repair Capability
Production Contract X X
11 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZEMIGRATION MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW UPDATE PLAN (CONTINUOUS) AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
N/A
Contract Award
AFI's and AFMCI's
EZ Source, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Navy System
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)/AF Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)s
AWARD PRODUCTION CONTRACT
Source Selection Authority (SSA)/Program Executive Officer (PEO) approval
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause PK regulation
Program technical data, Program planned life, spares Office/ALC/Prod data, Center, AFMC, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), MAJCOM Source Selection Plan Acquisition Lead, (if required at this point) Appropriate Logistics Information concerning Rep Preferred System Concept from Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Request for Proposal Program (RFP), responses, Office/ALC/Prod Center discussions
Migration Plan signed
Data system
1-6 months
Program Office, AFMC, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC
Source Selection Decision
Signed contract
AMOS, Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS)
Award is one day
Contracting officer, PM team, CFO X X
ENSURE WEAPON SYSTEM PROGRAM COMPLIES WITH AIR FORCE POLICY FOR NO NEW SOFTWARE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT AF/CIO APPROVAL INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS IN DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA) N/A Contract award Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) mission cope Previous Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) & Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)s in force at that plant location Contract Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA), Program Office, ALC, Prime Contractor, MAJCOMs Program Office, Contractor Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) MS Word 30 - 60 days PM team, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), ALC, Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA)
N/A
Contract award
Details of contract, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, AFI's, Contractor, security reqmts
Accepted contract MS Office tools deliverables, briefing charts, studies, reports, System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART) Asset Review (MART, Management Asset Review (MAR), Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE), Program Executive Officer (PEO) review Disposition or correction Deficiency Review Board, Materiel Improvement Process, Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) Approved Configuration Management Process
ACCOMPLISH SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) GUIDANCE PROVIDE LOGISTICS SUPPORT DURING THE G021, Joint DEFICIENCY REPORTING (DR) PROCESS Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS)
System deficiency
TO 00-35D-54
Submission of Deficiency Report
Product & Logistics Centers, MAJCOMS, Contractors
N/A
ACCOMPLISH THE PROVISIONING CONFERENCE
D220, D155, D169
Any Change Proposal required to meet the Configuration Control Board (CCB) Acquisition Strategy Panel, Contract, Provisioning Guidance Conference,
Product & Logistics Centers, MAJCOMS, Contractors Program office, Acquistion Logistician, Contractor, OEM, Other DoD Services if joint, DLA, ALC, SSM, MAJCOM, vendors
Disposition
DEVELOP A TRANSITION SUPPORT PLAN (part of program transfer process)
N/A
COMPLETE PROGRAM TRANSFER TEMPLATE AS REQUIRED FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS
N/A
COMPLETE SUPPORTABILITY REPORTING TEMPLATE FOR ALL PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) REVIEWS
N/A
Minutes from Guidance Conference, Contractor Data, User Requirements, Contract, Provisioning Parts List (PPL), DLA data, CONOPS, Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS) Agreed transition date AFMC Transition Guide ILA Handbook, AFMC between PM and Transition Guide, System Supportability Contract, IMS/IMP, Manager (SSM) Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s and Performance Based Agreements Agreed transition date AFMC Transition Guide, ILA Handbook, AFMC between PM and Standard Template Transition Guide, System Supportability charts for Program Contract, IMS/IMP, Manager (SSM) Executive Officer Expectation (PEO) review Management Agreement (EMA)s and Performance Based Agreements Program Executive Sustainment Template, Technical data, Officer (PEO) review or controlled by HQ Prod/Log center any review AFMC/A4 assessment, FM status, requirements issues, risk assessment Contract Award AFI 63-101 Program Baseline, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)s, Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s, Key System Attributes (KSA)s, Contract
AFMCI 23-101
Official minutes, any required contract modifications, PIO, Supply Support Request (SSR), AF Form 86 Cataloging Request, Refined cost estimate and budgeting
PBL, Program reviews, warranties, AF Form 86 Cataloging Request, NIMSR, AFMC Form 918
Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, AFMC A1, Centers XPs, Program Executive Officer (PEO)
Signed Transition Plan, Program Executive Officer (PEO) portfolio review charts
Program Executive Officer (PEO) charts, Transition Plan
1-2 years
Program Office, System Program Executive Supportability Manager Officer (PEO) portfolio (SSM) office, AFMC review charts A1, Centers XPs, Program Executive Officer (PEO)
Program Executive Officer (PEO) charts, Transition Plan
30 days
Prod/Log Centers, MAJCOM's
Sustainment template chart with backup
Template
<30 days
Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM X X
D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), seer REVIEW LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES IN THE INTEGRATED MASTER N/A PLAN / INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMP/IMS)
Program Office, System Signed Expectation Supportability Manager Management (SSM) office, MAJCOM Agreement (EMA)
Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Process and Template
3-6 months
Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM
Contract Award
Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) Guide
Contract, Weapon System Schedule, Program Executive Officer (PEO) Schedule, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), PM plan, TEMP, Systems Engineering Plan, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Plan, UID Plan
Program Office, System Integrated Master Plan / Program Reviews Supportability Manager Integrated Master (SSM) and Depot Schedule (IMP/IMS) Supportability Manager (DSM) offices
Ongoing
CONTINUE TO EVALUATE CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORTABILITY DATA (INCLUDING COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF (COTS) & CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRLs) (LEVEL OF REPAIR ANALYSIS (LORA), MAINTENANCE TASK ANALYSIS (MTA), RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM), ENGINEERING DATA, MAINTENANCE, ETC)
ENSURE CONTRACT FOR SUSTAINMENT (ORGANIC, COMMERCIAL & PARTNERSHIPS)
D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS) Navy Air Force Interface (NAFI)
Contract Award
Updated Supportability Plan
60 days
Contract Award
Contract and Contract Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s Contract Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan
Program Office, ALCs Prime Contractor, MAJCOMS Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), MAJCOM, ALC, Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG), Contractor, Contracting Officer, Logisticians, Engineers, Test Organizations, Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA)
Contract
ACQUIRE FULL SUPPLY SUPPORT CAPABILITY
D220, Defense Depot Activation and Logistics Agency Base Activation (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD), Advanced Planning System (APS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), UID Register N/A Depot Activation and Base Activation
Delivery Schedule, Shipping Instructions, Item Marking List, Evaluation of Contractor progress, Spares, Adjusted Requirements, Input for Spares Forecast (Advanced Planning System (APS)) (NOTE: old D200 system), Mitigation plan
Federal Acquisition 6 months Regulation (FAR) and applicable public laws including Title 10 DD250, D200, >12 months Transportation Systems, Base Supply Systems, Cataloging, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), UID Registry, PHS&T, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS) Database, Export License, Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), Advanced Planning System (APS)
Contract
Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), MAJCOM, ALC, Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG), Contractor, Contracting Officer, Logisticians, Engineers, Test Organizations, Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA)
DD250, D200, >12 months Transportation Systems, Base Supply Systems, Cataloging, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), UID Registry, PHS&T, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS) Database, Export License, Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), Advanced Planning System (APS)
MONITOR CONTRACTOR SPARES PROGRESS
N/A
Depot Activation and Base Activation
Contract
12 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS X
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TODELIVERY CAPABILITIES REVIEW MONITOR CONTRACTOR AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
N/A
Contract
RECEIVE SPARES
DD250/J018
Contract
MONITOR SPARES UTILIZATION
DD250/J018
Contract
ADDRESS DIMINISHING MANUFACTURER SOURCE (DMS) ISSUES
DD250/J018
Contract
DD250/J018, Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS)
Contract
ACQUIRE FULL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) CAPABILITY
N/A
Contract
Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan
Contract, UID/RFID, 24-48 mos DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, 24-48 mos DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, 24-48 mos DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, 24-48 mos DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, 24-48 mos DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Base supply, transportation, maintainers, 1-2 days
N/A
Contract
Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions Support Equipment Requirements Document, (GFE/CFE) List of hand tools, support equipment, evaluation of contractor performance, adjusted requirements, input for forecast (APS) mitigation plan
MONITOR CONTRACTOR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) CMS PROGRESS
Contract
Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS)
Contract
Delivery Schedule, shipping instructions Support Equipment Requirements Document, (GFE/CFE) List of hand tools, support equipment, evaluation of contractor performance, adjusted requirements, input for forecast (APS) mitigation plan
RECEIVE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE)
Contract
BASE ORDERS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) FROM ASC LIST (MAJCOM) 4.55.4.1
Standard Base Supply Site Activation Task System (SBSS), Air Force (SATAF), base Force Equipment activation Management System (AFEMS)
Funding, Allowance Source Code (ASC)
Funding, Site Activation Contractor w/govt Task Force (SATAF) oversight , Program office, ALC and MAJCOMs, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Equipment & IM specialist
Projected receiving dates, requisition
13 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES LOAD ORGANIZATION CODE INREVIEW AIR FORCE AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS (AFEMS) EXPERTISE ON TEAM) 4.55.4.2
BUILD AUTHORIZATION PACKAGES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) REQUIREMENTS 4.55.4.3
BUILD SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) READINESS PLAN (PHASING SCHEDULE) 4.55.4.4
CUSTOMER PLACES EQUIPMENT ON ORDER THROUGH EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT / LOGISTICS READINESS 4.55.4.5 SQUADRON (LRS)
MONITOR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT UTILIZATION
Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS)
Contract
Funding, Site Activation Contractor w/govt Task Force (SATAF) oversight , Program office, ALC and MAJCOMs, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Equipment & IM specialist Funding, Site Activation Contractor w/govt Task Force (SATAF) oversight , Program office, ALC and MAJCOMs, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Equipment & IM specialist Funding, Site Activation Contractor w/govt Task Force (SATAF) oversight , Program office, ALC and MAJCOMs, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Equipment & IM specialist Funding, Site Activation Contractor w/govt Task Force (SATAF) oversight , Program office, ALC and MAJCOMs, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Equipment & IM specialist Funding , Contract, Defense Logistics Contract Data Agency (DLA), Requirements List MAJCOM, ALC, Depot (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Maintenance Activation Site Activation Task Working Group Force (SATAF), (DMAWG), Contractor, Contract Delivery Contracting Officer, Order, Contract Parts Logisticians, Engineers, Data, Field Data, Test Organizations, Receiver Utilization Defense Contracts Data, Government Management Agency Industry Data Exchange (DCMA) Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (TM-8601) Funding, Contract, Contract delivery order, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), AFTO 22, DRs, Product Baseline, Engineering Change Proposal, Engineering Change Notices, Data deficiency, informal communication Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (TM-8601) Funding, Contract, Contract delivery order, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), AFTO 22, DRs, Product Baseline, Engineering Change Proposal, Engineering Change Notices, Data deficiency, informal communication Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), MAJCOM, ALC, Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG), Contractor, Contracting Officer, Logisticians, Engineers, Test Organizations, Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA)
Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS) updated, Org code loaded
Base supply, transportation, maintainers,
1-2 days
Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS) updated
1-2 days
Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS) updated
1-2 days
Projected receiving dates, requisition
1-2 days
Contract, UID/RFID, 24-48 mos DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, 24-48 mos DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Contract, UID/RFID, 24-48 mos DMS, DRs, PHS&T, Export license, MIL STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), UID Registry, PHS&T, Training Planning Team , DD250 12 mos for training material, *note DEPOT Training Equipment dependent on delivery of support equipment and Weapons System
ADDRESS DIMINISHING MANUFACTURER SOURCES (DMS) ISSUES
N/A
Contract
N/A
Contract
ACQUIRE FULL TRAINING/TRAINING EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY N/A
Contract
Contractor w/govt oversight, Contracting Officer, ALC, Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG), MAJCOM, AETC,
Delivery Schedule Shipping Instructions, Item Marking Instructions, Evaluation of Contractor Progress, Deliver Training Material/Equipment
N/A
Contract
Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), UID Registry, PHS&T, Training Planning Team , DD250
12 mos for training material, *note DEPOT Training Equipment dependent on delivery of support equipment and Weapons System
MONITOR CONTRACTOR TRAINING MATERIAL/ EQUIPMENT PROGRESS
Contract
N/A
Contract
RECEIVE TRAINING MATERIAL/ EQUIPMENT
Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), G009, System Metric & Reporting Tool (SMART)-AQ
Contract
ACQUIRE UPDATED TECHNICAL DATA
Sustainment / Contract award, Data Acquisiiton Composite Deficiency Model (SACOM), CMS, Logistics Composite Model (LCOM)
T.O. 00-5-1
Contractor w/govt oversight, Contracting Officer, ALC, Technical Order Management Agency (TOMA), Equipment Specialists, Engineers, MAJCOMs, Test
Delivery Schedule, Distribution Instructions, Evaluation of Contractor Progress, Technical Orders / Manuals, Updated Product Baseline, Resolution, Updated Technical Orders, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO)s
Performance-Based Logistics, Publishing & distribution, TOIPT, Joint Computer Aided Acquisition and Logistics Support (JCALS), DD250
60 days prior to base/depot activation
Contractor w/govt oversight, Contracting Officer, ALC, Technical Order Management Agency (TOMA), Equipment Specialists, Engineers, MAJCOMs, Test X X
Senior Officer Communication and Coordination Electronic Resource (SOCCER)
Contract award, Data Deficiency
T.O. 00-5-1
14 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO(SUPPORT CAPABILITIES REVIEW MONITOR CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (SE), DEPOT, REMAINING FIELD) TECHNICAL (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM) ORDERS / MANUALS PROGRESS
CMS
T.O. 00-5-1
N/A
RECEIVE TECHNICAL ORDERS / MANUALS
N/A
RESPOND TO DEFICIENCIES
N/A
DELIVER FULL SUPPLY SUPPORT CAPABILITY
N/A
Contract Award
DELIVER FULL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) CAPABILITY
N/A
Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (TM-8601) Funding, Contract, Contract delivery order, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), AFTO 22, DRs, Product Baseline, Engineering Change Proposal, Engineering Change Notices, Data deficiency, informal communication T.O.. 00-5-1 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (TM-8601) Funding, Contract, Contract delivery order, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), AFTO 22, DRs, Product Baseline, Engineering Change Proposal, Engineering Change Notices, Data deficiency, informal communication T.O. 00-5-1 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (TM-8601) Funding, Contract, Contract delivery order, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), AFTO 22, DRs, Product Baseline, Engineering Change Proposal, Engineering Change Notices, Data deficiency, informal communication T.O. 00-5-1 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (TM-8601) Funding, Contract, Contract delivery order, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), AFTO 22, DRs, Product Baseline, Engineering Change Proposal, Engineering Change Notices, Data deficiency, informal communication Contract and Contract Funding and Contract, Data Requirements List Contract Data (CDRL)s, Supportability Requirements List Plan (CDRL)s (ISSL, PPL), Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Contractor parts data Contract delivery order, DRs, Receiver utilization data Contract Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Policy and regulations, commodity council Advanced Planning System (APS), D035, D200C
Performance-Based 1-2 years Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), UID Registry, PHS&T, Export license, SSIPT, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Advanced Planning System (APS), DD250
Contract, UID/RFID, 24-48 mos, ongoing for DMS, DRs, PHS&T, multiple base Export license, MIL activations STD 1519, Performance-Based Logistics, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), SEIPT, IMPAC, Mil hdbk 300, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECSS), DD250 Commodity council business rules On going
COMMODITY COUNCIL MANAGES SUSTAINMENT OF Reliability and SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS) DELIVER FULL TRAINING/TRAINING EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY N/A
Requirement for the item
ALC, AFMC/A4, MAJCOM
Strategic direction
ALC, AFMC/A4, MAJCOM
Contract
DELIVER UPDATED TECHNICAL ORDERS IF REQUIRED BY THE TECHNICAL MANUAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS (TMCR) DOCUMENT TM-86-01
D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)/Basic Sustainment Material (BSM)
T.O. 00-5-1
CONTINUE CONDUCT SITE ACTIVATION TASK FORCE (SATAF) Pre Award Information Contract Award AS REQUIRED Exchange System (PIXS) ConWrite FEDBIZOPS, CBIS
AFI 10-503
Funding , Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, IMPs/IMS, Site Activation Task Force (SATAF), Contract Delivery Order, Contract Parts Data, Field Data, Receiver Utilization Data, Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), Deficiency Reports, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) Plan Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s (TM-8601) Funding, Contract, Contract delivery order, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), AFTO 22, DRs, Product Baseline, Engineering Change Proposal, Engineering Change Notices, Data deficiency, informal communication HHQ Beddown Plan, Operational Site reviews, Table of Allowance, Facilities Plan (Contractor), Status of Base Readiness, and P Plan
Contractor w/govt oversight, Contracting Officer, ALC, Technical Order Management Agency (TOMA), Equipment Specialists, Engineers, MAJCOMs, Test X X
CONTINUE DEPOT MAINTENANCE ACTIVATION WORKING GROUP (DMAWG)
DD250/J018
Schedule set during initial development 2.20
50-50, Clinger Cohen
Depot strategy, Level of System Program Required depot Repair determinations, Director (SPD) , using maintenance capability Source of Repair command, SSM, AFMC Assignment Process A4, (SORAP)
Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 250 Public Law Title 10
MAJCOM, Base Personnel, Contractors, Program Office and System Supportability Manager (SSM) representatives X X
continue through depot stand up
System Program Director (SPD) , using command, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC A4,
CONTINUE PERIODIC LOGISTICS PLANNING MEETINGS X X
REVIEW AND UPDATE PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MEMORANDUM (POM) AND BUDGET INPUTS FOR SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS
DO35, DO43, Program Objective Standard Base Supply Memorandum (POM) System (SBSS), Data Call D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Government and Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), DR SYS/GO21 D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)/Basic Sustainment Material (BSM), DO35G, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS) N/A EXPRESS/GO73, PDMSS, Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), DR/GO21, DO35T/DSS, GO19C, D200 Fielded System
FM regulations
Supportability Concept, Plan, Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), technical data
Prod/Log Centers
Program Objective Memorandum (POM)
Future budget, reports, 60 days meetings, presentations
Prod/Log Centers, Contractor w/govt oversight
ANALYZE DATA FROM FOLLOW ON OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION (FOT&E) / FDE ASSESS SUPPORTABILITY
Capability Production Document (CPD), Regulations, Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), Follow-on Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E) Test Plan
DT&E, Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E), Follow-on Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E) Test results, DR)s, Contractor data
Program office, MAJCOM, Base personnel, AFRL, Contractor w/govt oversight
Updated Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), Categorized DRs, Analyzed test data, Evaluation review results
Reports, briefings
90 days
Program office, MAJCOM, Base personnel, AFRL, Contractor w/govt oversight
INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY (IOC) ENSURE THE INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY (IOC) SUPPORTABILITY ASSESSMENTS ARE COMPLETED
X Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) and negotiated date with MAJCOM; Contractual Deliveries Technical Data, Technical Orders, Manpower and Personnel, Status of Resources and Training System (SORTS), Old Name: Blue Book, New Name: PD Supportability Assessments, Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E), Follow-on Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E), Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC), test results, schedule, beddown plan, Logistics Support Plan, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) DRs, funding, engineering support, maintenance information systems Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS) Program Office, MAJCOM, Field Personnel, Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC), AETC MAJCOM declares IOC, Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC) report, Operational capability Dollars and manpower to perform operational functions, supply chain, transportation, maintenance, infrastructure 30-60 days Program Office, MAJCOM, Field Personnel, Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC), AETC
RESOLVE SUPPORTABILITY ISSUES
G009, Wide-Area Work Flow (WAWF), GO21, Government and Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), DD250/JO18, D200, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS)
Supportability DR process, 00-54, Assessment report and TO-00-15-1 MAJCOM generated issues, AFTO22, Discrepancy Reports (DRs)
Closed DRs, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)s, response to the supportability report
Time Compliance 30-90 days Technical Order (TCTO)s, updated technical data, Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP), sustaining engineering
15 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES CONTINUE CONDUCTING SITE ACTIVATION TASKREVIEW FORCE AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (SATAF)S (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
N/A
Contract Award
AFI 10-503
ASSESS SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER SYSTEM PROGRAM MANAGER (SPM) RESPONSIBILITY UTILIZING TRANSITION SUPPORT PLAN
Pre Award Information Exchange System (PIXS), ConWrite, FEDBIZOPS
Agreed transition date between PM and System Supportability Manager (SSM)
AFMC Transition Guide, Standard Template charts for Program Executive Officer (PEO) review
FULL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY (FOC)
TRANSFER SYSTEM PROGRAM MANAGER (SPM) RESPONSIBILITY TO ALC
D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS) N/A
Contract Award
AFI 63-101
ILA Handbook, AFMC Transition Guide, Contract, IMS/IMP, Expectation Management Agreement (EMA)s and Performance Based Agreements Program Baseline, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)s, Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s, Key System Attributes (KSA)s, Contract
Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Checklist, Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS), Risk Assessment, Suspense Tracking System, Contractor Data and Data Systems, and DD 250 Transition Support Plan
MAJCOM, Base Personnel, Contractors, Program Office and System Supportability Manager (SSM) representatives X X
Program Office, System Signed Expectation Supportability Manager Management (SSM) office, MAJCOM Agreement (EMA)
3-6 months
Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM
Transfer decision
AFMC Transition Guide, Program Executive Completed Transfer Officer (PEO) Review Template Template, Program Data
Program Office, System Transfer to System Supportability Manager Program Manager (SSM) office, AFMC (SPM) A1, Centers XPs, Program Executive Officer (PEO)
AFMC Transition Guide, Completed Transfer Template
Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, AFMC A1, Centers XPs, Program Executive Officer (PEO) X X
MANAGE BUSINESS ACTIVITIES
Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), D220
Ongoing
MANAGE PRIME EQUIPMENT ACTIVITIES
All current AFMC Logistics IT systems G021, Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS)
Fielded System
PROVIDE LOGISTICS SUPPORT DURING THE DEFICIENCY REPORTING (DR) PROCESS
System deficiency
Budget, cost, schedule, performance (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)), risk and change management, Performance Evaluation, Baseline establishment / management, EVMs monitoring, Source Agreement management Estabilshed Air Force Maintenance & Repair systems TO 00-35D-54
MAJCOM Budget, Program Office, System Milestone C documents, Supportability Manager Definitive Agreement (SSM), AFMC, ALCs, Product Centers
Feedback, direction to source, Updated budget, Program status (SAR), Source Performance data, Program impacts (CAIV), Updated Business Program Documentation
Data systems
Ongoing
Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC, ALCs, Product Centers
Government & Contractor data and information Submission of Deficiency Report
Product & Logistics Centers, MAJCOMS, Contractors Product & Logistics Centers, MAJCOMS, Contractors
Equipment analysis report Disposition or correction Deficiency Review Board, Materiel Improvement Process, Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) Approved Configuration Management Process
Product / Logistics Center, Contractors, MAJCOM (Operators & Maintainers) Product / Logistics Center, Contractors, MAJCOM (Operators & Maintainers)
Improved Weapon System operations, performance and support Improved Weapon System operations, performance and support
N/A
MANAGE RESOURCES
N/A
Any Change Proposal required to meet the Configuration Control Board (CCB) Ongoing
Product & Logistics Centers, MAJCOMS, Contractors Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC, ALCs, Product Centers
Disposition
Product / Logistics Center, Contractors, MAJCOM (Operators & Maintainers) Ongoing Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC, ALCs, Product Centers
MANAGE INFORMATION / COMMUNICATION ACTIVITIES
N/A
N/A
PERFORM STRATEGIC PROGRAM PLANNING
N/A
CONDUCT SUSTAINMENT PROGRAM REVIEWS (SEMIANNUAL)
N/A
Updated resource Data systems requirements and documentation, Program Impacts, Organizational Structure, Resourcing Status Ongoing Reporting, Change Updated Business Program Office, System Responses to inquiries, Data systems Management, Program, Technical and Supportability Manager Required program Expectation Resource (SSM), AFMC, ALCs, reporting, Audit reports Management, Tasker Documentation, Product Centers and Suspense Definitive Agreement, Management, External MAJCOM Budget, and Internal Acquisition Program management Baseline (APB), Program Impacts Preferred System AFI 63-101, DoD 5000 Information concerning Acquisition Lead, Program Planning, Acquisition Led Concept Identified Preferred System Appropriate Logistics Including Risk Process Concept from Rep Management Alternative of Action (AOA) Study, Approved Course of Action (COA) approach Ongoing PPBE Inputs, Increment Updated Business Program Office, System Updated Expectation Management, Program, Technical and Supportability Manager Management Expectation Resource (SSM), AFMC, ALCs, Agreement (EMA), Management Documentation, Product Centers Capability Production Definitive Agreement, Document (CPD), MAJCOM Budget, FYDP Budget, Program Acquisition Program gaps and disconnects, Baseline (APB), Updated Acquisition Program Impacts, Strategy Impacts to Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Program Executive Sustainment Template, Technical data, Prod/Log Centers, Sustainment template Template Officer (PEO) review or controlled by HQ Prod/Log center MAJCOM's chart with backup any review AFMC/A4 assessment, FM status, requirements issues, risk assessment Milestone A decision HQ process Mission assignment, technical data Prod/Log Centers, HQ AFMC/A4 Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP)/Depot Maintenance Interservicing (DMI) started Program Office, System Signed Expectation Supportability Manager Management (SSM) office, Agreement (EMA) MAJCOM, ALCs, Product Centers Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) process
AFIs, DoDIs, Public Law, Management of Infrastructure, Manpower, Facilities, Personnel documentation
Specific Infrastructure & Manpower Acquired, Resource Funding Acquired, Program Management Directive (PMD)
Ongoing
Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC, ALCs, Product Centers X X
Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in Risk Management Planning X X
Ongoing
Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM), AFMC, ALCs, Product Centers X X
<30 days
Prod/Log Center, MAJCOM X X
REACCOMPLISH THE DEPOT SOURCE OF REPAIR (DSOR) PROCESS AS REQUIRED FOR FIELDED SYSTEMS
N/A
PERFORM DATA MANAGEMENT
D220, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) N/A
Contract Award
AFI 63-101
Program Baseline, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)s, Key Performance Parameters (KPP)s, Key System Attributes (KSA)s, Contract
3-6 months
Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM, ALCs, Product Centers
Fielded System
TM-86-01, Standard for drawing packages D100, Data Item description for all deliverables, Contract 1423 (DD form)
MANAGE TECHNICAL ORDER (TO) SUSTAINMENT
Joint Computer Aided Acquisition and Logistics Support (JCALS), Enhanced Technical Information Management System (ETIMS)
Fielded System
EVALUATE SUSTAINING ENGINEERING PROJECTS FOR SUPPORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS
N/A
Fielded System
Informal Communication, AFTO 22,DRs' Product Baseline, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), Engineering Change Notice (ECN) Technical Manual Formal technical orders Contract Requirements and supporting data, (TMCR) Document TM- Maintenance Strategy, 86-01, Transition Product Support Support Plan (TSP), TO Strategy, 00-5-3, TO 00-5-1, Technical Order Management Plan (TOMP), Technical Order Verification Plan (TOVP), AFRIMS, TO 00-5-18, AFI 61-204, AFI 21-303, AFI 65-601 Vol. 1, MIL-PRF-32216 Mil standards, OSSE Operational capability, standards, SERD Operational feedback (includes accident investigations), Test results, OSSE shortfall, Performance monitoring - Habitability, Survivability, Safety, Environment, Occupational health, RM&A Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Guidance; AFI, 50-50, Title 10, Core, Public Private Partnerships (PPP) Provisioning Data; Repair Procedures, Technical Data, Tools, Support Equipment, Trained Technicians, Funding
Program Office, System Updated Technical Supportability Manager Data, Updated Product (SSM) office, Baseline MAJCOM, ALCs, Product Centers
Data collection systems ongoing
Engineering dispositions, Potential engineering changes, Recommended modifications, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO)s
Database for problem reports
ongoing
Program Office, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM, ALCs, Product Centers X X
ENSURE DEPOT ACTIVATION ACCOMPLISHED (NO LATER THAN THREE YEARS AFTER INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY (IOC))
N/A
Mission Assignment, Funds Availability, Depot Maintenance Activation Plan
Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG), ALC, AFMC, Product Centers, Contracting, MAJCOM, Contractor
Depot Capability, Physical Plant established manned and operational, Funding in place, Production and Supplier Management Plans
Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), Data Systems, Spare parts, equipment, facilities, weapon system, personnel
years to decades
Program Office, ALCs, AFMC, MAJCOM, Contractors X X
DETERMINE SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS
D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)/Basic Sustainment Material (BSM), Weapon System Management Information System (WSMIS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS)
Coming out of ICS
AFMAN 23-110 Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook
MIL-PRF-49506 DIALSS-81529 DIALSS-81530 MILHDBK-502 Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook Budget, maintenance data
ACC, ALCs, ASC, AFMC, MAJCOMs, Contractor
Request for Proposal Data Systems, (RFP), Statement of Manpower, SE, Supply Work (SOW), Contract Support Plan Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, purchase order, Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR) 16 OF 156
Months to Years
Man Hours for Analysis, computations, Budget for travel/meetings
Supply Support Plan developed concurrently with Concept Refinement and Tech Dev during: Pre MS A and MS A X X
RETIRE PRODUCTS
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW OBTAIN / RENEW SUPPLY SOURCES AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
PRODUCE/DELIVER ASSET
Pre Award Information DMS, Basic Exchange System Sustainment Material (PIXS) ConWrite (BSM), contract FEDBIZOPS, CBIS, renewal, source selection, modification DD250/J018, 375D, Replenishment Standard Base Supply requirement and System (SBSS), Air modification, an order Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Weapon System Management Information System (WSMIS) N/A Acquisition or modification that involves software and computer systems DO35, DO43, Usage forecast, Standard Base Supply D200C, DMS, CLS bill System (SBSS), D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Government and Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), DR SYS/GO21, 375D, D165B, Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Weapon System Management Information System (WSMIS), Government On-Line Data (GOLD) (et al) Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS)
AFMAN 23-110 Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook AFMAN 23-110 Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook
Request for Proposal (RFP), requirements
Contractor's Proposal
Manpower, funding
ongoing
Time, Manpower, contracting
Better Performance-Based Logistics Planning/Metrics; Strategic Sourcing
MANAGE COMPUTER RESOURCES SUPPORT
Best Practice (rescinded AFI 800-14 & AFMCI 800-21) AFMAN 23-110 Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook
MANAGE SUPPLY/SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) SUSTAINMENT
Statement of Work (SOW), SSIPT, MIL-PRF-49506 DI-ALSS-81529 DI-ALSS-81530 MIL-HDBK-502 Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook Budget Acquisition or modification that involves software and computer systems Statement of Work (SOW), IPT, usage data, quality deficiency report
Spares assets, end items, DD250, bill of lading
Data Systems, Manpower, SE, Supply Support Plan, Depot Test Equipment, DLRs/Materials, ATPs
ongoing
DLRs, transportation, Inventory, Man-hours, time, production line, Supply Chain
Better Maintenance Planning--or better Performance-Based Logistics Planning/Metrics, better inventory locations, material management and forecasting
Updated Computer Resources Lifecycle Management Plan (CRLCMP) Product Centers, ALCs, Supply Metrics, CDRL AFMC, MAJCOMs, Reports Contractor
Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)
Life Cycle Support for computer resources
SE, STE, DLRs, GSD/MSD Budgets, Data Systems
ongoing
Consumable items (XB3s), Special Test Equipment/Support Equipment (STE/SE), Beyond Economical Repair (BER) Reparable (XD2) Assets, Sourcing, Contracting, Manpower
Strategic Sourcing,
MANAGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM
Requisition, usage data AFMAN 23-110, Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook Requisition, usage data AFMAN 23-110, Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook Requisition, usage data AFMAN 23-110, Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook Requisition, usage data AFMAN 23-110, Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook
ENSURE MAJCOM PRIORITIZES REQUIREMENT
ENSURE MAJCOM PRIORITIZED LIST SENT TO WRALC 585 CBSS
Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS) Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS)
ENSURE CONSOLIDATED ASSET MANAGEMENT (CAM) FUNDS APPLIED
ENSURE ALC EXECUTES LIST
Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), D035, D200C
Requisition, usage data AFMAN 23-110, Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook
ENSURE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) ORDERED
Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS) D200, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)/Basic Sustainment Material (BSM), DO35G, Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS)
Requisition, usage data AFMAN 23-110, Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS) Handbook
Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS) Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS) Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS) Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), Validated priority buy list Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS), Validated priority buy list pushed out to item managers Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS), Standard Base Supply System (SBSS)
Product Centers, ALCs, Support equipment AFMC, MAJCOMs, Metrics Contractor
Support equipment, data Fiscal year cycle systems, budgets
Manpower, facilities, ALCs, sourcing X X
Product Centers, ALCs, Support equipment AFMC, MAJCOMs, Metrics, Validated Contractor priority buy list
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT REPAIR PROCESS DISPOSE OF PARTS ASSET (PIECE PARTS)
ENSURE MAINTENANCE CHECK FLIGHT ACTIVITIES ARE PERFORMED
PERFORM ORGANIC REPAIR
Weapons platform, tech orders, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO), major modifications, fuels, cryogenics, other petroleum based products EXPRESS/GO73, Tech orders, Tech orders, process Maintenance action PDMSS, Standard scheduled/unscheduled guide, regulations, form 202, 107, 22, etc, Base Supply System maintenance operational tempo, laws MAJCOM, A4, A3, A5, (SBSS), DR/GO21, 50/50/Cost Oriented formal request for DO35T/DSS, GO19C, Resource Estimating repair or software D200 (CORE), Federal maintenance(206, 103, Acquisition Regulation project order , surge, (FAR), maintenance express orders), schedule, stock working physical assets, tech level, contracts, PHS&T orders, performance work statement, PHS&T requirements, Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR), purchase request, contract actions G009, Wide-Area Work Flow (WAWF), GO21, Government and Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), DD250/JO18, D200 Tech orders, Tech orders, process scheduled/unscheduled guide, regulations, maintenance operational tempo, laws 50/50/Cost Oriented Resource Estimating (CORE), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), maintenance schedule, stock working level, contracts, PHS&T rag
Depot schedule
T01-1-300, AFI 21-101, AFI 21-103, AFI 21107, AFTO series 781 forms, Weapons System Specific Technical Orders
Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) pilot, depot personnel
released aircraft, signed AFTO series 781 forms
Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) pilot, depot personnel
2-4 weeks
fuels, cryogenics, other petroleum based products X X
Equipment specialist, Disposition 202, maintainers, engineers, serviceable asset, item managers, condemned asset contractors
support plans, process guides, funding, trained maintainers, support equipment, facilities, parts, contract, GFE/GFP
On going
Consumable parts, supply items, support equipment time, fuel, power, etc.
PERFORM CONTRACTOR REPAIR
Maintenance action Equipment specialist, Disposition 202, form 202, 107, 22, etc, maintainers, engineers, serviceable asset, MAJCOM, A4, A3, A5, item managers, condemned asset formal request for contractors repair or software maintenance(206, 103, project order , surge, express orders), physical assets, tech orders, performance work statement, PHS&T requirements, Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR), purchase request, contract actions Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, Contractor w/govt oversight Approved program
support plans, process guides, funding, trained maintainers, support equipment, facilities, parts, contract, GFE/GFP
On going
Consumable parts, supply items, support equipment time, fuel, power, etc.
DEVELOP MODIFICATION PROGRAM
N/A
Tech Data, Identified Configuration Control Tech Data, Identified capability shortfall, Boards (CCB), Program capability shortfall, Deficiencies, Manager boards, AFI Deficiencies, Technology opportunity, 63-1101 Technology opportunity, Diminished Diminished Manufacturing Support Manufacturing Support (DMS) (DMS)
Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office X X
MANAGE TIME COMPLIANCE TECHNICAL ORDER (TCTO) PROCESS ACQUIRE MODIFICATION SOURCE Pre Award Information Tech Data, Identified Exchange System capability shortfall, (PIXS), ConWrite, Deficiencies, FEDBIZOPS Technology opportunity, Diminished Manufacturing Support (DMS) D220, Defense Tech Data, Identified Logistics Agency capability shortfall, (DLA), Interactive Deficiencies, Electronic Technical Technology opportunity, Manuals (IETMS), Diminished Reliability and Manufacturing Support Maintainability (DMS) Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Joint Engineering Data Management Information Control System (JEDMICS), Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS) N/A Funding, Contract, Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)s, Product baseline, PHS&T requirements, Funding, Program office, Selected source MAJCOM, System (Contract or Organic Supportability Manager equivalent) (SSM) office Contractor w/govt oversight Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office X X
DESIGN / INTEGRATE/TEST THE MOD
Configuration Control Board (CCB), Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), Engineering Change Notice (ECN), AFI 631101
Product Baseline, Selected source (Contract or Organic equivalent)
Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office Contractor w/govt oversight
Updated Tech data, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO), Demonstrated Design, Test procedures
Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office
TRIAL INSTALL / KIT PROOF
Tech Data, Identified T.O. 00-5-1 capability shortfall, Deficiencies, Technology opportunity, Diminished Manufacturing Support (DMS)
Product Baseline, Updated Tech data, Demonstrated Design, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO)
Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM, Field Units
Updated Tech Data, Validated / Verified Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO)/Tech Data, Installed system
Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM, Field Units X X
PERFORM MODIFICATION SYSTEM LEVEL TEST
INITIATE MODIFICATION KIT PRODUCTION AND INSTALLATION
Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS), Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS), Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), D220
Tech Data, Identified T.O. 00-5-1, Applicable capability shortfall, Tech Data Deficiencies, Technology opportunity, Diminished Manufacturing Support (DMS) Tech Data, Identified AFI-63-1101, capability shortfall, Deficiencies, Technology opportunity, Diminished Manufacturing Support (DMS)
Product baseline, Updated tech data, Modified system, Test Procedures
Product Baseline, Updated Tech data, Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO), Verified Design
Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM, Field Units Contractor w/govt oversight Program office, MAJCOM, System Supportability Manager (SSM) office, MAJCOM, Field Units Contractor w/govt oversight
Updated Tech Data, Verified design and performance, Discrepancy reports (feedback) Updated product baseline Modified operational system
UPDATE THE WEAPON SYSTEM SUPPORT PROGRAM (WSSP) DATABASE VERIFY DECISION ON SYSTEM DISPOSITION N/A
Decision to remove system from active inventory
AFI's and AFMCI's
System assessment, Migration Plan, Force Structure, Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Interest, Treaties,
System Supportability Manager (SSM), MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC, Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Product Center System Supportability Manager (SSM), MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC, Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Product Center
System Disposition,
Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Commercial Sales, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) / Long Term Storage / Reclamation / Regeneration / Attrition fillers, Museum, Trainer Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Commercial Sales, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) / Long Term Storage / Reclamation / Regeneration / Attrition fillers, Museum, Trainer 17 OF 156
System Supportability Manager (SSM), MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS),
VERIFY DECISION ON UNIT DISPOSITION (AIRCRAFT TAIL #)
N/A
AFI's and AFMCI's
System assessment, Migration Plan, Force Structure, System Disposition
Unit Disposition, Schedule for Disposition
RETIRE PRODUCTS X X
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
SDD (INTEGRATION)
TASK DESCRIPTION
ANALYZE MATERIAL SOLUTION TO CAPABILITIES REVIEW DETERMINE DRAWDOWN STRATEGY FOR SUPPORT AND RISK ASSESSMENT (CRRA) CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS STRUCTURE (FSA) (INCLUDE LOGISTICS EXPERTISE ON TEAM)
N/A
AFI's and AFMCI's
Inventory Parameters (D200), Unit Disposition, Schedule for disposition, Spares issues, Consider prior decisions / strategies, Disposal issues, SE/ATE
System Supportability Manager (SSM), MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC, Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Product Center System Supportability Manager (SSM), MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC, Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Product Center System Supportability Manager (SSM), MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC, Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Product Center System Supportability Manager (SSM), MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC, Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Product Center System Supportability Manager (SSM), MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC, Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Product Center
Draw down strategy
Foreign Military Sales Varies (FMS), Commercial Sales, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) / Long Term Storage / Reclamation / Regeneration / Attrition fillers, Museum, Trainer Foreign Military Sales Varies (FMS), Commercial Sales, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) / Long Term Storage / Reclamation / Regeneration / Attrition fillers, Museum, Trainer Foreign Military Sales Varies (FMS), Commercial Sales, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) / Long Term Storage / Reclamation / Regeneration / Attrition fillers, Museum, Trainer Foreign Military Sales Varies (FMS), Commercial Sales, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) / Long Term Storage / Reclamation / Regeneration / Attrition fillers, Museum, Trainer Foreign Military Sales Varies (FMS), Commercial Sales, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) / Long Term Storage / Reclamation / Regeneration / Attrition fillers, Museum, Trainer Data system 1-6 months
PROVIDE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) DISPOSITION (MAJCOM OR ITEM MANAGER)
Standard Base Supply Decision to remove System (SBSS), Air system from active Force Equipment inventory Management System (AFEMS)
AFI's and AFMCI's
Draw down strategy
SEND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) to DEPOT
AFI's and AFMCI's
Draw down strategy
FILL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) BASE SHORTAGES
AFI's and AFMCI's
Draw down strategy
SEND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) to DEFENSE REUTILIZATION MANAGEMENT SERVICE (DRMS)
AFI's and AFMCI's
Draw down strategy
UPDATE MIGRATION PLAN (ANNUAL)
N/A
AFI's and AFMCI's
EXECUTE DISPOSITION STRATEGY
N/A
AFI's and AFMCI's
Program technical data, System Supportability planned life, spares Manager (SSM), data, MAJCOM, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC, Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Product Center Force Structure, System Supportability Updated Migration Plan, Manager (SSM), Disposition Strategy MAJCOM, Aerospace (Decision / Action Plan) Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC, Museum, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Product Center
Migration Plan signed
Program Office, AFMC, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG), ALC X X
Inactive System Dispositioned
Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Commercial Sales, Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) / Long Term Storage / Reclamation / Regeneration / Attrition fillers, Museum, Trainer
18 OF 156
RETIRE PRODUCTS X X X X X X
SDD (DEMONSTRATION)
DESIGN SUPPORT
FIELD SUPPORT
PLAN SUPPORT
MANAGE CAPABILITIES
MECHANISMS
CONCEPT REFINEMENT
RESOURCES CONSUMED
CYCLE TIME
CONTROLS
MAINTAIN PRODUCTS
IMPROVE PRODUCTS
IT Systems
TRIGGER
OUTPUT
INPUT
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Define Supportability Objectives
1.03
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Functional Needs Analysis Joint Capabilities Document (JCD) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Capability Required and Operational Concept Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) Target Audience Description (TAD
DESCRIPTION: The supportability objectives checklist provides guidance to define the supportability analysis for the program. The supportability analysis is an analytical tool, conducted as part of the systems engineering process to determine the most costeffectively support of the system over its entire life cycle. It provides the basis for related design requirements to include Technical Orders (TO)s, Support Equipment (SE), Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation (PHS&T), Reliability, Maintainability & Availabilty (RMA), Producability, Interoperability and Maintenance Concept that may be included in specifications. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE CJCSI 3170.01F Joint Concept Refinement / 1. Ensure a logistician is involved on the team that develops the Capabilities Integration and Pre KDP-A Concept Systems Engineering Plan Development System (JCIDS) Studies Click JCIDS Process link. Go to (Pre-Milestone A) 2. Interpret user needs including Human Systems Integration Management Activities, Chapter (HSI) implications, constraints, issues and develop strategy for 11.1. addressing 3. Consider TOs SE and PHS&T, Reliability, Maintainability & Availabilty (RMA), Producability, Interoperability Supply Support, and Maintenance Concept that may be included in specifications. 4. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Systems Engineering Plan Prep 5. Develop Concept Performance (& Constraints) Definition & Guide Verification Objectives 6. Decompose Concept Functional Definition into Component Concepts & Assessment Objectives 7. Develop Component Concepts Defense Acquisition Guidebook (See chapters 2 Defense Acquisition Program Goals and Strategy, 4 Systems Engineering, and 6 Human Systems Integration) DoD 4140.1-R DoD Materiel Management Regulation DoD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System (See Enclosure 7) Designing and Assessing Supportability in DoD Weapon Systems (A Guide to Increased Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint) (See Chapter 3, but peruse entire document for further information)
AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support and Planning Assessment Use entire document AFI 63-111, Contract Support for Systems and Equipment
Use document based on Contracting strategy. AFI 10-601, Capabilities Based Requirements Development Document This document support JCIDS process AFI 10-602, Determining Mission Capability and Supportability Requirements Understand paragraph 1-2, and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program. MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics General information document on Acquisition Logistics EXIT CRITERIA: Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)
TASK # 1.05
PROCESS NAME: Include Product Support Capabilities in Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Plan
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Joint Operations Concepts Functional Needs Analysis Functional Solution Analysis
DESCRIPTION: The AoA plan is approved by the Milestone Decision Authority in conjunction with the Concept Decision. AoA is an evaluation of the performance, operational effectiveness, operational suitability, and estimated costs of alternative systems to meet a mission capability. The analysis assesses the advantages and disadvantages of alternatives being considered to satisfy capabilities, including the sensitivity of each alternative to possible changes in key assumptions or variables. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Ensure a logistician is involved on the team that provides input CJCSI 3170.01, Joint Capabilities Concept Refinement / to the Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Plan Integration and Development Pre KDP-A Concept System (JCIDS) Studies 2. Interpret User Needs Defines JCIDS process. Type Supportability in Edit, Find and Find Next to understanding the support role in process. 3. Analyze Operational Capabilities, Capability Gaps, Energy Efficiency, Alternate Fuels considerations and Environmental Constraints. Analysis of Alternatives Plan 4. Analyze Threat and Operational Environment See paragraph 3.3 5. Summarize results of the analysis a. Include alternative operating and system support concepts with specific consideration of performance-based options b. Consider the physical and operational maintenance CJCSM 3170.01B : Operation of environment of the proposed system the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System with attachments to the Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Document provides a general understanding on JCIDS. See Enclosure E for ICD information. NOTES: Data collected and analyzed during AoA can be very useful for Designing and Assessing performing a Performance Based Logistics business cases analysis. Supportability in DoD Weapon Systems (A Guide to Increased Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint) Entire document useful in building Life cycle related data in all program deliverables must be your plan updated during subsequent phases, especially prior to milestone AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support and Planning Assessment Logisticians should ensure product support is addressed. Product Entire document provides insight Support includes: Technical Data, Training and Training Support, to Integrated Product Support in Support Equipment, Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation, building your AoA plan. Supply Support, Facilities, Computer Resources Support, Design Interface, Maintenance Planning and Manpower/Personnel. AFI 63-111, Contract Support for Systems and Equipment Good reference document for programs with Contract Support strategy. AFI 10-601, Capabilities Based Requirements Development Document
This document supports the JCIDS process AFI 10-602 Understand para 1-2 and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program. MIL-HDBK-502, Acquisition Logistics General information document on Acquisition Logistics Office of Aerospace Studies Analysis Handbook Functional Systems Analysis Implementation Guide Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See checklists D-1, D-7, 12, F-1 EXIT CRITERIA: Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Plan Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)
TASK # 1.09
PROCESS NAME: Include Product Support Capabilities in Preferred System Concept
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Analysis of Alternatives Plan Preliminary Integrated Architecture Best Material Approach(es)
DESCRIPTION: Key to this initial step of concept refinement is to ensure that all drivers of the concept definition are completely captured and managed as an integrated whole, and that all of the drivers can be met by each of the concept alternatives under consideration. This defines the expectations of the overall system concept, and defines the trade space and risk associated with each of the constraints, above. Defining the trade space and risk enables the comprehensive analysis of system alternatives, and allows a rational selection of a preferred system concept. The preferred system concept should strike the best balance in providing the needed capabilities within the constraints on the program. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Ensure a logistician is involved on the team that provides input to the Preferred System Concept SOURCE DOCUMENTATION CJCSI 3170.01, Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Defines JCIDS process. Type Supportability in Edit, Find and Find Next to understand support role in the process. PHASE Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies
2.
Interpret User Needs
3. Analyze Operational Capabilities, Capability Gaps, and Environmental Constraints. CJCSM 3170.01B : Operation of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System with attachments to the Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Document provides a general understanding on JCIDS. See Enclosure E for ICD information Designing and Assessing Supportability in DoD Weapon Systems (A Guide to Increased Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint) Entire document useful in building your plan
4.
Analyze Threat and Operational Environment
5. 6.
Analyze Preliminary Integrated Architecture Summarize results of the analysis
a. Include alternative operating and system support concepts with specific consideration of performance-based options b. Consider the physical and operational maintenance environment of the proposed system c. Analyze the Human Systems Integration (HSI) implications of the system concept d. Analyze impacts to Maintenance Concepts NOTES: Data collected and analyzed during AoA can be very useful for performing a Performance Based Logistics business cases analysis. Life cycle related data in all program deliverables must be updated during subsequent phases, especially prior to milestone decisions.
AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support and Planning Assessment Entire document provides insight to Integrated Product Support.
AFI 63-111, Contract Support for Systems and Equipment Good reference document for programs with Contract Support strategy AFI 10-601, Capabilities Based Requirements Development This document supports the JCIDS process
AFI 10-602, Determining Mission Capability and Supportability Requirements Understand paragraph 1-2 and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program. System Engineering Chapter 4 Defense Acquisiton Guidebook Defense Acquisition Guidebook (See chapters 2 Defense Acquisition Program Goals and Strategy, 4 Systems Engineering, and 6 Human Systems Integration) DoD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System (See Enclosure 7 MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics General information on Acquisition Logistics Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See checklists D-1, D-3, D-7, D12, F-1 EXIT CRITERIA: Preferred System Concept
TASK # 2.04
Click on Task ID # to return PROCESS NAME: Develop Technology Development Strategy to Include Product Support
DESCRIPTION: The Technical Development Strategy (TDS) documents the rationale for adopting an evolutionary or a single-step-to capability strategy. For evolutionary acquisition, either spiral or incremental, the TDS shall include a preliminary des how the program will be divided into technology spirals and development increments to include number of prototype may be produced and deployed during technology development. The TDS will also define the support, specific perf goals, and exit criteria. Upon approval of the TDS and selection of an initial concept, the project will enter the Techn Development phase at MS A. The TDS is approved by the MDA at Milestone A for potential ACAT I and IA program purpose of this phase is to reduce technology risk and to determine the appropriate set of technologies to be integra full system. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK The logistician should consider the following key logistics criteria:
1. Forecast the physical and operational maintenance environment of the proposed system 2. Given the forecasted environment, assess the functional characteristics of the proposed system, its complexity, and the obstacles and enablers to effective sustainment in that environment 3. Assess the impact of the proposed system on the maintenance capabilities planned for the period in which the system will be introduced 4. Assess preliminary manpower and personnel requirements and constraints in both quantity and skill levels, and use of contractor support 5. Begin compilation of information and requirements for logistics footprint reductions, deployment requirements, and other factors affecting the in-theater operational concept 6. Initiate the development of operating and support reliability objectives and their corresponding benefits and resource requirements; consider the performance histories of prior systems or systems of similar capability where feasible 7. Assess the concept and technology with regard to their ability to facilitate the use of embedded diagnostics, prognostics, and similar maintenance enablers 8. Initiate the compilation and assessment of data on the projected sustainment demand, standardization of platforms, and required support equipment 9. Develop Rough Order of Magnitude Life Cycle Cost estimates
EXIT CRITERIA: Approved Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Identification of Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) and/or Key Systems Attributes (KSAs) Market Research for product support capabilities Risk Management Plan (document initial support related risk and risk mitigation planning)
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Supportability Objectives Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)
the rationale for adopting an evolutionary or a single-step-to-fullpiral or incremental, the TDS shall include a preliminary description of nd development increments to include number of prototype units that opment. The TDS will also define the support, specific performance election of an initial concept, the project will enter the Technology he MDA at Milestone A for potential ACAT I and IA programs. The determine the appropriate set of technologies to be integrated into a
SOURCE DOCUMENTATION DoDI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Paragraph 3.5.4
PHASE Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies
NSSA Policy 03-01 for Space Programs
Technology Program Management Model v2
DOD Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Deskbook Appendix F
d/or Key Systems Attributes (KSAs) risk and risk mitigation planning)
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Develop Initial Product Support Strategy in LCMP (To include Performance Based Logistics (PBL), PPP, Logistics Elements, etc.)
2.05
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Joint Capabilities & Development System Analysis Initial Capabilities Document Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Defined Supportability Objectives Analysis of Alternatives Plan Logistics footprint reductions requirements Deployment requirements Target Audience Description
DESCRIPTION: A Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) is a comprehensive document that consolidates the weapon system life cycle acquisition management and product support strategies from concept refinement through reclamation/disposal. It is a document that must be maintained to remain compliant with revised/new DOD policy and statutory requirements. It represents a corporate AF position on how to best execute and manage a specific program and requires participation from all program stakeholders in its development and update. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Review the LCMP Guide, Section 8.10. Use the given order to organize the information gained from the following steps. 2. Review the Joint Capabilities and Development System analysis for LCMP Guide (8.10) Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies
Defense Acquisition Guidebook (4.0, 5.0 and 6) DoD Template for Application of a. Life cycle cost: TLCSM and PBL In the Weapon System Life Cycle b. Logistics supportability treated as an operational Request for Proposal (RFP) performance capability that is inherent to systems design and Information c. Functional needs analysis that includes supportability as an Technology and Industrial Base inherent part of defining capability needs Plans, 10 U.S.C. 2440 d. Supportability as a key attribute to be defined, found within Technology Readiness the "capabilities based" approach to setting formal warfighter Assessment Deskbook (TRA) requirements Designing and Assessing Supportability in DoD Weapon e. Initial establishment of supportability and support-related Systems: A Guide to Increased performance criteria Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint 2003 (3.3) f. Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and System Operational Effectiveness education, Personnel, and Facilities (DOTMLPF) considerations (SOE) ref 1.3 & 2.2 to include key logistics criteria that will help minimize logistics footprint and reduce cost g. Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels considerations 3. Review the ICD for: PBL: PM's Product Support Guide (3.0 7.0) a. Product support concept and needed capabilities What is a Systems Engineering Plan (2.3.7) b. Reductions in logistics footprint & system life cycle costs What is a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) c. Potential constraints on operating and support resource (2.3.15) requirements 4. Refer to the forecast of the physical and operational MOSA during Concept maintenance environment of the proposed system. Given the Refinement (5.4.1.1.2) forecast, assess the functional characteristics of the proposed system, its complexity, and the obstacles and enablers to effective sustainment in that environment 5. Include assessment of the impact of the proposed system on MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook the current maintenance capabilities and based on initial capability Acquisition Logistics (ALL) analysis system solution, and target audience description (TAD) identify Human Systems Integration (HSI) implications and constraints
6. Influence product design with Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) for affordable System Operational Effectiveness (SOE) 7. Include the evaluation of the Product Support Capabilities
8. Review projected sustainment demand, standardization of platforms and required equipment 9. Ensure Product Support elements are input into draft Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), encompassing Product Support (PS) Systems Engineering (SE) requirements. 10. Review the Request for Proposal (RFP) for Systems Engineering (SE) concepts (Limit to objectives and goals identified in the Mission Needs Statement (MNS), constraints, customer objectives/goals and other boundary objectives/goals identified in program direction) Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels considerations are included. 11. Review the Best Material Approach and include the preferred Product Support concept 12. Review the Technology Development Strategy for Product Support concepts such as a. Conceptual impact on national technology or industrial base b. Critical Technology Information Protection c. Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels considerations 13. Review Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) strategy summary written by the program manager for a. Life cycle supportability b. Financial and support functions to make trade-off decisions that affect system readiness and cost c. Conceptual impact on national technology or industrial base d. Critical Technology Information Protection 14. Review exit criteria from the Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) for Product Support issues EXIT CRITERIA: Evaluation of Product Support Capabilities System Engineering Plan (SEP) Support & Maintenance Concepts & Technologies Request for Proposal (RFP) Approved and Finalized Preferred Solution from the AoA Inputs to Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Cost/Manpower estimates Technology Development Strategy Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) Draft Capabilities Development Document (CDD) Updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)
AFI 63-107 Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition System (1.4.4.2) Independent Cost Estimate: Operational Manpower requirements, 10 U.S.C.2434 DoD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System (Enclosure 7)
Defense Acquisition Guidebook
( See Chapter 6 Human Systems Integration) Systems Engineering Plan Prep Guide
Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See checklists D-2, D-3, D-4, D6, D-9, D-10, E-1
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Ensure Supportability Included in Expectation Program Management Directive (PMD) 2.06 Management Agreements (EMA) DESCRIPTION: The EMA is a jointly developed and formally documented agreement between the Program Office and the primary operator to proactively resolve or deconflict potential issues to include cost, schedule, performance, and logistics expectations over the life of the program. Providing the operator the capabilities needed when they are required, at the most affordable cost is the cornerstone to building credibility. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Ensure the CONOPS, to include usage rates, etc, are included LCMP Guide System Development in the EMA. (Example: Availability Rates, Mean Time between & Demonstration Failure, etc.) 2. Life Cycle Management Plan addresses the Life Cycle Support Strategy of the system/product. 3. Ensure Performance Based Logistics (PBL) tenets are considered. 4. Minimize logistics requirements (Logistic Footprint) to include AFI 63-101 Operations of sustainment strategy reprocurement of systems, subsystems, Capability Based Acquisition components, spares, and services beyond initial production. Include System Chapter 2.1.5 and 2.2.2 Government Furnished Equipment (GFE). 5. Consider disciplined maintenance procedures that preserve the system and end-item operational safety, suitability, and effectiveness throughout the operational life. 6. Establish performance metrics for assessing program success throughout the acquisition lifecycle that ensure supportability criteria is included in the EMA (i.e. mean time between failure (MTBF), Independent Logistics maintenance cycle time, footprint reduction, supply change Assessment (ILA) Handbook management). 7. Coordinate with the appropriate ALC for Packaging, Handling, See checklist F-1 Storage & Transportation, and Marking requirements 8. Ensure the user addresses / identifies facilities and site survey requirements (Ref checklist 2.24) EXIT CRITERIA: Updated Initial Capability Document (ICD) Updated CDD Updated Life Cycle Mgmt Plan (LCMP) Updated Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) Signed Expectation Management Plan
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Include Supportability in the Source Selection Plan (SSP)
2.07
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Pre-Solicitation Source Selection Planning Source Selection IPT including logistics as applicable Source Selection Authority Assignment Acquisition Plan Brief Description of Requirements/PMD Request For Proposal (RFP) Section L & M
DESCRIPTION: The SSP is a plan that describes how the source selection will be organized, how proposals will be evaluated and analyzed, and how sources will be selected. Sections L & M of the RFP are generally attached to the SSP. Well thought out evaluation criteria typically including supportability are a part of sections L & M. We select a vendor with the best product support value. Supportability criteria must be well designed and utilized in the source selection process. Source selection IAW the SSP will be conducted following the release of the RFP ending with the contract award. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Ensure integrated baseline addresses product support strategy AFMC SS Plan Guide (All) Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies 2. Develop life cycle product support areas of evaluation 3. Review supportability requirements assessing operational DFARS 215.3 Technology availability, logistics footprint, cost effectiveness and RAMS in the Development / Phase system engineering process A Concept 4. Participate on the source selection team to address product support concerns 5. Draft request for proposal sections L&M for product support to System Development include Technical Data, Support Equipment, Supply Support, & Demonstration Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages and Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation and Training. Defense Acquisition Guidebook Consideration must also be given to Energy Efficiency, Alternate Fuels, reclamation, demilitarization and disposal. Ensure this plan is executed in checklist 2.09 Task 3. (See chapters 2 Defense Acquisition Program Goals and Strategy, 4 Systems Engineering, 6 Human Systems Integration, 8 Pre-Contract Award and 11 Total Life Cycle Systems Management) DoD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System (See enclosure 7) AFFARS Mandatory Procedures 5315.3 AFFARS 5315.305(c) Supportability Requirements DoD 4140.1-R DoD Materiel Management Regulation Chapter 3 section 6 DoD 4160.21-M, Defense Materiel Disposition Manual DoD 4160.21-M-1, Defense Demilitarization Manual Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval
AFMAN 23-110 USAF Supply Manual EXIT CRITERIA: Complete Source Selection Plan
TASK # 2.09
PROCESS NAME: Include Supportability Requirements in Request for Proposal (RFP)
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Source Selection Plan Technical/Acquisition Strategy Product Support Strategy Milestone Decision Authority
DESCRIPTION: RFP is used in negotiated acquisitions to communicate the governments requirements and solicit proposals. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Concept Refinement / 1. Ensure product support requirements are identified by logistics Support Planning and Pre KDP-A Concept elements including Training and training support, Technical Data, Assessment (1.4.1.4) Studies Support Equipment, Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation, Supply Support, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages and Marking requirements. Coordinate with ALCs to ensure adequate packaging / transportation requirements are on contract (include data). Ensure Container Design Retrieval System (CDRS) testing requirements are in RFP. 2. Determine life cycle product support activities for the program applicable to all milestones. 3. Develop RFP sections L & M IAW plan developed in checklist 2.07 Task 5 to include product support strategy discriminators such as operational availability, logistics footprint, migration planning and maintenance concept. 4. Develop and revise all sections of the draft RFP for product support where appropriate. 5. Secure logistic experts as source selection evaluators and advisors. 6. Evaluate contractor proposals against product support RFP requirements. 7. Communicate product support strategy with Industry. Defense Acquisition Guidebook (4.0 & 5.0 & 6) Solicitation Section M Evaluation Factors for Award Guide and Template Solicitation Section L Instructions, conditions, and Notices to Offerors Guide and Template Capabilities/Requirements
Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development
System Development & Demonstration
Technology Insert Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C
Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) AFMCMAN 23-3 Cataloging & 8. Identify and include in RFP technical source data requirements. Standardization 9. Develop product support evaluation factors and sub-factors Chapter 26 EXIT CRITERIA: Released RFP
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Include Product Support Activities in Integrated Master Program Management Directive (PMD) 2.12 Plan/Integrated Master Schedule (IMP/IMS) DESCRIPTION: The IMP/IMS provides a basis for effective communication, serve as baselines for program plans, status and progress: and provides a basis for resource analysis, exploration of alternatives and cost, performance and schedule tradeoff studies. They should be integrated at all levels, contain sufficient detail and capture key events (e.g. acquisition, Training and training support, Technical Data,Support Equipment (SE) and Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation (PHS&T) , logistics, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and T&E perspectives). CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Develop a schedule to assess the adequacy of the logisticsProgram Management Directive Technology related activities and outcomes in addressing Total Life Cycle (PMD) (AFI 63-101, para 2.2.7) Development / Phase System Management responsibilities, objectives, and cost impacts. A Concept Do all logistics activities provide traceability to the contractors Work Development Breakdown Structure (WBS)? 2. Has a formal program been established and scheduled to identify actions necessary to achieve significant increases in reliability and reductions in the logistics footprint? 3. Has the following LCMP coordination and approval dates been LCMP Guide System Development annotated, in the schedule: & Demonstration a. Local organizations Competition Advocate, Procuring Defense Acquisition Guidebook Contract office, Judge Advocate, Small Business, and appropriate ALC or Logistics Office. b. ACAT I & II SAF/AQX, SAF/AQC, SAF/GCQ & AF/ILM (Chap. 11.3.1.4.2) Production and coordinated and signed (at a minimum). SAF/ACE & SAF/FMBI Deployment / Phase B will review and coordinate for policy compliance. Preliminary c. ACAT III will follow similar process at the local level. PEO AFI 63-101, Operations of Design/Phase C is final approval authority. Capability Based Acquisition Complete Design & System Build Approval 4. Has it been identified and scheduled, to address all comments, (Para. 2.2.7) Operations & Support to the LCMP, that need to be reviewed and deliberated by the IPT / Phase D Build & prior to forwarding to the MDA for approval? Operations 5. Does the development schedule of the Life Cycle Management AFPD 63-12, Assurance of Plan (LCMP) include all offices/stakeholders? Operational Safety, Suitability & Effectiveness 6. 6. Have supportability/logistics considerations been addressed AFMCP 63-5, Integration Master to include the 10 ILS elements including Diminishing Manufacturing Plan and Schedule Guide Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS), reclamation, a. Initial Capabilities Document/Capability Development AFI 36-2251, Management of Air document Force Training Systems b. Acquisition Strategy c. Technology Development strategy d. Acquisition Program Baseline 7. Has the Pre-Initial Operational Capability Supportability Review and Analysis been scheduled? 8. Has the Air Force logistics data systems, maintenance, supply, Technical Data, SE, PHS&T, and logistics training directives been scheduled to support the assurance of operational safety, suitability, and effectiveness for the Air Force systems and end item? 9. Has a schedule been developed for Post Deployment Reviews, periodic assessments of system support strategies vs. expected levels of performance & support? 10. To increase weapon system availability while reducing life cycle cost & the logistics footprint has the logistics manager scheduled periodic assessments, and where necessary, improvements of the product support strategy? EXIT CRITERIA:
Life-Cycle Logistics (LCL) Tools Professional Logistics Workforce identified Total Life Cycle Systems Management (TLCSM) Performance Based Agreement Performance Based Agreement for Organic Supply Support Designing and Assessing Supportability in Weapon Systems Product Support: PM Guide to buying performance
TASK # 2.14
PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Ensure Cost Estimate includes Life Cycle Support Costs Program Established (PMD)
DESCRIPTION: Cost estimates cover the entire life cycle of a system and need to adequately address all of the product support elements, including disposal, to ensure the total life cycle cost is understood and used for management decisions. The logistician needs to make sure that all of the costs for acquiring; fielding, sustaining, and disposal are included. Major categories of cost are Support Equipment, Technical Data, Supply Support, Training & Training Equipment, Depot Activation costs (if organic capability to be established), any Interim Contractor Support or Contractor Logistics Support costs to include Field Service representatives/maintenance activities/inventory management, sustaining engineering costs, depot maintenance, and organizational/intermediate level maintenance. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Engage as a team member on the Cost Estimating Team (FM SAF Memo 03A-002, Agile Concept Refinement / is normally OPR for this task) and engage as a member on the Acquisition Implementation, 4 Pre KDP-A Concept program Integrated Risk Assessment (IRA) Team. Feb 03 Studies 2. Ensure all elements of Product Support are included (Support Equipment, Supply Support, Technical Data, Training & Training Equipment, Depot Maintenance, O&I Maintenance, Manpower and personnel, testing costs, disposal costs, transportation costs (including SDT), Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS), demilitarization and disposal, PHS&T, facilities, planned modifications/upgrades, and integration costs if applicable. 3. Coordinate technical data such as RM&A with Engineering. AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Technology Support and Planning Development / Phase Assessment A Concept Development 4. Ensure all identified costs above are used for applicable Entire document is useful program tasks such as ECPs/CCPs, trade studies, SDT budgeting, reference on Integrated Product and new work packages. Support. 5. Participate in yearly updates of the Program Office Estimate and IRA activities to reflect any changes in the system data that would reflect in costs changes. ILA Handbook The first part of the documents explains the Integrated Logistics Assessment (ILA) process. Use the checklist within your program acquisition phase. Program Transfer Process Guide System Development & Demonstration
Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations
Overview document on the program transfer process. AFMC Guide to the Defense Depot Maintenance Council Cost Comparability Handbook AFPD 23-5 Reusing and Disposing of Materiel Paragraph 1 DoD 4160.21-M, Defense Materiel Disposition Manual Chapter 2 DoD 4160.21-M-1, Defense Demilitarization Manual Browse all appendices EXIT CRITERIA:
Approved Integrated Risk Assessment, POE or other cost estimate as described in AFI 63-107. Documentation of the source data for the POE product support elements.
TASK # PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Prepare Documentation for Milestone A Determination MS A is required 2.15 DESCRIPTION: There are two types of decision points: milestone decisions and decision reviews. Each decision point results in a decision to initiate, continue, advance, or terminate a project or program work effort or phase. The review associated with each decision point typically addresses program progress and risk, affordability, program trade-offs, acquisition strategy updates, and the development of exit criteria for the next phase or effort. The Milestone Decision Authority approves the program structure, including the type and number of decision points, as part of the acquisition strategy. Milestone A authorizes entry into the major acquisition process phase for Technology Development. The purpose of this phase is to reduce technology risk and to determine the appropriate set of technologies to be integrated into a full system. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE Review and make inputs to applicable documents required by Milestone A Documentation Technology statute or regulation before milestone decision. Development / Phase SAMPLE A Concept Development Standard ASC Milestone Decision Process Guide AFPD 20-1, Logistics Strategic Planning AFPD 63-1 Capability Based Acquisition System NSSA Policy 03-01 EXIT CRITERIA: Milestone decision approved All proper supporting documentation put in the official files
TASK # 2.17.1
PROCESS NAME: Establish a Technical Order Acquisition Program
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) Maintenance Strategy Product Support Strategy
DESCRIPTION: Technical order requirements must be planned and placed on contract to ensure completion and delivery concurrent with the equipment or hardware. The organization or individual assigned TO acquisition responsibility is called the Technical Order Manager. This checklist gives instruction on how to initiate a technical order acquisition program from development of the strategy to initial contract award. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION Establish Technical Order 1. Establish Technical Order (TO) acquisition program by Acquisition Program appointing an experienced technical order manager(s), provide training as needed, and establishing a TO Integrated Program Team. 2. Determine TO program strategy, objectives and requirements Appoint TO Manager by convening a TO Planning & Requirements Conference. The TO program strategy must address the full life cycle of TOs for acquisition, sustainment, management, distribution, and use. 3. Develop TO contract requirements that clearly specify technical TO 00-5-3 Air Force Technical Order Acquisition Procedures order requirements, including for delivery. Use latest version of Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document TM 8601, to place TOs on contract. Develop TO strategy Technical Order Contract Requirements TO Delivery Requirements TM 86-01 EXIT CRITERIA: Updated ICD Updated Draft CDD Updated Maintenance Strategy Updated Product Support Strategy Development of Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document, TM-86-01 PHASE Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Initiate the Depot Source of Repair (DSOR) Process
2.18
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Capability Development Document (CDD) Capability Production Document (CPD) Cost Analysis Requirements Document (CARD) Analysis of Alternatives (AOA) Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)
DESCRIPTION: All Air Force depot level maintenance posturing decisions are made through the Depot Source of Repair process. Subprocesses include a Strategic Source of Repair (SSOR), a Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP), and a Depot Maintenance Interservicing (DMI) process. The SSOR and SORAP processes determine the best long-term depot maintenance source of repair (SOR) for Air Force workloads while giving full consideration to the requirements of public law, Air Force policy, and which maximize weapon system sustainment to the warfighter with minimum use of scarce USAF resources. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment, defines how a product support strategy integrates acquisition and sustainment throughout the weapon systems life cycle. The DMI process determines the final SOR location with consideration to all DoD Services. The Logistician will use the Depot Source of Repair Electronic Management (DSOR-EM) tool to complete and track the DSOR process. A Weapon System may require multiple DSORs depending on complexity. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION AFI 63-101, Operations of Capabilities Based Acquisition System 1. Logistician decides if DSOR required using AFI 63-107 a. Identify and define requirements AFI 63-107, Integrated Product b. Develop memo to HQ AFMC/A4D requesting Core Support Planning and determination and Candidate Depot Assessment, Para 4.3.1 c. Provide Phase 1 data using appropriate template format 1)Template A New Start 2)Template B Modification LCMP Guide 3)Template C Workload Shift d. Decide if Commercial Statement is required. If no, proceed JG-DM Form 27 to HQ AFMC/A4D with request. If yes, seek Commercial Statement documentation (requires PK/JAG signature) and provide this with request to HQ AFMC/A4D. e. The Logistician will track status through DSOR-EM Tool throughout the remainder of the DSOR Process. JG-DM Form 28 2. Once HQ AFMC provides Candidate Depot and Core Assessment the Logistician will establish DSOR Team to initiate the SORAP (Reference DSOR CoP). a. Members include OEM, candidate depot, sustainment JG-DM Form 44 manager and other key stakeholders as appropriate b. Team stays formed throughout acquisition to activation (changes into Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group (DMAWG)) Depot Source of Repair (DSOR) Community of Practice (CoP) 3. DSOR Team evaluates workload
a. b. c.
Determine system support impacts Understanding of depot repair requirements Determine if and what additional data is required
AFI 65-508 Cost Analysis Guidance and Procedures
d. Validate/correct candidate depot assignments e. Is candidate depot interested in your depot workload? f. Will costing effort be required? g. Is data available from actual system? h. Is data available from like systems? i. Gather SORAP Template data as appropriate j. Define depot maintenance and acquisition strategy k. Develop Partnering strategy with stakeholders/ depots l. Update acquisition strategy plan & Life Cycle Management Plan with partnering strategy (AFI 63-107 Para 4.3.1) 4. Conduct Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) for depot workloads a. Validate organic / contractor estimates b. Partnering may be an option
5. Draft SORAP Template to include recommendation / cost Depot Maintenance estimate Implementation Plan Examples a. Coordinate with all stakeholders and obtain consensus with SOR recommendation b. Ensure appropriate template is filled in c. Prepare transmittal memo to HQ AFMC/A4D d. HQ AFMC/A4D will provide 50/50 assessment and HQ AFMC/A4 concurrence 6. Initiate Depot Maintenance Interservicing (DMI) 30 days after receipt of HQ AFMC/A4 concurrence a. Fill out JG-DM Forms 27, 28 and 44 b. Prepare cover letter and submit to HQ AFMC/A4D 7. Develop a Depot Maintenance Implementation Plan and submit to HQ AFMC/A4D EXIT CRITERIA: Completed SSOR (Task 1) Candidate Depot / Core Assessment Request (Task 1) DSOR Team (Task 2) Update to LCMP (Task 3) Completed CBA (Task 4) Signed SORAP (Task 5) DMI Decision Memo (Task 6) Depot Maintenance Implementation Plan (Task 7) Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See checklists D-2, D-9, D-10, D11, E-1, F-1
IA: ment Strategy (TDS) cument (ICD) nt Document (CDD) Document (CPD) ements Document (CARD) es (AOA) Plan (SEP) Master Plan (TEMP) nt Plan (LCMP)
rce of Repair process. Subocess (SORAP), and a Depot he best long-term depot o the requirements of public law, nimum use of scarce USAF sessment, defines how a product e cycle. The DMI process will use the Depot Source of Repair pon System may require multiple
PHASE Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development System Development & Demonstration Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Establish Depot Maintenance Activation Working Group Identification of new acquisitions with depot repair (DMAWG) Team capabilities 2.20 Initial SORAP identifying organic with a mission assignment DESCRIPTION: The objective of the DMAWG is to ensure a required depot maintenance capability is set up in a timely and efficient manner to achieve government-controlled capabilities for the depot repair. The DMAWG is the forum for conducting depot maintenance activation planning to ensure funding, contracting, and delivery of data is accomplished. If support concept is total Contractor Logistics Support (CLS), a DMAWG is not required; however a Contractor Depot Activation Plan is still required. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK : 1. A logistics support plan which defines contractor support and government activities is developed. Be sure to include Support Equipment (SE) and Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation (PHS&T). 2. System Program Manager appoints a Logistician as DMAWG chair 3. DMAWG chair calls for membership with the assigned depot
SOURCE DOCUMENTATION DOD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System
PHASE System Development & Demonstration
AFI 21-102 Depot Maintenance Management (Chap. 2, para 2.2)
(No later than 30 days after Preliminary Design Review and prior to Milestone C)
4.
AFMCI 21-101 Depot Maintenance Activation Planning (DMAP) 5. Review and ensure depot support requirements are adequately (Chap. 1) described 6. Identify participating DMAWG organizations (Maintenance AFI 63-107 Operation of Activation Planning Team) Capabilities Based Acquisition System 7. Develop, coordinate and maintain depot activation plans (Chap 5, para 5.7) 8. Determine depot activation requirements (facilities, training and training systems, SE, PHS&T, manpower and personnel) 9. Assist in developing funding requirements for depot support Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook 10. Maintain depot activation schedules 11. Conduct DMAWGs and coordinate activation activities 12. Ensure contractor has capability to support interim logistics support until transfer to organic repair. EXIT CRITERIA: Depot activation plan Minutes of DMAWG Final SORAP Complete When all identified activations have taken place. See Checklists D-3, D-9 AFH 32-1084 Facility Requirements
Develop a DMAWG charter
TASK # 2.24
PROCESS NAME: Facilities Concept Checklist
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Milestone A Approval Initial Capabilities Development
DESCRIPTION: Identifying and tracking facilities begins early during the operational site reviews when a mission beddown, realignment, transfer, conversion, activation/inactivation, or operational change begins with a site survey tasking for a particular program. The tasking is assessed and assigned to a MAJCOM Installations & Units Action Officer. The action officer reviews the tasking with the program manager and discusses an implementation strategy, to include possibilities of a site survey, a MAJCOM programming plan (PPLAN), environmental concerns and issues, and possible Site Activation Task Force meetings. The action officer acts as the focal point for the PPLAN process and serves as the site survey team chief. A site survey is defined as an authorized visit to survey real property, i.e., facilities and land, to determine its feasibility for unit or mission beddown. The following are some general guidelines for preparing for a site survey. The timelines can vary depending on the urgency of the action and the proposed effective date. The Logistician should review and make input to any supportability documents required by statute or regulation before Milestone Decision can be sought and rendered. Facilities summaries are especially relevant during Phase I because of the long lead-time normally required for establishing or modifying facilities. These summaries can be used to identify necessary facility requirements such as test equipment, training aids, building size and any other special considerations. The Logistician should perform analysis to define necessary facilities or facility improvements, review and make input to key documents required by statute or regulation before Milestone Decision can be sought and rendered. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Provide inputs to MAJCOM in determining proposed beddown AFI 10-503 Base Unit Beddown Technology date, aircraft delivery schedule, aircraft numbers (PAA/BAI), Program Development / Phase manpower and personnel impacts, mission unique requirements, A Concept and impacts on base operating support. Development 2. Coordinate on site survey objectives, proposed actions, and MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook facility requirements with MAJCOM. Provide beddown Acquisition Logistics recommendations based on potential beddown sites and facility options. 3. Participate in site survey, as required. Section 6.1.1, 5.e & 8 Section System Development 7.3.1 & Demonstration Attend site survey team in-brief to Wing Commander, staff, and base-level functional managers on the purpose of the visit. The MAJCOM site survey team will be briefed on potential beddown sites and facility options. In most cases, the team is taken on a tour of applicable base facilities. The team will breakout into working groups and the logistician will support the logistics activity; attend afternoon integration meetings; participate in outbrief preparation, and assist in the development of site survey report. At the conclusion of the site survey the Site Survey Team Chief will send out an e-mail advising everyone that the final site survey report is available (usually posted on a web site). 4. In some cases, MAJCOM may request support to develop and publish their PPLAN for beddown action. The PPLAN describes the program, outlines the milestones, and identifies the associated tasks. It also forms the basis for a future Site Action Task Force. See SATAF site activation operating instructions. 5. Some logistics site survey activities to address: Begin analysis comparing existing allocated space at test, depot, training and operational locations to determine specific facilities requirements to support the system. Verify maintenance and storage facilities options (contractor or organic, another Service, etc.) Determine if existing facilities can be used and if new or modified support facilities are required. Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval
MIL-STD-3007 DoD Index of Specifications & Standards
AFI 32-1024 Standard Facility Requirements
AFPD 10-5 Basing
AFI 10-501 Program Action Directives (PAD) and Programming Plans (PPLAN)
Ensure Energy Efficiency, and Alternate Fuels considerations are addressed Verify environmental compliance, pollution prevention and recovery or disposal considerations in the facilities consideration. Determine communication requirements including access and connectivity. 6. For program requirements the logistician should begin development of programming documents (Program Objective Memorandum) to incorporate MAJCOM Military Construction Program funding for the appropriate fiscal year. The logistician should also incorporate continuous facilities upgrades in the RFP. Do the facilities meet peacetime and wartime objectives? Are deployed facilities required? Review applicable operational effectiveness analyses for basing considerations Do you have organic depot repair cost estimates to support depot repair? Do you have contractor depot repair cost estimates to support deport repair? Is there special facility requirements needed for system software sustainability? What is the status of facilities design planning? What risks have been identified and what are the mitigation plans? Have environmental compliance, pollution prevention and recovery or disposal considerations been updated from concept refinement for the facility? If the deployment of a weapon system is an overseas location it may require the host nation acquire land and provide infrastructure support (power, water, communications, etc.) and/or facility support (construction of facilities to support installation of the system). Identify requirements for an RF site survey to fully understand the behavior of radio waves within a facility before installing wireless network access points EXIT CRITERIA: Site Survey Report PPLAN POM Inputs All proper supporting documentation put in the official files
AFI 10-501 Program Action Directives (PAD) and Programming Plans (PPLAN)
AFI 32-1032 Planning and Programming Appropriated Funded Maintenance, Repair, and Construction Projects
AFI 32-9004 Disposal of Real Property
Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See Checklist D-9
Click on Task ID # to return
TASK # PROCESS NAME:

Determine Manpower & Personnel Requirements
2.24.1
DESCRIPTION:
The logistician must ensure through contact with the MAJCOM, Product Centers and Air Logistics Centers that man personnel considerations are appropriately documented. Personnel refers to the specific knowledge skills and abil individual.
Manpower: A critical resource that supports an approved program. It is not a program by itself and should not be m separately from the program it supports.
Manpower Requirement - A statement of manpower needed to accomplish a job, workload, mission, or program. Th two types of manpower requirements: funded and unfunded. Funded manpower requirements are those that have b validated and allocated. Unfunded requirements are validated manpower needs but deferred because of budgetary
CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK

1. Participate in requirements discussions related to operators, maintainers or support personnel; interpret the Users needs and requirements (including Manpower and personnel implications, constraints, and issues) and develop strategy for addressing. 2. Participate in activities that address Manpower, personnel, training, human factors engineering, environmental, safety, occupational health, health hazards, habitability, supportability or any other Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) element or related areas (such as maintenance concept, organizational structure, knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs), or cognitive requirements) and provides guidance on accommodating Manpower into the design, or identify the effects the design will have on the operator or maintainer.
Manpower high drivers include:
Tasks that require high frequency man- hour/manpower
Tasks that are labor intensive
Tasks that require multiple persons to perform Weapon system designs and organizational designs that increase manpower requirements 3. Assure Manpower and personnel requirements are clearly reflected in the system functional baseline and that they are feasible and testable/verifiable.
4. Assure reliability, maintainability; design analysis, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) and trade studies reflect any impact on 5. Assure Manpower and personnel considerations are included in acquisition documentation. 6. The Manpower Estimate Report (MER) which is required by 10 U.S.C. Section 2434 for all Major Defense Acquisitions Programs (MDAP), ACAT I, is prepared by the DoD Components operating command with inputs from the implementing, supporting and participating commands manpower authority, or its designee, in support of Milestones B, C and Full-Rate Production (FRP). ACAT II and below programs are not required
7. Manpower and personnel issues and concerns: Is there a legacy system to use as a manpower and personnel baseline? Do the manpower levels need to be constrained to the same level as the predecessor system? Will the manpower mix (military, civilian, contractors) change significantly? Is there a mandate to optimize or reduce manpower authorizations? Have manpower authorizations been justified and/or modified to meet mission need? Will an increase in end-strength be required? What are the end-strength offsets? Approximately how many authorizations will it take to operate, maintain, train and support the full capability? (Full capability includes all operational and maintenance (local and remote) components.) What manpower estimate was used for the affordability assessment? How does the manpower estimate compare to current requirement and authorizations? How much could manpower grow before it would impact the affordability decision? If the manpower estimate is greater than authorizations, what is the resource sponsors position regarding funding?
Once manpower and personnel requirements are identified, ensure the program inputs them to the POM.
EXIT CRITERIA:
Inputs into Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs) Input into Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Input into Maintenance Concept Inputs into Training Plans Inputs into Test and Evaluations Master Plans (TEMP) Input into Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Input into Capabilities Development Document (CDD) Inputs into Production Capability Document (PCD) Input into Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Input into Manpower Estimate Report (MER) Input into Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Estimates Input to the Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Participate in SACOM Interview
n Task ID # to return
ENTRANCE CRITERIA:
Target Audience Description (TAD) Draft Maintenance Concept Cost Analysis Requirements Description (CARD) Initial Capability Document (ICD) Capability Development Document (CDD) Capability Production Document (CPD) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Analysis of Alternatives AoAs Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)
JCOM, Product Centers and Air Logistics Centers that manpower and Personnel refers to the specific knowledge skills and abilities of the program. It is not a program by itself and should not be manipulated
ded to accomplish a job, workload, mission, or program. There are ded. Funded manpower requirements are those that have been dated manpower needs but deferred because of budgetary constraints.
SOURCE DOCUMENTATION
CJCS 3170.01 Joint Capability Integration and Development System (JCIDS)
PHASE
Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies (Pre-Milestone A)
AFI 10-601,Capabilities-Based Requirements Development
This document support JCIDS process Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development AFI 10-602, Determining Mission Capability and Supportability Requirements Understand paragraph 1-2, and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program.
Systems Engineering Plan, para 3.4.3 Defense Acquisition Guidebook (See Chapters 3 Affordability and Life-Cycle Resource Estimates, 4 Systems Engineering, 5 Life-Cycle Logistics, and 6 Human Systems Integration 10 U.S.C. Section 2434 AFI 38-201, Determining Manpower Requirements DODI 5000.2 (See Enclosure 3 & 7)
Designing and Assessing Supportability in DoD Weapon Systems (A Guide to Increased Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint)
See Chapter 3, but scan entire document for further information Target Audience Description
Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval
Operations & Support / Phase D Build &
TASK #
Click on Task ID # to return PROCESS NAME: Define and Implement Military Construction (MILCON) Requirements
2.24A
DESCRIPTION: This checklist is intended to define, review and implement requirements for any new or modified facilities and assoc facilities equipment for purposes of supporting the Military Construction (MILCON) process. MILCON is 3300 fundin CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Determination of facility requirements begins with site survey. Participants should include, but are not limited to Program Office, Lead Command, Using Command, and base-level user 2. Following the site survey, the base-level user develops the MILCON package, i.e. AF Form 332, Environmental Assessment, Economic Assessment, etc. Final package is forwarded to the Using or Lead Command on DD Form 1391. Ensure depot facilities are included 3. The logistician should contact the using command, lead 4. Using or Lead Command identifies and POMs for MILCON funding to support fielding of the system through HQ AF 5. HQ AF approves, disapproves, defers funding and provides MILCON funding back to the Using or Lead Command. 6. Program Office provides POM inputs to Using or Lead Command for MILCON process NOTE: For minor construction projects (less than $750K) coordinate with Using or Lead Command to ensure facilities are available to support bed down of the system. If minor construction project of 750K or less, 3400 dollars are used
EXIT CRITERIA: Funding provided to accomplish MILCON project construction Inputs to Program Objective Memorandum (POM) for minor construction
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Concept of Operations (CONOPS) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Capability Development Document (CDD) Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) Site Survey
nt requirements for any new or modified facilities and associated y Construction (MILCON) process. MILCON is 3300 funding. SOURCE DOCUMENTATION DODI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System AFI 32-1021 Planning and Programming Military Construction (MILCON) Projects PHASE System Development & Demonstration Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design &
AF Form 332 AF Form 813 DD Form 1391 SAMPLE MILCON DOCUMENTS: MILCON Process Bullet Background Paper Sample MILCON Questionnaire Sample 1391 (F-22) Sample D3 document (F-22) Sample Certificate of Compliance (F-22) Sample Executive Summary (F22)
uction nor construction
TASK #
Click on Task ID # to return PROCESS NAME: Address Human Systems Integration (HSI)
2.29.2
DESCRIPTION: Human Systems Integration (HSI) is a process to ensure systems are designed and developed that effectively and a integrate with human capabilities and limitations. A good HSI process considers human factors engineering, manpo personnel, training, and environmental, safety, and occupational health (ESOH) aspects along with survivability, hab throughout system design, development, fielding, and sustainment. The aim of this checklist is to ensure the consid HSI early and throughout the acquisition process in order to maximize system capability while minimizing life cycle c the logistics footprint. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Participate in requirements discussions related to operators, maintainers or support personnel; interpret the Users needs and requirements and develop strategy for addressing HSI. 2. Participate in activities that address HSI and provide guidance on the effects the design will have relating to HSI.
3. Assure reliability, maintainability; design analysis, test program, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) and trade studies reflect any impact on HSI issues.
4.
Assure HSI considerations are included in acquisition
Operator ergonomics (reach, weight, height, comfort) Operator machine interface (maximum G-forces, potential electrical effects on operator, displays conform to optimum visual ability, etc) Impacts of heat and vibration on human operators
Environmental impact on operators and maintainers (arctic, desert, Chemical, Biological, Nuclear and Explosives, etc) Operator and maintainer personal and protective equipment (helmet, face shield, gloves, etc)
Occupational health (noise, radiation, chemical, etc)
5. Ensure the systems engineering process includes HSI considerations and are addressed at each engineering review (SRR, PDR, CDR, etc). Examples of considerations: Materials such as hydrazine, halon, and radioactive material Survivability of operators and maintainers (ejection seats, armor, etc) Human operator and maintainer limitations (sleep, food, and water requirements) EXIT CRITERIA: Inputs into Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs) Input into Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) nput into Maintenance Concept Inputs into Training Plans Inputs into Test and Evaluations Master Plans (TEMP) Input into Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Input into Capabilities Development Document (CDD) Inputs into Production Capability Document (PCD) Input into Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Input into Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Estimates
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Draft Maintenance Concept Initial Capability Document (ICD) Capability Development Document (CDD) Capability Production Document (CPD) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)
systems are designed and developed that effectively and affordably d HSI process considers human factors engineering, manpower, pational health (ESOH) aspects along with survivability, habitability stainment. The aim of this checklist is to ensure the consideration of r to maximize system capability while minimizing life cycle costs and
SOURCE DOCUMENTATION CJCS 3170.01 Joint Capability Integration and Development System (JCIDS)
PHASE Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies (Pre-Milestone A)
AFI 10-601,Capabilities-Based Requirements Development This document support JCIDS process AFI 10-602, Determining Mission Technology Capability and Supportability Development / Phase Requirements A Concept Understand paragraph 1-2, and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program.
Systems Engineering Plan, para 3.4.3
Defense Acquisition Guidebook (See Chapters 3 Affordability and Life-Cycle Resource Estimates, 4 Systems Engineering, 5 Life-Cycle Logistics, and 6 Human Systems Integration DODI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System (See Enclosure 3 & 7)
Production and Deployment / Phase B Designing and Assessing Preliminary Supportability in DoD Weapon Design/Phase C Systems (A Guide to Increased Complete Design & Reliability and Reduced Logistics Build Approval Footprint) See Chapter 3, but scan entire document for further information Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations
TASK # 2.30
PROCESS NAME: Refine Supportability Objectives
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Capability Development Document (CDD) Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) Developed Product Support Capabilities
DESCRIPTION: The objective of most support system design activities is to identify support considerations (e.g., constraints) which may influence selection. The logistician should address all supportability analysis needed to analyze, define, and verify the supportability thresholds and objectives for a system and to assess the risks in accomplishing them. Early in the process, the issue of tradeoffs must be raised during the analysis of proposed concepts. Careful use of tradeoff studies will guide the logisticians in finding the optimal designone which balances design objectives with supportability requirements. The supportability analysis is an analytical tool, conducted as part of the systems engineering process to determine the most costeffectively support for the system over its entire life cycle. It provides the basis for related design requirements that may be included in specifications. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Ensure a logistician is involved on the team that develops the CJCS 3170.01 Joint Capability Technology Systems Engineering Plan Integration and Development Development / Phase System (JCIDS) A Concept 2. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints See Chapter 11.1 Development 3. Refine Concept Performance (& Constraints) Definition & Verification Objectives Systems Engineering Plan Prep 4. Review ICD and draft CDD Guide 5. Review Test & Evaluation Test Strategy AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based Test and Evaluation Designing and Assessing 6. Review Support and Maintenance Concepts for all 10 ILS Supportability in DoD Weapon elements. Specifically for Support Equipment , minimize peculiar Systems (A Guide to Increased support equipment. Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint) Entire document provides a 7. Decompose Concept Functional Definition into Component general understanding on JCIDS. Concepts & Assessment Objectives 8. Refine Component Concepts AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support and Planning Assessment Entire document is useful reference on Integrated Product Support AFI 63-111, Contract Support for Systems and Equipment Good reference document for programs with Contractor Support strategy. AFI 10-601, Capabilities Based Requirements Development This document supports the JCIDS process AFI 10-602, Determining Mission Capability and Supportability Requirements Understand 1-2 and use appropriate attachments that apply to your program. MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics General information document on Acquisition Logistics
Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See Checklist D-3 EXIT CRITERIA: Updated Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Updated System Support and Maintenance Concepts Updated Acquisition Plan Developed Initial Product Support Strategy
TASK # 2.30.1
Click on Task ID # to return PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: CONSIDER APPLICATION OF MODELING AND SIMULATION TOOLS
DESCRIPTION: CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK
EXIT CRITERIA:
CE CRITERIA:
PHASE
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Develop Supportability Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)
1.12
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) Draft Capability Production Document (CPD) Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Test and Evaluation Strategy System Engineering Plan (SEP)
DESCRIPTION: Key Performance Parameters (KPPs): Those attributes or characteristics of a system that are considered critical or essential to the development of an effective military capability and those attributes that make a significant contribution to the key characteristics as defined in the Joint Operations Concepts (JOpsC) during an increment. KPPs are validated by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) for JROC interest items, and by the DOD component for Joint Integration or Independent documents. Capability development and capability production documents are included verbatim in the APB. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Coordinate with requirements authority regarding supportability DoD 5000.2 Operation of the Technology requirements Defense Acquisition System Development / Phase 2. Ensure KPPs address system supportability issues such as (Para 3.7.2.3) A Concept maintenance man-hours per flying hour and deployment footprint. Development (i.e. consideration of Support Equipment) Mandatory KPP/KSAs are required per OSD memo (see references) CJCS 3170.01 Joint Capability 3. Are support related performance and acceptance criteria Integration and Development developed to be demonstrated during planned testing? System (JCIDS) 4. Ensure Supportability KPPs linked through the capabilities (enclosure A & B) defined in the ICD to the key characteristics from the JOpsC. 5. Ensure Supportability KPPs in the CDD and CPD are inserted AFI 10-601, Capabilities Based verbatim into the APB Requirements Development (Chapter 5, para 5.5) AFI 63-101Operation of Capability Based Acquisition System (Chapter 2, para 2.4) Systems Engineering Plan Prep Guide Para 6.5, Sustainment Integration Mandatory KPP / KSAs -Jack Bell Memo AF/A5R Policy Memo 14 Dec 07 Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See checklists D-1, D-3, D-7, D12, F-1 EXIT CRITERIA: Input into Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) Input into Draft Capability Production Document (CPD) Input into Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Input into Test and Evaluation Strategy Input into System Engineering Plan (SEP)
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Participate in the Computer Resources Working Group Analysis of Alternatives (AOA) 2.32A (CRWG) or the Computer Resources Integrated Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Product Team (CR-IPT) Capability Development Document (CDD) DESCRIPTION: Computer Resources Support encompasses the facilities, hardware, software, documentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support mission critical computer hardware/software systems. As the primary end item, support equipment, and training devices increase in complexity, more and more software is being used. The expense associated with the design and maintenance of software programs is so high that one cannot afford not to manage this process effectively. It is standard practice to establish some form of computer resource working group to accomplish the necessary planning and management of computer resources support. The CRWG or CR-IPT is led by the Program Manager and should include: Logisticians, Software Engineers, Financial Management Personnel, Configuration Managers, Data Managers, Contracting Officer, System Engineer, Logistics Center Representative and Operating Command representative. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Contact CRWG Chair for participation and membership. CRLCMP Format Technology Development / Phase 2. Provide logistics input to the Computer Resources Life Cycle AFR 800-14 - Rescinded (Best Management Plan (CRLCMP) and review for supportability Practice) considerations and impacts. 3. Provide input for changes to appropriate system documentation AFMC 800-21 - Rescinded (Best System Development to include the Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP). Practice) & Demonstration Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & AFH 32-1084 Facility Requirements
4. Initiate actions to ensure supportability considerations are implemented as required. 5. Ensure facilities and MILCON funding including facility modifications requirements are addressed lead time away as applicable.
Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations
EXIT CRITERIA: Computer Resources Life Cycle Management Plan (CRLCMP) Budget Inputs Support elements developed, produced and delivered Revise Course of Action as appropriate
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Include Supportability Requirements in the CARD, POE, Program Established (PMD) 2.33 CCA, ICE, Affordability Assessments DESCRIPTION: The acronyms above stand for Cost Analysis Requirements Document (CARD), Program Office Estimate (POE), Component Cost Analysis (CCA), and Independent Cost Estimate (ICE). Affordability assessments are done at Air Force level only. Cost estimates cover the entire life cycle of a system and need to adequately address all of the Product Support elements, including disposal, to ensure the total life cycle cost is understood and used for management decisions. The logistician needs to make sure that all of the costs for acquiring; fielding, sustaining, and disposal are included. Major categories of cost are support equipment, technical data, supply support, training & training equipment, depot activation costs (if organic capability to be established), any Interim Contractor Support or Contractor Logistics Support costs to include field service representatives/maintenance activities/inventory management, sustaining engineering costs, depot maintenance, manpower and personnel, and organizational/intermediate level maintenance. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Engage as a team member on the Cost Estimating Team (for AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Concept Refinement / CARD, POE, CCA, ICE, (FM is normally OPR for this task), and Support and Planning Pre KDP-A Concept engage as a member on the program Integrated Risk Assessment Assessment Studies (IRA) Team. 2. Ensure all elements of Product Support are included (Support Entire document is useful Technology Equipment, Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation, Supply reference on Integrated Product Development / Phase Support, Technical Data, technical Orders, Training & Training Support. A Concept Equipment, Depot Maintenance, O&I Maintenance, Manpower and Development Personnel, testing costs, disposal costs, transportation costs (including Second Destination Transportation), Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages, facilities, planned modifications/upgrades, Human Systems Integration (HSI) and integration costs if applicable. Specifically address Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels considerations. Include any costs for demilitarization, declassification and disposal. 3. Coordinate technical data such as RM&A with Engineering. 4. Ensure consistent use of data for other applicable program tasks such as engineering change proposals/contractor change proposals, trade studies, SDT budgeting, and new work packages. 5. Participate in yearly (or as required) updates of the CARD, POE, CCA, ICE, and IRA activities to reflect any changes in the system data that would reflect in costs changes.
Defense Acquisition Guidebook
(See Chapters 2 Defense Acquisition Program Goals and Strategy, 4 Systems Engineering and 6 Human Systems Integration DoD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System (See Enclosure 7)
Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C AFMC Guide to the Defense Operations & Support Depot Maintenance Council Cost / Phase D Build & Comparability Handbook Operations AFPD 23-5 Reusing and Disposing of Materiel Paragraph 1 DoD 4160.21-M, Defense Materiel Disposition Manual Chapter 2 DoD 4160.21-M-1, Defense Demilitarization Manual Browse all appendices EXIT CRITERIA: Approved IRA, POE, ICE, CCA, other cost estimates that includes product support as described in AFI 63-107 Source data documentation for appropriate estimate product support elements
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Include Supportability in the Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)
2.35
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Initial Capabilities Plan (ICD) Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) Support & Maintenance concept & Technologies In SDD Phase: Capability Production Document Life Cycle Mgmt Plan (LCMP)
DESCRIPTION: The Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) defines the cost, schedule, benefits, and performance baselines for the acquisition program, should begin during the time the design requirement of the customer are created. It is the mutual agreement between the provider organization, and the user organization concerning the capability and benefits the program will provide and the cost and schedule authorized for the program. The APB also establishes performance metrics for assessing program success and advancing it through the acquisition lifecycle. For Baseline Development and Fielding & Operations activities, SDIPTs will develop APBs that specify the end state goals for cost, schedule and performance goals for the overall program and for each increment. APBs shall document the results of the planning process. All APBs for the next increment to be executed will be approved by the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA). Planning APBs for out year increments will be submitted to the MDA but do not require approval. All incremental APBs should be submitted with the SDIP for each increment. The overall program APB will a) document which increment(s) will satisfy which KPPs, b) specify the minimum performance parameters, including KPPs that define the core capability and c) target which increment will provide the core capability. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Review KPPs (e.g. Performance, availability, persistence) Defense Acquisition Guidebook Technology 2.1.1.1 Development / Phase A Concept Development 2. Provide input to the Expectation Management Agreement (EMA) 3. Coordinate with applicable MAJCOM office for requirements LCMP Guide System Development (e.g. DR) & Demonstration 4. Calculate Logistics Support portions of Total Ownership Cost (Chap. 8, para 8.3) (TOC) of the program. (i.e. all costs associated with the research, development, procurement, operation, logistical support, and disposal of an individual weapon system or piece of equipment over its total life cycle; and associated common support items). 5. Ensure the contractor, as a contract deliverable, demonstrates by Production and testing that they have achieved certain supportability/sustainability Deployment / Phase B targets. Preliminary Design/Phase C Independent Logistics Complete Design & Assessment (ILA) Handbook Build Approval See Checklists D-2, D-3, D-4, D6, D-9, D-12, E-1, F-1 EXIT CRITERIA: Updated Initial Capability Document (ICD) Updated CDD Updated Life Cycle Mgmt Plan (LCMP) Updated Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) Established performance metrics for assessing program success throughout the acquisition lifecycle that ensure supportability criteria is included in the APB and KPPs (i.e. mean time between failure (MTBF), maintenance cycle time, footprint reduction, supply change management).
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Include Supportability Requirements in the Program Objectives Memorandum (POM) submission
2.36
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Acquisition Strategy Strategic Planning Guidance Joint Programming Guidance Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Plan Supportability Concept & Requirements Source of Repair Assignments Depot Maintenance Plan Product Support Plan
DESCRIPTION: The POM is a major document in the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) process, and the basis for the component budget estimates. The POM is the principal programming document that details how a component proposes to respond to assignments I the Strategic Planning Guidance (SPG) and Joint Programming Guidance (JPG) and satisfy its assigned functions over the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP). CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Logistician should coordinate with the Program Manager (PM) PPBE Process Concept Refinement / and Financial Manager (FM) for POM inputs Pre KDP-A Concept 2. Analyze Acquisition Strategy Paragraph 1.2 3. Interpret Program Supportability needs Technology Development / Phase Designing and Assessing A Concept Supportability in DoD Weapon 4. Develop budget estimates in coordination with PM and FM Development Systems (A Guide to Increased Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint) 5. Coordinate with HQ AFMC CAM Office Entire document provides an System Development overview on lifecycle costs. In & Demonstration particular, chapter 3. (NOTE: Items to consider for logistics POM input: Support Production and Equipment (peculiar and common), Packaging, Handling, Storage & Deployment / Phase B Transportation and Marking, Specialized engineered containers Preliminary (design and testing cost), Technical Data, Initial and Replenishment Design/Phase C Spares, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages, Complete Design & Training systems and Training Equipment, Energy Efficiency, Build Approval Alternate Fuels considerations, Sustaining Engineering, Support for testing programs, CLS/ICS, Second Destination Transportation, Computer Resources Support and facilities etc). Include any costs for demilitarization, declassification and disposal. Funding for facilities is through MILCON, done separately from the POM process AFI 63-107, Integrated Product (Ref checklist 2.24A) Support and Planning Assessment Entire document is a useful Operations & Support reference on Integrated Product / Phase D Build & Support. Operations AFI 63-111, Contract Support for Systems and Equipment Entire document is a good reference for programs with a Contractor Support strategy. AFI-601, Capabilities Based Requirements Development This document should be used to support capabilities based support requirements. AFI 10-602, Determining Mission Capability and Supportability Requirements Understand paragraphs 1-2. Use appropriate attachments that apply to your program.
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Refine Product Support Strategy in LCMP (Increments, PBL, PPP, LOG Elements, etc.)
2.37
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Draft Capabilities Development Document (CDD) Preferred System Concept Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) Support & Maintenance Concepts & Technologies Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Market Analysis System Engineering Plan (SEP) Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Cost/Manpower Estimates
DESCRIPTION: A Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) is a comprehensive document that consolidates the weapon system life cycle acquisition management and product support strategies from concept refinement through reclamation/disposal. It is a document that must be maintained to remain compliant with revised/new DOD policy and statutory requirements. It represents a corporate AF position on how to best execute and manage a specific program and requires participation from all program stakeholders in its development and update. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Ensures points from checklist 2.05 are updated LCMP Guide (8.10) Technology Defense Acquisition Guidebook Development / Phase 2. Review the CDD for: (6) A Concept Integrated Defense Acquisition Development Technology and Logistics Life a. System Maintenance/Support Profiles and Use Case Cycle Mgmt Framework ("Wall Scenarios (Support Capability Packages) Chart") b. Reliability and Maintenance Rates 10 U.S.C. 2469 c. Support Environment and Locations for Support 10 U.S.C. 2466 Acquisition Program Baseline d. Support and Maintenance Effectiveness (APB) (bottom) e. Logistics/supportability input to Key Performance Parameters (5.1.3) (KPPs) Affordable System Operational f. Planning for Peculiar and Common Support Equipment (SE) Effectiveness (para 8) g. Planning for Technical Data Configuration Mgmt (4.2.3.6) h. Planning for Training and training support Configuration Mgmt 2 (5.2.1.4) 3. Continue to influence product design with Life Cycle Logistics Core Logistics Capability (para 3) (LCL) for Affordable System Operational Effectiveness (SOE) (5.3.3.1) showing dependency and interplay between system performance, availability, process efficiency, and system life cycle cost 4. Review preliminary manpower and personnel requirement and Core Logistics Capabilities (10 constraints in both quantity and skill levels U.S.C. 2464) 5. Review information and requirements for logistics footprint Cost as an Independent Variable reductions (include SE) , deployment requirements, other factors (CAIV) (3.2.4) 6. Review the operating and support reliability objectives and their Data Management (5.1.3.3) 7. Review the assessment of the concept and technology Data Management in Engineering regarding use of embedded diagnostics, prognostics, and similar (4.2.3.7) 8. Review data on the projected sustainment demand, Demilitarization and Disposal standardization of platforms, & required support equipment (5.1.3.8) 9. Review updated Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) for product Environment, Safety, and support strategy, including alternative operating and system support Occupational Health (ESOH) concepts (para 5) (5.2.1.6) 10. Include the design and development of the support system ESOH (4.4.11) utilizing Performance Based Logistics (PBL). Include discussion of PBL methodology for implementation and strategy. Review "PBL: A PM's Product Support Guide" for checklists on key product support issues 11. Review the Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) Life Cycle Cost Human Systems Integration Estimates (LCCE) for product support elements (HSI) (para 4) (5.2.1.6) 12. Review initial identification of support-related risk and risk Human Systems Integration (HSI) mitigation planning for product support 2 (2.3.13)
13. Review requirements for providing sustainment during technology-oriented demonstrations 14. Review the product support strategy found in the Acquisition Strategy for: a. Life cycle sustainment and continuous improvement of b. Supportability planning, analyses, and trade-offs used to determine the optimum support concept and identify the strategies c. Interoperability (including MOSA strategy for supply, interoperability, maintainability, and follow-on logistics planning for sustainment) 15. Review the Technology Readiness Assessment found in the Acquisition Strategy for product support elements 16. Review the Total System Product Support Package for product support concepts that are based on reliability and maintainability of the system 17. Review the Market Analysis for product support capabilities for achieving support objectives through design and elements of support currently provided by legacy systems and the measures to evaluate support effectiveness 18. Review the Test and Evaluation Master Plan for supportability and appropriate logistics considerations 19. Refer to the "Product Support Plan for Information Technology Guide" for the appropriate PS elements 20. Review the Work Breakdown Structure for deliverable work products and of life cycle logistics considerations 21. Review contracts that perform workloads previously performed by depot-level activities of the DoD, review the Competition Analysis for Depot-Level Maintenance >$3M (refer to 10 U.S.C. 2469) 22. HQ AFMC certified the source of repair/core determination and 50/50, include approach to developing organic depot repair capability for workloads identified as core (refer to U.S.C. 2466) 23. Ensure facilities and MILCON funding requirements are addressed lead time away as applicable.
Industrial Capability (2.3.16.1.4.5) Integrated Supply Chain Management (5.1.3.4) Interoperability (5.1.3.2) Life Cycle Assessment (5.1.3.7) Life Cycle Cost Optimization (5.1.3.5) Logistics Footprint Minimization (5.1.3.6) Market Analysis (para 1) (5.4.1.2.2) MOSA & Interoperability (para 1) (5.1.3.2)
PBL: A PM's Product Support Guide (All) PBL (All of 5.3) Methodology for Implementation and Strategy for PBL (5.3.1) Product Support (5.1.3.1)
Product Support Strategy in the Acquisition Strategy (5.1.3)
Product Support Plan for Information Technology Guide (SWGDO32) 24. Review Cost as an Independent Variable for cost estimate. Technology and Industrial Base Include any funding shortfalls and discuss current and planned cost Plans (10 U.S.C. 2440) 25. Review the Acquisition Decision Memorandum for product Technology Readiness support exit criteria Assessment Deskbook (TRA) (2.3) 26. For Space Systems refer to Acquisition Strategy per NSSA Test and Evaluation Master Plan Policy 03-01 (TEMP) (para 5) Total System Product Support Package (para 4) AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment (1.4.4.2) AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based Test and Evaluation Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See Checklists D-2, D-3, D-4, D6, D-9, D-10, E-1 NSSA Policy 03-01 EXIT CRITERIA: Capabilities Development Document (CDD) System Performance Specification Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Validated System Support & Maintenance Objectives & Requirements
Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Information Support Plan (ISP) Program Protection Plan (PPP) Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Inputs to Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) Inputs to Acquisition Strategy, Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Inputs to Affordability Assessment Inputs to Cost/Manpower Estimate, Independent Cost Estimate and Manpower Estimate Inputs to Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Inputs to Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Inputs to Industrial Capabilities, Cooperative Opportunities Core Logistics Analysis/ Source of Repair Analysis, & Competition Analysis for Depot-Level Maintenance >$3M
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Participate in SRR (Demonstrate Concepts)
1.15
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Test and Evaluation Strategy System Engineering Plan (SEP) Support & Maintenance concept & Technologies Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)
DESCRIPTION: A formal, system-level review conducted to ensure that system requirements have been completely and properly identified and that a mutual understanding between the government and contractor exists. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE Systems Engineering Concept Refinement / 1. Coordinate with lead engineer regarding supportability Fundamentals (Chapters 2, 4, 14, Pre KDP-A Concept requirements 15, 17, 17A, 18 & 19) Studies 2. Review applicable documentation against product support strategy such as system maintenance concept, significant system design criteria (reliability, maintainability, logistics requirements, layout drawings, conceptual design drawings, selected supplier components data, support equipment, etc.) a. Define baseline operational scenarios for system alternatives System Requirements Review Procedures b. Participate in market research for supportability attributes of potential commercial products c. Identify and estimate achievable values of logistics and R&M MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook parameters Acquisition Logistics (All) d. Establish system readiness objectives and tentative thresholds 3. Ensure product support requirements satisfy the ICD or draft Independent Logistics CDD Assessment (ILA) Handbook 4. Identify support cost drivers and targets for improvement See Checklists D-9, D-11, E-1 EXIT CRITERIA: Updated Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Updated Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) Updated Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Updated Test and Evaluation Strategy Updated System Engineering Plan (SEP) Updated Product Support Strategy Updated Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) SRR Minutes
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Design Interface for Life Cycle Logistics
3.02.1
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: CRRA Initial Capability Document Capability Development Document Capability Production Document Systems Engineering Plan Life Cycle Management Plan
DESCRIPTION: Design interface, is part of the supportability analysis and systems engineering process, relating logistics, design parameters to equipment readiness and support resources requirements. The objective of design interface using Performance Based Logistics (PBL) (DoD 5000.1 E1.17) is to minimize total ownership costs while delivering operational capability. An object of design interface is to perform trade offs between reliability, maintainability features of the equipment against support system processes. The PBL minimization forms the object of system engineering analysis with a minimization requirement and the subject to delivering operational capability. Note, that Design Interface is performed iteratively, meaning it is done in each phase of acquisition and recursively meaning that as design is matured it is performed on more detailed understanding of the design, technology and operational use. The Life Cycle Logistician must be a key member in the System Engineering Integrated Product Team (IPT). CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Strong Participation for Supportability, Sustainment and Product Defense Acquisition Guidebook CE, TD, SDD Support in the Program System Engineering Integrated Product Para 4.4.9.2 Team (SE IPT). Advocate minimum TOC in the SE IPT. 2. Supportability Concepts: Develop with the user, supply chain Technology manager and supporting depot detailed understanding of the Development / Phase maintenance and support concept including all operational A Concept limitations and issues. Develop system specification which Development addresses reliability, maintainability, support equipment, testability (interface with calibration and test equipment specs), deploy ability, mobility, and manpower and personnel estimates. Prepare the Functional Baseline. 3. Supportability Analysis: Interface with the reliability and MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook maintainability program. Perform top down allocation of equipment Acquisition Logistics reliability and maintainability performance requirements while modeling the impact of design decisions on the support processes required for maintaining and sustaining the equipment in its operational use. Maintain records of decisions and analyses supporting justification for design decisions and participate in developing the allocated baseline as well as design test and evaluation for reliability and maintainability performance. Participate in reliability and maintainability test and evaluation and prepare to demonstrate system level logistics capabilities to support the verification processes within system engineering IPT. Develop item development specifications which address reliability, maintainability, support equipment, testability (interface with calibration and test equipment specs), deploy ability, mobility, and manpower estimates. Monitor reliability and maintainability demonstration process as well as reliability improvement activities. Prepare the Allocated Baseline. 4. Interact with specialty engineering that impact product support: Reliability Maintainability, Testability, Deployability/Transportability/Packaging Human Machine Interfaces Interoperability AFI 63-1201, Life Cycle Systems Operations & Support Engineering / Phase D Build & Operations AFI 63-101 Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition System System Engineering Requirement System Development Process Template & Demonstration
Calibration and Metrology Support Equipment Standardization Energy and POL DMSMS Supportability Resources: Once the equipments inherent reliability and maintainability is determined the support resources developed in the trade studies need to be refined, identified, specified and acquired. The results of identifying supportability resources include support equipment recommendation data, provisioning data, etc acquired in the next process.
Defense Acquisition Guidebook Para 4.4.9.1 System Engineering Functional Analysis Process Template
Defense Acquisition Guidebook Para 4.4.9.4
Supportability Data: Coordinate on engineering data, item MIL PRF 49506 Performance development specifications, and maintenance task descriptions, lists Specification Logistics of maintenance task assets, facilities requirements, manpower Management Information needs and related supportability data requirements. Participate in functional configuration audits and assure that physical configuration audit supports the documentation of supportability requirements. System Engineering Task Analysis Process Template Defense Acquisition Guidebook Para 4.4.9.3 EXIT CRITERIA: Systems Engineering Plan Life Cycle Management Plan System Specification Allocated Baselines Functional Configuration Audit Inputs to TEMP updates
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Develop and Acquire Supportability Data
3.04.1
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Capabilities Development Document Supportability Objectives Configuration Management Plan Strategic Source of Repair Decision Maintenance Concept Milestone B
DESCRIPTION: Supportability data is the foundation for identifying and managing support resources including: supplies, support equipment, technical manuals, training resources and configuration management. Supportability data is acquired as part of the technical data of the weapon system acquisition and contributes to the sustainment processes: data management and configuration management as well as forming the basis for maintenance and supply. Supportability data links the allocated baseline of the weapon system to the physical baseline and integrates technical and engineering data with maintenance and supply data and forms the basis for managing the sustainment of the weapon system. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE Defense Acquisition Guide Milestone B 1. Consider configuration management approach Chapter 4, Paragraph 4.4.9 2. Integrate Supportability Data into the Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) plan 3. Understand the maintenance concept, operating scenarios, MIL PRF 49506 Performance Milestone C mobility/transportability requirements and other life cycle support Specification Logistics requirements contained in the CDD and EMA Management Information 4. Initiate budget for technical data, spares, support equipment, training and system engineering for life cycle logistics and supportability WBS Items 5. Determine Supportability Source Data format reflecting the MIL-STD-1840 DoD Interface functional allocation of reliability and maintainability requirements to Standard, Automated Interchange provide capability at least Total Ownership Costs (TOC) consistent of Technical Information with the planned allocated baseline format, i.e. S1000D 6. Integrate supportability data with the program managers Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) approach 7. Place MIL-PRF-49506 on contract MILT31000 Detail Specification Technical Data Packages 8. MIL-HDBK-502 has guidance on LMI Summaries 9. Place tailored MIL-STD-1840 on contract 10. Supportability Analysis Summaries (SAS) 11. Tailor DIALSS81529 Logistics Management Information (LMI) Data Product(s) to deliver supportability data Order LMI Data products reporting for filing in the PLM for requirements analysis tasks allocating functional baseline requirements for reliability, maintainability, supportability, availability, testability, and support equipment Order functional analysis LMI data products for results of Maintenance Task Analysis, including results of Failure Modes Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA), Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM), Repair Level Analysis (RLA), and related studies for use in Depot Source of Repair selection and identification of supportability resources and supportability data. 12. DIALSS81530 Logistics Management Information (LMI) Summaries 13. Link TMCR 86-01 to LMI data products as well as the PLM approach (Reference Checklist 3.19.1) 14. Link Provision Technical Documents to LMI data products 15. Tailor DI-ALSS-81529 to deliver Support Equipment recommendations 16. Acquire training plans
MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics Acquisition Logistics Guide (1997)
17. Develop maintenance plans using tailored DI-ALSS-81529 18. Establish integrated digital environment and use interactive workflow to review and manage supportability data 19. Plan transition of supportability data to the supporting ALC 20. Refer to checklist 3.18. EXIT CRITERIA: Milestone decision approved Data and information reports for populating product PLM Source data for Contractor Logistics Supportability Data Checklist 3.18 Technical Reports delivered which reflect results of maintenance task analysis and Reliability Centered Maintenance provide information for selection of Source Maintenance and Recovery (SMR) codes, Spares, support equipment, Technical Manuals, and so forth Individual Repairable Item Data delivered to support Level of Repair decisions Technical Reports delivered that detail maintenance plans for all repairable items Technical Reports delivered which provide source data for Technical Maintenance Data and Technical Orders Provisioning Technical Data supports supply support LMI Data Input to Support Equipment Recommendation Data Technical Reports delivered support Manpower and Personnel Estimates and Training Planning All proper supporting documentation put in the official files LMI validated at Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) review all support data and assured the data matches the physical system
TASK # 3.04.2
PROCESS NAME: Automated Test Systems (ATS) Acquisition
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Support Equipment Recommendation Data or equivalent ATS requirement documentation
DESCRIPTION: This checklist enables the Program Manger to make an ATS selection for each requirement that fits within the total DoD investment strategy context, i.e., the costs incurred are to be leveraged to the maximum extent possible within a Service and/or across the joint Services spectrum. The Automated Test Systems Acquisition Checklist provides guidance for defining, developing and implementing ATS solutions for logistics support of Air Force weapon systems. This checklist aids in ensuring that ATS requirements are satisfied while minimizing duplication of existing capability and total ownership costs for all weapon systems. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Identify the weapons system support/test requirements DoD ATS Policy Letter Technology a. Test Requirements Development / Phase DoD ATS Executive Directorate A Concept b. Maintenance Requirements (LSA/LSAR) Home Page Development c. Operational Requirements DODD 5000.1 The Defense 2. Define the various support/test alternatives Acquisition System a. DoD ATS Family DODI 5000.2 Operation of the b. Commercial Tester Defense Acquisition System c. Existing Service ATS d. Other DoD Inventory ATS ATS Master Plan e. Combination of above DoD ATS Selection Guide (2005) f. New Development ATS 3. Analyze the alternatives a. Parametric Analysis (UUT test requirements vs. ATS capabilities) b. Operational Assessment c. d. Cost Benefit Analysis ATS Support Requirements i. ii. 4. Special Tools and Support Equipment Calibration Requirements (AFMETCAL) AFPD 63-2 Automatic Test Systems and Equipment AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based Test and Evaluation AFI 63-201 Automatic Test Systems and Equipment Acquisition AFI 63-101 Operations of Capabilities Based Acquisition System Joint ATS MOA (July 2004)
AFPD 63-1 Capability Based Acquisition System
Select the appropriate ATS support alternative
EXIT CRITERIA: ATS Acquisition Strategy
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Address Support Equipment Management
3.04.3
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Capability Development Document Supportability Key Performance Parameters Product Support Strategy (ref. Life Cycle Management Plan) Mission Assignment Decision Source Of Repair Assignment Process/core/Candidate Depot Decision Systems Engineering Plan System Performance Specification Acquisition Strategy Plan complete
DESCRIPTION: Definition: Support Equipment (SE) and its associated logistics support, is all equipment (mobile or fixed) required to support operations and/or maintenance of a materiel system. This includes associated multiuse support items, ground-handling and maintenance equipment, tools, metrology and calibration equipment, and manual/Automatic Test Equipment/System (ATE/ATS). This checklist enables the Program Manager to make an SE selection for each requirement that fits within the total DoD investment strategy context, i.e., the costs incurred are to be leveraged to the maximum extent possible within a Service and/or across the joint Services spectrum. The Support Equipment checklist provides guidance for defining, developing, implementing and sustaining SE solutions for logistics support of Air Force weapon systems. This checklist aids in ensuring that SE requirements are satisfied while minimizing proliferation and total ownership costs for all weapon systems. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Establish SE IPT and DMAWG (checklist 2.20) to include ALC (SSM and SE Manager), Program Office, MAJCOM, AFMETCAL, Prime Contractor, etc. 2. Minimize the proliferation of system-unique equipment while ensuring the maintenance and deployment requirements of existing and developing systems are met. Acquire SE, to include ATS, that is to the maximum extent common and interoperable with other Services and across multiple weapon systems and munitions. Peculiar SE, to include ATS, shall be developed only as a last alternative. 3. Plan for T.O. (checklist 6.08.1), support for SE (include all Integrated Logistics Support elements), Supply Support (checklist), Configuration Management, UID (checklist 2.10), testing and validation/certification, scheduling (checklist 3.04.1). 4. Ensure cost estimate is completed (checklist 2.33). Make POM inputs (checklist 2.36) 5. Process SERD (checklist 3.04.4). Ensure review with SE IPT. 6. Ensure testing is planned and accomplished 7. Ensure equipment is delivered and fielded (checklist 4.22) 8. Plan for Sustainment of Support Equipment (see task 7.04) a. Identify additional requirements through the requirements AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based determination process. AFEMS is updated by MAJCOMs and will Test and Evaluation feed the D200C Equipment requirements computation. D200C is run quarterly and provides requirements data to the SE item manager. b. Develop acquisition program for required replacements and to fill new shortages. Address all ILS elements during planning stages to ensure supportability of newly acquired SE. Both investment and O&M funded items (checklist 3.03.3)
SOURCE DOCUMENTATION DAU Acronyms and Terms (B135) FEDLOG Information Center
AFI 63-101 Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition System Air Force Equipment Management System
System Development and Demonstration Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval
c. Input to the budet process by developing Buy/Budget Review Folders requested by D200C Requirements Control Officer (RCO), investment funded only, O&M support equipment items funded through CAM. d. Accomplish required SE modifications by budgeting appropriate fundin and gainng approval through the CCB process e. Respond to AFTO 22 requests safety issues or changes by accomplishing required TO update. f. Perform required repair actions as dictated through the new CAM process g. POM inputs- Prepare justification needed to obtain 3400 funding to include TDY, supplies, A&AS, BP16, provisioning. h. Coordinate Calibration requirements with AFMETCAL (checklist 3.03.3) i. Update Technical Order-Plan for TO updates when field submits changes via the AFTO 22 process and changes are approved or new instruments are included in systems. When a new configurations is procured, the TO must be updated. j. Obsolete Items Plan for diminishing manufacturing should be addressed by contacting the commodity PM to identify the preferred replacement item. k. Modifications l. Perform Analysis of Refurbish or Replenish or Replacement Operations & Support when a system is plagued by obsolete items and/or bad actors this / Phase D Build & analysis should determine if the system needs a mid-life upgrade Operations or there should be a total system replenishment m. Disposal-send to DRMO EXIT CRITERIA: Supportability Data (Contract Data Requirements List, drawings, Calibration Measurement Requirements Summary, Acceptance Test Procedures, Test Requirements Documents, Test Program Sets, Incorporated in Integrated Master Plan/Integrated Master Schedule Updated Test Evaluation Master Plan Updated Systems Engineering Plan Under Operations and Maintenance Phase demilitarization and disposal plan
TASK # PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Initiation of all new acquisitions 3.04.4 Calibration Support for New Acquisitions DESCRIPTION: Definition: Calibration is a comparison between equipment items, one of which is a measurement standard of known accuracy, to detect, correlate, adjust and report any variation in the accuracy of the other item(s). This checklist reminds the program manager (PM) to consider calibration requirements when initiating a new acquisition. The Air Force Metrology and Calibration Program (AFMETCAL) will assist the PM in a comprehensive review of the weapon system and related support equipment calibration requirements. A comprehensive evaluation of calibration requirements will address verification of system performance parameters from initial acceptance through lifecycle maintenance. The USAF has extensive organic calibration capabilities in equipment standards, laboratories (PMELs), and procedures. Lifecycle calibration costs for your program or system can be minimized by consulting with AFMETCAL. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE DODI 5000.2 Operation of the Concept Refinement / 1. Include AFMETCAL when defining supportability requirements. Defense Acquisition Program, Pre KDP-A Concept Chapters 1.6 and 4.3 Studies a. Calibration Measurement Requirements Summary (CMRS) MIL STD 1839C Calibration and 2. Include AFMETCAL when defining supportability requirements in measurement requirements the draft CDD 3. Submit a data call to AFMETCAL for CDRL requirements. Include CDRL requirements in the contract. a. Calibration Measurement Requirements Summary ( CMRS) b. Requirement for SERDs c. Calibration procedures and related technical data 4. Include AFMETCAL in the Support Equipment IPT. a. Participate in ILS meetings b. Participate in PDR, CDR, Validation/Verification c. Review CMRS data d. Review SERD data e. AFMETCAL provides input to PM on calibration support concept based on systems accuracy requirements and available calibration standards 5. AFMETCAL will Review Technical Data a. System KPPs b. System CMRS c. SE commercial technical data d. SERD data 6. AFMETCAL will evaluate calibration support alternatives a. Vendor Support (CLS) b. User Calibration c. Automated Calibration (PATEC Concept) d. PMEL Supported e. Regional / AFPSL supported 7. AFMETCAL will establish and maintain calibration support concept a. Publish calibration authority in TO 33K-1-100 / Weapon System Calibration Measurement Summary (CMS) 33K series Calibration TOs See your TODO to order TO 33K1-100, Calibration Measurement Summaries - See your TODO to order AFI 21-113 Air Force Metrology and Calibration Program AFMETCAL Web Page AF Portal / Robins AFB / 542 Wing/ 562 CBSS Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development System Development
DID-QCIC 80278B Calibration Measurement Requirements AFI 63-101 Operation of Capability Based Acquisition System
AFMETCAL Public Web Page TO 00-20-14 Air Force Metrology Program
Production and Deployment Through Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations
b. Publish 33K series calibration technical orders c. Assist in Test Program Sets (TPS) development d. Provide life cycle calibration support EXIT CRITERIA: Assist with acceptance testing of deliverables when appropriate. Establishment of a calibration support concept
TASK # 3.04.6
PROCESS NAME: Support Equipment Recommendation Data (SERD) process
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: ALC (SSM assigned) has to be identified Mission Assignment Process Need for Support Equipment
DESCRIPTION: Support Equipment Recommendation Data (SERD) A contract deliverable document that lists recommended specific items of support equipment to support a weapon system or item of equipment. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. PM with SSM contacts Prime Provisioning Activity (PPA) at the Need to re-establish guidance Milestone A ALC and policy for SERD 2. PPA will provide CDRL(DI-ALSS-81530/T) with attached documentation to PM 3. PM will include SERD CDRL in RFP 4. After contract award PM notifies PPA of contract number 5. Contractor submits SERD to PPA and PM 6. PPA distributes SERD and AFMC Form 603 to stakeholders for 7. PPA submits consolidated AFMC 603 to PM 8. PM prepares AFMC Form 9 indicating disposition from info on AFMC Form 603 9. PM sends Form 9 to PPA and contractor
Primary Stakeholders SERDs and Support Equipment Allowance Standards (AS) Manager: Evaluates the Basis of Issue (BOI) for items to be included in the allowance document. Determines and provides notification of the applicable weapon system TRC and the Program Depot Maintenance (PDM) authorization source code of the applicable AS. Returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation. Adds approved SE to the allowance standards upon receipt of approved AFMC Form 9. Calibration (AFMETCAL): Provides Calibration Measurement and Requirement Summaries (CMRS) if required for the piece of SE. Determines if inclusion in CMRS data item is required or not required. Determines if additional Test Measurement Diagnostics Equipment (TMDE) is required for calibration support of the recommended SE. Returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation. Cataloger - DLIS-KFGC: Determines if the P/N on the SERD has an NSN assigned, and if so, annotates the NSN on the AFMC Form 603. Reviews the cataloging data to determine if the Air Force is a registered user. If the P/N is not stocklisted, verifies the FSC assignment and annotates the correct FSC on the AFMC Form 603. Performs a technical analysis of the SERD for interchangeability and substitutability. Reviews stocklisted items for validity of current management data. Determines if the piece of SE meets the guidelines for inclusion in MIL-HBK-300. Determines if a substitute item exists. Coordinates and returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation.
Inventory Manager Specialist/Materiel Manager: Determines how the item is to be managed/purchased and assigns the Method of Support (MOS) code on the AFMC Form 603 and returns it with name, office symbol and phone number to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation. Coordinates on assigned NC Number in D143C and forwards the created 86 action to DLIS for NSN assignment Item (FSC) Equipment Specialist: The ES determines/identifies if a similar item already exists in the government inventory (or may be modified) that will satisfy the requirement in lieu of acquiring the recommended piece of SE. If nonconcurring with the SERD, gives the reason and the substitute part number/stock number desired. Nonconcurrence requires notification to the ES who manages the SE, and the provisioning office will make the notification. Verifies the SMR code (or changes it, as desired), provides correct IMC, DEMIL, ADPEC, PMIC codes. If CFE SE, the E.S. will assign a temporary stock number in D143C System and enter this NCC Number on the AFMC Form 603. Annotates requirements for a RIPPL, Technical Order and software for new SE. Returns the annotated copy of the AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation.
Lateral ALC: Receives SERD package from the PPA via e-mail for review/coordination by their ES and IMS/MM (duties as described above). The lateral ALC is responsible for cataloging new, procurable SMR-coded SE. Upon completion, the AFMC Form 603 is returned to the PPA for stakeholder consolidation. (Suspense 36 days)
Provisioning Specialist: Receives the SERD electronically from the contractor or SPO, assigns a Registry Control Number (RCN), prepares the file folders, includes a copy of the D043A screening and forwards the package to the SERD Coordinator. Also provides a SERD Data Sheet (on new contracts) to the SERD Coordinator, giving names of stakeholders. Upon receipt of PCL for SERDs requiring a RIPPL, it is the responsibility of the PS to request a Cost Proposal from the Contractor for submittal of the RIPPL. SERD Coordinator Receives the SERD package from the PS and prepares the AFMC Form 603 . Electronically sends the SERD, AFMC Form 603 and the D043A screening to the appropriate stakeholders (System ES and DLIS, simultaneously). Consolidates replies and forwards to all other stakeholders simultaneously. Initiates a follow-up if replies are not received by the assigned suspense date. A follow-up is forwarded up the chain of command until the reply is received. Quality checks all replies, making sure there are no conflicting responses, consolidates the replies on the AFMC Form 603. Sends the completed AFMC Form 603 to the SPO electronically, and requests a completed AFMC Form 9 (suspense: 15 days). Upon receipt of the AFMC Form 9, forwards a copy to all the stakeholders and files a copy in the folder.
If a RIPPL is required, requests the Program Manager complete a PCL in IRD and notify the SERD Coordinator of the Application Program Designator (APD). Upon receipt, the SERD Coordinator prints a copy of the PCL for the file and provides a copy to the PS. System Program Office (SPO): Provides approved/disapproved AFMC Form 9 to the contractor with a copy to the SERD Coordinator. Prior to choosing Automatic Test Systems, the ATS Policy office must be contacted. Supply Support Request AFMC Form 918 (SSR) Provisioner: (DLA/other service) Inputs SERD information into the D169 System and forwards SERD Package to DLA/other service for support of AF requirement and/or NSN assignment. System Support Manager (SSM) Equipment Specialist (ES): Performs a technical review of the SERD package to determine if the recommended item is an appropriate solution to the test or repair requirements. Determines if similar equipment already exists in the government inventory and should be used or may be less expensively modified than that recommended by the contractor. Recommends the Source/Maintenance/Recoverability (SMR) code; Expendability, Repairability, Recoverability Category (ERRC) code (only SE cataloged with S or U ERRC may be entered into the Allowance Standards (AS)); Item Management Code (IMC); Demilitarization (DEMIL) code; Automatic Data Processing Equipment Code (ADPEC); Precious Metals Indicator Code (PMIC), and if applicable, the Materiel Management Aggregation Code (MMAC). Identifies the subsystem Technical Repair Center (TRC) using the item and if the item is repairable, the TRC to repair the item. Returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation. Technology Repair Center (TRC): Reviews the SERD to ensure the SE requirements are included and to determine if quantities, support dates, and acquisition policies are compatible with present and planned workloads. If an additional or a lesser quantity is required other than what the contractor recommends, provides the quantity and a justification. Returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation. Using Commands: Reviews the SERD to ensure the SE requirements are included and to determine if the quantities, support dates, and acquisition policies are compatible with present and planned workloads. If an additional or a lesser quantity is required other than what the contractor recommends, provides the quantity and a justification. Returns the annotated AFMC Form 603 to the SERD Coordinator for stakeholder consolidation.
EXIT CRITERIA: SERD with final disposition
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Condition Based Maintenance Plus (CBM+)
3.04.12
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: CRRA Initial Capability Document Capability Development Document Capability Production Document Systems Engineering Plan Life Cycle Management Plan Functional Baseline
DESCRIPTION: CBM+ is the application and integration of appropriate processes, technologies and knowledge based capabilities to improve the reliability and maintenance effectiveness of DoD systems and components. At its core, CBM+ is maintenance performed on evidence of need provided by reliability centered maintenance (RCM) analysis and other enabling processes and technologies. CBM+ uses a systems engineering approach to collect data, enable analysis, and support the decision making processes for system acquisition, sustainment and operations. In conjunction with design interface and related life cycle cost, reliability and maintainability design activities optimize maintenance plans using prognostics and diagnostics technologies in conjunction with Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) efforts in the context of OSD defined CBM+. The objective is to minimize maintenance time and expenses balanced against acquisition and production costs and life cycle sustainment costs. CBM+ is performed in conjunction with supportability analysis and related system engineering for reliability, maintainability and sustainment, and is one of the OSD Enabling Techniques for life cycle logistics. Prognostics and diagnostics include engineering studies to optimize application of built in test, condition monitoring, operating environment recording and develop detailed knowledge of the relationship between how the equipment is used and how it approaches situations where fault tolerance is degraded and preventive maintenance tasks are needed. Prognostics done in conjunction with more traditional maintenance task analyses including RCM will permit minimum life cycle costs while maximizing equipment readiness. RCM is a process where the failure modes and effects (FMEA) are analyzed to develop scheduled preventive maintenance tasks to assure the system is safely maintained to perform the mission as well as justified increased reliability performance. CBM+ seeks to lengthen the period between scheduled maintenance tasks while assuring safe and economical operation. All maintainability analyses provide opportunities to justify either maintenance tasks or improved reliability. The object as in Performance Based Logistics is to minimize total See checklist 3.02. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Develop supportability requirements in the system functional System Engineering activities for baseline. Interact with the lead command to determine maintenance Requirements Allocation concepts, manpower and skills limits, and maintenance burden per unit of operation, built in test objectives, support equipment criteria and related maintainability requirements. 2. Assure the requirements are clearly reflected in the system functional baseline and that they are feasible and a test/verification process is planned and resources assigned to verify maintainability achievement. Gray beard lesson learned: equipment built in test languages need to be compatible with Automated Test Equipment and calibration standards used by the USAF. (See Checklist 3.02) 3. Monitor execution of Failure Modes and Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) System Engineering activities for Functional Analysis
4. Assure feedback to justify reliability, maintainability and testability design features are applied to the development of item development specifications. Analyze support resource impacts of reliability, maintainability and testability design performance. 5. Coordinate reliability, maintainability and supportability data System Engineering Task formats and recording systems with the Product Life Cycle Analysis Management activity within the program management office. Prepare to deliver logistics management information using MIL PRF 49506.
6. Perform RCM analysis. Determine minimized Total Ownership Cost maintenance tasks for scheduled and preventive maintenance tasks. 7. Understand system risks related to maintenance activities and justify preventive and scheduled maintenance based on safety, performance and costs. Use required skills, man hours, spares, support equipment, fault isolation processes and related resources estimates required to achieve equipment readiness requirements in both FMEA and RCM evaluations. Retain estimates for use in identifying maintenance task requirements and developing maintenance plans. 8. For maintenance tasks that require time change, determine if the maintenance task could be improved in terms of ownership costs and equipment readiness, if prognostics and diagnostics is applied to reduce maintenance and spare part costs. 9. Document detailed maintenance tasks and required skills, man hours, spares, support equipment, fault isolation processes and related resources required to achieve equipment readiness requirements. Insure this data is available as source data for technical manuals development. 10. Perform level of repair analysis, using resource and frequency data developed from maintenance task analysis performed using RCM analysis data determine life cycle maintenance assignment of repair tasks to depots. Retain level of repair analysis report to support depot activation budgets and source of repair assignment (SORAP). 11. Monitor the Failure reporting and Corrective Action System (FRACAS), the Test Analyze and Fix (TAAF) and maintenance demonstration process for achieving system performance. 12. Participate in validation of maintenance activities and modeling and simulation of effects of achieved reliability and maintainability requirements. 13. Coordinate in the development of prognostics and predictive maintenance support and deliver trade and engineering studies to the sustaining engineering function for future applications of maintenance and reliability improvement programs. 14. Monitor Design Test and Evaluation for reliability and maintainability performance.
MIL-HDBK-470A DoD Handbook Designing and Developing Maintainable Products and Systems Vol. I
CBM+ Community of Practice:
Significant process and policy is being developed in DSWS effort in CBM+.
AFI 63-1201, Life Cycle Systems Engineering
MIL PRF 49506 Performance Specification Logistics Management Information
15. Support System Level Logistics Demonstrations. 16. Analyze results of System Level Logistics Demonstrations against requirements. Certify system ready for Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E). 17. Assure that Item Unique Identification is applied to appropriate AFI 63-101 Operation of supply items to assist in life cycle management of individual spare Capabilities Based Acquisition parts and aid in capturing time and usage related data. System DoDI 4151.22 CBM+ for Materiel Maintenance DoDI 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System DoDD 4151.18 Maintenance of Military Material DoDD 5134.01 (USD(AT&L)) EXIT CRITERIA: Life Cycle Management Plan Systems Engineering Plan System Specification Allocated Baselines Functional Configuration Audit
Click on Task ID # to return PROCESS NAME: DEVELOP A DIMINISHING MANUFACTURING 3.04.13 SOURCES AND MATERIAL SHORTAGES (DMSMS) PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) is the loss or impending loss of manufacture or suppliers of items or raw material DMSMS is caused when manufacturers of item or raw material suppliers disco production. The objective is to reduce the impact of DMSMS by identifying and resolving DMSMS issues to ensure the continue availability of items and essential materials needed to support current and, when possible, planned defense requirem distributing notices, migrating legacy architectures toward an Open Systems Architecture, and providing DMSMS to single manager. This checklist provides guidance for defining, developing, implementing and sustaining DMSMS so logistics support of Air Force weapon systems. This checklist aids in ensuring that DMSMS program requirements satisfied while minimizing proliferation and total ownership costs for all weapon systems. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Ensure understanding of the Program data acquisition strategy. To establish a DMSMS program engineering design data must be available down to piece/part level 2. Ensure the Program Manager addresses the need for a DMSMS program at the appropriate level. The Program Manager will identify a DMSMS program manager within the 3. Develop DMSMS program plan down to piece/part level. Ensure you coordinate with the logistician, engineer, DLA rep, OEM, financial manager, contracting officer and support contractors. 4. Review and update the DMSMS program plan annually or as required. TASK # 5. Ensure DMSMS issues are addressed in the: Acquisition Strategy Plan (ASP) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) All design reviews (PDR, CDR, SVV, etc.) Applicable software functionality Provisioning Conference Program Objective Memorandum and Budgetary cycles Program Cost Estimates Weapon System Support Program (WSSP)
6. Accomplish appropriate DMSMS training; courses include: DAU CLL-201 DAU CLL-202 DAU CLL-203 DAU CLL-204 7. The DMSMS program manager will review technology product life cycle phase used in the design for obsolescence. This will include at minimum a review of the developers
8. Execute the DMSMS program plan. This will include the use of Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) and predictive tool(s). 9. When entering the Production & Deployment phase, ensure that the appropriate contract language requires the developer to implement DMSMS best practices. 10. When entering the Operations & Support phase the maintenance and operational concepts will drive DMSMS program implementation. The DMSMS program manager will establish a multi-functional team for an organic maintenance program. Ensure all Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) or Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) contracts contain language requiring an active DMSMS program. 11. The program manager must be aware of all potential changes in maintenance and support concepts I.E. CLS to Organic, for DMSMS implications.
EXIT CRITERIA: DMSMS program plan Updates to SEP Updates to LCMP Program Objective Memorandum and Budgetary inputs Program Cost estimate inputs Inputs to Request for Proposal (RFP) section L&M and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) for technical data
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Acquisition Strategy Plan (ASP) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)
ges (DMSMS) is the loss or impending loss of manufacturers of items when manufacturers of item or raw material suppliers discontinue
tifying and resolving DMSMS issues to ensure the continued pport current and, when possible, planned defense requirements, by d an Open Systems Architecture, and providing DMSMS tools for the fining, developing, implementing and sustaining DMSMS solutions for cklist aids in ensuring that DMSMS program requirements are p costs for all weapon systems. SOURCE DOCUMENTATION DMSMS Case Resolution Guide PHASE Technology Development / Phase A Concept
DMSMS Guide Book SD-22
DoD 4140.1-R DoD Materiel System Development Management Regulation Chap 3 & Demonstration Sec 6 AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support and Planning Assessment AFI 63-1201 Life Cycle Systems Engineering AFMCI 23-103 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources & Material Shortages Program Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations AFI 21-118 Improving Air and Space Equipment Reliability & Maintainability Chapter 2 DLA One Book Industrial Capabilities Section AFI 63-101 Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition System Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval
www.dau.mil
AFMCI 63-1201 Implementing Operational Safety Suitability and Effectiveness (OSS&E) and Life Cycle Systems Engineering
AFMAN 23-110 USAF Supply Manual Vol. 1, Part 1, Chap. 11AK (WSSP)
Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) for technical data
Click on Task ID # to return TASK # PROCESS NAME: Develop Supply Support Strategy
3.04.14
DESCRIPTION: Supply Support consists of all management actions, procedures, and techniques necessary to determine requireme acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue and dispose of spares, repair parts, and supplies. This means havin spares, repair parts, and supplies available, in the right quantities, at the right place, at the right time, at the right pri process includes provisioning for initial support, as well as acquiring, distributing, and replenishing inventories CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Understand the product support strategy, maintenance concept and CONOPS a. Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) b. Public-Private Partnership (PPP) c. Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) d. Organic Standard Base Supply System (SBSS) e. Interim Contractor Support (ICS) f. Interoperability considerations 2. Include the supply support technical requirements in the Statement of Objectives (SOO) / Request for Proposal (RFP). Ensure data rights are included in the RFP. 3. Review the Depot Source of Repair (DSOR) and Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) decision for possible impacts to supply. 4. Establish inventory control points 5. Ensure supply cost requirements are input to the cost estimate, Program Objective Memorandum (POM), Centralized Asset Management (CAM) and budgeting annually or as required. a. Initial and replenishment spares b. Spares for support and training equipment c. Readiness Spares Package (RSP)
d. Depot Level Repair (DLR) and Depot Purchased Equipment Maintenance (DPEM) e. Spares to support planned test programs f. Spares requirements for classified non-reporting bases
g. Reclamation 6. Ensure Total Asset Visibility (TAV) is addressed (RFID, UID, Serialized Part Tracking, Global Logistics Support Center (GLSC). 7. Participate in the Provisioning Guidance Conferences and Provisioning Conferences. Ref provisioning cklist 8. Participate in Weapon System Support Program (WSSP) if weapon system uses Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) parts. 9. Assign and maintain Standard Reporting Designators (SRD)
10. Acquire initial, replenishment and pre-operational supply support. a. Establish stock levels as required b. Ensure Packaging, Handling, Storage & Transportation (PHS&T) has been addressed c. Use Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR)
11. Manage supply sustainment a. Ensure quarterly computations for buy and repair actions are occurring. b. Establish Requirements Data Exchange List (RDEL) requirements to Primary Inventory Control Activity (PICA) 12. Plan for and execute demilitarization and disposal of assets 13. Participate in Configuration Control Boards (CCB) and take appropriate supply support actions as required 14. Establish Military Standard Requisitioning and Issue Procedures (MILSTRIP) authority as required
EXIT CRITERIA: Provide input for LCMP update Inputs to POM, budget, CAM and cost estimates All tasks identified in the AFMC Form 718 completed Data in WSSP workbench updated Source of Repair Assignment Process (SORAP) as required
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Approved CONOPS Contract Awards Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Capability Development Document (CDD) Configuration Control Board (CCB) established
cedures, and techniques necessary to determine requirements to se of spares, repair parts, and supplies. This means having the right uantities, at the right place, at the right time, at the right price. The s acquiring, distributing, and replenishing inventories SOURCE DOCUMENTATION AFI 63-101 Operation of Capabilities Based Acquisition AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Support and Assessment PBL Guide CLS Guide PHASE Concept Refinement / Pre KDP-A Concept Studies
DoD 4140.1-R DoD Materiel Management Regulation
System Development & Demonstration Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval
AFMAN 23-110 USAF Supply Manual
T.O. 00-25-195 AFTO Source, Maintenance, and Recoverability Coding of AF Weapons, Systems & Equipments DoD 2010.4 Entire Instruction Applies
Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations AFPD 23-1 Materiel Management Policy & Procedures AFI 23-120 AF Spares Requirements Review Board AFI 23-102 Operational Requirements Instructions for Determining Materiel Requirements for Reparable Items
AFI 23-102 Operational Requirements Instructions for Determining Materiel Requirements for Reparable Items AFI 23-105 Spares Breakout Program USC 2466 AFI 10-602 Determining Mission Capability and Supportability Requirements AFMCI 23-101 AF Provisioning Instruction USC 2464 AFMCI 23-111 Reclamation of Air Force Property AFMAN 23-110 USAF Supply Manual Vol. 1, Part 1, Chap. 11AK AFI 23-106 Assignment and use of Standard Reporting Designators
ired
Click on Task ID # to return TASK # 3.04.15 DESCRIPTION: CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK PROCESS NAME:
EXIT CRITERIA:
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA:
PHASE
Click on Task ID # to return TASK # 3.04.16 DESCRIPTION: CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK PROCESS NAME: Address Maintenance Planning
EXIT CRITERIA:
PHASE
TASK # 3.08
PROCESS NAME: Prepare Documentation for Milestone B
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Determination that MSD for MS B is required Initial Capabilities Document Capability Development Document
DESCRIPTION: There are two types of decision points: milestone decisions and decision reviews. Each decision point results in a decision to initiate, continue, advance, or terminate a project or program work effort or phase. The review associated with each decision point typically addresses program progress and risk, affordability, program trade-offs, acquisition strategy updates, and the development of exit criteria for the next phase or effort. The Milestone Decision Authority approves the program structure, including the type and number of decision points, as part of the acquisition strategy. Milestone B initiates system development. It is the most common point for formal program initiation in the Defense Acquisition System. There shall be only one Milestone B per program or evolutionary increment. Each increment of an evolutionary acquisition shall have its own Milestone B. Entrance into this phase depends on technology maturity (including software), approved requirements, and funding. Unless some other factor is overriding in its impact, the maturity of the technology shall determine the path to be followed. Programs that enter the acquisition process at Milestone B shall have an ICD that provides the context in which the capability was determined and approved, and a CDD that describes specific program requirements. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE Review and make inputs to applicable documents required by Milestone A Documentation Systems Development statute or regulation before milestone decision. & Demonstration Integration SAMPLE Standard ASC Milestone Decision Process Guide AFPD 20-1, Logistics Strategic Planning AFPD 63-1 Capability Based Acquisition System NSSA Policy 03-01 EXIT CRITERIA: Milestone decision approved All proper supporting documentation put in the official files
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Accomplish Support Equipment (SE) Guidance Conference
3.16.1
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Capability Development Document (CDD) Supportability Key Performance Parameters Product Support Strategy (ref. Life Cycle Management Plan) Mission Assignment Decision Source Of Repair Assignment Process / core / Candidate Depot Decision Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) System Performance Specification Contract Award (SDD) Contract Award (LRIP) Contract Award (FRP)
DESCRIPTION: Support Equipment must be considered and identified (developed if necessary) to support the product support strategy developed during a program's system development & demonstration (SDD) phase, which, is the time frame a program should consider for SE guidance to the contractor. An SE Guidance Conference is accomplished to: ensure the contractor appropriately relates SE to government contractual requirements, the system concept of operations (CONOPS) and maintenance concept are understood, and to ensure DoD guidance and policy for SE acquisition is understood and complied with. Moreover, the information shared and the dialogue established between the contractor and all government SE players, at a guidance conference, will greatly enhance the responsiveness to the end item user and reduce SE proliferation. When it makes economical and program sense, similar guidance efforts could be held for other logistics or program elements and should be considered for joint guidance conferences. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Participate in the Support Equipment Guidance Conference AFI 63-101, Operations of System Development 2. Ensure the following Topics are included in the Guidance Capability Based Acquisition Air Force (and other DoD & Joint Services, as applicable) program points of contact. Program overview AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Production and Operations concept (CONOPS) overview Support Planning and Deployment / Phase B Maintenance concept overview Assessment Preliminary Design/Phase C Training concept overview Complete Design & Packaging, Handling ,Storage & Transportation perspective, Build Approval as it relates to SE Provisioning process and procedures for SE AFPD 63-2 Automatic Test Data requirements documentation SE recommendation Operations & Support Systems and Equipment / Phase D Build & data (SERD or equivalent): Operations o Formats (provide samples as required) AFI 63-201 Automatic Test Systems and Equipment o Contract performance requirements (delivery schedule) Acquisition o Deliverable median(s) DoD ATS Policy Letter o Receiving organizations and number of copies o Government review and approval process DoD ATS Executive Directorate Home Page o Calibration requirements, Air Force Metrology Calibration (AFMETCAL) Procedures for obtaining Government Furnished Equipment DODD 5000.1 The Defense Acquisition System (GFE). Criteria for coding GFE and Contractor Furnished Equipment (CFE) SE delivery means and requirements ATS Master Plan MIL-HBK-300, or equivalent, use by contractor Government screening of recommended SE DoD ATS Selection Guide (2005) Classification and categories of SE Technical manuals for SE Procedures for obtaining Air Force publications. Support Equipment Plan (if applicable) Joint ATS MOA (July 2004)
Other Logistic elements, design interface, human systems integration for SE Contractor's process for identifying and selection of SE supporting system design Life cycle cost analysis / Cost Benefit Analysis (as applicable) Instructions to interrogate various data banks and SE sources of information Air Force (other Services) Preferred Items Lists of standard and modified hand tools Specific discussions on Automatic Test Equipment / Systems (ATE / ATS) process Government preferred order of SE selection 3. Recommended Air Force and DoD Participants - NOTE: Include Other Joint Service organizations, as applicable, for a program chaired by SPM, Logistics Manager or SSM, as appropriate
AFMCI 23-104 Functions and Responsibilities of the Equipment Specialist During Provisioning AFMCI 23-101 AF Provisioning Instruction
Program Office System Program Manager (SPM) Program Office Logistics Manager Program Office Support Equipment Manager (if applicable) Air Logistics Center (ALC) system and SE specialized Support Equipment Manager(s), as applicable Provisioning activity System Support Manager (SSM) / End Article Item Manager (EAIM) ALC) Engineering and reliability representative (Program Office/SSM/EAIM ALC) Packaging materials handling branch (SPM / EAIM ALC), as applicable Equipment allowance specialist (ALC) AFMETCAL representative Lead command, using command(s) (inclusive of Air Education & Training Command (AETC), as applicable). Technical Repair Center (TRC) maintenance representative, as applicable HQ AFMC equipment management representative, as applicable. DoD Cataloging and Standardization representative EXIT CRITERIA: Update to Capability Development Document (CDD) Update to Product Support Strategy (LCMP) Updates to System Engineering Plan (SEP) Understanding of Support Equipment contract requirements between government and prime contractor
TASK # 3.16.2
PROCESS NAME: Provide Logistics Support During the Deficiency Reporting (DR) Process
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Test Readiness Certification Contract Identification of Deficiency
DESCRIPTION: A Deficiency Report is the generic term used within the USAF to record, submit and transmit deficiency data which may include, but is not limited to a Deficiency Report involving quality, materiel, software, warranty, or informational deficiency data submitted using the SF 368 or equivalent format. Category I Deficiency - Category I deficiencies are those which may cause death, severe injury, or severe occupational illness; may cause loss or major damage to a weapon system; critically restricts the combat readiness capabilities of the using organization; or which would result in a production line stoppage. Category II Deficiency - Category II deficiencies are those that impede or constrain successful mission accomplishment (system does not meet minimum operational requirements but does not meet the safety or mission impact criteria of a Category I deficiency). It may also be a condition that complements, but is not absolutely required for, successful mission accomplishment. The recommended enhancement, if incorporated, will improve a systems operational effectiveness or suitability. Other categories of deficiencies are contained in T.O. 00-35D-54. This checklist is not all inclusive for the DR process during various phases of an acquisition and sustainment program but is meant to focus upon DR tasks a logistics manager would be involved in. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Understand T.O. 00-35D-54 and the local DR process. TO 00-35D-54 USAF Deficiency System Development Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution 2. Become a participating member of the review team. 3. Review proposed DR for supportability considerations and Production and impacts. Deployment / Phase B MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration 4. Initiate actions to ensure supportability considerations are Preliminary Management Guidance implemented as required. (See 3.16.3 CCB Checklist if required) Design/Phase C Complete Design & 5. Follow local exhibit management, storage and processing AFI 63-1201 Life Cycle Systems Build Approval procedures. Engineering 6. Make appropriate changes to system documentation i.e; Operations & Support Technical Orders ANSI/EIA 649A / Phase D Build & Spares Click on "Standards" Operations Support Equipment G021 Calibration will migrate to Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) Deficiency Reporting Investigation System (DRIS) SF 368 Product Quality Deficiency Report EXIT CRITERIA: DR Disposition Identify supportability trends
TASK # 3.16.3
PROCESS NAME: Participate in the Configuration Control Boards (CCB)
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Identification of Deficiency Design Change(s) (Hardware/Software/Firmware/Interface) Technology Insertion
DESCRIPTION: The purpose of CCB is to assist in planning for and implementing effective DoD or contractor configuration management activities and practices during all life cycle phases of defense systems and configuration items. It supports acquisition based on performance specifications, and the use of industry standards and methods to the greatest practicable extent. Activities and practices include: Configuration Identification Configuration Control Configuration Status Accounting Configuration Verification and Audit Data Management CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Understand MIL-HDBK-61A, local and contractor CCB process. MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration System Development Management Guidance 2. Become a participating member of the CCB team. 3. Review proposed changes for supportability considerations and Production and impacts (i.e. ILS elements, Facility, and Support Equipment) Deployment / Phase B 4. Initiate actions to ensure supportability considerations are AFI 63-1201, Life Cycle Systems Preliminary implemented as required Engineering Design/Phase C 5. Follow local exhibit management, storage and processing Complete Design & procedures for changes Build Approval 6. Make appropriate changes to system documentation i.e; ANSI/EIA 649A Click on "Standards" Technical data (Drawings, TO, Data, etc.) Spares AFI 63-101Operation of Operations & Support Support Equipment Capabilities Based Acquisition / Phase D Build & Calibration System Operations EXIT CRITERIA: Identify supportability Issues (ILS Checklist) Verified changes incorporated in all affected items, documents Status accounting data base appropriate to each phase Configuration Management-competent contractor base Configuration Management process performance measured & continuously improved Lesson learned CCB Recommendations and Disposition
TASK # 3.16.4
Click on Task ID # to return PROCESS NAME: Accomplish Spares Provisioning Guidance Conference
DESCRIPTION: During this conference, the contractor(s) is alerted of the provisioning requirements for the production contract. Suff details on the provisioning documentation and data submission media and procedures will be provided so that the c can provide realistic responses to the RFP or RFQ. This communication between the Air Force and the contractor(s provide the Contracting Office with topics to negotiate during the production contract negotiations. This provides a re and effective provisioning effort. The guidance conference provides an opportunity for explanation of the current log concept or plan applicable to the system/end article under contract as well as the techniques and methods used by Improperly prepared Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD). Delinquent submission of PTD. Inadequate/omitted Supplemental Data for Provisioning (SDFP). Incomplete or invalid recommendations by the contractor. Late scheduling of the provisioning conference and the resulting delivery of the initial support. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Establish a firm date and location with the contractor or prospective contractor(s). 2. Prepare and distribute, on a timely basis, the conference notification, AFMC Form 771. If sufficient time is not available to insure delivery of the conference notification by mail, the notification will be issued by message. 3. Develop agenda and furnish a copy with each AFMC Form 771 distributed. 4. Prepare or review tentative milestone dates for the 5. Obtain qualified personnel for detailed discussions such as; Engineers, Equipment Specialist, Item Manager, Production Manager, Packaging, Using Command and DLA representative. 6. Obtain a copy of the Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS) with attachments and applicable 7. Hold a closed Air Force familiarization meeting before conducting the conference to: a. Review proposed agenda for the conference. b. Resolve any difference of opinion. c. Establish or review the rules of conduct to be in effect d. Recognize and resolve any questions/discussions that relate solely to internal Air Force affairs so as to avoid undue e. Achieve an Air Force position. f. Meeting chairperson may invite other government agencies such as DLA or have a separate government only 8. Review the maintenance and support concept strategies. 9. Request contractor to hold a briefing on the system/end article on contract. The briefing should generally include: a. Design/maintainability/reliability. b. Operation requirements. c. Equipment capabilities. d. Organizational structure in relation to manufacture, e. Tour of manufacturer's area if conference is held at
f. Contractor(s) proposed Provisioning Performance 10. Government agrees to PPS. EXIT CRITERIA: Approved Provisioning Performance Schedule
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Spares acquisition CLIN on contract
provisioning requirements for the production contract. Sufficient mission media and procedures will be provided so that the contractor(s) communication between the Air Force and the contractor(s) can ring the production contract negotiations. This provides a responsive ce provides an opportunity for explanation of the current logistics er contract as well as the techniques and methods used by the Air umentation (PTD).
sioning (SDFP). ntractor. nd the resulting delivery of the initial support. SOURCE DOCUMENTATION AFMCI 23-101 Air Force Provisioning Instruction, chapter 6.2 PHASE System Development Demonstration
AFMC Form 771 Conference Notification
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Baseline Product Support Strategy in LCMP (Increments, PBL, PPP, LOG Elements, etc.)
3.18
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Capabilities Development Document (CDD) System Performance Specification Validated Systems Support & Maintenance Objective & Requirements Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) Acquisition Strategy (AS) Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Affordability Assessment Industrial Capabilities, Cooperative Opportunities Core Logistics Analysis/Source of Repair Analysis, & Competition Analysis for Depot-Level Maintenance >$3M Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Minutes from the System Functional Review (SFR) and Critical Design Review (CDR) Updated Cost Analysis Requirements Description (CARD)
DESCRIPTION: A Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) is a comprehensive document that consolidates the weapon system life cycle acquisition management and product support strategies from concept refinement through reclamation/disposal. It is a document that must be maintained to remain compliant with revised/new DOD policy and statutory requirements. It represents a corporate AF position on how to best execute and manage a specific program and requires participation from all program stakeholders in its development and update. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Ensure points from checklist 2.37 are updated LCMP Guide (all) System Development 2. Review the CDD for duration of support, sustainment planning, Defense Acquisition Guidebook & Demonstration and any overarching changes in DOTMLPF (4.0 & 5.0) (System Integration) Integrated Defense Acquisition 3. Review the Systems Engineering Plan for product support Technology and Logistics Life strategy Cycle Mgmt Framework ("Wall Chart") 4. Review the product support strategy for: AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment (1.4.4.2) a. Improvements on how the program addresses the support Cost as an Independent Variable and fielding requirements necessary to meet readiness and (CAIV) (3.2.4) performance objectives, lower total ownership cost, reduce risks, and avoid harm to the environment and human health (2.3.12) b. Contracting approach for product support throughout the Configuration Mgmt (4.2.3.6) 5. Total Life Cycle Systems Management (TLCSM) concepts Configuration Mgmt 2 (5.2.1.4) a. Supportability, life cycle costs, performance, and schedule Data Management (5.1.3.3) b. Planning for operations & support and the estimation of total Data Management in Engineering ownership costs. (4.2.3.7) c. System effectiveness and any improvements to life cycle Develop Performance Outcomes product affordability (5.3.1.4) 6. Review development of Performance Based Logistics (PBL) DoD Directive 5000.1; E1.17 Business Case Analysis (BCA) to determine relative cost vs. Performance-Based Logistics benefits of different support strategies, impact and value of performance/cost/schedule/sustainment trade-offs, and data required to support and justify the PBL strategy 7. Ensure support concepts satisfy user specified requirements for MOSA & Interoperability (para 1) sustaining support performance at the lowest possible life cycle cost (5.4.1.3.2) for each evolutionary increment of capability to be delivered to the user including:
a. Review applicable operational effectiveness analyses to ensure support concepts meet warfighter-specified levels of combat and peacetime performance b. Logistics support that sustains both short and long-term readiness c. Minimal total life cycle cost to own and operate (i.e., minimal total ownership cost) d. Maintenance concepts that optimize readiness while drawing upon both organic and industry sources e. Data management and configuration management that facilitates cost-effective product support throughout the system life cycle f. Support Equipment (peculiar and common)
PBL: A PM's Product Support Guide (All) Product Support Strategy (5.1.3) Product Support Concepts (5.1.3.1) Product Support Strategy in the Acquisition Strategy (5.1.3) Product Support Plan for Information Technology Guide (SWGD032) Technology and Industrial Base Plans (10 U.S.C. 2440)
g. Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels are considerations. 8. Include performance outcomes and corresponding metrics for operational availability, operational reliability, Cost per Unit Usage, Logistics Footprint, and Logistics Response Time 9. Given the operational environment and combatant commander availability requirements, define the logistics reliability targets and the corresponding sustainment infrastructure 10. Review maintainability for comprehensive identification of both projected maintenance strategy, including diagnostics, prognostics, maintenance duration targets, and similar measures 11. Review the Total System Product Support Package for product support concepts that are based on reliability and maintainability of the system including manpower and personnel & Training systems/Computer based training. 12. Review the collection, analysis, and evaluation of system performance and maintenance performance data to determine the need for and prescribe changes to the system configuration, maintenance support structure, and maintenance resource requirements. 13. Review identification of potential organic depot-level sources of maintenance alternative and refine logistics support considerations correspondent with the evolutionary acquisition strategy (when employed). 14. Ensure facilities and MILCON funding requirements are addressed lead time away as applicable. 15. 15. For Space systems refer to Acquisition Strategy per NSSA Policy 03-01 EXIT CRITERIA: Product Support Strategy Product Support Plan
Technology Readiness Assessment Deskbook (TRA) (2.3) Total System Product Support Package (para 4) (5.4.1.2.1)
AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based Test and Evaluation
Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See checklists D-2, D-3, D-4, D6, D-9, D-10, D-16, E-1
AFH 32-1084 Facility Requirements
NSSA Policy 03-01
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Contractor Logistics Supportability Data (Including COTS and CDRLs)
3.19
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Contract Award CDRLs on contract Test and Evaluation Management Plan (TEMP) Support & Maintenance Concept & Technologies Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Set Product Support Strategy
DESCRIPTION: Provides examples and guidance to develop Contractor Data Requirements List to place on contract to logistically support the product from development/demonstration to production phase. A formal, system-level review conducted to ensure that system requirements have been completely and properly identified and that a mutual understanding between the government and contractor exists. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Coordinate with lead IPT and contractor(s) regarding Systems Engineering System Development supportability to ensure CDRLs meet requirements. Fundamentals and Demonstration Entire document provides an overall on Systems Engineering. 2. Determine COTS requirements See Chapter 19 for Contracting information. 3. Verify contractor meets CDRL deliverables. Some examples of types of CDRLs are: a. DI-CMAN-81254A, Request for Nomenclature MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook Acquisition Logistics Entire document is helpful. See b. DI-SESS-81000B, Product Drawings and Associated Lists Sections 5, 6, 7, and 8 for related subject information. c. DI-MGMT-80004, Interim Contractor Support Plan Defense Acquisition Guidebook d. DI-MGMT-80004, Training Plan Chapter 7 (COTS) e. DI-MISC-80508B, Technical Reports/Studies/Services for Training System Requirements Analysis (TSRA) Independent Logistics f. DI-MGMT-80004, Site Activation Plan Assessment (ILA) Handbook g. DI-ALSS-81530, Logistics Management Information (LMI) See Checklists D-9, D-10, D-11, Summaries SERD Standard List (tailored for both common hand D-12, D-16 h. OT-2004-9001 Training Development and Material AIDS -This DID for CDs to accomplish familiarization training, O level training and D level training.) i. TMCR, TM-86-01F, Technical Manuals j. DI-MISC-81454A Automated Computer Program Identification Number Data and Control Record k. DI-ILSS-80134A, Proposed Spare Parts List l. Review applicable documentation against product support strategy such Life Cycle Management Plan, Validate Systems Support & Maintenance Objectives & Requirements, SEP, etc.) NOTE: The DIDs listed above are only samples of what a program may need to be logistical supportable. 4. Prepare for Milestone C decision 5. Update Acquisition Plan for Source Selection EXIT CRITERIA: Demonstrated Product Support Capability Updated Acquisition Contract
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Manage a Technical Order Acquisition Program
3.19.1
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Capability Development Document (CDD) Maintenance Strategy Product Support Strategy Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document, TM-86-01
DESCRIPTION: Technical order requirements must be progressively monitored and updated to ensure completion and delivery concurrent with the equipment or hardware. The organization or individual assigned TO acquisition responsibility is called the Technical Order Manager. This checklist gives instruction on how to manage a technical order acquisition program from development of the strategy to sustainment of the formal manuals. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE Generic TOMP System Design & 1. Generate a Technical Order Management Plan (TOMP) as Development soon as feasible. TO 00-5-3 Air Force Technical 2. Once a TO acquisition program is established and a contract Manual Acquisition Procedures awarded, begin managing the activities involved with delivery of Production and preliminary and formal technical manuals. The TO Manager and Deployment / Phase B Contractor will: Develop TO strategy a. Perform TO Guidance Conference Preliminary Technical Order Contract Design/Phase C b. Number and index TOs as required. See TO Numbering & Requirements Complete Design & Indexing Process Flow. Build Approval TO Delivery Requirements c. Perform In Process Reviews (IPR) as required by the contract. AFI 61-204 Disseminating d. Monitor contractor TO certification process. Scientific and Technical Information e. Contractor will update preliminary TOs as they are reviewed TM 86-01 and certified. Manage TO Acquisition Program f. Contractor will submit proposed Commercial off the shelf (COTS) manuals for government evaluation and acceptance as required. TO Verification Planning g. Contractor will deliver certified, preliminary TOs IAW the TMCR. 3. Verification planning is a critical step in the acquisition process TO Verification of preparing and delivering adequate and accurate TOs that meet the needs of the users. Verification planning decisions will be documented in a TO Verification Plan (TOVP) prepared by the TO manager. Generic TOVP 4. The TO Manager will ensure verification is performed and documented IAW TO 00-5-3 and the TOVP. Contractor support will be IAW TM-86-01. 5. The TO Manager will perform pre-pub reviews as required IAW MIL-PRF-32216 TO 00-5-3 and TMCR. TO Numbering & Indexing 6. Contractor will deliver formal TOs IAW the TMCR Process Flow TO 00-5-18 AF Technical Order 7. Contractor will develop and deliver formal TO updates if Numbering System required by the TMCR. 8. Budget (POM) for TO sustainment 2 years prior to transition to AFI 21-303 Technical Orders the ALC (if applicable). AFI 65-601 Vol. 1 Budget Guidance and Procedures EXIT CRITERIA: Delivery of formal TOs. Transition TOs to ALC based on Program requirements / schedule
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Establish and Manage Training Systems
3.19.4
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Acquisition Strategy approved Training System Requirements Analysis (TSRA) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) completed Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) completed Contract awarded
DESCRIPTION: Responsible for developing and sustaining aircraft training systems to train aircrew and maintenance students. The program uses the four Training System Requirements Analysis Reports to identify and assign the mandatory training tasks to both the maintenance and aircrew training devices. The devices and training materials are built, tested, approved and delivered to the government. After delivery, the devices and training materials are maintained using contractor logistics support and updated to keep concurrent with aircraft modifications. The following checklist represents a standardized training system program tasks. Depending on the scope of the program, these tasks maybe removed if not applicable. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Design of training devices meets contractual specification 677 AESG OI 63-5 Systems System Development requirements via the following milestones: Engineering and Demonstration a. Systems Requirements Review b. Preliminary Design Review ASD-TR-90-5000, ST 2000 c. Critical Design Review 2. Training devices are tested to ensure compliance with AFI 36-2251, Management of Air contractual specifications. Two phases of testing include: Force Training Systems a. Government In-plant testing Air Force Life Cycle Management System Development b. On-site Acceptance testing Plan (LCMP) Guide and Demonstration c. Final device certification 3. Training Devices are sustained via the following: a. Contractor Logistics Support Integrated Logistics Support Plan b. Training System Support Center 4. Ensure all facilities requirements are identified and tracked Performance Based Logistics Operations & Support including any facility modifications / Phase D Build & 5. Ensure all manpower and personnel requirements are identified Operations and planned for. REF checklist 2.24.1 6. Transfer Contract to Air Logistics Center EXIT CRITERIA: Devices and training materials delivered and used for training Annual sustainment contract options set up Annual training and instruction contract options set up Training System Support Center tracking device baselines and also incorporating minor modifications into devices Devices maintaining concurrency with aircraft Contract responsibility transferred to Air Logistics Center
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Identify and Plan Supportability Requirements for the Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)
3.20
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Test and Evaluation Strategy Live Fire Test Strategy Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) (Draft) Capability Development Document (CDD) (Draft) System Engineering Plan (SEP) Support & Maintenance Concept & Technologies
DESCRIPTION: A comprehensive plan of developmental and operational testing to determine system suitability and readiness for delivery to operational users. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Technology 1. Ensure product support KPPs are fully tested, analyzed, and Chapter 9, Integrated Test and Development / Phase assessed within the TEMP to meet acceptance criteria. Evaluation A Concept Development 2. Ensure product support strategy and CONOPs are assessed for operational safety, suitability and effectiveness. 3. Ensure TEMP assesses product support readiness to include AFPD 99-1, Test and Evaluation System Development training for maintenance and operators. Process and Demonstration 4. Ensure TEMP assesses system logistics footprint. DoD Guide for Achieving Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (Paragraphs: 1.5.1, 2.3.3, 2.3.5, 4.6, 5.4.1, 5.5.3) Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval
5. Ensure TEMP assesses product support facility and infrastructure requirements.
6. Ensure TEMP assesses maintenance procedures, to include technical manual development and data availability. 7. Ensure TEMP assesses support equipment suitability (to include calibration requirements) and compatibility with system maintenance concept 8. Ensure TEMP assesses on-equipment vs. off-equipment maintenance tasks. 9. Ensure TEMP assesses system size and weight, permitting AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based economical handling, loading, securing, transporting, and Test and Evaluation disassembling for shipment, to include handling hazardous materials. 10. Ensure TEMP includes the means to assess future logistics initiatives, due to cost reduction, technology developments, etc. EXIT CRITERIA: Approved/Updated TEMP Updated Test and Evaluation Strategy Updated Live Fire Test Strategy Updated Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Updated Capability Development Document (CDD) Updated System Engineering Plan (SEP) Updated Product Support Strategy in the Life Cycle Management Plan Updated Support & Maintenance Concept & Technologies
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Participate in System Requirements Review (SRR) (System Functional Specification)
3.23
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Test and Evaluation Strategy System Engineering Plan (SEP) Support & Maintenance Concept & Technologies Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Draft System Specification SRR (Demo) Minutes, if applicable
DESCRIPTION: A formal, system-level review conducted to ensure that system requirements have been completely and properly identified and that a mutual understanding between the government and contractor exists. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Coordinate with lead engineer regarding supportability Systems Engineering Technology requirements Fundamentals Development / Phase 2. Review applicable documentation against product support (Chap 11 page 104) A Concept strategy such as system maintenance concept, significant system Development design criteria (reliability, maintainability, logistics requirements, layout drawings, conceptual design drawings, selected supplier components data, etc.) 3. Ensure product support requirements satisfy the ICD or draft System Requirements Review CDD Procedures 4. Ensures that the system supportability requirements are consistent with the preferred system solution 5. Understand the approach and methods planned for use in MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook arriving at a balanced set of requirements to include product support Acquisition Logistics (manpower, personnel, training, reliability, supportability, life cycle cost analysis, etc.) 6. Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels are considered. 7. Ensure provisioning concepts and strategies are compatible with maintenance concept 8. Ensure contractual requirements levy the need for detailed Navy Acquisition Guide facility requirements data 9. Participate in site survey development and input into the Facility project books 10. Provides an overview of government and contractor data ISO 15288 (for fee service) rights for the system to include what key technical information and data will be developed during this phase 11. Review the technical approach reflect the capabilities, concepts of operation and support, and required attributes 12. Understanding requirements driving the preferred system MIL PRF 49506 Performance concept, including: potential statutory and regulatory requirements, Specification Logistics supportability requirements, training requirements, life-cycle cost Management Information requirements, and other design considerations 13. Review applicable operational effectiveness analyses to understand the linkage between overall operational effectiveness, weapon system performance, and execution of an effective product support strategy 14. Establish a consistent set of objectives for readiness and AFI 63-1201 Life Cycle Systems logistics parameters Engineering 15. Conduct trade-offs among design, support concepts, and support resource requirements. 16. Participate in market research for supportability attributes of AFI 10-602 Determining Mission potential commercial products; assess impact of deployment, Capability and evaluate support alternatives Supportability Requirements 17. Ensure logistics decisions and risk identified and are AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based incorporated into the minutes Test and Evaluation
EXIT CRITERIA: Updated Capability Development Document (CDD) Updated Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Updated System Engineering Plan (SEP) Updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Test and Evaluation Management Plan (TEMP) or equivalent Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) System Performance Specification
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Participate in System Functional Review (SFR)
3.27
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Capabilities Development Document (CDD) Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) System Engineering Plan (SEP) Validated System Support and Maintenance Objective Requirements Draft System Performance Specification System Functional Specification System Verification Plan Functional Analysis and Allocation of Reqmts Technical Performance Measurement data and analysis
DESCRIPTION: A formal review of the conceptual design of the system to establish its capacity to satisfy requirements. functional baseline. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION 1. Participate in refining the system functional baseline for Defense Acquisition Guidebook 2. Review applicable documentation against product support strategy such as system maintenance concept, significant system design criteria (reliability, maintainability, logistics requirements, layout drawings, conceptual design drawings, selected supplier components data, etc.) 3. Ensure provisioning concepts and strategies are compatible Systems Engineering with maintenance concept Fundamentals 4. Understanding the linkage between overall operational AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based effectiveness, weapon system performance, and execution of an Test and Evaluation effective product support strategy 5. Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels are considered. 6. Conduct trade-offs among design, support concepts, and System Requirements Review support resource requirements. Procedures 7. Ensure the system functional requirements satisfy the Capability Development Document for product support 8. Ensure adequate product support processes and metrics are in MIL-HDBK-502 DoD Handbook place for the program to succeed Acquisition Logistics (All) 9. Identify product support risks known and manageable for development MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration 10. Ensure the Cost Analysis Requirements Description is Management Guidance (Tables consistent with the approved functional baseline for product support 4.2-4.3) 11. Participate the system functional baseline been established to enable proper configuration management for product support ASC/EN Guide: Technical Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical Weapon Systems Acquisition System Functional Review Procedure (Gunter) Navy Acquisition Guide ISO 15288 (for fee service) MIL PRF 49506 Performance Specification Logistics Management Information AFI 63-1201 Life Cycle Systems Engineering
It establishes the
PHASE System Development & Demonstration (System Integration)
AFI 63-1201 Life Cycle Systems Engineering AFI 10-602 Determining Mission Capability and Supportability Requirements
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Participate in Preliminary Design Review (PDR)
3.29
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Capabilities Development Document Technical Performance Measurement Data Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) System Engineering Plan System Performance Specification System Allocated Baseline Cost Analysis Requirements Description Life Cycle Cost Analysis Test and Evaluation Management Plan Acquisition Program Baseline Supplier data describing specific components Equipment layout drawings and preliminary drawings (includes proprietary or restricted data) Existing documentation (technical orders; commercial manuals; preliminary materials, parts, and processes; analyses; reports; trade studies; logistics support analysis data; etc. Successful completion of all SRR action items Applicable CDRLs
DESCRIPTION: A formal review that confirms the preliminary design logically follows the System Functional Review findings and meets the requirements. It normally results in approval to begin detailed design. For complex systems, the program manager may conduct a PDR for each subsystem or configuration item, leading to an overall system PDR. When individual reviews have been conducted, the emphasis of the overall system PDR should focus on configuration item functional and physical interface design, as well as overall system design requirements. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Review progress of long-lead time support equipment items DoD Systems Engineering System Development and Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) Fundamentals & Demonstration procedures (System Integration) 2. Review the reliability/maintainability/availability to include support equipment items ASC/EN Guide: Technical 3. Review calibration requirements Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical Weapon Systems Acquisition 4. Describe technical manuals and data availability to include support equipment. 5. Verify compatibility of proposed support equipment with the Example: system maintenance concept 6. Verify on-equipment vs. off-equipment maintenance task trade SISP 1.0, Combined PDR/CDR study results to include support equipment impacts 7. Review updated list of required support equipment 8. Review Level 1 engineering drawings for ease of conversion to higher levels 9. Review repair rate sources and prediction methods 10. Identify design changes that will permit a greater use of standard or preferred parts and evaluate the trade-offs 11. Review Program Parts Selection List and status of all nonstandard parts identified 12. Determine if design meets contracts requirements governing size and weight to permit economical handling, loading, securing, transporting, and disassembly for shipment. Identify potential outsized and overweight items. Identify system/items defined as being hazardous and ensure compliance with hazardous materials regulations. 13. Review Transportability Analysis to determine that Independent Logistics transportation conditions have been evaluated Assessment (ILA) Handbook
14. Determine understanding of the background, purpose, See Checklist D-11 requirements, and usage of Maintenance Data Collection, historical/status records and methods of providing maintenance, failure, reliability, maintainability data 15. Review plans for Work Unit Coding of the equipment 16. Review logistics and provisioning planning to insure full understanding of scope of requirements to include provisioning requirements, GFP usage, and spare parts, and support during installation, checkout, and test 17. Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels are considered. 18. Review plans for maximum screening and usage of GFP, and extent plans have been implemented 19. Review status of the Technical Manual Publications Plan to include availability of technical manuals for validation and verification during DT&E testing 20. Evaluate the training system/simulator item development specifications 21. Ensure logistics decisions and risk identified and are incorporated into the minutes EXIT CRITERIA: Established system allocated baseline Updated risk assessment for SDD Updated Cost Analysis Requirements Description (CARD) based on the system allocated baseline Updated program schedule including system and software critical path drivers Updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Updated Test and Evaluation Management Plan (TEMP) Updated System Engineering Plan (SEP) Acceptance of CDRLS due at PDR
EXIT CRITERIA:
PHASE
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Participate in CDR
3.38
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Capability Development Document (CDD) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) System Engineering Plan System Performance Specification System Allocated Baseline Updated Cost Analysis Requirements Description Life Cycle Cost Analysis Reliability Analysis Technical Design documentation (engineering drawings, preliminary technical orders; commercial manuals; preliminary materials, parts, and processes; analyses; reports; trade studies; logistics support analysis data; etc. Test and Evaluation Management Plan System Engineering Plan (SEP) Successful completion of all PDR action items Applicable CDRLs
DESCRIPTION: The CDR is a multi-disciplined technical review to ensure that the system under review can proceed into system fabrication, demonstration, and test; and can meet the stated performance requirements within cost (program budget), schedule (program schedule), risk, and other system constraints. For complex systems, the program manager may conduct a CDR for each subsystem or configuration item. These individual reviews would lead to an overall system CDR. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Maintenance Planning includes plans/concept for initial, DOD Systems Engineering System Development transition and steady state organizational and depot level O&M Fundamentals and Demonstration 2. Review status of unresolved maintenance and maintenance data problems since PDR. 3. Has a process been implemented to assess achieved reliability, System Engineering Critical availability, and maintainability (RAM) performance by collection and Design Review 4. Has a Failure Reporting Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) been established and failures analyzed and trended for ILS visibility? 5. Review the updated life cycle cost estimate to ensure adequate Comprehensive CDR Checklist 6. Review updated list of required support equipment and verify compatibility of proposed support equipment with the system maintenance concept 7. Verify maximum consideration of GFE SE and common parts Logistics Considerations (standard item with NSN should be first preference). Review GFE provisioning planning to ensure timely receipt or required items. Ensure SERD procedures in place. 8. Review calibration and reliability predictions for SE. 9. Review spares planning to insure full understanding of scope of AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based requirements to include provisioning requirements, GFP usage, and Test and Evaluation support during test and initial deployment 10. Have accepted sparing analysis and modeling tools been utilized and are the assumptions consistent with the supportability analysis and the prescribed maintenance concept? 11. Has a Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material AFMCI 23-103 Diminishing Shortages (DMSMS) program been established and documented Manufacturing Sources & consistent with DoD policy. Material Shortages Program 12. Ensure energy efficiency and alternate fuels are considered 13. Review technical manuals and technical data package availability to include support equipment and COTS manuals. Ensure data rights issues are addressed. DoD 4140.1-R DoD Supply Chain 14. Review status of the Technical Manual Publications Plan to include availability of technical manuals for certification (validation) Materiel Management Regulation Chapter 3 section 6 and verification during DT&E testing 15. Review plans for Work Unit Coding of the equipment
16. Determine if design meets contracts requirements governing size and weight to permit economical handling, loading, securing, transporting, and disassembly for shipment. Identify potential outsized and overweight items. 17. Where applicable, have Unique Identification requirements been incorporated? 18. Identify system/items defined as being hazardous and ensure compliance with hazardous materials regulations. 19. Has a program to eliminate ESOH hazards or manage the risk where the hazard cannot be avoided been established? 20. Has a Program Environmental, Safety and Health Evaluation (PESHE) been developed? 21. Review Transportability Analysis to determine that transportation conditions have been evaluated. Identify any equipment to be test loaded for air transportability of material in military aircraft. 22. Have potential PHS&T related problems been identified and are risk mitigation plans in place? 23. Has a Training Plan been approved? Does the plan address how courses and related materials and devices will be developed for training at each required level of maintenance? 24. Has the Manpower Estimate report been updated? (ACAT1 only)? 25. Is there a total breakout of number of personnel and Air Force Specialty Codes (AFSC) that are projected to support the system? 26. Does the Product Support Plan include analysis conducted to determine facility requirements? Is there a Facilities Requirements Document and a schedule to conduct Site Surveys?
AFI 21-118 Improving Air and Space Equipment Reliability and Maintainability Chapter 2
AFI 63-107 Integrated Product Support and Assessment Para 3.3
Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook
See Checklist D-11
27. Ensure logistics decisions and risk identified and are incorporated into the minutes EXIT CRITERIA: An established system product baseline The status of the technical effort and design indicates OT success (operationally suitable and effective) The detailed design, as disclosed, will satisfy the CDD/CPD/ORD The program schedule is executable within the anticipated cost and technical risks An updated risk assessment for System Development and Demonstration An updated Cost Analysis Requirements Description (CARD) (or CARD-like document) based on the system product baseline Updated requirements for operations, maintenance, and training needs are complete and unambiguously stated in the system or subsystem specifications Updated requirements for RM&A are complete and unambiguously stated in the system or subsystem specifications Updated Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) An updated Test and Evaluation Strategy An updated System Engineering Plan (SEP)
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Prepare Documentation for Design Readiness Review Outputs from Critical Design Review 3.39 (DRR) DESCRIPTION: The Design Readiness Review provides an opportunity for mid-phase assessment of design maturity. It is not as large as a Milestone Decision Review (does not require as much documentation as specified by 5000.2) but it is not a technical review either. They are usually Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)-led management oversight reviews intended to provide an assessment (cost, schedule, supportability, and performance) of a program's readiness to progress further through the acquisition life cycle. MDA can determine the form and content of the review consistent with entrance/exit criteria for the Systems Integration and Systems Demonstration phases. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Review the number of subsystem and system design reviews DoDI 5000.2 Operation of the Systems Development for successfully completing product support initiatives. Defense Acquisition System and Demonstration 2. Review percentage of drawings completed Paragraph 3.7.4 3. Review planned corrective actions for product support deficiencies 4. Assess the environment, safety and occupational health risks 5. Review the completed failure modes and effects analysis Independent Logistics 6. Assess key product support system characteristics (include Assessment (ILA) Handbook See support equipment) and processes Checklist D-11 7. Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels are considered. 8. Review estimate of system reliability based on demonstrated reliability rates; etc. 9. Ensure logistics decisions and risk identified and are incorporated into the minutes NOTE: There is no guidebook or list of mandatory criteria. EXIT CRITERIA:
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Participate in Test Readiness Review (TRR)
3.43
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Test Plan Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) (Draft) Capability Development Document (CDD) (Draft) System Engineering Plan (SEP) Support & Maintenance Concept & Technologies
DESCRIPTION: A review of the test plan, including safety and facilities, to determine readiness to begin testing. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION Defense Acquisition Guidebook, 1. Identify any Product Support (PS) KPPs within the test plan and Chapter 9, Integrated Test and ensure they are fully tested, analyzed, and assessed to meet Evaluation acceptance criteria. 2. Identify opportunities to assess operational safety, suitability and effectiveness of the PS strategy and CONOPs. 3. 4. Review PS readiness assessments, as possible. Review system logistics footprint assessments, as possible. AFPD 99-1, Test and Evaluation Process
PHASE Technology Development / Phase A Concept Development
System Development and Demonstration
DoD Guide for Achieving Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability 6. Review maintenance procedures assessments, as possible, to ( Paragraphs: 2.3.4, 4.5.3, include technical manual development and data availability. 4.5.3.4) 7. Review support equipment suitability (to include calibration requirements) and compatibility with system maintenance concept assessments, as possible. 8. Review on-equipment vs off-equipment maintenance tasks assessments, as possible. 9. Review system size and weight, permitting economical AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based handling, loading, securing, transporting, and disassembling for Test and Evaluation shipment, to include handling hazardous materials assessments, as possible. 10. Ensure test plan includes adequate funding for PS testing Independent Logistics requirements, to include fee for service support and contracted Assessment (ILA) Handbook logistics/maintenance support. 11. Ensure Energy Efficiency and Alternate Fuels are considered. See Checklist D-11 12. Assess status of Training Systems to ensure supportability requirements have been met EXIT CRITERIA: Approved Readiness to Conduct Test Updated/Approved Test Plan 5. Review PS facility and infrastructure requirements assessments, as possible.
TASK # 3.47
PROCESS NAME: Update Product Support Strategy in LCMP (Increments, Performance Based Logistics (PBL), PPP, LOG Elements, etc.)
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Existing Life Cycle Management Design Readiness Review Operational Test Plan Capability Production Document
DESCRIPTION: A Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) is a comprehensive document that consolidates the weapon system life cycle acquisition management and product support strategies from concept refinement through reclamation/disposal. It is a document that must be maintained to remain compliant with revised/new DOD policy and statutory requirements. It represents a corporate AF position on how to best execute and manage a specific program and requires participation from all program stakeholders in its development and update. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Ensure points in checklist 3.18 are updated LCMP Guide System Development 2. Discuss demonstration of system affordability throughout the Defense Acquisition Guidebook & Demonstration life cycle, optimal funding, and proper phasing for rapid acquisition (System Integrated Defense Acquisition Demonstration) 3. Review Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV). Include any Technology and Logistics Life funding shortfalls and discuss current and planned cost reduction Cycle Mgmt Framework ("Wall initiatives Chart") 4. Update discussion of Human Systems Integration (HSI) AFI 63-107 Integrated Product implications, constraints and issues. Support Planning and Assessment (1.4.4.2) 5. Identify potential PBL product support integrators and providers Combined DT&E/OT&E/LFT&E 6. Refine life cycle logistics documents and analyses as a result of development and operational tests, and iterative systems engineering analyses 7. Review SEP to identify processes for development and updates for the Failure Modes, Effects & Criticality Analysis (FMECA) matrix, Failure Reporting, Analysis & Corrective Action System (FRACAS), and Trend Analysis for maturation purposes of the weapon system and its support system 8. Discuss secure and integrated information systems across industry and government that enable comprehensive product support reporting 9. Review the Capability Production Document (CPD) for System Maintenance/Support Profiles and Use Case Scenarios (Support Capability Packages); Reliability and Maintenance Rates; Support Environmental and Locations for Support; Support and Maintenance Effectiveness; Duration of Support 10. Ensure sufficient coverage of product support elements. . Include Diminshing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages, Energy Efficiency, Alternate Fuels considerations, demilitarization, declassification and disposal. 11. Review the MDA for exit criteria 12. Assess status of Training Systems to ensure supportability requirements have been met 13. Ensure facilities and MILCON funding requirements are addressed lead time away as applicable. Configuration Mgmt
Configuration Mgmt 2
Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV) DoD Directive 5000.1 The Defense Acquisition System E1.17 - Performance-Based Logistics DoD Supply Chain Material Management Regulation
Integrated Supply Chain Management Interoperability AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based Test and Evaluation
14. For Space systems refer to Acquisition Strategy per NSSA Policy Life Cycle Cost Optimization 03-01 PBL: A PM's Product Support Guide Product Support Strategy
Product Support Concepts Product Support Strategy in the Acquisition Strategy NSSA Policy 03-01 Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See Checklists D-3, D-10 EXIT CRITERIA: Elements of Product Support Updated Life Cycle Management Plan
TASK #
4.07A
PROCESS NAME: Participate in the Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) and monitor corrective actions for supportability performance requirements.
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Development testing reports System Specification Design-to/subsystem specs (Tier II) Program supportability objectives (CDD, KPPs, LCMP, CDRLs)
DESCRIPTION: The FCA verifies that all requirements established in the specifications, associated test plans, and related documents have been tested and that the item has passed the tests, or corrective actions has been initiated. The FCA forms the basis of the allocated baseline. It determines if the system produced is capable of meeting the technical performance requirements established in the specification. Reviews must be planned, managed, and followed up to be effective as an analysis and control tool. This may be done in conjunction with System Verification Review (SVR). CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE System Engineering System Development 1. Invite Air Logistics Center (ALC) logistician Fundamentals Guide, January & Demonstration 2001 2. Obtain a good understanding of supportability requirement in 3. Understand all the verification methodology for those Defense Acquisition Guide (DAG) supportability requirements. a. Verify para 4.3.3.9.2 b. Test ASC/EN Guide: Technical c. Demonstration Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical Weapon Systems Acquisition d. Analysis 4. Ensure supportability requirements have been verified and discrepancies have been documented. 5. Follow-up to ensure action items are completed.
Guide for FCA-PCA
ISO 15288 (for fee service) EXIT CRITERIA: All supportability requirements have been verified in the FCA and SVR All supportability requirements have been allocated in the design to/subsystem specifications which become the allocation baseline. FCA and SVR minutes
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Participate in Functional Configuration Audit (FCA), System Verification Review (SVR) and Production Readiness Review (PRR)
3.48
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Test Readiness Review completed Life Cycle Management Plan Test and Evaluation Master Plan Configuration Management Plan DT&E, LFT&E and Operational Assessments Product and Development Specifications Work instructions, Process specifications, Detailed manufacturing assembly and test processes and Manufacturing test data sheets Contractor version of baseline data package Program supportability objectives (CDD, KPPs, LCMP, CDRLs)
DESCRIPTION: SVR is a formal review conducted to verify that the actual item (which represents the production configuration) complies with the performance specification. (Note: The FCA can be done in parallel or can be replaced by the SVR) PRR is a formal examination of a program to determine if the design is ready for production, production engineering, problems have been resolved, and the producer has accomplished adequate planning for the production phase. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE Defense Acquisition Guidebook, System Development 1. Participate on the integrated product team Paragraphs 4.3.3.9.2/3 and Demonstration 2. Invite Air Logistics Center (ALC) logistician MIL-STD-973 MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration 3. Ensure designed-in RAM levels are not degraded Management Guidance 4. Obtain a good understanding of supportability requirement in ECSS Configuration and Data the functional baseline. Management Plan 5. Understand all the verification methodology for those Guide for FCA-PCA supportability requirements. a. Verify ASC/EN Guide: Technical b. Test Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical c. Demonstration Weapon Systems Acquisition d. Analysis 6. Ensure supportability requirements have been verified and discrepancies have been documented. 7. Follow-up to ensure actions items are completed. ISO 15288 (for fee service) MIL PRF 49506 Performance Specification Logistics Management Information AFI 63-1201 Life Cycle Systems Engineering AFI 10-602 Determining Mission Capability and Supportability Requirements AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based Test and Evaluation Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See Checklist E-1 EXIT CRITERIA: Updated Configuration Management Plan SVR, PRR, and/or FCA Minutes
TASK # 4.10
PROCESS NAME: Prepare Documentation for Milestone C
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Determination MS C is required Capability Production Document Information Support Plan Test and Evaluation Master Plan
DESCRIPTION: There are two types of decision points: milestone decisions and decision reviews. Each decision point results in a decision to initiate, continue, advance, or terminate a project or program work effort or phase. The review associated with each decision point typically addresses program progress and risk, affordability, program trade-offs, acquisition strategy updates, and the development of exit criteria for the next phase or effort. The Milestone Decision Authority approves the program structure, including the type and number of decision points, as part of the acquisition strategy. Milestone C authorizes entry into LRIP (for MDAPs and major systems), into production or procurement (for non-major systems that do not require LRIP) or into limited deployment in support of operational testing for MAIS programs or software-intensive systems with no production components. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE Review and make inputs to applicable documents required by Milestone C Documentation Production and statute or regulation before milestone decision. Deployment / Phase B Preliminary SAMPLE Design/Phase C Standard ASC Milestone Complete Design & Decision Process Guide Build Approval AFPD 20-1, Logistics Strategic Planning AFPD 63-1 Capability Based Acquisition System NSSA Policy 03-01 EXIT CRITERIA: Milestone decision approved; full rate production decision All proper supporting documentation put in the official files
TASK #
Click on Task ID # to return PROCESS NAME: Accomplish Spares Provisioning Conference
4.13.4
DESCRIPTION: The provisioning conference provides for the Government to make item selection and assign technical and manage codes (previously referred to within the Air force as a source coding conference). The following resources will normally be used: Sample articles when specified in the Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS). Provisioning technical documentation/SUPPLEMENTAL data for provisioning (PTD/SDFP). Maintenance engineering analysis (MEA), and/or RLA, when a requirement of the contract. Competent personnel with expert technical knowledge of the system/end article with regard to the design, reliab maintenance characteristics of the system/end article or the portion being provisioned. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK The following activities are accomplished/addressed during a provisioning conference: 1. Hold a closed Air Force meeting (similar to the familiarization meeting held during the guidance conference) before the start of the provisioning conference as required. Meeting chairperson may invite other government agencies such as DLA or have a separate 2. Ensure the availability of adequate facilities, PTD, SDFP, qualified contractor personnel, and Repair Level Analysis (RLA) data, when applicable. 3. Assign Source Maintenance Recoverability (SMR) coding action 4. Refer problems that cannot be adequately resolved to the HQ AFMC /A4SI provisioning Policy Office with all pertinent facts for 5. Ensure that all personnel are aware of the principle of the price challenge policy HQ AFMC direction. Refer all unresolved questions to the HQ AFMC /A4SM Provisioning Office for policy guidance. 6. Make sure official SMR codes are given to the contractor, through the Contracting Office, for publication in the IPB or the numerical index of the Illustrated Parts Breakdown (IPB) IAW MIL-M38807 (USAF). Expendability Recoverability Reparability Category 7. Assure resolution of or action taken on all problem areas. 8. Make sure requirement for the Repairable Items List (RIL), including dates needed are given to the contractor through the 9. Prepare and distribute minutes. 10. When a Recoverable Item Breakdown (RIB) is sent to the EXIT CRITERIA: Provisioning Office will update D220 based on changes during the Provisioning Conference. D220 generates a Supply Support Request (SSR) for Consumables to Defense Logistic Agency (DLA). D220 generates Required Provisioning Item Order (PIO) for Air Force Managed Items. Provisioning Conference minutes Generate Non-consumable item material support request (NIMSR)
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Spares Acquisition CLIN on Contract Nomenclature, Weapon System Designator Code Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD) Has Been PTD Has Been Loaded in D220 Approved Provisioning Performance Schedule (PPS)
nt to make item selection and assign technical and management urce coding conference).
ing Performance Specification (IPPS). TAL data for provisioning (PTD/SDFP). A, when a requirement of the contract. e of the system/end article with regard to the design, reliability and e or the portion being provisioned. SOURCE DOCUMENTATION AFMCI 23-101 Air Force Provisioning Instruction, chapter 14 PHASE System Development & Demonstration
TO 00-25-195 Source Production and Maintenance Recoverability Code Deployment / Phase B (SMR) Preliminary Design/Phase C AFMCMAN 23-3 Cataloging and Complete Design & Standardization Build Approval
ASME Y14.100 Engineering Drawing Practices Fee for Service MIL-DTL-31000 Technical Data Packages
during the Provisioning Conference. nsumables to Defense Logistic Agency (DLA). for Air Force Managed Items.
t (NIMSR)
Click on Task ID # to return TASK # PROCESS NAME: Program Transfer
4.14
DESCRIPTION: Program transfer is an orderly, timely and efficient transfer of program management responsibility for all ACAT leve to the sustainment portfolio at the most appropriate point in the program. AFI 63-101, indicates, As a general rule, program nears completion of all acquisition activity at Milestone C, program offices will consider transferring program responsibility from the Program Executive Officer (PEO) to the appropriate ALC for sustainment. Planning for sust (activities, schedule, resources, milestones, etc.) should occur early in the program life cycle and be documented an in the Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) or Acquisition Strategy. AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planni Assessment , requires the System Program Manager (SPM) to develop/maintain an LCMP that, makes visible to leadership all aspects of the program plan including sustainment activities. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Ensure the tasks required by checklists 4.10 (Prepare Documentation for Milestone C), 4.22 (Participate in Site Activation Task Force), and 4.42 (Prepare Documentation for Full Rate Production) have been addressed. 2. Ensure a logistician is included on any Integrated Product Teams (IPTs), Program Management Reviews (PMRs), or Portfolio Reviews to confirm the systems sustainment worthiness for transfer. Focus should be on programs due to transfer in next five years 3. Program transfer begins when the SPM (in collaboration with the System Support Manager (SSM) recommend programs to transfer to the PEO. 4. PEO & gaining Air Logistics Center (ALC)/CC will review and recommend transfer to the Service Acquisition Executive (SAE) & Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC)/CC based on: Review of established criteria: (PEO Assessment Criteria, section 3.1.2 and Figure 3.4, Air Force Program Transfer Process Guide, May be accomplished during PMRs and Portfolio Reviews Sustainment Elements: Independent Logistics Analysis (ILA) Handbook tools may be used for evaluation of sustainment elements
Click on one of the sustainment elements below to access an ILA Handbook checklist Manpower Personnel Maintenance Supportability Systems Engineering Data Management
Supply Transportation Configuration Management Training 5. Ensure Program Objective Memorandum (POM) input is (i.e. manpower) specifically to include subsequent support after 6. SAE & AFMC/CC evaluate and approve/decline transfer 7. Participate in update of the Program Management Directive (PMD) 8. Participate in IPT activities for the development and negotiation of transfer agreement. Delivering Center will be IPT lead. 9. Participate in IPT activities associated with the preparation of the Transition Support Plan (TSP) 10. TSP will be coordinated through product and logistics centers and submitted to PEO and ALC/CC for signature/approval. If the TSP is not approved, or if the approval is delayed excessively, 11. PEO and ALC/CC sign/approve Transfer Agreement. 12. Ensure all residual actions are tracked and accomplished per the Transfer Agreement. EXIT CRITERIA: Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Program Management Directive (PMD) Transition Support Plan (TSP) Program Transitioned
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Milestone C (completion of all acquisition activities) Initial Operating Capability (IOC) Full Rate Production (FRP) Site Activation Task Force (SATAF) Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)
er of program management responsibility for all ACAT level programs in the program. AFI 63-101, indicates, As a general rule, once a estone C, program offices will consider transferring program to the appropriate ALC for sustainment. Planning for sustainment occur early in the program life cycle and be documented and updated n Strategy. AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and PM) to develop/maintain an LCMP that, makes visible to senior stainment activities. SOURCE DOCUMENTATION AFI63-101, Operations of Capabilities Based Acquisition System, Chapter 6, Section 6.6 PHASE System Development and Demonstration
AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment, The entire document DoD 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System NSSA Policy 03-01 for Space Programs
Production & Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design and Build Approval
Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook Use the entire document, see specifically Appendix D, Evaluation Criteria for Milestones and Full Rate Production (FRP) D7 through D16 Air Force Program Transfer Guide Overall document on the program transfer process ASC/ACE Program Transfer Process Briefing, Sept 2007
Program Management Directive
(AFI 63-101, par 2.2.7)
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Conduct Site Activation Task Force (SATAF)
4.22
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: CE / Site / Project Office MOAs System Implementation Plan (SIP) Site Validated Requirements Facilities Requirement Plan Beddown Plan Site Floor Plans System Engineering Plan (SEP) System Security Plan System Master Equipment Matrix
DESCRIPTION: This procedure identifies the steps necessary to migrate or install a new system at the designated sites in accordance with the validated requirements, approved drawings and floor plans, and associated documentation (Plans/Policies). It is assumed that the infrastructure requirements performed by civil engineering (or contractor) have been satisfied. Activities may include installation, testing, and coordination with other infrastructure service agencies such as Defense Information Systems Agency. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Ensure logistician is part of the team. 2. Participate in operational base survey. 3. Validate logistics requirements to develop the site design. 4. Coordinate with site and base logistician on required assets (support equipment, technical orders, spares/training, etc). 5. Ensure all allied support (base level) is completed (such as infrastructure, communications, electrical power, and physical security requirements) in accordance with the associated Memorandums of Agreement (MOA)s 6. Work logistics action items with mitigation plan. 7. Plan and coordinate training, technical orders, support equipment, supply support activities, Facilities, maintenance planning, 8. Participate in SATAF out brief AFI 10-501, Program Action Directives (PAD) and Programming Plans (PPlan),
SOURCE DOCUMENTATION AFI 10-503, Base Unit Beddown Program
PHASE Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval
AFI 16-403, Updating the USAF Program Installations, Units, and Priorities and Movement of Air Force Units AFI 32-9005, Real Property Accountability and Reporting Fielding Community of Practice
Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See Checklist D-9 EXIT CRITERIA: Update SIP and SEP SATAF out brief
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Participate in Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR)
4.27
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Test Plan Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) (Draft) Capability Development Document (CDD) (Draft) System Engineering Plan (SEP) Support & Maintenance Concept & Technologies
DESCRIPTION: A review of the test plan, including safety and facilities, to determine readiness to begin testing. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION 1. Identify any Product Support (PS) KPPs within the test plan and Defense Acquisition Guidebook, ensure they are fully tested, analyzed, and assessed to meet Chapter 9, Integrated Test and acceptance criteria. Evaluation 2. Review operational safety, suitability and effectiveness of the PS strategy and CONOPs assessments, as possible. AFPD 99-1, Test and Evaluation 3. Review PS readiness assessments, as possible. Process 4. Review system logistics footprint assessments, as possible. DoD Guide for Achieving 5. Review PS facility and infrastructure requirements Reliability, Availability, and assessments, as possible. Maintainability 6. Review maintenance procedures assessments, as possible, to include technical manual development and data availability. 7. Review support equipment suitability (to include calibration AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based requirements) and compatibility with system maintenance concept Test and Evaluation assessments, as possible. 8. Review on-equipment vs off-equipment maintenance tasks assessments, as possible. 9. Review system size and weight, permitting economical handling, loading, securing, transporting, and disassembling for shipment, to include handling hazardous materials assessments, as possible. 10. Ensure test plan includes adequate funding for PS testing Independent Logistics requirements, to include fee for service support and contracted Assessment (ILA) Handbook logistics/maintenance support. 11. Assess status of Training Systems to ensure supportability See Checklist D-11 requirements have been met EXIT CRITERIA: Approved Readiness to Conduct Test Updated/Approved Test Plan
PHASE System Development and Demonstration
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Participate in Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)
4.31
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Acceptable performance in development, test and evaluation and operational assessment; mature software capability No significant manufacturing risks Manufacturing processes under control Approved ICD (if Milestone C is program initiation) Approved Capability Production Document (CPD) Acceptable interoperability; acceptable operational supportability Compliance with the DoD Strategic Plan; and demonstration that the system is affordable throughout the life cycle, optimally funded, and properly phased for rapid acquisition. CPD reflects the operational requirements resulting from SDD and details the performance expected of the production system.
DESCRIPTION: A formal audit that establishes the product baseline as reflected in an early production configuration item. The PCA is conducted around the time of the full rate production decision and examines the actual configuration of an item being produced. It verifies that the related design documentation matches the item as specified in the contract. In addition to the standard practice of assuring product verification, the PCA confirms that the manufacturing processes, quality control system, measurement and test equipment, and training are adequately planned, tracked, and controlled. The PCA validates many of the supporting processes used by the contractor in the production of the item and verifies other elements of the item that may have been impacted/redesigned after completion of the System Verification Review (SVR). A PCA is normally conducted when the government plans to control the detail design of the item it is acquiring via the Technical Data Package. When the government does not plan to exercise such control or purchase the item's Technical Data Package (e.g., performance based procurement) the contractor should conduct an internal PCA to define the starting point for controlling the detail design of the item and establishing a product baseline. The PCA is complete when the design and manufacturing documentation match the item as specified in the contract. If the PCA was not conducted prior to the full rate production decision, it should be performed as soon as production systems are available. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Review drawing for accuracy and compliance with contract Defense Acquisition Guidebook Production and requirements. Assess technical documentation for accuracy in the Deployment / Phase B technical orders/manuals Preliminary a. Drawing number match the latest released drawing Design/Phase C ASC/EN Guide: Technical Complete Design & b. Drawing revision letter match the drawing revision letter listed Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical Build Approval on the build paper Weapon System Acquisition c. Review build paper for quality assurance stamp d. Review list of materials on the build paper and match the ASC Configuration Management materials on the drawing Processes Guide e. Ensure nomenclature descriptions, part numbers and serial numbers on the drawings are listed on the build paper f. Ensure special instructions and processes on the drawings MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration are listed on the build paper to include dimensions, tolerances, Management Guidance g. Review drawings for all approved changes listed on the drawings/build paper and incorporated into the hardware 2. Review drawings and match to the hardware for approved nomenclature between the hardware and drawing 3. Review the Program Parts Selection List (PPSL) and ensure the list match the hardware and drawings 4. Define which parts will be provisioned. If so, ensure the test Independent Logistics data that is essential to manufacturing is included on, or furnished Assessment (ILA) Handbook with the drawings. 5. Review documentation to ensure the configuration before and See Checklist E-1 after qualification testing is available to include any changes made since qualification testing (e.g., engineering change orders).
6. Review documentation to ensure changes made since the last audit or drawing review (e.g., engineering change orders) are maintained. EXIT CRITERIA: Established production baseline Updated CPD, TEMP, PESHE, LCMP, and SEP as required Inputs to Cost/Manpower estimate FCA/PCA Certificate of Completion
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Prepare Documentation for Full Rate Production (FRP) Determination that FRP Decision is required 4.42 Decision DESCRIPTION: The Logistician should review and make input to the following documents required by statute or regulation before Milestone Decision can be sought and rendered CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 5 U.S.C. 306 IOC FRP Decision 1. Post-Deployment Performance Review 2. CCA Compliance (All IT-including NSS)(Table E4.T1) 3. Programmatic Environment Safety and Occupational Health Evaluation (PESHE)(including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance schedule) 4. Selected Acquisition Report (MDAPs only)(MS B and annually thereafter) 5. Independent Cost Estimate (CAIG) and Manpower Estimate (reviewed by OUSD(P&R))(N/A for AISs, MDAPs only) 6. LFT&E Report 7. Acquisition Program Baseline 8. Acquisition Strategy 9. Analysis of Alternatives (for MAIS, MS B or equivalent) 10. Interoperability Certification 11. Economic Analysis (MAIS only)(MS B or equivalent) 12. Component Cost Analysis (mandatory of MAIS anytime an economic analysis is required, either by statute or by the MDA, as requested by CAE for MDAP) 13. Cost Analysis Requirements Description (MDAPs and MAIS acquisition programs only)(for MAIS, anytime an economic analysis is required either by statute or by the MDA)(CARDs shall be prepared according to the procedures specified in DoD Instruction 5000.2) 14. Test and Evaluation Master Plan 15. Operational Test Agency Report of Operational Test and Evaluation Results 16. Acquisition Decision Memorandum EXIT CRITERIA: Milestone decision approved All proper supporting documentation put in the official files 15 U.S.C. 644(e)(2) 40 U.S.C. Subtitle III Sec. 8088, Pub.L. 107-248 (or successor appropriations act provision)
42 U.S.C. 4321
10 U.S.C. 2432 10 U.S.C. 2434 10 U.S.C. 2366 NSSA Policy 03-01 10 U.S.C. 2435
10 U.S.C. 2399 DoD Directive 5000.1 The Defense Acquisition System DoD Instruction 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System
TASK # 4.42.1
Click on Task ID # to return PROCESS NAME: Participate in Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Activities (if applicable)
DESCRIPTION: The Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Program is that part of Security Assistance authorized by the Arms Export Contro conducted using formal contracts or agreements between the Government and an authorized foreign country. Thes contracts, called Letters of Offer and Acceptance (LOAs), provide for the sale of defense articles and/or defense se include training) usually from DoD. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Respond to request for assistance in development of Foreign Military Sales requirement. The program office will receive a request from the SAF/IA Desk Officer or the AFSAC Command Country Manager (CCM) to provide assistance to a foreign government wishing to procure capabilities through the FMS process. Per DoD5105.38-M, Table C5.T2., all requests must come through SAF/IA and/or AFSAC. a. The Program Manager must determine if resources are available to support the requested effort. b. If additional resources are needed, communicate with SAF/IA or AFSAC. c. If total resources needed for a Pre-LOA effort exceeds man-year, or $25,000, inform SAF/IA and AFSAC CCM for potential development of LOA Support Case funded by the foreign government, or waiver. d. Funding for Pre-LOA travel must be coordinated through the center International Programs Office (IPO). 2. Perform Site Survey or other case planning to definitize foreign government requirements. If the foreign government is new to Foreign Military Sales or is wanting to acquire a system new to their inventory a Site Survey may be necessary to develop a program baseline. This effort is funded by the foreign government via a Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA), either written to specifically fund manpower (USG and contractor) and travel, or via recoupment through a system sale LOA. General case planning of lesser extent may be funded by FMS Administrative Funds. a. Form Site Survey Team or informal team. b. Perform a review/survey covering physical, logistical, training, information security, and technical assessments, as necessary. c. Prepare a report and/or brief the potential FMS purchaser whether Site Survey or informal review. d. If a formal Site Survey, prepare quarterly summary report for Congress, as directed by SAF/IA.
3. Prepare Price and Availability (P&A) data. P&A data are rough order of magnitude. If the development of the response requires preparation of reports or other documentation, or travel to meetings, it does not qualify as ROM/P&A. a. Receive validated P&A request from SAF/IA or AFSAC b. Using available information, including standard Air Force factors and formulas, formulate P&A. c. Include standard disclaimer on P&A response stating the data provided is to be used for planning purposes only. 4. Prepare LOA Data (LOAD). The Letter of Offer and Acceptance is a formal, binding document between the USG and the foreign government utilizing the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) system. The LOR is validated by the Command Country Manager at AFSAC who then passes the LOR to the Case Manager who requests formal, detailed information from the Program Office. This LOA Data (or LOAD) generally includes pricing for items being acquired and USG personnel to implement the program, schedules, Sole Source arrangements, services being acquired through contracts, Technical Data, training, testing, source of supply, etc. The request for LOAD is accomplished through the Defense Security Assistance Management System (DSAMS). a. Receive DSAMS tasking from Center IPO to prepare LOAD b. Review LOR to ensure information is sufficient to develop valid and accurate LOAD estimates. c. If information in the LOR is not sufficient, request additional information via the Case Manager d. Develop LOAD to include line item descriptions and notes, estimated delivery schedules, program milestones, payment schedules, and manpower and associated cost required to execute the case and all other required information. e. Complete LOAD tasking within 30 calendar days of the tasking date via DSAMS. f. If LOAD development cannot be completed by the due date the preparing office must request an extension from the Case Manager, providing justification. g. Review LOAD through internal Program Office and IPO process h. Complete LOAD tasking via DSAMS to Center IPO
5. Prepare FMS Manpower Data. During the development of an LOA the Program Manager, in conjunction with the Case Manager, may determine that the execution of the case requires dedicated manpower and personnel resources. Manpower and personnel resources are managed by a cooperative process involving SAF/IAPX and the MAJCOM Manpower and Organization Office. FMS manpower and personnel requirements must be categorized based on the duties performed. All case funded manpower requirements must be documented by the development of a Manpower Requirements Package (MRP) or Manpower Change Notice (MCN). A Manpower and Travel Data Sheet (MTDS) is mandated by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) and must accompany all LOAs requiring case funded manpower or case funded travel.
EXIT CRITERIA: Available resources are in place or are provided via AFSAC or SAF/IA Site Survey Report Price & Availability Data LOAD FMS Manpower Data Letter of Offer and Assistance
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Foreign Government Letter of Request (LOR) Tasking from Undersecretary of Defense for International Affairs (SAF/IA) or the Air Force Security Assistance Center (AFSAC)
Security Assistance authorized by the Arms Export Control Act and n the Government and an authorized foreign country. These ), provide for the sale of defense articles and/or defense services (to
DoD 5105.38-M Security Assistance Management Manual C5.T6., Row #1 AFMAN 16-101 International Affairs and Security Assistance Chapter 3
DoD 5105.38-M C5.T6., Row #2 AFSAC Interim Policy, 29 Apr 04
AFMAN 16-101 Chapter 3
DoD5105.38-M C5.T6., Row #3 and AFMAN 16-101, Chapter 3
AFMAN 16-101, Chapter 3 (Para 3.3.4.)
AFMAN 16-101, Chapter 3 (Para 3.4.1.) AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.4.2.1
AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.4.2.2
AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.4.2.3.1
AFMAN 16-101 Para 4.5.3.3. AFMAN 16-101 Para 4.5.3.1. AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.5.3.1.
AFMAN 16-101, Paras 4.5.2., 4.5.4. through 4.5.8., and 4.5.10. (with all sub-paras, as applicable)
AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.5.3.4. AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.5.3.5.
AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.5.11.1. AFMAN 16-101, Para 4.5.3.3.
AC or SAF/IA
EXIT CRITERIA:
PHASE
Click on Task ID # to return TASK # PROCESS NAME: Equipment Specialist Checklist
6.02.1
DESCRIPTION: The purpose of the Equipment Specialist is to assist in planning for and implementing effective DoD equipment man activities and practices during all life cycle phases of defense systems and configuration/non-configured items. It su acquisition based on performance specifications, and the use of industry standards and methods to the greatest pra extent throughout all phases of the lifecycle from concept exploration to disposition and disposal. Activities and prac include: Equipment/Material Identification Equipment/Material Control Equipment/Material Status Accounting Equipment/Material Verification and Audit Equipment/Material Data Management CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Understand MIL-HDBK-61A, local and contractor Equipment Control process. 2. Become a participating member of the EC and Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) teams. 3. Review proposed changes for equipment considerations and impacts (i.e. ILS elements, Facility, and Support Equipment) 4. Initiate actions to ensure supportability considerations are implemented as required 5. Follow local exhibit management, storage, processing, and disposal procedures 6. Make appropriate planning and control to system documentation i.e; Installation Drawings Master Equipment List Equipment/Material Technical data (Non-configured Drawings, TO, Data, etc.) Equipment/Material Spares Equipment/Material Support Equipment Equipment/Material Calibration EXIT CRITERIA: Identify Equipment supportability Issues (EC Checklist) Verified EC incorporated in all affected items with appropriate documents Status Equipment accounting data base appropriate to each phase Equipment Management-competent contractor base
Equipment Management process performance measured & continuously improved Lesson learned EC Recommendations and Disposition
n Task ID # to return ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Equipment List (Installation and non-configured items) Government Furnished Property (GFP) Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Support Equipment (SE) Material List Unique Tooling Unique Facility Equipment (Uninterruptible Power Supply, Generators, Filter, etc.) Unique Test Equipment Software/Hardware support equipment (Hardware/Software/Firmware/Installation Equipment)
anning for and implementing effective DoD equipment management ense systems and configuration/non-configured items. It supports e use of industry standards and methods to the greatest practicable t exploration to disposition and disposal. Activities and practices
SOURCE DOCUMENTATION AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning & Assessment AFPD 20-5, Air Force Product Support Planning & Management DoDI 5000.2, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System
System Design
System Development MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance AFI 63-1201 Life Cycle Systems Engineering ANSI/EIA 649A Click on Standards Production and Deployment / Phase B Preliminary Design/Phase C Complete Design & Build Approval Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations
priate documents ach phase
d & continuously improved
TASK # 6.04
PROCESS NAME: ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Manage Information & Communication Activities Requirement for Logistics IT System(s) DESCRIPTION: The logistics information systems are critical to providing acquisition logisticians with rapid, current, and complete logistics information for making informed command and control decisions. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1) Obtain an Information System Management Tool (ISMT) ISMT Web Site: Systems Development account https://www.ismt.wpafb.af.mil/ Production and 2) Submit a Communications and Information Systems Deployment / Phase B Requirements Document (CSRD) via ISMT Requirements Preliminary Document Tracking Module (RDTM) Design/Phase C 3) Provide support as required throughout the Logistics IT AFI 33-103 Requirements Complete Design & Requirements Management Process. Development and Processing Build Approval AFMC Requirements Management Plan located on the AFMC/A4N CoP Integrated Requirements Review Operations & Support Board (IRRB) Minutes (Posted / Phase D Build & monthly on the AFMC/A4N CoP) Operations
Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook See Checklist D-2, D-3, D-12 F-1 EXIT CRITERIA: Disposition of CSRD/Baseline Change Requests (BCR) directed towards the affected IT systems.
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Managing Technical Order (TO) Sustainment
6.08.1
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Formal Technical Orders and supporting data Technical Order Management Plan (TOMP) Maintenance Strategy Product Support Strategy Transition Support Plan (TSP)
DESCRIPTION: Technical Orders must be sustained and maintained to ensure currency, completeness and accuracy for support of affected equipment. Sustainment includes: updating, numbering, indexing, publication (editing & printing), stocking, and delivery to the user. The organization or individual assigned TO sustainment responsibility is called the Technical Order Manager. The TO content is managed by the equipment specialist (ES) or engineer responsible for the equipment covered by the TO. This individual is known as the Technical Content Manager (TCM). This checklist gives instructions on the processes used to maintain a technical order from TO formalization to equipment disposal. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK SOURCE DOCUMENTATION PHASE 1. Number and index TOs. See TO Numbering & Indexing Process TO 00-5-3 Air Force Technical Production and Flow. Manual Acquisition Process Deployment / Phase B Develop TO strategy Preliminary 2. Manage the correction and improvement of TOs through the TO Technical Order Contract Design/Phase C update process. See TO Improvement Process Flow. Requirements Complete Design & TO Delivery Requirements Build Approval 3. Manage the verification process for new TOs and TO updates. TM-86-01 See TO 00-5-3 and the TOVP. Generic TOMP 4. Publish TOs and updates. Includes developing, formatting, pre- TO Verification Planning TO Verification 5. Stock and store TOs IAW TO 00-5-3 Generic TOVP Manage TO Improvement System 6. Distribute TOs IAW validated orders received through the TO TO 00-5-1 Air Force Technical Operations & Support Management System (JCALS, soon to be replaced by ETIMS). Order System / Phase D Build & Ensure a digital copy is provided to the Air Force TO Archives. See Operations TO 00-5-3. AFRIMS 7. Develop TO budget inputs based on the Comprehensive Air (T33-40 R 03.00) Force Technical Order Plan (CAFTOP). See TO 00-5-3. TO Improvement Process Flow 8. Evaluate and approve Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) TO Numbering & Indexing manuals for equipment support as required. See MIL-PRF- 32216 Process Flow TO Publishing Process Flow 9. Review and rescind TOs when no longer required. See TO 00-5- AFI 61-204 Disseminating 3. Scientific and Technical Information TO 00-5-18 AF Technical Order Numbering System AFI 21-303 Technical Orders AFI 65-601 Vol. 1 Budget Guidance and Procedures MIL-PRF-32216 Evaluation of Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Manuals and Preparation of Supplemental Data EXIT CRITERIA: Sustainment of quality TOs that satisfy the needs of the users Disposal of Technical Orders
TASK #
PROCESS NAME: Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO) Process
9.01.1
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Configuration Control Board (CCB) approved: o Engineering Change Request or Order o Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) o Engineering Change Notice (ECN) Technical Order Management Plan (TOMP) Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) Document, TM-86-01 Maintenance Strategy Product Support Strategy
DESCRIPTION: TCTOs shall be used to document all permanent modifications, update changes and retrofit changes to standard Air Force (AF) systems and commodities. TCTOs are authorized by TO 00-5-1. They provide instructions for modifying military systems or commodities within specified time limits, initiate special one time inspections, or impose temporary restrictions on systems or commodities. This checklist gives instructions on the TCTO process used to maintain and update equipment configuration. CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Initiate TCTO package. (AFMC Forms 873, 874, 875 and AFTO Form 82). Ensure funding has been provided by the 2. Obtain TCTO number from JCALS / ETIMS, assign data code number (provided by the numbering specialist @ OC-ALC) and establish a Reliability and Maintainability Information System (REMIS) record. 3. Develop formal or interim TCTO IAW TO 00-5-15, 00-5-1, AFMCI 21-302 and MIL-PRF-38804. 4. If required, provide advanced notifications of Interim TCTO IAW AFMCI 21-302. 5. Develop TO updates as required to document TCTO before 6. Develop and number TCTO Kits as required by the complete kit concept (TO 00-5-15)
SOURCE DOCUMENTATION Technical Order Contract Requirements Generic TOMP
TM-86-01 TO 00-5-1 Air Force Technical Order System AFI 61-204 Disseminating Scientific and Technical Information
7. Perform TCTO verification (kit proofing) of the TCTO, any applicable TO updates and the TCTO kit. 8. Publish and distribute formal or interim TCTO, TO updates and TO 00-5-18 AF Technical Order TCTO kit concurrently to meet compliance period schedules. Numbering System 9. Rescind TCTO after compliance or upon reaching the rescission date. Update TOs to remove before data. 10. Update REMIS and JCALS records as necessary AFI 21-303 Technical Orders AFI 65-601 Vol. 1 Budget Guidance and Procedures Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations
TO 00-5-15 Air Force Time Compliance Technical Order
TCTO Development Flow Chart MIL-PRF-38804 Performance Specification Time Compliance Technical Orders - Preparation AFMCI 21-302 Processing Interim Technical Orders (ITO) and Rapid Action Changes (RAC) EXIT CRITERIA: Completion of modification to all affected equipment
Rescission of TCTO
TASK # 10.05.1
PROCESS NAME: Provide Support Equipment Disposition
ENTRANCE CRITERIA: Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP) Program Established (PMD)
DESCRIPTION: Disposal of Equipment CHECKLIST SUBTASKS: TASK 1. Ensure points for Checklist 2.05 are updated SOURCE DOCUMENTATION AFI 63-107, Integrated Product Support Planning and Assessment Entire document is useful reference on Integrated Product Support. Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Handbook The first part of the documents explains the Integrated Logistics Assessment (ILA) process. Use the checklist within your program acquisition phase. Program Transfer Process Guide Overview document on the program transfer process. AFMC Guide to the Defense Depot Maintenance Council Cost Comparability Handbook. AFPD 23-5 Reusing and Disposing of Materiel Paragraph 1 DoD 4160.21-M, Defense Materiel Disposition Manual Chapter 2 DoD 4160.21-M-1, Defense Demilitarization Manual Browse all appendices USAF Supply Manual AFMAN 23110, Vol II Part 2, Chapter 22 PHASE Operations & Support / Phase D Build & Operations
2. Ensure points for Checklist 2.14 are updated 3. Ensure points for Checklist 2.37 are updated
4. Determine reason for disposal
5. Coordinate with item managers for shipping instructions 6. Dispose of equipment according to Item manager instructions
EXIT CRITERIA: Approved Integrated Risk Assessment, POE or other cost estimate as described in AFI 63-107. Documentation of the source data for the POE product support elements. Updated Life Cycle Mgmt Plan (LCMP)

A and S Processes Matrix 1 Mar 08

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A and S Processes Matrix 1 Mar 08

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

To report problems with any of the links in this document contact HQ AFMC PRODUCT SUPPORT CAMPAIGN DSN 674-2758

ORG/PLAYERS SAF, HQ, LOG MECHANISMS CONTROLS IT Systems TRIGGER

AFMC A4A Product Support Campaign@wpafb.af.mil

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in FSA

DEFINE SUPPORTABILITY OBJECTIVES

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Development

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Process

Functional Capability Boards, Combatant Commands, AF/A5, MAJCOM Requirements Organizations

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in FSA X X

INCLUDE SUPPORTABILITY OBJECTIVES IN INITIAL CAPABILITIES DOCUMENT (ICD)

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Development

INCLUDE PRODUCT SUPPORT CAPABILITIES IN ALTERNATIVE N/A OF ACTION (AOA) PLAN

Decision to proceed to Concept Decision point or Appropriate Milestone

ACQUIRE CONCEPT DECISION FROM MILESTONE DECISION AUTHORITY (MDA)

Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Begun

Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Plan

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Process

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in FSA

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME)s Participation in FSA

Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Plan

Approval to Proceed Into Concept Refinement Phase

Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) Led Meeting

Alternative of Action (AOA) Results

MAJCOM Led Alternative of Action (AOA) Process

PARTICIPATE IN AND DOCUMENT THE INITIAL TECHNOLOGY REVIEW

Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Begun

Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Plan

MAJCOM Led Alternative of Action (AOA) Process

INCLUDE PRODUCT SUPPORT CONCEPTS IN PREFERRED SYSTEM CONCEPT

Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Draft Results

Alternative of Action (AOA) Study Plan

Identification of Preferred Concept

Reduction inTotal Ownership Cost (RTOC)

Preferred System Concept Identified

PARTICIPATE IN TEST & EVALUATION STRATEGY

Preferred System Concept Identified

AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2

Acquisition Led Process

Acquisition Led Process

Test Community Participation in Development of Initial Test Strategy

PARTICIPATE IN SYSTEM ENGINEERING PLAN (SEP) DEVELOPMENT

Preferred System Concept Identified

AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2

Acquisition Led Process

Engineers Participation in Development of Initial Systems Engineering Plan

DEVELOP TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (INCLUDING PRODUCT SUPPORT)

Preferred System Concept Identified

AFI 63-101, DoDI 5000.2

Acquisition Led Process

Functional Subject Matter Experts (SME) participation in development of TDS X X

REVIEW REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS/ INITIAL CAPABILITY OBJECTIVE (ICD)

Preferred System Concept Identified

REVIEW STRATEGIES FOR SIMILAR PRODUCTS/ STRATEGIES

Preferred System Concept Identified

DEVELOP ALTERNATIVES FOR PRODUCT SUPPORT STRATEGY

Preferred System Concept Identified

CONDUCT RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ALTERNATIVES

Preferred System Concept Identified

DEVELOP COST ESTIMATE FOR ALTERNATIVES

Preferred System Concept Identified

EDIT AND COORDINATE WRITING OF LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN (LCMP)