In this issue:
- Is Paying Just 5 Times Your Annual Income for a Property Realistic?
- Singapore Property News This Week
- Resale Property Transactions (June 11 – June 17)
In this issue:
- Is Paying Just 5 Times Your Annual Income for a Property Realistic?
- Singapore Property News This Week
- Resale Property Transactions (June 11 – June 17)
In this issue:
- Is Paying Just 5 Times Your Annual Income for a Property Realistic?
- Singapore Property News This Week
- Resale Property Transactions (June 11 – June 17)
Copyright 2011-2014 www.Propwise.sg. All Rights Reserved.
Contribute Do you have articles and insights and articles that youd like to share with thousands of readers interested in the Singapore property market? Send them to us at info@propwise.sg, and if theyre good enough, well publish them here, on our blog and even on Yahoo! News. Advertise Want to get your brand, product, service or property listing out to thousands of Singapore property investors at a very reasonable cost? Head over to www.propwise.sg/advertise/ to find out more. CONTENTS p2 Is Paying Just 5 Times Your Annual Income for a Property Realistic? p7 Singapore Property News This Week p12 Resale Property Transactions (June 11 - June 17 ) Welcome to the 162 th edition of the Singapore Property Weekly. Hope you like it! Mr. Propwise FROM THE EDITOR SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Page | 2 Back to Contents By Mr. Propwise In a recent blog post, guest contributor Property Soul shared her rules on buying a property you can afford, what she called the 3-3-5 rule. In a nutshell, the 3-3-5 rule states that: 1. You should have at least 30% of the propertys price in initial capital to cover the downpayment and other costs. 2. Your monthly mortgage payment should not exceed one-third of your monthly salary. 3. The purchase price of the property should not exceed five times your annual income Is Paying Just 5 Times Your Annual Income for a Property Realistic? SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Page | 3 Back to Contents Propwise.sg reader JC wrote in to comment that Rule #3 was unrealistic and overly conservative. Heres what he had to say: The five times of income to property price ratio is quite ridiculous. I feel that this ratio is only applicable during the "mata wear khaki shorts" days. How can one ever find such a low ratio of five times in today's context? No way, even if the property market is to crash, or rather correct. Nevertheless, I would definitely wish such a ratio would still hold today, and I would bet all my money into property. Example: a couple earns $15,000 per month, which annually would be $180,000. At five times, they can only afford a property that is $900,000, which can only buy a 2-bedder condo at an RCR or OCR location in Singapore. If the couple has kids, then I think its pretty difficult to live in a smallish 2-bedder of approximately 75 to 85 square meters with a maid! Rather, many couples CAN afford properties at $1.2 to $1.5 million and above when their income is approximately $10,000 per month, which is a 10x rather than 5x ratio. With savings of $400,000 to $500,000 (approximately 30% of $1.5mil), they can easily afford the mortgage at $3,000 per month (2% interest rate over 28 years). A savings of $400,000 is not difficult to achieve for a couple (both university grads) who have worked for 10 years possibly with a little help from their parents, say $50,000 to $80,000. In a nutshell, the 3-3-5 rule is skewed towards an unrealistic scenario which is unlikely to happen in Singapore (for Rule #3). SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Page | 4 Back to Contents We need to be realistic about the current pricing, current market, and hopefully, capitalize or gain from it through long term investment or enjoyment of the property. If we stick to this rule, we will NEVER buy a property (condo, that is) in Singapore, unless we earn $25,000 per month income combined for a couple. (i.e. $12,500 each!) I routed this question to Property Soul, who had the following response: This is what I called the boiling frog phenomenon. When people are in a high- price environment for too long, they will gradually think that it is normal and acceptable to pay high prices. Similarly, when people are in a prolonged boom of the property market, they will forget what a value-for-money home is, or why it is necessary to calculate the ROI of an investment property. When the market prices are climbing rapidly, salespeople will tell their clients that it is impossible to go back to the low prices in the past. But history has proven that they are wrong every single time. It is when market prices have corrected sharply that people begin to realize that buyers have been overpaying for their properties during the last peak of the property market. These buyers pay the price of holding their overpriced properties for the long-term to break-even, while missing the opportunities to buy when prices become reasonable. Developers can sell at future prices and sellers can market at unreasonably high prices. But as buyers, it doesnt mean that we have to take whatever they offer in the market. We all can exercise our individual judgment to see whether the current SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Page | 5 Back to Contents properties are overpriced before we buy anything. Of course, being kaypoh, I have some thoughts as well on this discussion: I view the 3-3-5 rule as a conservative affordability test. When you are making the biggest purchase in your life (of a property), you typically want to err on the side of being conservative. If your purchase meets Property Souls 3-3-5 rule test, then you know that financially you are not stretching yourself and can sleep peacefully in your home. However, that doesnt mean that you MUST follow the rule. For example, if you find a home that you like and meets your requirements, and it is six times your income, I dont think theres anything wrong with buying it as long as you have prepared for unexpected contingencies (e.g. have a cushion of savings). Sure a couple earning $10,000 a month can potentially buy a $1.5 million condo, but it is very aggressive. An 80% mortgage loan (i.e. $1.2 million) at a 2% rate over 30 years will result in a monthly mortgage payment of $4,435, or 44% of their income. They might be able to tide over if they do not spend too much in other areas. But we should NOT assume a 2% rate of interest using a more conservative 4% mortgage rate (a long term average), their monthly mortgage will balloon to $5,729 per month, which could put significant stress on their finances, especially if one party loses his or her job. So yes, if you are aggressive you can buy an expensive condo (as JC has pointed out), but you may not survive the tough times. SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Page | 6 Back to Contents Yes, a couple with kids and a maid will feel very cramped in a 900 square foot condo apartment, but it is a choice. They could have chosen to buy a resale HDB flat, or can choose to suffer in a cramped apartment for a few years until they can comfortably afford to upgrade. In general we have very short memories. It wasnt too long ago (certainly not during the mata wear khaki short days) when properties were more affordable. In fact, it was in 2006 when I bought my first private property and I paid less than 5x combined income for it. I dont think that property prices will necessarily go back to the previous lows as Property Soul has mentioned. In fact, looking at the URA Property Price Index over a long period of time we see that the general trend is an upward one, with higher lows and higher highs. Property prices go up over long periods of time due to inflation and rising incomes. But the market has cycles as well thats what I look at to time my entry and exit into the market. Hope you found this discussion interesting! If you have any opinions or stories youd like to share, do email me at info@propwise.sg. SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Singapore Property This Week Page | 7 Back to Contents Residential 2in 5 Sentosa condos resold at a loss According to market watchers, cooling down measures such as loan restrictions may have driven buyers away from the luxury homes market. Data from URA Realis that was gathered by STProperty.sg showed that 31 condominium units at Sentosa have been resold since May 2013, however, about two in five units were resold at a loss. According to HSR Research, between January and May this year, the average resale price fell 25 per cent to $1,800 per square foot as compared to $2,400 per square foot over the same period last year. Nonetheless, since only five transactions were made this year, price movements are expected to be more volatile. Among others, four units at The Berth, three units at The Oceanfront, two at the Coast and one at Azure were resold at a loss. Nicholas Mak from SLP International believes that given the weak leasing market, owners may choose to sell their property at a loss as they are unable to rent their units out. Other analysts believe that owners who have bought their Sentosa units at marked up prices earlier may be at the losing end now. (Source: Business Times) SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Page | 8 Back to Contents TDSR may push mortgagee sales to a new high in Q2 The number of properties that are auctioned by mortgagees in Q2 this year is the highest since Q3 2009. According to Colliers International, the number of properties that have been put up for auction this quarter almost doubled from 22 units in Q1 to 42 units in Q2 this year. This is likely to be due to the implementation of the total debt servicing ratio (TDSR) framework. Auctioneers explain that the TDSR framework has made it difficult for financially tight borrowers to secure buyers for their properties. As such, more of such homes have been put up for auction by financial institutions. As the supply of non-landed private homes increases, mortgagors face an even greater challenge in selling off their property. This means that mortgagee sales may increase even further. Besides that, market analysts believe that the weak leasing market may also contribute to the raise in mortgagee sales, as owners may not be able to find tenants. (Source: Business Times) 30 out of 80 units released at Trilive condo in Kondo have been sold Roxy-Pacific Holdings Trilive condo project at Kovan area was launched last Friday. However, sales have been slow at its launch said Teo Hong Lim, Roxy-Pacifics executive chairman. The 222-unit freehold project which is located 650 meters away from Kovan MRT, has released 80 of its units at a discounted price of $1,550 per square foot for early birds. Yet only 30 units have been sold so far. According to Teo, private home sales have been slow thus product differentiation may be the key to closing a deal. SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Page | 9 Back to Contents Unit sizes at the Trilive condo project begin from 463 square feet for a one-bedroom unit to 1,195 square feet for a four-bedroom unit. Of the 222 units, around 80 per cent of the units are dual key units. Prices start from $730,000 for a single bedroom unit to $870,000 for a two-bedroom unit. A two- bedroom dual key unit will start from $960,000, a three-bedroom dual key unit is priced around $1.3 million, and a four- bedroom unit will cost around $1.65 million. (Source: Business Times) Three new residential sites on GLS confirmed list Three 99-year leasehold residential sites are up for tender under the confirmed list of H1 2014 Government Land Sales programme. Of the three sites, two reside in Sengkang while the other is an executive condominium (EC) plot that is located at Choa Chu Kang. The Sengkang land parcels are both at Fernvale Roadthe smaller land plot is around 16,604 square meters while the larger plot is around 17,414 square meters. The tenders for both plots will close on August 7 and the two sites are expected to yield a total of 1,100 units when fully developed. Market analysts believe that each of the Sengkang site will draw bids from $420 to $480 per square foot per plot ratio. On the other hand, the EC plot at Choa Chu Kang which is expected to yield around 535 homes is expected to draw bids between $310 and $350 per square foot per plot ratio before its tender closes on September 4. (Source: Business Times) SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Page | 10 Back to Contents Commercial More land plots at Gambas and Tuas for sale The fourth land parcel at Gambas Crescent has been launched for sale, along with two new sites at Tuas South. The Gambas Crescent site which is 15,665 square meters large and has a maximum gross plot ratio of 2.5, is zoned for light industrial use for Business-1 development. The site has a 30- year lease and is expected to draw bids between $90 and $120 per square foot per plot ratio (psf ppr). Nicholas Mak from SLP International believes that Far East Organisation, which owns three other sites in the area, may aggressively bid for the fourth Gambas Crescent site in order to secure a stronger presence within the area. However, Ong Kah Seng, RST Research director believes that there is no major need for the property giant to own the fourth parcel as they already have a strong territorial presence. On the other hand, the land parcel at Tuas South Avenue 7, which also has a 30- year lease, is 25,700 square meters. It has a maximum gross plot ratio of 2.0 and is zoned for heavier industrial use for Business-2 development. Analysts believe that site will draw bids from $75 to $85 psf ppr. Lastly, the site at Tuas South Avenue 14 has been launched under the reserve list. It has a maximum gross plot ratio of 2.0 too, and is 33,300 square meters large. (Source: Business Times) Property investment sales slow to a crawl Investment sales in Singapore property has slowed to $3.5-$3.6 billion this quarter. SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Page | 11 Back to Contents Such sales cover big-ticket transactions that are beyond $10 million. In H1 of 2013, the total amount of investment sales was around $12 billion. However, the year-to-date tally this year is only around $8 billion. Both CBRE and Savills predict that there will be a fall in investment sales from last years $30 billion. CBRE expects that there will be $12-$15 billion worth of transactions this year while Savills predicts that there will be $16-$18 billion worth of transactions. This pullback in investments is expected to be due to the governments cooling measures. According to Desmond Sim from CBRE, the implementation of the total debt servicing ratio framework has affected buyers and sellers interest. Not only so reduced land supply in the Government Land Sales programme may also result in a decrease in investment sales. Furthermore, according to CBRE, there is increased interest in overseas property. Nonetheless, according to Savills Singapore, investment sales in the office sector have been optimistic as there are about $680 million of office transactions recorded this quarter. (Source: Business Times) SINGAPORE PROPERTY WEEKLY Issue 162 Page | 12 Back to Contents Non-Landed Residential Resale Property Transactions for the Week of Jun 11 Jun 17 Postal District Project Name Area (sqft) Transacted Price ($) Price ($ psf) Tenure 1 THE SAIL @ MARINA BAY 614 1,380,000 2,249 99 2 ICON 915 1,530,000 1,672 99 3 THE ANCHORAGE 1,798 2,370,000 1,318 FH 4 THE BERTH BY THE COVE 1,668 2,700,000 1,618 99 4 REFLECTIONS AT KEPPEL BAY 915 1,480,000 1,618 99 4 TERESA VILLE 3,972 4,725,000 1,190 FH 5 BOTANNIA 1,249 1,618,888 1,297 956 8 CITY SQUARE RESIDENCES 570 935,000 1,639 FH 8 CITYLIGHTS 689 1,070,000 1,553 99 8 HERTFORD COLLECTION 1,345 2,050,000 1,524 FH 9 HILLTOPS 2,874 11,285,640 3,927 FH 9 THE ORCHARD RESIDENCES 2,852 10,552,400 3,699 99 9 HELIOS RESIDENCES 1,916 5,100,000 2,662 FH 9 CAIRNHILL CREST 818 1,588,000 1,941 FH 10 DUCHESS RESIDENCES 1,485 2,720,000 1,831 999 10 BELLERIVE 958 1,615,000 1,686 FH 10 THE MARBELLA 1,399 2,338,000 1,671 FH 10 SPANISH VILLAGE 1,173 1,780,000 1,517 FH 11 MULBERRY TREE 441 820,000 1,858 FH 11 MANDALE HEIGHTS 764 980,000 1,282 FH 14 LE CRESCENDO 915 1,085,000 1,186 FH 14 D'HERITAGE CASTLE 1,173 1,035,000 882 FH 14 TORIEVIEW MANSIONS 1,335 1,000,000 749 FH 15 THE AZZURO 646 870,000 1,347 FH 15 WATER PLACE 1,227 1,600,800 1,305 99 15 SANCTUARY GREEN 1,399 1,630,000 1,165 99 Postal District Project Name Area (sqft) Transacted Price ($) Price ($ psf) Tenure 15 OCEAN PARK 2,110 2,320,000 1,100 FH 15 LAGUNA PARK 1,615 1,340,000 830 99 16 BAYSHORE PARK 1,292 1,360,000 1,053 99 16 PARBURY HILL CONDOMINIUM 2,185 2,300,000 1,053 FH 16 WATERFRONT WAVES 1,668 1,600,000 959 99 17 ESTELLA GARDENS 657 680,000 1,036 FH 18 RIS GRANDEUR 1,066 1,060,000 995 FH 18 LIVIA 1,539 1,430,000 929 99 18 TROPICAL SPRING 1,528 1,400,000 916 99 18 TROPICAL SPRING 1,378 1,240,000 900 99 18 CHANGI RISE CONDOMINIUM 1,023 890,000 870 99 19 THE QUARTZ 1,367 1,270,000 929 99 21 THE CASCADIA 1,141 1,700,000 1,490 FH 21 HIGHGATE 1,109 1,185,000 1,069 FH 22 PARC VISTA 1,249 1,088,000 871 99 22 LAKEHOLMZ 1,249 1,055,000 845 99 23 CASHEW HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM 1,227 1,220,000 994 999 23 HILLVIEW REGENCY 969 940,000 970 99 23 THE MADEIRA 1,356 1,200,000 885 99 23 PARKVIEW APARTMENTS 980 845,000 863 99 23 MI CASA 1,119 940,000 840 99 23 NORTHVALE 1,518 1,268,000 835 99 23 REGENT HEIGHTS 1,163 920,000 791 99 NOTE: This data only covers non-landed residential resale property transactions with caveats lodged with the Singapore Land Authority. Typically, caveats are lodged at least 2-3 weeks after a purchaser signs an OTP, hence the lagged nature of the data.