Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • BOTTI James CSH 011910 Order

    Uploaded by

    The Valley Indy
    32 views1 page
    The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut denied the defendant James Botti's motion for a new trial and motion for judgment of acquittal in the case United States of America v. James Botti. The court ordered that its reasons for denying the motions would be explained in a forthcoming opinion.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut denied the defendant James Botti's motion for a new trial and motion for judgment of acquittal in the case United States of America v. James Botti. The court ordered that its reasons for denying the motions would be explained in a forthcoming opinion.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    32 views1 page

    BOTTI James CSH 011910 Order

    Uploaded by

    The Valley Indy
    The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut denied the defendant James Botti's motion for a new trial and motion for judgment of acquittal in the case United States of America v. James Botti. The court ordered that its reasons for denying the motions would be explained in a forthcoming opinion.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

    v. 3:08-cr-00230 (CSH)

    JAMES BOTTI, ORDER

    Defendant.

    HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:

    Defendant’s motion for a new trial [Doc. 212] and motion for judgment of acquittal

    [Doc.214] are hereby DENIED. The Court’s reasons will be stated in an opinion to follow.

    It is SO ORDERED.

    Dated: New Haven, Connecticut, January 19, 2010.

    /s/ Charles S. Haight, Jr.


    Charles S. Haight, Jr.
    Senior United States District Judge

    You might also like