Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
This paper deals with the develop the finite element modelization of the re-drawing
process in order to create his virtual model. The finite element is a method that
permits to reduce the time and the cost in the designing. Then in a second time a
good finite element model permit to avoid or complement laboratory
characterization of material for re drawing. methodology for developing a
laboratory inverse re-drawing device. The drawing process is performed in two
phases: a direct drawing of a circular blank followed by a second reverse re-
drawing phase on the same device.
A work is also done on the finite element model for the single deep drawing.
This single deep drawing is used to validate the parameters of the numerical model.
The main goal of this simulation is to define geometrical parameters of the process,
in order to design a reverse re-drawing machine, and have the possibility in the
future to compare experimental results and finite element results. The second goal
is the estimation of the blank reaction (ability to support the process), and eliminate
as well the default obtain during the simulation.
Keywords: finite element simulations, inverse re-drawing, strain path
10
FASCICLE V THE ANNALS OF ‘DUNĂREA DE JOS” UNIVERSITY OF GALAłI
The comparison between the model and the A 3 mm diameter circle (dini) patterns is
experiments is realized for the HSLA steel (cf. printed on the blank. When the drawing is done,
tab 1). The FEM also was realized for the the circle’s deformation were measured by
DP600 steel. Both of them steels are designed electronic microscope and given the major and
for drawing operation. minor strain
Is detailed below, the geometrical
parameters both used in the model and in the
experimentation
Fi g. 2 - D efo r ma t io n o f th e g rid
W a ll of c u p
2 4, 8 71 1, 8 84
3 4, 2 1 1, 9 93
4 4, 2 4 2, 0 53
P u nc h d ia me ter d o = 8 2 .3 6 m m 5 4, 1 6 2, 4 46
P u nc h r o u nd r p = 5 .5 m m 6 3, 2 45 2, 6 21
r ad i u s 7 3, 1 46 3, 0 43
B la n k t h ic k n es s e = 1mm 8 3, 0 06 3, 0 46
B ot to m o f
B la n k d i a me ter D 0 =1 3 8 m m 9 3, 0 52 3, 2 34
Die r o u nd r ad i us rd = 8mm 10 3, 1 54 3, 2 17
11 3, 1 54 3, 1 17
c up
Cl ear a n ce c = 1 .3 m m
12 3, 1 42 3, 0 32
Dr a wi n g d ep t h P = 41mm
T he c ir c le 1 2 i s ta n ge n t at t he ce n ter ,
Fi g. 1 - G eo m et ri ca l p a r a met er s. and c ir c le s i nd e x es f r o m 1 2 to 7 ar e
d isp o sed o n t h e b a s e o f th e c up . T h e c ir c le
T he d r a w r at io ( i. e. se ver it y o f t he 1 i s o n t he b l a n k b o r d e r a nd cir c le s 1 to 6
p as s d e f i ned as β =D 0 / d 0 – cap .1 ) o f t h e ar e d i sp o s ed , fr o m t he b o r d er , n t h e wa ll o f
o p er at io n i s β=1 .6 7 . T he li mi t i n g d r a w th e d r a we d cup . T he cir c le o n t he c up
r atio ( t he s e ver it y t ha t st eel c a n b e s ub mi t r o u nd ca n ’t b e me a s ur ed .
to ) fo r HS L A st ee l i n o u r ca se is β l i m =1 .8 1 . Fr o m t h es e mea s ur e s, t he maj o r a nd
th e mi n o r str ai n ( ε 1 , ε 2 ) ar e c alc u la ted :
Tab 1 - Material properties ε 1 =ln(d m a j /d i n i ) ; ε 2 =ln(d m i n /d i n i ) (2)
Mat er ia l Y0 Rm E ν T he n t h e t h ic k ne s s s tr ai n ( ε3 ) is
[ Mp a] [ Mp a [ Mp a] d ed u ced wit h t he vo lu me co n ser v at io n
] r u le:
DP 6 0 0 260 840 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 .3 3 ε1+ ε2+ ε3 = 0 (3)
HS L A 370 530 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 .3 3
11
THE ANNALS OF ‘DUNĂREA DE JOS” UNIVERSITY OF GALAłI FASCICLE V
0,3
(Swift law) :
σ = Aε m (11) 0,2
0,1
Tab 4 - Parameters of the simulation
0
T he o pt i mi ze pa ra me t e rs
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69
Re la ti ve s lid i n g 0 .0 7 5
Inital radial position
ve lo c it y
Fr i ct io n co e f f ic ie n t 0 .0 1 Plane stress Axy-symmetric Experimental
Co nt ac t 0 .0 1
Co nt ac t b i as 0 .1 Fi g 4 - Ma jo r st ra in
12
FASCICLE V THE ANNALS OF ‘DUNĂREA DE JOS” UNIVERSITY OF GALAłI
In our case the second step’s limiting draw ratio 1 . M. Banu, C. Maier, S. Bouvier, H. Haddadi, C.
is β 2lim =1,33. But the draw ratio on the second Teodosiu, D a t a P r e p r o c e s s i n g a n d I d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f
the Elastoplastic Constitutive Models - WP3, Task
pass in the simulation (β 2 =1,75) is over the
1, 18-Months Progress Report, Digital Die Design
limit. As explain in the part 2. The modification S ys t e m s ( 3 D S ) IM S 1 9 9 0 0 0 0 5 1 , ( 2 0 0 1 ) , 2 2 - 2 9 .
of the material history and the effect of “re- 2. W. Johnson, P. B .Mellor, Engineering
treatment” of the second pass enhanced material plasticity, ELLIS H AR W O O D SER IES IN
M E C H A N I C A L E N G IN E E R I N G, 1 9 8 7
drawing abilities.
3 . M a n u e l N e mo z , G e n e r a l i t y o n t h e d e e p
drawing, (Universite d e Poitiers)
Tab 5 - Draw ratios of the reverse drawing FEM 4 . A mi t M u k u n d J o s h i , S t r a i n s t u d i e s i n s h e e t
Fir s t Seco nd O ver Al l metal stamping.
p as s p as s
β 1 ,6 7 1 ,7 5 2 ,9 2 *
βlim 1 ,8 1 1 ,3 3
( *r atio i f o p er a tio n wa s mad e i n a s i n gl e
p as s) .
13
FASCICLE V THE ANNALS OF ‘DUNĂREA DE JOS” UNIVERSITY OF GALAłI
11