Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE LIFE LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION, CHARISMATIC EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOR LIFE, AND OPERATION RESCUE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE LIFE LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION, CHARISMATIC EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOR LIFE, AND OPERATION RESCUE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Ratings: (0)|Views: 5 |Likes:
Published by Tom Ciesielka
Life Legal Defense Foundation countered illegal abortionist Bruce Norman’s bid to continue performing abortions at the unlicensed New Woman, All Women abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama. The clinic, permanently closed by a Jefferson County Circuit Court injunction, has been the scene of ongoing controversy due to the continued unlawful operation by Norman and owner Diane Derzis. Life Legal Defense Foundation’s “friends of the court” brief opposes Norman’s request for reconsideration in the matter of his ban on performing abortions. Norman was practicing at the Birmingham facility shut down by the Alabama Department of Public Health due to ongoing health hazards and violation of state laws.
Life Legal Defense Foundation countered illegal abortionist Bruce Norman’s bid to continue performing abortions at the unlicensed New Woman, All Women abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama. The clinic, permanently closed by a Jefferson County Circuit Court injunction, has been the scene of ongoing controversy due to the continued unlawful operation by Norman and owner Diane Derzis. Life Legal Defense Foundation’s “friends of the court” brief opposes Norman’s request for reconsideration in the matter of his ban on performing abortions. Norman was practicing at the Birmingham facility shut down by the Alabama Department of Public Health due to ongoing health hazards and violation of state laws.

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: Tom Ciesielka on Sep 30, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/15/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 AlaFileE-Notice
To:WILLIAMH.WEBSTERwill@websterhenry.com
01-CV-2013-901119.00
Judge:JOSEPHL.BOOHAKER
NOTICEOFELECTRONICFILING
INTHECIRCUITCOURTOFJEFFERSONCOUNTY,ALABAMA
ThefollowingmatterwasFILEDon9/27/20132:44:47PM
STATEBOARDOFHEALTHV.ALLWOMEN'S,INC.ETAL01-CV-2013-901119.00MOTIONTORECONSIDER
NoticeDate:9/27/20132:44:47PM[Filer:WEBSTERWILLIAMHOUSTON]
 ANNE-MARIEADAMSCIRCUITCOURTCLERK
JEFFERSONCOUNTY,ALABAMA716N.RICHARDARRINGTONBLVD.BIRMINGHAM,AL35203205-325-5355anne-marie.adams@alacourt.govJEFFERSONCOUNTY,ALABAMA
F002 CHARISMATIC EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOR LIFEF005 CHARISMATIC EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOR LIFEF001 LIFE LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATIONF004 LIFE LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATIONF003 OPERATION RESCUEF006 OPERATION RESCUE
 
 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OFJEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA
STATE BOARD OF HEALTH,Plaintiff,vs.ALL WOMEN’S INC., d/b/a NEW WOMANALL WOMEN HEALTH CARE, DIPAT,L.L.C., DIANE W. DERZIS, PATRICK H.SMITH, and BRUCE E. NORMAN, M.D.,Defendants.))))))))))Case No.: 01-CV-2013-901119 JBBRIEF OF
 AMICI CURIAE 
IN OPPOSITIONTO DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
BRIEF OF
 AMICI CURIAE
LIFE LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION,CHARISMATIC EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOR LIFE, ANDOPERATION RESCUE IN OPPOSITION TODEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
 
 
ELECTRONICALLY FILED9/27/2013 2:44 PM01-CV-2013-901119.00CIRCUIT COURT OFJEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMAANNE-MARIE ADAMS, CLERK
 
 
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... i
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................................................................................. ii
INTERESTS OF AMICI..................................................................................................... 1
ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................... 2
I. Unsupported statements are not evidence. ............................................................... 2II. Altered testimony is not permissible evidence. ........................................................ 3III. Voluntary compliance with the law is not grounds for setting aside the Court’sorder. ......................................................................................................................... 3CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ........................................................................................... 5
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->