Walled Up Nuns

by

Lancelot Holland

Godless House
Posted to Scribd : Tuesday, 05 November 2013

Introduction

Here we have a gruesome little item, Walled Up Nuns and Nuns Walled In, by W. Lancelot Holland, third edition, 1895. There is no date to the title page, as you can see, but the preface gives us a date. I acquired my copy more than a dozen years ago when I took to buying atheism related works. I have never read it, but I recall my impression being that it was a holier than thou type of protestant attack upon Catholicism. It is always nice to see religion being attacked in a substantive form no matter what the source or reason. Today, Saturday, 02 November 2013, with my copy in my hand I wondered what its availability was, and it turned out not to be. No free copies were in evidence and the only one for sale was priced at two hundred and fifty quid. The book is two hundred and forty three pages, and reproducing it all is too much bother, but I thought I could go as far as the first chapter in order to offer a piece of an otherwise rare item that is certainly grist to the mill of an atheist education, that I always have an eye to fostering. When we see accounts of human behaviour of this kind from times past, we are revolted by the depraved cruelty and horror portrayed, this is an immediate, personal reaction, and quite understandable, it is our instinctive sense of empathy placing us in the position of the victims of such nastiness that causes such a reaction, making us fear four ourselves in our imagination as they would have experienced fear for real at the time. The same emotional reaction is of course what gives us such delight in inflicting cruelty in the forum of public judgement, as we take an extraordinary pleasure in seeing people suffer something we find horrific, when we have been given permission to vent this emotion in this gleeful manner. This is our vicarious instinct at work, the most intense expression of our social nature, our vicariousness denoting that which might truly be called a human instinct. This instinct demonstrates our nonexistence as individuals, it is the personification of our human nature as individuals created to serve a social function, making us into individuals that are made to exist through others. This instinct is the reason for all that is unpleasant about life for humans, for it is this requirement that we live through others that makes us so interested in what others are doing, and so determined to impose a pattern of existence upon others, by whatever means. The we in this scenario of control however, is not us as individuals, it is the collective we that forms a social body with a core authority from whence the particular dictates are delivered. In this case we see one such dictate belonging to the Christian church, a most wicked and inhuman institution if ever there was one, a fact not to be forgotten when thinking about the nature of religion, ever, nor ever to be forgiven. A leopard does not change its spots, and a religion does not change its nature, no matter how much it appears to do so. As far as this observation goes and the extreme contrast between the miscreant Christians of today and a few centuries ago, we must recall that we live in a covert absolute theocracy today, whereas, when women were being bricked up in alcoves to die a miserable death, the absolute theocracy was out in the open, as it is in Muslim countries today where people are made to suffer terrible punishments like having their hands cut off for thieving or being flogged for sexual indiscretions. Bearing in mind that we individuals only exist through the being of the superorganism that we belong to, this existence through others is perfectly natural, and it is easy to see how these horrible behaviours are bound to have a highly positive effect in galvanising a social biomass into an organised structural form at a

time when television and sophisticated education, books and sports and other softer techniques are not available to the human animals structural order, where spectacle is always required in a large, extended human biomass, to animate that instinct of vicariousness, of living through others. Because we do not exist all the linguistic meanings that we commonly take for granted, like good and evil, they do not exist either, how can they, that would mean we had a personal will ? A robot cannot be evil, as we all acknowledge regarding animals, hopefully. What we are saying is that we are material units of a living animal and we have been evolved by nature to serve that being, so that all our behaviours are functional, and cannot be otherwise. Which is not how it appears to us close up, but if we step back by employing a macroscopic perspective that lets individuals disappear to leave only a conceptual view of the human animal they compose, then we can see that all that these intense behaviours are about is the physiology of the superorganism. Thus whether we are acting cruelly, or fighting against cruelty, as in animal rights movements, the actual function is identical, which is why animal rights fanatics are as cruel as it is possible to be, to humans. These people have just latched onto a suitable vehicle of power, the defenceless animal, and that is their lever to status within the superorganism. Attacks on homosexuality, or women getting pregnant out of wedlock, or, dare I say it, paedophiles, the big one of the moment, all these intensely emotional reactions of the many against the few, are exactly what the human animal needs in order to create a dynamic structure pulling people together at the behest of the linguistic force that creates and delivers these shared vectors of social action. Which is not to say that we cannot reason about right and wrong, it just means that we can do so in a more sophisticated and reasoned way, where we understand that we are made by nature to form societies and as such we are nothing without one another. The management of society is all about creating myths, taboos, ideologies, religions, bodies of knowledge of linguistic form, that constrain people, forcing them to coagulate here and amass there, from whence individuals act within the resulting social structure to reinforce it by conforming to the leading dogma, the taboo, the myth, the religion, and making an example of those that contradict the image that has been raised above the collective body. Without a victim how can we have any values ? We cannot despise thieves if there is no such thing as stealing. So positive and negative are interdependent in social structure as they are in other aspects of universal existence. A society must have its taboos, because it is a living thing, an animal, and language is the product of a force of information creating social form through such mental imagery. These nuns are one of numerous examples demonstrating this fact, they were the few who galvanised the many, in either case it is not the individuals who matter, it is the human animal, the superorganism. The real question for us Atheist Scientists therefore, as people who want to understand our species in a strictly scientific manner, is what this cruel behaviour means, and how making ourselves aware of it can aid our understanding of ourselves as animals, as things of nature. The mode of expression may of changed over the course of five centuries but equivalent horrors exist today, that continue to arise from a religious font of ideas, particularly that of Islam. It is a matter of weeks since we had the dramatic display of cruelty in a Kenya shopping mall that left many people dead. So when we read about this forgotten religious horror, we should be aware that it is still with us today in spirit, if not in the exact form, a shape shift that makes us think we are different creatures now, when we are not. The real horror therefore is not the acts of cruelty themselves, it is the existence of mindlessness, that is personified in religion. And of course Islam being a Jewish slave religion, just as Christianity is, uses its female element in exactly the same manner as Christians did in former times, as

demonstrated by the practice of enclosure so much vaunted in England today. Channel Four News did a week long special on the subject of women veiling themselves just last month, October 2013. The women we saw argued that this deeply alien activity to our society, which they like to say is their society, was done of their own free will, and it was a personally empowering behaviour. Learning from our Atheist Science, which tells us that the human animal is a superorganism and the individual does not exist, we can fully appreciate that this behaviour is indeed about the exercise of female power in society, even though we Europeans are inclined to misunderstand it as being an abuse of women by domineering men seeking to protect their property from one another. We do not come to this political understanding of our own accord, naturally, we are fed this deceitful idea of what is going on as part of our programming into the idea that there is good and evil, and we are individuals who must be good. Feminine power obviously has to do with the sexual dynamic which prompts desire in men, and thereby sets up the suppression of sexual desire as a gift to authority seeking a means to control the social biomass, and especially as it applies to the males, via the control of the females. Dont ask me where I read this, but when the British empire was at its peak its administrators found that when dealing with certain African tribes they could not bring them to the yoke by killing them because they were warriors through and through, but if they put them in prison that drove them mad, they could not bear it, because they were prevented from ensuring that their wives were not hit on by other men. If that dont say it all ! And this is why women whom we think should feel oppressed say they are empowered by the impositions they endure. Because these impositions are a basis of social authority and power, that raises the individuals acting as the promoters of such values to a higher social status, empowering otherwise merely anonymous individuals. The veiled face would seem to epitomise anonymity, yet what it does, because individuals do not exist anyway, is give the exceptional bearer of such regalia the purest identity of Islam, giving them a personal identity enhanced beyond any they could possess as one individual in the crowd. And within their segregated alien enclave within our English community, these Muslim women will be known and valued accordingly, for they empower Islam in opposition to the main biomass that Islam has been imported here to replace, imported by the action of linguistic force centering upon the core identity of the Western world, which is Jewish. This is why Muslims are not only here, but why they are enabled to promote their alien culture irrespective of how much it offends us, the indigenous English. The higher individual status accrued to these women is a reward for empowering the identity at the core of the behaviour, which is always a religious identity, and as Islam is the rising religious identity of the moment it is here that we find these extreme behaviours being vaunted at the present time. And murdering nuns by burying them alive is, functionally speaking, an identical act to that of veiling women in Islam, it is about keeping the suppression of female sexuality sacred, and thereby controlling men through women, thus allowing women their allotted portion of power within the social structure, which is essentially a slave structure with Judaism at its core, making Judaism the master identity served by all other identities. The reason for human brutality towards their own kind is then simple enough, it has to do with the organisation of the superorganism, it may be mindless, but it is perfectly functional. The individuals who perform the acts of cruelty are the robots empowered by the core identity which engages with the machinery of our somatic form, in the way it is made by nature to be engaged with. This is why, despite all our advances in terms of technology and real knowledge about reality as it is, nothing about our behaviour has changed since we came into existence, we are still the mindless, insect like creatures we have always been.

We argue that importing Islam into England is an act of treachery against our society, but it is an act dictated by the fact that Jews are our masters, they own us, they rule us, they farm us, and they need us to be their slaves, from the inner core of our individual being outwards. Hence our politicians, deeply religious as they are, just like any fanatical religious band, are heartless about us and our culture, and they work things so that Islam is seen as special and we who would oppose its presence amongst us are the monsters. Hence we get Channel Four News taking the part of a liberal media, acting as the propagandists of real fascism, religious fascism, politically speaking These manipulative processes rely upon the fact that all communication is drawn from the false pivot of observation that says we are individuals, so that each person has an equivalent value in principle, whereupon it does indeed follow that Islam must be understood via the words of individuals who bear the mark of this religion. If we adopt the true stance, and use the pivot of observation that recognises that humans are superorganisms and individuals do not exist, then the person bearing any given identity of this mass organising kind, vanishes from the picture and we are left with the religion itself as the only real thing. Now the story looks very different. And it is from this macroscopic perspective that does not see the person but only sees the social form, that atheists must understand these gross, religious human behaviours. Walling up nuns or slaughtering shoppers are not acts of individuals, they are expressions of religious identity, expressions of human nature as a corporate biological nature evolved to bring a human superorganism into being. We have seen the Jewish propaganda machine at work over the last few weeks, programming us to recognise that you can be a Muslim and be English, which is self evidently not the case. What our masters are trying to do here is to displace our English identity with their new slave identity. They have used the recently retired leader of the English Defence League, a Christian organisation, as seen on Newsnight, to reinforce this message, and they followed this up by having a Muslim stooge on the One Show, saying how his father fought for Britain in the last world war and how he was born here, and how he is deeply offended by the idea that he is not English. All of which twisted argument relies upon the principle that things are to be understood on the basis of the individual as an end in themselves. This understanding is a trick played upon us by our owners, the people who rule us and farm us and give us our minds, for by presenting us with sanitised examples of Muslim Englishman like this young man, and proving that he is English despite being dressed in Islamic regalia and espousing the slave identity of Islam that is anathema to our atheist English culture. This question is not about any individual, it is about the identities themselves, about Englishness versus Islam, and you cannot be a Muslim Englishman or Muslim Englishwomen anymore than you can be a feminist rapist ! Every Muslim who is English by dint of living here is a symbol our English cultures eradication. We are not who we are because of our geographical location within a territory where people speak English in its original form. We are who we are because of our culture, an English culture that is about the freedom of the individual personified in freedom of thought, which is anathema to religion because this freedom relies upon the ability to access knowledge or reality as it is, Truth in other words, as opposed to the lies we were made to be enslaved to by nature, and are enslaved to through religion.

Howard Hill

2 + 2 = 4 = Knowledge = Freedom = Englishness

2 + 2 = 5 = Faith = Ignorance = Slavery ___

The human animal is a superorganism = knowledge = freedom The person is the human animal = faith = slavery through ignorance