Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ROUND ZERO
IMPROMPTU
C YPRUS N IGERIA
B ULGARIA C ROATIA
L EBANON PALESTINE
I NDIA I RELAND
K UWAIT C YPRUS
JAPAN G REECE
P HILIPPINES C HINA
N ETHERLANDS N AMIBIA
S WEDEN KOREA
B ERMUDA RUSSIA
G ERMANY AUSTRALIA
B ULGARIA M EXICO
T HAILAND S COTLAND
A RGENTINA S UDAN
P ERU UAE
M ONTENEGRO I SRAEL
ROUND ONE (cont. . . )
C ROATIA E STONIA
N EW Z EALAND S LOVAKIA
L EBANON S RI L ANKA
ROMANIA S LOVENIA
Q ATAR U GANDA
T URKEY PAKISTAN
PALESTINE B OTSWANA
C ANADA BANGLADESH
L ITHUANIA E NGLAND
WALES O MAN
ROUND TWO
IMPROMPTU
I RELAND K UWAIT
C YPRUS I NDIA
G REECE P HILIPPINES
C HINA JAPAN
KOREA N ETHERLANDS
N AMIBIA S WEDEN
AUSTRALIA B ERMUDA
N IGERIA G ERMANY
M EXICO S INGAPORE
S COTLAND A RGENTINA
S UDAN T HAILAND
I SRAEL P ERU
UAE M ONTENEGRO
ROUND TWO (cont. . . )
IMPROMPTU
E STONIA N EW Z EALAND
S LOVAKIA C ROATIA
M ALAYSIA L EBANON
M ONGOLIA ROMANIA
PAKISTAN Q ATAR
U GANDA T URKEY
B OTSWANA C ANADA
BANGLADESH PALESTINE
E NGLAND I NDONESIA
O MAN C HILE
ROUND THREE
‘ THAT EVERY COUNTRY SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO POSSESS NUCLEAR WEAPONS ’
I RELAND C HILE
C YPRUS WALES
G REECE L ITHUANIA
C HINA I NDONESIA
E NGLAND S WEDEN
O MAN B ERMUDA
S INGAPORE T URKEY
B ULGARIA Q ATAR
S COTLAND BANGLADESH
S UDAN B OTSWANA
P ERU L EBANON
‘ THAT EVERY COUNTRY SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO POSSESS NUCLEAR WEAPONS ’
E STONIA M ONGOLIA
S LOVAKIA S LOVENIA
AUSTRALIA JAPAN
N IGERIA P HILIPPINES
KOREA I NDIA
N AMIBIA K UWAIT
N EW Z EALAND ROMANIA
I SRAEL M ALAYSIA
UAE S RI L ANKA
A RGENTINA RUSSIA
T HAILAND C ANADA
U GANDA M EXICO
IMPROMPTU MOTION
WALES I RELAND
C HILE C YPRUS
I NDONESIA G REECE
L ITHUANIA C HINA
N ETHERLANDS E NGLAND
G ERMANY O MAN
Q ATAR S INGAPORE
T URKEY B ULGARIA
B OTSWANA S COTLAND
BANGLADESH S UDAN
L EBANON M ONTENEGRO
ROUND FOUR (cont. . . )
IMPROMPTU MOTION
S LOVENIA E STONIA
M ONGOLIA S LOVAKIA
P HILIPPINES AUSTRALIA
JAPAN N IGERIA
K UWAIT KOREA
I NDIA N AMIBIA
S RI L ANKA I SRAEL
M ALAYSIA UAE
C ANADA A RGENTINA
PALESTINE T HAILAND
PAKISTAN M EXICO
ROMANIA RUSSIA
ROUND FIVE
M ONGOLIA I RELAND
S LOVENIA C YPRUS
RUSSIA G REECE
BANGLADESH N ETHERLANDS
B OTSWANA S WEDEN
T URKEY B ERMUDA
Q ATAR G ERMANY
O MAN S INGAPORE
S UDAN E NGLAND
L ITHUANIA P ERU
I NDONESIA M ONTENEGRO
ROUND FIVE (cont. . . )
E STONIA C HILE
S LOVAKIA WALES
U GANDA AUSTRALIA
PAKISTAN N IGERIA
PALESTINE KOREA
N AMIBIA C ANADA
M ALAYSIA P HILIPPINES
S RI L ANKA JAPAN
ROMANIA K UWAIT
UAE N EW Z EALAND
I SRAEL C ROATIA
M EXICO T HAILAND
ROUND SIX
IMPROMPTU MOTION
I RELAND S LOVENIA
C YPRUS M ONGOLIA
C HINA L EBANON
N ETHERLANDS B OTSWANA
S WEDEN BANGLADESH
B ERMUDA Q ATAR
G ERMANY T URKEY
B ULGARIA O MAN
E NGLAND S COTLAND
RUSSIA S UDAN
P ERU I NDONESIA
M ONTENEGRO L ITHUANIA
ROUND SIX (cont. . . )
IMPROMPTU MOTION
WALES E STONIA
C HILE S LOVAKIA
AUSTRALIA PAKISTAN
N IGERIA U GANDA
KOREA C ANADA
N AMIBIA PALESTINE
P HILIPPINES S RI L ANKA
JAPAN M ALAYSIA
I NDIA ROMANIA
N EW Z EALAND I SRAEL
C ROATIA UAE
A RGENTINA M EXICO
‘ THAT TERRORIST SUSPECTS SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL IN CIVILIAN COURTS ’
I RELAND B ULGARIA
G REECE S UDAN
RUSSIA S INGAPORE
C HINA S COTLAND
N ETHERLANDS M ONTENEGRO
S WEDEN P ERU
B ERMUDA S LOVAKIA
G ERMANY E STONIA
E NGLAND L EBANON
S LOVENIA O MAN
C HILE Q ATAR
WALES T URKEY
ROUND SEVEN (cont. . . )
‘ THAT TERRORIST SUSPECTS SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL IN CIVILIAN COURTS ’
B OTSWANA L ITHUANIA
BANGLADESH I NDONESIA
AUSTRALIA C ROATIA
N IGERIA N EW Z EALAND
KOREA UAE
I SRAEL N AMIBIA
P HILIPPINES T HAILAND
JAPAN A RGENTINA
M EXICO I NDIA
C ANADA PALESTINE
PAKISTAN U GANDA
S RI L ANKA M ALAYSIA
ROUND EIGHT
IMPROMPTU MOTION
S INGAPORE I RELAND
RUSSIA C YPRUS
S COTLAND G REECE
S UDAN C HINA
P ERU N ETHERLANDS
M ONTENEGRO S WEDEN
E STONIA B ERMUDA
S LOVAKIA G ERMANY
O MAN M ONGOLIA
Q ATAR WALES
T URKEY C HILE
ROUND EIGHT (cont. . . )
IMPROMPTU MOTION
I NDONESIA B OTSWANA
L ITHUANIA BANGLADESH
N EW Z EALAND AUSTRALIA
C ROATIA N IGERIA
I SRAEL KOREA
UAE N AMIBIA
A RGENTINA P HILIPPINES
T HAILAND JAPAN
M EXICO K UWAIT
C ANADA PAKISTAN
PALESTINE U GANDA
ROMANIA M ALAYSIA