It’s the saddest of the military holidays, invented after the Civil War, supposed to help us honor, or at least pause to remember, all the American dead from all our wars. That’s alot of men and some women to remember going back, well, how far? Big and small, we’ve “done” about 70 wars starting with the mid-18th century so-called French and Indian wars where George Washington was blooded and when we got our first taste of industrially massacring Native Americans, mainly Ojibwas and Algonquins who sided with the French against our British masters....
It’s the saddest of the military holidays, invented after the Civil War, supposed to help us honor, or at least pause to remember, all the American dead from all our wars. That’s alot of men and some women to remember going back, well, how far? Big and small, we’ve “done” about 70 wars starting with the mid-18th century so-called French and Indian wars where George Washington was blooded and when we got our first taste of industrially massacring Native Americans, mainly Ojibwas and Algonquins who sided with the French against our British masters....
It’s the saddest of the military holidays, invented after the Civil War, supposed to help us honor, or at least pause to remember, all the American dead from all our wars. That’s alot of men and some women to remember going back, well, how far? Big and small, we’ve “done” about 70 wars starting with the mid-18th century so-called French and Indian wars where George Washington was blooded and when we got our first taste of industrially massacring Native Americans, mainly Ojibwas and Algonquins who sided with the French against our British masters....
Military Resistance: thomasfbarton@earthlink.net 5.26.14 Print it out: color best. Pass it on.
Military Resistance 12E13
[Thanks to SSG N (retd) who sent this in]
Memorial Day What? Its A Dilemma How To Pay Tribute To The War Dead While Giving Pause To Young Men And Women Who May Be Thinking About Stepping Into The Dead Soldiers Combat Boots?
From: Clancy Sigal To: Military Resistance Newsletter Subject: Memorial Day What? Date: May 25, 2014
Except for mourning family members and Boy Scouts loyally placing tiny flags on veterans gravestones hardly anyone knows anything about Memorial Day except that its a day off.
Its the saddest of the military holidays, invented after the Civil War, supposed to help us honor, or at least pause to remember, all the American dead from all our wars. Thats a lot of men and some women to remember going back, well, how far?
Big and small, weve done about 70 wars starting with the mid-18th century so-called French and Indian wars where George Washington was blooded and when we got our first taste of industrially massacring Native Americans, mainly Ojibwas and Algonquins who sided with the French against our British masters.
Before penicillin its hard to get an accurate sum total figure of all those combat deaths because so many men died of disease and what was later called shell shock.
In our thirteen major and 60 or so minor wars lets call a round figure of one and a half million dead.
Compared to the mass war slaughter in, say, Russia or China, thats small potatoes, but big potatoes for us.
Our dead include wars you never heard, such the Quasi War with the French, the First Sumatran Expedition and Sheepeater Indian War plus, of course, both World Wars, Korea, Vietnam and Iraq and Afghanistan. A large number of U.S. wars were fought against our own Native Americans (Modocs, Nez Perce, serial Seminole wars etc.) and other colored peoples in China, the Philippines, Haiti, Central America, Mexico etc.
This doesnt and shouldnt take away from the genuine valor of so many American soldiers who fought, died, massacred others and were scalped in return.
Sadly or inspiringly, the truth is men and now women sometimes like to go to war. To do ones patriotic duty can be exciting as well as deadly. You get a sense of purpose and usefulness, possibly your own worth by being in uniform.
Personally, I liked being in the military including its chickenshit.
Its also thrilling to watch war movies.
To celebrate Memorial Day, Turner Classics on TV is throwing shot and shell at us for a solid four day, 72-hour marathon starting Saturday. The lineup includes 34 classics from the Civil War on.
Unless my eyes deceive me Turner is not showing, or avoiding, some fine anti- pro-war films, Renoirs Grand Illusion and Kubricks Paths of Glory as well as All Quiet On The Western Front and Howard Hawkss The Road To Glory (co-written by William Faulkner).
Turners bias is toward blood-and-guts combat stories, comedies and touching stories of the families who wait at home.
In the midst of all the testosterone-laden, gut-wrenching kill, kill, kill is some real quality that fails in the mission of sending men off to war.
If you can make your way past The Dirty Dozen and Kellys Heroes, theres The Best Years of Our Lives, the Quaker-friendly Friendly Persuasion, Sidney Lumets brilliant exposure of military sadism in The Hill, the German-made Westfront 19l8, and J ohn Hustons butchered but decent The Red Badge of Courage.
Missing, thank heaven, are Ronald Reagans favorite Patton and Katherine Bigelows ballsy recruiting poster Hurt Locker.
But Im sorry we wont see Clint Eastwoods Letters From Iwo J ima, a surprise masterpiece telling the battle from a J apanese point of view.
Whats not to love about war movies?
Vivid images of men shooting the crap out of each other heats my blood. The gore of this is how it is is ultimately romantic and seductive. Most war movies cant help but call us to arms. Rat tat tat to Black Watch bagpipe music.
Some movies, like Catch-22, M*A*S*H* and Tony Richardsons The Charge of the Light Brigade, which also are not on Turners list, make an attempt to lower the testosterone level with some humor and cynicism.
But in the end its almost impossible to outshout Objective, Burma, The Dawn Patrol, Where Eagles Dare and Twelve OClock High.
Its a dilemma.
How to pay tribute to the war dead while giving pause to young men and women who may be thinking about stepping into the dead soldiers combat boots?
FORWARD OBSERVATIONS
At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed. Oh had I the ability, and could reach the nations ear, I would, pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke.
For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder.
We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake.
The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppose.
Frederick Douglass, 1852
The Nixon administration claimed and received great credit for withdrawing the Army from Vietnam, but it was the rebellion of low-ranking GIs that forced the government to abandon a hopeless suicidal policy. -- David Cortright; Soldiers In Revolt
Full Disclosure Memorial Day 2014
The Wall 1986. Photograph by Mike Hastie, Army Medic Vietnam
From: Mike Hastie To: Military Resistance Newsletter Sent: May 26, 2014 Subject: Full Disclosure Memorial Day 2014
Photo and caption from the portfolio of Mike Hastie, US Army Medic, Vietnam 1970-71. (For more of his outstanding work, contact at: (hastiemike@earthlink.net) T)
One day while I was in a bunker in Vietnam, a sniper round went over my head. The person who fired that weapon was not a terrorist, a rebel, an extremist, or a so-called insurgent. The Vietnamese individual who tried to kill me was a citizen of Vietnam, who did not want me in his country. This truth escapes millions.
Mike Hastie U.S. Army Medic Vietnam 1970-71 December 13, 2004
Especially After The 1968 Tet Offensive, Antiwar Sentiment Spread Widely Among The Combat Troops In Vietnam The Main Activities Of Antiwar U.S. Servicepeople In Vietnam Were Not Peaceful Demonstrations A 1975 Survey Revealed That 75% Of Vietnam Veterans Were Opposed To The War There Is No Contemporaneous Evidence Of Any Antiwar Activists Spitting On Veterans
Excerpts from Vietnam And Other American Fantasies; H. Bruce Franklin; University Of Massachusetts Press; Amherst, 2000
The most serious occurred on April 14 at the base of Dau Tieng (east of Tay Ninh, north of Cu Chi), when a unit of the Third Brigade of the Fourth Infantry Division defied orders to proceed on a search-and-destroy mission near where another unit had been badly cut up.
The commanding officer ordered other soldiers to fire on the rebels, who returned the fire. One report indicated dozens of men killed or wounded and three helicopters destroyed.
As the Vietnam veteran and sociologist J erry Lembcke has demonstrated in his invaluable 1998 book The Spitting Image: Myth, Memory, and the Legacy of Vietnam, the vast majority of returning veterans characterized their reception as friendly.
There is no contemporaneous evidence of any antiwar activists spitting on veterans.
The first allegations of such behavior did not appear until the late 1970s. The spat-upon veteran then became a mythic figure used to build support for military fervor and, later on, the Gulf War, but the myth has become so powerful that many veterans have now come to believe, despite all evidence to the contrary, that it actually happened to them personally.
Of course it is possible that isolated instances may have occurred. But if antiwar activists were frequently spitting on veterans or otherwise abusing them, why has nobody ever produced even the tiniest scrap of contemporaneous evidence? According to the myth, spitting on veterans was a regular custom as they arrived from Vietnam at the San Francisco and Los Angeles airports.
We are supposed to believe that these men just back from combat then meekly walked away without attacking or even reporting their persecutors, and that nobody else, including airport security officers, ever noticed what was going on.
For there is not one press report, airport security report, police report, court record, diary entry, video shot, or photograph of a single incident at these airports or anywhere else.
How then to explain the belief now held by many veterans that they were indeed spat upon as they arrived from Vietnam at the San Francisco and Los Angeles airports?
The answer lies in the transformative power of collective national myth over individual memory.
The myth is so strong that it has even determined their memory of where they arrived, for they were flown back not to these civilian airports but to military bases closed to outsiders.
And a 1975 survey revealed that 75 percent of Vietnam veterans were opposed to the war.
Especially after the 1968 Tet offensive, antiwar sentiment spread widely among the combat troops in Vietnam, where peace symbols and antiwar salutes became commonplace.
Some units even organized their own antiwar demonstrations to link up with the movement at home.
For example, to join the November 1969 antiwar Mobilization, a unit stationed at Pleiku fasted against the war and boycotted the Thanksgiving Day dinner.
Of the 141 soldiers classified below the rank of specialist fifth class, only eight showed up for the traditional meal; this J ohn Turkey Movement spread to units all over Vietnam.
When Bob Hope introduced General Creighton Abrams, commander of all U.S. forces in Vietnam, to the 30,000 troops assembled for a Christmas show at the sprawling Long Binh base, the entire throng leaped to their feet and held their hands high in the V salute of the peace movement.
The Main Activities Of Antiwar U.S. Servicepeople In Vietnam Were Not Peaceful Demonstrations .
But the main activities of antiwar U.S. servicepeople in Vietnam were not peaceful demonstrations.
An ongoing dilemma for the antiwar movement back home was the difficulty of finding ways to move beyond verbal protest and symbolic acts to deeds that would actually interfere with the conduct of the war.
The soldiers in Vietnam had no such problem.
Individual acts of rebellion, ranging from desertion and sabotage to injuring and even killing officers who ordered hazardous search-and-destroy missions, merged into mutinies and large-scale resistance.
As early as the spring of 1967, sporadic small-scale mutinies were being reported in the French press but not in the U.S. media except for the movements own press.
The most serious occurred on April 14 at the base of Dau Tieng (east of Tay Ninh, north of Cu Chi), when a unit of the Third Brigade of the Fourth Infantry Division defied orders to proceed on a search-and-destroy mission near where another unit had been badly cut up.
The commanding officer ordered other soldiers to fire on the rebels, who returned the fire.
One report indicated dozens of men killed or wounded and three helicopters destroyed.
The base was sealed off and no outside personnel were admitted for three days.
Combat refusal and outright mutinies spread rapidly after the Tet offensive in 1968.
But news about this form of growing GI resistance was kept rather efficiently from most of the American public until August 1969, when correspondents reported firsthand on the unanimous battlefield refusal of a badly mauled infantry company to go back into combat.
During the next two years, the press published numerous reports of entire units refusing direct combat orders, and the public actually got to see two incidents of rebellion on network television.
A Common And Less Conspicuous Method Of Killing Unpopular Officers: Rifle Fire Often In The Midst Of Combat
Resistance took another form so widespread that it brought a new word into the English language: fragging.
Originally taking its name from fragmentation grenades but soon applied to any means of killing commissioned or noncommissioned officers, fragging developed its own generally understood customs, usages, and ethos.
Officers who aggressively risked or otherwise offended their men were customarily warned once or twice by a nonlethal grenade before being attacked with a booby- trapped or hurled grenade.
By mid-1972, the Pentagon was officially acknowledging 551 incidents of fragging with explosive devices, which had left 86 dead and more than 700 wounded. These figures were no doubt understated, and they did not include a common and less conspicuous method of killing unpopular officers: rifle fire often in the midst of combat.
This Memorial Day, Gold Star Mothers Can Save Up To 60%!
Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons
May 26, 2014 By J ay-B. The Duffle Blog
THE MALL Memorial Day doesnt just mean the start of summer. Its also a chance to cash in on the sacrifices in blood made by your loved ones!
Now through Tuesday, come on down to your local consumer emporium, and get blown away by an improvised explosive SAVINGS device!
If you come in with a death certificate for a child in the armed forces, you can save up to 60% off the latest electronics, including smart phones, tablets, and phablets. Dont worry! Our low prices wont maim your pocketbook!
If you served in the military, we also want to help you. All grills are 15% off with a valid military ID card. Show your purple heart or other commendation to receive an additional 10% off! (Sorry, offer not valid for bronze stars.)
Feeling suicidal? Dont jump off a lame old bridge. Check out Martys Gun Superstore and go out in style! Weve got great discounts on shotguns all you need is your VA identification card to qualify.
We can also match your disability rating from the VA! Lost a leg? Well chop 30% off our already low, low prices! Traumatic brain injury? Talk to one of our reps for special pricing.
Hanks Butcher Shop is offering bulk, freshly ground sausage to service members at a price so low it will give you PTSD! Fire up that grill with J P-8! Smells like victory!
If your husband or wife didnt make it home, Floppys Mattresses can help you by offering as much as 50% off on a fresh start twin beds to replace that depressing old queen size you used to share with someone.
Finally, Crazy Hals used cars will be offering moms and dads of veterans prices that are almost suicidal. Almost!
Show you support the troops and their sacrifice by coming out to the Memorial Day mega-sale!
Our discounts have never sunk so low!
YOUR INVITATION: Comments, arguments, articles, and letters from service men and women, and veterans, are especially welcome. Write to Box 126, 2576 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 10025-5657 or email contact@militaryproject.org: Name, I.D., withheld unless you request publication. Same address to unsubscribe.
Military Resistance In PDF Format? If you prefer PDF to Word format, email: contact@militaryproject.org
ANNIVERSARIES
May 27, 1963: One For Our Side Masters Of War Released
The record album, The Freewheelin Bob Dylan, with the song Masters Of War, was released.
Masters of War By Bob Dylan
Come you masters of war You that build all the guns You that build the death planes You that build the big bombs You that hide behind walls You that hide behind desks I just want you to know I can see through your masks
You that never done nothin But build to destroy You play with my world Like its your little toy You put a gun in my hand And you hide from my eyes And you turn and run farther When the fast bullets fly
Like J udas of old You lie and deceive A world war can be won You want me to believe But I see through your eyes And I see through your brain Like I see through the water That runs down my drain
You fasten the triggers For the others to fire Then you set back and watch When the death count gets higher You hide in your mansion As young peoples blood Flows out of their bodies And is buried in the mud
Youve thrown the worst fear That can ever be hurled Fear to bring children Into the world For threatening my baby Unborn and unnamed You aint worth the blood That runs in your veins
How much do I know To talk out of turn You might say that Im young You might say Im unlearned But theres one thing I know Though Im younger than you Even J esus would never Forgive what you do
Let me ask you one question Is your money that good Will it buy you forgiveness Do you think that it could I think you will find When your death takes its toll All the money you made Will never buy back your soul
And I hope that you die And your deathll come soon I will follow your casket In the pale afternoon And Ill watch while youre lowered Down to your deathbed And Ill stand oer your grave Til Im sure that youre dead
DO YOU HAVE A FRIEND OR RELATIVE IN THE MILITARY?
Forward Military Resistance along, or send us the email address if you wish and well send it regularly with your best wishes. Whether in Afghanistan or at a base in the USA, this is extra important for your service friend, too often cut off from access to encouraging news of growing resistance to injustices, inside the armed services and at home. Send email requests to address up top or write to: Military Resistance, Box 126, 2576 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 10025-5657.
CLASS WAR REPORTS
Protests, Strikes And Direct Actions Have Been Flaring Up Across The Country As The 2014 FIFA World Cup Approaches Its Almost Impossible To Keep Track Of The Wave Of Strikes And Demonstrations Taking Place Across Brazil, And It Will Only Heat Up More As The World Cup Approaches There Were Scenes Of Chaos Across Brazil Yesterday As The There Will Be No Cup Movement Was Repressed With Tear Gas And Rubber Bullets In Major World Cup Cities
May 15, 2014 by Dave Zirin, The Nation
Dave Zirin has a book out next week called Brazils Dance with the Devil: The World Cup, the Olympics and the Fight for Democracy. His travels to Brazil and work on that project inform much of this article.
For people just tuning in, the idea that people in Brazil would be protesting the 2014 World Cup makes about as much sense as New Yorkers rebelling against pizza.
And yet here we are, less than one month before the start of the Cup, and demonstrations bear the slogan #NoVaiTerCopa, or There will be no Cup.
Protests, strikes and direct actions have been flaring up across the country as the 2014 FIFA World Cup approaches.
Most notably, as many as 10,000 people in So Paolo under the banner of Brazils Landless Workers Movement, or MTST, has occupied a major lot next to Arena Corinthians, site of the World Cups opening match.
They call their occupation The Peoples Cup and point out that the nearly half a billion dollars that went into building the FIFA quality stadium next door could have been used to combat poverty or improve healthcare. The slogan we want FIFA quality hospitals and schools still rings out as it did a year ago, when during the Confederations Cup, Brazil saw its largest protests in a generation.
Now there is an even sharper desperation as the cup approaches. Maria das Dores Cirqueira, 44, a coordinator for the MTST, told the Los Angeles Times, When the government told us we would host the World Cup, we hoped there would be improvements for us. But they arent putting on a Cup for the people, theyre putting on a Cup for the gringos.
This belief that the lions share of Cup expenditures are for foreign consumption, while the disruption and pain will be shouldered by Brazils masses, is widespread.
Members of the Landless Workers Movement protest against the money spent on the World Cup near Arena Corinthians, which will host the tournaments first match in So Paulo, Brazil. (AP Photo/Andre Penner)
Every protest, every rally, every cry of despair is connected to the the three Ds: displacement, debt and defense. The stats on displacement, debt and defense can be numbing or easy to disregard for outsiders.
The numbers on people expelled from their homes vary wildly, but without question, hundreds of thousands of the most vulnerable residents in the country have been or will be relocated by either carrot or stick, whether through financial reimbursement or through the barrel of the gun.
As far as debt goes, this will be the most expensive World Cup in history, with a low- estimate price tag of $15 billion.
And then there is defense. In addition to harsh new anti-terror legislation, Brazils government will have more boots on the ground than any World Cup has ever witnessed: more than 170,000 security personnel, 22 percent more than South Africa saw in 2010. This brand of defense will drive up the displacement and debt on the ground in Brazil, as safety becomes the catch-all justification for President Dilma Rousseff and the ruling Workers Partys every step.
It is also defense that is driving people and organizations into the streets to say No Vai Ter Copa.
The defense operation has put the near-entirety of its focus on internal targets, which creates the appearance that all of this money is being spent to protect wealthy soccer tourists from the people of Brazil themselves. (Yet even some of the internal security measures are not immune from the discontent, as stadium security officers went on strike recently saying that they wanted FIFA quality wages.)
As Brazilians suffer these unprecedented disruptions into their lives, the words of those in charge could not be more tone deaf.
Brazils Sports Minister Aldo Rebelo huffed in March that any anger would dissipate by the time the Cup was underway, saying, People will be more concerned with celebrating rather than protesting.
FIFA General Secretary J erome Valcke seemed to pine for the dictatorial Brazil of yesteryear when he said that working with democratically elected governments can complicate organizing tournaments.
The foot-in-mouth Valcke also commented recently that FIFA has been through hell trying to keep the World Cup on schedule.
It is safe to guess that the hell of having your home bulldozed or being beaten and gassed by police is slightly worse than anything Valcke has had to endure.
The calls for protest aim to highlight the pain as well as show the world who is behind the curtain, pulling the strings. There is a highly sophisticated awareness that just as the governments World Cup plans for Brazil are designed for international consumption, there is also an unprecedented global spotlight. The great journalist Eduardo Galeano once wrote, There are visible and invisible dictators. The power structure of world football is monarchical. Its the most secret kingdom in the world. Protesters aim for nothing less than to drag FIFA from the shadows and into the light. If they are successful, it will leave a legacy that will last longer than the spectacle itself.
After we published this article, I received the below message from my friend Dylan Stillwood who is living in Brazil. His eyewitness observations are extremely helpful. He wrote,
Its almost impossible to keep track of the wave of strikes and demonstrations taking place across Brazil, and it will only heat up more as the World Cup approaches.
There were scenes of chaos across Brazil yesterday as the There Will Be No Cup movement was repressed with tear gas and rubber bullets in major World Cup cities.
In So Paulo, ten thousand public schoolteachers, who have been on strike for three weeks, marched to City Hall.
Meanwhile, the Homeless Workers Movement (MTST) joined forces with the Landless Workers Movement (MST) and blocked highways near the Itaquero stadium, where the opening game will be held, as well as in the west and south zones of the city.
In Recife, which will host five games, the military occupied the streets with tanks as a strike of the police and firefighters entered its second day.
Teachers are also on strike in Rio and Belo Horizonte, both Cup cities, and their unions officially joined the anti-Cup protests.
Rio was paralyzed by a wildcat bus strike for two days, while subway workers in So Paulo are threatening to do the same.
The list goes on: oil workers in Cubato, armored car drivers in So Paulo, civil servants in Belo Horizonte, airport workers in Guarulhos, just to name a few.
There have even been protests at Brazilian embassies abroad.
Many Brazilians have fallen out of love with the World Cup after seeing the destruction its caused. The word FIFA is about as popular as FEMA in New Orleans after Katrina.
A web poll at Veja magazine showed that only 22% of readers would root for Brazil, while 34% planned to root against.
Everyone has commented that the traditional pre-Cup festivities -- painting the streets, hanging up green and yellow bunting -- is hard to find this year.
In a poor neighborhood in So Paulo, one woman commented, The city hasnt even sent milk for our kids yet. How am I going to paint the street?
Another added, My children have a fever and theres no doctor to attend them. I cant think about the Cup in this situation.
But Brazilians havent forgotten about the protests last year, and the last few weeks have shown that the action off the pitch will be just as intense, and much more decisive for Brazils future, than the action on it.
Comment On China Vietnam Maritime Clashes And Vietnamese Worker Riots: Workers Have Acted Due To A Mixture Of Mass Revulsion Against Chinas Bullying Actions And Raw Class Hatred Of Bosses Chinese, Taiwanese, Korean And Even Vietnamese Factories Have Been Attacked And Burnt Unleashing Their Class Hatred Against All These Bosses, Due To A Pretext, Is Not Difficult To Understand At All
May 21, 2014 by M Karadjis, Marxism List
Comment on China Vietnam maritime clashes and Vietnamese worker riots
A number of key points need to be understood about recent Sino-Vietnamese clashes in the East Sea (also known as the South China Sea ) and the mass reactions of Vietnamese workers.
First, the disputed islands that China has placed its oil rig near - the Paracels - were not disputed before being seized by China from Vietnam in an act of armed aggression in 1974.
At the time, China carried out this action in agreement with Kissinger.
In 1988, in further naked armed aggression, China seized about a quarter of the Spratly Islands, which are much further south (and thus much further from China), which had also, till then, been simply Vietnamese sovereign territory.
I certainly dont support war, ie, I dont think any Vietnamese worker in uniform should have to get killed just to defend uninhabited islands.
However, that is different to being neutral in low-level conflict that inevitably does occur.
If leftists want to call the Paracel Islands disputed, then they should call the Golan Heights, which Israel similarly seized from Syria via armed aggression during that era, disputed.
If they want to call the Paracels Chinese because after all, Americans/Australians etc speaking on behalf of the Vietnamese dont want to be nationalists, then kindly be consistent and declare the Golan Israeli.
The bigger picture, of course, is that China has claimed the entire East Sea as its own, with the famous dotted line going right up to the borders of neighbouring countries, including Vietnam, the new Monroe Doctrine of the new imperial colossus.
Second, regardless of the Paracels - for arguments sake lets call them (and the Golan) disputed - the oil rig has been placed in what is indisputably Vietnams Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), based on what is indisputably Vietnamese territory on the mainland.
Third, the mass reaction against Chinese aggression by thousands of Vietnamese workers cannot be written off either as a chauvinist outburst (though it certainly has elements of that), as a government-orchestrated provocation, or as an act of mass ignorance (since so many attacked factories were Taiwanese rather than from the PRC).
Rather we need to look at it in all its complexity.
Mass revulsion against the Chinese regime in Vietnam is widespread (and an obvious problem for anti-imperialist analysts). It has a historical aspect (not just 1000 years of Chinese rule, but the 1979 invasion, being knifed by Mao in late Vietnam war (including the seizure of the Paracels); it has economic aspects, with Chinese companies operating a gigantic environmentally destructive bauxite- aluminium operation in VNs Central Highlands, and seizing the lions share of contracts for projects of similar size and of similar strategic importance; it has an aspect of moral revulsion and solidarity, as the Chinese navy regularly kidnaps large numbers of Vietnamese dirt-poor fisher-folk from around the two disputed island archipelagos, and holds them for massive ransoms for months at a time.
To blame the VCP government for provoking nationalism is a statement of ideology (whether Trotskyist or otherwise), based on the idea that as a Stalinist- turned capitalist regime it must be doing so.
It is also a statement of breathtaking ignorance about the actual facts.
The VCP government of course vigorously defends its own view of the islands. However, it also holds the view that only diplomatic means can be used, that war is out of the question.
However, most of the Vietnamese dissident opposition (whether genuinely democratic, right-wing, Buddhist, Catholic etc) have found the idea of anti-China nationalism a good horse to ride on, precisely because the VCP government is seen to have a too moderate strategy and opinion.
So they denounce the VCP government as being communists betraying the nation to China (which, while they dont often say so openly, can mean little more than advocating war, since the VCP does everything but this). In fact, anti-China, defend the islands, actions have become the most prominent issue in anti-VCP regime dissidence for some 5 years now.
It is wrong, the way the dissident movement pushes the issue, of course; but it cannot be denied that there is justice to the side overall which is resisting a new mega-capitalist superpower (whether one wants to call it imperialist or not is frankly besides the point).
Does this mean the nationalistic dissidents have secretly orchestrated the workers? Again, I think that is unlikely.
Most are rabid supporters of foreign capital (curiously, they think there isnt enough in Vietnam!); but more generally, workers are quite capable of leading themselves, both in doing good class struggle things and in making bad chauvinistic errors - no need to romanticise raw class struggle by having to explain its bad aspects by orchestration by the government, the opposition, or China itself (another theory floating around).
The simple facts of the matter are:
Workers Have Acted Due To A Mixture Of Mass Revulsion Against Chinas Bullying Actions And Raw Class Hatred Of Bosses
Workers have acted due to a mixture of mass revulsion against Chinas bullying actions and raw class hatred of bosses - Chinese, Taiwanese, Korean and even Vietnamese factories have been attacked and burnt.
More have been Taiwanese than Chinese, because more Taiwanese investors invest in these sweatshops than Chinese.
The Taiwanese, Chinese (often Hong Kongese) and Korean bosses are famous, not only in Vietnam, for running brutal capitalist regimes in their factories, which openly violate Vietnams labour laws, and are generally much harsher than what is tolerated by workers from Vietnamese bosses (let alone Vietnamese state industries, where workers conditions are far superior).
Unleashing their class hatred against all these bosses, due to a pretext, is not difficult to understand at all.
But to understand the particular revulsion against the Taiwanese bosses, two things need to be considered.
First, Chinas claims to the Paracels and Spratleys (which at the time were part of Frances Vietnam colony and were thus handed over to Vietnam at the 1954 Geneva Accords, where *China* and the USSR betrayed Vietnam by agreeing to partition) were only made by the Kuomintang regime that ruled China in the late 1940s before the 1949 revolution.
The CCP simply inherited these chauvinistic claims against its smaller and weaker brother nation, as you do. The Kuomintang still rules in Taiwan, still supports these claims to the islands (like China, it claims all of them), and in practice has been supporting the PRC in the island issues (so far has the capitalist integration of Taiwan and the PRC gone).
Second, even more surprising (for anti-imperialists, and those who see China as some kind of socialist state): As explained by Taiwanese researcher Wang Hongzen: Almost all Taiwanese factories hire PRC people as cadres (Yes, that is also how Taiwanese call their supervisors: cadres); inside the factories, there is a glass ceiling that blocks Vietnamese from being promoted.
There is also everyday confrontation between Chinese supervisors with Vietnamese workers under the so-called suppressive management style with Chinese characteristics (Hongzens article, Beating up Taiwanese is not a Misunderstanding, for anyone who reads Chinese, is at http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140516/398528/).
One needs to take this into account when we read reports of Vietnamese workers beating up Chinese workers, in some cases killing them.
From where I am, I cannot tell how targeted these attacks are: are they specifically targeting these repressive Chinese supervisors and cadres, or are these simply ugly chauvinist attacks on Chinese workers as a whole?
I dont know, but I suspect there is probably a bit of both.
However, to explain it as simply some kind of latent mindless chauvinism in Vietnamese workers coming out, rather than in the class terms as explained by Hongzen, is just plain wrong.
That of course should not be read to mean any justification to the real chauvinist acts that may be occurring.
Of course, more generally, regarding labour, some have written that workers all around the world often attack foreign workers for taking their jobs etc. In my opinion, this again is too narrow.
This usually refers to immigrants from poorer countries trying to get jobs in richer countries, being opposed by more privileged local workers.
But here it is reversed, and I dont only mean the joint-venture CCP/KMT cadres; as well, China tends to bring in masses of Chinese workers with its investments in Vietnam, as in Cambodia, Papua-NG, African countries etc. Bringing your workforce is not immigration; what it normally means is 2 things.
First, since the capitalist regime inside the factory is significantly harsher in China than in Vietnam, Chinese investors bring a workforce so as to not have to put up with too much trouble; they are well-known to see Vietnamese workers as more strike-prone and lazy, ie, refusing to take as much shit.
In any case, the Chinese workers often have no work visas; their jobs there are completely tied to their bosses.
Second, the Chinese investors use Chinese workers for better-skilled and higher paid positions, leaving Vietnamese with the least skilled and lowest paid positions.
Just how different this is from the position of immigrant workers vis-a-vis locals in imperialist countries is rather obvious.
So all this also adds to the antipathy to Chinese workers.
Naturally, that does not mean that the attacks on Chinese workers are in any way justified, except in cases when there is a issue of clear class revulsion against slave- driving cadres.
Clearly, masses of Chinese workers see themselves as in danger, and have fled; the VCP has been able to use the outbreaks as a cover to crack down on other peaceful forms of protest; the opposition claims the chaos is a result of the VCP not being hard enough on China; China has scored some points by pointing these events as Vietnamese anti-China aggression.
Vietnamese and Chinese workers need to see each other as allies against intensified capitalism in both countries.
However, when Marxists analyse what causes events like this, it is also important to understand who is the oppressor, both the national oppressor in the big picture, and the class oppressor - including its cadre agents and screws - in the factories.
OCCUPATION PALESTINE
Zionist Occupies Continue To Bar Gazan Children From Visiting Fathers Imprisoned In Israel; Two Of The Forbidden Ones Tell Their Personal Stories
12 May 2014 BTselem
In J uly 2012, Israel partially reinstated authorization for relatives to visit Palestinians from the Gaza Strip being held in Israel as prisoners or detainees (hereafter: inmates). Israels decision was made in consequence of a hunger strike by almost 2,000 Palestinian inmates.
However, Israel set strict criteria for these visits, allowing only inmates parents and wives to visit.
All other relatives, including children, siblings and grandparents, were not allowed to visit.
Visitation rights were extended to inmates children under the age of eight only in May 2013, and to children under the age of ten in September 2013. No official explanation was given, at any stage, for the age limit on childrens visits, which is not applied to children of security or criminal inmates from the West Bank and from Israel.
According to Israel Prisons Service (IPS) data, at the end of April 2014, Israel was holding 460 inmates from Gaza: 373 are defined as security inmates and 87 are defined as criminal inmates.
According to data by Gazas Ministry of Prisoners, there are 424 minors in the Gaza Strip whose fathers are incarcerated in Israel; yet only 164 those under the age of ten may visit.
In recent months, BTselem gathered testimonies from Gazan children over the age of ten who have not seen their imprisoned fathers since 2007, and from siblings of such prisoners.
In their testimonies, the children describe their longing to be reunited with fathers, as well as the difficulties they face because of the separation.
Security inmates are not allowed to speak on the telephone and their only mode of communication with relatives barred from visiting is written correspondence. Visitors are permitted to bring prisoners no more than three photographs per visit. The basic right of the inmates and of their relatives to family life, including prison visits, is enshrined in both international and Israeli law, which recognizes that people are social creatures who need family and community frameworks. It is the states duty to protect the right of every inmate to such visits, regardless of the offense for which he or she was convicted.
BTselem yet again calls upon Israeli authorities to act with regard to Gazan inmates as they do with those from Israel and the West, i.e., to allow all first-degree relatives, and especially children under the age of 18, to visit their loved ones being held in Israel,. There is no justification for discriminating between inmates based on their residence, all the more so where children are concerned.
LEEN A-SAFTAWI, 13, DOES NOT KNOW HER FATHER WHO HAS BEEN HELD IN ISRAEL FOR THE LAST 14 YEARS
Im in the eighth grade in Dar al-Arkam School.
I live with my mother and my brothers and sister in the a-Saftawi region of Gaza City. I have three brothers and a sister: J ihad, 23, Hamza, 24, Asad, 20, and Sara, 16.
My father, Imad Asad Hashem a-Saftawi, was arrested at Rafah Crossing on 13 December 2000, on his way back from Egypt. The crossing was under Israeli control at the time.
He was sentenced to 18 years in prison. My mother says that I visited him once, back in 2004. I went with my grandmother and my brother J ihad to Nafha Prison.
I dont remember anything from that visit, or of my father, because I was only three then. My grandmother told me about the visit later. Im thirteen now, and I dont know anything about my father.
I dont remember getting a hug from him like other kids, who feel their parents love. Im very sad. I have no words to describe how I feel. I feel something is missing in my life, especially on holidays or special occasions.
It really hurts when I see my cousins hugging their parents and sharing their problems with them and telling them how their day was.
I try to hide my feelings but sometimes I cant, and then I start crying.
Ive always dreamed of visiting my father and talking with him, sharing what Im going through, and telling him about my life. I really hope that someday well be allowed to visit him at least once a month.
I know my father only from photos. The last time I got a photo was two weeks ago, when my mom visited him. I was so happy. I decorated it and posted it on Facebook and wrote: How is Dad? Does he have any gray hair? Every time I use the computer, I see my fathers photo.
My mother visits my father at Nafha Prison about once every two months. She always calls the Red Cross the day before the visit to make sure its still on and to ask if anything has changed with regard to childrens visits.
Shes always told that she can only bring children under the age of ten. Every visit, my mother brings my father only three photos, because thats all shes allowed to give him.
That makes me angry too, because I want to send him more photos. Were five children and none of us can visit our father. I dont know how long Israel will keep denying me my right to visit him. Im afraid I wont get see him before he gets out of prison.
Leen a-Saftawi gave her testimony to BTselem field researcher Khaled al-Azayzeh on 11 March 2014.
RAMEZ AL-FARA, 13, OF KHAN YUNIS, HASNT SEEN HIS IMPRISONED FATHER IN SIX YEARS,
Im in the eighth grade in Eid al-Agha School. I live with my mother and two sisters Muna, 15, and Nada, 16 in a-Satar al-Gharbi neighborhood in Khan Yunis. I have two other sisters who are already married Maryam, 20, and Rana, 17.
My father, Raef al-Fara, belongs to Fatah. He was arrested on 11 December 2004 by soldiers at Abu Huli Checkpoint [a former checkpoint between the northern and southern Gaza Strip]. I was four years old then. My mother says he was sentenced to life in prison. Hes now in Nafha Prison in Israel.
Until 2007, I used to visit him with my mother and grandmother twice a month. My sisters visited him, too. There was no age limit for visitors.
The last time I visited my father was sometime in the summer of 2007; I dont remember the exact date. Dad was in Nafha Prison and I went there with my mom, my grandmother and my sister Muna. I was so happy to see him. We spent 45 minutes with him. I couldnt hug him because of a glass partition between us, and we spoke through a phone. When the time was up, the wardens hung up the phone and told us to leave.
I remember that one time, the wardens let me go into the room my dad was in and hug him. Thats the only time Ive hugged him since he was arrested. He was really happy. He picked me up and kissed me and walked around the room with me in his arms. I felt so happy in his embrace, and the other prisoners were so moved, they started crying. After 2007, Israel wouldnt allow prisoners from Gaza to have visitors for years. I was sad and very worried about my father, because we had practically no contact. Every now and then we sent him regards over the radio, and sometimes we sent him letters through the International Red Cross. I felt his absence particularly on special occasions and hoped I could at least visit him on holidays.
In 2012, Israel allowed visits again and I was thrilled. But they set an age limit for visitors and since I was 11, I wasnt allowed to visit him. It made me very sad. My mother goes there with my grandfather and grandmother about once every two months. My sisters and I stay home, sad because we cant go too.
On the day of the visit, I wake up with my mother at 3:00 A.M. and walk her to the bus station in Khan Yunis, where you get the bus to Erez Crossing. I ask my mother to say hi to my father from me and tell him that I miss him. I sit and wait with my sisters and aunts until she comes back with my grandparents. When they get home, at around 9:00 P.M., relatives pour into the house to hear news from my father. My sisters and I want to hear about every single detail of the visit.
The last photo I saw of my father is from seven months ago.
My grandparents visited him them at Nafha Prison and the wardens allowed prisoners to have their photos taken with visitors over the age of 50.
My mother calls the Red Cross every two weeks to find out visiting dates and the age limit for children. Every time, shes told that Israel doesnt allow kids over the age of ten to visit.
* Ramez al-Fara gave his testimony to BTselem field researcher Khaled al-Azayzeh on 4 March 2014.
To check out what life is like under a murderous military occupation commanded by foreign terrorists, go to: http://www.maannews.net/eng/Default.aspx and http://www.palestinemonitor.org/list.php?id=ej898ra7yff0ukmf16 The occupied nation is Palestine. The foreign terrorists call themselves Israeli.
DANGER: CAPITALISTS AT WORK
DANGER: POLITICIANS AT WORK
Vietnam GI: Reprints Available
Edited by Vietnam Veteran Jeff Sharlet from 1968 until his death, this newspaper rocked the world, attracting attention even from Time Magazine, and extremely hostile attention from the chain of command.
The pages and pages of letters in the paper from troops in Vietnam condemning the war are lost to history, but you can find them here.
Military Resistance has copied complete sets of Vietnam GI. The originals were a bit rough, but every page is there. Over 100 pages, full 11x17 size.
Free on request to active duty members of the armed forces.
Cost for others: $15 if picked up in New York City. For mailing inside USA add $5 for bubble bag and postage. For outside USA, include extra for mailing 2.5 pounds to wherever you are.
Checks, money orders payable to: The Military Project
Orders to: Military Resistance Box 126 2576 Broadway New York, N.Y. 10025-5657
All proceeds are used for projects giving aid and comfort to members of the armed forces organizing to resist todays Imperial wars.
Military Resistance Looks Even Better Printed Out Military Resistance/GI Special are archived at website http://www.militaryproject.org .
The following have chosen to post issues; there may be others: news@uruknet.info; http://williambowles.info/military-resistance-archives/.
MILITARY RESISTANCE BY EMAIL If you wish to receive Military Resistance immediately and directly, send request to contact@militaryproject.org. There is no subscription charge. Same address to unsubscribe.
Military Resistance distributes and posts to our website copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of the invasion and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law since it is being distributed without charge or profit for educational purposes to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational purposes, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. Military Resistance has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of these articles nor is Military Resistance endorsed or sponsored by the originators. This attributed work is provided a non-profit basis to facilitate understanding, research, education, and the advancement of human rights and social justice. Go to: law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml for more information. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If printed out, a copy of this newsletter is your personal property and cannot legally be confiscated from you. Possession of unauthorized material may not be prohibited. DoD Directive 1325.6 Section 3.5.1.2.