Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
• IW Background
• Engagement Efforts
Irregular Challenges
National Defense Strategy
identified a need to confront
irregular challenges…
FY07 leading
Budget of the edge investments FY08-13 Planning
United States of & Programming Supporting Studies
America Joint Programming
Guidance & Roadmaps
“In the post-September 11 world, irregular warfare has emerged as the dominant form of warfare
confronting the United States, its allies and its partners; accordingly, guidance must account for
distributed, long-duration operations, including unconventional warfare, foreign internal defense,
counterterrorism, counterinsurgency, and stabilization and reconstruction operations.” Quadrennial
Defense Review Report, 6 Feb 06
Doctrinal Pedigree
Navy IW History
• 1998: Naval TLAM strikes at UBL
• 2002: COMSUBLANT CT Initiative begins
• 2003-4: Conducted first dedicated CT missions
• 2005: Identified “Gaps and Seams”
– Reason: Navy and CT forces not synchronized
• Host nation - embassy disconnect (CIA/State)
• Stove-piped intel/operational directives (Fleet/CIA/NSA/Combatant CDR)
• Mar 2005: CSCO created to bridge gaps
– Direct liaison to TF, NCC, IA/IC, Tactical development
• Feb 2007: CSCO redesignated CECO to reflect Navy-wide effort
• Dec 2007: Deep Blue and Naval Studies Board conducts studies to
optimize Navy’s CT effort
– Finding: deeds do not match words-directs SUBFOR solution
– Study not acted upon by Navy
• July 25, 2008: CNO formally stands up IW effort under N3/N5
Strategic:
• Violent extremism will remain a long-term threat to the US, its allies, and
developing nations
• Littorals will grow in strategic significance as demographics and
globalization contribute to increased competition for resources
• Coastal approaches and rivers will remain vital lines of communication in
developing nations at risk of insurgency or extremism
Operational:
• Building partner capacity will be critical to achieving success with limited
resources, particularly in regions and countries at risk
• Closer coordination both within USG and with partners of diplomatic,
information, military, and economic activities will be key to diminishing /
countering IW threats
• Improved understanding of foreign cultural, social, political, economic
factors (i.e., better Situational Awareness) is essential to engaging the
increasingly complex global security environment
• Most USG actions will have strategic communications impact in the IW
environment
“The fight will move from Iraq and Afghanistan and be a worldwide struggle,
need to move and get to a distributed maritime capability to engage this threat.”
– LTG McChrystal (Nov 06)
Initiatives
Trident Reach
Comms Link
Collaboration
Concept of Operations
System Highlights:
•Dry Deck Shelter Stowed
•SSGN Deck Launch & Recovery
•Highly reliable, combat proven– over 100,000
combat flight hours of ISR service
•Long Endurance– 20+ hours
•Night / Day Capable– carries either EO or IR
cameras or both in dual bay configuration
• Other Payloads: AIS, Comm relay, NanoSAR SSGN HVI
synthetic aperture array
• Quiet. Low audible signature at altitude
Ground Assets
Demonstration
Providing cost-effective FAC-A training Aging Fleet of traditional FAC-A assets
GWOT requirements limit availability of training
assets
Increasing Fuel and maintenance costs
Imminent Fury Demo Provides:
• Demonstrates an inexpensive FAC-A trainer
can provide comparable training at a fraction
of the cost.
• Stepping stone to full USN/USMC program of
EMB-314 Super Tucano
record.
Funding ($M) FY08 FY09 Total
Key Participants
• Sponsors: NAVAIR / USN / OSD NAVAIR / OSD 1.58M 1.58M
• Gov‟t Contributors: AS&C, Navy Sponsor/Service 1.18M 1.18M
• Industry: Embraer (Brazil & Ft Lauderdale, FL); (USN) 3.76M
Rockwell Collins; FLIR Systems Inc.; L3 Comm Milestones Leading to Fielded Capability
Lease Aircraft / Flight Clearance April 2008
Key Deliverables: • FAC-A Equip. Integration May 2008
• One developmental test EMB-314 Super • Air Wing Work-ups (NAS Fallon) 9-21 June 2008
Tucano • 2010 POM
• Courseware, syllabus, and TTPs PM PoC: Terry Witte 301-757-6963 terence.witte@navy.mil
• Tech manuals
Navy Irregular Warfare
UNCLASSIFIED
USN RW Support to SOF
LONG TERM OPTIONS:
Engagement Efforts
Engagement Efforts
• NCR Engagement
• SOF/IC Engagement
• Forward Engagement
Achieving Synchronization
• Battle rhythm
– Quarterly visits:
• Regional Combatant CDRs
• US Fleet Forces Command
• Deployed Special Operations CDRs
• Fleet HQ’s- Bahrain/Yokosuka/Norfolk/Pearl Harbor
• Royal Navy/Royal Australian Navy/French Navy, IW partners
– Monthly visits:
• Type Commanders, waterfront
• Research laboratories/Industry leadership/Site visits
– Weekly interaction:
• Washington DC (Joint Staff, Intel community, Interagency)
• Technical development VTCs and conferences
• VTCs to Deployed Liaison Officers
Counter-Terrorism Platforms
• Insert Pictures
• Process:
– Acquisition / requirements process not agile or
responsive
– No IW platform or program sponsor = little advocacy
• Cultural:
– Lack of an Irregular Warfare Pillar
– Perceived threat to major programs: zero sum game
– Need to overcome “Dissident Colonel” reputation
• Resources:
– Resources allocation does not reflect IW and
conventional warfare balance
Looking to Industry
Questions?
Backups