Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Dale Anderson Telesford, A079 020 706 (BIA May 27, 2014)

Dale Anderson Telesford, A079 020 706 (BIA May 27, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 403|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held that delivery of marijuana under Iowa Code 124.401(1)(d) is not a drug trafficking aggravated felony under the intervening decision in Moncrieffe v. Holder, 133 S.Ct. 1678 (2013). The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held that delivery of marijuana under Iowa Code 124.401(1)(d) is not a drug trafficking aggravated felony under the intervening decision in Moncrieffe v. Holder, 133 S.Ct. 1678 (2013). The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Jul 09, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/01/2014

pdf

text

original

 
R. Joel Hatch Smih, Gardner, Susky, Lazer Phen
&
Rogers LLP 8712 West Dodge Road, Suite 400 Omha NE 681 Name: TESFOD ALE ANERSON
U.S
Department
of
Justice
Execuiv Ofce  Imigaton Rvew
Board of Immigraton Apels Oce of he Clek
5 J 07 Leesburg Pike, Ste 2000 Fal Chc Vrgna 3
HSICE Oice of Chef Cousel -OMA 177 Aveue H Omaha, NE 681
O
 A 79020706 ae o hs nice 5/2720
ncosed s a copy of he Boad's dcson
ad
oder n e aboe-erenced case. Enclosure
P Mmbr: Wndtla, Linda S.
w
Sncerely,
D
C
t
Donna Cr Cef Cerk
schuke U
m:
D
@
.
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Dale Anderson Telesford, A079 020 706 (BIA May 27, 2014)
 
l
US
Deparment of Jsce
Exece Oce r Imgrao Revew Decso o e Boar o aon Appeas Fas , Vira
00
ie: A09 0 0 7 06 Omah NE n re
DL ARSO
TE 
E 
ORD  MOAL
PROCEDINGS
PEL
ON B 
H
L
F
O SPOET
R
Joe Hatc Esqre
CHRGE:
Notice ec 237a)()B) & Ac 
US.C
1 ( )()( ]
e ed Sttes
vioaion of la Dat ec. 23a )(2)(() ,
N
Act
S.C 
§
2(2()() Covicted o cotro sstace violao Se  3a)(2)( )( ),
&
 t
[
 .S.
§
22 ( )(2 ( A) iConvcted o agavt loy as dend  s 0a )( 43)(B) of he Act
APPO
eminaio
MAY
. 7
2014
The respoent a natve  iten of Tdad and Tbago aeas te grat uge's ebrary 3 0 ecisio dg that t respondnt is roabl as gd d enyn e esos res a his remova proceedngs e teinated. We rw e mirio s ca dgs
r
ce eror an a otr ssues

noo

CF.R.
§
003 3
Th
reco o proceei i e ee On e 6 , 003 the espode pe ty o Deivr of a Shdule I Cod ubstace mara ) i iolaio of Ioa Co 
�
§
14401
1
)( d) a cass D lony Cout II )  a  ) e resod was gr a
defC
gmn an as set  ed t ys  robaio
(J
  .

x 3 t

e was so orre to ay  Sta  owa 2 r s couppote aoey a proa  o enoet e" o $50 a a iitative suag  $2 500 a a DARE e of $0
lJ
at
4

x
.
3
at

H was aso assssed oss.




O
Je
1 004 the
o
isse a rer of Dsmssa o ee
ugmnt Pobao 

 t 
On
over
6
009 at the resodets reuest the cour isse  Orr Car Disss o Dre Jdgme
J
at 2) 

E. Ta A. On apea, e respoe ues ta t mmgraton Jdg e y g ta t responets covitio as a r mmratio oss
I Mar o aquin-Gaca,

D
ec 
.
70  BA 99  ; AG. 2005   t Aoey enera e  er sectio 0)( 48 A of e mmitio an Natona A th m conviion incldes
oese to i te responet pd ulty ad h jdg  ld
a al
juco of i bt impose peles or resaints on e erss iby
Cite as: Dale Anderson Telesford, A079 020 706 (BIA May 27, 2014)
 
A07 020 706
 See also Maer of Cabera,
24
&
Dec. 459 46162 (BI 2008) (holdng hat mposng costs and surcharges n he crnal sentencng context constes a  of unshment or penalt r  rposes of eenng· weher the responent ws convcted" ndr secton 10
(a)( 48)() of the ct);
 see e.g Vasquez-Velezmoro

INS
281 F3 693 696 (8th Cr. 2002) (ctng
Mater of RoldanSantoyo
22
&
Dec. 512 56 ( 1999) as holdng hat n aln remans convcted r mgraton puross espte  subsequent sate acton hat prpos to erse"  e dnaton of gut rogh a reabltave polc") In  s case  resnen atmps to dstnguish
Mater of Maroqin spra
d argues  hat his convcton s not na r mgraton puposs because no ena or rstrant on lbt was ultmate osed on hm
 See
Resondent's Bref a 8 T rspondn gues ha te Iowa Dsc our r Boone Coun  not mpose rsans on he respondnt's eedom and onl osd a cv enl.
 See
Resondn's Brf at 5.
Accordng o h resondn t co ce  rsondn nr robaton bt as a rm of e efeed jdgmnt wc wold monor end's Comance w hs ded saus"
 See
Ex. 2 ab A;
 see also
Resondnt's Bref at 5. Despt hs gumnt he sa cor's Jne 1 2004 orer of dsmssal ncated that the rspondnt ws pacd on a proaon to h Scond Juca Dsc Deen of oreconl Servcs r a pero of wo (2) ears"
 See
Exh. 3 at 1.  thr h resondent was ordered o pa not smpl e alleged cvl pena" tha e now phaszes bt a probaton enolment fe" of $250 $620 r hs courappontd atoe a law ntatve surchge of $12500 d a DARE e of $10 (J at 4) He was also assessed coss
 See
Exh 3 at 8. Gvn he vdnce presente w gre t t Imgraon udg tha he sa cou mpos ents or rstants on h respondnt n ths case
 See Mater o Cabrea spra
Whle th resonent addtonal gues hat vonar" compance w e ts of probaon does no constue a resrant on lber we conclde at hs argen rees lge on semcs d ha probaon constues a resn on lbr spcve of ther th dend chooses" to sujec hmself o t as a condton of recevng a efed ajudcaton. or these resons w concu hat the respondent was convced" r mgaon puposs h rsponnt also gues on appeal hat s convcton a not e r an aggravated lon purs o
Matter o Casto Rodriguez
25
&N
Dec 68 (B 2012)
 See
Rspondent's Bef at 11. In
Mae o Caso Rodguez spa
ths Boar stad at n determng whthr 
1
Alhogh the respondn atms o sngush
Mater of Cabrea spra
b gung tha te cot n hs case ol mposed  cv penalt he state cour ndced n s 200 rdr th t dd not mos a cvl lalt."
 See
Exh. 2 ab A;
 see also
spondent's Bf at 5  uher o he extnt at he rsponden seeks to have us apl e aw of a er crcu othr  an he Eghh rcut
whch s case ses we declne o o so.
 See Maer o Anemo
0
&N Dec
5,

B
99
te Bod
soa ows a cours preceent
cses arsng n that crct)
 see aso
Rsponens rf at 6 910. Furhr stll as dscuss n he text
ia
eve  te responden dd rceve a cv penalt h aso was assessed oter costs ad chgs that qua as a pnat under o precet.
2
he cou und ha he puposes of proaton have een led an Defendat sul be smssed o proaton thout ent of ugent"
 See
h. 3 a 11 2
Cite as: Dale Anderson Telesford, A079 020 706 (BIA May 27, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->