Professional Documents
Culture Documents
David Trenholm
HIST 2623 X2
March 23rd, 2007
Dr. David Duke
Trenholm 2
In recent years the alchemist, and alchemy in general, has been reduced to a
logic and reason—but also of things magical and mystical. It is true, then, that the
alchemist was a pursuer of mythical objects, recipes and artefacts; such great items of
mythology like the Philosopher’s Stone, now immortalized in the popular science-fiction
series, Harry Potter, as well as the Grand Elixir of Immortality, a magical draught that,
when consumed, would grant the imbiber immortality1. One would guess, then, for such
mythical elements, alchemy would be a somewhat dated, if not archaic, science—and this
is true. The practice of alchemy originates as far back as 400 B.C.2, in China, where
alchemists of the medical persuasion were searching studiously for various curatives and
Alchemy was not limited to China in the ancient world, however; it soon found roots in
Ancient Egypt, Greece, Persia and India. As time passed, the mysteries of the profession
were traded and shared, leading to many significant and insignificant technological
latter a useful tool, the former an invention that would change the course of history.
Alchemy, then, is not just a science of magic and mythology, as it has contributed largely
the predecessor to chemistry, a widely practiced and incredibly important field of study in
the advancement of many sciences. As it often was with alchemy, chemistry is valued in
many fields of technological development and study; it would be a herculean task indeed
to measure its contribution to the modern world. Alchemy’s sudden evolution into
1
Trevor H. Levere, Transforming Matter: A History of Chemistry from Alchemy to Buckyball. (Baltimore:
The John Hopkins University Press, 2001), 1.
2
Levere, 2.
3
Fathi Habashi, From Alchemy to Atomic Bombs. (Quebec City: Métallurgie Extractive, 2002), 71.
Trenholm 3
chemistry could not have been possible, then, without the devoted work of hundreds of
alchemists over thousands of years, spanning back to its humble origins before the
recorded birth of Christ, and indeed, well before the onset of what we now call science.
Well before the term “scientist” was a common title for pursuers of scientific
knowledge, alchemists from all over the world were mixing together concoctions and
recipes, creating grand and often useless elixirs, and, on the rare occasion, shocking the
world with their innovations in technology. Alchemy was a practice, or art, that many
civilisations entertained. It was an invaluable pursuit for any prospective king, ruler or
leader; the mere concept of transmutation—the conversion of base metals into more
valuable ones, namely gold—was an incredibly tempting notion; certainly well worth the
time and effort that would be spent in pursuing it. It would then come as no surprise that
many kings would regularly employ a host of alchemists in pursuit of this elusive
discovery. Ancient Babylonian kings, for example, are recorded as testing received
shipments of gold to verify its authenticity, displaying evidence that alchemy was, at
some primitive level, being studied4. One of the most coveted discoveries that most
certainly enriched the study of alchemy was fire, an element that was crucial to further
experimentation.5 Fire was incredibly important to alchemists, and many of them viewed
alchemist, was convinced that in order to find the Philosopher’s Stone, one must
incorporate a special type of fire, or as he called it, “philosophic fire”. He urged that all
“philosophers”, or alchemists, search for this philosophic fire, as it would be with it that
4
Homer H. Dubs, “The Beginnings of Alchemy,” Isis 39 (1947), 80.
5
Henry M. Leicester, The Historical Background of Chemistry. (London: Chapman & Hall, 1956), 5.
Trenholm 4
Search, therefore, this fire with all strength of your mind, and you shall
reach the goal you have set yourself; for it is this that brings to completion
all the stages of the Work, and is the key of all the Philosophers, which
they have never revealed in their books. If you think well and deep upon
In the beginning, however, Alchemy was often pursued in at least two fields, especially in
namely the discovery of an elixir that would grant immortality8. The transmutation of
metals into gold was merely secondary, as they believed that such an elixir would take the
form of a liquid, drinkable gold. China was not the only home to alchemy, however, as
the practice had most definitely been taken up in other parts of the ancient world. Ancient
Egyptian alchemists were also at work, as evidenced by the large abundance of gold,
copper and silver work that has been discovered through archaeological means—the early
Egyptian alchemists practiced chemical and metallurgical alchemy, and their studies and
theories on the origin and formation of many metals ties closely to astrology9. The
and other mysterious chemicals; as a result, the entire process required the skill and
6
John Pontanus, “The Epistle on the Philosophic Fire,” The Alchemy Website,
http://www.levity.com/alchemy/pontan_1.html (accessed March 21st, 2007)
7
Trevor H. Levere, Transforming Matter: A History of Chemistry from Alchemy to Buckyball. (Baltimore:
The John Hopkins University Press, 2001), 3.
8
Levere, 3.
9
Henry M. Leicester, The Historical Background of Chemistry. (London: Chapman & Hall, 1956), 7.
10
Fathi Habashi, From Alchemy to Atomic Bombs. (Quebec City: Métallurgie Extractive, 2002), 51.
Trenholm 5
world, and the host to one of the largest and most extensive libraries in the ancient world,
was an important city in the development and sharing of alchemical knowledge. At this
point, the Greek, Roman and Egyptian sciences had been consolidated; astrology,
however, was also an important aspect for Alexandrian alchemy11. Many of the important
elements in the science were paired with an astrological symbol—Gold, for example, was
paired with the sun, and silver was paired with the moon. This type of alchemical theory
borrowed heavily from astrology, and as such time and effort was spent in studying it.12
With this amount of knowledge, study and effort, then, the study of alchemy cannot be
The world of alchemy saw definite improvements and developments since its
birth in the ancient world, but its eventual transformation into chemistry began in the
complexity of the science, which may have necessitated its evolution. The chief tool of
mixing of chemicals was the means in which alchemical discoveries were achieved. This
process, as it was practiced throughout the 15th, 16th and 17th centuries, eventually led to
the end of alchemy. Hennig Brand, a seventeenth century alchemist and physician,
discovered the element phosphorus after extensive tests on a large quantity of urine.13
Robert Boyle, a notable contemporary of Hennig Brand, was able to examine and create
11
Trevor H. Levere, Transforming Matter: A History of Chemistry from Alchemy to Buckyball. (Baltimore:
The John Hopkins University Press, 2001), 5.
12
Levere, 6.
13
Fathi Habashi, From Alchemy to Atomic Bombs. (Quebec City: Métallurgie Extractive, 2002), 87.
14
Habashi, 88.
Trenholm 6
later identified after an English scientist, Henry Cavendish, had tested and isolated it.
After Joseph Black of Edinburgh took note of a strange residual air in one of his
eventually led to the discovery of nitrogen.15 In 1774, Carl Scheele came upon chlorine
when he introduced manganese dioxide with hydrochloric acid—a man named Humphrey
Davy confirmed its existence, and named it chlorine after its unique colour.16 It was not
until the eventual discovery and confirmation of the element oxygen that the practice and
science of alchemy would end, as it was all too clear that the complexity of this particular
science was simply too great for alchemy’s humble and relatively simple origins, not to
It was in the year 1777, scientific scholar Fathi Habashi claims, that the popular
science of alchemy finally came to a sad end. It was with the discovery of oxygen, and
specifically the act of combustion, which spelled its eventual demise—as combustion and
oxygen served as an antithesis to the age-old theory of phlogiston.17 The celebrated theory
of phlogiston stated that, along with the other four elements, a fifth element existed in
anything deemed combustible, and that when burned, was released into the air—this
element was named phlogiston, after the Greek word phlogistos, meaning inflammable.18
Oxygen and combustion effectively disproved the theory of phlogiston, and a few short
years later the scientific community began to propose reforms that resulted in the birth of
chemistry. In the year 1787, one such reform came out of the Académie des sciences in
Paris; it detailed a plan to name every substance recognized in science according to his
15
Habashi, 90.
16
Habashi, 91.
17
Habashi, 94.
18
Trevor H. Levere, Transforming Matter: A History of Chemistry from Alchemy to Buckyball. (Baltimore:
The John Hopkins University Press, 2001), 33.
Trenholm 7
detailing which elements those substances contained.19 John Dalton introduced another
archaic, alchemical nomenclature that had been in use for hundreds of years.20 A
von Goethe elected a professor of chemistry into the Faculty of Philosophy—not the
Faculty of Medicine; this diversion from tradition was a first in history, as chemistry had
always been paired with medicine. Furthermore, Wilhelm Lampadius, working at the
Mining Academy in Freiberg, had adjusted the course layout so that Chemistry and
Metallurgy was separated. With alchemy having been split threefold—into chemistry,
medicine and metallurgy—the pursuit of the science in its original form was no longer
necessary. Alchemy, as the ancients and classical philosophers had known it, was no
—had reached such a level of development that a reformation and division of the field
was necessary.21 Such a division, which had occurred at about the same time of the
Industrial Revolution, may very well have led to such significant technological
advancements as the modern atomic theory, quantum theory and nuclear fission.
While still often regarded in literature and history as the gnarled, dilapidated
wise-man in search of the unattainable, the alchemist and alchemy in general is a very
real science, perhaps one of the first, that has made significant, long-lasting impacts
19
Fathi Habashi, From Alchemy to Atomic Bombs. (Quebec City: Métallurgie Extractive, 2002), 94.
20
Habashi, 95.
21
Habashi 95.
Trenholm 8
evidence enough that alchemical revelations have changed the very course of history. The
advent of cannons and firearms into world militaries has drastically changed the political
make-up and stability of the globe, and its affects are still felt today through modern
implements of war. It was not until a score of recent scientific discoveries that a division
of alchemy was necessary. The medicinal value of alchemy was gifted unto the field of
medicine, giving birth to a new field of study, metallurgy, leaving chemistry to develop
alone. This division is significant, as not only does it spell the end of alchemy as a
scientific pursuit, it also revolutionized the way followers of chemistry study and
experiment with their elements and compounds. The mythical aspect of alchemy remains,
though, with the legends and myths that had accompanied it through history—the ever-
present goal of acquiring the famed Philosopher’s Stone, or, to the Chinese, the Grand
cannot achieve, but in the realm of transmutation, science and myth have collided. In
something ancient alchemists had devoted their lives to: the successful transmutation of
one element into another, specifically gold. Taking a small sample of bismuth—an
element not dissimilar to lead—the scientists used a particle accelerator to transform the
sample into gold. While the cost of such an experiment ranged in the thousands, and the
priceless. Setting a goal to achieve what was considered the unattainable, humanity had
matter—and before the end of the second millennia, they had reached their goal; a
as successful as most would hope it would be, but nonetheless, its significance to
Bibliography
Dubs, Homer H., “The Beginnings of Alchemy.” Isis 38, 1/2. (1947): 62-86.
Habashi, Fathi. From Alchemy to Atomic Bombs. Quebec City: Métallurgie Extractive
Québec, 2002.
Leicester, Henry M., The Historical Background of Chemistry. London: Chapman &
Hall, 1956.
Levere, Trevor H., Transforming Matter: A History of Chemistry from Alchemy to the
Buckyball. Baltimore, Maryland: The John Hopkins University Press, 2001.
Newman, William, “Technology and Alchemical Debate in the Late Middle Ages.” Isis
80, 3. (1989): 423-445
Pontanus, John, “The Epistle on the Philosophic Fire,” The Alchemy Website available
from http://www.levity.com/alchemy/pontan_1.html; Internet; accessed 30
January 2007.