You are on page 1of 5

THE ANNALS OF “DUNĂREA DE JOS” UNIVERSITY OF GALAłI

FASCICLE V, TECHOLOLOGIES IN MACHINE BUILDING, ISSN 1221-4566


2007

Design of the virtual model of re-drawing process

C. Maier1, Kosmalski N.2, M. Banu1,


Epureanu Al.1, Paunoiu V.1
1
Universitatea “Dunărea de jos” GalaŃi, Facultatea de Mecanică
2
Ecole des Mines de Douai,France

ABSTRACT
This paper deals with the develop the finite element modelization of the re-drawing
process in order to create his virtual model. The finite element is a method that
permits to reduce the time and the cost in the designing. Then in a second time a
good finite element model permit to avoid or complement laboratory
characterization of material for re drawing. methodology for developing a
laboratory inverse re-drawing device. The drawing process is performed in two
phases: a direct drawing of a circular blank followed by a second reverse re-
drawing phase on the same device.
A work is also done on the finite element model for the single deep drawing.
This single deep drawing is used to validate the parameters of the numerical model.
The main goal of this simulation is to define geometrical parameters of the process,
in order to design a reverse re-drawing machine, and have the possibility in the
future to compare experimental results and finite element results. The second goal
is the estimation of the blank reaction (ability to support the process), and eliminate
as well the default obtain during the simulation.
Keywords: finite element simulations, inverse re-drawing, strain path

1. Introduction that is defined as β=D o /d o (where Do is the


blank diameter and do the punch diameter). A
This study deals with the creation of a finite blank with a certain thickness and material
elements simulation of a reverse deep characteristics, has a draw ratio limit βlim
redrawing process. The re drawing is a process which represent the most severe operation that
decomposed in several stages, and permit to it can be submit to. In this way a blank could
obtain better results than a single step drawing pass through a deep drawing operation if β <
(part 2). β lim .
Firstly, the goal is to determined correct When high drawing ratios is required the
numerical parameters (part 3.3) for a simulation process is decomposed into several steps. There
of deep drawing. This research is based upon are usually two kinds of redrawing: the direct
the comparison between a single drawing and the reverse one.
experimentation (part 3.1) and the result of the The direct re-drawing use punch travel in
simulation of this experience (part 3.2). the same time whereas reverse re-drawing
The parameters is used in the simulation punch travel in the opposite direction.
of the reverse drawing (part 4) in order to Logically, the thickness reduces due to the first
dimension reverse deep drawing tools pass makes that the limiting draw ratio has to
parameters (clearance between the punch and be decrease for the next steps:
the die/round radius of the punch and the die). do
A good simulation also permits to avoid or = k ⋅ β lim (1)
complement laboratory characterization of
e
reverse deep drawing process. where:
e - steel thickness
k - proportionality factor.
2. Generality on reverse drawing In the facts, we observe that β 2lim (limit
drawing ratio on the second step) is superior to
The severity of a deep drawing pass on a metal the estimation of β 2lim based on the thickness
blank could be represented by the draw ratio

10
FASCICLE V THE ANNALS OF ‘DUNĂREA DE JOS” UNIVERSITY OF GALAłI

reduction. The modification of the hardening


parameters due to the first pass and the Tab 2 - Power law parameters
bending-unbending effects when sheet pass in Mat er ia l A m E ν
the second step enhanced the material drawing [ Mp a]
properties. DP 6 0 0 1 0 9 3 0 .1 8 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 .3 3
HS L A 673 0 .1 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 .3 3
3. Validation of a finite element model 3.1 The experimental procedure

The comparison between the model and the A 3 mm diameter circle (dini) patterns is
experiments is realized for the HSLA steel (cf. printed on the blank. When the drawing is done,
tab 1). The FEM also was realized for the the circle’s deformation were measured by
DP600 steel. Both of them steels are designed electronic microscope and given the major and
for drawing operation. minor strain
Is detailed below, the geometrical
parameters both used in the model and in the
experimentation

Fi g. 2 - D efo r ma t io n o f th e g rid

T ab 3 - C ir cle 's d efo r ma tio n


i d m aj . d m in .
1 4, 6 49 1, 8 06

W a ll of c u p
2 4, 8 71 1, 8 84
3 4, 2 1 1, 9 93
4 4, 2 4 2, 0 53
P u nc h d ia me ter d o = 8 2 .3 6 m m 5 4, 1 6 2, 4 46
P u nc h r o u nd r p = 5 .5 m m 6 3, 2 45 2, 6 21
r ad i u s 7 3, 1 46 3, 0 43
B la n k t h ic k n es s e = 1mm 8 3, 0 06 3, 0 46
B ot to m o f

B la n k d i a me ter D 0 =1 3 8 m m 9 3, 0 52 3, 2 34
Die r o u nd r ad i us rd = 8mm 10 3, 1 54 3, 2 17
11 3, 1 54 3, 1 17
c up

Cl ear a n ce c = 1 .3 m m
12 3, 1 42 3, 0 32
Dr a wi n g d ep t h P = 41mm
T he c ir c le 1 2 i s ta n ge n t at t he ce n ter ,
Fi g. 1 - G eo m et ri ca l p a r a met er s. and c ir c le s i nd e x es f r o m 1 2 to 7 ar e
d isp o sed o n t h e b a s e o f th e c up . T h e c ir c le
T he d r a w r at io ( i. e. se ver it y o f t he 1 i s o n t he b l a n k b o r d e r a nd cir c le s 1 to 6
p as s d e f i ned as β =D 0 / d 0 – cap .1 ) o f t h e ar e d i sp o s ed , fr o m t he b o r d er , n t h e wa ll o f
o p er at io n i s β=1 .6 7 . T he li mi t i n g d r a w th e d r a we d cup . T he cir c le o n t he c up
r atio ( t he s e ver it y t ha t st eel c a n b e s ub mi t r o u nd ca n ’t b e me a s ur ed .
to ) fo r HS L A st ee l i n o u r ca se is β l i m =1 .8 1 . Fr o m t h es e mea s ur e s, t he maj o r a nd
th e mi n o r str ai n ( ε 1 , ε 2 ) ar e c alc u la ted :
Tab 1 - Material properties ε 1 =ln(d m a j /d i n i ) ; ε 2 =ln(d m i n /d i n i ) (2)
Mat er ia l Y0 Rm E ν T he n t h e t h ic k ne s s s tr ai n ( ε3 ) is
[ Mp a] [ Mp a [ Mp a] d ed u ced wit h t he vo lu me co n ser v at io n
] r u le:
DP 6 0 0 260 840 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 .3 3 ε1+ ε2+ ε3 = 0 (3)
HS L A 370 530 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 .3 3

11
THE ANNALS OF ‘DUNĂREA DE JOS” UNIVERSITY OF GALAłI FASCICLE V

As s u me d t ha t i s a p la ne str es s mo d el , 3.3 Comparison between simulation and


( no r ma l fo r c es o n co nt act ar e ne g le cted ) experimentation
th e s tr e s s i s ca lc ul at ed wi t h Lé v y- Vo n
Mi se s cr it er i a: Here a good strain correlation between the
Ho o k r ul es : result of the FEM and experimentation is
observed: 0,88 for the major strain and 0,97 for

[ ]
ε x = E σ x − µ (σ y + σ z ) ; ς xy = G ⋅ σ xy
1
the minor strain.
 The axy-symmetric simulation gives
ε y = ... (4) results close to the experimentation but there is
 anyway a gap between the series of strain. The
ε z = ... average difference in the wall strain is about
 20% and more than 100% in the bottom of the
cup. Anyway, the simulation gives usable and
So i t c a n b e d ed uced t he st r e ss :
coherent in the wall. And underestimation of
  µ
σ x = 2G ε x + (ε x + ε y + ε z ) 20% of the maximum strain value in the wall
has to be taken in account to obtain coherent
  1 − 2µ  results. But the results in the bottom of cup are

σ y = ... (5) unusable.
 The plane stress simulation doesn’t give
σ z = ... good strain results because the compressive
 stress under the blank holder is not applied on
elements. And so only the stress due to the die
T hi s r e lat io n is o b ta i ned : round radius is involved in the model, what it
σ x −σ y σ y −σ z σ z −σ x explain the tray allure for the strain in the wall
= = = 2G ( 6 ) (see the plane stress modelization strain in the
εx −εy εy −εz εz −εx figure 3 and 4).
I n g e ner a l c as e : Contrary to the plane stress model, axy-
σ1 − σ 2 σ 2 − σ 3 σ 3 − σ1 symmetric model take in account the
= = = cste (7) compressive stress and so gives better results.
ε1 − ε 2 ε2 −ε3 ε 3 − ε1
0,2
I n t he s it ua tio n o f p l a ne st r e ss :
0,1
σ1 − σ 2 σ2
= (8) 0
ε1 − ε 2 ε 2 − ε 3 -0,1
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69
strain

H ub er -M i se s -H e nc k y p l as tic cr i ter ia : -0,2

σ max − σ min = βσ 0 wi t h β=1.1 (9) -0,3


-0,4
I n o ur ca se i f σ 1 > σ 2 t he n σ 1 - σ 2 = β σ 0
-0,5
So t h e str es s ca n b e d ed uc e fr o m s tr ai n :
ε 3 − ε1 ε −ε -0,6
⋅ β ⋅ σ 0 = σ1 ; 2 3 ⋅ β ⋅ σ 0 = σ 2 (10) Initial radial position
ε 2 − ε1 ε1 − ε 2
Plane stress AxySymmetric Experimental

3.2 The numerical model


Fi g 3 - M in o r st ra in fo r t h e t wo F E M
mo d el i za t io n a n d e xp e ri men ta l d a ta s.
The finite element simulation is realized with
the implicit code MscMarc. A two dimensions 0,6
model is used with linear quad elements and
0,5
with the large strain multiplicative option and
use coulomb friction. The material is defined as 0,4
elasto-plastic and use a power law modelisation
strain

0,3
(Swift law) :
σ = Aε m (11) 0,2

0,1
Tab 4 - Parameters of the simulation
0
T he o pt i mi ze pa ra me t e rs
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69
Re la ti ve s lid i n g 0 .0 7 5
Inital radial position
ve lo c it y
Fr i ct io n co e f f ic ie n t 0 .0 1 Plane stress Axy-symmetric Experimental
Co nt ac t 0 .0 1
Co nt ac t b i as 0 .1 Fi g 4 - Ma jo r st ra in

12
FASCICLE V THE ANNALS OF ‘DUNĂREA DE JOS” UNIVERSITY OF GALAłI

4. Reverse re-drawing simulation Moreover it seems harder to evaluate the


limiting draw ratio for the second pass except
In order to create a laboratory reverse re- by realized tests or create a finite element
drawing tool, the finite elements method allows model dedicate to this.
to shearsh optimize dimension for this.
5. Conclusion
4.1 Characteristics of the simulation
Once the numerical model is validate, this
This simulation uses the parameters in table 4 allow to use in combination with the laboratory
and the characteristics of DP600 and HSLA trial of deep drawing in order to reduce time
steels. The first pass is the same than previous and cost on the drawing characterization
with a drawing depth of 29,5 mm. operation.
The second pass use a 47 mm diameter The result of the reverse drawing
punch and has a drawing depth of 58,5 mm. simulation permit to evaluate the abilities of
Initially there is a clearance of 5,2 mm between such a process. Secondly some important
the punch and the die on the second pass. This geometrical parameters (like, the clearance)
clearance was too high and creates undulations. were evaluate and improve the design of tools
(see the table of synthesis to reduce clearance). for a reverse drawing machine.
The final clearance is set at 1,2 mm but
increase the stress in the sheet. Consequently 6. Acknowledgements
we reduce the clearance on the first pass at 1,5
mm in order to reduce the stress and help the This work has been material and logistic
sheet move. funded by the National Excellence Research
Project -CEEX contract no. 22/2005.
4.2 Increases of material abilities in a
reverse redrawing process References

In our case the second step’s limiting draw ratio 1 . M. Banu, C. Maier, S. Bouvier, H. Haddadi, C.
is β 2lim =1,33. But the draw ratio on the second Teodosiu, D a t a P r e p r o c e s s i n g a n d I d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f
the Elastoplastic Constitutive Models - WP3, Task
pass in the simulation (β 2 =1,75) is over the
1, 18-Months Progress Report, Digital Die Design
limit. As explain in the part 2. The modification S ys t e m s ( 3 D S ) IM S 1 9 9 0 0 0 0 5 1 , ( 2 0 0 1 ) , 2 2 - 2 9 .
of the material history and the effect of “re- 2. W. Johnson, P. B .Mellor, Engineering
treatment” of the second pass enhanced material plasticity, ELLIS H AR W O O D SER IES IN
M E C H A N I C A L E N G IN E E R I N G, 1 9 8 7
drawing abilities.
3 . M a n u e l N e mo z , G e n e r a l i t y o n t h e d e e p
drawing, (Universite d e Poitiers)
Tab 5 - Draw ratios of the reverse drawing FEM 4 . A mi t M u k u n d J o s h i , S t r a i n s t u d i e s i n s h e e t
Fir s t Seco nd O ver Al l metal stamping.
p as s p as s
β 1 ,6 7 1 ,7 5 2 ,9 2 *
βlim 1 ,8 1 1 ,3 3
( *r atio i f o p er a tio n wa s mad e i n a s i n gl e
p as s) .

13
FASCICLE V THE ANNALS OF ‘DUNĂREA DE JOS” UNIVERSITY OF GALAłI

Proiectarea modelului virtual al procesului de ambutisare inversa


Rezumat

Aceasta lucrare prezinta metodologia modelarii cu elemente finite a procesului de


ambutisare inversa cu scopul dezvoltarii unui model virtual al acestuia. Metoda
elementelor finite permite reducerea timpului si costurilor de proiectare. De
asemenea, o modelare corecta cu elemente finite permite evitarea defectelor si
completarea cunostintelor privind comportarea materialului in timpul procesului de
ambutisare inversa. Pentru a putea aprecia corectitudinea modelarii cu elemente
finite se impune realizarea unui echipament tehnologic de laborator pentru
ambutisarea inversa.
In cadrul lucrarii sunt prezentate rezultatele simularii numerice a primei
etape – ambutisarea directa, rezultate care sunt validate prin cercetare
experimentala. Odata validati parametrii modelului numeric, se dezvolta acesta cu
scopul proiectarii si realizarii echipamentului de laborator pentru ambutisarea
inversa. Al doilea obiectiv major al cercetarii prezentate in aceasta lucrare este
estimarea corecta a reactiei de raspuns a materialului in timpul procesului de
deformare, astfel incat sa se evite posibilele defecte de tip cute, fisuri, revenire
elastica..

Conception du model virtuel du processus d’emboutissage inverse


Résume

Ce papier présent la méthode de modélisation éléments finis du processus


d’emboutissage inverse au but de développer un nouveau model virtuel de celui-ci.
La méthode éléments finis permet de réduire le temps et le coût des activités de
conception. Ensuite, une modélisation correcte aux éléments finis permet d’éviter les
défauts et compléter les connaissances sur le comportement du matériau pendant le
processus d’emboutissage inverse. Pour pouvoir valider la modélisation éléments
finis il s’impose la fabrication d’un équipement de laboratoire pour l’emboutissage
inverse.
Dans ce papier nous présentons les résultats de la simulation numérique de la
première étape – l’emboutissage direct, résultats valides par la recherche
expérimentale. Une fois valides les paramètres du model numérique, nous avons
développe ce model au but de réaliser la conception et la fabrication de
l’équipement de laboratoire pour l’emboutissage inverse. Le deuxième objectif la
recherche effectue a été la prédiction de la réaction réponse du matériau pendant le
processus de mise en forme, ainsi que nous pouvons éviter les défauts possibles de
type plis, fissures, retour élastique.

11

You might also like