Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Please do not include at this time. I am still working this internally. We will address in
the next round. Thanks for asking
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
From: Katherine.Cheney [mailto:Katherine.Cheney@noaa.gov]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 10:34 AM
To: Ponganis, David J NWD
Cc: Lorri Bodi; Lorri Bodi; Lear, Gayle N NWD; Peters, Rock D NWD; psmajkut@bpa.gov;
Coby.Howell@usdoj.gov; jkstier@bpa.gov; kpuckett@usbr.gov
Subject: Re: revsied amp for your review
should we add it and put in in yellow highlights or just leave it off all together ‐ please
advise
Ponganis, David J NWD wrote:
> Before inserting into today's version, I would like to discuss. Please
> hold for the next round or review and edits. thks
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
> From: Lorri Bodi [mailto:flbodi@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 9:09 PM
> To: katherine.cheney@noaa.gov
> Cc: Lorri Bodi; Lear, Gayle N NWD; Peters, Rock D NWD; Ponganis, David
> J
NWD;
> psmajkut@bpa.gov; Coby.Howell@usdoj.gov; jkstier@bpa.gov;
> kpuckett@usbr.gov
> Subject: Re: revsied amp for your review
>
> Hello all.
> Here is some proposed language on dam breaching for the intro to the AMP.
>
>
>
> The new Administration has included Snake River dam breaching in the
> AMP as
a
> long term contingency. Though they are not initiating new feasibility
> studies at this time, NOAA Fisheries and the Action Agencies will be
> developing a more advanced lifecycle model that will allow evaluation
> of
the
> net biological benefits of Snake River dam breaching and other long
> term contingency actions. Developing the capability to perform the
> life‐cycle modeling through a scientifically peer reviewed process is
> a high priority for the adaptive management program.
>
1
BR087
>
>
BR088