Upload_transparent

Library Associations GBS Letter to DOJ

 
 
 
 
 
Download PDF FREE
alawash

by alawash

Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 2 43
Words: 866 13640
Characters: 5626 81678
Lines: 18 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.5 5.99
Words per line: 48.11 21.89
Words per page: 433.0 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

484 Reads | 0 Comments

Description

July 30, 2009

Library groups advise DOJ on proposed Google Book Search settlement

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The American Library Association (ALA), the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) and the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) sent a letter to William Cavanaugh, Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Antitrust Division yesterday, requesting the Division to advise the court presiding over the Google Book Settlement to supervise the implementation of the settlement closely, particularly the pricing of institutional subscriptions and the selection of the Book Rights Registry board members.

The letter, which was sent following a meeting the library groups had with the Antitrust Division, also recommended that the Division itself actively monitor the parties' compliance with the settlement’s provisions.

In particular, the library groups urged the Division to ask the court to review pricing of institutional subscriptions whenever the Division concludes that the prices do not meet the economic objectives set forth in the settlement. In order to evaluate the price of an institutional subscription, the groups believe the Division should have access to all relevant price information from Google and the Registry.

The library associations assert that the Division should ask the court to review any refusal by the Registry to license copyrights in books on the same terms available to Google and to also review the selection process for the Registry Board to ensure the interests of all rightsholders are considered.

With an absence of competition for the proposed services, the settlement could compromise fundamental library values such as equity of access to information, patron privacy and intellectual freedom, according to the library associations who filed comments with the presiding judge on behalf of libraries and the public interest.

Pdf_16x16 2 Pages


Date Added

07/30/2009

Category
Tags
Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect