Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pervaporation Process
-Krunal J.S M.Tech in Chemical process & plant design
Content:
Where we stand
Pervaporation
It is one of the most complex membrane separation process where there is liquid on one side of the membrane and a vapor on the other side. The liquid diffuses through membrane and vaporizes.
Pervaporation(PV) Mechanism
The membrane is operated by the solution diffusion mechanism. PV involves partial vaporization of a liquid mixture through a dense membrane whose downstream is usually kept under vacuum.
Mechanism:
1) Upstream partitioning of feed component between flowing liquid mixture and the swollen upstream surface layer of membrane. 2) Diffusion of components from the surface layer through the
membrane.
3) Desorption of these component as the downstream surface of the membrane.
Selectivity: The generally accepted measure of the separation capability of a Pervaporation membrane for a specific binary mixture is the
The separation factor can vary from unity to infinity, where larger -values indicates increased selectivity.
Polar/Non-polar mixtures
Isomer mixtures
Chitosan - CS
CS is an inexpensive and non-toxic polycationic polymer obtained commercially by alkaline deacetylation of chitin (a N-acetyl-
glucosamine polymer), the hydroxyl and amino groups in the repeat units
make it a strong hydrophilic material.
Membrane Preparation
2 wt% CS solution and 7 wt% PVA solution were prepared first After this, both solutions were filtered to remove undissolved particles and impurities, Then they were mixed in certain proportions to form completely homogeneous solutions with different PVACS ratios.
Experiment: The feed solution was continuously circulated from a feed tank through the tube side of the membrane module using a variable speed feed pump. Vacuum on the permeate side was maintained at about 200 Pa and was monitored by a digital vacuum gauge. The permeated vapor was collected by turns in liquid nitrogen traps. Before Pervaporation, the membranes were immersed in the feed solution for 12h, so that the time for the membrane to come to the steady state permeation in the Pervaporation process was minimized . About 2 h after starting the PV process, the mass transfer equilibrium was established and PV performance was considered to be stable.
At steady state, the weight of permeate collected in the cold trap was measured to obtain the total flux, J J = M/ A*T
where M is the total mass permeated during the experiment time interval, t and A is the effective membrane area.
Conclusions
The pore size of ceramic support affects the Pervaporation performance of the composite membrane. The introducing of CS into PVA increased the amorphous region of the membrane whereas reduced the membrane hydrophilicity.
The membrane exhibited excellent Pervaporation performance, especially in the dehydration of ethyl acetate/water mixture at 3.5 wt% water in feed with a flux of 1250gm2 h1 and a separation factor larger than 10,000.
In addition, the ceramic support is non-deformable, so the deformation of the organic top layer can be restrained and the membrane performance can be improved.
References:
Rate controlled separation, part III, chapter12, page 703 Phillip C. Wankat Journal of membrane science, Jan2010 Yuixin Zhu, Shanshan Xia Separation of organic-organic mixture B.Smith, D Suhanya
Thank you