Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P M V Subbarao
Professor
Mechanical Engineering Department
I I T Delhi
From Takeoff to cruising
Realizing New Events of Physics.
Converging Nozzle
p
0
p
b
p
b
= Back Pressure
Design Variables:
0 0
, , T p m
Outlet Condition:
exit exit b
M or A or p
Designed Exit Conditions
{ }
1
2
1
0 0
2
1
1
)
`
+ =
)
`
exit
exit exit
M
T
T
p
p
( )
( ) 1 2
1
2
0
0
2
1
1
+
)
`
+
=
exit
exit exit
M
M A
T
p
R
m
)
`
+ =
)
`
exit
exit b
M
T
T
p
p
Profile of the Nozzle
( )
( ) 1 2
1
2
2
2
1
1
) (
2
1
1
) (
) (
+
=
exit
exit
exit
M
x M
x M
M
A
x A
{ }
{ }
1
2
2
) ( 1 2
1 2 ) (
)
`
+
+
=
x M
M
p
x p
exit
b
{ }
{ }
1
2
2
) ( 1 2
1 2 ) (
)
`
+
+
=
x M
M
p
x p
exit
exit
At design Conditions:
Full Capacity Convergent Nozzle
{ }
1
2
,
) ( 1 2
1 ) (
)
`
+
+
=
x M p
x p
critical b
( )
( ) 1 2
1
2
1
) (
2
1
1
) (
1 ) (
2
,
+
=
x M
x M A
x A
critical exit
Remarks on Isentropic Nozzle Design
Length of the nozzle is immaterial for an isentropic nozzle.
Strength requirements of nozzle material may decide the
nozzle length.
Either Mach number variation or Area variation or
Pressure variation is specified as a function or arbitrary
length unit.
Nozzle design attains maximum capacity when the exit
Mach number is unity.
Converging Nozzle
p
0
P
b,critical
1
,
0
2
1
)
`
+
=
critical b
p
p
1
0 ,
1
2
)
`
+
=
p p
critical b
Operational Characteristics of Nozzles
A variable area passage designed to accelerate the a gas flow is
considered for study.
The concern here is with the effect of changes in the upstream
and downstream pressures
on the nature of the inside flow and
on the mass flow rate through a nozzle.
Four different cases considered for analysis are:
Converging nozzle with constant upstream conditions.
Converging-diverging nozzle with constant upstream conditions.
Converging nozzle with constant downstream conditions.
Converging-diverging nozzle with constant downstream
conditions.
Pressure Distribution in Under Expanded Nozzle
p
0
P
b,critical
p
b
=p
0
p
b,critical<
p
b1<
p
0
p
b,critical<
p
b2<
p
0
p
b,critical<
p
b3<
p
0
At all the above conditions, the pressure at the exit plane
of nozzle, p
exit
= p
b
.
Variation of Mass Flow Rate in Exit Pressure
0
p
p
b
0
p
p
e
1
1
0
,
p
p
critical b
0
,
p
p
critical e
Variation of in Exit Pressure
0
p
p
b
0
p
p
e
1
1
0
,
p
p
critical b
0
,
p
p
critical e
Variation of in Mass Flow Rate
0
p
p
b
m
1
0
,
p
p
critical b
choked
m
= +
c x u x c
| | | | 1 2
1
0
1 2
0
2
1
0 0
) ( ) ( ) ( ) (
)
`
=
)
`
=
)
`
x
p
x p
T
x T
c
x c
{ } ) (
1
2
1
) (
1
2 ) (
2 2
0
2 2
0
2
x c c
x c c
x u
=
)
`
=
)
`
=
2
0
2 2
0
2
) (
1
1
2
) (
c
x c c
x u
| |
)
`
=
1
0
2
0
2
) (
1
1
2
) (
p
x p c
x u
| |
)
`
=
1
0
0
2
) (
1
1
2
) (
p
x p RT
x u
( )
| |
)
`
=
1
0 0
0
2
) (
1
1
2
) (
p
x p p
x u
( )
| |
2 / 1
1
0 0
0
) (
1
1
2
) (
(
(
(
)
`
p
x p p
x u
( )
| |
2 / 1
1
0 0
0
0
0
) (
1
1
2
) (
) (
(
(
(
)
`
p
x p p
x A
x
m
) ( ) ( ) ( x u x A x m =
) ( ) (
) (
0
0
x u x A
x
m
( )
| |
2 / 1
1
0 0
0
1
0
0
) (
1
1
2
) (
) (
(
(
(
)
`
)
`
p
x p p
x A
p
x p
m
)
`
)
`
p
p p
A
p
p
m
exit
exit
b
)
`
)
`
p
p p
A
p
p
m
t t
| | | |
2 / 1
1
0
*
1
0
2 / 1
1
0
1
0
1 1
)
`
)
`
)
`
)
`
p
p
A
p
p
p
p
A
p
p
t t b
exit
b
For a given value of high back pressure corresponding
throat pressure can be calculated.
As exit area is higher than throat area throat pressure
is always less than exit plane pressure.
An decreasing exit pressure produces lowering throat
pressure
Variation of Mass Flow Rate in Exit Pressure
0
p
p
b
0
p
p
e
1
1
0
,
p
p
critical b
0
,
p
p
critical e
Variation of in Mass Flow Rate
0
p
p
b
m
1
0
,
p
p
critical b
choked
m
|
.
|
1+
1
( )
2
M
2
|
\
|
.
|
(
+1
2 1 ( )
A
A
*
Define:
Expand F(M) is Taylors series about some arbitrary Mach
number M
(j)
F(M) = F(M
( j )
) +
cF
cM
|
\
|
.
|
( j )
M M
( j )
( )
+
c
2
F
cM
2
|
\
|
.
|
( j )
M M
( j )
( )
2
2
+ ...O M M
( j )
( )
3
Solve for M
M = M
( j )
+
F(M) F(M
( j )
)
c
2
F
cM
2
|
\
|
.
|
( j )
M M
( j )
( )
2
2
+ ...O M M
( j )
( )
3
(
(
(
(
(
cF
cM
|
\
|
.
|
( j )
From Earlier Definition , thus
F(M) = 0
M = M
( j )
F(M
( j )
) +
c
2
F
cM
2
|
\
|
.
|
( j )
M M
( j )
( )
2
2
+ ...O M M
( j )
( )
3
(
(
(
(
(
cF
cM
|
\
|
.
|
( j )
if M
(j)
is chosen to be close to M
M M
( j )
( )
2
<< M M
( j )
( )
And we can truncate after the first order terms with little
Loss of accuracy
Still exact expression
First Order approximation of solution for M
However; one would anticipate that
Hat indicates that solution is no longer exact
M
^
= M
( j )
F(M
( j )
)
cF
cM
|
\
|
.
|
( j )
M M
^
< M M
( j )
estimate is closer than original guess
And we would anticipate that
refined estimate . Iteration 1
M
^
^
= M
^
F(M
^
)
cF
cM
|
\
|
.
|
| M
^
M M
^
^
< M M
^
If we substitute back into the approximate expression
M
^
Abstracting to a j
th
iteration
Iterate until convergence
j={0,1,.}
M
^
( j +1)
= M
^
( j )
F(M
^
( j )
)
cF
cM
|
\
|
.
|
|( j )
1
M
^
( j +1)
2
+1
|
\
|
.
|
1+
1
( )
2
M
^
( j +1)
2
|
\
|
.
|
(
+1
2 1 ( )
A
A
*
A
A
*
< c
Drop from loop when