Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(40), mali (39), ethiopia (36), senegal (33), west africa (32), malawi (29), benin (28), burkina faso (26), mozambique (24), nigeria (21), cameroon (19), niger (19), zambia (18), botswana (17), southern africa (17), zimbabwe (17), namibia (16), and rwanda (16). Asia (india (83), indonesia (60), asia (40), philippines (36), bangladesh (29), nepal (28), asia and the pacific (26), vietnam (21), pakistan (20), cambodia (19), china (15)) and Latin America are also well represented. latin america (53), brazil (40), bolivia (29), mexico (15). Content by publication year 1983/4 2 1991/2 1 1985/6 1 1993/4 1 1987/8 0 1995/6 1 1989/0 0 1997/8 7
Information collecting The information has been collected in four ways, viz. by: (1) Google Scholar alerts; (2) Twitter; (3) RSS; and (4) websites. Google Scholar is the most time effective, i.e. produces the most useful results for the least search effort. Currently, three alerts are used based on queries focusing on: (a) capacity-building OR capacity-strengthening; (b) planning OR monitoring OR evaluation OR budgeting; and (c) local development OR participatory OR community OR civil OR non-governmental. The remainder of the queries contains the following terms: (i) decentralization OR "local governance OR government; and (ii) developing countries OR Africa OR poverty OR rural development OR millennium OR mdgs. The minimum time requirement per item is 45 minutes: (1) searching: 15 minutes; (2) providing short abstract and keywords (UNBIS thesaurus): 15 minutes; and (3) indexing: 15 minutes. The target is to have 1 item/day, i.e. 30/month. This corresponds to 23 hours/month. The information is used for tweets. A tweet takes about 5 minutes/item, which corresponds to about 3 hours/month. The time needed for searching and abstracting has been limited to 6 hours/week, so about 1 hour/week is left to check a limited number of RSS feeds and websites. Web 2.0 The LocalGovernance account of Twitter has currently (15 May 2013) 512 followers. There seems to be sufficient scope for further growth to 1000 followers within about 1-1.5 years. Without detailed analysis it seems clear that new followers are increasingly people from the South with an interest in local governance. Meanwhile, most if not all - of the international organizations involved in local governance worldwide are among the followers, some with multiple, including individual, accounts. Referral to the portal site from Twitter is an important source of visitors. Alerts for the portals new additions are available as RSS and e-alerts, but their contribution is limited. It is very likely that a blog with short items on various aspects of local governance in a rural setting in the South would help to attract many more visitors. Positioning In that sense the collection can be considered complementary to what is available via databases. Significant other collections in the area are those of GSDRC and FLACMA-UCLG Municipal Library (now defunct), but they lack the same focus, the first being insufficiently geared to local government and the second mostly geared towards municipal local government in Latin America.
Content by subtopic The developmental aspects of local government in rural are a key focus of this information portal. Important aspects include: popular participation, natural resources, public services, taxation, poverty alleviation, and capacity-building. The top-20 of keywords is composed of: local government (906), decentralization in government (694), governance (493), popular participation (317), public services (249), accountability (230), capacity building (213), poverty alleviation (210), community participation (197), democracy (183), development assistance (181), public administration (166), economic development (136), civil society (134), development strategies (117), natural resources (105), development planning (104), guidelines (97), land rights (95), and development policy (92).
Content by publication year 1983/4 2 1991/2 1 1985/6 1 1993/4 1 1987/8 0 1995/6 1 1989/0 0 1997/8 7
Information collecting The information is collected in four ways, viz. by: (1) Google Scholar alerts; (2) Twitter; (3) RSS; and (4) websites. Google Scholar is the most time effective, i.e. produces the most useful results for the least search effort. Currently, three alerts are used based on queries focusing on: (a) capacity-building OR capacity-strengthening; (b) planning OR monitoring OR evaluation OR budgeting; and (c) local development OR participatory OR community OR civil OR non-governmental. The remainder of the queries contains the following terms: (i) decentralization OR "local governance OR government; and (ii) developing countries OR Africa OR poverty OR rural development OR millennium OR mdgs. The minimum time requirement per item is 45 minutes: (1) searching: 15 minutes; (2) providing short abstract and keywords (UNBIS thesaurus): 15 minutes; and (3) indexing: 15 minutes. The target is to have 1 item/day, i.e. 30/month. This corresponds to 23 hours/month. The information is used for tweets. A tweet takes about 5 minutes/item, which corresponds to about 3 hours/month. The time needed for searching and abstracting has been limited to 6 hours/week, so about 1 hour/week is left to check a limited number of RSS feeds and websites. Web 2.0 The LocalGovernance account of Twitter has currently (15 May 2013) 512 followers. There seems to be sufficient scope for further growth to 1000 followers within about 1-1.5 years. Without detailed analysis it seems clear that new followers are increasingly people from the South with an interest in local governance. Meanwhile, most if not all - of the international organizations involved in local governance worldwide are among the followers, some with multiple, including individual, accounts. Referral to the portal site from Twitter is an important source of visitors. Alerts for the portals new additions are available as RSS and e-alerts, but their contribution is limited. It is very likely that a blog with short items on various aspects of local governance in a rural setting in the South would help to attract many more visitors. Positioning The strong focus on developmental local governance in a rural Southern context is unique. The active collection and sharing of current material allows practitioners worldwide to keep up with topical documents without any effort. There is no alternative way of finding this material, e.g. by the use of scholarly databases. In that sense the collection can be considered complementary to what is available via databases. Significant other collections in the area are those of GSDRC and FLACMA-UCLG Municipal Library, but they lack the same focus, the first being insufficiently geared to local government and the second mostly geared towards municipal local government in Latin America. Relevance According to Google Analytics there were 182 page views in 106 visits by 73 visitors, of which 40% returning visitors during the month of 11 April-11 May, 2013. Of these, 33 visits came from Twitter, 21 were direct (i.e. bookmark or similar), 21 came from Google search, and 12 came from a backlink on the GSDRC site. The number of downloads is typically in the range 100-120 documents/month. It would seem that these figures are well below potential. It is very likely that with growing Internet connectivity in sub-Saharan Africa and the rising importance attached to local governance for rural development, the relevance of the RDLG collection can grow considerably in the years to come.