A07 020 706
See also Maer of Cabera,
Dec. 459 46162 (BI 2008) (holdng hat mposng costs and surcharges n he crnal sentencng context constes a of unshment or penalt r rposes of eenng· weher the responent ws convcted" ndr secton 10
(a)( 48)() of the ct);
see e.g Vasquez-Velezmoro
281 F3 693 696 (8th Cr. 2002) (ctng
Mater of RoldanSantoyo
Dec. 512 56 ( 1999) as holdng hat n aln remans convcted r mgraton puross espte subsequent sate acton hat prpos to erse" e dnaton of gut rogh a reabltave polc") In s case resnen atmps to dstnguish
Mater of Maroqin spra
d argues hat his convcton s not na r mgraton puposs because no ena or rstrant on lbt was ultmate osed on hm
Resondent's Bref a 8 T rspondn gues ha te Iowa Dsc our r Boone Coun not mpose rsans on he respondnt's eedom and onl osd a cv enl.
Resondn's Brf at 5.
Accordng o h resondn t co ce rsondn nr robaton bt as a rm of e efeed jdgmnt wc wold monor end's Comance w hs ded saus"
Ex. 2 ab A;
Resondnt's Bref at 5. Despt hs gumnt he sa cor's Jne 1 2004 orer of dsmssal ncated that the rspondnt ws pacd on a proaon to h Scond Juca Dsc Deen of oreconl Servcs r a pero of wo (2) ears"
Exh. 3 at 1. thr h resondent was ordered o pa not smpl e alleged cvl pena" tha e now phaszes bt a probaton enolment fe" of $250 $620 r hs courappontd atoe a law ntatve surchge of $12500 d a DARE e of $10 (J at 4) He was also assessed coss
Exh 3 at 8. Gvn he vdnce presente w gre t t Imgraon udg tha he sa cou mpos ents or rstants on h respondnt n ths case
See Mater o Cabrea spra
Whle th resonent addtonal gues hat vonar" compance w e ts of probaon does no constue a resrant on lber we conclde at hs argen rees lge on semcs d ha probaon constues a resn on lbr spcve of ther th dend chooses" to sujec hmself o t as a condton of recevng a efed ajudcaton. or these resons w concu hat the respondent was convced" r mgaon puposs h rsponnt also gues on appeal hat s convcton a not e r an aggravated lon purs o
Matter o Casto Rodriguez
Dec 68 (B 2012)
Rspondent's Bef at 11. In
Mae o Caso Rodguez spa
ths Boar stad at n determng whthr
Alhogh the respondn atms o sngush
Mater of Cabrea spra
b gung tha te cot n hs case ol mposed cv penalt he state cour ndced n s 200 rdr th t dd not mos a cvl lalt."
Exh. 2 ab A;
spondent's Bf at 5 uher o he extnt at he rsponden seeks to have us apl e aw of a er crcu othr an he Eghh rcut
whch s case ses we declne o o so.
See Maer o Anemo
soa ows a cours preceent
cses arsng n that crct)
Rsponens rf at 6 910. Furhr stll as dscuss n he text
eve te responden dd rceve a cv penalt h aso was assessed oter costs ad chgs that qua as a pnat under o precet.
he cou und ha he puposes of proaton have een led an Defendat sul be smssed o proaton thout ent of ugent"
h. 3 a 11 2
Cite as: Dale Anderson Telesford, A079 020 706 (BIA May 27, 2014)