1

Case No.: 11-CV-02509-LHK

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
U
n
i
t
e
d

S
t
a
t
e
s

D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t

C
o
u
r
t

F
o
r

t
h
e

N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n

D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t

o
f

C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a















UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN J OSE DIVISION

IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 11-CV-02509-LHK


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
INTERVENE


THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
ALL ACTIONS
)
)
)
)
)
)

Christopher Wirth, Christopher Donnelly, J immy J ames Thule, William Parker, J odi Ann
Arias, J ared Lee Loughner, Terry Lynn Nichols, and J ames Holmes (Putative Intervenors) have
filed a Motion to Intervene. ECF No. 971. The Court DENIES the Motion to Intervene because
Putative Intervenors have not met their burden on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24. See Perry v.
Proposition 8 Official Proponents, 587 F.3d 947, 955 (9th Cir. 2009); Prete v. Bradbury, 438 F.3d
949, 954 (9th Cir. 2006).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 13, 2014 _________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District J udge

Case5:11-cv-02509-LHK Document979 Filed08/13/14 Page1 of 1