You are on page 1of 1320

Before the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel

in the matter of

The Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local


Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act
2010

and
in the matter of

Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Topic 081 Rezoning


and Precincts (Geographic)

JOINT PRIMARY STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MATTHEW ARMIN


LINDENBERG AND AMELIA JOAN LINZEY
ON BEHALF OF HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION
839, FS 3338

Joint Statement of primary evidence of Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey on


behalf of the Housing New Zealand Corporation

Dated:

19 February 2016

INDEX
INDEX ........................................................................................................... 2
OVERVIEW STATEMENT .................................................................................. 3
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 4
SCOPE OF EVIDENCE ...................................................................................... 4
OVERALL SCOPE OF THE CORPORATIONS SUBMISSIONS WITH REGARDS TO
ZONING ........................................................................................................ 9
THE PURPOSE OF ZONING ............................................................................ 11
THE RELATIONSHIP OF ZONING TO OVERLAYS .............................................. 15
ZONING SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 19
HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION PROPOSED REZONING BY

GEOGRAPHIC AREAS .................................................................................... 20


NORTH (NORTH SHORE) .............................................................................................................. 22
WEST ...................................................................................................................................... 25
CENTRAL .................................................................................................................................. 27
SOUTH ..................................................................................................................................... 40

CONCLUSION .............................................................................................. 47

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

JOINT STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MATT LINDENBERG AND


AMELIA LINZEY ON BEHALF OF HOUSING NEW ZEALAND
CORPORATION
19 February 2016
OVERVIEW STATEMENT
1

Our full names are Matthew Armin Lindenberg and Amelia Joan
Linzey. We are both Planners and respectively hold the positions
of Associate, and Senior Technical Director at Beca Limited. We
are providing planning evidence on behalf of Housing New Zealand
Corporations (the Corporation) primary and further submissions
(839, FS 3338) made in relation to Topic 081 (Rezoning and
Precincts Geographic) of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan
(PAUP).

In summary, the key points addressed in our evidence are:


2.1

An overview of our recommended updates to the


Corporations submission rezoning methodology as a
consequence of the hearing process so far and in light of the
Independent Hearings Panels (Panel) Interim Guidance on
best practice approaches to rezoning and precincts;

2.2

The proposed rezoning of the Auckland region, in light of our


updated methodology, for each of the four geographic areas
(North, West, Central and South);

2.3

Further specific commentary on rezoning that we consider


appropriate to fulfil the purpose of the Resource
Management Act 1991, the relevant objectives and policies
of the Regional Policy Statement (RPS) and as appropriate
the objectives and policies of the PAUP. Particular attention
is focused on those areas where the zoning that we
recommend differs from that proposed by Council in the
notified PAUP and more specifically in the evidence suite
presented by Council for Topic 081.
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence

Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

INTRODUCTION
3

Our full names are Matthew Armin Lindenberg and Amelia Joan
Linzey. We are both Planners and respectively hold the positions
of Associate, and Senior Technical Director at Beca Limited. We
have the qualifications and experience set out in our individual
statements of evidence dated 14 November 2014, on the RPS
Topic 004 and dated 17 October 2014, on the RPS Topic 005
(including Attachment A of those statements).

We are familiar with the national, regional and district planning


documents relevant to the PAUP.

We have been engaged by the Corporation since 2013 to provide


planning advice on both the Draft and Proposed Auckland Unitary
Plan. We are providing planning evidence on behalf of the
Corporation in relation to the Rezoning and Precincts (Geographic)
Topic (081) of the PAUP.

We have read the Environment Courts Code of Conduct for Expert


Witnesses, including amendments. We agree to comply with this
Code. We confirm that the issues addressed in this statement of
evidence are within our area of expertise and we have not omitted
to consider any material facts known to us that might alter or detract
from our opinions expressed in this statement.

SCOPE OF EVIDENCE
7

Our evidence is structured to address the following key matters:


7.1

Our recommended updates to the Corporations submission


rezoning methodology as a consequence of the hearing
process so far and in light of the Panels Interim Guidance on
best practice approaches to rezoning and precincts;

7.2

The proposed rezoning of the Auckland region, in light of our


updated methodology, for each of the four geographic areas
(North, West, Central and South); and
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence

Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

7.3

Further specific commentary on rezoning that we consider to


be appropriate, focusing specifically on those areas that
differ from that proposed by Council in the evidence suite
they have presented for Topic 081.

We confirm that we have read the submissions and further


submissions made by the Corporation in relation to the PAUP. We
are familiar with the Corporations corporate intent in respect of the
provision of housing within Auckland1.

We have referred to, and used as a basis in our evidence, the


statements of primary evidence of:
9.1

John Duguid (Rezoning General Statement), for Topics 080


and 081 on behalf of Auckland Council, dated 3 December
2015;

9.2

Dr James Fairgray (economic), for Topic 081 on behalf of


Auckland Council, dated 28 January 2016;

9.3

Kyle Balderston (capacity and feasibility modelling) for Topic


081 on behalf of Auckland Council, dated 26 January 2016;

9.4

Lisa Mein (Planning Historic Character Overlay Zoning


Principles), for Topics 080 and 081 on behalf of Auckland
Council, dated 3 December 2015;

9.5

Deborah Rowe (Planning Pre-1944 Overlay Zoning


Principles), for Topics 080 and 081 on behalf of Auckland
Council, dated 3 December 2015;

9.6

Mr Bourne (Watercare), for Topics 080 and 081 on behalf of


Auckland Council, dated 3 December 2015;

The Corporation provided their corporate evidence in respect of Hearing Topic 013,
December 2014.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

9.7

Stephen Brown (Landscape), for Topic 081 on behalf of


Auckland Council, dated 29 January 2016;

9.8

Peter Reaburn (Volcanic Viewshafts and Height Sensitive


Areas), for Topics 080 and 081 on behalf of Auckland
Council, dated 3 December 2015; and

9.9

Joint statement of Alastair Cribbens and others (Auckland


Transport), on behalf of Auckland Council, dated 26 January
2016.

10

We have also referred to, and used as a basis in our evidence, the
suite of various evidence report of submissions on behalf of
Council for each of the sub-areas of Central, West, North, Rodney
and South.

11

We also refer to and as relevant rely on other evidence prepared on


behalf of the Corporation in respect of the PAUP, as well the
Panels Interim Guidance where relevant. In particular, this
includes:
11.1 Evidence presented in respect of Topic 080 (rezoning
general) including the Joint Planning Statement by Mr
Lindenberg and Ms Linzey as well as evidence by Mr Lucca,
and the statement from Mr Osborne and Mr Heath;
11.2 Evidence presented in respect of Topic 013 (Urban Growth),
including the evidence of Ms Linzey, Mr Osborne and
Professor Howden-Chapman in respect of wider objectives of
the PAUP relating to urban growth;
11.3 The evidence of Ms Linzey in respect of Topics 029 and 030
and more recently Topic 079 (Special Character and Pre1944);
11.4 The evidence of Ms Linzey in respect of Topic 045 (Airport);

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

11.5 The evidence of Ms Linzey in respect of Topic 035 (Air


Quality);
11.6 The Joint Planning Statement of Mr Lindenberg and Ms
Linzey in respect of Topic 042 (Infrastructure);
11.7 The evidence of Mr Lindenberg in respect of Topics 043 and
044 (Transport);
11.8 Evidence presented in respect of Topic 061 (Retirement and
Affordability), including the Joint Planning Statement of Ms
Linzey and Mr Lindenberg, and the Joint Economic
Statement of Mr Osborne and Mr Heath in respect of
appropriate methods for addressing issues of housing
affordability;
11.9 The Joint Planning Statement of Mr Lindenberg and Ms
Linzey in relation to Topics 051-054 (Business);
11.10 The Joint Planning Statement of Mr Lindenberg and Ms
Linzey in relation to Topics 059, 060, 062 and 063
(Residential);
11.11 The Joint Planning Statement of Mr Lindenberg and Ms
Linzey in respect of Topic 064 (Subdivision);
11.12 Evidence prepared for this hearing topic, on behalf of the
Corporation, being the economic evidence of Mr Heath and
Mr Osborne (Economic) and Mr Lucca (Urban Design);
11.13 Interim Guidance Text for RPS Topic 013 (Urban Growth /
Rural Urban Boundary), dated 24 February 2015;
11.14 Interim Guidance Text for RPS Topic 013 (Urban Growth
other matters), dated 20 March 2015;

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

11.15 Interim Guidance (Best practice approaches to re-zoning,


precincts and changes to the Rural Urban Boundary), dated
31 July 2015; and
11.16 Interim Guidance Text for Topic 035 (Air quality), dated 25
September 2015.
12

The remainder of this statement addresses the following matters:


12.1 The overall scope provided by the Corporations submissions
with regards to proposed zone changes;
12.2 A discussion on the fundamental purpose of land use zoning;
12.3 A discussion regarding the relationship between zones and
Overlays in the PAUP;
12.4 An overall summary of zoning patterns in relation to the
Corporations stock; and
12.5 A summary discussion on key focus areas, grouped by the
sub-regions of North, West, Central and South, where the
Corporations position on zoning still differs from that now
proposed by Council (in their various evidence statement for
Topic 081).

13

In addition, the following are also contained as Attachments to this


statement:
13.1 Attachment A provides a suite of area assessment
summaries, as further context to the focus areas discussed
below, setting out how the Corporations zoning principles
are conceptually applied in each area. The purpose of these
area assessments is to outline the various amenities,
services and facilities which we consider support residential
intensification in these locations;

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

13.2 Attachment B provides a suite of conceptual maps to


illustrate how the Corporations zoning principles would be
applied across Auckland. These are not intended to be maps
representing the individual zoning submissions of the
Corporation, but rather how the Corporations zoning
principles would be applied, at a conceptual level, across the
City. The maps show the spatial extent of the four primary
residential zones (THAB, MHU, MHS and SH) which the
Corporations principles recommend; and
13.3 Attachment C provides the detailed outline of our
responses, in relation to Councils position, on the individual
zoning submissions from the Corporation. This detailed table
sets out the specific position in relation to each of the
Corporations specific zoning requests.
13.4 Attachment D provides a suite of more detailed maps, in
relation to the areas of focus discussed below in this
statement, setting out the Corporations recommended
zoning pattern, in the context of their landholdings and the
wider surrounding area.
OVERALL SCOPE OF THE CORPORATIONS SUBMISSIONS WITH
REGARDS TO ZONING
14

We refer to the memorandum filed on behalf of the Corporation (13


January 2016), in response to the memorandum filed on behalf of
Auckland 2040 with regard to the issue of scope in the revised
zoning presented in the evidence of Auckland Council for Topic
081.

15

To summarise, we consider there are two specific submission point


themes by the Corporation that give scope for many of the
proposed zone changes put forward by Auckland Council in their
evidence for Topic 081 (noting that there may well be scope from
other submitters as well). Further, it is our view that the further
amendments to the spatial application of zones recommended in
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

10

this EIC are also consistent with the relief sought and issues raised
by the Corporation as a result of their submissions on the PAUP.
Specifically, these are:
15.1 The Corporations submission sought amendments to the
spatial application of zones, in response to zoning changes
as a result of the application of various Overlays such as
the Pre-1994 Demolition Control, Special Character and
Volcanic Viewshaft Overlays. The approach taken to date
by Auckland Council has directly linked the use of particular
zones (such as the Single House zone) with the application
of particular Overlays (such as those listed). Therefore,
where any proposed zone changes put forward by Council
relate to amendments sought by the Corporation (or other
submitters) in relation to the spatial application of overlays
it is considered that as a consequence of this amendment
sought in submissions, there would be attendant changes to
the underlying zone;
15.2 The Corporations submission also clearly put at issue the
extent, and more specifically the sufficiency of the extent, of
areas within parts of the existing urban environment that
were required to provide for the anticipated urban
intensification sought by both the Auckland Plan and in the
objectives and policies of the RPS. In response to this
concern, the Corporation made numerous submissions with
regard to the zoning of their land with the proviso that there
would be an attendant need to also review and make
amendments to the pattern of zoning in areas surrounding
the Corporations landholdings. Without any such wider
amendments many of the property specific zoning
submission requests made by the Corporation, as well as
those of other submitters, could be considered as spot zone
requests. This was not the stated intention of the Corporation
and this was clearly indicated in the Corporations
submission.
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

11

15.3 On the basis of the above submissions, we consider that the


combined nature of the Corporations submissions on zoning,
as well as amendments sought to zoning by all other
submitters (particularly other Central Government submitters
such as the Minister for the Environment and the Ministry of
Business, Innovation and Employment), give scope for a
wider review of the spatial application of zones across
Auckland as a whole. Without this wider, integrated
consideration and review of zoning, most zoning requests
from individual submitters would be at risk of being
considered spot zoning submissions.
16

We are therefore of the opinion that the submissions made by the


Corporation in relation to the spatial application of zones, as well as
amendments sought to numerous Overlays, provides clear scope
for the proposed amendments to zoning discussed below in this
statement.

THE PURPOSE OF ZONING


17

It is worthwhile, as a starting point, to briefly consider what the


purpose of zoning is, as a land-use management tool within the
context of the PAUP.

18

Zoning is the key tool to set out, in a geographic sense, how


different types of land uses, in association with the built form of any
development necessary for those uses, are to be provided for
across geographic areas. It is a core tenet of how communities are
able to provide for their social, economic, cultural and
environmental wellbeing that there is broad guidance as to how and
where people can undertake particular types of activities across
different parts of the region.

19

In the Auckland context, the Auckland Plan (in particular the


Development Strategy Maps D.1 and D.2) sets out the spatial
growth plan for Auckland over a 30-year horizon. The Auckland
Plan provides a high-level, strategic outline of how and where
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

12

growth and change (in the way of quality intensification in


appropriate locations) is anticipated to occur. In our opinion, this
Spatial Plan is an important part of the vision for what the pattern
of sustainable development in Auckland will be, and how people
within the City will be able to provide for their wellbeing.
20

The RPS and then the remaining objectives and policies of the
PAUP then provide a set of regulatory tools and provisions to
provide for and manage how the overall development strategy and
growth vision will be delivered and achieved. Zoning of land is the
fundamental mechanism within the PAUP to identify the
geographical areas of Auckland which are best suited to providing
for differing levels of change and growth.

21

It is important to consider that zoning is not intended as an


expression of an existing or expected reality. Zoning should not
simply consider the future use of land in the context of that lands
existing use, or development form. Rather, it sets a pattern of land
use to provide for the social, economic, cultural and environmental
wellbeing of the community, both now but more importantly for
future generations.

22

However, how land is zoned will not necessarily dictate its use, or
how it is developed (it does not prescribe that change must happen,
rather it enables and prescribes what and how changes may occur).
In many instances, how a particular parcel of land is zoned may not
lead to any change in the existing use of that land either in the
short or long term. A change in land use is a factor of the change
that the owner of that land implements. On the basis of the
evidence of Mr Heath and Mr Osborne, and our own experience in
land development, we consider there are a number of factors that
influence landowners decisions as to whether or not they
undertake a change in land use. These factors include
considerations of a landowners existing use of land and investment
in capital on land, the configuration and characteristics of the land,
or fragmentation of land ownership (if changes in land use require
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

13

site amalgamations) and the commercial viability of undertaking


development or redevelopment in certain locations. In combination,
these factors may mean that land is not used or developed in the
way which zoning provides for or anticipates in the short or even
medium term.
23

In this sense, zoning is a macro-spatial tool to geographically depict


how the growth and development of a city will change and progress
over time in an integrated, holistic way. In the case of Auckland,
that is to enable growth and intensification in appropriate locations
as a means of achieving the RPS objectives, including the quality
compact city, urban intensification and increasing housing choices
for residents.

24

As a result of the need to think strategically about the appropriate,


long-term growth and development of a city, a pattern of zoning
might look to provide for growth and demographic changes facing a
region by setting a pattern for growth and change in certain
locations cognisant of the fact that the realisation of that
development may not eventuate for a further 5, 10, 15 or 20 years.

25

It is therefore important to consider the application of zoning, not


just to provide for the expected or anticipated realisation of change
simply within the lifetime of the PAUP itself (e.g the next 10-15
years), but also the pattern of zoning applied across Auckland over
a longer term horizon. We consider that the first generation Unitary
Plan lays a unique opportunity to set the best foundation for the
longer term growth of the City and to achieve the development
strategy envisioned by the Auckland Plan and RPS. To do this, it is
our opinion that the intent of zoning and the pattern of the Citys
current and future growth should be clearly and transparently set
out now.

26

On the basis of the above discussion, we generally support the


proposed zoning and subsequent zone changes (recommended in
various evidence statements on behalf of Council for Topic 081) for
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

14

a number of locations / areas across Auckland. Some examples of


locations where the we generally support the pattern of zoning
proposed by Council for Topic 081 are noted below:
26.1 North:

26.2

26.3

26.4

27

(a)

Rodney area;

(b)

Northcote

West:
(a)

Glen Eden / Kelston

(b)

New Lynn

(c)

Henderson / Lincoln Road

Central:
(a)

Westmere

(b)

Remuera

(c)

St Heliers

(d)

Glendowie

(e)

Hillsborough / Puketapapa

South:
(a)

Ormiston

(b)

Pakuranga

We note that where there are differences in the zoning proposed by


Council, to that sought by the Corporation, for a number of sites
within these locations the differences generally relate to the
extent of both the Mixed Housing Urban (MHU) and Mixed
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

15

Housing Suburban (MHS) zones, based upon the different


principles outlined by both Council and the Corporation in our
relevant evidence statements in relation to Topic 080. Principally
the key difference here is the applicability of the different
approaches to walkable catchments from centres and key facilities
and amenities (i.e. Council generally support a 250m/500m
catchment approach, while we support a 400m/800m catchment).
28

We also note that our review of the spatial application of zoning


across Auckland has taken account the Corporations zoning
principles (e.g. proximity criteria), the Corporations submission,
Councils response (through their Topic 081 evidence), as well as
the IHPs guidance. Specifically, in respect of the THAB zone, we
have also been cognisant of the changes recommended by Council
(and other parties) in relation to the residential zone provisions
(Topics 059, 060, 062 and 063), which proposed a permitted
maximum height of up to 5 storeys. It is our view that this does, in
some cases, represent a scale of development that warrants further
specific consideration and has resulted in amendments to specific
rezoning requests (outlined in Attachment C) where, on balance,
we have recommended rezoning to MHU in some locations rather
than the THAB outcome sought by the Corporation in their
submission.

THE RELATIONSHIP OF ZONING TO OVERLAYS


29

We have addressed previously, in various evidence statements on


behalf of the Corporation in relation to a number of previous
hearing topics, the issue the use of Overlays as a tool within the
PAUP to manage specific natural and physical resource issues.
The concept of the use of Overlays within the PAUP was to
provide a discrete values based layer of management specific to
a particular resource value in identified locations. The structure of
the Overlays is that these tools (in a hierarchical sense) sit on top of
the general provisions of the underlying zones, providing additional
regulation and management in response to specific resource
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

16

management considerations. As such, it is our view that Overlays


provide a clear mechanism whereby the specific provisions
identified to recognise and provide for matters of section 6, and to
manage the values of section 7, can be spatially defined and
transparently identified (in respect of the costs and benefits
associated with the protection or additional management that they
impose).
30

As previously identified, on this basis, we do not consider there is a


need to create a further dependency between the zoning of land,
and a given Overlay relating to that piece of land. To do so
obscures the costs and benefits of the Overlay protection, by in
part duplicating it in the zoning. While the issue of certainty for
landowners (addressing the concern that a zone may give a
development right only for the Overlay to take it way), as raised by
Council in respect of their evidence on Topic 080 is acknowledged2,
we consider that such an approach is less effective and efficient
than maintaining a separation between these tools for the following
reasons:
30.1 It enables the values and costs/benefits of an Overlay to be
transparently identified;
30.2 The separation of these values allows for any subsequent
review and potential amendment to Overlays to be clearly
processed (e.g. if the extent of an Overlay were reduced or
extended, it would not have to be undertaken in tandem with
a change to zoning); and
30.3 It provides clarity on the spatial pattern that the Council is
seeking in zoning. As set out in Councils evidence for Topic
080, the principles of zoning are broadly based on a suite of
criteria (e.g. proximity to services and infrastructure) that
2

We refer here to the evidence and rebuttal evidence of Mr Duguid in respect of Topic
080.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

17

deem an area appropriate for different land uses and


particularly for residential intensification. Such a model is
unnecessarily obscured by the introduction of Overlay values
on the zoning, when these values then apply their own
management regime.
31

Set out below are two examples of the issue between zoning and
Overlays are highlighted and where we have a different stance to
that adopted by Council, is in relation to the underlying zoning of
land which is impacted by the Special Character Overlay and the
Blanket Height Sensitive Area3 Overlay. We also have further
concerns where a similar approach has been taken to the nonstatutory layer of Flood Hazard.

32

In the case of the Special Character Overlay, Councils general


approach has been to apply a Single House (SH) zone to
residential land impacted (as discussed in the evidence of Ms Mein
in respect of Topic 080). In the case of the Height Sensitive
Overlay, Council has applied either the SH or MHS zone (as set out
in the evidence of Mr Raeburn in respect of Topic 080). In both
cases, the rationale for this, as set out by Councils experts, is
because they consider the application of that particular zone best
aligns with the resource value outcomes the additional layers of
management control are seeking to achieve. In our opinion, such
an approach essentially provides a double-layered approach to the
management of a single resource value issue. We see this
approach as potentially undermining the fundamental philosophy
within the PAUP as to how and why the zone and overlay
management approach was initially conceived, and what these two
regulatory tools were separately seeking to achieve. Perhaps this is
best illustrated by the discussion and complexity that has arisen in
both topics where we are seeking to understand the costs of the

The spatial definition of which, along with the identification of their associated values,
is still subject to on-going expert conferencing.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

18

overlay provisions and Councils own counter-factual assessment is


to compare the development opportunity of a site by zoning (with or
without the Overlay), when they have acknowledged that the zone
itself has been determined (at least in part) by the presence of that
Overlay.
33

Put simply, it is our view that the PAUP should let zones be zones
and let overlays be overlays. As a result of our approach and as
articulated in the various zoning principles set out in our joint EIC in
relation to Topic 080 many of the locations and areas discussed
in the remainder of this statement, where we identify the need for
further amendments to the spatial application of zones are
locations where Council have sought to apply a lower-density
zoning (such as SH) due to the presence of a particular Overlay.
Our approach seeks to acknowledge that not all development
enabled by a zone will be delivered, but rather that the Overlays will
transparently be recognised as an additional constraint on any
future development which needs to be managed.

34

In respect of the flood hazards, as already presented on behalf of


the Corporation in relation to Topic 022, the management of flood
hazard risk in established urban areas is a matter for managing the
location and design of buildings and structures. The flood hazard
provisions of the PAUP seek to address this issue. Consideration
of zoning of land impacted by flood hazards is a matter more
appropriately addressed through the Plan Change process required
for the creation of new urban areas, such as in the Future Urban
Zone. We agree that in the identification and creation of new areas
for urban activities and development, flood and other identified
natural hazard (such as coastal inundation areas) should not be
considered appropriate for residential intensification. This
approach, applied in greenfield areas, is one which focuses on
avoiding creating new hazard risks. In existing urban areas (and as
set out in previous evidence for Topic 022), we consider the
appropriate focus is on the management of building location and
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

19

design as a means of avoiding, remedying or mitigating the adverse


effects associated with flood hazards.
35

We further note that Councils assessment of the Corporations


rezoning submissions, with respect to sites impacted by flood
hazards, appears to focus on the degree or extent of hazard
identified for any given site. In our opinion, this overlooks the
potential for the Corporation to amalgamate sites in order to
undertake comprehensive redevelopment. We have consider this
matter in our responses to Councils assessment of the
Corporations individual zoning requests (refer to Attachment C).

ZONING SUMMARY
36

Under the notified PAUP the majority of the Corporations dwellings


were zoned MHS. In accordance with the principles set out in our
joint EIC in relation to Topic 080, the Corporation sought a review of
the zoning of their dwellings to enable greater provision of housing
choice (including typology, scale and cost) and intensification in
appropriate locations across Auckland. In general terms, the
Corporation sought a reduction in the proportion of its landholdings
to be zoned SH and MHS, and an increase in the proportion of its
landholdings to be zoned MHU and THAB.
The proportion of each residential zone4 in relation to the

37

Corporations stock is set out below:

Single House

Notified PAUP

Council Revised

HNZC

17.1%

13.3%

1.4%

Jan 2016

Submission

For the purposes of these calculations, only Corporation sites that have one zone
applied to them (i.e. not split zoned) have been examined. This split-zone

examples represent less than 2% of the Corporations total stock. In addition the
area examined includes the Auckland region, excluding the Rodney local board
(given the low proportion of HNZC landholdings in this area).

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

20

38

MHS

64.0%

47.9%

12.9%

MHU

9.6%

27.9%

59.2%

THAB

9.2%

10.9%

26.5%

Overall, we consider that the Council have made significant steps to


amend the proposed zoning pattern of the Corporations
landholdings across Auckland with, in general term, a reduction in
the proportion of land zoned SH and MHS, and an increase in the
proportion of land zoned MHU and THAB.

39

However, we consider that it is necessary to provide additional


zone changes, as set out in the remainder of this statement, in
order to provide for the level of growth and intensification in
Auckland that will be required to deliver upon the development
strategy outlined in the Auckland Plan, as well as to provide
Aucklanders with greater housing choices into the future to improve
the affordability and quality of housing for all.

HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION PROPOSED REZONING


BY GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
40

In our joint EIC for Topic 080 we highlighted the key areas of
difference between the Corporations approach to the application of
zoning principles, and those applied by Auckland Council. It is
important to reiterate that we agree with and generally support the
approach Council has taken to its principles for zoning. The issues
that remain at contention are the suitable proximity measures for
growth areas from centres, the rapid and frequent service network,
social infrastructure and community facilities, as well as the
relationship between zoning and Overlays.

41

A review of Councils proposed rezoning as attached in the various


evidence statements of Topic 081 demonstrates that while we
generally support the Councils proposed zone amendments in a
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

21

number of locations across Auckland, (as identified above in


paragraph 26) we consider there are still a number of locations
where there are differences in the rezoning sought between the two
parties.
42

As highlighted in the primary evidence for Topic 080, these key


differences primarily relate to the following two issues of contention
being:
42.1 The extent of application of Terrace Housing and Apartment
Buildings (THAB), MHU and MHS zones 400m and 800m
from centres, the rapid and frequent transport network
(FTN), as well as supporting amenities and community
facilities (as opposed to the 250m and 500m walkable
catchments applied by Council); and
42.2 Councils approach of double managing certain Overlayspecific matters such as Special Character, Blanket Height
Sensitive Areas and Significant Ecological Areas, by directly
linking the presence of an Overlay in relation to a given
property to how that property should be zoned (e.g.
application of the SH zone in relation to the aforementioned
Overlays). The Councils approach effectively uses Overlays
to either determine or influence decisions regarding how sites
should be zoned.

43

Therefore, for the purposes of this evidence statement, we seek to


provide examples of key areas where these differences are of
particular relevance to the Corporation.

44

In our joint EIC for Topic 080 we also noted that particular best
practice approaches outlined by the Panels Interim Guidance have
been further considered in respect of the Corporations submissions
on zoning, in particular:
44.1 The consideration of issues debated in recent plan changes
(where relevant);
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

22

44.2 The need to provide adequate separation between


incompatible land uses (e.g. houses adjacent to heavy
industry); and
44.3 The consideration of particular overlay constraints (e.g. the
High Aircraft Noise Area Overlay).
45

Some of the examples therefore outline specific instances where


further consideration of these matters has impacted upon the
Corporations zoning submission requests in relation to specific
sites or areas.

46

What follows is a brief summary of the key locations where the


application of our zoning principles identify that further amendments
to the zone changes proposed by Council are needed.
Attachment A to this statement provides a more detailed suite of
area-specific assessments which outline the key differences
between the Councils and the Corporations proposed zoning
approaches in relation to each location. As noted above, these
area assessments focus on how the Corporations zoning
principles have been applied conceptually to particular areas, and
provide a summary of the various services, amenities and facilities
which we consider support residential intensification in these areas.
North (North Shore)

47

As notified, the majority of the Corporations residential landholdings


in the North5 were zoned Mixed Housing Suburban. The table
below provides a summary of the Corporations landholdings in the
North, in respect of the notified PAUP, the Councils proposed

Where north refers to the area defined by Council in their evidence and by the
following local boards: Upper Harbour, Hibiscus and Bays, Devonport-Takapuna,

Kapatiki. It is noted that as the Hibiscus and Bays local board overlaps with the area
defined by council as north shore and Rodney the entire local board has been

included in these calculations. In addition as the Upper Harbour local board overlaps
with the area defined by council as west and north shore the percentages of the
local board has been split between the two areas.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

23

zone amendments (for Topic 081), and the Corporations rezoning


submissions.
Notified PAUP

Council Revised

HNZC

Single House

19%

9%

4%

MHS

53%

56%

18.6%

MHU

12%

15%

48.3%

THAB

15%

19%

28.7%

Jan 2016

Submission6

Beach Haven
48

The Beach Haven local centre supports the provision of residential


intensification, given the facilities and services provided by the
centre, as well as the surrounding open spaces and Beach Haven
Primary School (located on Tramway Road).

49

The notified PAUP provided for no MHU in proximity to the centre,


with surrounding residential zoning being a mix of MHS and SH.
Councils proposed zone amendments in this location now provide
for an area of MHU zoning surrounding the centre, which we
support.

50

The key differences between the application of the Corporations


principles, and the approach proposed by Council, primarily relates
to the extent of MHU in proximity to the Beach Haven local centre
and Beach Haven School. We have proposed the application of
MHU within 400m of the local centre, and 250m of the school
whereas Council have applied a limited amount of MHU

Refers to the proportion of each zone as sought by the Corporations submission on


rezoning.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

24

immediately adjacent to the centre (demonstrated in area


assessment NS1).
51

The second key difference in this location is Councils retention of


areas of SH zone due to the presence of particular overlay
constraints (e.g Significant Ecological Areas as well as flood
hazards). The application of our principles generally proposed
either MHU or MHS in these locations. In accordance with the
Corporations principles, we consider this location is appropriate for
the application of a wider extent of MHU zoning.
Belmont

52

The Belmont local centre and surrounds provides a good level of


amenity to support residential intensification, particularly in relation
to the presence of the FTN along Lake Road, a number of nearby
schools and open spaces, as well as the ferry terminal located at
the western extent of Bayswater Avenue / Marine Terrace.

53

In this location, we have proposed some zone amendments beyond


the application of our general principles demonstrated in area
assessment NS2. These changes primarily relate to the provision
of some THAB (or Mixed Use) immediately surrounding the local
centre, as well as a wider application of MHU, in particular
westwards along Bayswater Avenue down towards the ferry
terminal.

54

A proposed amendment, from the Corporations original submission


position, which we consider to be appropriate is to no longer pursue
the request for a THAB outcome on the sites at the corner of Lake
Road, Bardia Street and Tui Street. We feel MHU (as notified) is a
more appropriate outcome for this particular location.
Northcote

55

The Northcote town centre provides a high level of supporting


services to its local catchment, with the wider surrounds also
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

25

supported by local open spaces and schools. In addition, the FTN


is provided for along College Road and Lake Road.
56

The Northcote town centre is an example of where the


Corporations and Councils proposed extent of THAB (around the
centre) is very well aligned. We generally support the extent of
THAB proposed by Council in this location, subject to a few minor
amendments in certain locations to better reflect alignment with
property boundaries and zoning of adjacent sites.

57

The main area of difference between our approach and that of


Councils is our proposed wider application of MHU and MHS,
beyond the extent of THAB proposed by Council. Council appear
to have retained some areas of MHS and SH, in close proximity to
the extent of proposed THAB south-east of the centre, to address
what appear to be SEA Overlay and flood hazard matters. Much of
the residential development in this location already represents a
pattern of established infill development, and as such we do not
consider the SH zone to be an appropriate outcome in this location
(refer to Area Assessment NS3).
West

58

As notified, the majority of the Corporations residential landholdings


in the West7 were zoned SH. The table below provides a summary
of the Corporations landholdings in the West, in respect of the
notified PAUP, the Councils proposed zone amendments (for Topic
081), and the Corporations rezoning submissions.
Notified PAUP

Council Revised
Jan 2016

HNZC

Submission

Where west refers to the area defined by Council in their evidence and by the
following local boards: Upper Harbour, Henderson Massey, Waitakere Ranges. It is
noted that as the Upper Harbour local board overlaps with the area defined by

council as west and north shore the percentages of the local board has been split
between each area.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

26

Single House

38.7%

27.6%

7.5%

MHS

22.2%

27.2%

23%

MHU

33.2%

38.4%

60.3%

THAB

5.8%

6.8%

9.2%

Te Atatu Peninsula
59

The Te Atatu town centre provides a high level of supporting


services to its local catchment, with the wider surrounds also
supported by local open spaces and schools (refer to Area
Assessment W2). In addition, the FTN is provided along Te Atatu
Road and also completes a loop around the town centre itself.

60

The Te Atatu town centre is another example of where the


Corporations and Councils proposed extents of THAB and MHU
(around the centre) is generally well aligned. We generally support
the Councils proposed zone amendments in this location, subject
to a few minor amendments in certain locations to specific
properties.

61

Those particular properties where there is a difference between our


approach and that of Councils primarily relate to Councils retention
of the SH zone in certain locations to address what appear to be
flood hazard matters.
Henderson Valley Road / Border Road / Coburg Street

62

The application of the Corporations principles in this area


recommends a rezoning to MHU, based on proximity to schools,
open spaces, pockets of Neighbourhood Centre zoning to both the
east and west along Henderson Valley Road, as well as local
employment opportunities associated with the Light Industry
zoning to the east and the Henderson Metropolitan Centre beyond
that (refer to Area Assessment W1).
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

27

63

Councils proposed zone amendments in this location either retain


the notified MHS zoning, or propose new areas of SH zone which
appear to align with identified flood hazards in this location. These
appear to be newly proposed down-zonings by Council to address
this flood issue.
Central

64

As noted in the evidence of P Ampantong and H Scott, the


Corporation owns a number of properties throughout Westmere and
Grey Lynn (para 2.9). As noted in the Council evidence relating to
the Western Isthmus, the majority of residential land south of Mount
Albert Road, Sandringham Road Extension and surrounding the
Puketapapa (Mt Roskill) maunga is owned by the Corporation.

65

As notified, the majority of the Corporations residential landholdings


in the central area8 were zoned MHS. The table below provides a
summary of the Corporations landholdings in the Central area, in
respect of the notified PAUP, the Councils proposed zone
amendments (for Topic 081), and the Corporations rezoning
submissions.

Notified PAUP

Council Revised

HNZC

Single House

15.5%

7.3%

1%

MHS

57.1%

41.7%

9.7%

MHU

8.4%

30.8%

51.3%

THAB

19.0%

20.2%

38%

Jan 2016

Submission

Where central area refers to the area defined by Council in their evidence and by the

following local boards: Albert-Eden, Maungakiekie Tamaki, Maungakeikei-Orakei,


Puketapapa, Waitemata, Whau .

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

28

Avondale
66

The Avondale town centre and surrounds provides a high level of


amenity and is an ideal area for residential intensification, as it is in
close proximity to public transport, local amenities, community
facilities and open spaces (refer to Area Assessment C1). The
area is well supported by the FTN along both New North Road and
Great North Road, as well as the Avondale train station.

67

Council have proposed a number of rezonings in this location. The


corridor of THAB along Rosebank Road (notified PAUP) has been
proposed to be down-zoned and replaced with MHU. Along Great
North Road, a corridor of MHS (notified PAUP) has been up-zoned
to THAB. In addition, an area of THAB (notified PAUP) on both the
north and south sides of Walsall Street has now been proposed to
be down-zoned to MHS. This particular area of down-zoning
along Walsall Street appears to be in response to a combination of
flood hazard, as well as Pre-1944 Demolition Control Overlay,
matters.

68

The main area of difference between the Corporations and


Councils approaches in the Avondale area relates to properties
located west of Rosebank Road and north of Ash Street, where the
Corporation have sought rezoning primarily to achieve a MHU
outcome (Council proposing a mix of predominantly MHS and SH).
We consider this area is appropriate for a MHU outcome, given its
proximity to schools and open spaces, as well as the presence of
the FTN provided along Rosebank Road as far north as the
intersection between Rosebank Road, Avondale Road and
Eastdale Road.
Mt Albert

69

The Mt Albert town centre and surrounds is well suited for


residential intensification, given the various services and facilities
provided by the town centre, as well as nearby schools and open
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

29

spaces, along with the UNITEC campus along Carrington Road.


The centre is also well serviced by the FTN along New North Road
and Carrington Road, as well as the Mt Albert train station (refer to
Area Assessment C4).
70

The main differences between the Corporations and Councils


approaches in the Mt Albert area relate to the Corporations request
for a wider application of THAB to the north-west of the town centre
(the land generally bounded by Woodward Road and Seaview
Terrace, where the Council have proposed to apply MHU), as well
as land to the south-east of the town centre, where Council have
proposed to retain a large area of SH zoned land, primarily to
address what appear to be Special Character Overlay matters.
Pt Chevalier

71

The Pt Chevalier town centre and surrounds is well suited for


residential intensification, given the various services and facilities
provided by the town centre, as well as nearby schools and open
spaces, along with the UNITEC campus along Carrington Road.
The centre is also well serviced by the FTN along Great North
Road, which also extends north of the town centre along Pt
Chevalier Road before heading east along Meola Road (refer to
Area Assessment C10).

72

A key difference between the Corporations and Councils approach


is the extent of THAB proposed around the town centre. As
notified, Council proposed small pockets of THAB immediately
adjoining the town centre zoning. In their evidence for Topic 081,
Council are now proposing a down-zoning of the area of THAB
immediately to the north of the two centre zone (the land bounded
by the town centre zone to the south, and Tui Street to the north),
with these sites now proposed by Council to be MHS. Instead,
Council are proposing a thin corridor of THAB, followed by a
corridor of MHU, stretching northward along Pt Chevalier road.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

30

73

The application of the Corporations principles in this area


recommends a greater provision of THAB and MHU north of the
town centre.
West Lynn (Old Mill Road)

74

This area represents a number of consolidated sites owned by the


Corporation on Savage Street and Notley Street. The Corporation
is proposing MHU in this location, given its proximity to open
spaces, schools as well as local convenience neighbourhood
centre services. Council are proposing a predominantly MHS
outcome in this area (this does represent an up-zoning of some
sites which were zoned SH in the notified PAUP).
Grey Lynn (Tuarangi Road)

75

This area also represents a number of consolidated sites owned by


the Corporation, with existing development already at a 3-storey
typology. The sites are well supported by the open space and
community facilities afforded by Western Springs Park and its
associated surrounding activities. In addition, the sites adjoin the
FTN along Great North Road (refer to Area Assessment C3).

76

Due to the nature and typology of the existing stock in this area, in
combination with the various supporting amenities and services, the
Corporation have submitted seeking a Mixed Use and THAB
outcome for the two areas of consolidated ownership which front
Great North Road, a Local Centre zone for the site located at 34
Surrey Crescent (the site currently has a THAB / Local Centre splitzone), with the remainder of properties to be zoned MHU.

77

Council are proposing to retain the notified PAUP zoning in this


location in relation to the Corporations land, however, they are
proposing changes to apply a MHU outcome to land on the western
side of the centre, generally along Great North Road and adjacent
blocks. Flood hazard matters appear to be the primary reason for

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

31

Council proposing to retain the notified PAUP zoning in relation to


the Corporations land holdings in this location.
Freemans Bay
78

Freemans Bay is well suited for residential intensification, given its


proximity to the City Centre as well as Ponsonby, open spaces and
schools, employment opportunities provided by nearby Mixed Use
zones, as well as the FTN provided along Ponsonby Road, Franklin
Road, College Hill Road (refer to Area Assessment C2).

79

The key issue in this location is the overlay relationship issue with
respect to the Special Character Overlay, with Council applying
the SH zone to any sites impacted by the Special Character
overlay.
Owairaka (Hendon Avenue)

80

This area is well suited to intensification, given its proximity to open


spaces, the Stoddard Road town centre, as well as local
employment areas associated with Mixed Use and Light Industry
zoning east of the town centre, along Stoddard Road (refer to Area
Assessment C13).

81

The application of the Corporations zoning principles in this


location generally apply a THAB outcome for the sites located
between Hendon Avenue and the area of open space which abuts
the rear boundaries of properties along Alamein Terrace, as well as
those accessed off Olympus Street. Beyond this area, our
principles generally recommend a MHU outcome.

82

Council are generally proposing MHU in those areas where the


Corporation is seeking THAB, or a mixture of MHS and SH where
the Corporation is seeking MHU. Flood hazard issues in this
location appear to be the reasoning behind Councils proposed
application of SH zone.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

32

Stoddard Road
83

Similar to the discussion above regarding Hendon Avenue, the area


surround the Stoddard Road town centre is well suited to residential
intensification due to the availability of centre services and facilities,
local employment opportunities afforded by areas of Town Centre,
Mixed Use and Light Industry zoning, schools and open spaces. In
addition, the FTN is provided along Sandringham Road Extension,
Stoddard Road and Maioro Street (refer to Area Assessment C13).

84

The main area of difference in this location between the


Corporations and Councils approach is Councils proposed
retention of the SH zone for those sites impacted by flood hazards.
Due to the significant scale of the Corporations land holdings in this
area, and the comprehensive redevelopment opportunities afforded
by consolidated land ownership, providing residential zones which
enable intensification (rather than the SH zone) has the ability to
enable landowners to develop land in an economically viable way,
while also factoring in the potential costs associated with providing
upgrades to the existing local stormwater infrastructure as a means
of addressing the known flooding issues in this location. This is a
matter the Corporation has previously presented on in relation to
Hearing Topic 022 (Natural hazards and flooding).
St Lukes

85

The St Lukes town centre and surrounds is well suited to residential


intensification due to the various centre services and facilities
provided in the centre, the proximity to local schools and open
spaces, availability of local employment opportunities afforded by
areas of Mixed Use and Light Industry zoning (in particular to the
north along Morningside Drive), as well as the presence of the FTN
along Sandringham Road, Balmoral / St Lukes Road and
Morningside Drive (refer to Area Assessment C12).

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

33

86

The main areas of difference between the Corporations and


Councils approach in this area generally relates to the extent of
MHU, beyond the area of THAB zoning proposed By Council. For
instance, to the south of the Town Centre and Mixed Use zone (in
particular heading south along Fowlds Avenue), our principles
recommend a MHU outcome, whereas Council have proposed
predominantly MHS or even SH (to the east of Sandringham Road).
We understand that Councils proposed zoning in this location is
seeking to address matters associated with flood hazards, as well
as those sites impacted by the Special Character Overlay.
Mt Roskill

87

This area relates to the land bounded by Dominion Road (to the
east), Richardson Road (to the south), May Road (to the east) and
the south western motorway (to the north). The Corporation has a
significant consolidation of land ownership in this location.

88

Similar to the discussion above in relation to Stoddard Road, the


area is suitable for intensification given its proximity to open
spaces, schools, local employment opportunities, as well as the
provision of the FTN along both Dominion Road and May Road. In
addition to its proximity to the Stoddard Road town centre, the area
is further supported by local convenience services to both the east
and west, along Richardson Road (refer to Area Assessment C5).

89

As a result of the various amenities noted above, the application of


our principles in this location recommend a MHU outcome.
Councils revised position proposes a small area of up-zoning
(from SH to MHS zone) for those properties along Roseman
Avenue (which back onto the maunga of Mt Roskill). It appears that
Councils retention of MHS in this area (as opposed to the MHU
outcome sought by the Corporation) is directly linked to the
presence of the Volcanic viewshaft and blanket height sensitive
area Overlay in this location.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

34

Three Kings
90

Three Kings is well suited to residential intensification due to the


various services and facilities provided in the centre, proximity to
local schools and open spaces, availability of local employment
opportunities afforded by areas of Mixed Use (southern side of
Mount Albert Road), Light Industry (to the south, along Carr Road)
and General Business zoning (to the north, accessed off Hunters
Park Drive). In addition, the area is supported by the presence of
the FTN along Mount Eden Road and Mount Albert Road (refer to
Area Assessment C14).

91

The main differences in the Corporations and Councils


approaches in this area relate to the extent of THAB and MHU
zones surrounding the centre. The Councils proposed zone
amendments in this area include a rezoning of the former Three
Kings quarry site (to align with recent Plan Change process9) to
provide additional areas of THAB. We support the Councils
proposed extension of the THAB zoning in this location.

92

To the west of the town centre, however, the application of our


principles recommend an extension of THAB zoning along
Smallfield and McCullough Avenues (for approximately 400m from
the edge of the town centre), followed by application of the MHU
zone northwards, up to Duke Street. Councils revised zoning
proposes some up-zoning of SH zone to MHS (the land east of
McCullough Avenue), however there is no MHU proposed by
Council in this location. Councils proposed application of
predominantly MHS zoning beyond the town centre and Three
Kings Quarry site appears to primarily relate to the presence of
Special Character and Volcanic viewshaft and blanket height
sensitive area Overlays.

Currently under appeal to the Environment Court.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

35

93

We note that one area where Councils has proposed re-zoning,


which we do not support, is the proposed up-zoning (from SH to
MHS) of those properties at the southern end of both Churches
Avenue and Dally Terrace. These existing sites already sit very
high on the slopes of the maunga and are already visibly
prominent. We therefore support the retention of the notified SH
zone for these sites.
Royal Oak

94

Royal Oak is well suited to residential intensification due to the


various services and facilities provided in the centre, proximity to
local schools and open spaces, as well as the presence of the FTN
along Mount Albert Road, Manukau Road and Mount Smart Road
(refer to Area Assessment C11).

95

Royal Oak is an example of where the extent of THAB generally


aligns well with the application of the Corporations principles. The
main area of difference here is that the Corporation is seeking
additional areas of THAB along Raurenga Avenue. Council have
sought to retain the notified PAUP zoning in this location, being a
mix of THAB, MHU and SH. Councils retention of the SH zone
along Raurenga Avenue appears linked to the presence of the
Special Character Overlay.

96

The other key difference in the Corporations and Councils


approach in Royal Oak relates to the extent of MHU, south
Trafalgar Street. Application of the Corporations principles
generally recommends an MHU outcome for the area of land
bounded by Trafalgar Street (to the north) and Arthur Street (to the
south). Council have generally sought to retain the notified PAUP
zoning in this area, being predominantly a mix of MHS and SH.
With regards to the area of SH zone proposed by Council, there
appears to be no clear, contiguous Overlay or other resource
constraint (though there are pockets of Special Character and Pre1944 Demolition Control) which would indicate the need to retain
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

36

the SH zone in the area around Normans Hill Road and Quadrant
Road.
Onehunga (Jordan Avenue)
97

The area of land at Jordan Avenue represents a large, consolidated


land holding for the Corporation and is a significant comprehensive
redevelopment opportunity. The area is well suited to residential
intensification, being located on the north-eastern fringe of the
Onehunga town centre, and is supported by local open spaces,
schools as well as the presence of the FTN along Onehunga Mall
Road (refer to Areas Assessment C7).

98

Application of the Corporations principles for this area recommend


a THAB outcome for the land south of Jordan Avenue, with the land
on the north side of Jordan Avenue being clipped by our 400m
extent of proposed THAB.

99

Councils proposed amendments seek to provide for new areas of


THAB on the east and west sides of Cameron Street (south of
Jordan Avenue), but has retained the notified PAUP (MHU) zoning
for the large blocks of Corporation land holding. It is noted that
Councils proposed zone amendments in the vicinity of Onehunga
appears to have incorporated Councils latest proposals with regard
to the existence of the Special Character and Pre-1944 Demolition
Control Overlays. Such changes have led to certain sites that were
zoned either THAB or MHU in the notified PAUP now being
recommended for down-zoning to SH (e.g. sites in the vicinity of
Spring Street / Arthur Street). As the Corporations sites at Jordan
Ave are not proposed to be impacted by these particular Overlay
constraints, it is considered these large sites are ideally suited to
the application of the THAB zone to enable the comprehensive
redevelopment of aging Corporation housing stock in this location.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

37

Penrose (Mount Smart Road)


100

This is another area with a large amount of contiguous land holding


for the Corporation. It is well supported by local open spaces and
schools, as well as a local catchment of local convenience services
provided by areas of Neighbourhood Centre zoning along
Waitangi Road as well as Oranga Avenue to the north. The area is
also supported by the FTN which runs along Mount Smart Road, as
well as the Penrose train station to the east (beyond the area of
Light Industry zoning). Local employment opportunities area also
provided by the presence of the Light Industry zone (refer to Area
Assessment C9).

101

Given the nature of these supporting services and amenities, the


Corporation requested application of THAB zoning for those sites
which have frontage to Mount Smart Road, with MHU generally
requested for the sites beyond those where the THAB outcome is
sought. Councils proposed zone amendments provide additional
areas of MHU zoning (generally where the Corporation sought
THAB), with general retention of the notified MHS zone beyond that
(generally where the Corporation sought MHU).

102

Upon review of the Corporations zoning requests, as well as the


zone amendments now proposed by Council, we generally support
the new area of MHU now proposed by Council north of Mount
Smart Road. However, we still consider that the wider area is also
appropriate for a further extension of MHU. We consider this MHU
could extend as far north as the block of land south of Wallath
Road, on the eastern side of Waitangi Road (consistent with the
Corporations submission requests). To the west of Waitangi Road,
we consider the full extent of sites bounded by Oranga Road (to the
north), Namata Road (to the west), down to Mount Smart Road (to
the south) are all appropriate to be zoned MHU.

103

We also note the area of consolidated Corporation stock located on


Felix Street, to the south of Mount Smart Road. The Corporation
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

38

originally submitted seeking an up-zoning of this land to THAB.


The notified PAUP proposed MHS for this area, and that has been
retained in the Councils proposed zone amendments.
104

Having reviewed this request in more detail, in light of the


Corporations zoning principles, Councils proposed zone
amendments, as well as the typology and scale of existing built
form on the site in question (generally 3 storeys existing at present),
as well as the 20m height limit provided for on the Light Industry
zoned land on the opposite side of Felix Street, we consider this
particular area of the Corporations stock would be best suited to an
MHU outcome, with the provisions of an additional height control
to enable a fourth storey to be achieved. In this way, this area can
act as a transition between the potential 20m height of built form
which could be realised on the eastern side of Felix Street, and the
3 storey outcome which the MHU zoning proposed by Council (to
the immediate north and west of the Corporations land holding)
would allow.
Mt Wellington (Panama Road)

105

The Panama Road area is supported by local open spaces,


including the coastal esplanade, as well as Panama Road School.
The area is also supported by local convenience services
associated with the neighbourhood centre on the corner of Jolson
Road and Bernard Street. The notified PAUP also provided for
three consolidated areas of THAB zoning on both the north and
south sides of Panama Road (refer to Area Assessment C6).

106

The application of the Corporations principles supports the


application of MHU in this area, given proximity to the school and
open spaces. The Corporation made submissions seeking a THAB
outcome for a number of sites to the east of the Carbine Road and
Panama Road intersection. Having reviewed these requests in light
of the Corporations zoning principles, we consider a more
appropriate zoning outcome in this location would be MHU, given
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

39

the close proximity of these sites to the industry zoning immediately


adjacent (to the north), including the bulk liquid fuels storage facility
at Gabador Place. We are aware that Stolthaven Australia Pty Ltd
have submitted seeking the application of a new sensitive activity
restriction Overlay to this site at Gabador Place.
107

Along Jolson Road, we consider the contiguous nature of the


Corporation's stock, as well as the current nature of development in
the surrounding area, supports a wider application of MHU in this
location.
Orakei (Kupe Street)

108

Kupe Street is well suited to residential intensification, given its


proximity to local schools and open spaces, local convenience
services provided by the neighbourhood centre and surrounding
Mixed Use zones provided along Kepa Road. It is also noted that
the Eastridge local centre is located a short distance to the east
along Kepa Road (refer to Area Assessment C8).

109

The notified PAUP provided for a corridor of MHU, along both sides
of Kupe Street, before terminating close to the intersection of
Takitimu Street, Te Ararwa Street and Kupe Street, where the MHU
adjoined an area of proposed Mixed Use zoning around this
intersection. The Corporations original submissions sought to
upzone their stock along this corridor of MHU to be THAB.

110

Upon review of the Corporations zoning principles, as well as the


zone amendments proposed by Council in this area, we do support
an extension of the currently proposed THAB zoning at the
southern end of Kupe Street. This area of proposed THAB would
incorporate the block of land on the east side of Kupe Street,
bounded by the Neighbourhood Centre and Mixed Use (fronting
Kepa Road) to the south, Kurahaupo Street to the east and
Tokomaru Street to the north. An equivalent extent of THAB would
also be provided along the western side of Kupe Street. Beyond
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

40

Tokomaru Street, we consider an appropriate outcome along Kupe


Street would be MHU, consistent with the notified PAUP zoning.
We note Council has proposed to down-zone this area to MHS, for
what appear to be reasons associated with the Pre-1944
Demolition Control Overlay.
Waterview
111

The Corporation sought a number of rezoning in the Waterview


area, primarily to achieve a MHU outcome, with requests for a
consolidation of THAB zoning around the neighbourhood centre on
Daventry Street.

112

The Council have proposed to rezone a number of sites in the


Waterview area from MHS to MHU. We support the Councils
proposed amendments to rezone areas of MHS to MHU in this
area.

113

With regard to the Corporations submissions seeking a THAB


outcome, while we acknowledge the significant, comprehensive
redevelopment opportunity in this area afforded by the
Corporations consolidated land holding, we consider a more
intensive development outcome (which would be afforded by
THAB) may be better considered as part of a future Framework
Plan or Structure Plan process.
South

114

As notified, a significant proportion of the Corporations residential


landholdings in the South10 were zoned MHS, while only 1% were
zoned THAB. The below provides a summary of the Corporations
landholdings in the South, in respect of the notified PAUP, the

10

Where South refers to the area defined by Council in their evidence and by the

following local boards: Papakura, Otara-Papatoetoe, Mangere-Otahuhu, Franklin,


Howick.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

41

Councils proposed zone amendments (for Topic 081), and the


Corporations rezoning submissions.

115

Notified PAUP

Council Revised

HNZC

Single House

14.1%

13.7%

0.3%

MHS

79.2%

62.8%

12.7%

MHU

5.7%

20.5%

66.5%

THAB

1.0%

3.0%

20.5%

Jan 2016

submission

In summary, the key area of difference between the Corporations


and Councils proposals rezoning in the south relates to the extent
of MHU. There are particular town centres where application of the
Corporations principles support the further addition of new areas of
THAB, however, the largest difference are the areas where the
Corporations principles recommend a MHU outcome, but Councils
latest proposal generally supports MHS or MHU.
Mangere

116

The Mangere town centre and wider surrounds is well suited to


residential intensification, being supported by the various centre
services and facilities, local schools and open spaces, local
employment opportunities afforded by the Light Industry zoning to
the south-west of the centre, as well as the provision of the FTN
along Bader Drive, Orly Avenue, Thomas Road and Massey Road
(refer to Area Assessment S3). The FTN also extends north of the
centre (towards Mangere Bridge) along Bader Drive / Coronation
Road).

117

The key difference between the Corporations and Councils


approaches in this area is the proposed extents of THAB and MHU.
As notified, the PAUP applied MHS as the zone outcome
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

42

immediately beyond the extent of the town centre zone. Councils


proposed amendments for Topic 081 have proposed some new
areas of MHU (to the south-east and north-west of the centre) and
only one site (in the Corporations ownership) has been proposed
for an up-zoning to THAB.
118

We support the application of the Corporations principles in this


location, to provide a catchment of THAB zoning to support the
centre, as well as an increased extent of MHU zoning (both to the
south and north of the centre). The Councils proposed retention
of large areas of MHS and SH in this area (including the area
further north, which extends towards Mangere Bridge) appears to
be linked to flood hazard issues in this location.
Otara

119

Otara town centre and wider surrounds is well suited to residential


intensification, being supported by the centre services and
facilities, local open spaces as well as schools and tertiary
education facilities, including local employment opportunities
provided by the Manukau Institute of Technology campus as well as
the area of Light Industry zoning to the east of the town centre.
The FTN is also provided for along Otara Road and East Tamaki
Road (refer to Area Assessment S5).

120

Similar to Mangere town centre, the notified PAUP provided little in


the way of supporting THAB or MHU zoning surrounding the centre.
Councils latest proposed amendments to the zoning in this area
include a new area of THAB, opposite the town centre, on the south
side of East Tamaki Road. To the north, Council have proposed
new areas of MHU zoning, generally bounded by Bairds Road (to
the south), Gilbert Road (to the west) and Alexander Crescent (to
the east).

121

Given the level of supporting services and amenities in this location,


Otara is suitable for a further extension of THAB zoning within the
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

43

400m walkable catchment of the town centre. It appears that flood


hazard matters in this location may be influencing Councils
proposals for the application of MHS, with some MHU, in this area.
Clendon / Weymouth
122

The Clendon local centre and surrounds is well suited to residential


intensification, being supported by centre services and facilities,
local open spaces and schools, as well as the FTN along
Roscommon Road and Weymouth Road (refer to Area Assessment
S1).

123

In the notified PAUP council proposed the application of MHS (and


pockets of SH) surrounding the Local Centre zone. Councils
proposed zone amendments in this area include a small perimeter
of THAB surrounding the local centre zone, with a newly proposed
catchment of MHU for roughly 100m-200m distance from the edge
of the newly proposed THAB zoning. Outside of these areas,
Council are generally seeking retention of the notified MHS zoning.
In accordance with the Corporations principles, a wider area of
MHU zoning is sought over these areas of MHS zoning.

124

The Corporations principles generally would recommend an MHU


outcome for much of the wider area surrounding the centre (as
demonstrated in area assessment S1). Upon review of the
Councils proposed zone amendments we generally accept the
newly proposed extent of THAB however, beyond this, we consider
a wider application of MHU is appropriate, consistent with the
application of the Corporations zoning principles.
Pearl Baker Drive (Otara)

125

The Corporation have a considerable consolidation of stock in this


area, both to the north and south of Johntones Road. The area is
supported by local open spaces, Mayfield School (located on Pearl
Baker Drive), as well as a small area of Neighbourhood Centre.
Further to the north, but separated somewhat both in terms of
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

44

distance as well as topography, is the area of Light Industry zoning


to the south of Kerwyn Avenue.
126

The Corporations original submission sought up-zoning to THAB


and Mixed Use for their consolidated land holdings off Johnstones
Road, bounded by Valder Avenue to the north and Clarkson
Crescent to the south.

127

As demonstrated in Area Assessment S2, application of the


Corporations zoning principles in this location support the
application of MHU (generally for 250m surrounding the school site,
open space and neighbourhood centre). Beyond this, MHS is a
recommended outcome.

128

While we acknowledge the significant, comprehensive


redevelopment opportunity in this area afforded by the
Corporations consolidated land holding, we consider a more
intensive development outcome (which would be afforded by THAB
or Mixed Use zoning) may be better considered as part of a future
Framework Plan or Structure Plan process.

129

As an appropriate outcome in the PAUP, we consider that the area


is suitable for the application of MHU zoning on both sides of
Johnstones Road. On the northern side of Johnstones Road, we
consider MHU is the appropriate zone outcome for the areas of
land proposed by Council to be MHS. Beyond this, where Council
proposes SH, we consider this area should be rezoned to MHS, as
we do not consider there to be a significant constraint in this
location which would warrant application of SH.

130

South of Johnstones Road, we consider application of MHU is


appropriate for all sites north of the stream and open space
reserve. As this area extends to the west, the MHU would pick up
all land north of Grant Avenue. Further south of this, again we
consider any areas of SH are appropriate to be rezoned as MHS.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

45

Manukau
131

The Manukau Metropolitan Centre provides a wide range of


services, facilities and amenities to support residential
intensification in the surrounding area. The area contains a number
of schools and open spaces, as well as local employment
opportunities provided for within the Metropolitan Centre itself, as
well as the wider catchment of business / industry related zoning to
the north and west of the centre. The centre and surrounds is also
well supported by the FTN along Great South Road, Manukau
Station Road / Redoubt Road, Lambie Drive and Te Irirangi Drive
(refer to Area Assessment S4).

132

As notified, the PAUP proposed no provision of THAB or MHU


surrounding the Metropolitan Centre. Councils latest proposed
zone amendments now include one small pocket of THAB and
small pockets of MHU on the east and west sides of Great South
Road, heading south from the centre. Such limited provision is not
considered to be consistent with the Councils zone principles in
relation to Metropolitan Centres. We assume the primary reason
for this is in relation to the aircraft noise overlay associated with
Auckland International Airport, as well as areas of identified flood
hazards.

133

In accordance with the application of the Corporations principles,


combined with the comprehensive redevelopment opportunity
afforded by a significant consolidation of Corporation owned land,
the Corporation submitted in support of a THAB outcome for those
sites in the area to the immediate south of the centre, bounded by
Druces Road (to the east), Kerrs Road (to the south) and Great
South Road (to the east). We consider a THAB outcome in this
location is appropriate, noting this area is not located within the
aircraft noise overlay, and is also separated by a distance of some
450m to the Heavy Industry zoned land on the western side of
Hobill Avenue. Council have generally sought to retain the notified

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

46

PAUP pattern of zoning (MHS) in this location, in order to address


what appear to be flood hazard matters.
134

Further south, the Corporation also sought rezoning to THAB for


their properties located to the east of Great South Road, off Rata
Vine Drive. Council have proposed to up-zone the sites in this
location from MHS (as notified) to MHU. We generally accept and
support the Councils proposal to rezone this area to MHU.

135

To the east of State Highway 1 (in the area bounded by Te Irirangi


Drive to the north and Redoubt Road to the south) we continue to
support the application of MHU, consistent with the Corporations
zoning principles.
Papakura (Bates Street)

136

Similar to Manukau, the Papakura Metropolitan Centre provides a


wide range of services, facilities and amenities to support
residential intensification in the surrounding area. The area
contains a number of local schools and open spaces, as well as
local employment opportunities provided for within the Metropolitan
Centre itself, as well as the wider catchment of industry zoning to
the south-east of the centre. The centre and surrounds is also well
supported by the Papakura train station (refer to Area Assessment
S6).

137

As notified, the PAUP made only limited provision for THAB zoning
surrounding the centre. Councils proposed zone amendments
have made only very limited additions to THAB in the area
immediately east of the centre (on the southern side of Ingram
Street). In accordance with the Corporations principles, we
consider it is appropriate to provide for a greater extent of THAB
within 400m of the Papakura Metropolitan Centre.

138

In addition, the Corporation has a consolidated area of ownership


on both the east and west sides of Bates Street. The Corporations
submission originally sought rezoning to THAB for all their
Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence
Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

47

properties in this location. It is noted that the application of the


Corporations principles in this area recommends a MHU outcome.
In light of the close proximity to the Heavy Industry to the southeast (along Hunua Road), as well as a review of Council records in
relation to current air discharge consent locations (noting there is
currently an active consent for a discharge to air from the site at 4052 Hunua Road, currently zoned Light Industry), we consider that a
more appropriate zone outcome for this particular location would be
MHU.
CONCLUSION
139

In summary, we consider the Council have made significant steps


to amend the proposed zoning pattern for Auckland in order to
provide for additional areas of residential intensification in
appropriate locations.

140

We consider that further amendments to the pattern of zoning in


particular locations, as set out in this statement, is both necessary
and appropriate to provide for the level of growth and intensification
in Auckland that will be required to deliver upon the development
strategy identified in the Auckland Plan, as well as to provide
Aucklanders with greater housing choices into the future.

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey


19 February 2016

Matt Lindenberg and Amelia Linzey Joint Statement of Evidence


Joint Planning Evidence PAUP 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic.docm, 19 February, 2016

North Shore

Beach Haven Beach Haven Road and surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

NS1

Beach Haven Beach Haven Road and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area within a 800m walkable catchment of Beach Haven local
centre .
One school (Beach Haven Primary School) in immediate area with
three additional schools ( Birkdale North School, Birkdale
Intermediate and Birkenhead College) in close proximity .
Opportunity to accommodate a variety of housing types.
No apparent constraints with respect to viewshafts/blanket height
sensitive areas.
Ferry terminal at the end of Beach Haven Road.
Well provided with local passive and active open space such as
Shepherds Park.
Constraint
Limited public transport options (Close to Ferry terminal and some
buses but not on the FTN)
Some areas are covered by 1:100 year flood plain
Historic Heritage sites along coastal points
Area of coastal edge covered by SEA overlay
Prospect
Suitable location for some intensification given proximity to
education facilities, open spaces and local centre.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from local centre for MHU (HNZC
applying 400m Council applying MHU immediately adjacent).
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council not applying).
Double management of overlay specific matters for SEA around
coastal edge (Council applying/HNZC not applying).

NS1

Belmont and surrounds

Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

NS2

Belmont and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Half of the area is within a 400m walkable catchment of
Belmont local centre zone
Three schools ( Belmont School, Bayswater Primary,
Takapuna Grammar ) located in the immediate area
FTN along Lake Road and Old Lake Road is well serviced by
buses, ferry terminal at end of Bayswater Ave
No apparent constraints with respect to infrastructure or
statutory controls
Well provided with local passive and active open space such
as Bayswater Park
Constraint
Some properties south of centre contain a pre-1944 demolition
overlay
Majority of area is subject to volcanic view shaft of Rangitoto
SEA along eastern coastal edge
Prospect
Suitable for intensification given proximity to education
facilities and FTN
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council applying immediately adjacent in some
locations)

NS2

Northcote Centre and surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

NS3

Northcote Centre and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area within 800m walkable distance of Northcote town centre and
facilities;
FTN provided along College Road, Lake Road, Killham Avenue and
Peam Crescent.
Two Education facilities (Hato Petera College and AUT) in
immediate area.
Access to a range of open spaces such as Onewa Domain, Tuff
Crater Reserve, Onepoto Domain, Kauri Glen Park.
Employment opportunities provided to the south (light industry), and
north (general business).
Constraint
Some areas around centre contain a 1:100year flood plain.
Some areas zoned as THAB and town centre contain additional
height overlays.
SEA overlay covers open spaces.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given presence of multiple
amenities. Intensification in this location is able to provide critical
mass for public transport network.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from centre (Council applying
250/500m v HNZC 400m/800m)
Double management of overlay specific matters for SEA and
Flooding (Council applying/HNZC not applying)

NS3

West

Henderson Valley Road / Border Road / Coburg Street


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

W1

Henderson Valley Road / Border Road / Coburg Street


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Approximately half of area is within the 800m walkable catchment
of Henderson Metropolitan centre
Access to local public open space such as Henderson Park
A number of education institutions within the area such as
Henderson South Primary School and Henderson High school
Public Transport options available proximity to Henderson Train
Station.
Employment opportunities available given proximity to centre and
surrounding industry
Constraint
SEA covers areas of public open space
A large proportion of the area is covered by 1 in 100 year flood
overlay or flood sensitive area.
Prospect
Suitable for intensification given proximity to employment,
education, open space and train station
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for Flooding, SEA
(Council applying/HNZC not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from centres (HNZC applying 400/800m
buffer, Council applying 250m/500m buffer)
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying)

W1

Te Atatu Centre and Surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

W2

Te Atatu Centre and Surrounds


Justification for Proposed Zone
Amendment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area within 400m walkable catchment of Te Atatu Town Centre
services and facilities
Frequent service network provided along Taikata Road and Te
Atatu Road well serviced by buses
One school (Te Atatu Intermediate) in immediate area
Access to local public open spaces such as Ramlea Park
Constraint
Some properties are within the 1:100 year flood plain and in flood
sensitive areas.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given proximity to centre,
schools, open space, FTN
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for Flooding,
(Council applying/HNZC not applying)

Snip from zone graphic images prepared


by Caryl

W2

Central Area

Avondale Centre and surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C1

Avondale Centre and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area within 800m walking distance of Avondale town centre services and
facilities.
Frequent service network provided along St Georges Road and
Rosebank Road.
Accessibility to a variety of educational faculties (Avondale Primary,
Avondale Intermediate and Avondale College).

Opportunities for more intensive housing to support businesses within


town centre
No apparent constraints with respect to infrastructure or statutory
controls.
Well provided with local passive and active open space resources.
Constraint
Some areas around and within the town centre contain flood prone areas
and 1:100 year flood plains.
Some areas of pre-1944 overlay north of the centre
A large number of properties within and surrounding the town centre
contain additional height controls.
Prospect
Highly suitable for intensification given proximity to employment, transit
and education facilities
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from centre (Council applying
250/500m v HNZC 400m/800m).

C1

Freemans Bay Ponsonby Road, Hepburn Street, College Hill


Notified PAUP zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C2

Freemans Bay Ponsonby Road, Hepburn Street, College Hill


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area is predominantly within the 400m walkable catchment of
the Ponsonby Road town centre.
Area is bounded by existing high density and mixed use areas
(north and south).
Area is within close proximity to the city centre
Well serviced by Public transport with numerous bus services
operating along the FTN of Ponsonby Road.
Six schools (St Pauls College, St Marys College, Auckland
Girls Grammar School, Ponsonby Intermediate, Richmond
Road School, Freemans Bay School) located in immediate
area.
Access to local public open space as well as larger parks such
as Western Park .
No apparent constraints with respect to flooding and
infrastructure.
Constraint
Area dominated by Special Character Overlay .
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification highly accessible area
close to Ponsonby town centre and city centre. Area contains
various amenities including schools and public open space.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for Special
Character Overlay (Council applying/HNZC not applying).
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from centre (Council applying
250/500m v HNZC 400m/800m).
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying).
Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council applying immediately adjacent in some locations).

C2

Grey Lynn Tuarangi and surrounds

Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C3

Grey Lynn Tuarangi Road and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area is within 800m of the Grey Lynn local centre.
Area is within 250m of the FTN along Great North Road which is
well serviced by buses.
Additional employment opportunities in Mixed Use area, and West
Lynn local centre to the north.
Two primary schools (Grey Lynn School and St Josephs School)
located in area.
Access to local public open space including Grey Lynn Park and
Arch Hill Reserve.
No apparent constraints with respect to flooding and infrastructure.
Constraint
Area east of (and including) Grey Lynn local centre covered by
Special Character overlay
Area north and southwest of Grey Lynn local centre covered by
Pre-1944 Overlay
Some flood prone areas at bottom of Tuarangi Road.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification Accessible area close to Grey
Lynn Town Centre. Area contains various amenities including
schools and public open space
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from centre (HNZC applying 400m
MHU from Local centre, Council only applying 250/500m west of
centre).
Double management of overlay specific matters for Special
Character (Council applying/HNZC not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council applying immediately adjacent in some locations)

C3

Mount Albert Centre and surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C4

Mount Albert Centre and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area is within 800m walking distance to Mount Albert town centre
services and facilities.
Frequent service network provided along New North Road, Mount
Albert Road and Carrington Road, as well as Mount Albert train
station.
Access to local public open space and larger public areas such as
Mount Albert.
Two schools Gladstone primary, Hebron Christian College) and
Unitec in immediate area as well as Marist and Mount Albert
Grammar in close proximity.
Local employment opportunities provided by town centre and
surrounding mixed use zoning.
Constraint
Some pre-1944 overlay west of centre.
Special character overlay covering area south-east of centre.
Sites zoned as town centre contain additional height overlays.
Some areas in the town centre are within flood prone areas and
contain a 1:100 year flood plain.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given proximity to schools, open
space and employment centres.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for Special
Character overlay in east / south-east of centre (Council
applying/HNZC not applying).
Pedshed/walking circle from Mt Albert Town Centre (HNZC
applying 4000m/800m buffer, Council applying 250m/500m buffer
north of centre).

C4

Mount Roskill May Road, Richardson Road, Dominion Road

Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

Mount Roskill May Road, Richardson Road, Dominion Road


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Proximity to schools (Mount Roskill primary and May Road Primary
school, Mount Roskill Intermediate and Mount Roskill Grammar).
FTN provided along Dominion Road and May Road.
Access to areas of large public open space such as Mt Roskill and
Keith Hay Park.
Employment opportunities provided to the north west (light industry,
general business, and mixed use).
No apparent constraints with respect to SEAs, special character
and historic heritage.
Constraint
Area south of Mt Roskill subject to blanket height sensitive overlay.
Some areas subject to flood plain overlay along Balfron Avenue.
Area north of south-western motorway subject to special character
overlay
Prospect
Location for intensification given proximity to schools, parks and
employment centres
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for blanket height
sensitive areas around base of cone and special character north of
motorway (Council applying/HNZC not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council applying immediately adjacent in some locations)

C5

Mt Wellington Panama Road and surrounds

Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C6

Mt Wellington Panama Road and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Panama Road School located at centre of area.
Frequent service network provided along Mount Wellington
Highway.
Large employment opportunities north of area provided by
Sylvia Park.
Access to local public open space and larger parks such as
Mount Richmond Domain.
No apparent constraints with respect to Special Character,
Pre-1944, Heritage, SEAs, Viewshafts and infrastructure.
Constraint
Some flood prone areas around Panama Road School and
west of Mt Wellington Highway.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given presence of school
and proximity to employment centres.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying).
Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying).

C6

Onehunga Centre and surrounds

Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C7

Onehunga Centre and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area is within the 800m walkable catchment of Onehunga town
centre services and facilities.
FTN provided along Onehunga Mall and Church Street connecting to
Onehunga Train Station.
School located in centre of area (Onehunga Primary).
Access to local public open space as well as larger public parks such
as Gloucester Reserve and Onehunga Bay Reserve.
Opportunities for more intensive housing to support businesses
within town centre .
Constraint
Some industrial, centre and open space areas contain a 1:100year
flood plain and are in flood prone areas.
Properties zoned as town centre and some which are zoned mixed
use contain additional height controls.
Some pre-1944 overlay covering sites west of centre.
Some special character in centre and east of centre.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given presence of multiple
amenities. Intensification in this location able to provide critical mass
for public transport network.
Ample opportunities for employment in southern industrial area.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from centre (Council applying
250/500m v HNZC 400m/800m).
Double management of overlay specific matters for Special
Character (Council applying/HNZC not applying).

C7

Orakei Kupe Street and surrounds

Notified PAUP zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C8

Orakei Kupe Street and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area is within the 400m walkable catchment of several local
centres (Kepa Road/Eastridge and Mission Bay), neighbourhood
centres (Kepa Road, Coates Ave) and mixed use zones (Kupe
Street).
Well serviced by Public transport with numerous bus services
operating along FTN of Tamaki Drive, Coates Ave, Kepa Road and
Patterson Ave.
Two schools (Orakei School, St Josephs School) located in
immediate area.
Access to local public open space as well as larger public open
spaces such as Orakei Domain.
No apparent constraints with respect to flooding and infrastructure.
Constraint
Some flood prone areas in public open space and in the north east
Some areas of Pre-1944 along Kupe Street.
Some areas of special character along Dudley Road, Codrington
Crescent.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given proximity to FTN, schools
and local/neighbourhood centres.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for Special
Character Overlay (Council applying/HNZC not applying).
Pedshed/walking circle from Mixed Use for MHU (HNZC applying
400m buffer, Council not applying).
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council not applying).
Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council applying immediately adjacent).

C8

Penrose Mt Smart Road and surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C9

Penrose Mt Smart Road and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Two Schools (One Tree Hill College, Oranga Primary School, Te
Papapa School) located at within the area.
Frequent service network provided along Mount Smart Road serving
buses as well as trains from Penrose Station.
Multiple neighbourhood centres within area (Mount Smart Road,
Oranga Road, Waitangi Road, Marora road).
Large employment opportunities east of area provided by Penrose
Industrial area.
Access to local public open space including Fergusson Domain
Close proximity to Mt Smart Stadium.
No apparent constraints with respect to special character and SEAs.
Constraint
Some flood prone areas on industrial sites to the east.
Airspace restriction designation covers southern half of area.
Some pre-1944 overlay and special character overlays in north of
area.
North area subject to volcanic viewshaft overlay from One Tree Hill.
Some Heavy industry south of area generates potential amenity
impacts.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given presence of school and
proximity to employment centres.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council not applying).
Pedshed/walking circle from RFN (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council applying immediately adjacent to).
Double management of overlay specific matters for Flooding,
volcanic viewshaft, pre-1944 overlay (Council applying/HNZC not
applying).

C9

Point Chevalier Centre and surrounds


Notified PAUP zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C10

Point Chevalier Centre and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
FTN provided along Pt Chevalier Rd which is well serviced by
buses
Approximately half the area is within the 800m walkable catchment
of the Point Chevalier town centre
Two primary schools (St Francis Parish and Point Chevalier
Primary) located in area as well as Unitec
Access to local public open space as well as Point Chevalier park
and Beach
No apparent constraints with respect to flooding and infrastructure
Constraint
Area around town centre is dominated by Pre-1944 Overlay
Some flood prone areas near Meola reef eg. Walmer, Moa Road.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification accessible area close to
Point Chevalier town centre. Area contains various amenities
including schools and public open space, Point ChevalierBeach.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from centre (Council applying
250/500m v HNZC 400m/800m).
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council applying immediately adjacent)

C10

Royal Oak Centre and surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C11

Royal Oak Centre and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
-

Area is within 800m walkable catchment of Royal Oak town centre


services and facilities;
Frequent service network provided along Mount Albert Road, Mount
Smart Road and Manukau Road.
Access to areas of large public open space such as Cornwall Park.
Five schools in area (Royal Oak Primary and Intermediate School,
Monte Cecilia School, Onehunga High School, Marcellin College).
Opportunities for more intensive housing to support businesses within
town centre.

Constraint
Some areas are located within a 1:100 year flood plain.
Some areas contain a historic heritage overlay.
A volcanic view shaft exists for a majority of the properties.
Properties zoned as town centre contain an additional height overlay.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given proximity to employment,
education and open space.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from centre (Council applying
250/500m v HNZC 400m/800m).
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council not applying).
double management of overlay specific matters for Flooding, Blanket
Height Sensitive Overlay (Council applying/HNZC not applying).

C11

St Lukes Centre and Surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C12

St Lukes Centre and Surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area is within 800m walkable catchment of the St Lukes Town
centre services and facilities
Local employment opportunities provided by Town Centre and
surrounding Mixed Use zoning (south) and Light Industry (north)
No apparent constraints with respect to infrastructure or statutory
controls
Access to local passive and active open space resources
Frequent service network provided along St Lukes Road,
Balmoral Road, Morningside Drive and Sandringham Road
which is well serviced by buses
Five schools (Edendale Primary, Balmoral School, Mt Albert
Primary, Marist College, Mt Albert Grammar ) located in area
Constraint
Some areas are within a 1:100 year flood plain or flood prone
area.
Areas north and east of centre are subject to Special Character
overlay
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given proximity to
employment, education and open space.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from centre (Council applying
250/500m v HNZC 400m/800m).
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying)
double management of overlay specific matters for Special
Character (Council applying/HNZC not applying)

C12

Stoddard Road Centre and surrounds (including Hendon Avenue)

Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C13

Stoddard Road Centre and surrounds (including Hendon Avenue)


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area is within 800m walkable catchment of Stoddard Road town
centre services and facilities;
FTN provided along Sandringham Road, Maioro Street, Mt Albert
Road well serviced by buses.
Three schools (Wesley intermediate school, Wesley primary school,
Owairaka District School) located in immediate area
Access to corridor of local public open space (Alan Wood Reserve
and beyond)
Employment opportunities provided to the south east (light industry,
general business, and mixed use).
No apparent constraints with respect to special character and
infrastructure
Constraint
SEA along Alan Wood Reserve
Volcanic viewshaft/blanket height sensitive overlay from Mount
Albert to some west and north east areas
Area north of town centre covered by flood plain and flood prone
areas.
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given presence of multiple
amenities. Intensification in this location is able to provide critical
mass for public transport network.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for flooding,
blanket height sensitive area (Council applying/HNZC not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from centres (HNZC applying 400/800m
buffer, Council applying 250m/500m buffer)

C13

Three Kings Centre and surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

C14

Three Kings Centre and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area within a 800m walkable catchment of Three Kings town centre
services and facilities;
FTN provided along Mount Eden Road, Mount Smart Road and
Dominion Road, and are well serviced by buses.
Access to large public open space of Big King Reserve and Three
Kings Park
Seven schools (Monte Cecilia School, Sunnydene Special School,
Carlson School, Three Kings Primary School, Mt Roskill Primary,
Intermediate and Grammar, and Marcellin College ) in immediate
area
Employment opportunities provided to both the north (General
Business Zone) and south (Light Industry Zone)
Constraint
Some areas are within a 1:100 year flood plain
Some properties contain a pre-1944 building demolition overlay.
Special character overlay covers McCullough Avenue
Prospect
Suitable location for intensification given presence of multiple
amenities. Further supports intended intensification of Three Kings
quarry land . Intensification in this location able to provide critical
mass for public transport network, including the potential future
establishment of a light rail network along Mount Eden and Dominion
Roads.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for Special character
along eastern side of McCullough Avenue(Council applying/HNZC
not applying)
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from centre (Council applying
250/500m v HNZC 400m/800m)
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council not applying)

C14

South

Clendon / Weymouth and Surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

S1

Clendon / Weymouth and Surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Approximately half the area is within the 400m walkable
catchment of Weymouth Local Centre.
5 education facilities (Finlayson Park, Weymouth School, Te
Matauranga, Roscommon School, Rowandale School) located in
the immediate area
Frequent Service Network of Roscommon Road, Rowandale
Avenue, Weymouth Road
Access to local passive public open space as well as larger parks
such as Mountfort Park
No apparent constraints with respect to infrastructure or heritage
Constraint
There are some areas of value and significance to Mana Whenua
in the area.
Some areas are covered by 1 in 100 year flood overlay or flood
sensitive area.
Prospect
Suitable for some intensification given proximity to centre, schools
and the FTN.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning

Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m


buffer, Council not applying)

Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m buffer,


Council applying immediately adjacent in some locations)

S1

Pearl Baker Drive and Surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

S2

Pearl Baker Drive and Surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
One primary School (Mayfield primary) located in centre of area
Access to corridors of local public open space along the coast
Local employment opportunities provided by industry area to the
north and east
Constraint
Proximity to heavy industrial area.
A large proportion of the area is covered by 1 in 100 year flood
overlay or flood sensitive area.
Prospect
Suitable for some intensification given proximity to school , open
space and employment
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for Flooding,
(Council applying/HNZC not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying)

S2

Mangere Town Centre and Surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

S3

Mangere Town Centre and Surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area within the 800m walkable catchment of Mangere Town
Centre
Eight education facilities (Sir Douglas Bader Intermediate School,
Nga Iwi Primary School, Zayed College for Girls, Al-Madinah
School, Mangere Central School, Viscount Primary School, TKKM
o Mangere, Mangere College) in immediate area.
Access to local public open space as well as larger parks such as
David Lange Park and Mangere Centre Park
Well serviced by FTNs of Bader Drive, Massey Road, Thomas
Road, Idlewild Avenue.
Employment opportunities provided to the south east around the
airport
Constraint
A large proportion of the area, particularly north of the centre, is
covered by 1 in 100 year flood overlay or flood sensitive area.
Prospect
Suitable for intensification given proximity to employment,
education, open space and the FTN
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for Flooding,
(Council applying/HNZC not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from centres (HNZC applying 400/800m
buffer, Council applying 250m/500m buffer)
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council applying immediately adjacent in some locations)

S3

Manukau Centre and Surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

S4

Manukau Centre and Surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area is within the 800m walkable catchment of Manukau
Metropolitan centre
Employment opportunities provided by industrial/business areas
surrounding centre
Five schools (South Auckland SDA School, Kia Aroha College,
Chapel Downs Primary, Everglade School, Wiri Central School) in
immediate area
Access to local public open space such as Hayman park
No apparent constraints with respect to infrastructure or statutory
controls
Access to FTN of Great South Rd, Lambie Drive and Redoubt
Road well serviced by buses and trains from Manukau train
station
Constraint
A large proportion of the area, particularly to the east of the centre
is covered by 1 in 100 year flood overlay or flood sensitive area.
Aircraft Noise Overlays cover centre and surrounds
Prospect
Suitable for some intensification in appropriate locations given
proximity to centre, schools and FTN
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Pedshed/walking circle from centres (HNZC applying 400/800m
buffer, Council applying 250m/500m buffer)
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council applying immediately adjacent in some locations)
double management of overlay specific matters for Flooding,
aircraft noise overlay(Council applying/HNZC not applying)

S4

Otara Centre and Surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

S5

Otara Centre and Surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area is within the 800m walkable catchment of Otara town centre
A number of education institutions are located within the area
such as East Tamaki Primary, Ferguson Intermediate and
Manukau Institute of technology.
Frequent Service Network provided along East Tamaki Rd, Otara
Rd, Barids Rd serviced by buses
Access to public open space such as Otara Creek Reserve
Proximity to industrial areas of Highbrook providing opportunities
for employment
Constraint
A large proportion of the area i(particularly to the east of the
centre) s covered by 1 in 100 year flood overlay or flood sensitive
area.
Prospect
Suitable for intensification given proximity to employment,
education, open space and FTN
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Double management of overlay specific matters for Flooding,
(Council applying/HNZC not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from centres (HNZC applying 400/800m
buffer, Council applying 250m/500m buffer)
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying)
Pedshed/walking circle from FTN (HNZC applying 250m buffer,
Council applying immediately adjacent in some locations)

S5

Papakura Centre and surrounds


Notified PAUP Zone

Council Proposed Zone Topic 081

S6

Papakura Centre and surrounds


Area Assessment

HNZC Proposed Zone Principles

Opportunity
Area is within the 800m walkable catchment of Papakura
Metropolitan Centre
Serviced by local bus lines and Train s from Papakura Train
Station
Close proximity to Adjacent to Business Park and mixed use area,
providing local employment opportunities.
Well provided will local passive open space resources such as
Massey Park
Six schools (Papakura High School, Mansell Senior School,
Edmund Hillary School, Kelvin Road School, Opaheke School,
Rosehill College) located in immediate area
Opportunities for more intensive housing to support businesses
within large town centre
Constraint
Some of area covered by 1 in 100 year flood overlay
Additional height controls in centre
Prospect
Suitable for intensification given proximity to employment,
education, open space and train station.
Key Differences between Council Zoning and HNZC Proposed
Zoning
Extent of THAB from centre, Council not applying 250m buffer vs
HNZC applying 400m buffer
Extent of pedshed/walking circle from centre for Mixed Housing
Urban (Council applying 500m v HNZC 800m).
Pedshed/walking circle from schools (HNZC applying 250m
buffer, Council not applying)
double management of overlay specific matters for Flooding,
(Council applying/HNZC not applying)

S6

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-102

839-105

839-107

839-1265

839-130

839-138

839-139

839-1404

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 201, ARTHUR
STREET, Onehunga.

201 Arthur Street Onehunga


Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/42A-3/42A,
CHURCH STREET,
Otahuhu.
Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 12, BRADY ROAD,
Otahuhu.

1/42A-3/42A,
CHURCH STREET,
Otahuhu.

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 18,2,20,
MAIN HIGHWAY,
Ellerslie. [and 2
Wairakei Street,
Ellerslie]

18, 20 Main
Highway and 2
(2A-2F) Wairakei
St Ellerslie

Otahuhu

12, BRADY ROAD, Otahuhu


Otahuhu.

Ellerslie

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at 78 Main Highway Ellerslie


78, MAIN HIGHWAY, Ellerslie
Ellerslie.

MU

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


8 James Walter
Housing and
Place Mount
Apartment Buildings Wellington
at 8, JAMES WALTER
PLACE, Mount
Wellington.

THAB

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 47, KONINI ROAD, Greenlane


Suburban at 47,
Greenlane.
KONINI ROAD,
Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 451,451A,


Onehunga
Urban at 451,451A, ONEHUNGA
ONEHUNGA MALL,
MALL, Onehunga.
Onehunga.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MU

THAB

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support Retention of THAB zone on Arthur Street. This


site is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The retention
of THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

Support retention of the THAB zone. The THAB zoning in No Change


Church St Otahuhu is located close to the Otahuhu TC
and the RFN in Atkinson Avenue. The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zoning at 12 Brady
Street, Otahuhu. This THAB area is next to a large POS
(Seaside park). Retention of the zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MU

Support

THAB

Support

Site is close to Onehunga TC and the FN. The retention of


THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives and policies of the PAUP (including RPS).

Site is close to Otahuhu TC and the FN. The retention of


THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives and policies of the PAUP (including RPS).

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The sites are


No Change
located close to main transport routes a THAB zone and a
proposed MU zone. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MU zone. The site is located in close No Change


proximity to the RFN and will enable the development of
intensive residential activities. Retention of the MU zone
supports a quality compact urban form, giving effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives for the zone.
Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as No Change
THAB as the site is in close proximity to local facilities and
public transport networks. Therefore the retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS. This sites is affected by the


No Change
Pre-1944 BDC and therefore the notified zoning is
retained because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks
to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU on Onehunga Mall. This site is No Change
adjacent to a large area of THAB; has good access to the
RFN and is within walking distance of a neighbourhood
centre. The retention of MHU is the most appropriate
way to achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the

Site is close to facilities (Open Space) and the FN. The


retention of THAB is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives and policies of the PAUP
(including RPS).

Site has reasonable access to FN and proximity to THAB


and centres. The retention of MHU is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives and policies of the PAUP and
particularly the RPS.

Site has reasonable access to FN and proximity to THAB


and centres. The retention of MHU is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives and policies of the PAUP and
particularly the RPS.

Site is close to facilities and the FN. The retention of THAB


is the most appropriate way of achieving the objectives
and policies of the PAUP (including RPS).

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control), but support MHS zone as area
outside proximity to Centres or FN
Site has reasonable access to FN and proximity to THAB
and centres. The retention of MHU is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives and policies of the PAUP and
particularly the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1405

839-1406

839-1407

839-1408

839-1409

839-1410

839-1411

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1,3, TITAHI


One Tree Hill
Suburban at 1,3,
STREET, One Tree
TITAHI STREET, One Hill.
Tree Hill.

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
141A,141, PAIHIA
ROAD,47, ALIFORD
AVENUE,8,4,6, TITAHI
STREET, One Tree Hill.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

141A,141, PAIHIA Onehunga


ROAD,47,
ALIFORD
AVENUE,8,4,6,
TITAHI STREET,
One Tree Hill.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 121,123,121A,123 Onehunga


Suburban at
A, PAIHIA ROAD,
121,123,121A,123A, Oranga-Ellerslie.
PAIHIA ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 131,
PAIHIA ROAD,16,
MAROA ROAD, One
Tree Hill.

131, PAIHIA
Onehunga
ROAD,16, MAROA
ROAD, One Tree
Hill.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
107,107A, PAIHIA
ROAD,20A,20,
RANGIPAWA ROAD,
One Tree Hill.

107,107A, PAIHIA Onehunga


ROAD,20A,20,
RANGIPAWA
ROAD, One Tree
Hill.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
98,96A,96, PAIHIA
ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 21,21A,
NGATIAWA STREET,
One Tree Hill.

98,96A,96, PAIHIA Onehunga


ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

MHS

21,21A,
One Tree Hill
NGATIAWA
STREET, One Tree
Hill.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone on Titahi Street. These


No Change
sites are not close to higher density areas or the RFN.
The sites are also away from a LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road, Aliford


No Change
Avenue and Titahi Street. These sites do not have good
access to any suburban town centre or the RFN. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way of
achieving the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support
Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties
or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHS

Support
Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties
or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road,


Onehunga. These sites do not have good access to any
suburban town centre or the RFN. The retention of MHS
is the most appropriate way of achieving the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road and


No Change
Maroa Road. These site does not have good access to any
suburban town centres or the RFN. The retention of MHS
is the most appropriate way of achieving the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road and
No Change
Rangipawa Road. These sites do not have good access to
any suburban town centres or the RFN. The retention of
MHS is the most appropriate way of achieving the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)
MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road. These


No Change
sites does not have good access to any suburban town
centre or the RFN. The retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Ngatiwa Street. These No Change
sites do not have good access to any suburban town
centre or the RFN. The retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effects to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1412

839-1413

839-1414

839-1415

839-1416

839-1417

839-1418

839-1419

839-1420

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 42,40, KONINI


Greenlane
Suburban at 42,40,
ROAD, Greenlane.
KONINI ROAD,
Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 55,57,59, KONINI Greenlane


Suburban at
ROAD, Greenlane.
55,57,59, KONINI
ROAD, Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 32,30, KONINI


Greenlane
Suburban at 32,30,
ROAD, Greenlane.
KONINI ROAD,
Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 46,44, GARLAND Greenlane


Suburban at 46,44,
ROAD, Greenlane.
GARLAND ROAD,
Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 27,
GARLAND
ROAD,18B,18,18A,
CADMAN AVENUE,
Greenlane.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 11,9,13,
ST OSWALDS
ROAD,28, IRIRANGI
ROAD, Greenlane.

27, GARLAND
Greenlane
ROAD,18B,18,18A
, CADMAN
AVENUE,
Greenlane.

MHS

11,9,13, ST
OSWALDS
ROAD,28,
IRIRANGI ROAD,
Greenlane.

MHS

Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 22,22A, IRIRANGI Greenlane


Suburban at 22A,22, ROAD, Greenlane.
IRIRANGI ROAD,
Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 35, TE KAWA


Greenlane
Suburban at 35, TE
ROAD, Greenlane
KAWA ROAD, One
Tree Hill-Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 16,14A, WILLIAM Greenlane


Urban at 16,14A,
AVENUE,
WILLIAM AVENUE,
Greenlane.
Greenlane.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS of Konini Road. These sites are


affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified
zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS on Konini Road. These sites are
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retained as MHS
because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve
are generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS on Konini Road. These sites are
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retained as MHS
because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve
are generally aligned with the objectives of the SH/MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Garland Road. These
sites are not located around any suburban town centres
or the RFN. The retention of MHS is the most appropriate
way of achieving the zone objectives gives effects to the
RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Garland Road and
Cadman Avenue. These sites do not have good access to
any suburban town centre or the RFN. The retention of
MHS is the most appropriate way of achieving the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHS

Support

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHS

Support

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control), but support MHS zone as area
outside proximity to Centres or FN

MHS

Support

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control), but support MHS zone as area
outside proximity to Centres or FN

MHS

Support

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHS

Support

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHU

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Support retention of MHS on St Oswalds Street and


No Change
Irirangi Road. These sites do not have good access to any
suburban town centre or the RFN. The proposed
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way of
achieving the zone objectives gives effects to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Irirangi Road. These
No Change
sites do not have good access to any suburban town
centre or the RFN. The retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives gives
effects to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Te Kawa Road. This
No Change
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. The application of MHS to this site is
consistent with the zone objectives for MHS gives effects
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone on William Avenue. This No Change
site is close to the RFN and the retention of MHU will
complement the planned urban residential character of
the neighbourhood. The proposed retention of MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1421

839-1422

839-1423

839-1424

839-1425

839-1426

839-1427

839-1428

839-1429

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
15A,13,15,
KOWHATU ROAD,
One Tree Hill.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 83,85,
TAWA ROAD, One
Tree Hill.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

15A,13,15,
One Tree Hill
KOWHATU ROAD,
One Tree Hill.

MHS

83,85, TAWA
ROAD, One Tree
Hill.

MHS

One Tree Hill

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 95,97, RAWHITI


Suburban at 95,97,
ROAD, One Tree
RAWHITI ROAD, One Hill-Oranga.
Tree Hill-Oranga.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 6A,6, TAWHIRI


Suburban at 6A,6,
ROAD, One Tree
TAWHIRI ROAD, One Hill.
Tree Hill.

One Tree Hill

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 11,15,17,7,9,11A, One Tree Hill


Suburban at
MOATA ROAD,
11,15,17,7,9,11A,
One Tree Hill.
MOATA ROAD, One
Tree Hill.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 30A,30, RAWHITI One Tree HillSuburban at 30A,30, ROAD, One Tree Oranga
RAWHITI ROAD, One Hill-Oranga.
Tree Hill-Oranga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 82,80, PAIHIA


Onehunga
Suburban at 82,80,
ROAD, Onehunga
PAIHIA ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 18,14,16, MOATA Onehunga


Suburban at
ROAD, One Tree
18,14,16, MOATA
Hill.
ROAD, One Tree Hill.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
18B,18,20,18C,
RAWHITI
ROAD,81,79,85,
PAIHIA ROAD, One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

MHS

18B,18,20,18C,
RAWHITI
ROAD,81,79,85,
PAIHIA ROAD,
Onehunga

Onehunga

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone on Kowhatu Road. This


No Change
site is not close to any suburban town centres of the RFN.
The retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Tawa Road. This site is No Change
not close to any suburban town centres of the RFN. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Rawhiti Road. These
sites are not close to any suburban town centres of the
RFN. The retention of MHS is the most appropriate way
to achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Tawhiri Road. These
sites are not close to any suburban town centres of the
RFN. The retention of MHS is the most appropriate way
to achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Moata Road. These
sites are not close to any suburban town centres of the
RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Rawhiti Road. These
sites are not close to any suburban town centres of the
RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road. These
sites are not close to any suburban town centres of the
RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Moata Road. These
sites are not close to any suburban town centres of the
RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Rawhiti Road and
Paihia Road. These sites are not close to any suburban
town centres of the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

Support

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHS

Support

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHS

Support

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHS

Support

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

No Change

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

No Change

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

No Change

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

No Change

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1430

839-1431

839-1432

839-1433

839-1446

839-1447

839-1448

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 23, RAWHITI


Onehunga
Suburban at 23,
ROAD,91,93,
RAWHITI
PAIHIA ROAD,
ROAD,91,93, PAIHIA Onehunga
ROAD, One Tree HillOranga.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 68, PAIHIA ROAD, Onehunga
Suburban at 68,
Onehunga
PAIHIA ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 27,
JUBILEE AVENUE,40,
MARIRI ROAD, One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

27, JUBILEE
AVENUE,40,
MARIRI ROAD,
Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
7B,8,7A,7,6, SANTOS
PLACE,61,63,65,
WAITANGI ROAD,
Onehunga.

7B,8,7A,7,6,
Onehunga
SANTOS
PLACE,61,63,65,
WAITANGI ROAD,
Onehunga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 6,
GARSIDE
PLACE,38C,38D,40,
PAIHIA ROAD,
Onehunga.

6, GARSIDE
Onehunga
PLACE,38C,38D,40
, PAIHIA ROAD,
Onehunga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Single House


at 41, HILL STREET,
Onehunga.

41, HILL STREET,


Onehunga.

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 128,130,
VICTORIA STREET,35,
JORDAN AVENUE,
Onehunga.

128 & 130 Victoria Onehunga


Street, 35,
JORDAN AVENUE,
Onehunga.

One Tree HillOnehunga

Onehunga

MHS

SH

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone on Rawhiti Road and


No Change
Paihia Road. These sites are not close to any suburban
town centres of the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road. This site No Change
is not close to any suburban town centres of the RFN. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Jubilee Avenue and
No Change
Mariri Road. These sites are not close to any suburban
town centres of the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Santos Road. MHS
No Change
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone on Garside Place and


No Change
Paihia Road. These sites do not have good access to any
suburban town centres or the RFN. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone on Hill Street. This site is
No Change
affected by the HC and propose to retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHU zoning on Victoria
MHS
Street and Jordan Avenue; propose alternative zoning of
MHS. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
rezoned to MHS recognising that MHU zone is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC. The
proposed rezoning generally aligns with the outcomes
sought by the Pre-1944 BDC, the MHS zone objectives
and gives effect to the RPS.
This is an out of scope change, relevant further details

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Oppose

Support MHS zone as outside proximity to centres, facilties


or FN and consider zone appropriate to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP (Particularly the RPS)
Oppose reasoning, but support outome of Council
position. While the site has good proximity to the
Onehunga Town Centre and would support higher density
zone (THAB or similar), the existing land fragmentation of
the sites mean that the current SH zone is not

Support retention of zoning as notified - MHU is


appropriate zoning given proximity of sites to Onehunga
Town Centre

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1449

839-1450

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/66,2/66,3/66,
SPRING STREET,
Onehunga.

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 63,65, SPRING
STREET, Onehunga.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
1/66,2/66,3/66
Spring Street
Onehunga

63 & 65 Spring
Street Onehunga

LOCALITY

Onehunga

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Do not support retention of THAB on Spring Street;


propose alternative zoning of MHS. These sites are
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and are rezoned MHS
recognising that THAB zone is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC. The application of
MHS is the most appropriate of achieving the MHS zone
objectives, the outcomes sought by the Pre-1944 BDC
and gives effect to the RPS.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

This is an out of scope change, relevant further details


can be found in Attachment F.
Do not support retention of THAB on Spring Street;
MHS
propose alternative zoning of MHS. These sites are
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and are rezoned MHS
recognising that THAB zoning is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC. The proposed
rezoning generally aligns with the outcomes ought by the
Pre-1944 BDC, is the most appropriate way achieve MHS
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Support retention of zoning as notified - MHU is


appropriate zoning given proximity of sites to Onehunga
Town Centre

THAB

Oppose

Consider proximity to Centre and FN make THAB zone


appropriate, acknowledge scale of development
(particularly height) may be inconsistent with
development of this centre

This is an out of scope change, relevant further details


can be found in Attachment F.
839-1451

839-1452

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
3/162,1/162,4/162,2/
162, ARTHUR STREET,
Onehunga.
Southern Isthmus Retain TC at 102,104,
GALWAY STREET,
Onehunga.

3/162,1/162,4/16 Onehunga
2,2/162, Arthur
Street Onehunga

THAB

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support retention of THAB zone on Arthur Street. These No Change


sites is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The retention
of THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

Support THAB zoning with proximity to Onehunga centre.


102 & 104 Galway Onehunga
Street Onehunga

TC

TC

Support retention of TC zoning on Galway Street. The


No Change
properties are identified as part of the existing
commercial town centre. The Onehunga TC will remain as
identified in the centres hierarchy and RPS. The proposed
retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the TC zone and gives effect to

TC

Support
Support TC zoning as consistent with Objectives and
Policies of the RPS for Centres

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1453

839-1454

839-1455

839-1456

839-1457

839-1458

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 131C,131B,131A, Onehunga


Urban at
Victoria Street
131C,131B,131A,
Onehunga
VICTORIA STREET,
Onehunga.

PAUP ZONE

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


91,93,89, Victoria Onehunga
Housing and
Street Onehunga
Apartment Buildings
at 91,93,89, VICTORIA
STREET, Onehunga.

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3/46,46,2/46,
SPRING STREET,
Onehunga.

THAB

3/46,46,2/46
Spring Street
Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 209 & 211 Arthur Onehunga
Urban at 209,211,
Street Onehunga
ARTHUR STREET,
Onehunga.

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 68 & 68A Alfred


Urban at 68,68A,
Street Onehunga
ALFRED STREET,
Onehunga.

Onehunga

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 186, CHURCH
STREET,51A, ALFRED
STREET, Onehunga.

Onehunga

186, CHURCH
STREET,51A,
ALFRED STREET,
Onehunga.

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of MHU zoning on Victoria


MHS
Street; propose alternative zoning of MHS. 131A Victoria
is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and is rezoned to MHS
recognising that MHU zone is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC. The properties at 131B
and 131C are rezoned to MHS to ensure consistent
zoning. In this instance, the proposed rezoning is most
appropriate way of achieving the MHS zone objectives,
the outcomes sought by the Pre-1944 BDC and gives
effect to the RPS.
This is an out of scope change, relevant further details
Support retention of THAB zoning on Victoria Street.
No Change
These sites are close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The
proposed retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB on Spring Street;
MHS
propose alternative zoning of MHS. 46 Spring Street is
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and rezoned to MHS
recognising that THAB zone is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC. The properties at 2/463/446 are also rezoned to MHS to ensure consistent
zoning with adjoining properties. The proposed rezoning
generally aligns with the outcomes sought by the Pre1944 BDC, is the most appropriate way to achieve the
MHS zone objectives, and gives effect to the RPS.
This is an out of scope change, relevant further details
can be found in Attachment F.
Support retention of MHU on Arthur Street. These sites No Change
are close to the RFN and thereby an appropriate location
for intensification. The application of MHU is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU on Alfred Street. These sites
No Change
are close to the RFN and thereby an appropriate location
for intensification. The application of MHU is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support Retention of THAB zoning on Church Street and No Change
Alfred Street. These sites are close to Onehunga TC and
the RFN. The proposed retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Support Councils position as the sites are close to


Onehunga Town Centre and reflect the objectives and
policies of the PAUP (Particlarly the RPS)

Support retention of zoning as notified - THAB is


appropriate zoning given proximity of sites to Onehunga
Town Centre

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1459

839-1460

839-1461

839-1462

839-1463

839-1464

839-1465

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 198A, CHURCH
STREET, Onehunga.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
198A Church
Street Onehunga

LOCALITY

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 223,221, CHURCH Onehunga


Suburban at 223,221, STREET,
CHURCH STREET,
Onehunga.
Onehunga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


201,205,207,1/20 Onehunga
Housing and
3Apartment Buildings 3/203,201A,3/201at 201,205,207,1/203- 4/201, CHURCH
3/203,201A,3/201STREET,11,10,8A,
4/201, CHURCH
9A,10A,9,3/10STREET,11,10,8A,9A, 4/10, BOND
10A,9,3/10-4/10,
PLACE, Onehunga.
BOND PLACE,
Onehunga.

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 16A,16, BOND
PLACE, Onehunga.

16 &16A Bond
Place Onehunga

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 5,4,4A, BOND
PLACE, Onehunga.

5,4,4A, Bond
Place Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 2,4,
NAMATA ROAD,188,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, One Tree HillOranga.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 11,13,
CURZON STREET,
Onehunga.

2,4, NAMATA
Onehunga
ROAD,188,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Onehunga

MHU

11 & 13 Curzon
Onehunga
Street, Onehunga

MHU

Onehunga

Onehunga

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support Retention of THAB zoning on Church Street. This No Change


site is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The proposed
retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Church Street. There is No Change
an SEA covering approximately 20% of both properties
and MHS is retained recognising that that is growth is
limited on this site. Retention of retention is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objective of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Support Retention of THAB zoning on Church Street and No Change


Bond Place. These sites are close to Onehunga TC and the
RFN. The retention of THAB is the most appropriate way
of achieving the zone objectives and giving effect to the
RPS.

Support Retention of THAB zone on Bond Place. These


No Change
sites are close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The
retention of THAB zoning is the most appropriate way of
achieving the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Support Retention of THAB zone on Bond Place. These


No Change
sites are close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The
retention of THAB zonings the most appropriate way of
achieving the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHU on Namata Road and Mount No Change


Smart Road. The properties are located close to RFN and
large open spaces. MHU complements the
neighbourhood's planned urban built character and
retention of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHU on Curzon Street. These sites No Change
are close to the RFN and thereby an appropriate location
for intensification. The application of MHU is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1466

839-1467

839-1468

839-1469

839-1470

839-1471

839-1472

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
2/211,215,3/211,1/2
11,213, MOUNT
SMART ROAD, Royal
Oak-Penrose.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

2/211,215,3/211, Royal Oak1/211,213,


Penrose.
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Royal OakPenrose.

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 48A,48,50,


Suburban at
NAMATA ROAD,
48A,48,50, NAMATA Onehunga
ROAD, One Tree HillOranga.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at
31,29,29A, PAIHIA
ROAD,44,38,42,40,
NAMATA ROAD, One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

LOCALITY

Onehunga

31,29,29A, PAIHIA Onehunga


ROAD,44,38,42,40
, NAMATA ROAD,
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 11,13,17A,17,


Suburban at
PAIHIA ROAD,
11,13,17A,17, PAIHIA Onehunga
ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 3,5, PAIHIA ROAD, Onehunga


Suburban at 3,5,
Onehunga
PAIHIA ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1,3,2,2A, GARSIDE Onehunga


Suburban at 1,3,2,2A, PLACE, Onehunga.
GARSIDE PLACE,
Onehunga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 50,52, PAIHIA


Onehunga
Suburban at 50,52,
ROAD, Onehunga
PAIHIA ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU on Mount Smart Road. These No Change


sites are close to the RFN and thereby an appropriate
location for intensification. The application of MHU is the
most appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This


No Change
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centre or RFN.MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road and
No Change
Namata Road. These sites do not have good access to any
suburban town centre of the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road. These
sites do not have good access to any suburban town
centre or RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone. This site does not have
good access to any suburban town centres or the RFN.
MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Garside Place. These
sites are not close to any suburban town centres or the
RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone. This site does not have
good access to any suburban town centres or the RFN.
MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1473

839-1474

839-1475

839-1476

839-1477

839-1478

839-1479

839-1480

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 185A,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD,6, CURZON
STREET,32B,32,30,32
A, MAYS ROAD,
Onehunga.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

185A, MOUNT
Onehunga
SMART ROAD,6,
CURZON
STREET,32B,32,30
,32A, MAYS
ROAD, Onehunga.

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1, CURZON


Onehunga
Urban at 1, CURZON STREET,40, MAYS
STREET,40, MAYS
ROAD, Onehunga.
ROAD, Onehunga.

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 2/463/46,4/467/46,46A,8/46-9/46,
MAYS ROAD,
Onehunga.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 54, MAYS
ROAD, Onehunga.

2/46-3/46,4/46- Onehunga
7/46,46A,8/469/46, MAYS
ROAD, Onehunga.

MHU

54 Mays Road,
Onehunga

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 200,
CAPTAIN SPRINGS
ROAD,60,68,62,64,66
, MAYS ROAD,
Onehunga.

200, CAPTAIN
Onehunga
SPRINGS
ROAD,60,68,62,64
,66, MAYS ROAD,
Onehunga.

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 15, 1/15, 2/15,


Urban at 15,
3/15 Kentucky
KENTUCKY STREET,
Street Ellerslie
Ellerslie.

Onehunga

Ellerslie

MHU

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


13,15,17,
Ellerslie
Housing and
Somerfield Street
Apartment Buildings Ellerslie
at 13,15,17,
SOMERFIELD STREET,
Ellerslie.

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3,5, ARTHUR
STREET, Ellerslie.

THAB

3, 5 Arthur Street Ellerslie


Ellerslie

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of MHU. These site are close to the


RFN and thereby an appropriate location for
intensification. The application of MHU is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.

10

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

No Change

Support retention of MHU. These sites are close to the


No Change
RFN and thereby an appropriate location for
intensification. The application of MHU is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zoning on Mays Road. These No Change
sites are close to the RFN and thereby an appropriate
location for intensification. The application of MHU is the
most appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zoning on Mays Road. This site No Change
is close to the RFN and thereby an appropriate location
for intensification. The application of MHU is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU on Captain Springs Road and No Change
Mays Road. These sites are close to the RFN and thereby
an appropriate location for intensification. The
application of MHU is the most appropriate way of
achieving the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The sites are


No Change
located close to main transport routes, a THAB zone and
a TC. The retention of zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The sites are
No Change
located in close proximity to Ellerslie TC and a RFN. The
retention of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The sites are


located around a TC and a RFN. The retention of zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1481

839-1482

839-1483

839-1484

839-1485

839-1486

839-1487

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 4 , 6 Lawry Street Ellerslie


Suburban at 4,6,
Ellerslie
LAWRY STREET,
Ellerslie.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 43, MICHAELS


Suburban at 43,
AVENUE,1A,
MICHAELS
LAWRY STREET
AVENUE,1A, LAWRY
STREET, Ellerslie.

Ellerslie

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 4, 4A Peek Street


Suburban at 4,4A,
Ellerslie
PEEK STREET,
Ellerslie.

Ellerslie

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 2/70,2/72,1/70,1/ Ellerslie


Suburban at
72, BALLARAT
2/70,2/72,1/70,1/72, STREET
BALLARAT STREET,
Ellerslie-St Johns.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 15, 17 Vause


Suburban at 15,17,
Street Ellerslie
VAUSE STREET,
Ellerslie.

Ellerslie

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 14,16, JARMAN
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2/275,275,
PENROSE ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

14 & 16 Jarman
Road Mount
Wellington

2/275, 275
Mount
Penrose Road
Wellington
Mount Wellington

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support the retention of MHS zone as the sites are not


within close proximity to existing or planned public
transport network or large urban facilities. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS zone as the sites are not
within close proximity to existing or planned public
transport network or large urban facilities. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS zone as the sites are not
within close proximity to existing or planned public
transport network or large urban facilities. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS zone as the sites are not
within close proximity to existing or planned public
transport network or large urban facilities. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS zone as the sites are not
within close proximity to existing or planned public
transport network or large urban facilities. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB and propose MHU.
These sites sit underneath the NGC. MHU would be a
more appropriate zone and is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

11

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

MHU

The proposed rezoning of some sites to MHU is an out of


scope change, relevant further details can be found in
Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a No Change
LC and has good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the downzoning of this site, transmission


corridor to northern boundary. Support PAUP as notified.

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1488

839-1489

839-1490

839-1491

839-1492

839-1493

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 25B 25A, RUAWAI Mount


Urban at 25B,25A,
ROAD
Wellington
RUAWAI ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 147,149,
MOUNT
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at
138,140, PENROSE
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


1/30,3/30,6/30,4/30,
2/30,5/30,
PANORAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

147, 149 Mount


Wellington
Highway

Mount
Wellington

138 & 140


Penrose Road

Mount
Wellington

1/30,3/30,6/30,4/ Mount
30,2/30,5/30,
Wellington
PANORAMA
ROAD

MU

MU

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


102,2/104,1/104, Mount
Housing and
2/102, RUAWAI
Wellington
Apartment Buildings ROAD,
at
102,2/104,1/104,2/1
02, RUAWAI ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 20,22, LYNTON
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.

THAB

20,22, LYNTON
ROAD

Mount
Wellington

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MU

MU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

12

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU. The site has good access to No Change


the RFN and other public transport options and is located
close to areas of THAB. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention MHU. The site has good access to the No Change
RFN and other public transport options and is located
close to areas of THAB. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MU. The sites are not
MHS
adjacent to any centres, higher residential areas or the
RFN and future application is limited to locations which
will not harm the vitality and viability of the centres. The
area is characterised by residential and therefore MHS is
more appropriate and reflects existing character. The
rezoning to MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
The proposed rezoning to MHS is an out of scope change,
Do not support retention of MU. The sites are not
MHS
adjacent to any centres, higher residential areas or the
RFN and future application is limited to locations which
will not harm the vitality and viability of the centres. The
area is characterised by residential and therefore MHS is
more appropriate and reflects existing character. The
rezoning to MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
The proposed rezoning to MHS is an out of scope change,
Support retention of THAB. The sites are located close to No Change
a LC and have good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB. The sites are located close to No Change


a LC and have good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proposed Plan identifeid area as Mixed Use, supported


zoning on basis of transition from Light industry to rear.
Alternative zoning of THAB appropriate alternative to
provide transition to the scale of Light Industry activiity
and accessibility to employment

MU

Oppose
Proposed Plan identifeid area as Mixed Use, supported
zoning on basis of transition from Light industry to rear.
Alternative zoning of THAB appropriate alternative to
provide transition to the scale of Light Industry activiity
and accessibility to employment

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1494

839-1495

839-1496

839-1497

839-1498

839-1499

839-1500

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 30A,26,30,26A,
LYNTON ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

30A,26,30,26A,
LYNTON ROAD

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 31,29, LYNTON
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10,12, LYNTON
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
61B,61,61A,63,63A,
LYNTON ROAD,
Mount Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2/71,2/73,71,1/73,
WAIPUNA ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

31,29, LYNTON
ROAD

10,12, LYNTON
ROAD

LOCALITY

Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

61B,61,61A,63,63 Mount
A, LYNTON ROAD Wellington

2/71,2/73,71,1/73 Mount
, WAIPUNA ROAD Wellington
Mount Wellington

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


75, 75A Waipuna Mount
Housing and
Road Mount
Wellington
Apartment Buildings Wellington
at 75,75A, WAIPUNA
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 9,8,8A,7,9A,
TOMURI PLACE,
Mount Wellington.

THAB

9,8,8A,7,9A,
Mount
TOMURI PLACE
Wellington
Mount Wellington

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

13

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB. The sites are located close to No Change


a LC and have good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB. The sites are located close to No Change


a LC and have good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. The sites are located close to No Change
a LC and have good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. The sites are located close to No Change
a LC and have good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as


THAB as the sites are in close proximity to local facilities
and public transport networks. Therefore the retention
of THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as


THAB as the sites are in close proximity to local facilities
and public transport networks. Therefore the retention
of THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as


THAB as the sites are in close proximity to local facilities
and public transport networks. Therefore the retention
of THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1501

839-1502

839-1505

839-1506

839-1507

839-1508

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
3/79,6/77,5/77,2/77,
5/79,2/79,3/77,6/79,
75,1/79,4/79,4/77,1/
77, PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

3/79,6/77,5/77,2/ Mount
77,5/79,2/79,3/77 Wellington
,6/79,75,1/79,4/7
9,4/77,1/77
Panama Road
Mount Wellington

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
5/127,1/119,1/117,1
6/127,11/127,14/127
,6/127,3/119,2/127,3
/117,4/127,18/127,1
7/127,2/119,13/127,
1/127,2/117,3/127,1
2/127,7/127,10/127,
8/127,19/127,15/127
,9/127, PANAMA
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 68,78, CHURCH
STREET, Otahuhu.

5/127,1/119,1/11 Mount
7,16/127,11/127, Wellington
14/127,6/127,3/1
19,2/127,3/117,4/
127,18/127,17/12
7,2/119,13/127,1/
127,2/117,3/127,
12/127,7/127,10/
127,8/127,19/127
,15/127,9/127
Panama Road
Mount Wellington

THAB

1/78 CHURCH
Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu.

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 6,
CHATFIELD
AVENUE,69, FRANK
GREY PLACE,
Otahuhu.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 1,
CHATFIELD AVENUE,
Otahuhu.

6, CHATFIELD
AVENUE,69,
FRANK GREY
PLACE, Otahuhu.

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1,3, HUTTON
STREET, Otahuhu.

1,3, HUTTON
Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu

Otahuhu

1, CHATFIELD
Otahuhu (G2)
AVENUE, Otahuhu

MHS

MHS

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHS

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of THAB. Appropriate to retain as


THAB, reflects existing context and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB. Appropriate to retain as


THAB and reflects existing context and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the THAB. The THAB zoning at


Church St, Otahuhu is located next to the Otahuhu TC
and excellent public transport routes. The retention of
the THAB zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

14

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

No Change

No Change

Support retention of the MHS zone. The properties are No Change


away from good public transport, the RFN and the
Otahuhu TC. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHS zone at 1 Chatfield Ave. No Change
This property is not close to the RFN and is not close to
the Otahuhu TC and the area is mainly comprised of
suburban dwellings. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention
of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB. The THAB zoning at
No Change
Hutton St, Otahuhu is located next to the Otahuhu TC and
excellent public transport routes. The retention of the
THAB zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1509

839-1510

839-1531

839-1535

839-185

839-187

839-197

839-208

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 41A,41, HIGH
STREET, Otahuhu.

41A,41, HIGH
Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu.

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24,20,22,
PORTAGE
ROAD,32,30,34,
HOKONUI ROAD,
Otahuhu.
Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 11,11A, TOMURI
PLACE, Mount
Wellington.

24,20,22,
PORTAGE
ROAD,32,30,34,
HOKONUI ROAD,
Otahuhu

Otahuhu

11 & 11ATomuri
Place Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at 3/2,4/2 Hillside


3/2,4/2,HILLSIDE
Road Mount
ROAD,Mount
Wellington
Wellington,Auckland.

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 146, MOUNT


Urban at 146,
SMART ROAD,
MOUNT SMART
Onehunga
ROAD, Royal OakPenrose.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4, ROSLYN ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

4 ROSLYN ROAD Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 96, TE KAWA


Suburban at 96, TE
ROAD, One Tree
KAWA ROAD, One
Hill-Greenlane.
Tree Hill-Greenlane.

Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at 5-7/2 Hillside


5/2,6/2,/7/2,HILLSIDE Road, Mount
ROAD,Mount
Wellington
Wellington,Auckland.

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

MU

MHU

THAB

MHS

MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

MU

MHU

THAB

MHS

MU

REASONS

15

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the THAB. The THAB zoning is


No Change
located close to the Otahuhu TC and public transport
network including public transport interchange. The
retention of the THAB zoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB. The THAB zoning is
No Change
located close to Otahuhu TC with excellent public
transport routes. The retention of the THAB zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as


THAB as the sites are in close proximity to local facilities
and public transport networks. Therefore the retention
of THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support retention of MU. MU is appropriate in this


location. It is opposite a LC and on a public transport
network and therefore retention of MU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU on Mount Smart Road. This
site has good access to the RFN and is an appropriate
location for intensification. The retention of MHS is the
most appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives
and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MU

Support

No Change

Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a No Change


LC and has good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Te Kawa Road. This
No Change
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MU. MU is appropriate in this
No Change
location. It is near a LC and public transport network and
therefore retention of MU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-216

839-218

839-221

839-222

839-2229

839-223

839-2231

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 45, ALFRED
STREET, Onehunga.

45 Alfred Street
Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
95A,93,95,93A,
MOUNT
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 36, JAMES WALTER
PLACE, Mount
Wellington.

95A,93,95,93A,
MOUNT
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY

Mount
Wellington

36 James Walter
Place Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 67, SPRING
STREET, Onehunga.

67 Spring Street
Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 86, FRANK GREY


Suburban at 86,
PLACE, Otahuhu
FRANK GREY PLACE,
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/32A-4/32A,
ALBION ROAD,
Otahuhu.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at
596, MOUNT
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY, Mount
Wellington.

1/32A-4/32A,
ALBION ROAD,
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

596 Mount
Wellington
Highway Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

THAB

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHS

THAB

MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHS

THAB

MU

REASONS

Support Retention of THAB zone on Alfred Street. This


site is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The retention
of THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the
zone objectives and giving effect to the RPS.

16

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

Support retention of MHU. The sites have good access to No Change


the RFN and other public transport options and are
located close to areas of THAB. The retention of zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as No Change


THAB as the site is in close proximity to local facilities and
public transport networks. Therefore the retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support retention of THAB on Spring Street;


MHS
propose alternative zoning of MHS. This site is affected
by the Pre-1944 BDC and is rezoned MHS recognising
that THAB zone is generally incompatible with the values
of the areas that are proposed to be retained within the
Pre-1944 BDC. The application of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the MHS zone objectives,
the outcomes sought by the Pre-1944 BDC, and gives
effect to the RPS.
Scope for this change is provided submission points 2658Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is No Change
away from the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB. The THAB zoning is
No Change
located close to the Otahuhu TC and the RFN including
public transport interchange. The retention of the THAB
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU. MU is appropriate in this
location. It is opposite a LC and on a public transport
network and therefore retention of MU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

REVIEW - Do we agree to MHU on this site given nature of


development in this area

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MU

Support

No Change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2235

839-2236

839-224

839-2263

839-2285

839-2292

839-2345

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 13, WAIPUNA
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 12, ROSLYN ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
13 WAIPUNA
ROAD Mount
Wellington

LOCALITY

Mount
Wellington

12 ROSLYN ROAD Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 88, FRANK GREY


Suburban at 88,
PLACE, Otahuhu
FRANK GREY PLACE,
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 189 MOUNT
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY. Mount
Wellington.

Mount
Wellington

189 MOUNT
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 18 FITZGERALD


Urban at 18
ROAD
FITZGERALD ROAD.
Mount Wellington.

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHS

THAB

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 28 NGATIAWA


One Tree Hill
Suburban at 28
STREET. One Tree
NGATIAWA STREET. Hill.
One Tree Hill.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 20 LONGFORD
STREET. Mount
Wellington.

THAB

20 LONGFORD
STREET

Mount
Wellington

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHS

THAB

REASONS

17

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a


LC and has good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a


LC and has good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is No Change


away from the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a No Change
LC and has good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHU. The site has good access to No Change


the RFN and other public transport options and is located
close to areas of THAB. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Ngatiwa Street. This
No Change
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a No Change
LC and has good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2409

839-2420

839-2454

839-2464

839-249

839-2494

839-2497

839-2504

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 11 KAWAU ROAD. Greenlane


Suburban at 11
Greenlane.
KAWAU ROAD.
Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 200, 1/198B,
2/198B CHURCH
STREET. Onehunga.

THAB

200, 1/198B,
2/198B CHURCH
STREET,
Onehunga.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 76A Mays Road,


Urban at 76 MAYS
Onehunga
ROAD. Onehunga.

Onehunga

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/182A-31/182A,
32/182B-66/182B
LADIES MILE. EllerslieRemuera.

1/182A-31/182A, Ellerslie
32/182B-66/182B
LADIES MILE
Ladies Mile
Ellerslie

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


1/2-7/2, HILLSIDE
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.

1/2-7/2 Hillside
Road Mount
Wellington

MU

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1 Hilstan Place


Urban at 1 HILSTAN Onehunga
PLACE. Onehunga.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 240 MOUNT


Urban at 240 MOUNT SMART ROAD,
SMART ROAD. Royal Onehunga
Oak-Penrose.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3/275 PENROSE
ROAD. 7 MCRAE
ROAD. Mount
Wellington.

Mount
Wellington

3/275 PENROSE
ROAD. 7 MCRAE
ROAD.

MHU

MHU

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

THAB

MHU

THAB

MU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

18

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone on Kawau Road. This site No Change


does not have good access to any suburban town centres
or the RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zoning on Church Street.
These sites are close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The
retention of THAB is the most appropriate way of
achieving the THAB zone objectives and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

No Change

Support retention of MHU on Mays Road. This site is


No Change
close to the RFN and thereby an appropriate location for
intensification. The application of MHU is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The sites are
No Change
located in close proximity to Ellerslie TC and a RFN. The
retention of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of MU. MU is appropriate in this


location. It is opposite a LC and on a public transport
network and therefore retention of MU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU on Hilstan Place. This site is
close to the RFN and thereby an appropriate location for
intensification. The retention of MHU zoning is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU on Mount Smart Road. This
site has good access to the RFN and are in an appropriate
location for intensification. MHU complements the
neighbourhood's planned urban built character and
retention of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of THAB. The sites are located close to
a LC and have good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2519

839-2521

839-2522

839-2530

839-2544

839-2546

839-2553

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1/174A-6/174A


Onehunga
Suburban at 1/174A- MOUNT SMART
6/174A MOUNT
ROAD, Onehunga
SMART ROAD. Royal
Oak-Penrose.

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 74 FERNDALE


Suburban at 74
ROAD
FERNDALE ROAD.
Mount Wellington.

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/152, 3/152,
2/152 PANAMA
ROAD. Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 1, 3
TAWHIRI ROAD. One
Tree Hill.

Mount
Wellington

152 Panama Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

1, 3 TAWHIRI
Onehunga
ROAD, Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 135 Mount


Urban at Lot 44 DP
Wellington
119613 [135 Mt.
Highway
Wellington Highway].

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 39, 37 TE KAWA


Suburban at 39, 37 TE ROAD. One Tree
KAWA ROAD. One
Hill-Greenlane.
Tree Hill-Greenlane.

Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


10 Tomuri Place Mount
Housing and
Mount Wellington Wellington
Apartment Buildings
at 10 TOMURI PLACE.
Mount Wellington.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHS

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHS

THAB

REASONS

19

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of MHS on Mount ; propose


MHU
alternative zoning of MHU. This is a large site with
development capacity and has good access to the RFN.
The application of the MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
This is an out of scope change, relevant further details
can be found in Attachment F.
Support retention of MHS. The site is not close to higher No Change
density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of THAB. Appropriate to retain as
No Change
THAB and reflects existing context and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone on Tawhiri Road. This site No Change


does not have good access to any suburban town centre
or the RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. The site has good access to No Change
the RFN and other public transport options and is located
close to areas of THAB. The retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Te Kawa Road. These No Change
site do not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as No Change
THAB as the site is in close proximity to local facilities and
public transport networks. Therefore the retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Given proximity to FN and Centre, consider MHU zone


appropriate

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2577

839-2578

839-258

839-2580

839-2597

839-2598

839-2626

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain TC at 51


PRINCES STREET.
Onehunga.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
3G/51 Princes
Street Onehunga

LOCALITY

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

TC

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 16 CONVOY LANE. Otahuhu


Suburban at 16
Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 49, 49A Michaels Ellerslie


Suburban at 49A,49, Avenue Ellerslie
MICHAELS AVENUE,
Ellerslie.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 24A CONVOY


Suburban at 24A
LANE. Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 39 STATE


Suburban at 39 STATE AVENUE.
AVENUE. Onehunga. Onehunga.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 39A, 41A STATE


Suburban at 39A, 41A AVENUE.
STATE AVENUE.
Onehunga.
Onehunga.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 100 LUKE STREET Otahuhu


Suburban at 100
EAST. Otahuhu
LUKE STREET EAST.
Otahuhu.

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

TC

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of TC zoning on Princes Street. This site


is part of the existing commercial town centre. The
Onehunga TC will remain as identified in the centres
hierarchy and RPS. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the TC zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHS zone. This property is not
close to the RFN, and is not close to the Otahuhu TC. This
area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS zone as the sites are not
within close proximity to existing or planned public
transport network or large urban facilities. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is a
not close to the RFN, and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on State Avenue. This site
does not have good access to any suburban town centres
or the RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on State Avenue. These
sites do not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is
at a distance from public transport's RFN and is not close
to the Otahuhu TC and the area is mainly comprised of
suburban dwellings. The MHS zone complements the
neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention
of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

20

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change
TC

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2649

839-2650

839-2656

839-2657

839-2658

839-2659

839-2669

839-2670

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 172 ROCKFIELD


Suburban at 172
ROAD. PenroseROCKFIELD ROAD.
Ellerslie
Penrose-Ellerslie.

LOCALITY

Penrose

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 172A Rockfield


Suburban at 172A
Road Penrose
ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie.

Penrose

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 6 BOND PLACE.
Onehunga.

6 Bond Place
Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 7 BOND PLACE.
Onehunga.

7 Bond Place
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 7A BOND PLACE.
Onehunga.

7A Bond Place
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 8 BOND PLACE.
Onehunga.

8 Bond Place
Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 70 PAIHIA ROAD,


Suburban at 70
Onehunga
PAIHIA ROAD. OrangaEllerslie.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 70A Paihia Road


Suburban at Lot 2 DP Greenlane
403558. [70A Paihia
Road, Onehunga]

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHS

REASONS

21

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS on Rockfield Road. This site


No Change
adjoins SH zoned properties with flooding constraints
and a large area of LI zoned site. MHS on this
complements the planned suburban character of the
eastern-side of Rockfield Road and prevents an increase
in the number of sensitive activities, including residential
uses, close to an area of light industry. The retention of
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS on Rockfield Road. MHS
No Change
complements the planned suburban residential character
of the area. The retention of MHS is the most appropriate
way to achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone on Bond Place. This site No Change
is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB zone on Bond Place. This site


is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support retention of THAB zone on Bond Place. This site


is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support retention of THAB zone on Bond Place. This site


is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support retention of MHS zone on State Avenue. This site No Change


do not have good access to any suburban town centres or
the RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on State Avenue. These No Change
sites do not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2671

839-2678

839-2679

839-2680

839-2685

839-2686

839-269

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing Lot 3 DP 403558. Onehunga


Suburban at Lot 3 DP [70B Paihia Road,
403558. [70B Paihia Onehunga]
Road, Onehunga]

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1 TOROKINA


Onehunga
Suburban at 1
PLACE. Onehunga.
TOROKINA PLACE.
Onehunga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 2 TOROKINA


Onehunga
Suburban at 2
PLACE. Onehunga.
TOROKINA PLACE.
Onehunga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 2A TOROKINA


Onehunga
Suburban at 2A
PLACE. Onehunga.
TOROKINA PLACE.
Onehunga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 77 FRANK GREY


Suburban at 77
PLACE. Otahuhu.
FRANK GREY PLACE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1A CHATFIELD


Suburban at 1A
AVENUE.
CHATFIELD AVENUE. Otahuhu.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


1/14-14/14,
ATKINSON AVENUE,
Otahuhu.

1/14-14/14,
Otahuhu
ATKINSON
AVENUE, Otahuhu

MHS

MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road. This site


does not have good access to any suburban town centres
or the RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Torokina Place. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centre or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Torokina Place. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Torokina Place. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of the MHS zone. The retention of the
MHS zoning aligns with the objectives of the zone. The
property is away from good public transport and the
Otahuhu TC. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is
not close to the RFN, and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MU zone. The notified
PAUP provides for intensification of use around the
Otahuhu TC including Atkinson Ave and Station Rd. This
is part of the revitalisation of the Otahuhu TC and
surrounding area. Atkinson Ave and Station Rd are
adjacent to the RTN with Station Rd the site of a new
public transport interchange. The MU zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning
to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the

22

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MU

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2691

839-2692

839-2693

839-2694

839-2695

839-2696

839-2697

839-2698

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 39 NAMATA


Onehunga
Suburban at 39
ROAD, Onehunga
NAMATA ROAD. One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 37 NAMATA


Onehunga
Suburban at 37
ROAD, Onehunga
NAMATA ROAD. One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 35A NAMATA


Onehunga
Suburban at 35A
ROAD, Onehunga
NAMATA ROAD. One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 35 NAMATA


Onehunga
Suburban at 35
ROAD, Onehunga
NAMATA ROAD. One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 28 NAMATA


Onehunga
Suburban at 28
ROAD, Onehunga
NAMATA ROAD. One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 28A NAMATA


Onehunga
Suburban at 28A
ROAD, Onehunga
NAMATA ROAD. One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 30 NAMATA


Onehunga
Suburban at 30
ROAD, Onehunga
NAMATA ROAD. One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 32 NAMATA


Onehunga
Suburban at 32
ROAD, Onehunga
NAMATA ROAD. One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This


site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN.MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and give effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. The retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the

23

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2710

839-2711

839-2712

839-2713

839-2714

839-2715

839-2716

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14A CONVOY


Suburban at 14A
LANE. Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14B CONVOY


Suburban at 14B
LANE. Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14C CONVOY


Suburban at 14C
LANE. Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14D CONVOY


Suburban at 14D
LANE. Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14E CONVOY


Suburban at 14E
LANE. Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14F CONVOY


Suburban at 14F
LANE. Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14G CONVOY


Suburban at 14G
LANE. Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is


not close to the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
The area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is
not close to the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
The area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is
not close to the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
The area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is
not close to the RFN, is not close to the Otahuhu TC. This
area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is a
not close to the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHS zone. This property is a
significant distance from the RFN and is not close to the
Otahuhu TC. This area is mainly comprised of suburban
dwellings. The MHS zone complements the
neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention
of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHS zone. This property is not
close to the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC. This
area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

24

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2717

839-2718

839-2754

839-2793

839-2794

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14H CONVOY


Suburban at 14H
LANE. Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14J CONVOY


Suburban at 14J
LANE. Otahuhu.
CONVOY LANE.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


8 Harrod Street
Housing and
Ellerslie
Apartment Buildings
at 8 HARROD STREET.
Ellerslie.

Ellerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone


164,162A,162,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Royal OakPenrose from Mixed
Housing Urban, SH to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 5A,5,7,8,
HULL
PLACE,38,40B,40A,42
,36,40,34, WAITANGI
ROAD, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban, SH to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
(Note: The notified
zoning is SH for 5 Hull
and MHS for all other
properties).

164,162A,162,
Onehunga
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Onehunga

5A,5,7,8, HULL
Onehunga
PLACE,38,40B,40A
,42,36,40,34,
WAITANGI ROAD,
Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

THAB

SH/MHS/MH MHU
U

SH/MHS

MHU

REASONS

25

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is No Change


not close to the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHS zone . This property is No Change
not close to the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The site is
No Change
located near a TC, higher density areas and a RFN. The
retention of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS on Mount Smart No Change
Road. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
have flooding Constraints. The retention of the notified
zoning aligns with the outcomes sought by the Pre-1944
BDC, is the most appropriate way of achieving the SH
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Given proximity to FN and Centre, consider MHU zone


appropriate, do not support the 'down-zoning' of sites for
Pre-1944 Building Control and consider the flooding can be
managed by existing development control rules

Support change from SH to MHS for 5 Hull Place as


MHS
managing flooding risks on the site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The remaining sites are retained
as MHS. The proposed rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives
effect to the RPS.

Given proximity to Centre, consider MHU zone


appropriate, do not support the 'down-zoning' of sites for
Pre-1944 Building Control and consider the flooding can be
managed by existing development control rules

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2795

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone


150B,150C,2/156,150
A,4/156,6/156,3/156,
7/156,1/156,
AVENUE ROAD EAST,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

150B,150C,2/156, Otahuhu
150A,4/156,6/156
,3/156,7/156,1/15
6, AVENUE ROAD
EAST, Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

MHS/SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

26

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the change from MHS/SH to MHS. Rezone 1MHS


5/156 Avenue Road East as managing flooding risks on
these sites does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and proposed rezoning to the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

Consistent with re-zoning request


839-2852

839-2854

839-286

839-2868

839-2880

839-2884

Southern Isthmus Rezone 104, MOUNT 104, MOUNT


SMART ROAD, Royal SMART ROAD,
Oak-Penrose from
Onehunga
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 8, TRENWITH 8, TRENWITH


Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 210, CHURCH
STREET, Onehunga.

210 Church Street Onehunga


Onehunga

THAB

Southern Isthmus Rezone 34,


MURDOCH STREET,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 159, MOUNT
SMART ROAD, Royal
Oak-Penrose from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

34, MURDOCH
Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1, WALTERS


ROAD,24, MEADOW
STREET, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1, WALTERS
Mount
ROAD,24,
Wellington
MEADOW STREET
Mount Wellington

159 Mount Smart Onehunga


Road, Penrose

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change from MHS to MHU on Mount Smart


MHU
Road. This property is close to higher density areas,
Onehunga Town Centre and the RFN. The application of
the MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to a TC or higher density areas or the RFN. The MHS
zone at 8 Trenwith St, Otahuhu complements the
neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention
of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone on Church Street. This
No Change
site is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The retention
of THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to a TC, higher density areas or the RFN. The MHS
zone at 34 Murdoch Street, Otahuhu complements the
neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention
of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU on Mount Smart No Change
Road. This site is affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to higher density areas or the RFN and are
remote from LCs and therefore are not consistent with
the MHU objectives. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support
Proximity to Centre means MHU appropriate zone.

THAB

Support

MHS

Support
By proximity to centres and facliites support MHS

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

The site has proximity to centre and adjoins MHU zone.


The issue of flooding (on part of the site) can be addressed
by the Unitary Plan development controls and inefficient
as determinant of what would effectively be 'spot zoning'.

Proximity to Centre, FN and amenities (including


education) means MHU appropriate zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2897

839-2905

839-2906

839-2909

839-2911

839-2915

839-2919

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Rezone 6, CAMERON 6, CAMERON


STREET, Onehunga
STREET,
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 115B,


PANORAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

115B PANORAMA Mount


ROAD
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 12, JOLSON


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12 Jolson Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,


EWENSON AVENUE,
One Tree Hill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, EWENSON
AVENUE, One
Tree Hill

Southern Isthmus Rezone 30, MARIRI


ROAD, One Tree HillOranga from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 80, JOLSON
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 16, JOLSON
ROAD,159, PANAMA
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

30, MARIRI ROAD, One Tree Hill


One Tree Hill

One-Tree Hill

80 Jolson Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

16, JOLSON
ROAD,159,
PANAMA ROAD

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

27

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change from MHS to THAB on Cameron Street. THAB


This site adjoins Onehunga TC, THAB zoned properties
and has good access to the RFN. The proposed rezoning
is the most appropriate way of achieving the THAB zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to the RFN and LCs, albeit there is a small
neighbourhood centre nearby. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
the retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Ewenson No Change
Avenue. This sites is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
therefore the notified zoning of SH is retained because
the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH/MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Mariri Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to the RFN, LCs and higher density areas. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a RFN or a LC, albeit there is a NC close by 16
Jolson. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone), do consider proximity to
employment area (Light Industry zoning) warrants
consideration.

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to services (education and Open Space as well as


consistent transition with neighbouring THAB zone.
Consider MHU appropriate zoning for sites through to
Bernard Street (on basis of principles).

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Centre and education consider appropriate
area for MHU zone

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider site appropriate for MHU given proximity to


Onehunga Centre
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria). Consider the
contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the current
nature of development in surrounding area (including
THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis, consider the area
could reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale

Proximity to services (education and Open Space as well as


consistent transition with neighbouring THAB zone.
Consider MHU appropriate zoning for sites through to
Bernard Street (on basis of principles).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-293

839-296

839-2961

839-2969

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 60, NAMATA


Suburban at 60,
ROAD, One Tree
NAMATA ROAD, One Hill
Tree Hill-Oranga.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1, HARMONY


Suburban at 1,
AVENUE,
HARMONY AVENUE, Otahuhu.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu (G2)

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 46A, HUTTON 46A, HUTTON


Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


2/61,6/61,5/61,3/61,
1/61,4/61, LUKE
STREET, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2/61,6/61,5/61,3/ Otahuhu
61,1/61,4/61,
LUKE STREET,
Otahuhu

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1/4,2/4,


HILLSIDE ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1/4,2/4, Hillside
Road Mount
Wellington

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This


site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of the MHS zone at 1 Harmony Ave.
This property is not close to the RFN and is not close to
the Otahuhu TC and the area is mainly comprised of
suburban dwellings. The MHS zone complements the
neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention
of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Propose
alternative zone of MHU. The 46A Hutton Road site is
close to the Otahuhu TC, the neighbouring THAB zone
and RFN for public transport. The MHU zone provides for
staging between the higher intensity TC and THAB zoning
and the MHS of the area. The MHU zone complements
the built character and the MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU. These
properties are at a distance from the Otahuhu TC and the
RFN. The MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

28

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

No Change

MHU

Consider MHU appropriate on proximity criteria


No Change

MHU

Oppose

Consider MHU appropriate on proximity criteria


839-2975

839-2977

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1/64-34/64, 1/64-34/64,


Onehunga
GALWAY STREET,
GALWAY STREET,
Onehunga from
Onehunga
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

MHU

THAB

Support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are close to MHU
a LC and RFN. Therefore rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Support change from MHS to THAB on Galway Street.


This site adjoins Onehunga TC, areas of THAB and has
good access to the RFN. The proposed rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

The proposed changes require out of scope change to 112/64A Church Street to avoid spot zoning, relevant
further details can be found in Attachment F.

THAB

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2978

839-2985

839-2994

839-3014

839-3017

839-3025

839-3033

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 15, MASSEY


AVENUE, Greenlane
from SH to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

15, MASSEY
AVENUE,
Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Rezone 64, BOAKES


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

64 BOAKES ROAD Mount


Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 12, PEACE


AVENUE, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 15, FENCIBLE
PLACE, Otahuhu from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12 Peace Avenue Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 19, JUBILEE


AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19, JUBILEE
AVENUE,
Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2A, FORBES


STREET, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2A Forbes Street
Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 31, STATE


AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31, STATE
AVENUE,
Onehunga

15, FENCIBLE
PLACE, Otahuhu

Greenlane

Otahuhu

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

29

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHS on Massey


No Change
Avenue.
The site is affected by the HC and retained as the notified
SH zone because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not
close to the RFN, main road and LC. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU for 15
Fencible Place, Otahuhu. This property is away from the
Otahuhu TC and the RFN. The MHS zone complements
the neighbourhood's built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
on Jubilee Avenue because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Forbes
Street. This site does not have good access to the RFN or
any suburban TCs. Do not support the change from MHS
zone to MHU zone because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Oppose

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.

For reasons given in Council evidence, but based on


criteria of Corporation's proximity crteria

No Change
MHU

Oppose

MHU / MHS

Oppose in Part

MHU

Oppose

No Change

Proximity to services (education and Open Space as well as


consistent transition with neighbouring THAB zone.
Consider MHU appropriate zoning for sites
Do not support the reasoning of Council. Recognise the
constraint issues for proximity to employment and
facilities (by Motorway) but note if there is THAB and MHU
on this peninsula (as supported by Council for Princes St
East and Brady Road) then consider may warrant more
collective change to the area. (accepting issues of

No Change

Proximity to centre
No Change

MHU

Oppose

No Change
MHU

Oppose

Proximity to centre
Acknowledge the proximity criteria in this location, though
surrounding properties meet the criteria and the extent of
property within the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3043

839-3050

839-306

839-3069

839-3071

839-3072

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 29, WALTERS 29 Walters Road Mount


ROAD, Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 348,


PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

348, PANAMA
ROAD

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 35, KONINI ROAD, Greenlane


Suburban at 35,
Greenlane.
KONINI ROAD,
Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 5, FENCIBLE 5, FENCIBLE


PLACE, Otahuhu from PLACE, Otahuhu
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 5, FRANK


5, FRANK GREY
GREY PLACE, Otahuhu PLACE, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Otahuhu

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 261, MOUNT 261 Mount Smart Onehunga


SMART ROAD, Royal Road Onehunga
Oak-Penrose from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Southern Isthmus Rezone 11, COPPINS


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

30

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, a RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to a THAB zone, RFN, main arterials or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Konini
Road. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
therefore the notified zoning of SH is retained because
the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH/MHS zone
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU for 5
Fencible Place, Otahuhu. This property is away from the
Otahuhu TC and the RFN. The MHS zone complements
the neighbourhood's built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU but propose SH
to MHS. Managing the flooding risk on this site does not
require maintaining the SH zoning. This property is
however, away from the TC and the RFN. The MHS zone
complements the built character of the area and
rezoning to the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from MHU to THAB on Mount
Smart Road. The sites has good access to the RFN but is
not close to a centre, POS space or urban facilities
required to support the highest level of residential
intensification. MHU complements the neighbourhood's
planned urban character along Mount Smart Road and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone). Consider the contiguous
nature of Corporation's stock and the current nature of
development (2 storeys) could reasonably be increased to
provide for MHU scale development in this area. Do not
accept that flooding constraint necessary to restrict zoning
and can be addressed through zoning controls.
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone). Consider the contiguous
nature of Corporation's stock and the current nature of
development (2 storeys) could reasonably be increased to
provide for MHU scale development in this area. Do not
accept that flooding constraint necessary to restrict zoning
and can be addressed through zoning controls.

No Change

Proximity to Centre and facilities (education) - consider


MHS appropriate zone
No Change
MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

Proximity indicates this site support MHU zone, while


constraint of Motorway noted, access provided via Princes
Street East. Proximity to Open Space to east.

MHS

Recognise constraint of Motorway to access centre and


facilities to the west of site.
No Change

MHU

Support

Proximity to FN support MHU zone.


839-3077

11 Coppins Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to the RFN, main road, LC and higher density areas.
MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre supports MHU zone in this location

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3079

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone


3/36,1/36,4/36,6/36,
2/36,5/36, FERNDALE
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

3/36,1/36,4/36,6/ Mount
36,2/36,5/36,
Wellington
FERNDALE ROAD,
Mount Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

31

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

Consitent with proximity principles


839-3081

839-3089

839-3090

839-3092

839-3097

839-3102

Southern Isthmus Rezone 25, ARAPUNI 25, ARAPUNI


AVENUE, Onehunga AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 194,


194 Panama Road Mount
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington Wellington
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 111,


ROCKFIELD ROAD,
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

111, ROCKFIELD Onehunga


ROAD, Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 10, TUATA


10, TUATA
Onehunga
STREET, One Tree Hill STREET, One Tree
from Mixed Housing Hill
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 31B,31A,


31B,31A, LUKE
Otahuhu
LUKE STREET,
STREET, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 6, ARRON


6 Arron Street
STREET, Ellerslie from Ellerslie
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ellerslie

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change from MHS to MHU on Arapuni Avenue.


This site is located close to the RFN large public open
spaces. The proposed rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

MHU

.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The site is
No Change
not close to a centre, or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone


on Rockfield Road because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
on Tuata Street because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Propose
alternative zone of MHS. Managing the flooding risk on
these sites does not require maintaining the SH zoning.
These sites are however a distance from the TC and the
RFN. The MHS zone complements the built character of
the area and the proposed rezoning to the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. This site is
within the Pre-1944 BDC. The outcomes the Pre-1944
BDC seeks to achieve generally align with the objectives
of the MHS zone and therefore retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

On basis of criteria support MHU on this site. Note the


THAB to west of site (zoned by Council) may result in
change to planned character of area and consider MHU a
useful transition from this zoning as well. Do not support
COuncil consideration of flooding, can be managed by
development controls of plan (as appropriate). Proximity
to employment and education facilities.

No Change

Consider area suitable for higher intensity development


recognising proximity of open space and wider land use
development (See evidence)
No Change
MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

Proximity to site to centre and education facilities support


MHU. Context Council's position of 'spot zoning' both on
basis of Corporations submission for wider review of
zoning and given extent of corporations land holdings (and
submissions) in this immediate area.

MHS

Given proximity constraint of zoning support Council's


recommendation
No Change
MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of effect of Pre-1944


Demolition Control. Recognise the character values of the
area but consider these can be managed by the
development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3104

839-3111

839-3112

839-3113

839-3115

839-3127

839-3129

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 26,


26, NORMANS
NORMANS HILL
HILL ROAD,
ROAD, Onehunga
Onehunga
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 6, FRANK


6, FRANK GREY
GREY PLACE, Otahuhu PLACE, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 384,


PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

384 Panama Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 48, ORANGA 48, ORANGA


AVENUE, Penrose
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 104, HILLSIDE 104 Hillside Road Mount


ROAD, Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 49, STATE


AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

49, STATE
AVENUE,
Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 3, MAROA


ROAD, One Tree Hill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, MAROA ROAD, Onehunga


Onehunga

Onehunga

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

32

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHU on Normans Hill No Change


Road. This site is affected by the HC and therefore
retained as SH zone because the outcomes the HC seeks
to achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No Change
retention of MHS. This property is away from the TC and
the RFN. The MHS zone complements the built character
of the area and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to RFN or LCs. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Oranga Avenue because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support change from MHS to MHU. The site is close to
MHU
higher density areas and provides for a transition area.
Therefore rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Maroa Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.

Recognise constraint of Motorway to access centre and


facilities to the west of site.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider proximity criteria make MHU appropriate zone


and appropriate given the comprehensive land holding of
the Corporation and the THAB zone proposed by Council
to the North-east of site

Consider site appropriate for MHU given proximity to


education facilities, open space and local centre. Not also
the employment in reasonable proximity to the east.

Consider site appropriate for MHU given proximity to


education facilities, open space and local centre. Not also
the employment in reasonable proximity to the east. Do
not support Council's contention of spot zoning given both
Corporations submission seeking wider zoning review and
the scale of submission/property interest in this area.

Consider site appropriate for MHU given proximity to


education facilities, open space and local centre. Not also
the employment in reasonable proximity to the east. D

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-313

839-3133

839-3141

839-3157

839-3168

839-3196

839-3211

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 221 PENROSE


Urban at 221,
ROAD
PENROSE ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 10,


10, ROOSEVELT
ROOSEVELT AVENUE, AVENUE,
Onehunga from SH to Onehunga
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 4, SPOONER


LANE, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4 SPOONER LANE Mount


Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 34,


34, ROOSEVELT
ROOSEVELT AVENUE, AVENUE,
Onehunga from SH to Onehunga
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 10,8, YEE


PLACE, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 14, FORBES
STREET, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,8, YEE PLACE

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 50,


WAITANGI ROAD,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

50, WAITANGI
Onehunga
ROAD, Onehunga

14 Forbes Street
Onehunga

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHU

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

33

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU. The site is located close to


No Change
areas of THAB and is relatively close to a centre. The
retention of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change from SH to MHU on Roosevelt Avenue. MHU
The application of MHU to this site is supported as it has
good access to the RFN and aligns with proposed zoning
changes on Roosevelt Avenue. The proposed rezoning to
MHU is the most appropriate way to meet the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is
No Change
affected by flooding constraints and is away from the
centre. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHU on Roosevelt Avenue. MHU
The application of MHU to this site is supported as it has
good access to the RFN, large public open space and
aligns with proposed zoning changes on Roosevelt
Avenue. The proposed rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU. The site has good
MHU
access to the RFN and other public transport options and
is located close to areas of THAB. The rezoning of zone to
MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Forbes
No Change
Street. This site is not close to the RFN or any local or TCs
and applying MHU would create spot zoning. Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way of achieving the MHS
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to MHU zone on No Change
Waitangi Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Consider site appropriate for MHU given proximity to


Centre and open space. Note also the employment in
reasonable proximity to the west.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In


addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).
Recognise the site is on edge of proximity criteria, however
consider proximity to facilties (including open space),
employment and the comprehensive scale of the
Corporation landholdings in this area mean extention of
MHU to reserve boundary appropriate. Do not support
Council's assertion of spot zoning, both on basis of

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3214

839-3222

839-3224

839-3232

839-3240

839-3248

839-3249

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 4, MONTEREY 4, MONTEREY


Otahuhu
AVENUE, Otahuhu
AVENUE, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 36, MASSEY


AVENUE, Greenlane
from SH to Mixed
Housing Urban.

36, MASSEY
AVENUE,
Greenlane

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 42, KAWAU


ROAD, Greenlane
from SH to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

42, KAWAU
Greenlane
ROAD, Greenlane

Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Rezone 137, LADIES 137 Ladies Mile


MILE, EllerslieEllerslie
Remuera from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Ellerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 41, JARMAN


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount
Wellington

41 JARMAN
ROAD

SH

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 31, WALTERS 31 Walters Road Mount


ROAD, Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 78, ORANGA 78, ORANGA


AVENUE, Penrose
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Onehunga

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

34

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No Change
retention of MHS. This property at 4 Monterey Avenue,
Otahuhu is away from the Otahuhu TC and the RFN. The
MHS zone complements the built character of the area
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU on Massey
No Change
Avenue. This sites is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
has flooding constraints The retention of the notified
zoning aligns with the outcomes sought by the Pre-1944
BDC, is the most appropriate way of achieving the SH
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS on Kawau Road. No Change
This property is an area of identified HC. The outcomes
the HC seeks to achieve generally aligns with the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. This site is


within the Pre-1944 BDC. The outcomes the Pre-1944
BDC seeks to achieve generally align with the objectives
of the MHS zone and therefore retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Support MHU zone on basis of proximity criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Support MHU zone on basis of proximity criteria. Opposed


Pre-1944 Demolition Control and consider flooding risks (if
any) can be managed by development controls in Unitary
Plan.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.

No Change

Support change from MHS to MHU. The site has good


MHU
access to the RFN and other public transport options and
is located close to areas of THAB. The rezoning of the
zone to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to a RFN, higher density areas or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Oranga Avenue because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

Support MHU zone on basis of proximity criteria. Opposed


Pre-1944 Demolition Control

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone). Consider the contiguous
nature of Corporation's stock and the current nature of
development (2 storeys) could reasonably be increased to
provide for MHU scale development in this area. Do not
accept that flooding constraint necessary to restrict zoning
and can be addressed through zoning controls.
Consider site has proximity to schools, local centre and
open space. Also note employment to east. Do not support
Council's contention of spot zoning on basis of
Corporation's submission and particularly on extent of
landholding in this area.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3254

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Rezone 33,


PANORAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33 PANORAMA
ROAD, Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 211, CHURCH
STREET,1,
MOUNTJOY PLACE,
Onehunga.
Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 199, CHURCH
STREET, Onehunga.

211, CHURCH
STREET, &1
Mountjoy Place
Onehunga

LOCALITY

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

35

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Site has proximity to centre and employment


839-326

839-327

839-3284

839-3291

839-3316

839-3321

Onehunga

199 Church Street Onehunga


Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 19,


19, CAMERON
CAMERON STREET,
STREET,
Onehunga from
Onehunga
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 3, RYBURN


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 19,
ROOSEVELT AVENUE,
Onehunga from SH to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

3 Ryburn Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 33, BAILEY


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33 BAILEY ROAD Mount


Mount wellington Wellington

19, ROOSEVELT
AVENUE,
Onehunga

Onehunga

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

Support retention of THAB zone on Church Street. These No Change


sites are close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The
retention of THAB is the most appropriate way of
achieving the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB zoning on Church Street. This No Change


site is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The retention
of THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change from MHS to THAB on Cameron Street.


This site adjoins Onehunga TC and THAB zoned
properties and has good access to the RFN. The
proposed rezoning is the most appropriate way of
achieving the THAB zone objectives and gives effect to
the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support change from MHS to MHU. The site is close to a MHU


LC and RFN. Therefore rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to THAB on Roosevelt MHU


Avenue; propose alternative zoning of MHU. This sites
has good access to the RFN and large public open space
but is not close enough to a centre to support the highest
level of intensification. The application of MHU
complements the neighbourhood's planned urban
residential built character and is the most appropriate
way to achieve zone objectives of and gives effect to the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

On basis of proximity criteria

MHU

Oppose
Site has proximity to centre and employment

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3337

839-3350

839-3358

839-336

839-3360

839-3362

839-3364

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 18, COPPINS


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18 Coppins Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 60,


WAITANGI ROAD,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 31, CADMAN
AVENUE, Greenlane
from SH to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

60, WAITANGI
Onehunga
ROAD, Onehunga

31, CADMAN
AVENUE,
Greenlane

Greenlane

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 426 Panama Road Mount


Suburban at 426,
Mount Wellington Wellington
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 330,


PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

330 Panama Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 7, WALTERS


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7 Walters Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 5, BERTRAND 5 BERTRAND


ROAD, Mount
ROAD
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount
Wellington

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

36

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to RFN, the main road, LC and higher density areas.
MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Waitangi Road because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change from SH to MHS on Cadman
No Change
Avenue. These sites are affected by flooding constraints
and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. The site does not meet the
No Change
objectives and policies of THAB and MHU zone and
therefore retention of the MHS zone is appropriate. It is
set away from LCs, higher density areas and the RFN.
Therefore retention of MHS is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas or a LC. Also, any changes
would result in spot zoning and therefore not
appropriate. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Consider proximity criteria impacted by inlet and physical


access constraints, support Council position
Consider site has proximity to local centre and open space
- though note on edge of proximity criteria. Also note
employment to east. Do not support Council's contention
of spot zoning on basis of Corporation's submission and
particularly on extent of landholding in this area. on this
basis, support MHU zone

Consider flooding constraints (if any) can be managed by


development controls and not underlying zoning.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site has higher density zones on Panama Road to East.


Consider the large land holdings of Corporation provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopmetn of area. While
this site is outside proximity criteria (compared to sites to
east) support rezoning of peninsula.

Consider proximity to Centre and FN make MHU zone


appropriate

MHU

Oppose
Site on FN and has proximity to Centre, consider suitable
for MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-337

839-339

839-3393

839-340

839-3400

839-3405

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 228, MOUNT
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY, Mount
Wellington.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
228 MOUNT
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY

LOCALITY

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


13 ARANUI ROAD Mount
Housing and
Wellington
Apartment Buildings
at 13, ARANUI ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

THAB

Southern Isthmus Rezone 15A,15,


15A,15, RIELLY
RIELLY PLACE, Mount PLACE
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount
Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 100, ALFRED


Urban at 100, ALFRED STREET,
STREET, Onehunga. Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 20, WATER


STREET, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20, WATER
Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu

MHU

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 165, MOUNT 165 Mount Smart Onehunga


SMART ROAD, Royal Road, Penrose
Oak-Penrose from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 48,


PORTMAN ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

37

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a No Change


LC and has good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a No Change


LC and has good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to higher density areas or LCs. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU on Alfred Street. This site is
No Change
close to the RFN and thereby an appropriate location for
intensification. The application of MHU is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No Change
retention of MHS. This property is away from the
Otahuhu TC and the RFN. The MHS zone complements
the built character of the area and retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU on Mount Smart No Change
Road. This site is affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the notified zoning is appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site on FN and has proximity to Centre, consider suitable


for MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Site on FN and has proximity to Centre, consider suitable
for MHU

MHU

Oppose

Site has proximity to Centre, consider suitable for MHU


839-3422

48 PORTMAN
ROAD

Mount
Wellington

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas or LCs. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

Site on FN, consider suitable for MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3423

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 17,


PORTMAN ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
17 PORTMAN
ROAD

LOCALITY

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

38

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas or LCs. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Site on FN, consider suitable for MHU


839-3424

839-3426

839-3428

839-3431

839-3448

839-3450

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2, CAMERON 2, CAMERON


STREET, Onehunga
STREET,
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 82, GREY


82, GREY STREET, Onehunga
STREET, Onehunga
Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 167,


167, ROCKFIELD
ROCKFIELD ROAD,
ROAD, Penrose
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Penrose

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 17, MAROA


ROAD, One Tree Hill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Onehunga

17, MAROA
ROAD, One Tree
Hill

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 33, WALTERS 33 Walters Road Mount


ROAD, Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 77, ARANUI


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

77 ARANUI ROAD Mount


Wellington

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change from MHS to THAB on Cameron Street. THAB


This site adjoins Onehunga TC and other THAB sites. The
proposed rezoning is the most appropriate way of
achieving the THAB zone objectives and gives effect to
the RPS.

Support change from MHS to THAB on Grey Street. This THAB


site is close to the Onehunga TC and RFN. The proposed
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and will therefore give effect
to the RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS to THAB on


MHU
Rockfield Road but support a less intensified zone of
MHU. This site has good access to the RFN but is not
close enough to any centres to support the highest level
of residential intensification. The proposed rezoning to
MHU will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate for the existing neighbourhood, is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Maroa Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to a RFN, higher density areas or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas or LCs. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site has proximity toservices and local centre consider


suitable for MHU
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria from zoining principles).
Consider the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and
the current nature of development (2 storeys) could
reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale
development in this area. Do not accept that flooding
constraint necessary to restrict zoning and can be

Site on FN, consider suitable for MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3471

839-3473

839-3474

839-3485

839-3499

839-350

839-3510

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 44, JOLSON


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 12, ARAPUNI
AVENUE, Onehunga
from SH to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

44 Jolson Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

12, ARAPUNI
AVENUE,
Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 150,1/150,


ROCKFIELD ROAD,
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

150,1/150,
Penrose
ROCKFIELD ROAD,
Penrose-Ellerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 78,


COMMISSARIAT
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 32, KAWAU
ROAD, Greenlane
from SH to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

78
COMMISSARIAT
ROAD

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

39

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU on Arapuni
MHS
Avenue; propose alternative zoning of MHS. This site is
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and MHU has not been
applied recognising the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
application of MHS is also supported to ensure this site
has consistent zoning with surrounding properties.
The proposed change to MHS requires an out-of scope to
the adjoining property at 14 Arapuni Ave to avoid spot
zoning. Relevant further details can be found in
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield No Change
Road. This site is not located around any centres and
does not have good access to the RFN. Site is also remote
from LC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas or LCs. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria). Consider the
contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the current
nature of development in surrounding area (including
THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis, consider the area
could reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHS

Support
Recognise proximity - do note issues of compatibility with
business zone to rear of site.

MHU

Oppose

Site on FN, consider suitable for MHU


32, KAWAU
Greenlane
ROAD, Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


244 PENROSE
Mount
Housing and
ROAD
Wellington
Apartment Buildings
at 244, PENROSE
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 30, PAIHIA
30, PAIHIA ROAD, Onehunga
ROAD, OrangaOranga-Ellerslie
Ellerslie from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

THAB

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

Do not support change from SH to MHS on Kawau Road. No Change


This property is in an area of identified HC. The outcomes
the HC seeks to achieve generally aligns with the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a No Change


LC and has good access to the RFN and other public
transport options. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone on
No Change
Paihia Road because spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Therefore the
retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

MHS

Oppose

THAB

Support

MHS

Support in Part

Consider the controls of the character area can be


managed by development controls of the overlay and that
proximity criteria support higher intensity residential
activity.

Consider the site is not proximate to centre or FN. Do not


support Council's assertion of spot zoning, given
Corporation landholding and submission matters raised.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3516

839-3533

839-3534

839-3550

839-3555

839-3556

839-3561

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2, PAIHIA


ROAD, OrangaEllerslie from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 72, JOLSON
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

2, PAIHIA ROAD,
Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 76, JOLSON


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 252,
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

76, JOLSON ROAD Mount


Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 368,


PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

368 Panama Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 338,


PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

338 Panama Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 47,


WAITANGI ROAD,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

47, WAITANGI
Onehunga
ROAD, Onehunga

72 Jolson Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

252, PANAMA
ROAD

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone


on Paihia Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support partial change from SH to MHS but not MHU.
Managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone, the site is proposed to be rezoned
to MHS. MHS is appropriate on this site as it does not
meet the objectives of the MHU zone, it is away from
centres, higher density areas and the RFN. The site
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not
close to a RFN, higher density areas or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not
close to a RFN, higher density areas or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

40

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHS

Support in Part

Consider the site is not proximate to centre or FN. Do not


support Council's assertion of spot zoning, given
Corporation landholding and submission matters raised.

MHS
SH

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No Change

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria). Consider the
contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the current
nature of development in surrounding area (including
THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis, consider the area
could reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale
development in this area.
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria from zoining principles).
Consider the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and
the current nature of development (2 storeys) could
reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale
development in this area. Do not accept that flooding

No Change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Waitangi Road because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

Site has higher density zones on Panama Road to East.


Consider the large land holdings of Corporation provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopmetn of area. While
this site is outside proximity criteria (compared to sites to
east) support rezoning of peninsula.

Site has higher density zones on Panama Road to East.


Consider the large land holdings of Corporation provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopmetn of area. While
this site is outside proximity criteria (compared to sites to
east) support rezoning of peninsula.

Site has higher density zones on Panama Road to East.


Consider the large land holdings of Corporation provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopmetn of area. While
this site is outside proximity criteria (compared to sites to
east) support rezoning of peninsula.
Consider site has proximity to local centre and open space
- though note on edge of proximity criteria. Also note
employment to east. Do not support Council's contention
of spot zoning on basis of Corporation's submission and
particularly on extent of landholding in this area. on this
basis, support MHU zone

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-357

839-3572

839-3581

839-3587

839-3592

839-3601

839-3621

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 32A MARUA


Suburban at 32A
ROAD, Ellerslie
MARUA ROAD,
Ellerslie-St Johns.

LOCALITY

Ellerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 155,


PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

155 Panama Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 26, MASSEY


AVENUE, Greenlane
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

26, MASSEY
AVENUE,
Greenlane

Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Rezone 27A, BALLIN 27A Ballin Street


STREET, Ellerslie from Ellerslie
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ellerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 15, CADMAN 15, CADMAN


AVENUE, Greenlane AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Greenlane
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Greenlane

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 43, NAMATA 43 Namata Road, Onehunga


ROAD, One Tree Hill- Onehunga
Oranga from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 98, AVENUE 98, AVENUE


ROAD, Otahuhu from ROAD, Otahuhu
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Otahuhu

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

41

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of MHS. The site is not in close


No Change
proximity to existing or planned public transport network
or large urban facilities, furthermore, MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character .
The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Massey
Avenue. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC The
retention of the notified zoning aligns with the outcomes
sought by the Pre-1944 BDC, is the most appropriate way
of achieving the SH zone objectives and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not
close to a THAB zone, the RFN or the TC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Cadman
Avenue. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
propose to retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
on Namata Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property is away from Otahuhu TC and the
RFN. The MHS zone complements the built character of
the area and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site has higher density zones on Panama Road to East.


Consider the large land holdings of Corporation provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopmetn of area. While
this site is outside proximity criteria (compared to sites to
east) support rezoning of peninsula.

No Change

Recognise proximity - do note issues of compatibility with


business zone to rear of site.
No Change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No Change

Site has proximity to Centre, consider suitable for MHU


No Change

MHU

Oppose
Consider area suitable for higher intensity development
recognising proximity of open space and wider land use
development (See evidence)

No Change
MHU

Oppose
Site has proximity to Centre, consider suitable for MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3633

839-3634

839-365

839-3662

839-3669

839-369

839-370

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 21, BOAKES


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21, BOAKES ROAD Mount


Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 44, ALIFORD


AVENUE, One Tree
Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 53,
FRANK GREY PLACE,
Otahuhu.

44 Aliford Avenue, Ellerslie


Ellerslie

53, FRANK GREY


PLACE, Otahuhu.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 213, STATION 213, STATION


ROAD, Penrose from ROAD, Penrose
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 25,


MURDOCH STREET,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 63, WAIPUNA
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 60,
BALLARAT STREET,
Ellerslie-St Johns.

Otahuhu

Penrose

25, MURDOCH
Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu

63 Waipuna Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

60 Ballarat Street Ellerslie


Ellerslie

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

THAB

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHS

REASONS

42

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas or LCs. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Aliford Avenue because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support retention of the MHS zone. The property away No Change
from good public transport and the Otahuhu TC. The
MHS zone complements the built character of the area
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support change from MHU to THAB on Station
No Change
Road. This site is close to the RFN but does not have
access to any town centres urban facilities to support the
highest level of residential intensification. The retention
of MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS No Change


zoning. This property is away from the Otahuhu TC and
the RFN. The MHS zone complements the built character
of the area and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as No Change
THAB as the site is in close proximity to local facilities and
public transport networks. Therefore the retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS zone as the site is not
No Change
within close proximity to existing or planned public
transport network or large urban facilities. The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site has proximity to education and large Corporation


landholding to facilitate comprehensive development of
sites, consider suitable for MHU

Proposed Zoning by Council accords with the proximity


criteria set out in evidence

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3701

839-3708

839-3709

839-3720

839-3726

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 17A,17,


WILLIAM AVENUE,
Greenlane from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 47, JOLSON


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

17A,17, WILLIAM Greenlane


AVENUE,
Greenlane

47 Jolson Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 19, HOKONUI 19, HOKONUI


ROAD, Otahuhu from ROAD, Otahuhu
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2A-2D,


CHURCH STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

2A-2D, CHURCH
STREET,
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1,3, JORDAN 1,3, JORDAN


AVENUE, Onehunga AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Otahuhu

Onehunga

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU/THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

REASONS

43

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support change from MHS to MHU on William Avenue. MHU


These sites are located close to the RFN local centres and
large public open spaces. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
in support of the propose change from MHS to MHU on
William Avenue, we proposed to rezone surrounding
sites is Greenlane from MHS to MHU as they have good
access to the RFN and Greenlane LC. MHU complements
the planned urban residential built character of the
neighbourhood and therefore the proposed rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the MHU zone
objectives and gives effects to the RPS. Scope for these
changes is provided by a central-wide submission (619812). Refer to attachment D for further details of affected
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC, albeit a
neighbourhood centre is close by. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support a change from MHS to THAB. The area is
in close proximity to the proposed Otahuhu HI zone. To
limit potential reverse sensitivity issues, it proposed to
limit intensification of the site. The MHS zone also
complements the neighbouring built character with the
nearby Pre-1944 BDC area. It is considered MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Church
Street. This site is located around a number of SH/MHS
zoned properties and retained as MHS as spot zoning in
this location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The proposed retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives zone and gives
Do not support change from MHU to THAB on Jordan
Avenue. The site is located close to the RFN, large public
open space but is not close enough to the Onehunga TC
to support the highest level of residential intensification.
Retention of MHU allows some intensification and
complementing the planned suburban character of
properties on Cameron Street. The proposed retention of
MHU most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

No Change

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria). Consider the
contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the current
nature of development in surrounding area (including
THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis, consider the area
could reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale
development in this area.

No Change

Consider site has proximity to Otahuhu Centre and FN


routes, with employment areas to the west
No Change

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Consider site has good topography to support higher


development, linear residential form along Beachcroft
Road and separated from other sites on Church Street.
proximity criteria support MHU zone

No Change

The proximity of the site to FN, Centre and open space


facilities considered suitable for THAB development,
particularly given the size and opportunity of this site.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3730

839-3733

839-3739

839-375

839-3754

839-3757

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 35, WALTERS 35 Walters Road Mount


ROAD, Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 7, MAROA


ROAD, One Tree Hill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7, MAROA ROAD, Greenlane


One Tree Hill

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 39,41,


JOLSON ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39 and 41 Jolson
Road Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 50, SPRING
STREET, Onehunga.

50 Spring Street
Onehunga

Mount
Wellington

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 28, ARAPUNI 28, ARAPUNI


AVENUE, Onehunga AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 27A,1/2527A,1/25-6/25,


6/25, AMY STREET,
AMY STREET
Ellerslie from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Ellerslie

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

REASONS

44

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to a RFN, higher density areas or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Maroa Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC, albeit a
neighbourhood centre is close by. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB on Spring Street;
MHS
propose alternative zoning of MHS. This site is affected
by the Pre-1944 BDC and is rezoned MHS recognising
that THAB zone is generally incompatible with the values
of the areas that are proposed to be retained within the
Pre-1944 BDC. The application of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the MHS zone objectives,
the outcomes sought by the Pre-1944 BDC and gives
effect to the RPS.
The proposed rezoning to MHS is an out of scope change,
relevant further details are in Attachment F.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Arapuni
No Change
Avenue This sites is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
retain the zoning and is therefore retained because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. The sites are No Change
not directly adjacent to a LC and MHU complements the
built form and enables a finer grained approach. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone). Consider the contiguous
nature of Corporation's stock and the current nature of
development (2 storeys) could reasonably be increased to
provide for MHU scale development in this area. Do not
accept that flooding constraint necessary to restrict zoning
and can be addressed through zoning controls.

Site has proximity to education and open space and large


Corporation landholding to facilitate comprehensive
development of sites, consider suitable for MHU
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria). Consider the
contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the current
nature of development in surrounding area (including
THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis, consider the area
could reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale
development in this area.

Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control determining


zoning. Consider sites surrounding THAB and appropriate
zoning for Centre and FN proximity.

MHS

Support in Part

THAB

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHS

Sites neighbour THAB and consider the proximity criteria


appropriate for THAB zoning

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3762

839-377

839-3779

839-3786

839-3800

839-3801

839-3802

839-3827

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Rezone 3, NGAPORA 3, NGAPORA


STREET, Onehunga
STREET,
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Retain Town Centre
at 32,32A, STATION
ROAD, Otahuhu.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2A,


KENTUCKY STREET,
Ellerslie from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Onehunga

32,32A, STATION Otahuhu


ROAD, Otahuhu

2A Kentucky
Street Ellerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 57, FRANK


57, FRANK GREY
GREY PLACE, Otahuhu PLACE, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Ellerslie

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 39, BOAKES


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39, BOAKES ROAD Mount


Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 4, ALLEN


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 101,
PANORAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, ALLEN ROAD

Southern Isthmus Rezone 45, STATE


AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

45, STATE
AVENUE,
Onehunga

Mount
Wellington

101, PANORAMA Mount


ROAD
Wellington

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

TC

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

TC

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone


on Ngapora Street because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of existing TC zoning. The PAUP
aims to revitalise the Otahuhu TC and this includes
providing for residential development with additional
height limits and limiting the further expansion of the
TC. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the TC zoning and gives
effect to the RPS and centres hierarchy.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. The site and
surrounding sites are affected by a flooding constraint
which limits further development. Therefore the
retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support the change from SH to MHS. Managing the
flooding risk on this site does not require maintaining the
SH zoning. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and rezoning to the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not
close to higher density areas or LCs. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS

45

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHU

Oppose

TC

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Site has proximity to education and open space and local


centre. Further the large Corporation landholding in area
can facilitate comprehensive development of sites,
consider suitable for MHU (oppose assertion of spot
zoning)

No Change

No Change

Proximity cirteria support MHU and consider any flooding


risk can be managed by development controls on site
(where land already residential activity).

MHS

No Change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas or LCs. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or LCs. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

Site has proximity to Centre, consider suitable for MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

Proximity to Centre supports MHU zone in this location


Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In
addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3829

839-3831

839-3847

839-3870

839-3873

839-3878

839-3880

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 41A, HILLSIDE 41A & 41B Hillside Mount
ROAD, Mount
Road Mount
Wellington
Wellington from
Wellington
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 263,


PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

263, PANAMA
ROAD

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 71, HIGH


STREET, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

71, HIGH STREET, Otahuhu


Otahuhu

Mount
Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 58, WALTERS 58 Walters Road Mount


ROAD, Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 24, ARAPUNI 24, ARAPUNI


AVENUE, Onehunga AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 35, RIELLY


35, RIELLY PLACE
PLACE, Mount
Wellington from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 25, WALTERS 25 Walters Road
ROAD, Mount
Mount Wellington
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

46

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is at No Change


some distance from both the LC and RFN, whilst it is
opposite MHU area, the rezoning would create a spot
zone where it is not appropriate. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites is
No Change
not close to a RFN, higher density areas or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property is away from the Otahuhu TC and
the RFN. The MHS zone complements the built character
of the area and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is at
some distance from the LC, the RFN and higher density
areas, the rezoning would also result in spot zoning.
MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Arapuni
Avenue. This sites is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
therefore the notified zoning and retained because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. The site is
affected by flooding constraints, furthermore, the site is
away from centres and main transport options.
Therefore the retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not
close to a RFN, higher density areas or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Proximity to Local Centre

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site has higher density zones on Panama Road to East.


Consider the large land holdings of Corporation provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopmetn of area. While
this site is outside proximity criteria (compared to sites to
east) support rezoning of peninsula.

No Change

Proximity to Town Centre


No Change

MHU

Oppose

By proximity to centres and facliites support MHU


No Change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No Change

No Change

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN and Local Centre


Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone). Consider the contiguous
nature of Corporation's stock and the current nature of
development (2 storeys) could reasonably be increased to
provide for MHU scale development in this area. Do not
accept that flooding constraint necessary to restrict zoning
and can be addressed through zoning controls.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3881

839-3883

839-3890

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 52, CAMP


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

52 Camp Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 267,


267 Panama Road Mount
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington Wellington
Mount Wellington
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 13,


13, WHITFORD
WHITFORD AVENUE, AVENUE
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Mount
Wellington

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

47

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is at


some distance from the LC and higher density areas, the
rezoning would also result in spot zoning. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support partial change from SH to MHS but not MHU.
Managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone, this site is proposed to be
rezoned to MHS. However, the site is located at a
distance from the RFN and other facilities and therefore
does not meet the objectives for the MHU zone. The site
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not
close to higher density areas or LCs. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS

No Change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is at


some distance from the LC, RFN and higher density areas.
MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is
affected by the NGC, furthermore it is not close to a RFN,
higher density areas or LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Propose
alternative zone of MHU. The site is close to the Otahuhu
TC, the neighbouring THAB zone and RFN for public
transport. The MHU zone provides for a step between
the higher intensity TC and THAB zoning and the MHS of
the area. The MHU zone complements the built character
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change in zoning from MHS to MHU.
Retain MHS zoning. This property at 16 Fencible Place,
Otahuhu is remote from the TC and the RFN. The MHS
zone complements the built character of the area and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Proximity to Local Centre


MHS
SH

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site has higher density zones on Panama Road to East.


Consider the large land holdings of Corporation provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopmetn of area. While
this site is outside proximity criteria (compared to sites to
east) support rezoning of peninsula.

No Change

Proximity to FN and Metropolitan Centre


839-3904

839-3907

839-3909

839-3916

Southern Isthmus Rezone 9, COPPINS


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 36,
MATAROA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9 Coppins Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

36 Mataroa Road, Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 34, HUTTON 34, HUTTON


Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 16, FENCIBLE 16, FENCIBLE


PLACE, Otahuhu from PLACE, Otahuhu
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Otahuhu

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHS

Support

Consider proximity to facilities restricted by physical


access (inlet) constraints. Support Council's zoning
position

No Change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Do not support the need for MHS in response to the NGU


(in other areas MHU zone confirmed as appropriate).
Further note that MHU and THAB considered appropriate
in neighbouring sites. Recognise the constraint of SH1 to
access facilities to the west, but proximate to schools and
open space.

MHU

No Change

Recognise constraint of Motorway to providing access


centre and facilities to the west of site.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3931

839-3933

839-3935

839-427

839-429

839-4354

839-447

839-454

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 62,


CAMERON STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 4A, KONINI
ROAD, Greenlane
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
62, CAMERON
STREET,
Onehunga

LOCALITY

Onehunga

4A, KONINI
Greenlane
ROAD, Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Rezone 66, AVENUE 66, AVENUE


ROAD, Otahuhu from ROAD, Otahuhu
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


14 Allright Place Mount
Housing and
Mount Wellington Wellington
Apartment Buildings
at 14, ALLRIGHT
PLACE, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 36, PAIHIA ROAD, Onehunga
Suburban at 36,
Onehunga
PAIHIA ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

THAB

Southern Isthmus Rezone 21,23,


WAIRAKEI STREET,
Greenlane from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21,23, WAIRAKEI
STREET,
Greenlane

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 40, PORTAGE
ROAD, Otahuhu.

40, PORTAGE
ROAD, Otahuhu.

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 25, TE KAWA


Suburban at 25, TE
ROAD, One Tree
KAWA ROAD, One
Hill-Greenlane.
Tree Hill-Greenlane.

Greenlane

Otahuhu

Greenlane

MHS

THAB

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHS

REASONS

48

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone


on Cameron Street because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
on Konini Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the change from MHS to MHU. The site at 66
Avenue Rd is close to the Otahuhu TC, the neighbouring
THAB zone and the RFN for public transport. The MHU
zone provides for a step between the higher intensity TC
and THAB zoning and the MHS of the area. The MHU
zone complements the built character and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as
THAB as the site is in close proximity to local
employment and mixed use areas. Therefore the
retention of THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road. This is


not located close to a suburban town centre of the RFN.
MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU in Wairakei Street.
These sites are located close to the RFN (Great South
Road) and have good access to the Greenlane LC. The
proposed rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

MHU

No Change

MHU

Support retention of the THAB. The THAB zoning is


No Change
located close to the Otahuhu TC and public transport
network including public transport interchange. The
retention of the THAB zoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Te Kawa Road. This
No Change
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the

Consider proximity to Centre and FN make MHU zone


appropriate. Do not support assertion of spot zoning as
fails to recognise integrated assessment sought in
Corporation submission (supported by evidence)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-455

839-458

839-4751

839-4752

839-4753

839-4754

839-4755

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


1, RYBURN ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

1 Ryburn Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/123, CHURCH
STREET, Otahuhu.

1/123, CHURCH
Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 4, MAROA


ROAD, One Tree Hill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, MAROA ROAD, One Tree Hill


One Tree Hill

Southern Isthmus Rezone 19,17,


RANGIPAWA
ROAD,19,21,17,23,
HOUPARA STREET,
One Tree Hill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 7,6,
NGAPORA STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,17,
Onehunga
RANGIPAWA
ROAD,19,21,17,23
, HOUPARA
STREET, One Tree
Hill

MHS

7,6, NGAPORA
STREET,
Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


11,13,15,14,7,9,
TUATA STREET,1/4520/45, ROCKFIELD
ROAD, One Tree Hill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13,15,14,7,9, Onehunga
TUATA
STREET,1/4520/45, ROCKFIELD
ROAD, One Tree
Hill

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1,3,5, TUATA


STREET,13, MAROA
ROAD, One Tree Hill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,3,5, TUATA
STREET,13,
MAROA ROAD,
One Tree Hill

MHS

Onehunga

Onehunga

MU

THAB

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MU. MU is appropriate in this


location. It is opposite a LC and adjacent to THAB and on
a public transport network and therefore retention of
MU is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB. The THAB zoning at
1/123 Church St, Otahuhu is located next to the Otahuhu
TC and excellent public transport routes. The retention
of the THAB zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effects to
the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
on Maroa Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
on Rangipawa Road and Houpara Street because spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

49

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No Change

No Change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review
MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Ngapora Street Road and Houpara Street because spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Therefore the retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Tuata
No Change
Street and Rockfield Road because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The retention of MHS is the most appropriate
way to achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone on


No Change
Tuata Street and Maroa Road because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4756

839-4757

839-4758

839-4759

839-4760

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 38,42,40,


ALIFORD AVENUE,
One Tree Hill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 27,29,
MAROA ROAD, One
Tree Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 10,10A,
KONINI ROAD,
Greenlane from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,42,40,
Ellerslie
ALIFORD AVENUE,
One Tree Hill

Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,13,


KONINI ROAD,13,
HARONUI ROAD,
Greenlane from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13, KONINI
ROAD,13,
HARONUI ROAD,
Greenlane

27,29, MAROA
ROAD, One Tree
Hill

Onehunga

10,10A, KONINI
Greenlane
ROAD, Greenlane

Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Rezone 6A,6, KONINI 6A,6, KONINI


Greenlane
ROAD, Greenlane
ROAD, Greenlane
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

50

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Aliford Avenue because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Maroa Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Konini
No Change
Road. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
the notified zoning is retained because the outcomes the
Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Konini
No Change
Road and Haronui Road. These sites are affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and support retention the notified zoning
because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve
are generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Konini


No Change
Road. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
therefore the notified zoning of MHS is retained because
the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH/MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Consider proximity to Centre and FN make MHU zone


appropriate. Do not support assertion of spot zoning as
fails to recognise integrated assessment sought in
Corporation submission (supported by evidence)

Consider proximity to Centre and FN make MHU zone


appropriate. Do not support assertion of spot zoning as
fails to recognise integrated assessment sought in
Corporation submission (supported by evidence)

Consider proximity to Centre and FN make MHU zone


appropriate. Do not support assertion of spot zoning as
fails to recognise integrated assessment sought in
Corporation submission (supported by evidence)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4761

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1A, WENDELL


PLACE,5,7, WAIOHUA
ROAD, Greenlane
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1A, WENDELL
Greenlane
PLACE,5,7,
WAIOHUA ROAD,
Greenlane

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

51

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support change from MHS to MHU on Wendell Place and MHU


Waiohua Road. These sites are located around the RFN
and the application of MU and the application of MHU
zoning complements that planned urban character of the
neighbourhood. The proposed rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
In support of the proposed changes from MHS to MU on
Wendell Place and Waiohua Road, we propose to rezone
surrounding sites in Greenlane from MHS to MHU as
they have good access to the RFN and Greenlane LC.
MHU complements the planned urban residential built
character of the neighbourhood. Therefore, proposed
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the MHU
zone objectives and gives effects to the RPS. Scope for
these changes is provide by central-wide submission
(6198-12). Refer to attachment D for further details of
affected properties.

839-4762

839-4763

839-4764

839-4765

Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,11A,


WAIOHUA ROAD,
Greenlane-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,11A,
Greenlane
WAIOHUA ROAD,
Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Rezone 3,5,3A,7,


CADMAN AVENUE,
Greenlane from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 33,31,29,
WAIOHUA ROAD,
Greenlane-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3,5,3A,7,
CADMAN
AVENUE,
Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Rezone 39,37,35,


CADMAN AVENUE,
Greenlane from SH to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

39,37,35,
CADMAN
AVENUE,
Greenlane

Greenlane

33,31,29,
Greenlane
WAIOHUA ROAD,
Greenlane

Greenlane

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone


on Waiohua Road because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Cadman
Avenue. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC
and therefore the notified zoning of MHS is retained
because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve
are generally aligned with the objectives of the SH/MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Waiohua
Road. These site are not located near any suburban town
centres or the RFN, while 31 and 33 Cadman avenue are
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. The retention the MHS is
the most appropriate way of achieving the zone
objectives, aligns with aligned with outcome the Pre1944 BDC seeks to achieve and gives effect to the RPS.
Partially support change from SH to MHS on Cadman
Avenue. The properties at 37-39 Cadman Road are
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retained as SH
because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve
are generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning 35 Cadman Avenue from SH to MHS as
this property has no constraints an no longer justifies its
SH zoning. The proposed rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the MHS zone objectives and

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No Change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review
No Change
MHU

Oppose
Oppose Pre-1944 Demolition Control Overlay and any
impact on zoning

No Change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Pre-1944 Demolition Control Overlay and any
impact on zoning

No Change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support 1944 Demolition control and consider


underlying zoning more appropriately MHS on basis of
proximity criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4766

839-4767

839-4768

839-4769

839-4770

839-4771

839-4772

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 76,74, TE


KAWA ROAD,29,
KAWAU ROAD,
Greenlane from SH to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 62,64,
WAIOHUA ROAD,
Greenlane-Ellerslie
from SH to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

76,74, TE KAWA Greenlane


ROAD,29, KAWAU
ROAD, Greenlane

2,64, WAIOHUA Greenlane


ROAD, Greenlane-

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 18,20,


18,20, KAWAU
Greenlane
KAWAU ROAD,
ROAD, Greenlane
Greenlane from SH to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 15A,15,


15A,15, KAWAU Greenlane
KAWAU ROAD,
ROAD, Greenlane
Greenlane from SH to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 3,5,7,


3,5,7, MASSEY
MASSEY AVENUE,
AVENUE,
Greenlane from SH to Greenlane
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 4, MASSEY


AVENUE,2/235,1/235
,237, CAMPBELL
ROAD, Greenlane
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 10,12, TE


KAWA ROAD, One
Tree Hill-Greenlane
from SH to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Greenlane

4, MASSEY
Greenlane
AVENUE,2/235,1/
235,237,
CAMPBELL ROAD,
Greenlane

SH/MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

52

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHS on Te Kawa Road No Change


and Kawau Road. These sites are located in an area of
identified HC. The outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally aligns with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS
Oppose

Do not support change from SH to MHS on Waiohua


No Change
Road. These sites are affected by the HC and retain the
notified SH zone because the outcomes the HC seeks to
achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Do not support change from SH to MHS on Kawau Road. No Change


These sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified
SH zone because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Do not support change from SH to MHS on Kawau Road. No Change


These sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified
SH zone because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Do not support change from SH to MHS on Massey


No Change
Avenue. These sites are located an area of identified HC.
The outcomes the HC seeks to achieve generally aligns
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHS

Oppose

Oppose

Oppose

Oppose

Greenlane

SH

MHS

Do not consider SH zone is necessary to support


development controls of character overlay. Consider site
more appropriately zoned MHS

Do not consider SH zone is necessary to support


development controls of character overlay. Consider site
more appropriately zoned MHS

Do not consider SH zone is necessary to support


development controls of character overlay. Consider site
more appropriately zoned MHS

Do not consider SH zone is necessary to support


development controls of character overlay. Consider site
more appropriately zoned MHS

Do not consider SH zone is necessary to support


development controls of character overlay. Consider site
more appropriately zoned MHS

Do not support change from SH and MHS to MHU;


No Change
support retention of SH and MHS. The property at 4
Massey Ave is affected by the HC and retained as the
notified SH zone because the outcomes the HC seeks to
achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.
MHU

10,12, TE KAWA
ROAD, One Tree
Hill-Greenlane

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

The properties at 1/235, 2/235 and 237 Campbell Road


are not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is
also remote from LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support change from SH to MHS on Te Kawa Road Te
MHS
Kawa Road because spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The retention of
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve zone
objectives of the gives effect to the RPS.

Oppose
Do not support the character overlay requiring SH zone,
consider the character outcomes can be achieved with the
development controls of the Overlay. Site is within
proximity of facilities (education) and reasonable
proximity to FN route but more notably employment areas
(Mixed use and Light Industry).

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4773

839-4774

839-4775

839-4776

839-4777

839-4778

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 12, HOUPARA


STREET,4/38,1/38,42,
40,3/38,2/38,
ORANGA AVENUE,
Penrose from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

12, HOUPARA
Onehunga
STREET,4/38,1/38,
42,40,3/38,2/38,
ORANGA AVENUE,
Penrose

Southern Isthmus Rezone 47,47A,


ORANGA AVENUE,
Penrose from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 8,6, OLEA
ROAD, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

47,47A, ORANGA Onehunga


AVENUE, Penrose

Southern Isthmus Rezone 43, ORANGA


AVENUE,1,3, OLEA
ROAD, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

43, ORANGA
AVENUE,1,3,
OLEA ROAD,
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 12,14,16,


OLEA ROAD,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 19,17,
ORANGA AVENUE,
Penrose from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

12,14,16, OLEA
Onehunga
ROAD, Onehunga

8,6, OLEA ROAD,


Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

19,17, ORANGA
Onehunga
AVENUE, Penrose

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

53

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Houpara Street and Oranga Avenue because spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Oranga Avenue because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Olea Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Olea Road and Oranga Avenue because spot zoning
in this location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Olea Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Therefore the retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Oranga Avenue because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site is next to Neighbourhood Centre and consider MHU


appropriate

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site does not meet the proximity criteria in this location.


However, local centre, open space access and the
Corporations landholding provide opportunity for
integrated redevelopment of this area and wider land use
changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of spot zoning by
Council given the scale and nature of the Corporations
submission (particulalry in this location).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4779

839-4780

839-4781

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 178,


ROCKFIELD ROAD,
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
178 Rockfield
Road Penrose

LOCALITY

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 258,260,


MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Royal OakPenrose from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

258,260, MOUNT Onehunga


SMART ROAD,
Royal OakPenrose

Southern Isthmus Rezone


13,15,21,17,9A,11A,
EDMONTON
AVENUE,270,272,268
,274,266, MOUNT
SMART ROAD,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

13,15,21,17,9A,11 Onehunga
A, EDMONTON
AVENUE,270,272,
268,274,266,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Onehunga

(Note: The PAUP


zoning of 9A-21
Edmonton Avenue is
MHS and MHU for
266-274 Mount
Smart Road)

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS/MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

54

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield No Change


Road. This site is not close to the RFN or any local
centres. This retention aligns with objectives of the MHS
zone. A further reason for not rezoning this property is
that it directly adjoins a large area of LI and rezoning may
create reverse sensitivity. Therefore the retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change from MHU to THAB on Mount
No Change
Smart Road. These sites have good access to the RFN but
are not located close enough to any centres to support
the highest level of residential intensification. The
retention of MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS and MHU to THAB on MHU


Edmonton Avenue and Mount Smart Road; propose to
retain MHU zoning for 266-274 Mount Smart Road and
rezone 9A-21 Edmonton Avenue from MHS to MHU.
These sites have good access to the RFN but are not close
enough to any suburban town centres to justify THAB.
The proposed rezoning to MHU aligns with the planned
urban residential character for the neighbourhood, is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Given proximity to employment and opportunity for
comprehensive development, consider MHU appropriate

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4782

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 23,


EDMONTON
AVENUE,278,276,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

23, EDMONTON Onehunga


AVENUE,278,276,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS/MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

(Note: The notified


zoning for 276-278
Mount Smart Road is
MHU and MHS for 23
Edmonton Avenue).

REASONS

55

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS and MHU to THAB on MHU


Edmonton Avenue and Mount Smart Road; propose
retention of MHU for 276-278 Mount Smart Road and
rezoning of 23 Edmonton Avenue from MHS to MHU.
These sites have good access to the RFN but are not close
enough to any suburban town centres to support the
highest level of residential intensification. The
application of MHU aligns with the planned urban
residential character for the area and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

meets proximity criteria


839-4783

Southern Isthmus Rezone


288,294,282,292,284,
290,286, MOUNT
SMART
ROAD,27,33,31,37,29
,35, EDMONTON
AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

288,294,282,292, Onehunga
284,290,286,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD,27,33,31,37
,29,35,
EDMONTON
AVENUE,
Onehunga

SH/MHS/MH THAB
U

(Note: Notified
zoning is MHU for
282-284 Mount
Smart Road, SH for
288-294 Mount
Smart Road and MHS
for 27-37 Edmonton
Road)

Do not support change from SH, MHS and MHU to THAB MHU
Mount Smart Road and Edmonton Avenue. Propose to
retain MHU zoning for 282-286 Mount Smart road,
rezone 27-37 Edmonton Avenue from MHS to MHU, and
retain SH zoning for 288-294 Mount Smart Road. These
sites have good access to the RFN but are not close
enough to any suburban town centres to support the
highest level of residential intensification. The proposed
rezoning will complement the planned urban residential
character of the area, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Support

The properties at 288-294 Mount Smart Road are


affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Consider proximity to Centre, facilities and employment


make MHU zone more appropriate. Is on FN route.
839-4784

Southern Isthmus Rezone 159,161,157, 159,161,157,


Onehunga
ROCKFIELD ROAD,
ROCKFIELD ROAD,
Penrose-Ellerslie
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

THAB

Do not support change from MHS to THAB on Rockfield MHU


Road, but support a less intensified zone to MHU. These
sites have good access to the RFN but are not close
enough to any suburban town centres to support the
highest level of residential intensification. The
application MHU will enable intensification in the area
that is appropriate with for existing neighbourhood. The
proposed change is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4785

839-4786

839-4787

839-4788

839-4789

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 151,153,


151,153,
Onehunga
ROCKFIELD ROAD,
ROCKFIELD ROAD,
Penrose-Ellerslie
Penrose
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


59,49,55,47,57,51,53,
61,63, EDMONTON
AVENUE,147,145,143
,141,137,139,
ROCKFIELD ROAD,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

59,49,55,47,57,51 Onehunga
,53,61,63,
EDMONTON
AVENUE,147,145,
143,141,137,139,
ROCKFIELD ROAD,
Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 19,18,


GAMBIA
PLACE,24,30,20,
EDMONTON
AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,18, GAMBIA
PLACE,24,30,20,
EDMONTON
AVENUE,
Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


10,12,14,16,18,8,
EDMONTON
AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8,
Onehunga
10,12,14,16,18,8,
EDMONTON
AVENUE,
Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 3,5,


EDMONTON
AVENUE,1,3,5,7,5A5B, STATE AVENUE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

3,5, EDMONTON Onehunga


AVENUE,1,3,5,7,5
A-5B, STATE
AVENUE

MHS

Onehunga

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

56

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB on Rockfield MHU


Road; propose alternative zoning of MHU. These sites
have good access to the RFN but are not close enough to
any centres to support the highest level of residential
intensification. The proposed rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB on Edmonton MHU
Avenue and Rockfield Road, but support a less intensified
zoning of MHU. These sites have good access to the RFN
but are not close enough to any centres to support the
highest level of residential intensification. The proposed
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change from MHS to MHU on Gambia Place and MHU


Edmonton Avenue. These sites are located close to RFN
and the application of the MHU zoning will complement
the planned urban residential character of the
neighbourhood. The proposed rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change from MHS to MHU on Edmonton


MHU
Avenue. The properties are located close to the RFN and
large public open spaces. The application of MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to THAB on State


MHU
Avenue and Edmonton Avenue, but support a less
intensified zone of MHU. These sites have good access to
the RFN and the application of MHU will complement the
planned urban residential character of the
neighbourhood as the area is not adjacent to any centre.
The proposed rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHU zone objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Site meets the proximity criteria in this location. In


addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4790

839-4791

839-4792

839-4793

839-4794

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 15,14,16,


GAMBIA PLACE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 2,
EDMONTON
AVENUE,11,12,
GAMBIA
PLACE,11,13,15,
STATE AVENUE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone
19,63,67,21,65,
STATE
AVENUE,9,10,8,
GAMBIA
PLACE,42,40,
EDMONTON
AVENUE,9,8,7,
TOROKINA PLACE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 1,3,2,5,4,6,
GAMBIA
PLACE,36,34,
EDMONTON
AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15,14,16, GAMBIA Onehunga


PLACE, Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 129,135,127,


ROCKFIELD
ROAD,58,54,56,60,62
,64,66, STATE
AVENUE,46,
EDMONTON
AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

129,135,127,
Onehunga
ROCKFIELD
ROAD,58,54,56,60
,62,64,66, STATE
AVENUE,46,
EDMONTON
AVENUE,
Onehunga

2, EDMONTON
AVENUE,11,12,
GAMBIA
PLACE,11,13,15,
STATE AVENUE,
Onehunga

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

19,63,67,21,65,
Onehunga
STATE
AVENUE,9,10,8,
GAMBIA
PLACE,42,40,
EDMONTON
AVENUE,9,8,7,
TOROKINA PLACE,
Onehunga

MHS

1,3,2,5,4,6,
GAMBIA
PLACE,36,34,
EDMONTON
AVENUE,
Onehunga

MHS

Onehunga

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

57

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change from MHS to MHU on Gambia Place.


MHU
These sites have good access to the RFN and the
application of MHU will complement the planned urban
residential character of the neighbourhood. The
proposed rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHU zone objectives of this zone and gives
Support change from MHS to MHU on Edmonton
MHU
Avenue, State Avenue and Gambia Place. These sites
have good access to the RFN and the application of MHU
will complement the planned urban residential character
of the neighbourhood. The proposed rezoning is the
most appropriate way of achieving the MHU zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Support partial rezoning from MHS to MHU on Edmonton MHU


Avenue, State Avenue and Gambia Place. These sites
generally have good access to the RFN and MHU zone is
an appropriate zone for this location to enable
intensification. The proposed rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning properties at 67-69 Edmonton
Road and 7-9 Torokina Place to MHU. Further expansion
of the MHU to include these sites is not the most
appropriate way to achieve the MHU zone objectives and
does not give effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU on Edmonton Avenue MHU
and Gambia Place. The sites are located close to and
large public open spaces. The retention of zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield


Road, State Avenue and Edmonton Avenue. These sites
are not located around any suburban town centres and
do not have good access to the RFN. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4795

839-4796

839-4797

839-4798

839-4799

839-4800

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Rezone 61,59, STATE 61,59, STATE


AVENUE, Onehunga AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


38,44,42,36,40,44A,
STATE AVENUE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 30,28, STATE
AVENUE,5A,3,5,
WALLATH ROAD,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,44,42,36,40,44 Onehunga
A, STATE AVENUE,
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 31,29,


WAITANGI
ROAD,10,12,14,16,2,
4,6,8, STATE
AVENUE,9,8,7,
TREASURY PLACE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 13, NISSAN
PLACE,1,2, TREASURY
PLACE,20, STATE
AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31,29, WAITANGI Onehunga


ROAD,10,12,14,16
,2,4,6,8, STATE
AVENUE,9,8,7,
TREASURY PLACE,
Onehunga

MHS

13, NISSAN
PLACE,1,2,
TREASURY
PLACE,20, STATE
AVENUE,
Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 5,4,


TREASURY
PLACE,37A,39,37,
WAITANGI ROAD,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5,4, TREASURY
Onehunga
PLACE,37A,39,37,
WAITANGI ROAD,
Onehunga

30,28, STATE
AVENUE,5A,3,5,
WALLATH ROAD,
Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

58

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU. This site has good
MHU
access to the RFN and the application of MHU zoning will
complement the planned urban character of surrounding
properties. The proposed rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPs.

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Nissan Place, State Avenue and Treasury Place
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Treasury Place and Waitangi Road because spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In
addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In


addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).
Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the
proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4801

839-4802

839-4803

839-4804

839-4805

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 9,8, NISSAN


PLACE,41, WAITANGI
ROAD, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9,8, NISSAN
Onehunga
PLACE,41,
WAITANGI ROAD,
Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 4A, WALLATH


ROAD,59,51A,51C,51
B,51,53,55,57,
WAITANGI
ROAD,9,10,13,
SANTOS
PLACE,3,5,4,6,
NISSAN PLACE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4A, WALLATH
Onehunga
ROAD,59,51A,51C
,51B,51,53,55,57,
WAITANGI
ROAD,9,10,13,
SANTOS
PLACE,3,5,4,6,
NISSAN PLACE,
Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 4,6, WALLATH 4,6, WALLATH


Onehunga
ROAD, Onehunga
ROAD, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 22, STATE


AVENUE,1, NISSAN
PLACE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

22, STATE
AVENUE,1,
NISSAN PLACE,
Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 61,63,59,65,


ORANGA
AVENUE,1,3,2,
SANTOS
PLACE,1/6B,2/6B,3/6
B,4/6B,6A, WALLATH
ROAD, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

61,63,59,65,
Onehunga
ORANGA
AVENUE,1,3,2,
SANTOS
PLACE,1/6B,2/6B,
3/6B,4/6B,6A,
WALLATH ROAD,
Onehunga

Onehunga

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

59

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on and Nissan Place and Waitangi Road because spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on and Nissan Place and Waitangi Road because spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Wallath


No Change
Road. These site do not have good access to any
suburban town centres or the RFN. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on and Nissan Place and State Avenue because spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Oranga Avenue, Santos Place and Wallath Road
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In


addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).
Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In
addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).
Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the
proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In


addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4806

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone


138,142,136,140,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD,3,4, COWELL
PLACE,5,7, MOANA
AVENUE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone
Onehunga
138,142,136,140,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD,3,4,
COWELL
PLACE,5,7,
MOANA AVENUE,
Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS/MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Support change from MHS to MHU on Mount Smart


Road, Cowell Place and Moana Place. These sites have
good access to the RFN and the application of MHU will
complement the planned urban residential character of
the neighbourhood. The proposed rezoning is the most
appropriate way of achieving the MHU zone objectives
and gives effect to the RPS.

60

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

(Note: Notified
zoning is MHU for
136-142 Mount
Smart Road and MHS
for 3-4 Cowell Place
and 5-7 Moana
Aveneue)
839-4807

839-4808

839-4809

839-4810

839-4811

Southern Isthmus Rezone 8,7,6,


COWELL PLACE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 13,13A,
MOANA AVENUE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 3,5,4,7,6,
GOSPORT
PLACE,19,19A,
MOANA AVENUE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,10,12,9,
GOSPORT PLACE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 25,27,
MOANA AVENUE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8,7,6, COWELL
Onehunga
PLACE, Onehunga

13,13A, MOANA
AVENUE,
Onehunga

Onehunga

MHS

MHS

3,5,4,7,6,
Onehunga
GOSPORT
PLACE,19,19A,
MOANA AVENUE,
Onehunga

MHS

9, 10, 11, 12
Gosport Place,
Onehunga

MHS

Onehunga

11,10,12,9,
Onehunga
GOSPORT PLACE,
Onehunga

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Cowell


No Change
Place. These site are not close to higher density areas or
the RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Moana
No Change
Avenue. These site does not have good access to any
suburban town centres or the RFN. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Moana
No Change
Avenue and Gosport Place. These sites do not have good
access to any suburban town centres or the RFN. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Gosport
No Change
Place. These sites does not have good access to any
suburban town centres or the RFN. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Moana
No Change
Avenue. These site do not have good access to any
suburban town centres or the RFN. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and give effect

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In


addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).
Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In
addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In


addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).
Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In
addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).
Site meets the proximity criteria in this location,. In
addition, the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4812

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone


2/7A,3/7A,7A,
MARIRI
ROAD,10,8A,10A,3/4,
6,8,2/4,4, MOANA
AVENUE,128,126,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, One Tree HillOranga from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

2/7A,3/7A,7A,
Onehunga
MARIRI
ROAD,10,8A,10A,
3/4,6,8,2/4,4,
MOANA
AVENUE,128,126,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, One Tree
Hill

PAUP ZONE

MHS/MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Support change from MHS to MHU on Mariri Road,


Mount Smart Road, and Moana Avenue. The affected
properties are located close to the RFN, have good
access to the Onehunga TC and align with the planned
urban residential character of Mount Smart Road. The
proposed rezoning of MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

61

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

(Note: Notified
zoning is MHU for 16128 Mount Smart
Road and MHS for
properties on Mariri
Road and Moana
Avenue)
839-4813

839-4814

839-4815

Southern Isthmus Rezone


24,12A,12,24A,14,22,
MOANA
AVENUE,1/5,3,2,3/5,
4,7,6,2/5, SMITH
CRESCENT, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,12A,12,24A,14, Onehunga
22, MOANA
AVENUE,1/5,3,2,3
/5,4,7,6,2/5,
SMITH CRESCENT,
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 9, SMITH


CRESCENT,17,
MARIRI ROAD, One
Tree Hill-Oranga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9, SMITH
CRESCENT,17,
MARIRI ROAD,
One Tree Hill

Southern Isthmus Rezone 35A,35,


PLEASANT STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

35 & 35A Pleasant Onehunga


Street Onehunga

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Moana


No Change
Avenue and Smith Crescent. These sites do not have
good access to any suburban town centres or the RFN.
The retention of MHS is the most appropriate way of
achieving the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

The proximity of the site to Mount Smart Road / Onehunga


Mall (PT), the Centre of Onehunga and Royal Oak and open
space facilities (including Cornwall Park) considered
suitable for MHU.
Onehunga

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Smith Crescent and Mariri Road because spot zoning
in this location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Pleasant Street because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

The proximity of the site to Mount Smart Road / Onehunga


Mall (PT), the Centre of Onehunga and Royal Oak and open
space facilities (including Cornwall Park) considered
suitable for MHU.

The proximity of the site to Centres and education


consider appropriate for MHU.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4816

839-4817

839-4818

839-4819

839-4820

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 20A,20,


FORBES STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 10,13, YATES
STREET,9, MARIA
STREET, Onehunga
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

20A & 20 Forbes


Street Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone


10,12,14,16,18,4/16,
3/16,3/10,5/16,2/18,
14A,2/10,2/16,
CAMERON STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

10, 2/10, 3/10. 12, Onehunga


14, 14A, 16, 2/16,
3/16, 4/16, 5/16,
Lot 14 DP 193518,
18, 2/18,
Cameron Street,
Onehunga

10,13, YATES
Onehunga
STREET,9, MARIA
STREET,
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,9,13,15,


9, 11, 13, 15
CAMERON STREET,
Cameron Street,
Onehunga from
Onehunga
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 1/2012/20,1/22-12/22,
WADE AVENUE,1/912/9,1/7-12/7,
JORDAN AVENUE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Onehunga

Onehunga

1/20-12/20,1/22- Onehunga
12/22, WADE
AVENUE,1/912/9,1/7-12/7,
JORDAN AVENUE,
Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

62

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Forbes


No Change
Street. Site not close to higher density areas or the RFN.
Site is also remote from LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from SH to MHS on Yates Street No change
and Maria Street. These sites are surrounded by
properties affected the Pre-1944 BDC and HC overlays
and the application of MHS zoning would create spot
zoning. Do not support the proposed change because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Therefore the retention of the
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS
Support change from MHS to THAB on Cameron Street. THAB
These sites are close to the Onehunga TC and RFN. The
proposed rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and will
therefore give effect to the RPS.

Support change from MHS to THAB on Cameron Street.


These sites are close to the Onehunga TC and RFN. The
proposed rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and will
therefore give effect to the RPS.

THAB

Do not support change from MHU to THAB on Jordan


Avenue and Wade Avenue. These sites are located close
to the RFN, large public open space but are not close
enough to the Onehunga TC to support the highest level
of residential intensification. Retention of MHU allows
some intensification and complementing the planned
suburban character of properties om Cameron Street.
MHU most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
The proximity of the site to Centres and education
consider appropriate for MHU.

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

The proximity of the site to the Onehunga centre makes


THAB scale appropriate zoning. However, in
acknowledgement of the existing built development and
character values of this area consider MHU a more
appropriate transition for this site.

The proximity of the site to FN, Centre and open space


facilities considered suitable for THAB development,
particularly given the size and opportunity of this site.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4821

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2,4, JORDAN


AVENUE,117,109,97,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD,45A,45,43,47,
CAMERON STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

2,4, JORDAN
Onehunga
AVENUE,117,109,
97, MOUNT
SMART
ROAD,45A,45,43,
47, CAMERON
STREET,
Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS/MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

839-4823

839-4824

839-4825

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1,3,


HERETAUNGA
AVENUE,73,71,
ALFRED STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 46,48A,
GROTTO STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 13,15,
GROTTO STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,3, HERETAUNGA Onehunga


AVENUE,73,71,
ALFRED STREET,
Onehunga

MHS

46,48A, GROTTO
STREET,
Onehunga

Onehunga

MHS

13,15, GROTTO
STREET,
Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone


13B,13,15,17,19,13A,
17A,1A,5,3A,5A,
ARAPUNI AVENUE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3A, 3B, 5 , 5A, 13, Onehunga


13A, 13B, 15,
17,17A, 19
Arapuni Avenue,
Onehunga

MHS

MHS/MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change from MHS/MHU to THAB on


No Change
Jordan Avenue, Cameron Street and Mount Smart Road.
These properties are close to the RFN but not to the
Onehunga TC and other large facilities required to
support the level of intensification. The retention of MHU
is the appropriate way to the MHU zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning Properties at 45-47 Cameron
Street and 2 Jordan Street from MHS to THAB. These sites
are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and therefore retained
because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve
are generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

(Note: 2 Jordan
Avenue and 45-47
Cameron Street are
zoned MHS and
remaining properties
are zoned MHU)

839-4822

REASONS

63

THAB

The proximity of the site to FN, Centre and open space


facilities considered suitable for THAB development,
particularly given the size and opportunity of this site. do
not accept that 1944-Demolition Control should dictate
underlying zoning, or pre-empt any heritage listing /
scheduling process. Specific development site not affected
by Historic Heritage extent of place?

Support change from MHS to MHU. These properties are MHU


located close to the RFN and will enable intensification in
the neighbourhood. The application of MHU is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.

Support change from MHS to MHU on Grotto Street. The MHU


affected properties are located close to the RFN, areas of
THAB zone, town centres and large public open spaces.
The proposed rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU on Grotto Street.
No Change
These properties are located close to the RFN and will
enable intensification in the neighbourhood. The
proposed rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
of achieving the zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU on Arapuni Avenue.
The properties are located close to a RFN align with the
planned urban residential character of the
neighbourhood. The proposed rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support in Part
Explanation and Council reasoning supports rezoning and
consider this appropriate in line with Council's evidence.
Note that decision indicates no change - not supported.

MHU

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4826

839-4827

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 18,18A,20,


ARAPUNI AVENUE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 5, NAMATA
ROAD,11,13,15,1,5,7,
9, ROOSEVELT
AVENUE,200,202,198
,206,194,196,192,208
, MOUNT SMART
ROAD, One Tree HillOranga from SH to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
18,18A,20,
ARAPUNI
AVENUE,
Onehunga

LOCALITY

Onehunga

5, NAMATA
Onehunga
ROAD,11,13,15,1,
5,7,9, ROOSEVELT
AVENUE,200,202,
198,206,194,196,
192,208, MOUNT
SMART ROAD,
One Tree Hill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH/MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

64

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Arapuni


No Change
Avenue. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC
and retained as MHS because the outcomes the Pre-1944
BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

839-4829

839-4830

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2,4,6,


ROOSEVELT
AVENUE,11,13,
NAMATA ROAD, One
Tree Hill-Oranga from
SH to Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). However, recognise the site is
appropriate MHS zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Do not support change from SH and MHU to THAB on


MHU
Namata Road, Roosevelt Avenue and Mount Smart Road;
propose alternative zoning of MHU. These sites have
good access to the RFN but are not close enough to any
centres to support the highest level of residential
intensification. The proposed rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.

(Note: PAUP zoning


for properties at 192202, 206-208 Mount
Smart Road is MHU
and SH for properties
at 1, 5-15 Roosevelt
Avenue are zoned
SH.)

839-4828

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Consider proximity of site to centre means MHU is


appropriate zone. Recognise scale of site might enable
significant Corporation development opportunity, but
consider revised provisions for MHU appropriate to enable
this development (with scope for consenting processes to
enable some design flexibility).
2,4,6, ROOSEVELT Onehunga
AVENUE,11,13,
NAMATA ROAD,
One Tree Hill

Southern Isthmus Rezone 14,


14, ROOSEVELT
ROOSEVELT AVENUE, AVENUE,
Onehunga from SH to Onehunga
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,10,9,8,


MELVILLE PLACE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Onehunga

11,10,9,8,
MELVILLE PLACE,
Onehunga

SH/MHS/MH MHU
U

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

Support change from MHS to MHU on Roosevelt Avenue MHU


and Namata Road. These site are close to the RFN and
thereby an appropriate location for intensification. The
proposed rezoning is the most appropriate way of
achieving the MHU zone objectives and gives effect to
the RPS.

Support change from SH to MHU on Roosevelt Avenue. MHU


The application of MHU to this site is supported as it has
good access to the RFN and aligns with proposed zoning
changes on Roosevelt Avenue. The proposed rezoning is
the most appropriate way to meet the MHU zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Melville Place because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

While recognise proximity to centre and FN routes make


site more appropriate as MHS, consider the location
adjacent to major open space (Fergusson Domain) and
scale of sites held by Corporation mean that MHU zone
generally appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4831

839-4832

839-4833

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 10,12,8,6,


10,12,8,6, PAIHIA Onehunga
PAIHIA ROAD, Oranga- ROAD, OrangaEllerslie from Mixed Ellerslie
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 32,26,30,28,


ROOSEVELT AVENUE,
Onehunga from SH to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

32,26,30,28,
ROOSEVELT
AVENUE,
Onehunga

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 12,


WAITANGI
ROAD,25,39,27,33,43
,31,37,29,35,41,
ROOSEVELT
AVENUE,19,13,12,15,
14, BOW PLACE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

12, WAITANGI
Onehunga
ROAD,25,39,27,33
,43,31,37,29,35,4
1, ROOSEVELT
AVENUE,19,13,12,
15,14, BOW
PLACE, Onehunga

(Note: PAUP zoning


for 12 Waitangi Road
is MHS and SH for all
other affected
properties)

Onehunga

SH/MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

65

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Paihia Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHU on Roosevelt Avenue. MHU
These site are close to the RFN and thereby an
appropriate location for intensification. The proposed
rezoning is the most appropriate way to meet the MHU
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

Recognise proximity constraints in this area

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Do not support change from MHS to THAB on Waitangi MHU


Road or change from SH to THAB on Roosevelt Avenue
and Bow Place; propose alternative zoning of MHU for all
sites affected by this submission to MHU. These sites
have good access to the RFN but are not close enough to
any centres to support the highest level of residential
intensification. The proposed rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4834

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 21,23,


ROOSEVELT
AVENUE,8,6,
WAITANGI
ROAD,10,1,3,2,4,7,6,
9,8,3A, BOW
PLACE,216,214,212,2
18,234A,228,226,224
,222,220, MOUNT
SMART ROAD,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

21, 23, Roosevelt Onehunga


Avenue, 1, 2, 3,
3A, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, State Avenue,
Onehunga
6, 8 Waitangi
Road, Onehunga
212, 214, 216,
218, 220, 222,
224, 226, 228,
234A Mount
Smart Road,
Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH/MHS/MH THAB
U

REASONS

66

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change from SH, MHS and MHU to THAB MHU
on Roosevelt Avenue, Waitangi Road, Bow Place and
Mount Smart Road; propose alternative zoning of MHU
for all sites affected by this submission point. These
properties have good access to the RFN but are not close
enough to any suburban town centres to support the
highest level of residential intensification. The proposed
rezoning is the most appropriate way of achieving the
MHU zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

(Note: PAUP zoning is


MHS for 6-8 Waitangi
Road, MHU for 212228 Mount Smart
Road; and SH for 1, 2,
3, 3a, 4 and 6-10 Bow
Place and 21-23
Roosevelt Avenue)
Consider proximity to Centre, facilities and employment
make MHU zone more appropriate. Is on FN route.
839-4835

Southern Isthmus Rezone 18,


WAITANGI ROAD,49,
ROOSEVELT AVENUE,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

18, WAITANGI
ROAD,49,
ROOSEVELT
AVENUE,
Onehunga

Onehunga

SH/MHS

THAB

Do not support change from SH and MHS to THAB on


MHU
Waitangi Road and Roosevelt Avenue; propose
alternative zoning of MHU for both sites. These
properties have good access to the RFN but are not close
enough to any suburban town centres to support the
highest level of residential intensification. The proposed
rezoning is the most appropriate way of achieving the
MHU zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

(Note: 18 Waitangi
Road is zoned MHS
and 49 Waitangi Road
is zoned SH).

839-4836

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1,3,2, HULL


PLACE, Onehunga
from SH to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,3,2, HULL
Onehunga
PLACE, Onehunga

SH

MHU

Support change from SH to MHU on Hull Place. These


MHU
sites have good access to the RFN and are located around
large public open space. MHU complements the planned
urban residential character of the areas. The proposed
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve MHU
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4837

839-4838

839-4839

839-4840

839-4841

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,12, HULL


PLACE, Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,12, HULL
Onehunga
PLACE, Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 38,40,


ROOSEVELT
AVENUE,20,21,17,16,
19,18,16A, HULL
PLACE, Onehunga
from SH to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,40, ROOSEVELT Onehunga


AVENUE,20,21,17,
16,19,18,16A,
HULL PLACE,
Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

SH/MHS/MH MHU
U

Southern Isthmus Rezone


64A,64,66A,66, Onehunga
64A,64,66A,66,
WAITANGI ROAD,
WAITANGI ROAD,
Onehunga
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone
24,18,26,20,22, Onehunga
24,18,26,20,22,
PAIHIA ROAD,
PAIHIA ROAD, Oranga- Oranga-Ellerslie
Ellerslie from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1,3, MAYS


1,3, MAYS ROAD, Onehunga
ROAD, Onehunga
Onehunga
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

67

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Hull Place. These sites do not have good access to the
RFN and spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The application MHU zoning
is the most appropriate way of achieving the MHU zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Support partial change from SH and MHS to MHU on
MHU
Roosevelt Avenue and Hull Place. The application of MHU
to 38-40 Roosevelt Avenue and 1-3, 19-21 Hull Place is
supported as it aligns with proposed zoning changes on
Roosevelt Avenue. They are located in close proximity to
the RFN and will enable the development of intensive
residential activities. The Proposed rezoning to MHU
gives effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives for the zone.
Do not support the application of MHU to remaining
properties on Hull Place as MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Waitangi Road because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Paihia Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU on Mays Road.
These sites are affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change
MHU

Oppose

Do not support flooding constraints determining zoning


(for sites already residential in use), consider constraints
can be appropriately managed through development
controls

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4842

839-4843

839-4844

839-4846

839-4847

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 251, MOUNT


SMART
ROAD,20/28A,9/28A,
24/28A,8/28A,38A,38
B,21/28A,38D,38E,40
,1/18,12/22,12/20,44
C,44B,44A,46A,42C,4
6B,34D,34E,15/28A,4
2B,34A,34B,34C,42A,
36D,36E,36B,36C,36A
,38C,10/18,14/28A,1/
22,1/20,1/28,2/28,1/
28A, FELIX STREET,
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

251, MOUNT
Onehunga
SMART
ROAD,20/28A,9/2
8A,24/28A,8/28A,
38A,38B,21/28A,3
8D,38E,40,1/18,1
2/22,12/20,44C,4
4B,44A,46A,42C,4
6B,34D,34E,15/28
A,42B,34A,34B,34
C,42A,36D,36E,36
B,36C,36A,38C,10
/18,14/28A,1/22,
1/20,1/28,2/28,1/
28A, FELIX
STREET,
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 45,43,41,


45,43,41, AMY
AMY STREET, Ellerslie STREET
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ellerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 19,19A,


PUKERANGI
CRESCENT, Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ellerslie

19,19A,
PUKERANGI
CRESCENT,
Ellerslie

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 17B,17A,


17A, 17B Walpole Ellerslie
WALPOLE STREET,
Street Ellerslie
Ellerslie from MHS to
MHU.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 3,2,5,4,7,6,8, 3,2,5,4,7,6,8,


Mount
SIMMONDS LANE,
SIMMONDS LANE Wellington
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

68

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support change from MHS to THAB on Mount


No Change
Smart Road and Felix Street. This is a large group of
properties which are adjacent to Winstone's Wallboards
gib board manufacturing plant 37 Felix Street. The
application of MHU to this site will allow for more
residential intensification close to an established light
industrial activity which may create reverse sensitivity
issues. In addition, Ms Jarrette Wickham's evidence
provided for Hearing Topics 051-054 (27 July 2015)
proposed to rezone a large area east of this site from LI
MHU (height to 4 storey) Oppose
to HI, including the western side of Maurice Road and 210 Henderson Place. This area is established with
industrial activities, and the expansion of MHU would
the increase the number of sensitive activities closer to
more sensitive uses including residential properties.
Therefore, retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the relevant objectives of the
zone and to gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, the RFN or a TC/LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to higher density areas, the RFN or a TC/LC.
MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU zone. The sites are
MHU
located close to a RFN and will enable intensification in
the neighbourhood. MHU allows intensification in
appropriate areas and this is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support change from MHS to MHU. The sites have good MHU
access to the RFN and other public transport options and
are located close to areas of THAB. The rezoning of the
zone to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Corporation sought THAB in submission. Recognise


proximity issues to Centre (though is on the FN route for
accesibility). Consider MHU zoning appropriate and similar
in scale to exiting development. Furthermore, consider the
Light Industrial zoning to the east currently provides two
storey business park frontage (industrial rear of site) as
such consider additional height - e.g. up to 4 storeys
(16.5m). Note proposed Heavy Industry rezoning not
proximate to this area (e.g. beyond 250m) and not
considered necessary constraint to rezoning of this site.
Consider redevelopment opportunities can manage
flooding through development controls proposed in
Unitary Plan.

Oppose
Proximity to Ellerslie center confirms appropriateness of
MHU

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Ellerslie center confirms appropriateness of
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4848

839-4849

839-4850

839-4851

839-4852

839-4853

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone


11,10,13,12,15,14 Mount
11,10,13,12,15,14,9, ,9, SIMMONDS
Wellington
SIMMONDS LANE,
LANE
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 18,12,14,16,


YEE PLACE, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,12,14,16, YEE
PLACE

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1,3, YEE


PLACE, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 24,26,23, YEE
PLACE, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone
144,142,1/134,140,1
42A,134A,134B,134C,
2/134, BARRACK
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone
10,12,14,16,6,8,
MALONE ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,3, YEE PLACE

24,26,23, YEE
PLACE

Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

144,142,1/134,14 Mount
0,142A,134A,134 Wellington
B,134C,2/134,
BARRACK ROAD

10,12,14,16,6,8,
MALONE ROAD

Mount
Wellington

MHS

MHS

SH/MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

69

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change from MHS to MHU. The sites have good MHU
access to the RFN and other public transport options and
are located close to areas of THAB. The rezoning of the
zone to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change from MHS to MHU. The sites have good MHU
access to the RFN and other public transport options and
are located close to areas of THAB. The rezoning of the
zone to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change from MHS to MHU. The sites have good MHU
access to the RFN and other public transport options and
are located close to areas of THAB. The rezoning of the
zone to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU. The sites have good MHU
access to the RFN and other public transport options and
are located close to areas of THAB. The rezoning of the
zone to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH & MHS to MHU. The
No Change
sites are set at some distance from the centre and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Three sites are SH zone and are affected
by flooding constraints and are proposed to remain as
SH. In this instance the retention of the SH and MHS
zones is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of these zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. MHS
No Change
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support flooding constraints determining zoning


(for sites already residential in use), consider constraints
can be appropriately managed through development
controls. Further note the proximity criteria support MHU
and nature of Corporation landholding may enable
localised flooding constraints to be addressed in site
design (e.g. through development)

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4854

839-4855

839-4856

839-4859

839-4860

839-4861

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone


11,13,15,21,17,19 Mount
11,13,15,21,17,19,7,9 ,7,9, MALONE
Wellington
, MALONE ROAD,
ROAD
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


25,27,23,2/29,1/2 Mount
25,27,23,2/29,1/29, 9, HIGGS ROAD
Wellington
HIGGS ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


Mount
1/34,32,30,28,36,2/3 1/34,32,30,28,36, Wellington
4, HIGGS ROAD,
2/34, HIGGS
Mount Wellington
ROAD
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 10,12,8,6,


SPOONER LANE,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,12,8,6,
SPOONER LANE

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 3,2, LAVAS


PLACE, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3,2, LAVAS PLACE Mount


Wellington

Mount
Wellington

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

70

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. MHS


No Change
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. These sites


are at a distance from centres and are affected by
flooding constraints. Retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS

No Change

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

Southern Isthmus Rezone


77,75,83,81,87,79 Mount
77,75,83,81,87,79,85, ,85, FERNDALE
Wellington
FERNDALE ROAD,
ROAD
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
partially constrained by the NGC and are away from
higher density areas and centres. Furthermore, MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Do not support the need for MHS in response to the NGU


(in other areas MHU zone confirmed as appropriate). MHU
appropriate given sites proximity to Centre, employment
and open space facilities

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4862

839-4863

839-4864

839-4865

839-4866

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 43,43A,


FERNDALE ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

43,43A,
FERNDALE ROAD

Southern Isthmus Rezone 31,


HARWOOD
ROAD,1/62A,11/62A,
22/62A,10/62A,
BANKS ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31, HARWOOD
Mount
ROAD,1/62A,11/6 Wellington
2A,22/62A,10/62
A, BANKS ROAD

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission

Southern Isthmus Rezone 133,


133, PENROSE
PENROSE
ROAD,1/6,2/6,
ROAD,1/6,2/6, RYDAL RYDAL DRIVE
DRIVE, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone
146,150,144,152,1/1
40,154,156,158,148,1
42A,142C,142B,168,1
42D,164,166,2/140,1
60,162, ARANUI
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

71

Mount
Wellington

146,150,144,152, Mount
1/140,154,156,15 Wellington
8,148,142A,142C,
142B,168,142D,16
4,166,2/140,160,1
62, ARANUI
ROAD,

Southern Isthmus Rezone


1/123,2/123,2/12 Mount
1/123,2/123,2/125,1/ 5,1/125, ARANUI Wellington
125, ARANUI ROAD, ROAD
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission
MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission
MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4867

839-4868

839-4869

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1/872/87,87,3/87-4/87,


COMMISSARIAT
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone
2/103A,1/103A,
ARANUI ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1/872/87,87,3/874/87,
COMMISSARIAT
ROAD

Southern Isthmus Rezone 91, ARANUI


ROAD,27, WHITFORD
AVENUE,18, SKINNER
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

91, ARANUI
ROAD,27,
WHITFORD
AVENUE,18,
SKINNER ROAD,

LOCALITY

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

72

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

2/103A,1/103A,
ARANUI ROAD

Mount
Wellington

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

Mount
Wellington

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission
839-4870

839-4871

839-4872

Southern Isthmus Rezone 19,17,


19,17, WHITFORD Mount
WHITFORD AVENUE, AVENUE
Wellington
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


10,12B,10A,12A,
10,12B,10A,12A,
WHITFORD
WHITFORD AVENUE, AVENUE
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


1/130,2/130,3/130,4/
130,5/130, PANAMA
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount
Wellington

1/130,2/130,3/13 Mount
0,4/130,5/130
Wellington
Panama Road
Mount Wellington

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from centres and MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
at some distance from the LC, RFN and rezoning would
result in spot zoning. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4873

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1/182,2/182,


PANAMA
ROAD,128,132,130,1
26, CARBINE ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1-2/182 Panama Mount


Road, and 126,
Wellington
128, 130, 132
Carbine Road
Mount Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

73

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The sites are No Change
not close to a RFN or a LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission
839-4874

839-4875

839-4876

839-4877

Southern Isthmus Rezone


202,212,202A,206 Mount
202,212,202A,206,
Panama Road
Wellington
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 216,218,


216 & 218
Mount
PANAMA ROAD,
Panama Road
Wellington
Mount Wellington
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 224,222,


222 & 224
Mount
PANAMA ROAD,
Panama Road
Wellington
Mount Wellington
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 234,236,238, 234,236,238


Mount
PANAMA ROAD,
Panama Road
Wellington
Mount Wellington
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban. 234 is
SH in notified PAUP

SH/MHS

THAB

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The sites are No Change
not close to a centre, or the RFN and the area is mainly
suburban dwellings. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission
THAB

THAB

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The sites are No Change
not close to a centre, or the RFN and the area is mainly
suburban dwellings. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The sites are No Change
not close to a centre, or the RFN and the area is mainly
suburban dwellings. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from SH & MHS to MHU. The
MHS
sites are not close to higher density areas, the RFN or a
LC. However, one site (234 Panama Rd) is proposed to be
rezoned from SH to MHS as managing flooding risks on
this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

THAB

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Also note that THAB proposed in
proximity so area of change already proposed.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4878

839-4879

839-4880

839-4881

839-4882

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone


244,246,248,242, Mount
244,246,248,242,
PANAMA ROAD, Wellington
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
244,246 and 248 are
SH as per notified

SH/MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


258,260,256,254,
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

258,260,256,254 Mount
Panama Road
Wellington
Mount Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 151,147,149,


PANAMA ROAD,4,6,
JOLSON ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

151,147,149,
Mount
PANAMA
Wellington
ROAD,4,6,
JOLSON ROAD
Mount Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 18,20,


JOLSON ROAD,163,
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,20, JOLSON
Mount
ROAD,163,
Wellington
PANAMA ROAD
Mount Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 175,171,


PANAMA
ROAD,26,30,28,
JOLSON ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

175,171, PANAMA Mount


ROAD,26,30,28, Wellington
JOLSON ROAD
Mount Wellington

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

74

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support partial change from SH and MHS to MHS. Three MHS


of the sites are appropriate to be rezoned to MHS from
SH (244, 246, 248 Panama Road), because managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. However the sites are away from higher
density areas, the RFN and centres and therefore do not
meet the objectives and policies for MHU zone. The sites
complement the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to the RFN or to a LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Also note that THAB proposed in
proximity so area of change already proposed.

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission
MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The sites are No Change
not close to the RFN or LC and the area is mainly
suburban dwellings. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. the sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, a RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to THAB, the RFN or a LC. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria) but proximate to
facilities (education). Furthermore, consider the
contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the current
nature of development in surrounding area (including
THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis, consider the area
could reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale
development in this area.
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria) but proximate to
facilities (education). Furthermore, consider the
contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the current
nature of development in surrounding area (including
THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis, consider the area
could reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale
development in this area.
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria) but proximate to
facilities (education). Furthermore, consider the
contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the current
nature of development in surrounding area (including
THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis, consider the area
could reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale
development in this area.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4883

839-4884

839-4885

839-4886

839-4887

839-4888

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone


32,38,36,40,34,
JOLSON
ROAD,177,179,
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

32,38,36,40,34,
Mount
JOLSON
Wellington
ROAD,177,179,
PANAMA ROAD
Mount Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 143,141,


141 & 143
Mount
PANAMA ROAD,
Panama Road
Wellington
Mount Wellington
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1,3, JOLSON 1 & 3 Jolson Road Mount


ROAD, Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 8,6, BERNARD 8, 6 Bernard


STREET, Mount
Street Mount
Wellington from
Wellington
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 15, PEACE


AVENUE,13, JOLSON
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount
Wellington

15, PEACE
Mount
AVENUE,13,
Wellington
JOLSON ROAD
Mount Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 19,18, PEACE 19,18, PEACE


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE Mount
Wellington from
Wellington
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount
Wellington

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

75

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, a RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The sites are No Change
not close to a LC or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The sites are No Change
not close to a LC or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, a RFN or a LC, albeit there is a
small NC close by. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, a RFN or a LC. There is a small
NC close by. However, MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, the RFN or a LC. There is a
small NC, however MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria) but proximate to
facilities (education). Furthermore, consider the
contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the current
nature of development in surrounding area (including
THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis, consider the area
could reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale
development in this area.

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria) but proximate to
facilities (education). Furthermore, consider the
contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the current
nature of development in surrounding area (including
THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis, consider the area
could reasonably be increased to provide for MHU scale
development in this area.

Recognise that the site is on the edge of appropriate


proximity. However consider the contiguous nature of the
Corporation's stock in this area and the current nature of
zoning (including THAB to the west). On this basis,
consider rezoning of the wider area appropriate.

Consider proximity to facilites and employment make


MHU appropriate zoning.

MHU

Oppose
Consider proximity to facilites and employment make
MHU appropriate zoning.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4889

839-4890

839-4891

839-4892

839-4893

839-4894

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone


19,15,21,17,23,
BERNARD
STREET,8,5,7,6,
PEACE AVENUE,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,15,21,17,23,
BERNARD
STREET,8,5,7,6,
PEACE AVENUE,
Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2, PEACE


AVENUE,9,7,
BERNARD STREET,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, PEACE
Mount
AVENUE,9,7,
Wellington
BERNARD STREET
Mount Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 61,59,


JOLSON ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

61,59 Jolson Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone


11,10,13,12,15,14,1,2
,5,6,9,8, RUNA
PLACE,77,69,73,
JOLSON ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,10,13,12,15,14 Mount
,1,2,5,6,9,8, RUNA Wellington
PLACE,77,69,73,
JOLSON ROAD,
Mount Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 39,37,


BERNARD STREET,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39,37, Bernard
Street Mount
Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 50,52,


JOLSON ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

50,52, JOLSON
ROAD Mount
Wellington

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

76

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. There is a small
NC fairly close however, MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Consider proximity to facilites and employment make


MHU appropriate zoning.

Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. the sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone or to a RFN. There is a small NC
fairly close however, MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone or to a RFN. There is a small NC
fairly close however, MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN and a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider proximity to facilites and employment make


MHU appropriate zoning.
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.

Consider proximity to facilites and employment make


MHU appropriate zoning.
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4895

839-4896

839-4897

839-4898

839-4899

839-4900

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 60,62,64,58,


JOLSON ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

60,62,64,58,
Mount
JOLSON ROAD
Wellington
Mount Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


235,237,241,239,
PANAMA ROAD,81,
JOLSON ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

235,237,241,239, Mount
PANAMA
Wellington
ROAD,81, JOLSON
ROAD, Mount
Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 247,251,249,


PANAMA
ROAD,26,28, KEALY
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

247,251,249,
Mount
PANAMA
Wellington
ROAD,26,28,
KEALY ROAD,
Mount Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 259,257,


PANAMA
ROAD,19,21, KEALY
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 24,26,
BERNARD STREET,1,
KEALY ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

259,257, PANAMA Mount


ROAD,19,21,
Wellington
KEALY ROAD,
Mount Wellington

MHS

24,26, BERNARD
STREET,1, KEALY
ROADt Mount
Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 32,38,42,


BERNARD
STREET,299,297,295,
293,291, PANAMA
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,38,42,
Mount
BERNARD
Wellington
STREET,299,297,2
95,293,291,
PANAMA ROAD
Mount Wellington

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

77

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.

Consider proximity to facilites and employment make


MHU appropriate zoning.

Mount
Wellington

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.

Consider proximity to facilites and employment make


MHU appropriate zoning.
MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN, or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Consider proximity to facilites and employment make


MHU appropriate zoning.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4901

839-4902

839-4903

839-4904

839-4905

839-4906

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 285,287,


PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

285 & 287


Mount
Panama Road
Wellington
Mount Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 309,307,


PANAMA
ROAD,54,56,50,52,
BERNARD STREET,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

309,307, PANAMA Mount


ROAD,54,56,50,52 Wellington
, BERNARD
STREET Mount
Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 356,360,358, 356,360,358,


Mount
PANAMA ROAD,
PANAMA ROAD
Wellington
Mount Wellington
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


380,378,372,374,376,
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

380,378,372,374, Mount
376, PANAMA
Wellington
ROAD Mount
Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 388,390,


PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

388 & 390


Mount
Panama Road
Wellington
Mount Wellington

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


414,406,416,404,402,
412,400,408,
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

414,406,416,404, Mount
402,412,400,408, Wellington
PANAMA ROAD
Mount Wellington

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

78

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Consider proximity to facilites and employment make
MHU appropriate zoning.

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4907

839-4909

839-4910

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone


2/371,1/371,369,
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

2/371,1/371,369, Mount
PANAMA ROAD
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 18,20, TODD 18,20, TODD


Otahuhu
PLACE,52, ALBERT
PLACE,52, ALBERT
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


7/82,10/82,9/82,6/82
,5/82,2/82,8/82,1/82,
4/82,3/82, AVENUE
ROAD,9/75,6/75,5/75
,2/75,7/75,3/75,8/75,
1/75,4/75, PRINCES
STREET,47,45,
ALBERT STREET,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

7/82,10/82,9/82,6 Otahuhu
/82,5/82,2/82,8/8
2,1/82,4/82,3/82,
AVENUE
ROAD,9/75,6/75,5
/75,2/75,7/75,3/7
5,8/75,1/75,4/75,
PRINCES
STREET,47,45,
ALBERT STREET

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

79

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. 371 is


No Change
affected by the NGC, furthermore the sites are not close
to a RFN or a LC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retention of MHS. The properties are away from the TC
and the RFN. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.


consistent with MHS zone criteria). Furthermore, consider
the contiguous nature of Corporation's stock and the
current nature of development in surrounding area
(including THAB on SHA site to west). on this basis,
consider the area could reasonably be increased to provide
for MHU scale development in this area.

No Change

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Propose


MHU
alternative zone of MHU. The Avenue Road, Princes and
Albert Street sites are close to the Otahuhu TC, the THAB
zone and the RFN for public transport. The MHU zone
provides for a staging between the higher intensity TC
and THAB zoning and the MHS of the area. The MHU
zone complements the built character and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Consider proximity to facilites and employment make


MHU appropriate zoning.

MHU

Oppose

Consider proximity to facilites and employment make


MHU appropriate zoning.
839-4911

839-4912

Southern Isthmus Rezone 92,94,


AVENUE
ROAD,61,57,63,59,65
, ALBERT STREET,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 93, AVENUE
ROAD,12A,12,
WATER STREET,
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

92,94, AVENUE
Otahuhu
ROAD,61,57,63,59
,65, ALBERT
STREET, Otahuhu

MHS

93, AVENUE
ROAD,12A,12,
WATER STREET,
Otahuhu

SH

Otahuhu

MHU

MHU

Support the change from MHS to MHU. The Avenue


MHU
Road and Albert Street sites are close to the Otahuhu TC,
the THAB zone and the RFN for public transport. The
MHU zone provides for a staging between the higher
intensity TC and THAB zoning and the MHS of the area.
The MHU zone complements the built character and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Propose
MHS
alternative change to MHS. Managing the flooding risk
on these sites does not require maintaining the SH
zoning. These properties are however some distance
from the TC and the RFN. The MHS zone complements
the built character of the area and the proposed rezoning
to the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Consider proximity to facilites and employment make


MHU appropriate zoning. Do not consider flooding issues
need to be resolved through zoning, but rather through
development controls of the Unitary Plan.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4913

839-4914

839-4915

839-4916

839-4917

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone


79C,79A,79,79B,
LUKE STREET,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone
98,98B,98C,98A,98F,
98G,98D,98E, LUKE
STREET EAST,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 6A,8A,4,8,
CONVOY LANE,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
79C,79A,79,79B,
LUKE STREET,
Otahuhu

LOCALITY

Otahuhu

98,98B,98C,98A,9 Otahuhu
8F,98G,98D,98E,
LUKE STREET
EAST, Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

80

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retention of MHS. A change in zoning would create a
Spot zone. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retention of MHS. A change in zoning would create a
Spot zone. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Recognise proximity to education faciltiies and suitable for
MHU

MHS

Support
Recognise phsycial constraint of Motorway to limit
proximity and support Council's zoning in this location.

6A,8A,4,8,
CONVOY LANE,
Otahuhu

Otahuhu

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


10,12,14,2,6,8,
MURDOCH
STREET,200,202,198,
210,206,208,204,
PRINCES STREET
EAST, Otahuhu from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,12,14,2,6,8,
Otahuhu
MURDOCH
STREET,200,202,1
98,210,206,208,2
04, PRINCES
STREET EAST,
Otahuhu

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


63A,63B,63C,63D,63E
,63F,63G,63H,63J,63K
,63L, AVENUE ROAD,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

63A,63B,63C,63D, Otahuhu
63E,63F,63G,63H,
63J,63K,63L,
AVENUE ROAD,
Otahuhu

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No Change
retention of MHS for the Convoy Lane sites. A change in
zoning would create a Spot zone. The MHS zoning aligns
with the objectives of the MHS zone and promotes good
urban form. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from MHS to MHU. This site is a very MHU
large site and next to another large site that has applied
for MHU zoning. The combined sites provide for the
efficient use of land as set out by the RPS, they are also
close to a higher density area and POS. The change of
zoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
objectives and policies if the RPS

Support the change from MHS to MHU. The sites are


MHU
close to the Otahuhu TC, the THAB zone and the RFN for
public transport. The MHU zone provides for a staging
between the higher intensity TC and THAB zoning and the
MHS zoned areas. The MHU zone complements the built
character and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support
Recognise phsycial constraint of Motorway to limit
proximity and support Council's zoning in this location.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4918

839-4919

839-4920

839-4921

839-4922

839-4923

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 45,43,


45,43, TAMAKI
Otahuhu
TAMAKI AVENUE,
AVENUE, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Southern Isthmus Rezone


191,193,187,185,189,
2/183-4/183,
CHURCH STREET,23,
NIXON AVENUE,
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

191,193,187,185, Otahuhu
189,2/183-4/183,
CHURCH
STREET,23, NIXON
AVENUE, Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 18,16,


RONAKI ROAD,2,4,
PETRIE PLACE,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 24,26,22,
RONAKI ROAD,1,3,
PETRIE PLACE,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,
MONTEREY
AVENUE,27,
CLEMENTS STREET,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 13,15,17,
CLEMENTS STREET,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

18,16, RONAKI
Otahuhu
ROAD,2,4, PETRIE
PLACE, Otahuhu

24,26,22, RONAKI Otahuhu


ROAD,1,3, PETRIE
PLACE, Otahuhu

11, MONTEREY
Otahuhu
AVENUE,27,
CLEMENTS
STREET, Otahuhu

13,15,17,
Otahuhu
CLEMENTS
STREET, Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

81

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH


No Change
zoning. This part Otahuhu has a significant number of Pre1944 BDC properties. Related local context has sought to
retain this as an area Otahuhu with SH zoning, see
Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan. A change of zoning on
these to sites would result in spot zoning, nor is the area
close to the Otahuhu TC. The SH zone complements the
built character of the area and retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
No Change
zoning. The Nixon Ave site is covered by the Pre-1944
BDC. Related local context has sought to retain this as an
area Otahuhu with SH zoning, see Mangere-Otahuhu
Area Plan. A change of zoning on these two sites would
result in spot zoning, nor is the area close to the Otahuhu
TC. The SH zone complements the built character of the
area and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No Change
retention of MHS. The properties at Ronaki Rd and Petrie
Place are away from the TC and at a distance from the
RFN. The MHS zone complements the built character of
the area and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No Change
retention of MHS. The properties at Ronaki Rd and Petrie
Place are away from the TC and at a distance from the
RFN. The MHS zone complements the built character of
the area and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No Change
retention of MHS. The properties at Monterey Ave and
Clements St are away from the TC and at a distance from
the RFN. The MHS zone complements the built character
of the area and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No Change
retention of MHS. The properties are away from the TC
and the RFN for public transport. The MHS zone
complements the built character of the area and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Consider proximity to Centre and FN support provision of


MHU zone

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Centre and education consider appropriate
area for MHU zone

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre and education consider appropriate


area for MHU zone. Consider flooding can be appropriately
managed through development controls of Unitary Plan
and not efficient to determine zoning by this constraint.

Proximity to Centre and education consider appropriate


area for MHU zone. Consider flooding can be appropriately
managed through development controls of Unitary Plan
and not efficient to determine zoning by this constraint.

Proximity to Centre and education consider appropriate


area for MHU zone. Consider flooding can be appropriately
managed through development controls of Unitary Plan
and not efficient to determine zoning by this constraint.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4924

839-4925

839-4926

839-493

839-496

839-500

839-502

839-5026

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 5,7,


CLEMENTS STREET,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 98,100,
HUTTON STREET,
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5,7, CLEMENTS
Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 129C,131,


LUKE STREET EAST,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 25,
NGATIAWA STREET,
One Tree Hill.

129C,131, LUKE
STREET EAST,
Otahuhu

25, NGATIAWA
Onehunga
STREET, One Tree
Hill.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 222, CHURCH
STREET, Onehunga.

222 Church Street Onehunga


Onehunga

THAB

98,100, HUTTON Otahuhu


STREET, Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 93, TE KAWA


Suburban at 93, TE
ROAD, One Tree
KAWA ROAD, One
Hill-Greenlane.
Tree Hill-Greenlane.

Otahuhu

Greenlane

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 13, HOHERIA


Onehunga
Suburban at 13,
ROAD, Onehunga.
HOHERIA ROAD,
Onehunga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 17, JELLICOE 17, JELLICOE


Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retention of MHS. The properties are away from the TC
and the RFN for public transport. The MHS zone
complements the built character of the area and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support partial change from SH to MHU. Propose
alternative zone of MHS. Managing the flooding risk on
these sites does not require maintaining the SH zoning.
The sites are however away from the TC and the RFN. The
MHS zone complements the built character of the area
and rezoning to the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at Luke Street East Otahuhu is away
from the TC and the RFN. The MHS zone complements
the built character of the area and retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Ngatiwa Road. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of THAB zone on Church Street. This
site is close to Onehunga TC and the RFN. The retention
of THAB is the most appropriate way of achieving the
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

82

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

Proximity to Centre and education consider appropriate


area for MHU zone. Consider flooding can be appropriately
managed through development controls of Unitary Plan
and not efficient to determine zoning by this constraint.

MHS

Proximity to Centre and education consider appropriate


area for MHU zone. Consider flooding can be appropriately
managed through development controls of Unitary Plan
and not efficient to determine zoning by this constraint.

No Change

Recognise phsycial constraint of Motorway to limit


proximity and support Council's zoning in this location.
No Change
MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No Change

Support retention of MHS zone on Te Kawa Road. This


No Change
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Hohera Road. This site No Change
does not have good access to any suburban town centre
of the RFN. The retention of MHS is the most appropriate
way of achieving the zone objectives and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
No Change
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. A
change of zoning to this site would result in spot zoning,
nor is the area close to the Otahuhu TC. As these sites
are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is retained
because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve generally
align with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to

MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5027

839-504

839-5074

839-5091

839-5197

839-526

839-5383

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Rezone 649, GREAT


649, GREAT
SOUTH ROAD,
SOUTH ROAD
Otahuhu from Mixed
Use to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 123, CARBINE
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 64,
WALMSLEY
ROAD,90,88,92,
NIKAU ROAD,
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Otahuhu

123 Carbine Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

64, WALMSLEY
ROAD,90,88,92,
NIKAU ROAD

Southern Isthmus Rezone 132,


132, MANGERE
MANGERE ROAD,
ROAD, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

MU

THAB

SH

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1/62-5/62,62, 1/62-5/62,62,


Otahuhu
MANGERE ROAD,
MANGERE ROAD,
Otahuhu from
Otahuhu
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings
to Mixed Housing
Urban.

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


3 Tomuri Place
Mount
Housing and
Mount Wellington Wellington
Apartment Buildings
at 3, TOMURI PLACE,
Mount Wellington.

THAB

Southern Isthmus Rezone 10,


10, MIDDLEMORE Otahuhu
MIDDLEMORE ROAD, ROAD, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

83

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MU to MHU. Retain MU


No Change
zoning. This property is covered by HC. The MU zone is
on a major route and complements the built character of
the area and allows for a range of uses that are more
likely to be compatible with the HC. Retention of the MU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as No Change
THAB as the site is in close proximity to local facilities and
public transport networks. Therefore the retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
No Change
zoning. This property is in close proximity of the Otahuhu
HI zone, any changes would create a spot zoning.
Retaining the SH zoning would also limit potential
reserve sensitivity concerns. The SH zone complements
the built character of the area and retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
No Change
zoning. This property is in close proximity of the Otahuhu
HI zone, any changes would create a spot zone. Retaining
the SH zoning would limit potential reserve sensitivity
concerns. The SH zone complements the built character
of the area and retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from THAB to MHU. Support the No Change
retention of the THAB. The THAB zoning in Mangere Rd,
Otahuhu is located close to the Otahuhu TC and the RFN.
The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zoning and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as No Change


THAB as the site is in close proximity to local facilities and
public transport networks. Therefore the retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
No Change
zoning. This property is in close proximity of the Otahuhu
HI zone. any changes would also create a spot zone.
Retaining the SH zoning would limit potential reserve
sensitivity concerns. The SH zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

Retain zoning for reaons set out by Council in evidence

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Proximity to centre and FN make MHU appropriate zoning


by proximity. Acknowledge Heavy Industry and have
reviewed discharge consents in area (one on kaka Street
closest) outside 250m proximity and do not consider
necessary constraint to zoning of site.

Proximity to centre and FN make MHU appropriate zoning


by proximity. Acknowledge Heavy Industry and have
reviewed discharge consents in area (one on kaka Street
closest) outside 250m proximity and do not consider
necessary constraint to zoning of site.

Rational for zoning request is to align with adjoining


property to east (with Otahuhu College to west of site - not
residential on western boundary).

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN make MHU appropriate zoning by


proximity. Acknowledge Heavy Industry and have
reviewed discharge consents in area outside 250m
proximity and do not consider necessary constraint to
zoning of site.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5402

839-5501

839-5516

839-554

839-559

839-560

839-5616

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 33,33A, AWA 33,33A, AWA


Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 40, BEATTY


40, BEATTY
Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 7, BALDWIN 7, BALDWIN


Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 34, BRADY ROAD,
Otahuhu.

THAB

34, BRADY ROAD, Otahuhu


Otahuhu.

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 137,MT


Urban at 137,MT
WELLINGTON
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY
HIGHWAY,Mount
Wellington,Auckland.

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


286, GREAT
Housing and
SOUTH ROAD,
Apartment Buildings Greenlane.
at 286, GREAT SOUTH
ROAD, Greenlane.

Greenlane

Southern Isthmus Rezone 23, JELLICOE 23, JELLICOE


Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

THAB

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH


zoning. These properties are covered by a Historic
Heritage extent of place overlay and are in close
proximity of the Otahuhu HI zone. Retaining the SH
zoning would limit potential reserve sensitivity concerns.
The SH zone complements the built character of the area
and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. This property is covered by HC. As these sites are
affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is retained
because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve generally
align with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. This THAB area
is next to a large POS (Seaside park). Retention of the
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

84

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No Change

No Change

Proximity to FN make MHU appropriate zoning by


proximity. Acknowledge Heavy Industry and have
reviewed discharge consents in area outside 250m
proximity and do not consider necessary constraint to
zoning of site.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

No Change

Support retention of MHU. The site has good access to No Change


the RFN and other public transport options and is located
close to areas of THAB. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support retention of THAB on Great South Road; MHS


propose alternative zoning of MHS. This site is affected
by the Pre-1944 BDC and rezoned to MHS recognising
that THAB is generally incompatible with the values of
the areas that are proposed to be retained within the Pre1944 BDC. The proposed rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
No Change
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Proximity to FN and Centre make THAB appropriate


soning. Do not support Council's presumption of the
outcome of the Pre-1944 Demolition Control on the use of
this land.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5654

839-567

839-5670

839-5673

839-5705

839-571

839-5710

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 643, GREAT 643, GREAT


SOUTH ROAD,
SOUTH ROAD,
Otahuhu from Mixed Otahuhu
Use to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 12A, TAWHIRI


Suburban at 12A,
ROAD, One Tree
TAWHIRI ROAD, One Hill.
Tree Hill.

One Tree Hill

Southern Isthmus Rezone 115,


MANGERE ROAD,
Otahuhu from Light
Industry to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

115, MANGERE
ROAD, Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

MU

MHS

LI

Southern Isthmus Rezone 23, GOLF


23, GOLF AVENUE, Otahuhu
AVENUE, Otahuhu
Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 33, BEATTY


33, BEATTY
Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 51, WAIOHUA


Greenlane
Suburban at 51,
ROAD, GreenlaneWAIOHUA ROAD,
Ellerslie.
Greenlane-Ellerslie.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 58,


58, WALMSLEY
WALMSLEY ROAD,
ROAD, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Otahuhu

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

85

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MU to MHU. Retain MU


No Change
zoning. This property is covered by a HC overlay. The MU
zone complements the built character of the area and
allows for a range of uses that are more likely to be
compatible with the HC overlay. Retention of the MU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Tawhiri Road. This site No Change
does not have good access to any suburban town centres
or the RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from LI to MHU. Propose
SH
alternative zone of SH. Auckland Council District Plan
(Isthmus Section) zones the area as residential and the
current built form reflects this. The area in question is
also in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zone. To
minimise future reverse sensitivity constraints it is
proposed that the area be zoned SH. The SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives effect
to the RPS.
This proposed rezoning to SH is an out of scope change,
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. The site is away from the TC and other higher
density areas. The SH zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Waiohua Road. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and give effect to the
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

Retain zoning for reaons set out by Council in evidence

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to FN make MHU appropriate zoning by
proximity. Acknowledge Heavy Industry and have
reviewed discharge consents in area outside 250m
proximity and do not consider necessary constraint to
zoning of site.

No Change
MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

No Change

Proximity to FN make MHU appropriate zoning by


proximity. Acknowledge Heavy Industry and have
reviewed discharge consents in area outside 250m
proximity and do not consider necessary constraint to
zoning of site.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

No Change

No Change
MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-573

839-581

839-588

839-5926

839-595

839-6008

839-6009

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 19 Mataroa Road Mount


Suburban at 19,
Mount Wellington Wellington
MATAROA ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 216, MOUNT
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY, Mount
Wellington.

216, MOUNT
WELLINGTON
HIGHWAY

THAB

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 170,
MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Royal OakPenrose.

170, MOUNT
SMART ROAD,
Royal OakPenrose.

Mount
Wellington

Onehunga

MHU

Southern Isthmus Rezone 59, NIKAU


59, NIKAU ROAD, Otahuhu
ROAD, Otahuhu from Otahuhu
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 82, TE KAWA


Suburban at 82, TE
ROAD, One Tree
KAWA ROAD, One
Hill-Greenlane.
Tree Hill-Greenlane.

Onehunga

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 41,


WALMSLEY ROAD,
Otahuhu from Light
Industry to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

41, WALMSLEY
ROAD, Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 38, LIPPIATT 38, LIPPIATT


ROAD, Otahuhu from ROAD, Otahuhu
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Otahuhu

LI

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

86

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS. The site does not meet the


No Change
objectives and policies of THAB and MHU zone. The site
is away from LC, higher density areas and the RFN.
Therefore retention of MHS is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a No Change
LC and the RFN. The retention of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHU on Mount Smart Road. This


No Change
site is located close to the RFN and the application of
MHU zoning complements the planned urban residential
character of the neighbourhood. The retention of MHU is
the most appropriate way of achieving the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
No Change
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Te Kawa Road. This
No Change
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN.MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and give effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from LI to MHU. Propose
SH
alternative zone of SH. Auckland Council District Plan
(Isthmus Section) zones the area as residential and the
current built form of the area reflects this. The area in
question is also in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI
zone. To minimise future reverse sensitivity constraints
it is proposed that the area be zoned SH. The SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives
effect to the RPS.
This proposed rezoning to SH is an out of scope change,
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. This property is covered by a Historic Heritage
Extent of Place Overlay and is adjacent to an area of HC,
therefore SH is considered appropriate. The SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No Change
MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Proximity to FN make MHU appropriate zoning by


proximity. Acknowledge Heavy Industry and have
reviewed discharge consents in area outside 250m
proximity and do not consider necessary constraint to
zoning of site.
On the basis of the evidence of Mr Pearson in respect of
Topic 032, we do not support the site being identified as
contributing. On this basis, consider the development
controls of the Overlay can appropriately manage
redevelopment and the proximity measures make the
MHU appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-608

839-6168

839-620

839-621

839-622

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 16, HARMONY


Suburban at 16,
AVENUE,
HARMONY AVENUE, Otahuhu.
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 13,


MCDONALD PLACE,
Otahuhu from Light
Industry to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

13, MCDONALD
PLACE, Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 29, TE KAWA


Suburban at 29, TE
ROAD, One Tree
KAWA ROAD, One
Hill-Greenlane.
Tree Hill-Greenlane.

Greenlane

PAUP ZONE

MHS

LI

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 5A Curzon Street, Onehunga


Urban at 5A, CURZON Onehunga
STREET, Onehunga.

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 99, PAIHIA ROAD, Onehunga


Suburban at 99,
Oranga-Ellerslie.
PAIHIA ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

87

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is No Change


not close to the RFN, and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from LI to MHU. Propose
SH
alternative zone of SH. Auckland Council District Plan
(Isthmus Section) zones the area as residential and the
current built form of the area reflects this. The area in
question is also in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI
zone. To minimise future reverse sensitivity constraints
it is proposed that the area be zoned SH. The SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives
effect to the RPS.
This proposed rezoning to SH is an out of scope change,
Support retention of MHS zone on Te Kawa Road. Site not No Change
close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also
remote from LC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. This site is located close to
No Change
the RFN and will enable intensification in the
neighbourhood. The proposed retention is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road. Site not No Change
close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also
remote from LC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to FN make MHU appropriate zoning by


proximity. Acknowledge Heavy Industry and have
reviewed discharge consents in area outside 250m
proximity and do not consider necessary constraint to
zoning of site.

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-624

839-636

839-6387

839-6388

839-6389

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


55M,55L,55I,55H,55K
,55J,55E,55D,55G,55F
,55A,55C,55B,
ATKINSON
AVENUE,35E,35D,35C
,35B,35A,31J,31I,31H,
31C,31B,31A,31G,31F
,31E,31D, ALBION
ROAD,20A,20C,20B,2
0E,20D,20G,20F,20I,2
0H,20K,20J, PRINCES
STREET, Otahuhu.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

55M,55L,55I,55H, Otahuhu
55K,55J,55E,55D,
55G,55F,55A,55C,
55B, ATKINSON
AVENUE,35E,35D,
35C,35B,35A,31J,
31I,31H,31C,31B,3
1A,31G,31F,31E,3
1D, ALBION
ROAD,20A,20C,20
B,20E,20D,20G,20
F,20I,20H,20K,20J,
PRINCES STREET,
Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

MU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 7, TITAHI STREET, Ellerslie


Suburban at 7, TITAHI One Tree Hill.
STREET, One Tree Hill.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2, CRACROFT


STREET,618,620,
GREAT SOUTH ROAD,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Use to Mixed Housing
Urban.

2, CRACROFT
STREET,618,620,
GREAT SOUTH
ROAD, Otahuhu

MU

Southern Isthmus Rezone 27,29,


BEATTY STREET,6,
BALDWIN
STREET,24,26,28,26A,
JELLICOE STREET,
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

27,29, BEATTY
Otahuhu
STREET,6,
BALDWIN
STREET,24,26,28,2
6A, JELLICOE
STREET, Otahuhu

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 14,16,


JELLICOE STREET,19,
BEATTY STREET,
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14,16, JELLICOE
STREET,19,
BEATTY STREET,
Otahuhu

SH

Otahuhu

Otahuhu

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

88

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the MU zone. The notified


No Change
PAUP provides for intensification of use around the
Otahuhu TC including Atkinson Ave and Station Rd. This
is part of the revitalisation of the Otahuhu TC and
surrounding area. Atkinson Ave and Station Rd are
adjacent to the RTN with Station Rd the site of a new
public transport interchange. The MU zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning
to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone on Titahi Road. This site No Change


does not have good access to any suburban town centres
or the RFN. The retention of MHS is the most appropriate
way of achieving the zone objectives and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support a change from MU to MHU. The sites in No Change
question are adjacent to Great South Rd RFN. The MU
zoning allows for a range of uses and potential re-use of
buildings along this corridor. Adjacent sites have the HC
overlay or Pre-1944 BDC. A change of zoning to MHU
would create a spot zone. The MU zone can complement
the built character of the area and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
No Change
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH


No Change
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Support

MHS

Support

MU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support Council's position regarding the Pre-1944


Demolition Control, but accept that the zone can provide
appropriate transition to activities on the FN corridor.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6390

839-6391

839-6392

839-6393

839-6394

839-6396

839-6397

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,13,15,


BEATTY STREET,8,
JELLICOE STREET,
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

11,13,15, BEATTY Otahuhu


STREET,8,
JELLICOE STREET,
Otahuhu

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,13,11A,


11,13,11A,
Otahuhu
BALDWIN STREET,
BALDWIN STREET,
Otahuhu from Single Otahuhu
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1,3, BALDWIN 1,3, BALDWIN


Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 39,37,


39,37, JELLICOE
Otahuhu
JELLICOE STREET,
STREET, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 30A,30B,30, 30A,30B,30, GOLF Otahuhu


GOLF AVENUE,
AVENUE, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 19,17, GOLF 19,17, GOLF


Otahuhu
AVENUE, Otahuhu
AVENUE, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 11,7,


MIDDLEMORE
ROAD,146,142,148,
MANGERE ROAD,
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

11,7,
Otahuhu
MIDDLEMORE
ROAD,146,142,14
8, MANGERE
ROAD, Otahuhu

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

89

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH


No Change
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. This property is covered by a HC Overlay. As
these sites are affected by the HC, the notified SH zone is
retained because the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These sites are away from the TC and higher
density areas and retention of the MHS zone
complements the built character of the area is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

No Change

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH


No Change
zoning. These properties are within close proximity to the
Otahuhu HI zone. Retaining the SH zoning would limit
potential reserve sensitivity concerns. Changing the
zoning would create a spot zone. The SH zone
complements the built character of the area and
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
No Change
zoning. These properties are in close proximity to the
Otahuhu HI zone. Retaining the SH zoning would limit
potential reserve sensitivity concerns. The SH zoning is
also appropriate due to the sites being affected by
flooding constraints. The SH zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the

Consider that proximity to FN and other facilities


(education and health) make the zoning of MHU
appropriate.

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

Consider that proximity to FN and other facilities


(education and health) make the zoning of MHU
appropriate. Consider issues of flooding can appropriately
be managed by development controls. Otahuhu HI zone
not considered to be in proximity (e.g. beyond 250m) discharge from Middlemore Hospital but considered
internal to site.
Consider that proximity to FN and other facilities
(education and health) make the zoning of MHU
appropriate. Consider issues of flooding can appropriately
be managed by development controls. Otahuhu HI zone
not considered to be in proximity (e.g. beyond 250m) discharge from Middlemore Hospital but considered
internal to site.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6398

839-6399

839-6400

839-6401

839-6402

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone


11,13,15,1/1,3,5,7,9,
2/1, AWA
STREET,2/70,3/78,2/7
4,2/76,2/78,3/76,3/7
4,82,1/78,4/76,1/74,
1/76,1/70,72, NIKAU
ROAD, Otahuhu from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

11,13,15,1/1,3,5,7 Otahuhu
,9,2/1, AWA
STREET,2/70,3/78,
2/74,2/76,2/78,3/
76,3/74,82,1/78,4
/76,1/74,1/76,1/7
0,72, NIKAU
ROAD, Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

90

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to THAB. Retain SH


No Change
zoning. These properties are within close proximity to the
Otahuhu HI zone. Retaining the SH zoning would limit
potential reserve sensitivity concerns. The SH zone
complements the built character of the area and
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Consider that proximity to FN and centre make the zoning


of MHU appropriate. Otahuhu HI zone not considered to
be in proximity (e.g. beyond 250m) - discharge from
Middlemore Hospital but considered internal to site.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2/48,1/48,


2/48,1/48, NIKAU Otahuhu
NIKAU ROAD,
ROAD, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone


2/49,47,2/43,45,4/43
,3/43,1/43,4/49,1/49,
3/49, NIKAU ROAD,
Otahuhu from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

2/49,47,2/43,45,4 Otahuhu
/43,3/43,1/43,4/4
9,1/49,3/49,
NIKAU ROAD,
Otahuhu

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 44,42,


44,42, MARJORIE Otahuhu
MARJORIE JAYNE
JAYNE CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Otahuhu Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 10,12,


MCGEE STREET,59,
WALMSLEY ROAD,
Otahuhu from Light
Industry to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LI

10,12, MCGEE
Otahuhu
STREET,59,
WALMSLEY ROAD,
Otahuhu

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from SH to THAB. Retain SH


zoning. These properties are covered by a Historic
Heritage Extent of Place overlay. The SH zone
complements the built character of the area and
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from SH to THAB. Retain SH
zoning. These properties are within close proximity to the
Otahuhu HI zone. Retaining the SH zoning would limit
potential reserve sensitivity concerns. The SH zoning is
also appropriate due to the sites being affected by
flooding constraints. The SH zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. These properties are within close proximity to the
Otahuhu HI zone and are opposite a LI zone. Retaining
the SH zoning would limit potential reserve sensitivity
concerns. The SH zone complements the built character
of the area and retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from LI to MHU. Propose
alternative zone of SH. Auckland Council District Plan
(Isthmus Section) zones the area as residential and the
current built form of the area reflects this. The area in
question is also in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI
zone. To minimise future reverse sensitivity constraints
it is proposed that the area be zoned SH. The SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives
effect to the RPS.
This proposed rezoning to SH is an out of scope change,

No Change

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre indicates THAB appropriate zoning,


but recognise scale of land adjoining reserve available and
consider MHU appropriate zone. Note that the extent of
heritage place to front of site (not opposed to SH on the
front site) .

No Change

Consider that proximity to Centre and other facilities (FN


and open space) make the zoning of THAB appropriate.
Consider issues of flooding can appropriately be managed
by development controls. Otahuhu HI zone not considered
to be in proximity (e.g. beyond 250m)e.

No Change

Consider the proximity to Centre make the zoning of MHU


appropriate. Recognise the neighbouring HI zone, but this
is an existing and established residential area (not
greenfields) and therefore not 'new activity' to area.

SH

Consider the proximity to Centre make the zoning of MHU


appropriate. Recognise the neighbouring HI zone, but this
is an existing and established residential area (not
greenfields) and therefore not 'new activity' to area. have
reviewed discharge consents - none relevant to HI zone
area.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6403

839-6404

839-6407

839-661

839-683

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 15A,15B,


CHELSEA AVENUE,
Otahuhu from Light
Industry to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

15A,15B, CHELSEA Otahuhu


AVENUE, Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone


10,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,
MCDONALD PLACE,
Otahuhu from Light
Industry to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8, Otahuhu
MCDONALD
PLACE, Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 47,45,


WALMSLEY ROAD,4,
MCGEE STREET,8,2,
HANS STREET,
Otahuhu from Light
Industry to Mixed
Housing Urban.

47,45, WALMSLEY Otahuhu


ROAD,4, MCGEE
STREET,8,2, HANS
STREET, Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 82, FRANK GREY


Suburban at 82,
PLACE, Otahuhu
FRANK GREY PLACE,
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 36, KONINI ROAD, Greenlane


Suburban at 36,
Greenlane.
KONINI ROAD,
Greenlane.

PAUP ZONE

LI

LI

LI

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change from LI to MHU. Propose


alternative zone of SH. Auckland Council District Plan
(Isthmus Section) zones the area as residential and the
current built form of the area reflects this. The area in
question is also in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI
zone. To minimise future reverse sensitivity constraints
it is proposed that the area be zoned SH. The SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives
effect to the RPS.
This proposed rezoning to SH is an out of scope change,
Do not support change from LI to MHU. Propose
alternative zone of SH. Auckland Council District Plan
(Isthmus Section) zones the area as residential and the
current built form of the area reflects this. The area in
question is also in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI
zone. To minimise future reverse sensitivity constraints
it is proposed that the area be zoned SH. The SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives
effect to the RPS.
This proposed rezoning to SH is an out of scope change,
Do not support change from LI to MHU. Propose
alternative zone of SH. Auckland Council District Plan
(Isthmus Section) zones the area as residential and the
current built form of the area reflects this. The area in
question is also in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI
zone. To minimise future reverse sensitivity constraints
it is proposed that the area be zoned SH. The SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zoning to provide for a range of activities and gives
effect to the RPS.

91

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
SH

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
SH

This proposed rezoning to SH is an out of scope change,


Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is No Change
away from the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Konini Road. This site No Change
not close to higher density areas or the RFN. The site is
also remote from LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-695

839-700

839-706

839-723

839-726

839-729

839-738

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 20, KONINI


Greenlane
Suburban at 20,
ROAD, Greenlane.
KONINI ROAD,
Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 91 & 91A Marua


Suburban at 91,
Road Ellerslie
MARUA ROAD,
Ellerslie-St Johns.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 127, CARBINE
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 67,
NAMATA ROAD, One
Tree Hill-Oranga.

Ellerslie

127 Carbine Road Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

67, NAMATA
ROAD, One Tree
Hill-Oranga.

Onehunga

THAB

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 12, ORANGA


Onehunga
Suburban at 12,
AVENUE, Penrose.
ORANGA AVENUE,
Penrose.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 36, KOWHATU


Suburban at 36,
ROAD, One Tree
KOWHATU ROAD,
Hill.
One Tree Hill.

Greenlane

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 92, FRANK GREY


Suburban at 92,
PLACE, Otahuhu
FRANK GREY PLACE,
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

92

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone on Konini Road. This site No Change


is not close to higher density areas, local centres or the
RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and give effect to the
RPS.
Support the retention of MHS zone as the sites are not
No Change
within close proximity to existing or planned public
transport network or large urban facilities. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. It is appropriate to retain as No Change
THAB as the site is in close proximity to local facilities and
public transport networks. Therefore the retention of
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Namata Road. This
site not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is
also remote from LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Oranga Avenue. This
site not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is
also remote from LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Kowhatu Road. This
site not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is
also remote from LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is
away from the RFN and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-740

839-7410

839-7421

839-7425

839-7430

839-7432

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 7 ROWLANDS
AVENUE, Mt
Wellington.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
7 ROWLANDS
AVENUE

LOCALITY

Mount
Wellington

PAUP ZONE

THAB

Southern Isthmus Rezone 27, WALTERS 27 Walters Road Mount


ROAD, Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 9, JOLSON


ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 25, GOLF
AVENUE, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

9 Jolson Road
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

25, GOLF AVENUE, Otahuhu


Otahuhu

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2, TUATA


2, TUATA STREET, Onehunga
STREET, One Tree Hill One Tree Hill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone


2,6,8,7,5,9,11,13,16,1
0,12,14,7 SOPHIA
CLOSE, 72,70
PANAMA ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

2,6,8,7,5,9,11,13, Mount
16,10,12,14,7
Wellington
SOPHIA CLOSE,
72,70 PANAMA
ROAD Mount
Wellington

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

93

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of THAB. Part of the site sits


MHU
underneath the NGC. MHU would be a more appropriate
zone and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
The proposed rezoning to MHU is an out of scope
change, relevant further details can be found in
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. the site is not No Change
close to higher density areas, the RFN or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not
close to a RFN or LC, albeit there is a NC close by. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. The site is away from the TC and other higher
density areas and rezoning this site would create a spot
zone. The SH zoning complements the built character of
the area and retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU on
Tuata Street because spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The retention of
MHS the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU. Provides for a
transition area and close to higher density areas.
Therefore rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

No Change

Do not consider NGC necessary constraint to whole site


and can maintain THAB zoning
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone). Consider the contiguous
nature of Corporation's stock and the current nature of
development (2 storeys) could reasonably be increased to
provide for MHU scale development in this area. Do not
accept that flooding constraint necessary to restrict zoning
and can be addressed through zoning controls.
Recognise that sites on edge of proximity to centre (e.g.
consistent with MHS zone criteria) but has proximity to
factities (education). Consider the contiguous nature of
Corporation's stock and the current nature of development
in surrounding area (including THAB on SHA site to west).
on this basis, consider the area could reasonably be

No Change

Proximity to FN provides suitability for MHU zone. Note


that do not support Council's position of spot zoning given
nature of Corporations submission (wider zoning review)
and the number of Corporation sites in this location

No Change

MHU

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7436

839-7445

839-7448

839-7482

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone


7/82,10/82,9/82,6/82
,5/82,2/82,8/82,1/82,
4/82,3/82, AVENUE
ROAD,9/75,6/75,5/75
,2/75,7/75,3/75,8/75,
1/75,4/75, PRINCES
STREET,47,45,
ALBERT STREET,
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

7/82,10/82,9/82,6 Otahuhu
/82,5/82,2/82,8/8
2,1/82,4/82,3/82,
AVENUE
ROAD,9/75,6/75,5
/75,2/75,7/75,3/7
5,8/75,1/75,4/75,
PRINCES
STREET,47,45,
ALBERT STREET

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2/65, 1/65


2/65, 1/65
PRINCES STREET.
PRINCES STREET.
Otahuhu from Mixed Otahuhu
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 1A, 1C, 1B,
3B, 3A, 5A, 5B
CATHERINE STREET.
50 CHURCH STREET.
Onehunga from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Otahuhu

1A, 1C, 1B, 3B, 3A, Onehunga


5A, 5B CATHERINE
STREET. 50
CHURCH STREET,
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 108 SELWYN 108 SELWYN


STREET. Onehunga
STREET.
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 41, MOANA


Suburban at 41,
AVENUE,
MOANA AVENUE,
Onehunga.
Onehunga.

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

94

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the change from MHS to MHU. The Avenue


MHU
Road, Princes and Albert St sites are close to the Otahuhu
TC, the THAB zone and the RFN for public transport. The
MHU zone provides for a staging between the higher
intensity TC and THAB zoning and the MHS zoned areas.
The MHU zone complements the built character and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and give effect to the RPS.

Support the change from MHS to MHU. The Princes St MHU


sites are close to the Otahuhu TC, the THAB zone and the
RFN for public transport. The MHU zone provides for a
staging between the higher intensity TC and THAB zoning
and the MHS zoned areas. The MHU zone complements
the built character and is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from SH to THAB on Catherine
No Change
Street and Church Street. These site adjoin properties
affected by HC and Pre-1944 BDC are retained as SH to
avoid spot zoning. Retention of SH generally aligns with
the outcomes sought by the HC and Pre-1944, is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHU to THAB on Selwyn


Street zone because spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support character overlay determining underlying


zoning (as principle). Acknowledge the pattern of
development for surrounding site and that area not
appropriate for THAB. Consider MHU appropriate balance,
given proximity to Town Centre, character values and
existing development on site.

No Change

Meets proximity Criteria


839-750

839-7532

Southern Isthmus Rezone 41A, 41 AWA 41A, 41 AWA


Otahuhu
STREET. Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

Support retention of MHS zone on Moana Avenue. This No Change


site not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is
also remote from LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
No Change
zoning. These properties are covered by an historic
Heritage overlay. The SH zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU / SH

Oppose in Part
Consider that part of site in heritage extent and 41A
appropriate for MHU zone (proximity to centre)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7650

839-766

839-7668

839-7677

839-7680

839-7694

839-7695

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 64, 66


ORANGA AVENUE.
Penrose from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 78, ALFRED
STREET, Onehunga.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

64, 66 ORANGA
Onehunga
AVENUE. Penrose

78 Alfred Street
Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 100 PAIHIA


ROAD. OrangaEllerslie from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 15A-15D
COPPINS ROAD.
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

100 PAIHIA ROAD. Onehunga


Oranga-Ellerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 53A, 53


COMMISSARIAT
ROAD. Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 48
PANORAMA ROAD.
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

53A, 53
COMMISSARIAT
ROAD.

15A-15D Coppins Mount


Road Mount
Wellington
Wellington

48 PANORAMA
ROAD

Southern Isthmus Rezone 45 CARDWELL 45 CARDWELL


STREET. Onehunga
STREET.
from Mixed Housing Onehunga
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

95

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Oranga Avenue because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
Do not support retention of MHU on Alfred Street;
MHS
propose alternative zoning of MHS. These sites are
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and are rezoned MHS
recognising that MHU is generally incompatible with the
values of the areas that are proposed to be retained
within the Pre-1944 BDC. This change is the most
appropriate way of achieving the MHS zone objectives
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Paihia Road because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No Change
close to a RFN, higher density areas or a LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Whilst there No Change
is a small local centre near by, the site is away from
higher density areas and MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB on Cardwell
MHS
Street. The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
retained as MHS recognising that the outcomes sought
by the Pre-1944 zone are generally incompatible with the
objectives of the THAB zone. The retention of MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Consider access constraints impact proximity criteria.


Support Council's position.

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

THAB

Oppose
Consider site meets proximity criteria for proposed zoning.
Do not support the consequence of Pre-1944 Demolition
Control overlay impacting on zoning

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7704

839-7748

839-7758

839-7809

839-7822

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 62 HUTTON 62 HUTTON


Otahuhu
STREET. Otahuhu
STREET. Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 5/16, 4/16,


3/16, 2/16, 1/16
FELIX STREET.
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

5/16, 4/16, 3/16, Onehunga


2/16, 1/16 FELIX
STREET.
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 18 LONSDALE 18 Lonsdale Street Ellerslie


STREET. Ellerslie from Ellerslie
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2, 4, 6


CATHERINE STREET.
37A, 37C, 37B HILL
STREET. Onehunga
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

2, 4, 6 CATHERINE Onehunga
STREET. 37A, 37C,
37B HILL STREET.
Onehunga

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 104


ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

104 ROCKFIELD
ROAD. PenroseEllerslie

Penrose

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Propose


alternative zone of MHU. The Hutton St site is close to
the Otahuhu TC, the THAB zone and the RFN for public
transport. The MHU zone provides for a staging between
the higher intensity TC and THAB zoning and the MHS
zoned areas. The MHU zone complements the built
character of the area and is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Felix
Street. This site is adjacent to Winstone's Wallboards gib
board manufacturing plant 37 Felix Street. The
application of MHU to this site will allow for more
residential intensification close to an established light
industrial activity which may create reverse sensitivity
issues. In addition, Ms Jarrette Wickham's evidence
provided for Hearing Topics 051-054 (27 July 2015)
proposed to rezone a large area west of this site from LI
to HI, including the western side of Maurice Road and 210 Henderson Place. This area is established with
industrial activities, and the expansion of MHU would
the increase the number of sensitive activities closer to
more sensitive uses including residential properties.
Therefore retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the relevant objectives of the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not
close to a THAB zone, the RFN or a TC. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and give effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to THAB on Catherine
Street and Hill Street. These sites are located around a
large area of HC and retained as SH to avoid spot zoning.
Retention of SH generally aligns with the outcomes
sought by the HC, is the most appropriate way to achieve
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

96

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU (4 storey)

Oppose

No Change

Consider the site provides transition between LI (opposite


side of road is business offices, with GIB industrial behind).
Consider site is exsting and established residential and
therefore issues of reverse sensitivity not relevant.
No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No Change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield No Change


Road. This site does not have good access to the RFN and
is not located around any local or TCs. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Recognise historic heritage areas in locality and form of


existing development. However, not relevant to this site
and consider that the proximity criteria make THAB
appropriate. On this basis consider balanced approach to
provide for MHU on site
Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the
proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7823

839-7826

839-7840

839-7869

839-7897

839-790

839-791

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Rezone 21 COPPINS


ROAD. Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21 & 21A Coppins Mount


Road Mount
Wellington
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 136D, 136C


ARANUI ROAD.
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

136D, 136C
ARANUI ROAD

Southern Isthmus Rezone 92/33-109/33


WATER STREET. 1/5030/50, 31/90-91/90,
52 HIGH STREET.
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

92/33-109/33
Otahuhu
WATER STREET.
1/50-30/50, 31/9091/90, 52 HIGH
STREET. Otahuhu

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 138B, 136A


ARANUI ROAD.
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

138B, 136A
ARANUI ROAD

MHS

Mount
Wellington

Mount
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone Lot 1 DP


65B Rockfield
51219 from Mixed
Road, Onehunga
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/52-6/52,
RUAWAI ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

Mount
Wellington

1/52-6/52,
RUAWAI ROAD

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 56, PAIHIA ROAD, Onehunga


Suburban at 56,
Oranga-Ellerslie.
PAIHIA ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHS

REASONS

97

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
not close to a THAB zone, RFN or a LC. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS
Support the change from MHS to MHU. The High St and MHU
Water Rd sites are close to the Otahuhu TC and the RFN.
The MHU zoning encourages efficient use of the site. The
MHU zone complements the built character of the area
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on Rockfield Road because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
Support retention of THAB. The site is located close to a No Change
LC and has good access to the RFN. The retention of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road. This site No Change


not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also
remote from LC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support
Consider proximity criteria impacted by inlet and physical
access constraints, support Council position

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7910

839-7928

839-7965

839-7970

839-7971

839-8003

839-8086

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 86 ARANUI


ROAD. Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Southern Isthmus Rezone 2 ALCOCK
STREET. Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
[address does not
exist]
Southern Isthmus Rezone 136B, 138A
ARANUI ROAD.
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

86 ARANUI ROAD Mount


Wellington

2 ALCOCK STREET Mount


Wellington

136B, 138A
ARANUI ROAD

Southern Isthmus Rezone 144


144 MANGERE
MANGERE ROAD.
ROAD, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount
Wellington

Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 13


13 MIDDLEMORE Otahuhu
MIDDLEMORE ROAD. ROAD, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Southern Isthmus Rezone 59 CONVOY 59 CONVOY LANE, Otahuhu


LANE. Otahuhu from Otahuhu
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 41 STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

41 STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

Onehunga

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

98

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS
Address does not exist. However, for general area of
No Change
Alcock Street, do not support change from MHS to MHU.
The sites are away from higher density areas and centres
and MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No Change
away from higher density areas and centres and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. The property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu
HI zone. Retaining the SH zoning would limit potential
reserve sensitivity concerns. The SH zoning is also
appropriate due to the sites being affected by flooding
constraints. The SH zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Retain SH
zoning. These property are in close proximity to the
Otahuhu HI zone. Retaining the SH zoning would limit
potential reserve sensitivity concerns. The SH zoning is
also appropriate due to the sites being affected by
flooding constraints. The SH zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 59 Convoy Lane, Otahuhu is
away from the TC and the RFN. The MHS zone
complements the built character of the area and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU on
State Avenue zone because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No Change

MHU

Oppose

Site is on FN route - 250+ from HI and note no discharge


consents relevant from site (air discharge buffer). Do not
accept reverse sensitivity as long established residential
area (some sites between this one and HI are even in Pre1944 Demolition Control overlay - so likely older than
1945). Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

No Change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site is on FN route - 250+ from HI and note no discharge


consents relevant from site (air discharge buffer). Do not
accept reverse sensitivity as long established residential
area (some sites between this one and HI are even in Pre1944 Demolition Control overlay - so likely older than
1945). Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

No Change

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review
No Change
MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8087

839-8088

839-8089

839-8090

839-8091

839-810

839-8131

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Rezone 53 STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

53 STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 55 STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

55 STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 55A STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

55A STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 57A STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

57A STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 57 STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

57 STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

LOCALITY

Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Single House 1/6,2/6 Harbour


at 1/6,2/6, HARBOUR View Terrace
VIEW TERRACE,
Onehunga
Onehunga.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 115


ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Onehunga

115 ROCKFIELD
ROAD. PenroseEllerslie

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU on


State Avenue zone because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU on
State Avenue zone because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU on
State Avenue zone because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU on
State Avenue zone because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU on
State Avenue zone because spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS and gives effect
Support retention of SH zone on Harbour View Terrace.
This site adjoins an area of HC and is opposite an area
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. The retention of SH in this
location recognises that THAB or MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the areas affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and HC. The proposed retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the SH zone objectives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield
Road. This site not close to higher density areas or the
RFN. Site is also remote from LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

99

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

SH

Support

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

No Change

MHU

Oppose

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8132

839-8133

839-8134

839-8135

839-8136

839-8137

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Rezone 115A


ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

115A ROCKFIELD
ROAD. PenroseEllerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 121A


ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

121A ROCKFIELD
ROAD. PenroseEllerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 119


ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

119 ROCKFIELD
ROAD. PenroseEllerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 121B


ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

121B ROCKFIELD
ROAD. PenroseEllerslie

Southern Isthmus Rezone 48 STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

48 STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 48A STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

48A STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

LOCALITY

Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

100

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield No Change


Road. Site not close to higher density areas or the RFN.
Site is also remote from LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from MHU on Rockfield Road. Site No Change
not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also
remote from LC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU on Rockfield Road. Site No Change
not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also
remote from LC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield No Change
Road. Site not close to higher density areas or the RFN.
Site is also remote from LC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The
proposed retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone objectives and gives effect to the
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No Change
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. Do not
support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone on
State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The proposed
retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
MHS zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Acknowledge that some specific sites in area do and do not


meet the proximity criteria in this location, but note that
other sites in area do and given the Corporations
landholding provide opportunity for integrated
redevelopment of this area and wider land use changes.
Strongly oppose the assertion of spot zoning by Council
given the scale and nature of the Corporations submission
(particulalry in this location).
Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the
proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).
Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the
proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).
Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the
proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8138

839-8139

839-8140

839-8141

839-8157

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 48B STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 48C STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 50 STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 52 STATE


AVENUE. Onehunga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
48B STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

48C STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

50 STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

52 STATE
AVENUE.
Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 90 FRANK


90 FRANK GREY
GREY PLACE. Otahuhu PLACE, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

Onehunga

Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone


on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. Do not
support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone on
State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The proposed
retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
MHS zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. Do not
support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone on
State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The proposed
retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
MHS zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. Do not
support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone on
State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The proposed
retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
MHS zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
on State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. Do not
support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone on
State Avenue because spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The proposed
retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
MHS zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is under the NGC and is also away from
the Town Centre and the RFN. The MHS zone
complements the built character of the area and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

101

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8158

839-816

839-8163

839-8164

839-8165

839-8172

839-8173

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Rezone 84 FRANK


84 FRANK GREY
GREY PLACE. Otahuhu PLACE, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 64, PAIHIA ROAD, Onehunga


Suburban at 64,
Oranga-Ellerslie.
PAIHIA ROAD, OrangaEllerslie.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 102 AVENUE 102 AVENUE


ROAD. Otahuhu from ROAD, Otahuhu
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 26 TODD


26 TODD PLACE,
PLACE. Otahuhu from Otahuhu
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 28 TODD


28 TODD PLACE,
PLACE. Otahuhu from Otahuhu.
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 174


ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

174 Rockfield
Road Penrose

Penrose

Southern Isthmus Rezone 176


ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

176 Rockfield
Road Penrose

Penrose

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. The property is under the NGC, the property is
also away from the TC and the RFN. The MHS zone
complements the built character of the area and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road. This site
not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also
remote from LC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is away from the TC and the RFN. The
MHS zone complements the built character of the area
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is away from the TC and the RFN. The
MHS zone complements the built character of the area
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is away from the TC and the RFN. The
MHS zone complements the built character of the area
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield
Road. This site is not close to the RFN or any LCs. This
retention aligns with objectives of the MHS zone. A
further reason for not rezoning this property is that is
directly adjoins a large area of LI and rezoning may create
reverse sensitivity issues. Therefore the retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield
Road. This site is not close to RFN or any LCs. This
retention aligns with objectives of the MHS zone. A
further reason for not rezoning this property is that is
directly adjoins a large area of LI and rezoning may create
reverse sensitivity issues. Therefore the retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS

102

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No Change
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No Change

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review
No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No Change

MHU

Oppose

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

No Change

MHU

Oppose

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8174

839-8175

839-8187

839-8188

839-8189

839-8190

839-8232

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 174B


ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Southern Isthmus Rezone 174A


ROCKFIELD ROAD.
Penrose-Ellerslie
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
174B Rockfield
Road Penrose

174A Rockfield
Road Penrose

LOCALITY

Penrose

Penrose

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 17 RONAKI


17 RONAKI ROAD, Otahuhu
ROAD. Otahuhu from Otahuhu
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 19 RONAKI


19 RONAKI ROAD, Otahuhu
ROAD. Otahuhu from Otahuhu
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1 CLEMENTS


STREET. Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

1 CLEMENTS
Otahuhu
STREET. Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 1A CLEMENTS 1A CLEMENTS


Otahuhu
STREET. Otahuhu
STREET, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 16


16 ROOSEVELT
ROOSEVELT AVENUE. AVENUE.
Onehunga from SH to Onehunga
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Onehunga

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

103

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield No Change


Road. Site not close to higher density areas or the RFN. A
further reason for not rezoning this property is that is
directly adjoins a large area of LI and rezoning may create
reverse sensitivity. Site is also remote from LC. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and give effect to the RPS.
A further reason for not rezoning this property is that is
directly adjoins a large area of LI and rezoning may create
reverse sensitivity issues.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU on Rockfield No Change
Road. This site is not close to the RFN or any local
centres. MHS zoning complements the planned suburban
residential character of the area. This retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change in zoning from MHS to MHU.
Retain MHS zoning. The site is away from the TC and the
RFN. The MHS zone complements the built character of
the area and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change in zoning from MHS to MHU.
Retain MHS zoning. The site is away from the TC and the
RFN. The MHS zone complements the built character of
the area and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is away from the TC and the RFN public
transport network. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is away from the TC and the RFN public
transport network. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHU on Roosevelt Avenue.
This site is not close to higher density areas or the RFN.
Site is also remote from LC. MHU complements the
neighbourhood's planned urban built character and
rezoning of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the


proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).
Acknowledge that specific site does not meet the
proximity criteria in this location, but note that other sites
in area do and given the Corporations landholding provide
opportunity for integrated redevelopment of this area and
wider land use changes. Strongly oppose the assertion of
spot zoning by Council given the scale and nature of the
Corporations submission (particulalry in this location).

No Change

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review
No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU
MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8233

839-8234

839-824

839-8241

839-8242

839-8243

839-8244

839-831

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Southern Isthmus Rezone 16A


16A ROOSEVELT
ROOSEVELT AVENUE. AVENUE.
Onehunga from SH to Onehunga
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Rezone 18


18 ROOSEVELT
ROOSEVELT AVENUE. AVENUE.
Onehunga from SH to Onehunga
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 41A,41B, ARANUI
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.

41A,41B, ARANUI Mount


ROAD
Wellington

Southern Isthmus Rezone 71 FRANK


71 FRANK GREY
GREY PLACE. Otahuhu PLACE, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

Southern Isthmus Rezone 73 FRANK


73 FRANK GREY
GREY PLACE. Otahuhu PLACE, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

THAB

MHS

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 2A


2A CHATFIELD
Otahuhu
CHATFIELD AVENUE. AVENUE, Otahuhu
Otahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Rezone 75 FRANK


75 FRANK GREY
GREY PLACE. Otahuhu PLACE, Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otahuhu

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 36, PORTAGE
ROAD, Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

36, PORTAGE
ROAD, Otahuhu.

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

104

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change from SH to MHU on Roosevelt Avenue.


This site has good access to the RFN and is located
around large public open space. The proposed rezoning
us the most appropriate way to achieve the MHU zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support change from SH to MHU on Roosevelt Avenue.


This site has good access to the RFN and is located
around large public open space. The proposed rezoning
us the most appropriate way to achieve the MHU zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support retention of THAB. The sites are located close to No Change


a centre and have good access to the RFN. The retention
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS No Change


zoning. The site is away from the TC and the RFN public
transport network. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS No Change
zoning. The site is away from the TC and the RFN public
transport network. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS No Change
zoning. The site is away from the TC and the RFN public
transport network. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change in from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS No Change
zoning. The site is away from the TC and the RFN public
transport network. The MHS zone complements the built
character of the area and retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB. The THAB zoning is
No Change
located close to the Otahuhu TC with public transport
network including public transport interchange. The
retention of the THAB zoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-849

839-864

839-872

839-873

839-88

839-885

839-887

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 149, PAIHIA


Suburban at 149,
ROAD, OrangaPAIHIA ROAD, Oranga- Ellerslie.
Ellerslie.

LOCALITY

Onehunga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 445, ONEHUNGA Onehunga


Urban at 445,
MALL, Onehunga.
ONEHUNGA MALL,
Onehunga.

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 21, FITZGERALD


Urban at 21,
ROAD
FITZGERALD ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

Mount
Wellington

MHU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


26, PANORAMA
ROAD, Mount
Wellington.

Mount
Wellington

26, PANORAMA
ROAD

MU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 28A,28, ORANGA Onehunga


Suburban at 28A,28, AVENUE, Penrose.
ORANGA AVENUE,
Penrose.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


5, HAMLIN ROAD,
Mount Wellington.

MU

5, HAMLIN ROAD Mount


Wellington

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 31, RAWHITI


Suburban at 31,
ROAD, One Tree
RAWHITI ROAD, One Hill-Oranga.
Tree Hill-Oranga.

Onehunga

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

MU

MHS

MU

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone on Paihia Road. This site


is not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also
remote from LC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU on Onehunga Mall. This site is
adjacent to a large area of THAB zoned properties and
has good access to the RFN. MHU complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. The site has good access to
the RFN and is located close to areas of THAB. The
retention of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support retention of MU. The site is not adjacent
to any centres, higher residential areas or the RFN and
future application is limited to locations which will not
harm the vitality and viability of the centres. The area is
characterised by residential and therefore MHS is more
appropriate and reflects existing character. The rezoning
to MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

105

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MU

Oppose

No Change

No Change

MHS

The proposed rezoning to MHS is an out of scope change,


relevant further details can be found in Attachment F.
Support retention of MHS zone on Oranga Avenue. These No Change
sites are not close to any centres or the RFN. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU. The site is in close proximity to No Change
THAB and a MC with good public transport links.
Retention of the MU zone supports a quality compact
urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives for the zone.
Support retention of MHS zone on Rawhiti Road. This site No Change
is adjacent to a large area of THAB zoned properties, has
good access to the RFN and is within walking distance of
a neighbourhood centre. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and give effect to the
RPS.

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MU

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-900

839-906

839-915

839-916

839-918

839-945

839-953

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 58, ORANGA


Onehunga
Suburban at 58,
AVENUE, Penrose.
ORANGA AVENUE,
Penrose.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 15,17, WAHANUI Ellerslie


Suburban at 15,17,
ROAD, Greenlane.
WAHANUI ROAD,
Greenlane.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 30, ATHENS


Onehunga
Suburban at 30,
ROAD, Onehunga.
ATHENS ROAD,
Onehunga.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 9 Lawry Street


Suburban at 9,
Ellerslie
LAWRY STREET,
Ellerslie.

Ellerslie

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Single House


at 18, CATHERINE
STREET, Onehunga.

Onehunga

18 Catherine
Street Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 26, RANGIPAWA


Suburban at 26,
ROAD, One Tree
RANGIPAWA ROAD, Hill.
One Tree Hill.

Onehunga

Southern Isthmus Retain TC at 1A/44D/4, GERRARD


BEESON PLACE,
Onehunga.

Onehunga

1A/4-4D/4
Gerrard Beeson
Place Onehunga

SH

MHS

TC

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

TC

REASONS

106

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone on Oranga Avenue. This No Change


site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or the RFN. The retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the zone objectives and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning on Wahnui Road. These No Change
sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and the notified
zoning is retained because the outcomes the Pre-1944
BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone on Athens Road. This site


does not have good access to any suburban town centres
or RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS zone as the site is not
within close proximity to existing or planned public
transport network or large urban facilities. The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of SH zone on Catherine Street. This
site is affected by the HC and support retention of
notified SH zone because the outcomes the HC seeks to
achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone on Rangipawa Road. This
site does not have good access to any suburban town
centres or RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of TC zoning on Gerrard Beeson Place.
The properties are identified as part of the existing
commercial town centre. The Onehunga TC will remain as
identified in the centres hierarchy and RPS. The retention
of the TC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

TC

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-956

839-959

839-973

839-1287

839-1288

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


3F/10,4C/10,3D/10,4
H/10,3C/10,4G/10,1E
/10,1D/10,1B/10,1A/
10,3H/10,4A/10,4E/1
0,3K/10,3I/10,2E/10,
2B/10,1C/10,3E/10,1
F/10,4D/10,3B/10,3G
/10,2I/10,1I/10,4I/10,
1H/10,4J/10,2A/10,2
G/10,2D/10,1J/10,3J/
10,1G/10,4F/10,2F/1
0,2J/10,2C/10,3A/10,
4B/10,2K/10,2H/10,
PRINCES STREET,
Otahuhu.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

3F/10,4C/10,3D/1 Otahuhu
0,4H/10,3C/10,4G
/10,1E/10,1D/10,
1B/10,1A/10,3H/1
0,4A/10,4E/10,3K
/10,3I/10,2E/10,2
B/10,1C/10,3E/10,
1F/10,4D/10,3B/1
0,3G/10,2I/10,1I/
10,4I/10,1H/10,4J
/10,2A/10,2G/10,
2D/10,1J/10,3J/10
,1G/10,4F/10,2F/1
0,2J/10,2C/10,3A/
10,4B/10,2K/10,2
H/10, PRINCES
STREET, Otahuhu.

PAUP ZONE

MU

Southern Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 22B, CURLEW BAY Otahuhu


Suburban at 22B,
ROAD, Otahuhu.
CURLEW BAY ROAD,
Otahuhu.

MHS

Southern Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 46A, MASON
AVENUE, Otahuhu.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 8,8A, FOWLDS
AVENUE,
Sandringham.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at
443,447,445,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill.

46A, MASON
AVENUE,
Otahuhu.

Otahuhu

8, 8A Fowlds
Avenue
Sandringham

Sandringham

443, 447, 445


Sandringham
Road
Sandringham

Sandringham

THAB

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

MHS

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

107

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the MU zone. The notified


No Change
PAUP provides for intensification of use around the
Otahuhu TC including Atkinson Ave and Station Rd. This
is part of the revitalisation of the Otahuhu TC and
surrounding area. Atkinson Avenue and Station Road are
adjacent to the RFN with Station Road the site of a new
public transport interchange. The MU zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning
to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support the retention of the MHS zone. This property is No Change


not close to the RFN, and is not close to the Otahuhu TC.
This area is mainly comprised of suburban dwellings. The
MHS zone complements the neighbourhood's suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the retention of THAB on this site
MHS
propose to change to MHS. This site is subject to the Pre1944 BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.
The proposed rezoning to MHS is an out of scope change,
relevant further details can be found in Attachment F.
Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites No change
are located close to St Lukes Road RFN and St Lukes TC
and MU zone. The retention of the notified THAB zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of the notified MHU zone.
THAB
Properties are located with 5 minutes walk of the
Sandringham Rd RFN and the Sandringham LC. Proposed
alternative rezoning to THAB that is in scope of an area
wide submission (6099-6), refer to Attachment D.
Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to FN and Centre make THAB appropriate


soning. Do not support Council's presumption of the
outcome of the Pre-1944 Demolition Control on the use of
this land.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1289

839-1290

839-1296

839-1297

839-196

839-2503

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 451,453,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill.

451, 453
Sandringham
Road,
Sandringham

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 2, CARRIE
STREET,2, COYLE
STREET,501,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, Sandringham.

2 Carrie Street, 2 Sandringham


Coyle Street and
501 Sandringham
Road,
Sandringham

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 604,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD,2, HARWOOD
STREET,
Sandringham.

604 Sandringham Sandringham


Road, 2 Harwood
Street,
Sandringham

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 91, 93 Lambeth


Urban at 91,93,
Road,
LAMBETH ROAD,
Sandringham
SandringhamBalmoral.

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2, WATSON
AVENUE,
Sandringham.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 26
KITCHENER ROAD.
Sandringham.

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

Sandringham

2 Watson Avenue, Sandringham


Sandringham

26 Kitchener
Road,
Sandringham

Sandringham

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

108

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of the notified MHU zone.


THAB
Properties are located with 5 minutes walk of the
Sandringham Rd RFN and the Sandringham LC. Proposed
alternative rezoning to THAB that is in scope of an area
wide submission (6099-6), refer to Attachment D.
Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of the MHU zone. Properties
THAB
are located with 5 minutes walk of the Sandringham
Road RFN and the Sandringham LC. Proposed alternative
rezoning to THAB that is in scope of an area wide
submission (6099-6), refer to Attachment D. Rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHU zone and support a
THAB
change to THAB zone, in scope of an area-wide
submission (6099-6)(refer to Attachment D). These sites
are located around the Sandringham Road RFN, and close
to the Sandringham LC. The rezoning to THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of notified MHU zone. The
MHS
properties are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Proposed
alternative rezoning to MHS recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
The outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The scope to change zone is
provided by area-wide submissions listed in this
spreadsheet and Attachment D. Rezoning to MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Support retention of notified THAB zone. Property is
No change
located close to the Sandringham Road RFN and the
Saint Lukes TC. Rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support retention of the MHU zone. Properties
THAB
are located with 5 minutes walk of the Sandringham
Road RFN and the Sandringham LC. Proposed alternative
rezoning to THAB that is in scope of an area wide
submission (6099-6), refer to Attachment D. Rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-268

839-2844

839-2845

839-2865

839-2904

839-2921

839-2926

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 18, FOWLDS
AVENUE,
Sandringham.
Western Isthmus Rezone 299,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
18 Fowlds
Avenue,
Sandringham

LOCALITY

Sandringham

299 Sandringham Sandringham


Road
Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

THAB

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 76, LAMBETH 76 Lambeth Road Sandringham


ROAD, Sandringham- Sandringham
Balmoral from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 17,


17 Cambourne
CAMBOURNE ROAD, Road
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 8, SHORWELL 8 Shorwell Street, Sandringham


STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 29, KIWITEA 29 Kiwitea St,


STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 16, LAMBETH 16 Lambeth Road Sandringham


ROAD, Sandringham- Mount Roskill
Balmoral from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

109

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB zone at this site.. The site is


No change
located close to St Lukes Road RFN and St Lukes TC and
MU zone. The retention of the notified THAB zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from notified MHU to THAB. Property is THAB
located on the Sandringham Road RFN and close to the
Saint Lukes TC. It is not affected by HC, Pre-1944 BDC or
flooding constraints. Rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support change to the MHU zone. Properties are


within 5 minutes walk of the Sandringham Rd RFN .

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

THAB

Propose alternative rezoning from MHS to the more


intensive THAB zone that is in scope of an area wide
submission (6099-6), refer to Attachment D. Rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. This No change
site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and by the HC and
retains the notified SH zone because the outcomes the
overlay seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is
MHU
located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review. Do not
support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

Proximity to Local Centre makes MHU appropriate zone


(close to FN also). Consider flooding constraints can be
appropriately managed by development controls of
Unitary Plan.

Proximity to Local Centre makes MHU appropriate zone.


Consider amenity values of character overlay can be
appropriately managed by development controls of that
Overlay and not reliant on SH zoning.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2935

839-2938

839-2959

839-2960

839-2971

839-3088

839-3120

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 8, WEMBLEY 8 Wembley Road


ROAD, Mount Eden Mount Eden
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone 17,


PATTERSON STREET,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

17 Patterson
Street,
Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 31, ELDON


31 Eldon Road,
ROAD, Mount Eden Mount Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone 10, PARRY


10 Parry Street
STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 15,


HUNTINGTREE
AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 322, MOUNT
ALBERT ROAD, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

15 Huntingtree
Avenue,
Sandringham

322 Mount Albert Sandringham


Road
Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 35, PARRISH 35 Parrish Road,


ROAD, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

110

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is


MHU
located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change from notified MHS to MHU. Property is
close to the Sandringham Road RFN and THAB areas
Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change


site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is
MHU
located close to Mount Albert Road RFN and public open
spaces. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is


MHU
located on Mount Albert Road RFN. The rezoning to MHU
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Proximity to Local Centre/education facilities makes MHU


appropriate zone (close to FN also). Consider flooding
constraints can be appropriately managed by development
controls of Unitary Plan. Do not support Pre-1944
Demolition Control Overlay.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone (close to FN also). Consider flooding constraints can
be appropriately managed by development controls of
Unitary Plan. Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control
Overlay.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3122

839-3153

839-3155

839-3162

839-3166

839-3179

839-3190

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 9, DUNCAN 9 Duncan Avenue, Sandringham


AVENUE,
Sandringham
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 37,
37 Halesowen Ave Mount Eden
HALESOWEN
AVENUE,
Sandringham-Mount
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 57, RENFREW 57 Renfrew Ave


AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 5, SHORWELL 5 Shorwell St,
STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Sandringham

Sandringham

SH

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 51, DISRAELI 51 Disraeli Street Mount Eden


STREET, Epsom from Mount Eden
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 22, WEMBLEY 22 Lambeth Road Mount Eden,


ROAD,21, LAMBETH Mount Roskill
Sandringham
ROAD, Mount Eden
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 17,


HARWOOD STREET,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

17 Harwood St
Sandringham

Sandringham

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

111

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change


site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change
is affected by the HC and flooding constraints and retains
the notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlay
seeks to achieve generally align with the objectives of the
SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is
MHU
located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Proximity to centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone (close to FN also). Consider flooding constraints can
be appropriately managed by development controls of
Unitary Plan. Consider character overlay values can be
appropriately managed through development controls of
that overlay.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3195

839-3255

839-3267

839-3271

839-3295

839-3298

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 628,626,


SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
626, 628
Sandringham
Road,
Sandringham

LOCALITY

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 214,


214 Sandringham Sandringham
SANDRINGHAM
Road,
ROAD, Sandringham- Sandringham
Arch Hill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 29,


29 Shorwell Street Sandringham
SHORWELL STREET, Sandringham
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 45, DISRAELI 45 Disraeli Street Mount Eden


STREET, Epsom from Mount Eden
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 174, MOUNT 174 Mount Albert Sandringham


ALBERT ROAD, Mount Road
Albert-Royal Oak
Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, HULSE


AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

1 Hulse Avenue
Sandringham

Sandringham

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

112

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from notified MHS to MHU.


THAB
Properties are located on the Sandringham Road RFN and
are close to the Sandringham LC. Proposed alternative
rezoning to THAB that is in scope of an area wide
submission (6099-6), refer to Attachment D. Rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone, propose
THAB
more intensified zoning change to THAB, where
managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. Property is located with 5 minutes
walk of the Sandringham Road RFN and is in close
proximity to a large public open spaces (Gribblehirst
Park). Proposed alternative rezoning to THAB that is in
scope of an area wide submission (6099-6), refer to
Attachment D. Rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - this No change
site is not close to a centre, is remote from the RFN and
the area is mainly suburban dwellings. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is
MHU
located on Mount Albert Road RFN. The rezoning to MHU
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3310

839-3311

839-3326

839-3327

839-3329

839-3333

839-3349

839-3357

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 54A, FOWLDS 54A Fowlds Ave


AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 17, KIWITEA 17 Kiwitea St,
STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 7, COLUMBIA 7 Columbia Road


ROAD, Sandringham Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 306, MOUNT 306 Mount Albert Sandringham


ALBERT ROAD, Mount Road
Albert-Royal Oak
Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 21, KIWITEA 21 Kiwitea Street, Sandringham


STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 85, KING


EDWARD STREET,
Mount Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 28, LAMBETH
ROAD, SandringhamBalmoral from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

85 King Edward
Street, Mount
Eden

Mount Eden

28 Lambeth Road Sandringham


Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 16,


16 Ewington Ave
EWINGTON AVENUE, Mount Eden
Mount Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Eden

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this


site is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

113

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the site is
MHU
located close to Sandringham Road RFN, THAB zone and
public open space. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is
MHU
located on Mount Albert Road RFN. The rezoning to MHU
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is


MHU
located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the notified
zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Proximity criteria makes MHU appropriate zone. Consider


amenity values of character overlay can be appropriately
managed by development controls of that Overlay and not
reliant on SH zoning.

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control
Overlay.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3377

839-3378

839-3379

839-3382

839-3419

839-3476

839-3509

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 33, ARABI


33 Arabi Street,
STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 17, WEMBLEY 17 Wembley Rd


ROAD, Mount Eden
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone 22, TRURO


ROAD, Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

22 Truro Road
Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 35, KIWITEA 35 Kiwitea Street, Sandringham


STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 20A,


HARWOOD STREET,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

20A Harwood
Street,
Sandringham

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 69, BURNLEY 69 Burnley


TERRACE, Kingsland- Terrace, Mount
Mt Eden from Single Eden
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone 25, KIWITEA 25 Kiwitea St,


STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Sandringham

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

114

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is
MHU
located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change
site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified MHS zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944
BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.
Do not support change sought to MHU zone, support a
more intensified zoning to THAB - this site is located
close to Sandringham Road RFN, Sandringham LC and
public open space. This site is subject to flooding
constraints however rezoning to THAB is appropriate
where managing flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. Scope to change to THAB
is provided by submission 6099, refer to Attachment D.
The rezoning to THAB is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review. Do not
support Pre-1944 Demolition Control
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

THAB

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3517

839-3519

839-3554

839-3571

839-3636

839-3646

839-3654

839-3661

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 8,6, HULSE


AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 9, FREYBERG
AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6,8 Hulse Ave

Western Isthmus Rezone 1A,


HARWOOD STREET,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 4, COLUMBIA
ROAD, Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1A Harwood
Street
Sandringham

Sandringham

4 Columbia Road
Sandringham

Sandringham

9 Freyberg
Avenue
Sandringham

Sandringham

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 18,


18 Cambourne Rd Sandringham
CAMBOURNE ROAD,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 17, ELDON


ROAD, Mount Eden
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

17 Eldon Road
Balmoral

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone 23, WEMBLEY 23 Wembley


ROAD, Mount Eden Road, Mount
from Single House to Eden
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone 7, PARRISH


7 Parrish Rd,
ROAD, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Sandringham

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

115

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to MHU, support a more THAB
intensive zone to THAB. The site is located close to
Sandringham LC and RFN. The change to MHU is provided
by submission #6099, refer to Attachment D. The
rezoning to THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the site is
MHU
located close to Sandringham Road RFN, THAB zone and
public open space. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the notified
zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review. Do not
support Pre-1944 Demolition Control
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

No change

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3674

839-3677

839-3683

839-3687

839-3689

839-3710

839-3716

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 5,


HAZELMERE ROAD,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 43, KIWITEA
STREET, Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
5 Hazelmere
Road,
Sandringham

Sandringham

43 Kiwitea Street, Sandringham


Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, TRURO


1 Truro Road,
ROAD, Sandringham Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Western Isthmus Rezone 26,


SHORWELL STREET,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 656,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Sandringham

26 Shorwell Street Sandringham


Sandringham

656 Sandringham Sandringham


Road,
Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHU

MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 2, SHORWELL 2 Shorwell Street, Sandringham


STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 4, LAMBETH 4 Lambeth Road


ROAD, Sandringham- Mount Roskill
Balmoral from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Sandringham

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

116

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change


site is affected by flooding constraints, is not close to
centres or RFN and is suitable for suburban built-form of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. The retention of
the notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change
is affected by the HC and flooding constraints and retains
the notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlay
seeks to achieve generally align with the objectives of the
SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone.
Support rezoning from notified MHU to THAB. Property is THAB
located on the Sandringham Road RFN and close to the
Saint Lukes TC. It is not affected by HC, Pre-1944 BDC or
flooding constraints. Rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support change from MHS to MHU . This site is not


MHU
affected by HC, Pre-1944 or flooding constraints and is
close to the Sandringham Rd RFN. Rezoning is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from notified MHS to MHU.
THAB
Properties are located on the Sandringham Road RFN and
are close to the Sandringham LC. Proposed alternative
rezoning to THAB that is in scope of an area wide
submission (6099-6), refer to Attachment D. Rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is


MHU
located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone (close to FN also). Consider flooding constraints can
be appropriately managed by development controls of
Unitary Plan. Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control
Overlay.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3724

839-374

839-3753

839-3758

839-3773

839-3787

839-3814

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 13,


HARWOOD STREET,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 2B,
SHACKLETON ROAD,
Mount Eden.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
13 Harwood St
Sandringham

LOCALITY

Sandringham

2B Shackleton
Mount Eden
Road Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone 68, KIWITEA 68 Kiwitea St


STREET, Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,


ELIZABETH STREET,
Mount Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 400,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

32 Elizabeth
Street, Mount
Eden

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone 24, MOUNT


PLEASANT ROAD,
Mount Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
5/185,7/185,4/185,2/
185,3/185,1/185,6/1
85, LANDSCAPE
ROAD, Mount Eden
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24 Mt Pleasant
Rd, Mount Eden

400 Sandringham Sandringham


Road
Sandringham

Mount Eden

5/185,7/185,4/18 Mount Eden


5,2/185,3/185,1/1
85,6/185,
Landscape Road,
Mount Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHU

MHS

SH

MHU

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

117

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHU zone at this site - the site is


No change
located close to Mount Eden Road RFN, and NCs. The
retention of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is
MHU
located close to Mount Albert Road RFN. The rezoning to
MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the notified
zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from notified MHU to THAB. Property is THAB
located on the Sandringham Road RFN and close to the
Saint Lukes TC. It is not affected by HC, Pre-1944 BDC or
flooding constraints. Rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these sites MHU
are located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zone, and public open space. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone (close to FN also). Do not support Pre-1944
Demolition Control Overlay.

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3835

839-3846

839-3856

839-3869

839-3901

839-3908

839-3911

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 76, TAUMATA 76 Taumata Road, Sandringham


ROAD, Sandringham Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 26, GROVE


26 Grove Road,
ROAD, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, WEMBLEY 1 Wembley Road


ROAD, Mount Eden Mount Eden
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

Mount Eden

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 54, KIWITEA 54 Kiwitea Street, Sandringham


STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 31,


31 Cambourne
CAMBOURNE ROAD, Road
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 49, LAMBETH 49 Lambeth Rd


ROAD, SandringhamBalmoral from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Balmoral

Western Isthmus Rezone 170,


170 Haverstock
HAVERSTOCK ROAD, Road
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

118

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is


MHU
located close to Mount Albert Road RFN and is not
subject to any relevant site-specific constraints. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less
MHU
intensified zone to MHU - this site is located close to St
Lukes Road RFN, THAB zone, St Luke TC and public open
spaces. This site is affected by flooding constraints
however rezoning from SH to MHU is supported as
managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is
MHU
located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change
is affected by the HC and flooding constraints and retains
the notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlay
seeks to achieve generally align with the objectives of the
SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. This No change
site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by the HC and flooding constraints and retains
the notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlay
seeks to achieve generally align with the objectives of the
SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is not No change
close to higher density areas or the RFN. It is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Retention of the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Support in Part

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Consider proximity to St Lukes makes THAB zone


appropriate, good FN access also.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate
zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review. Do not
support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.
Consider character overlay values can be appropriately
managed through development controls of that overlay.

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3918

839-3936

839-395

839-4435

839-4436

839-4437

839-4438

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, RENFREW


AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 23, ELDON
ROAD, Mount Eden
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1 Renfrew Avenue Sandringham


Sandringham

23 Eldon Road
Balmoral

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 3 Kitchener Road, Sandringham


Urban at 3,
Sandringham
KITCHENER ROAD,
Sandringham.

Western Isthmus Rezone 18B,18A,


WARD TERRACE,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 8,2,4,6,
PARRISH ROAD,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 24,26,
PARRISH ROAD,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 54,
GRIBBLEHIRST
ROAD,40, PARRISH
ROAD, Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

18B, 18A Ward


Terrace
Sandringham

Sandringham

2,4,6,8 Parrish
Road,
Sandringham

Sandringham

24,26 Parrish Rd,


Sandringham

54 Gribblehirst
Road, 40 Parrish
Road,
Sandringham

Sandringham

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

119

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is


MHU
located on Mount Albert Road RFN. The rezoning to MHU
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this


site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
Do not support retention of notified MHU zone. The
property is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. The MHU zone
is generally incompatible with the values of the areas
that are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944
BDC. The outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve
are generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS
zone. Proposed alternative rezoning to a less intensive
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review. Do not
support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

MHS

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

No change

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4439

839-4440

839-4441

839-4442

839-4443

839-4444

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 25,27,27A,


PARRISH ROAD,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 39,41,
PARRISH ROAD,36,
CAMBOURNE ROAD,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

25,27,27A Parrish Sandringham


Rd, Sandringham

39,41 Parrish
Sandringham
Road, and 36
Cambourne Road,
Sandringham

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 42,40, ST


ALBANS AVENUE,
Mount Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
253,251,249,255,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

40,42 St Albans
Ave

SH

251, 253,
249,255,
Sandringham
Road
Sandringham

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 273,275,277,


SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

273, 275, 277


Sandringham
Road
Sandringham

Sandringham

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone


245, 247, 249, 243 Sandringham
245,247,249,243,
Balmoral Road
BALMORAL ROAD,
Sandringham
Epsom-Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

MHU

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

120

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and flooding
constraints and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the overlays seek to achieve are generally
aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and gives
effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone (close to FN also). Consider flooding constraints can
be appropriately managed by development controls of
Unitary Plan. Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control
Overlay.

No change

Support rezoning from notified MHU to THAB. Properties THAB


are located on the Sandringham Road RFN and close to
the Saint Lukes TC. They are not affected by HC, Pre-1944
BDC or flooding constraints. Rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support rezoning from notified MHU to THAB. Properties THAB


are located on the Sandringham Road RFN and close to
the Saint Lukes TC. They are not affected by HC, Pre-1944
BDC or flooding constraints. Rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from notified MHS zone to the


THAB
MHU zone. Property is located on the Balmoral RFN and
is within 5 minutes walk of the Sandringham Rd RFN and
the Balmoral LC. Propose alternative rezoning to THAB
that is in scope of an area wide submission (6099-6),
refer to Attachment D. Rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB and gives
effect to the RPS.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4445

839-4446

839-4447

839-4448

839-4449

839-4450

839-4451

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 31,31A,


DUNBAR ROAD,
Mount Eden from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 12A,12,
PATTERSON STREET,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31, 31A Dunbar


Road Balmoral

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,15,17,


SHORWELL STREET,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 429,431,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9,15,17,
Shorwell Street,
Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 18,20,22,16,


SHORWELL STREET,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,20,22,16
Shorwell Street
Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 36,34,


SHORWELL STREET,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 164,166,
HAVERSTOCK ROAD,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34,36 Shorwell
Street,
Sandringham

12A, 12 Patterson Sandringham


Street,
Sandringham

429,431
Sandringham Rd

164,166
Haverstock Rd

Sandringham

Sandringham

Sandringham

Sandringham

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

121

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the site is


MHU
located close to Balmoral Road and Dominion Road RFN,
THAB zone, centres and public open space. The rezoning
to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these sites MHU
are located close to Sandringham Road and Balmoral
Road RFN, THAB zone and centres. The rezoning to MHU
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Support change from MHS to MHU for 16,18.20,22 and


26 Shorwell St. These sites are not affected by HC, Pre1944 BDC or flooding constraints and are close to the
Sandringham Rd RFN. Rezoning is the most appropriate
way to meet the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. These No change


sites are affected by flooding constraints. Retaining the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4452

839-4453

839-4454

839-4455

839-4456

839-4457

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


160A,162B,162A,160
B,160, HAVERSTOCK
ROAD, Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

160A,162B,162A, Sandringham
160B,160,
Haverstock Road,
Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,13,15,14,16,18,
HULSE AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 5,7, HULSE
AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 4,4A,
CAMDEN ROAD,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13,15,14,16,18 Sandringham
Hulse Avenue,
Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 27A,27B,


KITCHENER ROAD,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 2,4,
TRANMERE ROAD,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

27A, 27B
Kitchener Road,
Sandringham

5,7 Hulse Ave

Sandringham

4A Camden Road Sandringham


Sandringham

2,4 Tranmere
Road,
Sandringham

Sandringham

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

SH, MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

122

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from notified SH/MHS zone to the MHS


MHU zone. Sites are not close to higher density areas or
the RFN. Sites are also remote from LC. Proposed
retention of notified MHS zone for 162B, 162A and 160B
Haverstock Rd and proposed alternative zoning from
notified SH to a more intensive MHS zoning for 160 and
160A Haverstock Rd. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Sites not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Sites are also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these No change
sites are not close to centres, are remote from the RFN
and the area is mainly suburban dwellings. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these No change
sites are not close to centres or RFN and are suitable for
suburban built-form of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support in Part
Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate
zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4458

839-4459

839-4460

839-4461

839-4462

839-4463

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 63, KIWITEA


STREET,282,284,
MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Mount AlbertRoyal Oak from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

63 Kiwitea Street, Sandringham


and 282,284
Mount Albert
Road, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak

Western Isthmus Rezone 292,290,


290, 292 Mount
MOUNT ALBERT
Albert Road
ROAD, Mount Albert- Sandringham
Royal Oak from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 86,84,


KIWITEA STREET,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 57,59,
KIWITEA STREET,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
74A,74B,74,78,76,
KIWITEA STREET,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 51, KIWITEA
STREET,2,4,
FREYBERG AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

86,84 Kiwitea
Street,
Sandringham

Sandringham

57,59 Kiwitea
Street,
Sandringham

Sandringham

74A,74B,74,78,76 Sandringham
Kiwitea Street,
Sandringham

51 Kiwitea Street, Sandringham


and 2,4 Freyberg
Avenue,
Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

123

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these sites MHU


are located close to RFN and public open spaces. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these sites MHU


are located close to RFN and public open spaces. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Support change from notified MHS to more intensive


MHU
MHU zone. Properties are close to the Mount Albert Rd
RFN. Rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Support

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is


MHU
located on Mount Albert Road RFN. The rezoning to MHU
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these sites MHU


are located close to RFN and public open spaces. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these sites MHU


are located close to RFN and public open spaces. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4464

839-4465

839-4467

839-4468

839-4469

839-4470

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 1,3,


FREYBERG
AVENUE,49, KIWITEA
STREET, Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,3 Freyberg
Avenue, and 49
Kiwitea Street,
Sandringham

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 64B,64,


KIWITEA STREET,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
48,46,44,42,50,40,
KIWITEA STREET,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 72, RENFREW
AVENUE,30, PARRY
STREET, Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

64,64B Kiwitea
Street,
Sandringham

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,30,


KIWITEA STREET,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 12,
VANCOUVER
AVENUE,3,5,7, PARRY
STREET, Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,30 Kiwitea
Street,
Sandringham

48,46,44,42,50,40 Sandringham
Kiwitea Street,
Sandringham

72 Renfrew Ave,
30 Parry St

Sandringham

Sandringham

12 Vancouver
Sandringham
Avenue, and 3,5,7
Parry Street,
Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

124

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change from notified MHS to more intensive


MHU
MHU zone. Properties are close to the Mount Albert Rd
RFN. Rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the HC and flooding constraints and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the
overlay seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU , The No change
sites areas affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone . The retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Support change in part. 12 Vancouver Ave is close to the SH, MHU
Sandringham Rd RFN and THAB areas. It is therefore
appropriate to support the proposed rezoning from MHS
to a more intensive MHU. This is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Parry St sits within the HC area. The outcomes the HC
seeks to achieve are inconsistent with the objectives of
the MHU zone but are generally aligned with the
objectives of the notified SH zone. The notified SH zone
complements the neighbourhoods planned suburban
built character. Support retention of SH zoning for 3,5
and 7 Parry St as the most appropriate way to achieve the
SH zones objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4471

839-4472

839-4473

839-4474

839-4475

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,21, PARRY 19,21 Parry Street, Sandringham


STREET, Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 1,3,3A,


HARWOOD
STREET,4,6, PARRY
STREET, Sandringham
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

1,3,3A Harwood
Street, and 4,6
Parry Street,
Sandringham

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone


86,88 Lambeth Rd Balmoral
86A,88,86B,86,
LAMBETH ROAD,
SandringhamBalmoral from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 82,80,


80,82 Lambeth Rd Balmoral
LAMBETH ROAD,
SandringhamBalmoral from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 72,70,


70,72 Lambeth Rd Balmoral
LAMBETH ROAD,
SandringhamBalmoral from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

125

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU/THAB

Support in Part

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Do not support retention of the MHU zone for 1,3 and 3A MHS, THAB
Harwood St. These properties are located within 5
minutes walk of the Sandringham Rd RFN and the
Sandringham LC. Propose alternative rezoning to THAB
that is in scope of an area wide submission (6099-6),
refer to Attachment D. Rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB and gives
effect to the RPS.
4 and 6 Parry St are within the HC. The outcomes the HC
seeks to achieve are inconsistent with the objectives of
the MHU zone but are generally aligned with the
objectives of the MHS zone. The notified MHS zone
complements the neighbourhoods planned suburban
built character. Support retention of MHS zoning for
those properties as the most appropriate way to achieve
the zones objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Support intent of THAB rezoning on basis of Council's


evidence. Do not support the Council's position of Special
Character as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the
character values of the area but consider these can be
managed by the development controls of Overlay (as
appropriate) and need not determine the land use controls
of the zone. Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of
proximity criteria

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate
zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

MHU

MHU

Do not support change sought to MHU zone, support a


THAB
more intensified zoning to THAB - the site is located close
to Sandringham Road RFN and Sandringham LC. Scope to
change to THAB is provided by submission 6099, refer to
Attachment D. The rezoning to THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone.

THAB

MHU

Support

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4476

839-4477

839-4478

839-4479

839-4480

839-4481

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 54,50,52,


50,52,54 Lambeth Balmoral
LAMBETH ROAD,
Rd
SandringhamBalmoral from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 45,43,


43,45 Lambeth Rd Balmoral
LAMBETH ROAD,
SandringhamBalmoral from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 18,18A,20,


KIWITEA STREET,69,
LAMBETH ROAD,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

18,18A,20 Kiwitea Sandringham


Street, and 69
Lambeth Road,
Sandringham

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 75,73,71,


LAMBETH ROAD,9,
KIWITEA STREET,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

75,73,71,
Lambeth Road,
and 9 Kiwitea
Street,
Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 87,85,


LAMBETH ROAD,23,
CALGARY STREET,
SandringhamBalmoral from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

87,85 Lambeth
Road, and 23
Calgary Street,
SandringhamBalmoral

Western Isthmus Rezone 101,101A,


101,101A
LAMBETH ROAD,
Lambeth Rd,
SandringhamSandringham
Balmoral from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

Sandringham

Balmoral

SH, MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

126

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the HC and flooding constraints and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the
overlay seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by flooding constraints and the HC and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the
overlay seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH and MHS to MHU No change
- these sites are affected by the HC and Pre-1944 BDC
and retain the notified SH and MHS zones because the
outcomes the overlay and Pre-1944 BDC seek to achieve
generally align with the objectives of these zones and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH and MHS
zones at these sites is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of these zones.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified MHS zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944
BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate
zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate
zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate
zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

MHU

Oppose
Proximity criteria makes MHU appropriate zone.Do not
support Pre-1944 Demolition Control Overlay.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate
zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4483

839-4484

839-4485

839-4486

839-4557

839-4558

839-488

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 20, WEMBLEY 20 Wembley Road Mount Eden


ROAD, Mount Eden Mount Eden
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 14,14A,


WEMBLEY ROAD,15,
LAMBETH ROAD,
Mount Eden from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14,14A Wembley Mount Eden,


Road, and 15
Sandringham
Lambeth Road,
Mount Eden

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,7,


WEMBLEY ROAD,
Mount Eden from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 2A,2B,
LAMBETH ROAD,
SandringhamBalmoral from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
300,302,304,306,298,
296,294,292,290,
MOUNT EDEN ROAD,
Three Kings-Grafton
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

7, 9, 11 Wembley Mount Eden


Road Mount Eden

MHS

2B Lambeth Road Sandringham


Mount Roskill

300,302,304,306, Mount Eden


298,296,294,292,
290, Mount Eden
Road, Three KingsGrafton

MHS

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 129,


129 Balmoral Rd, Balmoral
BALMORAL ROAD,
EpsomEpsom-Sandringham Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 15, KINGSWAY
AVENUE,
Sandringham.

THAB

15 Kingsway
Avenue,
Sandringham

Sandringham

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

127

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this site is


MHU
located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these sites MHU
are located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these sites MHU


are located close to Dominion Road RFN, THAB and MU
zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change to the MHU zone. Properties are THAB
within 5 minutes walk of the Dominion Rd RFN . Propose
alternative rezoning from MHS to the more intensive
THAB zone that is in scope of an area wide submission
(6099-6), refer to Attachment D. Rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to MHU, support a less
MHS
intensified zone to MHS. The sites are not close to a
centre, are remote from the RFN and the area is mainly
suburban dwellings. The sites are also within a HSA. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support Proposed Upzoning to MHS however consider the


site is more suitable to MHU as has access to facilities
(open space) and PT services on Mount Eden Road (FN
2022). While the HSA on site may limit height do not
consider this is the only development control relevant and
the site suitable for rezoning.

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Consider flooding constraints can be appropriately
managed by development controls of Unitary Plan.
THAB

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is


located close to St Lukes Road RFN and St Lukes TC. The
retention of the notified THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-535

839-7596

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Single House 764 Mount Eden


at 764, MOUNT EDEN Road
ROAD, Three KingsGrafton.

Western Isthmus Rezone 96


96 Balmoral Rd
BALMORAL ROAD.
Epsom-Sandringham
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Mount Eden

Balmoral

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHU

REASONS

128

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of notified SH zone at this site - MHU


this site is located close to Mount Eden Road RFN,
centres and public open space. The rezoning to MHU
zone, in scope of an area-wide submission (6099-4) (refer
to Attachment D) is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change
is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support
Incorrectly coded in Housing submission - Support
Councils position

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU.


839-7698

839-7732

839-7804

839-7806

839-7842

Western Isthmus Rezone 78 FOWLDS


AVENUE.
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 53 KINGSWAY
AVENUE.
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

78 Fowlds Avenue Sandringham


Sandringham

53 Kingsway
Avenue,
Sandringham

Sandringham

MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 11 VOLCANIC 11 Volcanic Street, Mount Eden


STREET. Mount Eden Mount Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 3/9, 2/9, 9


KITCHENER ROAD.
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 762 MOUNT
EDEN ROAD. Three
Kings-Grafton from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

2-3/9 Kitchener
Road,
Sandringham

Sandringham

762 Mount Eden


Road

Mount Eden

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this


site is not close to centres or RFN and is suitable for
suburban built-form of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
site is affected by flooding constraints, is not close to
centres or RFN and is suitable for suburban built-form of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. The retention of
the notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and flooding constraints and retains
the notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlays
seek to achieve generally align with the objectives of SH
zone. The retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change sought to MHU. Support a more
intensified zoning to THAB, within scope of an area-wide
submission (6099-6)(refer to Attachment D). These sites
are close to Sandringham Road RFN and Sandringham LC.
The rezoning to THAB is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site is
located close to Mount Eden Road RFN, centres and
public open space. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No change

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

MHU

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU, consider


flooding and HC values can be managed by the controls of
the relevant Plan provisions and/or Overlay. Recognise
that house on site contributes to the values of this area,
but consider change can be managed / accommodated

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7850

839-7886

839-7899

839-7932

839-7948

839-7950

839-8110

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 21


21 Cambourne
CAMBOURNE ROAD. Road
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 822 MOUNT
EDEN ROAD. Three
Kings-Grafton from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Sandringham

822 Mount Eden Mount Eden


Road Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Rezone 2 CONWAY


2 Conway Road,
ROAD. Mount Eden Mount Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 61
SHACKLETON ROAD.
Mount Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Mount Eden

61 Shackleton
Mount Eden
Road Mount Eden

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

SH

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 43


43 Mewburn Ave, Balmoral
MEWBURN AVENUE. 141 Balmoral
141 BALMORAL
Road
ROAD. Mount Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 82 CALGARY 82 Calgary St


STREET. SandringhamBalmoral from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 152D


152D Haverstock
HAVERSTOCK ROAD. Road,
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Sandringham

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

129

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change


site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone.
Support change of zone from SH to MHU at this site - the MHU
site is located close to Mount Eden Road RFN, centres
and public open space. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.
Do not support change sought to MHU zone, support a
MHS
less intensified zoning to MHS - this site is not close to
higher density areas or the RFN. The site is also remote
from centres. This change is out of scope, refer to
Attachment F. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change


is affected by the HC and retains the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone.
Do not support change sought to MHU, support a less
MHS
intensified zone to MHS - this site is not close to centres,
is remote from the RFN and the area is mainly suburban
dwellings. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Proximity to Centre/ facilities makes MHU appropriate


zone. Acknowledge distance to FN routes (2), but consider
terrain and walking environment good.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU.


Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Consider proximity to local centre, school and open space


make MHU appropriate zone in area

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8111

839-8112

839-8113

839-8114

839-8115

839-8116

839-8117

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 152C


152C Haverstock
HAVERSTOCK ROAD. Road,
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 152B


152B Haverstock
HAVERSTOCK ROAD. Road
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 152A


152A Haverstock
HAVERSTOCK ROAD. Rd
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 152


152 Haverstock Rd Sandringham
HAVERSTOCK ROAD.
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 150


150 Haverstock
HAVERSTOCK ROAD. Road
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 148


148 Haverstock
HAVERSTOCK ROAD. Road
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 146


146 Haverstock
HAVERSTOCK ROAD. Road
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

130

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change sought to MHU, support a less


MHS
intensified zone to MHS - this site is not close to centres,
is remote from the RFN and the area is mainly suburban
dwellings. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Consider proximity to local centre, school and open space
make MHU appropriate zone in area

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8118

839-815

839-871

839-1291

839-1292

839-1293

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 144


144 Haverstock
HAVERSTOCK ROAD. Road
Sandringham from
Sandringham
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 505 Sandringham Sandringham


Urban at 505,
Road,
SANDRINGHAM
Sandringham
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at 488 Dominion


488, DOMINION
Road, Mount
ROAD, Mount Roskill- Eden
Eden Terrace.

MU

Mount Eden

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 700,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham.

700,
Mount Roskill
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 8,4,6,
GREENVILLE
AVENUE,10,14,10B,1
0A,6,8, ELPHINSTONE
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

8,4,6, GREENVILLE Mount Roskill


AVENUE,10,14,10
B,10A,6,8,
ELPHINSTONE
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
10,12,10A,6,12A,
PLUMPTON
AVENUE,10,20,14,16,
18,6,16A,20A,14A,8,
GIFFORD
AVENUE,24,26,20,22,
18,28, ELPHINSTONE
AVENUE,3,
GREENVILLE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

10,12,10A,6,12A, Mount Roskill


PLUMPTON
AVENUE,10,20,14,
16,18,6,16A,20A,1
4A,8, GIFFORD
AVENUE,24,26,20,
22,18,28,
ELPHINSTONE
AVENUE,3,
GREENVILLE
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

131

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Site not close No change
to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of the notified MHU zone.
THAB
Properties are located with 5 minutes walk of the
Sandringham Rd RFN and the Sandringham LC. Proposed
alternative rezoning to THAB that is in scope of an area
wide submission (6099-6), refer to Attachment D.
Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MU zone. The property is No change
located along the Dominion Rd RFN. Its MU zoning acts
as a transition area between the Eden Valley and
Balmoral LCs and residential zones. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties No Change
are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties
are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

THAB

Support

MU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1294

839-1295

839-1312

839-1318

839-1319

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 24,26,28,
GIFFORD
AVENUE,3,5,
PLUMPTON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

24,26,28,
GIFFORD
AVENUE,3,5,
PLUMPTON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 3, WAITE
AVENUE,9,7,
PLUMPTON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

3, WAITE
AVENUE,9,7,
PLUMPTON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 346,348, MOUNT
ALBERT ROAD, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak.

346,348, MOUNT Mount Roskill


ALBERT ROAD,
Mount AlbertRoyal Oak.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
11,13,15,17,11B,19,1
1A, ALLISON
STREET,10,12,14,16,4
,6,8, MALCOLM
STREET, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
11,10,13,12,20,14,22,
16,18,6,26,1,3,5,4,7,2
4,9,8, PUKETAPAPA
STREET,24,26,12,20,1
4,22,16, ALLISON
STREET,26B,26A,24A,
24B,28A,32,28B,30A,
30B, ERNIE PINCHES
STREET,8,4,6,
SHENANDOAH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

11,13,15,17,11B,1 Mount Roskill


9,11A, ALLISON
STREET,10,12,14,1
6,4,6,8,
MALCOLM
STREET, Mount
Roskill.

THAB

11,10,13,12,20,14 Mount Roskill


,22,16,18,6,26,1,3
,5,4,7,24,9,8,
PUKETAPAPA
STREET,24,26,12,2
0,14,22,16,
ALLISON
STREET,26B,26A,2
4A,24B,28A,32,28
B,30A,30B, ERNIE
PINCHES
STREET,8,4,6,
SHENANDOAH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

THAB

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

132

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located around LC and along RFN. The retention of
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to Stoddard Road TC and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No change


are located close to Stoddard Road TC and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1320

839-1321

839-1322

839-1323

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 31,29, ERNIE
PINCHES STREET,
Mount Roskill.

31,29, ERNIE
Mount Roskill
PINCHES STREET,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 9,3,5,7, ALLISON
STREET,610,10,1,3,5,7,9,
HENEHAN
CRESCENT,10,12,14,1
6,18,5,7,6,9,8,
SHAWCROSS
AVENUE,1,5,
MALCOLM
STREET,48,46,54,44,4
2,50,40,52, ERNIE
PINCHES STREET,
Mount Roskill.

9,3,5,7, ALLISON Mount Roskill


STREET,610,10,1,3,5,7,9,
HENEHAN
CRESCENT,10,12,1
4,16,18,5,7,6,9,8,
SHAWCROSS
AVENUE,1,5,
MALCOLM
STREET,48,46,54,4
4,42,50,40,52,
ERNIE PINCHES
STREET, Mount
Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 47,49, ERNIE
PINCHES STREET,
Mount Roskill.

47,49, ERNIE
Mount Roskill
PINCHES STREET,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 9, FARRELLY
AVENUE,56A,56,
POTTER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

9, FARRELLY
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,56A,56,
POTTER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

133

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to Stoddard Road TC and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to Stoddard Road TC and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to Stoddard Road TC and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1324

839-1325

839-1326

839-1327

839-1328

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 787,779,789,791,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD
EXTENSION,9,10,8,4,
6, GALBRAITH
STREET,50,48,50A,
POTTER AVENUE,1,
FARRELLY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

787,779,789,791, Mount Roskill


SANDRINGHAM
ROAD
EXTENSION,9,10,8
,4,6, GALBRAITH
STREET,50,48,50A
, POTTER
AVENUE,1,
FARRELLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 46,44, POTTER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 9,9A,7, BETTS
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 54,56,58,52,
FARRELLY AVENUE,2,
DENIZE ROAD, Mount
Roskill.

46,44, POTTER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

THAB

9,9A,7, BETTS
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

54,56,58,52,
FARRELLY
AVENUE,2,
DENIZE ROAD,
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4,6, HOLDSWORTH
AVENUE,10,12,14,4,6
,8, O'DONNELL
AVENUE,769,771,767
,773,765,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD
EXTENSION,9,3,15,
SKEATES AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

4,6,
Mount Roskill
HOLDSWORTH
AVENUE,10,12,14,
4,6,8, O'DONNELL
AVENUE,769,771,
767,773,765,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD
EXTENSION,9,3,15
, SKEATES
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

134

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

No Change

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to Stoddard Road TC and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change
are located close to Stoddard Road TC and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1329

839-1330

839-1331

839-1332

839-1333

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 32,30,36,34,
POTTER
AVENUE,18,12,20,14,
16, HOLDSWORTH
AVENUE,18,16,
SKEATES AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

32,30,36,34,
Mount Roskill
POTTER
AVENUE,18,12,20,
14,16,
HOLDSWORTH
AVENUE,18,16,
SKEATES AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 40, POTTER
AVENUE,12, SKEATES
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

40, POTTER
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,12,
SKEATES AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
25,39,21,49,19,43,31,
45,37,29,35,41,33,47,
POTTER
AVENUE,1,3,4,7,6,9,8
, CHRISTINI
STREET,10,20,18,2,4,
8, HEDLEY
ROAD,25,39,21,23,19
,25A,37,35,33,
FARRELLY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 725,723,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham.

25,39,21,49,19,43 Mount Roskill


,31,45,37,29,35,4
1,33,47, POTTER
AVENUE,1,3,4,7,6,
9,8, CHRISTINI
STREET,10,20,18,2
,4,8, HEDLEY
ROAD,25,39,21,23
,19,25A,37,35,33,
FARRELLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

THAB

725,723,
Mount Roskill
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10,12, SHEPPARD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

10,12, SHEPPARD Mount Roskill


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

135

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1334

839-1335

839-1336

839-1337

839-1338

839-1339

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24,26,30,28,22,
SHEPPARD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

24,26,30,28,22,
SHEPPARD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
25,27,21,23,19,2/21A
,1/27A,1/21A,29,2/27
A,3/27A,21A,31,
AURORA
AVENUE,25,27,21,19,
31,29,2/29,
SHEPPARD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

25,27,21,23,19,2/ Mount Roskill


21A,1/27A,1/21A,
29,2/27A,3/27A,2
1A,31, AURORA
AVENUE,25,27,21,
19,31,29,2/29,
SHEPPARD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 9,
SHEPPARD
AVENUE,713,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at
38,48,46,32,44,30,42,
36,40,34,54,52,50,
AURORA
AVENUE,703A,703B,7
03C,703D,701D,701B,
701C,701A,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 20,22,
AURORA AVENUE,5,
THOMSON STREET,
Mount Roskill.

9, SHEPPARD
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,713,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill.

MHU

38,48,46,32,44,30 Mount Roskill


,42,36,40,34,54,5
2,50, AURORA
AVENUE,703A,70
3B,703C,703D,701
D,701B,701C,701
A, SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill.

MHU

20,22, AURORA
AVENUE,5,
THOMSON
STREET, Mount
Roskill.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 4,
THOMSON
STREET,12,14,
BEAGLE AVENUE,8,6,
AURORA AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

4, THOMSON
Mount Roskill
STREET,12,14,
BEAGLE
AVENUE,8,6,
AURORA AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

THAB

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

136

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-134

839-1340

839-1341

839-1342

839-1343

839-1344

839-1345

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at 1037, DOMINION Mount Roskill


1037, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount
ROAD, Mount Roskill- Roskill
Eden Terrace.

MU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 11,9, THOMSON


Urban at 11,9,
STREET, Mount
THOMSON STREET,
Roskill.
Mount Roskill.

MHU

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 36, SHEPPARD
AVENUE,17, AURORA
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

36, SHEPPARD
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,17,
AURORA AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 11,9,13,15,
AURORA AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

11,9,13,15,
Mount Roskill
AURORA AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24,20,22, BEAGLE
AVENUE,1,3,5,
AURORA AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

24,20,22, BEAGLE Mount Roskill


AVENUE,1,3,5,
AURORA AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 109,111,
O'DONNELL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

109,111,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 115,113,
O'DONNELL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

115,113,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

137

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the MU zone. The property is in No Change


close proximity to a LC and RFN. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties No Change
are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change
are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1346

839-1347

839-1348

839-1349

839-1350

839-1351

839-1352

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 121,123,119,
O'DONNELL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

121,123,119,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Town Centre


at 11,9,7, DENIZE
ROAD,62,64,66,
FARRELLY
AVENUE,10,8,4,6,
JESSOP
STREET,201,203,199,
STODDARD ROAD,
Mount Roskill.

11,9,7, DENIZE
Mount Roskill
ROAD,62,64,66,
FARRELLY
AVENUE,10,8,4,6,
JESSOP
STREET,201,203,1
99, STODDARD
ROAD, Mount
Roskill.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 11,13, MARION


Urban at 11,13,
AVENUE, Mount
MARION AVENUE,
Roskill.
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10,12,14,8,
GLENARM AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

10,12,14,8,
GLENARM
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24, GLENARM
AVENUE,11,13, TORY
STREET, Mount
Roskill.

24, GLENARM
AVENUE,11,13,
TORY STREET,
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 80,78, GIFFORD


Urban at 80,78,
AVENUE, Mount
GIFFORD AVENUE,
Roskill.
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 75,73, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

75,73, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

PAUP ZONE

THAB

TC

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

TC

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

138

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change

Support the retention of the TC zone. The properties are No Change


located on RFN and identified as part of the existing
commercial TC. The retention of notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the TC zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties
are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

THAB

Support

TC

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties No Change


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change
are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1353

839-1354

839-1355

839-1356

839-1357

839-1358

839-1359

839-1360

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


61,63,65,
Mount Roskill
Housing and
GIFFORD AVENUE,
Apartment Buildings Mount Roskill.
at 61,63,65, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 47,51,53,49,
GIFFORD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

47,51,53,49,
Mount Roskill
GIFFORD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
2/58B,58,56,60,62,64
,1/58A, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at
11,13,11A,5,7,9,
MAYN
AVENUE,46,44,48,
GIFFORD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 20, MAYN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

2/58B,58,56,60,62 Mount Roskill


,64,1/58A,
GIFFORD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

MHU

11,13,11A,5,7,9, Mount Roskill


MAYN
AVENUE,46,44,48,
GIFFORD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

MHU

20, MAYN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 14,16,
MAYN AVENUE,4,6,
WAITE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

14,16, MAYN
AVENUE,4,6,
WAITE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 10,8,6, MAYN


Urban at 10,8,6,
AVENUE, Mount
MAYN AVENUE,
Roskill.
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 38,40, GIFFORD


Urban at 38,40,
AVENUE, Mount
GIFFORD AVENUE,
Roskill.
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

139

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change


located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties No Change
are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties
are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties
are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1361

839-1362

839-1363

839-1364

839-1365

839-1366

839-1367

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 39,41, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 25,27, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 19,21,17, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

39,41, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

25,27, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 11,9,13,15,17,
WILLIAM BLOFIELD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

11,9,13,15,17,
WILLIAM
BLOFIELD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 8,6, WILLIAM
BLOFIELD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

8,6, WILLIAM
BLOFIELD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 19,21, WILLIAM
BLOFIELD
AVENUE,784,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at
1464,1470,1466,1468
, DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace.

19,21, WILLIAM Mount Roskill


BLOFIELD
AVENUE,784,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

1464,1470,1466,1 Mount Roskill


468, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

MHU

19,21,17,
Mount Roskill
GIFFORD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

140

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change


are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change
are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change
are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is


located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1368

839-1369

839-1372

839-1373

839-1374

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 10,8,2,4,6,
HOWELL
CRESCENT,1201,1203
, DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill.

10,8,2,4,6,
Mount Roskill
HOWELL
CRESCENT,1201,1
203, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount
Roskill.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 564,
RICHARDSON
ROAD,16, HOWELL
CRESCENT, Mount
Albert-Hillsborough.

564, RICHARDSON Mount Roskill


ROAD,16,
HOWELL
CRESCENT, Mount
AlbertHillsborough.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,6,8,4A,


KALLU
CRESCENT,12,15,14,1
7,16,19,18,6,8,
BALFRON AVENUE,2,
ROSEMAN
AVENUE,1A,1B,
FREELAND AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Suburban.
Seeks Mixed Housing
Urban.

10,6,8,4A, KALLU Mount Roskill


CRESCENT,12,15,1
4,17,16,19,18,6,8,
BALFRON
AVENUE,2,
ROSEMAN
AVENUE,1A,1B,
FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 8,14,16,
ROSEMAN
AVENUE,11,13,15,17,
19,3,5,7,9, KALLU
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill.

8,14,16,
Mount Roskill
ROSEMAN
AVENUE,11,13,15,
17,19,3,5,7,9,
KALLU CRESCENT,
Mount Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 24,26,


ROSEMAN
AVENUE,26C,26B,26,
32A,26D,32,30,28,26
A,36, KALLU
CRESCENT,61,63,73,7
1,67,69, FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban

24,26, ROSEMAN Mount Roskill


AVENUE,26C,26B,
26,32A,26D,32,30
,28,26A,36, KALLU
CRESCENT,61,63,7
3,71,67,69,
FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

141

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties


are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Do not support change of properties zoned MHS to MHU. No Change


The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSA or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The sites are subject to HSA surrounding Puketapapa
(Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.
MHS

MHU

Support the retention of MHS zone. The application of


No change
the MHS zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of between eight to nine metres. The sites are
subject to the HSA surrounding Puketapapa (Mount
Roskill) maunga. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN
Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1375

839-1376

839-1377

839-1524

839-1525

839-1526

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 9,3,5,7,


ROSEMAN
AVENUE,11,13,
YOUTH STREET,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban

9,3,5,7, ROSEMAN Mount Roskill


AVENUE,11,13,
YOUTH STREET,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone


82,90,80,92,86,84,96,
FREELAND
AVENUE,8,2,4,6,
GLYNN STREET,28,
ROSEMAN
AVENUE,142,140,132
,134,130,120,114,122
,116,124,136,126,112
,128,138,118, MAY
ROAD, Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban

82,90,80,92,86,84 Mount Roskill


,96, FREELAND
AVENUE,8,2,4,6,
GLYNN
STREET,28,
ROSEMAN
AVENUE,142,140,
132,134,130,120,
114,122,116,124,
136,126,112,128,
138,118, MAY
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


1288,1288A,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 22, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

1288,1288A,
Mount Roskill
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill

MU

22, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHU

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


2, ALLISON
Housing and
STREET, Mount
Apartment Buildings Roskill
at 2, ALLISON STREET,
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


6, ALLISON
Housing and
STREET, Mount
Apartment Buildings Roskill.
at 6, ALLISON STREET,
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

142

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support MHS


a less intensified zoning to MHS where managing
flooding risks on these sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The application of the MHS zone is
appropriate for the areas identified as HSAs or areas
where a VV would otherwise impose a height limit of
between eight to nine metres. These sites are subject to
the HSA surrounding Puketapapa (Mount Roskill)
maunga. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.

THAB

THAB

MU

MHU

THAB

THAB

Support the retention of the MU zone. The properties are No Change


in close proximity to a LC and RFN. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is No Change
located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is
located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No Change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1536

839-1537

839-168

839-2295

839-2330

839-2333

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Town Centre


at
11,13,15,17,19,18,3,5
,7,9, JESSOP
STREET,209,217,215,
217A,211, STODDARD
ROAD,38,36,40,34,
PARKINSON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

11,13,15,17,19,18 Mount Roskill


,3,5,7,9, JESSOP
STREET,209,217,2
15,217A,211,
STODDARD
ROAD,38,36,40,34
, PARKINSON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

TC

Western Isthmus Retain Town Centre


at
11,13,15,17,19,18,3,5
,7,9, JESSOP
STREET,209,217,215,
217A,211, STODDARD
ROAD,38,36,40,34,
PARKINSON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

11,13,15,17,19,18 Mount Roskill


,3,5,7,9, JESSOP
STREET,209,217,2
15,217A,211,
STODDARD
ROAD,38,36,40,34
, PARKINSON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

TC

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 35, AURORA


Urban at 35, AURORA AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 301 MOUNT
ALBERT ROAD. Mount
Albert-Royal Oak.

301 MOUNT
ALBERT ROAD.
Mount AlbertRoyal Oak.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 18, 16 SHEPPARD
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill.

18, 16 SHEPPARD Mount Roskill


AVENUE. Mount
Roskill.

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 340A, 340C, 340B
RICHARDSON ROAD.
[Mount Roskill]

340A, 340C, 340B Mount Roskill


RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

TC

TC

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

143

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support the retention of the TC zone. The properties are No Change


located on RFN and identified as part of the existing
commercial TC. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the TC
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
TC

Support

TC

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Support the retention of the TC zone. The properties are No Change


located on RFN and identified as part of the existing
commercial TC. The retention of notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the TC zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change


located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change
are located close to large public open spaces and RFN.
The retention of notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties


are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2415

839-2433

839-2441

839-2483

839-2510

839-2545

839-2548

839-2632

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 8 DENIZE ROAD.
Mount Roskill.

8 DENIZE ROAD.
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 715
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION. 2
SHEPPARD AVENUE.
Sandringham.

715
Mount Roskill
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION.
2 SHEPPARD
AVENUE.
Sandringham.

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at 25, 27 STODDARD Mount Roskill


25, 27 STODDARD
ROAD. Mount
ROAD. Mount Roskill. Roskill.

MU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 299 MOUNT
ALBERT ROAD. Mount
Albert-Royal Oak.

MHU

299 MOUNT
ALBERT ROAD.
Mount AlbertRoyal Oak.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 8 WAITE AVENUE. Mount Roskill


Urban at 8 WAITE
Mount Roskill.
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4, 4A ALLISON
STREET. Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Town Centre
at 194, 196, 198, 192
RICHARDSON ROAD.
Mount AlbertHillsborough.

THAB

4, 4A ALLISON
STREET. Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

194, 196, 198, 192 Mount Roskill


RICHARDSON
ROAD. Mount
AlbertHillsborough.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 13 WAITE


Urban at 13 WAITE
AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

TC

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MU

MHU

MHU

THAB

TC

MHU

REASONS

144

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is No Change


located around Stoddard Road TC and RFN. The retention
of notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties
are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

TC

Support

MHU

Support

No Change

Support the retention of the MU zone. The properties are No Change


in close proximity to a TC and RFN. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No Change
are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the TC zone. The properties are No Change
located on RFN and identified as part of the existing
commercial TC. The retention of notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the TC zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change


located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2633

839-2634

839-2635

839-2636

839-2653

839-2654

839-2655

839-2728

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 11 WAITE


Urban at 11 WAITE
AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 9 WAITE AVENUE. Mount Roskill


Urban at 9 WAITE
Mount Roskill.
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 9A WAITE


Urban at 9A WAITE
AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 11A WAITE


Urban at 11A WAITE AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 15 MAYN


Urban at 15 MAYN
AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 19, 17 MAYN


Urban at 19, 17
AVENUE. Mount
MAYN AVENUE.
Roskill.
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at Lot 3 DP
407384. [19 Mayn
Avenue, Mount
Roskill]
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 25 ERNIE PINCHES
STREET. Mount
Roskill.

19 Mayn Avenue, Mount Roskill


Mount Roskill

25 ERNIE PINCHES Mount Roskill


STREET, Mount
Roskill.

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is


located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties
are located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is
located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

145

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2780

839-2781

839-2782

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 133,137,135,


STODDARD
ROAD,18,16,
WILLIAM BLOFIELD
AVENUE,788,790,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Use, Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
to Mixed Use.

133,137,135,
Mount Roskill
STODDARD
ROAD,18,16,
WILLIAM
BLOFIELD
AVENUE,788,790,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 143,1/143,


STODDARD
ROAD,10,12,14,16,2,
6,8, FARRELLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Town
Centre, Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
to Town Centre.

143,1/143,
Mount Roskill
STODDARD
ROAD,10,12,14,16
,2,6,8, FARRELLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 58,


PARKINSON
AVENUE,227,225,229
, STODDARD ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Town Centre, Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
to Town Centre.

58, PARKINSON
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,227,225,
229, STODDARD
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU & THAB MU

TC, THAB

TC, THAB

TC

TC

REASONS

146

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of MU and THAB to MU zone for No Change


16 & 18, William Blofield Ave. The properties are located
on the back of MU sites on a residential street and
rezoning to MU zone does not recognise local context.
The retention of the THAB zone will not diminish the role,
function and amenity of the existing commercial TC and
MU. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU zone for 133,137,135, Stoddard
Rd and 788, 790, Sandringham Rd Ext properties. The
properties are notified MU zone. The properties are in
close proximity to and support the Stoddard Road TC and
RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the most
Do not support change from THAB to TC zone on Farrelly No Change
Ave. The properties are located on the back of the
existing TC with no direct access to Stoddard Road. The
retention of THAB will not diminish the function, role and
amenity of the TC along Stoddard Road. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of the TC zone on properties on
Stoddard Road. The properties are notified TC zone. The
Stoddard Road TC will remain as stated in the RPS and
Centres Hierarchy. The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the TC zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from THAB to TC zone on 58
No Change
Parkinson Ave. The properties are located on the back of
the existing TC with no direct access to Stoddard Road.
The retention of THAB will not diminish the function, role
and amenity of the TC along Stoddard Road. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the TC zone on Stoddard Road. The
Stoddard Road TC will remain as stated in the RPS and
Centres Hierarchy. The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the TC zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

TC

Support

TC

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2783

839-2784

839-2785

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,2A, CULLEN


AVENUE,11,13,15,7A,
7,9,11A, STODDARD
ROAD,3, GLENARM
AVENUE,33,31,37,39,
35, MAY ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Use, Single
House to Mixed Use.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

2,2A, CULLEN
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,11,13,15,
7A,7,9,11A,
STODDARD
ROAD,3,
GLENARM
AVENUE,33,31,37,
39,35, MAY
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, TORY


STREET,33,1/4523/45,2/45-24/45,35,
STODDARD
ROAD,18,20,
GLENARM AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Use, Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
to Mixed Use.

1, TORY
STREET,33,1/4523/45,2/4524/45,35,
STODDARD
ROAD,18,20,
GLENARM
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 25/4565/45,26/45-66/45,


STODDARD ROAD,4,
TORY STREET,46,48,
DENNY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Use, Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
to Mixed Use.

25/45Mount Roskill
65/45,26/4566/45, STODDARD
ROAD,4, TORY
STREET,46,48,
DENNY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MU & SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

MU & THAB MU

MU & THAB MU

REASONS

147

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of SH to MU zone for 2,2A, Cullen THAB, MU


Ave, 3, Glenarm Ave, and 33,31,37,39,35, May Rd.
Support a more intensive residential zone change to
THAB, where managing flooding risks on these sites does
not require maintaining a SH zone. The THAB zone will
provide for increased growth and development
surrounding the MU and Stoddard Road TC, close to RFN
and large open spaces. Scope to change to THAB is
provided by submissions 5280-274 and 5277-272,
referred to in this spreadsheet. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU zone for 7-15 Stoddard Road
(odd no's) properties. These properties do not need to
change to MU zone, these are notified as MU zone. The
properties are in close proximity to and support the
Stoddard Road TC and RFN. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change of notified THAB zone to MU zone No Change
for 18 & 20 Glenarm Ave. The properties are located on
the back of MU sites on another residential street and
rezoning to MU zone does not recognise local context.
The retention of the THAB zone will not diminish the role,
function and amenity of the existing commercial TC and
MU. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU zone for 1, Tory Street, and
33,1/45-23/45,2/45-24/45,35, Stoddard Road properties.
The properties are notified MU zone. The properties are
in close proximity to and support the Stoddard Road TC
and RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MU
Do not support change of notified THAB zone to MU zone No Change
for 46 & 48 Denny Ave. The properties are located on the
back of MU sites on a residential street and rezoning to
MU zone does not recognise local context. The retention
of the THAB zone will not diminish the role, function and
amenity of the existing commercial TC and MU. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU zone for 25/45-65/45,26/4566/45, Stoddard Rd and 4 Tory St properties. The
properties are notified MU zone. The properties are in
close proximity to and support the Stoddard Road TC and
RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the most

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB / MU

Support

MU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2864

839-2872

839-2892

839-2963

839-297

839-3004

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 46, MOUNT


ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
46, MOUNT
ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 8, BELCHER


8, BELCHER
STREET, Mount
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Western Isthmus Rezone 1336,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

1336, DOMINION Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
Roskill-Eden
Terrace

Western Isthmus Rezone 48, MAY


48, MAY ROAD,
ROAD, Mount Roskill Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 6, BEAGLE


Urban at 6, BEAGLE AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 53, FREELAND 53, FREELAND


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

148

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on this MHU


site does not impose a zoning constraint. The property is
located close to RFN, town and LCs and large public open
spaces. Scope to change zone on subject sites and
surrounding properties are provided by submissions
listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18, 5478-56, 59748, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10). The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. This site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on this


site does not impose a zoning constraint. The property is
located close to RFN, town and LCs and large public open
spaces. Scope to change zone on subject sites and
surrounding properties are provided by submissions
listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18, 5478-56, 59748, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10). The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on this
site does not impose a zoning constraint. The property is
located close to RFN, town and LCs and large public open
spaces. Scope to change zone on subject sites and
surrounding properties are provided by submissions
listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18, 5478-56, 59748, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10). The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development


control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB

MHU

MHU

No Change

No Change

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3066

839-3073

839-3076

839-3109

839-312

839-3134

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 12, FREELAND 12, FREELAND


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 68, FREELAND 68, FREELAND


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 63,


63, O'DONNELL
O'DONNELL AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 13, SANFT


13, SANFT
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 26, AURORA


Urban at 26, AURORA AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 1141,


DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1141, DOMINION Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

149

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU
No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB
risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The property is located close to RFN, THAB zone, town
and LCs and large public open spaces. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support MHS
a less intensified zoning to MHS, where managing
flooding risks on this site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate
for the areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV
would otherwise impose a height limit of between eight
to nine metres. This site is subject to the HSA
surrounding Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3194

839-3217

839-323

839-3237

839-3239

839-3283

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 556,


RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

556, RICHARDSON Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Western Isthmus Rezone 55,


55, O'DONNELL
O'DONNELL AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 15, FARRELLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Rezone 22, TYBURNIA
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

15, FARRELLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

22, TYBURNIA
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,10,12,7,9,8,
DELPHINE
CLOSE,24,26,20,22,16
,18, MCGEHAN
CLOSE, Mount Albert
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,10,12,7,9,8,
Mount Albert
DELPHINE
CLOSE,24,26,20,2
2,16,18,
MCGEHAN CLOSE,
Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 59, MOUNT


ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

59, MOUNT
ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

THAB

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

150

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB
risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The property is located close to RFN, THAB zone, town
and LCs and large public open spaces. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is


located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose in Part

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.

No Change

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


MHU
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of SH to THAB, support


MHS
alternative zone change to MHS. The properties are not
located close to a TC and RFN. The change to MHS
responds to the local context and surrounding
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings, where flooding
risks on those sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. This site is
No change
affected by the HC and retain the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the
RPS. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone.

MHU

Oppose

Acknowledge proximity criteria support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3289

839-3319

839-3320

839-3322

839-3330

839-3363

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 43, FREELAND 43, FREELAND


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 54, MAY


54, MAY ROAD,
ROAD, Mount Roskill Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 33, TYBURNIA 33, TYBURNIA


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 27, TYBURNIA 27, TYBURNIA


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 20, BURNETT 20, BURNETT


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 7,


7, SHENANDOAH Mount Roskill
SHENANDOAH
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill
Roskill from Strategic
Transport Corridor to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

151

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU
No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. The site is
No Change
notified as THAB zone, not STC zone. The site is close to
Stoddard Rd TC, RFN and in part of higher density THAB
zoning. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (Dominion Road) and Centre (Stoddard).
Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may impact on
height of development on this site, but provisions for zone
wider than just height.

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (Dominion Road) and Centre (Stoddard).
Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may impact on
height of development on this site, but provisions for zone
wider than just height.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3387

839-3402

839-3416

839-3420

839-3427

839-3438

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 57,


O'DONNELL
AVENUE,27, BEAGLE
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

57, O'DONNELL
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,27,
BEAGLE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 3, DENNY


3, DENNY
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 31, MOUNT


ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Roskill

31, MOUNT
ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 23, MAY


23, MAY ROAD,
ROAD, Mount Roskill Mount Roskill
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Western Isthmus Rezone 1,


HOLDSWORTH
AVENUE,16,
O'DONNELL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

1, HOLDSWORTH Mount Roskill


AVENUE,16,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 5,7,


5,7, O'DONNELL
O'DONNELL AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

152

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB


risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. This site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on this MHU


site does not impose a zoning constraint. The property is
located close to RFN, town and LCs and large public open
spaces. Scope to change zone on subject site and
surrounding properties are provided by submissions
listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18, 5478-56, 59748, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10). The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to THAB zone as managing
THAB
flooding risks on this site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. The property is located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support proposed change of zone from MHS to
No change
THAB. These sites are affected by flooding constraints
and retaining the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change from SH to THAB zone as managing


THAB
flooding risks on these sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose in Part

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Acknowledge proximity criteria support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Meets proximity criteria to support THAB. Consider any


relevant flooding constraints can more appropriately be
managed through development controls - particularly
given scale of Corporation landholding and opportuntiies
for constraints to be addressed in development form.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3503

839-3507

839-353

839-3568

839-3589

839-3613

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 14, TYBURNIA 14, TYBURNIA


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 199, MOUNT


ALBERT ROAD, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

199, MOUNT
ALBERT ROAD,
Mount AlbertRoyal Oak

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


1041, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount RoskillEden Terrace.

1041, DOMINION Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
Roskill-Eden
Terrace.

MU

Western Isthmus Rezone 7, YOUTH


STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7, YOUTH STREET, Mount Roskill


Mount Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 1330,


DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1330, DOMINION Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
Roskill-Eden
Terrace

Western Isthmus Rezone 4, FREELAND 4, FREELAND


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

153

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


MHU
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


MHU
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the MU zone. The property is


No Change
close to a LC and RFN. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support MHS
a less intensified zoning to MHS, where managing
flooding risks on this site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate
for the areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV
would otherwise impose a height limit of between eight
to nine metres. The site is subject to the HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on this MHU
site does not impose a zoning constraint. The property is
located close to RFN, town and LCs and large public open
spaces. Scope to change zone on subject site and
surrounding properties are provided by submissions
listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18, 5478-56, 59748, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10). The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU
No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (Dominion Road) and Centre (Stoddard).
Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may impact on
height of development on this site, but provisions for zone
wider than just height.

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (Dominion Road) and Centre (Stoddard).
Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may impact on
height of development on this site, but provisions for zone
wider than just height.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3616

839-3660

839-3664

839-3670

839-3675

839-3704

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 25, FREELAND 25, FREELAND


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 17, ROSEMAN 17, ROSEMAN


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 763,


SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

763,
Mount Roskill
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham

Western Isthmus Rezone 79,


79, O'DONNELL
O'DONNELL AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 39,


39, O'DONNELL
O'DONNELL AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 6, CULLEN


6, CULLEN
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

154

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHS zone as
MHS
managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone and the application of the MHS
zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas
where a VV would otherwise impose a height limit of
between eight to nine metres. This site is subject to the
HSA surrounding Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB
risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The property is located close to RFN, THAB zone, town
and LCs and large public open spaces. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB


risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The property is located close to RFN, THAB zone, town
and LCs and large public open spaces. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB


risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The property is located close to RFN, THAB zone, town
and LCs and large public open spaces. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB


risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The property is located close to RFN, THAB zone, town
and LCs and large public open spaces. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (Dominion Road) and Centre (Stoddard).
Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may impact on
height of development on this site, but provisions for zone
wider than just height.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3734

839-3747

839-3769

839-3789

839-3860

839-387

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 17, POTTER 17, POTTER


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 84,


84, O'DONNELL
O'DONNELL AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone


10,12,14,2,4,6,8,
MCGEHAN
CLOSE,1,3,2,5,4,6,
DELPHINE CLOSE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

10,12,14,2,4,6,8, Mount Albert


MCGEHAN
CLOSE,1,3,2,5,4,6,
DELPHINE CLOSE,
Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 8, TRITON


8, TRITON
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 554,


RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

554, RICHARDSON Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


67/45-77/45,68/4584/45, STODDARD
ROAD, Mount Roskill.

67/45Mount Roskill
77/45,68/4584/45, STODDARD
ROAD, Mount
Roskill.

MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MU

REASONS

155

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. This site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. This site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of SH to THAB, support


MHS
alternative zone change to MHS. The properties are not
located close to a TC and RFN. The change to MHS
responds to the local context and surrounding
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings, where flooding
risks on those sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to THAB zone
No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of this property from MHS to
No Change
MHU zone. The application of the MHS zone is
appropriate for areas identified as HSA or areas where a
VV would otherwise impose a height limit of between
eight to nine metres. The site is subject to HSA
surrounding Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The
retention of the MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support the retention of the MU zone. The properties are No Change
in close proximity to a TC and RFN. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose in Part

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development


control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB

Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development


control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB

Acknowledge proximity criteria support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

MU

Support

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HAS if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3887

839-3899

839-3900

839-391

839-393

839-418

839-446

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 108, MAY


ROAD,94, FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

108, MAY
ROAD,94,
FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1165,


DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1165, DOMINION Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
Roskill-Eden
Terrace

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 762,764,


SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

762,764,
Mount Roskill
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 35, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 5, FARRELLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Rezone 6, ROSEMAN
AVENUE,2, KALLU
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
.

35, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

5, FARRELLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

6, ROSEMAN
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,2, KALLU
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 797,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham.

797,
Mount Roskill
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

REASONS

156

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to THAB zone as managing


THAB
flooding risks on these sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is No Change


located close to large public open spaces and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is
located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HAS if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


service facilities. Acknowledge that the HAS if retained
may impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

No Change

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is No Change
located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support MHU on basis that the site is proximate to FN


Route (May Road and Stoddard Road) and Centre
(Stoddard). Acknowledge that the HSA (if retained) may
impact on height of development on this site, but
provisions for zone wider than just height.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4466

839-4487

839-4488

839-4546

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,15,17,


ELPHINSTONE
AVENUE,726,730,724
,732,722,734,720,728
, SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

19,15,17,
Mount Roskill
ELPHINSTONE
AVENUE,726,730,
724,732,722,734,
720,728,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 334,334A,


MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Mount AlbertRoyal Oak from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

334,334A,
MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 340A,340,


MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD,21, MONS
AVENUE, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

340A,340,
MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD,21, MONS
AVENUE, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 32A,


OWAIRAKA
AVENUE,18B,18A,20,
22, TRITON
AVENUE,9, TYBURNIA
AVENUE,11,1,3,5,7,9,
MCGEHAN CLOSE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

32A, OWAIRAKA Mount Albert


AVENUE,18B,18A,
20,22, TRITON
AVENUE,9,
TYBURNIA
AVENUE,11,1,3,5,
7,9, MCGEHAN
CLOSE, Mount
Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

157

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of MHU to THAB zone for 15 & 17 No Change


Elphinstone Ave. The properties are located on the back
of THAB sites on a residential street and rezoning to
THAB does not recognise local context. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of THAB for the remaining properties.
The properties are notified THAB zone. The properties
are in close proximity to and support the Stoddard Road
TC, RFN and large open spaces. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Oppose

Consider the opportunity to manage redevelopment for


this site makes additional THAB appropriate

MHU

Support

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Do not support change of SH to THAB, support less


MHS
intensive residential zone change to MHS for 3-11
McGehan Close. The properties are not located close to a
TC and RFN. The change to MHS responds to the local
context and surrounding neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings, where flooding risks on those sites does
not require maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose in Part

Do not support change of MHS to THAB for 32A,


Owairaka Ave,18B,18A,20,22, Triton Ave & 9, Tyburnia
Ave properties because spot zoning in this location not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Acknowledge proximity criteria support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4658

839-4659

839-4660

839-4661

839-4662

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,15,21,17,


O'DONNELL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

19,15,21,17,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 24,18,26,20,


O'DONNELL
AVENUE,11,9,3,5,7,
HOLDSWORTH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

24,18,26,20,
Mount Roskill
O'DONNELL
AVENUE,11,9,3,5,
7, HOLDSWORTH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone


33,25,31,27,29,
O'DONNELL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

33,25,31,27,29,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 28,


O'DONNELL
AVENUE,10,12,14,22,
16,18, POTTER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

28, O'DONNELL
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,10,12,14,
22,16,18, POTTER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 4,


PARKINSON
AVENUE,11,9,5,7,
SHEARER
STREET,11,9,13,
POTTER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

4, PARKINSON
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,11,9,5,7,
SHEARER
STREET,11,9,13,
POTTER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

158

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to THAB zone as managing


THAB
flooding risks on these sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support proposed change of zone from MHS to


No change
THAB. These sites are affected by flooding constraints.
The retention of the notified zone aligns with local
context and maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone in the area. Retaining the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to THAB zone as managing


THAB
flooding risks on these sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proximity criteria to support THAB. Consider any


relevant flooding constraints can more appropriately be
managed through development controls - particularly
given scale of Corporation landholding and opportuntiies
for constraints to be addressed in development form.

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

No change

Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development


control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB

No change

Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development


control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4663

839-4664

839-4665

839-4666

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 16A,16,


PARKINSON
AVENUE,4, BELCHER
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

16A,16,
Mount Roskill
PARKINSON
AVENUE,4,
BELCHER STREET,
Mount Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,19,15,


HEDLEY
ROAD,49,55,47,51,53
,61,65,67,69,
FARRELLY
AVENUE,2,4,6,
SHEARER
STREET,11,13,12,15,1
4,3,5,7,9, BELCHER
STREET,22,
PARKINSON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,19,15, HEDLEY Mount Roskill


ROAD,49,55,47,51
,53,61,65,67,69,
FARRELLY
AVENUE,2,4,6,
SHEARER
STREET,11,13,12,1
5,14,3,5,7,9,
BELCHER
STREET,22,
PARKINSON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone


38,48,46,54,44,50,40,
52, O'DONNELL
AVENUE,3,7,
PARKINSON
AVENUE,3,7, POTTER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

38,48,46,54,44,50 Mount Roskill


,40,52,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE,3,7,
PARKINSON
AVENUE,3,7,
POTTER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 73, FARRELLY


AVENUE,76,80,74,78,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE,27,29,
PARKINSON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

73, FARRELLY
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,76,80,74,
78, O'DONNELL
AVENUE,27,29,
PARKINSON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

159

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development


control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB

Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development


control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB
THAB

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

THAB

Oppose
Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development
control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB

THAB

Do not support proposed change of zone from MHS to


THAB. These sites are affected by flooding constraints
and retaining the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria to support THAB. Consider any
relevant flooding constraints can more appropriately be
managed through development controls - particularly
given scale of Corporation landholding and opportuntiies
for constraints to be addressed in development form.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4667

839-4668

839-4669

839-4670

839-4671

839-4672

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,8,


10,8, BUCCANEER Mount Roskill
BUCCANEER STREET, STREET, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 3,5,


3,5, BUCCANEER
BUCCANEER STREET, STREET, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 45,43,


45,43, O'DONNELL Mount Roskill
O'DONNELL AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 39,37,41,


AURORA
AVENUE,707,709,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 11,13,
BEAGLE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 19,21,
BEAGLE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

39,37,41,
Mount Roskill
AURORA
AVENUE,707,709,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill

SH

11,13, BEAGLE
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

19,21, BEAGLE
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

160

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB


risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB
risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB
risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change of SH to MHU zone. The properties are
MHU
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support the change from MHS to THAB zone
No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meets proximity criteria for MHU and consider Beagle Ave


as transition

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4673

839-4674

839-4675

839-4676

839-4677

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 3,5,3A,


TRITON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
11,11A,7A,9A,7,9,
TRITON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 13,15,17,
MCGEHAN CLOSE,16,
TRITON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

3,5,3A, TRITON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

13,15,17,
Mount Albert
MCGEHAN
CLOSE,16, TRITON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 3,5,


WAINWRIGHT
AVENUE,91,89,87,85,
O'DONNELL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

3,5,
Mount Roskill
WAINWRIGHT
AVENUE,91,89,87,
85, O'DONNELL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 4,6,


TYBURNIA AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4,6, TYBURNIA
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

11,11A,7A,9A,7,9, Mount Roskill


TRITON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

161

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of SH to THAB, support
MHS
alternative zone change to MHS. The properties are not
located close to a TC and RFN. The change to MHS
responds to the local context and surrounding
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings, where flooding
risks on those sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. These No change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose in Part

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Support

Acknowledge proximity criteria support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development


control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4678

839-4679

839-4680

839-4681

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 8,2,6,


WAINWRIGHT
AVENUE,3,5,
FLETCHER
STREET,95,97,
O'DONNELL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
8,2,6,
WAINWRIGHT
AVENUE,3,5,
FLETCHER
STREET,95,97,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

This submission is supported in part. See C11 revised


zoning map in Attachment E.

162

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

103, O'DONNELL Mount Roskill


AVENUE,6,
FLETCHER STREET,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone


49,55,47,57,45,2/45,
43,53,3/45,4/45,
PARKINSON
AVENUE,108,110,112
,102,106,104,
O'DONNELL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

49,55,47,57,45,2/ Mount Roskill


45,43,53,3/45,4/4
5, PARKINSON
AVENUE,108,110,
112,102,106,104,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 39,


PARKINSON
AVENUE,90,92,
O'DONNELL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

39, PARKINSON
AVENUE,90,92,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

SH

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

Do not support change of SH to THAB zone on 2


Wainwright Ave, 3 Fletcher Street and 95, 97 O'Donnell
Ave properties. These sites are affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB
risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

This submission is supported in part. See C11 revised


zoning map, in Attachment E.

THAB

Support in Part

Do not support Council postion in respect of SH for


flooding risk (can be managed by development control) support THAB zoning

THAB

Support

THAB

Support in Part

MHS & THAB

Support in part change of MHS to THAB for 53, 55, 57


Parkinson Ave and 102-112 O'Donnell Ave (even no's)
properties. These properties are in close proximity to
Stoddard Rd TC, RFN, and large open spaces. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH, THAB

Support change of SH to THAB zone on 6-8 Wainwright


Ave & 5 Fletcher Street properties as managing flooding
risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN and large
public open spaces. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Western Isthmus Rezone 103,


O'DONNELL
AVENUE,6, FLETCHER
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support change from MHS to THAB zone for 43-49


Parkinson Ave (odd no's) properties, where the sites are
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support proposed change of zone from MHS to
No change
THAB. These sites are affected by flooding constraints
and retaining the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support Council postion in respect of SH for


flooding risk (can be managed by development control) support THAB zoning

THAB

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support THAB. Consider any


relevant flooding constraints can more appropriately be
managed through development controls - particularly
given scale of Corporation landholding and opportuntiies
for constraints to be addressed in development form.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4682

839-4683

839-4684

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,13,15,17,19,18,3,5
,7,9, JESSOP
STREET,209,217,215,
217A,211, STODDARD
ROAD,38,36,40,34,
PARKINSON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

11,13,15,17,19,18 Mount Roskill


,3,5,7,9, JESSOP
STREET,209,217,2
15,217A,211,
STODDARD
ROAD,38,36,40,34
, PARKINSON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH, MHU &


TC

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

This submission is supported in part. See C11 revised


zoning map in Attachment E.

163

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH, THAB, TC

Support change of MHU to THAB zone on 7-19 Jessop


Street properties. The properties are located close to
RFN, a TC, and large public open spaces. The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
The properties identified on Stoddard Road are not
zoned SH, they are notified TC zone. Support retention of
TC zone for these properties. The properties are located
on a RFN and part of the commercial TC. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the TC zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,7,


DENIZE
ROAD,62,64,66,
FARRELLY
AVENUE,10,8,4,6,
JESSOP
STREET,201,203,199,
STODDARD ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

11,9,7, DENIZE
Mount Roskill
ROAD,62,64,66,
FARRELLY
AVENUE,10,8,4,6,
JESSOP
STREET,201,203,1
99, STODDARD
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,13B,13,27,13G,13
F,13E,13D,33,23,13A,
35,29,15,25,13C,21,
GLENARM
AVENUE,24,10,26,12,
20,14,18,28,8,
DENNY
AVENUE,10,1,3,5,4,7,
6,8, KINLOCH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,13B,13,27,13G, Mount Roskill


13F,13E,13D,33,2
3,13A,35,29,15,25
,13C,21,
GLENARM
AVENUE,24,10,26,
12,20,14,18,28,8,
DENNY
AVENUE,10,1,3,5,
4,7,6,8, KINLOCH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH

THAB

THAB

THAB / TC

Support in Part

Do not support change of SH to THAB zone on 34-40


Parkinson Ave (even numbers) properties and 3 & 5
Jessop Street. These sites are affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Support change of MHU to THAB zone. The properties
THAB
are located close to RFN, town and LCs and large public
open spaces. The change of zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support Council postion in respect of SH for


flooding risk (can be managed by development control) support THAB zoning

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB


risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4685

839-4686

839-4687

839-4688

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,13,15,


11,9,13,15,
DENNY AVENUE,
DENNY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mount Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

This submission is supported in part. See C11 revised


zoning map in Attachment E.

164

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 42,36,40,


DENNY
AVENUE,30,28,
GLENARM
AVENUE,8,2,4,7,6,
OXLEY
AVENUE,18,16, TORY
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

2,36,40, DENNY Mount Roskill


AVENUE,30,28,
GLENARM
AVENUE,8,2,4,7,6,
OXLEY
AVENUE,18,16,
TORY STREET,
Mount Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,30, DENNY


AVENUE,34,
GLENARM AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

32,30, DENNY
AVENUE,34,
GLENARM
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH

Mount Roskill

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Do not support change of SH to THAB zone on 9 Denny


Ave. This site is affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB
risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB
risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH, THAB

Support change of SH to THAB zone on 11, 13, 15 Denny


Ave properties as flooding risks on those sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The properties are located
close to RFN and large public open spaces. The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Western Isthmus Rezone 25,21,23,


25,21,23, DENNY Mount Roskill
DENNY AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support in Part

Do not support Council postion in respect of SH for


flooding risk (can be managed by development control) support THAB zoning

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development


control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4689

839-4690

839-4691

839-4692

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone


39,37,43,35,41,
39,37,43,35,41,
DENNY AVENUE,
DENNY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone


47,45,51,53,49,
47,45,51,53,49,
DENNY AVENUE,
DENNY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone


59,61,63,65,67,69,67
A, DENNY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

59,61,63,65,67,69 Mount Roskill


,67A, DENNY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,3,5,7,


HOWELL
CRESCENT,24,26,12,2
0,14,22,16,18,28,
SANFT
AVENUE,13,15,17,
BURNETT
AVENUE,548,546,
RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,3,5,7, HOWELL Mount Roskill


CRESCENT,24,26,1
2,20,14,22,16,18,
28, SANFT
AVENUE,13,15,17,
BURNETT
AVENUE,548,546,
RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

165

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB


risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. These
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB


risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Consider flooding issues can be addressed in development


control - also note scale of Corporation land holding and
THAB zone may give scope for design to address flooding
constraints. Meets proximity to Stoddard Centre to
support THAB and otherwise spot zoning

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HAS if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4693

839-4694

839-4695

839-4696

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone


38,46,32,44,36,40,34,
SANFT
AVENUE,536,544,538
, RICHARDSON
ROAD,11,7A-7P,3,9,7,
PLAYFAIR ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,46,32,44,36,40 Mount Roskill


,34, SANFT
AVENUE,536,544,
538, RICHARDSON
ROAD,11,7A7P,3,9,7,
PLAYFAIR ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 25,21,1,3,5,7,


SANFT
AVENUE,32,34,
FREELAND AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25,21,1,3,5,7,
SANFT
AVENUE,32,34,
FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 9,3,5,7,


BURNETT
AVENUE,26,28,
FREELAND
AVENUE,8,2,4,6,
SANFT AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 18,12,14,16,
PLAYFAIR
ROAD,524,518,526,5
34,520,532,530,512,5
28,514,516,
RICHARDSON
ROAD,2,12,8,6,
VERCOE STREET,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9,3,5,7, BURNETT Mount Roskill


AVENUE,26,28,
FREELAND
AVENUE,8,2,4,6,
SANFT AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

MHS

8,12,14,16,
Mount Roskill
PLAYFAIR
ROAD,524,518,52
6,534,520,532,53
0,512,528,514,51
6, RICHARDSON
ROAD,2,12,8,6,
VERCOE STREET,
Mount AlbertHillsborough

MHS

Mount Roskill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

166

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and
open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4697

839-4698

839-4699

839-4700

839-4701

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 508,


508, RICHARDSON Mount Roskill
RICHARDSON
ROAD,3,5,7,
ROAD,3,5,7, VERCOE VERCOE STREET,
STREET, Mount Albert- Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Hillsborough
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


33,39,37,35,41,
FREELAND AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33,39,37,35,41,
FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1195,1197,


DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1195,1197,
Mount Roskill
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,12,14,


BURNETT
AVENUE,1185,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 24,18,22,16,
FREELAND
AVENUE,2C,2D,4,2B,6
,2A, BURNETT
AVENUE,1173,1183,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,12,14,
Mount Roskill
BURNETT
AVENUE,1185,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill

MHS

24,18,22,16,
Mount Roskill
FREELAND
AVENUE,2C,2D,4,
2B,6,2A, BURNETT
AVENUE,1173,118
3, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Mount Roskill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

167

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

No Change

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

No Change

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

No Change

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

No Change

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4702

839-4703

839-4704

839-4705

839-4706

839-4707

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 1436,1436A,


DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1436,1436A,
Mount Roskill
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1432A,1432,


DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1432A,1432,
Mount Roskill
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1428,1426,


DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1428,1426,
Mount Roskill
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


1420B,1420C,1420A,
1420D,1420E,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
1420J,1420K,1420H,1
420F,1420G,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 1410,1410A,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1420B,1420C,142 Mount Roskill


0A,1420D,1420E,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

MHS

1420J,1420K,1420 Mount Roskill


H,1420F,1420G,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

MHS

1410,1410A,
Mount Roskill
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

168

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

MHU

Oppose

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

MHU

Oppose

No Change

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

No Change

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

No Change

Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4708

839-4709

839-4710

839-4711

839-4712

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 1,3, YOUTH


STREET,1151,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1,3, YOUTH
Mount Roskill
STREET,1151,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,1A,13,7B,7A,1,3,1
B,5,7,9, BALFRON
AVENUE,13,15,21,17,
23,19,23A,17A,15A,
FREELAND AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,1A,13,7B,7A,1, Mount Roskill


3,1B,5,7,9,
BALFRON
AVENUE,13,15,21,
17,23,19,23A,17A,
15A, FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 62,62A,


FREELAND AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

62,62A,
FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 47,49,


FREELAND AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

47,49, FREELAND Mount Roskill


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,13,


ROSEMAN AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

11,13, ROSEMAN Mount Roskill


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

169

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support MHS


a less intensified zoning to MHS where managing
flooding risks on these sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The application of the MHS zone is
appropriate for the areas identified as HSAs or areas
where a VV would otherwise impose a height limit of
between eight to nine metres. These sites are subject to
the HSA surrounding Puketapapa (Mount Roskill)
maunga. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHS zone as
MHS
managing flooding risks on these sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone and the application of the MHS
zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas
where a VV would otherwise impose a height limit of
between eight to nine metres. These sites are subject to
the HSA surrounding Puketapapa (Mount Roskill)
maunga. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4713

839-4714

839-4715

839-4716

839-4717

839-4718

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 102,104, MAY


ROAD,7, CHRISTIE
STREET,38A,38,36,40,
36A, ROSEMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

102,104, MAY
Mount Roskill
ROAD,7, CHRISTIE
STREET,38A,38,36
,40,36A,
ROSEMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


49,55,47,45,51,53,
ROSEMAN AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

49,55,47,45,51,53 Mount Roskill


, ROSEMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone


4C,6,4B,2A,4A,
CHRISTIE STREET,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4C,6,4B,2A,4A,
Mount Roskill
CHRISTIE STREET,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 25,23,


DENBIGH AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 65,67,
MOUNT ROSKILL
ROAD, Mount Roskill
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 72,70, MAY
ROAD,1,1A,3,5,3A,
DENBIGH AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

25,23, DENBIGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

65,67, MOUNT
ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

72,70, MAY
Mount Roskill
ROAD,1,1A,3,5,3A
, DENBIGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

170

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support


a less intensified zoning to MHS, where managing
flooding risks on these sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The application of the MHS zone is
appropriate for the areas identified as HSAs or areas
where a VV would otherwise impose a height limit of
between eight to nine metres. These sites are subject to
the HSA surrounding Puketapapa (Mount Roskill)
maunga. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. This site is
affected by the HC and retain the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the
RPS. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. This site is
affected by the HC and retain the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the
RPS. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. This site is
affected by the HC and retain the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the
RPS. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

MHS

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

No Change

No Change

No change

No change

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)
Consider the site meets proximity criteria for MHU.
Consider any character values can be appropriately
managed through the development controls of the Overlay
and can accommodate change to use and intensity of use.
Consider the Height sensitive area can (as appropriate)
manage height of built form, and does not need to dictate
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4719

839-4720

839-4721

839-4722

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,4,6,


DENBIGH AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
2,4,6, DENBIGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 60,58, MAY 60,58, MAY


ROAD, Mount Roskill ROAD, Mount
from Mixed Housing Roskill
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 12,14,


DENBIGH AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
11,3/11,13,2/11,15,
RADNOR
ROAD,18,2/18,20,2/2
0, DENBIGH
AVENUE,56, MOUNT
ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

12,14, DENBIGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

11,3/11,13,2/11,1 Mount Roskill


5, RADNOR
ROAD,18,2/18,20,
2/20, DENBIGH
AVENUE,56,
MOUNT ROSKILL
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on


these sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support change of MHS to MHU zone, where flooding on
those sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. This site is
affected by the HC and retain the SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the
RPS. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone.
This submission is supported in part. See C11 revised
zoning map in Attachment E.
Support change of SH to MHU for 11-15 Radnor Rd (odd
no) properties close to Dominion Road RFN, where
managing flooding risks on these sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. These properties are not affected
by the HC and HSA overlays. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. See C11 revised
zoning map, in Attachment E.
Do not support change of SH to MHU for
18,2/18,20,2/20, Denbigh Ave and 56, Mount Roskill
Road. These sites are affected by the HC and HSA
surrounding Puketapapa and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlays seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. These sites are not affected by
the flooding constraints. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the

171

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support in Part

Consider the site meets proximity criteria for MHU.


Consider any character values can be appropriately
managed through the development controls of the Overlay
and can accommodate change to use and intensity of use.
Consider the Height sensitive area can (as appropriate)
manage height of built form, and does not need to dictate

SH, MHU

Consider the site meets proximity criteria for MHU.


Consider any character values can be appropriately
managed through the development controls of the Overlay
and can accommodate change to use and intensity of use.
Consider the Height sensitive area can (as appropriate)
manage height of built form, and does not need to dictate
zoning.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4723

839-4724

839-4725

839-4726

839-4727

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 8, COLEMAN


AVENUE,1, RADNOR
ROAD, Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8, COLEMAN
AVENUE,1,
RADNOR ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,8,


RADNOR ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,8, RADNOR
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 6, COLEMAN


AVENUE,2, RADNOR
ROAD, Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6, COLEMAN
AVENUE,2,
RADNOR ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 34, DENBIGH


AVENUE,1085,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34, DENBIGH
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,1085,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 38,40,


MOUNT ROSKILL
ROAD,15,17,
COLEMAN AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,40, MOUNT
ROSKILL
ROAD,15,17,
COLEMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on


these sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on
these sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on
these sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on
these sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on
these sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect

172

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4728

839-4729

839-4730

839-4731

839-4732

839-4733

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 22,


MEMORIAL
AVENUE,25,25A,23,
MOUNT ROSKILL
ROAD, Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

22, MEMORIAL
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,25,25A,2
3, MOUNT
ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 20, MAY


ROAD,27A,27B,27,29,
MEMORIAL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 19,21,
MOUNT ROSKILL
ROAD, Mount Roskill
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 18, MOUNT
ROSKILL
ROAD,19,15,17,
MEMORIAL AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 20A,20,
MOUNT ROSKILL
ROAD, Mount Roskill
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 1308A,1308,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20, MAY
Mount Roskill
ROAD,27A,27B,27
,29, MEMORIAL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH

19,21, MOUNT
ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

SH

18, MOUNT
ROSKILL
ROAD,19,15,17,
MEMORIAL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

20A,20, MOUNT
ROSKILL ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

1308A,1308,
Mount Roskill
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

173

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone as managing


MHU
flooding risks on these sites does not impose a zoning
constraint. The properties are located close to RFN, town
and LCs and large public open spaces. Scope to change
zone on subject sites and surrounding properties are
provided by submissions listed in Attachment D (408713, 5002-18, 5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10,
7051-10). The change of zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. These No Change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.
Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider
flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.
Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider
flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4734

839-4740

839-4741

839-4742

839-4743

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 1322,1320,


DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

322,1320,
Mount Roskill
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1,5,7,


SOMERSET
ROAD,26,30,28,22,
WINSTONE ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,5,7, SOMERSET Mount Roskill


ROAD,26,30,28,22
, WINSTONE
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 13,13A,


SOMERSET ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

13,13A,
Mount Roskill
SOMERSET ROAD,
Mount Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 56, DENBIGH


AVENUE,19,21,17,
SOMERSET ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

56, DENBIGH
Mount Roskill
AVENUE,19,21,17,
SOMERSET ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 38A,38,


WINSTONE ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

38A,38,
Mount Roskill
WINSTONE ROAD,
Mount Roskill

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on


these sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on
these sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on
these sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on
these sites does not impose a zoning constraint. The
properties are located close to RFN, town and LCs and
large public open spaces. Scope to change zone on
subject sites and surrounding properties are provided by
submissions listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18,
5478-56, 5974-8, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10).
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. These
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

174

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

MHU

MHU

No change
Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider
flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4744

839-4745

839-483

839-4946

839-4947

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone


48,46,44,48A,44A,46
A, SOMERSET ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

48,46,44,48A,44A, Mount Roskill


46A, SOMERSET
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 3,5,7,


BRISTOL ROAD,14,16,
LOWERY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3,5,7, BRISTOL
Mount Roskill
ROAD,14,16,
LOWERY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 24, KALLU


24, KALLU
Mount Roskill
CRESCENT, Mount
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill form Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


60,62,64,58,66,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE,11,17,
PARKINSON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

60,62,64,58,66,
O'DONNELL
AVENUE,11,17,
PARKINSON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,


2, BUCCANEER
BUCCANEER STREET, STREET, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Roskill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

175

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of SH to MHU, support a less


MHS
intensified zoning to MHS zone where managing flooding
risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. These sites are subject to the HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. These No change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support in Part

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to facilities (open space and education) support


MHU zone. Consider flooding constraints can be
addressed by development controls and rules of Plan and
further note that the scale of Corporations land holding in
area may provide means to address constraints in design.

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Proximity to Centre supports THAB. Consider flooding


constraints can be addressed by development controls and
rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.
Mount Roskill

SH

THAB

Support change of SH to THAB zone as managing flooding THAB


risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The property is located close to RFN, THAB zone, town
and LCs and large public open spaces. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4948

839-4949

839-4950

839-517

839-521

839-613

839-646

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 46,50,48,


FREELAND
AVENUE,17,
PLAYFAIR
ROAD,50,52, SANFT
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 66, FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
46,50,48,
FREELAND
AVENUE,17,
PLAYFAIR
ROAD,50,52,
SANFT AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

66, FREELAND
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 46, ROSEMAN 46, ROSEMAN


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 1478,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace.

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

1478, DOMINION Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
Roskill-Eden
Terrace.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 16, AURORA


Urban at 16, AURORA AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4, SHEPPARD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

4, SHEPPARD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 20, KALLU


Mount Roskill
Suburban at 20,
CRESCENT, Mount
KALLU CRESCENT,
Roskill.
Mount Roskill.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHS

REASONS

176

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of properties zoned MHS to MHU. No Change


The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSA or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The sites are subject to HSA surrounding Puketapapa
(Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU
No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is No Change
located close to large public open spaces and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support retention of property zoned MHS. The


No change
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSA or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The retention of the MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-652

839-685

839-731

839-7569

839-757

839-7582

839-7661

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 10, THOMSON


Urban at 10,
STREET, Mount
THOMSON STREET,
Roskill.
Mount Roskill.

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 1474,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace.

1474, DOMINION Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
Roskill-Eden
Terrace.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 716,
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham.
Western Isthmus Rezone 64 FREELAND
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

716,
Mount Roskill
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION,
Sandringham.

THAB

64 FREELAND
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill

MHS

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 27, MARION


Urban at 27, MARION AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 4, 6


4, 6 BUCCANEER
BUCCANEER STREET. STREET. Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 53A, 53


MARION AVENUE.
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

53A, 53 MARION
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill

MHU

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

177

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change


located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties
are located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No Change

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU, support more
intensive residential zone change to THAB, where
managing flooding risks on these sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The properties are located close
to a TC, RFN and large open spaces. Scope to change to
THAB is provided by submissions 5280-259 and 5277257, referred in this spreadsheet, Attachment C. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to MHU zone as managing flooding
risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The properties are located close to RFN, THAB
zone, town and LCs and large public open spaces. The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

No Change

THAB

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7685

839-7690

839-7716

839-7815

839-7819

839-7841

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 88 FREELAND 88 FREELAND


AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 44 ROSEMAN 44 ROSEMAN


AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 9, 9A


9, 9A PARKINSON Mount Roskill
PARKINSON AVENUE. AVENUE. Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 48 SANFT


48 SANFT
AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 1 VERCOE


STREET. 56 FREELAND
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1 VERCOE STREET. Mount Roskill


56 FREELAND
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 510


RICHARDSON ROAD.
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

510 RICHARDSON Mount Roskill


ROAD. Mount
AlbertHillsborough

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

178

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU
No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. These No change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU


No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of properties from MHS to MHU No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The sites are subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU
No Change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Proximity to Centre supports THAB. Consider flooding


constraints can be addressed by development controls and
rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Support MHU on basis of proximity of the site to FN and


open space. Acknowledge that the HSA if retained may
impose additional height control - this is not the only
relevant provision of the zone (objectives and provisions
more encompassing than just building height)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7848

839-7868

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 4 RADNOR


4 RADNOR ROAD. Mount Roskill
ROAD. Mount Roskill Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 702


SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION. 2
ELPHINSTONE
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

702
Mount Roskill
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD EXTENSION.
2 ELPHINSTONE
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 8A CULLEN


AVENUE. Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8A CULLEN
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 8 CULLEN


AVENUE. Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8 CULLEN
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10, TORY STREET,
Mount Roskill.

10, TORY STREET, Mount Roskill


Mount Roskill.

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 31, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

31, GIFFORD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

179

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone as flooding on this MHU


site does not impose a zoning constraint. The property is
located close to RFN, town and LCs and large public open
spaces. Scope to change zone on subject site and
surrounding properties are provided by submissions
listed in Attachment D (4087-13, 5002-18, 5478-56, 59748, 6210-12, 6927-9, 6942-10, 7051-10). The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHU to THAB zone
No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Recognise intersection as appropriate transition


839-8012

839-8013

839-822

839-835

Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

SH

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

Do not support change of SH to MHU, support more


THAB
intensive residential zone change to THAB, where
managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The property is located close to a
TC, RFN and large open spaces. Scope to change to THAB
is provided by submissions 5280-274 and 5277-272,
referred in this spreadsheet, Attachment C. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of SH to MHU, support more
THAB
intensive residential zone change to THAB, where
managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The property is located close to a
TC, RFN and large open spaces. Scope to change to THAB
is provided by submissions 5280-274 and 5277-272,
referred in this spreadsheet, Attachment C. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is No Change
located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is No Change
located close to large public open spaces and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-847

839-89

839-903

839-912

839-925

839-942

839-947

839-950

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Town Centre 233, STODDARD


at 233, STODDARD
ROAD, Mount
ROAD, Mount Roskill. Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Town Centre 207, STODDARD


at 207, STODDARD
ROAD, Mount
ROAD, Mount Roskill. Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 23, MARION


Urban at 23, MARION AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 68, GIFFORD


Urban at 68, GIFFORD AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

TC

TC

MHU

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


57, ERNIE
Mount Roskill
Housing and
PINCHES STREET,
Apartment Buildings Mount Roskill.
at 57, ERNIE PINCHES
STREET, Mount
Roskill.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 28, FARRELLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 16,
KALLU CRESCENT,
Mount Roskill.

THAB

28, FARRELLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

16, KALLU
Mount Roskill
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 16, PLUMPTON


Urban at 16,
AVENUE, Mount
PLUMPTON AVENUE, Roskill.
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

MHS

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

TC

TC

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the TC zone. The property is


located on RFN and identified as part of the existing
commercial TC. The retention of notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the TC zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the TC zone. The property is
located on RFN and identified as part of the existing
commercial TC. The retention of notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the TC zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is
located around Stoddard Road TC, large public open
spaces and RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

180

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
TC

Support

TC

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is No Change


located around Stoddard Road TC and RFN. The retention
of notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of property from MHS to MHU
No change
zone. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSA or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The site is subject to HSA surrounding
Puketapapa (Mount Roskill) maunga. The retention of the
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No Change
located close to RFN, THAB zone, town and LCs and large
public open spaces. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Note this is anomalous to zoning principles but submitted


in support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-114

839-1303

839-1304

839-1305

839-1307

839-1308

839-1309

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


498, Mount Albert Three Kings
Housing and
Road, Mount
Apartment Buildings Albert-Royal Oak.
at 498, MOUNT
ALBERT ROAD, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


143, PEARY
ROAD,836,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Eden.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at
938,936, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount RoskillEden Terrace.

143, Peary Road,


836, Dominion
Road, Mount
Eden

Three Kings

MU

938,936,
Dominion Road,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/475,2/475,
MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Mount AlbertRoyal Oak.

1/475,2/475,
Mount Albert
Road, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 2, CHURCHES
AVENUE,13,15,
DALLY TERRACE,
Mount Roskill.

2, CHURCHES
AVENUE,13,15,
DALLY TERRACE,
Mount Roskill

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 14,16, CONNOLLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


968,972,970,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace.

14,16, CONNOLLY Three Kings


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

968,972,970,
Dominion Road,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

Three Kings

MU

THAB

SH

SH

MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MU

MU

THAB

SH

SH

MU

REASONS

Do not support retention of THAB zone at this site. The


site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and rezoning to MHS
is appropriate given the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
rezoning to MHS at this site is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone.
Support retention of MU zone at this site - the site is
located close to Dominion Road RFN and is adjacent to
existing MU zone. The retention of the MU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU zone at these sites - the sites
are located close to Dominion Road RFN and are adjacent
to existing MU zone. The retention of the MU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone at this site - the site
is located close to Three Kings TC, Mount Albert Road
RFN and large public open space. The retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

181

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

THAB

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
THAB, consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles.

No change
MU

Support

MU

Support

THAB

Support

SH

Oppose

No change

No change

Do not support retention of notified SH zone, support


MHS
rezoning to MHS zone at these properties. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The MHS zone is appropriate for the site in keeping with
the surrounding sites. This is an out of scope change,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support retention of notified SH zone, support
MHS
rezoning to MHS zone at these properties. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The MHS zone is appropriate for the site in keeping with
the surrounding sites. This is an out of scope change,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support retention of MU zone at these sites - the sites
No change
are located close to Dominion Road RFN and are adjacent
to existing MU zone. The retention of the MU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Consider that SH zone appropriate given the location of


these site on the Maunga reserve

SH

Oppose

Consider that SH zone appropriate given the location of


these site on the Maunga reserve

MU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1310

839-1311

839-1313

839-1314

839-1315

839-142

839-2527

839-2740

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


1, HAIG
AVENUE,891,893,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 2,2A, HAZEL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1, Haig Avenue,
891,893,
Dominion Road,
Mount Roskill

Three Kings

2,2A, Hazel
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

MU

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 392, Mount Albert Three Kings
Urban at 392,
Road, Mount
MOUNT ALBERT
Albert-Royal Oak
ROAD, Mount AlbertRoyal Oak.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 898,898A,
MOUNT EDEN ROAD,
Three Kings-Grafton.

898,898A,
MOUNT EDEN
ROAD, Three
Kings-Grafton

Three Kings

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
1/908,2/908, MOUNT
EDEN ROAD, Three
Kings-Grafton.

1/908,2/908,
MOUNT EDEN
ROAD, Three
Kings-Grafton

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at 931, Dominion


931, DOMINION
Road, Mount
ROAD, Mount Roskill. Roskill

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 473B, 473A
MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD. Mount AlbertRoyal Oak.

473B, 473A
Mount Albert
Road, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


4A FOCH AVENUE.
887A, 887B
DOMINION ROAD.
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace.

4A Foch Avenue,
887A, 887B
Dominion Road,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

Three Kings

MHU

MU

THAB

MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MU

THAB

MU

REASONS

182

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MU zone at this site - the site is


located close to Dominion Road RFN and is adjacent to
existing MU zone. The retention of the MU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone at this site - the site
is located close to Dominion Road RFN and adjacent to
existing MU zone. The retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHU zone and support a
change to a more intensive zone to THAB - the site is
adjacent to the Mount Roskill LC and close to RFN. The
change is within the scope of an area-wide submission
#6099-6, refer to Attachment D. The rezoning to THAB is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHU zone and support a
change to THAB - the site is located close to centres, large
public open space and Mount Eden Road RFN. The
rezoning to THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support retention of MHU zone and support a
change to THAB - the site is located along Mount Eden
Road RFN and is close to large public open space and
centres. The rezoning to THAB is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the notified MU zone. The site is
located on Dominion Rd RFN and is adjacent to other MU
areas. The retention of the MU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone at this site - the site
is located close to Three Kings TC, RFN and large public
open space. The retention of the THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MU zone at this site - the site


supports the function of Mount Roskill LC, is located
along Dominion Road RFN and retention of MU zoning
will enable the development of intensive residential
activities. Retention of the MU zone supports a quality
compact urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MU

Support

THAB

Support

MU

Support

No change

THAB

THAB

THAB

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2741

839-2779

839-2837

839-2879

839-2893

839-2894

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


887C, 887D
DOMINION ROAD.
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
887C, 887D
Dominion Road,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

LOCALITY

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 18B,18,18A, 18B,18,18A,


DORNWELL ROAD,
Dornwell Road,
Mount Roskill from
Mount Roskill
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, KAIN


1, KAIN STREET,
STREET, Mount Eden Mount Eden
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 6A,


6A, Mccullough
MCCULLOUGH
Avenue, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 25, FEARON


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25, Fearon
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 8, CLEGHORN


AVENUE,13,
BRIDGMAN AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

8, Cleghorn
Three Kings
Avenue,13,
Bridgman Avenue,
Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

MHU, THAB THAB

MHS

SH

SH

SH

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

183

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MU zone at this site - the site


No change
supports the function of Mount Roskill LC, is located
along Dominion Road RFN and retention of MU zoning
will enable the development of intensive residential
activities. Retention of the MU zone supports a quality
compact urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the
THAB
property is located close to Three Kings TC, Mount Albert
Road RFN and the site is adjacent to an existing block of
THAB. The rezoning to THAB is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the No change


site is not close to higher density areas and is remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. The retention of the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB - this
No change
site is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site No change
is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre supports THAB. Consider the amenity


values of the character overlay can (as appropriate) be
recognised through the developmetn controls of that
Overlay (form and relationship to street). Not appropriate
to dictate zone.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2899

839-2946

839-2973

839-2997

839-3001

839-3006

839-3039

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 39, DUKE


STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
39, Duke Street,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 51, FEARON


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 23, HAMON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

51, Fearon
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 12, MILLIKEN


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 10,12,8,
HARDLEY AVENUE,16,
HAIG AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 2, BRIDGMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, MILLIKEN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

23, HAMON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

LOCALITY

Three Kings

Three Kings

Three Kings

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

10,12,8, HARDLEY Three Kings


AVENUE,16, HAIG
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH

2, BRIDGMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 29, PARAU


29, PARAU
STREET, Three Kings- STREET, Three
Balmoral from Mixed Kings-Balmoral
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Three Kings

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. MHS


complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Rezoning to MHS will avoid spot zoning
which would not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The rezoning to the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
property is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change to MHU, support retention of
notified MHS zone at this site. The retention of the
notified MHS zone is most appropriate given the distance
to the nearest centres and RFN. The retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
property is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.

184

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Support in Part
Consider proximity to Centre and employment (mixed use)
make this site suitable for MHU zone.

No change
MHS

Support in Part

MHS

Oppose in Part

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHs zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHS zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change
MHU

Oppose

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3041

839-3051

839-3053

839-3086

839-3093

839-3116

839-3128

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 24,


MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 8,
SIMMONDS AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 37, PARAU
STREET, Three KingsBalmoral from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

24, MCCULLOUGH Three Kings


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH

8, SIMMONDS
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

SH

37, Parau Street,


Three KingsBalmoral

Three Kings

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 60A, PARAU 60A, Parau Street, Three Kings
STREET, Three Kings- Three KingsBalmoral from Mixed Balmoral
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 15,


15, Invermay
INVERMAY AVENUE, Avenue, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 9,9A, CARR


ROAD, Three Kings
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

9,9A, Carr Road,


Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,10A,


10,10A, PARAU
PARAU STREET, Three STREET, Three
Kings-Balmoral from Kings-Balmoral
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site


is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
property is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The sites
are also subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a
Riukiuta (Big King). The application of the MHS zone is
appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a
VV would otherwise impose a height limit of between
eight to nine metres. The retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
property is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the site is
close to Dominion Road RFN and existing MU zone. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

185

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

No change

Support MHU on basis of proximity to FN and facilities,


including reserve / open space areas.
No Change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
wider zoning pattern changes.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the No change


sites are not located close to RFN and are also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the No change
site is not close to higher density areas or centres. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone at this site
supports decreasing intensity from centres. The retention
of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3171

839-3174

839-319

839-3225

839-3229

839-3268

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 6, MILLARD 6, Millard Street,


STREET, Three Kings Three Kings
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 53, HAMON 53, Hamon


AVENUE, Mount
Avenue, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 20, DALLY
TERRACE, Mount
Roskill.

Western Isthmus Rezone 37, PRINCES


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20, DALLY
Three Kings
TERRACE, Mount
Roskill

37, PRINCES
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 14, PARAU


14, PARAU
STREET, Three Kings- STREET, Three
Balmoral from Mixed Kings-Balmoral
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 99, DUKE


STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

99, Duke Street,


Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

186

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - the


site is not located adjacent to Three Kings TC or close to
RFN. The site is not subject to any site-specific
constraints. The retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


site is not close to a centre, is remote from the RFN and
the area is mainly suburban dwellings. The sites are
subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a Riukiuta (Big
King). The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of notified SH zone, support
rezoning to MHS zone at these properties. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The MHS zone is appropriate for the site in keeping with
the surrounding sites. This is an out of scope change,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not close to higher density areas or centres. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone at this site
supports decreasing intensity from centres. The retention
of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
a less intensified zone to MHS. The sites are subject to
the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) and
are located close to Three Kings TC and Mount Albert
Road RFN. The application of the MHS zone is
appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a
VV would otherwise impose a height limit of between
eight to nine metres. The rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Support MHU on basis of proximity to FN and facilities,


including reserve / open space areas.
MHS

SH

Oppose

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider that SH zone appropriate given the location of


these site on the Maunga reserve
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

No change

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN (Mt Eden Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that MHU appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3280

839-3304

839-3339

839-3359

839-3372

839-3397

839-3403

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 6, HAUGHEY 6, Haughey


AVENUE, Three Kings Avenue, Three
from Mixed Housing Kings
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 938, MOUNT 938 Mount Eden Three Kings
EDEN ROAD, Three
Road, Three KingsKings-Grafton from
Grafton
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 11, DUKE


STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

11, DUKE STREET, Three Kings


Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 86, DUKE


86 Duke Street,
STREET, Mount
Mount Roskill
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 23, BREMNER 23, BREMNER


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 5, MILLIKEN


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 2,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Three Kings

5, Milliken
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

2, MCCULLOUGH Three Kings


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

187

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


site is not located adjacent to Three Kings TC or close to
RFN. The site is not subject to any site-specific
constraints. The retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the
property is close to Three Kings TC, large public open
space and the Mount Eden Road RFN. The rezoning to
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. Support


alternative rezoning to MHS. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
rezoning to the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
property is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not close to higher density areas or RFN. The site is
also remote from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU, support retention of
notified MHS zone at this site. The retention of the
notified MHS zone is most appropriate given the distance
to the nearest centres and RFN. The retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.

MHS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

THAB

THAB

Support

MHU

Support in Part
Consider proximity to Centre and employment (mixed
use) make this site suitable for MHU zone.

No Change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3406

839-3433

839-3446

839-3455

839-3458

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,


11, MCCULLOUGH Three Kings
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 3A, HARDLEY 3A, Hardley


AVENUE, Mount
Avenue, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 33,


MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,36,
SMALLFIELD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Three Kings

33, MCCULLOUGH Three Kings


AVENUE,36,
SMALLFIELD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 46, PARAU


46, Parau Street,
STREET, Three Kings- Three KingsBalmoral from Mixed Balmoral
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 5, FYVIE


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

5, Fyvie Avenue,
Mount Roskill

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB


zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The site is subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua
a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to Three
Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The application of
the MHS zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of between eight to nine metres. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is
also remote from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The site is subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua
a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to Three
Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The application of
the MHS zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of between eight to nine metres. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

188

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to Centre and FN mean THAB zone appropriate.
Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site may limit height,
but do not consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS
zone.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHS

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to Centre and FN mean THAB zone appropriate.
Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site may limit height,
but do not consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS
zone.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Centre and FN mean MHU zone appropriate.
Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site may limit height,
but do not consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS
zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3467

839-3475

839-3493

839-3539

839-3552

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 9, BARRISTER 9 Barrister


AVENUE, Mount
Avenue, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Western Isthmus Rezone 66,


MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 17,
SIMMONDS AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

SH

66, MCCULLOUGH Three Kings


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH

17, SIMMONDS
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 56,


56, Smallfield
SMALLFIELD AVENUE, Avenue, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 59, DUKE


59 Duke Street,
STREET, Mount
Mount Roskill
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB


zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The site is subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua
a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to Three
Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The application of
the MHS zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of between eight to nine metres. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
retention of notified SH zoning. This site is affected by
the HC and retains the notified SH zone because the
outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve generally align
with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU,
retention of notified MHS zone appropriate for the site
given the distance to the nearest centres and walkability
from RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The site is subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua
a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to Three
Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The application of
the MHS zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of between eight to nine metres. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not close to a centre, is remote from the RFN and
the area is mainly suburban dwellings. The sites are
subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a Riukiuta (Big
King). The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

189

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

THAB

Oppose

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre and FN mean THAB zone appropriate.


Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site may limit height,
but do not consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS
zone.
Proximity to FN (Mt Eden Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that MHU appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site (though
contest the outcomes of that overlay and the controls
imposed). Do not consider the character values of the area
warrant a 'no change' zoning

No change

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review
MHS

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN (Mt Eden Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that MHU appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

No Change

Proximity to FN (Mt Eden Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that MHU appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3569

839-3573

839-3608

839-3623

839-3626

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 105,


MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
105,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 58, PARAU


58 Parau Street,
STREET, Three Kings- Three KingsBalmoral from Mixed Balmoral
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Three Kings

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


741,743,745,747,733,
735,737,739,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

741,743,745,747, Three Kings


733,735,737,739,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone


24,25,20,21,22,23,1,3
,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,11,10,1
3,12,15,14,17,16,19,1
8, THREE KINGS
GROVE, Three Kings
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,25,20,21,22,23 Three Kings


,1,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,
11,10,13,12,15,14
,17,16,19,18,
THREE KINGS
GROVE, Three
Kings

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 18, DUKE


STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18, DUKE STREET, Three Kings


Mount Roskill

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

190

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU MHS


zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The site is subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua
a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to Three
Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The application of
the MHS zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of between eight to nine metres. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No Change
property is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support MU
rezoning to MU. MU is in keeping with adjacent site uses.
The sites are located close to centres and along Dominion
Road RFN. This change is out of scope, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning to MU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from notified MHS to MHU zone. No change


These sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a
Riukiuta (Big King) and not close to the RFN and nearest
centres. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate
for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Rezoning to MHS will avoid spot zoning
which would not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The rezoning to the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to FN (Mt Eden Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that MHU appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MU

Support
Acknowledge scope but consider it provides appropriate
alternate relief to that sought in Corporations submission
and supports the activities surrounding the site.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support in Part

Proximity to FN (Mt Eden Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that MHU appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

MHS

Consider proximity to Centre and employment (mixed


use) make this site suitable for MHU zone. Do not support
assertion of spot zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3632

839-366

839-3672

839-3707

839-3719

839-3729

839-3745

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 63, PARAU


63, Parau Street,
STREET, Three Kings- Three KingsBalmoral from Mixed Balmoral
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 11,11A, Louvain


Urban at 11,11A,
Avenue, Wesley.
LOUVAIN AVENUE,
Wesley.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 27, HAMON 27, HAMON


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 12,


BRIDGMAN AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 4, BARRISTER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

12, BRIDGMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

4 Barrister
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 23, RENFREW


AVENUE,
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 30, BREMNER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

23 Renfrew
Avenue,
Sandringham

30, BREMNER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Sandringham

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this


property is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The sites
are also subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a
Riukiuta (Big King). The application of the MHS zone is
appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a
VV would otherwise impose a height limit of between
eight to nine metres. The retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support the retention of MHU zone at this site - the site
is located close to Mount Roskill LC, Dominion Road RFN
and adjacent to existing MU zone. The retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
property is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site
is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The site is subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua
a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to Three
Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The application of
the MHS zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of between eight to nine metres. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not located close to Mount Roskill TC or RFN. The
site is not subject to any site-specific constraints. The
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not located close to centre or RFN. The retention
of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

191

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to FN (Mt Eden Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that MHU appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

No change
MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose in Part

No change

No change
MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

MHS

Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS zone.
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3781

839-3848

839-3854

839-3888

839-3903

839-3927

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 30, KINGS


30, KINGS ROAD,
ROAD, Mount Roskill Mount Roskill
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 110,


MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

110,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 14, HAMON 14, HAMON


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 14,16, HAZEL


AVENUE,4,6,
HARDLEY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 11, MILLIKEN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 14, TANSLEY
AVENUE, Epsom from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

14,16, HAZEL
AVENUE,4,6,
HARDLEY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

11, MILLIKEN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

14, Tansley
Avenue, Epsom

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - this site


is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The site is subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua
a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to Three
Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The application of
the MHS zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of between eight to nine metres. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU,
retention of notified MHS zone appropriate for the site
given the distance to the nearest centres and walkability
from RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.
Do not support change to MHU, support retention of
notified MHS zone at this site. The retention of the
notified MHS zone is most appropriate given the distance
to the nearest centres and RFN. The retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought from SH to MHU as the
site does not align with the objectives of the zone, being
some distance from the nearest centres, RFN and THAB
zone. Support rezoning to MHS because the site is not
subject to any site-specific constraints and MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. The rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

192

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose in Part

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

MHS

Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that MHU appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

No change

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHS zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

No change

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review
MHS

MHU

Support in Part

Proximity to centre supports MHU. D

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3929

839-403

839-4482

839-4559

839-4560

839-4561

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 4,


4 Smallfield
SMALLFIELD AVENUE, Avenue, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


832, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount RoskillEden Terrace.

832, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount
Roskill-Eden
Terrace

LOCALITY

Three Kings

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

SH

MU

Western Isthmus Rezone 27A,27,


27A,27, Invermay Three Kings
INVERMAY AVENUE, Avenue, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 24,25,23A,23, 24,25,23A,23,


KAIN STREET, Mount KAIN STREET,
Eden from Mixed
Mount Eden
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 18A,17, KAIN 18A,17, KAIN


STREET, Mount Eden STREET, Mount
from Mixed Housing Eden
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,7, KAIN


STREET,128,130,126,
LANDSCAPE ROAD,
Mount Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11,7, KAIN
Three Kings
STREET,128,130,1
26, LANDSCAPE
ROAD, Mount
Eden

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB


zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The site is subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua
a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to Three
Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The application of
the MHS zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of between eight to nine metres. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU zone at this site - the site
supports the function of Balmoral LC, is located along
Dominion Road RFN and retention of MU will enable the
development of intensive residential activities. Retention
of the MU zone supports a quality compact urban form,
giving effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not close to higher density areas or RFN. The site is
also remote from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU,
retention of notified MHS zone appropriate for the site
given the distance to the nearest centres and walkability
from RFN. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
sites are not close to higher density areas or RFN. The
sites are also remote from centres. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
a less intensified rezoning to MHS. 11 and 7 Kain Street
were notified MHS and 126-130 Landscape Road were
notified SH. Sites do not align with principles of MHU
because of distance from RFN, public open space and
centres. Sites not constrained by environmental
(flooding) constraints or HC and can support rezoning to
MHS. The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to

193

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS zone.

No change

MU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of


Corporations submission for wider zoning review
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria - oppose spot zoning on nature of
Corporations submission for wider zoning review

MHS

MHU

Support in Part
Proximity to emplyment and open space (with access onto
Landscape Road from site) consider site appropriate for
MHU zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4562

839-4563

839-4564

839-4565

839-4566

839-4567

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,13,15,17,


HAMON
AVENUE,99,101,97,
PARAU STREET,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,13,15,17,
Three Kings
HAMON
AVENUE,99,101,9
7, PARAU STREET,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 3,5,7,


HAMON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3,5,7, HAMON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,13,15,


FULLJAMES AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13,15,
FULLJAMES
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,8, HAMON 10,8, HAMON


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 108,106,


108,106, DUKE
DUKE STREET, Mount STREET, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone


102,100,100A,
102,100,100A, DUKE DUKE STREET,
STREET, Mount
Mount Roskill
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

194

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these


sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these
sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these
sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these
sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these
sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support in Part
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHS zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHS

Support in Part
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHS zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHS

Support in Part
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHS zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHS

Support in Part
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHS zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN and facilities, including Three Kings and


open space, mean that MHU appropriate zoning.
Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

No change

Proximity to FN and facilities, including Three Kings and


open space, mean that MHU appropriate zoning.
Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4568

839-4569

839-4570

839-4571

839-4572

839-4573

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 90,92, DUKE 90,92 Duke Street, Three Kings
STREET, Mount
Mount Roskill
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,3,5,7,


BARCLAY AVENUE,82,
DUKE STREET, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11,9,3,5,7,
Three Kings
BARCLAY
AVENUE,82, DUKE
STREET, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 8,4,6,


BARCLAY
AVENUE,5,7,
FULLJAMES AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8,4,6, Barclay
Three Kings
Avenue, 5,7,
Fulljames Avenue,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,8,12,14,6,


FULLJAMES
AVENUE,68, DUKE
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

10,8,12,14,6,
Three Kings
FULLJAMES
AVENUE,68, DUKE
STREET, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 37, HAMON


AVENUE,58, DUKE
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

37, Hamon
Avenue,58, Duke
Street, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 83,85, PARAU


STREET,31, HAMON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

83,85, PARAU
Three Kings
STREET,31,
HAMON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

Three Kings

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

195

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change


property is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change
site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. MHU No change


is not appropriate for these sites given distance to
centres and RFN. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character. The
retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the No change


properties are not close to centres or RFN. The retention
of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
while this is outside the proximity criteria (just) it
acknowledges the neighbourhood centre the accessibility
to FN from Duke Street and opportunity for
comprehensive development. On this basis support MHU

MHU

Oppose
while this is outside the proximity criteria (just) it
acknowledges the neighbourhood centre the accessibility
to FN from Duke Street and opportunity for
comprehensive development. On this basis support MHU

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support in Part

while this is outside the proximity criteria (just) it


acknowledges the neighbourhood centre the accessibility
to FN from Duke Street and opportunity for
comprehensive development. On this basis support MHU

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHs zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4574

839-4575

839-4576

839-4577

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 54, DUKE


STREET,75,73, PARAU
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 1,3,5,7,
HENSHAW
AVENUE,3,
SMALLFIELD
AVENUE,10,1,3,5,4,7,
6,8, GARRISON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

54, Duke Street,


75,73, Parau
Street, Mount
Roskill

MHS

1,3,5,7,
Three Kings
HENSHAW
AVENUE,3,
SMALLFIELD
AVENUE,10,1,3,5,
4,7,6,8,
GARRISON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


9/12,20/12,12/12,11/
12,21/12,4/12,3/12,8
/12,22/12,13/12,16/1
2,6/12,2/12,1/12,7/1
2,15/12,18/12,14/12,
5/12,10/12,17/12,19/
12, HENSHAW
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

9/12,20/12,12/12, Three Kings


11/12,21/12,4/12,
3/12,8/12,22/12,1
3/12,16/12,6/12,2
/12,1/12,7/12,15/
12,18/12,14/12,5/
12,10/12,17/12,1
9/12, HENSHAW
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,4,


HENSHAW
AVENUE,1,3,5,7,
BARRISTER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

2,4, Henshaw
Three Kings
Avenue,1,3,5,7,
Barrister Avenue,
Mount Roskill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

196

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No Change


site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change from notified MHS to THAB zone. No change
These sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a
Riukiuta (Big King) and not close to the RFN and nearest
centres. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate
for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from notified MHS to THAB zone. No change


These sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a
Riukiuta (Big King) and not close to the RFN and nearest
centres. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate
for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS zone.

THAB

Oppose

Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS zone.
SH

THAB

Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB


MHS
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4578

839-4579

839-4580

839-4581

839-4582

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 5,7,


SMALLFIELD
AVENUE,2,
BARRISTER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

5,7, SMALLFIELD
AVENUE,2,
BARRISTER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,13,15,17,


SMALLFIELD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

19,13,15,17,
SMALLFIELD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 25,27,21,23,


SMALLFIELD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,34,


SMALLFIELD AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Western Isthmus Rezone 28,


SMALLFIELD
AVENUE,19,25,21,23,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

25,27,21,23,
SMALLFIELD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

32,34,
SMALLFIELD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

LOCALITY

Three Kings

Three Kings

Three Kings

Three Kings

28, SMALLFIELD Three Kings


AVENUE,19,25,21,
23, MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB


zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

197

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS zone.

MHS

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS zone.

MHS

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS zone.

MHS

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS zone.

MHS

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) for MHS zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4583

839-4584

839-4585

839-4586

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


25,23,32,30,36,34,
SIMMONDS
AVENUE,18,14,16,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,468,472,470
,476,474,478,480,
MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Mount AlbertRoyal Oak from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Western Isthmus Rezone 502, MOUNT


ALBERT ROAD,4A,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Western Isthmus Rezone 30,28,


MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,22,
SIMMONDS AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 18,
SIMMONDS
AVENUE,34,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

25,23,32,30,36,34 Three Kings


, SIMMONDS
AVENUE,18,14,16,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,468,472,
470,476,474,478,
480, MOUNT
ALBERT ROAD,
Mount AlbertRoyal Oak

502, MOUNT
Three Kings
ALBERT ROAD,4A,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak

30,28,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,22,
SIMMONDS
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

18, SIMMONDS
AVENUE,34,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB.

198

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

THAB

SH

MHU

MHU

THAB

Oppose

The properties on Simmonds Avenue and McCullough


Avenue subject to this submission have retained the
notified SH zoning because these sites are affected by the
HC and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve generally
align with the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is the most
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB.
MHS, SH
502 Mount Albert Road was notified THAB however is
rezoned to MHS zone because the site is affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and rezoning to MHS is appropriate
because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve
are generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The rezoning to MHS at this
site is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone.

SH

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH & MHS

Support rezoning properties along Mount Albert Road


from MHU to MHS. These sites are affected by the Pre1944 BDC and rezoning to MHS is appropriate because
the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The rezoning to MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone.

SH

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

4A Simmonds Avenue is affected by the HC and retains


the notified SH zoning because the outcomes the overlay
seeks to achieve generally align with the objectives of the
SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.

Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning.

THAB

Oppose
Consider proximity of site means THAB appropriate zone.
(not refernece to 4a Simmons should be 4a McCullough).
The character values of this area relate to streetscape and
relationship to maunga. Consider these can be managed
through design controls of the Overlay and not determine
the zoning. Do not support the Pre-1944 Development
control

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria recognising topography
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4587

839-4588

839-4589

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 46,44,42,40,


SMALLFIELD
AVENUE,39,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

46,44,42,40
Three Kings
Smallfield Avenue,
39 Mccullough
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 51,53,49,


MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

51,53,49,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,13,15,


SCOUT AVENUE,3,
SIMMONDS AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9,13,15,
Three Kings
SCOUT AVENUE,3,
SIMMONDS
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 450, MOUNT


ALBERT ROAD,5,
SCOUT AVENUE,
Mount Albert-Royal
Oak from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

450, Mount Albert Three Kings


Road, 5, Scout
Avenue, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 8,6,


BREMNER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

8,6, Bremner
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

199

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB


MHS
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU MHS
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Sites are not No change
close to higher density areas or the RFN. Site is also
remote from Three Kings TC. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
the retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including
Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

Meet proximity criteria


839-4590

839-4591

Three Kings

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change


site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.

Support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site is


MHU
close to Three Kings TC, Mount Albert Road RFN, and
large public open space. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4592

839-4593

839-4594

839-4595

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,12,12A,


BREMNER
AVENUE,10,7,6,9,8,4
D,4B,4C,4A, BAXTER
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

10,12,12A,
Three Kings
BREMNER
AVENUE,10,7,6,9,
8,4D,4B,4C,4A,
BAXTER STREET,
Mount Roskill

SH, MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 18,18A,


BREMNER
AVENUE,1C,1B,1D,3,
BAXTER STREET,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 2, SCOUT
AVENUE,446,
MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Mount AlbertRoyal Oak from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,18A, BREMNER Three Kings


AVENUE,1C,1B,1D
,3, BAXTER
STREET, Mount
Roskill

MHS

2, SCOUT
AVENUE,446,
MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Mount
Albert-Royal Oak

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


9A,9C,9B,5A,5B,
PARAU
STREET,8J,8K,8H,8I,8L
,8B,8C,8A,8F,8G,8D,8
E,6, SCOUT AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9A,9C,9B,5A,5B, Three Kings


Parau Street,
8J,8K,8H,8I,8L,8B,
8C,8A,8F,8G,8D,8
E,6, Scout Avenue,
Mount Roskill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

200

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support change of zone from SH to MHU at 6, 8 10 & 12 MHU


Bremner Ave, where managing flooding risks on those
sites does not require maintaining a SH zone. The sites
are close to Three Kings TC, Mount Albert Road RFN and
large public open space. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU at remaining


properties identified - the properties are close to Three
Kings TC, Mount Albert Road RFN and large public open
space. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Three Kings

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the site is


MHU
close to Three Kings TC, Mount Albert Road RFN, and
large public open space. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the No Change


site is not close to higher density areas or centres. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. The retention of the notified MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose

Meet proximity criteria


839-4596

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,17, PARAU 19,17, PARAU


STREET, Three Kings- STREET, Three
Balmoral from Mixed Kings-Balmoral
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4597

839-4598

839-4599

839-4600

839-4601

839-4602

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 68,72,70,


FEARON
AVENUE,32,38,36,40,
PARAU STREET,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 52,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,21, SCOUT
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 60,62,56,58,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,27,29,
SCOUT AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

68,72,70, FEARON Three Kings


AVENUE,32,38,36,
40, PARAU
STREET, Mount
Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

52, MCCULLOUGH Three Kings


AVENUE,21,
SCOUT AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

SH

60,62,56,58,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,27,29,
SCOUT AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

Three Kings

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 33,35, SCOUT 33,35, SCOUT


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 61,59,


MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

61,59 Mccullough Three Kings


Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 37-39,35,


37-39,35
Three Kings
SMALLFIELD AVENUE, Smallfield Avenue,
Mount Roskill from
Mount Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

201

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU MHS
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB
MHS
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Proximity to FN and facilities, including Three Kings and


open space, mean that MHU appropriate zoning.
Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4603

839-4604

839-4605

839-4606

839-4607

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone


24,26,30,28,22,
24,26,30,28,22, FYVIE FYVIE AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone


38,46,44,42,36,40 Three Kings
38,46,44,42,36,40,34, ,34 Fyvie Avenue,
FYVIE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 51,53, FYVIE


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

51,53, Fyvie
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 47,45,43,


47,45,43, Fyvie
FYVIE AVENUE,
Avenue, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 33,31,29,35, 33,31,29,35,


FYVIE AVENUE,
FYVIE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mount Roskill
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Three Kings

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU


zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from notified SH zone to MHU
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) and are located close to Three
Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The application of
the MHS zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of between eight to nine metres. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

202

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Proximity to FN and facilities, including Three Kings and


open space, mean that MHU appropriate zoning.
Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

MHS

Proximity to FN and facilities, including Three Kings and


open space, mean that MHU appropriate zoning.
Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

MHS

Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

MHS

Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

MHS

Proximity to FN (Mt Albert Road) and facilities, including


Three Kings and open space, mean that THAB appropriate
zoning. Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4608

839-4609

839-4610

839-4611

839-4612

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 77,75,73,


MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,10,8A,12,16,
18,10A,6A,2,4,6,8,
FYVIE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

77,75,73,
Three Kings
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,10,8A,12
,16,18,10A,6A,2,4,
6,8, FYVIE
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 72,70,


72,70, Mccullough Three Kings
MCCULLOUGH
Avenue, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 54,56,


FEARON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 86,84,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

54,56 Fearon
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


98,90,100,92,94,96,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE,36, HAMON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

98,90,100,92,94,9 Three Kings


6, Mccullough
Avenue,36,
Hamon Avenue,
Mount Roskill

Three Kings

86,84 Mccullough Three Kings


Avenue, Mount
Roskill

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU


zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not close to a centre, is remote from the RFN and
the area is mainly suburban dwellings. The sites are
subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a Riukiuta (Big
King). The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retains the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
Do not support change from notified MHS to MHU zone.
These sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a
Riukiuta (Big King) and not close to the RFN and nearest
centres. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate
for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from notified MHS to MHU zone.
These sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a
Riukiuta (Big King) and not close to the RFN and nearest
centres. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate
for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

203

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN and facilities, including Three Kings and


open space, mean that MHU appropriate zoning.
Acknowledge proposed HSA on the site but do not
consider height is sole reason (std) between MHU and
MHS zone.

No Change

Within 500m of FN on Mt Albert Road. Consider the


proximity of site to FN and open space mean that MHU
appropriate zoning. Acknowledge that there is potential
for the HSA to restrict height, however this is not sole
development control different between MHS and MHU
zone.

No Change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No Change

Within 500m of FN on Mt Albert Road. Consider the


proximity of site to FN and open space mean that MHU
appropriate zoning. Acknowledge that there is potential
for the HSA to restrict height, however this is not sole
development control different between MHS and MHU
zone.

No change

Consider proximity to Centre (Three Kings) and facilities


(school) make this site suitable for MHU zone. Given
quantum of Corporation interest in area and potential for
comprehensive redevelopment, consider the potential for
change to 'existing character' appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4613

839-4614

839-4615

839-4616

839-4617

839-4618

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 83,87,85,


MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

83,87,85
Mccullough
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone


99,93,101,95,97,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

99,93,101,95,97,
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 30,28,


HAMON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

30,28, HAMON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

LOCALITY

Three Kings

Three Kings

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 47,45,43,


FEARON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

47,45,43, Fearon
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 33,31,


FEARON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 44,42,
FEARON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

33,31, FEARON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

44,42, FEARON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU


zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from notified MHS to MHU zone.
These sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a
Riukiuta (Big King) and not close to the RFN and nearest
centres. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate
for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - these
sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain the
notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

204

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support in Part

Consider proximity to Centre (Three Kings) and facilities


(school) make this site suitable for MHU zone. Given
quantum of Corporation interest in area and potential for
comprehensive redevelopment, consider the potential for
change to 'existing character' appropriate.

MHS

Consider proximity to Centre (Three Kings) and facilities


(school) make this site suitable for MHU zone. Given
quantum of Corporation interest in area and potential for
comprehensive redevelopment, consider the potential for
change to 'existing character' appropriate.

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHs zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change

MHU

Oppose

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support Council postion in respect of pre-1944


Demolition Control predetermining zoning
Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider
flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design. character values can
appropriately be managed by the controls of the overlay.
Generally meets proximity criteria to support MHU.
Consider flooding constraints can be addressed by
development controls and rules of Plan and further note
that the scale of Corporations land holding in area may
provide means to address constraints in design. character
values can appropriately be managed by the controls of

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4619

839-4620

839-4621

839-4622

839-4623

839-4624

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 36,34,


FEARON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 2, DALLY
TERRACE,1,
CONNOLLY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
36,34, FEARON
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

2, Dally Terrace, 1 Three Kings


Connolly Avenue,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 89,87,85,


89,87,85, Duke
DUKE STREET, Mount Street, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Western Isthmus Rezone


103,103A,105,
103,103A,105, DUKE DUKE STREET,
STREET, Mount
Mount Roskill
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Western Isthmus Rezone 109,111,


109,111, DUKE
DUKE STREET, Mount STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,15,21,17,


FEARON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Three Kings

Three Kings

Three Kings

19,15,21,17,
Three Kings
FEARON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from notified SH to MHU
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
a less intensified zone to MHS. The sites are subject to
the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) and
are located close to Three Kings TC and Mount Albert
Road RFN. The application of the MHS zone is
appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a
VV would otherwise impose a height limit of between
eight to nine metres. The rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
a less intensified zone to MHS. These sites are affected by
the Pre-1944 BDC and are zoned MHS because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone.
The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
a less intensified zone to MHS. The sites are subject to
the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) and
are located close to Three Kings TC and Mount Albert
Road RFN. The application of the MHS zone is
appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a
VV would otherwise impose a height limit of between
eight to nine metres. The rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change from SH to MHU, support
retention of notified SH zoning. These sites are affected
by flooding constraints and by the HC and retain the
notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks
to achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH

205

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

MHS

Consider proximity to Centre (Three Kings) and facilities


(school) make this site suitable for MHU zone. Given
quantum of Corporation interest in area and potential for
comprehensive redevelopment, consider the potential for
change to 'existing character' appropriate.

MHS

Given proximity to FN and Centre (Three Kings) consider a


MHU zone appropriate. Acknowledge that the HSA may
limit height but consider this is only one development
control of the zone
MHS

MHU

Oppose
Given proximity to FN and Centre (Three Kings) consider a
MHU zone appropriate. Acknowledge that the HSA may
limit height but consider this is only one development
control of the zone

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Given proximity to FN and Centre (Three Kings) consider a
MHU zone appropriate. Acknowledge that the HSA may
limit height but consider this is only one development
control of the zone

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design. character values can
appropriately be managed by the controls of the overlay.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4625

839-4626

839-4627

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 9,7, FEARON


AVENUE,1,3,
BRIDGMAN AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
9,7, FEARON
AVENUE,1,3,
BRIDGMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

LOCALITY

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 31,29,


31,29, CLEGHORN Three Kings
CLEGHORN AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,30,


KEYSTONE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

32,30, KEYSTONE Three Kings


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

206

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and flooding constraints and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the
overlay seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU for site No change
given distance to Mount Roskill LC and zoning principle of
decreasing intensity from centres. MHS fits pattern of
zoning for the block. The retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria
Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider
flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design. character values can
appropriately be managed by the controls of the overlay.

Meet proximity criteria


839-4628

839-4629

839-4630

839-4631

Western Isthmus Rezone 18,16,


18,16, BRIDGMAN Three Kings
BRIDGMAN AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,21,


19,21, CLEGHORN Three Kings
CLEGHORN AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,13,15,


CLEGHORN AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11,9,13,15,
CLEGHORN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 12,


CLEGHORN
AVENUE,15,
BRIDGMAN AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

12, CLEGHORN
AVENUE,15,
BRIDGMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by the HC and flooding constraints and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the
overlay seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these
sites are affected by the HC and flooding constraints and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the
overlay seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone.
Do not support change from SH to MHU, support
retention of notified SH zoning. These sites are affected
by flooding constraints and by the HC and retain the
notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks
to achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
Do not support change from SH to MHU, support
retention of notified SH zoning. These sites are affected
by flooding constraints and by the HC and retain the
notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks
to achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design. character values can
appropriately be managed by the controls of the overlay.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design. character values can
appropriately be managed by the controls of the overlay.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design. character values can
appropriately be managed by the controls of the overlay.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design. character values can
appropriately be managed by the controls of the overlay.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4632

839-4633

839-4634

839-4635

839-4636

839-4637

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 2, CLEGHORN


AVENUE,24, DONALD
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, CLEGHORN
Three Kings
AVENUE,24,
DONALD
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 1212,1214,


DOMINION ROAD,1,
CLEGHORN
AVENUE,26, DONALD
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1212,1214,
Three Kings
DOMINION
ROAD,1,
CLEGHORN
AVENUE,26,
DONALD
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 7, BRIDGMAN


AVENUE,14,16,18,16
A,2/16,2/14, DONALD
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7, BRIDGMAN
Three Kings
AVENUE,14,16,18,
16A,2/16,2/14,
DONALD
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 15,17,


DONALD CRESCENT,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 1204,1206,
DOMINION
ROAD,11,5,7,
DONALD CRESCENT,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 8,6, DONALD
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15,17, DONALD
Three Kings
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill

SH

1204,1206,
Three Kings
DOMINION
ROAD,11,5,7,
DONALD
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill

SH

8,6, DONALD
Three Kings
CRESCENT, Mount
Roskill

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

207

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.
Do not support change from SH to MHU, support
No change
retention of notified SH zoning. These sites are affected
by flooding constraints and by the HC and retain the
notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks
to achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change from SH to MHU, support
No change
retention of notified SH zoning. These sites are affected
by flooding constraints and by the HC and retain the
notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks
to achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design. character values can
appropriately be managed by the controls of the overlay.

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design. character values can
appropriately be managed by the controls of the overlay.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4638

839-4639

839-4640

839-4641

839-4642

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 1198,1196,


DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1198,1196,
Three Kings
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount RoskillEden Terrace

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 1,3,5,


DUNCUMB
STREET,23, DUKE
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 15, DUKE
STREET,18,16,
FEARON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1,3,5, DUNCUMB Three Kings


STREET,23, DUKE
STREET, Mount
Roskill

SH

15, DUKE
Three Kings
STREET,18,16,
FEARON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 24, FEARON


AVENUE,2,
DUNCUMB STREET,
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

24, FEARON
AVENUE,2,
DUNCUMB
STREET, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,10A, FOCH 10,10A, FOCH


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

Three Kings

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

208

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change


sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.
This submission is supported in part. See C12 revised
SH & MHS
zoning map in Attachment E.
Support rezoning 15 Duke Street from SH to MHS as the
site is not affected by any site-specific constraints and
MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The rezoning to MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone.

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

Support retention of notified SH zone at 16 and 18


Fearon Avenue. These sites are affected by the HC and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the
overlay seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
Do not support change from SH to MHU, support
No change
retention of notified SH zoning. These sites are affected
by flooding constraints and by the HC and retain the
notified SH zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks
to achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design. character values can
appropriately be managed by the controls of the overlay.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4643

839-4644

839-4645

839-4646

839-4647

839-4648

839-4649

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 95,97,


BUCKLEY ROAD,600,
MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Epsom from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

95,97 Buckley
Three Kings
Road, 600 Mount
Albert Road,
Epsom

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 608,608A,


MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Mount AlbertRoyal Oak from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

608,608A, Mount Three Kings


Albert Road,
Mount AlbertRoyal Oak

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 616A,616,


MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Mount AlbertRoyal Oak from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

616A,616, Mount Three Kings


Albert Road,
Mount AlbertRoyal Oak

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,32A,


32,32A, Buckley
BUCKLEY ROAD,
Road, Epsom
Epsom from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 50A,


50A, Liverpool
LIVERPOOL STREET, Street, Epsom
Epsom from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 15A,15B,


BUCKLEY ROAD,
Epsom from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15A,15B, BUCKLEY Three Kings


ROAD, Epsom

Western Isthmus Rezone 154, THE


DRIVE,31, SELWYN
ROAD, Epsom from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

154, The Drive,


31, Selwyn Road,
Epsom

Three Kings

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

209

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the site is


MHU
close to Three Kings TC, Mount Albert Road RFN and
large public open space. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the site is


MHU
close to Royal Oak TC, Three Kings TC, Mount Albert Road
RFN and large public open space. The rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the site is


MHU
close to Royal Oak TC, Three Kings TC, Mount Albert Road
RFN and large public open space. The rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


sites are not close to higher density areas or RFN. The
sites are also remote from centres. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not close to higher density areas or RFN. The site is
also remote from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS, support
retention of notified SH zoning. This site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Meet proximity criteria


No change

MHS

Support in Part

No change
MHS

Oppose

Recognise proximity constraints


Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHS on basis of proximity

No change
MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4650

839-4651

839-4652

839-4653

839-4654

839-4655

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 39,2/39,


39,2/39, Carr
Three Kings
CARR ROAD, Three
Road, Three Kings
Kings from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


35B,35A,31,31B,33A,
33B, CARR ROAD,
Three Kings from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 25,25A, CARR
ROAD, Three Kings
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

35B,35A,31,31B,3 Three Kings


3A,33B, Carr
Road, Three Kings

25,25A, Carr
Three Kings
Road, Three Kings

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


15A,19,15,19A,17, Three Kings
15A,19,15,19A,17,
Haughey Avenue,
HAUGHEY AVENUE, Three Kings
Three Kings from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,11A,


11,11A, Haughey
HAUGHEY AVENUE, Avenue, Three
Three Kings from
Kings
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1,1A,


GERRARD
STREET,15A,13,15,13
A, CARR ROAD, Three
Kings from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

1,1A, Gerrard
Three Kings
Street,15A,13,15,
13A, Carr Road,
Three Kings

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at this


site given distance to RFN and centres. Site is close to LI
but pattern of residential zoning supports decreasing
intensity from centres. MHS fits the pattern of zoning for
the block. The retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
sites are not located close to RFN and are also remote
from centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at this
site given distance to RFN and centres. Site is close to LI
but pattern of residential zoning supports decreasing
intensity from centres. MHS fits the pattern of zoning for
the block. The retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - the
site is not located adjacent to Three Kings TC or close to
RFN. The site is not subject to any site-specific
constraints. The retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

210

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Consider appropriate transition for proximity criteria to
recognise access constraints at Millard Street and
Hillsborough Road (connecting to Centre)

MHS

THAB

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - the


site is not located adjacent to Three Kings TC or close to
RFN. The site is not subject to any site-specific
constraints. The retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at this No change


site given distance to RFN and centres. Site is close to LI
but pattern of residential zoning supports decreasing
intensity from centres. MHS fits the pattern of zoning for
the block. The retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Meets criteria - do not support Council downzoning for Pre1944 Demolition Control. Consider the volcanic features of
this site can be appropriately recognised through the
development controls of the Overlay (if retained).
Recognise MHU appropriate to transition for land use

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4656

839-4657

839-4735

839-4736

839-4737

839-4738

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,2A,


MILLARD STREET,
Three Kings from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 3,3A, CARR
ROAD, Three Kings
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2,2A, Millard
Street, Three
Kings

Three Kings

3,3A, Carr Road,


Three Kings

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone


54,56,52,62A,58B,58
A,64, BREMNER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

54,56,52,62A,58B, Three Kings


58A,64, Bremner
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 38,40,


BREMNER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,40, BREMNER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 30,36,


MILLIKEN AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 35, MILLIKEN
AVENUE,11,9,13,5,7,
BREMNER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

30,36, MILLIKEN
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

35, MILLIKEN
Three Kings
AVENUE,11,9,13,5
,7, BREMNER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1/24,2/24,22, 1/24,2/24,22,


Three Kings
BREMNER AVENUE, Bremner Avenue,
Mount Roskill from
Mount Roskill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


site is not located adjacent to Three Kings TC or close to
RFN. The site is not subject to any site-specific
constraints. The retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not located adjacent to Three Kings TC or close to
RFN. The site is not subject to any site-specific
constraints. The retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone to MHU at these sites.
Properties 52, 58A and 58B are notified SH zone. These
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone for other sites as
MHU is not appropriate considering distance to centres
and RFN. The retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
sites are not close to higher density areas or RFN. The
sites are also remote from centres. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU, support retention of
notified MHS zone at this site. The retention of the
notified MHS zone is most appropriate given the distance
to the nearest centres and RFN. The retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
sites are not close to higher density areas and are also
remote from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

211

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4739

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at this No change


site given distance to RFN and centres and zoning
principle of decreasing intensity from centres. MHS fits
the pattern of zoning for the block. The retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-478

839-492

839-503

839-548

839-630

839-711

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


897, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount RoskillEden Terrace.

897, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount
Roskill-Eden
Terrace

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 10, CONNOLLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

10, CONNOLLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 24, DALLY
TERRACE, Mount
Roskill.

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 11, CONNOLLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

24, DALLY
Three Kings
TERRACE, Mount
Roskill

11, CONNOLLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at 2, LOUVAIN


2, LOUVAIN AVENUE, AVENUE, Wesley
Wesley.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 805,
DOMINION ROAD,
Mount Roskill-Eden
Terrace.

Three Kings

805, Dominion
Road, Mount
Roskill-Eden
Terrace

PAUP ZONE

MU

SH

SH

SH

MU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

SH

SH

SH

MU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MU zone at this site - the site is


located close to Dominion Road RFN and is adjacent to
existing MU zone. The retention of the MU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of notified SH zone, support
rezoning to MHS zone at these properties. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The MHS zone is appropriate for the site in keeping with
the surrounding sites. This is an out of scope change,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support retention of notified SH zone, support
rezoning to MHS zone at these properties. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The MHS zone is appropriate for the site in keeping with
the surrounding sites. This is an out of scope change,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support retention of notified SH zone, support
rezoning to MHS zone at these properties. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The MHS zone is appropriate for the site in keeping with
the surrounding sites. This is an out of scope change,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support retention of notified MU zone at this site. The
site is located on Dominion Road RFN and is part of an
existing block of MU. The retention of MU at this site
supports the objectives of the MU zone, reflects the
existing range of uses and is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support retention of MHU zone and support a
change to THAB - the site is located close to MU zone and
RFN. The change to THAB is within the scope of an areawide submission #6099-6, refer to Attachment D. The
rezoning to THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the

212

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MU

Support

SH

Oppose

MHS

Consider site appropriate for SH due to location (on top of


maunga)
MHS

SH

Oppose

Consider site appropriate for SH due to location (on top of


maunga)
MHS

SH

Oppose

Recognise this site is on the Maunga and more appropriate


SH
No change
MU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-728

839-7431

839-7435

839-7473

839-7533

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 20, CONNOLLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
20, CONNOLLY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

LOCALITY

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone


39,41,43A,43B,43 Three Kings
39,41,43A,43B,43C, C, Hamon Avenue,
HAMON STREET, 55A - 55A - 55H Duke
55H DUKE STREET, 69 Street, 69 Parau
PARAU STREET,
Street, Mount
Mount Roskill from
Roskill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 2, GARRISON 2, GARRISON


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Three Kings

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 2 GARRISON 2, GARRISON


AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 26


26 MCCULLOUGH Three Kings
MCCULLOUGH
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill
Roskill from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

213

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of notified SH zone, support


MHS
rezoning to MHS zone at these properties. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The MHS zone is appropriate for the site in keeping with
the surrounding sites. This is an out of scope change,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the No change
properties are not close to centres or RFN. The sites are
subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a Riukiuta (Big
King). The application of the MHS zone is appropriate for
areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from notified MHS to THAB zone. No change
These sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a
Riukiuta (Big King) and not close to the RFN and nearest
centres. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate
for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from notified MHS to THAB zone. No change
These sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te Ttua a
Riukiuta (Big King) and not close to the RFN and nearest
centres. The application of the MHS zone is appropriate
for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would
otherwise impose a height limit of between eight to nine
metres. The retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB - this
No change
site is affected by the HC and retains the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

SH

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Recognise this site is on the Maunga and more appropriate


SH

MHU

Oppose
Given proximity to faciltiies (school) and Centre (Three
Kings) consider a MHU zone appropriate. Acknowledge
that the HSA may limit height but consider this is only one
development control of the zone

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site has excellent access to Mt Albert Road (FN) and


services, including Countdown. Consider THAB zone
appropriate. Recognise issue of Height Sensitive Area
limiting height (potentially) but consider these provisions
should be managed separately and not amend the
underlying zone (suitability of the site for higher intensity
residential use)

Site has good accessibility to Mt Albert Road (FN) and


services, including Countdown. Consider THAB zone
appropriate. Recognise issue of Height Sensitive Area
limiting height (potentially) but consider these provisions
should be managed separately and not amend the
underlying zone (suitability of the site for higher intensity
residential use)

Consider proximity of site means MHU appropriate zone


(cusp of THAB on the site). The character values of this
area relate to streetscape and relationship to maunga.
Consider these can be managed through design controls of
the Overlay and not determine the zoning.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7549

839-7568

839-7573

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 42, 43, 24, 25,


26, 27, 20, 21, 22, 23,
46, 47, 44, 45, 28, 29,
41, 1, 3, 2, 5, 4, 7, 6,
9, 8, 39, 38, 11, 10,
13, 12, 15, 14, 17, 16,
19, 18, 31, 30, 37, 36,
35, 34, 33, 32 FRED
WOODWARD PLACE.
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

42, 43, 24, 25, 26, Three Kings


27, 20, 21, 22, 23,
46, 47, 44, 45, 28,
29, 41, 1, 3, 2, 5,
4, 7, 6, 9, 8, 39,
38, 11, 10, 13, 12,
15, 14, 17, 16, 19,
18, 31, 30, 37, 36,
35, 34, 33, 32 Fred
Woodward Place,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 20 RENFREW


AVENUE.
Sandringham from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 7 PARAU
STREET. Three KingsBalmoral from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

20 Renfrew
Avenue,
Sandringham

Sandringham

7 Parau Street,
Three KingsBalmoral

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 30, DALLY
TERRACE, Mount
Roskill.

30, DALLY
Three Kings
TERRACE, Mount
Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB,


support retention of notified MHU zoning at this site.
MHU zone appropriate given distance to Three Kings TC
and Mount Albert Road RFN. Retention of notified MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

214

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meets proxmity criteria and provides appropriate zoning


between THAB to the east and Mixed Use to west of sites would make wider zoning changes
MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property MHU


is close to RFN, public open space and Mount Roskill LC.
The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the No Change
site is not close to higher density areas or centres. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. The retention of the notified MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-762

839-7727

Western Isthmus Rezone 10 DONALD


CRESCENT. 1 FEARON
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10 DONALD
Three Kings
CRESCENT and 1
FEARON AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

SH

SH

SH

MHU

Do not support retention of notified SH zone, support


MHS
rezoning to MHS zone at these properties. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The MHS zone is appropriate for the site in keeping with
the surrounding sites. This is an out of scope change,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone.

SH

Oppose

Consider site appropriate for SH due to location (on top of


maunga)

MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7821

839-7832

839-7838

839-787

839-7961

839-8248

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 20, 22


HAMON AVENUE.
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 50B
LIVERPOOL STREET.
Epsom from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

20, 22 Hamon
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 47, 45, 43, 41


SMALLFIELD AVENUE.
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

47, 45, 43, 41


SMALLFIELD
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 8, CHURCHES
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

8, CHURCHES
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 2 FULLJAMES


AVENUE. 70 DUKE
STREET. Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

50B Liverpool
Street, Epsom

2 Fulljames
Avenue and 70
Duke Street,
Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 48 BREMNER 48 Bremner


AVENUE. Mount
Avenue, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Three Kings

Three Kings

Three Kings

Three Kings

Three Kings

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

SH

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at this


site given distance to RFN and centres and zoning
principle of decreasing intensity from centres. MHS fits
the pattern of zoning for the block. The retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
site is not close to higher density areas or RFN. The site is
also remote from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from notified SH zone to THAB
zone, support less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites are subject to the HSA surrounding Te
Ttua a Riukiuta (Big King) however are located close to
Three Kings TC and Mount Albert Road RFN. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support retention of notified SH zone, support
rezoning to MHS zone at these properties. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The MHS zone is appropriate for the site in keeping with
the surrounding sites. This is an out of scope change,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at this
site given distance to RFN and centres and zoning
principle of decreasing intensity from centres. MHS fits
the pattern of zoning for the block. The retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

215

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support in Part

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHs zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS

THAB

Oppose

SH

Oppose

Site has good accessibility to Mt Albert Road (FN) and


services, including Countdown. Consider THAB zone
appropriate. Recognise issue of Height Sensitive Area
limiting height (potentially) but consider these provisions
should be managed separately and not amend the
underlying zone (suitability of the site for higher intensity
residential use)

MHS

Consider site appropriate for SH due to location (on top of


maunga)
No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS, support No change


retention of notified SH zoning. This site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

while this is outside the proximity criteria (just) it


acknowledges the neighbourhood centre the accessibility
to FN from Duke Street and opportunity for
comprehensive development. On this basis support MHU
Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider
flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8249

839-8250

839-8251

839-8252

839-8253

839-923

839-929

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 46 BREMNER 46 Bremner


AVENUE. Mount
Avenue, Mount
Roskill from Single
Roskill
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 44 BREMNER 44 Bremner


AVENUE. Mount
Avenue, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 42 BREMNER 42 Bremner


AVENUE. Mount
Avenue, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Rezone 44A


BREMNER AVENUE.
Mount Roskill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 40A
BREMNER AVENUE.
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

44A Bremner
Avenue, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

40A BREMNER
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


927, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount RoskillEden Terrace.

927, DOMINION
ROAD, Mount
Roskill-Eden
Terrace

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 16, DALLY
TERRACE, Mount
Roskill.

16, DALLY
Three Kings
TERRACE, Mount
Roskill

Three Kings

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MU

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MU

SH

REASONS

216

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS, support No change


retention of notified SH zoning. This site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the No change
site is not close to higher density areas or RFN. The site is
also remote from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone sought from MHS to MHU No change
- The sites are not close to a centre, are remote from
Mount Albert Road RFN and the area is mainly suburban
dwellings. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS, support No change
retention of notified SH zoning. This site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the No change
site is not close to higher density areas or RFN. The site is
also remote from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU zone at this site - the site is
No change
located along Dominion Road RFN and is adjacent to
existing MU zone. The retention of the MU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of notified SH zone, support
MHS
rezoning to MHS zone at these properties. The
application of the MHS zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of between eight to nine metres.
The MHS zone is appropriate for the site in keeping with
the surrounding sites. This is an out of scope change,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Meet Criteria

MU

Support

SH

Oppose

Consider site appropriate for SH due to location (on top of


maunga)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1316

839-1434

839-1435

839-1436

839-1437

839-1438

839-1439

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 20A,20, OAK
STREET, Royal Oak.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
20A,20, OAK
STREET, Royal
Oak.

LOCALITY

Royal Oak

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


27A,27B,27,29,
Housing and
BOYD AVENUE,
Apartment Buildings Royal Oak.
at 27A,27B,27,29,
BOYD AVENUE, Royal
Oak.

Royal Oak

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


81A-81Q,
Housing and
SYMONDS
Apartment Buildings STREET, Royal
at 81A-81Q,
Oak.
SYMONDS STREET,
Royal Oak.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
24,18AHousing and
18B,22,16AApartment Buildings 16B,20A,30,
at 24,18A-18B,22,16A- INKERMAN
16B,20A,30,
STREET,
INKERMAN STREET, Onehunga.
Onehunga.

Royal Oak

Royal Oak

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 37, MOUNT SMART
ROAD,41, INKERMAN
STREET, Onehunga.

37, MOUNT
Royal Oak
SMART ROAD,41,
INKERMAN
STREET,
Onehunga.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 133,135, SELWYN
STREET, Onehunga.

133,135, SELWYN Royal Oak


STREET,
Onehunga.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 56,58, MOUNT
SMART ROAD,20,
BROOKFIELD
AVENUE, Onehunga.

56,58, MOUNT
Royal Oak
SMART ROAD,20,
BROOKFIELD
AVENUE,
Onehunga.

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is


located close to Royal Oak TC and is part of an existing
block of THAB. The retention of the THAB zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

217

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

No change

Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites No change


are located close to Royal Oak TC and RFN and are part of
a notified THAB block. The retention of the THAB zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is


located close to Royal Oak TC and RFN. The retention of
the THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites


are located close to Royal Oak TC, large public open
space and Mount Smart Road RFN. The retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites No change


are located close to Royal Oak TC and Mount Smart Road
RFN. The retention of the THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites


are located close to RFN and Royal Oak TC and the sites
are not subject to any site-specific constraints. The
retention of the THAB zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites
are located close to Royal Oak TC, large public open
space and Mount Smart Road RFN. The retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1440

839-1441

839-1442

839-1443

839-1444

839-1445

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 68,66,70, MOUNT
SMART ROAD,10,8,
BROOKFIELD
AVENUE, Onehunga.

68,66,70, MOUNT Royal Oak


SMART
ROAD,10,8,
BROOKFIELD
AVENUE,
Onehunga.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 78, MOUNT SMART
ROAD,420,422,
ONEHUNGA MALL,
Onehunga.

78, MOUNT
Royal Oak
SMART ROAD and
420,422
ONEHUNGA
MALL, Onehunga

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 432, ONEHUNGA
MALL,1,3,
BROOKFIELD
AVENUE, Onehunga.

432, ONEHUNGA Royal Oak


MALL,1,3,
BROOKFIELD
AVENUE,
Onehunga.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
11,10,13,12,15,14,16,
18,3,7,9,8, BAKER
PLACE, Onehunga.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 31,33A,33C,33B,
BROOKFIELD
AVENUE, Onehunga.

11,10,13,12,15,14 Royal Oak


,16,18,3,7,9,8,
BAKER PLACE,
Onehunga.

THAB

31,33A,33C,33B,
BROOKFIELD
AVENUE,
Onehunga.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


2/36,1/36,
Housing and
BROOKFIELD
Apartment Buildings AVENUE,
at 2/36,1/36,
Onehunga.
BROOKFIELD
AVENUE, Onehunga.

Royal Oak

Royal Oak

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

218

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites


are located close to Royal Oak TC, large public open
space and Mount Smart Road RFN. The retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites


are located close to Royal Oak TC, large public open
space and Mount Smart Road RFN. The retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites


are located close to Royal Oak TC, large public open
space and Mount Smart Road RFN. The retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites


are located close to Royal Oak TC, large public open
space and Mount Smart Road RFN. The retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites No change


are located close to Royal Oak TC and RFN and are part of
an existing notified block of THAB. The retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB zone at these sites - the sites No change


are located close to Royal Oak TC and RFN and are part of
an existing notified block of THAB. The retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-173

839-207

839-3206

839-3570

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 472, ONEHUNGA
MALL, Onehunga.

472, ONEHUNGA Royal Oak


MALL, Onehunga.

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 74, MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Royal OakPenrose.

74, MOUNT
SMART ROAD,
Royal OakPenrose.

Royal Oak

Western Isthmus Rezone 57,57A,


RAURENGA AVENUE,
Royal Oak from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

57,57A,
RAURENGA
AVENUE, Royal
Oak

Royal Oak

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 31,


31, CAMPBELL
Royal Oak
CAMPBELL ROAD,
ROAD, Royal OakRoyal Oak-Greenlane Greenlane
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 390,


390, ONEHUNGA Royal Oak
ONEHUNGA MALL,
MALL, Onehunga
Onehunga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 38,


HILLSBOROUGH
ROAD, Lynfield-Three
Kings from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

219

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is


No change
located close to Royal Oak TC and has excellent access to
public open space. The retention of the THAB zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is
No change
located close to Royal Oak TC, and has excellent access to
public open space. This property is not subject to any
constraints and the retention of the THAB zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB No change
rezoning to THAB would create spot zoning and the
retention of MHU provides a transition in density
between THAB and MHS. The retention of the MHU zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB. This


site is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proxmity criteria (albeit marginal) but also provides


for integration of zoning (with THAB proposed to rear of
site)

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3684

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - MHS No change


zone most appropriate for the site given flooding
constraints and potential of spot zoning. The retention of
the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3875

38,
HILLSBOROUGH
ROAD, LynfieldThree Kings

Three Kings

THAB

Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less


MHU
intensified zone to MHU - the site is not adjacent to any
centres but is on arterial and near large public open
space. MHU will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood that
provides a transition in density between existing THAB
and MHS. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-413

839-430

839-4748

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 8, RAURENGA
AVENUE, Royal Oak.

8, RAURENGA
AVENUE, Royal
Oak

Royal Oak

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
1/6,7/8,4/6A,3/6,8/8,
5/6A,6/8,2/6, BANFF
AVENUE, Epsom.

1/6,7/8,4/6A,3/6, Epsom
8/8,5/6A,6/8,2/6
BANFF AVENUE,
Epsom

Western Isthmus Rezone 18,12A12K,14,16,


RAURENGA AVENUE,
Royal Oak from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

18,12A-12K,14,16, Royal Oak


RAURENGA
AVENUE, Royal
Oak

Western Isthmus Rezone


19,2/19,2/17,17,
RAURENGA AVENUE,
Royal Oak from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

19,2/19,2/17,17,
RAURENGA
AVENUE, Royal
Oak

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is


located close to Royal Oak TC and large public open
space. The retention of the THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

220

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Do not support retention of THAB to SH zone for


MHS
properties at 6 Banff Ave. These sites are affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and are rezoned MHS recognising that
THAB is generally incompatible with the values of the
area that are proposed to be retained within the Pre1944 BDC and that the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seek
to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The No change
adjacent sites are covered by the SH zone and are
affected by the HC overlay. THAB zoning of would not
provide an appropriate transition in building scale from
theses lower density SH areas. The MHU zone provides a
more appropriate transition. The retention of the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to FN and Centre make THAB appropriate
soning. Do not support Council's presumption of the
outcome of the Pre-1944 Demolition Control on the use of
this land.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4749

Royal Oak

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the


site is adjoining existing SH with the HC overlay. The
retention of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4750

839-662

Western Isthmus Rezone 39,37,


39,37, RAURENGA Royal Oak
RAURENGA AVENUE, AVENUE, Royal
Royal Oak from
Oak
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 52, MOUNT SMART
ROAD, Royal OakPenrose.

THAB

52, MOUNT
SMART ROAD,
Royal OakPenrose.

Royal Oak

THAB

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The No change


adjacent sites are covered by the SH zone and are
affected by the HC overlay. THAB zoning of would not
provide an appropriate transition in building scale from
theses lower density SH areas. The MHU zone provides a
more appropriate transition. The retention of the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is
No change
located close to Royal Oak TC, Mount Smart Road RFN
and has excellent access to public open space. The
retention of the THAB zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-686

839-721

839-782

839-794

839-808

839-937

839-1230

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


13, BOYD
Housing and
AVENUE, Royal
Apartment Buildings Oak.
at 13, BOYD AVENUE,
Royal Oak.

Royal Oak

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


7, BROOKFIELD
Housing and
AVENUE,
Apartment Buildings Onehunga.
at 7, BROOKFIELD
AVENUE, Onehunga.

Royal Oak

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


2, BROOKFIELD
Housing and
AVENUE,
Apartment Buildings Onehunga.
at 2, BROOKFIELD
AVENUE, Onehunga.

Royal Oak

Western Isthmus Retain Local Centre at 580, MANUKAU Royal Oak


580, MANUKAU
ROAD, Royal OakROAD, Royal OakNewmarket.
Newmarket.

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4A, BECKENHAM
AVENUE, Royal Oak.

4A, BECKENHAM
AVENUE, Royal
Oak.

Royal Oak

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 10B,10A,
HILLSBOROUGH
ROAD, Lynfield-Three
Kings.

10B,10A,
HILLSBOROUGH
ROAD, LynfieldThree Kings.

Royal Oak

Western Isthmus Retain SH at 276,


NEW WINDSOR
ROAD,77,
ROSAMUND AVENUE,
New Windsor.

276 NEW
WINDSOR ROAD
and 77
ROSAMUND
AVENUE, New
Windsor

New Windsor

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

LC

THAB

MHU

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

LC

THAB

MHU

SH

REASONS

221

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is


located close to Royal Oak TC and RFN. The retention of
the THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is


located close to Royal Oak TC, Mount Smart Road RFN
and large public open space. The retention of the THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is


located close to Royal Oak TC, Mount Smart Road RFN
and large public open space. The retention of the THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified LC zone at this site - the site No change


is located on Manukau Road RFN which provides good
public transport access and is part of Greenwoods Corner
LC. The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and retain
the notified zoning because the typology of buildings in
the Pre-1944 BDC that are also within the LC zone is likely
to generally align with the zoning. The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - the site is


No change
located close to Royal Oak TC, has excellent access to
public open space and is close to Manukau Road RFN.
The retention of the THAB zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone at this site - the site is
No change
located adjacent to the THAB zone which is close to Three
Kings TC and large public open space. The retention of
the MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
MHU
intensified zoning change to MHU. This site is located
close to RFN and a NC. This change is out of scope, refer
to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

LC

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Accords with proximity criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1317

839-1370

839-1371

839-1378

839-1379

839-1380

839-1381

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
1/93,2/93,3/93,
STAMFORD PARK
ROAD, Mount Roskill.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1/93,2/93,3/93
Mount Roskill
STAMFORD PARK
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 3,5 CORMACK


Suburban at 3,5,
STREET, Mount
CORMACK STREET,
Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain SH at 1A,1B,


PENNEY AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

1A,1B PENNEY
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain MHU at 9,9A,


WHITE SWAN ROAD,
Blockhouse BayMount Roskill.

9,9A, WHITE
SWAN ROAD,
Blockhouse BayMount Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain SH at 4A-4P,


GAYNOR STREET,37,
BOYCE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

4A-4P GAYNOR
STREET and 37
BOYCE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 3,5,
NASH ROAD,587,585,
RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough.

3,5 NASH ROAD


and 587,585
RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 593,
RICHARDSON
ROAD,10,8, MORRIE
LAING AVENUE,
Mount AlbertHillsborough.

593 RICHARDSON Mount Roskill


ROAD and 10,8
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

SH

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning


for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
intensified zoning change to MHU. This site is located
close to RFN and a NC. This change is out of scope along
with the adjacent properties that are also proposed to
change to MHU zone around NC and along Richardson
Road, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone at these two sites.
The sites are close to a NC and on RFN. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
intensified zoning change to MHS. The change of zone on
Gaynor St and Boyce Ave reflects local context and
surrounding neighbourhood built form of predominantly
one-two storey buildings not constrained by any
overlays. The change is out of scope, refer to Attachment
F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

222

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

No change

MHU

Accords with proximity criteria


No change
MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Accords with proximity criteria


No change

Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1382

839-1383

839-1384

839-1385

839-1386

839-1387

839-1388

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
605,607,603,
RICHARDSON
ROAD,18, MORRIE
LAING AVENUE,
Mount AlbertHillsborough.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 611,
RICHARDSON
ROAD,2,4, GLASS
ROAD, Mount AlbertHillsborough.

605,607,603
RICHARDSON
ROAD and 18
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

611 RICHARDSON Mount Roskill


ROAD and 2,4
GLASS ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 10, NASH
ROAD,3, MORRIE
LAING AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

10 NASH ROAD
and 3 MORRIE
LAING AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

MHS

Mount Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 25,31,27,29 NASH Mount Roskill


Suburban at
ROAD, Mount
25,31,27,29, NASH
Roskill
ROAD, Mount Roskill.

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 9,3,5,7,
REVEL
AVENUE,11,13,2/11,
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 2,
MCGREGOR
STREET,20, NASH
ROAD, Mount Roskill.

MHS

9,3,5,7 REVEL
AVENUE and
11,13,2/11
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

2 MCGREGOR
STREET and 20
NASH ROAD,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 19 MORRIE LAING Mount Roskill


Suburban at 19,
AVENUE, Mount
MORRIE LAING
Roskill
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

223

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for No change
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1389

839-1390

839-1391

839-1392

839-1393

839-1394

839-1395

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 3133,29B, MORRIE
LAING AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

31-33,29B
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
39,45,43,41, MORRIE
LAING AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

39,45,43,41
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 1,3,5,
ALBRECHT
AVENUE,55,57,
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 32,30,
GLASS ROAD, Mount
Roskill.

1,3,5 ALBRECHT
AVENUE and
55,57 MORRIE
LAING AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

Mount Roskill

32,30 GLASS
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 667,669,
RICHARDSON
ROAD,4, WHITMORE
ROAD, Mount AlbertHillsborough.

667,669
RICHARDSON
ROAD and 4
WHITMORE
ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 669A669F,669G-669M,
RICHARDSON
ROAD,8,8A,
WHITMORE ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough.

669A-669F,669G- Mount Roskill


669M
RICHARDSON
ROAD and 8,8A
WHITMORE
ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
24,32,26,30,28,
WHITMORE ROAD,
Mount Roskill.

24,32,26,30,28
WHITMORE
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Mount Roskill

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

224

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning No change
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1396

839-1397

839-1398

839-1399

839-1400

839-1401

839-1402

839-1403

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 5,7 HALLEYS


Suburban at 5,7,
PLACE, Mount
HALLEYS PLACE,
Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 46,44 ALBRECHT


Suburban at 46,44,
AVENUE, Mount
ALBRECHT AVENUE, Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 50,52 ALBRECHT


Suburban at 50,52,
AVENUE, Mount
ALBRECHT AVENUE, Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 60,
ALBRECHT
AVENUE,43, QUONA
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 21,
HALLEYS PLACE,
Mount Roskill.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

60 ALBRECHT
Mount Roskill
AVENUE, and 43
QUONA AVENUE,
Mount Roskill

MHS

21 HALLEYS
PLACE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 46,54,50,48,52


Suburban at
GLASS ROAD,
46,54,50,48,52,
Mount Roskill
GLASS ROAD, Mount
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 15,17 REVEL


Suburban at 15,17,
AVENUE, Mount
REVEL AVENUE,
Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
27,21,29,23, REVEL
AVENUE,1,1A,3,5,
MCGREGOR
STREET,24, NASH
ROAD, Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

27,21,29,23
REVEL AVENUE,
1,1A,3,5
MCGREGOR
STREET and 24
NASH ROAD,
Mount Roskill

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning


for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

225

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1527

839-1528

839-1529

839-1530

839-2393

839-2468

839-260

839-270

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 18 HALLEYS


Suburban at 18,
PLACE, Mount
HALLEYS PLACE,
Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 26 ALBRECHT


Suburban at 26,
AVENUE, Mount
ALBRECHT AVENUE, Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 38,40 GLASS


Suburban at 38,40,
ROAD, Mount
GLASS ROAD, Mount Roskill
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
10,12,14,16,4,6,8,
MOLLEY GREEN
PLACE, Mount Roskill.

10,12,14,16,4,6,8 Mount Roskill


MOLLEY GREEN
PLACE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 17 PARFITT


Suburban at 17
STREET, Mount
PARFITT STREET.
Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 10 REVEL


Suburban at 10 REVEL AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE. Mount
Roskill
Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 10 CORMACK


Suburban at 10,
STREET, Mount
CORMACK STREET,
Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 56 ALBRECHT


Suburban at 56,
AVENUE, Mount
ALBRECHT AVENUE, Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

226

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2786

839-2787

839-2788

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


623,631,633,627,635,
625,629,
RICHARDSON
ROAD,38,48,46,44,42
,36,40,36A,34,50,
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE,1,3,5,
MCKINNON STREET,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, SH to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

623,631,633,627, Mount Roskill


635,625,629
RICHARDSON
ROAD,
38,48,46,44,42,36
,40,36A,34,50
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE and 1,3,5
MCKINNON
STREET, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,13, GLASS 11,13, GLASS


ROAD, Mount Roskill ROAD, Mount
from Mixed Housing Roskill
Suburban, SH to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Western Isthmus Rezone


60,68,88,90A,64,66,8
2,80,86,84,96,76,74,7
2,70,102,100,92,94,7
8,90B,58,98,54,56,62,
52, MORRIE LAING
AVENUE,12,
MCKINNON
STREET,649,657,643,
653,651,
RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, SH to
Mixed Housing

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

60,68,88,90A,64,6 Mount Roskill


6,82,80,86,84,96,
76,74,72,70,102,1
00,92,94,78,90B,5
8,98,54,56,62,52
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE, 12
MCKINNON
STREET and
649,657,643,653,
651 RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

PAUP ZONE

SH/ MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

Support the submission in part. See C14 revised zoning


map.

227

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

SH/ MHS

MHS

MHS or MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH / MHS

Support the change of SH to MHS zone for specific


properties along Morrie Laing Ave and Richardson Rd,
where managing flooding risks on those sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The change to MHS aligns
with the surrounding neighbourhood built form character
of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

SH/ MHS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support the change of SH to MHS zone at 1, 3, 5


McKinnon St, and 48, 50 Morrie Laing Ave. These sites
are affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
Support change of SH to MHS zone at 13 Glass Rd, where MHS
managing flooding risks on those sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The zoning to MHS aligns with the
surrounding neighbourhood built form of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support in Part

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan .

MHS

Support

MHS

Support in Part

The property at 11 Glass Rd is already zoned MHS in the


notified PAUP. The retention of the notified zone aligns
with local context and maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone in the area. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support the submission in part. See C14 revised zoning
SH / MHS
map.
Support the change of SH to MHS zone for specific
properties along Morrie Laing Ave and Richardson Rd,
where managing flooding risks on those sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The change to MHS aligns
with the surrounding neighbourhood built form character
of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of SH to MHS zone at 12
McKinnon St, 48-88 Morrie Laing Ave (even no's) and 639645 Richardson Rd (odd no's) . These sites are affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan .

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2789

839-2790

839-2791

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone


10,12,14,16,18,4,6,8,
SKIPPER
AVENUE,77,75,73,71,
81,79, MORRIE LAING
AVENUE,13B,13A,11A
,17,11B,9A,9B,15A,15
B, WHITMORE ROAD,
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, SH to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

10,12,14,16,18,4, Mount Roskill


6,8 SKIPPER
AVENUE,
77,75,73,71,81,79
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE and
13B,13A,11A,17,1
1B,9A,9B,15A,15B
WHITMORE
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

SH/ MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 21,


WHITMORE
ROAD,10,12,20,14,16
,18,2,4,8, ALBRECHT
AVENUE,59,61,63,65,
67,69, MORRIE LAING
AVENUE,11,25,13,15,
21,17,23,19,1,3,7,9,5
A,5B, SKIPPER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
SH to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

21 WHITMORE
Mount Roskill
ROAD,
10,12,20,14,16,18
,2,4,8 ALBRECHT
AVENUE,
59,61,63,65,67,69
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE and
11,25,13,15,21,17
,23,19,1,3,7,9,5A,
5B SKIPPER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH/ MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,13,15,17,3,5,7,9,
MOLLEY GREEN
PLACE,25,13,45,15,21
,17,23,19,31,27A,29,
35,33,35A, ALBRECHT
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
SH to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

11,13,15,17,3,5,7, Mount Roskill


9 MOLLEY GREEN
PLACE and
25,13,45,15,21,17
,23,19,31,27A,29,
35,33,35A
ALBRECHT
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

SH/ MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

228

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of SH to MHS zone on Skipper Ave and


MHS
Morrie Laing Ave, where managing flooding risks on
those sites does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
zoning to MHS aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Specific properties on Morrie Laing Ave and Whitmore Rd
are already zoned MHS in the notified PAUP. The
properties zoned MHS align with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Support change of SH to MHS zone on Skipper Ave and
MHS
Morrie Laing Ave, where managing flooding risks on
those sites does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
change of zone aligns with local context and maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone in the
area. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
The properties on Whitmore Rd and Albrecht Ave are
already zoned MHS in the notified PAUP. The properties
zoned MHS align with the surrounding neighbourhood
built form of predominantly one-two storey buildings.
The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to MHS zone on Molley Green
MHS
Place and Albrecht Ave, where managing flooding risks
on those sites does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The zoning to MHS aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Specific properties on Molley Green Place and Albrecht
Ave are already zoned MHS in the notified PAUP. The
retention of the notified zone aligns with local context
and maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone in the area. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2792

839-281

839-304

839-3048

839-3143

839-3290

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


25,39,27,21,35A,23,1
9,31,37,29,35,33,37A
, GLASS
ROAD,24,26,12,14,22
,30,28, REVEL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
SH to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

25,39,27,21,35A,2 Mount Roskill


3,19,31,37,29,35,
33,37A GLASS
ROAD and
24,26,12,14,22,30
,28 REVEL
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain SH at 74,


74 ROSAMUND
ROSAMUND AVENUE, AVENUE, New
New Windsor.
Windsor

New Windsor

PAUP ZONE

SH/ MHS

SH

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 95 HENDRY


Suburban at 95,
AVENUE,
HENDRY AVENUE,
Hillsborough
Hillsborough.

Hillsborough

Western Isthmus Rezone 120,


120 DONOVAN
DONOVAN STREET,
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay from Blockhouse Bay
Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

Blockhouse Bay MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 113, OLSEN


AVENUE,
Hillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

Hillsborough

113 OLSEN
AVENUE,
Hillsborough

Western Isthmus Rezone 28, HALLEYS 28, HALLEYS


PLACE, Mount Roskill PLACE, Mount
from SH to Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban.

Mount Roskill

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

229

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of SH to MHS zone on Glass Rd and Revel MHS


Ave, where managing flooding risks on those sites does
not require maintaining a SH zone. The zoning to MHS
aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built form of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Specific properties on Revel Ave and Glass Rd are already
zoned MHS in the notified PAUP. The properties zoned
MHS align with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
MHS
intensified zoning change to MHS. The change of zone on
Rosamund Ave reflects local context and surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The change is out of scope, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for No change
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support change of MHS to MHU at this site. The site is
MHU
close to NC and on a RFN. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to MHS zone on Strangler Drive,
MHS
Budgen Street and Ramelton Road, where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The zoning to MHS aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Accords with proximity criteria

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-348

839-3548

839-3668

839-384

839-398

839-437

839-4746

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain SH at 75,


75 ROSAMUND
ROSAMUND AVENUE, AVENUE, New
New Windsor.
Windsor

LOCALITY

New Windsor

Western Isthmus Rezone 69, JOHN


69 JOHN DAVIS
DAVIS ROAD, Mount ROAD, Mount
Roskill from SH to
Roskill
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 4,


4 RANGITATA
RANGITATA PLACE,
PLACE, Lynfield
Lynfield from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
MHU.

Lynfield

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
11,25,13,27,15,21,17,
23,19,39,31,37,29,35,
41,1,33,3,5,7,9,
RAINFORD STREET,
Mount Roskill.

11,25,13,27,15,21 Mount Roskill


,17,23,19,39,31,3
7,29,35,41,1,33,3,
5,7,9 RAINFORD
STREET, Mount
Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain SH at 18,


FREDERICK STREET,
Hillsborough.

18 FREDERICK
STREET,
Hillsborough

SH

Hillsborough

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 13 DREW STREET, Mount Roskill


Suburban at 13,
Mount Roskill
DREW STREET,
Mount Roskill.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,2A, PASCOE 2,2A, PASCOE


STREET, Mount
STREET, Mount
Roskill from SH to
Roskill
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Mount Roskill

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHS

MHU

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support retention of SH zone, support more


intensified zoning change to MHS. The change of zone on
Rosamund Ave reflects local context and surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The change is out of scope, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support change of SH to MHS zone, where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The zoning to MHS aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for these sites. The zoning
for these sites aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

230

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHS

Support

Accords with proximity criteria


MHS

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

Support retention of SH zone at this property. The


No change
dwelling on this property adjoins a power pylon. The site
is affected by the NGC and retaining the notified SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for No change
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of SH to MHS, support more
MHU
intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties are
located on a RFN. MHU will enable more intensification
in the area. The change to this property is out of scope,
refer to Attachment F. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

Accords with proximity criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4747

839-564

839-585

839-616

839-619

839-625

839-626

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 27, MORRIE


LAING
AVENUE,12,14,
GLASS ROAD, Mount
Roskill from SH to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 575,
RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough.

27 MORRIE LAING Mount Roskill


AVENUE and
12,14 GLASS
ROAD, Mount
Roskill

SH

575 RICHARDSON Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 30,
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 21,
MORRIE LAING
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 16, NASH
ROAD, Mount Roskill.

30 MORRIE LAING Mount Roskill


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

21 MORRIE LAING Mount Roskill


AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

MHS

16 NASH ROAD,
Mount Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain SH at 6,


KIRKWOOD PLACE,
New Windsor.

6 KIRKWOOD
PLACE, New
Windsor

Western Isthmus Retain SH at 21,


BOYCE AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

21 BOYCE
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

New Windsor

Mount Roskill

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

REASONS

231

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of SH to MHS zone, where managing


MHS
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The zoning to MHS aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for No change
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
intensified zoning change to MHS. The change of zone on
Kirkwood Place reflects local context and surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The change is out of scope, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
intensified zoning change to MHS. The change to MHS
aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built form
character of predominantly one-two storey buildings.
This change is out of scope along with the adjacent
properties that are also proposed to change to MHS zone
as out of scope, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

No change

No change

MHS

Accords with proximity criteria


MHS

MHS

Support

Accords with proximity criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-697

839-7469

839-7480

839-7483

839-7516

839-7523

839-7534

839-7538

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain MHU at 13,


13 RANGITIKI
RANGITIKI CRESCENT, CRESCENT,
Lynfield.
Lynfield

LOCALITY

Lynfield

Western Isthmus Rezone 111 MELROSE


ROAD. Mount RoskillHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

111 MELROSE
ROAD, Mount
RoskillHillsborough

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 2 WHITMORE


ROAD. 665
RICHARDSON ROAD.
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

2 WHITMORE
ROAD and 665
RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 9 CORMACK 9 CORMACK


STREET. Mount
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
MHU.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 67 STAVELEY 67 STAVELEY


AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
MHU.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 9 NASH


9 NASH ROAD,
ROAD. Mount Roskill Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 17 GERBIC


17 GERBIC PLACE, Waikowhai
PLACE. Mount Roskill Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 201 WHITE


SWAN ROAD.
Blockhouse BayMount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

MHS

201 WHITE SWAN Mount Roskill


ROAD, Blockhouse
Bay-Mount Roskill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

232

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU zone at this site. The site is


No change
close to Lynfield LC, higher density THAB zoning, RFN,
large open spaces and is part of MHU zoning in the
surrounding the neighbourhood which will provide more
intensification in the area. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU at this site. The site is
close to NC and on a RFN. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

MHU

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-754

839-7542

839-7565

839-7606

839-7648

839-7657

839-7660

839-7696

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 581,
RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

581 RICHARDSON Mount Roskill


ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Western Isthmus Rezone 24 HALLEYS 24 HALLEYS


PLACE. Mount Roskill PLACE, Mount
from Mixed Housing Roskill
Suburban to MHU.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 19A MORRIE 19A MORRIE


LAING AVENUE.
LAING AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mount Roskill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 21 MOLLEY


21 MOLLEY
GREEN PLACE. Mount GREEN PLACE,
Roskill from Mixed
Mount Roskill
Housing Suburban to
MHU.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 10, 16


HALLEYS PLACE.
Mount Roskill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

Mount Roskill

10, 16 HALLEYS
PLACE, Mount
Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 19 HALLEYS 19 HALLEYS


PLACE. Mount Roskill PLACE, Mount
from Mixed Housing Roskill
Suburban to MHU.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 4 MIRIAM


4 MIRIAM PLACE, Mount Roskill
PLACE. Mount Roskill Mount Roskill
from SH to MHU.

Western Isthmus Rezone 11 NASH


11 NASH ROAD,
ROAD. Mount Roskill Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

233

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for No change
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU, support less
intensified zoning change to MHS. The change to MHS
aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built form
character of predominantly one-two storey buildings.
Adjacent properties are also proposed to change to MHS
zone as an out of scope change, refer to Attachment F.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHS

Does not meet crtieria


No change
MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7721

839-7744

839-7766

839-7799

839-7807

839-7814

839-7825

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 87 JOHN


87 JOHN DAVIS
DAVIS ROAD. Mount ROAD, Mount
Roskill from SH to
Roskill
MHU.

LOCALITY

Mount Roskill

PAUP ZONE

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 4 HALLEYS


4 HALLEYS PLACE, Mount Roskill
PLACE. Mount Roskill Mount Roskill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 30 FAIRWAY 30 FAIRWAY


DRIVE. Mount Roskill DRIVE, Mount
from Mixed Housing Roskill
Suburban to MHU.

Mount Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 44, 42, 2/44 44, 42, 2/44


GLASS ROAD. Mount GLASS ROAD,
Roskill from Mixed
Mount Roskill
Housing Suburban to
MHU.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 139, 137


BOUNDARY ROAD.
134 DONOVAN
STREET. Blockhouse
Bay from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
MHU.

MHS

139, 137
Blockhouse Bay MHS
BOUNDARY ROAD
and 134
DONOVAN
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

Western Isthmus Rezone 21A MORRIE 21A MORRIE


LAING AVENUE.
LAING AVENUE,
Mount Roskill from
Mount Roskill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to MHU.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 39 ALBRECHT 39 ALBRECHT


AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
MHU.

Mount Roskill

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of SH to MHU, support less


intensified zoning change to MHS, where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The change to MHS aligns with the
surrounding neighbourhood built form character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU at these sites. The sites
are close to NC and on a RFN. The change of zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

234

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7861

839-7890

839-7986

839-7987

839-801

839-826

839-8292

839-859

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 19 MOLLEY


19 MOLLEY
GREEN PLACE. Mount GREEN PLACE,
Roskill from Mixed
Mount Roskill
Housing Suburban to
MHU.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 25 ROGAN


25 ROGAN
STREET. Mount
STREET, Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Roskill
Housing Suburban to
MHU.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Rezone 1/1588B


DOMINION ROAD
EXTENSION. Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
MHU.
Western Isthmus Rezone 2/1588B
DOMINION ROAD
EXTENSION. Mount
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
MHU.
Western Isthmus Retain SH at 4, MARY
DREAVER STREET,
New Windsor.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

1/1588B
Mount Roskill
DOMINION ROAD
EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill

MHS

2/1588B
Mount Roskill
DOMINION ROAD
EXTENSION,
Mount Roskill

MHS

4 MARY DREAVER New Windsor


STREET, New
Windsor

SH

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 38 ALBRECHT


Suburban at 38,
AVENUE, Mount
ALBRECHT AVENUE, Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 2 REVEL


2 REVEL AVENUE, Mount Roskill
AVENUE. Mount
Mount Roskill
Roskill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
MHU.

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain SH at 86,


WEBSTER AVENUE,
Mount Roskill.

SH

86 WEBSTER
AVENUE, Mount
Roskill

Mount Roskill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

MHS

MHU

SH

REASONS

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
intensified zoning change to MHU. This site is located
close to RFN and a NC. This change is out of scope along
with the adjacent properties that are also proposed to
change to MHU zone, refer to Attachment F. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
intensified zoning change to MHS. The change to MHS
aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built form
character of predominantly one-two storey buildings.
This change is out of scope along with the adjacent
properties that are also proposed to change to MHS
zone, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

235

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Accords with proximity criteria


No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHS

Accords with proximity criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-907

839-928

839-944

839-1238

839-1239

839-1240

839-1241

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 38 SUBRITZKY


Suburban at 38,
AVENUE, Mount
SUBRITZKY AVENUE, Roskill
Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 19 NASH ROAD,


Suburban at 19, NASH Mount Roskill
ROAD, Mount Roskill.

Mount Roskill

Western Isthmus Retain Local Centre at


40/580,1/580,
HILLSBOROUGH
ROAD, Lynfield-Three
Kings.

Mount Roskill

40/580,1/580
HILLSBOROUGH
ROAD, LynfieldThree Kings

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 13,13A FIR


Suburban at 13,13A, STREET,
FIR STREET,
Waterview
Waterview.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 46, FIR
STREET,2, SEASIDE
AVENUE, Waterview.

Waterview

46 FIR STREET and Waterview


2 SEASIDE
AVENUE,
Waterview

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 3,3A HADFIELD


Suburban at 3,3A,
AVENUE,
HADFIELD AVENUE, Waterview
Waterview.

Waterview

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 23,21A,
ALVERSTON STREET,
Waterview.

Waterview

23,21A
ALVERSTON
STREET,
Waterview

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

LC

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

LC

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS for this site. The zoning for
this site aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support retention of LC zoning for Lynfield. The Lynfield
LC will remain as stated in the RPS and Centres Hierarchy.
The sites are part of the existing commercial local centre.
The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the LC zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of the notified MHS zone,
support more intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close to the Great North Rd RFN, Northwestern
Motorway and large public open spaces (including
Waterview Reserve) . The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of the notified MHS zone,
support more intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close to the Great North Rd RFN, Northwestern
Motorway and large public open spaces (including
Waterview Reserve) . The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

236

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

LC

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

MHU

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

MHU

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1242

839-1243

839-1244

839-1245

839-1246

839-1247

839-1248

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 37A,37B,37


Suburban at
ALFORD STREET,
37A,37B,37, ALFORD Waterview
STREET, Waterview.

LOCALITY

Waterview

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
55,57,55A,55C,55B,
ALFORD
STREET,56,54A,56A,
OAKLEY AVENUE,
Waterview.

55,57,55A,55C,55 Waterview
B ALFORD STREET
and 56,54A,56A
OAKLEY AVENUE,
Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 67A,67B
[67 or 69?], ALFORD
STREET, Waterview.

67A,67B [67 or
69?], ALFORD
STREET,
Waterview.

Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 13,15,
HEMINGTON STREET,
Waterview.

13,15
HEMINGTON
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 11,9,
KATOA STREET,30,
HUMARIRI STREET,
Point Chevalier.

11,9 KATOA
STREET and 30
HUMARIRI
STREET, Point
Chevalier

MHS

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 24,22 HUMARIRI


Suburban at 24,22,
STREET, Point
HUMARIRI STREET,
Chevalier
Point Chevalier.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 11,11A,
ST MICHAELS
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier.

Point Chevalier MHS

11,11A ST
MICHAELS
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

237

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of the notified MHS zone,


MHU
support more intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close to the Great North Rd RFN, Northwestern
Motorway and large public open spaces (including
Waterview Reserve) . The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these No change
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these No change
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHS, support more
MHU
intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close to the Great North Rd RFN, Northwestern
Motorway and large public open spaces (including
Waterview Reserve) . The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these No change
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these No change
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these No change
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1249

839-1250

839-1251

839-1253

839-1254

839-165

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 18,16 WRIGHT


Suburban at 18,16,
ROAD, Point
WRIGHT ROAD, Point Chevalier
Chevalier.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Point Chevalier MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 1,
WRIGHT ROAD,318,
POINT CHEVALIER
ROAD, Point
Chevalier.

1 WRIGHT ROAD Point Chevalier MHS


and 318 POINT
CHEVALIER ROAD,
Point Chevalier

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
1086,1100,1088,1102
E,1102D,1102G,1102
F,1102,1102C, GREAT
NORTH ROAD, Point
Chevalier.

1086,1100,1088,1 Point Chevalier THAB


102E,1102D,1102
G,1102F,1102,110
2C GREAT NORTH
ROAD, Point
Chevalier

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


1053,1055, GREAT
NORTH ROAD, Point
Chevalier.

1053,1055 GREAT Point Chevalier MU


NORTH ROAD,
Point Chevalier

MU

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 21, WALMER
ROAD,19, TUI
STREET, Point
Chevalier.

21 WALMER
Point Chevalier THAB
ROAD and 19 TUI
STREET, Point
Chevalier

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 3A OAKLEY


Suburban at 3A,
AVENUE,
OAKLEY AVENUE,
Waterview
Waterview.

Waterview

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

238

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these No change
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the retention of the notified MHS zone on MHU
the site. The site is not affected by the Pre-1944 BDC, HC
or flooding constraints and is on the Point Chevalier Rd
RFN.
Proposed alternative rezoning to a more intensive MHU
zone in scope of an area wide submission (6099-4)(refer
to attachment D) is the most appropriate way to achieve
Support retention of THAB. The sites are located on the No change
Point Chevalier Rd RFN and are close to the Point
Chevalier TC. Retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support retention of MU zone. The sites support the


No change
function of Point Chevalier TC. They are located in close
proximity to the Great North Road RFN and will enable
the development of intensive residential activities. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way of achieving the objectives of the MU zone and gives
Do not support the retention of the THAB zone, support MHS
less intensified zoning change to the MHS zone in scope
of an area wide submission (5541-4) (refer to Attachment
D). The sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and are
proposed to be rezoned to the MHS zone recognising
that THAB or MHU are generally incompatible with the
values of the areas that are proposed to be retained
within the Pre-1944 BDC. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support retention of the notified MHS zone,
MHU
support more intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close to the Great North Rd RFN, Northwestern
Motorway and large public open spaces (including
Waterview Reserve) . The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

THAB

Support

MU

Support

THAB

Oppose
Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not
support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-200

839-2549

839-2775

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1 HUMARIRI


Suburban at 1,
STREET, Point
HUMARIRI STREET,
Chevalier
Point Chevalier.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain


1491 GREAT
Waterview
Neighbourhood
NORTH
Centre at 1491 GREAT ROAD, Waterview
NORTH
ROAD. [Waterview]

NC

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,4, OAKLEY 2,4 OAKLEY


AVENUE, Waterview AVENUE,
from Neighbourhood Waterview
Centre, Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Neighbourhood
Centre.

NC / MHS

Waterview

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

NC

NC

REASONS

Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for this


site. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the NC zone in Waterview. The NC
zone reflects a mixture of existing commercial and retail
use, with some sites are currently residential in nature
but which could provide for small scale commercial and
retail needs in the future. Retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the NC zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change in zoning for 4 Oakley Ave
from the notified MHS to the NC.

239

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

839-2908

MHS

Support

NC

Support

NC

Oppose

No change

NC / MHU

The site is not affected by any site specific constraints


such as HC, the Pre-1944 BDC and or flooding constraints
and is located in close proximity to the Great North Rd
RFN, large public open spaces such as Oakley Esplanade
and community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School.

Western Isthmus Rezone 95, MOA


95 MOA ROAD,
ROAD, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 231, MEOLA


ROAD, Point
Chevalier-Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

231 MEOLA
ROAD, Point
ChevalierWestmere

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Support alternative rezoning to a more intensive MHU


zone in scope of an area wide submission (6099-4)(refer
to attachment D). The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

839-2856

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

MHU

Support retention of the notified NC zoning at 2 Oakley


Ave. The NC zone reflects a mixture of existing
commercial and retail use, with some sites are currently
residential in nature but which could provide for small
scale commercial and retail needs in the future.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change
MHU. The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change in zoning from the notified MHS to
MHU
MHU for this site as it is on the Meola Rd RFN and is not
affected the Pre-1944 BDC, HC or flooding constraints .
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2918

839-2928

839-2945

839-2954

839-2957

839-2976

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 208, POINT


208 POINT
Point Chevalier MHS
CHEVALIER ROAD,
CHEVALIER ROAD,
Point Chevalier from Point Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 91, WALMER 91 WALMER


ROAD, Point
ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 35, WAINUI 35 WAINUI


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 49, FORMBY 49 FORMBY


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 26, FORMBY 26 FORMBY


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1609A,1609B,


GREAT NORTH
ROAD,24,26,20,14,22
,16,18,28, CADMAN
AVENUE,
[Waterview] Aucklan
d from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1609A,1609B
Waterview
GREAT NORTH
ROAD and
24,26,20,14,22,16
,18,28 CADMAN
AVENUE,
[Waterview] Auckl
and

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

240

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the change in zoning from the notified MHS to


MHU
MHU for this site as it is on the Meola Rd RFN and is not
affected the pre-1944 BDC, HC or flooding constraints .
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change


MHU. The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change
MHU. The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change in zoning from the notified
MHU
MHS to THAB as the properties are not close to any TCs
or LCs. support a less intensified zoning change to MHU
zone. The change to MHU is in scope of an area wide
submission (6099-4), refer to attachment D. The
properties are located close to the Great North Rd RFN,,
large public open spaces (including Heron Park and
Phyllis Street Reserve. MHU will enable intensification in
the area and provides a density that is between THAB
and MHS zones. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2999

839-3008

839-3012

839-3028

839-3037

839-3046

839-3052

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 54, WALMER 54 WALMER


ROAD, Point
ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 16,


16 MURIPARA
MURIPARA AVENUE, AVENUE, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Point Chevalier SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 8, KANUKA


8 KANUKA
STREET, Point
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 14, RAMA


ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 38, SMALE
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

14 RAMA ROAD,
Point Chevalier

38 SMALE STREET, Point Chevalier MHS


Point Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 29, FORMBY 29 FORMBY


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 11A,11B,


BERRIDGE AVENUE,
Point Chevalier from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

11A,11B
BERRIDGE
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS


zone to THAB for this site. The site is affected by the Pre1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified zone,
recognising that THAB or MHU is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone. Retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from notified SH to MHS. This
site is not subject to environmental and heritage
constraints, such as HC and flooding constraints, that
would make a SH zoning appropriate. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

241

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

MHS

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3059

839-3070

839-3074

839-3085

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 79, WALMER 79 WALMER


ROAD, Point
ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 73,


HERDMAN STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Waterview

73 HERDMAN
STREET,
Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,


32 MONTROSE
MONTROSE STREET, STREET, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Point Chevalier MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

242

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change


MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.s
Support rezoning from the notified MHS zone to MHU.
MHU
The property is located close to the Great North Rd RFN,
Northwestern Motorway, large public open spaces
(including Waterview Reserve and Oakley Esplanade) as
well as community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support the change in zoning at this site from the MHU
notified MHS to THAB because a THAB zoning may result
in development which would dominate the properties
across the road which are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support an alternative rezoning to MHU in scope of an
area wide submission (6099-4) (refer to attachment D) as
the sites are close to the Great North Rd RFN, Point
Chevalier TC and because a zone with a 3 storey limit will
not dominate the Pre-1944 BDC affected properties
across the road.

Western Isthmus Rezone 62B, SMALE 62B SMALE


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 87, WALKER 87 WALKER


ROAD, Point
ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Single Chevalier
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Point Chevalier SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 71, WALMER 71 WALMER


ROAD, Point
ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

MHU

Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the


objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3087

839-3138

MHS

MHU

Support change of zone from notified SH to MHS. These MHS


sites are not subject to environmental and heritage
constraints, such as HC and flooding constraints, that
would make a SH zoning appropriate. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3149

839-315

839-3156

839-3220

839-3223

839-3228

839-3259

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 64, MOA


64 MOA ROAD,
ROAD, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 432 POINT


Point Chevalier MHS
Suburban at 432,
CHEVALIER ROAD,
POINT CHEVALIER
Point Chevalier
ROAD, Point
Chevalier.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 133, POINT


133 POINT
Point Chevalier MHU
CHEVALIER ROAD,
CHEVALIER ROAD,
Point Chevalier from Point Chevalier
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

THAB

Western Isthmus Rezone 29, BUXTON 29 BUXTON


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 21, BUXTON 21 BUXTON


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 4,6, CADMAN 4,6 CADMAN


AVENUE, Waterview AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Waterview
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 1572


[1574?],1/15702/1570, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
[Waterview] from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Waterview

1572
[1574?],1/15702/1570, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Waterview

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

243

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change


MHU. The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the retention of the notified MHS zone on MHU
the site. The site is not affected by the Pre-1944 BDC, HC
or flooding constraints and is on the Point Chevalier Rd
RFN.
Proposed alternative rezoning to a more intensive MHU
zone in scope of an area wide submission (6099-4)(refer
to attachment D) is the most appropriate way to achieve
Support change of zone from notified MHU to THAB.
THAB
These site is close to or on the Point Chevalier Rd and
Great North Rd RFNs and is close to the Point Chevalier
TC. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3261

839-3294

839-3336

839-3342

839-3344

839-3345

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 30, RAMA


ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 49, SMALE
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
30 RAMA ROAD,
Point Chevalier

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Point Chevalier MHS

49 SMALE STREET, Point Chevalier MHS


Point Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 50, ALBERTA 50 ALBERTA


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 55, PREMIER 55 PREMIER


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 3, BERRIDGE 3 BERRIDGE


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 62, SMALE


62 SMALE STREET, Point Chevalier SH
STREET, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS
zone to THAB for this site. The site is affected by the Pre1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified zone,
recognising that THAB or MHU is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone. Retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

244

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change

Do not support change of from notified SH to MHU zone No change


for this site. The site is affected by flooding constraints
and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to support MHU. Consider


flooding constraints can be addressed by development
controls and rules of Plan and further note that the scale of
Corporations land holding in area may provide means to
address constraints in design.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3351

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 74,


HERDMAN
STREET,77,
DAVENTRY STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
74 HERDMAN
STREET and 77
DAVENTRY
STREET,
Waterview

LOCALITY

Waterview

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

245

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHU


to MHS. Support the retention of the MHU zone. The
properties are located close to the Great North Rd RFN,
Northwestern Motorway, large public open spaces
(including Waterview Reserve and Oakley Esplanade) as
well as community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to


MHU. The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from notified MHU to THAB.
These sites are close to or on the Point Chevalier Rd and
Great North Rd RFNs and is close to the Point Chevalier
TC. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3367

839-3408

839-3429

839-3437

Western Isthmus Rezone 77, MOA


77 MOA ROAD,
ROAD, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 67, MOA


ROAD,1, KANUKA
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 1243 [1255],
GREAT NORTH
ROAD,22-24, POINT
CHEVALIER ROAD,
[Point Chevalier] from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Point Chevalier MHS

67 MOA ROAD
and 1 KANUKA
STREET, Point
Chevalier

Rezone 1243
Point Chevalier MHU
[1255], GREAT
NORTH ROAD,2224, POINT
CHEVALIER ROAD,
Point Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 24, ALFORD 24 ALFORD


STREET, Waterview STREET,
from Single House to Waterview
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Waterview

SH

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

THAB

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

Do not support the change in zoning from the notified SH MHU


zone to MHS.
The site is not affected by any site specific constraints
such as HC, the Pre-1944 BDC and or flooding constraints
and is located in close proximity to the Great North Rd
RFN, large public open spaces such as Oakley Esplanade
and community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School.
Proposed alternative rezoning to MHU in scope of an
area wide submission (6099-4), refer to attachment D is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Accords with proximity criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3529

839-3541

839-3542

839-3583

839-3588

839-3598

839-3606

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 21, RAMA


ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 247, MEOLA
ROAD,3, WALFORD
ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
21 RAMA ROAD,
Point Chevalier

PAUP ZONE

Point Chevalier MHS

247 MEOLA ROAD Point Chevalier MHS


and 3 WALFORD
ROAD, Point
Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 74, WALMER 74 WALMER


ROAD, Point
ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 58A, RIRO
STREET,63, MOA
ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 20A,
HADFIELD AVENUE,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 3, RIRO
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Point Chevalier MHS

58A RIRO STREET Point Chevalier MHS


and 63 MOA
ROAD, Point
Chevalier

20A HADFIELD
AVENUE,
Waterview

Waterview

3 RIRO STREET,
Point Chevalier

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 24,


24 PASADENA
PASADENA AVENUE, AVENUE, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Point Chevalier MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

246

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change in zoning from the notified MHS to
MHU
MHU for these sites as they are on the Meola Rd RFN and
are not affected the pre-1944 BDC, HC or flooding
constraints . The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to


MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS
zone to THAB for this site. The site is affected by the Pre1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified zone,
recognising that THAB or MHU is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone. Retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change in zoning from the notified MHS to
MHU for this site as it is on the Meola Rd RFN and is not
affected the pre-1944 BDC, HC or flooding constraints .
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU
MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Support

No change

MHU

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3619

839-3628

839-3635

839-3640

839-3657

839-3671

839-3694

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 32, ALBERTA 32 ALBERTA


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 9-7, CADMAN 9-7 CADMAN


AVENUE, Waterview AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Waterview
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 214, MEOLA


ROAD, Point
Chevalier-Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

214 MEOLA
ROAD, Point
ChevalierWestmere

Western Isthmus Rezone 69, PREMIER 69 PREMIER


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Point Chevalier MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 60A, RIRO


60A RIRO STREET, Point Chevalier MHS
STREET, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 215, MEOLA


ROAD, Point
Chevalier-Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

215 MEOLA
ROAD, Point
ChevalierWestmere

Point Chevalier MHS

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 82,


DAVENTRY STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

82 DAVENTRY
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

MHS

MHU

REASONS

247

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS No change


zone to THAB for this site. The site is affected by the Pre1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified zone,
recognising that THAB or MHU is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone. Retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change in zoning from the notified
No change
MHS to THAB. The sites are not in close proximity to any
TCs or LCs or close to any RFNs.
Support retention of the notified MHS zone. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
Support the change in zoning from the notified MHS to
MHU
MHU for this site as it is on the Meola Rd RFN and is not
affected the pre-1944 BDC, HC or flooding constraints .
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change


MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change in zoning from the notified MHS to
MHU
MHU for this site as it is on the Meola Rd RFN and is not
affected the pre-1944 BDC, HC or flooding constraints .
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support rezoning from the notified MHS zone to MHU.


MHU
The property is located close to the Great North Rd RFN,
Northwestern Motorway, large public open spaces
(including Waterview Reserve and Oakley Esplanade) as
well as community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3715

839-3731

839-3743

839-3748

839-3767

839-3791

839-3806

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 23, KANUKA 23 KANUKA


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 37, PREMIER 37 PREMIER


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 109, HUIA


ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 71, HUIA
ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Point Chevalier MHS

109 HUIA ROAD,


Point Chevalier

71 HUIA ROAD,
Point Chevalier

Point Chevalier MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Western Isthmus Rezone 39, SMALE


39 SMALE STREET, Point Chevalier MHS
STREET, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 53, RIRO


53 RIRO STREET,
STREET, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 49, RIRO


49 RIRO STREET,
STREET, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

MHU

REASONS

248

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change


MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change in zoning from the notified MHS to
MHU
MHU for this site as it is on the Meola Rd RFN and is not
affected the pre-1944 BDC, HC or flooding constraints .
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS
zone to THAB for this site. The site is affected by the Pre1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified zone,
recognising that THAB or MHU is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone. Retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3851

839-3858

839-3859

839-3865

839-390

839-3902

839-3941

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 99, KIWI


99 KIWI ROAD,
ROAD, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 82, WALKER 82 WALKER


ROAD, Point
ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Single Chevalier
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Point Chevalier SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 15,


15 FAIRLANDS
FAIRLANDS AVENUE, AVENUE,
Waterview from
Waterview
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 75, PREMIER 75 PREMIER


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 44 FIR STREET,


Suburban at 44, FIR Waterview
STREET, Waterview.

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 18, KANUKA 18 KANUKA


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 62, PREMIER 62 PREMIER


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

249

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change


MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of notified SH zone to MHS zone No change
for this site. The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and
retains the notified zoning because the outcomes the Pre1944 BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH/MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHS

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH on basis of pre1944 Demolition Control. Consider the site is appropriate
for MHS zone given proximity to services and facilities.

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
MHS
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3942

839-417

839-4221

839-4222

839-4223

839-4224

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 62A,


62A PREMIER
PREMIER AVENUE,
AVENUE, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 20 HERDMAN


Suburban at 20,
STREET,
HERDMAN STREET,
Waterview
Waterview.

Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,4,


2,4 FAIRLANDS
FAIRLANDS AVENUE, AVENUE,
Waterview from
Waterview
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,9A,


TUTUKI STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 2426,10,12,20,14,22,16,
18,30,28,20A, TUTUKI
STREET,1555,1557,
GREAT NORTH ROAD,
Auckland from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11,9,9A TUTUKI
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

24Waterview
26,10,12,20,14,22
,16,18,30,28,20A
TUTUKI STREET
and 1555,1557
GREAT NORTH
ROAD, Auckland

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 6, TUTUKI


STREET,10,8, FIR
STREET, Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6 TUTUKI STREET Waterview


and 10,8 FIR
STREET,
Waterview

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

250

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change


MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHS, support more
MHU
intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close to the Great North Rd RFN, Northwestern
Motorway, large public open spaces (including
Waterview Reserve and Oakley Esplanade) as well as
community facilities such as Waterview Primary School.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU


MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4225

839-4226

839-4227

839-4228

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,15,17,


TUTUKI STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 33,25,35,23,
TUTUKI STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,15,17 TUTUKI
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

33,25,35,23
TUTUKI STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone


1559,1559A,1563,15
65,1561, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 12,14,
ALFORD STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to
Neighbourhood
Centre.

1559,1559A,1563, Waterview
1565,1561 GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland

MHS

12,14 ALFORD
STREET,
Waterview

MHS

Waterview

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

NC

REASONS

251

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU


MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

NC

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the change in zoning from the notified SH MHU


zone to MHS.
The site is not affected by any site specific constraints
such as HC, the Pre-1944 BDC and or flooding constraints
and is located in close proximity to the Great North Rd
RFN, large public open spaces such as Oakley Esplanade
and community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School.
Proposed alternative rezoning to MHU in scope of an
area wide submission (6099-4), refer to attachment D is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4229

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 9,9A, ALFORD 9,9A ALFORD


STREET, Waterview STREET,
from Mixed Housing Waterview
Suburban to
Neighbourhood
Centre.

LOCALITY

Waterview

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

NC

REASONS

Do not support the change in zoning from the notified


MHS to the neighbourhood centre zone as the NC zone.

252

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

The site is not affected by any site specific constraints


such as HC, the Pre-1944 BDC and or flooding constraints
and is located in close proximity to the Great North Rd
RFN, large public open spaces such as Oakley Esplanade
and community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School.

NC

Oppose

Do not support rezoning to NC as extending the NC zone


may adversely affect the function role and amenity of the
Point Chevalier TC.

839-4230

839-4231

839-4232

839-4233

Western Isthmus Rezone 15A,15,


OAKLEY AVENUE,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15A,15 OAKLEY
AVENUE,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 24,26,14,


DAVENTRY STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,26,14
DAVENTRY
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 46,50,48,52,


ALFORD
STREET,18,20,22,
SAXON STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46,50,48,52
ALFORD STREET
and 18,20,22
SAXON STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9, SAXON


STREET,47, ALFORD
STREET, Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9 SAXON
STREET and 47
ALFORD STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support proposed alternative rezoning to MHU in scope


of an area wide submission (6099-4), refer to attachment
D is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No change
not in close proximity to RFNs or large public open
spaces. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4234

839-4235

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,4,6, SAXON


STREET,38,
DAVENTRY STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 19,21,17,23,
DAVENTRY
STREET,38,42,36,
HERDMAN STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

2,4,6 SAXON
STREET and 38
DAVENTRY
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

MHS

19,21,17,23
DAVENTRY
STREET and
38,42,36
HERDMAN
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone


26,30,28A,32,28B,28,
HERDMAN
STREET,9,3,5,3A,
DAVENTRY STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

26,30,28A,32,28B, Waterview
28 HERDMAN
STREET and
9,3,5,3A
DAVENTRY
STREET,
Waterview

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone


8/4,1/4,5/4,7/4,4/4,6
/4,3/4,6,9/4,2/4,
ARLINGTON
STREET,48,46,54,56,5
0,52, HERDMAN
STREET,47,45,51,53,4
9, DAVENTRY STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

8/4,1/4,5/4,7/4,4/ Waterview
4,6/4,3/4,6,9/4,2/
4 ARLINGTON
STREET,
48,46,54,56,50,52
HERDMAN STREET
and
47,45,51,53,49
DAVENTRY
STREET,
Waterview

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

253

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU


MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHU No change
to MHS. Support the retention of the MHU zone. The
properties are located close to the Great North Rd RFN,
Northwestern Motorway, large public open spaces
(including Waterview Reserve and Oakley Esplanade) as
well as community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-4236

THAB

Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHU


to MHS. Support the retention of the MHU zone. The
properties are located close to the Great North Rd RFN,
Northwestern Motorway, large public open spaces
(including Waterview Reserve and Oakley Esplanade) as
well as community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4237

THAB

Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHU No change


to MHS at these properties. Support the retention of the
MHU zone. The properties are located close to the Great
North Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public
open spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4238

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,5,7,


ARLINGTON
STREET,72,70,
HERDMAN
STREET,59,57,61,63,7
3,65,71,67,
DAVENTRY STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

11,9,5,7
Waterview
ARLINGTON
STREET and 72,70
HERDMAN STREET
and
59,57,61,63,73,65
,71,67 DAVENTRY
STREET,
Waterview

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 46,44,


DAVENTRY
STREET,1,3,5, SAXON
STREET, Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46,44 DAVENTRY Waterview


STREET and 1,3,5,
SAXON STREET,
Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 54,50,52,


DAVENTRY
STREET,49C,49A,49B,
49, OAKLEY AVENUE,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

54,50,52
Waterview
DAVENTRY
STREET and
49C,49A,49B,49
OAKLEY AVENUE,
Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


60,62,64,66,70,68,
DAVENTRY STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 11,13,
HOWLETT STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

60,62,64,66,70,68 Waterview
DAVENTRY
STREET,
Waterview

MHS

11,13 HOWLETT
STREET,
Waterview

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHU


to MHS. Support the retention of the MHU zone. The
properties are located close to the Great North Rd RFN,
Northwestern Motorway, large public open spaces
(including Waterview Reserve and Oakley Esplanade) as
well as community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

254

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4239

839-4240

839-4241

839-4242

Waterview

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU


MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4243

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone


55,2/57,57,2/55,59,
WATERBANK
CRESCENT,49,47,51,2
/53,2/47,2/51,53,
HERDMAN STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

55,2/57,57,2/55,5 Waterview
9 WATERBANK
CRESCENT and
49,47,51,2/53,2/4
7,2/51,53
HERDMAN
STREET,
Waterview

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 47,45,51,49,


WATERBANK
CRESCENT,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

47,45,51,49
WATERBANK
CRESCENT,
Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


24,6,26,20,22,16,18,3
0,28,4,32,
WATERBANK
CRESCENT,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 69,67,
HERDMAN STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,6,26,20,22,16, Waterview
18,30,28,4,32
WATERBANK
CRESCENT,
Waterview

MHS

69,67 HERDMAN
STREET,
Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 5,7A,7,


HEMINGTON
STREET,77,83,81,79,
HERDMAN STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5,7A,7
HEMINGTON
STREET and
77,83,81,79
HERDMAN
STREET,
Waterview

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHU


to MHS. Support the retention of the MHU zone. The
properties are located close to the Great North Rd RFN,
Northwestern Motorway, large public open spaces
(including Waterview Reserve and Oakley Esplanade) as
well as community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

255

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4244

839-4245

839-4246

839-4247

Waterview

Waterview

Waterview

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support the change in zoning from the notified


MHU
MHS to THAB as the properties are not close to any TCs
or LCs. support a less intensified zoning change to MHU
zone. The change to MHU is in scope of an area wide
submission (6099-4), refer to attachment D. The
properties are located close to the Great North Rd RFN,
Northwestern Motorway, large public open spaces
(including Waterview Reserve and Oakley Esplanade) as
well as community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School. MHU will enable intensification in the area and
provides a density that is between THAB and MHS zones.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4248

839-4249

839-4250

839-4251

839-4252

839-4253

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


8B,8A,4,6,8,4B,
HADFIELD AVENUE,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 37,35A,35,
ALBERTA STREET,
Point Chevalier from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
8B,8A,4,6,8,4B
HADFIELD
AVENUE,
Waterview

Waterview

PAUP ZONE

MHS

37,35A,35
Point Chevalier MHS
ALBERTA STREET,
Point Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 43,43A,


43,43A ALBERTA
ALBERTA STREET,
STREET, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Western Isthmus Rezone 50, MILLER
STREET,47, ALBERTA
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Point Chevalier MHS

50 MILLER STREET Point Chevalier MHS


and 47 ALBERTA
STREET, Point
Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 51A,51,


51A,51 ALBERTA
ALBERTA STREET,
STREET, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 27A,27,29,


27A,27,29
Point Chevalier MHS
ALBERTA STREET,
ALBERTA STREET,
Point Chevalier from Point Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

256

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU


MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS
zone to THAB for these sites. The sites are affected by
the Pre-1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified
zone, recognising that THAB or MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS
zone to THAB for these sites. The sites are affected by
the Pre-1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified
zone, recognising that THAB or MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to


MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS
zone to THAB for these sites. The sites are affected by
the Pre-1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified
zone, recognising that THAB or MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

No change

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

THAB

Oppose

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4254

839-4255

839-4256

839-4257

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 19, ALBERTA 19 ALBERTA


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Point Chevalier MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

Western Isthmus Rezone 13,13A,


13 and 13A
Point Chevalier MHS
ALBERTA STREET,
ALBERTA STREET,
Point Chevalier from Point Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

THAB

Western Isthmus Rezone 44,42,


MONTROSE STREET,
Point Chevalier from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

THAB

Western Isthmus Rezone 120, POINT


CHEVALIER
ROAD,3,5,7, MILLER
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

44 and 42
MONTROSE
STREET, Point
Chevalier

Point Chevalier MHS

REASONS

257

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS No change


zone to THAB for this site. The site is affected by the Pre1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified zone,
recognising that THAB or MHU is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone. Retention is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to THAB zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Do not support the change in zoning at these sites from MHU


the notified MHS to THAB because a THAB zoning may
result in development which would dominate the
properties across the road which are affected by the Pre1944 BDC.
Support an alternative rezoning to MHU in scope of an
area wide submission (6099-4)(refer to attachment D) as
the sites are close to the Great North Rd RFN, Point
Chevalier TC and because a zone with a 3 storey limit will
not dominate the Pre-1944 BDC affected properties
across the road.

120 POINT
Point Chevalier MHU
CHEVALIER ROAD
and 3,5,7 MILLER
STREET, Point
Chevalier

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the


Support in part.

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Consider the site meets proximity criteria for THAB.


Recognise potential for amenity values to be recognised by
character overlays (further process) but do not support Pre1944 Demolition Control predetermining appropriate
values - may be appropriate to consider additional height
control for local context (4 storey) but consider THAB
appropriate.

MHS / THAB

Support the change in zoning from the notified MHU to


THAB for 120 Point Chevalier Road, and 3 and 5 Miller
Street. The sites are located along the Point Chevalier
Road RFN and are in close proximity to the Point
Chevalier TC. Rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHU
to THAB for 7 Miller Street. These sites are affected by
the Pre-1944 BDC. Support alternative zoning from
notified MHU to a less intensive MHS in scope of an area
wide submission (6099-4) (refer to attachment D)
recognising that THAB or MHU is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4258

839-4259

839-4260

839-4261

839-4262

839-4263

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 22A,22,22B, 22A,22,22B


Point Chevalier MHS
FORMBY AVENUE,
FORMBY AVENUE,
Point Chevalier from Point Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 67, SMALE


STREET,5,7, RAMA
ROAD,10,12,6,8,4B,4
A, PELHAM AVENUE,
Point Chevalier from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

67 SMALE STREET, Point Chevalier MHS


5,7 RAMA ROAD
and
10,12,6,8,4B,4A
PELHAM AVENUE,
Point Chevalier

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 8, WAINONI


AVENUE,81,79,
WALKER ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

8 WAINONI
AVENUE and
81,79 WALKER
ROAD, Point
Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 12,14,


12,14 WAINONI
WAINONI AVENUE, AVENUE, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Point Chevalier SH

Point Chevalier SH

MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 72,70, KIWI 72,70 KIWI ROAD, Point Chevalier MHS
ROAD, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

THAB

Western Isthmus Rezone 68,70,


68,70 WALMER
WALMER ROAD,
ROAD, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Point Chevalier MHS

REASONS

258

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to


MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to


MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support change of zone from notified SH to MHS. These


sites are not subject to environmental and heritage
constraints, such as HC and flooding constraints, that
would make a SH zoning appropriate. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from notified SH to MHS. These
sites are not subject to environmental and heritage
constraints, such as HC and flooding constraints, that
would make a SH zoning appropriate. MHS complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS
zone to THAB for these sites. The sites are affected by
the Pre-1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified
zone, recognising that THAB or MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. The sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHS

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4264

839-4265

839-4266

839-4267

839-4268

839-4269

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 58, WALMER


ROAD,55, KIWI ROAD,
Point Chevalier from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

58 WALMER
Point Chevalier MHS
ROAD and 55 KIWI
ROAD, Point
Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 271,269,


POINT CHEVALIER
ROAD,1, BUXTON
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 33,35,
BUXTON STREET,
Point Chevalier from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

271,269 POINT
Point Chevalier MHS
CHEVALIER ROAD
and 1 BUXTON
STREET, Point
Chevalier

MHU

33 and 35
Point Chevalier MHS
BUXTON STREET,
Point Chevalier

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 21B,21A,


21B,21A WAINUI
WAINUI AVENUE,
AVENUE, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 42A42P,50,48, RIRO


STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
39B,39,37,39A,43,41,
RIRO STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

42A-42P,50,48
RIRO STREET,
Point Chevalier

39B,39,37,39A,43, Point Chevalier MHS


41 RIRO STREET,
Point Chevalier

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS


zone to THAB for these sites. The sites are affected by
the Pre-1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified
zone, recognising that THAB or MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

259

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose
Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not
support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

Support the change in zoning from the notified MHS to


MHU
MHU for these sites as they are on the Meola Rd RFN and
are not affected the pre-1944 BDC, HC or flooding
constraints . The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4270

839-4271

839-4272

839-4273

839-4274

839-4275

839-4276

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 50,48,


50,48 WALMER
WALMER ROAD,
ROAD, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Western Isthmus Rezone 61,63,
WALMER ROAD,68,
MOA ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 58, RIRO
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Point Chevalier MHS

61,63 WALMER
Point Chevalier MHS
ROAD and 68
MOA ROAD, Point
Chevalier

58 RIRO STREET,
Point Chevalier

Point Chevalier MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 12,14,14A,


12,14,14A
Point Chevalier MHS
KANUKA STREET,
KANUKA STREET,
Point Chevalier from Point Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 82,80, MOA 82,80 MOA ROAD, Point Chevalier MHS
ROAD, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 83,81,85,


WALMER ROAD,90,
MOA ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 1,3, DE LUEN
STREET [81 Moa
Road], Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

83,81,85
WALMER ROAD
and 90 MOA
ROAD, Point
Chevalier

Point Chevalier MHS

1,3, DE LUEN
STREET [81 Moa
Road], Point
Chevalier

Point Chevalier MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change in zoning from notified MHS


zone to THAB for these sites. The sites are affected by
the Pre-1944 BDC. Proposed retention of the notified
zone, recognising that THAB or MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC zone.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

260

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4277

839-4278

839-4279

839-4280

839-4281

839-4282

839-4283

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,13,15, DE 11,13,15 DE LUEN Point Chevalier MHS


LUEN STREET, Point STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 89, MOA


ROAD,6, DE LUEN
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 95,97,
WALMER ROAD,94,
MOA ROAD, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 108,110,
WALMER ROAD,
Point Chevalier from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

89 MOA ROAD
and 6 DE LUEN
STREET, Point
Chevalier

Point Chevalier MHS

95,97 WALMER
Point Chevalier MHS
ROAD and 94
MOA ROAD, Point
Chevalier

108,110 WALMER Point Chevalier MHS


ROAD, Point
Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 98,100,


98,100 WALMER
WALMER ROAD,
ROAD, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 90,92,94,


90,92,94
WALMER ROAD,
WALMER ROAD,
Point Chevalier from Point Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 80, WALMER


ROAD,13, WAKATIPU
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

80 WALMER
ROAD and 13
WAKATIPU
STREET, Point
Chevalier

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to


MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

261

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4284

839-4285

839-4286

839-4287

839-4288

839-4289

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 221,219,


MEOLA ROAD, Point
Chevalier-Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
221,219 MEOLA
ROAD, Point
ChevalierWestmere

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Point Chevalier MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 60,58B,58,


60,58B,58
Point Chevalier MHS
WAINUI AVENUE,
WAINUI AVENUE,
Point Chevalier from Point Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 80, PREMIER


AVENUE,19, KANUKA
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

80 PREMIER
Point Chevalier MHS
AVENUE and 19
KANUKA STREET,
Point Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 74, PREMIER 74 PREMIER


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 63,61,61A,


PREMIER AVENUE,
Point Chevalier from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

63,61,61A
PREMIER
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 48, PREMIER


AVENUE,10,8,4,6,
KETTLE STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

48 PREMIER
AVENUE and
10,8,4,6 KETTLE
STREET, Point
Chevalier

Point Chevalier MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

262

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the change in zoning from the notified MHS to


MHU
MHU for these sites as they are on the Meola Rd RFN and
are not affected the pre-1944 BDC, HC or flooding
constraints . The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change


MHU. This site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. Support
retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4290

839-4291

839-465

839-4954

839-516

839-520

839-544

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 3,5, KETTLE


STREET,60, PREMIER
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

3,5 KETTLE
STREET and 60
PREMIER
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier

Western Isthmus Rezone 47,45,47A,43,


PREMIER AVENUE,
Point Chevalier from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

47,45,47A,43
PREMIER
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14 HEMINGTON


Suburban at 14,
STREET,
HEMINGTON STREET, Waterview
Waterview.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Point Chevalier MHS

Point Chevalier MHS

Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 18,20,22,16,


DAVENTRY STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,20,22,16
DAVENTRY
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 9,
JOHNSTONE
STREET,16 [14?],
BUNGALOW AVENUE,
Point Chevalier.

9, JOHNSTONE
STREET and 16
[14?],
BUNGALOW
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 19 OLIVER


Suburban at 19,
STREET, Point
OLIVER STREET, Point Chevalier
Chevalier.

MHS

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 31 SAXON STREET, Waterview


Suburban at 31,
Waterview
SAXON STREET,
Waterview.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

263

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to


MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to


MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Do not support retention of the notified MHS zone,


MHU
support more intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close to the Great North Rd RFN, Northwestern
Motorway and large public open spaces (including
Waterview Reserve) . The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these No change
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for this No change
site. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these No change
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-550

839-566

839-569

839-587

839-606

839-647

839-678

839-701

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 71,
HARBOUR VIEW
ROAD, Point
Chevalier.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 10,
HEMINGTON STREET,
Waterview.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

71 HARBOUR
Point Chevalier MHS
VIEW ROAD, Point
Chevalier

MHS

10 HEMINGTON
STREET,
Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 12 OAKLEY


Suburban at 12,
AVENUE,
OAKLEY AVENUE,
Waterview
Waterview.

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1552, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Waterview.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 72,72A,
ALVERSTON STREET,
Waterview.

LOCALITY

Waterview

Waterview

1552 GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Waterview

Waterview

72,72A
ALVERSTON
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 5 HUMARIRI


Suburban at 5,
STREET, Point
HUMARIRI STREET,
Chevalier
Point Chevalier.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 15 HUMARIRI


Suburban at 15,
STREET, Point
HUMARIRI STREET,
Chevalier
Point Chevalier.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1 SEACOMBE


Suburban at 1,
ROAD, Point
SEACOMBE ROAD,
Chevalier
Point Chevalier.

Point Chevalier MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

264

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for this


site. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHS, support more
intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close to the Great North Rd RFN, Northwestern
Motorway and large public open spaces (including
Waterview Reserve) . The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of the notified MHS zone,
support more intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close to the Great North Rd RFN, Northwestern
Motorway and large public open spaces (including
Waterview Reserve) . The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. The site is located on the
Great North Rd RFN and close to large public open spaces
such as Heron Park and Phyllis St Reserve . The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for this


site. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for this
site. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for this
site. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-727

839-732

839-7411

839-7412

839-7413

839-7428

839-7465

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 1503, GREAT


Suburban at 1503,
NORTH ROAD,
GREAT NORTH ROAD, Waterview
Waterview.

LOCALITY

Waterview

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14 HUMARIRI


Suburban at 14,
STREET, Point
HUMARIRI STREET,
Chevalier
Point Chevalier.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, BERRIDGE 1 BERRIDGE


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 5, BERRIDGE 5 BERRIDGE


AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 62A, SMALE 62A SMALE


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 76,


DAVENTRY STREET,
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Waterview

76 DAVENTRY
STREET,
Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 72, 70


72, 70 PREMIER
PREMIER AVENUE.
AVENUE, Point
Point Chevalier from Chevalier
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Point Chevalier MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

265

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of MHS, support more


MHU
intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close on the Great North Rd RFN, and close to the
Northwestern Motorway and large public open spaces
(including Waterview Reserve) . The change of zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for this No change
site. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS zone to MHU zone No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from the notified MHS zone to MHU.
MHU
The property is located close to the Great North Rd RFN,
Northwestern Motorway, large public open spaces
(including Waterview Reserve and Oakley Esplanade) as
well as community facilities such as Waterview Primary
School. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to No change
MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7496

839-7563

839-7697

839-7736

839-7787

839-789

839-7966

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 26 PELHAM 26 PELHAM


AVENUE. Point
AVENUE, Point
Chevalier from Mixed Chevalier
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 24 HADFIELD 24 HADFIELD


AVENUE. Waterview AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Waterview
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 10, 8, 6


HOWLETT STREET.
Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10, 8, 6 HOWLETT Waterview


STREET,
Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 2 HADFIELD


AVENUE. 30 FIR
STREET. Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2 HADFIELD
AVENUE and 30
FIR STREET,
Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 1584 GREAT 1584 GREAT


NORTH ROAD.
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland from Mixed Auckland
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Waterview

Waterview

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 295 POINT


Point Chevalier MHS
Suburban at 295,
CHEVALIER ROAD,
POINT CHEVALIER
Point Chevalier
ROAD, Point
Chevalier.

Western Isthmus Rezone 22 OAKLEY


AVENUE. Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

22 OAKLEY
AVENUE,
Waterview

Waterview

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from notified MHS zoning to


MHU. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC.
Support retention of MHS, recognising that MHU is
generally incompatible with the values of the areas that
are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

266

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

MHU

MHU

Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU


MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the retention of the notified MHS zone on MHU
the site. The site is not affected by the Pre-1944 BDC, HC
or flooding constraints and is on the Point Chevalier Rd
RFN.
Proposed alternative rezoning to a more intensive MHU
zone in scope of an area wide submission (6099-4)(refer
to attachment D) is the most appropriate way to achieve
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7968

839-8102

839-8103

839-8104

839-8105

839-8106

839-8107

839-8108

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 37 OAKLEY


AVENUE. Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37 OAKLEY
AVENUE,
Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 27 TUTUKI


STREET. Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

27 TUTUKI
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 27A TUTUKI


STREET. Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

27A TUTUKI
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 27B TUTUKI


STREET. Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

27B TUTUKI
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 27C TUTUKI


STREET. Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

27C TUTUKI
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 29 TUTUKI


STREET. Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29 TUTUKI
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 31 TUTUKI


STREET. Waterview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31 TUTUKI
STREET,
Waterview

Waterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 11


11 FAIRLANDS
FAIRLANDS AVENUE. AVENUE,
Waterview from
Waterview
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Waterview

Waterview

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU


zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN, Northwestern Motorway, large public open
spaces (including Waterview Reserve and Oakley
Esplanade) as well as community facilities such as
Waterview Primary School. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

267

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8109

839-858

839-87

839-919

839-939

839-1252

839-1298

839-1299

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 9 FAIRLANDS 9 FAIRLANDS


AVENUE. Waterview AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Waterview
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Waterview

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 38 HUMARIRI


Suburban at 38,
STREET, Point
HUMARIRI STREET,
Chevalier
Point Chevalier.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 11 - 15 OLIVER


Suburban at 11 - 15, STREET, Point
OLIVER STREET, Point Chevalier
Chevalier.

Point Chevalier MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


9 WALMER ROAD, Point Chevalier THAB
Housing and
Point Chevalier
Apartment Buildings
at 9, WALMER ROAD,
Point Chevalier.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 11, OAKLEY


Suburban at 11,
AVENUE,
OAKLEY AVENUE,
Waterview.
Waterview.

Waterview

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 25,23, PARR


Urban at 25,23, PARR ROAD SOUTH,
ROAD SOUTH, Point Point Chevalier.
Chevalier.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 90,92, KITENUI
AVENUE, Mount
Albert.

90,92, KITENUI
AVENUE, Mount
Albert.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


1032A,1030,1032B,1
028, NEW NORTH
ROAD, AvondaleGrafton.

1032A,1030,1032 Mount Albert


B,1028, NEW
NORTH ROAD,
Avondale

MHS

MHU

SH

MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHU

SH

MU

REASONS

268

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the change from notified MHS zone to MHU


MHU
zone. The properties are located close to the Great North
Rd RFN and large public open spaces (including Heron
Park and Phyllis Street Reserve). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for this
site. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified MHS zone for these
sites. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the retention of the THAB zone, support
less intensified zoning change to MHS zone, in scope of
an area wide submission (5541-4) (refer to attachment
D). The sites are affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and are
proposed to be rezoned as MHS recognising that THAB or
MHU is generally incompatible with the values of the
areas that are proposed to be retained within the Pre1944 BDC. The change of zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support retention of the notified MHS zone,
support more intensified zoning change to MHU.
Change to MHU is in scope of an area-wide submission
(6099-4), refer to attachment D. The property is located
close to the Great North Rd RFN, Northwestern
Motorway and large public open spaces (including
Waterview Reserve) . The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties
are located close to RFN, and Point Chevalier TC, and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as notified. These sites are
affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MU zone. The properties are
in close proximity to Mount Albert TC and RFN. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

No change

MHS

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.
MHU

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Support

SH

Support

MU

Support

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1300

839-1301

839-1302

839-152

839-179

839-2360

839-263

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 45,43, SEAVIEW Mount Albert


Urban at 45,43,
TERRACE, Mount
SEAVIEW TERRACE, Albert.
Mount Albert.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3/16,2/16,1/16,
WILLCOTT STREET,
Mount Albert.

3/16,2/16,1/16,
WILLCOTT
STREET, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1186,1188, NEW
NORTH ROAD,4,
BOLLARD AVENUE,
Avondale-Grafton.

1186,1188, NEW
NORTH ROAD,4,
BOLLARD
AVENUE,
Avondale

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 36, WILLCOTT
STREET, Mount
Albert.

36, WILLCOTT
STREET, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

THAB

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 12, WOODWARD Mount Albert


Urban at 12,
ROAD, Mount
WOODWARD ROAD, Albert.
Mount Albert.

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


994B, 994C, 994A
NEW NORTH ROAD.
Avondale-Grafton.

MU

994B, 994C, 994A Mount Albert


NEW NORTH
ROAD. Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 12, NOVAR PLACE, Mount Albert
Urban at 12, NOVAR Point Chevalier.
PLACE, Point
Chevalier.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MU

MHU

REASONS

269

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No change


located close to RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No change
are located close to Mount Albert TC and RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No change


are located around Mount Albert TC and on RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Do not support retention of THAB at this property,


support less intensified zoning to MHS. This site is
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and are rezoned MHS
recognising that THAB or MHU is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support retention of MHU for this property,
support more intensified zoning to THAB. This property is
located close to RFN and Mount Albert TC. Scope to
change the notified zone to proposed THAB zone is
provided by site specific submissions 5277-116 and 5280118 listed in this spreadsheet. The change of zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MU zone. The properties are
in close proximity to Mount Albert TC and RFN. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the MHU zone. The properties
are located close to RFN, and Point Chevalier TC, and
large public open spaces. The retention of notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

Meet Criteria
THAB

THAB

Support

MU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2778

839-2839

839-2849

839-2855

839-2871

839-2876

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 27, PRESTON


AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 39, HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
27, PRESTON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

39, HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 40, RANGE


40, RANGE VIEW
VIEW ROAD, Mount ROAD, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 91, HENDON 91, HENDON


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 22, RENTON 22, RENTON


ROAD, Mount Albert ROAD, Mount
from Single House to Albert
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 57,


57, MARGARET
MARGARET AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support change of SH to MHS zone at 27 Preston Ave,


where managing flooding risks on those sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The change of zone aligns
with local context and maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone in the area. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The property is
not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The property is
not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

270

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHS

Support
note does not accord with proximity criteria but submitted
in support

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2912

839-2916

839-2932

839-2948

839-2953

839-2979

839-2981

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 29,


29, MARGARET
MARGARET AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Western Isthmus Rezone 186A-186C,


CARRINGTON ROAD,
Point ChevalierMount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

186A-186C,
CARRINGTON
ROAD, Point
Chevalier-Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 115,


115, OWAIRAKA
OWAIRAKA AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 25A, FIFTH


25A, FIFTH
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 33,


PARKDALE ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 14, JERSEY
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 57, MOUNT
ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

33, PARKDALE
ROAD, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

14, JERSEY
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

57, MOUNT
ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of MHS to THAB zone for these
properties on Carrington Rd, support a less intensified
zoning change to MHU. The proposed MHU zone will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood, located on RFN, close to a
large tertiary education institute and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

271

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

MHU

Oppose

No change

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


MHU
located close to RFN and Mount Albert TC. The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS. This site No change


is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Do not support character overlay determining underlying


zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for MHU
but Corporation sought MHS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2982

839-2989

839-3010

839-3035

839-3082

839-3103

839-3148

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 25, TASMAN


AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 160, HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

25, TASMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

160, HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 33, ASQUITH


AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 56, STEWART
ROAD, Mount Albert
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

33, ASQUITH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

56, STEWART
ROAD, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,


32, MARGARET
MARGARET AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Western Isthmus Rezone 9, VERONA


AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Albert

9, VERONA
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 19, FIFTH


19, FIFTH
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

272

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


MHU
close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The proposed
MHU zone will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood, close to
RFN and provides a transition in density between THAB
and MHS. The change of zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is
MHU
located close to RFN and Mount Albert TC. The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change of SH to MHU, support a less MHS


intensified zone change to MHS for this property.
Support MHS as a less intensified zone change that will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood and provides a transition in
density between MHU and SH. The change of zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site No change
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3150

839-3151

839-3152

839-3154

839-3169

839-3227

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 27,


27, RAWALPINDI
RAWALPINDI STREET, STREET, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 22,


22, RAWALPINDI
RAWALPINDI STREET, STREET, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 26,


26, RAWALPINDI
RAWALPINDI STREET, STREET, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 16, RANGE


16, RANGE VIEW
VIEW ROAD, Mount ROAD, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 16, BURNSIDE 16, BURNSIDE


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
Albert
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 1124, NEW


NORTH
ROAD, [Mount
Albert] from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

1124, NEW
NORTH
ROAD, Mount
Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to THAB zone because


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

273

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Do not support the change of SH to THAB zone for 1124 MHU


New North Rd, support a less intensified zoning change
to MHU that will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood, close to
RFN and provides a transition in density between THAB
and MHS. Support rezoning from SH to MHU where
managing flooding risks on those sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3230

839-3233

839-3243

839-3244

839-3270

839-3297

839-3312

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 54, MOUNT


ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

54, MOUNT
ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 37, MOUNT


ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 45, MOUNT
ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 51, MOUNT
ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 33, RANGE
VIEW ROAD, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37, MOUNT
ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert

45, MOUNT
ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert

51, MOUNT
ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert

33, RANGE VIEW


ROAD, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 15, PHYLLIS 15, PHYLLIS


STREET, Mount Albert STREET, Mount
from Single House to Albert
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 20,
NEWCASTLE
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

20, NEWCASTLE Mount Albert


TERRACE, Mount
Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS. This site
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS. This site
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS. This site
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

274

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change
MHS

Oppose
Do not support character overlay determining underlying
zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for MHS.

No change
MHS

Oppose
Do not support character overlay determining underlying
zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for MHS.

No change
MHS

Oppose
Do not support character overlay determining underlying
zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for MHS.

No change
MHU

Oppose
In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,
consider change to MHU is appropriate

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

No change

Do not support Pre-1944 Overlay determining zone


outcome. Consider MHU is appropriate, consistent with
Corporation's principles and submissions seeking review of
wider zoning around Corporation's properties.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3318

839-3331

839-3335

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 30, STEWART 30, STEWART


ROAD, Mount Albert ROAD, Mount
from Single House to Albert
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 41, MOUNT


ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 16, COUNSEL
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

41, MOUNT
ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

275

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. The site is


No change
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as
principle). Consider MHU zone is appropriate.

16, COUNSEL
Mount Albert
TERRACE, Mount
Albert

SH

MHU

MHS

THAB

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS. This site No change


is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change from MHU to THAB zone. The
No change
property is not adjacent to any centre. MHU will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood and provides a transition in
density between THAB and MHS. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Do not support character overlay determining underlying
zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for MHS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3340

839-3356

839-3388

839-3404

Western Isthmus Rezone 47, FIFTH


47, FIFTH
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 10, JERSEY


AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 96,
RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Albert

10, JERSEY
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

96, RICHARDSON Mount Albert


ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Western Isthmus Rezone 2, OLYMPUS 2, OLYMPUS


STREET, Mount Albert STREET, Mount
from Mixed Housing Albert
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is
MHU
located close to RFN and Mount Albert TC. The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


located on RFN. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a


MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The property is
not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3407

839-3411

839-3418

839-3436

839-3439

839-3440

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 21, RENTON 21, RENTON


ROAD, Mount Albert ROAD, Mount
from Single House to Albert
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 50,
SPRINGLEIGH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

50, SPRINGLEIGH Mount Albert


AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 23, FIFTH


23, FIFTH
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 43, HENDON 43, HENDON


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 119, HENDON 119, HENDON


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
Albert
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 22, DUART


AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

22, DUART
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The property is
not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of SH to THAB zone for this
property, support a less intensified zoning change to
MHU that will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood, close to
RFN and provides a transition in density between THAB
and MHS. The property is not adjacent to any centre.
Support rezoning from SH to MHU where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The change of zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the

276

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

No change

Do not support Pre-1944 Overlay determining zone


outcome. Consider MHU is appropriate, consistent with
Corporation's principles and submissions seeking review of
wider zoning around Corporation's properties.
No change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


consider change to THAB is appropriate.
No change
MHU

Oppose

Do not support character overlay determining underlying


zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for
MHU.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3443

839-3456

839-3460

839-3461

839-3463

839-3482

839-3484

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 9, JERSEY


9, JERSEY
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,


PARKDALE ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 39, RANGE
VIEW ROAD, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, PARKDALE
ROAD, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

39, RANGE VIEW


ROAD, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

277

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve area
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site No change
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. The site is
No change
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as


principle). Consider MHU zone is appropriate.

Western Isthmus Rezone 5, DUNKIRK 5, DUNKIRK


Mount Albert
TERRACE, Mount
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 17,


PARKDALE ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 95,
OWAIRAKA AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

17, PARKDALE
ROAD, Mount
Albert

95, OWAIRAKA
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 3, JERSEY


3, JERSEY
AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site No change
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve area
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Do not support character overlay determining underlying


zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for
MHU.

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3500

839-3521

839-3535

839-3553

839-3560

839-3567

839-3602

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 2, VERONA


AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, VERONA
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 11, RANGE


VIEW ROAD, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, RANGE VIEW


ROAD, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, MARGARET 1, MARGARET


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 10, LEONE


TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 1, FONTENOY
STREET, Mount Albert
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10, LEONE
Mount Albert
TERRACE, Mount
Albert

MHS

1, FONTENOY
STREET, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 13A, DUART


AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

13A, DUART
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 35, HARGEST 35, HARGEST


Mount Albert
TERRACE, Mount
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

278

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site No change


is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of SH to MHU, support a less MHS
intensified zone change to MHS for this property.
Support MHS as a less intensified zone change that will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood and provides a transition in
density between MHU and SH. The change of zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is
MHU
located close to RFN. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


located close to RFN. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


consider change to MHU is appropriate.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


MHU
close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site No change
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect

Do not support character overlay determining underlying


zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for
MHU.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3603

839-3607

839-3625

839-3631

839-3679

839-3692

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 2, TASMAN


AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 32,
FONTENOY STREET,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

2, TASMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

32, FONTENOY
STREET, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 25,23,


25,23, HARGEST Mount Albert
HARGEST TERRACE, TERRACE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, GLENTUI


1, GLENTUI ROAD, Mount Albert
ROAD, Mount Albert Mount Albert
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 49,


49, MARGARET
MARGARET AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 95, HENDON 95, HENDON


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

279

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


MHU
close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support the change of SH to THAB zone for these
properties, support a less intensified zoning change to
MHU that will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood, close to
RFN and provides a transition in density between THAB
and MHS. The property is not adjacent to any centre.
Support rezoning from SH to MHU where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The change of zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints and Pre-1944 BDC overlay. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The property is
not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Meet Criteria
MHU

THAB

Oppose
Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as
principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider THAB zone is appropriate.

No change

MHS

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU. Do not support Pre-1944 determining
zone outcome (as principle)

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
MHU

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3706

839-3712

839-3713

839-3740

839-3741

839-3750

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 57,


RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

57, RICHARDSON Mount Albert


ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Western Isthmus Rezone 12,


CHATHAM AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

12, CHATHAM
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

280

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. The site is


No change
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as
principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHU zone is appropriate.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 37,


FONTENOY STREET,9,
AMBROSE STREET,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37, FONTENOY
STREET,9,
AMBROSE
STREET, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 106,


RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

106, RICHARDSON Mount Albert


ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Western Isthmus Rezone 8, BURNSIDE 8, BURNSIDE


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
Albert
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 46, WILLCOTT 46, WILLCOTT


STREET, Mount Albert STREET, Mount
from Single House to Albert
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because


No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve area
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is
MHU
located on RFN. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site No change


is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. This site No change
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Do not support character overlay determining underlying


zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for
THAB, consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3761

839-3774

839-3777

839-3783

839-3796

839-3804

839-3815

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 44, STEWART 44, STEWART


ROAD, Mount Albert ROAD, Mount
from Single House to Albert
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 2, DUNKIRK 2, DUNKIRK


Mount Albert
TERRACE, Mount
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 35,


HARLSTON ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

35, HARLSTON
ROAD, Mount
Albert

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 21,


PARKDALE ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 29, RANGE
VIEW ROAD, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21, PARKDALE
ROAD, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

29, RANGE VIEW


ROAD, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 17, TASMAN


AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 24, HARGEST
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

17, TASMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

24, HARGEST
Mount Albert
TERRACE, Mount
Albert

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints and Pre-1944 BDC overlay. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

281

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as
principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHU zone is appropriate.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHS. Do not support Pre-1944 determining
zone outcome (as principle), but recognise existing site
fragmentation

No change

Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because


No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is
MHU
close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU. Do not support Pre-1944 determining
zone outcome (as principle)

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

Recognise some sites at edge of proximity but has nature


of development opportunity and neighbourhood centre
support integrated rezoning.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3820

839-3853

839-3906

839-423

839-4292

839-4293

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 4, MARGARET 4, MARGARET


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 52, HARGEST 52, HARGEST


Mount Albert
TERRACE, Mount
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 40, HENDON 40, HENDON


AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
Albert
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 12, WILLCOTT
STREET, Mount
Albert.
Western Isthmus Rezone
11,13,15,21,17,19,
RAWALPINDI STREET,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, WILLCOTT
STREET, Mount
Albert.

Mount Albert

THAB

11,13,15,21,17,19 Mount Albert


, RAWALPINDI
STREET, Mount
Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,8,


RAWALPINDI
STREET,42A,42,
TASMAN
AVENUE,25,27,25A,
SEGAR AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,8,
Mount Albert
RAWALPINDI
STREET,42A,42,
TASMAN
AVENUE,25,27,25
A, SEGAR
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


located close to RFN. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

282

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a


MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The property is
not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is No change
located close to Mount Albert TC and RFN. The retention
of notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve area
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4294

839-4295

839-4296

839-4297

839-4298

839-4299

839-4300

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,21,17,


SEGAR AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 18,20,16,
TASMAN
AVENUE,11,9,13,
SEGAR AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 8,6, TASMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 90,
CARRINGTON
ROAD,3,5, TASMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 94,96,
CARRINGTON ROAD,
Point ChevalierMount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,21,17, SEGAR
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,


TASMAN AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 33,35,
TASMAN AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

18,20,16,
Mount Albert
TASMAN
AVENUE,11,9,13,
SEGAR AVENUE,
Mount Albert

MHS

8,6, TASMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

MHS

Mount Albert

90, CARRINGTON Mount Albert


ROAD,3,5,
TASMAN AVENUE,
Mount Albert

MHS

94,96,
CARRINGTON
ROAD, Point
Chevalier-Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

MHS

11,9, TASMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

33,35, TASMAN
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

283

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is


MHU
close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU
close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU
close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties on MHU


Carrington Road are located on RFN, and close to a large
tertiary institute, and Mount Albert and Point Chevalier
TCs. The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4301

839-4302

839-4303

839-4304

839-4305

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 20,2/20,


FONTENOY STREET,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 28A,28,
FONTENOY STREET,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20,2/20,
FONTENOY
STREET, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

28A,28,
FONTENOY
STREET, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 38,36,


FONTENOY STREET,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,36, FONTENOY Mount Albert


STREET, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 39,45,43,41,


FONTENOY STREET,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39,45,43,41,
FONTENOY
STREET, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 33,31,


FONTENOY
STREET,11,13,5,14,7,
AMBROSE STREET,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33,31, FONTENOY Mount Albert


STREET,11,13,5,14
,7, AMBROSE
STREET, Mount
Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,8,6,


AMBROSE STREET,50,
FIFTH AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,8,6, AMBROSE Mount Albert


STREET,50, FIFTH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 5,7,


PARKDALE ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

5,7, PARKDALE
ROAD, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

284

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4306

839-4307

Mount Albert

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve area
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site No change
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4308

839-4309

839-4310

839-4311

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 12, LEONE


TERRACE,10,8,
MARTIN AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 11,7, LEONE
TERRACE,12,14,
MARGARET
AVENUE,13,15,
MARTIN AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, LEONE
Mount Albert
TERRACE,10,8,
MARTIN AVENUE,
Mount Albert

MHS

11,7, LEONE
Mount Albert
TERRACE,12,14,
MARGARET
AVENUE,13,15,
MARTIN AVENUE,
Mount Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


18,18A,16A,16,
MONAGHAN
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 24,24A,
SEAVIEW TERRACE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

18,18A,16A,16,
MONAGHAN
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 8,7A,


DOREEN
AVENUE,11,15,
MARGARET AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8,7A, DOREEN
AVENUE,11,15,
MARGARET
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,10A,


10,10A, KNIGHT
KNIGHT AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

24,24A, SEAVIEW Mount Albert


TERRACE, Mount
Albert

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

285

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the change of MHS to MHU zone at these
MHU
properties. The properties are close to RFN. The change
to MHU will enable more intensification in and around
the train station. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to THAB zone at 24 and
No change
24A Seaview Terrace. The properties are close to any
centre or THAB zone. Retain MHS zone to align with
existing neighbourhood and local context. The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4489

839-4490

MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


located close to RFN. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the change from MHS to THAB. The properties THAB


are close to RFN and Mount Albert TC. Scope provided by
submission 4903-1, listed in this spreadsheet. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4491

839-4492

839-4493

839-4494

839-4495

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 982, NEW


NORTH ROAD,
Avondale-Grafton
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

982, NEW NORTH Mount Albert


ROAD,
Avondale/Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 167,169,


CARRINGTON ROAD,
Point ChevalierMount Albert from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

167,169,
CARRINGTON
ROAD, Point
Chevalier-Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 61,57A,59,


WOODWARD ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

61,57A,59,
WOODWARD
ROAD, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHU

SH, MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 23A,23,


23A,23, BENFIELD Mount Albert
BENFIELD AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,13,15,5,7,9,
RENTON ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

11,13,15,5,7,9,
RENTON ROAD,
Mount Albert

Mount Albert

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

286

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. This site No change


is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The No change


property is not adjacent to any centre and considered
spot zoning in this location that does not recognise local
context. MHU will enable intensification in the area that
is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHU to THAB zone for 57A MHU
Woodward Rd. The property is not adjacent to any
centre. Support retention of the MHU zone, properties
close to RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of SH to THAB zone for 59 &
61 Woodward Rd, support a less intensified zoning
change to MHU that will enable intensification in the area
that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood,
close to RFN and provides a transition in density between
THAB and MHS. Support rezoning from SH to MHU where
managing flooding risks on those sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support character overlay determining underlying
zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for
THAB, consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


consider THAB zone is appropriate.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4496

839-4497

839-4498

839-4499

839-4500

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,11A,


HARBUTT AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,11A, HARBUTT Mount Albert


AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone


20A,18,18A,20,
HARBUTT AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20A,18,18A,20,
HARBUTT
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 1A,1C,1B,3,


NEWCASTLE
TERRACE,1,3,5,7,6,9,
8, JENNINGS
STREET,18,20, JERSEY
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1A,1C,1B,3,
Mount Albert
NEWCASTLE
TERRACE,1,3,5,7,6
,9,8, JENNINGS
STREET,18,20,
JERSEY AVENUE,
Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 24,26,


NEWCASTLE
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Albert

24,26,
Mount Albert
NEWCASTLE
TERRACE, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,2A, PHYLLIS 2,2A, PHYLLIS


STREET, Mount Albert STREET, Mount
from Single House to Albert
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

287

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve area
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve area
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone on
MHU
properties 1A,1C,1B,3, Newcastle Terrace and
1,3,5,7,6,9,8, Jennings St. These sites are affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the notified MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone for these properties. See C5
revised zoning map in Attachment E.
Support change of MHS to MHU on 18 & 20 Jersey Ave .
The properties are located on and close to RFN and close
to Mount Albert TC. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU. Do not support Pre-1944 determining
zone outcome (as principle)

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4501

839-4502

839-4503

839-4504

839-4505

839-4506

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 1097A,1097B, 1097A,1097B,


NEW NORTH ROAD, NEW NORTH
Avondale-Grafton
ROAD, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Mixed Use.

Western Isthmus Rezone


1094,1090D,1090A,1
092,1090C,1086,1090
B,1088, NEW NORTH
ROAD, AvondaleGrafton from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

1094,1090D,1090 Mount Albert


A,1092,1090C,108
6,1090B,1088,
NEW NORTH
ROAD, Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 1120,1118,


1120,1118, NEW Mount Albert
NEW NORTH ROAD, NORTH ROAD,
Avondale-Grafton
Avondale-Grafton
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,11A,


DUART AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 10,8,2,4,6,
LAUREL STREET,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 39,41,
SPRINGLEIGH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,11A, DUART
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

10,8,2,4,6,
LAUREL STREET,
Mount Albert

Mount Albert

39,41,
SPRINGLEIGH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

288

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of MHU to MU, support more


THAB
intensified zoning to THAB. The properties are adjacent
to the Mount Albert TC and RFN. The change to THAB will
not diminish the role, function and amenity of the Mount
Albert TC. The scope to change to THAB is provided by
submissions 5277-116 and 5280-118, listed in this
spreadsheet. The change of zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
Support the change from MHS to THAB. The properties THAB
are close to RFN and Mount Albert TC. The change of
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change of SH to THAB zone for these


properties, support a less intensified zoning change to
MHU that will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood, close to
RFN and provides a transition in density between THAB
and MHS. Support rezoning from SH to MHU where
managing flooding risks on those sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site
is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning princplies,


consider change to MHU is appropriate.
No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Do not support character overlay determining underlying


zoning (as principle). Consider site is appropriate for
MHU, consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles.

No change
In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,
and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

No change
In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,
and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4507

839-4508

839-4509

839-4510

839-4511

839-4512

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 1132,1134,


1132,1134, NEW Mount Albert
NEW NORTH ROAD, NORTH ROAD,
Avondale-Grafton
Avondale-Grafton
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 39,41,


PRESTON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

39,41, PRESTON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 38,36,


PRESTON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

38,36, PRESTON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone


24,26,20,22,32,30,28,
PRESTON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 23A,21,23,
PRESTON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,26,20,22,32,30 Mount Albert


,28, PRESTON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

23A,21,23,
PRESTON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 57,59,


57,59, HENDON
HENDON AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support the change of SH to THAB, support a less


intensified zoning change to MHU. The property is not
adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect

289

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as


principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHU zone is appropriate.
No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

No change

Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as


principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHU zone is appropriate.
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

Meets proximity criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4513

839-4514

839-4515

839-4516

839-4517

839-4518

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 54, HENDON


AVENUE,61,59,
RANGE VIEW ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

54, HENDON
AVENUE,61,59,
RANGE VIEW
ROAD, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone


77,75,73,79,71,
HENDON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

77,75,73,79,71,
HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 83,81,


83,81, HENDON
HENDON AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 89,87,


89,87, HENDON
HENDON AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 51,53, RANGE 51,53, RANGE


VIEW ROAD, Mount VIEW ROAD,
Albert from Single
Mount Albert
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 60,62,64,


HENDON
AVENUE,56,58,
RANGE VIEW ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

60,62,64,
HENDON
AVENUE,56,58,
RANGE VIEW
ROAD, Mount
Albert

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support the change of SH to MHU, support a less


intensified zone change to MHS for these properties.
Support MHS as a less intensified zone change that will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood and provides a transition in
density between MHU and SH. The change of zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of SH & MHS to THAB zone for
these properties, support a less intensified zoning change
to MHU that will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood, close to
RFN and provides a transition in density between THAB
and MHS. The properties are not adjacent to any centre.
Support rezoning from SH to MHU where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The change of zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives

290

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

MHU

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

Meets proximity criteria


MHU

MHU

Support

Meets proximity criteria


No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as
principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHU zone is appropriate.

MHU

THAB

Support

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning princplies,


consider change to MHU is appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4519

839-4520

839-4521

839-4522

839-4523

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


24,10,12,20,14,22,16,
18,6,8, OLYMPUS
STREET,46,54,52,
RANGE VIEW ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

24,10,12,20,14,22 Mount Albert


,16,18,6,8,
OLYMPUS
STREET,46,54,52,
RANGE VIEW
ROAD, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 99,97,


99,97, HENDON
HENDON AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 36,34, RANGE 36,34, RANGE


VIEW ROAD, Mount VIEW ROAD,
Albert from Mixed
Mount Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,30, RANGE 32,30, RANGE


VIEW ROAD, Mount VIEW ROAD,
Albert from Mixed
Mount Albert
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 76,72,


HENDON
AVENUE,11,13,15,21,
17,23,19,1,3,5,7,9,
OLYMPUS
STREET,20,14,22,16,1
8,22A, HARGEST
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

76,72, HENDON Mount Albert


AVENUE,11,13,15,
21,17,23,19,1,3,5,
7,9, OLYMPUS
STREET,20,14,22,1
6,18,22A,
HARGEST
TERRACE, Mount
Albert

PAUP ZONE

SH, MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support the change of MHS to THAB zone for 54


Range View Rd, and 24,10,12,20,14,22,16,18,6,8,
Olympus St, support a less intensified zoning change to
MHU that will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood, close to
large open space and RFN and provides a transition in
density between THAB and MHS. The properties are not
adjacent to any centre. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of SH to THAB zone for 46 &
52 Range View Rd. These sites are affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

291

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH, MHU

MHU

Support in part

Support Council proposed change to MHU. Do not support


flood hazard determing zone outcome. In accordance with
the Corporation's zoning principles, consider MHU zone is
an appropriate outcome.
MHU

MHU

Support

Meets proximity criteria


No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4524

839-4525

839-4526

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


109,107,109A,
HENDON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
109,107,109A,
HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 115,113,


115,113, HENDON Mount Albert
HENDON AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,13,15,17,3,5,7,9,
HARGEST
TERRACE,114,116,11
0,112,102,100,118,10
4, HENDON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,13,15,17,3,5,7, Mount Albert


9, HARGEST
TERRACE,114,116,
110,112,102,100,
118,104, HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,12,14,6,


ALAMEIN TERRACE,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

10,12,14,6,
Mount Albert
ALAMEIN
TERRACE, Mount
Albert

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

292

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a


MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU, where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a MHS zone. The properties are not adjacent to any
centre. The proposed MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a
MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU, where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a MHS zone. The properties are not adjacent to any
centre. The proposed MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Consider appropriate transition line to MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4527

THAB

Do not support change of SH to THAB zone. These sites


No change
are affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as
principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider THAB zone is appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4528

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone


38,46,32,44,42,36,40,
34, HARGEST
TERRACE,11,20,17,19
,3,5,7,9, ALAMEIN
TERRACE,10,12,14,16
,4,6,8, CASSINO
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

38,46,32,44,42,36 Mount Albert


,40,34, HARGEST
TERRACE,11,20,17
,19,3,5,7,9,
ALAMEIN
TERRACE,10,12,14
,16,4,6,8,
CASSINO
TERRACE, Mount
Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 31,29,


HARGEST
TERRACE,132,130,
HENDON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

31,29, HARGEST Mount Albert


TERRACE,132,130,
HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

MHS, MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

293

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a


MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU, where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a MHS zone. The properties are not adjacent to any
centre. The proposed MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4529

839-4530

839-4531

Western Isthmus Rezone 124,126,


124,126, HENDON Mount Albert
HENDON AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Western Isthmus Rezone 39, HARGEST


TERRACE,142,
HENDON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

39, HARGEST
TERRACE,142,
HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

SH

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

Do not support the change of MHU to THAB zone for 130 MHU
& 132 Hendon Ave. The properties are not surrounding a
TC. Support retention of the MHU zone, properties close
to RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB zone for 29 &
31 Hargest Terrace, support a less intensified zone
change to MHU that will enable intensification in the area
that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood,
close to RFN and provides a transition in density between
THAB and MHS. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support the change of SH to THAB zone for these MHU
properties, support a less intensified zoning change to
MHU that will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood, close to
RFN and provides a transition in density between THAB
and MHS. The property is not adjacent to any centre.
Support rezoning from SH to MHU where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The change of zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support the change from MHU to THAB zone
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as
principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider THAB zone is appropriate.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4532

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,13,15,17,5,7,9,
CASSINO
TERRACE,123,125,
RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,13,15,17,5,7,9, Mount Albert


CASSINO
TERRACE,123,125,
RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 129,131,


RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

129,131,
RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Mount Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 139,137,141,


RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount AlbertHillsborough from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

139,137,141,
RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
AlbertHillsborough

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 150, HENDON


AVENUE,145,
RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

150, HENDON
AVENUE,145,
RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
Albert

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

294

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a


MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4533

THAB

Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a


MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4534

MHS

THAB

Do not support the change of MHS to THAB, support a


MHU
less intensified zoning change to MHU. The properties
are not adjacent to any centre. The proposed MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the existing neighbourhood, close to RFN and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4535

Mount Albert

MHS, MHU

THAB

Do not support the change of MHU to THAB zone for 150 MHU
Hendon Ave. The property is not adjacent to any centre.
Support retention of the MHU zone. The property is close
to RFN and large open spaces. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of MHS to THAB zone for 145
Richardson Rd, support a less intensified zoning change
to MHU that will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood, close to
RFN and provides a transition in density between THAB
and MHS. The change of zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4536

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 159,155,157,


HENDON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

159,155,157,
HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 163, HENDON


AVENUE,161,
RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

163, HENDON
AVENUE,161,
RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 13,15,


DUNKIRK TERRACE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

13,15, DUNKIRK Mount Albert


TERRACE, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone


10,12,14,23,16,8,21,
DUNKIRK TERRACE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,12,14,23,16,8, Mount Albert


21, DUNKIRK
TERRACE, Mount
Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 10,8,4,6,


RANGE VIEW
ROAD,95,97,
RICHARDSON ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,8,4,6, RANGE
VIEW
ROAD,95,97,
RICHARDSON
ROAD, Mount
Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 5,7, RANGE


VIEW ROAD, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5,7, RANGE VIEW Mount Albert


ROAD, Mount
Albert

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

295

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change of MHU to THAB zone. The


No change
properties are not surrounding a TC. Support retention of
the MHU zone, close to RFN. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4537

Mount Albert

MHU

THAB

Do not support the change of MHU to THAB zone. The


No change
properties are not surrounding a TC. Support retention of
the MHU zone, close to RFN. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4538

839-4539

839-4540

839-4541

Mount Albert

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU
located on RFN. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of SH to MHU zone. The properties are


located close to RFN. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4542

839-4543

839-4544

839-4545

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 16, STEWART


ROAD,19,25,21,17,23
, RANGE VIEW ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

16, STEWART
Mount Albert
ROAD,19,25,21,17
,23, RANGE VIEW
ROAD, Mount
Albert

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 38,36,


STEWART ROAD,43,
RANGE VIEW ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

38,36, STEWART Mount Albert


ROAD,43, RANGE
VIEW ROAD,
Mount Albert

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 39,41,


STEWART ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

39,41, STEWART
ROAD, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone


174,168,172,170,
HENDON AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

174,168,172,170, Mount Albert


HENDON
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 182,180,


HENDON
AVENUE,12A,12B,
HALLAM STREET,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

182,180, HENDON Mount Albert


AVENUE,12A,12B,
HALLAM STREET,
Mount Albert

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

296

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because


No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints and Pre-1944 BDC overlay. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. These sites
No change
are affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support flood hazard and 'Pre-1944' Overlay


determing zone outcome (as principle). In accordance
with the Corporation's zoning principles, consider MHU
zone is appropriate.

Do not support flood hazard determing zone outcome (as


principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHU zone is appropriate.
Mount Albert

SH

MHS

MHU

THAB

Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because


No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints and Pre-1944 BDC overlay. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
Do not support change from MHS to THAB zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Do not support 'Pre-1944' Overlay determing zone


outcome (as principle). In accordance with the
Corporation's zoning principles, consider MHU zone is
appropriate.

Meet Criteria
839-4547

MHS

THAB

Do not support change from MHS to THAB zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4548

Western Isthmus Rezone 8,6, HALLAM 8,6, HALLAM


STREET, Mount Albert STREET, Mount
from Mixed Housing Albert
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

MHS

THAB

Do not support change from MHS to THAB zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4549

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


1/5,4/5,3/5,7,9,2/5,
HALLAM STREET,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1/5,4/5,3/5,7,9,2/ Mount Albert


5, HALLAM
STREET, Mount
Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

297

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4550

839-4551

839-4552

839-4553

839-4554

Western Isthmus Rezone 76,74,


76,74, OWAIRAKA Mount Albert
OWAIRAKA AVENUE, AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 68,72,66,70,


MOUNT ROYAL
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

68,72,66,70,
MOUNT ROYAL
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 60,62,64,58,


MOUNT ROYAL
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

60,62,64,58,
MOUNT ROYAL
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 69,65,67,


MOUNT ROYAL
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

69,65,67, MOUNT Mount Albert


ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 38,42,40,


38,42,40, MOUNT Mount Albert
MOUNT ROYAL
ROYAL AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mount
Mount Albert
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

SH

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to THAB zone because


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS. These
sites are affected by the HC and retain the notified SH
zone because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone.
Do not support the change of MHS to MHU zone. These
sites are affected by the HSAs surrounding Owairaka
(Mount Albert). Therefore the application of the MHS
zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas
where a VV would otherwise impose a height limit of
between eight to nine metres and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Do not support character Overlay determing zone outcome
(as principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHS zone is appropriate.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4555

839-4556

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,34,


MOUNT ROYAL
AVENUE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 165,163,
MOUNT ALBERT
ROAD, Mount AlbertRoyal Oak from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,34, MOUNT
ROYAL AVENUE,
Mount Albert

MHS

165,163, MOUNT Mount Albert


ALBERT ROAD,
Mount AlbertRoyal Oak

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 6, VIOLET STREET,
Mount Albert.

6, VIOLET STREET, Mount Albert


Mount Albert.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

298

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change of MHS to MHU zone. These No change


sites are affected by the HSAs surrounding Owairaka
(Mount Albert). Therefore the application of the MHS
zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas
where a VV would otherwise impose a height limit of
between eight to nine metres and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support the change of MHS to MHU zone. These No change


sites are affected by the HSAs surrounding Owairaka
(Mount Albert). Therefore the application of the MHS
zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas
where a VV would otherwise impose a height limit of
between eight to nine metres and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-525

839-7407

839-744

839-7444

839-752

Western Isthmus Rezone 24, RENTON 24, RENTON


ROAD, Mount Albert ROAD, Mount
from Single House to Albert
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


1215, NEW
Housing and
NORTH ROAD,
Apartment Buildings Avondale
at 1215, NEW NORTH
ROAD, AvondaleGrafton.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 38


38 OWAIRAKA
OWAIRAKA AVENUE. AVENUE. Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 5, ASQUITH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert.

Mount Albert

5, ASQUITH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

SH

THAB

MHS

THAB

SH

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

Support retention of SH zone as notified. This site is


No change
affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The properties No change
are located around Mount Albert TC and on RFN. The
retention of notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of the THAB zone. The property is No change
located close to Mount Albert TC and RFN. The retention
of notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

SH

Support

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

Meet Criteria

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7521

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 157 MOUNT


ALBERT ROAD. Mount
Albert-Royal Oak
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

157 MOUNT
ALBERT ROAD,
Mount AlbertRoyal Oak

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 1 ALLENDALE 1 ALLENDALE


ROAD. Mount Albert ROAD. Mount
from Single House to Albert
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

299

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change of MHS to MHU zone. These No change


sites are affected by the HSAs surrounding Owairaka
(Mount Albert). Therefore the application of the MHS
zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas
where a VV would otherwise impose a height limit of
between eight to nine metres and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7572

839-7663

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 46 SEAVIEW 46 SEAVIEW


Mount Albert
TERRACE. Mount
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 1A, 1B


HARLSTON ROAD.
Mount Albert from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 9 LAUREL
STREET. Mount Albert
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

THAB

THAB

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. This site No change


is affected by the HC and retain the notified SH zone
because the outcomes the overlay seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change of MHU to THAB zone. The


No change
properties are not surrounding a TC. Support retention of
the MHU zone, close to RFN. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Do not support character Overlay determing zone outcome
(as principle). In accordance with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider THAB zone is appropriate.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7681

839-7720

839-7724

1A, 1B HARLSTON Mount Albert


ROAD. Mount
Albert

9 LAUREL STREET. Mount Albert


Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 54 HARGEST 54 HARGEST


Mount Albert
TERRACE. Mount
TERRACE, Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. The


No change
property is zoned SH to complement the surrounding
local context and neighbouring street properties. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because
No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHU to THAB zone
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Do not consider that "complementing the wider context"


represents a significant constraint. As such, do not
support retention of SHZ. Consider MHU is appropriate.

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7728

839-7734

839-7742

839-7767

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 27


FONTENOY STREET.
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Western Isthmus Rezone 5, 7 SEGAR


AVENUE. Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 1155 NEW
NORTH ROAD.
Avondale-Grafton
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 144 HENDON
AVENUE. Mount
Albert from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
27 FONTENOY
STREET, Mount
Albert

5, 7 SEGAR
AVENUE. Mount
Albert

LOCALITY

Mount Albert

Mount Albert

1155 NEW NORTH Mount Albert


ROAD, AvondaleGrafton

144 HENDON
AVENUE. Mount
Albert

Mount Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

300

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by the
Pre-1944 BDC and retain the notified zoning because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve area
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU
close to RFN, a large tertiary institute, and Mount Albert
and Point Chevalier TCs. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. The site is
No change
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change from MHU to THAB zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Do not support flood hazard determining zone outcome


(as principle). Consistent with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHU zone is appropriate.

Meet Criteria
839-7859

839-8303

839-870

Western Isthmus Rezone 16


16 NORGROVE
NORGROVE AVENUE. AVENUE. Mount
Mount Albert from
Albert
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Rezone 8 HENDON


8 HENDON
AVENUE. Mount
AVENUE. Mount
Albert from Mixed
Albert
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 20, NORRIE


Suburban at 20,
AVENUE, Mount
NORRIE AVENUE,
Albert.
Mount Albert.

Mount Albert

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHS

Do not support change from SH to MHU zone because


No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The site is also affected by
flooding constraints. The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Support retention of MHS zone
with surrounding neighbourhood built character. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support the retention of MHS zone. The retention of the No change
zone aligns with local context and surrounding
neighbourhood's suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

In accordance with the Corporation's zoning principles,


and submissions seeking wider review of zoning pattern
around the Corporation's sites, consider site is suitable to
be zoned MHU. Do not support flood hazard determining
zone outcome (as principle)

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-889

839-899

839-110

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 12, THOMAS


Urban at 12, THOMAS AVENUE, Mount
AVENUE, Mount
Albert.
Albert.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 6, WOODWARD


Urban at 6,
ROAD, Mount
WOODWARD ROAD, Albert.
Mount Albert.

Mount Albert

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 112, FONTEYN
STREET, Avondale.

112, FONTEYN
Avondale
STREET, Avondale.

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

301

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the MHU zone. The property is No change


located close to RFN. The retention of notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHU for this property,
THAB
support more intensified zoning to THAB. This property is
located close to RFN and Mount Albert TC. Scope to
change the notified zone to proposed THAB zone is
provided by site specific submissions 5277-116 and 5280118 listed in this spreadsheet. The change of zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB zone for this property, MHU
support a less intensified zoning change to MHU zone.
The property is close to RFN but further away from the
TC. Rezoning to MHU is a more appropriate level of
intensification given this area is transitioning away from
the town centre. The change of zone is out of scope,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-1222

839-1223

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


8,2,4,6, DONEGAL Donegal,
Housing and
STREET, Avondale Avondale
Apartment Buildings
at 8,2,4,6, DONEGAL
STREET, Avondale.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 20A, CRAYFORD
STREET,115,
BLOCKHOUSE BAY
ROAD, Avondale.

THAB

20A, CRAYFORD Blockhouse


THAB
STREET,115,
Bay, Avondale
BLOCKHOUSE BAY
ROAD, Avondale

THAB

THAB

Support retention of notified THAB zone. The properties No change


are located close to Avondale TC and RFN. The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. The properties No change
are located close to Avondale TC and RFN. The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1224

839-1233

839-1234

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


9, ELM STREET,84,
ROSEBANK ROAD,
Avondale.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
9, ELM STREET,
Avondale
84, ROSEBANK
ROAD, Avondale

LOCALITY

Avondale

PAUP ZONE

MU

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
11,25,15,21,17,19,3/
13,1/13,2/13, ASH
STREET,10B,10,10A,
CANAL ROAD,
Avondale.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 177,175,
ROSEBANK ROAD,
Avondale.

11,25,15,21,17,19 Avondale
,3/13,1/13,2/13,
Ash Street,
Avondale
10B,10,10A, Canal
Road, Avondale

THAB

177,175,
Avondale
ROSEBANK ROAD,
Avondale.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 65, VICTOR
STREET,153,
ROSEBANK ROAD,
Avondale.

65 VICTOR
Avondale
STREET Avondale,
153 ROSEBANK
ROAD, Avondale

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 67,
Avondale Road,33,35,
Meliora Place,
Avondale.

67, Avondale
Road,33,35,
Meliora Place,
Avondale

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

302

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of MU zone at 9 Elm St and 84 THAB


Rosebank Rd, support a change of zone to THAB. The
properties are located close to the TC zone, but in this
location the land is transitioning away from the centre.
Scope to change to THAB is provided by an area wide
submission #5253-77, refer to Attachments C and D.
Given the block is near to the existing town centre with
its facilities, and this area is close to the RFN, the land is
well suited to provide increased urban living that
increases Auckland's housing capacity and choice. The
rezoning also removes spot zoning in this location, as all
the properties within the block are proposed to change
to THAB zoning. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. The properties No change
are located close to Avondale TC and RFN. The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Do not support retention of THAB zone for this property, MHU


support a less intensified zoning change to MHU zone.
The property is in close to RFN but further away from the
TC. Rezoning to MHU is a more appropriate level of
intensification given this area is transitioning away from
the town centre. The change of zone is out of scope,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-1235

839-1236

Avondale

THAB

MHS

Support retention of notified THAB zone. The properties No change


are located close to Avondale TC and RFN. The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support retention of notified MHS zone. The properties No change


are within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1237

839-166

839-212

839-213

839-2339

839-2343

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 98,96, Canal Road, Avondale


Suburban at 98,96,
Avondale
Canal Road,
Avondale.

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 123, Canal Road,


Suburban at 123,
Avondale
Canal Road,
Avondale.

Avondale

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 9, Meliora Place,


Suburban at 9,
Avondale
Meliora Place,
Avondale.

Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 62, Mead Street,


Suburban at 62,
Avondale
Mead Street,
Avondale.

Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


1831 GREAT NORTH
ROAD. Auckland.

Avondale

1831 GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 29 Mead Street.


Suburban at 29 Mead Avondale
Street. Avondale.

Avondale

MHS

MHS

MU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MU

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of notified MHS zone. The properties


are within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. The property is
within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. Properties are
within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
given the distance to the proposed RFN (Rosebank Rd)
and distance to Avondale Town Centre. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. The property is
within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the notified MU zone at this
property - it is located on the main arterial road, close to
RFN and Avondale TC, and part of the existing
commercial/business corridor to the centre. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

303

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MU

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of notified MHS zone. The property is No change


within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-239

839-2390

839-248

839-259

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at 1833 GREAT


1833, GREAT NORTH NORTH ROAD,
ROAD, Auckland.
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 2/62,
2/60, 2/58, 3/60,
1/62, 1/60, 64, 1/64,
4/60, 3/58, 1/58
EASTDALE ROAD.
Avondale.

LOCALITY

Avondale

2/62, 2/60, 2/58, Eastdale,


3/60, 1/62, 1/60, Avondale
64, 1/64, 4/60,
3/58, 1/58
EASTDALE ROAD.
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 122, Canal Road,


Suburban at 122,
Avondale
Canal Road,
Avondale.

Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 14, ROBERTON


Suburban at 14,
ROAD, Avondale
ROBERTON ROAD,
Avondale.

Roberton,
Avondale

PAUP ZONE

MU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

304

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the notified MU zone at this


No change
property - it is located on the main arterial road, close to
RFN and Avondale TC, and part of the existing
commercial/business corridor to the centre. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified MHS zone. The properties No change


are within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. The property is No change
within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHS zone at this site,
MHU
support a more intensified zoning change to MHU zone
The property is located close to RFN (Great North Rd), an
area of THAB zoning, and Avondale TC. This change is out
of scope, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Zoning of specific properties along Roberton Rd are also
proposed to change to MHU zoning, as an out of scope
change, refer to Attachment F and see Attachment E for
map changes.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support Council on principles of proximity

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2768

839-2771

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


25,15,21,17,19,25A,1
7A, WALSALL
STREET,3/37,3/35,4/3
9,1/35,1/37,1/39,3/3
9,4/35,2/41,4/41,1/4
1,3/41,2/35,2/37,2/3
9, ROSEBANK ROAD,
Avondale from Mixed
Use, Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Western Isthmus Rezone


10,10A,6A,8A,6,8,
BAMFORD
PLACE,1/7,8/7,5/7,7/
7,4/7,6/7,5,3/7,2/7,
RIVERSDALE ROAD,
Avondale from
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Avondale

PAUP ZONE

THAB/ MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

25,15,21,17,19,25
A,17A, WALSALL
STREET, Avondale
GIS to check all
properties listed
3/37,3/35,4/39,1/
35,1/37,1/39,3/39
,4/35,2/41,4/41,1
/41,3/41,2/35,2/3
7,2/39,
ROSEBANK ROAD,
Avondale GIS to
check all
properties listed

10,10A,6A,8A,6,8, Avondale
BAMFORD PLACE,
Avondale
1/7,8/7,5/7,7/7,4/
7,6/7,5,3/7,2/7,
RIVERSDALE
ROAD, Avondale

REASONS

305

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change of MU to THAB zone for


MHS, MU
properties at 3/37, 3/35, 4/39, 1/35, 1/37, 1/39, 3/39,
4/35, 2/41, 4/41, 1/41, 3/41, 2/35, 2/37, 2/39, Rosebank
Road, support retention of the notified MU zone. These
properties are located close to the Avondale TC and RFN
surrounding the commercial business area of the centre.
The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB zone for properties
25,15,21,17,19,25A,17A, Walsall Street, support a less
intensified zoning change to MHS. These sites are
affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and area rezoned MHS
recognising that MHU or THAB is generally incompatible
with the values of the areas that are proposed to be
retained within the Pre-1944 BDC. This change is out of
scope, refer to Attachment F. The change of zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS / THAB THAB

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Oppose

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB and MU zones are appropriate.

Do not support change of MHS to THAB zone for 8A & 10 MHS, MHU
Bamford Place, support less intensified zoning change to
MHU zone. Whilst managing flooding risks on the site
does not require maintaining a MHS zone, the site is not
close to any centre. MHU is more appropriate and
aligned with the surrounding local context. Neighbouring
properties are proposed to change to MHU zone, this is
within scope of submissions listed in Attachment C. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives for the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB zone for 6, 6A,8
Bamford Place and 1/7,8/7,5/7,7/7,4/7,6/7,5,3/7,2/7,
Riversdale Road, Avondale, support a less intensified
zoning change to MHU zone. The sites are not close to
any centre. MHU is more appropriate and aligned with
the surrounding local context. Neighbouring properties
are proposed to change to MHU zone, this is within scope
of submissions listed in this spreadsheet. The rezoning to
MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives for the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to THAB zone for 10A
Bamford Place. Support retention of the notified zone.
The site is affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2772

839-2773

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 15,7A,9A,17A- 15,7A,9A,17AAvondale


17C,9B,9E,9D,15A,9C, 17C,
CANAL ROAD,166,
9B,9E,9D,15A,9C
ROSEBANK
CANAL ROAD,
ROAD,6,4/8,7/8,5/8,4 Avondale
/10,3/10,8/8,2/8,8,5/ 166, ROSEBANK
10,3/8,2/10,1/10,6/8, ROAD, Avondale
RIVERSDALE ROAD, 6,4/8,7/8,5/8,4/1
Avondale from
0,3/10,
Terrace Housing and 8/8,2/8,8,5/10,3/
Apartment Buildings, 8,2/10, 1/10,6/8,
Mixed Housing
RIVERSDALE
Suburban, Single
ROAD, Avondale
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH, MHS,
THAB

Western Isthmus Rezone 9,5,7,


9,5,7, BAMFORD
BAMFORD PLACE,
PLACE, Avondale
Avondale from
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS / THAB THAB

Avondale

THAB

REASONS

306

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support change of SH & MHS to THAB zone for properties THAB


at 6, 4/8, 7/8, 5/8,4/10,3/10, 8/8,2/8,8,5/10,3/8,2/10,
1/10,6/8, Riversdale Road, Avondale and 15,7A,9A,17A17C, 9B,9E,9D,15A,9C CANAL ROAD, where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The properties are located close to the
Avondale town centre and RFN. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 166 Rosebank
Road, Avondale. The property is located near a RFN and
Avondale town centre. The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Do not support change of MHS to THAB zone for 9


MHS, MHU
Bamford Place. Support retention of the notified zone.
The site is affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB zone for 5 & 7 Bamford
Place, support a less intensified zoning change to MHU
zone. The sites are not close to any centre. MHU is more
appropriate and aligned with the surrounding local
context. Neighbouring properties are proposed to change
to MHU zone, this is within scope of submissions listed in
Attachment C. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives for the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-2774

Western Isthmus Rezone 79A,


Avondale
Road,25,27,21,17,23,
19,29,21A, Meliora
Place, Avondale from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

79A, Avondale
Avondale
Road,25,27,21,17,
23,19,29,21A,
Meliora Place,
Avondale

SH/ MHS

MHS

Do not support change of SH to MHS zone for 79A,


SH
Avondale Road and 25,27,21,23,29,21A, Meliora Place,
Avondale. These sites are affected by flooding constraints
and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHS zone for 17 & 19
Meliora Place. The site is affected by flooding constraints
and changing the zone to SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives

MHS

Oppose

Do not support flood hazard determining zone outcome


(as principle). Consistent with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHS zone is appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2882

839-2883

839-2890

839-2955

839-2972

839-2995

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 26,


26, ESMERALDA
ESMERALDA AVENUE, AVENUE,
Avondale from Single Avondale
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

LOCALITY

Avondale

PAUP ZONE

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 56, Maple


56, Maple Street, Avondale
Street, Avondale from Avondale
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 27, WAIRAU


AVENUE, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

27, WAIRAU
AVENUE,
Avondale

Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 48, TARAMEA 48, TARAMEA


Avondale
STREET, Avondale
STREET, Avondale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 7, KENLEY


7, KENLEY PLACE, Avondale
PLACE, Avondale
Avondale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 3, SCEPTRE


3, SCEPTRE PLACE, Avondale
PLACE, Avondale
Avondale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

307

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from SH to MHS zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to MHS zone for this property. The MHS
change of zone aligns with local context, zoning of
properties on the opposite side of the street and
surrounding neighbourhood built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. The whole
street is proposed to change to MHS zone provided by
submission #6432-1. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of MHS to MHU zone for 27 Wairau Ave. MHU
This site is close to RFN, higher density THAB zone along
Rosebank Rd, MU Zone on Ash St and Avondale TC.
Support rezoning to MHU as this will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood and provides a transition of
density between THAB and MHS zones in the area. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Zoning of specific properties along Wairau Ave is also
proposed to change to MHU zone as an out of scope
change, refer to Attachment F and see Attachment E on
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone at this
No change
property. The site is affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH to MHS zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH to MHS zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Oppose

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No identified 'significant constraint' to justify retention of


SH zone. Consistent with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHS zone is appropriate.

Do not support flood hazard determining zone outcome


(as principle). Consistent with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHU zone is appropriate.

No identified 'significant constraint' to justify retention of


SH zone. Consistent with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHS zone is appropriate.

No identified 'significant constraint' to justify retention of


SH zone. Consistent with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHS zone is appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3031

839-3091

839-3106

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 126,


126, Avondale
Avondale Road,
Road, Avondale
Avondale (Auckland)
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

LOCALITY

Avondale

PAUP ZONE

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 60, ORCHARD 60, ORCHARD


Avondale
STREET, Avondale
STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


1/108,5/108,4/108,3/
108,2/108,6/108,108,
102A,102B,106, ASH
STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

1/108,5/108,4/10 Avondale
8,3/108,2/108,6/1
08,108,102A,102B
,106, ASH STREET,
Avondale

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

308

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from SH to MHS zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone - the
No change
properties are not adjacent to any centre or near a RFN.
The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
No identified 'significant constraint' to justify retention of
SH zone. Consistent with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHS zone is appropriate.

MHS

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHS.

Meet Criteria
839-3136

839-3164

Western Isthmus Rezone 23A,23, Canal 23A,23, Canal


Road, Avondale from Road, Avondale
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 5A,5,7,5B,


5A,5,7,5B,
Avondale
WAIRAU AVENUE,
WAIRAU AVENUE,
Avondale from Mixed Avondale
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Support change of MHS to MHU zone for these


MHU
properties. The sites are close to RFN, higher density
THAB zone along Rosebank Rd, and are within walking
distance to Avondale TC and Avondale College. Support
rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the area
that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density between THAB and MHS
zones in the area. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Zoning of specific properties along Canal Rd is also
proposed to change to MHU zone as an out of scope
Support change of MHS to MHU zone for these
MHU
properties. The sites are close to RFN, higher density
THAB zone along Rosebank Rd, MU Zone on Ash St and
Avondale TC. Support rezoning to MHU as this will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood and provides a transition of
density between THAB and MHS zones in the area. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Zoning of specific properties along Wairau Ave is also
proposed to change to MHU zone as an out of scope
change, refer to Attachment F and see Attachment E for
map changes.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3182

839-3192

839-3208

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 31,


31, ESMERALDA
ESMERALDA AVENUE, AVENUE,
Avondale from Single Avondale
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 2,4, BEATRIX 2,4, BEATRIX


STREET, Avondale
STREET
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beatrix,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 101,


101, FONTEYN
Avondale
FONTEYN STREET,
STREET, Avondale
Avondale from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

309

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from SH to MHS zone because No change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone for these
THAB
properties, support more intensified zoning to THAB
zone. These sites are located close to Avondale TC and
RFN (Great North Rd). The scope to change to THAB is
provided by an area-wide submission #5277-374, refer to
Attachment D. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
Do not support change of SH to MHS zone, support more MHU
intensified zoning change to MHU where managing
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. The site is within walking distance and close to
RFN (Rosebank Rd) and close to a large public open space
(Eastdale Reserve). This is an out of scope change that is
part of a wider area that is proposed to be rezoned to
MHU, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives for the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Oppose

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No identified 'significant constraint' to justify retention of


SH zone. Consistent with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHS zone is appropriate.

Support Council's proposed change to MHU.


839-3251

839-3252

Western Isthmus Rezone 18, CRADOCK 18, CRADOCK


Cradock,
STREET, Avondale
STREET, Avondale Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 50,52,


50,52, Avondale
Avondale Road,
Road, Avondale
Avondale (Auckland)
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Avondale

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 138, Canal


138, Canal Road,
Road, Avondale from Avondale
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Avondale

MHU

MHU

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3323

MHS

MHU

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support
Basis of proximity criteria consider MHS appropriate

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3348

839-3368

839-3380

839-343

839-3432

839-3469

839-3522

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 88, ASH


STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
88 ASH STREET,
Avondale

LOCALITY

Avondale

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 26, Maple


26, Maple Street, Avondale
Street, Avondale from Avondale
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 4, NAUMAI


STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4 NAUMAI
Avondale
STREET, Avondale

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 4, Tony Segedin
Drive, Avondale.

4, Tony Segedin
Drive, Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 9,9A,9B,


CRADOCK STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 29, ASH
STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9,9A,9B,
Cradock,
CRADOCK STREET, Avondale
Avondale

MHS

29, ASH STREET,


Avondale

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 121, ASH


STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

121 ASH STREET,


Avondale

Avondale

Avondale

Avondale

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone - the


properties are not adjacent to any centre or near a RFN.
The retention of the notified zone aligns with local
context and maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone in the area. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to MHS zone for this property. The
change of zone aligns with local context, zoning of
properties on the opposite side of the street and
surrounding neighbourhood built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. The whole
street is proposed to change to MHS zone provided by
submission #6432-1. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is
located close to a RFN and higher density THAB zone.
Rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the area
that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density away between THAB and
MHS zones in the area. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone. The property is identified
under the NGC and aligns with the surrounding local
context. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone for 29 Ash St. The
site is located on the RFN, adjacent to higher density
THAB zone and MU zone along Ash St and Avondale TC.
Support rezoning to MHU as this will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood and provides a transition of
density between THAB and MHS zones in the area. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone - the
property is not adjacent to any centre or near a RFN. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

310

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3527

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 64, Avondale 64, Avondale


Road, Avondale
Road, Avondale
(Auckland) from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Avondale

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

311

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3611

839-3643

839-3659

839-3666

839-368

Western Isthmus Rezone 10, CALVIN


10, CALVIN PLACE, Avondale
PLACE, Avondale
Avondale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 64,
BLOCKHOUSE BAY
ROAD, Blockhouse
Bay-Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

64, BLOCKHOUSE Blockhouse


MHS
BAY ROAD,
Bay, Avondale
Blockhouse BayWaterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 51, ORCHARD 51, ORCHARD


Avondale
STREET, Avondale
STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 26, Riversdale 26, Riversdale


Road, Avondale from Road, Avondale
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3, MEAD STREET,
Avondale.

Avondale

3, MEAD STREET, Avondale


Avondale

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support the change from SH to MHS zone because


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone for 64 Blockhouse
Bay Rd. The site is located on the RFN and Avondale TC.
Support rezoning to MHU as this will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood and provides a transition of
density between THAB and MHS zones in the area. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone for this property.
The site is close to RFN, THAB zone along Rosebank Rd
and within walking distance to Avondale TC and large
urban facilities (Avondale College). Rezoning to MHU will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood and provides a transition of
density between THAB and MHS zones. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB zone for this property,
support a less intensified zoning change to MHU zone.
The property is in close to RFN but further away from the
TC. Rezoning to MHU is a more appropriate level of
intensification given this area is transitioning away from
the town centre. The change of zone is out of scope,
refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change
MHS

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

No identified 'significant constraint' to justify retention of


SH zone. Consistent with the Corporation's zoning
principles, consider MHS zone is appropriate.

MHU

No change

Consider appropriate by proximity for MHS


MHU

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3714

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 200,


BLOCKHOUSE BAY
ROAD, Blockhouse
Bay-Waterview from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

200, BLOCKHOUSE Blockhouse


MHU
BAY ROAD,
Bay, Avondale
Blockhouse BayWaterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 9, ORCHARD


STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9, ORCHARD
Avondale
STREET, Avondale

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

312

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of MHU to THAB zone. Retention No change


of MHU along Blockhouse Bay Rd provides a transition in
density between the THAB and MHS zones located in this
area. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3737

839-376

839-3830

839-3866

839-3867

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 51, EASTDALE


Suburban at 51,
ROAD, Avondale
EASTDALE ROAD,
Avondale.

Eastdale,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 1742, GREAT 1742, GREAT


NORTH ROAD,
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland from Mixed Avondale
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Great North
Rd, Avondale

MHS

MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 51, Maple


51, Maple Street, Avondale
Street, Avondale from Avondale
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 44, Maple


44, Maple Street, Avondale
Street, Avondale from Avondale
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

MHU

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHS

Support change of MHS to MHU zone for this property.


The site is close to RFN and large open spaces. Rezoning
to MHU will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density between THAB and MHS
zones. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support retention of notified MHS zone. The property is
within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The site is located
on the RFN and Avondale TC. Support rezoning to MHU
as this will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density between THAB and MHS
zones in the area. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to MHS zone for this property. The
change of zone aligns with local context, zoning of
properties on the opposite side of the street and
surrounding neighbourhood built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. The whole
street is proposed to change to MHS zone provided by
submission #6432-1. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

MHU

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3920

839-4157

839-4160

839-4161

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 19, BEATRIX


STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

19, BEATRIX
Beatrix,
STREET, Avondale Avondale

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 24,26,


24,26, DONEGAL Donegal,
DONEGAL STREET,
STREET, Avondale Avondale
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 1825,1827,


GREAT NORTH
ROAD,3-5,
COMMUNITY LANE,
Auckland from
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings
to Mixed Use.

THAB/ MU

1825,1827, GREAT Avondale


NORTH ROAD,
Avondale & 3-5
COMMUNITY
LANE, Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 19,21,


19,21, ROBERTON Roberton,
ROBERTON ROAD,
ROAD, Avondale Avondale
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MU

REASONS

313

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the change of MHS to MHU zone. The site is


MHU
located close to the RFN (Great North Road), an area of
higher density THAB zoning, and Avondale TC. The
change to MHU provides a transition in density between
THAB and MHS zones. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Zoning of specific
properties along Beatrix St are also proposed to change
to MHU zone as an out of scope change, refer to
Attachment F and see Attachment E for map changes.
Support the change of MHU to THAB zone. These
THAB
properties are located close to the RFN, an area of higher
density THAB zoning on the opposite side of the road,
and Avondale TC. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS Objectives and Policies. Zoning of
specific properties along Donegal St is also proposed to
change to MHU zone as an out of scope change, refer to
Attachment F and see Attachment E for map changes.
Support change of THAB to MU zone. The properties are MU
located adjacent to Avondale TC and on the RFN. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
The impact of reduced residential density from the
rezoning from THAB to MU can be compensated in part
by applying an Additional Zone Height Control (AZHC) to
this MU area of 21m. Previously no AZHC was applied
when the properties were zoned THAB. Adjacent
properties not subject to this submission are also
proposed to change to MU zone with the AZHC as an out
of scope change, refer to Attachment F.

MHS

MHU

Support the change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is MHU


located close to the RFN (Great North Road), an area of
higher density THAB zoning, and Avondale TC. The
rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the area
that provides a transition in density between THAB and
MHS zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Zoning of specific properties along Roberton Rd is also
proposed to change to MHU zone as an out of scope
change, refer to Attachment F and see Attachment E for

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4162

839-4163

839-4164

839-4165

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 9,5,7, PLANE


STREET,8,12, BEATRIX
STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

9,5,7, PLANE
STREET,8,12,
BEATRIX STREET,
Avondale

Beatrix,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone


15A,2/13,13,15,13A,
CRADOCK STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 24,22,
CRADOCK STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 24,26,
ROBERTON ROAD,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

15A,2/13,13,15,1 Cradock,
3A, CRADOCK
Avondale
STREET, Avondale

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

REASONS

314

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of MHS to THAB zone for these


MHU
properties, support less intensified zoning to MHU zone.
These sites are located close to RFN (Great North Rd),
THAB zoning and adjacent to large urban facility
(Avondale College). The proposed MHU zone provides an
appropriate transition between THAB and MHS that
aligns with local context. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
24,22, CRADOCK Cradock,
STREET, Avondale Avondale

24,26, ROBERTON Roberton,


ROAD
Avondale

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is MHU
located close to the RFN (Great North Road), an area of
higher density THAB zoning, and Avondale TC. The
rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the area
that provides a transition in density between THAB and
MHS zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Zoning of specific properties along Roberton Rd is also
proposed to change to MHU zone as an out of scope
change, refer to Attachment F and see Attachment E for

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4166

839-4167

839-4195

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


1719,1717,1715,
GREAT NORTH
ROAD,6A,6,
GLENDON
AVENUE,5/3,1/3,7A,4
/3,1,3/3,5,7,6/3,2/3,5
A, BEATRIX STREET,
Auckland from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1719,1717,1715, Beatrix,
GREAT NORTH
Avondale
ROAD,6A,6,
GLENDON
AVENUE,5/3,1/3,7
A,4/3,1,3/3,5,7,6/
3,2/3,5A, BEATRIX
STREET

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

This submission is supported in part. See W14 revised


zoning map in Attachment E.

315

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

26,26A,
Blockhouse
MHS
BLOCKHOUSE BAY Bay, Avondale
ROAD, Blockhouse
Bay-Waterview

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone


1/44A,3/44A,2/44A,
TARAMEA
STREET,55,47,57,2/45
,53,1/45,3/45,4/45,5/
45, Riversdale Road,
Avondale from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1/44A,3/44A,2/44 Avondale
A, TARAMEA
STREET,55,47,57,2
/45,53,1/45,3/45,
4/45,5/45,
Riversdale Road,
Avondale

MHU

SH

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS, THAB

Support change of MHS to THAB zone at 1719,1717,1715,


Great North Rd and 5/3, 1/3, 7A, 4/3, 1, 3/3, 5, 7, 6/3,
2/3, 5A Beatrix St. These properties are located on or
near RFN (Great North Rd) and are in close proximity to
Avondale TC. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Western Isthmus Rezone 26,26A,


BLOCKHOUSE BAY
ROAD, Blockhouse
Bay-Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support change of MHS to THAB at 6 & 6A


Glendon Rd. These sites are affected by the Pre-1944
BDC and are rezoned MHS recognising that MHU or THAB
is generally incompatible with the values of the areas
that are proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944
BDC. The change of zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU
located on the RFN and Avondale TC. Support rezoning to
MHU as this will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density between THAB and MHS
zones in the area. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone at these
No change
properties. These sites are affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support in part

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Consider zoning transition is appropriate for MHU (edge of
proximity criteria) - do not support flood hazard dictating
zoning

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4196

839-4197

839-4198

839-4199

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone


25,26,27,20,21,23,28,
29,40,3,5,4,7,6,9,8,38
,11,10,13,12,14,17,16
,19,18,31,30,37,36,35
,34,33,32,
BELLGROVE
PLACE,38,40B,40A,18
,42,40,1/3236/32,18A, WAIRAU
AVENUE,2/60,3/60,1/
60,70,68,4/60,
Riversdale Road,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban
and Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

25,26,27,20,21,23 Avondale
,28,29,40,3,5,4,7,
6,9,8,38,11,10,13,
12,14,17,16,19,18
,31,30,37,36,35,3
4,33,32,
BELLGROVE
PLACE,38,40B,40A
,18,42,40,1/3236/32,18A,
WAIRAU
AVENUE,2/60,3/6
0,1/60,70,68,4/60
, Riversdale Road,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 38,40,


Riversdale
Road,47,47A,
WAIRAU AVENUE,
Avondale from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,40, Riversdale Avondale


Road,47,47A,
WAIRAU AVENUE,
Avondale

SH/ MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone at 42 Wairau


Ave. This site is affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone for the


remaining properties. The sites are not adjacent to any
centre or near a RFN. The retention of the zone aligns
with the surrounding neighbourhood and local context.
The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Site meets proximity criteria (when considering whole


development block) and comprehensive scale of site.
consider flooding constraints can be managed by
development controls and does not justify downzoning
one 'lot' within development block.

Western Isthmus Rezone


27,29,2/29,3/29,
27,29,2/29,3/29,
Canal Road,
Canal Road, Avondale Avondale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,13,14,2/9,5,7,9,1/
11,2/5,2/7, NAUMAI
STREET,41, ASH
STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

316

Avondale

11,13,14,2/9,5,7,9 Avondale
,1/11,2/5,2/7,
NAUMAI STREET,
Avondale
41 ASH STREET,
Avondale

SH

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone at these


No change
properties. These sites are affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of SH to MHU zone, where managing


MHU
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The sites are close to the RFN and THAB zone
along Rosebank Rd, and within walking distance to
Avondale TC. They are also within walking distance to
the entrance to Avondale College. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. Adjacent
properties not subject to this submission are also
proposed to change to MHU zone as an out of scope
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU
located close to a RFN and higher density THAB zone.
Rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the area
that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density away between THAB and
MHS zones in the area. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Site meets proximity criteria (when considering whole


development block) and comprehensive scale of site.
consider flooding constraints can be managed by
development controls and does not justify downzoning
one 'lot' within development block.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4200

839-4201

839-4202

839-4203

839-4204

839-4205

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 2/8,10,8,


2/8,10,8, NAUMAI Avondale
NAUMAI STREET,
STREET, Avondale
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


60,62,56,64,58,
TARAMEA STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 68,74,72,70,
TARAMEA STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

60,62,56,64,58,
Avondale
TARAMEA
STREET, Avondale

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 5, KIRITOA


STREET,57,59,
TARAMEA STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
1/32,34A,30,36,34,38
,2/38,2/30,2/32,
ORCHARD
STREET,51,53,2/51,
TARAMEA
STREET,4,2/6,6,
KIRITOA STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 43,41,
TARAMEA STREET,
Avondale from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, KIRITOA
Avondale
STREET,57,59,
TARAMEA
STREET, Avondale

MHS

1/32,34A,30,36,3 Avondale
4,38,2/38,2/30,2/
32, ORCHARD
STREET,51,53,2/5
1, TARAMEA
STREET,4,2/6,6,
KIRITOA STREET,
Avondale

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

317

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


located close to a RFN and higher density THAB zone.
Rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the area
that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density away between THAB and
MHS zones in the area. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
68,74,72,70,
Avondale
TARAMEA
STREET, Avondale

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Consider zoning transition is appropriate for MHU (edge of
proximity criteria) - do not support flood hazard dictating
zoning

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

43,41, TARAMEA Avondale


STREET, Avondale

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone at these


No change
properties. These sites are affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

Consider zoning transition is appropriate for MHU (edge of


proximity criteria) - do not support flood hazard dictating
zoning
Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of
proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4206

839-4207

839-4208

839-4209

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


48,46,54,44,42,50,52,
ORCHARD
STREET,1,1A-1C,
KIRITOA STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

48,46,54,44,42,50 Avondale
,52, ORCHARD
STREET,1,1A-1C,
KIRITOA STREET,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 46,44,50,48, 46,44,50,48, Canal Avondale


Canal Road, Avondale Road, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

SH/ MHS

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 145A,145B, 145A,145B,


Avondale
ROSEBANK ROAD,
ROSEBANK ROAD,
Avondale from Single Avondale
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,9,13,


ASPEN STREET,40,
VICTOR STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

11,9,13, ASPEN
STREET,40,
VICTOR STREET,
Avondale

Aspen,
Avondale

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change of SH & MHS to MHU zone for


these properties, support less intensified zoning change
to MHS. For some properties, this would result in the
retention of the notified MHS zone. For the properties
notified as SH zone, the change to MHS is proposed,
where managing flooding risks on those sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone or although the SH zone
could be retained due to the sites being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management or resources and does not
recognise the local context. The change to MHS will align
with the surrounding local context. See Attachment E on
map changes. This rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone for these
properties. The sites are close to RFN, higher density
THAB zone along Rosebank Rd, and are within walking
distance to Avondale TC and Avondale College. Rezoning
to MHU will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density between THAB and MHS
zones in the area. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Zoning of specific properties along Canal Rd is also
proposed to change to MHU zone as an out of scope
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone for these
properties, support more intensified zoning change to
THAB, where managing flooding risks on those sites does
not require maintaining a SH zone. The properties are
located on a RFN, close to Avondale TC and higher
density THAB zoning. The change to THAB zone is within
scope of submissions 5277-375, 5277-374, 5280-376,
referred in Attachment C. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
Support the change of MHS to THAB zone for these
properties. The properties are located close to RFN,
Avondale TC, Avondale College, and large open spaces.
The change to THAB will enable intensification in the area
and zoning to these properties will align with local
context and zoning on the other side of the street. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Zoning of specific properties along Aspen and Victor
Streets are also proposed to change to MHU zone as an
out of scope change, refer to Attachment F and see
Attachment E for map changes.

318

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

THAB

THAB

Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of


proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and
other facilties in area (including open space and education)
as well as topography of area mean a more comprehensive
inclusion of MHU (to reserve) is appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4210

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone


41B,39,35C,35B,35A,
41C,33,31,37,43,35,4
1,31A,41A, VICTOR
STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

41B,39,35C,35B,3 Victor,
5A,41C,33,31,37,4 Avondale
3,35,41,31A,41A,
VICTOR STREET,
Avondale

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

319

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of MHS to THAB zone for these


MHU
properties, support less intensified zoning to MHU zone.
These sites are located close to RFN (Great North Rd),
THAB zoning and adjacent to large urban facility
(Avondale College). The proposed MHU zone provides an
appropriate transition between THAB and MHS that
aligns with local context. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

Consider meets proximity criteria but provides appropriate


transition
839-4211

839-4212

839-4213

839-4214

Western Isthmus Rezone


25,27,27A,31,25A,29,
29A,31A, ORCHARD
STREET,15, OREGON
AVENUE, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25,27,27A,31,25A, Avondale
29,29A,31A,
ORCHARD
STREET,15,
OREGON AVENUE,
Avondale

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone


37A,37B,37,35,
ORCHARD STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 10, MAIRE
STREET,45,43,41,
ORCHARD STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 6A,6B,6,
OREGON AVENUE,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

37A,37B,37,35,
Avondale
ORCHARD STREET,
Avondale

MHS

10, MAIRE
Avondale
STREET,45,43,41,
ORCHARD STREET,
Avondale

MHS

6A,6B,6, OREGON Avondale


AVENUE,
Avondale

SH/ MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone - the


properties are not adjacent to any centre or near a RFN.
The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone for the 6 & 6B SH
Oregon Ave. These sites are affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHS zone for 6 Oregon Ave.
The site is affected by flooding constraints and changing
the zone to SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS. The change to SH zone is within scope of
submission 5716-2801, referred in Attachment C.

MHU

Oppose

Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of


proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and
other facilties in area (including open space and education)
as well as topography of area mean a more comprehensive
inclusion of MHU (to reserve) is appropriate.
Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of
proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and
other facilties in area (including open space and education)
Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of
proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and
other facilties in area (including open space and education)

Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of


proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and
other facilties in area (including open space and education)
as well as topography of area mean a more comprehensive
inclusion of MHU (to reserve) is appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4215

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 60,62,58,


Avondale Road,4,
MAIRE STREET,
Avondale from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

60,62,58,
Avondale
Avondale Road,4,
MAIRE STREET,
Avondale

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

320

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

839-4217

839-4218

Western Isthmus Rezone


59,61,63,65,67,69,
Maple Street,68,
Avondale Road,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
90B,90F,90D,90C,90E
,88C,88B,88A,90A,88
G,88F,88E,88D,88K,8
8J,88I,88H,90,90G,
EASTDALE ROAD,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

59,61,63,65,67,69 Avondale
, Maple Street,68,
Avondale Road,
Avondale

MHS

90B,90F,90D,90C, Eastdale,
90E,88C,88B,88A, Avondale
90A,88G,88F,88E,
88D,88K,88J,88I,8
8H,90,90G,
EASTDALE ROAD,
Avondale

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, OREGON


AVENUE,38,42,40,
Avondale Road,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1, OREGON
Avondale
AVENUE,38,42,40,
Avondale Road,
Avondale

SH/ MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone for these


MHS
properties, support a less intensified zoning change to
MHS. Whilst managing flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone, the site is not close to RFN
and MHS is more appropriate and aligned with the
surrounding local context. The rezoning to MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives for the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Adjacent properties 2A, 2B Maire St are proposed to
change to MHS zone and identified as out of scope
change, refer to Attachment F. Although the SH zone
could be retained due to the sites being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management or resources and does not
recognise the local context.

839-4216

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

MHU

Support

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of


proximity criteria .
Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of
proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and
other facilties in area (including open space and education)
as well as topography of area mean a more comprehensive

Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of


proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and
other facilties in area (including open space and education)
as well as topography of area mean a more comprehensive
inclusion of MHU (to reserve) is appropriate.

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone at 1 Oregon


No change
Ave and 38, 40 Avondale Rd. These sites are affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone for 42
Avondale Rd. The site is not adjacent to any centre or
near a RFN. The retention of the zone for this property
aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood and local
context. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of


proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and
other facilties in area (including open space and education)
as well as topography of area mean a more comprehensive
inclusion of MHU (to reserve) is appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4219

839-4220

839-425

839-451

839-485

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone


46A,48B,48A,46B, Holly, Avondale MHS
46A,48B,48A,46B,
HOLLY STREET,
HOLLY STREET,
Avondale
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

THAB

Western Isthmus Rezone 8,8A,


8,8A, WAIRAU
WAIRAU AVENUE,
AVENUE,
Avondale from Mixed Avondale
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Avondale

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 22, Tony Segedin
Drive, Avondale.

Avondale

22, Tony Segedin


Drive, Avondale

MHS

SH

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 10, Meliora Place, Avondale


Suburban at 10,
Avondale
Meliora Place,
Avondale.

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 92, FONTEYN


Avondale
Suburban at 92,
STREET, Avondale
FONTEYN STREET,
Avondale.

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

REASONS

321

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from MHS to THAB zone


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone for these


properties. The sites are close to RFN, higher density
THAB zone along Rosebank Rd, MU Zone on Ash St and
Avondale TC. Support rezoning to MHU as this will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood and provides a transition of
density between THAB and MHS zones in the area. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Zoning of specific properties along Wairau Ave are also
proposed to change to MHU zone as an out of scope
Support retention of notified SH zone. The property is
within an area proposed to be retained as SH zone to
align with local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. Properties are
within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
given the distance to the proposed RFN (Rosebank Rd)
and distance to Avondale Town Centre. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support retention of MHS zone, support a more
intensified zoning change to MHU zone. The property is
close to RFN (Rosebank Rd), and to a large recreational
reserve (Eastdale Reserve). The rezoning to MHU
provides for a more appropriate level of intensification in
the area. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS. This is an out of scope change, refer to
Attachment F.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of


proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and
other facilties in area (including open space and education)
as well as topography of area mean a more comprehensive
inclusion of MHU (to reserve) is appropriate.

MHU

No change

No change

MHU

Zoning of specific properties within the wider area are


also proposed to change to MHU zoning, as an out of
scope change, refer to Attachment F and see Attachment
E for map changes.
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4945

839-537

839-552

839-556

839-586

839-591

839-599

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 37,


BLOCKHOUSE BAY
ROAD, Blockhouse
Bay-Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37, BLOCKHOUSE Blockhouse


MHS
BAY ROAD,
Bay, Avondale
Blockhouse BayWaterview

MHU

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 165, Riversdale
Road, Avondale.

165, Riversdale
Road, Avondale

SH

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 39, Tony Segedin
Drive, Avondale.

39, Tony Segedin


Drive, Avondale

Avondale

Avondale

SH

SH

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 39, Maple Street, Avondale


Suburban at 39,
Avondale
Maple Street,
Avondale.

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 2, BURNSALL
PLACE,10, Maple
Street, Avondale.

SH

2, BURNSALL
PLACE,10, Maple
Street, Avondale

Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 27, CRAYFORD
STREET, Avondale.

27, CRAYFORD
Crayford,
STREET, Avondale Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Town Centre


at 10-22,
RACECOURSE
PARADE, Avondale.

10-22,
RACECOURSE
PARADE,
Avondale

Avondale

THAB

TC

SH

MHS

SH

THAB

TC

REASONS

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The site is located


on the RFN and Avondale TC. Support rezoning to MHU
as this will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density between THAB and MHS
zones in the area. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone. The property is
within an area proposed to be retained as SH zone to
align with local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone. The property is identified
under the NGC and aligns with the surrounding local
context. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. The property is
within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
intensified zoning change to MHS. The change of zone
aligns with local context, zoning of properties on the
opposite side of the street and surrounding
neighbourhood built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Scope to change to MHS zone is
provided by a street-wide submission #6432-1 that seeks
MHS zone for whole of Maple St. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. The property is
located close to Avondale TC and RFN. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

322

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

MHS

Meets proximity criteria


No change

Support retention of the notified TC zone at this property No change


- it is located in close proximity to the main arterial road,
is part of the existing commercial/business centre of
Avondale and is providing the focus for commercial
activities to the TC. The property also has good access to
the RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the TC zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

TC

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-607

839-638

839-653

839-655

839-689

839-698

839-712

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 7, ASH STREET,
Avondale.
Western Isthmus Retain Single House
at 2, KORCULA PLACE,
Avondale.

7 ASH STREET,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 5, Tony Segedin
Drive, Avondale.

5, Tony Segedin
Drive, Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 24, Tony Segedin
Drive, Avondale.

24, Tony Segedin


Drive, Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 5A,5B, HENRY
STREET, Avondale.

5A,5B HENRY
Avondale
STREET, Avondale

2, KORCULA
PLACE, Avondale

Avondale

Avondale

Avondale

Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 89, Avondale


Suburban at 89,
Road, Avondale
Avondale Road,
Avondale (Auckland).

Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 141, Avondale


Suburban at 141,
Road, Avondale
Avondale Road,
Avondale (Auckland).

Avondale

PAUP ZONE

THAB

SH

SH

SH

THAB

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

SH

SH

SH

THAB

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of notified THAB zone. The property is


located close to Avondale TC and RFN. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone. The property is
within an area proposed to be retained as SH zone to
align with local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone. The property is
within an area proposed to be retained as SH zone to
align with local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone. The property is
within an area proposed to be retained as SH zone to
align with local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB zone for 5A & 5B
Henry St, support a less intensified zoning change to MHS
zone. The sites fronting the road are affected by the Pre1944 BDC and are rezoned MHS recognising that THAB or
MHU is generally incompatible with the values of the
areas that are proposed to be retained within the Pre1944 BDC. This site is at the rear of the properties
fronting Henry St affected by the Pre-1944 BDC. To avoid
spot zoning and recognise local context, these properties
are proposed to MHS zoning. The change of zone is
within scope of an area-wide submission #9213-21, refer
to Attachment D. The change of zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. Properties are
within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
given the distance to the proposed RFN (Rosebank Rd)
and distance to Avondale Town Centre. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. The property is
within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

323

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
THAB

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

MHS

Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not


support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.
No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-730

839-7479

839-7525

839-7529

839-753

839-755

839-7555

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 159, ROSEBANK
ROAD, Avondale.

159 ROSEBANK
ROAD, Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 34 WAIRAU


AVENUE. Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34 WAIRAU
AVENUE.
Avondale

LOCALITY

Avondale

Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 16 ORCHARD 16 ORCHARD


Avondale
STREET. Avondale
STREET. Avondale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

THAB

MHS

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 38 HOLLY


STREET. Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38 HOLLY STREET. Holly, Avondale MHS


Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 25, CRAYFORD
STREET, Avondale.

25, CRAYFORD
Crayford,
STREET, Avondale Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 3, COLORADO


Suburban at 3,
PLACE, Avondale
COLORADO PLACE,
Avondale.

Colorado,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 12 CALVIN


12 CALVIN PLACE, Avondale
PLACE. Avondale
Avondale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

THAB

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHS

MHS

REASONS

324

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone. The property is No change


located close to Avondale TC and RFN. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone at this
No change
property. The site is affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support the change of MHS to MHU zone. The property is MHU
located close to the RFN (Great North Road), large urban
facilities, large open space and Avondale TC. The
rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the area
that provides a transition in density between THAB and
MHS zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Adjacent properties along Holly St are also proposed to
change to MHU zoning as an out of scope change, refer
Support retention of notified THAB zone. The property is No change
located close to Avondale TC and RFN. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. The property is No change
within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH to MHS zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of
proximity criteria (when considering whole development
block) and comprehensive scale of site. consider flooding
constraints can be managed by development controls and
does not justify downzoning one 'lot' within development
block, however consider scale of Corporation stock and

Meets proximity criteria for MHU, submission recognised


local context and support MHS zone

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7593

839-760

839-7627

839-7746

839-7892

839-7947

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 25, 25A Canal 25, 25A Canal


Road. Avondale from Road. Avondale
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 2, Maple
Street,157, Riversdale
Road, Avondale.

2, Maple
Street,157,
Riversdale Road,
Avondale

LOCALITY

Avondale

Avondale

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 3 OREGON


3 OREGON
Avondale
AVENUE. Avondale
AVENUE Avondale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 19 GLENDON 19 GLENDON


AVENUE. Avondale
AVENUE.
from Mixed Housing Avondale
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glendon,
Avondale

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 39


BLOCKHOUSE BAY
ROAD. Blockhouse
Bay-Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Blockhouse
MHS
Bay, Avondale

39 BLOCKHOUSE
BAY ROAD
Blockhouse BayWaterview

Western Isthmus Rezone 14 CALVIN


14 CALVIN PLACE, Avondale
PLACE. Avondale
Avondale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

325

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone for these


MHU
properties. The sites are close to RFN, higher density
THAB zone along Rosebank Rd, and are within walking
distance to Avondale TC and Avondale College. Support
rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the area
that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density between THAB and MHS
zones in the area. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Zoning of specific properties along Canal Rd is also
proposed to change to MHU zone as an out of scope
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
MHS
intensified zoning change to MHS. The change of zone
aligns with local context, zoning of properties on the
opposite side of the street and surrounding
neighbourhood built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Scope to change to MHS zone is
provided by a street-wide submission #6432-1 that seeks
MHS zone for whole of Maple St. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHS zone at this
No change
property. The site is affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from MHS to MHU zone
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The site is located MHU
on the RFN and Avondale TC. Support rezoning to MHU
as this will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood and
provides a transition of density between THAB and MHS
zones in the area. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH to MHS zone because No change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proximity criteria

MHS

Oppose
Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of
proximity criteria .

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose
Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of
proximity criteria .

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-821

839-825

839-8295

839-867

839-936

839-1218

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at


16, GEDDES
TERRACE,8, ST JUDE
STREET, Avondale.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
16 GEDDES
TERRACE 8 ST
JUDE STREET,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 43, Avondale


Suburban at 43,
Road, Avondale
Avondale Road,
Avondale (Auckland).

LOCALITY

Avondale

Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 120, 122A


ASH STREET.
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 1/9610/96, Riversdale
Road, Avondale.

120, 122A ASH


Avondale
STREET Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 20, WALSALL
STREET, Avondale.

20, WALSALL
Avondale
STREET, Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 144,142,
METHUEN ROAD,
New Windsor.

PAUP ZONE

MU

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of the notified MU zone at this


property - it is located in close proximity to Avondale TC
and the RFN and is part of the existing
business/commercial corridor to the centre. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

326

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Support retention of notified MHS zone. The property is No change


within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone - the
No change
properties are not adjacent to any centre or near a RFN.
The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

1/96-10/96,
Riversdale Road,
Avondale

Avondale

144,142,
Methuen,
METHUEN ROAD, Avondale
New Windsor

MHS

THAB

SH

MHS

THAB

SH

Support retention of notified MHS zone. The properties No change


are within an area proposed to be retained as MHS zone,
aligning with the surrounding local context and suburban
built character of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB zone for 20 Walsall St, MHS
support a less intensified zoning change to MHS zone.
The site is affected by the Pre-1944 BDC and are rezoned
MHS recognising that THAB or MHU is generally
incompatible with the values of the areas that are
proposed to be retained within the Pre-1944 BDC. The
change of zone is within scope of an area-wide
submission #9213-21, refer to Attachment D. The change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
MHS
intensified zoning change to MHS at 144, 142 Methuen
Rd. The change of zone will enable intensification in the
area that aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood
built form of predominantly one-two storey buildings.
Scope to change to MHS for this site and specific
properties along Methuen Rd is provided by submission
#5277-382, refer to Attachment D. The rezoning to MHS
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose
Do not support the Pre-1944 Overlay. Further, do not
support the need for this Overlay to predetermine
appropriat land uses. By proximity to Centre and FN
consider THAB zone appropriate.

MHS

Support

Meets proximity criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1219

839-1220

839-1221

839-1225

839-1226

839-1227

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
6/56,10/56,2/56,9/56
,1/56,8/56,7/56,4/56,
3/56,11/56,5/56, ST
GEORGES ROAD,
Avondale.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
102,104A,102A,104,
ST GEORGES ROAD,
Avondale.

6/56,10/56,2/56,9 St Georges,
/56,1/56,8/56,7/5 Avondale
6,4/56,3/56,11/56
,5/56, ST
GEORGES ROAD,
Avondale

THAB

102,104A,102A,10 St Georges,
4, ST GEORGES
Avondale
ROAD, Avondale

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 50,50A, ST
GEORGES ROAD,
Avondale.

50,50A, ST
GEORGES ROAD,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 69, MULGAN
STREET, New
Windsor.

69, MULGAN
STREET, New
Windsor

St Georges,
Avondale

Mulgan New
Windsor

THAB

SH

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 174,172, WHITNEY
STREET, New
Windsor-Blockhouse
Bay.

174,172,
Whitney,
SH
WHITNEY STREET, Blockhouse Bay
New WindsorBlockhouse Bay

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
18,12,14,16,
HERTFORD STREET,
Blockhouse Bay.

18,12,14,16,
HERTFORD
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

Hertford
MHS
Blockhouse Bay

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

SH

SH

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of notified THAB zone at the specific


properties along St Georges Rd. The properties are close
to both the New Lynn MC and Avondale TC with close
access to RFN and future walking and cycling
infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor cycleway)
and employment centres (town centres and light
industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at the specific
properties along St Georges Rd. The properties are close
to both the New Lynn MC and Avondale TC with close
access to RFN and future walking and cycling
infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor cycleway)
and employment centres (town centres and light
industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
Support retention of notified THAB zone at the specific
properties along St Georges Rd. The properties are close
to both the New Lynn MC and Avondale TC with close
access to RFN and future walking and cycling
infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor cycleway)
and employment centres (town centres and light
industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
intensified zoning change to MHS at 69 Mulgan St. The
change of zone will enable intensification in the area that
aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built form of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. Scope to
change to MHS is provided by submission #5277-386,
refer to Attachment D. The rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
intensified zoning change to MHS at 174, 172 Mulgan St.
The change of zone will enable intensification in the area
that aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings. Scope
to change to MHS is provided by submission #5277-386,
refer to Attachment D. The rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone at these
properties. MHS aligns with the surrounding local context
and properties are not close to any TC zone and RFN. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives

327

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

MHS

Meets proximity criteria


MHS

MHS

Support

Meets proximity criteria


No change
MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1228

839-1229

839-1231

839-1232

839-1518

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 18,16A-16B,
VALONIA STREET,
New Windsor.

18,16A-16B,
Roseville/Valon THAB
VALONIA STREET, ia New
New Windsor
Windsor

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24A,24B, VALONIA
STREET,23,
ROSEVILLE
STREET,19,13,13A,
NETHERTON STREET,
New Windsor.

24A,24B,
Roseville/Valon THAB
VALONIA
ia New
STREET,23,
Windsor
ROSEVILLE
STREET,19,13,13A
, NETHERTON
STREET, New
Windsor

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 16, BOLTON
STREET,138,140,
TAYLOR STREET,
Blockhouse Bay.

16, BOLTON
STREET,138,140,
TAYLOR STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

Bolton,
THAB
Blockhouse Bay

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Single House


at 235,237,239,
WHITNEY STREET,60,
EXMINSTER STREET,
Blockhouse Bay.

235,237,239,
WHITNEY
STREET,60,
EXMINSTER
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay.

Whitney,
SH
Blockhouse Bay

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 6, HERTFORD


Suburban at 6,
STREET,
HERTFORD STREET, Blockhouse Bay
Blockhouse Bay.

Hertford
MHS
Blockhouse Bay

THAB

SH

MHS

REASONS

328

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB. This site is within a THAB


No change
area, within easy walking distance of an RTN (Maioro St)
and the Town Centre zone on Stoddard Rd. Accordingly,
THAB is considered the most appropriate zone to achieve
the objectives for residential zones and give effect to the
Regional Policy Statement.
Support retention of THAB. This site is within a THAB
No change
area, within easy walking distance of an RTN (Maioro St)
and the Town Centre zone on Stoddard Rd. Accordingly,
THAB is considered the most appropriate zone to achieve
the objectives for residential zones and give effect to the
Regional Policy Statement.

Support retention of notified THAB zone. These sites are No change


adjacent to the Blockhouse Bay LC, close to RFN and part
of the higher density THAB zoning around the LC. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support retention of SH, support more intensified MHU


zoning change to MHU zone. The sites are close to an
RTN (Donovan St), large open space (Blockhouse Bay
Recreational Reserve) and within easy walking distance
of Blockhouse Bay LC zone. The change of zone will
enable intensification in the area. Scope to change to
MHU zone is provided by submission #5277-386, refer to
Attachment D. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU and gives effect to
Support retention of notified MHS zone. The property is No change
within an area of MHS zone that aligns with the
neighbourhood built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proximity criteria

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-159

839-170

839-171

839-2232

839-2238

839-2384

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Single House 204, METHUEN


at 204, METHUEN
ROAD, New
ROAD, New Windsor. Windsor.

LOCALITY

Methuen,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 92A,92, ST
GEORGES ROAD,
Avondale.

92A,92, ST
GEORGES ROAD,
Avondale

St Georges,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 94B,94, ST
GEORGES ROAD,
Avondale.

94B,94, ST
GEORGES ROAD,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 18, WINGATE
STREET, Avondale.

18, WINGATE
Wingate,
STREET, Avondale Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 98, ST GEORGES
ROAD, Avondale.

98, ST GEORGES
ROAD, Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 110 ST GEORGES
ROAD. Avondale.

110 ST GEORGES
ROAD. Avondale

St Georges,
Avondale

St Georges,
Avondale

St Georges,
Avondale

PAUP ZONE

SH

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Do not support retention of SH zone, support more


intensified zoning change to MHS at 204 Methuen Rd
where managing flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The change of zone will
enable intensification in the area that aligns with the
surrounding neighbourhood built form of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. Scope to change to MHS for
this site and specific properties along Methuen Rd is
provided by submission #5277-382, refer to Attachment
D. The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of notified THAB zone at the specific
properties along St Georges Rd. The properties are close
to both the New Lynn MC and Avondale TC with close
access to RFN and future walking and cycling
infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor cycleway)
and employment centres (town centres and light
industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
Support retention of notified THAB zone at the specific
properties along St Georges Rd. The properties are close
to both the New Lynn MC and Avondale TC with close
access to RFN and future walking and cycling
infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor cycleway)
and employment centres (town centres and light
industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 18 Wingate
St. The property is close to both the New Lynn MC and
Avondale TC with close access to RFN and future walking
and cycling infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor
cycleway) and employment centres (town centres and
light industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at the specific
properties along St Georges Rd. The properties are close
to both the New Lynn MC and Avondale TC with close
access to RFN and future walking and cycling
infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor cycleway)
and employment centres (town centres and light
industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
Support retention of notified THAB zone at the specific
properties along St Georges Rd. The properties are close
to both the New Lynn MC and Avondale TC with close
access to RFN and future walking and cycling
infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor cycleway)
and employment centres (town centres and light
industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of

329

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHS

Support

Meets proximity criteria


No change

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-253

839-2535

839-2769

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Use at 42A,42,


Wolverton
42A,42, WOLVERTON WOLVERTON
New Windsor
STREET, Avondale.
STREET, Avondale

PAUP ZONE

MU

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


2148-2158 GREAT Great North
Housing and
NORTH ROAD,
Rd, Avondale
Apartment Buildings Avondale
at 2148-2158 GREAT
NORTH ROAD.
Auckland.

THAB

Western Isthmus Rezone 48,


WOLVERTON
STREET,4,4A,
RUAHINE STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Use, Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Use.

MU/ MHS

48, WOLVERTON Wolverton


STREET,4,4A,
New Windsor
RUAHINE STREET,
Avondale

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

THAB

MU

REASONS

330

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MU zone at 42, 42A Wolverton St. No change


The sites are located within a MU zoned area, along a
RFN (Wolverton Rd), and close to New Lynn MC. The MU
zoned sites are compatible with LI zone on the other side
of Wolverton Rd, and surrounding residential areas. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
zone to achieve the objectives of the MU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 2148-2158
No change
Great North Road. The properties are close to both the
New Lynn MC and Avondale TC with close access to RFN
and future walking and cycling infrastructure (Whau
Walkway, rail corridor cycleway) and employment
centres (town centres and light industrial zones). The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
zone to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and
Do not support change of MHS to MU for 4, 4A Ruahine MU/ MHU
St, support a less intensified zoning change to MHU zone
for this site. The property is located at the back of MU
zone on a back street off Miranda St. Retain MU zone on
Wolverton St to align with the commercial business
corridor. Support change to properties on Ruahine St
from MHS to MHU. The properties are close to RFN and
MU zone along Wolverton St. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The change to MHU
zone along adjacent properties on Otira St, Miranda St
and Ruahine St is proposed out of scope, refer to
Attachment F.
Support retention of MU zone at 48 Wolverton St. The
property is located on the commercial business corridor,
part of the existing mixed use/business area. The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Support

THAB

Support

MU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Consider MU appropriate transitional zone

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2770

839-2846

839-2863

839-2881

839-2898

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 1, OTIRA


STREET,64A,64,
WOLVERTON
STREET,46,44,48,
MIRANDA STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Use, Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Use.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1, OTIRA
Wolverton
STREET,64A,64,
New Windsor
WOLVERTON
STREET,46,44,48,
MIRANDA STREET,
Avondale

PAUP ZONE

MU/ MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

Western Isthmus Rezone 3, BUSBY


3, BUSBY STREET, Busby,
MHS
STREET, Blockhouse Blockhouse Bay
Blockhouse Bay
Bay from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 24, RUAHINE 24, RUAHINE


Ruahine
STREET, Avondale
STREET, Avondale Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 74, MAIORO


STREET, New
Windsor from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

74, MAIORO
STREET, New
Windsor

Western Isthmus Rezone


24,28,26,20,22,
24,28,26,20,22,
DICKEY STREET,
DICKEY STREET, New New Windsor
Windsor from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Maioro, New
Windsor

Dickey, New
Windsor

SH

MHU

MHU

REASONS

331

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of MHS to MU for 1 Otira St & 46, MU/ MHU
44, 48 Miranda St, support a less intensified zoning
change to MHU zone for this site. The properties are
located at the back of MU zone on a back/side streets
from Wolverton St. Retain MU zone on Wolverton St to
align with the commercial business corridor. Support
change to properties on Otira and Miranda Streets from
MHS to MHU. The properties are close to RFN and MU
zone along Wolverton St. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The change to MHU
zone along adjacent properties on Otira St, Miranda St
and Ruahine St is proposed out of scope, refer to
Attachment F.
Support retention of MU zone at 64A, 64 Wolverton St.
The properties are located on the commercial business
corridor, part of the existing mixed use/business area.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.
MHU
The property is close to RFN (Taylor St), large open space
(Olympic Park) and New Lynn MC. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.
MHU
The property is located on a RFN (Wolverton St) and
close to MU zone along Wolverton St. MHU zone will
enable intensification in the area that aligns with local
context. Adjacent properties are also proposed to change
to MHU, as an out of scope change to avoid spot-zoning
and align with local context, refer to Attachment F. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to MHU zone at this property. The MHU
property is adjacent to MHU zoning, large open space,
close to RFN (Maioro St) and Stoddard Rd TC. MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that aligns with
local context. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone, support less MHS
intensified zoning change to MHS. The site is located
within an area that is proposed to be re-zoned to MHS.
This is a large site (3,500m2) that provides good
opportunities for comprehensive re-development.
Surrounding properties are proposed to be zoned to
MHS, either in the scope of a submission #5277-382
(refer to Attachment D) or as out of scope, refer to
Attachment F. Rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Consider MU appropriate transitional zone

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

Recognise site more appropriate for MHS zone on basis of


proximity criteria .

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2902

839-2910

839-2984

839-2991

839-3057

839-3165

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Rezone 113, NEW


WINDSOR ROAD,
New Windsor from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 22,
SWINBURNE STREET,
Blockhouse Bay from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

113, NEW
New Windsor
WINDSOR ROAD,
New Windsor

22, SWINBURNE
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Swinburne,
SH
Blockhouse Bay

Western Isthmus Rezone 62,


62, SHOREHAM
Shoreham
SHOREHAM STREET, STREET, Avondale Avondale
Avondale from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 28,


WESTMINSTER
STREET, New
Windsor from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28,
WESTMINSTER
STREET, New
Windsor

Westminster,
New Windsor

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 125,


TIVERTON ROAD,
New Windsor from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 9, WHITTLE
PLACE, New Windsor
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

125, TIVERTON
ROAD, New
Windsor

New Windsor

9, WHITTLE
PLACE, New
Windsor

Whittle, New
Windsor

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.


The property is located on the RFN (Tiverton Rd/ New
Windsor Rd), and close to a local NC and school. MHU
zone will enable intensification in the area that aligns
with local context. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone, support less
intensified zoning change to MHS at these properties.
The change to MHS zone aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Adjacent properties are also proposed
to change to MHS, as an out of scope change to avoid
spot-zoning and align with local context, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support change of SH to MHS zone at this property where
managing flooding risks on the site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The change of zone will provide
intensification in the area that aligns with the
surrounding neighbourhood built form of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. Adjacent properties are also
proposed to change to MHS, as an out of scope change to
avoid spot-zoning and align with local context, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. The property
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

332

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU
MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Meets criteria for MHU


MHS

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.


MHU
The property is located on the RFN (Tiverton Rd), and
close to a school and local NC. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. The property No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Site meets proximity criteria (when considering whole


development block) and comprehensive scale of site.
consider flooding constraints can be managed by
development controls and does not justify downzoning
one 'lot' within development block.

Site meets proximity criteria (when considering whole


development block) and comprehensive scale of site.
consider flooding constraints can be managed by
development controls and does not justify downzoning
one 'lot' within development block.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3173

839-3193

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 28A,28,


28A,28, RUAHINE Ruahine
RUAHINE STREET,
STREET, Avondale Avondale
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 23,


23, ALANBROOKE Alanbrooke,
ALANBROOKE
CRESCENT,
Avondale
CRESCENT, Avondale Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

333

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


close to RFN (Wolverton St) and MU zone along
Wolverton St. MHU zone will enable intensification in
the area that aligns with local context. Adjacent
properties are also proposed to change to MHU, as an
out of scope change to avoid spot-zoning and align with
local context, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone. The
No change
property is affected by the NGC and part of a cluster of
houses zoned MHS and SH zone under the overlay.
Retaining the notified zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-3215

839-3265

Western Isthmus Rezone 118, TAYLOR 118, TAYLOR


STREET, Blockhouse STREET,
Bay from Mixed
Blockhouse Bay
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Taylor,
MHS
Blockhouse Bay

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 29, MARGATE 29, MARGATE


Margate,
SH
ROAD, Blockhouse
ROAD, Blockhouse Blockhouse Bay
Bay from Single
Bay
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 47, VALONIA 47, VALONIA


STREET, New
STREET, New
Windsor from Single Windsor
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Valonia, New
Windsor

THAB

Western Isthmus Rezone 2092, GREAT 2092, GREAT


NORTH ROAD,
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland from Mixed Avondale
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Great North
Rd, Avondale

Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.


MHU
The property is located on a RFN (Taylor St) and close to
Blockhouse Bay LC. MHU zone will enable intensification
in the area that aligns with local context. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. The property No change
is affected by the NGC and part of a cluster of houses
zoned SH zone under the overlay. Retaining the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3305

839-3409

839-3488

Western Isthmus Rezone 155, NEW


WINDSOR ROAD,
New Windsor from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

155, NEW
New Windsor
WINDSOR ROAD,
New Windsor

SH

MHU

MHS

THAB

MHU

Support change of SH to THAB zone at this property. The THAB


property is adjacent to a higher density THAB zoning,
large open space, close to RFN (Maioro St) and Stoddard
Rd TC. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support change of MHU to THAB zone. The property is
THAB
close to both New Lynn MC and Avondale TC with good
access to future walking and cycling infrastructure (Whau
Walkway, rail corridor cycleway) and employment
centres (town centres and light industrial zones). Located
on an RFN (Great North Rd). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.
MHU
The property is located on the RFN (New Windsor Rd),
and close to a local NC and school. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3492

839-363

839-3703

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone 121, ST


121, ST GEORGES St Georges,
GEORGES ROAD,
ROAD, Avondale Avondale
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 7, ROSEVILLE


Urban at 7,
STREET, New
ROSEVILLE STREET,
Windsor
New Windsor.
Western Isthmus Rezone
1/31,3/37,3/35,1/35,
3/31,1/37,4/31,4/37,
4/35,5/35,2/35,2/37,
2/31, ULSTER ROAD,
Blockhouse Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Roseville, New MHU


Windsor

1/31,3/37,3/35,1/ Ulster,
MHS
35,3/31,1/37,4/31 Blockhouse Bay
,4/37,4/35,5/35,2
/35,2/37,2/31,
ULSTER ROAD,
Blockhouse Bay

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

334

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


located close to RFN (Wolverton St), large open space
and MU zone along Wolverton St. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
Adjacent properties are also proposed to change to MHU,
as an out of scope change to avoid spot-zoning and align
with local context, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone. The property is No change
within an area of MHU zone that is close to RFN, higher
density THAB zoning and Stoddard Rd TC. The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support change of MHS to THAB zone, because
No change
spot zoning in this location does not will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-3755

839-3790

839-3799

Western Isthmus Rezone 2, BRABHAM 2, BRABHAM


PLACE, Avondale
PLACE, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ruahine
Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 10A,


HOLBROOK STREET,
New Windsor from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10A, HOLBROOK
STREET, New
Windsor

Holbrook New MHS


Windsor

Western Isthmus Rezone 52, MAIORO


STREET, New
Windsor from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

52, MAIORO
STREET, New
Windsor

Maioro, New
Windsor

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.


MHU
The property is located close to a RFN (Wolverton St) and
close to MU zone along Wolverton St. MHU zone will
enable intensification in the area that aligns with local
context. Adjacent properties are also proposed to change
to MHU, as an out of scope change to avoid spot-zoning
and align with local context, refer to Attachment F. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to MHU, because spot
No change
zoning in this location does not will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Properties not located close to
centre or RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.
MHU
The property is located on a RFN (Maioro Rd), large open
space and Stoddard Rd TC. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3898

839-3912

839-3914

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 57, TAYLOR 57, TAYLOR


STREET, Blockhouse STREET,
Bay from Mixed
Blockhouse Bay
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Taylor,
MHS
Blockhouse Bay

Western Isthmus Rezone 5, FALKIRK


STREET, Blockhouse
Bay from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, FALKIRK
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

Falkirk,
SH
Blockhouse Bay

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,11A,


CROWTHER STREET,
Blockhouse Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,11A,
CROWTHER
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

Western Isthmus Rezone 5,


WESTMINSTER
STREET, New
Windsor from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, WESTMINSTER Westminster,
STREET, New
New Windsor
Windsor

Western Isthmus Rezone 23,


HERTFORD STREET,
Blockhouse Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 23,
Hertford
MHS
HERTFORD
Blockhouse Bay
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay
from Mixed
Housing Suburban
to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Crowther,
MHS
Blockhouse Bay

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.


The property is located on a RFN (Taylor St). MHU zone
will enable intensification in the area that aligns with
local context. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

335

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Do not support change of SH to MHU, support less


MHS
intensified zoning to MHS, where managing flooding risks
on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
site is not close to RFN or any centre. The change to MHS
aligns with local context and surrounding built character
of predominantly one-two storey buildings. The change
to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to THAB zone, because
No change
spot zoning in this location does not will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3921

839-3925

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone, support less MHS


intensified zoning change to MHS at these properties.
The change to MHS zone aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Adjacent properties are also proposed
to change to MHS, as an out of scope change to avoid
spot-zoning and align with local context, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone, because
No change
spot zoning in this location does not will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. Properties not located close
to centre or RFN. The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-402

839-4158

839-4159

839-4168

839-4169

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Retain Single House 9, CONDLIFFE


at 9, CONDLIFFE
PLACE, New
PLACE, New Windsor. Windsor.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Condliffe, New SH
Windsor

Western Isthmus Rezone 45, NEW


WINDSOR ROAD,
New Windsor from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone
2086A,2088,2086,20
88A, GREAT NORTH
ROAD, Auckland from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

45, NEW
New Windsor
WINDSOR ROAD,
New Windsor

MHS

2086A,2088,2086, Great North


2088A, GREAT
Rd, Avondale
NORTH ROAD,
Avondale

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone


165A,163A,165,167,1
61,163, NEW
WINDSOR ROAD,
New Windsor from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 172-174,
NEW WINDSOR
ROAD, New Windsor
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

165A,163A,165,16 New Windsor


7,161,163, NEW
WINDSOR ROAD,
New Windsor

MHS

172-174, NEW
New Windsor
WINDSOR ROAD,
New Windsor

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

336

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of SH, support more intensified MHS


zoning change to MHS at 9 Condliffe Pl. The change of
zone will enable intensification in the area that aligns
with the surrounding neighbourhood built form of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. This is an out of
scope change (refer to Attachment F) adjacent to
properties that are within scope of a submission to
change to MHS (refer to #5277 382 in Attachment D). The
change of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone, because
No change
spot zoning in this location does not will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHU to THAB zone. The properties
THAB
are close to both New Lynn MC and Avondale TC with
good access to future walking and cycling infrastructure
(Whau Walkway, rail corridor cycleway) and employment
centres (town centres and light industrial zones). Located
on an RFN (Great North Rd). The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


located on the RFN (New Windsor Rd), and close to a
local NC and school. MHU zone will enable intensification
in the area that aligns with local context. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


located on the RFN (New Windsor Rd), and close to a
local NC and school. MHU zone will enable intensification
in the area that aligns with local context. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4170

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone


11,13,15,21,17,19,3,5
,7,9, HERTFORD
STREET,21,23,
HOLBROOK STREET,
Blockhouse Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13,15,21,17,19 Hertford
MHS
,3,5,7,9,
Blockhouse Bay
HERTFORD
STREET,21,23,
HOLBROOK
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 15A,15,17,


HOLBROOK STREET,
New Windsor from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15A,15,17,
HOLBROOK
STREET, New
Windsor

MHU

REASONS

337

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of MHS to MHU along corner of No change


Hertford St And Holbrook St. The properties are not close
to any centres or RFN. The change to MHU does not align
with local context. The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4171

839-4172

Holbrook New MHS


Windsor

Western Isthmus Rezone


20A,20B,20,22,
Margate,
MHS
20A,20B,20,22,
MARGATE ROAD, Blockhouse Bay
MARGATE ROAD,
Blockhouse Bay
Blockhouse Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone


1/6,1/4,2/4,2/6, Margate,
MHS
1/6,1/4,2/4,2/6,
MARGATE ROAD, Blockhouse Bay
MARGATE ROAD,
Blockhouse Bay
Blockhouse Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,11A,


HOLBROOK STREET,
New Windsor from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,11A,
HOLBROOK
STREET, New
Windsor

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 7A,7,


HOLBROOK STREET,
New Windsor from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

7A,7, HOLBROOK Holbrook New SH


STREET, New
Windsor
Windsor

Do not support change of MHS to MHU, because spot


No change
zoning in this location does not will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Properties not located close to
centre or RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to MHU, because spot
No change
zoning in this location does not will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Properties not located close to
centre or RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4173

Do not support change of MHS to MHU, because spot


No change
zoning in this location does not will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Properties not located close to
centre or RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4174

839-4175

Holbrook New MHS


Windsor

MHU

Do not support change of MHS to MHU, because spot


No change
zoning in this location does not will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Properties not located close to
centre or RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU, support less
MHS
intensified zoning to MHS, where managing flooding risks
on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
site is within an area proposed to be rezoned from SH to
MHS in the scope of submission #5277-386, refer to
Attachment D. The site is not close to RFN or any centre.
The change to MHS aligns with local context and
surrounding built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. The change to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4176

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 320,


BLOCKHOUSE BAY
ROAD,1, HOLBROOK
STREET, Blockhouse
Bay-Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

320, BLOCKHOUSE Holbrook MHS


BAY ROAD,1,
Blockhouse Bay
HOLBROOK
Waterview
STREET,
Blockhouse BayWaterview

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone


38A,26,38D,38B,28A,
42,44,28,26A,40,36,
HOLBROOK STREET,
New Windsor from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

38A,26,38D,38B,2 Holbrook New SH


8A,42,44,28,26A,4 Windsor
0,36, HOLBROOK
STREET, New
Windsor

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone


308,312,310,306,314,
BLOCKHOUSE BAY
ROAD,6A,8A,4,2,2A,6
,8,4A, HOLBROOK
STREET, Blockhouse
Bay-Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

308,312,310,306, Blockhouse Bay MHS


314, BLOCKHOUSE - Holbrook
BAY
ROAD,6A,8A,4,2,2
A,6,8,4A,
HOLBROOK
STREET,
Blockhouse BayWaterview

MHU

REASONS

338

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of MHS to MHU, because spot


No change
zoning in this location does not will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Properties not located close to
centre or RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4177

839-4178

839-4179

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,11A,


MIRANDA
STREET,32,34,
RUAHINE STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11,11A, MIRANDA Ruahine


STREET,32,34,
Avondale
RUAHINE STREET,
Avondale

MHS

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone, support less MHS


intensified zoning change to MHS at these properties.
The change to MHS zone aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Adjacent properties are also proposed
to change to MHS, as an out of scope change to avoid
spot-zoning and align with local context, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
This request applies to a large number of properties and MHS, MHU
the zoning change to these properties varies, depending
on their location, proximity and local context. This
submission is supported in part. See W14 revised zoning
map in Attachment E.
Support change of MHS to MHU on properties along
Blockhouse Bay Rd. These sites are close to RFN (Tiverton
Rd), and NC and MU zones. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of MHS to MHU on properties


with access off Holbrook St and Shoreham St. These sites
are located off the RFN and are more aligned with the
surrounding neighbourhood built form of predominantly
one-two storey buildings along the streets. The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU
located close to RFN (Wolverton St) and close to MU
zone along Wolverton St. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
Adjacent properties are also proposed to change to MHU,
as an out of scope change to avoid spot-zoning and align
with local context, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4180

839-4181

839-4182

839-4183

839-4184

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone


10,12,14,16,10A,1 Ruahine
10,12,14,16,10A,16A, 6A,14A, RUAHINE Avondale
14A, RUAHINE
STREET, Avondale
STREET, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 42,40A,40,


MIRANDA STREET,2,
OTIRA STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

42,40A,40,
Miranda
MIRANDA
Avondale
STREET,2, OTIRA
STREET, Avondale

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone


6A,6B,8A,5,7,6,8, Otira Avondale MHS
6A,6B,8A,5,7,6,8,5A, 5A, OTIRA STREET,
OTIRA STREET,
Avondale
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 24,28,26,24A, 24,28,26,24A,


Miranda
MIRANDA STREET,
MIRANDA STREET, Avondale
Avondale from Mixed Avondale
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 18,20,16,


18,20,16,
Miranda
MIRANDA STREET,
MIRANDA STREET, Avondale
Avondale from Mixed Avondale
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are


located close to RFN (Wolverton St) and close to MU
zone along Wolverton St. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
Adjacent properties are also proposed to change to MHU,
as an out of scope change to avoid spot-zoning and align
with local context, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are
located close to RFN (Wolverton St) and close to MU
zone along Wolverton St. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
Adjacent properties are also proposed to change to MHU,
as an out of scope change to avoid spot-zoning and align
with local context, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are
located close to RFN (Wolverton St) and close to MU
zone along Wolverton St. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
Adjacent properties are also proposed to change to MHU,
as an out of scope change to avoid spot-zoning and align
with local context, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone. The
properties are affected by the NGC and part of a cluster
of houses zoned MHS zone under the overlay. Retaining
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

339

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

MHU

No change

Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone. The


No change
properties are affected by the NGC and part of a cluster
of houses zoned MHS zone under the overlay. Retaining
the notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Consistent with zoning principles for MHU and request to


consider Corporation's zone change request alongside
wider pattern of zoning (change)

MHU

Oppose

Consistent with zoning principles for MHU and request to


consider Corporation's zone change request alongside
wider pattern of zoning (change)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4185

839-4186

839-4187

839-4188

839-4189

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Rezone


10,12,14,8A,10A,8 Miranda
10,12,14,8A,10A,8,
, MIRANDA
Avondale
MIRANDA STREET,
STREET, Avondale
Avondale from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone


15A,15B,15,17,
TAYLOR
STREET,98,96,
WOLVERTON STREET,
Blockhouse Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15A,15B,15,17,
TAYLOR
STREET,98,96,
WOLVERTON
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

Taylor,
MHS
Blockhouse Bay

Western Isthmus Rezone 9A,9C,9B,1/73/7, WOLVERTON


STREET, New LynnNew Windsor from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9A,9C,9B,1/7-3/7, Wolverton
WOLVERTON
New Windsor
STREET, New LynnNew Windsor

MHS

Western Isthmus Rezone 27,29,


ALANBROOKE
CRESCENT, Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

27,29,
ALANBROOKE
CRESCENT,
Avondale

MHS

Alanbrooke,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 32,26,


32,26, ULSTER
Ulster,
MHS
ULSTER ROAD,
ROAD, Blockhouse Blockhouse Bay
Blockhouse Bay from Bay
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

340

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone, support less SH, MHS


intensified zoning change to MHS at 10, 10A, 12, 14
Miranda St where managing flooding risks on those sites
does not require maintaining a SH zone. The change to
MHS aligns with adjacent sites to the west. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone for 8, 8A
Miranda St. These sites are affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.
MHU
The property is located on a RFN (Taylor St and
Wolverton St). MHU zone will enable intensification in
the area that aligns with local context. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.


MHU
The property is located on a RFN (Wolverton St). MHU
zone will enable intensification in the area that aligns
with local context. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone. The


properties are affected by the NGC and part of a cluster
of houses zoned MHS and SH zone under the overlay.
Retaining the notified zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support change of MHS to THAB, because spot


No change
zoning in this location does not will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Consistent with zoning principles for MHU and request to


consider Corporation's zone change request alongside
wider pattern of zoning (change)

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4190

839-4191

839-4192

839-4193

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone 11,13, BUSBY


STREET,36,34,
CROWTHER STREET,
Blockhouse Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13, BUSBY
STREET,36,34,
CROWTHER
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

Busby,
MHS
Blockhouse Bay

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 18,20,16,


BUSBY STREET,
Blockhouse Bay from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 23, FALKIRK
STREET,27,
SWINBURNE STREET,
Blockhouse Bay from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

18,20,16, BUSBY
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

Busby,
SH
Blockhouse Bay

23, FALKIRK
STREET,27,
SWINBURNE
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

Falkirk,
SH
Blockhouse Bay

Western Isthmus Rezone


85B,77,75,73,85A,71,
83,69,87D,81,87B,87
C,79,87A, BOLTON
STREET,24,39,37,43,4
1, MARLOWE ROAD,
Blockhouse Bay from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

85B,77,75,73,85A, Bolton,
SH
71,83,69,87D,81,8 Blockhouse Bay
7B,87C,79,87A,
BOLTON
STREET,24,39,37,4
3,41, MARLOWE
ROAD, Blockhouse
Bay

MHU

Western Isthmus Rezone 3,


WINDERMERE
CRESCENT,12,14,
EXMINSTER STREET,
Blockhouse Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, WINDERMERE Exminster,
MHS
CRESCENT,12,14, Blockhouse Bay
EXMINSTER
STREET,
Blockhouse Bay

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

341

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.


MHU
The property is close to RFN (Taylor St), large open space
(Olympic Park) and New Lynn MC. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.


MHU
The property is close to RFN (Taylor St), large open space
(Olympic Park) and New Lynn MC. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of SH to MHU, support less
MHS
intensified zoning to MHS, where managing flooding risks
on those sites does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The sites are not close to RFN or any centre. The change
to MHS aligns with local context and surrounding built
character of predominantly one-two storey buildings.
The change to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone, support less MHS
intensified zoning change to MHS. The site is located
within an area that is proposed to be re-zoned to MHS.
This is a large site (16,000m2) that offers opportunities
for re-development and connectivity from Marlowe St to
Bolton St. Scope to change to MHS is provided by
submission #5277-386 (refer to Attachment D). Rezoning
to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4194

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. This is a large


MHU
corner site (2,500m2) with potential for re-development
adjacent to an area proposed to be rezoned to THAB. The
site is close to Blockhouse Bay LC, RFN and Blockhouse
Bay Recreational Reserve. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-422

839-431

839-473

839-489

839-4940

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Mixed Housing 192, NEW


New Windsor, MHS
Suburban at 192,
WINDSOR ROAD, New Windsor
NEW WINDSOR
New Windsor
ROAD, New Windsor.

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 33, VALONIA
STREET, New
Windsor.
Western Isthmus Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 79, ST GEORGES
ROAD, Avondale.

33, VALONIA
STREET, New
Windsor

Roseville/Valon THAB
ia New
Windsor

THAB

79, ST GEORGES
ROAD, Avondale

St Georges,
Avondale

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 81, ST GEORGES
ROAD, Avondale.

81, ST GEORGES
ROAD, Avondale

Western Isthmus Rezone 39,


HOLBROOK STREET,
New Windsor from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

39, HOLBROOK
STREET, New
Windsor

St Georges,
Avondale

THAB

THAB

Holbrook New SH
Windsor

THAB

MHS

REASONS

Do not support retention of MHS, support more


intensified zoning change to MHU zone. The sites are
close to an RTN (New Windsor Rd). The change of zone
will enable intensification in the area. Scope to change to
MHU zone is provided by submission #5277-386, refer to
Attachment D. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU and gives effect to
Support retention of THAB. This site is within a THAB
area, within easy walking distance of an RTN (Maioro St)
and the Town Centre zone on Stoddard Rd. Accordingly,
THAB is considered the most appropriate zone to achieve
the objectives for residential zones and give effect to the
Regional Policy Statement.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 79 St Georges
Rd. The property is close to both the New Lynn MC and
Avondale TC with close access to RFN and future walking
and cycling infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor
cycleway) and employment centres (town centres and
light industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 81 St Georges
Rd. The property is close to both the New Lynn MC and
Avondale TC with close access to RFN and future walking
and cycling infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor
cycleway) and employment centres (town centres and
light industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of SH to MHS zone at this property where
managing flooding risks on the site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The change of zone will provide
intensification in the area that aligns with the
surrounding neighbourhood built form of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. Adjacent properties are also
proposed to change to MHS, as an out of scope change to
avoid spot-zoning and align with local context, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives

342

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4953

839-508

839-511

839-531

839-551

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Western Isthmus Rezone


24,10,26,12,20,14,22,
16,18,2,4,6,8,
UMBRIEL
LANE,11,25,13,27,15,
21,17,23,19,29,1,9,7,
3C,3B,3A, RUAHINE
STREET,27A,27B,21,1
7,23,25B,25C,25A,29
B,29A,19A,19B,
MIRANDA STREET,
Avondale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

24,10,26,12,20,14 Ruahine
,22,16,18,2,4,6,8, Avondale
UMBRIEL
LANE,11,25,13,27,
15,21,17,23,19,29
,1,9,7,3C,3B,3A,
RUAHINE
STREET,27A,27B,2
1,17,23,25B,25C,2
5A,29B,29A,19A,1
9B, MIRANDA
STREET, Avondale

MHS

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1, WESTMINSTER
STREET,20,
ROSEVILLE STREET,
New Windsor.

1, WESTMINSTER Westminster,
STREET,20,
New Windsor
ROSEVILLE
STREET, New
Windsor.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Single House 154, METHUEN


at 154, METHUEN
ROAD, New
ROAD, New Windsor. Windsor

Methuen,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


9, ALANBROOKE
Housing and
CRESCENT,
Apartment Buildings Avondale
at 9, ALANBROOKE
CRESCENT, Avondale.

Alanbrooke,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 37, ST GEORGES
ROAD, Avondale.

St Georges,
Avondale

37, ST GEORGES
ROAD, Avondale

SH

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

SH

THAB

THAB

REASONS

343

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of MHS to MHU zone. The properties are MHU


located close to RFN (Wolverton St) and close to MU
zone along Wolverton St. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
Adjacent properties are also proposed to change to MHU,
as an out of scope change to avoid spot-zoning and align
with local context, refer to Attachment F. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at these sites.


No change
The sites are part of notified THAB zoning area, close to
RFN (Maioro St) and Stoddard Rd TC. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate zone to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support retention of SH zone, support more


MHS
intensified zoning change to MHS at 154 Methuen Rd
where managing flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The change of zone will
enable intensification in the area that aligns with the
surrounding neighbourhood built form of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. Scope to change to MHS for
this site and specific properties along Methuen Rd is
provided by submission #5277-382, refer to Attachment
D. The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 9 Alanbrooke No change
Cres. The property is close to both the New Lynn MC and
Avondale TC with close access to RFN and future walking
and cycling infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor
cycleway) and employment centres (town centres and
light industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 37 St Georges No change
Rd. The property is close to both the New Lynn MC and
Avondale TC with close access to RFN and future walking
and cycling infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor
cycleway) and employment centres (town centres and
light industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proximity criteria for MHU, submission recognised


local context and support MHS zone

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-601

839-623

839-631

839-650

839-663

839-722

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

2087, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 19, VALONIA
STREET, New
Windsor.
Western Isthmus Retain Single House
at 28, JAMAICA
PLACE, Blockhouse
Bay.

19, VALONIA
STREET, New
Windsor

Roseville/Valon THAB
ia New
Windsor

THAB

28, JAMAICA
PLACE,
Blockhouse Bay.

Jamaica,
SH
Blockhouse Bay

SH

Methuen,
Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


20, ALANBROOKE Alanbrooke,
Housing and
CRESCENT,
Avondale
Apartment Buildings Avondale
at 20, ALANBROOKE
CRESCENT, Avondale.

Western Isthmus Retain Single House 9, JAMAICA


at 9, JAMAICA PLACE, PLACE,
Blockhouse Bay.
Blockhouse Bay

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2087, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Avondale.

Western Isthmus Retain Single House 65, METHUEN


at 65, METHUEN
ROAD, New
ROAD, New Windsor. Windsor.

Great North
Rd, Avondale

PAUP ZONE

SH

THAB

Jamaica,
SH
Blockhouse Bay

THAB

SH

THAB

SH

REASONS

Support retention of notified THAB zone at 2087 Great


North Road. The property is close to both the New Lynn
MC and Avondale TC with close access to RFN and future
walking and cycling infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail
corridor cycleway) and employment centres (town
centres and light industrial zones). The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate zone to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 19 Valonia St.
This site is part of notified THAB zoning area, close to
RFN (Maioro St) and Stoddard Rd TC. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate zone to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support retention of SH, support more intensified
zoning change to MHS at 28 Jamaica Pl. The change of
zone will enable intensification in the area that aligns
with the surrounding neighbourhood built form of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. This is an out of
scope change, refer to Attachment F. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone, support more
intensified zoning change to MHS at 65 Methuen Rd. The
change of zone will enable intensification in the area that
aligns with the surrounding neighbourhood built form of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. Scope to
change to MHS for this site and specific properties along
Methuen Rd is provided by submission #5277-382, refer
to Attachment D. The rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 20
Alanbrooke Cres. The property is close to both the New
Lynn MC and Avondale TC with close access to RFN and
future walking and cycling infrastructure (Whau
Walkway, rail corridor cycleway) and employment
centres (town centres and light industrial zones). The
retention of the notified zone is the most appropriate
zone to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and
Do not support retention of SH, support more intensified
zoning change to MHS at 9 Jamaica Pl. The change of
zone will enable intensification in the area that aligns
with the surrounding neighbourhood built form of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. This is an out of
scope change, refer to Attachment F. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

344

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

No change

MHS

Meets proximity criteria


MHS

MHS

Support

Meets proximity criteria


No change

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Meets proximity criteria for MHU, submission recognised


local context and support MHS zone

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-737

839-7494

839-7621

839-7622

839-7659

839-7692

839-776

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 23, VALONIA
STREET, New
Windsor.
Western Isthmus Rezone 63 BATKIN
ROAD. New Windsor
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
23, VALONIA
STREET, New
Windsor

Western Isthmus Rezone 95 NEW


WINDSOR ROAD.
New Windsor from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Retain Single House
at 6, HILLVIEW
AVENUE, New
Windsor.

SH

Hertford
MHS
Blockhouse Bay

5 DICKEY STREET. Dickey, New


New Windsor
Windsor

Western Isthmus Rezone 75 TAYLOR


75 TAYLOR
STREET. Blockhouse STREET.
Bay from Mixed
Blockhouse Bay
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

Roseville/Valon THAB
ia New
Windsor

63 BATKIN ROAD. Batkin, New


New Windsor
Windsor

Western Isthmus Rezone 10, 8


10, 8 HERTFORD
HERTFORD STREET. STREET.
Blockhouse Bay from Blockhouse Bay
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Western Isthmus Rezone 5 DICKEY
STREET. New
Windsor from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

SH

Taylor,
MHS
Blockhouse Bay

95 NEW
New Windsor
WINDSOR ROAD.
New Windsor

MHS

6, HILLVIEW
AVENUE, New
Windsor

SH

Hillview, New
Windsor

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

REASONS

Support retention of notified THAB zone at 23 Valonia St.


This site is part of notified THAB zoning area, close to
RFN (Maioro St) and Stoddard Rd TC. The retention of
the notified zone is the most appropriate zone to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of SH to THAB, support less
intensified zoning change to MHS. The change to THAB is
considered spot zoning and does not recognise local
context. Scope to change to MHS zone is provided by
submission #5277-382 that seeks MHS zoning along
Bollard Ave, Batkin Rd and Methuen Rd. The change to
MHS is aligned with the surrounding neighbourhood built
form of predominantly one-two storey buildings on a
local residential street. The rezoning is the most
appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of MHS to MHU, because spot
zoning in this location does not will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Properties not located close to
centre or RFN. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.
The property is close to RFN (New Windsor Rd) and
adjacent to an area proposed to be rezoned to MHU
zone. MHU zone will enable intensification in the area
that aligns with local context. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support change of MHS to MHU zone at this property.
The property is close to RFN (Taylor St), large open space
(Olympic Park) and New Lynn MC. MHU zone will enable
intensification in the area that aligns with local context.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

345

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHS

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Do not support change of MHS to MHU, because spot


No change
zoning in this location does not will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH, support more intensified MHS
zoning change to MHS at 6 Hillview Ave. The change of
zone will enable intensification in the area that aligns
with the surrounding neighbourhood built form of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. This is an out of
scope change, refer to Attachment F. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support
Meets proximity criteria for MHU, submission recognised
local context and support MHS zone

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7796

839-7914

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Western Isthmus Rezone 6 LABURNUM 6 LABURNUM


ROAD. New Windsor ROAD. New
from Single House to Windsor
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Western Isthmus Rezone 229


BLOCKHOUSE BAY
ROAD. Blockhouse
Bay-Waterview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Laburnum,
New Windsor

PAUP ZONE

SH

229 BLOCKHOUSE Blockhouse Bay- MHS


BAY ROAD.
Waterview
Blockhouse BayWaterview

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

346

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone, support less MHS


intensified zoning change to MHS at this property. The
change to MHS zone aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Adjacent properties are also proposed
to change to MHS, as an out of scope change to avoid
spot-zoning and align with local context, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of MHS to MHU, because spot
No change
zoning in this location does not will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The retention of the notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-8096

Western Isthmus Rezone 5 MIRANDA 5 MIRANDA


Miranda
STREET. Avondale
STREET. Avondale Avondale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Western Isthmus Rezone 5A MIRANDA 5A MIRANDA


Miranda
STREET. Avondale
STREET. Avondale Avondale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of SH to MHU zone. The site is


No change
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-8097

839-8229

839-851

Western Isthmus Rezone 38C


HOLBROOK STREET.
New Windsor from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

38C HOLBROOK
STREET

Western Isthmus Retain Single House 28, LABURNUM


at 28, LABURNUM
ROAD, New
ROAD, New Windsor. Windsor

Holbrook New SH
Windsor

Laburnum,
New Windsor

SH

MHU

MHU

SH

Do not support change of MHS to MHU zone at 5A


SH
Miranda St, support less intensified zoning of SH zone.
The site is affected by flooding constraints and rezoning
the site to SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS. This is an out of scope change, refer to
Do not support change of SH to MHU zone, support less MHS
intensified zoning change to MHS at this property. The
change to MHS zone aligns with the surrounding
neighbourhood built form of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Adjacent properties are also proposed
to change to MHS, as an out of scope change to avoid
spot-zoning and align with local context, refer to
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support retention of SH, support more intensified MHS
zoning change to MHS at 28 Laburnum Rd. The change of
zone will enable intensification in the area that aligns
with the surrounding neighbourhood built form of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. This is an out of
scope change, refer to Attachment F. The change of zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support
Meets proximity criteria for MHU, submission recognised
local context and support MHS zone

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-955

839-960

839-961

839-978

839-1215

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 18A, WINGATE
STREET, Avondale.

18A, WINGATE
Wingate,
STREET, Avondale Avondale

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 27A, ARRAN
STREET, Avondale.

27A, ARRAN
Arran,
STREET, Avondale Avondale

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


27, ARRAN
Arran,
Housing and
STREET, Avondale Avondale
Apartment Buildings
at 27, ARRAN STREET,
Avondale.

THAB

Western Isthmus Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 98A, ST GEORGES
ROAD, Avondale.

98A, ST GEORGES St Georges,


ROAD, Avondale Avondale

THAB

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 22/29,11/2914/29,5/29,35/29,34/
29,21/29,15/2916/29,29/2932/29,17/29,1/292/29,27/2928/29,3/294/29,7/299/29,6/29,18/2920/29,23/2926/29,10/29,33/29,
BERESFORD STREET
CENTRAL, Freemans
Bay.

Apartment
Freemans Bay
Buildings at
22/29,11/2914/29,5/29,35/29,
34/29,21/29,15/2
9-16/29,29/2932/29,17/29,1/292/29,27/2928/29,3/294/29,7/299/29,6/29,18/2920/29,23/2926/29,10/29,33/2
9, BERESFORD
STREET CENTRAL,
Freemans Bay.

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of notified THAB zone at 18a Wingate


St. The property is close to both the New Lynn MC and
Avondale TC with close access to RFN and future walking
and cycling infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor
cycleway) and employment centres (town centres and
light industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 27A Arran St.
The property is close to both the New Lynn MC and
Avondale TC with close access to RFN and future walking
and cycling infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor
cycleway) and employment centres (town centres and
light industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 27 Arran St.
The property is close to both the New Lynn MC and
Avondale TC with close access to RFN and future walking
and cycling infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail corridor
cycleway) and employment centres (town centres and
light industrial zones). The retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at 98A St
Georges Rd. The property is close to both the New Lynn
MC and Avondale TC with close access to RFN and future
walking and cycling infrastructure (Whau Walkway, rail
corridor cycleway) and employment centres (town
centres and light industrial zones). The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate zone to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone. THAB zone is
appropriate for the properties' context given their
proximity to City Centre and RFN. Properties are also
within walking distance to community facilities
(Freemans Bay Community Centre) and a large open
space (Western Park). The retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

347

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2338

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 60, 62, 58
WELLINGTON
STREET. 83, 81, 87,
79, 85 BERESFORD
STREET WEST. 59, 55,
57, 61, 57A, 55A
HEPBURN STREET.
146, 144, 142, 148
HOWE STREET.
Freemans BayNewton.

Apartment
Freemans Bay
Buildings at 60,
62, 58
WELLINGTON
STREET. 83, 81,
87, 79, 85
BERESFORD
STREET WEST. 59,
55, 57, 61, 57A,
55A HEPBURN
STREET. 146, 144,
142, 148 HOWE
STREET. Freemans
Bay-Newton.

THAB

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 16/49, 2/49, 9/49,
7/49, 6/49, 18/49,
5/49, 17/49, 12/49,
10/49, 11/49, 14/49,
15/49, 13/49, 4/49,
1/49, 8/49, 3/49
COLLINGWOOD
STREET. Freemans
Bay.

Apartment
Freemans Bay
Buildings at
16/49, 2/49, 9/49,
7/49, 6/49, 18/49,
5/49, 17/49,
12/49, 10/49,
11/49, 14/49,
15/49, 13/49,
4/49, 1/49, 8/49,
3/49
COLLINGWOOD
STREET. Freemans
Bay

THAB

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 8 PRATT STREET.
Freemans Bay.

8 Pratt Street,
Freemans Bay.

THAB

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 116 WELLINGTON
STREET. Freemans
Bay.

Apartment
Freemans Bay
Buildings at 116
Wellington Street,
Freemans Bay

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

348

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB zone. THAB zone is


appropriate for the properties' context given their
proximity to City Centre and RFN. Properties are also
within walking distance to community facilities
(Freemans Bay Community Centre) and a large open
space (Western Park). The retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No

Support retention of THAB zone. THAB zone is


appropriate for the properties' context given their
proximity to City Centre and RFN. Properties are also
within walking distance to community facilities
(Freemans Bay Community Centre) and a large open
space (Western Park). The retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2368

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2472

839-2502

Freemans Bay

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support retention of THAB zone. THAB zone is


No
appropriate for its context given its proximity to the City
Centre and RFN. The property is also within walking
distance to community facilities (Freemans Bay
Community Centre) and a large open space (Western
Park). The retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
Support retention of THAB zone. THAB zone is
No
appropriate for its context given its proximity to City
Centre and RFN. The property is also within walking
distance to community facilities (Freemans Bay
Community Centre) and a large open space (Western
Park). The retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2514

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/122, 6/122
WELLINGTON
STREET. 15/53, 7/53
COLLINGWOOD
STREET. Freemans
Bay.

Apartment
Freemans Bay
Buildings at
1/122, 6/122
Welllington Street
and 15/53, 7/53
Collingwood
Street, Freemans
Bay.

THAB

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 5/11, 4/14, 3/14,
6/20, 3/11, 4/11,
5/20, 66, 8/9, 8/14,
15/9, 6/14, 14/9,
4/20, 6/11, 1/11,
2/11, 6/2, 7/14, 2/14,
1/14, 1/7, 3/20, 5/2,
13/9, 5/14, 3/7, 12/7,
8/2, 6/9, 2/7, 10/7,
7/9, 1/20, 11/7, 5/9,
4/7, 7/2, 7/20, 9/7,
16/9, 2/20 HAYDEN
STREET. 3/34, 1/34,
7/34, 6/34, 2/50,
4/50, 3/50, 4/34,
1/50, 2/34, 5/34
WELLINGTON
STREET. 1/14520/145 HOWE
STREET. Freemans
Bay.

Apartment
Freemans Bay
Buildings at 5/11,
4/14, 3/14, 6/20,
3/11, 4/11, 5/20,
66, 8/9, 8/14,
15/9, 6/14, 14/9,
4/20, 6/11, 1/11,
2/11, 6/2, 7/14,
2/14, 1/14, 1/7,
3/20, 5/2, 13/9,
5/14, 3/7, 12/7,
8/2, 6/9, 2/7,
10/7, 7/9, 1/20,
11/7, 5/9, 4/7,
7/2, 7/20, 9/7,
16/9, 2/20
Hayden Street,
3/34, 1/34, 7/34,
6/34, 2/50, 4/50,
3/50, 4/34, 1/50,
2/34, 5/34
Wellington Street
and 1/145-20/145
Howe Street,
Freemans Bay

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

349

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB zone. THAB zone is


No
appropriate for the properties' context given their
proximity to the City Centre and RFN. Properties are also
within walking distance to community facilities
(Freemans Bay Community Centre) and a large open
space (Western Park). The retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2520

THAB

Support retention of THAB zone. THAB zone is


No
appropriate for the properties' context given their
proximity to the City Centre and RFN. Properties are also
within walking distance to community facilities
(Freemans Bay Community Centre) and a large open
space (Western Park). The retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2866

839-2951

City Centre Fringe Rezone 29, MOIRA


29 Moira Street,
STREET, Ponsonby
Ponsonby
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 21, HUKANUI 21 Hukanui


CRESCENT, Ponsonby Crescent,
from Mixed Housing Ponsonby
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ponsonby

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support zone change from SH to MHU. Support


No
retention of SH. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support No
retention of MHS. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3029

839-3246

839-3315

839-3452

839-3501

839-3526

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone 25,27,


25 and 27
Ponsonby
HUKANUI CRESCENT, Hukanui Crescent,
Ponsonby from
Ponsonby
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone 2/243,


RICHMOND ROAD,5,
TAWARIKI STREET,
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

2/243 Richmond
Road and 5
Tawariki Street,
Grey Lynn

Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone 5, MOIRA


5 Moira Street,
STREET, Ponsonby
Ponsonby
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 2, MOIRA


STREET, Ponsonby
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2 Moira Street,
Ponsonby

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 28, MOIRA


STREET, Ponsonby
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28 Moira Street,
Ponsonby

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 41, TAWARIKI 41 Tawariki


STREET, Ponsonby
Street, Ponsonby
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 4, MOKAU


4 Mokau Street,
STREET, Ponsonby
Ponsonby
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Ponsonby

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

350

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support No


retention of MHS. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and give effect to the RPS.

Do not support zone change from SH to MHU. Support


retention of SH. The sites are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

No

Do not support zone change from SH to MHU. Support


No
retention of SH. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support No
retention of MHS. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU. The subject site is
Yes
located close to a local POS and is within walking distance
to RFN. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC. However,
adjoining properties are not. In this instance, the extent
of the Pre-1944 BDC is not considered sufficient as to
impact on the zoning of the property. Rezoning the site
to MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU. The subject site is
Yes
located close to a local POS and is within walking distance
to RFN. Rezoning the site to MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Meet Criteria
839-3817

SH

MHU

Do not support zone change from SH to MHU. Support


No
retention of SH. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3895

839-3905

839-3917

839-4339

839-4340

839-4342

839-4345

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

City Centre Fringe Rezone 30, PARAWAI 30 Parawai


CRESCENT, Ponsonby Crescent,
from Mixed Housing Ponsonby
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 239A,


RICHMOND ROAD,9,
TAWARIKI STREET,
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Grey Lynn

239A Richmond
Road and 9
Tawariki Street,
Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone 36, PARAWAI 36 Parawai


CRESCENT, Ponsonby Crescent,
from Mixed Housing Ponsonby
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 2,4, PARAWAI 2 and 4 Parawai


CRESCENT, Ponsonby Crescent,
from Single House to Ponsonby
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 10,12,8,


10,12,8, Parawai
PARAWAI CRESCENT, Crescent,
Ponsonby from Single Ponsonby
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 24,26,


24,26, Parawai
PARAWAI CRESCENT, Crescent,
Ponsonby from
Ponsonby
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 33,37,35,


TAWARIKI STREET,
Ponsonby from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33,37,35 Tawariki Ponsonby


Street, Ponsonby

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

351

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support No


retention of MHS. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and give effect to the RPS.

Do not support zone change from SH to MHU. Support


retention of SH. The sites are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

No

Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support No


retention of MHS. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and give effect to the RPS.

Do not support zone change from SH to MHU. Support


retention of SH. The sites are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

No

Do not support zone change from SH to MHU. Support


retention of SH. The sites are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

No

Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support No


retention of MHS. The sites are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support No


retention of MHS. The sites are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4346

839-4347

839-4348

839-4349

839-4350

839-7828

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

City Centre Fringe Rezone


1/8A,4/8A,10,3/8A,8,
2/8A, MOIRA
STREET,27,21,29,23,
TAWARIKI STREET,
Ponsonby from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1/8A,4/8A,10,3/8 Ponsonby
A,8,2/8A, Moira
Street,27,21,29,23
Tawariki Street,
Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 18,20, MOIRA 18,20 Moira


STREET, Ponsonby
Street, Ponsonby
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 19,21,17,23, 19,21,17,23,


MOIRA STREET,
Moira Street,
Ponsonby from Single Ponsonby
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 239,


239 Richmond
RICHMOND ROAD,
Road, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone 1/243,


1/243 Richmond
RICHMOND ROAD,
Road, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Grey Lynn

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 69


69 Kelmarna
Ponsonby
KELMARNA AVENUE. Avenue, Ponsonby
Ponsonby from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Use at


17 BLAKE STREET.
Ponsonby.

MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

352

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support No


retention of MHS. The sites are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

Support change from MHS to MHU. The properties are Yes


located close to a local public open space and are within
walking distance to the RFN. The sites are subject to the
Pre-1944 BDC. However, adoining properties are not. In
this instance, the extent of the Pre-1944 BDC is not
considered sufficient to impact on the zoning of the
properties. Rezoning the site to MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support zone change from SH to MHU. Support
No
retention of SH. The sites are subject to the pre 1944
BDC and intensive development of the site such as MHU
is inappropriate. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support zone change from SH to MHU. Support
No
retention of SH. The sites are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support zone change from SH to MHU. Support
No
retention of SH. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU. The property is
Yes
located close to a local POS and is within walking distance
to RFN. Rezoning the site to MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Meet Criteria
839-2405

17 Blake Street,
Ponsonby

Ponsonby

MU

Support retention of MU zone as site is located within


No
walking distance to Ponsonby TC, located within walking
distance of an RFN and local amenities such as schools.
The zoning also reflects existing land uses along Blake
Street. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3030

839-3301

839-3795

839-4341

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

City Centre Fringe Rezone 20, TAWARIKI 20 Tawariki


STREET, Ponsonby
Street, Ponsonby
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 24, TAWARIKI 24 Tawariki


STREET, Ponsonby
Street, Ponsonby
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 34, TAWARIKI 34 Tawariki


STREET, Ponsonby
Street, Ponsonby
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Ponsonby

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 18,16,


16 and 18 Parawai Ponsonby
PARAWAI CRESCENT, Crescent,
Ponsonby from Single Ponsonby
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 11,13,15,17,


HUKANUI
CRESCENT,1/4A3/4A,10,1/8A3/8A,4,6,8, TAWARIKI
STREET, Ponsonby
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13,15,17
Ponsonby
Hukanui Crescent,
1/4A3/4A,10,1/8A3/8A,4,6,8,
Tawariki Street,
Ponsonby

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone


46,44,38,42,40,
TAWARIKI STREET,
Ponsonby from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46,44,38,42 and
40 Tawariki
Street, Ponsonby

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support


retention of SH zone. The site is subject to the pre-1944
BDC and flooding constraints and retention of the
notified zoning is appropriate because the outcomes the
pre-1944 BCD seek to achieve are aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support
retention of SH zone. The site is subject to the pre-1944
BDC and flooding constraints and retention of the
notified zoning is appropriate because the outcomes the
pre-1944 BCD seek to achieve are aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support
retention of SH zone. The site is subject to the pre-1944
BDC and flooding constraints and retention of the
notified zoning is appropriate because the outcomes the
pre-1944 BCD seek to achieve are aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support
retention of SH zone. The sites are subject to the pre1944 BDC and flooding constraints and retention of the
notified zoning is appropriate because the outcomes the
pre-1944 BCD seek to achieve are aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

353

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4343

839-4344

Ponsonby

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No
retention of MHS zone. These sites are subject to the pre1944 BDC and retention of the notified MHS zone is
appropriate because the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC
seek to achieve generally align with the objectives of the
zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No
retention of MHS zone. The sites are subject to the pre1944 BDC and flooding constraints and retention of the
notified zoning is appropriate because the outcomes the
pre-1944 BCD seek to achieve are aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4351

839-116

839-121

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Herne Bay

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone


59,57,61,63,65,67,
KELMARNA AVENUE,
Ponsonby from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

59,57,61,63,65
and 67 Kelmarna
Avenue, Herne
Bay

SH / MHS

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 51, NORFOLK
STREET, Ponsonby.

51 Norfolk Street, Ponsonby


Ponsonby

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House 38 Ponsonby


Ponsonby
at 38, PONSONBY
Terrace, Ponsonby
TERRACE, Ponsonby.

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 24,26,22, RYLE
STREET, Freemans
Bay.
City Centre Fringe Retain Single House
at 33,35, KELMARNA
AVENUE, Ponsonby.

24,26,22, RYLE
Freemans Bay
STREET, Freemans
Bay

SH

33 and 35
Herne Bay
Kelmarna Avenue,
Herne Bay

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 72, O'NEILL
STREET, Ponsonby.

72 O'Neill Street,
Ponsonby

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 12-14, ENGLAND
STREET,33/1,41/1,34/
1,40/1,39/1,42/1,32/
1, MIDDLE
STREET,30/3,29/3,31/
3,23/1,28/3,21/1,22/
1, RUNNELL
STREET,35/16,38/16,
26/16,37/16,27/16,2
4/16,36/16,25/16,
SPRING STREET,
Freemans Bay.

12-14 England
Freemans Bay
Street,33/1,41/1,3
4/1,40/1,39/1,42/
1,32/1, Middle
Street,30/3,29/3,3
1/3,23/1,28/3,21/
1,22/1 Runnell
Street
,35/16,38/16,26/1
6,37/16,27/16,24/
16,36/16,25/16,
Spring Street,
Freemans Bay.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

SH

SH

REASONS

354

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU on 59, 57, 61


and 63 Kelmarna Avenue. Support change from MHS to
MHU on 65 and 67 Kelmarna Avenue. These sites (65
and 67 Kelmarna Avenue) are not subject to flooding
constraints and do not require a SH zone to manage
flooding risks. The sites could be rezoned to higher
intensification because they are located near Jervois
Road LC, a public open space and have good access to
RFN. The rezoning of these properties is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support retention of notified SH zone. HC applies to the
site and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone. HC applies to the
site and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.

Yes

Support retention of notified SH zone. HC applies to the


sites and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone. HC applies to the
sites and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.

No

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No
SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No
SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

839-1214

839-1260

SH

SH

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No
SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

839-262

839-265

Ponsonby

THAB

SH

THAB

Support retention of SH zone. The site is subject to the No


HC and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. Sites are located within
No
adjacent to MU zone and across from New World
supermarke and have good access to RFN along College
Hill. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-294

839-2941

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 45, JOHN STREET,
Ponsonby.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
45 John Street,
Ponsonby

LOCALITY

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 76,


76 Beresford
BERESFORD STREET Street West,
WEST, Freemans Bay Freemans Bay
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Freemans Bay

City Centre Fringe Rezone 45, HEPBURN 45 Hepburn


STREET, Freemans
Street, Freemans
Bay from Single
Bay
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Freemans Bay

City Centre Fringe Rezone 49, HEPBURN 49 Hepburn


STREET, Freemans
Street, Freemans
Bay from Single
Bay
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Freemans Bay

City Centre Fringe Rezone 7, BAYARD


7 Bayard Street,
STREET, Ponsonby
Ponsonby
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Ponsonby

City Centre Fringe Rezone 46,44,42,40, 46,44,42 and 40


FRANKLIN ROAD,
Franklin Road,
Freemans Bay from Freemans Bay
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Freemans Bay

City Centre Fringe Rezone 2-8, RYLE


STREET,38, WOOD
STREET, Freemans
Bay from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Freemans Bay

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

THAB

REASONS

355

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of SH zone. The site is subject to the No


HC and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to THAB. Support retention of SH No
zone. The site is subject to the HC and the outcomes the
HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
SH

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support
As per submission by Corporation

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3047

SH

THAB

Do not support change to THAB. Support retention of SH No


zone. The site is subject to the HC and the outcomes the
HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3063

SH

THAB

Do not support change to THAB. Support retention of SH No


zone. The site is subject to the HC and the outcomes the
HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3264

839-3286

839-3414

2-8 Ryle Street


and 38 Wood
Street, Freemans
Bay

MHS

SH

SH

THAB

THAB

MHU

Do not support change to THAB, support retention of


No
MHS. While it is recognised that the property is located
near Ponsonby TC and the RFN, rezoning it to THAB is not
supported. The property is surrounded by SH zoned
properties with the HC. These properties are
predominantly one storey buildings. Retention of MHS is
appropriate given the surrounding context. The
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change to THAB. Support retention of SH No
zone. The sites are subject to the HC and the outcomes
the HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Do not support change to MHU. Support retention of SH No


zone. The sites are subject to the HC and the outcomes
the HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3788

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone


4/97,11/97,21/97,16/
97,22/97,6/97,9/97,1
0/97,15/97,2/97,7/97
,5/97,17/97,13/97,14
/97,3/97,12/97,18/97
,19/97,8/97,20/97,1/
97, VERMONT
STREET, Ponsonby
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

4/97,11/97,21/97, Ponsonby
16/97,22/97,6/97,
9/97,10/97,15/97,
2/97,7/97,5/97,17
/97,13/97,14/97,3
/97,12/97,18/97,1
9/97,8/97,20/97,1
/97, VERMONT
STREET, Ponsonby

MHS

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 18, TRINITY
STREET, Ponsonby.

18 Trinity Street,
Ponsonby

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. The subject


properties are located some 400m away from Ponsonby
TC and are surrounded by SH zoned with the HC. The
properties are also subject to historic heritage extent of
place overlay and the outcomes the overlay seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

356

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No

MHS

Support

Accept Historic Heritage site


839-388

839-3919

City Centre Fringe Rezone 53,


53 Anglesea
ANGLESEA STREET,
Street, Freemans
Freemans Bay from Bay
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Ponsonby

Freemans Bay

SH

SH

THAB

Support retention of SH zone. The site is subject to the No


HC and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to THAB. Support retention of SH No
zone. The site is subject to the HC and the outcomes the
HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4156

City Centre Fringe Rezone 8, TAHUNA


STREET,88,
BERESFORD STREET
WEST, Freemans Bay
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

8 Tahuna Street
Freemans Bay
and 88 Beresford
Street West,
Freemans Bay

SH

THAB

Do not support change to THAB. Support retention of SH No


zone. The sites are subject to the HC and the outcomes
the HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4352

City Centre Fringe Rezone 68,66,


68,66 Kelmarna
KELMARNA AVENUE, Avenue, Herne
Ponsonby from
Bay
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Herne Bay

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The sites are No


subject to flooding constraints and retaining the SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7863

City Centre Fringe Rezone 3, 5 PICTON 3, 5 Picton Street, Freemans Bay


STREET. Freemans
Freemans Bay
Bay from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

THAB

Do not support change to THAB. Support retention of SH No


zone. The sites are subject to the HC and the outcomes
the HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7866

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

City Centre Fringe Rezone 3 HOPETOUN 3 Hopetoun


STREET. Auckland
Street, Freemans
from Single House to Bay
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Freemans Bay

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

357

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to THAB. Support retention of SH No


zone. The site is subject to the HC and the outcomes the
HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2290

839-2628

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Use at 6


BURGOYNE STREET. 8
CHAPMAN STREET.
Grey Lynn.

6 BURGOYNE
Grey Lynn
STREET, 8
CHAPMAN
STREET, Grey Lynn

MU

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Use at


14, 16 CHAPMAN
STREET. 1, 11, 3, 5, 7
BURGOYNE STREET.
Grey Lynn.

14, 16 CHAPMAN Grey Lynn


STREET and 1, 11,
3, 5, 7 BURGOYNE
STREET, Grey
Lynn.

MU

City Centre Fringe Rezone


1B/32,1B/34,1B/36,1
D/36,1D/34,1A/34,1A
/36,1A/32,2B/32,2B/
36,2B/34,1C/36,1C/3
4,1C/32,2A/32,2A/36,
2A/34,2D/34,2D/36,2
C/34,2C/36,2C/32,
SURREY CRESCENT,
Grey Lynn from
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings
to Local Centre.

1B/32,1B/34,1B/3 Grey Lynn


6,1D/36,1D/34,1A
/34,1A/36,1A/32,
2B/32,2B/36,2B/3
4,1C/36,1C/34,1C
/32,2A/32,2A/36,
2A/34,2D/34,2D/3
6,2C/34,2C/36,2C
/32, SURREY
CRESCENT, Grey
Lynn

THAB

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 1, WEONA
PLACE,4,
WINSOMERE
CRESCENT,
Westmere.

1 WEONA PLACE, Westmere


4 WINSOMERE
CRESCENT,
Westmere

SH

MU

MU

Support retention of notified MU zone. The sites are


No
located close to and support City Centre and Ponsonby
TC and enable the development of intensive residential
activities. Retention of the notified MU zone gives effect
to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving
the objectives of the MU zone.
Support retention of notified MU zone. The sites are
No
located close to and support City Centre and Ponsonby
TC and enable the development of intensive residential
activities. Retention of the notified MU zone gives effect
to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving
the objectives of the MU zone.

MU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4335

LC

Do not support change to LC but note that 1A-2C/32


No
Surrey Crescent is already zoned Local Centre, as notified.
Support retention of THAB zone for 1A-2D/34 and 1A2D/36 Surrey Crescent. Retention of the THAB zone
supports a quality compact urban form around a centre
and RFN, gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone.
Furthermore, there is no evidence to suggest that there is
a need to expand the existing LC. Economic evidence
from Susan Fairgray (topics 051-054) indicates that there
is a surplus of retail activity in the Grey Lynn area.

THAB

Support

Site rezoning is split, but accept THAB


839-1255

839-1256

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 42A,42B,
LEMINGTON ROAD,
Westmere.

42A,42B,
Westmere
LEMINGTON
ROAD, Westmere

SH

SH

SH

Do not support retention of notified SH zone. Support


Yes
MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for its context and
complements the neighbourhood's existing and planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Proposed change is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives for the zone
and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change, relevant further details can be found in
Do not support retention of notified SH zone. Support
Yes
change to MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for its
context and complements the neighbourhood's existing
and planned suburban built character of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. Proposed change is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change, relevant further details can be found in

SH

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

SH

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1257

839-1259

839-160

839-190

839-276

839-284

839-2843

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Housing 1,3 MEOLA ROAD, Westmere
Urban at 1,3, MEOLA Westmere
ROAD, Point
Chevalier-Westmere.

MHU

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Housing 47,48,49, WEBBER Westmere


Urban at 47,48,49,
STREET,
WEBBER STREET,
Westmere
Westmere.

MHU

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 10, SUNNY BRAE
CRESCENT,
Westmere.

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 1, WESTMERE
PARK AVENUE,
Westmere.

10 SUNNY BRAE
CRESCENT,
Westmere

1 WESTMERE
PARK AVENUE,
Westmere

Westmere

Westmere

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Housing 2 MEOLA ROAD,


Urban at 2, MEOLA
Point ChevalierROAD, Point
Westmere
Chevalier-Westmere.

Westmere

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 24, SUNNY BRAE
CRESCENT,
Westmere.

Westmere

24 SUNNY BRAE
CRESCENT,
Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 22, TIROTAI 22 TIROTAI


CRESCENT, Westmere CRESCENT,
from Single House to Westmere
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Westmere

SH

MHU

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

SH

SH

MHU

SH

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of notified MHU zone. The sites are


close to RFN and will provide urban living that increases
housing capacity and choice. Retention of the MHU zone
supports a quality compact urban form, gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone.
Support retention of notified MHU zone. The sites are
close to a high density residential area, have good access
to existing RFN, and will provide urban living that
increases housing capacity and choice and future
increased access to RFN. Retention of the MHU zone
supports a quality compact urban form, giving effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
Do not support retention of notified SH zone. Support
change to MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for its
context and complements the neighbourhood's existing
and planned suburban built character of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. Proposed change is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change, relevant further details can be found in
Do not support retention of notified SH zone. Support
change to MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for its
context and complements the neighbourhood's existing
and planned suburban built character of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. Proposed change is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change, relevant further details can be found in
Support retention of notified MHU zone. The site is close
to RFN and will provide urban living that increases
housing capacity and choice. Retention of the MHU zone
supports a quality compact urban form, gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone.
Do not support retention of SH zone. Support change to
MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for its context and
complements the neighbourhood's existing and planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Proposed change is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change, relevant further details can be found in
Do not support change to MHS zone. Support change to
MHU zone. The site is close to Westmere NC and RFN and
will provide urban living that increases housing capacity
and choice. Proposed change to MHU supports a quality
compact urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
zone. This is an out of scope change, relevant further
details can be found in Attachment F.

358

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Yes

SH

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

Yes

SH

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

No
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Yes

SH

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

Yes

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2848

839-3024

839-3061

839-3126

839-3160

839-3170

839-3191

839-3235

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

City Centre Fringe Rezone 72,


WARNOCK STREET,
Westmere-Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 6, OBAN
ROAD, Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

72 WARNOCK
STREET,
Westmere

Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 27,


NOTTINGHAM
STREET, Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 61,
WARNOCK STREET,
Westmere-Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 33, CHESTER
AVENUE, Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

27 NOTTINGHAM Westmere
STREET,
Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 52,


WELLPARK AVENUE,
Grey Lynn from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

52 WELLPARK
AVENUE, Grey
Lynn

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

359

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHU zone. Site is subject to


No
Pre-1944 BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks
are generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
On basis of proximity to centreconsider MHS appropriate
Zoning

6 OBAN ROAD,
Westmere

61 WARNOCK
STREET,
Westmere

33 CHESTER
AVENUE,
Westmere

Westmere

Westmere

Westmere

Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone 34, WARWICK 34 WARWICK


AVENUE, Westmere AVENUE,
from Single House to Westmere
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 24, NOTLEY 24 NOTLEY


STREET, Westmere
STREET,
from Single House to Westmere
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Westmere

SH

SH

SH

SH

MHS

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change to MHU zone. The site is close to


Yes
Westmere NC and RFN and provides urban living that
increases housing capacity and choice. Proposed change
to MHU supports a quality compact urban form, giving
effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the zone.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of the SH zone. The site is subject to Pre-1944 BDC and
the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks are generally
aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Site is subject to
No
Pre-1944 BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks
to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention


of the SH zone. The site is subject to Pre-1944 BDC and
the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.

Yes

Support retention of notified MHS zone. MHS zone is


appropriate for its context and complements the
neighbourhood's existing (predominantly single storey)
and planned suburban built character of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention
of the SH zone. The site is subject to Pre-1944 BDC and
the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.

No

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
On basis of proximity to centreconsider MHS appropriate
Zoning

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Meet Criteria
No

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support change to Yes


MHS zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3241

839-3242

839-3245

839-3361

839-3376

839-3394

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

City Centre Fringe Rezone 14, NOTLEY 14 NOTLEY


STREET, Westmere
STREET,
from Single House to Westmere
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Westmere

PAUP ZONE

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 35, OLD MILL 35 OLD MILL


Grey Lynn
ROAD, WestmereROAD, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 10,


HERRINGSON
AVENUE, Grey Lynn
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

10 HERRINGSON
AVENUE, Grey
Lynn

Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone 20, OBAN


20 OBAN ROAD,
ROAD, Westmere
Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 15, SAVAGE


STREET, Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Westmere

15 SAVAGE
STREET,
Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 7, TIROTAI


7 TIROTAI
CRESCENT, Westmere CRESCENT,
from Single House to Westmere
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Westmere

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support change to


MHS zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone.
Proposed change is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support change to
MHS zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone.
Proposed change is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention
of the MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for its context
and complements the neighbourhood's existing (single
storey) and planned suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. Retention of
this zone is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone, avoids spot zoning and gives
Do not support change to MHS zone. Support change to
MHU zone. The site is close to Westmere NC and RFN and
will provide urban living that increases housing capacity
and choice. Proposed change to MHU supports a quality
compact urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
zone. This is an out of scope change, relevant further
details can be found in Attachment F.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention
of the MHS zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHS zone. Support change to
MHU zone. The site is close to Westmere NC and RFN and
will provide urban living that increases housing capacity
and choice. Proposed change to MHU supports a quality
compact urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
zone. This is an out of scope change, relevant further
details can be found in Attachment F.

360

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Yes
MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

Yes

On basis of proximity to centreconsider MHS appropriate


Zoning
No

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Yes

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Yes

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3466

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

City Centre Fringe Rezone


10/27A,9/27A,4/27A,
1/27A,8/27A,2/27A,3
/27A,5/27A,6/27A,7/
27A, SACKVILLE
STREET, Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

10/27A,9/27A,4/2 Grey Lynn


7A,1/27A,8/27A,2
/27A,3/27A,5/27A
,6/27A,7/27A,
SACKVILLE
STREET, Grey Lynn

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

361

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change to MHU zone. The site is close to West


Yes
Lynn LC and Richmond Road/Westmoreland Street West
shopping area and has good access to RFN. Will provide
urban living that increases housing capacity and choice
and future access to increased RFN. Proposed change
supports a quality compact urban form, giving effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3544

839-3551

839-3585

839-3586

839-3680

839-3751

City Centre Fringe Rezone 39, CHESTER 39 CHESTER


AVENUE, Westmere AVENUE,
from Single House to Westmere
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Westmere

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 61, FRANCIS 61 FRANCIS


Grey Lynn
STREET, Grey Lynn
STREET, Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 47,


47 WARNOCK
WARNOCK STREET,
STREET,
Westmere-Grey Lynn Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Westmere

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 33, NOTLEY


STREET, Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Westmere

33 NOTLEY
STREET,
Westmere

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone 56,


56 SELBOURNE
Grey Lynn
SELBOURNE STREET, STREET, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 1, SAVAGE


STREET, Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

1 SAVAGE STREET, Westmere


Westmere

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No


of the SH zone. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support change to
MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for its context and
complements the neighbourhood's existing and planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Proposed change is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change to MHU zone. The site is close to
Westmere NC and RFN and is not subject to any
environmental and historic character constraints. It
provides urban living that increases housing capacity and
choice. Proposed change to MHU supports a quality
compact urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention
of MHS zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
of achieving the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU. Support retention of SH
zone. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC and the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention
of MHS zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
of achieving the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Yes

Meet Criteria
Yes

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

No
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3763

839-3765

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

City Centre Fringe Rezone 29, TIROTAI 29 TIROTAI


CRESCENT, Westmere CRESCENT,
from Single House to Westmere
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 36A,


36A WESTMERE
WESTMERE
CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Westmere Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 54,


WARNOCK STREET,
Westmere-Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 54,
LARCHWOOD
AVENUE, Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

54 WARNOCK
STREET,
Westmere

Westmere

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 44, SUNNY BRAE
CRESCENT,
Westmere.

44 SUNNY BRAE
CRESCENT,
Westmere

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

REASONS

362

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHS zone. Support change to Yes


MHU zone. The site is close to Westmere NC and RFN and
provides urban living that increases housing capacity and
choice. Proposed change supports a quality compact
urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone.
This is an out of scope change, relevant further details
can be found in Attachment F.
Support change to MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate
Yes
for its context and complements the neighbourhood's
existing planned suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. Proposed
change is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3816

839-3884

839-389

839-3915

54 LARCHWOOD
AVENUE,
Westmere

Westmere

Westmere

SH

MHS

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 11, MEOLA


11 MEOLA ROAD, Westmere
ROAD, Point
Point Chevalier
Chevalier-Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 1, WILLIAM


DENNY AVENUE,
Westmere from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

MHU

MHU

SH

MHU

Do not support change to MHU. Support retention of SH No


zone. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC and the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for its context
and complements the neighbourhood's existing and
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings. Retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of notified SH zone. Support
Yes
change to MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for the
site's context and complements the neighbourhood's
existing and planned suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. Proposed
change is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is
an out of scope change, relevant further details can be
Support change to MHU zone. The site is close to
Yes
Westmere NC and RFN and provides urban living that
increases housing capacity and choice. Proposed change
to MHU supports a quality compact urban form, gives
effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the zone.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centres.

Meet Criteria

SH

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3928

1 WILLIAM DENNY Westmere


AVENUE

MHU

Do not support change to MHU. Support change to MHS Yes


zone. MHS zone is appropriate for the site's context and
complements the neighbourhood's existing and planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Proposed change is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change, relevant further details can be found in

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4312

839-4313

839-4314

839-4315

839-4316

839-4317

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Westmere

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone 43,41,


TIROTAI CRESCENT,
Westmere from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

41, 43 TIROTAI
CRESCENT,
Westmere

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 2,4, TIROTAI


CRESCENT,7,
LEMINGTON ROAD,
Westmere from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

2,4 TIROTAI
Westmere
CRESCENT, 7
LEMINGTON
ROAD, Westmere

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 24,22,


LEMINGTON ROAD,
Westmere from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

24,22
Westmere
LEMINGTON
ROAD, Westmere

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 18,16,


LEMINGTON ROAD,
Westmere from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

18,16,
Westmere
LEMINGTON
ROAD, Westmere

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 21,23,


21, 23 WESTMERE Westmere
WESTMERE
CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Westmere Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 15, MEOLA


ROAD,18,14,16,
WESTMERE
CRESCENT, Point
Chevalier-Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

15, MEOLA
ROAD,18,14,16,
WESTMERE
CRESCENT,
Westmere

Westmere

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change to MHS zone. Support change to


MHU zone. The sites are close to Westmere NC and RFN
and will provide urban living that increases housing
capacity and choice. Proposed change supports a quality
compact urban form, gives effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
zone. This is an out of scope change, relevant further
details can be found in Attachment F.
Do not support change to MHS zone. Support change to
MHU zone. The sites are close to Westmere NC and RFN
and will provide urban living that increases housing
capacity and choice. Proposed change supports a quality
compact urban form, gives effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
zone. This is an out of scope change, relevant further
details can be found in Attachment F.
Do not support change to MHS zone. Support change to
MHU zone. The sites are close to Westmere NC and RFN
and will provide urban living that increases housing
capacity and choice. Proposed change supports a quality
compact urban form, gives effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
zone. This is an out of scope change, relevant further
details can be found in Attachment F.
Do not support change to MHS zone. Support change to
MHU zone. The sites are close to Westmere NC and RFN
and will provide urban living that increases housing
capacity and choice. Proposed change supports a quality
compact urban form, gives effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
zone. This is an out of scope change, relevant further
details can be found in Attachment F.
Do not support change to MHS zone. Support change to
MHU zone. The sites are close to Westmere NC and RFN
and will provide urban living that increases housing
capacity and choice. Proposed change supports a quality
compact urban form, gives effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
zone. This is an out of scope change, relevant further
details can be found in Attachment F.
Support change to MHU zone. The sites are close to
Westmere NC and RFN and will provide urban living that
increases housing capacity and choice. Proposed change
supports a quality compact urban form, gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone.

363

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Yes

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Yes

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Yes

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Yes

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Yes

Meet Criteria
Yes

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4318

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone 12,14,16,


12,14,16, MEOLA Westmere
MEOLA ROAD, Point ROAD, Westmere
Chevalier-Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 8,6, MEOLA 8,6 MEOLA ROAD, Westmere
ROAD, Point
Westmere
Chevalier-Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 2, DORSET


STREET,133,131,
GARNET ROAD,
Westmere from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

364

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change to MHU zone. The sites are close to


Yes
Westmere NC and RFN and will provide urban living that
increases housing capacity and choice. Proposed change
supports a quality compact urban form, gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4319

MHU

Support change to MHU zone. The sites are close to


Yes
Westmere NC and RFN and will provide urban living that
increases housing capacity and choice. Proposed change
supports a quality compact urban form, gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4320

839-4321

839-4322

839-4323

839-4324

2 DORSET STREET, Westmere


133,131 GARNET
ROAD, Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 8,6, NOTLEY 8,6 NOTLEY


STREET, Westmere
STREET,
from Single House to Westmere
Mixed Housing
Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 25,27,29,
NOTLEY STREET,
Westmere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 86,84,
GARNET ROAD,
Westmere from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 18,20,
NOTLEY STREET,
Westmere from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Westmere

SH

25, 27, 29 NOTLEY Westmere


STREET,
Westmere

MHS

86,84 GARNET
Westmere
ROAD, Westmere

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change to MHU zone. The properties are


subject to the Pre-1944 BDC. Support retention of
notified SH zone at 2 Dorset Street and support retention
of notified MHS zone at 131 and 133 Garnet Road
because the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve
are generally aligned with the objectives of the SH and
MHS zones and gives effect to the RPS. The Garnet Road
properties are located directly on the RFN and retention
of the MHS zone for these two properties also avoids
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support change to
MHS zone. The properties are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone. Proposed change is the most appropriate way
of achieving the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change to MHU zone. The sites are
subject to the Pre-1944 BDC and SEA overlays. Support
retention of less intensive MHS zone because the
outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support change to
MHS zone. The properties are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Yes
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Yes

Meet Criteria
Yes
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

18,20 NOTLEY
STREET,
Westmere

Westmere

SH

MHU

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support change to Yes


MHS zone. The properties are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate as it complements
the neighbourhood's existing and planned suburban built
character of predominantly one-two storey buildings.
Proposed change is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4325

839-4326

839-4327

839-4336

839-4337

839-4338

839-4941

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone 19,21,


SAVAGE STREET,
Westmere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 5,7, SAVAGE
STREET, Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,21 SAVAGE
STREET,
Westmere

Westmere

MHS

5,7 SAVAGE
STREET,
Westmere

Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone


139,145,143,141,
OLD MILL
ROAD,10,12,14,16,18
,31,29,27,2,25,8,4,
SAVAGE STREET,
Westmere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 9,
LIVINGSTONE
STREET, Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

139,145,143,141, Westmere
OLD MILL ROAD,
10,12,14,16,18,31
,29,27,2,25,8,4,
SAVAGE STREET,
Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 43,41,


REGINA STREET,
Westmere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

43,41 REGINA
STREET,
Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 35, REGINA


STREET,36, WEBBER
STREET, Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

35 REGINA
Westmere/Gre MHS
STREET, 36
y Lynn
WEBBER STREET,
Westmere

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

365

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No


of MHS zone. The properties are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of MHS zone. The properties are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone and give effect to the RPS. Retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of MHS zone. The properties are subject to the Pre-1944
BDC and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control
9 LIVINGSTONE
STREET,
Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 28, NOTLEY 28 NOTLEY


STREET, Westmere
STREET,
from Single House to Westmere
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Grey Lynn

Westmere

Westmere

SH

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change to MHU zone. The site is close to West


Lynn LC and Richmond Road/Westmoreland Street
shopping area and has good access to the RFN and
provides urban living that increases housing capacity and
choice. Proposed change supports a quality compact
urban form, gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone.
Support change to MHU zone. The sites are close to a
high density residential area (in Regina Street/Livingstone
Street), have good access to RFN and provide urban living
that increases housing capacity and choice. Proposed
change supports a quality compact urban form, gives
effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the zone.
Support change to MHU zone. The sites are close to a
high density residential area (in Regina Street/Livingstone
Street), have good access to RFN and provide urban living
that increases housing capacity and choice. Proposed
change supports a quality compact urban form, gives
effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the zone.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support change to
MHS zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone.
Proposed change is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

Yes

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Yes

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Yes

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Yes
MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4942

839-639

839-704

839-745

839-7484

839-7646

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

City Centre Fringe Rezone 37, NOTLEY


STREET, Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37 NOTLEY
STREET,
Westmere

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 44, FIFE STREET,
Westmere.

44 FIFE STREET,
Westmere

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Housing 17 NOTLEY


Suburban at 17,
STREET,
NOTLEY STREET,
Westmere
Westmere.

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Housing 35 WEBBER


Urban at 35, WEBBER STREET,
STREET, Westmere. Westmere

LOCALITY

Westmere

Westmere

Westmere

Grey Lynn

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

City Centre Fringe Rezone 39, 3/34,


1/34, 32, 30, 4/34,
2/34 NOTLEY STREET.
Westmere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39, 3/34, 1/34, 32, Westmere


30, 4/34, 2/34
NOTLEY STREET,
Westmere

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone 11, 13


LIVINGSTONE
STREET. Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11, 13
LIVINGSTONE
STREET,
Westmere

SH

Westmere

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention


of MHS zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone. Support change to
MHU zone. The site is close to a high density residential
area, has good access to existing RFN, and will provide
urban living that increases housing capacity and choice
and future increased access to RFN. Proposed change
supports a quality compact urban form, gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
Support retention of notified MHS zone. The site is
subject to the Pre-1944 BDC and the outcomes the Pre1944 BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the MHS zone. MHS zone is also appropriate
for its context and complements the neighbourhood's
existing and planned suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. The retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives for the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone. The site is close
to a high density residential area (in Regina
Street/Livingstone Street), has good access to RFN and
provides urban living that increases housing capacity and
choice. Retention of the MHU zone supports a quality
compact urban form, gives effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention
of MHS zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
of achieving the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

366

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Yes

MHU

Oppose

SH

Support in Part

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Yes

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning
No

MHS

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

No

Meet Criteria
No

Support change to MHU zone. The sites are close to a


Yes
high density residential area (Regina Street/Livingstone
Street) and Richmond Road/Westmoreland Street
shopping area, have good access to RFN and provide
urban living that increases housing capacity and choice.
Proposed change supports a quality compact urban form,
giving effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way
of achieving the objectives of the zone.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7773

839-809

839-2913

839-2841

839-2990

839-3247

839-3281

839-3324

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

City Centre Fringe Rezone 68, 74, 72, 70


LARCHWOOD
AVENUE. Westmere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

68, 74, 72, 70


LARCHWOOD
AVENUE,
Westmere

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 41, LEMINGTON
ROAD, Westmere.

41 LEMINGTON
Westmere
ROAD, Westmere

City Centre Fringe Rezone 3, FIRTH


3, FIRTH ROAD,
ROAD, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Westmere

Grey Lynn

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 52,


52 SELBOURNE
Grey Lynn
SELBOURNE STREET, STREET, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 3A,


3A SCHOFIELD
Grey Lynn
SCHOFIELD STREET, STREET, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 31, ALLEN


31 ALLEN ROAD,
ROAD, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone 25,23,


25,23,
Grey Lynn
SELBOURNE STREET, SELBOURNE
Grey Lynn from Single STREET, Grey Lynn
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 30,


30 NOTTINGHAM Westmere
NOTTINGHAM
STREET,
STREET, Westmere
Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

367

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No


of MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for the site's
context and complements the neighbourhood's existing
and planned suburban built character of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. It also avoids spot zoning.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
of achieving the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support retention of notified SH zone. Support
Yes
change to MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for its
context and complements the neighbourhood's existing
and planned suburban built character of predominantly
one-two storey buildings. Proposed change is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

SH

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN as well as
services Schools.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centres.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centres.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centres.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre / facilities.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre / facilities.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3832

839-3852

839-3882

839-703

839-1261

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

City Centre Fringe Rezone 18, ALLEN


18 ALLEN ROAD,
ROAD, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Grey Lynn

PAUP ZONE

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 17, DRYDEN 17 DRYDEN


Grey Lynn
STREET, Grey Lynn
STREET, Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 29,


29 SELBOURNE
Grey Lynn
SELBOURNE STREET, STREET, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 148, SURREY
CRESCENT, Grey
Lynn.

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/134-8/134,
SURREY CRESCENT,
Grey Lynn.

148 SURREY
CRESCENT, Grey
Lynn

Grey Lynn

1/134-8/134,
SURREY
CRESCENT, Grey
Lynn

Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone 670,668,


670,668, GREAT
GREAT NORTH ROAD, NORTH ROAD,
[Grey Lynn] Auckland Grey Lynn
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone 650, GREAT 650 GREAT


NORTH ROAD, [Grey NORTH ROAD,
Lynn] Auckland from Grey Lynn
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Grey Lynn

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

THAB

REASONS

368

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No


of SH zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone. Support change to Yes
MHU zone as the site is close to a high density
residential area and Grey Lynn LC, has good access to
existing RFN, and will provide urban living that increases
housing capacity and choice and future increased access
to RFN. Proposed change supports a quality compact
urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. The sites are
No
located between Grey Lynn and West Lynn LC's and RFN.
Retention of the THAB zone supports a quality compact
urban form, gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

SH

Support in Part

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre / facilities.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre / facilities.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre / facilities.

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2896

MHS

THAB

Do not support change to THAB. Support change to MHU Yes


zone. The site is located close to Grey Lynn LC and RFN
and, given its topography, which slopes from north east
to south west and potential effects on surrounding
properties, this is considered to be the appropriate zone.
This proposed rezoning supports a quality compact urban
form, gives effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate
way of achieving the objectives of the MHU zone.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3018

MHS

THAB

Do not support change to THAB. Support change to MHU Yes


zone. The site is located close to Grey Lynn LC and RFN
and, given its topography, which slopes from east to west
and potential effects on surrounding properties, this is
considered to be the appropriate zone. This proposed
rezoning supports a quality compact urban form, gives
effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the MHU zone.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3793

839-4333

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

City Centre Fringe Rezone 656, GREAT 656, GREAT


NORTH ROAD,
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland from Mixed Grey Lynn
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

City Centre Fringe Rezone 638,640,


GREAT NORTH
ROAD,13, TUARANGI
ROAD, Auckland from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Grey Lynn

638,640, GREAT Grey Lynn


NORTH ROAD and
13, TUARANGI
ROAD, Grey Lynn

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

369

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to THAB. Support change to MHU Yes


zone. The site is located close to Grey Lynn LC and RFN
and, given its topography, which slopes from east to west
and potential effects on surrounding properties, this is
considered to be the appropriate zone. This proposed
rezoning supports a quality compact urban form, gives
effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the MHU zone.
Do not support change to THAB. Support change to MHU Yes
zone. The site is located close to Grey Lynn LC and RFN
and, given its topography, which slopes from east to west
and potential effects on surrounding properties, this is
considered to be the appropriate zone. This proposed
rezoning supports a quality compact urban form, gives
effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the MHU zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4334

City Centre Fringe Rezone 664,662,660, 664,662,660,


Grey Lynn
GREAT NORTH ROAD, GREAT NORTH
Auckland from Mixed ROAD, Grey Lynn
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 9, SEFTON
AVENUE, Grey Lynn.

SH

THAB

Do not support change to THAB. Support change to MHU Yes


zone. The site is located close to Grey Lynn LC and RFN
and, given its topography, which slopes from east to west
and potential effects on surrounding properties, this is
considered to be the appropriate zone. This proposed
rezoning supports a quality compact urban form, gives
effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the MHU zone.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-765

9 SEFTON
AVENUE, Grey
Lynn

Grey Lynn

SH

Do not support retention of SH zone. Support change to Yes


MHU zone as the property is close to Grey Lynn LC and a
high density residential area, has good access to existing
RFN, and will provide urban living that increases housing
capacity and choice and future increased access to RFN.
The proposed change supports a quality compact urban
form, gives effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate
way of achieving the objectives of the zone. There is
scope from submission 5727-28 to rezone this site to

SH

Support in Part

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2874

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

City Centre Fringe Rezone


11/430,14/430,5/430
,4/430,6/430,1/430,2
5/432,17/432,20/432
,16/430,12/430,8/43
0,19/432,24/432,15/
430,7/430,13/430,21
/432,9/430,3/430,18/
432,10/430,22/432,2
3/432,2/430, GREAT
NORTH ROAD, [Grey
Lynn] Auckland from
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings
to Mixed Use.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

11/430,14/430,5/ Grey Lynn


430,4/430,6/430,
1/430,25/432,17/
432,20/432,16/43
0,12/430,8/430,1
9/432,24/432,15/
430,7/430,13/430
,21/432,9/430,3/4
30,18/432,10/430
,22/432,23/432,2/
430, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Grey Lynn

PAUP ZONE

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

REASONS

370

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change to MU. The sites are close to Grey No


Lynn LC and RFN and will support increasing capacity and
housing choice and diversity. Retention of the THAB zone
supports a quality compact urban form, gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone.

MU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3891

839-3332

839-3370

City Centre Fringe Rezone 60, IVANHOE 60 IVANHOE


ROAD, Western
ROAD, Western
Springs from Mixed Springs
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

City Centre Fringe Rezone 68,


TUARANGI ROAD,
Grey Lynn from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Grey Lynn

68 TUARANGI
Grey Lynn
ROAD, Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone 64, IVANHOE 64 IVANHOE


Grey Lynn
ROAD, Western
ROAD, Grey Lynn
Springs from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change to MHU. The site is subject to


No
flooding constraints and less intensive MHS zone is
appropriate. managing flooding risks on this site does not
require a SH zoning. MHS zone is appropriate for its
context and complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
Do not support change to MHU. The site is subject to
No
flooding constraints and less intensive MHS zone is
appropriate. managing flooding risks on this site does not
require a SH zoning. MHS zone is also appropriate for its
context and complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Proposed retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU. The site is subject to
No
flooding constraints and less intensive MHS zone is
appropriate. Managing flooding risks on this site does not
require a SH zoning. Retention of the MHS zone is also
appropriate for its context and complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. Proposed
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the zone and gives effect to

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3676

839-3691

839-4329

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone 54, IVANHOE 54 IVANHOE


Grey Lynn
ROAD, Western
ROAD, Grey Lynn
Springs from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone 87, IVANHOE 87 IVANHOE


Grey Lynn
ROAD, Western
ROAD, Grey Lynn
Springs from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone


714A,702A,708,718,7
04,716,698,714,700,7
12,702,710,708A,722
,720,706, GREAT
NORTH
ROAD,2/93,89,77,97,
3/93,83,67,5/93,1/93
,75,63,73,65,71,4/93,
91,69,81,95,79,85,
TUARANGI ROAD,
Auckland from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

714A, 702A, 708, Grey Lynn


718, 704, 716,
698, 714, 700,
712, 702, 710,
708A, 722, 720,
706 GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
2/93, 89, 77, 97,
3/93, 83, 67, 5/93,
1/93, 75, 63, 73,
65, 71, 4/93, 91,
69, 81, 95, 79, 85
TUARANGI ROAD,
Grey Lynn

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone


10,12,20,14,16,18,68, IVANHOE
ROAD,88,82,80,86,84
,78, TUARANGI
ROAD,744,736,
GREAT NORTH ROAD,
Auckland from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Use.

10, 12, 20, 14, 16, Grey Lynn


18, 6-8 IVANHOE
ROAD, 88, 82, 80,
86, 84, 78
TUARANGI ROAD,
744, 736 GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Grey Lynn

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

371

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHU. The site is subject to


No
flooding constraints and less intensive MHS zone is
appropriate. managing flooding risks on this site does not
require a SH zoning. MHS zone is also appropriate for its
context and complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Proposed retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU. The site is subject to
No
flooding constraints and less intensive MHS zone is
appropriate. Managing flooding risks on this site does not
require a SH zoning. MHS zone is also appropriate for its
context and complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Proposed retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU. The sites are subject to No
flooding constraints and the majority of sites (except 8797 Tuarangi Road) are subject to Pre-1944 BDC. Less
intensive MHS zone is appropriate. MHS zone is also
appropriate for its context and complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings. Proposed
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4330

MU

Do not support change to MU. The sites are subject to


No
flooding constraints. Acknowledge that 88 Tuarangi Road
and 736 and 744 Great North Road have existing three
storey blocks of flats. However, given flooding
constraints less intensive MHS zone is considered
appropriate for the identified sites. Proposed retention
of MHS is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4331

839-4332

839-1258

839-282

839-3026

839-320

839-3441

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone


25, 27, 21, 17, 23, Grey Lynn
25,27,21,17,23,19,
19 IVANHOE
IVANHOE ROAD,
ROAD, Grey Lynn
Western Springs from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Use.

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone


2/49, 1/47, 1/49, Grey Lynn
2/49,1/47,1/49,2/47, 2/47 IVANHOE
IVANHOE ROAD,
ROAD, Grey Lynn
Western Springs from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House 18,12,14,16,


at 18,12,14,16,
CASTLE STREET,
CASTLE STREET, Grey Grey Lynn
Lynn.

SH

Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


1/530-29/530,
Grey Lynn
Housing and
GREAT NORTH
Apartment Buildings ROAD, Grey Lynn
at 1/530-29/530,
GREAT NORTH ROAD,
Grey Lynn.

THAB

City Centre Fringe Rezone 9, WEST VIEW 9 WEST VIEW


Westmere
ROAD, Westmere
ROAD, Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 70, ROSE ROAD,
Grey Lynn.

SH

70 ROSE ROAD,
Grey Lynn

Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone 30,


30 Cockburn
Grey Lynn
COCKBURN STREET, Street, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

MHU

SH

THAB

MHS

SH

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change to MU zone. The sites are subject


to flooding constraints and the MHS zone reflects the
residential land use of Ivanhoe Street and the
surrounidng area south of Great North Road. The MHS
zone complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. MU zone is not appropriate as it will
result in spot zoning. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
Do not support change to MHU zone. The sites are
subject to flooding constraints and managing flooding
risks does not require a SH zone. MHS zone is
appropriate as it complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings and avoids spot zoning. Proposed
retention of MHS is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified SH zone. The sites are
subjec to the HC. Retention of the notified SH zone is
appropriate because the outcomes the HC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. The sites are
close to Grey Lynn LC and the RFN and proposed
retention provides urban living that increases housing
capacity and choice and access to centres and RFN.
Retention of the THAB zone supports a quality compact
urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone.
Do not support change to MHS zone. The site is subject
to the HC. Retention of the notified SH zone is
appropriate because the outcomes the HC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

372

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No

MU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No
SH

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

No

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No

Support retention of notified SH zone. The sites are


No
subjec to the HC. Retention of the notified SH zone is
appropriate because the outcomes the HC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone. The sites are
No
subjec to the pre-1944 BDC. Retention of the notified SH
zone is appropriate because the outcomes the Pre-1944
BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose

SH

Support in Part

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre / facilities.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3663

839-3695

839-3696

839-4328

839-532

839-658

839-7442

839-7658

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone 1, WEST VIEW 1 WEST VIEW


Grey Lynn
ROAD, Westmere
ROAD, Westmere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 40, OLD MILL 40, OLD MILL
Grey Lynn
ROAD, WestmereROAD, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 1, FISHERTON 1 FISHERTON


Grey Lynn
STREET, Grey Lynn
STREET, Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 26,28, WEST


VIEW ROAD,
Westmere from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
City Centre Fringe Retain Single House
at 11, CHAMBERLAIN
STREET, Grey Lynn.

26,28, WEST VIEW Grey Lynn


ROAD, Westmere

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 21, KIRK STREET,
Grey Lynn.

21 KIRK STREET,
Grey Lynn

11 CHAMBERLAIN Grey Lynn


STREET, Grey Lynn

Grey Lynn

SH

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 122


122 RICHMOND Grey Lynn
RICHMOND ROAD.
ROAD, Grey Lynn
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 13/2-6, 16/2- 13/2-6, 16/2-6,


Grey Lynn
6, 17/2-6, 9/2-6, 11/2- 17/2-6, 9/2-6,
6, 15/2-6, 10/2-6,
11/2-6, 15/2-6,
14/2-6, 12/2-6
10/2-6, 14/2-6,
SCHOFIELD STREET. 12/2-6 SCHOFIELD
Grey Lynn from Single STREET, Grey Lynn
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

REASONS

373

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHS zone. Support retention


of SH zone. HC applies to the site and the outcomes the
HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

No

Do not support change to MHS zone. The HC applies to


the site and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.

No

Support change to MHU. The site is located between


Yes
West Lynn and Grey Lynn LC with good access to RFN and
provides urban living that increases housing capacity and
choice. Proposed change supports a quality compact
urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the MHU
Do not support change to MHS zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The properties are subject to the HC and the
outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned
with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone. HC applies to the No
site and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone. HC applies to the No
site and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Pre-1944 BDC
No
applies to the site and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC
seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives
of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Support change to MHU zone. The sites are close to Grey Yes
Lynn LC and the RFN and will increase housing capacity
and choice. Proposed change supports a quality compact
urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the MHU
zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

SH

Support in Part

SH

Support in Part

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre / facilities.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7678

839-7793

839-7800

839-786

839-7936

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone 11 HAKANOA 11 HAKANOA


Grey Lynn
STREET. Grey Lynn
STREET, Grey Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 1/1A-10/1A 1/1A-10/1A


DRYDEN STREET.
DRYDEN STREET,
Grey Lynn from Single Grey Lynn
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Grey Lynn

City Centre Fringe Rezone Lot 62 DP


3147 from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban [11
Hakanoa St, Grey
Lynn].
City Centre Fringe Retain Single House
at 30, DICKENS
STREET, Grey Lynn.

Lot 62 DP 3147
Grey Lynn
from Single House
to Mixed Housing
Urban [11
Hakanoa St, Grey
Lynn]
30 DICKENS
Grey Lynn
STREET, Grey Lynn

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 2/2-6, 3/2-6,


6/2-6, 7/2-6, 1/2-6,
5/2-6, 4/2-6, 8/2-6
SCHOFIELD STREET.
Grey Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2/2-6, 3/2-6, 6/2- Grey Lynn


6, 7/2-6, 1/2-6,
5/2-6, 4/2-6, 8/26 SCHOFIELD
STREET, Grey Lynn

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 2/92, 3/92,


1/92, 88, 4/92, 90, 86
OLD MILL ROAD.
8/46, 6/46, 7/46,
5/46 WEST VIEW
ROAD. WestmereGrey Lynn from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
City Centre Fringe Retain Single House
at 39, MILLAIS
STREET, Grey Lynn.

2/92, 3/92, 1/92, Grey Lynn


88, 4/92, 90, 86
OLD MILL ROAD
and 8/46, 6/46,
7/46, 5/46 WEST
VIEW ROAD, Grey
Lynn

MHS

39 MILLAIS
Grey Lynn
STREET, Grey Lynn

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

MHU

REASONS

374

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No


of SH zone. The HC applies to the site and the outcomes
the HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Support change to MHU zone. The sites are close to Grey Yes
Lynn LC and the RFN and will increase housing capacity
and choice. Proposed change supports a quality compact
urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the MHU
zone.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The HC applies to the site and the outcomes
the HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Support retention of SH zone. The site is subject to the No


HC and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Support change to MHU zone. The sites are close to Grey Yes
Lynn LC and RFN and will increase housing capacity and
choice. Proposed change supports a quality compact
urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the MHU
zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

SH

Support in Part

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Meet Criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

Meet Criteria
839-7951

839-836

839-7600

MHU

Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No


of MHS zone. MHS zone is appropriate for its context and
complements the neighbourhood's existing and planned
suburban built character of predominantly one-two
storey buildings. Proposed retention is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Western Isthmus Rezone 9 SURREY


9 SURREY
CRESCENT. Grey Lynn CRESCENT, Grey
from Single House to Lynn
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Grey Lynn

SH

SH

MHU

Support retention of SH zone. The site is subject to the No


HC and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU zone. Support retention No
of SH zone. The property is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.

SH

Support in Part

MHU

Oppose

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre / facilities.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2525

839-2462

839-1286

839-4433

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Housing 693 New North


Saint Lukes
Urban at 693 NEW
Road, Saint Lukes
NORTH ROAD. [St
Lukes]

MHU

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Use at


11, 10, 12, 15, 19, 28,
20 MORNING STAR
PLACE. Mount Albert.

MU

11, 10, 12, 15, 19, Mount Albert


28, 20 MORNING
STAR PLACE,
Mount Albert

City Centre Fringe Retain Town Centre 53A,53B


at 53B,53A,
MORNINGSIDE
MORNINGSIDE
DRIVE
DRIVE, MorningsideMount Albert.

Mount Albert

City Centre Fringe Rezone


678,668,674,666,676,
664,670,672, NEW
NORTH ROAD,
Avondale-Grafton
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

678, 668, 674,


666, 676, 664,
670, 672 NEW
NORTH ROAD,
Saint Lukes

Saint Lukes

City Centre Fringe Rezone


1D/14,1B/14,1A/14,2
4,25,26,20,21,22,23,2
B/14,1A/33H/3,28,5,1C/14,7,6,
9,8,3D/14,3C/14,3B/1
4,11,10,13,12,15,17,1
6,19,18,30,2C/14,32,
3A/14, ATAWHAI
LANE, Mount Albert
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1D/14, 1B/14,
Saint Lukes
1A/14, 24, 25, 26,
20, 21, 22, 23,
2B/14, 1A/3-3H/3,
28, 5, 1C/14, 7, 6,
9, 8, 3D/14,
3C/14, 3B/14, 11,
10, 13, 12, 15, 17,
16, 19, 18, 30,
2C/14, 32, 3A/14
ATAWHAI LANE,
Mount Albert

TC

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MU

TC

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of notified MHU zone. The property is


located close to RFN, St Lukes TC and THAB zoned
properties. Retention of MHU supports a quality compact
urban form giving effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
Support retention of notified MU zone as it provides for a
compatible mix of residential and employment activities
near St Lukes TC, enables the development of intensive
residential activities and is within walking distance to
RFN. The zoning is also consistent with commercial land
uses that currently exist in this location. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of TC zone for the identified sites. TC
zone is appropriate for St Lukes due to the scale of the
centre, its location on a main arterial road and proximity
to RFN and the level of residential intensification
proposed around the site to support the TC. The
retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
THAB appropriate for all sites in submission apart from
664 New North Road which is subject to flood constraint.
THAB will support nearby St Lukes TC, and sites are close
to the RFN. The partial rezoning of the property to THAB
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

375

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No

MU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No

TC

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Yes

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4955

MHU

THAB

Support the rezoning to THAB of the submission site (and Yes


the surrounding sites). The sites are close to the RFN and
the St Lukes TC and are able to provide additional
intensification. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and give
effect to the RPS.
THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-210

839-818

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Sandringham

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 74, AROHA
AVENUE,
Sandringham.
City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 5, BOURNEMOUTH
AVENUE,
Sandringham.

74 AROHA
AVENUE,
Sandringham

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
1/30,3/30,6/30,4/30,
2/30,5/30, SCHOOL
ROAD, Morningside.

1/30, 3/30, 6/30, Kingsland


4/30, 2/30, 5/30
SCHOOL ROAD,
Morningside

THAB

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


1A SCHOOL ROAD, Kingsland
Housing and
Morningside
Apartment Buildings
at 1A, SCHOOL ROAD,
Morningside.

THAB

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


2 DON CROOT
Housing and
STREET,
Apartment Buildings Morningside
at 2, DON CROOT
STREET, Morningside.

THAB

5 BOURNEMOUTH Sandringham
AVENUE,
Sandringham

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

376

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone. The site has no No


environmental or HC, is located within close proximity to
RFN, St Lukes TC and open space (Gribblehirst park) and
can support increased intensification. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. The site has no No
environmental or HC, is located within close proximity to
RFN, St Lukes TC and open space (Gribblehirst park) and
can support increased intensification. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1284

THAB

Support retention of notified THAB zone. The site has no No


environmental or HC constraints, is located within close
proximity to RFN, and Morningside and Kingsland local
centres. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-272

839-780

839-896

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 558, NEW NORTH
ROAD, AvondaleGrafton.

Western
Springs

558 NEW NORTH Kingsland


ROAD, Kingsland

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support retention of notified THAB zone. The site has no No


environmental or HC constraints and is located within
close proximity to RFN, Morningside local centre and
open space zone (School reserve). The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. The site has no No
environmental or HC constraints and is located within
close proximity to RFN, Morningside local centre and
open space zone (School reserve). The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. The site has no No
environmental or HC constraints and is located within
close proximity to RFN, Morningside local centre and
open space zone (School reserve). The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-664

839-691

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Housing 15 Altham


Kingsland
Urban at 15, ALTHAM Avenue, Kingsland
AVENUE, Mount
Eden.

MHU

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Housing 24 Rossmay


Kingsland
Urban at 24,
Terrace, Kingsland
ROSSMAY TERRACE,
Mount Eden.

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support retention of notified MHU zone. The property is No


close to the RFN and local and NCs. This zoning provides
for a range of residential intensity within the area.
Retention of the MHU zone supports a quality compact
urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support retention of notified MHU zone. The property is No
close to RFN, THAB and MU zoning, and local and NCs.
Retention of MHU zone supports a quality compact urban
form, giving effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3056

839-8099

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone 52,


52 Kingsland
Kingsland
KINGSLAND AVENUE, Avenue, Kingsland
Kingsland from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone Lot 2 DP


386617 from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
[2A Brewster Avenue,
St Lukes]

MHS

Lot 2 DP 386617
2A Brewster
Avenue, Saint
Lukes

Saint Lukes

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

377

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH zone to MHU. Site has


No
flooding constraints and is subject to Pre-1944 BDC. It is
not located in close proximity to transport routes or
centres to warrant MHU zone. The retention of the zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change, support retention of MHS zone. No
Site has flooding constraints and is best suited to the
notified zone. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3617

839-3932

839-7979

839-3682

839-7588

City Centre Fringe Rezone 12, MALVERN 12 MALVERN


ROAD, Morningside ROAD,
from Mixed Housing Morningside
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount Albert

City Centre Fringe Rezone 2/73,


ASQUITH AVENUE,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 1/73
ASQUITH AVENUE.
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
City Centre Fringe Rezone 36, MALVERN
ROAD, Morningside
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2/73 ASQUITH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Saint Lukes

1/73 ASQUITH
AVENUE, Mount
Albert

Saint Lukes

36 MALVERN
ROAD,
Morningside

Mount Albert

City Centre Fringe Rezone 29/41, 27/41,


28/41, 25/41, 31/41,
30/41, 32/41, 24/41,
26/41 FOURTH
AVENUE. Kingsland
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

29/41, 27/41,
28/41, 25/41,
31/41, 30/41,
32/41, 24/41,
26/41 FOURTH
AVENUE,
Kingsland

Kingsland

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support


retention of MHS. The site is subject to the pre 1944 BDC
and intensive development of the site such as that
enabled by MHU is inappropriate. The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. MHS is most
appropriate as the site is not located close to local or TC
or RFN. Rezoning the site to MHU would also result in
spot zoning in the area. The retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. MHS is most
appropriate as the site is not located close to local or TC
or RFN. Rezoning the site to MHU would also result in
spot zoning in the area. The retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The site is
subject to the pre-1994 BDC and MHS is most
appropriate. In addition, the site is not located close to
local or TC or RFN. The retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Retention of the notified SH zone is supported as the
sites are subject to environmental constraints (flooding).
Retention of the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

No
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre / facilities.

No

Meet Criteria
No
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

No

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-177

839-2870

839-3594

839-4430

839-4431

839-507

839-575

839-3197

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 16, RICHBOURNE
STREET, Kingsland.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
16 Richbourne
Street, Kinsgland

LOCALITY

Kingsland

City Centre Fringe Rezone 5,


5 KINGSLAND
KINGSLAND AVENUE, AVENUE,
Kingsland from Single Kingsland
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Kingsland

City Centre Fringe Rezone 21, FOURTH 21 FOURTH


AVENUE, Kingsland
AVENUE,
from Single House to Kingsland
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Kingsland

City Centre Fringe Rezone 45A, FIRST


AVENUE,6,
KINGSLAND AVENUE,
Kingsland from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Kingsland

45A FIRST
AVENUE and 6
KINGSLAND
AVENUE,
Kingsland

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 55,53, KING 55, 53 KING


Kingsland
STREET, Newton from STREET, Kingsland
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 26, ALEXANDER
STREET, Kingsland.

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Single House


at 25, MOSTYN
STREET, Kingsland.

26 Alexander
Street, Kingsland

Kingsland

25 Mostyn Street, Kingsland


Kingsland

City Centre Fringe Rezone 30, LEVONIA 30 LEVONIA


STREET, Morningside STREET,
from Single House to Morningside
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Western
Springs

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

SH

MHU

REASONS

378

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the notified SH zone due to the HC. No


Retention of the notified SH zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS, while ensuring the values of
the identified historic character area are maintained.
Support retention of the notified SH zone due to the
No
existing HC at the site. Retention of SH zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the notified SH zone. The site is


No
affected by the HC and retention of the notified SH zone
is proposed because the outcomes the HC seeks to
achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the notified SH zone. The site is
No
affected by the HC and retention of the notified SH zone
is appropriate because the outcomes the HC seeks to
achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.

Retention of the notified SH zone is supported as the site No


and surrounding area are subject to the HC. The
outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned
with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of the notified SH zone. The site is
No
affected by the HC and retention of the notified SH zone
is appropriate because the outcomes the HC seeks to
achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Retention of the notified SH zone is supported as the site No
(and surrounding sites) are subject to the HC. The
outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally aligned
with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the
Do not support rezoning to MHU as the site is not located Yes
within close enough proximity to the RFN. However,
support rezoning to MHS as the site is not subject to any
environmental constraints. The proposed change to MHS
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

SH

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support in Part

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

SH

Support in Part

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning
SH

Support in Part

MHU

Oppose

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3369

839-3445

839-3764

839-812

839-3520

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

City Centre Fringe Rezone 45,


45 MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN VIEW
VIEW ROAD,
ROAD, Morningside Morningside
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Western
Springs

PAUP ZONE

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 18, LEVONIA 18 Levonia Street, Western


STREET, Morningside Morningside
Springs
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 28,


28 Bannerman
BANNERMAN ROAD, Road, Western
Western Springs from Springs
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Western
Springs

MHS

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Housing 124 WESTERN


Suburban at 124,
SPRINGS ROAD,
WESTERN SPRINGS
Morningside
ROAD, Morningside.

Western
Springs

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone 21, SELKIRK


21 SELKIRK ROAD, Saint Lukes
ROAD, Mount Albert Mount Albert
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone 15, ST LUKES 15 St Lukes Road, Saint Lukes
ROAD, Western
Saint Lukes
Springs-St Lukes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

City Centre Fringe Rezone 686,688,


686,688, NEW
NEW NORTH ROAD, NORTH ROAD,
Avondale-Grafton
Saint Lukes
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

379

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning to MHU as the site is subject to Yes


the Pre-1944 BDC and is not located within close enough
proximity to the RFN or nearest centre zone. However,
support rezoning to MHS to align with proposed and
notified zoning of surrounding sites. The outcomes the
Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned with
the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the
Do not support rezoning to MHU as the site is not located Yes
within close proximity to the RFN or nearest centre
zoning. However, support rezoning to MHS to align with
proposed MHS zoning of surrounding sites. Proposed
rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support Yes
retention of MHS. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and give effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS due to lack of other constraints No


at the site and proximity to transport and other
infrastructure. Adjoins with other notified and proposed
MHS zoneed properties in the area. Retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. Support No
retention of MHS. The site is subject to the Pre-1944 BDC
and the outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are
generally aligned with the objectives of the MHS zone
and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre / facilities.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centre and FN.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3874

839-4434

Saint Lukes

THAB

THAB

Do not support change to THAB. Support rezoning to


Yes
MHU given the property is in proximity to the St Lukes TC
and the RFN. Proposed rezoning to MHU supports a
quality compact urban form and will provide a transition
between centres, THAB and lower intensification zones
such as MHS and SH. The rezoning gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone.
Support rezoning to THAB as this will support increased Yes
intensity near the St Lukes TC and sites in close to the
RFN. The proposed rezoning is the most appropiate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7967

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

City Centre Fringe Rezone 27 ST LUKES


ROAD. 117D TAYLORS
ROAD. Western
Springs-St Lukes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

27 ST LUKES ROAD Saint Lukes


and 117D
TAYLORS ROAD,
Saint Lukes

City Centre Fringe Rezone


111A,111B,121D,121
C,121B,117F,117E,12
1A,117C,117B,117A,1
19A,113B,113A,119B,
115A,119C,115C,115
B, TAYLORS ROAD,
Mount Albert from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

111A, 111B, 121D, Mount Albert


121C, 121B, 117F,
117E, 121A, 117C,
117B, 117A, 119A,
113B, 113A, 119B,
115A, 119C, 115C,
115B TAYLORS
ROAD, Mount
Albert

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

380

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to THAB. Support rezoning to


Yes
MHU given proximity to the RFN and St Lukes TC.
Rezoning to MHU supports density decreasing away from
centres providing a transition between THAB and MHS
and SH zones and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4432

MHS

THAB

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Support


Yes
increasing intensity to MHU given proximity to RFN and
St Lukes TC. Rezoning to MHU provide a transition
between centres, THAB and other residential zones and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and give effect to the RPS.
THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1285

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Housing 1,1A,1B,


Urban at 1,1A,1B,
SANDRINGHAM
SANDRINGHAM
ROAD, Kingsland
ROAD, SandringhamArch Hill.

Sandringham

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Use at 6 6 PIWAKAWAKA


PIWAKAWAKA
STREET. Eden
STREET. Eden
Terrace
Terrace.

Eden Terrace

City Centre Fringe Retain Mixed Use at


11, 9, 5, 7
CHARLOTTE STREET.
4 RENDALL PLACE.
Eden Terrace.

11, 9, 5, 7
CHARLOTTE
STREET. 4
RENDALL PLACE.
Eden Terrace

Eden Terrace

City Centre Fringe Rezone 33 VIEW


ROAD. Mount Eden
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33 View Road, Mt Mount Eden


Eden

MHU

MHU

Support retention of MHU as the subject properties are


located close to RFN and TC zone and are not subject to
the HC. Retention of MHU zone supports a quality
compact urban form, giving effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone.

No

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2459

839-2480

MU

MU

MU

MU

Suport retention of MU zone. Site is part of contiguous


No
MU zone supporting TC. Retention of the MU zone
supports a quality compact urban form, gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives for the zone.
Suport retention of MU zone. Site is part of contiguous
No
MU zone supporting TC and aligned to transport routes.
Retention of the MU zone supports a quality compact
urban form, gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives for the zone.

MU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7471

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Site is


supportive of greater density, THAB innapropriate given
VV constraints, MHU is the most appropriate zone to
achieve the objetives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Yes
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3262

839-4353

839-1262

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

City Centre Fringe Rezone 11,9,13,15,


11,9,13,15,
Eden Terrace
SUFFOLK STREET,
SUFFOLK STREET,
Eden Terrace from
Eden Terrace
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

City Centre Fringe Rezone 59, VIRGINIA


AVENUE
WEST,18,20,22,16,
SUFFOLK
STREET,1,9,3,5,7,
DEVON STREET, Eden
Terrace from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

59, VIRGINIA
Eden Terrace
AVENUE
WEST,18,20,22,16
, SUFFOLK
STREET,1,9,3,5,7,
DEVON STREET,
Eden Terrace

SH

City Centre Fringe Retain Terrace


Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 9,5,7, CRACROFT
STREET,10,8A,12,20,1
4,12A,18,6,10A,16A,6
A,20A,16,14A,8,18A,
BEDFORD STREET,83,
PARNELL RISE,
Parnell.

9,5,7, CRACROFT Parnell


STREET,10,8A,12,
20,14,12A,18,6,10
A,16A,6A,20A,16,
14A,8,18A,
BEDFORD
STREET,83,
PARNELL RISE,
Parnell

THAB

City Centre Fringe Rezone 1/15-18/15,


AVON STREET,1/128/12, STANWELL
STREET, Parnell from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

1/15-18/15,
AVON
STREET,1/128/12, STANWELL
STREET, Parnell

MHU

Eastern Isthmus

82,80A,76,88,74,7 Panmure
2,76B,80,76A,86,8
4,78, PILKINGTON
RD,10,12,14,16,6
A,2,4,6,8,4A,
DUNN RD,
Panmure

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

381

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB however Yes


do support the change from SH to MHU to provide urban
living options. Sites are not subject to any constraints.
The application of the MHU zone gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives for the zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB however Yes
do support the change from SH to MHU to provide urban
living options. Sites are not subject to any constraints.
The application of the MHU zone gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives for the zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Given toporgraphy and access consider this zone


appropriate
THAB

Support retention of THAB zone for this site due to


proximity to Parnell TC and RFN. Retention of the THAB
zone is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS

No

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3513

Parnell

THAB

Support change from MHU to THAB. The THAB zone


Yes
supports a quality compact urban form, gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives for the zone.
THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2009

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
82,80A,76,88,74,72,7
6B,80,76A,86,84,78,
PILKINGTON
ROAD,10,12,14,16,6A
,2,4,6,8,4A, DUNN
ROAD, Panmure.

THAB

THAB

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located adjacent to MU and is close to Panmure TC and
POS. This retention aligns with the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS
THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2010

839-2922

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
56,50,60,82,62,64,66,
68,80,52,86,84,48,46,
44,42,40,76,74,72,70,
90,92,94,78,38,58,32,
30,36,34,88,54,
PLEASANT VIEW
ROAD, Panmure.

56,50,60,82,62,64 Panmure
,66,68,80,52,86,8
4,48,46,44,42,40,
76,74,72,70,90,92
,94,78,38,58,32,3
0,36,34,88,54,
PLEASANT VIEW
RD, Panmure

THAB

Rezone 34,
STANHOPE ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34, STANHOPE
RD, Mount
Wellington

MHS

Mount
Wellington

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

REASONS

382

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located adjacent to Panmure TC, close to POS and the
RFN (Panmure Train station) and supports decreasing
density out from the TC. Retaining THAB zone aligns with
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area, gives effect to the RPS and supports
the zone objectives.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-3181

839-3306

839-3735

839-3944

839-4429

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 176, IRELAND 176, IRELAND RD, Panmure


ROAD, Mount
Mount WellingtonWellington-Panmure Panmure
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 5, MONO
PLACE, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 9, GOLLAN
ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 28A,
MOUNTAIN ROAD,
Mount Wellington
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

5, MONO PLACE, Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

9, GOLLAN RD,
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

28A, MOUNTAIN
RD, Mount
Wellington

Rezone 10,8, COTTON 10,8, COTTON


STREET, St Johns from STREET, Saint
Mixed Housing
Johns
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mount
Wellington

Saint Johns

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to NC, LC, Metropolitan Centre (Sylvia Park) and
MU zones. Rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity
for housing in this location, is an appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area, gives effect to the RPS and supports
the zone objectives.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area, gives effect to the RPS and supports
the zone objectives.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area, gives effect to the RPS and supports
the zone objectives.

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to facilities (including open space) and


walkability to FN and train station (Mt Wellington)
consider that MHU zone appropriate.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area, gives effect to the RPS and supports
the zone objectives.

Proximity to facilities (including open space) and Centre


(Panmure) consider that MHU zone appropriate.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4857

839-4858

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 1, MONO
PLACE, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
3/14,2/14,1/14,
HARRIS ROAD, Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1, MONO PLACE, Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

3/14,2/14,1/14, Mount
HARRIS RD,
Wellington
Mount Wellington

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

383

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area, gives effect to the RPS and supports
the zone objectives.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. These properties
are not close enough to centres or the RFN to merit
intensification to MHU and MHS is appropriate to achieve
the objectives of the zone, provides a range of residential
options in the area and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5242

839-5435

839-5620

839-6069

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 47,47A,
47,47A, APIRANA Saint Johns
APIRANA AVENUE,
AVE, KohimaramaKohimarama-Point
Point England
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 27, ALLENBY 27, ALLENBY RD,


ROAD, Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Panmure

Rezone 29, APIRANA 29, APIRANA AVE, Saint Johns


AVENUE,
KohimaramaKohimarama-Point
Point England
England from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 29, KINGS


29, KINGS RD,
ROAD, Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Panmure

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located


THAB
within close proximity to Glen Innes TC zone and the RFN
and are located adjacent to POS. Rezoning to THAB will
increase the residential capacity to support the centre
and is an appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area, gives effect to the RPS and supports
the zone objectives.
Rezoning to MHU supported as this site is located within MHU
close enough proximity to Glen Innes TC zone and the
RFN and is located adjacent to POS. The retention of SH
zone is not required in order to manage the flood risk at
the site. Rezoning to MHU will increase the residential
capacity to support the centre, supports decreasing
density away from the centre and is an appropriate way
to meet the objectives of the zone and give effect to the
Do not support change sought to THAB, rezoning to MHU MHU
more appropriate in keeping with the surrounding sites
on Kings Road, proximity to the Panmure TC and the
decreasing density from the centre. The rezoning to MHU
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6208

839-6209

839-6210

839-7478

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 45,43,41,
APIRANA AVENUE,
Kohimarama-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

45,43,41,
APIRANA AVE,
KohimaramaPoint England

Rezone 51A,51,53,
APIRANA AVENUE,
Kohimarama-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

51A,51,53,
APIRANA AVE,
KohimaramaPoint England

LOCALITY

Saint Johns

Saint Johns

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Rezone 59A,59,
59A,59, APIRANA Saint Johns
APIRANA AVENUE,
AVE, KohimaramaKohimarama-Point
Point England
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 34 HARDING 34 HARDING AVE. Mount


AVENUE. Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 12 COTTON
STREET. 4 LUSH
AVENUE. St Johns
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12 COTTON
STREET. 4 LUSH
AVE. Saint Johns

MHS

Rezone 2 MONO
PLACE. Mount
Wellington from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2 MONO PLACE. Mount


Mount Wellington Wellington

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

384

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located


THAB
within close proximity to Glen Innes TC zone and the RFN
and are located adjacent to POS. Rezoning to THAB will
increase the residential capacity to support the centre
and is an appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
zone and give effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from notified MHS to THAB as


THAB
these sites are located within close proximity to Glen
Innes TC, a RFN and POS. Rezoning to THAB will increase
the residential capacity to support the centre and is an
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located


THAB
within close proximity to Glen Innes TC zone and the RFN
and are located adjacent to POS. Rezoning to THAB will
increase the residential capacity to support the centre
and is an appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area, gives effect to the RPS and supports
the zone objectives.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-7574

Eastern Isthmus

Saint Johns

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area, gives effect to the RPS and supports
the zone objectives.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7741

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area, gives effect to the RPS and supports
the zone objectives.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7870

839-7933

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 21 HARRIS
ROAD. Mount
Wellington from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

21 HARRIS RD.
Mount
Mount Wellington Wellington

PAUP ZONE

SH

Rezone 2/23, 23
2/23, 23 CHURCH Panmure
CHURCH CRESCENT. CRESCENT.
Panmure from Mixed Panmure
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Retain Mixed Use at


76, MERTON ROAD,
St Johns.

76, MERTON RD,


St Johns.

MU

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 204, TRIPOLI
ROAD, PanmurePoint England.

204, TRIPOLI
ROAD, PanmurePoint England

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 13, HOLLAND
AVENUE, Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 31, PADDINGTON
STREET, Glen Innes.

13, HOLLAND
AVENUE, Point
England

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 18, EASTVIEW
ROAD, Glen Innes.

18, EASTVIEW
Glen Innes
ROAD, Glen Innes

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

385

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change sought from SH to MHU due to


MHS
distance to the RFN and the closest TC at Panmure. Do
support rezoning to MHS as the flooding constraint on
the site (and the surrounding sites) does not require
management through the application of SH zone. For the
adjacent sites this is an out of scope change and can be
found in Attachment F. MHS is an appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support rezoning to THAB. MHU is appropriate
No change
for the site given the proximity to the RFN and Panmure
TC. Retaining MHU provides for decreasing density away
from the centre and the THAB zoned sites and
appropriately gives effect to the RPS and aligns with the
objectives of the zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-938

839-1538

839-1561

839-1566

839-1575

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Saint Johns

Pt England

Pt England

31, PADDINGTON Glen Innes


STREET, Glen
Innes.

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MU

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support retention of notified MU zone - the site is part of No change


an existing MU zone and is on an arterial road. Retention
of the MU zone supports a quality compact urban form,
gives effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives for the zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - No change
it is located close to Glen Innes TC and a RFN and is part
of an existing notified THAB block. This retention aligns
with the objectives of the THAB zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change
part of an existing notified THAB block and is in keeping
with the surrounding neighbourhood. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a
MHU
change to MHU zone - the property is located close to
POS however is not close enough to the Glen Innes TC to
warrant THAB intensification. Rezoning to MHU provides
a more fine grain response to residential zoning. This is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change refer to Attachment F.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - No change
it is located close to Glen Innes TC, public transport and
POS. This site is adjacent to an existing notified THAB
block. This retention aligns with the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS. Management of
the flood risk on site does not require SH zone

MU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1584

839-1613

839-1618

839-1619

839-1622

839-1655

839-1664

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 41, EASTVIEW
ROAD, Glen Innes.

41, EASTVIEW
Glen Innes
ROAD, Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 45, EPPING
STREET, Glen Innes.

45, EPPING
STREET, Glen
Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 45, PADDINGTON
STREET, Glen Innes.

45, PADDINGTON Glen Innes


STREET, Glen
Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 13, EPPING
STREET, Glen Innes.

13, EPPING
STREET, Glen
Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 37, PADDINGTON
STREET, Glen Innes.

37, PADDINGTON Glen Innes


STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Retain Terrace
21, TRIPOLI ROAD, Panmure
Housing and
Panmure-Point
Apartment Buildings England
at 21, TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England.

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 198, PILKINGTON
ROAD, PanmurePoint England.

THAB

198, PILKINGTON Pt England


ROAD, PanmurePoint England

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

386

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - No change


it is located close to Glen Innes TC and public transport
and is adjacent to POS. This site is adjacent to an existing
notified THAB block. This retention aligns with the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. Close to TC and No change
POS with good access to public transport. This retention
aligns with the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - the property is located close to
POS however is not close enough to the Glen Innes TC to
warrant THAB intensification. Rezoning to MHU provides
a more fine grain response to residential zoning. This is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change refer to Attachment F.
Support retention of notified THAB zone. Close to TC and No change
POS. This retention aligns with the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Any flood risk on the
site does not require management through zoning.

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - the property is located close to
POS however is not close to centres and rezoning to MHU
provides a more fine grain response to residential zoning.
MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
This is an out of scope change refer to Attachment F.
Support retention of notified THAB - site is close to
No change
Panmure TC and a RFN. The site is part of an existing
notified THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No change


it is located close to Panmure TC and is part of an already
existing notified THAB block. This retention aligns with
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1667

839-1674

839-1680

839-1689

839-1703

839-1706

839-1707

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2, DELEMERE
PLACE, Glen Innes.

2, DELEMERE
Glen Innes
PLACE, Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 21, EASTVIEW
ROAD, Glen Innes.

21, EASTVIEW
Glen Innes
ROAD, Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 35, ERIMA
AVENUE, Point
England.

35, ERIMA
AVENUE, Point
England

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 38, WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

38, WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 29, WADDELL
AVENUE, Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 117, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen Innes.

29, WADDELL
AVENUE, Point
England

Pt England

117, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Pt England

Glen Innes

Retain Mixed Housing 6, MARION PLACE, Glen Innes


Suburban at 6,
Glen Innes
MARION PLACE, Glen
Innes.

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHS

REASONS

387

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an existing
notified THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property it is located close to Glen Innes TC and public transport
and is adjacent to POS. This site is adjacent to an existing
notified THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a
change to MHU zone - the property is located close to
POS however is not close to centres and rezoning to MHU
provides a more fine grain response to residential zoning
and supports the objectives of the MHU zone. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Scope for this change can be found in points 6641-1 and
Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a
change to MHU zone - the property is located close to
POS however is not close to centres and rezoning to MHU
provides a more fine grain response to residential zoning
and supports the objectives of the MHU zone. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
This is an out of scope change refer to Attachment F.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is
part of an already existing THAB block which is located
close to Glen Innes TC. This retention is in keeping with
the surrounding neighbourhood and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of notified THAB zone because
of distance to Glen Innes TC and the RFN. Support MHU
as a more appropriate zone for this (and adjacent)
property. MHU zone provides a more fine grain response
to residential zoning and aligns with the objectives of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change refer to Attachment F.
Support retention of notified MHS zone - property is part
of an existing MHS block and MHS zone helps provide a
range of residential choices. Property is beyond 250m
walking distance of nearest centres or RFN and retention
of the zone is aligned with the zone objectives and gives
effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change
THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change
MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1710

839-1715

839-1723

839-1735

839-1750

839-1753

839-1761

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
23, TE KOA ROAD, Panmure
Housing and
Panmure
Apartment Buildings
at 23, TE KOA ROAD,
Panmure.

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 16, NGARIMU
ROAD, Panmure.

16, NGARIMU
ROAD, Panmure

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 18, ROPATA
AVENUE, Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 5, EPPING STREET,
Glen Innes.

18, ROPATA
AVENUE, Point
England

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 21, PILKINGTON
ROAD, PanmurePoint England.

21, PILKINGTON
ROAD, PanmurePoint England

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 16, WADDELL
AVENUE, Point
England.

16, WADDELL
AVENUE, Point
England

Panmure

Pt England

5, EPPING STREET, Glen Innes


Glen Innes

Panmure

Pt England

Retain Terrace
45, TE KOA ROAD, Panmure
Housing and
Panmure
Apartment Buildings
at 45, TE KOA ROAD,
Panmure.

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

388

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change


part of an already existing THAB block which is located
close to Panmure TC. This retention is in keeping with the
surrounding neighbourhood and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and give
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone for this property- No change
it is located close to Panmure TC and is part of an already
existing notified THAB block. This retention aligns with
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No change
it is located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an
already existing notified THAB block. This retention aligns
with the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change
located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an existing
notified THAB block. This retention aligns with the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
The flood risk on the site does not require management
through zoning.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No change
it is located adjacent to Panmure TC and is part of an
already existing notified THAB block. This retention aligns
with the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - the property is located close to
POS however is not close to centres and rezoning to MHU
provides a more fine grain response to residential zoning
and aligns with the objectives of the MHU zone. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Scope for this change can be found in points 6641-1 and
Support retention of THAB zone at this property - its is
No change
located close to Panmure TC and POS and is in keeping
with the surrounding neighbourhood. This retention
aligns with the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1781

839-1791

839-1793

839-1794

839-1810

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 124, ELSTREE
AVENUE, Point
England-Glen Innes.

124, ELSTREE
AVENUE, Point
England-Glen
Innes

Pt England

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 102, CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT,34A,34B,3
4C, MERFIELD
STREET, Glen Innes.

102, CASTLEDINE Glen Innes


CRESCENT,34A,34
B,34C, MERFIELD
STREET, Glen
Innes

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

Retain Terrace
19, TE KOA ROAD, Panmure
Housing and
Panmure
Apartment Buildings
at 19, TE KOA ROAD,
Panmure.

THAB

Retain Terrace
17, TRIPOLI ROAD, Panmure
Housing and
Panmure-Point
Apartment Buildings England
at 17, TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England.

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 130, ELSTREE
AVENUE, Point
England-Glen Innes.

THAB

130, ELSTREE
AVENUE, Point
England-Glen
Innes

Pt England

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

389

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - the property is located adjacent to
POS and close to a NC however is not close to centres and
rezoning to MHU provides a more fine grain response to
residential zoning and supports the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of
scope change refer to Attachment F.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - No change
it is located close to Glen Innes TC, a RFN and POS. This
site is adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. This
retention aligns with the objectives of the THAB zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - No change


it is located close to Panmure TC, and is adjacent to POS.
This site is adjacent to an existing notified THAB block.
This retention aligns with the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone at this property - its is
located close to Panmure TC and POS and is in keeping
with the surrounding neighbourhood. This retention
aligns with the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - the property is located close to
POS and a NC however rezoning to MHU provides a more
fine grain response to residential zoning and gives effect
to the RPS. This is an out of scope change refer to
Attachment F.

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1837

839-1848

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Retain Terrace
20, TE KOA ROAD, Panmure
Housing and
Panmure
Apartment Buildings
at 20, TE KOA ROAD,
Panmure.

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 34, PADDINGTON
STREET, Glen Innes.

THAB

34, PADDINGTON Glen Innes


STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

THAB

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - No change


it is located adjacent to Panmure TC and aligns with the
objectives of the THAB zone. The retention of the notified
THAB zone gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - the property is located adjacent to
POS and is close to a NC however rezoning to MHU
provides a more fine grain response to residential zoning
and is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change refer to Attachment F

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1871

839-1916

839-1917

839-1918

839-1919

839-1920

839-1921

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2, CAEN ROAD,
Panmure.

2, CAEN ROAD,
Panmure

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 77,75,73,79,71,
APIRANA AVENUE,
Kohimarama-Point
England.

77,75,73,79,71,
APIRANA
AVENUE,
KohimaramaPoint England

Pt England

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24,18,20,22,16,
MERFIELD STREET,
Glen Innes.

24,18,20,22,16,
MERFIELD
STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 8,6, MERFIELD
STREET, Glen Innes.

8,6, MERFIELD
STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 37,35A,35,35B,
LINE ROAD, Point
England-Glen Innes.

37,35A,35,35B,
Glen Innes
LINE ROAD, Point
England-Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24,28,26,24A,
EASTVIEW
ROAD,4,4A, MARINO
PLACE, Glen Innes.

24,28,26,24A,
EASTVIEW
ROAD,4,4A,
MARINO PLACE,
Glen Innes

THAB

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
9,13,15,
Glen Innes
Housing and
EASTVIEW ROAD,
Apartment Buildings Glen Innes
at 9,13,15, EASTVIEW
ROAD, Glen Innes.

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

390

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - No change


it is located close to Panmure TC, POS and public
transport options. This site is adjacent to an existing
notified THAB block. This retention aligns with the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB at this property - it Is No change
located adjacent to POS and Glen Innes TC and has good
access to public transport options. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an existing
notified THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an existing
notified THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change
located close to Glen Innes TC, public transport and is
adjacent to Glen Innes school. This site is adjacent to an
existing notified THAB block. This retention aligns with
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC, public transport and POS.
This site is adjacent to an existing notified THAB block.
This retention aligns with the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and public transport and is
adjacent to POS. This site is adjacent to an existing
notified THAB block. This retention aligns with the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1922

839-1923

839-1924

839-1925

839-1926

839-1927

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3B,3,5,3A,
MARINO PLACE, Glen
Innes.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 31,29, EASTVIEW
ROAD, Glen Innes.

3B,3,5,3A,
MARINO PLACE,
Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 45A,45B,45,47,
LINE ROAD, Point
England-Glen Innes.

45A,45B,45,47,
Glen Innes
LINE ROAD, Point
England-Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 55,55A, LINE
ROAD, Point EnglandGlen Innes.

55,55A, LINE
ROAD, Point
England-Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 63,61,61A,65,63A,
LINE ROAD, Point
England-Glen Innes.

63,61,61A,65,63A, Glen Innes


LINE ROAD, Point
England-Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10,12, DELEMERE
PLACE,2,4,6, EPPING
STREET,25,27,21,23,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen Innes.

10,12, DELEMERE Glen Innes


PLACE,2,4,6,
EPPING
STREET,25,27,21,2
3, FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

31,29, EASTVIEW Glen Innes


ROAD, Glen Innes

Glen Innes

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

391

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC, public transport and POS.
This site is adjacent to an existing notified THAB block.
This retention aligns with the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change
located close to Glen Innes TC and public transport and is
adjacent to POS. This site is adjacent to an existing
notified THAB block. This retention aligns with the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change
located close to Glen Innes TC, public transport and is
adjacent to Glen Innes school. This site is adjacent to an
existing notified THAB block. This retention aligns with
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC, public transport and is
adjacent to Glen Innes school. This site is adjacent to an
existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - site is adjacent No change
POS and close to Glen Innes TC. This site is adjacent to an
existing THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - No change


it is located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an
existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1928

839-1929

839-1930

839-1931

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10,12, EPPING
STREET, Glen Innes.

10,12, EPPING
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 11,14,3,5,7,9,
DELEMERE
PLACE,11,13,15,17,3,
5,7,9, HEATHERBANK
STREET,24,26,20,22,
EPPING
STREET,33,31,29,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen Innes.

11,14,3,5,7,9,
Glen Innes
DELEMERE
PLACE,11,13,15,1
7,3,5,7,9,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,24,26,20,2
2, EPPING
STREET,33,31,29,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 61,63,59,65,
FARRINGDON
STREET,24,26,20,22,1
8,30,28,34,32,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,30,28,34,
EVANDALE
STREET,5,4,7, HUXLEY
PLACE, Glen Innes.

61,63,59,65,
Glen Innes
FARRINGDON
STREET,24,26,20,2
2,18,30,28,34,32,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,30,28,34,
EVANDALE
STREET,5,4,7,
HUXLEY PLACE,
Glen Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 32,30,36,34,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen Innes.

32,30,36,34,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2, HARLOW
PLACE,39,41, EPPING
STREET, Glen Innes.

2, HARLOW
PLACE,39,41,
EPPING STREET,
Glen Innes

Glen Innes

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

392

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an existing
notified THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is


No change
located close to Glen Innes TC, is part of an existing
notified THAB block and A adjacent to NC. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - No change


it is located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an
existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - this site is located close to POS
and a NC however rezoning to MHU is more appropriate
given the distance from Glen Innes TC and RFN. This zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change refer to Attachment F.

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1932

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

THAB

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and public transport and is
adjacent to POS. This site is adjacent to an existing
notified THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1933

839-1934

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
24,26,20,14,22,16,18,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen Innes.

24,26,20,14,22,16 Glen Innes


,18, FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2,4, WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT,40,
PADDINGTON
STREET, Glen Innes.

2,4, WIMBLEDON Glen Innes


CRESCENT,40,
PADDINGTON
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
24,10,12,20,14,22,16,
18,8, WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

24,10,12,20,14,22 Glen Innes


,16,18,8,
WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 46,50,48,
PADDINGTON
STREET,40,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen Innes.

46,50,48,
PADDINGTON
STREET,40,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 9,7, WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

9,7, WIMBLEDON Glen Innes


CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

393

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and POS and is part of an
existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - this site is located close to POS
and a NC however rezoning to MHU is more appropriate
given the distance from Glen Innes TC and RFN. This zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change refer to Attachment F.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1935

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - this site is located close to POS
and a NC however rezoning to MHU is more appropriate
given the distance from Glen Innes TC and RFN. This zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change refer to Attachment F.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1936

Eastern Isthmus

Glen Innes

THAB

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - this site is located close to POS
and a NC however rezoning to MHU is more appropriate
given the distance from Glen Innes TC and RFN. This zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change refer to Attachment F.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1937

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

THAB

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - this site is located close to POS
and a NC however rezoning to MHU is more appropriate
given the distance from Glen Innes TC and RFN. MHU
supports the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS. This is an out of scope change refer to
Attachment F.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1938

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 46,54,56,48,52,
FARRINGDON
STREET,19,13,15,21,1
7, WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

46,54,56,48,52,
Glen Innes
FARRINGDON
STREET,19,13,15,2
1,17,
WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 25,31,23,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,38,42A,32,44,
30,42,36,40,34,
EPPING STREET, Glen
Innes.

25,31,23,
Glen Innes
HEATHERBANK
STREET,38,42A,32
,44,30,42,36,40,3
4, EPPING STREET,
Glen Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
53A,49,55,47,57,51,5
3,57A, EPPING
STREET,39,43A,43,41,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,175A,177,177
A,179,173A,179B,175
,173,179A,171,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 44,38,40,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,18,16,
EVANDALE STREET,
Glen Innes.

53A,49,55,47,57,5 Glen Innes


1,53,57A, EPPING
STREET,39,43A,43
,41,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,175A,177,
177A,179,173A,17
9B,175,173,179A,
171, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

44,38,40,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,18,16,
EVANDALE
STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 50,48,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,12,
EVANDALE STREET,
Glen Innes.

50,48,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,12,
EVANDALE
STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

394

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - this site is located close to POS
and a NC however rezoning to MHU is more appropriate
given the distance from Glen Innes TC and RFN. MHU
supports the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS. This is an out of scope change refer to
Attachment F.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1939

839-1940

839-1941

839-1942

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and POS and is part of an
existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is


No change
located close to Glen Innes TC and POS and is part of an
existing THAB block. The retention of the notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS. Management
of the flood risk on site does not require SH zone.

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is


located close to Glen Innes TC and POS and is part of an
existing THAB block. The retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified THAB zone - these


No change
properties are located close to Glen Innes TC and are
part of an existing THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1943

839-1944

839-1945

839-1946

839-1947

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 54,56,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,8,4,6,
EVANDALE STREET,
Glen Innes.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 167, TANIWHA
STREET,60,58,
HEATHERBANK
STREET, Glen Innes.

54,56,
HEATHERBANK
STREET,8,4,6,
EVANDALE
STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

167, TANIWHA
STREET,60,58,
HEATHERBANK
STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 75,73,71,
FARRINGDON
STREET,31,
EVANDALE STREET,
Glen Innes.

75,73,71,
FARRINGDON
STREET,31,
EVANDALE
STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 147,145,143,141,
TANIWHA
STREET,3,5,4,7,6,8,
COLEGRAVE
PLACE,8,3,5,7,
HALFORD
PLACE,19,13,15,17,23
, EVANDALE
STREET,87,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen Innes.

147,145,143,141, Glen Innes


TANIWHA
STREET,3,5,4,7,6,8
, COLEGRAVE
PLACE,8,3,5,7,
HALFORD
PLACE,19,13,15,1
7,23, EVANDALE
STREET,87,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 151,149, TANIWHA
STREET,4, HALFORD
PLACE, Glen Innes.

151,149,
TANIWHA
STREET,4,
HALFORD PLACE,
Glen Innes

THAB

Glen Innes

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

395

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone - these


No change
properties are located close to Glen Innes TC and are
part of an existing THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone - these


No change
properties are located close to Glen Innes TC and are
part of an existing THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone - these


No change
properties are located close to Glen Innes TC and are
part of an existing THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is


located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an existing
THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is


located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an existing
THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1948

839-1949

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 159,155,161,157,
TANIWHA
STREET,11,9,7,
EVANDALE STREET,
Glen Innes.

159,155,161,157, Glen Innes


TANIWHA
STREET,11,9,7,
EVANDALE
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 60,62,64,58,70,
FARRINGDON
STREET,27,35A,23,33,
31,29,35,
WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

60,62,64,58,70,
Glen Innes
FARRINGDON
STREET,27,35A,23
,33,31,29,35,
WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 32,26,30,28,34,
WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

32,26,30,28,34,
WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 42A,46,44,42,44A,
WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT,133,139,
TANIWHA
STREET,74,72,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen Innes.

42A,46,44,42,44A, Glen Innes


WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT,133,13
9, TANIWHA
STREET,74,72,
FARRINGDON
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2, MAYBURY
STREET,114,108,110,
112, LINE ROAD,
Point England.

2, MAYBURY
Glen Innes
STREET,114,108,1
10,112, LINE
ROAD, Point
England

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is


located close to Glen Innes TC and is part of an existing
THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

396

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - this site is located close to POS
and a NC however rezoning to MHU is more appropriate
given the distance from Glen Innes TC and RFN. MHU
supports the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS. This is an out of scope change refer to
Attachment F.

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1950

Eastern Isthmus

Glen Innes

THAB

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - this site is located close to POS
and within walking distance of a NC however rezoning to
MHU is more appropriate given the distance from Glen
Innes TC and RFN. MHU supports the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of
scope change refer to Attachment F.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1951

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

Do not support retention of THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - this site is located close to POS
however rezoning to MHU is more appropriate given the
distance from Glen Innes TC and RFN. MHU supports the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
This is an out of scope change refer to Attachment F.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1952

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

Support retention of notified THAB - site adjacent Glen


No change
Innes TC and close to POS and train station. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1953

839-1954

839-1955

839-1956

839-1957

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
48,42A,42C,42B,42D,
46,44, MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
54B,54C,64C,54A,54D
,64A,56,62,52,60,58D
,64B,58B,58C,66,58A,
MAYBURY STREET,
Point England.

48,42A,42C,42B,4 Pt England
2D,46,44,
MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England

THAB

54B,54C,64C,54A, Pt England
54D,64A,56,62,52
,60,58D,64B,58B,
58C,66,58A,
MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
192A,200A,198,200,1
94,196,190,190A,182
,180,202,186,184,198
A,184B,184A,192,182
A,188, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen Innes.

192A,200A,198,20 Glen Innes


0,194,196,190,19
0A,182,180,202,1
86,184,198A,184B
,184A,192,182A,1
88, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
70-74, LINE ROAD, Glen Innes
Housing and
Point EnglandApartment Buildings Glen Innes
at 70-74, LINE ROAD,
Point England-Glen
Innes.

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
201,205A,203,199,20
7,203A,209,197,201A
,199A,209A,205,207A
,197A, TANIWHA
STREET,78, LINE
ROAD, Glen Innes.

THAB

201,205A,203,199 Glen Innes


,207,203A,209,19
7,201A,199A,209
A,205,207A,197A,
TANIWHA
STREET,78, LINE
ROAD, Glen Innes

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

397

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB at this site - it Is


No change
located adjacent to POS, is close to Glen Innes TC and has
good access to public transport options. The retention of
the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does not
require SH zone.
Support retention of notified THAB at this site - it Is
No change
located adjacent to POS, is close to Glen Innes TC and has
good access to public transport options. The retention of
the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and adjacent to POS. This
site is adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The
retention of the notified THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


adjacent to Glen Innes TC, and close to MU zone and
public transport. The retention of the notified THAB zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS. Management of the
flood risk on site does not require SH zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change
adjacent to Glen Innes TC, and close to MU zone and
public transport. The retention of the notified THAB zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS. Management of the
flood risk on site does not require SH zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1958

839-1959

839-1960

839-1961

839-1962

839-1963

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 174, TANIWHA
STREET,52, ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

174, TANIWHA
STREET,52,
ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 5,4, TOSCA
LANE,37,35,
ROWENA CRESCENT,
Glen Innes.

5,4, TOSCA
LANE,37,35,
ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
38,48,46,44,42,36,40,
34, ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 25,31,27,29,
ROWENA CRESCENT,
Glen Innes.

38,48,46,44,42,36 Glen Innes


,40,34, ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

THAB

25,31,27,29,
ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 21B,21A, ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

21B,21A,
ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 28A,28B, ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

28A,28B,
ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

398

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and adjacent POS. This site
is adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The
retention of the notified THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and POS. This site is
adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and adjacent POS. This site
is adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The
retention of the notified THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site as it


is close to TC and POS. This aligns with and supports the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site as it


is close to TC and POS. This aligns with and supports the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site as it


is close to TC and POS. This aligns with and supports the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1964

839-1965

839-1966

839-1967

839-1968

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 158, TANIWHA
STREET,11,13,15,17,1
,3,5,7,9, ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

158, TANIWHA
Glen Innes
STREET,11,13,15,1
7,1,3,5,7,9,
ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 18,20,22, ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

18,20,22,
ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 12,14,16, ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes.

12,14,16,
ROWENA
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
72D,72E,72B,72C,72A
,74,70, MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
82D,92B,82A,82C,82B
,88,96A,96B,96C,86A,
86C,86B,86D,84,92A,
98,102,90,100,78,80,
76B,76C,76A,
MAYBURY
STREET,121,115117,119, ELSTREE
AVENUE, Point
England.

72D,72E,72B,72C, Pt England
72A,74,70,
MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England

THAB

82D,92B,82A,82C, Pt England
82B,88,96A,96B,9
6C,86A,86C,86B,8
6D,84,92A,98,102
,90,100,78,80,76B
,76C,76A,
MAYBURY
STREET,121,115117,119, ELSTREE
AVENUE, Point
England

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site close to TC and POS. The retention of the notified THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

399

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and adjacent POS. This site
is adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The
retention of the notified THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB at the sites as they are within No change
walking distance of the Glen Innes TC and the RFN and
are located within a block of THAB zoned sites that can
support intensification. Retention of THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site close to TC and POS and part of an existing THAB block.
This is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


MHU
zone more appropriate given the distance from centres
and RFN (refer to map in Attachment E). The rezoning to
MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is
an out of scope change refer to Attachment F.

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1969

839-1970

839-1971

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
52,50B,50C,48,50A,
POINT ENGLAND
ROAD,1,3B,3A,5,3C,
DALTON
STREET,45A,45B,45C,
43B,43A, MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
67,61B,59,65C,49,51
A,51C,51B,53,55,65A,
63,61C,57C,57B,57A,
61A,65B,69,57E,57D,
MAYBURY
STREET,64A,64C,64B,
58,76,74B,74A,62,74
C,72,66,56A,56B,56C,
70A,70B, POINT
ENGLAND ROAD,
Point England.

52,50B,50C,48,50 Pt England
A, POINT
ENGLAND
ROAD,1,3B,3A,5,3
C, DALTON
STREET,45A,45B,4
5C,43B,43A,
MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England

THAB

67,61B,59,65C,49, Pt England
51A,51C,51B,53,5
5,65A,63,61C,57C,
57B,57A,61A,65B,
69,57E,57D,
MAYBURY
STREET,64A,64C,6
4B,58,76,74B,74A,
62,74C,72,66,56A,
56B,56C,70A,70B,
POINT ENGLAND
ROAD, Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
98,94E,96,82E,82D,8
2A,94D,82C,82B,88B,
88A,94A,80,92,94B,9
4C,84,78, POINT
ENGLAND ROAD,125,
ELSTREE
AVENUE,95,93A,93C,
81A,81B,81C,81D,81E
,81F,93D,77,89,93B,9
1,83,87A,87B,87C,79,
85, MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England. MAP
CHANGE NEEDED TO
CORRECT ERROR

98,94E,96,82E,82 Pt England
D,82A,94D,82C,82
B,88B,88A,94A,80
,92,94B,94C,84,78
, POINT ENGLAND
ROAD,125,
ELSTREE

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

400

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone at these sites - No change


close to Glen Innes TC and POS and part of an existing
THAB block. This is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does not
require SH zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support retention of notified THAB zone at these sites - No change


close to Glen Innes TC and POS and part of an existing
THAB block. This is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does not
require SH zone.

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone in full


MHU
and support rezoning part of the submission point sites
to MHU zone where the sites are too distant from the TC
and the RFN. Retention of THAB is supported at 78,80, 82
and 84 Pt England Road This supports the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change refer to Attachment F.

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1972

839-1973

839-1974

839-1975

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 2,2A,
KIANO PLACE,3,
KOTAE ROAD,68,70,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

2,2A, KIANO
Glen Innes
PLACE,3, KOTAE
ROAD,68,70,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 11,13,15, KOTAE Glen Innes


Suburban at
ROAD, Glen Innes
11,13,15, KOTAE
ROAD, Glen Innes.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
58,46,56,50,60,62,
TANIWHA
STREET,25,15,21,17,2
3,19, LYNDHURST
STREET,4,6, KOTAE
ROAD, Glen Innes.

58,46,56,50,60,62 Glen Innes


, TANIWHA
STREET,25,15,21,1
7,23,19,
LYNDHURST
STREET,4,6,
KOTAE ROAD,
Glen Innes

MHS

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
217,215,219,229,227,
225,223,231,221,
PILKINGTON
ROAD,16,54,56,28,50
,52,8, TIPPETT
STREET,25,27,23,33,3
1,37,29,35, SALIMA
TALAGI STREET,
Panmure-Point
England.

217,215,219,229, Pt England
227,225,223,231,
221, PILKINGTON
ROAD,16,54,56,28
,50,52,8, TIPPETT
STREET,25,27,23,3
3,31,37,29,35,
SALIMA TALAGI
STREET, PanmurePoint England

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of notified MHS zone - property is part


of an existing MHS block and MHS zone helps provide a
range of residential choices. Property is beyond 250m
walking distance of centres or the RFN. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone - property is part
of an existing MHS block and MHS zone helps provide a
range of residential choices. Property is beyond 250m
walking distance of centres or the RFN. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone - property is part
of an existing MHS block and MHS zone helps provide a
range of residential choices. Property is beyond 250m
walking distance of centres or the RFN. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and gives effect to the RPS. Management of the flood
risk on site does not require SH zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is
located close to Glen Innes TC, POS and public transport.
This site is adjacent to an existing notified THAB block.
The retention of the notified THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

401

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1976

839-1977

839-1977

839-1979

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 366,1/390-12/390,
APIRANA
AVENUE,1A/49,2A/49
,2D/49,55,57,45,51,5
3,2C/49,2B/49,
TIPPETT
STREET,1/20112/201,1/19712/197, PILKINGTON
ROAD, KohimaramaPoint England.

366,1/390Pt England
12/390, APIRANA
AVENUE,1A/49,2A
/49,2D/49,55,57,4
5,51,53,2C/49,2B/
49, TIPPETT
STREET,1/20112/201,1/19712/197,
PILKINGTON
ROAD,
KohimaramaPoint England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 214,212,214A,
PILKINGTON
ROAD,11,13,11A,11B,
7,9, ROPATA
AVENUE, PanmurePoint England.

214,212,214A,
Pt England
PILKINGTON
ROAD,11,13,11A,
11B,7,9, ROPATA
AVENUE,
Panmure-Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 214,212,214A,
PILKINGTON
ROAD,11,13,11A,11B,
7,9, ROPATA
AVENUE, PanmurePoint England.

214,212,214A,
Pt England
PILKINGTON
ROAD,11,13,11A,
11B,7,9, ROPATA
AVENUE,
Panmure-Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 12, ANDERSON
AVENUE,23,21C,21B,
21,21A, HOLLAND
AVENUE, Point
England.

12, ANDERSON
Pt England
AVENUE,23,21C,2
1B,21,21A,
HOLLAND
AVENUE, Point
England

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

402

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and public transport and is
adjacent to POS. This site is adjacent to an existing
notified THAB block. The retention of the notified THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC, and POS. This site is
adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC, and POS. This site is
adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and the site is adjacent to
an existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1980

839-1981

839-1982

839-1983

839-1984

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 47,45,49, POINT
ENGLAND ROAD,
Point England.

47,45,49, POINT Pt England


ENGLAND ROAD,
Point England

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 6A,8,6, HOLLAND
AVENUE, Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 21,2/21,3/21,
WADDELL
AVENUE,24,20,3/22,2
2,18,2/18,2/22,
HOLLAND AVENUE,
Point England.

6A,8,6, HOLLAND Pt England


AVENUE, Point
England

THAB

21,2/21,3/21,
Pt England
WADDELL
AVENUE,24,20,3/
22,22,18,2/18,2/2
2, HOLLAND
AVENUE, Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 33,31B,31,31A,
ROPATA
AVENUE,9,7A,7,
ANDERSON AVENUE,
Point England.

33,31B,31,31A,
ROPATA
AVENUE,9,7A,7,
ANDERSON
AVENUE, Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
218,228,226,224,230,
222,232,220, TRIPOLI
ROAD,43,39,39A,41,
ROPATA
AVENUE,190,
PILKINGTON ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England.

218,228,226,224, Pt England
230,222,232,220,
TRIPOLI
ROAD,43,39,39A,
41, ROPATA
AVENUE,190,
PILKINGTON
ROAD, PanmurePoint England

Pt England

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

403

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and the site is adjacent to
an existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change
located close to Glen Innes TC and the site is adjacent to
an existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is part No change
of an already existing THAB block which is located close
to Glen Innes TC. This retention is in keeping with the
surrounding neighbourhood. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is part No change


of an already existing THAB block which is located close
to Glen Innes TC. This retention is in keeping with the
surrounding neighbourhood. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is part No change


of an already existing THAB block which is located close
to Glen Innes TC. This retention is in keeping with the
surrounding neighbourhood and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1985

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Pt England

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3,5,7, TAURIMA
AVENUE,69,67,
POINT ENGLAND
ROAD,10,12,8,
WADDELL AVENUE,
Point England.

3,5,7, TAURIMA
AVENUE,69,67,
POINT ENGLAND
ROAD,10,12,8,
WADDELL
AVENUE, Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
11,13,15,17,19,3,5,7,
9, ERIMA
AVENUE,2/2,1/2,4,
TAURIMA
AVENUE,2/77,3/77,7
5,73,71,1/77, POINT
ENGLAND ROAD,
Point England.

11,13,15,17,19,3, Pt England
5,7,9, ERIMA
AVENUE,2/2,1/2,4
, TAURIMA
AVENUE,2/77,3/7
7,75,73,71,1/77,
POINT ENGLAND
ROAD, Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24,20,22,
ANDERSON
AVENUE,26,
WADDELL AVENUE,
Point England.

24,20,22,
ANDERSON
AVENUE,26,
WADDELL
AVENUE, Point
England

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

404

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


MHU
zone is more appropriate given the distance from the
Glen Innes TC and the RFN. MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change refer to Attachment F.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1986

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


zone is more appropriate given the distance from the
Glen Innes TC and the RFN. MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1987

Eastern Isthmus

Pt England

THAB

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


zone is more appropriate given the distance from the
Glen Innes TC and the RFN. MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Scope for this change
can be found in points 6641-1 and 6697-1- See
Attachment D..

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1988

Eastern Isthmus

Retain Terrace
32,34, ANDERSON Pt England
Housing and
AVENUE, Point
Apartment Buildings England
at 32,34, ANDERSON
AVENUE, Point
England.

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 38, ANDERSON
AVENUE,23, ERIMA
AVENUE, Point
England.

THAB

THAB

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


MHU
zone is more appropriate given the distance from the
Glen Innes TC and the RFN. MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change refer to Attachment F.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1989

Eastern Isthmus

38, ANDERSON
AVENUE,23,
ERIMA AVENUE,
Point England

Pt England

THAB

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


zone is more appropriate given the distance from the
nearest TC and the RFN. MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Scope for this change
can be found in points 6641-1 and 6697-1- See
Attachment D..

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1990

839-1991

839-1992

839-1993

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Pt England

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 32,30, ROPATA
AVENUE,27,29,
HOLLAND
AVENUE,13,
ANDERSON AVENUE,
Point England.

32,30, ROPATA
AVENUE,27,29,
HOLLAND
AVENUE,13,
ANDERSON
AVENUE, Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 216,208,212,210,
TRIPOLI
ROAD,33,37,35,
HOLLAND
AVENUE,44,42,36,40,
ROPATA AVENUE,
Panmure-Point
England.

216,208,212,210, Pt England
TRIPOLI
ROAD,33,37,35,
HOLLAND
AVENUE,44,42,36,
40, ROPATA
AVENUE,
Panmure-Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
38,42A,44,42,36,40,4
6,44A, HOLLAND
AVENUE,1/35,33,45,3
7,43,2/35, WADDELL
AVENUE,196,198,202
, TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England.

38,42A,44,42,36,4 Pt England
0,46,44A,
HOLLAND
AVENUE,1/35,33,
45,37,43,2/35,
WADDELL
AVENUE,196,198,
202, TRIPOLI
ROAD, PanmurePoint England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1, BAGNALL
AVENUE,28,
WADDELL
AVENUE,25,27B,27A,
ANDERSON AVENUE,
Point England.

1, BAGNALL
Pt England
AVENUE,28,
WADDELL
AVENUE,25,27B,2
7A, ANDERSON
AVENUE, Point
England

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

405

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is part No change


of an already existing THAB block which is located close
to Glen Innes TC. This retention is in keeping with the
surrounding neighbourhood and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is part No change


of an already existing THAB block which is located close
to Glen Innes TC. This retention is in keeping with the
surrounding neighbourhood and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does
not require SH zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is part No change


of an already existing THAB block which is located close
to Glen Innes TC. This retention is in keeping with the
surrounding neighbourhood and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


MHU
zone more appropriate given the distance from centre
and RFN. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS. Scope for this change can be found in points
6641-1 and 6697-1- See Attachment D.

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1994

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 176,186,184,178,
TRIPOLI
ROAD,11,13,15,21,17
,19,5,7,9, BAGNALL
AVENUE,46,44,42,
WADDELL AVENUE,
Panmure-Point
England.

176,186,184,178, Pt England
TRIPOLI
ROAD,11,13,15,21
,17,19,5,7,9,
BAGNALL
AVENUE,46,44,42,
WADDELL
AVENUE,
Panmure-Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 31,29, ANDERSON
AVENUE,6,2A,2B,4,
BAGNALL AVENUE,
Point England.

31,29, ANDERSON Pt England


AVENUE,6,2A,2B,
4, BAGNALL
AVENUE, Point
England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
39,49,47,45,51,53,41,
ERIMA
AVENUE,174A,
TRIPOLI
ROAD,18,12,14,16,
BAGNALL AVENUE,
Panmure-Point
England.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 177,
RIVERSIDE
AVENUE,24, TUAKIRI
STREET, Point
England.

39,49,47,45,51,53 Pt England
,41, ERIMA
AVENUE,174A,
TRIPOLI
ROAD,18,12,14,16
, BAGNALL
AVENUE,
Panmure-Point
England

THAB

177, RIVERSIDE
AVENUE,24,
TUAKIRI STREET,
Point England

MHS

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
191,193,183,181,187,
179,185,177,189,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England.

191,193,183,181, Pt England
187,179,185,177,
189, TRIPOLI
ROAD, PanmurePoint England

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

406

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


MHU
zone more appropriate given the distance from the Glen
Innes TC and the MU zone. Rezoning to MHU aligns with
MHU objectives and gives effect to the RPS. Scope for
this change can be found in points 6641-1 and 6697-1See Attachment D..
THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1995

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


MHU
zone more appropriate given the distance from the Glen
Innes TC and the MU zone. Rezoning to MHU aligns with
MHU objectives and gives effect to the RPS. Scope for
this change can be found in points 6641-1 and 6697-1See Attachment D..

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-1996

839-1997

839-1998

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


MHU
zone more appropriate given the distance from the Glen
Innes TC and the MU zone. Rezoning to MHU aligns with
MHU objectives and gives effect to the RPS. Scope for
this change can be found in points 6641-1 and 6697-1See Attachment D..

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


Pt England

THAB

MHS

THAB

Support retention of notified MHS zone - property is part No change


of an existing MHS block and MHS zone helps provide a
range of residential choices. Property is beyond 250m
walking distance of centres or the RFN. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU
MHU
zone more appropriate given the distance from the Glen
Innes TC and the MU zone. Rezoning to MHU aligns with
MHU objectives and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change. This is an out of scope change refer to
Attachment F.

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1999

839-2000

839-2001

839-2002

839-2003

839-2004

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
11,13,15,17,19,3,5,7,
9, HINAKI
STREET,158,182,180,
168,178,164,166,174,
160,162,170,
PILKINGTON
ROAD,8,2,4,6,
TORINO STREET,
Panmure-Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 9,5,7, TORINO
STREET, Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 6A,4,6, TRIPOLI
ROAD,1/4-40/4,4,6,
KINGS ROAD,
Panmure.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 8, KAHU
ROAD,3,5,4,6, TE
HANA ROAD,
Panmure.

11,13,15,17,19,3, Pt England
5,7,9, HINAKI
STREET,158,182,1
80,168,178,164,1
66,174,160,162,1
70, PILKINGTON
ROAD,8,2,4,6,
TORINO STREET,
Panmure-Point
England

THAB

9,5,7, TORINO
STREET, Point
England

Pt England

THAB

6A,4,6, TRIPOLI
ROAD,1/440/4,4,6, KINGS
ROAD, Panmure

Panmure

8, KAHU
ROAD,3,5,4,6, TE
HANA ROAD,
Panmure

Panmure

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 13, TRIPOLI
ROAD,2A, TE HANA
ROAD, Panmure.

13, TRIPOLI
ROAD,2A, TE
HANA ROAD,
Panmure

Panmure

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 7,6, KAHU ROAD,
Panmure.

7,6, KAHU ROAD, Panmure


Panmure

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

407

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


MHU
zone more appropriate given the distance from the Glen
Innes TC and the MU zone. Rezoning to MHU aligns with
MHU objectives and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change. This is an out of scope change refer to
Attachment F.
THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


MHU
zone more appropriate given the distance from the Glen
Innes TC and the MU zone. Rezoning to MHU aligns with
MHU objectives and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change. This is an out of scope change refer to
Attachment F.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No change
it is located close to Panmure TC and is part of an already
existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone at this site - it is located No change
close to Panmure TC, POS and RFN and is in keeping with
the surrounding neighbourhood. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - it is located No change


close to Panmure TC and Tripoli Road RFN, is adjacent to
POS, and is in keeping with the surrounding
neighbourhood. The retention of the notified THAB zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone at this site - it is located No change
close to Panmure TC, POS and RFN and is in keeping with
the surrounding neighbourhood. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does not
require SH zone.

THAB

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2005

839-2006

839-2007

839-2008

839-2223

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 44,42,40,
STEWART
AVENUE,24,32B,26,3
2A,20,22,28B,28,34,
NGARIMU
ROAD,33,31,27,29,35
, TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10,12,14,
NGARIMU ROAD,
Panmure.

44,42,40,
Panmure
STEWART
AVENUE,24,32B,2
6,32A,20,22,28B,2
8,34, NGARIMU
ROAD,33,31,27,29
,35, TRIPOLI
ROAD, Panmure

THAB

10,12,14,
Panmure
NGARIMU ROAD,
Panmure

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2,4,6, NGARIMU
ROAD,11,9,13,15, TE
KOA ROAD, Panmure.

2,4,6, NGARIMU Panmure


ROAD,11,9,13,15,
TE KOA ROAD,
Panmure

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
25,39,27,33,31,37,29,
35, PILKINGTON
ROAD,1,3,2A,2B,4,
KAPUNI ROAD,14, TE
KOA ROAD, Panmure.

25,39,27,33,31,37 Panmure
,29,35,
PILKINGTON
ROAD,1,3,2A,2B,4
, KAPUNI
ROAD,14, TE KOA
ROAD, Panmure

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
11,25,13,27,15,21,23,
19,31,29,1,33,3,5,7,9,
TIPPETT
STREET,352,360,
APIRANA AVENUE,
Kohimarama-Point
England.

11,25,13,27,15,21 Pt England
,23,19,31,29,1,33,
3,5,7,9, TIPPETT
STREET,352,360,
APIRANA
AVENUE,
KohimaramaPoint England

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

408

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - it is located No change


close to Panmure TC, POS and Tripoli Road RFN and is in
keeping with the surrounding neighbourhood. The
retention of the notified THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS. Management of the flood risk
on site does not require SH zone.

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - it is located No change


close to Panmure TC, POS and RFN and is in keeping with
the surrounding neighbourhood. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does not
require SH zone.
Support retention of THAB zone at this site - it is located No change
close to Panmure TC, POS and RFN and is in keeping with
the surrounding neighbourhood. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - it is located No change


close to Panmure TC, POS and RFN and is in keeping with
the surrounding neighbourhood. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of THAB zone at this site - it is located No change


close to Glen Innes TC and on arterial. Retention of
notified THAB zone is in keeping with the surrounding
area. The retention of the notified THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and give effect to the RPS. Management of the flood risk
on site does not require SH zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2224

839-2239

839-2291

839-2304

839-2306

839-2309

839-2341

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 32,38,24-28,36,34,
SALIMA TALAGI
STREET, Point
England.

32,38,24Pt England
28,36,34, SALIMA
TALAGI STREET,
Point England

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10 ROWENA
CRESCENT.Glen
Innes.

10 ROWENA
CRESCENT.Glen
Innes

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 76 LINE ROAD.
Point England-Glen
Innes.

76 LINE ROAD.
Point EnglandGlen Innes

Glen Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
13 Tosca Lane,
Housing and
Glen Innes
Apartment Buildings
at Lot 6 DP 41451 [13
Tosca Lane, Glen
Innes]

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4 MAYBURY
STREET. Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 25 ROPATA
AVENUE. Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 11, 10, 9 TOSCA
LANE. Glen Innes.

4 MAYBURY
STREET. Point
England

Pt England

25 ROPATA
AVENUE. Point
England

Pt England

11, 10, 9 TOSCA Glen Innes


LANE. Glen Innes

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

409

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change


located adjacent to POS, close to Glen Innes TC and has
good access to public transport and urban facilities. This
retention aligns with the objectives of the THAB zone and
will provide increased choice in housing options. The
retention of the notified THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property, No change
in keeping with the zoning of surrounding sites. Area can
support intensification that support the Glen Innes TC
and the MU zone. Retention of notified zoning is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - it is No change
adjacent to Glen Innes TC, and close to MU zone and
public transport. The retention of the notified THAB zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is No change


located close to Glen Innes TC and POS. This site is
adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does not
require SH zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change
located close to Glen Innes TC and POS and has good
access to public transport options. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change
part of an existing THAB block and is close to Glen Innes
TC and on arterial. This retention provides a range of
housing options in the area, aligns with the objectives of
the THAB zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is No change
located close to Glen Innes TC and POS. This site is
adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does not
require SH zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2348

839-2362

839-2378

839-2397

839-2400

839-2413

839-2418

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 6 TAURIMA
AVENUE. Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 26 ROWENA
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes.

6 TAURIMA
AVENUE. Point
England

Pt England

26 ROWENA
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 32 ROWENA
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes.

32 (possibly 34)
ROWENA
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24 ROWENA
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes.

24 ROWENA
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
219 TRIPOLI
Housing and
ROAD. PanmureApartment Buildings Point England
at 219 TRIPOLI ROAD.
Panmure-Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 183, 183A
TANIWHA STREET.
Glen Innes.

Pt England

183, 183A
Glen Innes
TANIWHA STREET.
Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
200 TRIPOLI
Housing and
ROAD. PanmureApartment Buildings Point England
at 200 TRIPOLI ROAD.
Panmure-Point
England.

Pt England

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

410

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone, MHU


MHU
zone more appropriate given the distance from the Glen
Innes TC and the MU zone. Rezoning to MHU aligns with
MHU objectives and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out
of scope change. This is an out of scope change refer to
Attachment F.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is No change
located close to Glen Innes TC and POS. This site is
adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of THAB. THAB is appropriate as the
No change
area is located next to Glen Innes TC. The zone provides
considerable density and is appropriate given their
locations with good access to RFN's. THAB zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS. Management of
the flood risk on site does not require SH zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is No change
located close to Glen Innes TC and POS. This site is
adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property, No change
in keeping with the zoning of surrounding sites. Area can
support intensification that support the Glen Innes TC
and the adjacent MU and LI zoned land. Retention of
notified zoning is an appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is No change
located on the RFN, close to Glen Innes TC and adjacent
to POS. This site is adjacent to an existing notified THAB
block. The retention of the notified THAB zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Management of the
flood risk on site does not require SH zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - this property is No change
part of an existing THAB block and is close to Glen Innes
TC and located close to Erima Avenue RFN. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2435

839-2436

839-2445

839-2465

839-2474

839-2512

839-2515

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 8, 7, 6 TOSCA
LANE. Glen Innes.

8, 7, 6 TOSCA
Glen Innes
LANE. Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1, 3, 2 TOSCA
LANE. Glen Innes.

1, 3, 2 TOSCA
Glen Innes
LANE. Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 21 EVANDALE
STREET. Glen Innes.

21 EVANDALE
STREET. Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3 EVANDALE
STREET. Glen Innes.

3 EVANDALE
STREET. Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 68 MAYBURY
STREET. Point
England.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 13, 12 TOSCA
LANE. Glen Innes.

68 MAYBURY
STREET. Point
England

Pt England

13, 12 TOSCA
Glen Innes
LANE. Glen Innes

Retain Terrace
221 TRIPOLI
Housing and
ROAD. PanmureApartment Buildings Point England
at 221 TRIPOLI ROAD.
Panmure-Point
England.

Pt England

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is


located close to Glen Innes TC and POS. This site is
adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does not
require SH zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is
located close to Glen Innes TC and POS. This site is
adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does not
require SH zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is
located close to Glen Innes TC and POS and is part of an
existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is
located close to Glen Innes TC and POS and is part of an
existing notified THAB block. The retention of the
notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - this site is
located close to Glen Innes TC, is part of an existing
notified THAB block and adjacent to POS. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site - its is
located close to Glen Innes TC and POS. This site is
adjacent to an existing notified THAB block. The retention
of the notified THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Management of the flood risk on site does not
require SH zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property,
in keeping with the zoning of surrounding sites. Area can
support intensification that support the Glen Innes TC
and the adjacent MU and LI zoned land. Retention of
notified zoning is an appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

411

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2528

839-2536

839-2606

839-2607

839-2777

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 94 MAYBURY
STREET. Point
England.

94 MAYBURY
STREET. Point
England

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 36 WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes.

36 WIMBLEDON
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1 ANDERSON
AVENUE. Point
England.

1 ANDERSON
AVENUE. Point
England

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 196 PILKINGTON
ROAD. PanmurePoint England.

196 PILKINGTON
ROAD. PanmurePoint England

Rezone 103,107,105,
TANIWHA STREET,35,
FENCHURCH STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

103,107,105,
TANIWHA
STREET,35,
FENCHURCH
STREET, Glen
Innes

LOCALITY

Pt England

Glen Innes

Pt England

Pt England

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHS

REASONS

Do not support retention of notified THAB zone because


of distance to Glen Innes TC and the RFN. Support MHU
as a more appropriate zone for this (and adjacent)
property. MHU zone provides a more fine grain response
to residential zoning and aligns with the objectives of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change refer to Attachment F.
Do not support retention of notified THAB zone because
of distance to Glen Innes TC and the RFN. Support MHU
as a more appropriate zone for this (and adjacent)
property. MHU zone provides a more fine grain response
to residential zoning and aligns with the objectives of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change refer to Attachment F.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this site.
THAB zone is appropriate as the area is located close to
Glen Innes TC. The zone provides considerable density
and is appropriate given the properties location with
good access to a RFN. The retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and give effect to the RPS. Note: This
submission point is referring to property 196a Pilkington
Support retention of THAB zone - the property is part of
an existing THAB block and is close to centres and POS.
Supports the objectives of the THAB zone and give effect
to the RPS.

412

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

No change

Support change sought from SH and MHS to MHS.


MHS
Support rezoning of 107 Taniwha Street from SH to MHS
zone where managing flooding risks on this site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The MHS zone is
appropriate as it complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. The MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2797

839-2798

839-2799

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
46,62,46A,50,48,
LINE
ROAD,10,1,3,5,4,7,6,
9,8, HARLOW
PLACE,25,27,15,21,17
,23,19,31,33, EPPING
STREET, Glen Innes
from Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings, Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

46,62,46A,50,48, Glen Innes


LINE
ROAD,10,1,3,5,4,7
,6,9,8, HARLOW
PLACE,25,27,15,2
1,17,23,19,31,33,
EPPING STREET,
Glen Innes

Various

Rezone
6A,6B,6C,6D,6E,8A,10
B,10C,10A,10D,10E,8
E,8B,8D,8C,4D,4E,4B,
4C,4A, MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England from Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

6A,6B,6C,6D,6E,8 Pt England
A,10B,10C,10A,10
D,10E,8E,8B,8D,8
C,4D,4E,4B,4C,4A,
MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England

MHS, THAB

Rezone
24,12A,12B,12C,12D,
12E,22,28,14D,14E,1
4B,14C,14A,26,20,38,
16,18,30,36,34,32,
MAYBURY STREET,
Point England from
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

24,12A,12B,12C,1 Pt England
2D,12E,22,28,14D
,14E,14B,14C,14A,
26,20,38,16,18,30
,36,34,32,
MAYBURY
STREET, Point
England

MHS, THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

Various

THAB

THAB

REASONS

413

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located


THAB
opposite Glen Innes TC and within walking distance to a
RFN. Sites are also located adjacent to POS. The rezoning
to THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Support change of zone from MHS to THAB as these sites THAB


are located opposite Glen Innes TC and within walking
distance to a RFN. Sites are also located adjacent to POS.
The rezoning to THAB is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located


THAB
close to Glen Innes TC, MU zone and within walking
distance to a RFN. Sites are also located adjacent to POS.
The rezoning to THAB is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2800

839-2801

839-2802

839-2803

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 2,4, ROWENA


CRESCENT,1,3,2,5,4,7
,6,8, VIENNA
ROW,140, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen Innes
from Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings, Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

2,4, ROWENA
Glen Innes
CRESCENT,1,3,2,5,
4,7,6,8, VIENNA
ROW,140,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes

Rezone 7, KOTAE
ROAD,3,5, MARION
PLACE,10,6, KIANO
PLACE, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

7, KOTAE
ROAD,3,5,
MARION
PLACE,10,6,
KIANO PLACE,
Glen Innes

Rezone
24,26,12,20,14,22,
LYNDHURST
STREET,33,31,39,
SILVERTON AVENUE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

24,26,12,20,14,22 Wai O Taki Bay SH, MHS


, LYNDHURST
STREET,33,31,39,
SILVERTON
AVENUE, Glen
Innes

MHS

Rezone 8,
LYNDHURST
STREET,25,
SILVERTON AVENUE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

8, LYNDHURST
STREET,25,
SILVERTON
AVENUE, Glen
Innes

MHS

Glen Innes

MHS, THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH, MHS

Wai O Taki Bay SH, MHS

THAB

MHS

REASONS

414

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support change sought from MHS to THAB where sites


THAB
are within walking distance of Glen Innes TC and Taniwha
Street RFN. The surrounding area has been rezoned to
THAB to support increased intensification. The rezoning
to THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from SH and MHS to MHS.


MHS
Managing the flooding risks on these sites does not
require maintaining the notified SH zone. Aligns with
zones objectives and policies in that it will complement
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character.
The rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support the change of zone from notified SH and MHS to MHS
MHS at these sites as there are no heritage or
environmental constraints that require management
through SH zoning. The sites are located within walking
distance to POS. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support the change of zone from notified SH and MHS to MHS


MHS at these sites as there are no heritage or
environmental constraints that require management
through SH zoning. The sites are located within walking
distance to POS. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2804

839-2805

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone
38,32,30,42,36,40,
TANIWHA
STREET,1A,3,3A,7,
LYNDHURST
STREET,9,5,
SILVERTON AVENUE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

38,32,30,42,36,40 Wai O Taki Bay SH, MHS


, TANIWHA
STREET,1A,3,3A,7,
LYNDHURST
STREET,9,5,
SILVERTON
AVENUE, Glen
Innes

MHS

Rezone 19,
INGLEWOOD
STREET,20,22,
TANIWHA STREET,4,
SILVERTON AVENUE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

19, INGLEWOOD
STREET,20,22,
TANIWHA
STREET,4,
SILVERTON
AVENUE, Glen
Innes

MHS

Wai O Taki Bay SH, MHS

REASONS

415

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from SH and MHS to MHS. MHS MHS


zone is appropriate for its context and complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character of
predominantly one-two storey buildings with adequate
services of network utilities. The rezoning to MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Support change of zone from SH and MHS to MHS - the MHS


sites are located close to POS and with no constraints on
the sites, rezoning to MHS is suitable. The rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2806

839-2807

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone
1/118,7/116,1/116,1
3/118,12/118,19/116
,23/116,12/116,24/1
16,13/116,9/116,8/1
16,3/118,8/118,3/11
6,9/118,10/118,15/1
18,10/116,15/116,22
/116,2/118,7/118,5/1
16,5/118,2/116,11/1
18,14/116,16/116,16
/118,14/118,11/116,
26/116,21/116,6/118
,4/118,4/116,6/116,1
8/116,17/118,25/116
,20/116,17/116,18/1
18, LINE ROAD [Glen
Innes and Point
England]
24,26,38,20,22,18,44,
30,28,36,40,34,2,32,4
2, POINT ENGLAND
ROAD,37,8/1,35,25,2
7,21,23,29,41,7/1,5/3
,1/3,1/1,3/1,12/1,12/
3,6/1,6/3,2/1,2/3,8/3
,11,5/1,15,10/3,17,10
/1,19,4/3,31,4/1,11/3
Rezone 340,330,

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1/118,7/116,1/11 Pt England
6,13/118,12/118,
19/116,23/116,12
/116,24/116,13/1
16,9/116,8/116,3/
118,8/118,3/116,
9/118,10/118,15/
118,10/116,15/11
6,22/116,2/118,7/
118,5/116,5/118,
2/116,11/118,14/
116,16/116,16/11
8,14/118,11/116,
26/116,21/116,6/
118,4/118,4/116,
6/116,18/116,17/
118,25/116,20/11
6,17/116,18/118,
LINE ROAD [Glen
Innes and Point
England]
24,26,38,20,22,18
,44,30,28,36,40,3
4,2,32,42, POINT
ENGLAND
ROAD,37,8/1,35,2
5,27,21,23,29,41,
7/1,5/3,1/3,1/1,3/
340,330, APIRANA Pt England
APIRANA
AVENUE,1,5,
AVENUE,1,5, POINT POINT ENGLAND
ENGLAND ROAD,
ROAD,
Kohimarama-Point
KohimaramaEngland from Terrace Point England
Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

Various

MHS, THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

Various

THAB

REASONS

416

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located


THAB
opposite a LC and within walking distance to a RFN. Sites
are also located adjacent to POS. The rezoning to THAB
will increase the capacity for housing in this location and
will result in an efficient use of land and gives effect to
the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located


THAB
very close to TC and within walking distance to a RFN.
Sites are also located adjacent to POS. Rezoning to THAB
will increase the capacity for housing in this location and
will result in an efficient use of land as well as giving
effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2808

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 8,4,6, HINAKI


STREET,8,4,6,
PARATA
STREET,201,203,215,
205,213,207,211,209,
197,199, TRIPOLI
ROAD, PanmurePoint England from
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

8,4,6, HINAKI
Pt England
STREET,8,4,6,
PARATA
STREET,201,203,2
15,205,213,207,2
11,209,197,199,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England

MHS, THAB

Rezone
18B,24,26,18A,20,35/
14,22,16,1/14,
TRIPOLI ROAD,8,4,6,
MATAPAN
ROAD,11,13,21,17,23
,19,17A,3,9,19A,
CAEN ROAD,
Panmure from
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Mixed Housing
Urban, Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

18B,24,26,18A,20, Panmure
35/14,22,16,1/14,
TRIPOLI
ROAD,8,4,6,
MATAPAN
ROAD,11,13,21,17
,23,19,17A,3,9,19
A, CAEN ROAD,
Panmure

MHS, MHU,
THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

417

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support THAB as too far from Glen Innes TC and MHU
the RFN to support THAB. MHU is more appropriate as it
provides an appropriate transition between THAB and
MHS zones and the site is within close proximity to RFN.
Rezoning will increase capacity and choice of housing in
this location and is an appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-2809

839-5070

839-5089

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 25,
25, MCCULLOCH
MCCULLOCH ROAD, ROAD, Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 8,
8, FENCHURCH
FENCHURCH STREET, STREET, Glen
Glen Innes from
Innes
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glen Innes

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB supported on Tripoli Road as located on a RFN and THAB/ MHU


within walking distance to TC (refer to map in
Attachment E). MHU most appropriate for Caen Road as
further from RFN and Centre than sites on Tripoli Road.
Supports density decreasing away from Centres. The
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as site is


within walking distance to a RFN and is located close to
MU and THAB zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5094

839-5126

839-5134

839-5149

839-5157

839-5160

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 45,
45, ANDERSON
ANDERSON AVENUE, AVENUE, Point
Point England from
England
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pt England

Rezone 20, TUAKIRI 20, TUAKIRI


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
England from Mixed England
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pt England

Rezone 41, CAEN


41, CAEN ROAD,
ROAD, Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 222,
RIVERSIDE AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pt England

222, RIVERSIDE
AVENUE, Point
England

Rezone 48,
48, INGLEWOOD
INGLEWOOD STREET, STREET, Glen
Glen Innes from
Innes
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glen Innes

Rezone 44,
44, INGLEWOOD
INGLEWOOD STREET, STREET, Glen
Glen Innes from
Innes
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

418

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


MHU
distance to Erima Avenue RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to Glen Innes TC. The rezoning to MHU
will increase the capacity for housing in this location, is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or a RFN and the application of MHS
is appropriate in providing a range of residential options
in the area and supports decreasing densities away from
centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less
intensified zone to MHU - the property is not adjacent to
any centre however is close to the RFN and adjacent to
POS. Rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the
area that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood
that provides a transition in density between THAB and
MHS. This zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for
its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHS supported as the site is adequately
serviced by network utilities and does not have any
overlays preventing development. Aligns with zones
objectives and policies in that it will complement the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character. The
rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHS supported as the site is adequately
serviced by network utilities and does not have any
overlays preventing development. Aligns with zones
objectives and policies in that it will complement the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character. The
rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHS

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5166

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 6, CAEN
6, CAEN ROAD,
ROAD, Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 28, BENGHAZI 28, BENGHAZI


ROAD, Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 54,
54, INGLEWOOD
INGLEWOOD STREET, STREET, Glen
Glen Innes from
Innes
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glen Innes

Rezone 48, CAEN


48, CAEN ROAD,
ROAD, Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

419

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to THAB. MHU is more


No change
appropriate as the site is located within walking distance
to the RFN but not located close to centres. The retention
of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-5179

839-5201

839-5204

839-5217

839-5222

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 143, TRIPOLI


ROAD,57, TORINO
STREET, PanmurePoint England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

143, TRIPOLI
Pt England
ROAD,57, TORINO
STREET, PanmurePoint England

Rezone 12, EASTVIEW 12, EASTVIEW


Glen Innes
ROAD, Glen Innes
ROAD, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

SH

MHS

POS

MHS

MHU

MHS

THAB

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS
Rezoning to MHS supported as the site is adequately
serviced by network utilities and does not have any
overlays preventing development. Aligns with zones
objectives and policies in that it will complement the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character. The
rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to THAB, support
alternative rezoning to MHU - the property is not
adjacent to any centre however is close to the RFN and
adjacent to POS. Rezoning to MHU will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood that provides a transition in
density between THAB and MHS. This zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Rezone 57 Torino Street to MHU as site is in close
proximity to MU zone (local amenities) and RFN (refer to
map in Attachment E). 143 Tripoli Road is to be retained
as POS - this is an existing POS that services surrounding
residential neighbourhood.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHS

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located


THAB
very close to TC and within walking distance to a RFN.
Sites are also located adjacent to POS. Rezoning to THAB
will increase the capacity for housing in this location and
will result in an efficient use of land. The THAB zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5223

839-5224

839-5230

839-5231

839-5243

839-5244

839-5247

839-5248

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 42, ERIMA


AVENUE,33,35,
KAWITI AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 72, COURT
CRESCENT, Panmure
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

42, ERIMA
AVENUE,33,35,
KAWITI AVENUE,
Point England

Pt England

72, COURT
CRESCENT,
Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 27, TORINO


STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 2, KAY ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

27, TORINO
STREET, Point
England

Pt England

2, KAY ROAD,
Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 42,
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 27, ALAMEIN
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

42, TORRINGTON Glen Innes


CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

27, ALAMEIN RD, Panmure


Panmure

Rezone 12, UPHAM 12, UPHAM


ROAD, Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 33, TORINO 33, TORINO


STREET, Point
STREET, Point
England from Mixed England
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pt England

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to Erima Avenue RFN. Sites are also located
close to THAB zone and POS. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and
gives effect to the RPS.

420

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as the site is located along MHU


Court Crescent RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to NC and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location. MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase the
capacity for housing in this location and gives effect to
the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Glen Innes TC, MU and POS. Rezoning to
MHU will increase the capacity for housing in this
location as well as giving effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this


property is not close to centres or the RFN. Suitable for
suburban-built form of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to LC and NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. Rezoning to MHU is an appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5249

839-5253

839-5260

839-5290

839-5292

839-5314

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 67, ELSTREE


AVENUE, Point
England-Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

67, ELSTREE
AVENUE, Point
England-Glen
Innes

Rezone 31, TAMATEA


AVENUE, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 20,
PADDINGTON
STREET, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31, TAMATEA
AVENUE, Point
England

Rezone 12, LEASIDE


LANE, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, LEASIDE LANE, Glen Innes


Glen Innes

Pt England

20, PADDINGTON Glen Innes


STREET, Glen
Innes

Rezone 40, CAEN


40, CAEN ROAD,
ROAD, Panmure from Panmure
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 30,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glen Innes

Panmure

30, LEYBOURNE Glen Innes


CIRCLE, Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

421

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and is
an appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area and supports decreasing densities away from
centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less
intensified zone to MHU. Retention of SH is not required
for the management of the flooding constraint at the
site. The property is not adjacent to any centre however
is close to RFN and POS. Rezoning to MHU will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood that provides a transition in
density between THAB and MHS/SH. The MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5318

839-5344

839-5375

839-5409

839-5410

839-5413

839-5414

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 283, WEST


TAMAKI ROAD, St
Heliers-Glen Innes
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 9, UPHAM
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

283, WEST
Wai O Taki Bay SH
TAMAKI ROAD, St
Heliers-Glen Innes

MHS

9, UPHAM ROAD, Panmure


Panmure

MHU

Rezone 12,
CLAIRVILLE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

12, CLAIRVILLE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Rezone 32,
PADDINGTON
STREET, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32, PADDINGTON Glen Innes


STREET, Glen
Innes

Rezone 2,
FERNWOOD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 27, HOBSON
DRIVE, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, FERNWOOD
Glen Innes
PLACE, Glen Innes

27, HOBSON
DRIVE, Panmure

Rezone 8, LINE ROAD, 8, LINE ROAD,


Point England-Glen
Point EnglandInnes from Mixed
Glen Innes
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glen Innes

Panmure

Glen Innes

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close


proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Apirana Ave
and Line Road. Is it located within walking distance to LC
and NC zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU supports the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to LC and NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. Rezoning to MHU is an appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Rezoning to MHS supported as site is adequately serviced
by network utilities and does not have any overlays
preventing development. Aligns with zones objectives
and policies in that it will complement the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character. The
rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area and supports decreasing densities away from
centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the rezoning from notified SH to MHS as
managing flooding risks at this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the site is
within walking distance to a RFN. Site is also located
within walking distance to NC and MU zones. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location and gives effect to the RPS.

422

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS
MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

MHS

No change

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHS
MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as site is


MHU
within walking distance to a RFN, Glen Innes TC and POS.
The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5440

839-5453

839-5495

839-5520

839-5522

839-5533

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 8, ERIMA
AVENUE, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 14, BROMLEY
PLACE, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8, ERIMA
AVENUE, Point
England

Pt England

Rezone 104,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 28,
PADDINGTON
STREET, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

104, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen
Innes

Rezone 14, KESTREL


PLACE, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, KESTREL
Glen Innes
PLACE, Glen Innes

14, BROMLEY
Glen Innes
PLACE, Glen Innes

Glen Innes

28, PADDINGTON Glen Innes


STREET, Glen
Innes

Rezone 42, COURT


42, COURT
CRESCENT, Panmure CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Panmure
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

423

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as this site is located along MHU


Erima Road RFN, and is located within walking distance
to a NC and POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase the
capacity for housing in this location and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for
its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities and aligns with the objectives of this zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as the site is located along
Court Crescent RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to NC and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location. MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change
MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU
MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5534

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 5,
5, MCCULLOCH
MCCULLOCH ROAD, ROAD, Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 51,
51, PILKINGTON
PILKINGTON ROAD, ROAD, PanmurePanmure-Point
Point England
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 15, STEWART 15, STEWART


AVENUE, Panmure
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Panmure
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 101, TRIPOLI 101, TRIPOLI


ROAD, PanmureROAD, PanmurePoint England from
Point England
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 50, TORINO


STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 16, EASTVIEW
ROAD, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
No such site address:
most likely 107-109
Castledine Cres

Pt England

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support THAB as too far from TC. MHU most


appropriate as provides appropriate transition between
THAB and MHS zones and site is within proximity to the
RFN. Rezoning will increase the capacity and choice of
housing in this location, achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and appropriately gives effect to the RPS.

424

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-5535

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

THAB

Do not support THAB as the site is not close enough to


MHU
the TC to warrant THAB zoning. MHU is more appropriate
as it provides an appropriate transition between THAB
and MHS zones and the site is within close proximity to
RFN. Rezoning will increase capacity and choice of
housing in this location, is an appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-5536

839-5537

839-5538

839-5549

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

50, TORINO
STREET, Point
England

16, EASTVIEW
Glen Innes
ROAD, Glen Innes

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support THAB as the site is too distant from the


Panmure TC. MHU is supported as it provides an
appropriate transition between THAB and MHS zones
and is within close proximity to RFN. Rezoning will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location and MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to two NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located
very close to TC and within walking distance to a RFN.
Sites are also located adjacent to POS. Rezoning to THAB
will increase the capacity for housing in this location and
will result in an efficient use of land. The THAB zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

THAB

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5550

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 48, APIRANA


AVENUE,
Kohimarama-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
48, APIRANA
AVENUE,
KohimaramaPoint England

LOCALITY

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

425

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to THAB not supported due to distance from


MHU
the centre. MHU considered most appropriate as the site
is within walking distance to RFN, TC, MU and POS zones.
Retention of MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the this zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-5551

839-5552

839-5553

839-5554

839-5555

839-5556

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 84,
84, CASTLEDINE
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Glen Innes

Rezone 37,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37, CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Rezone 31, TARATOA


STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 5, TANGAROA
STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

31, TARATOA
STREET, Point
England

Pt England

5, TANGAROA
STREET, Point
England

Pt England

Rezone 54, COURT


54, COURT
CRESCENT, Panmure CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Panmure
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 8, UPHAM
8, UPHAM ROAD, Panmure
ROAD, Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less


MHU
intensified zone to MHU - the property is not adjacent to
any centre however rezoning to MHU will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood that provides a transition in
density between THAB and MHS. This zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to MHU, support a less
MHS
intensified zone to MHS due to distance from the RFN
and nearest centre. Rezoning to MHS is appropriate given
the zoning of neighbouring properties and as the flooding
constraint on the property does not require retention of
SH zone. MHS is consistent with the zoning of
surrounding sites and is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN and POS. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


MHU
distance to a RFN and POS. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and
aligns with the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as the site is located along MHU


Court Crescent RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to NC and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location. MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close
MHU
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to LC and NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. Rezoning to MHU is an appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5557

839-5639

839-5689

839-5691

839-5709

839-5745

839-5759

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 11, TANIWHA 11, TANIWHA


STREET, Glen Innes
STREET, Glen
from Mixed Housing Innes
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Glen Innes

Rezone 9, OVERLEA
ROAD, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9, OVERLEA
Glen Innes
ROAD, Glen Innes

Rezone 6, SLOANE
STREET, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6, SLOANE
STREET, Glen
Innes

Rezone 3, DUNKIRK 3, DUNKIRK


ROAD, Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glen Innes

Panmure

Rezone 18,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18, LEYBOURNE Glen Innes


CIRCLE, Glen Innes

Rezone 12, ERIMA


AVENUE, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 27, CORAL
CRESCENT, Panmure
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

12, ERIMA
AVENUE, Point
England

Pt England

27, CORAL
CRESCENT,
Panmure

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities and aligns with the objectives of this zone and
gives effect to the RPS and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area and supports decreasing densities away from
centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for
its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Rezoning to MHU supported as this site is located along
Dunkirk Road RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC and POS. The rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

426

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change
MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Rezoning to MHU supported as this site is located along MHU
Erima Road RFN, and is located within walking distance
to a NC and POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase the
capacity for housing in this location and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support THAB as site is some distance from the
MHU
Panmure TC. Support MHU as the site is within walking
distance to the RFN. MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5772

839-5773

839-5775

839-5788

839-5792

839-5824

839-5838

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 151, TRIPOLI 151, TRIPOLI


ROAD, PanmureROAD, PanmurePoint England from
Point England
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Pt England

Rezone 24,
FERNWOOD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 16,
SILVERTON AVENUE,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 20,
FERNWOOD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 20,
CLAIRVILLE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

24, FERNWOOD Glen Innes


PLACE, Glen Innes

Rezone 205,
RIVERSIDE AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

205, RIVERSIDE
AVENUE, Point
England

16, SILVERTON
AVENUE, Glen
Innes

Rezone 35,
35, INGLEWOOD
INGLEWOOD STREET, STREET, Glen
Glen Innes from
Innes
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

MHS

SH

Wai O Taki Bay SH

20, FERNWOOD Glen Innes


PLACE, Glen Innes

20, CLAIRVILLE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

PAUP ZONE

Glen Innes

Pt England

Glen Innes

SH

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close


proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to two NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHS as site is not
subject to any environmental constraints such as
flooding, or HC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change of zone from notified SH to MHS at
this site as there are no heritage or environmental
constraints that require management through SH zoning.
The site is also located within close proximity to NC and
POS. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support change of zone from SH to MHS as site is not
subject to any environmental constraints such as
flooding, or HC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHS supported as site is adequately serviced
by network utilities and does not have any overlays
preventing development. Aligns with zones objectives
and policies in that it will complement the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character. The
rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for
its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHS supported as site is adequately serviced
by network utilities and does not have any overlays
preventing development. It also located within close
proximity to NC. Aligns with zones objectives and policies
in that it will complement the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and give effect to the RPS.

427

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

No change

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHS

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5848

839-5852

839-5862

839-5866

839-5867

839-5870

839-5874

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 101,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

101, LEYBOURNE Glen Innes


CIRCLE, Glen Innes

Rezone 36, ORAN


36, ORAN ROAD,
ROAD, Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Rezone 82, TRIPOLI


ROAD, PanmurePoint England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 47, TORINO
STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 11, STEWART
AVENUE, Panmure
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

82, TRIPOLI ROAD, Panmure


Panmure-Point
England

MHS

47, TORINO
STREET, Point
England

Pt England

MHS

11, STEWART
AVENUE,
Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 61, WEST


TAMAKI ROAD, St
Heliers-Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

61, WEST TAMAKI Glen Innes


ROAD, St HeliersGlen Innes

Rezone 33,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33, LEYBOURNE Glen Innes


CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

428

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the site is MHU
within walking distance to a RFN and is located close to
THAB and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to two NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB as the site is too distant from the
Panmure TC. MHU is supported as it provides an
appropriate transition between THAB and MHS zones
and is within close proximity to RFN. Rezoning will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location and MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Apirana Ave. Is
it located within walking distance to LC and NC zones.
Rezoning will increase housing capacity in the area. Site is
also within close proximity to a POS network. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and give effect to the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

MHU

MHU

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5875

839-5876

839-5880

839-5881

839-5882

839-5883

839-5910

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 3, TARATOA
STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 64, TRIPOLI
ROAD, PanmurePoint England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 15, TRENT
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
3, TARATOA
STREET, Point
England

LOCALITY

Pt England

PAUP ZONE

MHS

64, TRIPOLI ROAD, Panmure


Panmure-Point
England

MHS

15, TRENT ROAD, Panmure


Panmure

MHS

Rezone 152, TRIPOLI 152, TRIPOLI


ROAD, PanmureROAD, PanmurePoint England from
Point England
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pt England

Rezone 16, CHILTERN 16, CHILTERN


CRESCENT, Glen
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Innes
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glen Innes

Rezone 12,
12, INGLEWOOD
INGLEWOOD STREET, STREET, Glen
Glen Innes from
Innes
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glen Innes

Rezone 3, KAWITI
3, KAWITI
AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
England from Mixed England
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pt England

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

429

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. The rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close


proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to two NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to two NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to two NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to MHU, support a less
intensified zone to MHS - rezoning to MHS is appropriate
given the zoning of neighbouring properties. Rezoning
the property to MHU would result in spot zoning. There
are no heritage or environmental constraints that require
management through SH zoning. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
rezoning to MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the site is
within walking distance to a RFN and is also located close
to a NC and large POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase
the capacity for housing in this location and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

No change

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHS

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU
MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5932

839-5935

839-5995

839-6006

839-6061

839-6086

839-6088

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 39, CORAL


39, CORAL
CRESCENT, Panmure CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Panmure
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 25,
25, CASTLEDINE
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glen Innes

Rezone 140,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 28,
FERNWOOD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 9, SUDA
PLACE, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

140, LEYBOURNE Glen Innes


CIRCLE, Glen Innes

Rezone 26,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 8, MARETH
STREET, Panmure
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

26, CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

430

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as the site is located close MHU


to Matapan Road RFN and POS. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location. MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified SH zone. This site is affected
by flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

28, FERNWOOD Glen Innes


PLACE, Glen Innes

9, SUDA PLACE,
Panmure

Panmure

Glen Innes

8, MARETH
Panmure
STREET, Panmure

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from SH to MHS as site is not


MHS
subject to any environmental constraints such as
flooding, or HC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN and POS. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and
aligns with the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to West Tamaki Road RFN. Site is also located
within walking distance to NC, TC and MU zones. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC and POS. The rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6109

839-6135

839-6137

839-6138

839-6141

839-6143

839-6146

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 43,
43, INGLEWOOD
INGLEWOOD STREET, STREET, Glen
Glen Innes from
Innes
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

LOCALITY

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

SH

Rezone 12, KOTAE


12, KOTAE ROAD, Glen Innes
ROAD, Glen Innes
Glen Innes
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 32, TORINO


STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 47,45, ORAN
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32, TORINO
STREET, Point
England

Pt England

MHS

47,45, ORAN
ROAD, Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 20, TORINO


STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 60, TRIPOLI
ROAD, PanmurePoint England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20, TORINO
STREET, Point
England

Pt England

60, TRIPOLI ROAD, Panmure


Panmure-Point
England

Rezone 49, TRIPOLI


49, TRIPOLI ROAD, Panmure
ROAD, PanmurePanmure-Point
Point England from
England
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

431

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHS supported as site is adequately serviced


by network utilities and does not have any overlays
preventing development. It also located within close
proximity to NC. Aligns with zones objectives and policies
in that it will complement the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character. The MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHS supported as site is adequately serviced
by network utilities and does not have any overlays
preventing development. Aligns with zones objectives
and policies in that it will complement the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character. The
rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the sites
are within walking distance to a RFN and are located
close to THAB and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB as too far from Panmure or Glen
Innes TC. MHU is more appropriate as it provides an
appropriate transition between THAB and MHS zones
and the site is within close proximity to RFN. Rezoning
will increase capacity and choice of housing in this
location and is an appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB as too far from Panmure TC. MHU
is more appropriate as it provides an appropriate
transition between THAB and MHS zones and the site is
within close proximity to RFN. Rezoning will increase
capacity and choice of housing in this location and is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6147

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 12,14, COURT 12,14, COURT


CRESCENT, Panmure CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Panmure
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support THAB as site is some distance from the


Panmure TC zone. MHU most appropriate as properties
are located along Court Crescent RFN and close to local
amenities in the MU zone. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

432

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6150

839-6153

839-6159

839-6160

839-6161

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 28,
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 9,
HURSTWOOD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28, TORRINGTON Glen Innes


CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

9, HURSTWOOD Glen Innes


PLACE, Glen Innes

MHS

MHS

Rezone 31, ALAMEIN 31, ALAMEIN RD, Panmure


ROAD, Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 40,
INGLEWOOD STREET,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone
38A,38B,40B,40A,
COATES CRESCENT,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban. NB 40A and
40B are zoned
Neighbourhood
Centre

SH

40, INGLEWOOD
STREET, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Glen Innes TC and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change
property is not close to centres or the RFN. Suitable for
suburban-built form of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone. Site is subject to a
No change
flooding constraint that requires management through
retention of the notified SH zone. Retention aligns with
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHS

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

38A,38B,40B,40A, Panmure
COATES
CRESCENT,
Panmure

MHS

MHU

Support change from MHS to MHU. No change is


MHU
proposed to the NC zone. This area is well serviced by the
RFN and other public transport networks and can support
intensification to the MHU zone to increase the capacity
for housing in the area and support the Panmure TC.
Rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6164

839-6196

839-6197

839-6198

839-6199

839-6200

839-6201

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 155,
RIVERSIDE AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

155, RIVERSIDE
AVENUE, Point
England

Pt England

Rezone 8,
FERNWOOD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 38,36,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 22B,22A,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 48,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT,3,
MINIVER STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 45,43,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 12,14,
HURSTWOOD
PLACE,33,31,29,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

8, FERNWOOD
Glen Innes
PLACE, Glen Innes

38,36,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

22B,22A,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

48, CASTLEDINE Glen Innes


CRESCENT,3,
MINIVER STREET,
Glen Innes

MHS

45,43,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

MHS

12,14,
HURSTWOOD
PLACE,33,31,29,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

433

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHS as site is not
MHS
subject to any environmental constraints such as
flooding, or HC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to West Tamaki Road RFN. Sites are also located
within walking distance to NC, TC and MU zones. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area and retention of the zone
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to West Tamaki Road RFN. Site is also located
within walking distance to NC, TC and MU zones. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location, is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. Retention of the zone supports the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS at 14 Hurstwood Place MHS
where the retention of SH zone is not required to manage
the flooding constraint on site. Do not support change
from MHS to MHU to enable decreasing density zoning
pattern from RFN and the nearest centre and as the sites
are not within close enough proximity to the centre to
support MHU. Retention, and rezoning to the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6202

839-6203

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 18,16,
18,16, MELLING
MELLING STREET,
STREET, Glen
Glen Innes from
Innes
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Glen Innes

SH, MHS

Rezone 8,4,6,
MELLING STREET,19,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

8,4,6, MELLING
STREET,19,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

Rezone 64A,62,64,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 3,
HURSTWOOD
PLACE,24,26,20,22,
MELLING
STREET,61,59,67,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

64A,62,64,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

3, HURSTWOOD Glen Innes


PLACE,24,26,20,2
2, MELLING
STREET,61,59,67,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

SH, MHS

Rezone 68,72,70,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT,57, WEST
TAMAKI ROAD, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

68,72,70,
Glen Innes
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT,57,
WEST TAMAKI
ROAD, Glen Innes

SH, MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

434

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change sought to THAB due to distance to MHS


the RFN and the nearest centre. Support retention of the
MHS zone and rezoning the property zoned SH (18
Melling Street) to MHS as it does not require retention of
SH zone to manage the flooding constraint on the site.
MHS zoning is in keeping with the surrounding
neighbourhood and is an appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6204

839-6205

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHU

THAB

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to West Tamaki Road RFN. Site is also located
within walking distance to NC, TC and MU zones. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location, is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to THAB, support
MHS
retention of less intensified zone to MHS - rezoning to
MHS is appropriate given the zoning of neighbouring
properties, distance to centres and the RFN and rezoning
to THAB would be spot zoning. Rezoning 20 Melling St to
MHS is supported as the site does not require retention
of SH zone to manage the flooding constraint on site.
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6206

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Support change from SH and MHS to MHU where


MHU
managing flooding risks on those sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The sites are also located close to
West Tamaki Road RFN. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6207

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 10,8A,8,
CINTRA
PLACE,11,2/9,13,3/9,
1/9, CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT,2/9,3,1/9,
MELLING STREET,38,
APIRANA AVENUE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

10,8A,8, CINTRA Glen Innes


PLACE,11,2/9,13,3
/9,1/9,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT,2/9,3,1
/9, MELLING
STREET,38,
APIRANA
AVENUE, Glen
Innes

PAUP ZONE

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

435

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to THAB not supported due to distance from


MHS
the centre. MHS considered more appropriate as sites are
within walking distance to RFN, TC, MU and POS zones.
Rezoning from SH to MHS supported for 38 Apirana Ave
as retention of SH zone is not required for the
management of the flooding constraint on the site. MHS
supports decreasing density from the Glen Innes TC and
retention/rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the this zone and give effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6211

839-6212

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 8,6,
8,6, EASTVIEW
Glen Innes
EASTVIEW ROAD,
ROAD, Glen Innes
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone
13,15,21,17,23,19,
MELLING STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH, MHS

13,15,21,17,23,19 Glen Innes


, MELLING
STREET, Glen
Innes

THAB

THAB

Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located


THAB
very close to TC and within walking distance to a RFN.
Sites are also located adjacent to POS. Rezoning to THAB
will increase the capacity for housing in this location and
will result in an efficient use of land. The THAB zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to THAB due to distance to MHS
the RFN and the nearest centre. Support retention of the
MHS zone and rezoning the property zoned SH (23
Melling St) to MHS as it does not require retention of SH
zone to manage the flooding constraint on the site. MHS
zoning is in keeping with the surrounding neighbourhood
and is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6213

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone
2/27,1/27,31,29, Glen Innes
2/27,1/27,31,29,
MELLING STREET,
MELLING STREET,
Glen Innes
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH, MHS

THAB

Do not support change sought to THAB due to distance to MHS


the RFN and the nearest centre. Support retention of the
MHS zone and rezoning the property zoned SH (1/27
Melling Street) to MHS as it does not require retention of
SH zone to manage the flooding constraint on the site.
MHS zoning is in keeping with the surrounding
neighbourhood and is an appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6214

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 76,78,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT,16,
RADCLIFFE
STREET,24,18,20,22,
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

76,78,
Glen Innes
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT,16,
RADCLIFFE
STREET,24,18,20,2
2, TORRINGTON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

MHS

Rezone 11,9, LINE


ROAD,32,34,
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
88A,88,90,96,94,94A,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT,19,25,19A,
21,23, MERFIELD
STREET,6A,6B,4,8,6,
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,9, LINE
ROAD,32,34,
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

MHS

88A,88,90,96,94,9 Glen Innes


4A, CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT,19,25,1
9A,21,23,
MERFIELD
STREET,6A,6B,4,8,
6, TORRINGTON
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

MHS

Rezone
25,27,15,21,23,1,3,5,
7,9, TORRINGTON
CRESCENT,11,13,15,
MERFIELD STREET,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

25,27,15,21,23,1, Glen Innes


3,5,7,9,
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT,11,13,1
5, MERFIELD
STREET, Glen
Innes

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

436

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less


MHU
intensified zone to MHU - the property is not adjacent to
any centre however rezoning to MHU will enable
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
existing neighbourhood that provides a transition in
density between THAB and MHS. Rezoning to MHU will
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6215

839-6216

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Glen Innes

MHU

THAB

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as sites are


MHU
within walking distance to a RFN, Glen Innes TC and POS.
The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Do not support THAB as too far from Glen Innes TC and MHU
the RFN to support THAB. MHU is more appropriate as it
provides an appropriate transition between THAB and
MHS zones and the site is within close proximity to RFN.
Rezoning will increase capacity and choice of housing in
this location and is an appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6217

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

Do not support change of zone from notified SH and MHS MHU


to THAB as too far from Glen Innes TC, the RFN or the
adjacent MU zoned land to support THAB. MHU is more
appropriate as it provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones and the site is within
close proximity to RFN. Managing the flooding risks at 23,
25, 27 Torrington Crescent and 11, 13 Merfield Street
does not require maintaining a SH zone. Rezoning will
increase capacity and choice of housing in this location
and is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6218

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 31, LINE


ROAD,3,3A,
MERFIELD STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

31, LINE
ROAD,3,3A,
MERFIELD
STREET, Glen
Innes

MHS

Rezone 91,93, WEST


TAMAKI ROAD, St
Heliers-Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

91,93, WEST
Glen Innes
TAMAKI ROAD, St
Heliers-Glen Innes

Rezone 10,8,2A,2B,4,
OVERLEA ROAD,149,
WEST TAMAKI ROAD,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,8,2A,2B,4,
Glen Innes
OVERLEA
ROAD,149, WEST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 161,163,
WEST TAMAKI
ROAD,10,8,4,6,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

161,163, WEST
Glen Innes
TAMAKI
ROAD,10,8,4,6,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 14,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,167, WEST
TAMAKI ROAD, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 173,171,
WEST TAMAKI
ROAD,20,22,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, LEYBOURNE Glen Innes


CIRCLE,167, WEST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Glen Innes

MHS

173,171, WEST
Glen Innes
TAMAKI
ROAD,20,22,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

437

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support THAB as too far from Glen Innes TC or the MHU
RFN to support THAB. MHU is more appropriate as it
provides an appropriate transition between THAB and
MHS zones and the site is within close proximity to RFN.
Rezoning will increase capacity and choice of housing in
this location and is an appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6219

839-6220

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHU

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within close


MHU
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Apirana Ave.
The sites are located within walking distance to LC and
NC zones. Rezoning will increase housing capacity in the
area. Sites are also within close proximity to a POS
network. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
MHU supported along RFN on West Tamaki Road (refer MHS/ MHU
to map in Attachment E) and 2A, 2B and 4 Overlea Road.
Retain MHS on those sites which are further from the
RFN on Overlea Road. This aligns with the objectives of
these zones and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6221

839-6222

839-6223

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning properties 161 and 163 West Tamaki


MHU
Road from MHS to MHU and support retention of
notified MHS zone at remaining properties (refer to map
in Attachment E). Rezoning to MHU supported along
West Tamaki Road is closer to RFN. This aligns with the
objectives of each zone and gives effect to the RPS

Rezone 167 West Tamaki Road to MHU as this property is MHU


on RFN route and is within walking distance to a NC (refer
to map in Attachment E). Retain 14 Leybourne Circle as
MHS as these properties are further away from public
transport network but are within walking distance to a
NC. This aligns with the objectives of each of these zones
and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezone 161 West Tamaki Road to MHU as this property is MHU
on RFN route and is within walking distance to a NC (refer
to map in Attachment E). Retain 20, 22 Leybourne Circle
as MHS as these properties are further away from public
transport network but are within walking distance to a
NC. This aligns with the objectives of each of these zones
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6224

839-6225

839-6226

839-6227

839-6228

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 189,191,
WEST TAMAKI
ROAD,38,42,36,40,34
, LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

189,191, WEST
Glen Innes
TAMAKI
ROAD,38,42,36,40
,34, LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 207, WEST


TAMAKI
ROAD,46,44,48,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

207, WEST
Glen Innes
TAMAKI
ROAD,46,44,48,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 1,3,5,7,
COURTLAND
AVENUE,52,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,213, WEST
TAMAKI ROAD, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 217, WEST
TAMAKI ROAD,4,
COURTLAND
AVENUE, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,3,5,7,
Glen Innes
COURTLAND
AVENUE,52,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,213, WEST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Glen Innes

MHS

217, WEST
Glen Innes
TAMAKI ROAD,4,
COURTLAND
AVENUE, Glen
Innes

MHS

Rezone 12,14,16,
COURTLAND
AVENUE,60,58,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12,14,16,
Glen Innes
COURTLAND
AVENUE,60,58,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

438

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezone 189, 191 West Tamaki Road to MHU as


MHU
properties are on RFN route and is within walking
distance to a NC (refer to map in Attachment E). Retain
38, 42, 36, 40, 34 Leybourne Circle as MHS as these
properties are further away from public transport
network but are within walking distance to
neighbourhood centre. This aligns with the objectives of
each of these zones and gives effect to the RPS
Rezone 207 West Tamaki Road to MHU as property is on MHU
RFN route and is within walking distance to a NC (refer to
map in Attachment E). Retain46, 44, 48 Leybourne Circle
as MHS as these properties are further away from public
transport network but are within walking distance to
neighbourhood centre. This aligns with the objectives of
each of these zones and gives effect to the RPS

Support rezoning 1 Courtland Avenue from MHS to MHU MHU


as the property has good access to the RFN (refer to
maps in Attachment E). Retention of notified MHS
supported for the rest of the site subject to this
submission point due to distance from centres. This
approach supports the objectives of each of these zones
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support rezoning of 217 West Tamaki Road to MHU as


site is on the RFN and is close to NC (refer to maps in
Attachment E). Retain MHS at 4 Courtland Ave as this
property is not close enough to the RFN. This approach
supports the objectives of each of these zones and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6229

839-6230

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 68,66,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

68,66,
Glen Innes
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

Rezone 20,15,
LYNDALE
PLACE,61,63,59,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,4,
GUILDFORD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20,15, LYNDALE Glen Innes


PLACE,61,63,59,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,4,
GUILDFORD
PLACE, Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

SH, MHS

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

439

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change sought to MHU. Support


MHS
retention of MHS at 68 Leybourne and rezoning 66
Leybourne to MHS as appropriate in keeping with the
surrounding neighbourhood zoning and given the
distance from the RFN and centres. Retention of SH zone
at 66 Leybourne is not required for the management of
the flooding constraint on the site. The MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this
Support partial change; some sites can be rezoned to
MHS
MHS however the flooding constraints on 61 and 63
Leybourne Circle require management through retention
of the SH zoning (refer to map in Attachment E). This
approach aligns with the objectives of each of these
zones and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6231

839-6232

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone
10,12,20,14,16,18 Glen Innes
10,12,20,14,16,18,8A ,8A,8, GUILDFORD
,8, GUILDFORD
PLACE, Glen Innes
PLACE, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone
49,47,45,51,43,43A,4
1,49A, LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

49,47,45,51,43,43 Glen Innes


A,41,49A,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 8,4,6,
ROSEWAY PLACE,4,6,
RIDGEWAY
PLACE,25,13,27,15,21
,23,19,29,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8,4,6, ROSEWAY Glen Innes


PLACE,4,6,
RIDGEWAY
PLACE,25,13,27,1
5,21,23,19,29,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. These properties
are not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area and supports decreasing densities away from
centres. This aligns with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6233

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. This aligns with the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6234

839-6235

839-6236

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 9,7,
ROSEWAY PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 3, ROSEWAY
PLACE,10,8,
RIDGEWAY PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9,7, ROSEWAY
Glen Innes
PLACE, Glen Innes

Rezone 1,9,3,7,
RIDGEWAY
PLACE,1,5,3,137,7,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,9,3,7,
Glen Innes
RIDGEWAY
PLACE,1,5,3,137,7
, LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone
115,121,117,119,125,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,24,20,14,22,1
6,18, RIDGEWAY
PLACE, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

115,121,117,119, Glen Innes


125, LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,24,20,14,2
2,16,18,
RIDGEWAY PLACE,
Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 138,136,134,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,38,36,34,
ELSTREE
AVENUE,5A,3,5,7,
LINTHORPE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

138,136,134,
Glen Innes
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,38,36,34,
ELSTREE
AVENUE,5A,3,5,7,
LINTHORPE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

SH, MHS

3, ROSEWAY
Glen Innes
PLACE,10,8,
RIDGEWAY PLACE,
Glen Innes

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

440

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area and supports decreasing densities away from
centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. This aligns with the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6237

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. This aligns with the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6238

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Support rezoning 7 Linthorpe to MHS. All other


MHS
properties were notified MHS except for 134, 136 and
138 Leybourne Crescent. Retention of SH zone at these 3
properties is necessary to manage the flooding constraint
on the sites. All other properties meet the objectives of
the MHS zone and MHU is not supported as the sites are
too far from the RFN and Centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6239

839-6240

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 32,30,
ELSTREE AVENUE,4,
LINTHORPE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

32,30, ELSTREE
AVENUE,4,
LINTHORPE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

MHS

Rezone
146,150,144,152,148,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,10,12,20,14,1
6,18,14A,8, ELSTREE
AVENUE,1,3,5,
OVERLEA ROAD, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

146,150,144,152, Glen Innes


148, LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,10,12,20,1
4,16,18,14A,8,
ELSTREE
AVENUE,1,3,5,
OVERLEA ROAD,
Glen Innes

SH, MHS

Rezone
10,12,14,16,2,4,6,8,
LYNDALE
PLACE,91,89,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,12,14,16,2,4,6, Glen Innes


8, LYNDALE
PLACE,91,89,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 95,97,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

95,97,
Glen Innes
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 83,7779,75,73,71,67,69,81,
87,85, LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,11,7A,9A,1,3,
5,7,9, LYNDALE
PLACE, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

83,77Glen Innes
79,75,73,71,67,69
,81,87,85,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,11,7A,9A,1
,3,5,7,9, LYNDALE
PLACE, Glen Innes

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

441

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to MHU, support a less
MHS
intensified zone to MHS - rezoning to MHS is appropriate
given the zoning of neighbouring properties and distance
to the centres and the RFN. Retention of SH zone is not
required for management of any flooding constraints.
Rezoning the properties to MHU would result in spot
zoning. MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of and rezoning to
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6241

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. This aligns with the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6242

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU -the


property is located to far from centres or the RFN and
MHS zone is in keeping with the surrounding
neighbourhood. This aligns with the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS

No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6243

Eastern Isthmus

SH, MHS

MHU

Do not support change sought to MHU, support retention MHS


of MHS at all sites apart from 9 Lyndale Place which was
zoned SH. Support rezoning this site to MHS as
management of the flooding constraint on the site does
not require the retention of SH zone and MHS is
consistent with neighbouring properties and appropriate
given the distance of the sites from the nearest centre or
the RFN. The MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and give effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6244

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 11,3,5,7,
CHILTERN
CRESCENT,11,13,14,1
,3,5,7,9, LEASIDE
LANE,51,49, ELSTREE
AVENUE, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,3,5,7,
Glen Innes
CHILTERN
CRESCENT,11,13,1
4,1,3,5,7,9,
LEASIDE
LANE,51,49,
ELSTREE AVENUE,
Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone
46,44,42,48,40,
ELSTREE AVENUE,
Point England-Glen
Innes from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46,44,42,48,40,
Glen Innes
ELSTREE AVENUE,
Point EnglandGlen Innes

SH

Rezone 55,61,57,59,
ELSTREE
AVENUE,2/8,10,2,8,6,
CHILTERN CRESCENT,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

55,61,57,59,
Glen Innes
ELSTREE
AVENUE,2/8,10,2,
8,6, CHILTERN
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

MHS

Rezone 54,56,58,52,
ELSTREE AVENUE,
Point England-Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

54,56,58,52,
Glen Innes
ELSTREE AVENUE,
Point EnglandGlen Innes

MHS

Rezone 8,4,6,
LEASIDE
LANE,19,13,15,17,
CHILTERN CRESCENT,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8,4,6, LEASIDE
Glen Innes
LANE,19,13,15,17,
CHILTERN
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

442

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6245

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Upzone all properties to MHS apart from 48 Elstree Ave MHS


as this site has a flooding constraint (refer to maps in
Attachment E) MHS most suitable as too far from public
transport and Centres to be MHU. MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6246

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6247

839-6248

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6249

839-6250

839-6251

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
25,27,23,33,31,37,29,
35, CHILTERN
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
77,75,73,79,71,
ELSTREE
AVENUE,24,26,30,28,
34, CHILTERN
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 47,45,43,49,
CHILTERN
CRESCENT,121,125,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

25,27,23,33,31,37 Glen Innes


,29,35, CHILTERN
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

MHS

7,75,73,79,71,
Glen Innes
ELSTREE
AVENUE,24,26,30,
28,34, CHILTERN
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

MHS

47,45,43,49,
Glen Innes
CHILTERN
CRESCENT,121,12
5, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen
Innes

MHS, THAB
(121, 125
Taniwha
Street)

Rezone 1/2086/208,7/208-12/208,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes from
Town Centre to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1/208Glen Innes
6/208,7/20812/208, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen
Innes

TC

Rezone
84,98,108,110,102,10
0,92,106,94,104,96,
ELSTREE
AVENUE,11A,14,7A,1
1B,16A,16B,1,3,5,7B,
CONCORD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

84,98,108,110,10 Glen Innes


2,100,92,106,94,1
04,96, ELSTREE
AVENUE,11A,14,7
A,11B,16A,16B,1,
3,5,7B, CONCORD
PLACE, Glen Innes

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

443

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to Taniwha Street RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to NC, Glen Innes TC and MU zones.
Rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location, is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to Taniwha Street RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to NC, Glen Innes TC and MU zones. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location, is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support THAB at these sites as they are not close MHU
enough to the Glen Innes TC to support THAB. MHU is a
more appropriate zoning as it provides an appropriate
transition between THAB and MHS zones. Rezoning of
the Taniwha St sites to MHU from notified THAB is also
supported and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6252

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

Do not support change of zone from TC to THAB. Notified No change


TC part of an existing TC block and is the most
appropriate zoning given location and surrounding zones.
Aligns with the objectives of the TC zone and gives effect
to the RPS

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6253

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Rezoning of those sites which are not subject to Coastal MHU


Inundation to MHU as close to RFN on Elstree Avenue
(refer to map in Attachment E) is supported. This zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. Those sites
which are subject to Coastal Inundation shall be retained
MHS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6254

839-6255

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 10,8,2,4,6,
CONCORD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
146,150,144,142,140,
148,132,136,134,138,
POINT ENGLAND
ROAD, Point England
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

10,8,2,4,6,
Glen Innes
CONCORD PLACE,
Glen Innes

MHS

146,150,144,142, Pt England
140,148,132,136,
134,138, POINT
ENGLAND ROAD,
Point England

MHS

Rezone 114,112,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
11,13,15,22,3,5,7,9,
KESTREL
PLACE,98,88,82,90,80
,92,86,94,84,96,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 8,4,6,
KESTREL
PLACE,11,9,3,5,
KIANO
PLACE,76,74,78,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

114,112,
Glen Innes
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes

MHS

11,13,15,22,3,5,7, Glen Innes


9, KESTREL
PLACE,98,88,82,9
0,80,92,86,94,84,
96, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen
Innes

MHS

8,4,6, KESTREL
Glen Innes
PLACE,11,9,3,5,
KIANO
PLACE,76,74,78,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

444

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to the RFN. The site are also located adjacent to
POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for
housing in the area and is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change
its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6256

839-6257

839-6258

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

MHU

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities and aligns with the objectives of this zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is not close to any centres or the RFN. The
retention of notified MHS zone is in keeping with
surrounding neighbourhood is an appropriate way to
meet the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS

No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6259

839-6260

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 3,
SUNNYMEAD
ROAD,24,26,22,
FENCHURCH
STREET,91,93,95,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
77,81,87,79,85,
TANIWHA
STREET,11,9,13,7,17,
SUNNYMEAD ROAD,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, SUNNYMEAD Glen Innes


ROAD,24,26,22,
FENCHURCH
STREET,91,93,95,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes

MHS

77,81,87,79,85,
Glen Innes
TANIWHA
STREET,11,9,13,7,
17, SUNNYMEAD
ROAD, Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 69,75,73,
TANIWHA
STREET,19,21,23,
SUNNYMEAD ROAD,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

69,75,73,
Glen Innes
TANIWHA
STREET,19,21,23,
SUNNYMEAD
ROAD, Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 5,
MANSFIELD
STREET,33,31,29,
SUNNYMEAD
ROAD,61,57,63,59,65
, TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, MANSFIELD
Glen Innes
STREET,33,31,29,
SUNNYMEAD
ROAD,61,57,63,59
,65, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen
Innes

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

445

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities and aligns with the objectives of this zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6261

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


these sites given the distance to the RFN and Glen Innes
TC. Retention of MHS is an appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS

No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6262

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area and supports decreasing densities away from
centres. Retention is an appropriate way to meet the
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6263

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 13,15,
13,15, SILVERTON Wai O Taki Bay SH
SILVERTON AVENUE, AVENUE, Glen
Glen Innes from
Innes
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

MHS

Support the change of zone from notified SH to MHS at MHS


these sites as there are no heritage or environmental
constraints that require management through SH zoning.
The sites are also located within close proximity to NC
and POS. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6264

839-6265

839-6266

839-6267

839-6268

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 19,21,
FERNWOOD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 9,7,
FERNWOOD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 12,14,
FERNWOOD PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 311, WEST
TAMAKI ROAD, St
Heliers-Glen Innes
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone
10,8,12,14,16,
TANIWHA STREET,13,
INGLEWOOD STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,21,
Glen Innes
FERNWOOD
PLACE, Glen Innes

SH

9,7, FERNWOOD Glen Innes


PLACE, Glen Innes

SH

Rezone 11,9,7,
CLAIRVILLE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9,7, CLAIRVILLE Glen Innes


CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Rezone 24,20,22,
INGLEWOOD
STREET,15,21,
CLAIRVILLE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,20,22,
INGLEWOOD
STREET,15,21,
CLAIRVILLE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

12,14,
Glen Innes
FERNWOOD
PLACE, Glen Innes

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

311, WEST
Wai O Taki Bay SH
TAMAKI ROAD, St
Heliers-Glen Innes

MHS

10,8,12,14,16,
TANIWHA
STREET,13,
INGLEWOOD
STREET, Glen
Innes

MHU

Glen Innes

SH, MHS

REASONS

Support change of zone from SH to MHS as the sites are


not subject to any environmental constraints such as
flooding, or HC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHS as the sites are
not subject to any environmental constraints such as
flooding, or HC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHS as the sites are
not subject to any environmental constraints such as
flooding, or HC. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Apirana Ave
and Line Road. Is it located within walking distance to LC
and NC zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU supports the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to MHU, support retention
of MHS at all sites apart from 13 Inglewood Street which
was zoned SH. Support rezoning this site to MHS as there
are no constraints on the site that warrant retention of
SH zone and MHS is consistent with neighbouring
properties and appropriate given the distance of the sites
from the nearest centre or the RFN. The MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this
zone and give effect to the RPS.

446

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS
MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHS
MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHS
MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHS
MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHS

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6269

839-6270

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Glen Innes

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change sought to MHU, support a less


MHS
intensified zone to MHS due to distance from the nearest
centre and the RFN. Rezoning to MHS is appropriate
given the zoning of neighbouring properties. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to MHU, support a less
MHS
intensified zone to MHS - rezoning to MHS is appropriate
given the zoning of neighbouring properties. Rezoning
the property to MHU would result in spot zoning.
Retention of the SH zone is not necessary to manage any
flooding constraints on the site. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
rezoning to MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6271

839-6272

839-6273

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 2,4, HILTON


PLACE,76,74,78A,80,
78,72, LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,25,27,21,17,2
3,31,29,21A,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2,4, HILTON
Glen Innes
PLACE,76,74,78A,
80,78,72,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,25,27,21,1
7,23,31,29,21A,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes

SH, MHS

Rezone
98,88,90,92,94,84,96,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,8,4,
MANSFIELD
STREET,51,39,49,47,4
5,37,41, TANIWHA
STREET, Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

98,88,90,92,94,84 Glen Innes


,96, LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,8,4,
MANSFIELD
STREET,51,39,49,4
7,45,37,41,
TANIWHA STREET,
Glen Innes

SH, MHS

Rezone
11,25,13,27,15,21,17,
23,19,29,1,3,5,7A,9,
FENCHURCH STREET,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,25,13,27,15,21 Glen Innes


,17,23,19,29,1,3,5
,7A,9,
FENCHURCH
STREET, Glen
Innes

SH, MHS

Rezone 2,4,
FENCHURCH
STREET,124,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2,4, FENCHURCH Glen Innes


STREET,124,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

447

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change sought to MHU, support retention MHS


of and rezoning to MHS - rezoning to MHS is appropriate
given the zoning of neighbouring properties and were SH
zoned sites (72 Leybourne Circle and 25-31 Taniwha St)
do not require retention of the SH zone to manage the
flooding constraints. Rezoning the property to MHU
would result in spot zoning and sites are too distant from
the Glen Innes TC and RFN to support MHU. MHS
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention and rezoning to MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to MHU, Support rezoning MHS
SH sites to MHS where any flooding constraint on the site
does not require management through the retention of
the SH zone (45,41,39,37 Taniwha Street). MHS zoning is
in keeping with the surrounding neighbourhood and
appropriate given the distance to the nearest centre and
RFN. Three properties retain their notified SH zone due to
flooding constraints requiring management through SH
zoning (92,94,96 Leybourne Circle) Refer to C20
Proposed zoning maps in Attachment E. The proposed
zoning supports the objectives of the MHS and SH zones
and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezone those sites not subject to flooding to MHS close MHS/ SH
to NC on corner of Fenchurch Street (refer to map in
Attachment E). The remaining sites that have flooding
constraints are to retain SH zone in accordance with
principles. MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6274

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6275

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
24,10,26,12,20,14,22,
16,18,30,28,2,4,6,8,
SUNNYMEAD
ROAD,120,114,116,1
10,112,118,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,18,12,14,16,
FENCHURCH
STREET,10,1,3,5,7,6,9
,8, AVELINE PLACE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,10,26,12,20,14 Glen Innes


,22,16,18,30,28,2,
4,6,8,
SUNNYMEAD
ROAD,120,114,11
6,110,112,118,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,18,12,14,1
6, FENCHURCH
STREET,10,1,3,5,7,
6,9,8, AVELINE
PLACE, Glen Innes

SH, MHS

Rezone 102,104,
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,38,36,
SUNNYMEAD ROAD,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

102,104,
Glen Innes
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE,38,36,
SUNNYMEAD
ROAD, Glen Innes

SH, MHS

Rezone 19,15,21,17,
KAWITI
AVENUE,24,20,22,
ERIMA
AVENUE,46,42,
ANDERSON AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,15,21,17,
Pt England
KAWITI
AVENUE,24,20,22,
ERIMA
AVENUE,46,42,
ANDERSON
AVENUE, Point
England

MHS

Rezone 4,4A, KAWITI


AVENUE,95, POINT
ENGLAND ROAD,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4,4A, KAWITI
AVENUE,95,
POINT ENGLAND
ROAD, Point
England

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

448

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change sought to MHU, support a less


MHS
intensified zone to MHS - rezoning to MHS is consistent
with neighbouring properties. Retention of the SH zone
at 2,4,6, 20 Sunnymead Rd, 7,9 Aveline Place, 110, 114
Leybourne Circle is required for the management of the
flood constraints but not required at 8,10,12, 28
Sunnymead Road, 18 Fenchurch, 10 Aveline Place where
rezoning the MHS is supported. Please refer to
Attachment E - Proposed zoning maps for details. The
supported zoned are the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH and MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6276

839-6277

839-6278

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Pt England

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change sought to MHU. Support


MHS
retention of MHS for three sites and rezoning 104
Leybourne Circle from SH to MHS as appropriate in
keeping with the surrounding neighbourhood zoning and
given the distance from the RFN and centres. Retention
of SH zone at 104 Leybourne is not required for the
management of the flooding constraint on the site. The
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to Erima Avenue RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to a TC zone. rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are located close to MHU


a RFN and are also located within walking distance to a
NC and POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase the
capacity for housing in this location and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6279

839-6280

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
11,21,17,19,7,9,
TAMATEA
AVENUE,10,12,20,14,
1/18,16-18,8, KAWITI
AVENUE, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 6, TAMATEA
AVENUE,221,219,
RIVERSIDE AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,21,17,19,7,9, Pt England
TAMATEA
AVENUE,10,12,20,
14,1/18,16-18,8,
KAWITI AVENUE,
Point England

MHS

6, TAMATEA
Pt England
AVENUE,221,219,
RIVERSIDE
AVENUE, Point
England

MHS

Rezone 12, TAMATEA


AVENUE,215,
RIVERSIDE AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, TAMATEA
AVENUE,215,
RIVERSIDE
AVENUE, Point
England

Pt England

MHS

Rezone 214,214A,
RIVERSIDE AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

214,214A,
RIVERSIDE
AVENUE, Point
England

Pt England

Rezone 39,37,41,
ANDERSON
AVENUE,25,27,
KAWITI AVENUE,32,
ERIMA AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39,37,41,
ANDERSON
AVENUE,25,27,
KAWITI
AVENUE,32,
ERIMA AVENUE,
Point England

Pt England

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

449

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are located close to MHU


a RFN and are also located within walking distance to a
NC and POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase the
capacity for housing in this location and gives effect to
the RPS.

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6281

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6282

839-6283

839-6284

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 31, KAWITI


31, KAWITI
AVENUE, Point
AVENUE, Point
England from Mixed England
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pt England

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to Erima Avenue RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to a TC zone. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase the
capacity for housing in this location and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6285

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 32,30,36,34,
TAMATEA
AVENUE,55,61,57,63,
59, ANDERSON
AVENUE, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

32,30,36,34,
Pt England
TAMATEA
AVENUE,55,61,57,
63,59, ANDERSON
AVENUE, Point
England

MHS

Rezone 54,56,50,48,
ERIMA
AVENUE,47,45,51,43,
41, KAWITI AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

54,56,50,48,
Pt England
ERIMA
AVENUE,47,45,51,
43,41, KAWITI
AVENUE, Point
England

MHS

Rezone 2,4,6,
TUAKIRI STREET,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 46, KAWITI
AVENUE,45,
TAMATEA AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 49, TAMATEA
AVENUE,56,52,
KAWITI
AVENUE,12,14,16,
TUAKIRI STREET,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2,4,6, TUAKIRI
STREET, Point
England

Pt England

MHS

46, KAWITI
AVENUE,45,
TAMATEA
AVENUE, Point
England

Pt England

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this


site is not close to centres or the RFN. Suitable for
suburban built form of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and give effect to the RPS.

450

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6286

839-6287

839-6288

839-6289

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

49, TAMATEA
Pt England
AVENUE,56,52,
KAWITI
AVENUE,12,14,16,
TUAKIRI STREET,
Point England

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to Erima Avenue RFN. Sites are also located
within walking distance to THAB zone and POS. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location and gives effect to the RPS.

Support request to rezone from MHS to MHU - site is


close to POS and the RFN and will provide increased
capacity for housing in the area. Rezoning to MHU is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN and are also located within walking
distance to POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase the
capacity for housing in this location and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN and are also located within walking
distance to POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase the
capacity for housing in this location and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6290

839-6291

839-6292

839-6293

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 4,6,
TANGAROA
STREET,11,13,17,19,5
,9, PIRANGI
STREET,1,11,9,5,7,
TUAKIRI
STREET,154,156,158,
164,160,162, TRIPOLI
ROAD, PanmurePoint England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4,6, TANGAROA Pt England


STREET,11,13,17,1
9,5,9, PIRANGI
STREET,1,11,9,5,7,
TUAKIRI
STREET,154,156,1
58,164,160,162,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England

MHS

Rezone 4, PIRANGI
STREET,15, TUAKIRI
STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

4, PIRANGI
STREET,15,
TUAKIRI STREET,
Point England

MHS

Rezone 14, PIRANGI


STREET,165,161,163,
RIVERSIDE AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, PIRANGI
Pt England
STREET,165,161,1
63, RIVERSIDE
AVENUE, Point
England

MHS

Rezone 14,
TANGAROA
STREET,151,
RIVERSIDE AVENUE,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, TANGAROA
STREET,151,
RIVERSIDE
AVENUE, Point
England

MHS

Rezone
159,161,157,163,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

159,161,157,163, Pt England
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England

Pt England

Pt England

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to Tripoli Road RFN and are located close to
POS. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

451

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area and supports decreasing densities away from
centres. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area and supports decreasing densities away from
centres MHS complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change
its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6294

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close


MHU
proximity to Tripoli Road RFN and local amenities on
Pilkington Road. Is it located within walking distance to
two NC zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6295

839-6296

839-6297

839-6298

839-6299

839-6300

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
175,173,169,171,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 1, TUAKANA
STREET,26,30,28,
TARATOA STREET,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

175,173,169,171, Pt England
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England

MHS

1, TUAKANA
Pt England
STREET,26,30,28,
TARATOA STREET,
Point England

MHS

Rezone 44,38,42,40,
TORINO STREET,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

44,38,42,40,
TORINO STREET,
Point England

MHS

Rezone 24,26,30,28,
TORINO STREET,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,26,30,28,
TORINO STREET,
Point England

Rezone 1,5A,5,
PARATA
STREET,10,12,
TORINO
STREET,18,12,14,16,
HINAKI STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
19,15,21,17,23,
TORINO STREET,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,5A,5, PARATA
Pt England
STREET,10,12,
TORINO
STREET,18,12,14,1
6, HINAKI STREET,
Point England

MHS

19,15,21,17,23,
TORINO STREET,
Point England

MHS

Pt England

Pt England

Pt England

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

452

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close


MHU
proximity to Tripoli Road RFN and local amenities on
Pilkington Road. Is it located within walking distance to
two NC zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to the RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS zones. Rezoning to MHU
will increase the capacity for housing in this location and
is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as these sites MHU


are within walking distance to Pilkington Road RFN. Sites
are also located within walking distance to large MU zone
and POS. Rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for
housing in this location and gives effect to the RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6301

839-6302

839-6303

839-6304

839-6305

839-6306

839-6307

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 45,43,
TORINO STREET,
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 3,5,4,6,
SANDA ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 1, SANDA
ROAD,80, COURT
CRESCENT, Panmure
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

45,43, TORINO
STREET, Point
England

Pt England

3,5,4,6, SANDA
ROAD, Panmure

Panmure

1, SANDA
Panmure
ROAD,80, COURT
CRESCENT,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone 1,1A,3,5,
ORAN ROAD,8,7,
SANDA ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
25,15,21,17,23,19,
ORAN ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 109,111,113,
TRIPOLI
ROAD,55,51,53,
ORAN ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1,1A,3,5, ORAN
Panmure
ROAD,8,7, SANDA
ROAD, Panmure

MHS

25,15,21,17,23,19 Panmure
, ORAN ROAD,
Panmure

109,111,113,
TRIPOLI
ROAD,55,51,53,
ORAN ROAD,
Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 11,9,3,5,7,
11,9,3,5,7,
TOBRUK ROAD,
TOBRUK ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed Panmure
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Panmure

MHS

MHS

SH, MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

453

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the sites
MHU
are located close to a RFN, THAB and MU zones and POS.
The rezoning to MHU will increase the housing capacity
in this area and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to Court Crescent RFN. Sites are also located
within walking distance to MU and THAB zones along
with POS. The rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity
for housing in this location, is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the sites
MHU
are within walking distance to a RFN and are located
close to THAB and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from SH and MHS to MHU.


Managing the flooding risks on these sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The sites are within
walking distance to a RFN and are located close to POS
and MU zone. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as the sites are within
walking distance to Tripoli Road RFN and are located
close to POS and MU zone. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6308

839-6309

839-6310

839-6311

839-6312

839-6313

839-6314

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 15,17,
TOBRUK ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 115,
DUNKIRK ROAD,21,
TOBRUK ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

15,17, TOBRUK
ROAD, Panmure

Rezone 18,16,
TOBRUK ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 2,4,6,
TOBRUK ROAD,106,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 3,2,5,4,7,6,8,
DERNA
ROAD,10,12,14,
TOBRUK ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

18,16, TOBRUK
ROAD, Panmure

Rezone 90,92,98,
TRIPOLI
ROAD,5,4,7,6,
SOLLUM ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 32,30, ORAN
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

90,92,98, TRIPOLI Panmure


ROAD,5,4,7,6,
SOLLUM ROAD,
Panmure

MHS

32,30, ORAN
ROAD, Panmure

MHS

115, DUNKIRK
Panmure
ROAD,21, TOBRUK
ROAD, Panmure

Panmure

2,4,6, TOBRUK
ROAD,106,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure

Panmure

3,2,5,4,7,6,8,
DERNA
ROAD,10,12,14,
TOBRUK ROAD,
Panmure

Panmure

Panmure

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

454

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to a RFN and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking
distance to a RFN and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to Tripoli Road RFN. Sites are also located within
walking distance to NC and POS. The rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location. MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the sites


are within walking distance to a RFN and are located
close to POS and MU zone. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6315

839-6316

839-6317

839-6318

839-6319

839-6320

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 8,7,6, TRENT


ROAD,1/26,2/26,30,1
/28,2/28, HOBSON
DRIVE, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8,7,6, TRENT
Panmure
ROAD,1/26,2/26,3
0,1/28,2/28,
HOBSON DRIVE,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone
38,42,36,40,34,
HOBSON DRIVE,1,3,
UPHAM ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

38,42,36,40,34,
HOBSON
DRIVE,1,3,
UPHAM ROAD,
Panmure

Panmure

MHS

Rezone 46,48,
HOBSON DRIVE,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 89A,89B,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 11,9,
BENGHAZI ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

46,48, HOBSON
DRIVE, Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 75, DUNKIRK


ROAD,24,20,22,
BENGHAZI ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

75, DUNKIRK
Panmure
ROAD,24,20,22,
BENGHAZI ROAD,
Panmure

89A,89B, TRIPOLI Panmure


ROAD, PanmurePoint England

11,9, BENGHAZI
ROAD, Panmure

Panmure

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

455

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to NC and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to NC and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to NC and POS. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close


MHU
proximity to Tripoli Road RFN and local amenities on
Pilkington Road. Is it located within walking distance to
two NC zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6321

839-6322

839-6323

839-6324

839-6325

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 12,14,16,
BENGHAZI
ROAD,71,67,
DUNKIRK ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 59, DUNKIRK
ROAD,8,6, BENGHAZI
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12,14,16,
BENGHAZI
ROAD,71,67,
DUNKIRK ROAD,
Panmure

59, DUNKIRK
Panmure
ROAD,8,6,
BENGHAZI ROAD,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone 5,7,
BENGHAZI
ROAD,19,21,23,
ALAMEIN ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 9,7, ALAMEIN
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5,7, BENGHAZI
ROAD,19,21,23,
ALAMEIN RD,
Panmure

MHS

Panmure

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

456

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change
property is not close to centres or the RFN. Suitable for
suburban-built form of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


9,7, ALAMEIN RD, Panmure
Panmure

Rezone 76,74,78,
76,74,78, TRIPOLI Panmure
TRIPOLI ROAD,1,3,
RD,1,3, ALAMEIN
ALAMEIN ROAD,
RD, Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

SH, MHS

MHU

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


MHU
distance to Tripoli Road RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to Panmure TC zone. The rezoning to
MHU will increase the capacity for housing in this
location, is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to Tripoli Road RFN. Retention of SH zone is not
required to manage the flooding constraint at the site.
Site is also located within walking distance to a TC zone.
The rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for
housing in this location, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6326

839-6327

839-6328

839-6329

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
59,61,75,63,73,65,71,
83,81, TRIPOLI
ROAD,48,46,32,44,30
,42,36,40,34, TUNIS
ROAD,6A,7A,3,2,5,4,7
,6,8, HAY
ROAD,1,3,5,7, KAY
ROAD,1A,3,2,5,4,7,6,
9,8, BARDIA
ROAD,33,31,37,
HOBSON DRIVE,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

59,61,75,63,73,65 Panmure
,71,83,81, TRIPOLI
ROAD,48,46,32,44
,30,42,36,40,34,
TUNIS
ROAD,6A,7A,3,2,5
,4,7,6,8, HAY
ROAD,1,3,5,7, KAY
ROAD,1A,3,2,5,4,
7,6,9,8, BARDIA
ROAD,33,31,37,
HOBSON DRIVE,
Panmure

SH, MHS

Rezone
10,16,8A,4,6,8,
ALAMEIN
ROAD,11,13,15,17,19
,7, LARSEN ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

10,16,8A,4,6,8,
Panmure
ALAMEIN
RD,11,13,15,17,19
,7, LARSEN D,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone 70, TRIPOLI


ROAD,2A, ALAMEIN
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

70, TRIPOLI
ROAD,2A,
ALAMEIN ROAD,
Panmure

Panmure

MHS

Rezone 47,51,49,
TUNIS
ROAD,19,21,23,
HOBSON
DRIVE,46,48,
MCCULLOCH ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

47,51,49, TUNIS
ROAD,19,21,23,
HOBSON
DRIVE,46,48,
MCCULLOCH
ROAD, Panmure

Panmure

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

457

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to Tripoli Road RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to Panmure TC and MU zones.
Managing the flooding risks at 3 Hay Road and 44 & 46
Tunis Road does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location, is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


distance to Tripoli Road RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to a TC zone. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


distance to Tripoli Road RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to a TC zone. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to NC and POS. Managing the flooding risks at
47 Tunis Road and 46, 48 McCulloch Road does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6330

839-6331

839-6332

839-6333

839-6334

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone
33,31,37,43,35,41,
TUNIS
ROAD,32,38,40,34,
MCCULLOCH ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

33,31,37,43,35,41 Panmure
, TUNIS
ROAD,32,38,40,34
, MCCULLOCH
ROAD, Panmure

Rezone 32,30,28,34, 32,30,28,34,


ALAMEIN ROAD,
ALAMEIN ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed Panmure
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 14,16,
LARSEN ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 10,8, LARSEN
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14,16, LARSEN
ROAD, Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 2, LARSEN
ROAD,54,56,52,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

2, LARSEN
ROAD,54,56,52,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure

Rezone 46,44,42,48,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

46,44,42,48,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England

10,8, LARSEN
ROAD, Panmure

Panmure

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

SH, MHS

SH / MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

458

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from SH and MHS to MHU as the MHU


sites are within walking distance to a RFN and are located
close to THAB and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH and MHS to MHU


- the sites are not close to centres or the RFN. 32 and 34
Alamein Road were notified SH but support rezoning to
MHS as retention of SH on the sites is not required to
manage the flood risk. Retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU - this site is
part of a block of properties subject to coastal inundation
and flooding and the retention of MHS zone is supported
to avoid spot zoning. MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the sites
are within walking distance to a RFN and POS. Rezoning
to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in this
location and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS (32 and 34


Alamein Road)

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change
MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Do not support change sought to THAB, rezoning to MHU MHU


more appropriate in keeping with the surrounding
neighbourhood and given the distance from Panmure TC.
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is
an out of scope change refer to Attachment F.

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6335

Eastern Isthmus

Panmure

MHS

THAB

Do not support THAB as too far from Panmure TC. MHU


is more appropriate as it provides an appropriate
transition between THAB and MHS zones and the site is
within close proximity to RFN. Rezoning will increase
capacity and choice of housing in this location and is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6336

839-6337

839-6338

839-6339

839-6340

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 7,6, SUDA


7,6, SUDA PLACE, Panmure
PLACE, Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 3,4, SUDA


3,4, SUDA PLACE, Panmure
PLACE, Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 19,21,17,
MARETH STREET,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 18,16,
MARETH STREET,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
11,25,13,15,21,17,23,
19, CORAL CRESCENT,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

19,21,17,
Panmure
MARETH STREET,
Panmure

MHS

18,16, MARETH
Panmure
STREET, Panmure

MHS

Rezone
24,14,22,16,22A,14B,
14A, CORAL
CRESCENT, Panmure
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

24,14,22,16,22A,1 Panmure
4B,14A, CORAL
CRESCENT,
Panmure

11,25,13,15,21,17 Panmure
,23,19, CORAL
CRESCENT,
Panmure

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

459

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as site are within walking


MHU
distance to a RFN and POS. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and
aligns with the objectives of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC and POS. The rezoning to MHU
will increase the capacity for housing in this location. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC and POS. The rezoning to MHU
will increase the capacity for housing in this location. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB as site is some distance from the
MHU
Panmure TC zone. Support MHU as the site is within
walking distance to the RFN. MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6341

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

THAB

Do not support THAB as site is some distance from the


Panmure TC zone. Support MHU as the site is within
walking distance to the RFN. MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6342

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 1,3,
MATAPAN
ROAD,38,32,30,36,40
,34, TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1,3, MATAPAN
Panmure
ROAD,38,32,30,36
,40,34, TRIPOLI
ROAD, Panmure

MHS

Rezone 1,3,5, CORAL


CRESCENT,9,5,7,
MATAPAN ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1,3,5, CORAL
Panmure
CRESCENT,9,5,7,
MATAPAN ROAD,
Panmure

Rezone 19,15,17,
MATAPAN
ROAD,6A,6B,30,4,
CORAL CRESCENT,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

19,15,17,
Panmure
MATAPAN
ROAD,6A,6B,30,4,
CORAL CRESCENT,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone 8,4,6, KAY


ROAD,13,15,14,
BELLONA ROAD,53,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 37,35A,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

8,4,6, KAY
Panmure
ROAD,13,15,14,
BELLONA
ROAD,53, TRIPOLI
ROAD, Panmure

MHS

37,35A, TRIPOLI
ROAD, PanmurePoint England

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

460

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support THAB at these sites as they are not close


enough to the Panmure TC to support THAB. MHU is a
more appropriate zoning as it provides an appropriate
transition between THAB and MHS zones. Rezoning of
the Taniwha St sites to MHU from notified THAB is also
supported and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Do not support THAB as site is some distance from the


Panmure TC zone. Support MHU as the site is within
walking distance to the RFN. MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support THAB as site is some distance from the


Panmure TC zone. Support MHU as the site is within
walking distance to the RFN. MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to Tripoli Road RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to TC and MU zones. The rezoning to
MHU will increase the capacity for housing in this
location, is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support THAB at these sites as they are not close


enough to the Panmure TC to support THAB. MHU is a
more appropriate zoning as it provides an appropriate
transition between THAB and MHS zones. Rezoning of
the Taniwha St sites to MHU from notified THAB is also
supported and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6343

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6344

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6345

839-6346

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Panmure

MHU

THAB

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6347

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 45,51,43,49,
CORAL
CRESCENT,3,5,7,
MARETH
STREET,25,31,27,29,
MATAPAN ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

45,51,43,49,
Panmure
CORAL
CRESCENT,3,5,7,
MARETH
STREET,25,31,27,2
9, MATAPAN
ROAD, Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support THAB as site is some distance from the


Panmure TC zone. Support MHU as the site is within
walking distance to the RFN. MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

461

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6348

839-6349

839-6350

839-6351

839-6352

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 21, DUNKIRK 21, DUNKIRK


ROAD, Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

MHS

Rezone 26,30,
26,30, MATAPAN Panmure
MATAPAN ROAD,
ROAD, Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 38,36,40,
MATAPAN ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
47B,47,47A,49, CAEN
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

38,36,40,
Panmure
MATAPAN ROAD,
Panmure

MHS

47B,47,47A,49,
CAEN ROAD,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone 9,7, DUNKIRK 9,7, DUNKIRK


ROAD, Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

Panmure

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as this site is located close


to Matapan Road and Dunkirk Road RFN. This site also
has excellent access to POS. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support THAB at these sites as they are located


MHU
too far from the Panmure TC. MHU is more appropriate
as it is in keeping with the proposed zoning for the
surrounding sites and provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones that support decreasing
density from the Panmure TC zone. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location, is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC and POS. The rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less
MHU
intensified zone to MHU - the property is not adjacent to
any centre however is close to the RFN and adjacent to
POS. Rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the
area that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood
that provides a transition in density between THAB and
MHS. This zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are located along
MHU
Dunkirk Road RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC and have excellent access to POS.
The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6353

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone
11,10,13,12,15,14,17,
16,19,18,3,2,5,4,7,6,9
,20,8,21, ARMEIN
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

11,10,13,12,15,14 Panmure
,17,16,19,18,3,2,5
,4,7,6,9,20,8,21,
ARMEIN ROAD,
Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

462

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to a more


No change
intensive zone. Sites are not close enough to the centre
or the RFN to warrant increased intensification. MHS at
the site and surrounds supports decreasing density from
centres and the objectives of the zone. The retention of
the notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6354

839-6355

839-6356

839-6357

839-6358

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 40A,40,
40A,40, ARMEIN
ARMEIN ROAD,
ROAD, Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 24,24A,
24,24A, ARMEIN
ARMEIN ROAD,
ROAD, Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 32,30,28,
32,30,28, CAEN
CAEN ROAD,
ROAD, Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 24,18,20,22, 24,18,20,22,


CAEN ROAD,
CAEN ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed Panmure
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 12,14, CAEN 12,14, CAEN


ROAD, Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Panmure

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

Do not support requested change to MHU and support


retention of MHS at the site. There are no heritage or
environmental constraints on the site, but it is not
located within close enough proximity to a centre or RFN
to warrant increased intensification. The retention of the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support requested change to MHU and support
retention of MHS at the site. There are no heritage or
environmental constraints on the site, but it is not
located within close enough proximity to a centre or RFN
to warrant increased intensification. The retention of the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less
intensified zone to MHU - the property is not adjacent to
any centre however is close to the RFN and adjacent to
POS. Rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the
area that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood
that provides a transition in density between THAB and
MHS. This zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less
intensified zone to MHU - the property is not adjacent to
any centre however is close to the RFN and adjacent to
POS. Rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the
area that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood
that provides a transition in density between THAB and
MHS. This zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change sought to THAB, support
retention of MHU - the property is not adjacent to any
centre however is close to RFN. Rezoning to MHU will
enable intensification in the area that is appropriate with
the existing neighbourhood that provides a transition in
density between THAB and MHS and is an appropriate
way to meet the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6359

839-6360

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
25,27,33,31,29,35 Panmure
25,27,33,31,29,35,
, CAEN ROAD,
CAEN ROAD,
Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 11,15,21,23,
NGARIMU
ROAD,32,30,34,
STEWART AVENUE,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,15,21,23,
NGARIMU
ROAD,32,30,34,
STEWART
AVENUE,
Panmure

Panmure

MHU

Rezone 3,5, TE KOA


ROAD,24,18,26,
STEWART
AVENUE,1,3,5,
NGARIMU ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

3,5, TE KOA
ROAD,24,18,26,
STEWART
AVENUE,1,3,5,
NGARIMU ROAD

Panmure

Rezone
58,56,60,62,64,68,
COATES
CRESCENT,77,75,73,7
1,69,81, COURT
CRESCENT,91,93,89,9
5, PILKINGTON ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

58,56,60,62,64,68 Panmure
, COATES
CRESCENT,77,75,7
3,71,69,81,
COURT
CRESCENT,91,93,8
9,95, PILKINGTON
ROAD, Panmure

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

463

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less


MHU
intensified zone to MHU - the property is not adjacent to
any centre however is close to the RFN and adjacent to
POS. Rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the
area that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood
that provides a transition in density between THAB and
MHS. This zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change to THAB. MHU is more
No change
appropriate as the sites are located within walking
distance to RFN but not located close to centres. MHU
supports the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6361

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

THAB

Do not support change to THAB. MHU is more


No change
appropriate as the sites are located within walking
distance to the RFN but are not located within close
enough proximity to the Panmure TC to support THAB.
Retention of MHU at the sites supports the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6362

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHU

Support rezoning to MHU. This area is well serviced by


MHU
the RFN and other public transport networks and can
support intensification to the MHU zone to increase the
capacity for housing in the area and support the Panmure
TC and nearby MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6363

839-6364

839-6365

839-6366

839-6367

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
46,44,50,48,52,
COATES
CRESCENT,59, COURT
CRESCENT, Panmure
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46,44,50,48,52,
Panmure
COATES
CRESCENT,59,
COURT CRESCENT,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone
10,12,14,16,18,4,6,8,
ORAN
ROAD,60,68,62,64,58
, COURT CRESCENT,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

10,12,14,16,18,4, Panmure
6,8, ORAN
ROAD,60,68,62,64
,58, COURT
CRESCENT,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone 11,10,13,12,
TRENT
ROAD,24,20,22,
ORAN
ROAD,50,48,52,
COURT CRESCENT,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 23, COATES
CRESCENT,2,
HOBSON DRIVE,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11,10,13,12,
Panmure
TRENT
ROAD,24,20,22,
ORAN
ROAD,50,48,52,
COURT CRESCENT,
Panmure

MHS

23, COATES
CRESCENT,2,
HOBSON DRIVE,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone 35, COURT


CRESCENT,9,
HOBSON
DRIVE,32,30,28,36,34
, COATES CRESCENT,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

35, COURT
Panmure
CRESCENT,9,
HOBSON
DRIVE,32,30,28,3
6,34, COATES
CRESCENT,
Panmure

Panmure

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

464

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning to MHU. This area is well serviced by


MHU
the RFN and other public transport networks and can
support intensification to the MHU zone to increase the
capacity for housing in the area and support the Panmure
TC and nearby MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to Court Crescent RFN. The site are also located
within walking distance to NC and MU zones. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location. MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to Court Crescent RFN. Sites are also located
within walking distance to NC and MU zones. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location. MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support rezoning to MHU. This area is well serviced by


MHU
the RFN and other public transport networks and can
support intensification to the MHU zone to increase the
capacity for housing in the area and support the Panmure
TC and nearby MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU
distance to Court Crescent RFN. Sites are also located
within walking distance to NC and MU zones. Rezoning to
MHU will increase the capacity for housing in this
location. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6368

839-6369

839-6370

839-6371

839-6372

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 69,67B,67,
PILKINGTON ROAD,
Panmure-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 47,
MCCULLOCH
ROAD,11,13,15,
HOBSON DRIVE,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 38, COURT
CRESCENT,41,
MCCULLOCH ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

69,67B,67,
PILKINGTON
ROAD, PanmurePoint England

Panmure

47, MCCULLOCH
ROAD,11,13,15,
HOBSON DRIVE,
Panmure

Panmure

38, COURT
CRESCENT,41,
MCCULLOCH
ROAD, Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 33,39,37,35, 33,39,37,35,


MCCULLOCH ROAD, MCCULLOCH
Panmure from Mixed ROAD, Panmure
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 1, COURT
CRESCENT,55,61,57,6
3,59, PILKINGTON
ROAD,2, COATES
CRESCENT, Panmure
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1, COURT
Panmure
CRESCENT,55,61,5
7,63,59,
PILKINGTON
ROAD,2, COATES
CRESCENT,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone 24,18,20,22,
COATES CRESCENT,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

24,18,20,22,
COATES
CRESCENT,
Panmure

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

465

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN and are located close to Panmure TC,
MU and THAB zones. The rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to a RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to NC and POS. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking


distance to Court Crescent RFN. Sites are also located
close to NC and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the sites


MHU
are within walking distance to a RFN and are located
close to THAB and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from notified MHS to


THAB as the sites are not close enough to the Panmure
TC zone to support THAB. MHU is more appropriate as
the sites are within walking distance to Court Crescent
RFN and local amenities in MU zone. The rezoning to
MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6373

Eastern Isthmus

Panmure

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to Court Crescent RFN and the area is well
serviced by public transport. Sites are also located within
walking distance to NC, MU and THAB zones. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location. MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6374

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone
10,12,14,16,6,8,
COATES
CRESCENT,19,9,
COURT CRESCENT,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

10,12,14,16,6,8, Panmure
COATES
CRESCENT,19,9,
COURT CRESCENT,
Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

466

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support THAB as sites are not in close enough


proximity to the TC zone. MHU most appropriate as
within walking distance to Court Crescent RFN and local
amenities in MU zone. MHU at these sites supports the
zoning pattern of decreasing density away from centre
zone. The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support THAB as the site is too distant from the


Panmure TC. MHU is supported as it provides an
appropriate transition between THAB and MHS zones
and is within close proximity to RFN. Rezoning will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location and MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support THAB as site is some distance from the
Panmure TC zone. MHU most appropriate as properties
are located along Court Crescent RFN and close to local
amenities in the MU zone. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6375

839-6376

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 1, STEWART 1, STEWART


AVENUE, Panmure
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Panmure
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 8,6, COURT


8,6, COURT
CRESCENT, Panmure CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Panmure
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6377

839-6378

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 24, COURT


CRESCENT,19,15,17,
MCCULLOCH ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

24, COURT
Panmure
CRESCENT,19,15,1
7, MCCULLOCH
ROAD, Panmure

MHS

Rezone
25,13,27,15,21,17,23,
19,29, TUNIS
ROAD,24,20,22,16,18
,30, MCCULLOCH
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25,13,27,15,21,17 Panmure
,23,19,29, TUNIS
ROAD,24,20,22,16
,18,30,
MCCULLOCH
ROAD, Panmure

MHS

MHU

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within walking MHU


distance to Court Crescent RFN. Site is also located close
to NC, MU and THAB zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location. MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the sites


MHU
are within walking distance to a RFN and are located
close to THAB and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6379

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 9,7, TUNIS


ROAD,8,6,
MCCULLOCH ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
9,7, TUNIS
ROAD,8,6,
MCCULLOCH
ROAD, Panmure

LOCALITY

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support THAB as too far from TC. MHU most


appropriate as provides appropriate transition between
THAB and MHS zones and site is within proximity to the
RFN. Rezoning will increase the capacity and choice of
housing in this location, achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and appropriately gives effect to the RPS.

467

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6380

839-6381

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 24,20,22,
24,20,22, TUNIS
TUNIS ROAD,
ROAD, Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 9,8, BELLONA


ROAD,10,14, TUNIS
ROAD, Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

9,8, BELLONA
ROAD,10,14,
TUNIS ROAD,
Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 1, TUNIS
ROAD,25,21,23,
STEWART AVENUE,2,
MCCULLOCH ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1, TUNIS
ROAD,25,21,23,
STEWART
AVENUE,2,
MCCULLOCH
ROAD, Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 6, KAPUNI
6, KAPUNI
ROAD,8, TE KOA
ROAD,8, TE KOA
ROAD, Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Panmure

SH, MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are within close


MHU
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. The sites are located within walking distance to
two LC zones and within close proximity to a POS
network. Managing the flooding risks on the sites does
not require maintaining a SH zone. Rezoning to MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less
MHU
intensified zone to MHU - the property is not adjacent to
any centre however is close to RFN and POS. Rezoning to
MHU will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the existing neighbourhood that
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6382

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

THAB

Do not support THAB as too far from TC. MHU most


appropriate as provides appropriate transition between
THAB and MHS zones and site is within proximity to the
RFN. Rezoning will increase the capacity and choice of
housing in this location, achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and appropriately gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-6383

Eastern Isthmus

MHU and
THAB

THAB

Support retention of notified MHU and THAB zones to


No change
ensure a cogent zoning pattern and avoid spot zoning.
MHU supports the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6384

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 33,31,35,
STEWART
AVENUE,3,2,5,4,7,6,
BELLONA ROAD,8,2,6,
TUNIS
ROAD,45,43,41,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

33,31,35,
Panmure
STEWART
AVENUE,3,2,5,4,7,
6, BELLONA
ROAD,8,2,6,
TUNIS
ROAD,45,43,41,
TRIPOLI ROAD,
Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

468

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change sought to THAB, support a less


MHU
intensified zone to MHU - the properties are not adjacent
to any centre however are close to the RFN and POS.
Rezoning to MHU will enable intensification in the area
that is appropriate with the existing neighbourhood that
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS.
The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-7394

839-7395

839-7396

839-7397

839-7404

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 6,
6, HURSTWOOD Glen Innes
HURSTWOOD PLACE, PLACE, Glen Innes
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 37A,37,35,
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE,
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37A,37,35,
Glen Innes
LEYBOURNE
CIRCLE, Glen Innes

MHS

Rezone 4, MARETH
STREET, Panmure
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, MARETH
Panmure
STREET, Panmure

Rezone 11, DUNKIRK 11, DUNKIRK


ROAD, Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 17,
17, TORRINGTON Glen Innes
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT, Glen
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. This zone supports the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC and POS. The rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as this site is located along MHU
Dunkirk Road RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC and has excellent access to POS.
The rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support THAB as the site is too far from the Glen MHU
Innes TC. MHU more appropriate as provides appropriate
transition between THAB and MHS zones supports
decreasing density away from the centre. Rezoning to
MHU will increase residential capacity and choice of
housing in this location and is an appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7427

839-7429

839-7527

839-7558

839-7560

839-7562

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 39,
CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39, CASTLEDINE
CRESCENT, Glen
Innes

Rezone 10, TARATOA


STREET, Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 1/12
MAYBURY STREET.
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

10, TARATOA
STREET, Point
England

Pt England

1/12 MAYBURY
STREET. Point
England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban

Pt England

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

Rezone 4
4 HURSTWOOD
Glen Innes
HURSTWOOD PLACE. PLACE. Glen Innes
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 25, 27 COURT 25, 27 COURT


CRESCENT. Panmure CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Panmure
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

MHS

Rezone Lot 107 DP


52A Court
38232 from Mixed
Crescent,
Housing Suburban to Panmure
Mixed Housing Urban
[52A Court Crescent,
Panmure]

Panmure

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

469

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change sought to MHU, support a less


MHS
intensified zone to MHS due to distance from the RFN
and nearest centre. Rezoning to MHS is appropriate given
the zoning of neighbouring properties and as the flooding
constraint on the property does not require retention of
SH zone. MHS is consistent with the zoning of
surrounding sites and is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to large MU and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location and is
an appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to THAB supported as this site is located close THAB
to Glen Innes TC and within walking distance to a RFN.
Sites are also located adjacent to POS. Rezoning to THAB
will increase the capacity for housing in this location and
will result in an efficient use of land and therefore gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


No change
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites are located along
MHU
Court Crescent RFN. Sites are also located within walking
distance to NC and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location. MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as this site is located along MHU
Court Crescent RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to NC and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location. MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7567

839-7586

839-7624

839-7656

839-7672

839-7717

839-7764

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 98, 98A, 96A, 98, 98A, 96A, 96


96 KINGS ROAD.
KINGS ROAD.
Panmure from Mixed Panmure
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 103, 105


103, 105 DUNKIRK Panmure
DUNKIRK ROAD.
ROAD. Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 120
TANIWHA STREET.
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 2/12
MAYBURY STREET.
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

120 TANIWHA
STREET. Glen
Innes

Glen Innes

MHS

2/12 MAYBURY
STREET. Point
England

Pt England

Rezone 50 TRIPOLI
ROAD. PanmurePoint England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone Lot 268 DP
38233 from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban. [36A Court
Crescent, Panmure]

50 TRIPOLI ROAD. Panmure


Panmure-Point
England

MHS

36A Court
Crescent,
Panmure

MHS

Rezone 118
TANIWHA STREET.
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

118 TANIWHA
STREET. Glen
Innes

Panmure

Glen Innes

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for
its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities and aligns with the objectives of this zone and
gives effect to the RPS and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to THAB supported as these sites are located
very close to TC and within walking distance to a RFN.
Sites are also located adjacent to POS. rezoning to THAB
will increase the capacity for housing in this location and
will result in an efficient use of land. Rezoning to THAB is
the most appropriate way to achieve the relevant
objectives of the zone and to give effect to the RPS.

470

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change
MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close


MHU
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to two NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Rezoning to MHU supported as this site is located along MHU
Court Crescent RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to NC and MU zones. The rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location. MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change
its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities and aligns with the objectives of this zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7779

839-7802

839-7903

839-7931

839-7958

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 212
RIVERSIDE AVENUE.
Point England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

212 RIVERSIDE
AVENUE. Point
England

Rezone 167 TRIPOLI


ROAD. PanmurePoint England from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

167 TRIPOLI
ROAD. PanmurePoint England

LOCALITY

Pt England

Pt England

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Rezone 32B, 32, 32A, 32B, 32, 32A, 34 Panmure


34 MATAPAN ROAD. MATAPAN ROAD.
Panmure from Mixed Panmure
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 50 ELSTREE
AVENUE. Point
England-Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

50 ELSTREE
AVENUE. Point
England-Glen
Innes

MHS

Rezone 47, 45
PILKINGTON ROAD.
Panmure-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

47, 45
PILKINGTON
ROAD. PanmurePoint England

Glen Innes

Panmure

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

REASONS

471

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities. MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within close
proximity to a RFN and local amenities on Pilkington
Road. Is it located within walking distance to two NC
zones. Site is also within close proximity to a POS
network. MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support THAB at these sites as they are located
too far from the Panmure TC. MHU is more appropriate
as it is in keeping with the proposed zoning for the
surrounding sites and provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones that support decreasing
density from the Panmure TC zone. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location, is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close enough to centres or the RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. Spot zoning is not
supported. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB as the site is not close enough to
the TC to warrant THAB zoning. MHU is more appropriate
as it provides an appropriate transition between THAB
and MHS zones and the site is within close proximity to
RFN. Rezoning will increase capacity and choice of
housing in this location, is an appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. This zone supports the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-7960

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 39B, 39, 39A 39B, 39, 39A


Glen Innes
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE. LEYBOURNE
Glen Innes from
CIRCLE. Glen Innes
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7962

839-7963

839-8119

839-8120

839-8121

839-8122

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 19
19 TORRINGTON
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT. Glen
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Glen Innes

Rezone 38, 36
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 131
LEYBOURNE CIRCLE.
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glen Innes

38, 36
TORRINGTON
CRESCENT. Glen
Innes

131 LEYBOURNE Glen Innes


CIRCLE. Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 19 RIDGEWAY 19 RIDGEWAY


Glen Innes
PLACE. Glen Innes
PLACE. Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 17 RIDGEWAY 17 RIDGEWAY


Glen Innes
PLACE. Glen Innes
PLACE. Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 17A
RIDGEWAY PLACE.
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

17A RIDGEWAY
Glen Innes
PLACE. Glen Innes

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

472

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support THAB as the site is too far from the Glen MHU
Innes TC. MHU more appropriate as provides appropriate
transition between THAB and MHS zones supports
decreasing density away from the centre. Rezoning to
MHU will increase residential capacity and choice of
housing in this location and is an appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Glen Innes TC and POS. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity for housing in this location, is an
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area and supports decreasing densities away from
centres. This zone supports the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8123

839-8124

839-8125

839-8144

839-8145

839-8150

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 15A
RIDGEWAY PLACE.
Glen Innes from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

15A RIDGEWAY
Glen Innes
PLACE. Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 15 RIDGEWAY 15 RIDGEWAY


Glen Innes
PLACE. Glen Innes
PLACE. Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 13 RIDGEWAY 13 RIDGEWAY


Glen Innes
PLACE. Glen Innes
PLACE. Glen Innes
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 7 COATES
7 COATES
CRESCENT. Panmure CRESCENT.
from Mixed Housing Panmure
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

MHS

Rezone 7A COATES
7A COATES
CRESCENT. Panmure CRESCENT.
from Mixed Housing Panmure
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 56
56 ANDERSON
ANDERSON AVENUE. AVENUE. Point
Point England from
England
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pt England

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and


support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or the RFN and the application of
MHS is appropriate in providing a range of residential
options in the area and supports decreasing densities
away from centres. MHS complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of this zone and gives effect to the
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites is within walking
distance to Court Crescent RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to NC, MU and THAB zones. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location. MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Rezoning to MHU supported as sites is within walking
distance to Court Crescent RFN. Site is also located within
walking distance to NC, MU and THAB zones. The
rezoning to MHU will increase the capacity for housing in
this location. MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this
site is not close to centres or the RFN. Suitable for
suburban-built form of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of this zone
and give effect to the RPS.

473

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

No change

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8151

839-8152

839-8161

839-8162

839-8170

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 54
54 ANDERSON
ANDERSON AVENUE. AVENUE. Point
Point England from
England
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pt England

Rezone 24 TAMATEA
AVENUE. Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 1/25
DUNKIRK ROAD.
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 2/25
DUNKIRK ROAD.
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 34 APIRANA
AVENUE.
Kohimarama-Point
England from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

24 TAMATEA
AVENUE. Point
England

Pt England

1/25 DUNKIRK
ROAD. Panmure

Panmure

Rezone 34A APIRANA


AVENUE.
Kohimarama-Point
England from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

34A APIRANA
AVENUE.
KohimaramaPoint England

2/25 DUNKIRK
ROAD. Panmure

34 APIRANA
AVENUE.
KohimaramaPoint England

Panmure

Glen Innes

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

474

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - this No change


site is not close to centres or the RFN. Suitable for
suburban-built form of predominantly one-two storey
buildings. MHS complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change
its context and complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character of predominantly onetwo storey buildings with adequate services of network
utilities and aligns with the objectives of this zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as this site is located within MHU
walking distance to Matapan Road and Dunkirk Road
RFN. Site also has excellent access to POS. The rezoning
to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as this site is located within MHU
walking distance to Matapan Road and Dunkirk Road
RFN. Site also has excellent access to POS. Rezoning to
MHU will increase the capacity for housing in this
location and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to THAB not supported due to distance from
MHU
the centre. MHU considered most appropriate as the site
is within walking distance to RFN, TC, MU and POS zones.
Retention of MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the this zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Oppose
Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


839-8171

839-8191

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 42 MATAPAN 42 MATAPAN


ROAD. Panmure from ROAD. Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glen Innes

Panmure

SH

MHS

THAB

MHU

Do not support change sought to rezone from SH to


MHU
THAB, support rezoning to MHU as site is subject to
flooding however does not require retention of the SH
zone to manage the flooding constraint on the site.
Rezoning to MHU suitable given proximity to Glen Innes
TC and the RFN and maintaining consistency with the
surrounding neighbourhood. Rezoning to MHU supports
the zones objectives and will result in an efficient use of
land, achieving the objectives of the MHU zone and
giving effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC, THAB zone and POS. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8192

839-8193

839-8194

839-8197

839-8198

839-8199

839-8200

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 44 MATAPAN 44 MATAPAN


ROAD. Panmure from ROAD. Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

Rezone 44A
MATAPAN ROAD.
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 44B
MATAPAN ROAD.
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 40A
MATAPAN ROAD.
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 40B
MATAPAN ROAD.
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 28 MATAPAN
ROAD. Panmure from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

44A MATAPAN
ROAD. Panmure

44B MATAPAN
ROAD. Panmure

40A MATAPAN
ROAD. Panmure

40B MATAPAN
ROAD. Panmure

28 MATAPAN
ROAD. Panmure

Rezone 26B
26B MATAPAN
MATAPAN ROAD.
ROAD. Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Panmure

Panmure

Panmure

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

475

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking


MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC, THAB zone and POS. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC, THAB zone and POS. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC, THAB zone and POS. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC, THAB zone and POS. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as site is within walking
MHU
distance to a RFN. Site is also located within walking
distance to Panmure TC, THAB zone and POS. The
rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB at these sites as they are located
MHU
too far from the Panmure TC. MHU is more appropriate
as it is in keeping with the proposed zoning for the
surrounding sites and provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones that support decreasing
density from the Panmure TC zone. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location, is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB at these sites as they are located
MHU
too far from the Panmure TC. MHU is more appropriate
as it is in keeping with the proposed zoning for the
surrounding sites and provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones that support decreasing
density from the Panmure TC zone. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location, is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8201

839-8202

839-8203

839-8204

839-8205

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 26A
26A MATAPAN
MATAPAN ROAD.
ROAD. Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 20 MATAPAN 20 MATAPAN


ROAD. Panmure from ROAD. Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 22 MATAPAN 22 MATAPAN


ROAD. Panmure from ROAD. Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 24 MATAPAN 24 MATAPAN


ROAD. Panmure from ROAD. Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

Rezone 22B
22B MATAPAN
MATAPAN ROAD.
ROAD. Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Do not support THAB at these sites as they are located


too far from the Panmure TC. MHU is more appropriate
as it is in keeping with the proposed zoning for the
surrounding sites and provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones that support decreasing
density from the Panmure TC zone. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location, is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB at these sites as they are located
too far from the Panmure TC. MHU is more appropriate
as it is in keeping with the proposed zoning for the
surrounding sites and provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones that support decreasing
density from the Panmure TC zone. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location, is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB at these sites as they are located
too far from the Panmure TC. MHU is more appropriate
as it is in keeping with the proposed zoning for the
surrounding sites and provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones that support decreasing
density from the Panmure TC zone. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location, is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB at these sites as they are located
too far from the Panmure TC. MHU is more appropriate
as it is in keeping with the proposed zoning for the
surrounding sites and provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones that support decreasing
density from the Panmure TC zone. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location, is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support THAB at these sites as they are located
too far from the Panmure TC. MHU is more appropriate
as it is in keeping with the proposed zoning for the
surrounding sites and provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones that support decreasing
density from the Panmure TC zone. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location, is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

476

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8206

839-8270

839-8271

839-8272

839-8273

839-8274

839-8275

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 22A
22A MATAPAN
MATAPAN ROAD.
ROAD. Panmure
Panmure from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Panmure

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 38 ARMEIN
38 ARMEIN ROAD, Panmure
ROAD. Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 35B ARMEIN 35B ARMEIN


ROAD. Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

MHS

Rezone 35A ARMEIN 35A ARMEIN


ROAD. Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Panmure

MHS

Rezone 35 ARMEIN
35 ARMEIN ROAD, Panmure
ROAD. Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 36 ARMEIN
36 ARMEIN ROAD, Panmure
ROAD. Panmure from Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 36A ARMEIN 36A ARMEIN


ROAD. Panmure from ROAD, Panmure
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Panmure

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support THAB at these sites as they are located


too far from the Panmure TC. MHU is more appropriate
as it is in keeping with the proposed zoning for the
surrounding sites and provides an appropriate transition
between THAB and MHS zones that support decreasing
density from the Panmure TC zone. Rezoning to MHU will
increase the capacity and choice of housing in this
location, is an appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from notified MHS to
MHU and support retention of notified MHS zone. This
property is not close to centres or RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. The retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from notified MHS to
MHU and support retention of notified MHS zone. This
property is not close to centres or RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. The retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from notified MHS to
MHU and support retention of notified MHS zone. This
property is not close to centres or RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. The retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from notified MHS to
MHU and support retention of notified MHS zone. This
property is not close to centres or RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. The retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from notified MHS to
MHU and support retention of notified MHS zone. This
property is not close to centres or RFN and the
application of MHS is appropriate in providing a range of
residential options in the area. The retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU and
support retention of notified MHS zone. This property is
not close to centres or RFN and the application of MHS is
appropriate in providing a range of residential options in
the area. The retention of MHS is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

477

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company


No change

MHU

Oppose

Refer to evidence of Tamaki Redevelopment Company

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1283

839-174

839-2651

839-2652

839-2878

839-2907

839-3098

839-3288

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 2, 2A Jefferson


Suburban at 2,2A,
Str, Gendowie
JEFFERSON STREET,
Glendowie.

Glendowie

Retain Mixed Housing 17 Esperance Rd


Suburban at 17,
and 1 Jefferson
ESPERANCE ROAD,1, Str, Glendowie
JEFFERSON STREET,
Glendowie.

Glendowie

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 46a Cranbrook Pl, Glendowie


Suburban at 46A
Glendowie
CRANBROOK PLACE.
Glendowie.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 46b Cranbrook Pl, Glendowie


Suburban at 46B
Glendowie
CRANBROOK PLACE.
Glendowie.

MHS

Rezone 24,18,20,22,
CROSSFIELD ROAD,
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,18,20,22,
Glendowie
CROSSFIELD
ROAD, Glendowie

MHS

Rezone 61,57,59,
RIDDELL ROAD, St
Heliers from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 37,
WHITEHAVEN ROAD,
Glendowie from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone
3/59,4/59,1/59,2/59,
CRANBROOK PLACE,
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

61,57,59, RIDDELL Glendowie


ROAD, St Heliers

37 Whitehaven
Rd, Glendowie

Glendowie

3/59,4/59,1/59,2/ Glendowie
59, CRANBROOK
PLACE, Glendowie

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

478

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS at the site. Properties are not No change


subject to constraints and are not within walking distance
of the RFN or centres. Retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS at the sites. Properties are not No change
subject to overlay constraints but are not within walking
distance of the RFN or centres. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU as property is within walking
MHU
distance to RFN. Also provides increased housing choice
within vicinity of open space and community facilities.
Rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to RPS.
This is an out of scope change (Refer to Attachment F).
Support rezoning to MHU as property is within walking
MHU
distance to RFN. Also provides increased housing choice
within vicinity of open space and community facilities.
Rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to RPS.
This is an out of scope change (Refer to Attachment F)
Support rezoning to MHU as properties are on the RFN
MHU
and within vicinity of open space and community
facilities (Schools). Rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support rezoning to MHU as properties are on the RFN


MHU
and within vicinity of open space and community
facilities (Schools). Rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning site from SH to MHS as there are no
heritage or environmental constraints on the site that
requires management through SH zoning. Rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support rezoning to MHU as properties are within


MHU
walking distance to the RFN and rezoning provides
increased housing choice within vicinity of open space
and community facilities. Rezoning is an appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3371

839-3391

839-359

839-3630

839-3693

839-4421

839-4422

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 17,
17 Colchester Ave, Glendowie
COLCHESTER
Glendowie
AVENUE, Glendowie
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 16,
CRANBROOK PLACE,
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

16 Cranbrook
Glendowie
Place, Glendowie

Retain Mixed Housing 20 Kildare Ave


Suburban at 20,
and 45 Sylvia Rd,
KILDARE AVENUE,45, Glendowie
SYLVIA ROAD,
Glendowie.

Glendowie

Rezone 71, KILDARE 71 Kildare Ave,


AVENUE, Glendowie Glendowie
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glendowie

MHS

SH

Rezone 129, MASKELL 129, MASKELL


Glendowie
STREET, St Heliers
STREET, St Heliers
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 58A-58V,
WENDOVER ROAD,
Glendowie from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 51,53,
WENDOVER ROAD,
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

58A-V Wendver
Rd. Glendowie

Glendowie

51,53,
Glendowie
WENDOVER
ROAD, Glendowie

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

479

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning to MHS as property is within walking


MHS
distance to the RFN and rezoning provides increased
housing choice within vicinity of open space and
community facilities. Rezoning most appropriate way of
achieving objectives of MHS zone and gives effect to RPS.

Support rezoning to MHU as property is within walking


MHU
distance to RFN and rezoning provides increased housing
choice within vicinity of open space and community
facilities. Rezoning is an appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to RPS.

Support retention of MHS at the site. Properties are not No change


subject to constraints and are not within walking distance
of the RFN or centres. Retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning site and surrounding sites from SH to
MHS
MHS as there are no heritage or environmental
constraints on the sites that require management
through SH zoning. Rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way of achieving objectives of zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
There are no historic or environmental constraints on the No change
site, but it is not located within close enough proximity to
a centre or RFN to warrant increased intensification.
Retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to
the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU. Sites are within walking
MHU
distance of the RFN and management of the flooding
constraints does not require the continued application of
the SH zoning. Rezoning most appropriate way to achieve
objectives of zone and give effect to the RPS.
Rezoning to MHU appropriate as properties are within
MHU
walking distance to RFN and rezoning would enable
increased housing choice within vicinity of open space
and community facilities. Rezoning most appropriate way
to achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4423

839-4424

839-4425

839-4426

839-4427

839-4428

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 11,9,3,5,7,
CRANBROOK
PLACE,38,36,40,
CROSSFIELD ROAD,
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 4,6,
CRANBROOK
PLACE,32,30,28,34,
CROSSFIELD ROAD,
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 10,12,
CROSSFIELD ROAD,
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 69,75,73,71,
RIDDELL
ROAD,11,25,13,27,15
,21,17,23,19,39,31,37
,29,35,41,33,5,7,9,
CARDINAL PLACE,
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9,3,5,7,
Glendowie
CRANBROOK
PLACE,38,36,40,
CROSSFIELD
ROAD, Glendowie

MHS

4,6, CRANBROOK Glendowie


PLACE,32,30,28,3
4, CROSSFIELD
ROAD, Glendowie

MHS

10,12,
Glendowie
CROSSFIELD
ROAD, Glendowie

MHS

69,75,73,71,
Glendowie
RIDDELL
ROAD,11,25,13,27
,15,21,17,23,19,3
9,31,37,29,35,41,
33,5,7,9,
CARDINAL PLACE,
Glendowie

MHS

Rezone 65,67,
RIDDELL ROAD, St
Heliers from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
6/44,4/44,3/28,2/44,
1/28,1/44,3/44,7/44,
2/28,5/28,5/44,4/28,
CRANBROOK PLACE,
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

65,67, RIDDELL
ROAD, St Heliers

MHS

Glendowie

6/44,4/44,3/28,2/ Glendowie
44,1/28,1/44,3/44
,7/44,2/28,5/28,5
/44,4/28,
CRANBROOK
PLACE, Glendowie

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

480

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning to MHU supported as properties are within


MHU
walking distance to the RFN and rezoning would enable
increased housing choice within vicinity of open space
and community facilities. Rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives
effect to RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as properties are within


MHU
walking distance to the RFN and rezoning would enable
increased housing choice within vicinity of open space
and community facilities. Rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives
effect to RPS.

Rezoning to MHU supported as properties are within


MHU
walking distance to the RFN and rezoning would enable
increased housing choice within vicinity of open space
and community facilities. Rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives
effect to RPS.
Rezoning to MHU on Riddell Rd supported as the sites
MHU
are on the RFN and within walking distance of the RFN
from Cardinal Pl and the nearest centre. Rezoning to
MHU is the most appropriate way to meet objectives of
zone and gives effect to RPS.

Rezoning to MHU on Riddell Rd supported as the sites


are on the RFN and within walking distance of the RFN
from Cardinal Pl and the nearest centre. Rezoning to
MHU is the most appropriate way to meet objectives of
zone and gives effect to RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as properties are within


MHU
walking distance to RFN and rezoning provides for
increased housing choice within vicinity of open space
and community facilities. Rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and gives
effect to RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-499

839-7775

839-8207

839-8208

839-8209

839-1282

839-2914

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 82 Riddell Rd,


Suburban at 82,
Glendowie
RIDDELL ROAD, St
Heliers.

LOCALITY

Glendowie

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 3/34, 1/34,


32, 2/42, 4/34, 2/34
CRANBROOK PLACE.
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3/34, 1/34, 32,


Glendowie
2/42, 4/34, 2/34
CRANBROOK
PLACE. Glendowie

MHS

Rezone 46C
CRANBROOK PLACE.
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46C CRANBROOK Glendowie


PLACE. Glendowie

MHS

Rezone 46D
CRANBROOK PLACE.
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46D CRANBROOK Glendowie


PLACE. Glendowie

Rezone 46E
CRANBROOK PLACE.
Glendowie from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46E Cranbrook
Glendowie
Place, Glendowie

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 25, 25A, 23


Saint Heliers
Suburban at
Tarawera Terrace
25,25A,23,
St Heliers
TARAWERA TERRACE,
St Heliers.

MHS

Rezone 52A,
52A Maskell
MASKELL STREET, St Street St Heliers
Heliers from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Saint Heliers

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support rezoning to MHU as site is located on RFN and


rezoning provides for increased housing choices in the
wider area within the vicinity of open space and
community facilities (Schools). Rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to RPS. This is an out of scope change.
Please see Attachment F for further details.
Rezoning to MHU supported as properties are within
walking distance to RFN and rezoning would enable
increased housing choices within vicinity of open space
and community facilities. Rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to RPS.

481

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Rezoning to MHU supported as property is within walking MHU


distance to RFN and rezoning would enable increased
housing choice within vicinity of open space and
community facilities. Rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as property is within walking MHU
distance to RFN and increased intensification would
enable increased housing choice within vicinity of open
space and community facilities. Rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and
gives effect to RPS.
Rezoning to MHU supported as property is within walking MHU
distance to RFN and increased intensification would
enable increased housing choice within vicinity of open
space and community facilities. Rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives and
gives effect to RPS.
Properties align with residential development with no
constraints. Retention of MHS zone most appropriate
way to achieve objectives of the zone and give effect to
the RPS.

No Change

MHS zone supports the residential principles - property


within residential area with no constraints. Retention of
MHS most appropriate way of achieving objectives of
zone and give effect to RPS.

No Change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3142

839-3198

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 76, GODDEN 76 Godden Cres,


CRESCENT, Mission Mission Bay
Bay from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mission Bay

Rezone 9, AUMOE
AVENUE, St Heliers
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9 Aumoe Avenue Saint Heliers


St Heliers

Rezone 5, SAYEGH
STREET, St Heliers
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5 Sayegh Street St Saint Heliers


Heliers

Rezone 13A,
HAWERA ROAD,
Kohimarama from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 208,
KOHIMARAMA ROAD,
Kohimarama from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

13A Hawera Road Kohimarama


Kohimarama

Rezone 105, LONG


DRIVE, St Heliers
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

105 Long Drive St Saint Heliers


Heliers

Rezone 20, SAYEGH


STREET, St Heliers
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20 Sayegh Str, St
Heliers

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

482

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Sites no longer subject to constraint - however as a single MHS


site constitutes spot zoning. Surrounding area also
subject to retraction of constraints and is proposed for
rezone. MHS is considered appropriate zone given the
location of the area and based on residential principles
(refer to Attachments E and F). Rezone to MHS gives
Property aligns with residential development with no
No Change
constraints. Retention of MHS zone most appropriate
way to achieve objectives of the zone and give effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3213

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHU

MHS zone supports the residential principles - property


within residential area with no constraints. Retention of
MHS most appropriate way of achieving objectives of
zone and give effect to RPS.

No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3219

839-3256

839-3597

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

208 Kohimarama Kohimarama


Road Kohimarama

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Property and adjoining properties align with objectives of MHU


MHU - within walking distance of RFN. Rezoning with
surrounding properties to MHU (refer to Attachments E
and F) gives effect to RPS.

Property and adjoining properties align with objectives of MHU


MHU - within walking distance of RFN. Rezoning with
surrounding properties (refer to Attachments E and F)
gives effect to RPS.

MHS zone supports the residential principles - property


within residential area with no constraints. Retention of
MHS most appropriate way of achieving objectives of
zone and give effect to RPS.

No Change

MHS zone supports the residential principles - property


within residential area with no constraints. Retention of
MHS most appropriate way of achieving objectives of
zone and give effect to RPS.

No Change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3727

Eastern Isthmus

Saint Heliers

MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3772

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 815, RIDDELL 815 Riddell Road


ROAD, St Heliers from St Heliers
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Saint Heliers

SH

MHS

Property no longer subject to constraint and therefore


MHS
meets contextual principles of MHS. Adjoining properties
also meet principles of MHS. Rezone property and
adjoining properties to MHS (refer to Attachments E and
F) to give effect to RPS.

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3885

839-4417

839-4418

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 8, HAWERA
ROAD, Kohimarama
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
8 Hawera Road
Kohimarama

LOCALITY

Kohimarama

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 121A-121C, 121A Kohimarama Kohimarama


KOHIMARAMA ROAD, Road Kohimarama
Kohimarama from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 42, HAWERA 42 Hawera Rd and Kohimarama


ROAD,1, GERALDINE 1A Geraldine Pl,
PLACE, Kohimarama Kohimarama
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 31,
CHALLENGER
STREET,60,62,58,
LONG DRIVE, St
Heliers from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
119A,117,119,117A,
ST HELIERS BAY
ROAD, St Heliers from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 18 HAWERA
ROAD. Kohimarama
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

483

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Property aligns with locational principles of MHU


MHU
(located on RFN) but as a single request is a spot zone.
Surrounding area also aligns with MHU. Rezoning of area
(refer to Attachments E and F) most appropriate way of
achieving objectives of zone and giving effect to RPS.
Property aligns with locational principles of MHU
MHU
(located on RFN) but as a single request is a spot zone.
Surrounding area also aligns with MHU. Rezoning of area
(refer to Attachments E and F) most appropriate way of
achieving objectives of zone and giving effect to RPS.

Property aligns with residential development with no


constraints. Retention of MHS zone most appropriate
way to achieve objectives of the zone and give effect to
the RPS.

No Change

MHS zone supports the residential principles - property


within residential area with no constraints. Retention of
MHS most appropriate way of achieving objectives of
zone and give effect to RPS.

No Change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-4419

839-4420

839-7636

839-7906

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

58-62 Long
Driveand 31
Challenger Rd, St
Heliers

Saint Heliers

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
117 - 119a St
Saint Heliers
Heliers Bay Rd, St
Heliers

18 Hawera Road
Kohimarama

Rezone 52, 50A, 48A, 52 Long Drive St


48, 50 LONG DRIVE. Heliers
St Heliers from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Kohimarama

Saint Heliers

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Property no longer subject to constraints but as a single MHU


request constitutes a spot zone. Surrounding area also
subject to retraction of constraints and meets principles
of MHU - located along the RFN. Rezoning area to MHU
(refer to map in Attachment E) achieves objectives of the
zone and gives effect to RPS.
Property and adjoining properties align with objectives of MHU
MHU - within walking distance of RFN. Rezoning with
surrounding properties (refer to Attachments E and F)
gives effect to RPS.

MHU zone more accurately reflects the residential


MHU
principles for this location - adjacent to a centre and
within walking distance of the RFN. Rezone to MHU (refer
to map in Attachment E) gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1279

839-1280

839-1281

839-277

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
10,4/12,3/12,2,6/12,
4,6,2/12,1/12,8,5/12,
BRENTON
PLACE,2/123,5/123,1
/119,2/119,7/119,11
5,11/123,117,12/119,
113,3/119,6/123,4/1
23,8/119,9/119,10/1
19,1/123,5/119,7/12
3,12/123,125,3/123,1
0/123,6/119,4/119,8/
123,11/119,9/123,
KEPA ROAD, Orakei.

10,4/12,3/12,2,6/ Orakei
12,4,6,2/12,1/12,
8,5/12 BRENTON
PLACE;
2/123,5/123,1/11
9,2/119,7/119,11
5,11/123,117,12/
119,113,3/119,6/
123,4/123,8/119,
9/119,10/119,1/1
23,5/119,7/123,1
2/123,125,3/123,
10/123,6/119,4/1
19,8/123,11/119,
9/123, KEPA
ROAD, Orakei.

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1,1A,3,5,7,
BRENTON PLACE,
Orakei.

1, 1A, 3,5,7
Brenton Place,
Orakei

THAB

Retain Mixed Use at


1/144,10/144,11/144
,6/144,12/144,5/144,
4/144,3/144,9/144,8/
144,7/144,2/144,
KEPA ROAD,170,
COATES AVENUE,
Orakei.

1/144,10/144,11/ Orakei
144,6/144,12/144
,5/144,4/144,3/14
4,9/144,8/144,7/1
44,2/144, KEPA
ROAD and 170
COATES AVENUE,
Orakei.

Retain Mixed Housing 94 Aotea St,


Urban at 94, AOTEA Orakei
STREET, Orakei.

Orakei

Orakei

MU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of THAB as most appropriate way to


achieve objectives of the zone that gives effect to the
RPS. THAB zone is appropriate for properties located on
the RFN (Kepa Road) and adjacent to the Kepa Road NC
and MU zone with good access to public open space.

484

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change

Support retention of THAB as most appropriate way to


No Change
achieve objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
THAB zone is appropriate for properties located on the
RFN (Kepa Road) and adjacent to the Kepa Road NC and
MU zone with good access to public open space.

MU zone is appropriate for these properties on the RFN No change


(Kepa Road) adjacent to the NC and will provide for a
range of residential and commercial uses. Retention of
the MU zone supports a quality compact urban form,
gives effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives for the zone.

Support retention of MHU. The site is within walking


No change
distance of the RFN, the Mission Bay LC and open space.
Retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2776

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 1/3-8/3,1/17/1,5,7, KURAHAUPO


STREET,200,198,194,
196,190,192,188,
KEPA ROAD,1,9,3,
GODDEN CRESCENT,
Mission Bay from
Mixed Use, Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
to Mixed Use.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 1/3Orakei
8/3,1/1-7/1,5,7,
KURAHAUPO
STREET,200,198,1
94,196,190,192,1
88, KEPA
ROAD,1,9,3,
GODDEN
CRESCENT,
Mission Bay

PAUP ZONE

THAB and
MU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MU

REASONS

485

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MU and THAB zones as notified.


No change
These sites are located close to RFNs on Kepa Road and
Coates Ave and there is sufficient zoned MU land in the
vicinity to provide for the mix of residential and
commercial activities that will support the centres.
Retention of the zones as notified is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of those zones
and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2877

839-2885

839-2931

839-2974

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 115, ATKIN


115 Atkin Ave,
AVENUE, Mission Bay Mission Bay
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mission Bay

Rezone 18, AWARUA 18 Awarua


CRESCENT, Orakei
Crescent, Orakei
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 6, PAERIMU
STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6 Paerimu Street, Orakei


Orakei

Rezone 32, TAKITIMU 32 Takitimu St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 38, AWARUA 38 Awarua St,


CRESCENT, Orakei
Orakei
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are


MHU
within walking distance to the RFN and the LC at Kepa
Road / Eastridge. Rezoning the site (and adjacent sites) to
MHU will increase residential capacity of area and is the
most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Site and surrounds are within walking distance to the RFN MHU
on Ngaiwi and the NC on Coates Ave. Rezoning the site to
MHU will increase residential capacity of area and is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

Site (and surrounds) are within walking distance of the


MHU
RFN on Coates Ave and the NC zone. Rezoning the site to
MHU will increase residential capacity of area and is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone at site due to the No change
distance to the nearest LC or NC and to the RFN. MHS
zoning at this site is the most appropriate way to achieve
zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3015

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHU

Site and surrounds are within walking distance to the RFN MHU
on Ngaiwi Rd and the NC on Coates aver Rezoning the
site (and adjacent sites) to MHU will increase residential
capacity of area and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3019

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 6, MATATUA 6 Matatua St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 63, REIHANA 63 Reihana St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 25, TE
25 Te Arawa
ARAWA STREET,
Street, Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 38, TAKITIMU 38 Takitimu


STREET, Orakei from Street, Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 29, TE
29 Te Arawa St,
ARAWA STREET,
Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Orakei

Retain NC at 1,5A,3,5, 1, 3, 5, 5a Paora


PAORA STREET,
St, Orakei
Orakei.

Orakei

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

486

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified MHS zone at site due to the No change


distance to the nearest LC or NC and to the RFN. MHS
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the zone
objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3023

839-3036

839-3040

839-3078

839-308

839-3135

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 36, RAUTARA 36 Rautara St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

NC

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

NC

MHU

Site and surrounds are within walking distance to the RFN


on Coates Ave and Kepa Road and the NC on Coates Ave.
Rezoning the site to MHU will increase residential
capacity of area and is the most appropriate way of
achieving the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone at site due to the
distance to the nearest LC or NC and to the RFN. Site is
also subject to pre-1944 BDC and the objectives of the
MHS zone are generally aligned with the outcomes that
the pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve. MHS zoning supports
the pattern of decreasing density from the THAB zone on
Kupe Street. MHS zoning at this site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support retention of the notified MHS zone at site due to
the distance to the nearest LC or NC and to the RFN. MHS
zoning supports the decreasing density from the THAB
zone on Kupe Street. MHS zoning at this site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone at site due to the
distance to the nearest LC or NC and to the RFN. Site is
also subject to pre-1944 BDC and the objectives of the
MHS zone are generally aligned with the outcomes that
the pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve. MHS zoning supports
the pattern of decreasing density from the THAB zone on
Kupe Street. MHS zoning at this site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support retention of notified NC zone as it reflects the
scale and nature of development at the site and
surrounds. Sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC however
the typology of buildings generally aligns with this
zoning. NC zoning supports local residential needs and
retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, supports the Centres hierarchy,
Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are
within walking distance of the RFN on Coates Ave and
Kepa Road, and the NC and MU zone. Rezoning will
support increased residential capacity in the area close to
public facilities and is the most appropriate way to meet
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the

MHU
MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

NC

Support

MHU

Support

No change

MHU

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3159

839-3188

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 74, RUKUTAI 74 Rukutai St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Orakei

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 82,
82 Kurahaupo St, Orakei
KURAHAUPO STREET, Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 26, APIHAI


STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

487

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified MHS zone at site due to the No change


distance to the nearest LC or NC and to the RFN. MHS
zoning supports the decreasing density from the THAB
zone on Kupe Street. MHS zoning at this site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone at site due to the No change
distance to the nearest LC or NC and to the RFN. MHS
zoning supports the decreasing density from the THAB
zone on Kupe Street. MHS zoning at this site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3209

839-3231

839-3307

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

26 Apihai St,
Orakei

Rezone 131, COATES 131 Coates Ave,


AVENUE, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Orakei

MHS

Rezone 77,
77 Kurahaupo St, Orakei
KURAHAUPO STREET, Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 59A,59B,
REIHANA STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 11, NGAIO
STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are


MHU
within walking distance of the RFN on Coates Ave, the NC
and public open space. Rezoning will support increased
residential capacity in the area close to public facilities
and is the most appropriate way to meet the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU. Site is located on the RFN on MHU
Coates Ave and close to Kepa Road and the NC. Rezoning
will support increased residential capacity in the area
close to public facilities and is the most appropriate way
to meet the objectives of the MHU zone that gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone at site due to the No change
distance to the nearest LC or NC and to the RFN. MHS
zoning supports the decreasing density from the THAB
zone on Kupe Street. MHS zoning at this site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3338

839-3341

839-3347

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

59A, 59B Reihana Orakei


St, Orakei

11 Ngaio St,
Orakei

Rezone 96, REIHANA 96 Reihana St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Orakei

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are


MHU
within walking distance of the RFN on Coates Ave, the NC
and public open space. Rezoning will support increased
residential capacity in the area close to public facilities
and is the most appropriate way to meet the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are
MHU
within walking distance of the RFN on Coates Ave and
Kepa Rd and the NC and public open space. Rezoning will
support increased residential capacity in the area close to
public facilities and is the most appropriate way to meet
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are
MHU
within walking distance of the RFN on Coates Ave and
Kepa Rd, the NC and public open space. Rezoning will
support increased residential capacity in the area close to
public facilities and is the most appropriate way to meet
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3395

839-3447

839-3498

839-3540

839-3557

839-3575

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 30, APIHAI


STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
30 Apihai St,
Orakei

LOCALITY

Orakei

Rezone 53, RUKUTAI 53 Rukutai St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 40, NGAKE


STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

40 Ngake St,
Orakei

Rezone 83, REIHANA 83 Reihana St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 41A,41,
41, 41A Ngake St, Orakei
NGAKE STREET,
Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 93,
93 Kurahaupo St Orakei
KURAHAUPO STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 48, RUKUTAI 48 Rukutai St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are


within walking distance of the RFN on Coates Ave and
the NC and public open space. Rezoning will support
increased residential capacity in the area close to public
facilities and is the most appropriate way to meet the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone at site due to the
distance to the nearest LC or NC and to the RFN. MHS
zoning supports the decreasing density from the THAB
zone on Kupe Street. MHS zoning at this site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning to MHU as the site and adjacent
sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC and intensive
development of the site such as MHU is not consistent
with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve,
which are more consistent with the objectives of the
MHS zone. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Site is subject to pre1944 BDC but does not form part of a
contiguous block of sites subject to this. It is within
walking distance to the RFN on Coates Ave and Kepa
Street and can support rezoning to MHU, in keeping with
the proposed zoning of adjacent sites, to provide
increased residential capacity in the area.
Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the
relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. Mixed housing suburban is in keeping with
the surrounding sites zoning and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the
relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. Mixed housing suburban is in keeping with
the surrounding sites zoning and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

488

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU
MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No Change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

MHU

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3590

Eastern Isthmus

Orakei

MHU

Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the


No change
relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. Mixed housing suburban is in keeping with
the surrounding sites zoning and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3622

839-3627

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 39,45,43,41, 39,41,43,45 Kupe Orakei


KUPE STREET, Orakei St, Orakei
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 51,
51 Kurahaupo St, Orakei
KURAHAUPO STREET, Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 30, RAUTARA


STREET,123, COATES
AVENUE,2/62,3/62,6
0,1/62,64,4/62,
NGAIO STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

REASONS

489

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning to THAB. Sites are subject to pre- No change


1944 BDC but do not form a large contiguous block of
sites subject to this. Support retention of notified MHU
zone in keeping with the notified adjacent sites and the
proposed rezoned sites close to the RFN and the NC on
Kepa Road .

Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the


relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Consider the proximity of the site to the local centre as
well as the currounding land use and zoning (e.g. THAB to
the south) makes the site suitable for THAB zoning

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3645

839-3673

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

30 Rautara St, 123 Orakei


Coates Ave, 14/62 Ngaio St
Orakei

Rezone 5A,5, NGAKE 5, 5a Ngake St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 10, TAUTARI


STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

MHS

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are


MHU
within walking distance of the RFN on Coates Ave and
Kepa Rd, the NC and public open space. Rezoning will
support increased residential capacity in the area close to
public facilities and is the most appropriate way to meet
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the


relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
839-3702

839-3732

839-3778

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

10 Tautari St,
Orakei

Rezone 49, REIHANA 49 Reihana St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 137, COATES 137 Coates Ave,


AVENUE, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are close MHU


to the RFN on Coates Ave, THAB zoned land and the NC.
Rezoning will support increased residential capacity in
the area close to public facilities and is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are
MHU
within walking distance of the RFN on Coates Ave, the NC
and public open space. Rezoning will support increased
residential capacity in the area close to public facilities
and is the most appropriate way to meet the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU. Site is located on the RFN on MHU
Coates Ave and close to the RFN on Kepa Road and the
NC and MU zone. Rezoning will support increased
residential capacity in the area close to public facilities
and is the most appropriate way to meet the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3805

839-3808

839-3809

839-3850

839-3930

839-4371

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 93, RUKUTAI 93 Rukutai St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 75, REIHANA 75 Reihana St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 74, TAUTARI


STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

74 Tautari St,
Orakei

Rezone 87, REIHANA 87 Reihana St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 51, TAUTARI


STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

51 Tautari St,
Orakei

Rezone 55,51,49,
49,51,55 Ngaio St, Orakei
NGAIO
37,39,41,43,45
STREET,39,45,37,43,4 Rautara St, Orakei
1, RAUTARA STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of notified MHS zone at site due to the


distance to the nearest LC or NC and to the RFN. MHS
zoning supports the decreasing density from the THAB
zone on Kupe Street. MHS zoning at this site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are
within walking distance of the RFN on Coates Ave and
Kepa Rd, the NC and public open space. Rezoning will
support increased residential capacity in the area close to
public facilities and is the most appropriate way to meet
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC and form part of a
contiguous block of pre 1944-BDC land. Rezoning these
sites to MHU is not supported as intensive development
is not an appropriate way to achieve the outcomes the
pre-1944 BDC seeks to maintain which are more aligned
with the objectives of the MHS zone. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to meet the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS .
Site is subject to pre-1944 BDC but does not form part of
a contiguous block of sites subject to this overlay. It is
within walking distance to the RFN on Coates Ave and
Kepa Street and can support rezoning to MHU, in keeping
with the proposed zoning of adjacent sites. This is an
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS
The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC and form part of a
contiguous block of pre 1944-BDC land. Rezoning these
sites to MHU is not supported as intensive development
is not an appropriate way to achieve the outcomes the
pre-1944 BDC seeks to maintain which are more aligned
with the objectives of the MHS zone. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to meet the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS .
Support rezoning all sites to MHU. These sites are located
near the RFN (Coates Ave and Kepa Road) and within
walking distance of Kepa Road NC and MU zone and
Open space.51-55 Ngaio Street are subject to pre-1944
BDC but the properties do not form part of a contiguous
block of overlay sites and can be rezoned to avoid spot
zoning. Rezoning to MHU will support increased
residential capacity in the area, is the most appropriate
way to meet the objectives of the zone, and gives effect

490

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU
MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

No change
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding land use zoning proposed. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

MHU

No change

MHU

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding land use zoning proposed. In particular,
given scale of Corporation land in this area, consider
change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4372

839-4373

839-4374

839-4375

839-4376

839-4377

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
18,20,22,24,26,28 Orakei
24,26,20,22,18,30,28, ,30,32,34,36 Kupe
36,34,32, KUPE
St, Orakei
STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 19,21,17,
17,19,21 Kupe St, Orakei
KUPE STREET, Orakei Orakei
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone
25, 27,29,31,33
33,25,31,27,29, KUPE Kupe St, Orakei
STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Orakei

Rezone 19,21,
19, 21 Kurahaupo Orakei
KURAHAUPO STREET, St, Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 11,9,3,5,7,
RUKUTAI STREET,12,
GODDEN CRESCENT,
Mission Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

11,9,3,5,7,
Orakei
RUKUTAI STREET;
12 GODDEN
CRESCENT
Mission Bay

Rezone 36,34,
34,36 Godden
Orakei
GODDEN CRESCENT, Crescent Mission
Mission Bay from
Bay
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

491

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Sites are subject to the pre-1944 BDC and retention of


No change
the notified MHU zone is supported as intensive
development of the sites to THAB is not aligned with the
outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve. However,
as the sites are very close to the RFN and the NC,
retention of the notified MHU zone is considered the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.
Sites are subject to the pre-1944 BDC and retention of
No change
the notified MHU zone is supported as intensive
development of the sites to THAB is not aligned with the
outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve. However,
as the sites are very close to the RFN and the NC,
retention of the notified MHU zone is considered the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Sites are subject to the pre-1944 BDC and retention of
No change
the notified MHU zone is supported as intensive
development of the sites to THAB is not aligned with the
outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve. However,
as the sites are very close to the RFN and the NC,
retention of the notified MHU zone is considered the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are
MHU
within walking distance of the RFN on Kepa Rd, and the
NC. Rezoning will support increased residential capacity
in the area close to public facilities and is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning of 12 Godden Crescent to MHU. It is
not subject to pre-1944 BDC and is within walking
distance of the RFN and is adjacent to THAB supporting
the Kepa Road NC. Do not support rezoning of the
Rukutai St sites as they are subject to the pre-1944 BDC.
Retention of notified MHS zone is supported as intensive
development of the sites is not appropriate way to
achieve the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks. MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. Refer to Attachment E C25 Proposed Zoning
Support rezoning to MHU. Sites are located within close
proximity to the RFN and close to the THAB that is
supporting the Kepa Road LC and NC. Rezoning will
support increased residential capacity in the area and is
the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

While proximity for centre makes this site appropriate for


MHU zone, note neighbouring THAB and neighbourhood
centre on opposite side of road (with mixed use) and
Eastridge centre (local) in proximity. Given scale of
Corporation landholding see this as opportunity for change
in this area and support THAB Zoning.
While proximity for centre makes this site appropriate for
MHU zone, note neighbouring THAB and neighbourhood
centre on opposite side of road (with mixed use) and
Eastridge centre (local) in proximity. Given scale of
Corporation landholding see this as opportunity for change
in this area and support THAB Zoning.

While proximity for centre makes this site appropriate for


MHU zone, note neighbouring THAB and neighbourhood
centre on opposite side of road (with mixed use) and
Eastridge centre (local) in proximity. Given scale of
Corporation landholding see this as opportunity for change
in this area and support THAB Zoning.

MHU (12
Godden
Crescent)

MHU

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4378

839-4379

839-4380

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 25,23,
RUKUTAI STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 39,37,35,41,
RUKUTAI STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
23,25 Rukutai St,
Orakei

LOCALITY

Orakei

39,37,35,41
Orakei
RUKUTAI STREET,
Orakei

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS and SH MHU

Rezone 55,57,
55,57 Kurahaupo Orakei
KURAHAUPO
St and 30 Rukutai
STREET,30, RUKUTAI St, Orakei
STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 68,64,66,
64,66,68
KURAHAUPO STREET, Kurahaupo St,
Orakei from Mixed
Orakei
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

MHU

REASONS

492

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites) MHU


are within close enough proximity to the RFN and LC and
NC on Kepa Road to support increased intensification.
Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS
Support rezoning to MHU as managing flooding on the
SH sites does not require maintaining a SH zone. All the
sites are within close enough proximity to the RFN and
the Kepa Road LC and NC and rezoning increases
residential capacity of the area and supports the
decreasing density from the Kepa Road LC. Rezoning is
the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the
relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the


relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the


relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Meet Criteria
839-4381

Eastern Isthmus

Orakei

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4382

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 33,35,
33,35 Kurahaupo Orakei
KURAHAUPO STREET, St, Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone
51,53,55,57,59,61 Orakei
59,55,57,51,53,61,63, ,63,65,67,69,71,7
73,65,71,67,69, KUPE 3 Kupe St, Orakei
STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4383

Eastern Isthmus

THAB

The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC. Do not support


MHS
rezoning to THAB as intensive development is not
consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Propose rezoning from notified zone to MHS
because of the pre-1944 BDC and the relative distance to
the RFN and LC on Kepa Road. Rezoning is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of scope
change, relevant further details can be found in

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4384

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 50,52,
50,52 Kurahaupo Orakei
KURAHAUPO STREET, St, Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 5, HAWAIKI
STREET,82,76,74,72,6
6,70,68,80,86,84,78,
KUPE STREET,30,
NGAKE STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU and
MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the


relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

493

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4385

839-4386

839-4387

839-4388

839-4389

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

5 Hawaiki St,
Orakei
66,68,70,72,74,76
,78,80,82,84,86
Kupe St, 30 Ngake
St Orakei

Rezone 38,36, NGAKE 36,38 Ngake St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

MHS

Rezone 86,84,
84,86 Reihana St, Orakei
REIHANA STREET,
Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone
75,77,79,81,83,85 Orakei
77,75,89,91,83,93,81, ,87,89,91,93,95
95,87,79,85, KUPE
Kupe St, Orakei
STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 33,37,35,
33,35,37 Ngake
NGAKE STREET,
St, Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Orakei

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC. Do not support


MHS
rezoning to THAB as intensive development is not
consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Propose rezoning from notified MHU zone to
MHS because of the pre-1944 BDC and the distance to
the RFN and LC on Kepa Road. Rezoning is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS . This is an out of scope
change, relevant further details can be found in
Attachment F.
The sites are subject to the pre-1944 BDC and form part No change
of a contiguous block of pre- 944 BDC land. Do not
support rezoning to MHU of these sites as intensive
development is not consistent with the outcomes the pre1944 BDC seeks to achieve, which are more aligned with
the MHS zone objectives. Retention of the notified zone
is the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS .
The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC and form part of a No change
contiguous block of 1944-BDC land. Do not support
rezoning to MHU of these sites as intensive development
is not consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC
seeks, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone
The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC. Do not support
MHS
rezoning to THAB as intensive development is not
consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks,
which are more aligned with the MHS zone objectives.
Propose rezoning from notified zone to MHS because of
the pre-1944 BDC and the distance to the RFN and LC on
Kepa Road. Rezoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS . This is an out of scope change, relevant further
details can be found in Attachment F.
Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the
No change
relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4390

839-4391

839-4392

839-4393

839-4394

839-4395

839-4396

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 106,104,
REIHANA STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 81,79,
TAUTARI STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 69,67,
TAUTARI STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

104, 106 Reihana Orakei


St, Orakei

79,81 Tautari St,


Orakei

67,69 Tautari St,


Orakei

Orakei

Orakei

Rezone 61,63,59,
59,61,63 Tautari
TAUTARI STREET,15, St, 15 Paerimu St
PAERIMU STREET,
Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 11,9,
PAERIMU STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
116,116A,118,
COATES AVENUE,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 6A,4,6,
RAUTARA STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Orakei

9,11 Paerimu St,


Orakei

116,116A,118
Coates Avem
Orakei

Orakei

4,6,6A Rautara St, Orakei


Orakei

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

494

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites) MHU


are within close enough proximity to the RFN and LC and
NC on Kepa Road to support increased intensification.
Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites)
are within close enough proximity to the RFN and LC and
NC on Coates Rd and Kepa Road to support increased
intensification. Rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC and form part of a
contiguous block of 1944-BDC land. Do not support
rezoning to MHU of these sites as intensive development
is not consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC
seeks, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone
The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC and form part of a
contiguous block of 1944-BDC land. Do not support
rezoning to MHU of these sites as intensive development
is not consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC
seeks, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS .
Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites)
are within close enough proximity to the RFN and LC and
NC on Coates Rd and Kepa Road to support increased
intensification. Rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS
Support rezoning to MHU. Site and surrounds are on the
RFN (Coates Ave) and within walking distance to the
Coates Ave NC and can support increased residential
density. Rezoning is the most appropriate way to meet
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

No change
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

No change

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning to MHU. Site and surrounds are close to MHU


the RFN and within walking distance to the Kepa Road
NC, MU zone and THAB and can support increased
residential density. Rezoning is the most appropriate way
to meet the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and
facilities. In particular, given scale of Corporation land in
this area, consider change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4397

839-4398

839-4399

839-4400

839-4401

839-4402

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone
4/14A,5/14A,3/14A,1
4,6/14A,2/14A,1/14A
, GRACE STREET,34,
NGAIO STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

4/14A,5/14A,3/14 Orakei
A,14,6/14A,2/14A
,1/14A, GRACE
STREET and 34
NGAIO STREET,
Orakei

MHS

Rezone 19,15,17,
15,17,19 Grace St, Orakei
GRACE STREET,
Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 24,26, GRACE 24,26 Grace St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

MHS

Rezone 60,58,
58,60 Tautari St,
TAUTARI STREET,
Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 32,34,
SUDELEY STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 21,23,
AWARUA CRESCENT,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

32,34 Sudeley St, Orakei


Orakei

21,23 Awarua
Crescent, Orakei

Orakei

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support rezoning to MHU for all sites apart from 14


Grace Street which is subject to pre-1944 BDC. Sites are
close to the RFN on Coates Ave and to open space and
can support increased residential density. the Grace
Street site forms part of a contiguous block of pre-1994
BDC sites and increased intensification of this site is not
an appropriate way to achieve the outcomes the pre1944 BDC seeks. Retention of the notified MHS for the
Grace Street site is supported as the zone objectives are
more aligned with the pre-1944 BDC outcomes. Rezoning
to MHU for all the other submission sites is supported.
The sites are subject to the pre-1944 BDC and form part
of a contiguous block of 1944-BDC land. Do not support
rezoning to MHU of these sites as intensive development
is not consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC
seeks, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone
The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC and form part of a
contiguous block of 1944-BDC land. Do not support
rezoning to MHU of these sites as intensive development
is not consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC
seeks, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone
The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC and form part of a
contiguous block of 1944-BDC land. Do not support
rezoning to MHU of these sites as intensive development
is not consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC
seeks, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone
Support rezoning to MHU. Site and surrounds are close to
the RFN and within walking distance of the NC on Coates
Ave and can support increased residential density.
Rezoning is the most appropriate way to meet the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

495

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change
Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944
Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding zoning. In particular, given scale of
Corporation land in this area, consider change appropriate.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding zoning. In particular consider the scale
and pattern of surrounding zoning makes this targeted
zoning of these sites inefficient and ineffective

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding zoning. In particular consider the scale
and pattern of surrounding zoning makes this targeted
zoning of these sites inefficient and ineffective

MHU

The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC and form part of a No change
contiguous block of 1944-BDC land. Do not support
rezoning to MHU of these sites as intensive development
is not consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC
seeks, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding zoning. In particular consider the scale
and pattern of surrounding zoning makes this targeted
zoning of these sites inefficient and ineffective

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4403

839-4404

839-4405

839-4406

839-4407

839-4408

839-4409

839-4410

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 19,15,17,
15,17,19 Awarua
AWARUA CRESCENT, Crescent, Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 39,37, PAORA 37,39 Paora St,


STREET, Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Orakei

Rezone 51, PAORA


STREET,21,23,
REIHANA STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 31,29,
REIHANA STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 15,17, APIHAI
STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

51 Paora St, 21,23 Orakei


Reihana St Orakei

Rezone 5,7, APIHAI


STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5,7 Apihai St,


Orkaei

Rezone 108,106,
COATES AVENUE,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 46,50,48,
REIHANA STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

106,108 Coates
Ave, Orakei

29,31 Reihana St, Orakei


Orakei

15,17 Apihai St,


Orakei

Orakei

Orakei

Orakei

46,48,50 Reihana Orakei


St, Orakei

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

496

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

The sites are subject to the pre-1944 BDC and form part No change
of a contiguous block of 1944-BDC land. Do not support
rezoning to MHU of these sites as intensive development
is not consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC
seeks, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone
Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites) MHU
are within close enough proximity to the RFN and NC on
Coates Rd to support increased intensification. Rezoning
is the most appropriate way gives effect to the RPS and
meet the objectives of the MHU zone.
Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites) MHU
are within close enough proximity to the RFN and NC on
Coates Rd to support increased intensification. Rezoning
is the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites) MHU


are within close enough proximity to the RFN and NC on
Coates Rd to support increased intensification. Rezoning
is the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites) MHU
are within close enough proximity to the RFN and NC on
Coates Rd to support increased intensification. Rezoning
is the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites) MHU
are within close enough proximity to the RFN and NC on
Coates Rd to support increased intensification. Rezoning
is the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to MHU. Site and surrounds are on the MHU
RFN (Coates Ave) and within walking distance to the
Coates Ave NC and can support increased residential
density. Rezoning is the most appropriate way to meet
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the
No change
relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. Retention of MHS is in keeping with the
zoning of surrounding sites and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding zoning. In particular consider the scale
and pattern of surrounding zoning makes this targeted
zoning of these sites inefficient and ineffective (not
contiguous block referred to owned wholly by

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4411

839-4412

839-4413

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone
114,108,110,112,102,
100,106,104, KUPE
STREET,10,4, NGAKE
STREET, Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

100,102,104,106, Orakei
108,110,112,114
Kupe St, 4,10
Ngake St, Orakei

Rezone 85A,85,
RUKUTAI STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 35, TE
ARAWA STREET,3,5,
MATATUA STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

85, 85A Rukutai


St, Orakei

Rezone 64,66,
RUKUTAI STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 63,65,
RUKUTAI STREET,
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

64,66 Rukutai St,


Orakei

Rezone 107,107A,
ATKIN AVENUE,
Mission Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 212, KEPA ROAD,
Orakei-Kohimarama.

107, 107A Atkin


Ave, Mission Bay

Orakei

PAUP ZONE

MHU and
MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

REASONS

497

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the notified MHS zone for the


properties on Ngake Street not subject to pre-1944 BDC
as they are some distance from the RFNs on Kepa Road
and Coates Ave and the NC on Kepa Road. For the sites
on Kupe Street which are subject to the pre-1944 BDC,
rezoning from MHU to MHS is supported as the most
appropriate way to retain the values of the sites and
meet the objectives of the zone, as shown in the
Proposed zoning maps in Attachment E. This is an out of
scope change. Refer to Attachment F.
Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the
relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the


relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the


relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding zoning. In particular, given scale of
Corporation land in this area, consider change appropriate.

No change

Meet Criteria
35 Te Arawa St,
3,5 Matatua St,
Orakei

Orakei

MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4414

839-4415

839-4416

839-506

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Orakei

MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

63,65 Rukutai St,


Orakei

212 Kepa Road,


Orakei

Orakei

Mission Bay

Orakei

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

The sites are subject to pre-1944 BDC and form part of a No change
contiguous block of 1944-BDC land. Do not support
rezoning to MHU of these sites as intensive development
is not consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC
seeks, which are more aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHS zone
Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites) MHU
are within close enough proximity to the RFN and NC on
Kepa Rd to support increased intensification. Rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zoning on the RFN and
adjacent to the Eastridge LC on Kepa Road. Retention is
the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
THAB zone, supports increasing density around centres
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

No change

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding zoning. In particular, given scale of
Corporation land in this area, consider change appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7415

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 49,
49 Kurahaupo St, Orakei
KURAHAUPO STREET, Orakei
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 99 KUPE
99 Kupe St, Orakei Orakei
STREET. Orakei from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 101 KUPE


101 Kupe St,
STREET. Orakei from Orakei
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Orakei

MHU

Rezone 103 KUPE


103 Kupe Street
STREET. Orakei from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Orakei

Rezone 16 NGAIO
STREET. Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

16 Ngaio St,
Orakei

Orakei

Rezone 12 NGAIO
STREET. Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12 Ngaio St Orakei Orakei

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

498

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone at sites because of the


relative distance to the nearest LC or NC on Kepa Road
and the RFNs. MHS is in keeping with the surrounding
sites zoning and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support rezoning to THAB. The site is subject to


the pre-1944 BDC and forms part of a contiguous block of
1944-BDC land. Intensive redevelopment is not
consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks
and are more generally aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Rezoning to MHS is appropriate due to pre1944 BDC and the distance from RFNs and centres and it
the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of
Do not support rezoning to THAB. The site is subject to
the pre-1944 BDC and forms part of a contiguous block of
1944-BDC land. Intensive redevelopment is not
consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks
and are more generally aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Rezoning to MHS is appropriate due to pre1944 BDC and the distance from RFNs and centres and it
the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of
Do not support rezoning to THAB. The site is subject to
the pre-1944 BDC and forms part of a contiguous block of
1944-BDC land. Intensive redevelopment is not
consistent with the outcomes the pre-1944 BDC seeks
and are more generally aligned with the MHS zone
objectives. Rezoning to MHS is appropriate due to pre1944 BDC and the distance from RFNs and centres and it
the most appropriate way to meet the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of
Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites)
are within close enough proximity to the RFN and NC on
Coates Rd to support increased intensification. Rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7437

839-7438

839-7439

839-7723

839-7924

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

MHU

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding zoning. In particular, given scale of
Corporation land in this area, consider change appropriate.

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding zoning. In particular, given scale of
Corporation land in this area, consider change appropriate.

THAB

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain MHS (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to areas of change and facilities
and surrounding zoning. In particular, given scale of
Corporation land in this area, consider change appropriate.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites) MHU


are within close enough proximity to the RFN and NC on
Coates Rd to support increased intensification. Rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7938

839-7940

839-7964

839-7972

839-111

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 14 NGAIO
STREET. Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14 Ngaio St,
Orakei

Rezone 53 NGAIO
STREET. Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

53 Ngaio St,
Orakei

Rezone 18 NGAIO
STREET. Orakei from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18 Ngaio St,
Orakei

Rezone 99, 99A


COATES AVENUE.
Orakei from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 117
SEAVIEW ROAD,
Remuera.

99, 99A Coates


Ave, Orakei

117 Seaview
Road, Remuera

LOCALITY

Orakei

Orakei

Orakei

Orakei

Remuera

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

499

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning to MHU as sites (and surrounding sites) MHU


are within close enough proximity to the RFN and NC on
Coates Rd to support increased intensification. Rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Subject site is subject to the pre-1944 BDC but is not
MHU
within a contiguous block of pre-1944 BDC sites. Site (and
surrounds) are located within proximity to the RFN and
NC on Coates Ave. Rezoning to MHU will support
increased residential capacity in the area and is the most
appropriate way to meet the objectives of the MHU zone
Support rezoning to MHU. Site (and surrounds) are
MHU
located within proximity to the RFN and NC on Coates
Ave. Rezoning will support increased residential capacity
in the area and is the most appropriate way to meet the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS
Support rezoning to MHU. Site and surrounds are on the MHU
RFN (Coates Ave) and within walking distance to the
Coates Ave NC and can support increased residential
density. Rezoning is the most appropriate way to meet
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change
site context given distance to the RFN and centres.
Retaining zoning at the site is the most appropriate way
to meet the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-117

Eastern Isthmus

Retain Mixed Housing 4 Koangi St,


Suburban at 4
Remuera
KOANGI STREET,
Remuera.

Remuera

Retain Mixed Housing 46,44,46A,48


Suburban at
LILLINGTON
46,44,46A,48
ROAD, Remuera.
LILLINGTON ROAD,
Remuera.

Remuera

Retain Single House


at 29,29A
ROTOMAHANA
TERRACE, Remuera.

Remuera

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


site given distance to the RFN and Remuera TC. Retaining
zoning at the site is the most appropriate way to meet
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1263

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


site given distance to the RFN and Remuera TC. Retaining
zoning at the site is the most appropriate way to meet
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1264

Eastern Isthmus

29,29A
ROTOMAHANA
TERRACE,
Remuera

SH

SH

Support retention of SH. The properties are subject to a No change


pre-1944 BDC and flooding constraints. The retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to manage the
environmental constraints and achieve the pre-1944 BDC
outcomes for the sites as these are generally aligned with
the objectives of the SH zone. Retention of SH zone gives
effect to the RPS

SH

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1266

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 19,21,23 HAPUA Remuera


Suburban at 19,21,23 STREET, Remuera.
HAPUA STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 12,14 HAPUA


Remuera
Suburban at 12,14
STREET, Remuera.
HAPUA STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 25,23 WILES


Suburban at 25,23
AVENUE,
WILES AVENUE,
Remuera.
Remuera.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

500

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN or nearest centres
zoning. Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate
way to meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1267

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1268

Eastern Isthmus

Remuera

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1269

Eastern Isthmus

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 19A,21
LEYS CRESCENT,80
PORTLAND ROAD,
Remuera.

19A,21 LEYS
Remuera
CRESCENT,80
PORTLAND ROAD,
Remuera

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 46,44 SPENCER


Remuera
Suburban at 46,44
STREET, Remuera
SPENCER STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 25,21,23
SPENCER STREET,19,
WALTON STREET,
Remuera.

25,21,23 SPENCER Remuera


STREET,19,
WALTON STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
49,55,2/57,51,53,1/5
7,3/57,55A,55B,
SPENCER STREET,
Remuera.

49,55,2/57,51,53, Remuera
1/57,3/57,55A,55
B, SPENCER
STREET, Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 58
MAHOE
AVENUE,20,22,
COMBES ROAD,
Remuera.

58 MAHOE
AVENUE,20,22,
COMBES ROAD,
Remuera.

MHS

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1270

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1271

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1272

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1273

Eastern Isthmus

Remuera

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1274

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 19,21 LINGARTH Remuera


Suburban at 19,21
STREET, Remuera
LINGARTH STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 12A,12 DEMPSEY Remuera


Suburban at 12A,12 STREET, Remuera
DEMPSEY STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 5,7 RAUMATI


Suburban at 5,7
ROAD, Remuera.
RAUMATI ROAD,
Remuera.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

501

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1275

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1276

Eastern Isthmus

Remuera

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1277

Eastern Isthmus

Retain Mixed Housing 39,43,41,


Remuera
Suburban at
LINGARTH
39,43,41, LINGARTH STREET, Remuera.
STREET, Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 72,70, LINGARTH Remuera


Suburban at 72,70,
STREET, Remuera
LINGARTH STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 60 SPENCER


Remuera
Suburban at 60
STREET, Remuera.
SPENCER STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 36,34 PLATINA


Remuera
Suburban at 36,34
STREET, Remuera
PLATINA STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 23,
MEADOWBANK
ROAD, Meadowbank.

MHU

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1278

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-129

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


the site given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC
zone. Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way
to meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-132

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-135

Eastern Isthmus

23,
MEADOWBANK
ROAD,
Meadowbank.

Meadowbank

MHU

Support retention of MHU. The property is located close No change


to the RFN and retention of MHU zoning meets the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-137

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 16A GRAND


Suburban at 16A
DRIVE, Remuera.
GRAND DRIVE,
Remuera.

Remuera

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 741 REMUERA
ROAD, Remuera.

Remuera

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

502

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


the site given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC
zone. Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way
to meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-211

839-230

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

741 REMUERA
ROAD, Remuera.

Retain Mixed Housing 27 LEYS


Suburban at 27 LEYS CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Remuera. Remuera.

Remuera

Retain Mixed Housing 24, 28, 24B


Suburban at 24, 28, INGRAM ROAD.
24B INGRAM ROAD. Remuera.
Remuera.

Remuera

Retain Mixed Housing 31 LEYS


Suburban at 31 LEYS CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Remuera. Remuera.

Remuera

THAB

MHS

THAB

MHS

Support retention of THAB. THAB zone is appropriate as No change


the property is located close to the Meadowbank LC and
on the RFN. Retaining THAB zoning is an appropriate way
to meet the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change
the site given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC
zone. Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way
to meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-2517

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-275

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


the site given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC
zone. Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way
to meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-290

Eastern Isthmus

Retain Mixed Housing 80,78 SPENCER


Remuera
Suburban at 80,78
STREET, Remuera
SPENCER STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 25 LINGARTH


Remuera
Suburban at 25
STREET, Remuera.
LINGARTH STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Rezone 6, MAMAKU
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


sites given the distance to the RFN and nearest LC zone.
Retaining MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
meet the objectives of that zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-291

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3005

Eastern Isthmus

6, MAMAKU
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3007

839-3084

839-3095

839-3096

839-3163

839-3177

839-3180

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 73, TAHAPA


CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

73, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 11 TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 8, BONNIE
BRAE ROAD,
Meadowbank from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 5, KAPUA
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 126,
MEADOWBANK
ROAD, Meadowbank
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11 TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

8, BONNIE BRAE
ROAD,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

126,
MEADOWBANK
ROAD,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 10,7, KOA


STREET,1/24-14/24,
TAHAPA CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,7, KOA
STREET,1/2414/24, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 120,
MEADOWBANK
ROAD, Meadowbank
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

120,
MEADOWBANK
ROAD,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

5, KAPUA STREET, Meadowbank


Meadowbank

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

503

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU


is located within walking distance of the RFN, the
Meadowbank train station and rezoning to allow for
increased intensity gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change
property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. Support No change
the retention of SH zone as the property is subject to HC
and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally
aligned with the SH zone objectives. Retention of SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the HC outcomes,
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning to allow for
increased intensity gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. Support No change
the retention of SH zone as the property is subject to HC
and retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the zone objectives, the HC outcomes and
gives effect to the RPS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. Support No change


the retention of SH zone as the property is subject to HC
and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally
aligned with the SH zone objectives. Retention of SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the HC outcomes,
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHS on basis of proximity
criteria

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning


Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3253

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 58
MEADOWBANK
ROAD, Meadowbank
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

58
MEADOWBANK
ROAD,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 5, MANAPAU
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 8, MANAPAU
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 18,
MANAPAU STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 45, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, MANAPAU
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

8, MANAPAU
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

18, MANAPAU
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

45, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 29, TAHAPA


CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

504

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3266

839-3269

839-3282

839-3354

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU


is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change
property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning


839-3375

Eastern Isthmus

Meadowbank

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3430

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 30
30 WAIATARUA
WAIATARUA ROAD, ROAD, Remuera
Remuera from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Remuera

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3449

839-3506

839-3524

839-3525

839-3528

839-3559

839-3564

839-3595

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 3, MAMAKU
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 4, BONNIE
BRAE ROAD,
Meadowbank from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 10, MAMAKU
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 1, PUROTO
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 21, PUROTO
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 65, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, MAMAKU
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

4, BONNIE BRAE
ROAD,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

10, MAMAKU
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

1, PUROTO
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

21, PUROTO
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

65, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 171
MEADOWBANK
ROAD, Meadowbank
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

171
MEADOWBANK
ROAD,
Meadowbank

Rezone 28, BONNIE


BRAE ROAD,
Meadowbank from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

28, BONNIE BRAE Meadowbank


ROAD,
Meadowbank

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

505

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. Support No change
the retention of SH zone as the property is subject to HC
and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally
aligned with the SH zone objectives. Retention of SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the HC outcomes,
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change
property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning


Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning

Meadowbank

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU


is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU


is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. Support No change


the retention of SH zone as the property is subject to HC
and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally
aligned with the SH zone objectives. Retention of SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the HC outcomes,
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3629

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 25, TAHAPA


CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 16, MAMAKU


STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 29, BONNIE
BRAE ROAD,
Meadowbank from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

16, MAMAKU
STREET,
Meadowbank

Rezone 14,
MANAPAU STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 13, KAPUA
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 1,3 KITIRAWA
ROAD, Remuera from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

14, MANAPAU
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

13, KAPUA
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

1,3 KITIRAWA
ROAD, Remuera

Remuera

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

506

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning


839-3678

839-3723

839-3823

839-3924

839-4355

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Meadowbank

29, BONNIE BRAE Meadowbank


ROAD,
Meadowbank

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


property is not located within close enough proximity to
the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. Support No change
the retention of SH zone as the property is subject to HC
and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally
aligned with the SH zone objectives. Retention of SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the HC outcomes,
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change from SH to MHS. Properties are subject MHS
to flooding risk but do not require maintaining SH zone to
manage the risk. The application of the MHS zone is
consistent with achieving the objectives of the zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning


Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Meet Criteria
839-4356

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 5,7, PUROTO 5,7, PUROTO


STREET,
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Meadowbank
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Meadowbank

MHS

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The


MHU
properties are located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4357

839-4358

839-4359

839-4360

839-4361

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 8,6, PUROTO


STREET,11,9,
PUREWA ROAD,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8,6, PUROTO
STREET,11,9,
PUREWA ROAD,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 2, MAMAKU
STREET,61, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, MAMAKU
STREET,61,
TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 82,80,78,
TAHAPA CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

82,80,78, TAHAPA Meadowbank


CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

Rezone 72, TAHAPA


CRESCENT,157,
MEADOWBANK
ROAD, Meadowbank
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

72, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,157,
MEADOWBANK
ROAD,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 151,153,149,
MEADOWBANK
ROAD,3,5, KOA
STREET,68, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

151,153,149,
MEADOWBANK
ROAD,3,5, KOA
STREET,68,
TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

507

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The


MHU
properties are located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


properties are not located within close enough proximity
to the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The


MHU
properties are located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The


MHU
properties are located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The


MHU
properties are located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4362

839-4363

839-4364

839-4365

839-4366

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 2, MARA
STREET,26,28,
TAHAPA
CRESCENT,8,6, KOA
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 11,9,9A,
MARA STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 3,5, MARA
STREET,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 24,26,
HARAPAKI ROAD,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 39,41,
TAHAPA CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, MARA
STREET,26,28,
TAHAPA
CRESCENT,8,6,
KOA STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

11,9,9A, MARA
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

3,5, MARA
STREET,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Rezone 7, MAMAKU
STREET,49, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7, MAMAKU
STREET,49,
TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

508

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


properties are not located within close enough proximity
to the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning


MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


properties are not located within close enough proximity
to the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


properties are not located within close enough proximity
to the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning

24,26, HARAPAKI Meadowbank


ROAD,
Meadowbank

MHS

39,41, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


properties are not located within close enough proximity
to the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning

Meadowbank

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


properties are not located within close enough proximity
to the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning


839-4367

839-4368

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 38,36,
38,36, BONNIE
BONNIE BRAE ROAD, BRAE ROAD,
Meadowbank from
Meadowbank
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Meadowbank

Meadowbank

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


properties are not located within close enough proximity
to the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. Support No change


the retention of SH zone as the property is subject to HC
and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally
aligned with the SH zone objectives. Retention of SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the HC outcomes,
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Oppose

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning


Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4369

839-4370

839-474

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 25,23,
25,23, BONNIE
BONNIE BRAE ROAD, BRAE ROAD,
Meadowbank from
Meadowbank
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Meadowbank

Rezone 18,20,
18,20, BONNIE
BONNIE BRAE ROAD, BRAE ROAD,
Meadowbank from
Meadowbank
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Meadowbank

Retain Mixed Housing 34 Ara Street,


Suburban at 34 Ara
Remuera.
Street, Remuera.

Remuera

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

509

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. Support No change


the retention of SH zone as the property is subject to HC
and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally
aligned with the SH zone objectives. Retention of SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the HC outcomes,
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. Support No change
the retention of SH zone as the property is subject to HC
and the outcomes the HC seeks to achieve are generally
aligned with the SH zone objectives. Retention of SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the HC outcomes,
the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for
site given the distance to the RFN and TC on Remuera
Road. Retaining MHS zoning at the site is the most
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support the Council's position of Special Character


as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria
Do not support the Council's position of Special Character
as Historic Heritage (RPS) matter. Recognise the character
values of the area but consider these can be managed by
the development controls of Overlay (as appropriate) and
need not determine the land use controls of the zone.
Consider site suitable for MHU on basis of proximity
criteria

No change

Meet Criteria
839-487

Eastern Isthmus

Retain Mixed Housing 28 HAPUA


Remuera
Suburban at 28
STREET, Remuera
HAPUA STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 34 WILES


Suburban at 34 WILES AVENUE,
AVENUE, Remuera.
Remuera.

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


site given the distance to the RFN and Centres. Retaining
MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate way to
meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-497

Eastern Isthmus

Remuera

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


site given the distance to the RFN and nearest centres.
Retaining MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate
way to meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-498

Eastern Isthmus

Retain Mixed Housing 39 SPENCER


Remuera
Suburban at 39
STREET, Remuera.
SPENCER STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 18 WILES


Suburban at 18 WILES AVENUE,
AVENUE, Remuera.
Remuera.

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


site given the distance to the RFN and Centres. Retaining
MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate way to
meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-527

Eastern Isthmus

Remuera

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


site given the distance to the RFN and Centres. Retaining
MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate way to
meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-580

839-634

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Retain Single House


at 23, PEACH
PARADE, Remuera.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
23, PEACH
PARADE,
Remuera.

Retain Mixed Housing 28 WILES


Suburban at 28 WILES AVENUE,
AVENUE, Remuera.
Remuera

LOCALITY

Remuera

Remuera

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHS

REASONS

510

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of SH. It is noted that the property


No change
address is not identified under Council's GIS database.
However, properties on the northern side of Peach
Parade are subject to flooding constraints and the pre1944 BDC The retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to manage the values and
environmental constraints of the sites, achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change
site given the distance to the RFN and nearest centres.
Retaining MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate
way to meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

SH

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-660

Eastern Isthmus

Retain Mixed Housing 8 HAPUA STREET, Remuera


Suburban at 8 HAPUA Remuera
STREET, Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 56, LINGARTH


Remuera
Suburban at 56,
STREET, Remuera.
LINGARTH STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Rezone 19,17,
TAHAPA CRESCENT,
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,17, TAHAPA
CRESCENT,
Meadowbank

MHS

Retain Single House


at 28A
ROTOMAHANA
TERRACE, Remuera.

28A
ROTOMAHANA
TERRACE,
Remuera

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


site given the distance to the RFN and Centres. Retaining
MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate way to
meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-736

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


site given the distance to the RFN and Centres. Retaining
MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate way to
meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7416

Eastern Isthmus

Meadowbank

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The No change


properties are not located within close enough proximity
to the RFN the Meadowbank train station to support
increased intensification. Retaining MHS is a more
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-814

839-8218

839-8219

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Rezone 17 MANAPAU
STREET.
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone Lot 2 DP
407708 from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
[10 Kapua St,
Meadowbank]

Remuera

17 MANAPAU
STREET.
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

10 Kapua St,
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

Support retention of SH. Site is subject to flooding


No change
constraints and the pre-1944 BDC The retention of the
SH zone is the most appropriate way to manage the
values and environmental constraints of the sites and
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The
MHU
properties are located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The
MHU
properties are located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning site gives effect
to the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone.

SH

Support in Part
Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria
for higher zoning

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8220

839-8221

839-8222

839-8223

839-8224

839-8225

839-8226

839-878

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

Rezone 12 KAPUA
STREET.
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 10, 8 KAPUA
STREET.
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 6 KAPUA
STREET.
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone Lot 6 DP
407708 from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
[6A Kapua St,
Meadowbank]
Rezone Lot 7 DP
407708 from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
[8 Kapua St,
Meadowbank]
Rezone Lot 8 DP
407708 from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
[10 Kapua St,
Meadowbank]
Rezone 9 MANAPAU
STREET.
Meadowbank from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 22
INGRAM ROAD, 29
SPENCER STREET,
Remuera.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

12 KAPUA STREET. Meadowbank


Meadowbank

10, 8 KAPUA
STREET.
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

6 KAPUA STREET. Meadowbank


Meadowbank

6A Kapua St,
Meadowbank

8 Kapua St,
Meadowbank

10 Kapua St,
Meadowbank

9 MANAPAU
STREET.
Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Meadowbank

Meadowbank

22 INGRAM
Remuera
ROAD, 29
SPENCER STREET,
Remuera.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

511

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU


is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The
MHU
properties are located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. The property MHU
is located within walking distance of the RFN
Meadowbank train station and rezoning gives effect to
the RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone.
Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change
sites given the distance to the RFN and Remuera TC.
Retaining MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate
way to meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-93

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Eastern Isthmus

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 11 LINGARTH


Remuera
Suburban at 11
STREET, Remuera.
LINGARTH STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 10 ROSS STREET,


Suburban at 10 ROSS Remuera.
STREET, Remuera.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

512

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


sites given the distance to the RFN and Remuera TC.
Retaining MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate
way to meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-934

Eastern Isthmus

Remuera

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


sites given the distance to the RFN and Remuera TC.
Retaining MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate
way to meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-935

Eastern Isthmus

Retain Mixed Housing 31 HAPUA


Remuera
Suburban at 31
STREET, Remuera.
HAPUA STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 20, LINGARTH


Remuera
Suburban at 20,
STREET, Remuera.
LINGARTH STREET,
Remuera.

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for


site given the distance to the RFN and nearest centre
zones. Retaining MHS zoning at the site is the most
appropriate way to meet the zone objectives and gives
effect to the RPS.

No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-963

Eastern Isthmus

MHS

Support retention of MHS. MHS zone is appropriate for No change


site given the distance to the RFN and Centres. Retaining
MHS zoning at the site is the most appropriate way to
meet the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-2350

Albany and
Greenhithe

Retain Local Centre at


B1/210-B10/210,
A1/210-A50/210
DAIRY FLAT
HIGHWAY. AlbanyPuhoi.

B1/210-B10/210, Albany Village LC


A1/210-A50/210 and surrounds
Dairy Flat
Highway, Albany

LC

Supports the retention of LC at this location as part of a No change


network of local centres that enable commercial activity
which services local convenience needs and provides
residential living opportunities. This appropriately
complements the larger scale of the metropolitan Albany
centre. The scale and intensity of development within
local centres respects the future planned character of the
surrounding environment as a modest hub for an area
with potential for future housing intensification and
growing community needs.
Retention of the LC zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

LC

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2432

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Albany and
Greenhithe

SUMMARY

Retain Local Centre at


D1/210-D13/210,
C1/210-C20/210
DAIRY FLAT
HIGHWAY. AlbanyPuhoi.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

D1/210-D13/210, Albany Village LC


C1/210-C20/210 and surrounds
Dairy Flat
Highway, Albany

REQUESTED
ZONE

LC

REASONS

513

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Supports the retention of LC at this location as part of a No change


network of local centres that enable commercial activity
which services local convenience needs and provides
residential living opportunities. This appropriately
complements the larger scale of the metropolitan Albany
centre. The scale and intensity of development within
local centres respects the future planned character of the
surrounding environment as a modest hub for an area
with potential for future housing intensification and
growing community needs.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

LC

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Retention of the LC zone is the most appropriate way to


achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
839-2541

839-7715

839-8258

Albany and
Greenhithe

Albany and
Greenhithe

Albany and
Greenhithe

Retain Mixed Housing 60 Te Wharau


Greenhithe
Suburban at 60 TE
Drive, Greenhithe Village and
WHARAU DRIVE.
Wainoni
Greenhithe.

MHS

Rezone 18
VANDERBILT
PARADE. Albany from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 17 MULROY
PLACE. Pinehill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

18 Vanderbilt
Parade, Albany

Rosedale and
Albany south

MHS

MHU

Support retention of MHS. The MHS zoning is appropriate No change


as the area is peripheral to the urban area, distant from
significant centres and has limited public transport
options. Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
No change
Do not support change from SH to MHU. This site is
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
17 Mulroy Place,
Pinehill

Pinehill and
Windsor Park

MHS

MHU

No change
Do not support this isolated request to rezone in a
peripheral suburban area with limited access to transport
or centres. Spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise the local context.

MHU

Oppose

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Meet Criteria
839-1012

Devonport and
peninsula

Retain Single House 24 Empire Road; Devonport


at 24, EMPIRE
10 Ariho Terrace,
ROAD,10, ARIHO
Devonport
TERRACE, Devonport.

SH

SH

Support the retention of SH. SH is the most appropriate No change


zone for properties in Devonport to ensure development
maintains and complements areas with identified historic
character. The outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
SH is also an appropriate zone for properties under a VV
and within the HSA surrounding Takarunga (Mt Victoria).
The application of the SH zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of eight to nine metres and gives
effect to the RPS.

SH

Support in Part

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1013

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Single House 9A,9C,9B,9E,9D,9 Devonport


at
G,9F Kerr Street,
9A,9C,9B,9E,9D,9G,9F Devonport
, KERR STREET,
Devonport.

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

REASONS

514

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

839-2254

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Retain Single House


at 48, KIWI ROAD,
Stanley Point.

48 Kiwi Road,
Stanley Point

Retain Mixed Housing 58 Norwood


Suburban at 58
Road, Bayswater
NORWOOD ROAD.
Bayswater.

Stanley Point

Bayswater

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support the retention of SH. SH is the most appropriate No change


zone for properties in Devonport to ensure development
maintains and complements areas with identified historic
character. The outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
SH is also an appropriate zone for properties under a VV
and within the HSA surrounding Takarunga (Mt Victoria).
The application of the SH zone is appropriate for areas
identified as HSAs or areas where a VV would otherwise
impose a height limit of eight to nine metres and gives
effect to the RPS.

839-1014

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support the retention of SH. SH is the most appropriate No change


zone for properties in Stanley Point to ensure
development maintains and complements areas with the
identified historic character. The outcomes the HC seeks
to achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH
zone and the retention of SH gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of zone. MHS is an appropriate zone
No change
for areas away from the RFN and Local/Neighbourhood
Centres. MHS allows an appropriate level of development
under the VV to Rangitoto Island and for properties with
the Pre-1944 BDC. The outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks
to achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone. MHS also ensures the planned suburban built
character of Bayswater is maintained.

SH

Support in Part

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
839-2321

Devonport and
Peninsula

Retain Single House


at 101 BERESFORD
STREET. Bayswater.

101 Beresford
Bayswater
Street, Bayswater

SH

SH

Do not support retention of SH zone for this property.


MHS
MHS is supported in an area outside of centres and away
from the RFN, with no significant environmental/site
constraints, is appropriate and will enable greater
housing choice. This gives effect to section B2.1 of the
RPS.
MHS is the most appropriate zone for 83-103 Beresford
St to recognise the area's planned suburban built
character. Rezoning 3 Sandy Bay Rd and 83-91, 97
Beresford St from SH to MHS is proposed in response to
839-3699 and 883-35. An out of scope change from SH to
MHS for 95, 95A, 99, 101 and 103 Beresford St is
proposed for consistency and to avoid spot zoning (see
Attachment F).
The proposed changes are the most appropriate way to

Meets proximity criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-285

839-2924

839-2936

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Single House


at 10, ASCOT
AVENUE, Narrow
Neck.

10 Ascot Avenue, Narrow Neck


Narrow Neck

Rezone 31, FRASER


ROAD, Narrow Neck
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31 Fraser Road,
Narrow Neck

Narrow Neck

Rezone 2, FIFESHIRE 2 Fifeshire Street, Belmont


STREET, Hauraki from Belmont
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHU

MHU

REASONS

515

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of SH. The SH zone is the most


No change
appropriate zone for properties in Devonport to ensure
development maintains and complements areas with
identified historic character. The outcomes the HC
overlay seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and the retention of SH gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to
Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

SH

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). Note the
zoning composition surrounding this site is already mix (eg
MHU zone on northern boundary of sites)

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Meet Criteria
839-2937

Devonport and
Peninsula

Rezone 40, JUTLAND 40 Jutland Road,


ROAD, Hauraki from Hauraki
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hauraki

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way


to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2958

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 2B,
2B Aramoana
ARAMOANA AVENUE, Avenue,
Devonport from
Devonport
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Devonport

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

516

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to
Rangitoto Island and Takarunga (Mt Victoria) and for
properties subject to the Pre-1944 BDC. The outcomes
the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned
with the objectives of the MHS zone.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
839-2986

839-2987

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Rezone 9, PHILOMEL 9, PHILOMEL


CRESCENT, Bayswater CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Bayswater
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 7, CREAMER
AVENUE, Belmont
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayswater

7 Creamer
Belmont
Avenue, Belmont

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. MHS is
also an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto
Island.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater
Peninsular and has very good access to this route. Oppose
Council's position regarding 'spot zoning' as fails to
consider the more integrated spatial pattern of the
COrporation's submission with respect to property.
Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and
beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater
Peninsular and has very good access to this route. Oppose
Council's position regarding 'spot zoning' as fails to

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Meet Criteria
839-300

Devonport and
peninsula

Retain Single House


at 25, DOMAIN
STREET, Devonport.

25 Domain Street, Devonport


Devonport

SH

SH

Support the retention of SH. SH is the most appropriate No change


zone for properties in Devonport to ensure development
maintains and complements areas with the identified
historic character. The outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
SH is also an appropriate zone for properties under a VV
to Rangitoto Island and within the HSA surrounding
Takarunga (Mt Victoria). The application of the SH zone is
appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a
VV would otherwise impose a height limit of eight to nine
metres and gives effect to the RPS.

SH

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3022

839-3044

839-3068

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

Rezone 140,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

140, BAYSWATER Bayswater


AVENUE,
Bayswater

Rezone 10, DIOMEDE 10, DIOMEDE


STREET, Bayswater
STREET,
from Mixed Housing Bayswater
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 41, PHILOMEL 41, PHILOMEL


CRESCENT, Bayswater CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Bayswater
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayswater

Bayswater

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

517

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
839-3110

Devonport and
Peninsula

Rezone 13, MOA


13 Moa Street,
STREET, Belmont
Belmont
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Belmont

MHU

THAB

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Spot zoning


is not supported in an area where MHU is the most
appropriate zone. MHU rather than THAB achieves a
better balance of growth and recognises the constraints
of Lake Rd as the only arterial road servicing the
peninsula.
Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater
Peninsular and has very good access to this route. Oppose

Proximity to FN (rail) consider appropriate zoning


Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and
beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater
Peninsular and has very good access to this route. Oppose
Council's position regarding 'spot zoning' as fails to

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3119

839-3185

839-3202

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 4, STONE
4 Stone Street,
STREET, Hauraki from Hauraki
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hauraki

Rezone 4, MOA
4 Moa Street,
STREET, Belmont
Belmont
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Belmont

Rezone 101,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

101, BAYSWATER Bayswater


AVENUE,
Bayswater

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

518

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change from MHS to MHU. MHU is the most


MHU
appropriate zone for the area around Hauraki Local
Centre. Intensification around centres and along the RFN
(Lake Rd) is supported. The change is consistent with the
proposed changes in response to submissions 5277-130
and 5280-132. The proposed change is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Spot zoning


is not supported in an area where MHU is the most
appropriate zone. MHU rather than THAB achieves a
better balance of growth and recognises the constraints
of Lake Rd as the only arterial road servicing the
peninsula.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve


integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.

Meet Criteria

No change

Support

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
839-3207

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 206, LAKE


ROAD, TakapunaDevonport from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

206 Lake Road,


Belmont

Belmont

SH

MHU

Proximity to facilities and services consider that MHS


appropriate zoning

Do not support change from SH to MHU. The property is No change


subject to flooding constraints and the retention of SH is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. To avoid spot zoning, the SH
zone for 190-208 Lake Rd is also proposed to be retained.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Oppose

Consider proximity of site to FN and facilities (schools)


means that MHU appropropriate zoning. Note issues of
flooding, but consider existing topography of site would
enable redevelopment to be undertaken in a manner to
address flooding issues (e.g. road frontage elevation and
lower rear of site. Do not support Council's comment on
spot zoning given the submission from Corporation for
wider zone review and in review of zoning pattern to the
south (including MHS and MHU sites)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3216

839-3263

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

SUMMARY

Rezone 174, LAKE


ROAD, TakapunaDevonport from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
174 Lake Road,
Belmont

LOCALITY

Belmont

Rezone 5, FIFESHIRE 5 Fifeshire Street, Belmont


STREET, Hauraki from Belmont
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

519

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change from MHS to MHU. MHU achieves an


MHU
appropriate balance of growth on the peninsula and
recognises the constraints of Lake Rd as the only arterial
road servicing the peninsula. MHU is generally
appropriate around Local and Neighbourhood Centres
and along the RFN.
The proposed change is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to section B2.1 of the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Meet Criteria
839-3287

Devonport and
Peninsula

Rezone 8,6, MOANA 6 and 8 Moana


Belmont
AVENUE, Belmont
Avenue, Belmont
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Mixed Use.

MHU

MU

Do not support change from MHU to MU. Spot zoning in No change


this location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.
MU is generally applied around Metropolitan and Town
Centres, where smaller-scale commercial activity does
not cumulatively affect the function, role and amenity of
centres. MHU achieves an appropriate balance of growth
on the peninsula to support the RFN on Lake Rd and
recognises the constraints of Lake Rd as the only arterial
road servicing the peninsula.

839-3303

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 143,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

143, BAYSWATER Bayswater


AVENUE,
Bayswater

MHS

MHU

Retention of MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

MU

Oppose
Council principle to consider MU or THAB in Centres. Given
scale of centre at Belmont and surrounding land uses as
well as proximity to FN (Lake Road) and facilities (schools)
consider this site appropriate to MHU zone. Do not
support Council's concerns regarding spot zoning given the
submission from the Corporation for wider integrated
zoning review.

MHU

Oppose

Strongly oppose Council's position of 'spot zoning' for this


site, given the scale and nature of Corporation submission
in this area, consider the assertion invalid. The area has
reasonable proximity to Centre (acknowledge local centre
of Belmont but moderate scale with assosciated facilities),
services (schools and parks) and potential for future PT
access with Bayswater wharf development. the scale of the
COrporation's landholdings in this area make it suitable for
comprehensive redevelopment and appropriate
intensification.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3308

839-3390

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 2,
2 Eversleigh Road, Belmont
EVERSLEIGH ROAD, Belmont
Belmont from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 108, LAKE


ROAD, TakapunaDevonport from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

108 Lake Road,


Belmont

Belmont

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

520

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change from MHS to MHU. MHU achieves an


MHU
appropriate balance of growth on the peninsula and
recognises the constraints of Lake Rd as the only arterial
road servicing the peninsula. MHU is generally
appropriate around Local and Neighbourhood Centres
and along the RFN.
The proposed change is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to section B2.1 of the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHU. Although the property MHU
is subject to flooding constraints, retaining SH would
result in a spot zone at this location. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. MHU achieves an appropriate balance of growth
on the peninsula and recognises the constraints of Lake
Rd as the only arterial road servicing the peninsula.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

The proposed change is the most appropriate way to


achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to section B2.1 of the RPS.
839-3415

839-3435

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Rezone 86A,86,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

86A,86,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE,
Bayswater

Rezone 26,
26 Westwell
WESTWELL ROAD,
Road, Belmont
Belmont from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Bayswater

Belmont

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Strongly oppose Council's position of 'spot zoning' for this


site, given the scale and nature of Corporation submission
in this area, consider the assertion invalid. The area has
proximity to Centre (acknowledge local centre of Belmont
but moderate scale with assosciated facilities), services
(schools and parks) and potential for future PT access with
Bayswater wharf development. the scale of the
COrporation's landholdings in this area make it suitable for
comprehensive redevelopment and appropriate
intensification.

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3444

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

Rezone 2, DIOMEDE
STREET, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
2, DIOMEDE
STREET,
Bayswater

LOCALITY

Bayswater

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

521

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
839-3453

839-3465

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 9, FRASER
ROAD, Narrow Neck
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9 Fraser Road,
Narrow Neck

Narrow Neck

Rezone 53, OLD LAKE 53 Old Lake Road, Narrow Neck


ROAD, Narrow Neck Narrow Neck
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to
Rangitoto Island and Takarunga (Mt Victoria). Retention
of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
839-3470

Devonport and
Peninsula

Rezone 7,1/5-3/5, TUI 1/5-3/5 and 7 Tui Belmont


STREET, Belmont
Street, Belmont
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

THAB

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Spot zoning


is not supported in an area where MHU is the most
appropriate zone. MHU rather than THAB achieves a
better balance of growth and recognises the constraints
of Lake Rd as the only arterial road servicing the
peninsula.
Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Strongly oppose Council's position of 'spot zoning' for this


site, given the scale and nature of Corporation submission
in this area, consider the assertion invalid. The area has
proximity to Centre (acknowledge local centre of Belmont
but moderate scale with assosciated facilities), services
(schools and parks) and potential for future PT access with
Bayswater wharf development. the scale of the
COrporation's landholdings in this area make it suitable for
comprehensive redevelopment and appropriate
intensification.

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). Note the
zoning composition surrounding this site is already mix (eg
MHU zone on northern boundary of sites)

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). Note the
zoning composition surrounding this site is already mix (eg
MHU zone on northern boundary of sites)

No change

On basis of proxmity to Belmont Centre and FN route


consider MHU appropriate zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3478

839-3487

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 71, OLD LAKE 71 Old Lake Road, Narrow Neck


ROAD, Narrow Neck Narrow Neck
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 25, PHILOMEL 25, PHILOMEL


CRESCENT, Bayswater CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Bayswater
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayswater

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

522

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to
Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
839-3491

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 1A,
1A Aramoana
ARAMOANA AVENUE, Avenue,
Devonport from
Devonport
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Devonport

MHS

MHU

Consider the site has reasonable proximity for MHU and


comprehensive development opportunity

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Devonport and
Peninsula

Rezone
1-4/29 Eversleigh Belmont
4/29,3/29,2/29,1/29, Road, Belmont
EVERSLEIGH ROAD,
Belmont from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

MHU

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). Note the
zoning composition surrounding this site is already mix (eg
MHU zone on northern boundary of sites)

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to
Rangitoto Island and Takarunga (Mt Victoria) and for
properties subject to the Pre-1944 BDC. The outcomes
the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned
with the objectives of the MHS zone.

839-3504

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centres (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). Note the
zoning composition surrounding this site is already mix (eg
MHU zone on northern boundary of sites)

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3518

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 29, HANLON 29 Hanlon


Narrow Neck
CRESCENT, Narrow
Crescent, Narrow
Neck from Mixed
Neck
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

523

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
839-3532

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 9, ACHILLES 9 Achilles


Narrow Neck
CRESCENT, Narrow
Crescent, Narrow
Neck from Mixed
Neck
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
839-3576

Devonport and
Peninsula

Rezone 59, ROBERTS 59 Roberts


AVENUE, Bayswater Avenue,
from Mixed Housing Bayswater
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayswater

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The property No change


is within Devonport Peninsula sub-precinct C. MHS is an
appropriate underlying zone for the precinct to ensure
development not carried out as part of a comprehensive
precinct development is consistent with the planned
suburban built character of these areas. It is also an
appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island. Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.
The retention of MHS for the Devonport Peninsula subprecincts is the most appropriate way to achieve the
relevant objectives of the precinct and the zone, and
gives effect to the RPS.

839-3647

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 243, LAKE


ROAD, TakapunaDevonport from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

243 Lake Road,


Belmont

Belmont

MHS

MHU

Support change from MHS to MHU. The property is on


MHU
the RFN (Lake Rd) and within moderate walking distance
to Belmont Local Centre. This change is consistent with
the proposed changes for surrounding properties on Lake
Rd in response to submissions 5277-135 and 5280-137.
The zone change is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centres (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). Note the
zoning composition surrounding this site is already mix (eg
MHU zone on northern boundary of sites)

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centres (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). Note the
zoning composition surrounding this site is already mix (eg
MHU zone on northern boundary of sites)

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centres (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). Note the
zoning composition surrounding this site is already mix (eg
MHU zone on northern boundary of sites)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3652

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

Rezone 77,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
77, BAYSWATER
AVENUE,
Bayswater

LOCALITY

Bayswater

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

524

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
839-3698

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 62,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

62, BAYSWATER
AVENUE,
Bayswater

Bayswater

MHS

MHU

Devonport and
Peninsula

Rezone 97,
BERESFORD STREET,
Bayswater from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

97 Beresford
Bayswater
Street, Bayswater

SH

MHU

Given proximity to centre, services and facilities consider


that MHS appropriate Zoning

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to
Rangitoto Island and for properties subject to the Pre1944 BDC. The outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone.

839-3699

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

Support

Given proximity to centre, services and facilities consider


that MHS appropriate Zoning

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning the property from SH to MHU
MHS
however support an alternative zone of MHS. MHS is
supported in an area outside of centres and away from
the RFN, with no significant environmental/site
constraints, is appropriate and will enable greater
housing choice. This gives effect to section B2.1 of the
RPS.
MHS is the most appropriate zone for 83-103 Beresford
St to recognise the area's planned suburban built
character. In addition to 97 Beresford St, rezoning 3
Sandy Bay Rd and 83-91 Beresford St from SH to MHS is
proposed in response to 883-35. An out of scope change
from SH to MHS for 95, 95A, 99, 101 and 103 Beresford
St is proposed for consistency and to avoid spot zoning
(see Attachment F). The proposed changes are the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3728

839-3798

839-3837

839-3844

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 391, LAKE


391 Lake Road,
ROAD, TakapunaHauraki
Devonport from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

LOCALITY

Hauraki

Rezone 11, ACHILLES 11 Achilles


Narrow Neck
CRESCENT, Narrow
Crescent, Narrow
Neck from Mixed
Neck
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 128,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

128, BAYSWATER Bayswater


AVENUE,
Bayswater

Rezone 72, JUTLAND 72 Jutland Road,


ROAD, Hauraki from Hauraki
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hauraki

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Spot zoning


is not supported in an area where MHU is the most
appropriate zone. MHU rather than THAB achieves a
better balance of growth and recognises the constraints
of Lake Rd as the only arterial road servicing the
peninsula.

525

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve


integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to
Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centres (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). Note the
zoning composition surrounding this site is already mix (eg
MHU zone on northern boundary of sites)

Consider proximity of site to Centre and facilities (schools


and Open Space) means that MHU appropropriate zoning.

MHU

Oppose

Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way


to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3864

839-3960

839-3961

839-3962

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 15A, FRASER 15A Fraser Road,


ROAD, Narrow Neck Narrow Neck
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 277A,277,
277A and 277
LAKE ROAD,
Lake Road,
Takapuna-Devonport Belmont
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 10,8, TUI


STREET,2,2A, BARDIA
STREET,177,183,181,
179, LAKE ROAD,
Belmont from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Narrow Neck

Belmont

8 and 10 Tui
Belmont
Street; 2 and 2A
Bardia Street; 177,
179, 181 and 183
Lake Road,
Belmont

Rezone 18,20,
18 and 20 Bardia
BARDIA STREET,
Street, Belmont
Belmont from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Belmont

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

526

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island and Takarunga (Mt Victoria). Retention
of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU. The property is on
MHU
the RFN (Lake Rd) and within moderate walking distance
to Belmont Local Centre. This change is consistent with
the proposed changes for surrounding properties on Lake
Rd in response to submissions 5277-135 and 5280-137.

MHU

Support

No change

Support

The zone change is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Spot zoning No change
is not supported in an area where MHU is the most
appropriate zone. MHU rather than THAB achieves a
better balance of growth and recognises the constraints
of Lake Rd as the only arterial road servicing the
peninsula.
Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Spot zoning No change
is not supported in an area where MHU is the most
appropriate zone. MHU rather than THAB achieves a
better balance of growth and recognises the constraints
of Lake Rd as the only arterial road servicing the
peninsula.
Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). Note the
zoning composition surrounding this site is already mix (eg
MHU zone on northern boundary of sites)

For the reasons of proximity to Centre and FN and faciltiies


(schools) consider MHU appropriate.

MHU

Support

On the basis of proximity to Centre and FN consider MHU


appropriate Zoning

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3963

839-3964

839-3965

839-3966

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 8,6, MOA


6 and 8 Moa
STREET, Belmont
Street, Belmont
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 7B,7A, MOA 7A and 7B Moa


STREET, Belmont
Street, Belmont
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 10,12, OPUA 10 and 12 Opua


STREET, Belmont
Street, Belmont
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone
32,26,27,28,31,
PHILOMEL
CRESCENT,13,12,14,
DIOMEDE STREET,
Bayswater from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Belmont

Belmont

Belmont

32,26,27,28,31,
Bayswater
PHILOMEL
CRESCENT,13,12,1
4, DIOMEDE
STREET,
Bayswater

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Spot zoning


is not supported in an area where MHU is the most
appropriate zone. MHU rather than THAB achieves a
better balance of growth and recognises the constraints
of Lake Rd as the only arterial road servicing the
peninsula.

527

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve


integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Spot zoning No change
is not supported in an area where MHU is the most
appropriate zone. MHU rather than THAB achieves a
better balance of growth and recognises the constraints
of Lake Rd as the only arterial road servicing the
peninsula.

THAB

Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve


integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Spot zoning No change
is not supported in an area where MHU is the most
appropriate zone. MHU rather than THAB achieves a
better balance of growth and recognises the constraints
of Lake Rd as the only arterial road servicing the
peninsula.

MHU

Spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve


integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

Support

On the basis of proximity to Centre and FN consider MHU


appropriate Zoning

No change

Support

On the basis of proximity to Centre and FN consider MHU


appropriate Zoning

No change

MHU

Support

Oppose

For the reasons of proximity to Centre and FN and faciltiies


(schools) consider MHU appropriate.
Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and
beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3967

839-3968

839-3969

839-3970

839-3971

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

Rezone 37A,39,37,
PHILOMEL
CRESCENT,8,7,6,
DIOMEDE STREET,
Bayswater from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

7A,39,37,
Bayswater
PHILOMEL
CRESCENT,8,7,6,
DIOMEDE STREET,
Bayswater

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 50,48,
EGREMONT
STREET,19,18,20,21,2
2, PHILOMEL
CRESCENT, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

50,48,
Bayswater
EGREMONT
STREET,19,18,20,2
1,22, PHILOMEL
CRESCENT,
Bayswater

Rezone 11,12,
PHILOMEL
CRESCENT,37,35,
EGREMONT STREET,
Bayswater from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,12, PHILOMEL Bayswater


CRESCENT,37,35,
EGREMONT
STREET,
Bayswater

Rezone 3,5,4,
DIOMEDE
STREET,2/148,1/148,
156, BAYSWATER
AVENUE,3,2,5,4,7,6,8
, PHILOMEL
CRESCENT, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3,5,4, DIOMEDE Bayswater


STREET,2/148,1/1
48,156,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE,3,2,5,4,7,
6,8, PHILOMEL
CRESCENT,
Bayswater

MHS

Rezone 57,59,58,
PHILOMEL CRESCENT,
Bayswater from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

57,59,58,
PHILOMEL
CRESCENT,
Bayswater

MHS

Bayswater

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

528

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. MHS is No change
an appropriate zone for areas of Devonport that are away
the RFN and Local/Neighbourhood Centres without
environmental/site constraints. MHS is consistent with
the area's planned suburban character.
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

The retention aligns with the objectives of the MHS zone


and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater
Peninsular and has very good access to this route. Oppose
Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and
beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater

Meet Criteria
Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and
beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater
Peninsular and has very good access to this route. Oppose
Council's position regarding 'spot zoning' as fails to
Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and
beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater
Peninsular and has very good access to this route. Oppose
Council's position regarding 'spot zoning' as fails to

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3972

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

Rezone 61, PHILOMEL


CRESCENT,132,136,1
34, BAYSWATER
AVENUE, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

61, PHILOMEL
Bayswater
CRESCENT,132,13
6,134,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE,
Bayswater

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

529

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
839-3973

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 139,137,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

139,137,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE,
Bayswater

Bayswater

MHS

MHU

Do not support zone change from MHS to MHU. MHS is No change


an appropriate zone for areas of Devonport that are away
the RFN and Local/Neighbourhood Centres without
environmental/site constraints. MHS is consistent with
the area's planned suburban character and an
appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.
The retention aligns with the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

839-3974

839-3975

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone
61,63,69,65,67,
ROBERTS AVENUE,
Bayswater from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 98,100,94,96,
BERESFORD
STREET,104,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE, Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

61, 63, 65, 67, 69 Bayswater


Roberts Avenue,
Bayswater

98,100,94,96,
BERESFORD
STREET,104,
BAYSWATER
AVENUE,
Bayswater

Bayswater

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. The


No change
properties are within Devonport Peninsula sub-precinct
C. MHS is an appropriate underlying zone for the precinct
to ensure development not carried out as part of a
comprehensive precinct development is consistent with
the planned suburban built character of these areas. It is
also an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto
Island.
The retention of MHS for the Devonport Peninsula subprecincts is the most appropriate way to achieve the
relevant objectives of the precinct and the zone, and
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater
Peninsular and has very good access to this route. Oppose
Council's position regarding 'spot zoning' as fails to
Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and
beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater
Peninsular and has very good access to this route. Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support
Do not support Council's contention of spot zoning, given
scale of site. However, on basis of proximity to facilities
and centres consider MHS zone appropriate

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3986

839-3987

839-3988

839-3989

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

Rezone 16A,16B,
FRASER ROAD,
Narrow Neck from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 24A,24B,
FRASER ROAD,
Narrow Neck from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone
102,100,102A, LAKE
ROAD, TakapunaDevonport from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 5,5A-5B,
FRASER ROAD,92,
LAKE ROAD, Narrow
Neck from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

16A, 16B Fraser


Road, Narrow
Neck

Narrow Neck

24A, 24B Fraser


Road, Narrow
Neck

100, 102 and


102A Lake Road,
Narrow Neck

5, 5A, 5B Fraser
Road; 92 Lake
Road, Narrow
Neck

Narrow Neck

Narrow Neck

Narrow Neck

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

530

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

On basis of proximity to FN Route (Lake Road / Old Lake


Road), and proximity to Centre (acknowleding services of
Kings Store) consider MHU appropriate zone. Do not
support Council's contention of spot zoning, given scale of
sites and submission by Corporation for integrated review
of zoning requests

MHU

Oppose

On basis of proximity to FN Route (Lake Road / Old Lake


Road), and proximity to Centre (acknowleding services of
Kings Store) consider MHU appropriate zone. Do not
support Council's contention of spot zoning, given scale of
sites and submission by Corporation for integrated review
of zoning requests

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change from MHS to MHU for 100, 102 and MHU
102A Lake Rd as the properties are located on the RFN
and within walking distance to the NC zone. MHU is
appropriate under the VV to Rangitoto Island and
Takarunga (Mt Victoria) as the viewshaft height is greater
than the MHU zone height (11m).
The proposed change is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support partial change from MHS to MHU. MHU is the
MHU
most appropriate zone for properties on the RFN (Lake
Rd) and opposite the NC zone. Rezoning 92 Lake Rd from
MHS to MHU is proposed however it is appropriate retain
MHS for 5, 5A and 5B Fraser Rd as spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.
The proposed changes to MHU on Lake Rd and the
retention of MHS for properties on Fraser Rd are the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zones and give effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3990

839-3991

839-3992

839-3993

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 55,57, OLD


55, 57 Old Lake
LAKE ROAD, Narrow Road, Narrow
Neck from Mixed
Neck
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Narrow Neck

Rezone 1, HANDLEY
AVENUE,27, OLD
LAKE ROAD, Narrow
Neck from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 14, ACHILLES


CRESCENT,1,3,3A,
AJAX STREET, Narrow
Neck from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1 Handley
Avenue; 27 Old
Lake Road,
Narrow Neck

Narrow Neck

14 Achilles
Narrow Neck
Crescent; 1, 3, 3A
Ajax Street,
Narrow Neck

Rezone 2,4, AJAX


2, 4 Ajax Street,
STREET, Narrow Neck Narrow Neck
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Narrow Neck

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

531

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

On basis of proximity to FN Route (Lake Road / Old Lake


Road), and proximity to Centre (acknowleding services of
Kings Store) consider MHU appropriate zone. Do not
support Council's contention of spot zoning, given scale of
sites and submission by Corporation for integrated review
of zoning requests

MHU

Oppose

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

On basis of proximity to FN Route (Lake Road / Old Lake


Road), and proximity services and facilites (including open
space and beach amenities) consider MHU appropriate
zone. Do not support Council's contention of spot zoning,
given scale of sites and submission by Corporation for
integrated review of zoning requests

MHU

Oppose

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

On basis of proximity to FN Route (Lake Road / Old Lake


Road), and proximity services and facilites (including open
space and local centre with good services at King Store)
consider MHU appropriate zone. Do not support Council's
contention of spot zoning, given scale of sites and
submission by Corporation for integrated review of zoning
requests

On basis of proximity to FN Route (Lake Road / Old Lake


Road), and proximity services and facilites (including open
space and local centre with good services at King Store)
consider MHU appropriate zone. Do not support Council's
contention of spot zoning, given scale of sites and
submission by Corporation for integrated review of zoning
requests

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3994

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 25,27,29,29A, 25, 27, 29, 29A


Narrow Neck
ACHILLES CRESCENT, Achilles Crescent,
Narrow Neck from
Narrow Neck
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

532

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

No change

Support

MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to


Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
839-3995

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 2,4B,4A,
WESLEY STREET,
Devonport from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, 4A, 4B Wesley Devonport


Street, Devonport

MHS

MHU

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 36,36A,
36, 36A Aramoana Devonport
ARAMOANA AVENUE, Avenue,
Devonport from
Devonport
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

On basis of proximity to FN Route (Lake Road / Old Lake


Road), and proximity services and facilites (including open
space and local centre with good services at King Store)
consider MHU appropriate zone. Do not support Council's
contention of spot zoning, given scale of sites and
submission by Corporation for integrated review of zoning
requests

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to
Rangitoto Island and for properties subject to the Pre1944 BDC. The outcomes the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to
achieve are generally aligned with the objectives of the
MHS zone.

839-3996

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to
Rangitoto Island and Takarunga (Mt Victoria) and for
properties subject to the Pre-1944 BDC. The outcomes
the Pre-1944 BDC seeks to achieve are generally aligned
with the objectives of the MHS zone.

On basis of proximity consider MHS zone appropriate.

No change

Support

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
On basis of proximity consider MHS zone appropriate.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3997

839-442

839-628

839-641

839-707

839-7419

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

SUMMARY

Rezone 33,34,
NICCOL AVENUE,
Narrow Neck from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Retain Single House


at 12, CAUTLEY
STREET, Stanley
Point.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

33, 34 Niccol
Avenue, Narrow
Neck

Narrow Neck

12 Cautley Street, Stanley Point


Stanley Point

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

Retain Mixed Housing 9 Westwell Road, Belmont


Urban at 9,
Belmont
WESTWELL ROAD,
Belmont.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 26 Hanlon


Narrow Neck
Suburban at 26,
Crescent, Narrow
HANLON CRESCENT, Neck
Narrow Neck.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 20 Egremont


Urban at 20,
Street, Belmont
EGREMONT STREET,
Belmont.

Belmont

MHU

Rezone 40, PHILOMEL 40, PHILOMEL


CRESCENT, Bayswater CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Bayswater
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayswater

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

SH

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

533

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
MHS is also an appropriate zone under the VV to
Rangitoto Island. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of SH. SH is the most appropriate No change
zone for properties in Stanley Point to ensure
development maintains and complements areas with the
identified historic character. The outcomes the HC seeks
to achieve generally align with the objectives of the SH
zone and the retention of SH gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. The property is within
moderate walking distance to the RFN (Lake Rd) and
Belmont Local Centre. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS. MHS is an appropriate zone


for properties away from centres and the RFN to ensure
development is consistent with the area's planned
suburban built character. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU. The property is within


moderate walking distance to the RFN (Lake Rd) and
Belmont Local Centre. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Proximity to FN and Town Centre limited, however access


to other amenities including reserve, open space, beach
and King Store local centre. Consider MHU appropriate.

SH

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to facilities (schools), amenities (open space and


beach) and centre (Belmont and Kings Store Local Centre)
consider this area is sufficiently accessible to make MHU
zone appropriate. Do not consider Council's position of
'spot zone' appropriate given scale of interest in area for
HNZ (and submission that seeks that a more holistic review
is undertaken on sites surrounding HNZ sites). While not
proximate to FN route, note bus services on Lake Road
could be progressed with development in Bayswater
Peninsular and has very good access to this route. Oppose
Council's position regarding 'spot zoning' as fails to

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7509

839-7548

839-7616

839-7783

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

Devonport and
Peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 2A DOMAIN 2A Domain Street, Devonport


STREET. Devonport
Devonport
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 1 ROSYTH
AVENUE. Bayswater
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1 ROSYTH
AVENUE,
Bayswater

Rezone 3 RIVIERA
3 Riviera Place,
PLACE. Hauraki from Hauraki
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 24 NAPIER
AVENUE. 4 ELDON
STREET. Takapuna
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayswater

Hauraki

24 Napier Avenue; Takapuna


4 Eldon Street,
Takapuna

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

534

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Spot zoning in No change


this location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. SH is the most appropriate zone for properties in
Devonport to ensure development maintains and
complements areas with the identified historic character.
The outcomes the HC seeks to achieve generally aligns
with the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the
RPS.
SH is also an appropriate zone for properties under a VV
to Rangitoto Island and within the HSA surrounding
Takarunga (Mt Victoria). The application of the SH zone is
appropriate for areas identified as HSAs or areas where a
VV would otherwise impose a height limit of eight to nine
metres and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change
not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. It is also
an appropriate zone under the VV to Rangitoto Island.
Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Spot zoning in MHS
this location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. However an alternative zone of MHS is
appropriate to recognise the built suburban character of
the area as there are no site/environmental constraints
at the property. An out of scope change from SH to MHS
is also proposed for other SH properties in the same area
(see Attachment F).
The proposed changes are the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to
the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU for 24 Napier Ave and MHU
4 Eldon St. The properties are close to the RFN and the
THAB zone. This is consistent with the changes proposed
in response to 5277-130, 5280-132 and 6022-25 for this
area, as shown on the proposed zoning map for the
Devonport and Peninsula topic area in Attachment E.
The proposed change is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7786

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
Peninsula

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 19 ONEPOTO 19 Onepoto Road, Hauraki


ROAD. Hauraki from Hauraki
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

535

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Spot zoning is No change


not supported in an area where MHS is the most
appropriate zone for recognising the area's planned
suburban built character. Spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way


to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Meet Criteria
839-8296

839-8297

839-884

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Devonport and
peninsula

Rezone 186 LAKE


ROAD. TakapunaDevonport from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 186A LAKE


ROAD. TakapunaDevonport from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Retain Single House


at 8, EMPIRE ROAD,
Devonport.

186 Lake Road,


Belmont

186A Lake Road,


Belmont

8 Empire Road,
Devonport

Belmont

Belmont

Devonport

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

SH

Support change from MHS to MHU. The property is on


MHU
the RFN (Lake Rd) and within moderate walking distance
to Belmont Local Centre. The VV plane at this location is
greater than the permitted height of the MHU zone (up
to 11m) therefore MHU is considered appropriate. This
change is consistent with the proposed changes for
surrounding properties on Lake Rd in response to
submissions 5277-135 and 5280-137.
The zone change is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU. The property is on
MHU
the RFN (Lake Rd) and within moderate walking distance
to Belmont Local Centre. The VV plane at this location is
greater than the permitted height of the MHU zone (up
to 11m) therefore MHU is considered appropriate. This
change is consistent with the proposed changes for
surrounding properties on Lake Rd in response to
submissions 5277-135 and 5280-137.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

The zone change is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support the retention of SH. SH is the most appropriate No change
zone for properties in Devonport to ensure development
maintains and complements areas with the identified
historic character. The outcomes the HC seeks to achieve
generally align with the objectives of the SH zone and
give effect to the RPS.
SH is also an appropriate zone for properties within the
HSA surrounding Takarunga (Mt Victoria). The application
of the SH zone is appropriate for areas identified as HSAs
or areas where a VV would otherwise impose a height
limit of eight to nine metres and gives effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-989

839-198

839-2267

839-2353

839-2759

839-283

839-2927

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Devonport and
Peninsula

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

SUMMARY

Retain Single House


at 45A,45B,45,
WALTER STREET,
Hauraki.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
45, 45A, 45B
Walter Street,
Hauraki

LOCALITY

Hauraki

PAUP ZONE

SH

Retain Mixed Housing 69, OAKTREE


Browns Bay
Suburban at 69,
AVENUE, Browns
OAKTREE AVENUE,
Bay
Browns Bay.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 80 STAPLEFORD


Suburban at 80
CRESCENT.
STAPLEFORD
Browns Bay
CRESCENT. Browns
Bay.

MHS

Browns Bay

Retain
8 KNIGHTS ROAD. Rothesay Bay
Neighbourhood
Rothesay Bay
Centre at 8 KNIGHTS
ROAD. Rothesay Bay.

NC

Rezone
73A,73B,69B,69A,71B
,71A, SYCAMORE
DRIVE, Sunnynook
from Mixed Housing
Urban, Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS
MHU

69A, 69B, 71A,


71B, 73A, 73B
Sycamore Drive,
Sunnynook

Sunnynook

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

NC

MHU

REASONS

536

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of SH at these properties. SH is an


No change
appropriate zone for properties near the coast as a
precaution to recognise the potential natural hazard risks
and environmental constraints of the coastal edge. The
retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone.
No significant site constraints present.
Not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zone.


No significant site constraints present.
Not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified zone. This zoning is the


No change
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the NC
zone and give effect to the RPS.

Support zone change for 69A and 69B Sycamore Drive


MHU
from MHS to MHU and retention of MHU for 71A, 71B,
73A and 73B. MHU is appropriate for properties close to
proposed THAB zone (in response to submission 6372-1),
around Sunnynook Town Centre and the POS zone
nearby to provide greater housing capacity and choice.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

NC

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

The proposed changes are the most appropriate way to


achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to
the RPS.

Retain Mixed Housing 5, INTREPID


Suburban at 5,
PLACE, Torbay
INTREPID PLACE,
Torbay.

Torbay

Rezone 9, FOLEY
PLACE, Torbay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Torbay

9 FOLEY PLACE,
Torbay

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support retention of MHS zone.


No significant site constraints present.
Not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change to MHU. Support


No change
retention of MHS zone. The distance from a centre makes
the MHS zone more appropriate. This zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and give effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2929

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

East Coast Bays

SUMMARY

Rezone 5, SALEM
PLACE, Torbay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
5 SALEM PLACE,
Torbay

LOCALITY

Torbay

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

537

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHU. Support


No change
retention of MHS zone. The distance from a centre makes
the MHS zone more appropriate. This zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-2943

839-2996

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

Rezone 2, MISTLETOE 2 Mistletoe Place, Browns Bay


PLACE, Browns Bay
Browns Bay
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 28, REWI


28 REWI STREET,
STREET, Torbay from Torbay
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Torbay

SH

Rezone 3, FOLEY
PLACE, Torbay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Torbay

MHS

MHU

Support change to MHS.


MHS
No significant constraints present to justify SH zoning and
the site is adjacent to MHS zoned properties
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change. Support retention of the SH zone. No change
Flooding constraint present but managing flooding risks
on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
Retain as SH because spot zoning in this location does
not recognise local context. The proposed zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3055

839-3100

839-3275

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

3, FOLEY PLACE,
Torbay

Rezone 72, BOND


72 Bond Crescent, Forrest Hill
CRESCENT, Forrest
Forrest Hill
Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 150, DEEP


150, DEEP CREEK
CREEK ROAD, Torbay ROAD, Torbay
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Torbay

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change to MHU. Support


No change
retention of MHS zone. The distance from a centre makes
the MHS zone more appropriate. This zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.

MHU

Oppose
Consider development block opportunity aand has
proximity to Centre and school

No change

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change. Support retention of SH because No change
spot zoning in this location does not recognise local
context. The proposed zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3328

839-3546

839-3579

839-3596

839-3599

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 30, REGENCY 30 Regency Place, Sunnynook


PLACE, Sunnynook
Sunnynook
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 47,
AWARUKU ROAD,
Torbay from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

47, AWARUKU
ROAD, Torbay

Rezone 55,
AWARUKU ROAD,
Torbay from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

55, AWARUKU
ROAD

Torbay

Torbay

Rezone 57, BOND


57 Bond Crescent, Forrest Hill
CRESCENT, Forrest
Forrest Hill
Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 3,
CLENSMORE PLACE,
Torbay from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, CLENSMORE
PLACE, Torbay

Torbay

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this


property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.

MHU

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change. Support retention of SH due to
No change
flooding constraint on site. This zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.

MHS

MHU

538

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's contention of spot zoning, given


scale of site. Consider flooding constraints can (as
appropriate) be managed by developmetn controls,

No change
Do not support change. Support retention of SH zone. A
flooding constraint is present and while managing
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining a
SH zone a change of zone would be a spot zoning which
does not recognise local context.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.

Meet Criteria
No change

Retention of MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve


the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do no support change. Support retention of SH zone due No change
to flooding constraint on site. This zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3605

839-3612

839-3614

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 5, REGENCY 5 Regency Place,


PLACE, Sunnynook
Sunnynook
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 5, TONKIN
DRIVE, Sunnynook
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5 Tonkin Drive,
Sunnynook

LOCALITY

Sunnynook

Sunnynook

Rezone 12, FOLEY


PLACE, Torbay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, FOLEY PLACE, Torbay


Torbay

Rezone 141,BEACH
ROAD, Castor BayLong Bay, Auckland
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

141 Beach Road,


Castor Bay

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

539

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHU but support an MHS


alternative zone of MHS. Although the property is subject
to flooding constraints, managing the risk does not
require maintaining a SH zone at this location. MHS is the
most appropriate zone to ensure development is
consistent with the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character. Surrounding SH properties are also
proposed to be rezoned (out of scope) for the same
reasons (see Attachment F).
The proposed changes are the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this
No change
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.
The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU. Support
No change
retention of MHS zone. The distance from a centre makes
the MHS zone more appropriate. This zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3736

East Coast Bays

Castor Bay

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this


property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.
The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3776

839-3825

839-3839

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

SUMMARY

Rezone 11, KAMA


PLACE, Sunnynook
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
11 Kama Place,
Sunnynook

LOCALITY

Sunnynook

Rezone 27, REGENCY 27 Regency Place, Sunnynook


PLACE, Sunnynook
Sunnynook
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 15, AROSA


15 Arosa Place,
PLACE, Forrest Hill
Forrest Hill
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Forrest Hill

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this


property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.

540

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the


objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this
No change
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.
The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support zone change from SH to MHU however
MHS
support an alternative zone of MHS. The property is
subject to flooding constraints however managing flood
risk at this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
MHS is the most appropriate zone to ensure
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. To avoid spot zoning,
out of scope changes from SH to MHS is also proposed
for surrounding SH properties (see Attachment F).

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

The proposed changes are the most appropriate way to


achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to
the RPS.
Meet Criteria
839-3863

East Coast Bays

Rezone 6, FOLEY
PLACE, Torbay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6, FOLEY PLACE,
Torbay

Torbay

MHS

MHU

Do not support change to MHU. Support


No change
retention of MHS zone. The distance from a centre makes
the MHS zone more appropriate. This zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3893

839-3896

839-3913

839-3955

839-3956

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

SUMMARY

Rezone 9, REGENCY
PLACE, Sunnynook
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
9 Regency Place,
Sunnynook

LOCALITY

Sunnynook

Rezone 15, REGENCY 15 Regency Place, Sunnynook


PLACE, Sunnynook
Sunnynook
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 25, BOND


25 Bond Crescent, Forrest Hill
CRESCENT, Forrest
Forrest Hill
Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 33,31,27,29,
NOR'EAST DRIVE,8,
EAGLESON STREET,
Northcross from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

33,31,27,29,
NOR'EAST
DRIVE,8,
EAGLESON
STREET,
Northcross

Northcross

Rezone 46,44,42,40,
NOR'EAST DRIVE,
Northcross from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46,44,42,40,
Northcross
NOR'EAST DRIVE,
Northcross

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

541

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this


No change
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. Managing flood risks
on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. MHS
ensures development is consistent with the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character. Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.
Its retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the


objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this
No change
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.
The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change. Support retention of notified
No change
zones.
Sites are not within close proximity of centre.
Flooding constraint exists on some sites. Retain MHS
zoning, and SH zoning for sites with flooding constraints.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS and SH zones respectively, and
give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHU. Support
No change
retention of MHS zone. The distance from a centre makes
the MHS zone more appropriate. This zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3957

839-3958

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 32,34,
NOR'EAST DRIVE,
Northcross from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 9, TOPLISS
DRIVE,10,12,14,16,2,
4, COTTAM GROVE,
Northcross from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,34, NOR'EAST Northcross


DRIVE, Northcross

MHS

9, TOPLISS
Northcross
DRIVE,10,12,14,1
6,2,4, COTTAM
GROVE

MHS

Rezone 24,22,
REGENCY PLACE,
Sunnynook from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

22, 24 Regency
Sunnynook
Place, Sunnynook

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

542

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHU. Support


No change
retention of MHS zone. The distance from a centre makes
the MHS zone more appropriate. This zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support change to MHU. Support


No change
retention of MHS zone. The distance from a centre makes
the MHS zone more appropriate. This zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3984

839-3985

839-416

839-420

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

Rezone 33A,33B,
REGENCY PLACE,
Sunnynook from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33A, 33B Regency Sunnynook


Place, Sunnynook

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 84, OAKTREE


Browns Bay
Suburban at 84,
AVENUE, Browns
OAKTREE AVENUE,
Bay.
Browns Bay.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 51, OAKTREE


Browns Bay
Suburban at 51,
AVENUE, Browns
OAKTREE AVENUE,
Bay
Browns Bay.

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU for these


No change
properties. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.
The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU for these
No change
properties. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the


objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone.
No change
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

Support retention of MHS zone.


This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

Meet Criteria

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4943

839-582

839-593

839-681

839-714

839-7507

839-7544

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

SUMMARY

Rezone
39,49,47,45,37,43,41,
NOR'EAST DRIVE,
Northcross from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 48,
DANBURY DRIVE,
Torbay.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

39,49,47,45,37,43 Northcross
,41, NOR'EAST
DRIVE, Northcross

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

543

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change. Support retention of MHS and SH No change


due to distance from centre and flooding constraints.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS and SH zones and give effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
48, DANBURY
DRIVE, Torbay

Torbay

Retain Mixed Housing 117A,


Suburban at 117A,
WEATHERLY
WEATHERLY ROAD, ROAD, Torbay
Torbay.

Torbay

Retain Mixed Housing 68, AWARUKU


Suburban at 68,
ROAD, Torbay
AWARUKU ROAD,
Torbay.

Torbay

Retain Mixed Housing 2, FREYA PLACE,


Suburban at 2, FREYA Torbay.
PLACE, Torbay.

Torbay

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 34
34 Ramsgate
Mairangi Bay
RAMSGATE TERRACE. Terrace, Mairangi
Mairangi Bay from
Bay
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Rezone 62 COCKAYNE 62 Cockayne


CRESCENT.
Crescent,
Sunnynook from
Sunnynook
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Sunnynook

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

Support retention of MHS zone.


This site has no significant site constraints present and is
not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone.
This site has no significant site constraints present and is
not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone.
This site has no significant site constraints present and is
not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone.
This site has no significant site constraints present and is
not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change
Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

MHU
Support change from SH to MHU
The floodplain only brushes the site.
The site is adjacent to park and in close proximity to
centre and public transport.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.
(Note the maps in Attachment E do not reflect the
proposed changes. The proposed changes will be shown
when the maps are next updated.)
Do not support change from MHU to THAB for this
No change
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHU is the most appropriate zone. 62 Cockayne Cres is
outside of the area proposed to be rezoned from MHU to
THAB in response to submissions 5727-14 and 6372-1.
MHU is the most appropriate zone to provide a transition
between the proposed THAB around the TC zone and
MHS as notified, further north. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.
The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7575

839-7735

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

SUMMARY

Rezone 42
SALAMANCA ROAD.
Sunnynook from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

42 Salamanca
Sunnynook
Road, Sunnynook

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 47 SARTORS 47 SARTORS


Browns Bay
AVENUE. Browns Bay AVENUE. Browns
from Single House to Bay
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Rezone 9 KAPITI
9 Kapiti Place,
PLACE. Sunnynook
Sunnynook
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this


property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS is the most appropriate zone. MHS ensures
development is consistent with the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character. Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context.

544

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the


objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support requested rezone to MHU. Support
No change
alternative rezone to MHS.
No significant site constraints.
Rezone to MHS rather than MHU due to location outside
of centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7797

839-7918

839-7977

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

Sunnynook

Rezone 22
22 Ravenwood
Forrest Hill
RAVENWOOD DRIVE. Drive, Forrest Hill
Forrest Hill from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 15 MAYFAIR
CRESCENT. Mairangi
Bay from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15 MAYFAIR
CRESCENT.
Mairangi Bay

Mairangi Bay

SH

SH

THAB

MHU

MHU

Support zone change from MHU to THAB at 9 Kapiti Pl.


THAB
The property is within walking distance to Sunnynook
Town Centre and Sunnynook Bus Station. The property is
also within the area of proposed THAB in response to
submission 6372-1.
The proposed change is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support zone change from SH to MHU. There are no
MHU
environmental/site constraints therefore the SH zone for
this property is not supported. MHU is the most
appropriate zone for this property due to its proximity to
the RFN, and is consistent with the properties rezoned
from MHS to MHU on, and close to, Forrest Hill Rd in
response to 6296-5.
The proposed change is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support change to MHU. Support retention of SH No change
zone because spot zoning in this location does not
recognise local context. The proposed zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-817

East Coast Bays

Retain Mixed Housing 6, SQUIRREL


Suburban at 6,
LANE, Browns
SQUIRREL LANE,
Bay.
Browns Bay.

Browns Bay

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS zone.


No significant site constraints present.
Not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change
MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-857

839-984

839-985

839-986

839-987

839-2356

839-3201

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

East Coast Bays

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 3, AIREY PLACE,


Suburban at 3, AIREY Torbay.
PLACE, Torbay.

Torbay

Retain Mixed Housing 54,56, DANBURY


Suburban at 54,56,
DRIVE, Torbay.
DANBURY DRIVE,
Torbay.

Torbay

Retain Mixed Housing 44,42,40,


Torbay
Suburban at
DANBURY DRIVE,
44,42,40, DANBURY Torbay
DRIVE, Torbay.

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 1,
FALLOW
STREET,43,41,
OAKTREE AVENUE,
Browns Bay.
East Coast Bays
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at
39,41A,41, JOHN
DOWNS DRIVE,
Browns Bay.
Takapuna, Milford Retain Mixed Housing
and Smales Farm Urban at 149
SHAKESPEARE ROAD.
Milford.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

1, FALLOW
Browns Bay
STREET,43,41,
OAKTREE
AVENUE, Browns
Bay.

MHS

39,41A,41, JOHN
DOWNS DRIVE,
Browns Bay.

Browns Bay

MHS

149 Shakespeare
Road, Milford

Milford

Takapuna, Milford Rezone 8, CORUNNA 8 Corunna Road,


and Smales Farm ROAD, Milford from Milford
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Milford

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

545

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone.


No significant site constraints present.
Not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zone.


No significant site constraints present.
Not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zone.


No significant site constraints present.
Not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone.
No significant site constraints present.
Not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Support retention of MHS zone.


No change
No significant site constraints present.
Not within close proximity of a centre.
This zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. MHU is the most appropriate No change
zone along this part of Shakespeare Rd, which is part of
the RFN. The northern end of Shakespeare Rd is also
within moderate walking distance to Milford Town
Centre. Retention of MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU for this
No change
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHS most appropriately recognises the planned
suburban built character of the neighbourhood. Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3862

839-3959

839-7505

839-568

839-773

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Takapuna, Milford Rezone 3, NAPOLEON 3 Napoleon


and Smales Farm AVENUE, Milford
Avenue, Milford
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Milford

Takapuna, Milford Rezone 23A,23,


23, 23A Otakau
and Smales Farm OTAKAU ROAD,
Road, Milford
Milford from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Milford

Takapuna, Milford Rezone 15 OTAKAU 15 Otakau Road,


and Smales Farm ROAD. Milford from Milford
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Milford

Takapuna, Milford Retain Terrace


and Smales Farm Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 26, BYRON
AVENUE, Takapuna.

26 Byron Avenue, Takapuna


Takapuna

Takapuna, Milford Retain Terrace


and Smales Farm Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 12, CAMPBELL
ROAD, Takapuna.

12 Campbell
Road, Takapuna

Takapuna

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from MHU to THAB for this


property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHU is the most appropriate zone to provide reasonable
additional intensification within moderate walking
distance to the RFN. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of MHU
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB for this
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHU is the most appropriate zone to provide reasonable
additional intensification within moderate walking
distance to the RFN. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of MHU
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB for this
property. Spot zoning is not supported in an area where
MHU is the most appropriate zone to provide reasonable
additional intensification within moderate walking
distance to the RFN. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of MHU
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. The property is within
walking distance to the MC zone and close to the RFN on
Burns Ave.

546

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
THAB

Support

THAB

Support

The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the


objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. The properties are within
No change
walking distance to the MC zone and close to the RFN on
Anzac St and Hurstmere Rd.
The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-843

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Takapuna, Milford Retain Terrace


53 Anzac Street,
and Smales Farm Housing and
Takapuna
Apartment Buildings
at 53, ANZAC STREET,
Takapuna.

LOCALITY

Takapuna

PAUP ZONE

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

547

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB. The property is part of the


No change
Takapuna 2 precinct and within walking distance to the
MC zone and to the RFN on Anzac St. THAB is an
appropriate zone for the precinct, the purpose of which is
to promote a high-quality intensive 'perimeter block'
style residential development.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

The retention of THAB as the underlying zone for


Takapuna 2 is the most appropriate way to achieve the
relevant objectives of the precinct and the objectives of
the THAB zone, and gives effect to the RPS.
839-855

839-988

839-100

839-1000

839-1001

Takapuna, Milford
and Smales Farm
(reallocated from
Devonport and
Peninsula)

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 21, BURNS
AVENUE, Takapuna.

Takapuna, Milford Retain Terrace


and Smales Farm Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10,12,8,6, LAKE
PUPUKE DRIVE,58,
KILLARNEY STREET,
Takapuna.
Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

21 Burns Avenue, Takapuna


Takapuna

6, 8, 10, 12 Lake
Pupuke Drive; 58
Killarney Street,
Takapuna

Takapuna

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support retention of THAB. The property is within


walking distance to the MC zone and on the Burns Ave
RFN.

No change

The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the


objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB. The properties are within
No change
walking distance to the MC zone and close to the RFN on
Anzac St and Taharoto Rd.
The retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Retain Mixed Housing 8, LAUDERDALE


Suburban at 8,
ROAD
LAUDERDALE ROAD,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Retain Mixed Housing 5A,5,7,


Suburban at 5A,5,7, THISTLEDEW
THISTLEDEW PLACE, PLACE, Bayview.
Bayview.

Bayview

Retain Mixed Housing 15,17B,17A,


Suburban at
THISTLEDEW
15,17B,17A,
PLACE, Bayview.
THISTLEDEW PLACE,
Bayview.

Bayview

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1002

839-1003

839-1004

839-1005

839-1006

839-1007

839-1008

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 31, 29 Hale Cres


Suburban at 31,29,
HALE CRESCENT,
Bayview.

LOCALITY

Bayview

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 21B, 21A Glastron Bayview


Suburban at 21B,21A, Pl
GLASTRON PLACE,
Bayview.

MHS

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 5 Camrose Pl


Urban at 5, CAMROSE
PLACE, Glenfield.

MHU

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 18B, 20, Teviot Pl Totara Vale


Suburban at 18B,20,
TEVIOT PLACE, Totara
Vale.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 93B,93A,
SANTIAGO
CRESCENT,9,7,
CABELLO PLACE,
Unsworth Heights.

MHS

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

93B,93A,
SANTIAGO
CRESCENT,9,7,
CABELLO PLAC

Glenfield

Unsworth
heights

Retain Mixed Housing 33, MEADOWOOD Unsworth


Suburban at 33,
DRIVE,5, SABANA heights
MEADOWOOD
PLACE
DRIVE,5, SABANA
PLACE, Unsworth
Heights.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 15,17, SANTIAGO Unsworth


Suburban at 15,17,
CRESCENT
heights
SANTIAGO
CRESCENT, Unsworth
Heights.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. The property is near the RFN.
There are no identified significant constraints to require
the application of the SH zone. Retaining the zone with is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

548

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1009

839-1010

839-1011

839-1015

839-1016

839-1017

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 7,5B, EXETER


Suburban at 7,5B,
PLACE
EXETER PLACE,
Unsworth Heights.

LOCALITY

Unsworth
heights

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 34A,34B,


Unsworth
Suburban at 34A,34B, CARIBBEAN DRIVE heights
CARIBBEAN DRIVE,
Unsworth Heights.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 20, 22 Caribbean


Suburban at 20,22,
Dr
CARIBBEAN DRIVE,
Unsworth Heights.

MHS

Unsworth
heights

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 61,63, POTTER
AVENUE, Northcote.

61, 63 Potter Ave Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10,8, KO
STREET,25,27,21,23,1
9,29, POTTER
AVENUE,24,52,26,6/2
8,46,32,44,30,3/28,3
6,1/28,34,2/28,5/28,
38-40,4/28,42,50,
GREENSLADE
CRESCENT,
Northcote.

10,8, KO
Northcote
STREET,25,27,21,2
3,19,29, POTTER
AVENUE,24,52,26,
6/28,46,32,44,30,
3/28,36,1/28,34,2
/28,5/28,3840,4/28,42,50,
GREENSLADE
CRESCENT,

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 13,15,17, KAKA
STREET, Northcote.

13,15,17, KAKA
STREET,
Northcote.

THAB

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Northcote

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

549

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote


town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support retaining THAB. Stormwater remediation works No change


will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1018

839-1019

839-1020

839-1021

839-1022

839-1023

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
9, 7 Kaka St
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 9,7, KAKA STREET,
Northcote.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3, KAKA STREET,
Northcote.

3 Kaka St

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10,8,6,14,16,
POTTER
AVENUE,10,12,20,14,
16,18,6,8, KAKA
STREET, Northcote.

10,8,6,14,16,
Northcote
POTTER
AVENUE,10,12,20,
14,16,18,6,8,
KAKA STREET,
Northcote.

THAB

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 137,135, LAKE
ROAD, Northcote.

137, 135 Lake Rd

THAB

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 159,167, LAKE
ROAD, Northcote.

159, 167 Lake Rd

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 193,185, LAKE
ROAD,1, FRASER
AVENUE, Northcote.

193,185, LAKE
ROAD,1, FRASER
AVENU

Northcote

Northcote

Northcote

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

550

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retaining THAB. Stormwater remediation works No change


will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. Stormwater remediation works No change
will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. Stormwater remediation works No change
will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote


town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote


town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retaining THAB. Stormwater remediation works No change


will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1024

839-1025

839-1026

839-1027

839-1028

839-1029

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
11,13,12,14,3,5,7,9,
RICHARDSON
PLACE,26,22,16,18,30
,28,36,34,32,38-40,
FRASER
AVENUE,11,13,15,21,
17,23,19,31,35,33,7,9
,19A, TONAR STREET,
Northcote.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at
38,48,46,44,42,36,40,
34,50, TONAR
STREET, Northcote.

11,13,12,14,3,5,7, Northcote
9, RICHARDSON
PLACE,26,22,16,1
8,30,28,36,34,32,
38-40, FRASER
AVENUE,11,13,15,
21,17,23,19,31,35
,33,7,9,19A,
TONAR STREE

THAB

38,48,46,44,42,36 Northcote
,40,34,50, TONAR
STREET

MHU

Retain Single House


at
56,50,52,25,27,21,48,
23,46,44,42,29,40,39,
38,19,32,31,30,37,36,
35,34,33,54, RANCH
AVENUE, Beach
Haven.
Rezone
19D,19A,19C,19B,
CROCOMBE
CRESCENT, Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban

56,50,52,25,27,21 Beach Haven


,48,23,46,44,42,2
9,40,39,38,19,32,
31,30,37,36,35,34
,33,54, RANCH
AVENUE, Beach
Have

SH

19D,19A,19C,19B, Beach Haven


CROCOMBE
CRESCENT

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 162C,162B,162A,1 Birkdale


Suburban at
62E,162D,
162C,162B,162A,162 BIRKDALE ROAD,
E,162D, BIRKDALE
ROAD, Birkdale.

MHS

Retain Terrace
122B, 122A
Housing and
Birkenhead Ave
Apartment Buildings
at 122B,122A,
BIRKENHEAD
AVENUE, Birkenhead.

THAB

Birkenhead

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

SH

MHU

MHS

THAB

REASONS

Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote


town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

551

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Support retaining MHU. Stormwater remediation works No change


will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and the RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining SH along the coast. Particularly for
No change
properties subject to coastal hazard risk. SH is an
appropriate zone for properties near the coast as a
precaution to recognise the potential natural hazard risks
and environmental constraints of the coastal edge.
Retaining SH is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Birkenhead No change
town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-108

839-140

839-143

839-151

839-1519

839-1520

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 52 Powrie St


Urban at 52, POWRIE
STREET, Glenfield.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 36 Castleton St


Suburban at 36,
CASTLETON STREET,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Retain Mixed Housing 18 Ivy Pl


Suburban at 18, IVY
PLACE, Birkdale.

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 149 Spinella Dr


Urban at 149,
SPINELLA DRIVE,
Bayview.

Bayview

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 57, POTTER
AVENUE, Northcote.

57 Potter Ave

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10,8,12,4,6,
FRASER
AVENUE,217,203,215
,205,213,207,211,209
,219,225,223,221,
LAKE ROAD,8,4,6,
RICHARDSON PLACE,
Northcote.

10,8,12,4,6,
Northcote
FRASER
AVENUE,217,203,
215,205,213,207,
211,209,219,225,
223,221, LAKE
ROAD,8,4,6,
RICHARDSON
PLACE,

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

REASONS

552

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retaining MHU. Stormwater remediation works


will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and the RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote


town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1521

839-181

839-186

839-203

839-209

839-220

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
51,43,61,63,53,25,27,
21,23,47,45,29,41,1,3
,5,7,9,39,59,11,13,15,
17,19,55,31,49,37,35,
33,57, CADNESS
STREET,83,81,79,85,
TONAR STREET,
Northcote.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

51,43,61,63,53,25 Northcote
,27,21,23,47,45,2
9,41,1,3,5,7,9,39,
59,11,13,15,17,19
,55,31,49,37,35,3
3,57, CADNESS
STREET,83,81,79,8
5, TONAR STREE

THAB

Retain Mixed Housing 13 Lauderdale Rd Birkdale


Suburban at 13,
LAUDERDALE ROAD,
Birkdale.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 68 Lynn Rd


Suburban at 68, LYNN
ROAD, Bayview.

MHS

Bayview

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
184 Sunnynook
Housing and
Rd
Apartment Buildings
at 184, SUNNYNOOK
ROAD, Sunnynook.

Totara Vale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Single House 23 Clarence Rd


at 23, CLARENCE
ROAD, Northcote
Point.
Retain Mixed Housing 18 Wanita Pl
Suburban at 18,
WANITA PLACE,
Totara Vale.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

PAUP ZONE

Totara Vale

THAB

SH

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

MHS

THAB

SH

MHS

REASONS

Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote


town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

553

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No change
retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Sunnynook
No change
local centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retaining SH. These sites are affected by the HC No change


and retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes
the HC seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No change
retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2227

839-2228

839-2244

839-2264

839-2266

839-2268

839-2269

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 59 Spinella Dr


Suburban at 59,
SPINELLA DRIVE,
Bayview.

Bayview

Retain Mixed Housing 3 Laser Pl


Suburban at 3, LASER
PLACE, Bayview.

Bayview

Retain Mixed Housing 193 Rangatira Rd


Suburban at 193
RANGATIRA ROAD.
Beach HavenBirkdale.

Beach Haven

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 94 Tonar St


Urban at 94 TONAR
STREET. Northcote.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 10 RICHARDSON
PLACE. Northcote.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 186 Coronation


Suburban at 186
Rd
CORONATION ROAD.
Hillcrest.

Hillcrest

Retain Mixed Housing 188 Coronation


Suburban at 188
Rd
CORONATION ROAD.
Hillcrest.

Hillcrest

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

10 Richardson Pl

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. Stormwater remediation
works will manage flooding risks on the site without the
need to maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

554

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-227

839-2282

839-2318

839-2319

839-232

839-2349

839-2352

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 12, GREENSLADE
CRESCENT,
Northcote.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
12 Greenslade
Cres

LOCALITY

Northcote

PAUP ZONE

THAB

Retain Terrace
74 Birkenhead
Housing and
Ave
Apartment Buildings
at 74 BIRKENHEAD
AVENUE. Birkenhead.

Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 8 Thistledew Pl


Suburban at 8
THISTLEDEW PLACE.
Bayview.

Bayview

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 86, 88, 82A, 82B


Urban at 86, 88, 82A, TONAR STREET.
82B TONAR STREET.
Northcote.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 20 Devonshire Rd Unsworth


Suburban at 20,
heights
DEVONSHIRE ROAD,
Unsworth Heights.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 13 Gatman St


Suburban at 13
GATMAN STREET.
Birkdale.

Birkdale

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 78 Tonar St


Urban at 78 TONAR
STREET. Northcote.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

555

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote


town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Birkenhead


town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. Stormwater remediation
works will manage flooding risks on the site without the
need to maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. Stormwater remediation
works will manage flooding risks on the site without the
need to maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2387

839-2396

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 13 Romulus Pl


Urban at 13
ROMULUS PLACE.
Totara Vale.

Totara Vale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Single House 1/77 - 3/77 Beach Beach Haven


at 1/77-3/77 BEACH Haven Rd
HAVEN ROAD. Beach
Haven.

PAUP ZONE

MHU

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

SH

REASONS

556

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retaining MHU. Stormwater remediation works No change


will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and the RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH. Support alternative
MHS
rezoning to MHS (Out of scope change, see Attachment
F) because multiple dwellings already exist on the
property and will recognise the local context.
Inappropriate to retain SH because the site have no
identified constraints to require maintaining the SH zone.
Rezoning to the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the purpose of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets proximity criteria


839-2398

839-240

839-2404

839-241

839-2422

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 54 Lynden Ave


Suburban at 54
LYNDEN AVENUE.
Hillcrest.

Hillcrest

Retain Mixed Housing 30 Exeter Pl


Suburban at 30,
EXETER PLACE,
Unsworth Heights.

Unsworth
heights

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 59 POTTER
AVENUE. Northcote.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 7 Santiago Cres


Suburban at 7,
SANTIAGO
CRESCENT, Unsworth
Heights.

Unsworth
heights

Retain Mixed Housing 66 Tonary St


Urban at 66 TONAR
STREET. Northcote.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

59 Potter Ave

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHU

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote
No change
town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. Stormwater remediation
No change
works will manage flooding risks on the site without the
need to maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2428

839-244

839-2451

839-2456

839-2490

839-250

839-2507

839-2531

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 8 Calypso Way


Suburban at 8
CALYPSO WAY.
Unsworth Heights.

Unsworth
heights

Retain Mixed Housing 91 Lynn Rd


Suburban at 91, LYNN
ROAD, Bayview.

Bayview

Retain Mixed Housing 184 Coronation


Suburban at 184
Rd
CORONATION ROAD.
Hillcrest.

Hillcrest

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 3 Roberts Rd


Urban at 3 ROBERTS
ROAD. Glenfield.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 47 Bluebird Cres


Suburban at 47
BLUEBIRD CRESCENT.
Unsworth Heights.

Unsworth
heights

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Single House 57 Queen St


at 57, QUEEN STREET,
Northcote Point.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 3 Camrose Pl


Urban at 3 CAMROSE
PLACE. Glenfield.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 76, 70D, 74, 72,


Northcote
Urban at 76, 70D, 74, 68, 70A, 70B, 70C
72, 68, 70A, 70B, 70C TONAR STREET
TONAR STREET.
Northcote.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. The property is near the RFN.
There are no identified significant constraints to require
the application of the SH zone. Retaining the zone with is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining SH. These sites are affected by the HC
and retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes
the HC seeks to achieve generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. The property is near the RFN.
There are no identified significant constraints to require
the application of the SH zone. Retaining the zone with is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. Stormwater remediation
works will manage flooding risks on the site without the
need to maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

557

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2537

839-255

839-256

839-273

839-2758

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Single House 79 Beach Haven


at 79 BEACH HAVEN Rd
ROAD. Beach Haven.

Beach Haven

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 19 Saffron St


Suburban at 19,
SAFFRON STREET,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Retain Mixed Housing 26 McPhail St


Suburban at 26,
MCPHAIL STREET,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Retain Mixed Housing 24 Glastron Pl


Suburban at 24,
GLASTRON PLACE,
Bayview.

Bayview

Rezone 45,51,
CASTLETON STREET,
Birkdale from Mixed
Housing Suburban, ,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

45, 51 Castleton
St

Birkdale

Rezone 7, GEMINI
PLACE, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7 Gemini Pl

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support retaining SH. Support alternative rezoning


from SH to MHS (out of scope change, see Attachment F).
There are no identified constraints on site to require
maintaining SH. Rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support
retaining SH. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

558

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS
MHS

Support
Meets proximity criteria

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
839-2840

839-2850

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 50,
50 Chippendale
CHIPPENDALE
Cres
CRESCENT, Birkdale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Beach Haven

Birkdale

MHS

SH

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
MHS (inferred) Support change from SH to MHS. Appropriate to rezone MHS
to MHS because managing flooding risks on the site does
not require maintaining a SH zone. An out of scope
change from SH to MHS (see Attachement F) is proposed
for 62, 60, and 58 because they are not subject to
identified constraints and will avoid spot zoning.The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2851

839-2869

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

Rezone 44,
LANCASTER ROAD,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

44 Lancaster Rd

Beach Haven

Rezone 81, ONEWA 81 Onewa Rd


ROAD, BirkenheadNorthcote from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Northcote

Rezone 9, GEMINI
PLACE, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

559

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support
retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS. While SH is not necessary to manage
constraints on site rezoning will create an instance of
spot zoning. Spot zoning in this context will not generally
achieve integrated of resources and does not recognise
local context. Inappropriate to encourage greater
residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2875

839-288

839-2895

839-2900

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

9 Gemini Pl

Retain Mixed Housing 7A Hale Cres


Suburban at 7A, HALE
CRESCENT, Bayview.

Bayview

Rezone 31, O'DONN 31 O'Donn Ave


AVENUE, Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Beach Haven

Rezone 1, FRIZELL
1 Frizell St
STREET, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2925

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 17,
17 Wavelrey Ave
WAVERLEY AVENUE,
Glenfield from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Glenfield

Retain Mixed Housing 71 Stott Ave


Suburban at 71,
STOTT AVENUE,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Rezone 8, ELLIOTT
AVENUE, Bayview
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8 Elliot Ave

Bayview

Rezone 28,
TRAMWAY ROAD,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28 Tramway Rd

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

560

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-298

839-2980

839-2992

839-2993

839-3002

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Beach Haven

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 14,
14 Crocombe Cres Beach Haven
CROCOMBE
CRESCENT, Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 45, STANLEY 45 Stanley Rd


ROAD, Glenfield from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Glenfield

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3003

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 2, CELESTE
2 Celeste Pl, 259
PLACE,259, WAIRAU Wairau Rd
ROAD, MilfordGlenfield from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Glenfield

Rezone 17, ROMULUS 17 Romulus Pl


PLACE, Totara Vale
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Totara Vale

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

561

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3020

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

MHU

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3021

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 22,
22 Tawavale Cres Totara Vale
TAWAVALE
CRESCENT, Totara
Vale from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 42, JAPONICA 42 Japonica Dr


DRIVE, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3027

839-3034

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Beach Haven

Rezone 36, LANIGAN 36 Lanigan Street Birkdale


STREET, Birkdale from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 85, TRIAS


ROAD, Totara Vale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

MHS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support
No change
retaining SH. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3038

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

85 Trias Rd

Totara Vale

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3045

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 28,
28 Woodside Ave Northcote
WOODSIDE AVENUE,
Northcote from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 57, TAURUS 57, TAURUS


CRESCENT, Beach
CRESCENT
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Beach Haven

MHS

Rezone 27,
FORDHAM STREET,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

562

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3049

839-3054

839-310

839-3101

839-3105

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

27 Fordham St

Retain Mixed Housing 89, ESKDALE


Suburban at 89,
ROAD
ESKDALE ROAD,
Birkdale-Birkenhead.

Birkdale

Rezone 16, MELBA


16 Melba St
STREET, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

Rezone 133, LYNN


133 Lynn Rd
ROAD, Bayview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayview

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3130

839-3131

839-3137

839-3147

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 159,
159 Rangatira Rd
RANGATIRA ROAD,
Beach Haven-Birkdale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

Rezone 5, SEAVIEW 5 Seaview Rd


ROAD, Glenfield from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glenfield

Rezone 50,
FAIRCLOUGH ROAD,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

50 Fairclough Rd

Beach Haven

Rezone 30, ONEWA


ROAD, BirkenheadNorthcote from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

30 Onewa Rd

Northcote

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
retaining SH. These sites are affected by the HC and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the HC
seeks to achieve genearlly align with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

563

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-317

839-3175

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 24 Stott Ave


Suburban at 24,
STOTT AVENUE,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Rezone 38, LINGFIELD 38 Lingfield St


STREET, Glenfield
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glenfield

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3186

839-3204

839-3236

839-3257

839-3258

839-3278

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 65, BAYVIEW 65 bayview Rd


ROAD, Bayview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayview

Rezone 20, MAYFIELD 20 Mayfield Rd


ROAD, Glenfield from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Glenfield

Rezone 8, ONEWA
8 Onewa Rd
ROAD, BirkenheadNorthcote from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 42, MELBA
42 Melba St
STREET, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Northcote

Rezone 19, PARAGON 19, PARAGON


AVENUE, Beach
AVENUE
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Beach Haven

Rezone 63, AYTON


63 Ayton Dr
DRIVE, Totara Vale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Totara Vale

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

564

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
No change
retaining SH. These sites are affected by the HC and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the HC
seeks to achieve genearlly align with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Beach Haven

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support
No change
retaining SH. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3293

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 26,
26 Tawavale Cres Totara Vale
TAWAVALE
CRESCENT, Totara
Vale from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 27, JAPONICA 27 Japonica Dr


DRIVE, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

MHS

Rezone 30, ELLICE


30 Ellice Rd
ROAD, Totara Vale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Totara Vale

Rezone 42, HAYMAN 42 Hayman Pl


PLACE, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 26, PARK


26 Park Road
ROAD, Glenfield from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 58,
FAIRCLOUGH ROAD,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

565

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3302

839-3309

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SH

MHU

MHS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support
No change
retaining SH. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3313

839-3353

839-3381

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

58, FAIRCLOUGH
ROAD,

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
retaining SH zone. Do not support spot zoning for a site
where SH most appropriately provides for identified
constraints (SEA). Retention of the SH is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3396

839-3399

839-341

839-3421

839-3442

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 4, PARAGON 4 Paragon Ave


AVENUE, Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Beach Haven

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 23,
23 Beaudine Ave
BEAUDINE AVENUE,
Glenfield from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 40 Castleton St


Suburban at 40,
CASTLETON STREET,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 30,
CASTLETON STREET,
Birkdale from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

30 Castleton St

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 1/19,2/19,
LANCASTER ROAD,16,
FAIRCLOUGH ROAD,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1/19,2/19,
LANCASTER
ROAD,16,
FAIRCLOUGH
ROAD

Beach Haven

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
alternative rezoning to MHS. The site is not near a centre
or the RFN. Appropriate to rezone to MHS because
managing flooding risks on the site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support
retaining SH zone. The site is significantly affected by the
SEA. The outcomes of the SEA generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone. Retaining the SH zone will be
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

566

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3454

839-346

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 57, PEACH


57 Peach Rd
ROAD, Glenfield from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 12 Hobby Ave


Suburban at 12,
HOBBY AVENUE,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

SH

MHS

MHU

MHS

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support


No change
retaining SH zone. Do not support spot zoning for a site
where SH most appropriately provide for identified
flooding constraints. Retention of the SH is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3468

839-347

839-3489

839-349

839-3495

839-3497

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 9, ROSALIND 9 Rosalind Rd


ROAD, Glenfield from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glenfield

Retain Mixed Housing 13 Aplin Pl


Suburban at 13,
APLIN PLACE,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Rezone 142, LYNN


142 Lynn Rd
ROAD, Bayview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayview

Retain Mixed Housing 12 Aplin Pl


Suburban at 12,
APLIN PLACE,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Rezone 26, BELLE


26 Bellevue Ave Northcote
VUE AVENUE,
Northcote Point from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 161, BEACH 161 Beach Haven Beach Haven
HAVEN ROAD, Beach Rd
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

567

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
retaining SH. These sites are affected by the HC and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the HC
seeks to achieve genearlly align with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3512

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 4, LANCELOT 4 Lancelot Pl


PLACE, Glenfield from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Glenfield

Rezone 8, LANCELOT 8 Lancelot Pl


PLACE, Glenfield from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Glenfield

Rezone 47, TAURUS 47 Taurus Cres


CRESCENT, Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Beach Haven

Rezone 23, FAIRFAX 23 Fairfax Ave


AVENUE, Northcote
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Northcote

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

568

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
alternative rezoning to MHS. 11 and 13 Fairfax Ave are
considered as part of an area-wide submission
requesting to upzone the Birkenhead/Onewa Rd area.
Properties on Onewa Rd are near RFN and are generally
without constraints. Locational context such as
topography and the character of surrounding SH built
form makes MHS a suitable buffer. Rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Support change from MHS to MHU. The property is on a
transport corridor served by 2 RFN and close to
Constellation Station. Rezoning will not create a spot
zoning because the wider Sunset Rd corridor is proposed
to be rezoned from MHS to MHU. Rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS. There are no identified
constraints on site to require maintaining SH. Rezoning to
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3514

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

MHU

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3536

839-3543

839-3563

839-3565

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 4,
4 Meadowood Dr Unsworth
MEADOWOOD
heights
DRIVE, Unsworth
Heights from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 46, ESKDALE 46 Eskdale Rd
Birkdale
ROAD, BirkdaleBirkenhead from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3574

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 30,
30 Tawavale Cres Totara Vale
TAWAVALE
CRESCENT, Totara
Vale from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 50, SAFFRON 50 Saffron Street


STREET, Birkdale from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Birkdale

SH

Rezone 81, ATHENA


DRIVE, Totara Vale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Totara Vale

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

569

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3584

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

MHS

Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support


No change
retaining SH. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3593

839-360

839-3649

839-3738

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

81 Athena Dr

Retain Mixed Housing 2 Packham Pl, 8


Suburban at 2,
O'Donn Ave
PACKHAM PLACE,8,
O'DONN AVENUE,
Beach Haven.

Beach Haven

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 20, PARAMU 20 Paramu Ave


AVENUE, Birkdale
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 1, SPINELLA 1 Spinella Dr, 49


DRIVE,49, BAYVIEW Bayview Rd
ROAD, Bayview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayview

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. Though SH is not
necessary to manage flooding risks, do not support spot
zoning in an area where SH most appropriately
recognises the planned suburban character of the
neighbourhood. Retention of the SH is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3744

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 1, SUNWARD 1 Sunward Rise,


RISE,22, POWRIE
22 Powrie St
STREET, Glenfield
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Glenfield

Rezone 65,
MARLBOROUGH
AVENUE, Glenfield
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

65 Marlborough
Ave

Glenfield

Rezone 23,
LANCASTER ROAD,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

23 Lancaster Rd

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

570

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3749

839-3759

839-3766

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Beach Haven

Rezone 18,
18 Waimana Ave
WAIMANA AVENUE,
Northcote Point from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Northcote

Rezone 22,
22 Waimana Ave
WAIMANA AVENUE,
Northcote Point from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Northcote

Rezone 27,
LANCASTER ROAD,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
No change
retaining SH. These sites are affected by the HC and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the HC
seeks to achieve genearlly align with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3775

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SH

MHU

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support


No change
retaining SH. These sites are affected by the HC and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the HC
seeks to achieve genearlly align with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3803

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

27 Lancaster Rd

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No change
retaining MHS. SH is not necessary to manage flooding
risks rezoning will create an instance of spot zoning. Spot
zoning in this context will not generally achieve
integrated of resources and does not recognise local
context. Inappropriate to encourage greater residential
intensity away from a centre or RFN. Retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3807

839-3810

839-3834

839-3836

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 1-1A,
1-1A, LYSANDER
LYSANDER CRESCENT, CRESCENT
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 26,
26 Crocombe Cres Beach Haven
CROCOMBE
CRESCENT, Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 119, SUNSET 119 Sunset Rd


ROAD, Totara ValeSunnynook from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Totara Vale

MHS

Rezone 31,
31 Lambrown Dr
LAMBROWN DRIVE,
Totara Vale from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Totara Vale

Rezone 61, SAFFRON 61 Saffron Street


STREET, Birkdale from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Birkdale

Rezone 42, ESKDALE


ROAD, BirkdaleBirkenhead from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Birkdale

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support
retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

571

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3838

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SH

MHS

Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support


No change
retaining SH. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3840

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

42 Eskdale Rd

SH

MHS

Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support


No change
retaining SH. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3841

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 18,
18 Tawavale Cres Totara Vale
TAWAVALE
CRESCENT, Totara
Vale from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 46, CHEVAL


DRIVE, Totara Vale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

572

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support
retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3845

839-3849

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

46 Cheval Dr

Totara Vale

Rezone 23,
23 Tawavale Cres Totara Vale
TAWAVALE
CRESCENT, Totara
Vale from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 16,
16 Lambrown Dr
LAMBROWN DRIVE,
Totara Vale from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3857

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Totara Vale

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3871

839-3876

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 28,
LAUDERDALE ROAD,
Birkdale from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

28 Lauderdale Rd Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 85,
85 Totaravale Dr
TOTARAVALE DRIVE,
Totara Vale from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Totara Vale

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support change from SH to MHS. Appropriate to rezone MHS


to MHS because managing flooding risks on the site does
not require maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3877

839-3886

839-3897

839-3910

839-392

839-3940

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 13, GEMINI


PLACE, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

13 Gemini Pl

Rezone 29,
AEROVIEW DRIVE,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29 Aeroview Dr

LOCALITY

Beach Haven

Beach Haven

Rezone 152,
152 Glendhu Rd
GLENDHU ROAD,
Bayview from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Bayview

Rezone 154, LYNN


154 Lynn Rd
ROAD, Bayview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayview

Retain Mixed Housing 11 Mackwood Pl


Suburban at 11,
MACKWOOD PLACE,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Rezone 31, BENTLEY 31 Bentley Ave


AVENUE, Glenfield
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Glenfield

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

573

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3976

839-3977

839-3978

839-3979

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone
67, 63, 2/67, 65,
67,63,2/67,65,65A, 65A Simon Ellice
SIMON ELLICE DRIVE, Dr
Bayview from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Bayview

Rezone 54,56,58,
TOTARAVALE
DRIVE,90,88, TRIAS
ROAD, Totara Vale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Totara Vale

54, 56, 58 Totara


Vale Dr

Rezone
27A,27B,31,29,
27A,27B,31,29,
TOTARAVALE
TOTARAVALE DRIVE, DRIVE
Totara Vale from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Totara Vale

Rezone 19,13,15,17, 19, 13, 15, 17


TAWAVALE
Tawavale Cres
CRESCENT, Totara
Vale from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Totara Vale

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

574

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to THAB. Support
retention of SH zone. Do not support spot zoning for a
site where SH most appropriately provide for identified
flooding constraints. Rezoning would also create spot
zoning which will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the SH is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support
retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support
retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3980

839-3981

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 1,3,5,
JENANNE PLACE,13,
CHEVAL DRIVE,
Totara Vale from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,3,5 Jeanne Pl, 13 Totara Vale


Cheval Dr

Rezone 1/30,2/30,28, 1/30,2/30,28,


LAMBROWN DRIVE, LAMBROWN
Totara Vale from
DRIVE
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Totara Vale

MHS

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3982

839-3983

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 61B,61A,
61B,61A, ELLICE
ELLICE ROAD, Totara ROAD
Vale from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Totara Vale

Rezone
249,1/241,2/241,245,
1/237,1/235,2/239,1/
233,1/231,2/235,2/2
37,2/231,2/233,1/23
9, WAIRAU ROAD,
Milford-Glenfield
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

249,1/241,2/241, Glenfield
245,1/237,1/235,
2/239,1/233,1/23
1,2/235,2/237,2/2
31,2/233,1/239,
WAIRAU ROAD

Rezone 37, FRASER


AVENUE,56,54,42,60,
82,62,64,66,68,80,52,
84,24,26,20,22,46,44,
28,40,78,40C,40B,40
A,76,38,72,70,92,58,
12,14,16,18,30,36,34,
74,32, CADNESS
STREET,2/49,7/49,6/4
9,55,5/49,6367,4/49,1/49,8/49,3/
49, TONAR STREET,
Northcote from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

37, FRASER
Northcote
AVENUE,56,54,42,
60,82,62,64,66,68
,80,52,84,24,26,2
0,22,46,44,28,40,
78,40C,40B,40A,7
6,38,72,70,92,58,
12,14,16,18,30,36
,34,74,32,
CADNESS
STREET,2/49,7/49,
6/49,55,5/49,6367,4/49,1/49,8/49
,3/49, TONAR
STREET,

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support
retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

575

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3998

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SH

THAB

Do not support change from SH to THAB. Support


No change
retaining SH. Though the properties are close to
Northcote town centre and RFN, SH is required to
manage flooding risks and to allow stormwater
remediation works for the surrounding area. This work is
critical to allow the management of flood risks without
requiring SH on nearby properties.
Retaining SH is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3999

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 1,1A,
1, 1A Woodside Northcote
WOODSIDE
Ave, 85 Onewa Rd
AVENUE,85, ONEWA
ROAD, BirkenheadNorthcote from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

THAB

Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support


No change
retaining MHU. Because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context.Retention of the MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4000

839-4001

839-4002

839-4003

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 11,13,
FAIRFAX AVENUE,
Northcote from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11, 13 Fairfax Ave Northcote

Rezone
125B,125C,125A,
LANCASTER ROAD,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

125B,125C,125A, Beach Haven


LANCASTER ROAD

Rezone 8B,8A,
MELBA STREET,
Beach Haven from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 1, HAYMAN
PLACE,195,197,191,1
93,187,189, BEACH
HAVEN ROAD, Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

8B, 8A, Melba St

Rezone 8,2,4,6,
MAVIS
PLACE,183,185,
BEACH HAVEN
ROAD,19,21,23,
HAYMAN PLACE,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8,2,4,6, MAVIS
PLACE,183,185,
BEACH HAVEN
ROAD,19,21,23,
HAYMAN PLACE,

Beach Haven

1 Hayman Pl,
Beach Haven
195,197,191,193,
187,189, Beach
Haven Rd

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

576

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support


alternative rezoning to MHS. 11 and 13 Fairfax Ave are
considered as part of an area-wide submission
requesting to upzone the Birkenhead/Onewa Rd area.
Properties sorth of Onewa Rd are near RFN and are
generally without constraints. Locational context such as
topography and the character of surrounding SH built
form makes MHS a suitable buffer. Rezoning to MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
retaining SH zone. Do not support spot zoning for a site
where SH most appropriately provide for identified
flooding constraints. Retention of the SH is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4004

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Beach Haven

MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4005

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

Rezone 11,9,13,15,7,
HAYMAN PLACE,1,5A,
MAVIS PLACE, Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
11,9,13,15,7,
HAYMAN
PLACE,1,5A,
MAVIS PLACE

LOCALITY

Beach Haven

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

577

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
retention of SH zone. The site is significantly affected by
the SEA. The outcomes of the SEA generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone. Rezoning would also create
spot zoning which will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of SH zone will be the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4006

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 52,
52 Lancaster Rd, Beach Haven
LANCASTER
10, 12,20, 14, 22,
ROAD,10,12,20,14,22 16, 18 Hayman Pl
,16,18, HAYMAN
PLACE, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 30,28,
HAYMAN PLACE,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4007

839-4008

839-4009

839-4010

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

30, 28 Hayman Pl Beach Haven

Rezone 34, HAYMAN 34 Hayman Pl, 18, Beach Haven


PLACE,18,20,
20 Lancaster Rd
LANCASTER ROAD,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 37,48,35,
HAYMAN PLACE,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37, 48, 35
Hayman Pl

MHS

Rezone 33,35,
JAPONICA DRIVE,
Beach Haven from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

33, 35 Japonica Dr Beach Haven

Beach Haven

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4011

839-4012

839-4013

839-4014

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 18A,
FAIRCLOUGH ROAD,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18A, FAIRCLOUGH Beach Haven


ROAD

Rezone 10,12,8,
SISPARA PLACE,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,12,8, SISPARA
PLACE

Rezone 42,
AEROVIEW DRIVE,2,
SISPARA PLACE,
Beach Haven from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 55,51,53,
LYSANDER CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban. 53 and 55 are
currently zoned
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

42 Aeroview
Drive, 2 Sispara
Place

Beach Haven

Beach Haven

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

578

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
No change
retaining SH zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and doe snot recognise local context. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
55. 51. 53
Lysander Cres

Beach Haven

SH

MHU

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support


alternative rezoning to MHS for 51 Lysander Cres.
Appropriate to rezone to MHS because managing
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4015

839-4016

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 13,43,41,
13, 43, 41
LYSANDER CRESCENT, Lysander Cres
Beach Haven from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Beach Haven

Rezone 10,8,12,4,6,
MIRAGE PLACE,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

10,8,12,4,6,
MIRAGE PLACE

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support


No change
retaining SH. Because spot zoning in this context will not
generally achieve integrated of resources and does not
recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4017

839-4018

839-4019

839-4020

839-4021

839-4022

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 46,48,
46, 48 Lysander
LYSANDER CRESCENT, Cres
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone
32, 30, 28, 36, 40, Beach Haven
32,30,28,36,40,34,42, 34, 42 Lysander
LYSANDER CRESCENT, Crescent
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone
25,27,21,23,19,31,29,
33, LYSANDER
CRESCENT,1,3,5,
MIRAGE PLACE,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 18,20,22,16,
LYSANDER CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25,27,21,23,19,31 Beach Haven


,29,33, LYSANDER
CRESCENT,1,3,5,
MIRAGE PLACE,

MHS

Rezone
69,63,73,65,71,
TAURUS CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

69,63,73,65,71,
TAURUS
CRESCENT,

Rezone 207,
RANGATIRA ROAD,4,
LYSANDER CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

207, RANGATIRA Beach Haven


ROAD,4,
LYSANDER
CRESCENT

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

579

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
18,20,22,16,
LYSANDER
CRESCENT

Beach Haven

Beach Haven

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4023

839-4024

839-4025

839-4026

839-4027

839-4028

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 10,8,
10, 8 Lysander
LYSANDER CRESCENT, Cres
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

Rezone 32,38,36,34,
TAURUS CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32, 38, 36, 34


Taurus Cres

Beach Haven

Rezone
24,10,26,12,20,14,22,
16,42,28,50,52,48,24
A, TAURUS
CRESCENT, Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 91,93,89,95,
TAURUS CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,10,26,12,20,14 Beach Haven


,22,16,42,28,50,5
2,48,24A, TAURUS
CRESCENT

Rezone 179,
RANGATIRA
ROAD,99,2,4,6,
TAURUS CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 39,41,
TAURUS CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

179 Rangatira Rd, Beach Haven


99, 2, 4, 6 Taurus
Cres

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

580

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
91,93,89,95,
TAURUS
CRESCENT

Beach Haven

39, 41 Taurus Cres Beach Haven

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4029

839-4030

839-4031

839-4032

839-4033

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 33,31,29,
TAURUS CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33, 31, 29 Tauraus Beach Haven


Cres

Rezone 25,23,
TAURUS CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25, 23 Taurus Cres Beach Haven

Rezone 11,13,
TAURUS CRESCENT,
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13, TAURUS
CRESCENT

Rezone 165,167,
165, 167
RANGATIRA ROAD,
Rangatira Rd
Beach Haven-Birkdale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

Beach Haven

Rezone
10,12,20,14,16,18 Beach Haven
10,12,20,14,16,18,
, GEMINI PLACE
GEMINI PLACE, Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

581

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4034

839-4035

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

Rezone
54B,54C,54A,54F,54D
,54E,56A,56B,56C,56
D,56E, VERRAN
ROAD, Birkdale from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Rezone
9I,9H,9K,9J,9M,9L,9O
,9N,9A,9C,9B,9E,9D,9
G,9F,9Q,9P,9S,9R,9U,
9T, AORANGI PLACE,
Birkenhead from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

54B,54C,54A,54F, Birkdale
54D,54E,56A,56B,
56C,56D,56E,
VERRAN ROAD,

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

Support change from SH to MHS for 54A, 54B, 54C, 54D,


54E, 56E, and 56D Verran Rd. Support retention of SH
zone for 54F, 56A, 56B, and 56C Verran Rd.

582

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

9I,9H,9K,9J,9M,9L Birkenhead
,9O,9N,9A,9C,9B,9
E,9D,9G,9F,9Q,9P,
9S,9R,9U,9T,
AORANGI PLACE

MHU

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS / SH

There are no identified constraints 54A, 54B, 54C, 54D,


54E, 56E, and 56D Verran Rd to require maintaining SH.
54F, 56A, 56B, and 56C Verran Rd are significantly
affected by the SEA. The outcomes of the SEA generally
align with the objectives of the SH zone.
Rezoning to 54A, 54B, 54C, 54D, 54E, 56E, and 56D
Verran Rd MHS and retention of SH zone for 54F, 56A,
56B, and 56C Verran Rd is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the respective zones and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support
retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-405

839-409

839-412

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 47 Lynn Rd


Suburban at 47, LYNN
ROAD, Bayview.

Bayview

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 3 Agincourt St


Urban at 3,
AGINCOURT STREET,
Glenfield.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 26 Shanaway Rse Hillcrest


Suburban at 26,
SHANAWAY RISE,
Hillcrest.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS. Managing the SEA on the site No change


does not require the application of SH. Retaining MHS is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-415

839-421

839-434

839-445

839-449

839-456

839-460

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 13 Glastron Pl


Suburban at 13,
GLASTRON PLACE,
Bayview.

Bayview

Retain Mixed Housing 25 Cheval Dr


Suburban at 25,
CHEVAL DRIVE,
Totara Vale.

Totara Vale

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 19 Vendeleur Ave Birkdale


Suburban at 19,
VANDELEUR AVENUE,
Birkdale.

MHS

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 4 Sunhaven Ave


Urban at 4,
SUNHAVEN AVENUE,
Glenfield.

Glenfield

MHU

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 238 Birkdale Rd


Suburban at 238,
BIRKDALE ROAD,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Retain Mixed Housing 44 Trias Rd


Suburban at 44,
TRIAS ROAD, Totara
Vale.

Totara Vale

Retain Mixed Housing 9 Tacitus Pl


Suburban at 9,
TACITUS PLACE,
Totara Vale.

Totara Vale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. The property is near a centre of
employment and RFN. There are no identified significant
constraints to require the application of the SH zone.
Retaining the zone with is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

583

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-461

839-464

839-467

839-469

839-477

839-501

839-509

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 16 Sevilla Pl


Suburban at 16,
SEVILLA PLACE,
Unsworth Heights.

Unsworth
heights

Retain Mixed Housing 15, Hiwihau Pl


Suburban at 15,
HIWIHAU PLACE,
Glenfield.

Glenfield

Retain Single House 40 Beach Haven


at 40, BEACH HAVEN Rd
ROAD, Beach Haven.

Beach Haven

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

Retain Mixed Housing 96 Lauderdale Rd Birkdale


Suburban at 96,
LAUDERDALE ROAD,
Birkdale.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 299 Beach Haven Beach Haven


Suburban at 299,
BEACH HAVEN ROAD,
Beach Haven.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 23 Tamahere Dr


Suburban at 23,
TAMAHERE DRIVE,
Glenfield.

Glenfield

MHS

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 22, POTTER
AVENUE, Northcote.

Northcote

22 Potter Ave

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

REASONS

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining SH. Though SH is not necessary to
manage flooding risks, rezoning will result in spot zoning
which will generally not achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the
local context. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

584

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-522

839-539

839-545

839-547

839-557

839-562

839-577

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 12B, 12 Hale Cres Bayview


Suburban at 12B,12,
HALE CRESCENT,
Bayview.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 9 Laser Pl


Suburban at 9, LASER
PLACE, Bayview.

MHS

Bayview

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 576 Glenfield Rd


Urban at 576,
GLENFIELD ROAD,
Glenfield.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 11 Chippendale


Suburban at 11,
Cres
CHIPPENDALE
CRESCENT, Birkdale.

Birkdale

Retain Mixed Housing 29 Chippendale


Suburban at 29,
Cres
CHIPPENDALE
CRESCENT, Birkdale.

Birkdale

Retain Mixed Housing 107 Hillside Rd


Suburban at 107,
HILLSIDE ROAD,
Wairau Valley.

Glenfield

Retain Single House 20 Packham Pl


at 20, PACKHAM
PLACE, Beach Haven.

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. The property is near the RFN.
There are no identified significant constraints to require
the application of the SH zone. Retaining the zone with is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining SH. Though SH is not necessary to
manage flooding risks, rezoning will result in spot zoning
which will generally not achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the
local context. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

585

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-578

839-596

839-600

839-604

839-614

839-633

839-635

839-637

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Single House 4 Ranch Ave


at 4, RANCH AVENUE,
Beach Haven.

LOCALITY

Beach Haven

Retain Mixed Housing 13 O'Donn Ave


Suburban at 13,
O'DONN AVENUE,
Beach Haven.

Beach Haven

Retain Mixed Housing 32 Salisbury Rd


Suburban at 32,
SALISBURY ROAD,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 6 Nutsey Ave


Urban at 6, NUTSEY
AVENUE, Northcote.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Single House


at 1, MCQUOID
PLACE,65, EASTON
PARK PARADE,
Glenfield.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 280 Glenfield Rd


Urban at 280,
GLENFIELD ROAD,
Glenfield.

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Single House


at 51, EASTON PARK
PARADE, Glenfield.

51, EASTON PARK Glenfield


PARADE

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 98, GREENSLADE
CRESCENT,
Northcote.

98 Greenslade
Cres

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

1, MCQUOID
PLACE,65,
EASTON PARK
PARADE,

Glenfield

Northcote

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

SH

MHU

SH

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

SH

MHU

SH

THAB

REASONS

Support retaining SH. Though there are no identified


significant constraints which require the application of
the SH zone, rezoning will result in spot zoning which will
generally not achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. Stormwater remediation
works will manage flooding risks on the site without the
need to maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining SH. The site is significantly affected by
the SEA. The outcomes of the SEA generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone. Retaining the SH zone will be
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

586

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support retaining MHU. The property is near the RFN.


No change
There are no identified significant constraints to require
the application of the SH zone. Retaining the zone with is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining SH. The site is significantly affected by No change
the SEA. The outcomes of the SEA generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone. Therefore, rezoning to SH will
be the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote
No change
town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-643

839-644

839-671

839-672

839-673

839-676

839-690

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 93 Spinella Dr


Suburban at 93,
SPINELLA DRIVE,
Bayview.

Bayview

Retain Mixed Housing 18 Beaudine Ave


Suburban at 18,
BEAUDINE AVENUE,
Glenfield.

Glenfield

Retain Mixed Housing 51 Meadowood


Suburban at 51,
Dr
MEADOWOOD
DRIVE, Unsworth
Heights.

Unsworth
heights

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2, SUNNYFIELD
CRESCENT,13,
KAIPATIKI ROAD,
Glenfield.

Glenfield

2 Sunnyfield
Crescent, 13
Kaipatiki Rd

Retain Mixed Housing 14 Flaxdale St


Suburban at 14,
FLAXDALE STREET,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 1 Sapphire Pl


Urban at 1, SAPPHIRE
PLACE, Bayview.

Bayview

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 12 Caribbean Dr


Suburban at 12,
CARIBBEAN DRIVE,
Unsworth Heights.

Unsworth
heights

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Glenfield
town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

587

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. The property is near the RFN.
No change
There are no identified significant constraints to require
the application of the SH zone. Retaining the zone with is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-692

839-7406

839-7408

839-743

839-7467

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 49 Caribbean Dr


Suburban at 49,
CARIBBEAN DRIVE,
Unsworth Heights.

Unsworth
heights

Rezone 5, GEMINI
PLACE, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5 Gemini Pl

Beach Haven

Rezone 15, GEMINI


PLACE, Beach Haven
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15 Gemini Pl

Beach Haven

Retain Mixed Housing 1 Helicon Pl, 77


Suburban at 1,
Trias Rd
HELICON PLACE,77,
TRIAS ROAD, Totara
Vale.

Totara Vale

Rezone 5 WAIMANA 5 Waimana Ave


AVENUE. Northcote
Point from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Northcote

Retain Mixed Housing 3 Chippendale


Suburban at 3,
Cres
CHIPPENDALE
CRESCENT, Birkdale.

Birkdale

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
retaining SH. These sites are affected by the HC and
retain the notified SH zone because the outcomes the HC
seeks to achieve genearlly align with the objectives of the
SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

588

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
839-747

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

MHS

MHS

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7514

839-7524

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 32 HELLYERS 32 Hellyers St


STREET. Birkdale from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 11 BENTLEY 11 Bentley Ave


AVENUE. Glenfield
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 2 NEA PLACE. 2 Nea Pl and 18


18 BEATRICE
Beatrice Ave
AVENUE. Hillcrest
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hillcrest

Rezone 21 WARATAH 21 Waratah St


STREET. Birkenhead
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 94 Eskdale Rd


Suburban at 94,
ESKDALE ROAD,
Birkdale-Birkenhead.

Birkdale

Rezone 3 EMIRAU
3 Emirau Pl
PLACE. Glenfield from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Glenfield

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

589

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
MHS
alternative rezoning to MHS where as managing flood
risks on site do not require maintaining SH zone.
Rezoning to MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve
the purpose of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7530

839-7536

839-756

839-7578

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHS

THAB

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Support
alternative zoning to MHU. The properties are near the
RFN and close to Birkenhead town centre. SH is not
required to manage the flooding risks on site. Hoever,
rezoning to THAB will create spot zoning that generally
do not achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHU to THAB. Support
retaining MHU. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7590

839-7618

839-7631

839-764

839-7643

839-7652

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 86 STANLEY 86 Stanley Rd


ROAD. 2 CONTESSA
DRIVE. Glenfield from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glenfield

Rezone 55
55 Marlborough
MARLBOROUGH
Ave
AVENUE. Glenfield
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Glenfield

Rezone 87 WELDENE 87 Weldene Ave


AVENUE. Glenfield
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 58 Tonar St


Urban at 58, TONAR
STREET, Northcote.

Northcote

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 7A
CHIPPENDALE
CRESCENT. Birkdale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

7A Chippendale
Cres

Rezone 25 FLAXDALE 25 Flaxdale Street Birkdale


STREET. Birkdale from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. Stormwater remediation works
will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and the RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
retaining SH zone. Do not support spot zoning for a site
where SH most appropriately provide for identified
flooding constraints. Retention of the SH is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

590

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7654

839-7688

839-7714

839-7719

839-7739

839-774

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

Rezone 75
MARLBOROUGH
AVENUE. Glenfield
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
75 Marlborough
Ave

LOCALITY

Glenfield

Rezone 298
298 Rangatira Rd
RANGATIRA ROAD.
Beach Haven-Birkdale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

Rezone 53 PEACH
53 Peach Rd
ROAD. Glenfield from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glenfield

Rezone 23
23 Sunnyhaven
SUNNYHAVEN
Ave
AVENUE. Beach
Haven from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 90 CHIVALRY 90 Chivalry Rd
ROAD. Glenfield from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Beach Haven

Retain Mixed Housing 54 Tonar St


Urban at 54, TONAR
STREET, Northcote.

Northcote

Glenfield

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU. The property is
adjacent to Beach Haven local centre and a future RFN.
Rezoning to MHS it the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

591

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Support


No change
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. Stormwater remediation works No change
will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and the RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7747

839-7778

839-7788

839-7792

839-7795

839-7857

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 28
28 Mannering Pl
MANNERING PLACE.
Hillcrest from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Hillcrest

Rezone 13
FAIRCLOUGH ROAD.
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

13 Fairclough Rd

Rezone 2/104, 1/104 2/104, 1/104


HILLSIDE ROAD.
HILLSIDE ROAD.
Wairau Valley from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Wairau Valley

Rezone 55 BAYVIEW 55 Bayview Rd


ROAD. Bayview from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bayview

Rezone 55 SEAVIEW 55 Seaview Rd


ROAD. Glenfield from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glenfield

Rezone 32
LANCASTER ROAD.
Beach Haven from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

32 Lancaster Rd

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

592

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7865

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 38 LYNDEN
38 Lynden Avenue Hillcrest
AVENUE. Hillcrest
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 23 WARATAH 23 Waratah St


STREET. Birkenhead
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Birkenhead

MHS

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 59 HILLCREST 59 Hillcrest Ave


AVENUE. Hillcrest
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Hillcrest

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Rezone 243 BIRKDALE 243 Birkdale Rd


ROAD. Birkdale from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Beach Haven

Rezone 9 GLENVALE
PLACE. Totara Vale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9 Glenvale Pl

Totara Vale

Rezone 42
STANAWAY STREET.
Hillcrest from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

42 Stanaway St

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

593

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support


No change
retaining SH. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7875

839-7887

839-7902

839-7917

839-7930

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Hillcrest

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to THAB. Support


alternative zoning to MHU. The properties are near the
RFN and close to Birkenhead town centre. SH is not
required to manage the flooding risks on site. Hoever,
rezoning to THAB will create spot zoning that generally
do not achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Rezoning to MHU is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHS. Support
retaining SH. The site is significantly affected by the SEA.
The outcomes of the SEA generally align with the
objectives of the SH zone. Therefore, rezoning to SH will
be the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. Support
retaining SH zone. Do not support spot zoning for a site
where SH most appropriately provide for identified
flooding constraints. Retention of the SH is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8000

839-8001

839-8002

839-806

839-820

839-823

839-830

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 14 BRUNTON 14 Brunton Pl


PLACE. Glenfield from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glenfield

Rezone 14A
14A Brunton Pl
BRUNTON PLACE.
Glenfield from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glenfield

Rezone 14B
14B Brunton Pl
BRUNTON PLACE.
Glenfield from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glenfield

Retain Mixed Housing 59 Castleton St


Suburban at 59,
CASTLETON STREET,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 75 Bruce Rd


Urban at 75, BRUCE
ROAD, Glenfield.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 53 Castleton St


Suburban at 53,
CASTLETON STREET,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Retain Mixed Housing 11 Hale Cres


Suburban at 11, HALE
CRESCENT, Bayview.

Bayview

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support


retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU. Support
retaining MHS because spot zoning in this context will
not generally achieve integrated of resources and does
not recognise local context. Inappropriate to encourage
greater residential intensity away from a centre or RFN.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. The property is near a centre of
employment and RFN. There are no identified significant
constraints to require the application of the SH zone.
Retaining the zone with is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

594

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-832

839-834

839-839

839-850

839-853

839-86

839-874

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 43 Vandeleur Ave Birkdale


Suburban at 43,
VANDELEUR AVENUE,
Birkdale.

MHS

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 177, LAKE ROAD,
Northcote.

177 Lake Rd

THAB

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 7, POTTER
AVENUE, Northcote.

7 Potter Ave

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 8 Julia Pl


Suburban at 8, JULIA
PLACE, Totara Vale.

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Northcote

Northcote

Totara Vale

Retain Mixed Housing 24 Stanaway St


Suburban at 24,
STANAWAY STREET,
Hillcrest.

Hillcrest

Retain Mixed Housing 6 Chippendale


Suburban at 6,
Cres
CHIPPENDALE
CRESCENT, Birkdale.

Birkdale

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 13-15, POTTER
AVENUE, Northcote.

Northcote

13-15 Potter Ave

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

REASONS

595

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote
No change
town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote


town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining THAB. The site is close to Northcote
town centre and RFN. Retaining THAB is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-877

839-879

839-886

839-890

839-892

839-905

839-910

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 92 Lauderdale Rd Birkdale


Suburban at 92,
LAUDERDALE ROAD,
Birkdale.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 92 Spinella Dr


Suburban at 92,
SPINELLA DRIVE,
Bayview.

MHS

Bayview

Retain Mixed Housing 54 Lauderdale Rd Birkdale


Suburban at 54,
LAUDERDALE ROAD,
Birkdale.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 19 Sabana Pl


Suburban at 19,
SABANA PLACE,
Unsworth Heights.

Unsworth
heights

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 20 Cheval Dr


Suburban at 20,
CHEVAL DRIVE,
Totara Vale.

Totara Vale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 125 Bruce Rd


Urban at 125, BRUCE
ROAD, Glenfield.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 16B Hale Cres


Suburban at 16B,
HALE CRESCENT,
Bayview.

Bayview

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

MHS

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. Stormwater remediation works
will manage flooding risks on the site without the need to
maintain a SH zone. The site is close to Northcote town
centre and the RFN. Retaining MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

596

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-917

839-92

839-932

839-990

839-991

839-992

839-993

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 98 Weldene Ave


Suburban at 98,
WELDENE AVENUE,
Glenfield.

Glenfield

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 137, SPINELLA


Urban at 137,
DRIVE, Bayview.
SPINELLA DRIVE,
Bayview.

Bayview

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 10 Glastron pl


Suburban at 10,
GLASTRON PLACE,
Bayview.

Bayview

Retain Mixed Housing 33, 31 Vandeleur


Suburban at 33,31,
Ave
VANDELEUR AVENUE,
Birkdale.

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 25, 27 Vandeleur Birkdale


Suburban at 25,27,
Ave, 147, 145, 149
VANDELEUR
Verbena Rd
AVENUE,147,145,149
, VERBENA ROAD,
Birkdale.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 11,10,13,12,15,14 Birkdale


Suburban at
,4,6,8, MERRILL
11,10,13,12,15,14,4,6 PLACE
,8, MERRILL PLACE,
Birkdale.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 9, 5, 7 Merril Pl


Suburban at 9,5,7,
MERRILL PLACE,
Birkdale.

MHS

Birkdale

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. The property is near the RFN.
There are no identified significant constraints to require
the application of the SH zone. Retaining the zone with is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

597

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-994

839-995

839-996

839-997

839-998

839-5039

839-5058

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 14,
ESKDALE
ROAD,26,38,32,30,28
,36,34, CHIPPENDALE
CRESCENT, Birkdale.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

14, ESKDALE
Birkdale
ROAD,26,38,32,30
,28,36,34,
CHIPPENDALE
CRESCENT

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 19, 15, 17


Birkdale
Suburban at
Chippendale Cres
19,15,17,
CHIPPENDALE
CRESCENT, Birkdale.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 14, 16


Birkdale
Suburban at 14,16,
Chippendale Cres
CHIPPENDALE
CRESCENT, Birkdale.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 9, 7, Lauderdale


Suburban at 9,7,
Rd
LAUDERDALE ROAD,
Birkdale.

MHS

Birkdale

Glenfield,
Northcote and
Birkenhead

Retain Mixed Housing 109,111,113,103, Glenfield


Urban at
107,105, BRUCE
109,111,113,103,107, ROAD,
105, BRUCE ROAD,
Glenfield.

MHU

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone 226, PUHINUI 226, PUHINUI


ROAD, Papatoetoe
ROAD,
from Single House to Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papatoetoe

SH

Rezone 8, ATKINSON 8, ATKINSON


AVENUE, Papatoetoe AVENUE,
from Single House to Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Papatoetoe

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

598

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of No change


intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHS. MHS allows for a suitable level of
intensification in keeping with the neighbourhood's built
form character. The site is not near a centre of the RFN
and there are no identified significant constraints to
require application of the SH zone. Retaining MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retaining MHU. The property is near a centre of
employment and RFN. There are no identified significant
constraints to require the application of the SH zone.
Retaining the zone with is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. This property
is within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA) and as such
there are reverse sensitivity constraints. The SH zone also
complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. This property
is within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The area
in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone.
To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support
retaining the SH zone.The SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning
to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5123

839-5373

839-5465

839-5467

839-6079

839-6080

839-6094

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone 2, ISLAY
2, ISLAY PLACE,
PLACE, Wiri from
Manukau
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone 148, PUHINUI 48, PUHINUI


Papatoetoe
ROAD, Papatoetoe
ROAD, Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Rezone 2, INVERELL
2, INVERELL
AVENUE, Wiri from
AVENUE, Wiri
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manukau

MHS

Rezone 28, INVERELL 28, INVERELL


AVENUE, Wiri from
AVENUE, Wiri
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manukau

Rezone 29, INVERELL 29, INVERELL


AVENUE, Wiri from
AVENUE, Wir
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manukau

Rezone 32, INVERELL 32, INVERELL


AVENUE, Wiri from
AVENUE, Wiri
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manukau

Rezone 41, CLENDON 41, CLENDON


AVENUE, Papatoetoe AVENUE,
from Single House to Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Papatoetoe

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Manukau

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHS

REASONS

Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The SH site


and nearby properties are affected by flooding
constraints. The site is also remote from Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and a significant distance from the
RFN. The retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. The site and
nearby properties are affected by flooding constraints.
The site is also remote from Manukau Metropolitian
Centre. The SH zone complements the neighbourhood's
suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The site is
also remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and a
significant distance from the RFN. The MHS zone
complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning MHS to THAB. The property is
remote from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and the
Great South Road Mixed Use zone. It is also a significant
distance from the RFN. The MHS zone also
complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and
nearby properties are affected by flooding constraints.
The site is also remote from Manukau Metropolitian
Centre. The SH zone complements the neighbourhood's
suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Property is
distant from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and Great
South Road Mixed Use zone. It is also a significant
distance from the RFN. The MHS zone also complements
the neighbourhood's suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. This property
is within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The area
in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone.
To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support
retaining the SH zone. The SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zoning
to provide for a range of activities and gives effect to the

599

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Has proximity to services (neighbourhood centre), FN
route and education / open space - consider MHU
appropriate zoning.

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Consider zone is appropriate to existing development
pattern

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7097

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
38,20,48,22,46,32,44,
42,36,40,34,52,50,
TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE,2, DRUCES
ROAD, Wiri from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

38,20,48,22,46,32 Manukau
,44,42,36,40,34,5
2,50, TREVOR
HOSKEN DRIVE,2,
DRUCES ROAD,
Wiri

SH

Rezone
11,13,1,3,5,7,9,
TOURMALIN
PLACE,1A,3, TREVOR
HOSKEN
DRIVE,24,26,12,14,22
,16, DRUCES ROAD,
Wiri from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,13,1,3,5,7,9,
Manukau
TOURMALIN
PLACE,1A,3,
TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE,24,26,12,1
4,22,16, DRUCES
ROAD, Wiri

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

600

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and No change


nearby properties have flooding constraints. Property is
distant from Manukau Metropolitian Centre and more
than 500 metres from good RFN and the proposed
Manukau public transport hub. The SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7098

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

THAB

Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The


No change
properties are remote from Manukau Metropolitian
Centre, more than 500 metres from the RFN and the
proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zone
also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Consider the site is appropriate for THAB to access to


employment, services and Centre
839-7099

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone 21, TREVOR


HOSKEN
DRIVE,10,5,7,8,
ZIRCON PLACE, Wiri
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

21, TREVOR
HOSKEN
DRIVE,10,5,7,8,
ZIRCON PLACE,
Wiri

Wiri

Rezone 10,8,6,
GRANITE
PLACE,11,1,3,5,7,9,
MARBLE PLACE, Wiri
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

10,8,6, GRANITE Manukau


PLACE,11,1,3,5,7,
9, MARBLE PLACE,
Wiri

MHS

THAB

Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The


No change
properties are remote from Manukau Metropolitian
Centre, more than 500 metres from the RFN and the
proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zone
also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7100

839-7101

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone 54,52,
54,52, INVERELL
INVERELL AVENUE,
AVENUE, Wiri
Wiri from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manukau

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The


properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre, more than 500 metres from the RFN and the
proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zone
also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support rezoning friom MHS to THAB. The


No change
properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre, more than 500 metres from the RFN and the
proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS zone
also complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

THAB

Oppose

Consider the site is appropriate for THAB to access to


employment, services and Centre

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7102

839-7103

839-7104

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SUMMARY

Rezone 1,9,7, ISLAY


PLACE,39,45,43,41,
INVERELL AVENUE,
Wiri from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1,9,7, ISLAY
Manukau
PLACE,39,45,43,4
1, INVERELL
AVENUE, Wiri

Rezone 46,44,42,48, 46,44,42,48,


INVERELL AVENUE,
INVERELL
Wiri from Mixed
AVENUE, Wiri
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manukau

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

Rezone
753,749,751,747,
GREAT SOUTH
ROAD,12A,12B,14,10
B,10C,10A, ISLAY
PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

753,749,751,747, Papatoetoe
GREAT SOUTH
ROAD,12A,12B,14
,10B,10C,10A,
ISLAY PLACE,
Papatoetoe

SH

Rezone 18, ILIAD


PLACE,26, INVERELL
AVENUE,10,4, IXIA
PLACE, Wiri from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

18, ILIAD
Manukau
PLACE,26,
INVERELL
AVENUE,10,4, IXIA
PLACE, Wiri

MHS

Rezone 10,12,14,
INVERELL AVENUE,5,
ILIAD PLACE, Wiri
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

10,12,14,
INVERELL
AVENUE,5, ILIAD
PLACE, Wiri

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

601

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and No change


nearby properties are affected by flooding constraints.
The properties are remote from the Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and more 500 metres from the RFN
route. The SH zone complements the suburban built
character and retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The
No change
properties are also remote from the Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and more than 500 metres from the
RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub.
The MHS zone complements the suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. The site and No change
nearby properties are affected by flooding constraints.
The properties are remote Manukau Metropolitian
Centre and more 500 metres from the RFN route. The SH
zone complements the suburban built character and
retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7106

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

THAB

Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The


No change
properties are also remote from the Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and more than 500 metres from the
RFN and the proposed Manukau public transport hub.
The MHS zoning complements the suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7107

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Manukau

THAB

Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The


No change
properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre and a significant distance from the RFN and the
proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7108

839-7644

839-7955

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
10,8,12,14,16,
Manukau
10,8,12,14,16, ILIAD ILIAD PLACE, Wiri
PLACE, Wiri from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 20 DRUCES
ROAD. Wiri from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

20 DRUCES ROAD Manukau

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone 118 PUHINUI 18 PUHINUI ROAD Papatoetoe


ROAD. Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone 36A PLUNKET 36A PLUNKET


AVENUE. PuhinuiAVENUE
Manukau City Centre
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

602

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The


No change
properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre and a significant distance from the RFN and the
proposed Manukau public transport hub. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The
No change
properties are remote from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre and a significant distance from the RFN. The MHS
suburban zone is separated by a POS zone from a new
THAB area. The MHS zone complements the suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH toTHAB. The SH site
No change
and nearby properties are affected by flooding
constraints. The retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-8005

839-2119

839-2120

839-2121

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
11,25,13,15,21,17,23,
19,7,9, PANTERA
WAY, Manurewa.

Manukau

11,25,13,15,21,17 Manukau
,23,19,7,9,
PANTERA WAY,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 3,5, PANTERA


Manukau
Suburban at 3,5,
WAY, Manurewa.
PANTERA WAY,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 8,4,6, PANTERA Manukau


Suburban at 8,4,6,
WAY, Manurewa.
PANTERA WAY,
Manurewa.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. The area in


question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. To
manage future reverse sensitivity effects it is proposed
that the area be retained as a SH zone. The site and
nearby properties also are affected by flooding
constraints. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zoning and gives effect
Support the retention of the MHS zoning for these sites.
These properties are a significant distance from the RFN
and are not close to the Manukau Metropolitan Centre.
This area is mainly of suburban dwellings. The MHS zone
complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the MHS zoning for these sites.
These properties are a significant distance from the RFN
and are not close to the Manukau Metropolitan Centre.
This area is mainly of suburban dwellings. The MHS zone
complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the MHS zoning for these sites.
These properties are a significant distance from the RFN
and are not close to the Manukau Metropoliian Centre.
This area is mainly of suburban dwellings. The MHS zone
complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2313

839-2489

839-2551

839-5458

839-5463

839-5566

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Retain
Neighbourhood
Centre at 4 NOEL
BURNSIDE ROAD.
Wiri.

4 NOEL BURNSIDE Manukau


ROAD. Wiri.

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Retain
Neighbourhood
Centre at 8 NOEL
BURNSIDE ROAD.
Wiri.

8 NOEL
Manukau
BURNSIDE ROAD.
Wiri.

Retain
Neighbourhood
Centre at 6 NOEL
BURNSIDE ROAD.
Wiri.

6 NOEL
Manukau
BURNSIDE ROAD.
Wiri.

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

PAUP ZONE

NC

NC

NC

Rezone 4, ZIRCON
4, ZIRCON PLACE Manukau
PLACE, Wiri from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 14, CELADON 14, CELADON


PLACE, Wiri from
PLACE,
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 767A767D,765A-765C,
GREAT SOUTH
ROAD,14A-14D,12A12F, IONo PLACE,
Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manukau

767A-767D,765A- Manukau
765C, GREAT
SOUTH ROAD,14A14D,12A-12F,
IONo PLACE,
Papatoetoe

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

NC

NC

NC

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of current NC zone. This NC zoning at


Noel Burnside Road, Wiri can has a role and function for
the surrounding Papatoetoe residential area and the Wiri
industrial area. Retention of the NC zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the centres strategy and hierarchy in
Support the retention of the NC zoning for this site. The
NC zone provides for a variety of local shops that service
both residential and industrial areas.These properties are
a significant distance from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre. The NC zone complements the neighbourhood's
built character and retention of the NC zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the NC zoning for this site. The
NC zone provides for a variety of local shops that service
both residential and industrial areas.These properties are
a significant distance from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre. The NC zone complements the neighbourhood's
built character and retention of the NC zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB zoning. This
property is remote from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre and significant distance from the RFN . In
addition spot zoning in this location will not generally
deliver integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The MHS zone also
complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the this
Do not support change from MHS to THAB zoning. This
property is remote from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre and asignificant distance from the RFN. In
addition spot zoning in this location will not generally
deliver integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The MHS zone also
complements the neighbourhood's suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area
is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and
adjacent to the RFN. THAB is not supported as the area
is remote from the Manukau MC zone and the area does
not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

603

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
NC

Support

NC

Support

NC

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5725

839-5780

839-5782

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SUMMARY

Rezone 3, GREAT
SOUTH ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
3, GREAT SOUTH
ROAD,

Rezone 8, TOPAZ
8, TOPAZ PLACE,
PLACE, Wiri from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 5, TREVOR
HOSKEN DRIVE,2,
TOURMALIN PLACE,
Wiri from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Manukau

Manukau

5, TREVOR
Manukau
HOSKEN DRIVE,2,
TOURMALIN
PLACE,

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

604

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area MHU


is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and
adjacent to the RFN route. In addition spot zoning in this
location will not generally deliver integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from MHS to THAB . The site is No change
significant distance from Manukau Metropolitian Centre
or TC zone. It is also a significant distance from the RFN.
In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally
deliver integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The MHS zone complements
the suburban built character and retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB . The site is No change
significant distance from Manukau Metropolitian Centre
or TC zone. It is also a significant distance from the RFN.
The MHS zone complements the suburban built character
and retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5828

839-5992

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone 13,
3, ATKINSON
ATKINSON AVENUE, AVENUE,
Papatoetoe from
Papatoetoe
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.13,
ATKINSON AVENUE, P

Rezone 15, COSTAR


PLACE, Wiri from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

15, COSTAR PLACE Manukau

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from SH to MHS. This property


No change
falls within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The
area in question is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI
zone. As such there are reverse sensitivity constraints.
To manage future reverse sensitivity effects, I support
retaining the SH zone. In addition spot zoning in this
location will not generally deliver integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to
Do not support change in zone from MHS to MHU . The No change
site is significant distance from the Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and THAB zone as well as a
significant distance from the RFN. In addition spot
zoning in this location will not generally deliver
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The MHS zone complements the
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5994

839-6020

839-6123

839-6418

839-6419

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 4, CELADON
PLACE,17-19,
TOURMALIN PLACE,
Wiri from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

4, CELADON
PLACE,17-19,
TOURMALIN
PLACE,

Rezone 12, BURRELL


AVENUE, Wiri from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

12, BURRELL
AVENUE, Wiri

Rezone 25, FREYBERG 25, FREYBERG


AVENUE, Papatoetoe AVENUE,
from Single House to Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Rezone 278,278A,
PUHINUI ROAD,6,
BURRELL AVENUE,
Papatoetoe from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 8, BURRELL
AVENUE,272,
PUHINUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Manukau

Manukau

Papatoetoe

278,278A,
Papatoetoe
PUHINUI ROAD,6,
BURRELL AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

8, BURRELL
AVENUE,272,
PUHINUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change in zone from MHS to THAB . The


site is remote from from Manukau Metropolitian Centre
and a significant distance from the RFN. In addition
spot zoning in this location will not generally deliver
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. The MHS zone complements the
suburban built character and retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change in zoning from SH to MHU. The
site is significant distance from the Manukau
Metropolitian Centre and is subject to the High Aircraft
Noise Overlay (HANA) and as such there are reverse
sensitivity constraints. The sie is also not close to THAB.
In addition spot zoning in this location will not generally
deliver integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. Retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change from SH to MHS. This property
falls within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA). The
area is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. As
such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. To manage
future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the
SH zone. In addition spot zoning in this location will not
generally deliver integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zoning. The site
is significant distance from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre and property falls within the High Aircraft Noise
Area (HANA). The area is also in close proximity to the
Wiri HI zone. As such there are reverse sensitivity
constraints. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects,
I support retaining the SH zone. In addition spot zoning
in this location will not generally deliver integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU zoning. The site
is significant distance from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre and property falls within the High Aircraft Noise
Area (HANA). The area is also in close proximity to the
Wiri HI zone. As such there are reverse sensitivity
constraints. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects,
I support retaining the SH zone. In addition spot zoning
in this location will not generally deliver integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to

605

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Consider this consistent with current development pattern


No change

MHS

Oppose

Consider this consistent with current development


pattern, recognise HANA constraint for further
intensification zoning
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6419

839-7105

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SUMMARY

Rezone 8, BURRELL
AVENUE,272,
PUHINUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone
775,777,779,781,773,
GREAT SOUTH ROAD,
Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
8, BURRELL
AVENUE,272,
PUHINUI ROAD

LOCALITY

Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

775,777,779,781,
773, GREAT
SOUTH ROAD,
Papatoetoe

REASONS

606

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from SH to MHU zoning. The site No change


is significant distance from the Manukau Metropolitian
Centre and property falls within the High Aircraft Noise
Area (HANA). The area is also in close proximity to the
Wiri HI zone. As such there are reverse sensitivity
constraints. To manage future reverse sensitivity effects,
I support retaining the SH zone. In addition spot zoning
in this location will not generally deliver integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to
Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area MHU
is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and
adjacent to the RFN .THAB is not supported as the area
is remote from the Manukau MC zone and the area does
not have high amenity. The MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7109

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone
98,88,102,90,100,92,
106,94,104,96,
TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE,55,57,51,53,49
, KERRS ROAD, Wiri
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manukau

MHS

THAB

98,88,102,90,100,
92,106,94,104,96,
TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE,55,57,51,5
3,49, KERRS
ROAD,

Do not support change from MHS to THAB zoning. The No change


sites in question are remote from the MC or TC zoning
and a significant distance from the RFN. Retention of the
mHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7110

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone
11,10,13,12,15,14,4,6
,9, AMETHYST
PLACE,38,58,48,46,54
,44,42,50,52,62,64,
DRUCES
ROAD,77,61,73,79,
KERRS ROAD,1,3,
CELADON PLACE,47,
TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE, Wiri from
Mixed House
Suburban and Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone
Manukau
11,10,13,12,15,14
,4,6,9, AMETHYST
PLACE,38,58,48,4
6,54,44,42,50,52,
62,64, DRUCES
ROAD,77,61,73,79
, KERRS ROAD,1,3,
CELADON
PLACE,47,
TREVOR HOSKEN
DRIVE, Wiri

SH

THAB

Do not support change from MHS and SH to THAB


No change
zoning. The sites in question are remote from the MC or
TC zoning and a significant distance from the RFN. The SH
zoned sites are affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is appropriate Retention
of the MHS and SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zoning and gives effect to
the RPS.
THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7111

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 1,9,5,7, RATA


VINE
DRIVE,11,13,11A,17,1
3A,3,5,7,9,1/15,2/15,
BEGONIA PLACE, Wiri
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1,9,5,7, RATA
Manukau
VINE
DRIVE,11,13,11A,
17,13A,3,5,7,9,1/
15,2/15, BEGONIA
PLACE, Wiri

MHS

Rezone
10,8A,2,2A,6,8,4,
BEGONIA
PLACE,7A,1,3,5,7,9,
ENID PLACE, Wiri
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

10,8A,2,2A,6,8,4, Manukau
BEGONIA
PLACE,7A,1,3,5,7,
9, ENID PLACE,
Wiri

MHS

Rezone 44A44F,38,42,40, RATA


VINE
DRIVE,11,13,15,19,1,
3,5E,5D,5G,5F,5A,5C,
5B, AZALEA PLACE,
Wiri from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

44A-44F,38,42,40, Manukau
RATA VINE
DRIVE,11,13,15,1
9,1,3,5E,5D,5G,5F,
5A,5C,5B, AZALEA
PLACE, Wiri

MHS

Rezone 8,2,6,
LAURELIA
PLACE,2,4B,4A, RATA
VINE DRIVE, Wiri
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

8,2,6, LAURELIA Manukau


PLACE,2,4B,4A,
RATA VINE DRIVE,
Wiri

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

607

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area MHU


is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and
adjacent to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area
is remote from the Manukau MC zone and does not have
high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7112

839-7113

839-7114

839-7115

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Rezone
24,10,12,20,14,22 Manukau
24,10,12,20,14,22,
, LAURELIA PLACE,
LAURELIA PLACE, Wiri Wiri
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area MHU


is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and
adjacent to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area
is remote from the Manukau MC zone and does not have
high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is MHU


close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent
to the RFN. THAB is not supported as the area is remote
from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high
amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is MHU


close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent
to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area is remote
from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high
amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is MHU


close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent
to the RFN. THAB is not supported as the area is remote
from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high
amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7116

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 1,3,5A,7,
LAURELIA
PLACE,10,12,18,16,
RATA VINE DRIVE,
Wiri from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1,3,5A,7,
Manukau
LAURELIA
PLACE,10,12,18,1
6, RATA VINE
DRIVE, Wiri

MHS

Rezone 15, LAURELIA


PLACE,24,10,12,20,14
,22,16,18,8, FELICIA
PLACE, Wiri from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

15, LAURELIA
Manukau
PLACE,24,10,12,2
0,14,22,16,18,8,
FELICIA PLACE,
Wir

MHS

Rezone
11,25,13,27,15,21,17,
23,19,39,31,37,26,35,
29,33,3,5,7,41,
FELICIA
PLACE,10,12,20,14,16
,18,6,8, AZALEA
PLACE,32,36,34,
RATA VINE DRIVE,21,
LAURELIA PLACE, Wiri
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,25,13,27,15,21 Manukau
,17,23,19,39,31,3
7,26,35,29,33,3,5,
7,41, FELICIA
PLACE,10,12,20,1
4,16,18,6,8,
AZALEA
PLACE,32,36,34,
RATA VINE
DRIVE,21,
LAURELIA PLACE,
Wiri

MHS

Rezone
25,27,21,19,31,35,33,
37A-37E,1/29-4/29,
RATA VINE
DRIVE,4,1/6-6/6,
ENID PLACE, Wiri
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

25,27,21,19,31,35 Manukau
,33,37A-37E,1/294/29, RATA VINE
DRIVE,4,1/6-6/6,
ENID PLACE, Wiri

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

608

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is MHU


close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent
to the RFN .THAB is not supported as the area is remote
from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high
amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7117

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

THAB

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is MHU


close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent
to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area is remote
from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high
amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7118

839-7433

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

THAB

THAB

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is MHU


close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent
to the RFN . THAB is not supported as the area is remote
from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high
amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area is MHU


close to the MU zone on Great South Road and adjacent
to the RFN. THAB is not supported as the area is remote
from the Manukau MC zone and does not have high
amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7460

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 17 RATA VINE 17 RATA VINE


DRIVE. 2 ENID PLACE, DRIVE. 2 ENID
Wiri from Mixed
PLACE, Wiri
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Manukau

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

609

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change in zoning from MHS to MHU. The area MHU


is close to the MU zone on Great South Road and
adjacent to the RFN. THAB is not supported as the area
is remote from the Manukau MC zone and does not have
high amenity. The MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7872

839-8010

839-7081

839-2524

839-2492

839-2109

839-2040

Highbrook and Manukau


City
Rezone
11Central Business
11
Manukau
MEADOWCOURT
MEADOWCOURT
DRIVE, Manukau
DRIVE, Manukau
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Highbrook and
Manukau City
Central Business

SH

Rezone 26A
BALLANCE AVENUE.
Papatoetoe from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

26A BALLANCE
AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,13,


West)
TANNOCK PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Retain Mixed Housing
west)
Suburban at 1
CHANTELLE PLACE. 20
FERNDOWN AVENUE.
Papatoetoe.
Urban (central and Retain Mixed Housing
west)
Suburban at 1
NAVIGATOR PLACE.
Papatoetoe.
Urban (central and Retain Mixed Housing
west)
Suburban at 1,
HOLBORN PLACE,49,
CATKIN CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

11,13, TANNOCK
PLACE, Mangere
East

Urban (central and


west)

1/28AWymondley
3/28A,38,34A,48,46,
32,44,30,42,36,40,3
4,36A, FIRTH
CRESCENT, Otara.

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 1/28A3/28A,38,34A,48,46,32,
44,30,42,36,40,34,36A,
FIRTH CRESCENT, Otara.

Papatoetoe

Mangere East

MHS

1 CHANTELLE
Papatoetoe
PLACE. 20
FERNDOWN
AVENUE.
Papatoetoe.
1 NAVIGATOR
Papatoetoe
PLACE. Papatoetoe.

MHS

1, HOLBORN
PLACE,49, CATKIN
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

MHS

Papatoetoe

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Do not support change from MHS to MHU zoning. This No change


would create spot zone within this block. (This was the
only submission within this area.) Spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The MHS zone complements the
neighbourhood's suburban built character and retention
of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change from SH to MHU zoning. The
No change
property falls within the High Aircraft Noise Area (HANA).
The area is also in close proximity to the Wiri HI zone. As
such there are reverse sensitivity constraints. To manage
future reverse sensitivity effects, I support retaining the
SH zone. In addition spot zoning in this location will not
generally deliver integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zoning and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are
located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN. The NGC which is close to the edge of
this was considered but it was not sufficient reason not rezone
this site. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
Support retention of MHS zoning. The area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close


No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1676

839-1851

839-1862

839-2044

839-2013

839-1818

839-2019

839-2108

839-1766

839-2743

839-2012

839-1836

839-2015

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 1/42-4/42,


Suburban at 1/42-4/42, SWAFFIELD ROAD,
SWAFFIELD ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Papatoetoe.

LOCALITY

Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 10,
DAPHNE ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 10, FIRTH
CRESCENT,52,
WYMONDLEY ROAD,
Otara.

10, DAPHNE ROAD, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe.

MHS

10, FIRTH
CRESCENT,52,
WYMONDLEY
ROAD, Otara.

Wymondley

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
10,12,14,18,16,
BILLINGTON AVENUE,
Otara.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 101,95,97,
PAH ROAD,3,5, DAPHNE
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

10,12,14,18,16,
BILLINGTON
AVENUE, Otara.

Wymondley

101,95,97, PAH
Papatoetoe
ROAD,3,5, DAPHNE
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 106, PAH
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

106, PAH ROAD,


Papatoetoe.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 107,105,
HILLCREST ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 11,13,
CATKIN CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

107,105, HILLCREST Papatoetoe


ROAD, Papatoetoe.

MHS

11,13, CATKIN
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

Retain Mixed Housing 11,9, FIRTH


Suburban at 11,9, FIRTH CRESCENT, Otara.
CRESCENT, Otara.

Wymondley

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 111A PAH
ROAD. Papatoetoe.
(Not mapped?)

Papatoetoe

111A PAH ROAD.


Papatoetoe.

MHS

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 115,121,117,119,11 Papatoetoe


Suburban at
3, PAH ROAD,
115,121,117,119,113,
Papatoetoe.
PAH ROAD, Papatoetoe.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 117,
HILLSIDE ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 12,16,
LISMORE PLACE,
Papatoetoe.

117, HILLSIDE
Papatoetoe
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

MHS

12,16, LISMORE
Papatoetoe
PLACE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

610

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close


No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
No change
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2011

839-1658

839-1576

839-1719

839-1631

839-1542

839-2036

839-1678

839-2046

839-2047

839-2107

839-1807

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

120,120A,118B,118, Papatoetoe
118A, PAH ROAD,
Papatoetoe.

MHS

129, HILLSIDE
Papatoetoe
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

MHS

136, GRAY AVENUE, Middlemore


MiddlemorePapatoetoe.

MHS

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 15,
LENDENFELD DRIVE,
Papatoetoe.

15, LENDENFELD
Papatoetoe
DRIVE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 154,
HILLSIDE ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 17,
HEATHBERRY CLOSE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at
18,20,22,16, FIRTH
CRESCENT,3,5,7,
KINGSFORD PLACE,
Otara.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 19, NOGAT
AVENUE, Papatoetoe.

154, HILLSIDE
Papatoetoe
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

MHS

17, HEATHBERRY
Papatoetoe
CLOSE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

18,20,22,16, FIRTH Wymondley


CRESCENT,3,5,7,
KINGSFORD PLACE,
Otara.

MHS

19, NOGAT AVENUE, Middlemore


Papatoetoe.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 19,17,
BILLINGTON AVENUE,
Otara.

19,17, BILLINGTON
AVENUE, Otara.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 1A,9,3,5,7,
BILLINGTON
AVENUE,68,66,70,
FIRTH CRESCENT, Otara.

1A,9,3,5,7,
BILLINGTON
AVENUE,68,66,70,
FIRTH CRESCENT,
Otara.

Wymondley

Retain Mixed Housing


2, DAPHNE ROAD,
Suburban at 2, DAPHNE Papatoetoe.
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
120,120A,118B,118,118
A, PAH ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 129,
HILLSIDE ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 136, GRAY
AVENUE, MiddlemorePapatoetoe.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 218,
HILLSIDE ROAD,
Papatoetoe.

Wymondley

218, HILLSIDE
Papatoetoe
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close


proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - the property is located a
considerable distance from Papatoetoe Town Centre. Support
retention of MHS which is compatible with the surrounding
area zoning. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding-related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of Single House zoning as the growth is
limited at this area due to significant flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

611

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close


No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
No change
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zones and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
No change
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained No change
by flooding-related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1657

839-1808

839-2288

839-2039

839-2045

839-2719

839-1821

839-1823

839-1775

839-2038

839-1546

839-1819

839-2106

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 22,
MALASPINA PLACE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 24, MALTE
BRUN PLACE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 25, 23
CASPAR ROAD.
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at
25,13,15,21,17,23,19,7,
FIRTH CRESCENT, Otara.

22, MALASPINA
Papatoetoe
PLACE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

24, MALTE BRUN


Papatoetoe
PLACE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

25, 23 CASPAR
Hunters Corner
ROAD. Papatoetoe.

MHS

25,13,15,21,17,23,1 Wymondley
9,7, FIRTH
CRESCENT, Otara.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 25,21,23,
BILLINGTON AVENUE,
Otara.

25,21,23,
BILLINGTON
AVENUE, Otara.

MHS

Wymondley

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing 26 CAPITAL PLACE.


Suburban at 26 CAPITAL Papatoetoe.
PLACE. Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing 26, CATKIN


Suburban at 26, CATKIN CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe. Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing 27, CATKIN


Suburban at 27, CATKIN CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe. Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 27,
SKIPTON STREET,
Mangere East.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 28,26,24A,
FIRTH CRESCENT, Otara.

27, SKIPTON
STREET, Mangere
East.

Mangere East

28,26,24A, FIRTH
CRESCENT, Otara.

Wymondley

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing 3, CATKIN


Suburban at 3, CATKIN CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe. Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 3,
FERNDOWN AVENUE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 35,
ALABASTER DRIVE,4,
NAVIGATOR PLACE,
Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

PAUP ZONE

3, FERNDOWN
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe.

35, ALABASTER
Papatoetoe
DRIVE,4,
NAVIGATOR PLACE,
Papatoetoe.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close


proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding-related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zoning. This area is not in
close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

612

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1608

839-1548

839-1555

839-1571

839-1787

839-1669

839-1741

839-1583

839-1890

839-1539

839-1598

839-1835

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 4, DAPHNE
ROAD,12, CHANTELLE
PLACE, Papatoetoe.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

4, DAPHNE
ROAD,12,
CHANTELLE PLACE,
Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Retain Mixed Housing 40, HAMILL ROAD,


Suburban at 40, HAMILL Otara.
ROAD, Otara.

Otara North

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


24, HAMILL ROAD, Otara North
Suburban at 24, HAMILL Otara.
ROAD, Otara.

MHS

Retain Terrace Housing


and Apartment
Buildings at 150, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 4,
HOLBORN PLACE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 4,
MAGELLAN PLACE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 4, QUINTAL
PLACE, Papatoetoe.

150, EAST TAMAKI Otara North


ROAD, PapatoetoeEast Tamaki.

THAB

4, HOLBORN PLACE, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe.

MHS

4, MAGELLAN
Papatoetoe
PLACE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

4, QUINTAL PLACE,
Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 82, HILLS
ROAD, Otara.

82, HILLS ROAD,


Otara.

Otara North

Retain Mixed Housing 40, CATKIN


Suburban at 40, CATKIN CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe. Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 40,
LENDENFELD DRIVE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 19,
BOLTON PLACE, Otara.

40, LENDENFELD
Papatoetoe
DRIVE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

19, BOLTON PLACE, Otara North


Otara.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 44,
WYMONDLEY ROAD,
Otara.

44, WYMONDLEY
ROAD, Otara.

Wymondley

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

613

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained


by flooding-related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning where managing flooding
risks on those sites does not require maintaining a SH zone.
Area is also not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre and
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - It is
located on a main arterial road with the RFN, and is adjacent to
Otara Town Centre. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close


proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related-environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2305

839-1737

839-2037

839-1738

839-1582

839-1646

839-2049

839-2720

839-1767

839-2016

839-2042

839-2246

839-1824

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing 46 CASPAR ROAD.


Suburban at 46 CASPAR Papatoetoe.
ROAD. Papatoetoe.

Hunters Corner

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 46, PAH
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

46, PAH ROAD,


Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
46,54,50,48,
WYMONDLEY
ROAD,4,6, FIRTH
CRESCENT, Otara.
Urban (central and Retain Mixed Housing
west)
Suburban at 49,
ALABASTER DRIVE,
Papatoetoe.
Urban (central and Retain Mixed Housing
west)
Suburban at 49,
SKIPTON STREET,
Mangere East.
Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing
West)
Suburban at 23, HAMILL
ROAD, Otara.

46,54,50,48,
WYMONDLEY
ROAD,4,6, FIRTH
CRESCENT, Otara.

Wymondley

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
49,47,45,51,43,53,
FIRTH
CRESCENT,76,74,72,78,
WYMONDLEY ROAD,
Otara.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 5 CAPITAL
PLACE. Papatoetoe.

49,47,45,51,43,53, Wymondley
FIRTH
CRESCENT,76,74,72,
78, WYMONDLEY
ROAD, Otara.

MHS

5 CAPITAL PLACE.
Papatoetoe.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 5,
STERLING STREET,
Otara.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 53A,53,
PAH ROAD, Papatoetoe.

5, STERLING STREET, Wymondley


Otara.

MHS

53A,53, PAH ROAD, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

MHS

MHS

49, ALABASTER
Papatoetoe
DRIVE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

49, SKIPTON
STREET, Mangere
East.

Mangere East

MHS

23, HAMILL ROAD,


Otara.

Otara North

Papatoetoe

Retain Mixed Housing 54,52, FIRTH


Suburban at 54,52,
CRESCENT, Otara.
FIRTH CRESCENT, Otara.

Wymondley

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 55 PAH
ROAD. Papatoetoe.

55 PAH ROAD.
Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 55,
FERNDOWN AVENUE,
Papatoetoe.

55, FERNDOWN
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

614

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close


No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
No change
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of notified MHS zoning. This area is not in
close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for considering
change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close


proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1589

839-1705

839-1853

839-1822

839-1727

839-1729

839-1635

839-2043

839-2041

839-1764

839-1638

839-2279

839-1838

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 6,
KOMAKO PLACE,
Papatoetoe.
Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing
West)
Suburban at 54, HAMILL
ROAD, Otara.

6, KOMAKO PLACE, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe.

MHS

54, HAMILL ROAD,


Otara.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

6, LENDENFELD
Papatoetoe
DRIVE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

6, OLIVE CRESCENT, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe.

MHS

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 34,
WILLIAMS CRESCENT,
Otara.
Urban (central and Retain Mixed Housing
west)
Suburban at 43, HAMILL
ROAD, Otara.

34, WILLIAMS
CRESCENT, Otara.

Otara North

MHS

43, HAMILL ROAD,


Otara.

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

60, FERNDOWN
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

60,62,58, FIRTH
CRESCENT,2,4,6,
BILLINGTON
AVENUE, Otara.

Wymondley

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 6,
LENDENFELD DRIVE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 6, OLIVE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 60,
FERNDOWN AVENUE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 60,62,58,
FIRTH CRESCENT,2,4,6,
BILLINGTON AVENUE,
Otara.

Urban (central and


west)

Otara North

MHS

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
60,68,62,64,66,
WYMONDLEY
ROAD,27,33,37,29,29A,
3, FIRTH CRESCENT,
Otara.
Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing
West)
Suburban at 28,
WILLIAMS CRESCENT,
Otara.

60,68,62,64,66,
Wymondley
WYMONDLEY
ROAD,27,33,37,29,2
9A,3, FIRTH
CRESCENT, Otara.

MHS

28, WILLIAMS
CRESCENT, Otara.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 63, PAH
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

63, PAH ROAD,


Papatoetoe.

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing 7 MCLEAN AVENUE. Hunters Corner


Suburban at 7 MCLEAN Papatoetoe.
AVENUE. Papatoetoe.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing 7, QUINTAL PLACE,


Suburban at 7, QUINTAL Papatoetoe.
PLACE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

Otara North

Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

615

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified MHS zoning. This area is not in


close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for considering
change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for considering
change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close


proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained


by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1769

839-2615

839-1550

839-2048

839-1699

839-2616

839-2018

839-1581

839-1713

839-2014

839-1718

839-1717

839-2258

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 53, HILLS
ROAD, Otara.

53, HILLS ROAD,


Otara.

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 76 PAH
ROAD. Papatoetoe.

76 PAH ROAD.
Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Single House at


17, GEE PLACE,
Mangere East.

17, GEE PLACE,


Mangere East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing 76,74, FIRTH


Suburban at 76,74,
CRESCENT, Otara.
FIRTH CRESCENT, Otara.

Otara North

Wymondley

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 40,
KOHINOOR AVENUE,
Mangere.

40, KOHINOOR
Mangere
AVENUE, Mangere.

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 76A PAH
ROAD. Papatoetoe.

76A PAH ROAD.


Papatoetoe.

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 77,75,
ALABASTER DRIVE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 80,
ALABASTER DRIVE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 59,
ARCHBOYD AVENUE,
Mangere East.

77,75, ALABASTER Papatoetoe


DRIVE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

80, ALABASTER
Papatoetoe
DRIVE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

59, ARCHBOYD
AVENUE, Mangere
East.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
80,84,78A,78B, PAH
ROAD, Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 9,
NAVIGATOR PLACE,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Single House at
12, PEACHWOOD
GROVE, Favona.

80,84,78A,78B, PAH Papatoetoe


ROAD, Papatoetoe.

MHS

9, NAVIGATOR
Papatoetoe
PLACE, Papatoetoe.

MHS

12, PEACHWOOD
GROVE, Favona.

SH

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 91
HILLCREST ROAD.
Papatoetoe.

91 HILLCREST
Papatoetoe
ROAD. Papatoetoe.

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Papatoetoe

Mangere East

Favona

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained


by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of SH zoning 17, Gee Place, Mangere East.
The SH zoning complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town Centres and the
RFN for considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

616

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

No change

No change

As per submission by Corporation


No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

As per submission by Corporation


No change

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2105

839-2104

839-2240

839-2672

839-2673

839-2674

839-1849

839-2034

839-2029

839-1721

839-2028

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 101,101A,105,
STATION ROAD,29,
ASHLYNNE AVENUE,
Papatoetoe.

101,101A,105,
Papatoetoe
STATION ROAD,29,
ASHLYNNE AVENUE,
Papatoetoe.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
133,135C,135B,135A,13
5E,135D, GRAY
AVENUE, MiddlemorePapatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 174 SHIRLEY
ROAD. Papatoetoe.

133,135C,135B,135 Middlemore
A,135E,135D, GRAY
AVENUE,
MiddlemorePapatoetoe.

MHU

174 SHIRLEY ROAD. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe.

MHU

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing 19 ASHLYNNE


Urban at 19 ASHLYNNE AVENUE.
AVENUE. Papatoetoe. Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 19A
ASHLYNNE AVENUE.
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 19B ASHLYNNE
AVENUE. Papatoetoe.

19A ASHLYNNE
AVENUE.
Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

19B ASHLYNNE
AVENUE.
Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 6, COLLETT ROAD,


Suburban at 6, COLLETT Otara.
ROAD, Otara.

Otara South

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
1A,7C,7B,7A,1,3,5,7,5E,
5D,3A,5A,5C,5B,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,39,45,37,43,
43A,41, SWAFFIELD
ROAD, Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at
24E,24D,24A,22,24C,24
B, MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

Middlemore
1A,7C,7B,7A,1,3,5,7,
5E,5D,3A,5A,5C,5B,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,39,45,37,
43,43A,41,
SWAFFIELD ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
24E,24D,24A,22,24C Middlemore
,24B, MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 11,
PURATA PLACE,
Mangere Bridge.

11, PURATA PLACE, Mangere Bridge MHS


Mangere Bridge.

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
25,15,21,17,23,19,17A,1
5A, MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

25,15,21,17,23,19,1 Middlemore
7A,15A,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

617

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close


proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of MHU zone
for this property and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close


proximity to Middlemore train station and the RFN. Retention
of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zoning as the area its in close


proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station and
the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area its in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station and
the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area its in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station and
the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area its in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station and
the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmenatl issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close


proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is subject to


No change
the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA overlay. It is also not close
to a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
No change
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2027

839-2026

839-1860

839-1861

839-2025

839-1743

839-2021

839-1874

839-1886

839-2030

839-1752

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 27,29,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

27,29,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

Middlemore

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 33,37,35,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

33,37,35,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

Middlemore

Retain Single House at 35, ANTRIM


35, ANTRIM CRESCENT, CRESCENT, Otara.
Otara.

Otara North

Retain Single House at 28, ANTRIM


28, ANTRIM CRESCENT, CRESCENT, Otara.
Otara.

Otara North

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
43,45,47,41A,41,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

43,45,47,41A,41,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

Middlemore

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 24,
KOHINOOR AVENUE,
Mangere.

24, KOHINOOR
Mangere
AVENUE, Mangere.

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 46,48A,
CAMBRIDGE TERRACE,
Papatoetoe.

46,48A,
CAMBRIDGE
TERRACE,
Papatoetoe.

Papatoetoe

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 43,43A,
KUDU ROAD, Otara.

43,43A, KUDU
ROAD, Otara.

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

SH

SH

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 15,
COLLETT ROAD, Otara.

15, COLLETT ROAD, Otara South


Otara.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

47, SWAFFIELD
Middlemore
ROAD,10,12,14,12A,
10B,10A,16A,16,2A,
8,2,4, MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

MHU

5, CULLINAN
Mangere
AVENUE, Mangere.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 47, SWAFFIELD
ROAD,10,12,14,12A,10B
,10A,16A,16,2A,8,2,4,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 5,
CULLINAN AVENUE,
Mangere.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

SH

SH

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close


proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

618

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support in Part

No change

Support retention of Single House zone - Heavy Industry Air


No change
Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth is limited due to
significant adverse effects on amenity values and thereby the
application of SH zone is consistent with the policy direction to
manage the adverse effects in adjacent areas to Heavy
Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
Support retention of Single House zone - Heavy Industry Air
No change
Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth is limited due to
significant adverse effects on amenity values and thereby the
application of SH zone is consistent with the policy direction to
manage the adverse effects in adjacent areas to Heavy
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
No change
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to a
TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Papatoetoe train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for considering
change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning
SH

Support in Part

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Corporation submitted in support, meets proximity criteria


for higher zoning

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to a No change


TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1760

839-1780

839-1796

839-1816

839-1820

839-1856

839-1866

839-1896

839-1858

839-1859

839-2024

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 29,
ARCHBOYD AVENUE,62,
CHELBURN CRESCENT,
Mangere East.

29, ARCHBOYD
Mangere East
AVENUE,62,
CHELBURN
CRESCENT, Mangere
East.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

8, SECOIA
CRESCENT,
Mangere.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 8, SECOIA
CRESCENT, Mangere.

Retain Mixed Use at 57, 57, CORONATION


CORONATION ROAD,
ROAD, Mangere
Mangere Bridge.
Bridge.

Mangere

Mangere Bridge MU

Retain Town Centre at


1/19,2/19,3/19,4/19,5/
19, CAPE ROAD,
Mangere. (27 Cape
Road Mangere)

1/19,2/19,3/19,4/19 Mangere
,5/19, CAPE ROAD,
Mangere. (27 Cape
Road Mangere)

TC

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Neighbourhood
Centre at 7, FORBES
ROAD, Favona.

7, FORBES ROAD,
Favona.

NC

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Local Centre at 8, 8, CAMEO COURT


CAMEO COURT ROAD, ROAD, Favona.
Favona.

Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Use at


36,CRAWFORD
AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge, Auckland.

36,CRAWFORD
AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge,

Mangere Bridge MU

Retain Single House at


8, PARKSTONE PLACE,
Favona.

8, PARKSTONE
PLACE, Favona.

Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing 53, MIDDLEMORE


Urban at 53,
CRESCENT,
MIDDLEMORE
Papatoetoe.
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

Favona

Middlemore

LC

SH

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


56, SWAFFIELD
Middlemore
Urban at 56, SWAFFIELD ROAD, Papatoetoe.
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 61,63,59,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

MHU

61,63,59,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

Middlemore

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MU

TC

NC

LC

MU

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to


a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give
Support retention of MU zone at 57 Coronation Road. This are
is immediately south of the Mangere Bridge local centre and
has identified for growth and development of the commercial
centre. (Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan). Retention of the MU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of TC zone for 27 Cape Road, Mangere. The
Mangere Town centre zoning has been expand under the
PAUP. The expanded TC zone seek to improve the commercial
vitality of the Mangere Town Centre. Retention of the TC zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of NC zoning at 7, Forbes Road, Favona. The
NC zone provides a vital role in the community. Retention of
the NC zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of LC zoning at 8, Cameo Court Road,
Favona. The LC zone provides a vital role in the community.
Retention of the LC zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU zone at 36 Crawford Avenue,
Mangere Bridge. This area is immediately south of the
Mangere Bridge local centre and has identified for growth and
development of the commercial centre. (Mangere-Otahuhu
Area Plan). Retention of the MU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of SH zone. The site at 37, Bicknell Road,
Favona is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zone and there
are constraints related residential intensification and potential
'reverse sensitivity' issues related to air quality. Retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

619

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

TC

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

NC

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

LC

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2359

839-2032

839-2023

839-2020

839-2031

839-2022

839-2033

839-1768

839-1621

839-1627

839-1659

839-1805

839-1857

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 62 STATION
ROAD. Papatoetoe.

62 STATION ROAD.
Papatoetoe.

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
69,69A,67A,67,
SWAFFIELD ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 69,71,67,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

69,69A,67A,67,
SWAFFIELD ROAD,
Papatoetoe.

Middlemore

69,71,67,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

Middlemore

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
74A,74B,74,74D,74C,
KENDERDINE ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 75,73,
SWAFFIELD
ROAD,38,36F,32,36D,36
E,36B,36C,40,36A,36,44
C,44B,44A,34,44,42,44D
, MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

74A,74B,74,74D,74C Papatoetoe
, KENDERDINE
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

MHU

75,73, SWAFFIELD Middlemore


ROAD,38,36F,32,36
D,36E,36B,36C,40,3
6A,36,44C,44B,44A,
34,44,42,44D,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 77,75,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe.

77,75,
MIDDLEMORE
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 86A,86,
SWAFFIELD ROAD,
Papatoetoe.

86A,86, SWAFFIELD Middlemore


ROAD, Papatoetoe.

Retain Mixed Use at


232, MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere-Otahuhu.

232, MASSEY ROAD, Middlemore


Mangere-Otahuhu.

MU

326,324, MASSEY
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu.

MU

Retain Mixed Use at


326,324, MASSEY
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu.
Urban (Central and Retain Single House at
West)
13, MALASPINA PLACE,
Papatoetoe.
Urban (Central and Retain Single House at
West)
190, HILLSIDE ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Urban (Central and Retain Single House at
West)
34, LENDENFELD DRIVE,
Papatoetoe.
Urban (central and Retain Single House at
west)
70, HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East.

Papatoetoe

Middlemore

Middlemore

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MU

MU

13, MALASPINA
Papatoetoe
PLACE, Papatoetoe.

SH

SH

190, HILLSIDE
Papatoetoe
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

SH

SH

34, LENDENFELD
Papatoetoe
DRIVE, Papatoetoe.

SH

70, HENWOOD
ROAD, Mangere
East.

SH

Mangere East

SH

SH

REASONS

620

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close


proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close


proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close


proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Middlemore train station and to the RFN. MHU
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of Mixed Use zone. The activity on the
property is compatible with this zoning. Retention of the zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of Mixed Use zone. Mixed Use reflects
the surrounding zoning. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MU zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MU

Support

MU

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2035

839-1595

839-2017

839-1672

839-2271

839-1873

839-1677

839-7580

839-7927

839-5774

839-5771

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace Housing 124,126, ST GEORGE Papatoetoe


and Apartment
STREET,
Buildings at 124,126, ST Papatoetoe.
GEORGE STREET,
Papatoetoe.

THAB

Retain Terrace Housing 16, MILES AVENUE, Papatoetoe


and Apartment
Papatoetoe.
Buildings at 16, MILES
AVENUE, Papatoetoe.

THAB

Retain Terrace Housing 18B,18,18A,


Papatoetoe
and Apartment
KENDERDINE ROAD,
Buildings at 18B,18,18A, Papatoetoe.
KENDERDINE ROAD,
Papatoetoe.

THAB

Retain Terrace Housing


and Apartment
Buildings at
23C,23A,23B,23,
KENDERDINE ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings at 38 WYLLIE
ROAD. Papatoetoe.

23C,23A,23B,23,
Papatoetoe
KENDERDINE ROAD,
Papatoetoe.

THAB

38 WYLLIE ROAD.
Papatoetoe.

THAB

Retain Terrace Housing


and Apartment
Buildings at 76,
RANGITOTO ROAD,
Papatoetoe.
Retain Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings at 94, GRAY
AVENUE, MiddlemorePapatoetoe.

76, RANGITOTO
Papatoetoe
ROAD, Papatoetoe.

94, GRAY AVENUE, Middlemore


MiddlemorePapatoetoe.

THAB

Rezone 1 GEORGE
STREET. Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1 GEORGE STREET.
Mangere East

SH

Rezone 1 RAGLAN
STREET. Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 1, DREIFUSS
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 1, HADDON
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1 RAGLAN STREET. Mangere East


Mangere East

Papatoetoe

Mangere East

1, DREIFUSS PLACE, Middlemore


Mangere East

1, HADDON STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

THAB

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

621

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of THAB zoning as the area is in close


No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station. THAB
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of THAB is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of THAB zone
for this property and gives effect to RPS.
Support retention of THAB zoning as the area is in close
No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station. THAB
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of THAB is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of THAB zone
for this property and gives effect to RPS.
Support retention of THAB zoning as the area is in close
No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station. THAB
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of THAB is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of THAB zone
for this property and gives effect to RPS.
Support retention of THAB zoning as the area is in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station. THAB
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of THAB is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of THAB zone
for this property and gives effect to RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Consider proximity of site to Papatoetoe Town Centre is


appropriate for THAB

No change

Support retention of THAB zoning as the area is in close


No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station. THAB
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zoning as the area is in close
No change
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and train station. THAB
reflects the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zoning as the area its in close
No change
proximity to Middlemore train station and RFN. Retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as No change
the growth is limited at this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
and Hunters Corner Town Centres and RFN. Support retention
of MHS as a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified No change
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider the site proximity to FN route on Massey Road


(FN32) makes MHU zone appropriate. Do not consider the
potential flooding hazard on site should dictate
development density - can be managed as development
control (e.g. to manage development risk).

Meet Criteria
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site is reasonable distance from FN (Massey Road) at


approx 250m and Centres (800m) on this basis support
MHU zoning

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5631

839-6931

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 1, RESEDA
PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 1,1A, ALLEN
West)
STREET,150, BUCKLAND
ROAD, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1, RESEDA PLACE,
Papatoetoe

1,1A, ALLEN
STREET,150,
BUCKLAND ROAD,
Mangere East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 1,3,5, CHAPLIN


STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,3,5, CHAPLIN
STREET, Mangere
East

Middlemore

Rezone 10, BLEDISLOE


STREET, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10, BLEDISLOE
Papatoetoe
STREET, Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

622

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified No change
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-6904

839-5602

839-5163

839-5452

839-2050

839-2051

839-2052

839-2053

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (Central and Rezone 10, KAIRANGA


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

10, KAIRANGA
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
and Hunters Corner Town Centres and RFN. Support retention
of MHS as a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and MHU zone. Support retention of MHS as a
lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified No change
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Site is reasonable distance from FN (Massey Road) at


approx 250m and Centres (within 400m) of Hunters
Cornder on this basis support MHU zoning

Meet Criteria

Rezone 10,
10, KINGSWOOD
KINGSWOOD ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Hunters Corner

Retain Terrace Housing


and Apartment
Buildings at 154,156,
EAST TAMAKI ROAD,
Otara.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 4,6,
LEONARD PLACE,29,
BLAMPIED ROAD,47,
HAMILL ROAD, Otara.

154,156, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Otara.

Otara North

4,6, LEONARD
PLACE,29,
BLAMPIED
ROAD,47, HAMILL
ROAD, Otara.

Otara North

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 10,
LEONARD PLACE,53,
HAMILL ROAD, Otara.

10, LEONARD
PLACE,53, HAMILL
ROAD, Otara.

Otara North

46,44, HAMILL
ROAD, Otara.

Otara North

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 46,44,
HAMILL ROAD, Otara.

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property - It is
located on a main arterial road with the RFN, and is adjacent to
Town Centre. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose
Support MHU zoning on basis of proximity criteria

No change

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2054

839-2055

839-2056

839-2057

839-1898

839-1901

839-1904

839-1905

839-1906

839-1910

839-1911

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 9,7,
WILLIAMS CRESCENT,
Otara.

9,7, WILLIAMS
CRESCENT, Otara.

Retain Single House at


31,29, ANTRIM
CRESCENT, Otara.

31,29, ANTRIM
CRESCENT, Otara.

LOCALITY

Otara North

Otara North

Retain Mixed Housing 3,5, WINDSOR


Suburban at 3,5,
PLACE, Otara.
WINDSOR PLACE, Otara.

Otara South

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 33,35,
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara.
Retain Single House at
37, BICKNELL ROAD,
Favona.

33,35,
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara.

Otara South

Retain Single House at


42, ABIRU CRESCENT,
Favona.

42, ABIRU
Favona
CRESCENT, Favona.

Retain Single House at


14, BICKNELL ROAD,
Favona.

14, BICKNELL ROAD, Favona


Favona.

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 21,
WALDOS WAY,
Mangere.

21, WALDOS WAY, Mangere


Mangere

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 19,
WALDOS WAY,
Mangere.

19, WALDOS WAY,


Mangere

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 27, TIDAL
ROAD, Mangere.

27, TIDAL ROAD,


Mangere

37, BICKNELL ROAD, Favona


Favona.

Retain Mixed Housing 27B, TIDAL ROAD,


Suburban at 27B, TIDAL Mangere.
ROAD, Mangere.

Mangere

Mangere

Mangere

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained


by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of Single House zone - Heavy Industry Air
Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth is limited due to
significant adverse effects on amenity values and thereby the
application of SH zone is consistent with the policy direction to
manage the adverse effects in adjacent areas to Heavy
Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close
proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for considering
change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Support retention of SH zone. The site at 37, Bicknell Road,
Favona is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zone and there
are constraints related residential intensification and potential
'reverse sensitivity' issues related to air quality. Retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone. The site at 42, Bauru Crescent,
Favona is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zone and there
are constraints related residential intensification and potential
'reverse sensitivity' issues related to air quality. Retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone. The site is in close proximity to
the Otahuhu HI zone and there are constraints related
residential intensification and potential 'reverse sensitivity'
constraints related to air quality and alike. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to a
TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give

623

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

As per submission by Corporation


No change

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No change

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1912

839-2092

839-2093

839-2094

839-2095

839-6946

839-6941

839-6909

839-6453

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 33A, TIDAL ROAD,


Suburban at 33A, TIDAL Mangere.
ROAD, Mangere.

Mangere

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 18,12,20,14,16,


Suburban at
PURATA PLACE,
18,12,20,14,16, PURATA Mangere Bridge.
PLACE, Mangere Bridge.

Mangere Bridge MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 15,17,
PURATA PLACE,
Mangere Bridge.

15,17, PURATA
PLACE, Mangere
Bridge.

Mangere Bridge MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 24,20, LINDIS


Suburban at 24,20,
PLACE, Mangere
LINDIS PLACE, Mangere Bridge.
Bridge.

Mangere Bridge MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 20, DALRY
PLACE,40, WALLACE
ROAD, Mangere Bridge.

20, DALRY
Mangere Bridge MHS
PLACE,40, WALLACE
ROAD, Mangere
Bridge.

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 10,12,


West)
COURTENAY
CRESCENT,21,21A,
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,12, COURTENAY Mangere East


CRESCENT,21,21A,
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East

MHS

MHU

Mangere East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone
10,12,20,14,16,18,2,4,6,
8, MAYFLOWER CLOSE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 10,4,8,
MCBURNEY PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 10,6,2,20,18,
LARSEN
STREET,58,54,56,62,64,
66, BAIRDS ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

10,12,20,14,16,18,2,
4,6,8, MAYFLOWER
CLOSE, Mangere
East
10,4,8, MCBURNEY
PLACE, Mangere
East

Middlemore

10,6,2,20,18,
Wymondley
LARSEN
STREET,58,54,56,62,
64,66, BAIRDS
ROAD, Otara

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to a


TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to a
TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Support retention of MHS zoning. The sites at 15,17,Purata
Place, Mangere Bridge are subject the Mangere Mountain VV
and HSA controls which provides for 8 metres height control as
does the activity status of the MHS zone. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the
Support retention of MHS zoning. The sites at 24,20, Lindis
Place, Mangere Bridge are subject the Mangere Mountain VV
and HSA controls which provides for 8 metres height control as
does the activity status of the MHS zone. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHS zoning. The sites at 20 Darley Place
and 40 Wallace Road, Mangere Bridge are subject the
Mangere Mountain VV and HSA controls which provides for 8
metres height control as does the activity status of the MHS
zone. The MHS zoning complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zoning of properties at 10, 12
Courtenay Crescent from SH to MHU - the growth is limited in
these areas due to flooding constraints. Retention of the zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS. Do not support change at 21,
21A Henwood Road, Mangere East from MSH to MHU. - This
area is a considerable distance from the Mangere and
Papatoetoe Town Centres. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
and Mangere Town Centres and the RFN. Support retention of
MHS as a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

624

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara and
Hunters Corner Town Centres and RFN. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Support MHU zoning on basis of proximity criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6948

839-6412

839-2096

839-2097

839-2098

839-2099

839-2100

839-2101

839-2102

839-2103

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 10,8,


West)
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,8, HENWOOD
ROAD, Mangere
East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 10,8, RESEDA


PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 32,32A,34,
MATAPOURI ROAD,
Mangere Bridge.

10,8, RESEDA
Papatoetoe
PLACE, Papatoetoe

32,32A,34,
Mangere Bridge MHS
MATAPOURI ROAD,
Mangere Bridge.

MHS

Retain Mixed Use at


16D,16A,16B,14D,14B,1
4C,14A, CRAWFORD
AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge.

16D,16A,16B,14D,1 Mangere Bridge MU


4B,14C,14A,
CRAWFORD
AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge.

MU

Retain Mixed Use at


52,52A,48,50B,48C,50,4
8A,48B,50C,50A,46B,
CRAWFORD AVENUE,
Mangere Bridge.

52,52A,48,50B,48C, Mangere Bridge MU


50,48A,48B,50C,50A
,46B, CRAWFORD
AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge.

MU

Retain Mixed Use at


54B,54,54A,52C,
CRAWFORD AVENUE,
Mangere Bridge.

54B,54,54A,52C,
CRAWFORD
AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge.

Mangere Bridge MU

MU

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 74,72,70,
CROSSANDRA DRIVE,
Mangere.

74,72,70,
CROSSANDRA
DRIVE, Mangere.

Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

51,53,49, PUKAKI
ROAD, Mangere.

Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 51,53,49,
PUKAKI ROAD,
Mangere.

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at
32,26,30,28,34,
CINNAMON ROAD,
Mangere.
Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing
West)
Suburban at 29B,29A,
TIDAL ROAD, Mangere.

Mangere East

32,26,30,28,34,
CINNAMON ROAD,
Mangere.

Mangere

29B,29A, TIDAL
ROAD, Mangere.

Mangere

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the area is not


close to Mangere and Papatoetoe Town Centres. Support
change of zoning from Single House to MHS. The area is not
constrained by flooding related environmental issues. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zoning. The sites at 15, 17, Purata
Place, Mangere Bridge are subject the Mangere Mountain VV
and HSA controls which provides for 8 metres height control as
does the activity status of the MHS zone. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the
Support retention of MU zone at 16D, 16A, 16B, 14D, 14B,
14C,14A,Crawford Avenue, Mangere Bridge. This are is
immediately south of the Mangere Bridge local centre and has
identified for growth and development of the commercial
centre. (Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan). Retention of MU zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Support retention of MU zone at 52, 52A, 48, 50B, 48C,
50,48A,48B,50C,50A,46B, Crawford Avenue , Mangere Bridge.
This are is immediately south of the Mangere Bridge local
centre and has identified for growth and development of the
commercial centre. (Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan). Retention
of MU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MU zone at 4B,54,54A,52C, Crawford
Avenue , Mangere Bridge. This are is immediately south of the
Mangere Bridge local centre and has identified for growth and
development of the commercial centre. (Mangere-Otahuhu
Area Plan). Retention of MU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to a
TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to

625

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

On basis of proximity to FN (Massey Road) and community


facilities (education) consider MHU appropriate zoning.
Consistent with Council's and Corporation proximity to FN
criteria

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2110

839-2237

839-6932

839-7750

839-2111

839-7497

839-6916

839-6432

839-2297

839-7488

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 6,4,4A,
HILDA ROAD, Favona.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
6,4,4A, HILDA
ROAD, Favona.

LOCALITY

Favona

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Urban at 9, VICKERMAN
STREET,14-26,
O'CONNOR STREET,
Otara. 9 Vickerman
Street is Mixed Housing
Suburban

9, VICKERMAN
Otara South
STREET,14-26,
O'CONNOR STREET,
Otara. 9 Vickerman
Street

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
10,8A,12,14,12A,6,10A,
6A,4,14A,8,4A, LAVINIA
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Single House
to Mixed Housing
Urban.

10,8A,12,14,12A,6,1 Mangere East


0A,6A,4,14A,8,4A,
LAVINIA CRESCENT,
Mangere East

SH

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 100 CARRUTH


ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 125,
FAVONA ROAD,10,12,
HILDA ROAD, Favona.

100 CARRUTH
ROAD. Papatoetoe

MHS

125, FAVONA
Favona
ROAD,10,12, HILDA
ROAD, Favona.

MHS

Rezone 101 CARRUTH


ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
106A,106C,106B,106D,
GRAY AVENUE,
MiddlemorePapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

101 CARRUTH
ROAD. Papatoetoe

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to No change


a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained No change
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House / MHS to
No change
MHU as the growth is limited in this area due to flooding
constraints. Retention of SH/MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH/MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

106A,106C,106B,10 Middlemore
6D, GRAY AVENUE,
MiddlemorePapatoetoe

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

No change

Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 10B,10,10A,


10B,10,10A, KING
Papatoetoe
West)
KING STREET,
STREET, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 6 LIZZIE
LANE. Clover Park.

6 LIZZIE LANE.
Clover Park.

Otara South

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

11 AVIS AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

Rezone 11 AVIS
AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

626

MHU

These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified No change
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support retention of MHS zoning. Area is also not in close


No change
proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for considering
change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2112

839-2113

839-2114

839-2394

839-2115

839-2116

839-2117

839-2118

839-2248

839-7811

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Single House at


10,8, LOLIM PLACE,
Favona.

10,8, LOLIM PLACE, Favona


Favona

Retain Single House at


11,9,13,15, LOLIM
PLACE, Favona.

11,9,13,15, LOLIM
PLACE, Favona.

Retain Single House at


19,21, LOLIM PLACE,
Favona.

LOLIM PLACE,
Favona.

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 8 LIZZIE
LANE. Clover Park.

8 LIZZIE LANE.
Clover Park.

Urban (central and


west)

Favona

Favona

Otara South

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
47,49,43,53,41,
ARCHBOYD AVENUE,
Mangere East.
Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing
West)
Suburban at 33,35,
ARCHBOYD AVENUE,
Mangere East.

47,49,43,53,41,
ARCHBOYD
AVENUE, Mangere
East.

Mangere East

33,35, ARCHBOYD
AVENUE, Mangere
East.

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Retain Single House at


West)
4,6, ABIRU
CRESCENT,9,5,7,
PEACHWOOD GROVE,
Favona.

4,6, ABIRU
CRESCENT,9,5,7,
PEACHWOOD
GROVE, Favona.

Favona

Urban (central and


west)

46,48, ABIRU
Favona
CRESCENT, Favona.

Urban (central and


west)

Retain Single House at


46,48, ABIRU
CRESCENT, Favona.

Retain Mixed Housing


47 PUKAKI ROAD.
Suburban at 47 PUKAKI Mangere.
ROAD. Mangere.

Urban (Central and Rezone 11 JOHN


West)
STREET. Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11 JOHN STREET.
Mangere East

Mangere

Mangere East

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of SH zoning. This property is not close to a


TC zone and is remote from RFN. The SH zoning complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zoning. This property is not close to a
TC zone and is remote from RFN. The SH zoning complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone - The properties at 19,21, Lolim
Place, Favona are in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned
areas and further residential intensification may result in
reverse sensitivity issues. The properties are also a significant
distance from town centre and public transport networks.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Area is also not in
close proximity to Otara Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU. Retention of the zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to a
TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a town centre and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the
Support retention of SH zone - The properties at 19,21, Lolim
Place, Favona are a significant distance from town centre and
the RFN. The area is also with in close proximity to the
Otahuhu HI zoning so that maintaining the SH zone is a means
of managing reverse sensitivity constraints. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone - The properties at 46,48, ABIRU
CRESCENT, Favona are in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI
zoned areas and further residential intensification may result in
reverse sensitivity issues. The properties are also a significant
distance from town centre and public transport networks.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a TC zone and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

627

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No change

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No change

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No change

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5331

839-2323

839-2331

839-2340

839-4975

839-6097

839-6420

839-6452

839-6933

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 11, EVELYN


11, EVELYN STREET, Papatoetoe
STREET, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


45 PUKAKI ROAD.
Suburban at 45 PUKAKI Mangere.
ROAD. Mangere.

MHS

Urban (Central and Retain Mixed Housing


West)
Suburban at 122
WALMSLEY ROAD.
Mangere.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

122 WALMSLEY
ROAD. Mangere.

Mangere

Favona

MHS

Retain Single House at 6 6 ANDES AVENUE.


ANDES AVENUE.
Mangere Bridge.
Mangere Bridge.

Mangere Bridge SH

Rezone 11, HOKIANGA


STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, HOKIANGA
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Rezone 11, SABRE


PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
11,10,13,12,15,14,17,3,
2,5,4,7,6,9,8,
MILLENNIUM PLACE,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11, SABRE PLACE,


Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

11,10,13,12,15,14,1 Papatoetoe
7,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,
MILLENNIUM
PLACE, Papatoetoe

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retaining


a less intensified MHU zone. MHU reflects the surrounding
zoning and proximity to the RFN and Papatoetoe Town Centre.
This will allow intensification in the area that is appropriate
with the neighbourhood and provides a transition in density
between THAB and MHS zones. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a town centre and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a town centre and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of SH zone - 6 ANDES AVENUE. Mangere
Bridge. The site is subject to the Mangere mountain VV & HAS
area controls and Places of Value to Mana Whenua Overlay.
detention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

SH

Support
As per submission by Corporation

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU. This area No change
is not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Rezone 11,13, BERNARD 11,13, BERNARD


Hunters Corner
STREET, Papatoetoe
STREET, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
11,13,15,21,17,23,19,3,
5,7,9, LAVINIA
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

628

11,13,15,21,17,23,1 Mangere East


9,3,5,7,9, LAVINIA
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU. This area


is not in close proximity to Hunters Corner Town Centre or to
the RFN. This is also outside the MHU zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located far away from Papatoetoe Town Centre and
RFN. Support retention of the MHS as a less intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Consider this site meets appropriate proximity criteria for
MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6454

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
11,25,13,27,15,21,17,23
,19,29,1,3,5,7,9, LARSEN
STREET,10, LAXON
AVENUE,12A,12,14,8,
WYMONDLEY ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,25,13,27,15,21,1 Wymondley
7,23,19,29,1,3,5,7,9,
LARSEN STREET,10,
LAXON
AVENUE,12A,12,14,
8, WYMONDLEY
ROAD, Otara

MHS

Rezone
11,25,13,27,21,23,33,31
,29,1,3,5,7,9,
MAYFLOWER CLOSE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 3
BRUNSWICK RISE.
Mangere.

11,25,13,27,21,23,3 Mangere East


3,31,29,1,3,5,7,9,
MAYFLOWER
CLOSE, Mangere
East

MHS

3 BRUNSWICK RISE. Mangere


Mangere.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 12
CROSSANDRA DRIVE.
Mangere.

12 CROSSANDRA
DRIVE. Mangere.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

629

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located far away from Otara and Hunters Corner
Town Centres and RFN. Support retention of the MHS as a
lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6940

839-2410

839-2417

839-5607

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located far away from Papatoetoe Town Centre and
RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 110, HILLCREST 110, HILLCREST


West)
ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Papatoetoe

Urban (Central and Rezone 9,7, GUBB


9,7, GUBB PLACE,
West)
PLACE, Otara from
Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single House
to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Otara North

Urban (Central and Rezone 38,42,36,40,34, 38,42,36,40,34,


West)
BLAMPIED ROAD, Otara BLAMPIED ROAD,
from Mixed Housing
Otara
Suburban, Single House
to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere East

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to No change


a town centre and is remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to No change
a town centre and is remote from RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified No change
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-2810

839-2811

839-2424

Retain Local Centre at 177 BUCKLAND


403 MASSEY ROAD. 177 ROAD. Mangere
BUCKLAND ROAD.
East
Mangere-Otahuhu.

SH / MHS

SH / MHS

LC

MHS

MHS

LC

Do not support change zoning of properties at 7 Gubb Place - No change


growth is limited in these areas due to significant flooding
constraints and thereby support retention of SH, which is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS. Support retention of MHS at 9 Gubb
Place as this zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zoning at 36, 38 Blampied Road, Otara from MHS
Single House to MHS. As although the SH zone could be
retained due to the site(s) being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location a spot
zone will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context. Support
retention of MHS zoning at 34, 40, 42 Blampied Road, Otara.
Retention of the MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of LC zone. The properties at 403 MASSEY No change
ROAD. 177 BUCKLAND ROAD Mangere are identified as part of
an existing commercial centre. The local centre will remain as
identified in the centres hierarchy and RPS. The retention of
the zone is the most apprriate way to achieve the objectives of
the LC zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

LC

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2431

839-2488

839-2566

839-4959

839-6189

839-2567

839-4962

839-7852

839-2568

839-2722

839-4970

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Local Centre at 2


CAMEO COURT ROAD.
44 ROBERTSON ROAD.
Favona.

2 CAMEO COURT
Favona
ROAD. 44
ROBERTSON ROAD.
Favona.

LC

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 17
BRUNSWICK RISE.
Mangere.

17 BRUNSWICK
RISE. Mangere.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 78
NAYLORS DRIVE.
Mangere.

78 NAYLORS DRIVE. Mangere


Mangere.

Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 66, FISHER


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 110A,
West)
BUCKLAND ROAD,
Mangere EastPapatoetoe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

66, FISHER
CRESCENT, Otara

110A, BUCKLAND
ROAD, Mangere
East-Papatoetoe

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

10 FITCHBURG
PLACE. Mangere.

Mangere

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 10
FITCHBURG PLACE.
Mangere.

Urban (Central and Rezone 25, DARNELL


West)
CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

MHS

MHS

SH

25, DARNELL
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara South

MHS

SH

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 63
PENINSULA ROAD.
Mangere.

63 PENINSULA
ROAD. Mangere.

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 38A
CROSSANDRA DRIVE.
Mangere.

38A CROSSANDRA
DRIVE. Mangere.

Urban (Central and Rezone 70, ZELDA


West)
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LC

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of LC zone. The properties at 2 CAMEO


COURT ROAD. 44 ROBERTSON ROAD Favona are identified as
part of an existing commercial centre. The local centre will
remain as identified in the centres hierarchy and RPS. The
retention of the zone is the most apprriate way to achieve the
objectives of the LC zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a town centre and is remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to
a town centre and is remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support change from MHS to MHU zone - the property is
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The proposed
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

LC

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the area is not


No change
close to both the Mangere and Papatoetoe Town Centres.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 111 PUHINUI


111 PUHINUI ROAD. Papatoetoe
West)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

REQUESTED
ZONE

630

Mangere

Mangere

70, ZELDA AVENUE, Otara South


Clover Park

MHS

MHU

MHU

Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to No change


a town centre and is remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to the Dawson Road Local Centre or to
the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified No change
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to No change


a town centre and is remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to No change
a town centre and is remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to the Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN.
The MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2723

839-4974

839-5793

839-5023

839-4978

839-4982

839-8260

839-2818

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 38B
CROSSANDRA DRIVE.
Mangere.

38B CROSSANDRA
DRIVE. Mangere.

Rezone 32, PEARL


BAKER DRIVE, Otara
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

32, PEARL BAKER


DRIVE, Otara

Rezone 111, RAGLAN


STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 112, TUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

111, RAGLAN
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

112, TUI ROAD,


Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

Urban (Central and Rezone 10, BLAND


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 9, MATTHEWS
west)
ROAD, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 113A WYLLIE
west)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone
west)
11,1,3,5,9,3A,5A, HILDA
ROAD,8, FORBES ROAD,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

10, BLAND PLACE,


Otara

11,1,3,5,9,3A,5A,
HILDA ROAD,8,
FORBES ROAD,
Favona

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 18,16, HILDA


West)
ROAD,129,131, FAVONA
ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single House
to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

18,16, HILDA
ROAD,129,131,
FAVONA ROAD,
Favona

Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

9, MATTHEWS
ROAD, Flat Bush

Mangere

Otara North

Otara North

Otara South

113A WYLLIE ROAD. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

631

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zoning. This property is not close to


a town centre and is remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town
Centres or to the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support change of
zone to a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The proposed
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


located close to the Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN.
The MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Given proximity to Centre and FN support MHU as


appropriate zone

MHU

Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning the
MHS
property at 8 Forbes Road, Favona. Managing the flood risk on
this site does not require maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS
zoning complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Given proximity to FN, employment (Light Industry) and


comprehensive development block potential for area
consider MHU appropriate Zone. Do not support Council
principle of downzoning on basis of Pre-1944 Demolition
Control Overlay.

Meet Criteria
839-2819

SH/MHS

MHS

Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.


MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2820

839-8261

839-8312

839-8313

839-2821

839-4961

839-5005

839-5006

839-4966

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 64,66,


West)
CHELBURN CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single House
to Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Urban (central and Rezone 113B WYLLIE
west)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 116A GRAY
west)
AVENUE. MiddlemorePapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

64,66, CHELBURN Mangere East


CRESCENT, Mangere
East

SH/MHS

113B WYLLIE ROAD. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

MHS

116A GRAY
AVENUE.
MiddlemorePapatoetoe

Middlemore

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 116B GRAY


AVENUE. MiddlemorePapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

116B GRAY
AVENUE.
MiddlemorePapatoetoe

Middlemore

Rezone
12A,12B,16A,16B,14B,1
4A, GROWERS
LANE,387P,387H,387I,3
87J,387K,387L,387M,38
7N,387A,387B,387C,387
D,387E,387F,387G,
MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere-Otahuhu from
Local Centre, Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to Local
Centre.

12A,12B,16A,16B,14 Mangere East


B,14A, GROWERS
LANE,387P,387H,38
7I,387J,387K,387L,3
87M,387N,387A,387
B,387C,387D,387E,3
87F,387G, MASSEY
ROAD, Mangere

SH/MHS/LC

Urban (Central and Rezone 20, DONNELL


West)
AVENUE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20, DONNELL
AVENUE, Favona

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

13, ORETI PLACE,


Clover Park

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 13, ORETI


PLACE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 3, GUBB PLACE,
West)
Otara from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

LC

REASONS

632

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.


MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS zone as a
less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS zone as a
less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS zone as a
less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to FN, employment (Light Industry) and


comprehensive development block potential for area
consider MHU appropriate Zone. Do not support Council
principle of downzoning on basis of Pre-1944 Demolition
Control Overlay.

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

LC

Oppose

Meet Criteria

3, GUBB PLACE,
Otara

Favona

Otara South

Otara North

Rezone 28, KEMBLE


28, KEMBLE CLOSE, Mangere
CLOSE, Mangere from Mangere
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU zoning. Retain


No change
MHS zoning. This property is not close to a town centre and is
remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified No change
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS

Support submission in part rezone from MHS to MHU. This site MHU
at 28 Kemble Close, Mangere is close to the Mangere Town
Centre and near to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

MHU

Support

Do not support Council's position on flooding constraints,


but accept proximity criteria make MHS more appropriate
zone.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4972

839-4985

839-5013

839-4987

839-5015

839-5016

839-4993

839-8314

839-5022

839-6582

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 16, TUA PLACE, 16, TUA PLACE,


Favona from Mixed
Favona
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

LOCALITY

Favona

Rezone 194,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 45, COOPER
West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 92, WINDRUSH
west)
CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

194, ROBERTSON
ROAD, Mangere
East

Mangere East

45, COOPER
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara North

Urban (Central and Rezone 6, FERGUSON


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6, FERGUSON
ROAD, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 28, DESMOND


PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28, DESMOND
PLACE, Otara

Rezone 6, HARWELL
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 116C GRAY
AVENUE. MiddlemorePapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

6, HARWELL PLACE, Mangere


Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 1, CAPSTICK
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 1,3,5,
West)
SANDBROOK
AVENUE,275, BAIRDS
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

92, WINDRUSH
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU zoning. Retain


MHS zoning. This property is not close to a TC or MU zone and
is remote from the RFN for public transport The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property is not close to a TC or MU zone and is
remote from the RFN for public transport The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. This property is not close to a TC or MU zone or the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site at 83 Windrush
Close, Mangere would create a spot and not achieve the
integrated management of resources or recognise local
context. The MHS zoning complements the neighbourhood's
planned suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

633

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Otara South

MHS

MHS

Rezone 116C GRAY Middlemore


AVENUE.
MiddlemorePapatoetoe

MHS

1, CAPSTICK ROAD, Otara South


Otara

MHS

1,3,5, SANDBROOK Otara South


AVENUE,275,
BAIRDS ROAD,
Otara

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site at 6 Harwell
MHU
Place, Mangere is close to the Mangere Town Centre and near
to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS zone as a
less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre. Support retention of MHS which is compatible with the
surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre. Support retention of MHS which is compatible with the
surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7537

839-8216

839-5021

839-6149

839-5030

839-5012

839-5034

839-5014

839-5037

839-5018

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 1/29-2/29


West)
ASPIRING AVENUE. 1/22/2 LOWBURN PLACE.
Manukau from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1/29-2/29 ASPIRING Otara South


AVENUE. 1/2-2/2
LOWBURN PLACE.
Manukau

MHS

Rezone 11A GRAY


11A GRAY AVENUE. Middlemore
AVENUE. Middlemore- MiddlemorePapatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 10, IVON ROAD, 10, IVON ROAD,
West)
Otara from Mixed
Otara
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 12, GEOFFREY


West)
PLACE, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

12, GEOFFREY
PLACE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

31, WHITLEY
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 31, WHITLEY


CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 5, CURLEW
PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 27, WHITLEY
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 750, MASSEY
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 200, BAIRDS
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Urban (Central and Rezone 27, CLEEK


West)
ROAD, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

5, CURLEW PLACE,
Favona

27, WHITLEY
CRESCENT, Otara

50, MASSEY ROAD,


Mangere East

Favona

Otara North

Mangere

200, BAIRDS ROAD, Otara North


Otara

27, CLEEK ROAD,


Mangere East

Mangere East

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

634

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from the Dawson
Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS
which is compatible with the surrounding area zoning.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS zone which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from the Otara
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS which is compatible
with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support changes sought from Single House to MHU and
support change of zone to a less intensified MHS zone - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support change of zone to MHS zone which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. The proposed
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone or RFN for
public transport. The MHS zoning complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone and would
create Spot zone. The MHS zoning complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention
of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to FN, employment (Light Industry) and


Centre consider MHU appropriate Zone. Do not support
Council principle of downzoning on basis of Pre-1944
Demolition Control Overlay.

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHS

Support
Meets proximity criteria for MHS

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone No change


The property at 27 Cleek Road is in close proximity to the
Otahuhu HI zoned areas and further residential intensification
may result in reverse sensitivity issues. The properties are also
a significant distance from town centre and public transport
networks. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5031

839-5047

839-5049

839-5035

839-5038

839-5117

839-5055

839-5043

839-6577

839-5061

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 13, KEMBLE


CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 111, FLAT BUSH
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

13, KEMBLE CLOSE, Mangere


Mangere

111, FLAT BUSH


ROAD, Otara

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 15, EVERITT


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 11, COMET
West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

15, EVERITT ROAD,


Otara

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 14, ASHMORE


PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, ASHMORE
PLACE, Favona

Rezone 12, NARADA


PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 2, WILLIAMS
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 30,
FARNBOROUGH
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 10,8,4,6,
MURRAY ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, NARADA PLACE, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (Central and Rezone 31, AWATERE


West)
STREET, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

11, COMET
Mangere Bridge SH
CRESCENT, Mangere

2, WILLIAMS
CRESCENT, Otara

Favona

Otara North

30, FARNBOROUGH Mangere


CRESCENT, Mangere

10,8,4,6, MURRAY
ROAD, Otara

Otara South

31, AWATERE
Otara South
STREET, Clover Park

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

635

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support submission in part to rezone from MHS to MHU. This


site is close to the Mangere Town Centre and near to the RFN
for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning SH to MHU. Retain SH zone at 11,
Comet Crescent, Mangere due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone or nor is it
close RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS zone as a
less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone or nor is it
close to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria for MHU (allowing for


accessibility) and network pattern

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
consider proximity of site and facilities (education) is
appropriate

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5051

839-5052

839-5066

839-7782

839-5056

839-5064

839-5065

839-5080

839-5071

839-5072

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

LOCALITY

Rezone 15, FRIESIAN


DRIVE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15, FRIESIAN DRIVE, Mangere


Mangere

Rezone 19, HARANIA


AVENUE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19, HARANIA
AVENUE, Favona

Rezone 35, PEARL


BAKER DRIVE, Otara
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

35, PEARL BAKER


DRIVE, Otara

Rezone 100 TE IRIRANGI 100 TE IRIRANGI


DRIVE. Manukau from DRIVE. Manukau
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 86, VINE


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

86, VINE STREET,


Mangere East

Favona

Otara North

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

Mangere Bridge MHS

Rezone 3,
3, MCNAUGHTON
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere
AVENUE, Mangere East East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

Rezone 6, IOTA PLACE, 6, IOTA PLACE,


Clover Park from Mixed Clover Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 5, HARVARD


West)
PLACE, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone or nor is it
close the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone or nor is it
close to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Support change from MHS to MHU zone - the property is
located close to Dawson Road Local centre and the RFN. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Mangere East

Rezone 81, CRAWFORD 81, CRAWFORD


AVENUE, Mangere
AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge from Mixed
Bridge
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 24, GARUS


24, GARUS
West)
AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Single House to
East
Mixed Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

636

Mangere East

MHS

MHS

SH

5, HARVARD PLACE, Mangere Bridge SH


Mangere

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Support retention of No change


SH zone. The site is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zone
and there are constraints related to residential intensification
and potential 'reverse sensitivity' issues related to air quality.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS.
No change
Subject to Mangere Mountain VV and HAS Overlay. Would
also create Spot zone and not provide for the integrated
management of resources. Retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone nor is it close
to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning. MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zoning. SH No change
zoning needs to be retained in Bader Drive area due to the site
affected by flooding constraints. Retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and give effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5077

839-5083

839-5097

839-5277

839-5087

839-5105

839-5088

839-5092

839-5101

839-5106

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 13, KAPUKA


13, KAPUKA ROAD,
ROAD, Mangere Bridge Mangere Bridge
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge SH

Rezone 7, DUGGAN
7, DUGGAN
AVENUE, Mangere from AVENUE, Mangere
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere

Rezone 2, ANTRIM
CRESCENT, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

2, ANTRIM
CRESCENT, Otara

Rezone 124A,124,
124A,124, WYLLIE
WYLLIE ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 47, CONVAIR


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Papatoetoe

MHS

MHS

MHS

47, CONVAIR
Mangere Bridge SH
CRESCENT, Mangere

Rezone 10, PESARO


10, PESARO PLACE, Otara South
PLACE, Clover Park from Clover Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 17, TUA PLACE, 17, TUA PLACE,


Favona from Mixed
Favona
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Favona

MHS

Rezone 6, JURY PLACE,


Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Favona

6, JURY PLACE,
Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 81, VINE


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

81, VINE STREET,


Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 45, CHADWICK


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

45, CHADWICK
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zoning.


Subject to Mangere Mountain VV and HAS Overlay. Would also
create Spot zone and not provide for the integrated
management of resources. Retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone nor is it close
to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS zone as a
lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zoning. SH
zoning needs to be retained in Bader Drive area due to the site
affected by flooding constraints. Retention of the SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from the Dawson
Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS
which is compatible with the surrounding area zoning.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone The property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area
and further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The properties are also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. Retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site at 45, Chadwick
Crescent, East Mangere is close to the RFN for public transport.
The NGC was considered but it was determined as not
sufficient reason not rezone this site (and the surrounding
area). The NGC crosses marginally at edge of property.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to

637

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose
Consider proximity criteria appropriate for MHS

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5107

839-7713

839-5108

839-5707

839-5161

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 1/160-6/160,


West)
FAVONA ROAD,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.
Urban (central and Rezone 125 PUHINUI
west)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 33, ASHGROVE
west)
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 125, TUI ROAD,
west)
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
1/160-6/160,
FAVONA ROAD,
Mangere

LOCALITY

Favona

125 PUHINUI ROAD. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

33, ASHGROVE
ROAD, Mangere

125, TUI ROAD,


Papatoetoe

Mangere

Hunters Corner

Rezone 129, BUCKLAND 129, BUCKLAND


ROAD, Mangere East- ROAD, Mangere
Papatoetoe from Mixed East-Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere East

Rezone 171, DAWSON


ROAD, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 13 AVIS
AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 3, RUSH PLACE,
Mangere from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

638

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone The property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area
and further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS zone as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone nor is it close
to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS
zone as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe and Mangere Town
Centres or to the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support change from MHS to MHU zone - the property is


located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning
the property at 3, Rush Place, Mangere. Managing the flood
risk on this site does not require maintaining a SH zoning. The
MHS zoning complements the neighbourhood's planned
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Support retention of
existing zoning SH due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to Centre and FN support MHU as


appropriate zone

No change

Meet Criteria
839-5116

839-7489

839-5109

839-5120

839-5110

839-5112

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

171, DAWSON
ROAD, Flat Bush

13 AVIS AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

3, RUSH PLACE,
Mangere

Papatoetoe

Mangere

MHS

MHS

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 7, BAHAMA


7, BAHAMA PLACE, Otara South
West)
PLACE, Clover Park from Clover Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 17,


West)
PENDERFORD PLACE,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

17, PENDERFORD
PLACE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 18, GARUS


18, GARUS AVENUE, Mangere East
West)
AVENUE, Mangere East Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

SH

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

MHS

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS.


MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5118

839-5121

839-5128

839-5124

839-8008

839-5308

839-5271

839-5125

839-6062

839-8259

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 49, MCKINSTRY 49, MCKINSTRY


AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 32, WAKEFIELD 32, WAKEFIELD


West)
ROAD, Favona from
ROAD, Favona
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,


West)
LAPPINGTON ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 34, IMRIE
West)
AVENUE, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, LAPPINGTON
ROAD, Otara

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

13 DREADON
AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

13, ALABASTER
DRIVE, Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 13 DREADON
AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 13, ALABASTER
DRIVE, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone nor is it close
to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. This site is not close to a TC or MU zone nor is it close
to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements
the neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU zone - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local centre and the RFN. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

34, IMRIE AVENUE, Mangere


Mangere

Rezone 13, CALVERT


13, CALVERT
AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 81, BLAKE


West)
ROAD, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PAUP ZONE

639

81, BLAKE ROAD,


Mangere East

Middlemore

Mangere East

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

Rezone 13,15,
13,15, WEDGWOOD Middlemore
WEDGWOOD AVENUE, AVENUE, Mangere
Mangere East from
East
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 135 STATION


135 STATION ROAD. Papatoetoe
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Support retention of No change


existing zoning SH due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning sought to THAB and support MHU
change of zone to a less intensified MHU zone. MHU reflects
the surrounding zoning and proximity to the RFN and
Papatoetoe Town Centre. This allows intensification in the area
that is appropriate with the neighbourhood and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS zones.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Support Retain of SH No change
zone. The site is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zone and
there are constraint related residential intensification and
potential 'reverse sensitivity' issues related to air quality and
alike. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS zone which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

Recognise industry and discharges, but consider MHS


appropriate to scale of existing development

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to FN (on Station Road) consider MHU


appropriate Zone. Do not support Council principle of
downzoning on basis of Pre-1944 Demolition Control
Overlay.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8009

839-8006

839-7871

839-5232

839-5150

839-5151

839-5154

839-5156

839-5127

839-5159

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 13A DREADON


AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 14 DREADON
west)
AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 14 PHOENIX
west)
PLACE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 14, AVIS
west)
AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 48, FISHER
West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

13A DREADON
AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

14 DREADON
AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

14 PHOENIX PLACE. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

14, AVIS AVENUE,


Papatoetoe

48, FISHER
CRESCENT, Otara

Papatoetoe

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 35, DISSMEYER 35, DISSMEYER


West)
DRIVE, Clover Park from DRIVE, Clover Park
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 1, VICKERMAN
STREET, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1, VICKERMAN
STREET, Otara

Rezone 43, FISHER


CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 37, KILLINGTON
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

43, FISHER
CRESCENT, Otara

Rezone 206, EAST


TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

206, EAST TAMAKI Otara North


ROAD, PapatoetoeEast Tamaki

Otara South

37, KILLINGTON
Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

Do not support changes sought from MHS to THAB and support


change of zone to a less intensified MHU zone. MHU reflects
surrounding zoning and proximity to the RFN and Papatoetoe
Town Centre. This allows intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the neighbourhood and provides a transition
in density between THAB and MHS zones.
Do not support zoning changes sought from MHU to THAB and
support retention of a less intensified MHU zone. MHU reflects
surrounding zoning and proximity to the RFN and Papatoetoe
Town Centre. This enables intensification in the area that is
appropriate with the neighbourhood and provides a transition
in density between THAB and MHS zones.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS

640

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as


MHU
managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The property is located close to Dawson
Road Local Road and the RFN. The MHU zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS which is compatible with the surrounding
area zoning. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. This The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. This site is not close to the Mangere Town Centre zone
nor is it close to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. This The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5758

839-5146

839-5917

839-5130

839-5137

839-5167

839-5158

839-5164

839-5165

839-5169

839-5176

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 14, BARRIE


AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 14, BERYL
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 14, CHISHOLM
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, BARRIE AVENUE, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

Rezone 16, PAINE


PLACE, Mangere from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 78,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Rezone 14, BERYL


PLACE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

14, CHISHOLM
PLACE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

16, PAINE PLACE,


Mangere

Mangere

78, COTTINGHAM Mangere East


CRESCENT, Mangere
East

Urban (Central and Rezone 70, BOUNDARY 70, BOUNDARY


West)
ROAD, Flat Bush from
ROAD, Flat Bush
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere

Rezone 24, COURT


24, COURT TOWN
TOWN CLOSE, Mangere CLOSE, Mangere
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Urban (Central and Rezone 16, PLUMLEY


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

16, PLUMLEY
Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 5, ASHMORE


West)
PLACE, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, ASHMORE
PLACE, Favona

Urban (central and


west)

78, WINDRUSH
CLOSE, Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 78, WINDRUSH


CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 40, PENION
DRIVE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

40, PENION DRIVE,


Flat Bush

Favona

Mangere

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Support retention of
existing zoning SH due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to the Mangere TC zone or
Mangere East LC zone. Nor is it close to the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as
the growth is limited at this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

641

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Support retention of No change


existing zoning SH due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site at 16, Plumley Crescent, Mangere is not close
to the Mangere TC zone. Nor is it close to the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. This site at 78 Windrush Close, Mangere, is not close to
the TC zone. Nor is it close to the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5170

839-5180

839-5421

839-5172

839-5192

839-5193

839-5194

839-5442

839-5207

839-5174

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 5, ROYALPARK
PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban. (Check
the address?)
Urban (central and Rezone 48, BELINDA
west)
AVENUE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 14, GIFFORD
west)
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 9, KELBURN
west)
LANE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 88, FRANKLYNE
West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
5, ROYALPARK
PLACE, Favona

48, BELINDA
AVENUE, Flat Bush

LOCALITY

Favona

Otara South

14, GIFFORD ROAD, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

9, KELBURN LANE

88, FRANKLYNE
ROAD, Otara

Mangere

Otara North

Urban (Central and Rezone 11, COTY PLACE, 11, COTY PLACE,
West)
Clover Park from Mixed Clover Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 69, ALEXANDER 69, ALEXANDER


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from CRESCENT, Otara
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Otara North

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 144, GRAY


144, GRAY AVENUE, Middlemore
West)
AVENUE, Middlemore- MiddlemorePapatoetoe from Single Papatoetoe
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 53, DIORELLA


53, DIORELLA
West)
DRIVE, Clover Park from DRIVE, Clover Park
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

SH

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere

Rezone 52, WINDRUSH 52, WINDRUSH


CLOSE, Mangere from CLOSE, Mangere
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHS

REASONS

642

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This site is not close to the Mangere TC zone or
Mangere East LC zone. Nor is it close to the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the suburban built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support submission in part to rezone from MHS to MHU. This MHU
site at 9 Kelburn Lane, Mangere is close to the Mangere TC
zone and near to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from and lacks
direct access to Otara Town Centre. Support retention of MHS
as a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
No change
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retaining No change
a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent to
any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - These sites


are affected by flooding and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support submission in part to rezone from MHS to MHU. This


property is close to the Mangere TC zone and near to the RFN
for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5210

839-5212

839-7769

839-5215

839-5216

839-5177

839-5189

839-5209

839-5218

839-5229

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 49, FLAT BUSH


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
49, FLAT BUSH
ROAD, Otara

LOCALITY

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 1, BAHAMA


1, BAHAMA PLACE, Otara South
West)
PLACE, Clover Park from Clover Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

SH

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 145
RANGITOTO ROAD.
Papatoetoe from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 3, DISSMEYER
DRIVE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 9, AWATERE
STREET, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 4, TARATA


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
Bridge from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 1, FREDA PLACE,
west)
Favona from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

145 RANGITOTO
ROAD. Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

643

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a significant distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS which is compatible with the surrounding
area zoning. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS which is compatible with the surrounding
area zoning. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to THAB.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

3, DISSMEYER
DRIVE, Clover Park

Otara South

9, AWATERE
Otara South
STREET, Clover Park

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

4, TARATA
Mangere Bridge SH
CRESCENT, Mangere
Bridge

MHU

1, FREDA PLACE,
Favona

MHU

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 78, CHINGFORD 78, CHINGFORD


West)
CLOSE, Mangere from CLOSE, Mangere
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 32, YATES


West)
ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 23, CLYDE
West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

32, YATES ROAD,


Mangere East

23, CLYDE ROAD,


Otara

Otara North

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


located close to the Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN.
The zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS which is compatible with the surrounding
area zoning. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU zone. Retain SH zone.
The 1 Freda Place property is subject to the NGC. Do not
support change from SH to MHU as this would create a Spot
zone in this location will not achieve integrated management
of resources and does not recognise local context. Retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site is not
close to the TC or MU zones and is remote from RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site is close to the MHU
East Mangere LC and is close to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4984

839-5220

839-8007

839-5221

839-5228

839-5241

839-5233

839-5235

839-5238

839-5245

839-5251

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 149, PORTAGE


ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 7, VISCOUNT
West)
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

149, PORTAGE
ROAD, Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 14A DREADON


AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 249, KIRKBRIDE
West)
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14A DREADON
AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

249, KIRKBRIDE
ROAD, Mangere

Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 23, VISCOUNT


West)
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

23, VISCOUNT
STREET, Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

19, PARKER
CRESCENT, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 19, PARKER


CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 11, AVRO
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 2, BEDLOW


West)
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 1, CLYRO PLACE,
west)
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 6, WESTNEY
west)
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 66, GADSBY
West)
ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7, VISCOUNT
STREET, Mangere

11, AVRO PLACE,


Mangere

2, BEDLOW PLACE,
Mangere East

1, CLYRO PLACE,
Mangere East

Mangere East

MHS

Mangere Bridge SH

SH

SH

Mangere Bridge MHS

Otara North

MHS

Mangere Bridge MHS

Mangere East

Mangere East

6, WESTNEY ROAD, Mangere


Mangere

66, GADSBY ROAD,


Favona

PAUP ZONE

Favona

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

644

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning. MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone and is remote from
the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements
the suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Waste Water Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Waste Water Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site is close to the
East Mangere LC and is near to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC zone or MU zone. Nor is it
close to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC zone or MU zone. Nor is it
close to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC zone or MU zone. Nor is it
close to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5252

839-5254

839-5265

839-5929

839-5270

839-6918

839-5258

839-7771

839-7882

839-7608

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Urban (Central and Rezone 1,7,


West)
REGALWOOD PLACE,
Favona from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 13, STAVERTON
west)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

1,7, REGALWOOD
PLACE, Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 8, NORRIE


West)
SMITH AVENUE, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

8, NORRIE SMITH
AVENUE, Flat Bush

Urban (central and


west)

Favona

13, STAVERTON
Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere

Rezone 14A, HENWOOD 14A, HENWOOD


ROAD, Mangere East
ROAD, Mangere
from Single House to
East
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 1, DESMOND


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Otara South

Mangere East

1, DESMOND PLACE, Otara South


Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 14B,14A,


14B,14A, GORDON
West)
GORDON ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 6, GADSBY
ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 15 HUIA ROAD.
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Urban (Central and Rezone 15 JOHN


West)
STREET. Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

6, GADSBY ROAD,
Favona

15 HUIA ROAD.
Papatoetoe

15 JOHN STREET.
Mangere East

Rezone 15 PUHINUI
15 PUHINUI ROAD.
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

645

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.


Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC zone or MU zone. Nor is it
close to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


located close to the Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN.
The zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the area is not


MHS
close to both the Mangere and Papatoetoe Town Centres.
Support change of zoning from Single House to MHS. The area
is not constrained by flooding related environmental issues.
The proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from the Dawson
Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS
which is compatible with the surrounding area zoning.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Hunters Corner

Mangere East

Hunters Corner

MHS

MHU

SH

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. This site is not close to a TC zone or MU zone. Nor is it
close to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support changes sought from MHU to THAB and
support retention of a less intensified MHU zone, as the
property is not adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone.
Retention of MHU aligns with objectives of the MHU zone for
this property .

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre, Manukau Metropolitan Centre and MHU zone.
Support retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention
of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5262

839-5264

839-6425

839-5274

839-5279

839-5291

839-5269

839-6448

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 20, DESFORD


West)
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 80, WICKMAN
west)
WAY, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 15, DREADON
west)
AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 19, THOMAS
west)
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 14, ORLY
west)
AVENUE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 18, BENTLEY
west)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 15, KAKAPO
west)
PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 15,17, RANUM
West)
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20, DESFORD PLACE, Mangere


Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 33, SIKKIM


West)
CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33, SIKKIM
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

57, SIKKIM
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara South

80, WICKMAN WAY, Mangere East


Mangere East

15, DREADON
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

19, THOMAS ROAD, Mangere


Mangere

14, ORLY AVENUE,


Mangere

Mangere

18, BENTLEY ROAD, Otara North


Otara

15, KAKAPO PLACE, Hunters Corner


Papatoetoe

15,17, RANUM
ROAD, Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

646

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. This site is not close to a TC zone or MU zone. Nor is it
close to the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This is close to the
Mangere TC zone and close to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning sought to THAB and support
change of zone to a less intensified MHU zone. MHU reflects
the surrounding zoning and proximity to the RFN and
Papatoetoe Town Centre. This allows intensification in the area
that is appropriate with the neighbourhood and provides a
transition in density between THAB and MHS zones.
Support submission in part to rezone from MHS to MHU. This
site at 19 Thomas Road, Mangere is close to the Mangere TC
zone and near to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site is close to the


Mangere TC zone and near to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Meet Criteria
MHU

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centres and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from the both
Hunters Corner and Otara Town Centres and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5295

839-5296

Rezone 57, SIKKIM


CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Manukau
Metropolitan Centre and Otara Town Centre and the RFN.
Support retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Manukau
Metropolitan Centre and Otara Town Centre and the RFN.
Support retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5297

839-5298

839-5280

839-5282

839-6417

839-5286

839-5304

839-6567

839-6060

839-5299

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

LOCALITY

65, SIKKIM
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 3, ARDEN


West)
COURT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, ARDEN COURT,
Clover Park

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

30, HARANIA
AVENUE, Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 65, SIKKIM


CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 30, HARANIA


AVENUE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 32, KILLINGTON 32, KILLINGTON


Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Rezone 150,148A,148, 150,148A,148,


WYLLIE ROAD,
WYLLIE ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 606, MASSEY


ROAD, MangereOtahuhu from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 153,153A, TUI
west)
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 103,105,
West)
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Favona

PAUP ZONE

606, MASSEY
ROAD, Mangere

153,153A, TUI
ROAD, Papatoetoe

103,105, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara

Papatoetoe

Mangere

Hunters Corner

Otara South

Rezone 158, GRAY


158, GRAY AVENUE, Middlemore
AVENUE, Middlemore- MiddlemorePapatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 29, DONNELL


West)
AVENUE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29, DONNELL
AVENUE, Favona

Favona

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Manukau
Metropolitan Centre and Otara Town Centre and the RFN.
Support retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Manukau
Metropolitan Centre and Otara Town Centre and the RFN.
Support retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to a TC zone or MU zone. It is also
remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Support retention of
existing zoning SH due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to
the RPS.

647

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS. Close to public MHS
transport network, efficient use of land and good urban form.
The MHS zoning complements the suburban built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Otara and Hunters Corner Town
Centres or to the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to the Dawson Road Local Centre or to
the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS which is compatible
with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to Centre and FN support MHU as


appropriate zone

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5301

839-5305

839-5528

839-5317

839-5326

839-5327

839-6569

839-6429

839-5321

839-5322

839-5325

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 61, MOUNTAIN 61, MOUNTAIN


ROAD, Mangere Bridge ROAD, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Bridge
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge MHS

Rezone 39, LENORE


ROAD, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

39, LENORE ROAD,


Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 11, COOMBE


West)
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 13, QUENNELL
West)
AVENUE, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, COOMBE
AVENUE, Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 19, CAREY


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 5, COSMO
west)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 11,13,15,
West)
RAPSON ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 15A,15B, AVIS
west)
AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 86, KIVELL
West)
CLOSE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 1, CURLEW
west)
PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19, CAREY PLACE,


Otara

Urban (central and


west)

LOCALITY

13, QUENNELL
AVENUE, Favona

5, COSMO PLACE,
Otara

11,13,15, RAPSON
ROAD, Otara

Otara South

Favona

Otara North

Otara North

Otara South

15A,15B, AVIS
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

86, KIVELL CLOSE,


Mangere East

Mangere East

1, CURLEW PLACE,
Favona

Rezone 12, DUGGAN


12, DUGGAN
AVENUE, Mangere from AVENUE, Mangere
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Favona

Mangere

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain existing


MHS zone. Site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV & HAS 8metre height restrictions. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property 39 Lenore Road, Favona is in close proximity to the
Otahuhu HI zoned area and further residential intensification
may result in reverse sensitivity issues. The property is also a
significant distance from town centre and public transport
networks. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

648

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Consider MHS appropriate zoning by proximity criteria.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site at 86, Kivell
Close, Mangere East is close to the TC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5696

839-5564

839-5349

839-5795

839-5332

839-5356

839-6121

839-5913

839-5368

839-5333

839-5337

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 117, PRESTON


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 16, LAURESTON
west)
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

117, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 2, RAVENNA


West)
WAY,48, ISRAEL
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 16, SKIPTON
West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Urban (central and Rezone 25, ASHMORE
west)
PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 48, PEARL
west)
BAKER DRIVE, Otara
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

2, RAVENNA
WAY,48, ISRAEL
AVENUE, Clover
Park

Otara South

16, SKIPTON
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

25, ASHMORE
PLACE, Favona

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 16, COOMBE


West)
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 166, TUI ROAD,
West)
Papatoetoe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

16, COOMBE
AVENUE, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

92, FLAT BUSH


ROAD, Otara

Rezone 92, FLAT BUSH


ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 14, DEBORAH
west)
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 11, PLUMLEY
West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

16, LAURESTON
AVENUE, Otara

48, PEARL BAKER


DRIVE, Otara

166, TUI ROAD,


Papatoetoe

14, DEBORAH
PLACE, Mangere

Otara South

Hunters Corner

Otara North

Otara South

Hunters Corner

Otara South

Mangere

11, PLUMLEY
Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

649

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Support change of
zoning from Single House to MHS. The area is not constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. The proposed zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site at 11 Plumley Crescent, Mangere is a
significant distance to a TC zone or MU zone. It is also remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5355

839-5374

839-6458

839-5060

839-5391

839-5376

839-5377

839-5400

839-5382

839-5451

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 19, ASHLEY


19, ASHLEY
West)
AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere

Rezone 36, FORBURY


PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 17, LAXON
AVENUE,38,40,
WYMONDLEY
ROAD,6A,8,6,2A,4,
KINGSFORD PLACE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

36, FORBURY
PLACE, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 16, INGRAM


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 85, GILBERT
West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 29A, VINE
West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

16, INGRAM
CRESCENT, Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 19, VINE


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

19, VINE STREET,


Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 73, HAMILL


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 4, TRANENT
West)
ROAD, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

73, HAMILL ROAD,


Otara

Urban (central and


west)

17, MAYFLOWER
CLOSE, Mangere
East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 17,
MAYFLOWER CLOSE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

17, LAXON
Wymondley
AVENUE,38,40,
WYMONDLEY
ROAD,6A,8,6,2A,4,
KINGSFORD PLACE,
Otara

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

650

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This property at 36,
MHU
Forbury Place, Mangere is close to a TC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara and
Hunters Corner Town Centres and the RFN. Support retention
of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Consider the extent of the potential development block
supports THAB

No change

MHU

Oppose
Consider the rationale for rezoning would extend whole
site

Otara South

85, GILBERT ROAD, Otara North


Otara

29A, VINE STREET,


Mangere East

4, TRANENT ROAD,
Mangere

Mangere East

Mangere East

Otara North

Mangere

Mangere East

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less
MHU
intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent to any
centre to apply THAB zone. The proposed zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The No change
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The No change
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre or to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning. MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Consider the rationale for rezoning would extend whole
site

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5394

839-5398

839-5403

839-5406

839-7849

839-5411

839-5418

839-5428

839-5430

839-5420

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 23, THOMAS


ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 25, HARANIA
west)
AVENUE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 63, BLAKE
West)
ROAD, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

23, THOMAS ROAD, Mangere


Mangere

25, HARANIA
AVENUE, Favona

63, BLAKE ROAD,


Mangere East

Favona

Mangere East

Rezone 16, ROYALPARK 6, ROYALPARK


PLACE, Favona from
PLACE, Favona
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

Rezone 177 PORTAGE


ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 21, WAYNE
DRIVE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 730, MASSEY
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 21, CLAYTON
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 21, DILLON
CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 11, GADSBY


West)
ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

177 PORTAGE
ROAD. Papatoetoe

21, WAYNE DRIVE,


Mangere

Mangere

730, MASSEY ROAD, Mangere


Mangere

21, CLAYTON
AVENUE, Otara

21, DILLON
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara North

Otara South

11, GADSBY ROAD, Favona


Favona

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

651

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site is close to


the TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the suburban built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Consider site meets zone criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This site is a significant distance to a TC zone or MU
zone. It is also remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5432

839-5425

839-5427

839-5439

839-7641

839-5443

839-5665

839-5447

839-5448

839-5449

839-4963

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 98, FRANKLYNE 98, FRANKLYNE


West)
ROAD, Otara from
ROAD, Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

Urban (Central and Rezone 7, WOOD


7, WOOD AVENUE,
West)
AVENUE, Mangere East Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere Bridge MHS

Rezone 32, KORU


STREET, Mangere
Bridge from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

32, KORU STREET,


Mangere Bridge

7, LEONARD PLACE, Otara North


Otara

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 18 TUTERE
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 1, NATALIE
West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 18, APPLEBY
west)
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 17, BAHAMA
west)
PLACE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 99, FLAT BUSH
west)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 43, TYRONE
west)
STREET, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18 TUTERE ROAD.
Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

18, AVIS AVENUE,


Papatoetoe

Rezone 18, AVIS


AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre or to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 7, LEONARD


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

1, NATALIE PLACE,
Otara

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

652

Papatoetoe

Otara North

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zone. The


property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV & HAS
Volcanic Viewshaft Height Overlay with a permitted 8m height
limit. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - growth is
limited in these areas as the sites are affected by flooding
constraints. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre or to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Consider site meets zone criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

18, APPLEBY PLACE, Mangere East


Mangere East

17, BAHAMA PLACE, Otara South


Clover Park

99, FLAT BUSH


ROAD, Otara

Otara South

43, TYRONE STREET, Otara North


Otara

Papatoetoe

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change
Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5830

839-5276

839-5454

839-5576

839-5431

839-7418

839-5434

839-5438

839-5456

839-5464

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 18, LANDSCAPE 18, LANDSCAPE


ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Papatoetoe

Rezone 18, MARGARET 18, MARGARET


ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

MHS

55, OTHELLO DRIVE, Otara South


Clover Park

18, MCBURNEY
PLACE, Mangere
East

Middlemore

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 14, CHINGFORD


CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 16, PIAKO
west)
STREET, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 7, MIKASA
west)
PLACE, Mangere from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 39, ASHLEY
West)
AVENUE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, CHINGFORD
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 80, CHELBURN


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

80, CHELBURN
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

39, JOHNSTONES
ROAD, Otara

MHS

Rezone 39,
JOHNSTONES ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

7, MIKASA PLACE,
Mangere

39, ASHLEY
AVENUE, Mangere
East

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 55, OTHELLO


West)
DRIVE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 18, MCBURNEY
west)
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

16, PIAKO STREET,


Otara

REQUESTED
ZONE

653

Otara South

Mangere

Mangere East

Otara North

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site is close to the
TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Given proximity to FN, employment (Light Industry) and


Centre consider MHU appropriate Zone. Do not support
Council principle of downzoning on basis of Pre-1944
Demolition Control Overlay.

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Support retention of No change
existing SH zoning due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site is close to
MHU
the TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS - The No change
property is located a considerable distance from a TC or MU
zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre and
RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5323

839-5474

839-5028

839-5460

839-6917

839-4960

839-5461

839-5483

839-5462

839-6926

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 17, ASPIRING


West)
AVENUE, Manukau
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 37, FISHER
west)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 18, RAGLAN
west)
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 61, MILLER
West)
ROAD, Mangere Bridge
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
17, ASPIRING
AVENUE, Manukau

37, FISHER
CRESCENT, Otara

LOCALITY

Otara South

Otara South

18, RAGLAN STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

61, MILLER ROAD,


Mangere Bridge

Rezone 18,18A, NOGAT 18,18A, NOGAT


AVENUE, Papatoetoe
AVENUE,
from Single House to
Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Mangere Bridge SH

Middlemore

SH

Middlemore

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere Bridge MHS

18, TINDALL
CRESCENT, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

9, MASTERS PLACE, Favona


Favona

Urban (central and


west)

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The MHU
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain existing SH
No change
zone. Site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV & HAS 8metre height restrictions. Retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 18, TINDALL


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 9, MASTERS
PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

REASONS

Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 18B,


18B, WEDGWOOD
West)
WEDGWOOD AVENUE, AVENUE, Mangere
Mangere East from
East
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 13, MCKENZIE 13, MCKENZIE
ROAD, Mangere Bridge ROAD, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Bridge
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

654

Otara North

Rezone 19,17, NARADA 19,17, NARADA


Papatoetoe
PLACE, Papatoetoe
PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain existing


No change
MHS zone. Site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV & HAS 8metre height restrictions. Retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the area is not
MHS
close to Otara Town Centre. Support change of zoning from
Single House to MHS. Support the rezoning from SH to the
MHU zone where managing flooding risks on those sites does
not require maintaining a SH zone. The proposed MHS zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS - The No change
property is located a considerable distance from a TC or MU
zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Consider site meets zone criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5488

839-5476

839-5490

839-5482

839-5484

839-5489

839-5492

839-5493

839-5494

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 2, BLAND


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 17,
west)
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, BLAND PLACE,
Otara

17, MCNAUGHTON Mangere East


AVENUE, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

5, NATALIE PLACE,
Otara

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 5, NATALIE
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 7, ILFORD
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 2, ATIU PLACE,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 13, FORBES


West)
ROAD, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

Otara North

Otara North

7, ILFORD
Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere

2, ATIU PLACE,
Favona

13, FORBES ROAD,


Favona

Favona

Favona

Rezone 38, KILLINGTON 38, KILLINGTON


Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 14, VIMY PLACE, 14, VIMY PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Urban (Central and Rezone 8, IDLEWILD


8, IDLEWILD
West)
AVENUE, Mangere from AVENUE, Mangere
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

Mangere Bridge MHS

Mangere Bridge MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

655

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The MHU
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS - The No change
property is located a considerable distance from a TC or MU
zone and is remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre and
RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

THAB

Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site is close to


the TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning. MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The SH zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS - The No change
property is located a considerable distance from a TC or MU
zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near the Wastewater Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Waste Water Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5506

839-5498

839-5510

839-5500

839-5502

839-5507

839-6433

839-5527

839-5020

839-7420

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 9, BELINDA
AVENUE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 22, MOFFITT
West)
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9, BELINDA
AVENUE, Flat Bush

22, MOFFITT
PLACE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 10, SERAI


PLACE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 6, BETULA
West)
PLACE,84, MCKENZIE
ROAD, Mangere Bridge
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10, SERAI PLACE,


Flat Bush

Otara South

6, BETULA
PLACE,84,
MCKENZIE ROAD,
Mangere Bridge

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (central and


west)

94, CHINGFORD
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere

Rezone 94, CHINGFORD


CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 76, CHINGFORD
West)
CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

76, CHINGFORD
CLOSE, Mangere

Otara South

Mangere

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 19,17, YORK


19,17, YORK ROAD, Papatoetoe
West)
ROAD, Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

Rezone 90, ZELDA


AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 17, SANDRA
west)
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 18, INGRAM
West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

90, ZELDA AVENUE, Otara South


Clover Park

17, SANDRA
AVENUE, Otara

18, INGRAM
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara South

Otara South

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

656

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS zone. No change
The property is located a considerable distance from a TC or
MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS zone. No change
The property is located a considerable distance from a TC or
MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS zone. No change
The property is located a considerable distance from a TC or
MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS zone. No change
The property is located a considerable distance from a TC or
MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre. Support retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6459

839-5512

839-5518

839-5519

839-5542

839-6442

839-5532

839-6416

839-5539

839-5562

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 19,21, LAXON


AVENUE,11,13,15,
KINGSFORD PLACE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

19,21, LAXON
Wymondley
AVENUE,11,13,15,
KINGSFORD PLACE,
Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 34, YATES


West)
ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 3, FAIREY
west)
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34, YATES ROAD,


Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 29, GADSBY


West)
ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29, GADSBY ROAD,


Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 25, DILLON


CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25, DILLON
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Rezone 19,21,23,
ESPERANTO ROAD,4,
GRANTHAM ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

19,21,23,
Hunters Corner
ESPERANTO
ROAD,4,
GRANTHAM ROAD,
Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

3, FAIREY PLACE,
Mangere

26, MOLESWORTH
PLACE, Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

33, FORBES ROAD,


Favona

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

MHS

Mangere Bridge MHS

Favona

Otara South

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara and
Hunters Corner Town Centres and the RFN. Support retention
of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site is close to


the TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS zone.
The property is located a considerable distance from a TC or
MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre. Support retention of MHS as a lesser intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Hunters Corner Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Consider site and surroundign zoning pattern makes MHU
appropriate

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 26,


West)
MOLESWORTH PLACE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 195,193,
west)
PUHINUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Rezone 33, FORBES
ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 153, DAWSON
ROAD, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

PAUP ZONE

657

195,193, PUHINUI
ROAD, Papatoetoe

153, DAWSON
ROAD, Flat Bush

Mangere Bridge SH

Papatoetoe

Favona

Otara South

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre, Manukau Metropolitan Centre and MHU zone.
Support retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention
of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS zone. No change
The property is located a considerable distance from a TC or
MU zone and is remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7566

839-8016

839-5540

839-5545

839-5558

839-5565

839-5567

839-5568

839-5930

839-5571

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 197 PUHINUI


197 PUHINUI ROAD. Papatoetoe
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 1A HENWOOD
ROAD. Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1A HENWOOD
ROAD. Mangere
East

Mangere East

SH

Rezone 16, MARINER


STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 31, FRIESIAN
DRIVE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

16, MARINER
STREET, Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

31, FRIESIAN DRIVE, Mangere


Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 28, ROYTON


28, ROYTON
West)
AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Single House to
East
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 40, LENORE


ROAD, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

40, LENORE ROAD,


Favona

Rezone 17, OPAWA


17, OPAWA
CRESCENT, Favona from CRESCENT, Favona
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

Rezone 32, BLAKE


ROAD, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Mangere East

Rezone 2, AZARA
PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 33, ASHMORE
West)
PLACE, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32, BLAKE ROAD,


Mangere East

2, AZARA PLACE,
Papatoetoe

33, ASHMORE
PLACE, Favona

Papatoetoe

Favona

MHS

SH

SH

SH

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

658

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre, Manukau Metropolitan Centre and MHU zone.
Support the retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the area is not
MHS
close to Mangere and Papatoetoe Town Centres. Support
change of zoning from Single House to MHS. The area is not
constrained by flooding related environmental issues. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site is close to the MHU
TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The Pre 1944 BDC constraints have
also been removed. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity constraints. The property is also a significant
distance from town centre and public transport networks. The
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to FN, and education facilities with


reasonable access to Centre, consider MHU appropriate
Zone. Do not support Council principle of downzoning on
basis of Pre-1944 Demolition Control Overlay.

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5572

839-5574

839-5578

839-5579

839-5586

839-5762

839-5587

839-5588

839-7699

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 73, IDLEWILD


AVENUE,2, ORVILLE
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 27, VISCOUNT
West)
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

73, IDLEWILD
Mangere Bridge MHS
AVENUE,2, ORVILLE
PLACE, Mangere

THAB

27, VISCOUNT
STREET, Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 24, BLAKE


West)
ROAD, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

24, BLAKE ROAD,


Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 4, FLEMING
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

4, FLEMING STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

Rezone 48, MUIR


AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

48, MUIR AVENUE,


Mangere Bridge

Rezone 2, CHAPLIN
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, CHAPLIN STREET, Middlemore


Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning to from MHS to THAB. This site is close to the MHU
TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Mangere Bridge MHS

Mangere East

SH

SH

Mangere Bridge SH

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 94, CHELBURN


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

94, CHELBURN
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 209,


West)
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

209, ROBERTSON
ROAD, Mangere
East

SH

Urban (central and


west)

REASONS

659

Mangere East

Rezone 2/156, 4/156,


2/156, 4/156, 1/156, Hunters Corner
1/156, 3/156 TUI ROAD. 3/156 TUI ROAD.
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. This site is not close to a TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Waste Water Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zone. Part
of larger SH area and promotes good urban form. SH is the
most appropriate zone for this location given the local context
as outlined in the Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan. The SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zone. The
site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA overlays.
The site is part of larger SH area and SH is the most appropriate
zone for this location given the local context as outlined in the
Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan. The SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. This is appropriate with the adjoining Single
House zone with the overlying Rosella Road Precinct. Retention
of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS zone.
The property is located a considerable distance from a TC or
MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to FN, employment (Light Industry), open


space and Centre consider MHU appropriate Zone. Do not
support Council principle of downzoning on basis of Pre1944 Demolition Control Overlay. Further consider scale of
site makes redevelopment feasible.

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5604

839-5605

839-7729

839-5608

839-5589

839-5612

839-5614

839-6059

839-5600

839-5629

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 18, ALMAY


PLACE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 7, OTHELLO
DRIVE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 2/78, 3/78, 1/78
KOLMAR ROAD. 6/23,
5/23, 4/23-6/23, 4/23
MARGAN AVENUE.
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

18, ALMAY PLACE,


Clover Park

2/78, 3/78, 1/78


Papatoetoe
KOLMAR ROAD.
6/23, 5/23, 4/236/23, 4/23 MARGAN
AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 15, JULIAN


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 1, GROWERS
West)
LANE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 52, FLAT BUSH
west)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 23, CROWN
West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15, JULIAN PLACE,


Otara

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

20, BARRIE AVENUE, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 20, BARRIE


AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 166, HALL
AVENUE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7, OTHELLO DRIVE,
Clover Park

Otara South

Otara South

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

660

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre. Support retention of MHS as a lesser intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. This enables intensification
in the area that is appropriate with the neighbourhood and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS zones.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Otara North

1, GROWERS LANE, Mangere East


Mangere East

52, FLAT BUSH


ROAD, Otara

23, CROWN
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara South

Otara North

166, HALL AVENUE, Favona


Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 17, CASERTA


17, CASERTA PLACE, Otara South
West)
PLACE, Clover Park from Clover Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention MHU


of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. The MHU zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site is close to the
TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the area is not
close to Otara Town Centre. Support change of zoning from
Single House to MHS where managing flooding risks on the site
does not require maintaining a SH zone. The proposed MHS
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5601

839-5294

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 1, GARDINER
GROVE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1, GARDINER
GROVE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 20, CARINGBAH 20, CARINGBAH


West)
DRIVE, Papatoetoe from DRIVE, Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Favona

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

661

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
While outside proximity criteria rationalisation of
surrounding zoning makes MHU appropriate

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5611

839-5628

839-5769

839-5630

839-5530

839-6581

839-5641

839-5633

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 90,94, GADSBY


ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

90,94, GADSBY
ROAD, Favona

Rezone 11, NORTON


PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 20, HADDON
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11, NORTON PLACE, Mangere


Mangere

20, HADDON
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHS

MHS

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 109, HALL


109, HALL AVENUE, Favona
West)
AVENUE, Mangere from Mangere
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

Rezone 18, PIAKO


STREET, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 19,15,17,
West)
SANDBROOK AVENUE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

18, PIAKO STREET,


Otara

19,15,17,
SANDBROOK
AVENUE, Otara

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 14, LESLIE


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, LESLIE PLACE,


Otara

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 17, WALMSLEY 17, WALMSLEY


ROAD, Mangere from
ROAD, Mangere
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

MHS

MHS

Mangere Bridge MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning. MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain existing
No change
MHS zone. Site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV & HAS 8metre height restrictions. Retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

While outside proximity criteria rationalisation of


surrounding zoning makes MHU appropriate

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5635

839-5652

839-5637

839-5642

839-5644

839-5653

839-4989

839-5655

839-5667

839-5662

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 6, ATIU PLACE,


Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
6, ATIU PLACE,
Favona

LOCALITY

Favona

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 198, BAIRDS


198, BAIRDS ROAD, Otara North
West)
ROAD, Otara from
Otara
Mixed Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

SH

Rezone 15, JORDAN


ROAD, Mangere from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 132, TENNESSEE
West)
AVENUE, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

15, JORDAN ROAD,


Mangere

132, TENNESSEE
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Mangere

Mangere East

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 9, CORSAIR


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

9, CORSAIR
Mangere Bridge SH
CRESCENT, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 28, MERVAN


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28, MERVAN
STREET, Mangere
East

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere East

Rezone 20,
20, HEATHBERRY
Papatoetoe
HEATHBERRY CLOSE,
CLOSE, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 19, ELMDON


West)
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19, ELMDON
STREET, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 2, NORRIE


West)
SMITH AVENUE, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

2, NORRIE SMITH
AVENUE, Flat Bush

Urban (central and


west)

3, FARETI PLACE,
Mangere

Rezone 3, FARETI
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

SH

Mangere

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention MHU
of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. The proposed zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zoning.
The property is located a considerable distance from a TC or
MU zone and is remote from the RFN. Do not support the
change from SH zone to MHS zone because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. The SH zoning
complements the built character and retention of SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

THAB

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
While outside proximity criteria rationalisation of
surrounding zoning makes MHU appropriate

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Mangere Bridge SH

Otara South

REQUESTED
ZONE

662

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV & HSA Overlay.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5663

839-5677

839-5678

839-5666

839-5675

839-5676

839-5686

839-5680

839-5361

839-5693

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 413, MASSEY


West)
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

413, MASSEY
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

225, BAIRDS ROAD, Otara North


Otara

Rezone 225, BAIRDS


ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 112, CLAYTON
West)
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 10, VINE
West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

112, CLAYTON
AVENUE, Otara

10, VINE STREET,


Mangere East

Otara North

Mangere East

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 93, TENNESSEE 93, TENNESSEE


West)
AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Single House to
East
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

83, CORONATION
ROAD, Mangere
Bridge

Mangere Bridge MHS

36, CLAYTON
AVENUE, Otara

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 83,
CORONATION ROAD,
Mangere Bridge from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 36, CLAYTON
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 15, MOUNTAIN
ROAD, Mangere Bridge
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 206, PRESTON


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 29, CLAYTON
west)
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

SH

MHS

15, MOUNTAIN
ROAD, Mangere
Bridge

Mangere Bridge SH

206, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara

Otara South

29, CLAYTON
AVENUE, Otara

Otara North

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

663

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone - the property MHU
is located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The MHU
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support submission in part rezone from SH to MHS. This site is MHS
further from the Otahuhu HI zone than other properties that
have remain SH to limit Reverse Sensitivity constraints. This
site is close to the TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support rezoning SH to MHS. Retain SH zoning. The site No change
is affected by NGC. The SH zoning is the most appropriate zone
for this location. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS zone. No change
The property is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV & HSA
Overlay with a permitted 8 metre height limit. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The No change
property is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV & HSA
Overlay with a permitted 8 metre height limit. Local context
supported by the M-O Area Plan study has sought to retain the
SH zoning. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to
Support change from MHS to MHU zone - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The proposed
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the notified
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site is on the Massey Road FN and acessible to Buckland


Road FN routes and reasonable proximity to Centre (local)
of open space. On this basis consider MHU zone
appropriate.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU / THAB

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria for THAB, some local context
constraint with extent of THAB in this area

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5694

839-6000

839-5681

839-5698

839-5685

839-5687

839-5697

839-5702

839-5699

839-5704

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 54, CLAYTON


AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 21, RAPSON
West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 45, YATES
west)
ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 7, SIKKIM
west)
CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

54, CLAYTON
AVENUE, Otara

7, SIKKIM
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 9, WINDRUSH
CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 8, ROELL PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9, WINDRUSH
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere

Rezone 72, YATES


ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 183,185,
West)
BAIRDS ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 76, FRIESIAN
west)
DRIVE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

72, YATES ROAD,


Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Otara North

21, RAPSON ROAD, Otara South


Otara

45, YATES ROAD,


Mangere East

8, ROELL PLACE,
Mangere East

183,185, BAIRDS
ROAD, Otara

Mangere East

Mangere East

Mangere East

Otara North

76, FRIESIAN DRIVE, Mangere


Mangere

Rezone 21, VETORI


21, VETORI PLACE,
PLACE, Clover Park from Clover Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

664

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the notified
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site is close to
MHU
the TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site is close to
MHU
the TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
There are also limits on the wastewater infrastructure. The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of rezone from MHS to MHU. The site is
MHU
located in close proximity to Mangere East LC zone and is in
close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to THAB - the property is
THAB
located opposite to Otara Town Centre (across East Tamaki
Road) and close to the RFN. The zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
There are also limits on the wastewater infrastructure. The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4988

839-7625

839-5450

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 201, PORTAGE


ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 21 WALDEN
PLACE. Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 21, GLENMARY
PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
201, PORTAGE
ROAD, Papatoetoe

LOCALITY

Mangere East

21 WALDEN PLACE. Mangere East


Mangere East

Rezone 21,
GLENMARY PLACE,
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

665

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a lesser
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5700

839-5956

839-5701

839-5703

839-6440

839-5718

839-5711

839-5713

Urban (Central and Rezone 36, IDLEWILD


36, IDLEWILD
West)
AVENUE, Mangere from AVENUE, Mangere
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (central and


west)

Hunters Corner

Rezone 21, STONEX


ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 65, BADER
West)
DRIVE, Mangere BridgeMangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21, STONEX ROAD,


Papatoetoe

65, BADER DRIVE,


Mangere BridgeMangere

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 13, MERVAN


STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 21,23, KAKAPO
PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

13, MERVAN
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 29, COOPER


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 31,
West)
WOODWARD AVENUE,
Mangere Bridge from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29, COOPER
CRESCENT, Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 28, CONVAIR


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

28, CONVAIR
Mangere Bridge SH
CRESCENT, Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

21,23, KAKAPO
Hunters Corner
PLACE, Papatoetoe

31, WOODWARD
AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge

Otara North

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Mangere Bridge MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. Site is
also subject to height restriction of VV & HSA overlays.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner and Otara Town Centres and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. Site is
also subject to height restriction of VV & HSA overlays.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a significant distance from Hunters Corner
and Otara Town Centres and the RFN. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is also subject to height restriction of VV &
HSA overlays. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. Site is
also subject to height restriction of VV & HSA overlays.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5715

839-7485

839-5719

839-7447

839-7774

839-5720

839-5723

839-5732

839-5738

839-5747

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 33, HARANIA


West)
AVENUE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
33, HARANIA
AVENUE, Favona

LOCALITY

Favona

Rezone 22 ALEXANDER 22 ALEXANDER


AVENUE. Papatoetoe
AVENUE.
from Mixed Housing
Papatoetoe
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Hunters Corner

Rezone 27, COURT


27, COURT TOWN
TOWN CLOSE, Mangere CLOSE, Mangere
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mangere

Rezone 22 KIMPTON
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 22 KING
STREET. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 53, ASHGROVE
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 49, JAMES
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

53, ASHGROVE
ROAD, Mangere

49, JAMES STREET,


Mangere East

Papatoetoe

Mangere

Mangere East

Rezone 21, COURT


21, COURT TOWN
TOWN CLOSE, Mangere CLOSE, Mangere
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mangere

Rezone 12, RUSH


PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 22, COURTENAY
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

12, RUSH PLACE,


Mangere

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The site is also located under the NGC network. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

22 KIMPTON ROAD. Hunters Corner


Papatoetoe

22 KING STREET.
Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

666

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. Site is
also subject to the Air Quality Transport Corridor. Retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a
less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support submission in part to zone from MHS to MHU. This site MHU
is close to the TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

22, COURTENAY
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support the retention of MHS as a
less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Sites within development block meet proximity criteria
and opportunity for integrated redevelopment

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5744

839-5739

839-6920

839-6925

839-5740

839-7667

839-5741

839-5746

839-5749

839-7921

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 8, TREVISO


West)
PLACE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 11, MIKASA
west)
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
8, TREVISO PLACE,
Clover Park

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

Rezone
Papatoetoe
22D,22C,22A,22,22B
, PARK AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

MHS

Rezone 1, FLEMING
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1, FLEMING
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

SH

Rezone 23 GLEN
AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 6, FRIESIAN
DRIVE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

23 GLEN AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

6, FRIESIAN DRIVE,
Mangere

Rezone 47, MUIR


47, MUIR AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mangere
Mangere Bridge
Bridge from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 44, WAKEFIELD 44, WAKEFIELD
West)
ROAD, Favona from
ROAD, Favona
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 23 ROSELLA
ROAD. Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The site overlooks South Western motorway and subject to the
Air Quality Transport Corridor The MHS zoning complements
the built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Rezone
22D,22C,22A,22,22B,
PARK AVENUE,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Otara South

11, MIKASA PLACE, Mangere


Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 22A,22,


22A,22, ASHLYNNE
West)
ASHLYNNE AVENUE,
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe from Single Papatoetoe
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

LOCALITY

667

Mangere

MHS

MHS

Mangere Bridge SH

Favona

23 ROSELLA ROAD. Middlemore


Mangere East

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support submission inpart to zone from SH to MHS - the sites MHS
are located in close proximity to a Mangere East LC zone and is
close to the RFN. The site aligns with the objectives of the MHs
zone. The MHS zoning complements the built character and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention MHS
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. This allows intensification in
the area that is appropriate with the neighbourhood and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS zones.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain existing SH
zoning. Mangere Mountain VV & HAS Overlay limit of 8 metres
. Local Context incorporates Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan study
and support SH zone option. Retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
This area is under the Rosella Road Precinct which has SH zone
as underlying zone.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Based on proximity to Centre, consider THAB zone


appropriate, note that application of Counci ls principles
would support MHU zone in this locatino

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6042

839-4990

839-5752

839-5753

839-5278

839-5754

839-5764

839-5478

839-5766

839-5768

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

LOCALITY

23, CRAMOND
DRIVE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

23, HENWOOD
ROAD, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 28, HALSWELL


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28, HALSWELL
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

56, BLAKE ROAD,


Mangere East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 23, CRAMOND


DRIVE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 23, HENWOOD
ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 56, BLAKE


ROAD, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Rezone 23, MARGARET 23, MARGARET


ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

Urban (Central and Rezone 18, TINKLER


West)
PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18, TINKLER PLACE, Favona


Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 1, DILLON


West)
CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1, DILLON
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Otara South

Rezone 23, MCBURNEY 23, MCBURNEY


PLACE, Mangere East
PLACE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Middlemore

Rezone 30A,30B,30,
TINDALL CRESCENT,60,
COBHAM CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Otara North

Urban (Central and Rezone 229, BAIRDS


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

30A,30B,30,
TINDALL
CRESCENT,60,
COBHAM
CRESCENT, Otara

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character of the
Neighbourhood and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less
intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

668

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Consider site appropriate for MHU by proximity criteria


229, BAIRDS ROAD, Otara North
Otara

MHS

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone - the property MHU
is located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5098

839-5531

839-5114

839-5776

839-5831

839-6938

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 235, PORTAGE


ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 235, PUHINUI
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
235, PORTAGE
ROAD, Papatoetoe

235, PUHINUI
ROAD, Papatoetoe

LOCALITY

Mangere East

Papatoetoe

Urban (Central and Rezone 24, HADDON


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

24, HADDON
STREET, Mangere
East

Urban (Central and Rezone 16, RALEIGH


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 24, LANDSCAPE
West)
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

16, RALEIGH PLACE, Otara North


Otara

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone
24,10,26,12,20,14,22,16
,18,28, WINTHROP
WAY,11,13,15,21,17,23,
19,7,9, COURTENAY
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

24, LANDSCAPE
ROAD, Papatoetoe

Mangere East

Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

669

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of the MHS as a
less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre, Manukau Metropolitan Centre and MHU zone.
Support retention of the MHS as a lesser intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as No change
the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support change of MHS
zoning to a less intensified MHS, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. change of zone to MHS
aligns with objectives of the MHS zone for this property.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Mangere East

MHS

MHU

24,10,26,12,20,14,2
2,16,18,28,
WINTHROP
WAY,11,13,15,21,17
,23,19,7,9,
COURTENAY
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5760

839-5789

839-5761

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 9, BELLARD
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 49, CHARNTAY
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 9, BEN LORA
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9, BELLARD PLACE,
Mangere East

49, CHARNTAY
AVENUE, Clover
Park

Mangere East

Otara South

9, BEN LORA PLACE, Mangere East


Mangere East

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site is close to the MHU
TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6908

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 24,24A,24C,24B,
WEDGWOOD AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
24,24A,24C,24B,
WEDGWOOD
AVENUE, Mangere
East

LOCALITY

Middlemore

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

670

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6934

839-6437

839-5796

839-5797

839-5787

839-5928

839-5791

839-5756

839-7424

Urban (Central and Rezone 24,26,30,28,22, 24,26,30,28,22,


Mangere East
West)
LAVINIA CRESCENT,
LAVINIA CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mangere East
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

Rezone 241,239, ST
241,239, ST GEORGE Hunters Corner
GEORGE STREET,
STREET, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Urban (Central and Rezone 55, ISRAEL


West)
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 24, TINDALL
West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 21,
West)
WATCHFIELD CLOSE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 22, ASPIRING
West)
AVENUE, Manukau
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 21,
west)
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE,40, KIVELL
CLOSE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 25, HADDON
west)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

55, ISRAEL AVENUE, Otara South


Clover Park

24, TINDALL
CRESCENT, Otara

21, WATCHFIELD
CLOSE, Mangere

22, ASPIRING
AVENUE, Manukau

Otara North

MHS

MHS

21, MCNAUGHTON Mangere East


AVENUE,40, KIVELL
CLOSE, Mangere
East

MHS

25, HADDON
STREET, Mangere
East

SH

Rezone 25, MCBURNEY 25, MCBURNEY


PLACE, Mangere East
PLACE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

Middlemore

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Mangere Bridge SH

Otara South

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV & HSA overlays.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

While outside proximity criteria rationalisation of


surrounding zoning makes MHU appropriate

On basis of proximity to FN (Massey Road) and community


facilities (education) consider MHU appropriate zoning.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5820

839-5806

839-5943

839-5823

839-6914

839-6910

839-5810

839-5821

839-5833

839-6190

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 205, DAWSON


ROAD, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 38, CHELBURN
West)
CRESCENT,11,
ARCHBOYD AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

205, DAWSON
ROAD, Flat Bush

Urban (Central and Rezone 235, EAST


West)
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 6, ULAY PLACE,
West)
Clover Park from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

235, EAST TAMAKI Otara South


ROAD, PapatoetoeEast Tamaki

SH

6, ULAY PLACE,
Clover Park

SH

Urban (central and


west)

25,25A,
WEDGWOOD
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Middlemore

Rezone 25,27,
EARLSWORTH ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 60,
West)
MOLESWORTH PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

25,27,
EARLSWORTH
ROAD, Mangere
East

Middlemore

60, MOLESWORTH
PLACE, Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 8, STEVEN


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

8, STEVEN STREET,
Mangere East

Rezone 25,25A,
WEDGWOOD AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

11, ARCHBOYD
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Otara South

Mangere East

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

671

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

Otara South

Mangere East

Rezone 26, DEWHURST 26, DEWHURST


PLACE, Favona from
PLACE, Favona
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

Rezone 255, PORTAGE 255, PORTAGE


ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as the


MHU
area is close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. Support the
rezoning from SH to MHU zone where managing flooding risks
on those sites does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV &
HSA overlays setting a height limit of 8 metres. The property is
located a considerable distance from a TC or MU zone and is
remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support submission inpart to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5844

839-5834

839-5836

839-5845

839-5846

839-5849

839-5854

839-5851

839-5853

839-5855

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 104,
104, BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY ROAD, Flat ROAD, Flat Bush
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 27, IDLEWILD


27, IDLEWILD
West)
AVENUE, Mangere from AVENUE, Mangere
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (central and


west)

108, ROBERTSON
ROAD, Mangere
East

Mangere East

61, VISCOUNT
STREET, Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 108,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 61, VISCOUNT
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 4, CRANMERE
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

4, CRANMERE
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 21, ROYTON


21, ROYTON
West)
AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 37, FLAT BUSH


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 26, NICOLA
west)
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37, FLAT BUSH


ROAD, Otara

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 20, MARINER


West)
STREET,72, KIRKBRIDE
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

72, KIRKBRIDE
ROAD, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 38, VISCOUNT


West)
STREET,1, WIMPEY
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1, WIMPEY STREET, Mangere Bridge MHS


Mangere

26, NICOLA PLACE,


Mangere

Mangere

MHS

MHS

MHS

Mangere Bridge MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

672

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from SH to MHU. This site is close to the TC MHU
zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport. The
flooding risk on this site does not require maintaining a SH
zone. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support rezoning to from SH to MHU. This site is close to the MHU
TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Waste Water Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximate to FN on Buckland Road and within proximity of


Centre. Also close to education facilities. Consider MHU
zone appropriate

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7468

839-4976

839-5856

839-5865

839-5868

839-5873

839-5857

839-5863

839-5885

839-5889

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 26 MCDONALD 26 MCDONALD


ROAD. Papatoetoe from ROAD. Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

Rezone 26, MARGARET 26, MARGARET


ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

Rezone 4, SPERRY
PLACE,66, KIRKBRIDE
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge MHS

,66, KIRKBRIDE
ROAD, Mangere

Rezone 92, HILLS ROAD, 92, HILLS ROAD,


Otara from Mixed
Otara
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 36, EVERITT


ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 30, ALEXANDER
West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

36, EVERITT ROAD,


Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 11, VISCOUNT


West)
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, VISCOUNT
STREET, Mangere

30, ALEXANDER
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara North

Otara North

Otara North

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 29, STAVERTON 29, STAVERTON


Mangere
West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

Rezone 11, JAMES


STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 27, LANGIOLA
West)
DRIVE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, JAMES STREET,


Mangere East

27, LANGIOLA
DRIVE, Favona

Mangere East

Favona

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Wastewater Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity constraints related to odour. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone - the property
is located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

673

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Waste Water Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
Site next to motorway and affected by Air Quality Transport
Corridor. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximate to FN on Buckland Road and within proximity of


Centre. Also close to education facilities. Consider MHU
zone appropriate

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5891

839-5892

839-5893

839-6942

839-5640

839-5894

839-5895

839-6436

839-5914

839-5903

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 8, ORLY
AVENUE,2, NORTON
PLACE,2, STAVERTON
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 70, CONVAIR
West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

27, LANGIOLA
DRIVE, Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 47, JAMES


STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

47, JAMES STREET,


Mangere East

Rezone 26,28,
MAYFLOWER CLOSE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 23A,23,
ASPIRING AVENUE,
Manukau from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

26,28, MAYFLOWER Mangere East


CLOSE, Mangere
East

Rezone 8, CARNAC
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 47, THOMAS
ROAD,1, ORLY AVENUE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

8, CARNAC PLACE,
Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere

PAUP ZONE

SH

23A,23, ASPIRING
AVENUE, Manukau

47, THOMAS
ROAD,1, ORLY
AVENUE, Mangere

Mangere East

Otara South

Mangere East

Mangere

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

70, CONVAIR
Mangere Bridge SH
CRESCENT, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 261, ST GEORGE 261, ST GEORGE


Hunters Corner
West)
STREET, Papatoetoe
STREET, Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 64, OTARA
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 26, VALIANT
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

674

64, OTARA ROAD,


Otara

26, VALIANT
STREET, Mangere

Otara North

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN. There are also
wastewater infrastructure issues. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support rezoning from SH to MHU. This site is close to the TC
zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support rezoning from SH to MHU. This site is close to the TC
zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport. The
flooding risk on this site does not require maintaining a SH
zone. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
While outside proximity criteria rationalisation of
surrounding zoning makes MHU appropriate

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to THAB.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Mangere Bridge MHS

THAB

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This site is not close to a TC zone. Local context
concerns related to intensification near Wastewater Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity constraints related to odour. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7817

839-5906

839-5915

839-5921

839-5922

839-6562

839-5470

839-5925

839-5927

839-7780

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 263 PUHINUI


ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 33, CHELBURN
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 11, DESFORD


West)
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

263 PUHINUI ROAD. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

MHS

33, CHELBURN
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

11, DESFORD PLACE, Mangere


Mangere

MHS

Rezone 68, FRANKLYNE 68, FRANKLYNE


ROAD, Otara from
ROAD, Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 15, CLUTHA


West)
CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15, CLUTHA
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara South

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 24,20,22,


West)
SANDBROOK AVENUE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

24,20,22,
SANDBROOK
AVENUE, Otara

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 241, EAST


West)
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 19, HAMILL
west)
ROAD,1, DAIRY ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

241, EAST TAMAKI Otara South


ROAD, PapatoetoeEast Tamaki

SH

19, HAMILL ROAD,1, Otara North


DAIRY ROAD, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 10, FLAT BUSH


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 247 EAST
West)
TAMAKI ROAD.
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

10, FLAT BUSH


ROAD, Otara

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

675

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
While outside proximity criteria rationalisation of
surrounding zoning makes MHU appropriate

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Otara South

247 EAST TAMAKI Otara South


ROAD. PapatoetoeEast Tamaki

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

THAB

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6071

839-5475

839-5931

839-5937

839-7638

839-5939

839-6580

839-5944

839-5946

839-5918

839-6169

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

LOCALITY

Rezone 267, PUHINUI


267, PUHINUI
ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

Rezone 27, MCBURNEY 27, MCBURNEY


PLACE, Mangere East
PLACE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Middlemore

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 18, EVERITT


ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 53, COOPER
West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 279 PUHINUI
West)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

18, EVERITT ROAD,


Otara

53, COOPER
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara North

Otara North

279 PUHINUI ROAD. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

Rezone 7, CAREY PLACE, 7, CAREY PLACE,


Otara from Mixed
Otara
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara North

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone


25,27,21,23,31,25A, Otara South
West)
25,27,21,23,31,25A,29, 29, SANDBROOK
SANDBROOK AVENUE, AVENUE, Otara
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

Rezone 12, COSMO


PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 12, COBHAM
West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 6, MERVAN
west)
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 253, EAST
west)
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

12, COSMO PLACE,


Otara

12, COBHAM
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara North

Otara North

6, MERVAN STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

253, EAST TAMAKI Otara South


ROAD, PapatoetoeEast Tamaki

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

676

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre, Manukau Metropolitan Centre and MHU zone.
Support retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention
of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

On basis of proximity to FN (Massey Road) and community


facilities (education) consider MHU appropriate zoning.
MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to THAB.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

consider proximity appropropriate for MHU zone


MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

While outside proximity criteria rationalisation of


surrounding zoning makes MHU appropriate

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5949

839-5919

839-5947

839-5950

839-5951

839-5958

839-7805

839-5953

839-5963

839-5954

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 49, COOPER


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 40, JAMES
West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 152, HALL
West)
AVENUE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 42, WINDRUSH
west)
CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 700, MASSEY
west)
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 212, BAIRDS
West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

49, COOPER
CRESCENT, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

280 MASSEY ROAD. Middlemore


Mangere-Otahuhu

Rezone 280 MASSEY


ROAD. MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

40, JAMES STREET,


Mangere East

Otara North

Mangere East

152, HALL AVENUE, Favona


Mangere

42, WINDRUSH
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere

700, MASSEY ROAD, Mangere


Mangere-Otahuhu

212, BAIRDS ROAD, Otara North


Otara

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 397, MASSEY


West)
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

397, MASSEY ROAD, Mangere East


Mangere-Otahuhu

Urban (central and


west)

1, PALERMO
Otara South
PLACE,16, RAVENNA
WAY, Clover Park

MHS

19, ASHMORE
PLACE, Favona

MHS

Rezone 1, PALERMO
PLACE,16, RAVENNA
WAY, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 19, ASHMORE
West)
PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support rezoning from SH to MHU. This site is close to the TC
zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

677

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC. The rezoning of this to MHU would create a spot zoning in
this location and will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5970

839-5961

839-5969

839-5973

839-5974

839-5980

839-5982

839-5983

839-5984

839-5997

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 29,


West)
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 19, MERVAN
West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29, FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara

19, MERVAN
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 89, BADER


DRIVE, Mangere BridgeMangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 212, BUCKLAND
ROAD, Mangere EastPapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

89, BADER DRIVE,


Mangere BridgeMangere East

Mangere Bridge MHS

212, BUCKLAND
ROAD, Mangere
East-Papatoetoe

Mangere East

Rezone 8,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

8, COTTINGHAM
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Otara South

Rezone 12, PAINE


12, PAINE PLACE,
Mangere
PLACE, Mangere from Manger
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 8, FLEMING
8, FLEMING STREET Mangere East
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 90, VINE


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Urban (central and Rezone 10, JORDAN
west)
ROAD, Mangere from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 8, VICKERMAN
west)
STREET, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

90, VINE STREET,

10, JORDAN ROAD,


Mangere

8, VICKERMAN
STREET, Otara

Mangere East

Mangere

Otara South

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

SH

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHS

THAB

MHU

REASONS

678

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align No change
with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone, and closer to
Light Industrial zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part rezone from MHS to MHU. This site MHU
at 89, Bader Drive, Mangere is close to the Mangere Town
Centre zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property at 212, Buckland Road, Mangere East is
located a considerable distance from a TC or MU zone. A
change in the zoning would also create a spot zone in this
location and will not achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property at 8, Cottingham Crescent , Mangere East
is located a considerable distance from a TC or MU zone and is
remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning at
12, Paine Place, Mangere due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

On basis of proximity to FN (Massey Road) and community


facilities (education) consider MHU appropriate zoning.
Oppose position of Council for spot zoning as fails to
consider the Corporations wider integrated review of
zoning

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning at No change
10, Jordan Road, Mangere due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS which is compatible with the surrounding
area zoning. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5999

839-5900

839-5987

839-5991

839-6003

839-8300

839-6001

839-8301

839-6002

839-6007

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 18, EMERSON


West)
ROAD, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 26, HANNAH
west)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 9, WESTNEY
west)
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
18, EMERSON
ROAD, Clover Park

LOCALITY

Otara South

26, HANNAH ROAD, Otara South


Otara

9, WESTNEY ROAD, Mangere


Mangere

Rezone 75, MAHUNGA 75, MAHUNGA


DRIVE, Mangere Bridge DRIVE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Bridge
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 9, EMERSON


West)
ROAD, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 28A PARK
west)
AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 20, PLUMLEY
West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9, EMERSON ROAD, Otara South


Clover Park

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 28B PARK


AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 20, COMET
West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

28B PARK AVENUE. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

Urban (Central and Rezone 18, CONVAIR


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

18, CONVAIR
Mangere Bridge SH
CRESCENT, Mangere

28A PARK AVENUE. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

20, PLUMLEY
Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

20, COMET
Mangere Bridge SH
CRESCENT, Mangere

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. Site aligns


with the policies and objectives of MHS zone. MHS is
appropriate as the site is away from Dawson Road Local
Centre. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property at 75 Mahunga Drive, Favona is not close
to a TC or MU zone. A change in the zoning would also create a
spot zone in this location and will not achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the local
context. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. Site aligns
with the policies and objectives of MHS zone. MHS is
appropriate as the site is not within walkable distance to the
Dawson Road Local Centre. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Reject the change from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning - the site
is not located close to a town centre or to public transport
frequent service network. A change in the zoning would also
create a spot zone in this location and will not achieve
integrated management of resources and does not recognise
the local context. (Retain as part of wide SH grouping to
manage flood risk) Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and

679

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Near THAB proposed and consider MHU appropriate
transition in this area

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6014

839-6015

839-6016

839-6018

839-6026

839-6019

839-8302

839-6021

839-6027

839-6038

839-6039

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 10, ELMDON


West)
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
10, ELMDON
STREET, Mangere

LOCALITY

Mangere Bridge SH

Rezone 18, COURT


18, COURT TOWN
TOWN CLOSE, Mangere CLOSE, Mangere
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Mangere

Rezone 52, MASCOT


AVENUE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 4, TANNOCK
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere

52, MASCOT
AVENUE, Mangere

PAUP ZONE

SH

4, TANNOCK PLACE, Mangere East


Mangere East

MHS

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 70, WICKMAN


West)
WAY,6, TANNOCK
PLACE, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

70, WICKMAN
WAY,6, TANNOCK
PLACE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 28C PARK


AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 24, ROYTON
West)
AVENUE, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

28C PARK AVENUE. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

39, CHELBURN
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

18, CHARNTAY
AVENUE, Clover
Park

Otara South

MHS

65, COOPER
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara North

Urban (Central and Rezone 18, CHARNTAY


West)
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 65, COOPER
west)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Reject the change from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning at due No change


to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site is
also within the Mangere Mountain VV & HSA overlay.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Reject the change from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning at due to No change
the site being affected by flooding constraints. Retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 3, PESARO


3, PESARO PLACE,
West)
PLACE, Clover Park from Clover Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 39, CHELBURN


CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

680

MHS

SH

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support submission in part rezone from MHS to MHU. This site MHU
is near to the TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property at 4, Tannock Place, Mangere East is
located a considerable distance from a TC or MU zone and is
remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Reject the change from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning at due No change
to the site being affected by flooding constraints. Retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

24, ROYTON
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHS

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Reject the change from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning at due No change
to the site being affected by flooding constraints. Retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The property at 39, Chelburn Crescent 4, Mangere East
is located a considerable distance from a TC or MU zone and is
remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6030

839-6052

839-6035

839-6044

839-6047

839-6040

839-6043

839-6048

839-6049

839-5364

839-6055

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 20,


West)
REGALWOOD PLACE,
Favona from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 29, CASPAR
west)
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 25, CAMEO
West)
COURT ROAD, Favona
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

20, REGALWOOD
PLACE, Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 12, CLAYTON


AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 25, CHARNTAY
West)
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 18, HEYFORD
west)
CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 64, ROBERTSON
west)
ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, CLAYTON
AVENUE, Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 20, CAMEO


West)
COURT ROAD, Favona
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

20, CAMEO COURT Favona


ROAD, Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 16, CAMEO


West)
COURT ROAD, Favona
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

16, CAMEO COURT


ROAD, Favona

Urban (central and


west)

29, CHEVIOT
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

15, ASHTON
AVENUE, Otara

Otara North

Rezone 29, CHEVIOT


STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 15, ASHTON
West)
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Favona

29, CASPAR ROAD, Hunters Corner


Papatoetoe

25, CAMEO COURT


ROAD, Favona

Favona

Otara North

25, CHARNTAY
AVENUE, Clover
Park

Otara South

18, HEYFORD
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere

64, ROBERTSON
ROAD, Mangere
East

Favona

Favona

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

681

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.


Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MSH to THAB - the
property is not adjacent to Otara Town Centre to apply THAB
zone. Support retention of MHS which is compatible with
Retention of the zone of adjoining properties. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support submission in part to rezone from MHS to MHU. This
site is near to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to
the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to Otara Town Centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6050

839-6051

839-8085

839-5898

839-6063

839-6064

839-6056

839-5563

839-5708

839-5144

839-6405

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Urban (Central and Rezone 16, WELBY


West)
PLACE, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

16, WELBY PLACE,


Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

4, LYNCROFT
STREET, Mangere
East

Rezone 4, LYNCROFT
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 2A BERNARD
STREET. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 3, AZARA
west)
PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 39, PENION
west)
DRIVE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 9, TYRONE
West)
STREET, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 11, LENORE
west)
ROAD, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

LOCALITY

Mangere Bridge SH

Mangere East

2A BERNARD
Hunters Corner
STREET. Papatoetoe

3, AZARA PLACE,
Papatoetoe

39, PENION DRIVE,


Flat Bush

9, TYRONE STREET,
Otara

11, LENORE ROAD,


Favona

Papatoetoe

Otara South

Otara North

Favona

Rezone 3, CALVERT
3, CALVERT
AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Middlemore

Rezone 3, CRAMOND
DRIVE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 3, RAGLAN
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 3,3A, ROD
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

3, CRAMOND
DRIVE, Mangere
East

3, RAGLAN STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

3,3A, ROD PLACE,


Mangere East

PAUP ZONE

Middlemore

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

682

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning


due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. This site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from the both Town
Centres, Papatoetoe and Otara. Support retention of MHS
which is compatible with the surrounding area zoning.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Reject the change from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning - the site
is not located close to a town centre or to public transport
frequent service network. A change in the zoning would also
create a spot zone in this location and will not achieve
integrated management of resources and does not recognise
the local context. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre. MHS is
appropriate, as this property is adjoining the Single House zone
which is the underlying zone to Rosella Road precinct.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Site adjoins THAB has proximity to Centre and FN route
sufficient to support MHU zone.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Site is proximate to FN and empolyment (Mixed Use) to


northern boundary (would include remaining site between
MU and this site in MHU zoning).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6072

839-6057

839-6937

839-6065

839-6073

839-7949

839-6075

839-6077

839-6084

839-6085

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 1, ANGUS


West)
STREET, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 259,
West)
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Rezone 65, YATES


ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 1, KORU
West)
STREET, Mangere
Bridge from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

259, ROBERTSON
ROAD, Mangere
East

65, YATES ROAD,


Mangere East

1, KORU STREET,
Mangere Bridge

Rezone 31 LAURESTON 31 LAURESTON


AVENUE. Otara from
AVENUE. Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 32, VENTURA


West)
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

1, ANGUS STREET,
Otara

LOCALITY

Otara North

Mangere East

Rezone 30,28,
30,28, COURTENAY Mangere East
COURTENAY CRESCENT, CRESCENT, Mangere
Mangere East from
East
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

32, VENTURA
STREET, Mangere

Mangere East

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

Mangere Bridge SH

Hunters Corner

MHS

Mangere Bridge SH

Rezone 11,
11, MCNAUGHTON Mangere East
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere
AVENUE, Mangere East East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 88, FISHER


CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 54, DARNELL
CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

88, FISHER
CRESCENT, Otara

54, DARNELL
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara South

Otara South

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

683

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning. MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site at 65, Yates
Road, Mangere East is near to the Mangere East LC zone and in
close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property at 1, Koru Street, Mangere Bridge is not
close to a TC or MU zone. This site is also subject the Mangere
Mountain VV and HSA overlay. The MHS zoning complements
the built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. This site
at 32, Ventura Street, Mangere is also subject to the Mangere
Mountain VV and HSA Overlay. Retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6081

839-6092

839-6450

839-6082

839-5138

839-6066

839-6098

839-6089

839-6095

839-6110

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 5, WELBY


5, WELBY PLACE,18, Mangere Bridge SH
West)
PLACE,18, WATCHFIELD WATCHFIELD
CLOSE, Mangere from CLOSE, Mangere
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Urban (central and


west)

MHU

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 212, EAST


TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

212, EAST TAMAKI Otara North


ROAD, PapatoetoeEast Tamaki

Rezone 31A,31,29,29A, 31A,31,29,29A,


CORNWALL ROAD,
CORNWALL ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

MHS

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 20, IMRIE


20, IMRIE AVENUE, Mangere
West)
AVENUE, Mangere from Mangere
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

Rezone 32, GRAEME


32, GRAEME
AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 32, HADDON


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Urban (central and Rezone 5, CONSTANCE
west)
PLACE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 7,
west)
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32, HADDON
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

5, CONSTANCE
PLACE, Clover Park

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

7, MERVAN STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 7, MERVAN
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 29, PEARL
BAKER DRIVE, Otara
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

7, MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Rezone 29, PEARL Otara North


BAKER DRIVE, Otara

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

684

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. This site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning. MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change
Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6113

839-6107

839-5948

839-6108

839-6129

839-6114

839-6140

839-6142

839-6125

839-6132

839-6144

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 44, DAWSON


ROAD, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 56, WINDRUSH
west)
CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 26, SANDRA
west)
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 6, MOFFITT
West)
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 86, ZELDA
west)
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 29, CRANMERE
West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

44, DAWSON ROAD, Otara South


Flat Bush

56, WINDRUSH
CLOSE, Mangere

26, SANDRA
AVENUE, Otara

6, MOFFITT PLACE,
Mangere East

Mangere

Otara South

Mangere East

86, ZELDA AVENUE, Otara South


Clover Park

29, CRANMERE
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 42, FRANKLYNE 42, FRANKLYNE


ROAD, Otara from
ROAD, Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

Urban (Central and Rezone 92, FRANKLYNE 92, FRANKLYNE


West)
ROAD, Otara from
ROAD, Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

Urban (Central and Rezone 14, SPERRY


West)
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge MHS

14, SPERRY PLACE,


Mangere

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site at 56,
MHU
Windrush Close, Mangere is near to the Mangere TC zone and
in close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning
this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre or to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre or to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 40, IMRIE


40, IMRIE AVENUE, Mangere
West)
AVENUE, Mangere from Mangere
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 24, TARATA
West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
Bridge from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

685

SH

24, TARATA
Mangere Bridge SH
CRESCENT, Mangere
Bridge

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This site at 14 Sperry Place, Mangere is not close to the
TC zone. Local context concerns relate to intensification near
Wastewater Treatment Plant and reverse sensitivity issues
related to odour. The MHS zoning complements the suburban
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. This site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5794

839-6145

839-6148

839-6158

839-6167

839-5923

839-6165

839-6166

839-6175

839-6176

839-6177

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 32, LAVINIA


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

32, LAVINIA
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

Urban (Central and Rezone 36, VENTURA


West)
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

36, VENTURA
STREET, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 16, CHELBURN


West)
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Single House
to Mixed Housing
Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 6, COLIN
West)
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

16, CHELBURN
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

SH

6, COLIN STREET,
Mangere

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 32, COBHAM


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 26, WAIMATE
West)
STREET, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 6, DEWHURST
West)
PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32, COBHAM
CRESCENT, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 23, TARATA


CRESCENT, Mangere
Bridge from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

23, TARATA
Mangere Bridge MHS
CRESCENT, Mangere
Bridge

MHU

Rezone 36, NAYLORS


DRIVE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 15, ARI LANE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

36, NAYLORS DRIVE, Mangere


Mangere

MHU

Rezone 11, ARI LANE,


Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11, ARI LANE,


Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

26, WAIMATE
STREET, Otara

6, DEWHURST
PLACE, Favona

15, ARI LANE,


Mangere

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

Mangere Bridge SH

Mangere

Otara North

Otara South

Favona

Mangere

Mangere

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. This site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zoning from SH to THAB - These sites
are affected by flooding and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

686

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
consider proximity appropropriate for MHU zone

Do not support change of zoning from SH to THAB - growth is No change


limited in this area due to flooding constraints. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site at 6, Dewhurst Place, Favona is not close to a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site at 23, Tarata Crescent, Mangere Bridge is not
close to a TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site at 36, Naylors Drive, Mangere is not close to
the Mangere TC zone and is remote from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site at 15, Ari Lane, Mangere is not close to the
Mangere TC zone and is remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site at 11, Ari Lane, Mangere is not close to the
Mangere TC zone and is remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre for this site and access to light industry


employment consider that MHU zone appropriate. Note
THAB on Walmsley Road (to north) less proximate to
services.

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6178

839-6179

839-6180

839-6438

839-6455

839-6945

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 3, ARI LANE,


Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

3, ARI LANE,
Mangere

Rezone 8, ARI LANE,


Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

8, ARI LANE,
Mangere

Rezone 50, CYCLAMEN


ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

50, CYCLAMEN
ROAD, Mangere

LOCALITY

Mangere

Mangere

Mangere

Rezone 32,26,30,28,
32,26,30,28, GREAT Hunters Corner
GREAT SOUTH ROAD,
SOUTH ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Urban (central and


west)

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

32,26,30,28, LARSEN Wymondley


STREET, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

32,30,34,
Mangere East
WINTHROP
WAY,38,42,40,
COURTENAY
CRESCENT,36,40,
LAVINIA CRESCENT,
Mangere East

MHS

6, OUTRIGGER
PLACE, Mangere

MHS

Mangere East

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. The site at 3, Ari Lane, Mangere is a significant distance
from the Mangere TC zone and is remote from the RFN for
public transport. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site at 8, Ari Lane, Mangere is a significant distance
from the Mangere TC zone and is remote from the RFN for
public transport. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site at 50, Cyclamen Road Mangere is a significant
distance from the Mangere TC zone and is remote from the
RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support rezoning
to a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is adjacent to
MHU and MHS zones. Rezoning of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara and
Hunters Corner Town Centres and the RFN. Support retention
of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - These sites
are affected by flooding and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Rezone 32,26,30,28,
LARSEN STREET, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 32,26,38,36,34,
West)
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,26,38,36,34,
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East

REQUESTED
ZONE

687

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-6935

839-6181

839-6182

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 32,30,34,
WINTHROP
WAY,38,42,40,
COURTENAY
CRESCENT,36,40,
LAVINIA CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 6, OUTRIGGER
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 10, OUTRIGGER 10, OUTRIGGER


West)
PLACE, Mangere from PLACE, Mangere
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere

Mangere

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. The site at 6, Outrigger Place, Mangere is a significant
distance from the Mangere TC zone and is remote from the
RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site at 6, Outrigger Place, Mangere is a significant
distance from the Mangere TC zone and is remote from the
RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6192

839-6193

839-6905

839-6194

839-5019

839-6915

839-7855

839-6911

839-5818

839-5234

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 43, MASCOT


AVENUE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 18, KAMAKA
ROAD, Mangere Bridge
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

43, MASCOT
AVENUE, Mangere

Rezone 32,34, GRAY


AVENUE, MiddlemorePapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

32,34, GRAY
AVENUE,
MiddlemorePapatoetoe

Rezone 17, LILI CHEN


WAY, Mangere Bridge
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

17, LILI CHEN WAY, Mangere Bridge MHS


Mangere Bridge

Mangere

Middlemore

33, RAGLAN STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

33,33A,
WEDGWOOD
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Middlemore

Rezone 34A
34A EARLSWORTH
EARLSWORTH ROAD,
ROAD, Mangere
Mangere East. Mangere East
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Middlemore

Rezone 34D,34B,34C,
EARLSWORTH ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 35A, HILLSIDE
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 36, ALLEN
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34D,34B,34C,
EARLSWORTH
ROAD, Mangere
East

Middlemore

35A, HILLSIDE
ROAD, Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 33,33A,
WEDGWOOD AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

18, KAMAKA ROAD, Mangere Bridge MHS


Mangere Bridge

Urban (Central and Rezone 33, RAGLAN


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

PAUP ZONE

36, ALLEN STREET,


Mangere East

Mangere East

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site at 43, Mascot


Avenue, Mangere is near to the Mangere Town Centre (TC
zone) and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and
HSA Overlay with a maximum permitted height of eight
metres. Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS zone which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site at 17, Lili Chen Way, Mangere Bridge 6, is a
significant distance from a TC or MU zone and is remote from
the RFN. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - These sites
are affected by flooding and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

688

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to FN, employment (Light Industry) and


Centre consider MHU appropriate Zone. Do not support
Council principle of downzoning on basis of Pre-1944
Demolition Control Overlay.

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Oppose

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

On basis of proximity to centre consider MHU zone


appropriate, note THAB zone to north of site no more
proximtate

MHU

Oppose

Oppose Council reasoning to retain SH (pre-1944


Demolition Control). Consider the site is appropriate for
MHU zone given proximity to Centres.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5706

839-6943

839-6919

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 36, HILLSIDE


ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 36,34,
west)
MAYFLOWER
CLOSE,55,57,59,
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 36C,36B,36,36A,
West)
ASHLYNNE AVENUE,
Papatoetoe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

36, HILLSIDE ROAD, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

36C,36B,36,36A,
Papatoetoe
ASHLYNNE AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

SH

Urban (central and


west)

37, MAYFLOWER
CLOSE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHS

37A OVERTON
ROAD. Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

36,34, MAYFLOWER Mangere East


CLOSE,55,57,59,
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

689

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

While outside proximity criteria rationalisation of


surrounding zoning makes MHU appropriate

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5136

839-7990

839-6067

839-5779

839-6409

Rezone 37,
MAYFLOWER CLOSE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 37A OVERTON
west)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 38, BEAUFORT
West)
PLACE, Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

38, BEAUFORT
Papatoetoe
PLACE, Papatoetoe

Urban (Central and Rezone 38, GREAT


38, GREAT SOUTH
West)
SOUTH ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (central and
west)

Rezone
38,32,42,36,40,34,
MARGARET
ROAD,121,123,123A,12
7,119,125, WYLLIE
ROAD,15,17,1,5,7,9,
GIFFORD ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

38,32,42,36,40,34, Papatoetoe
MARGARET
ROAD,121,123,123A
,127,119,125,
WYLLIE
ROAD,15,17,1,5,7,9,
GIFFORD ROAD,
Papatoetoe

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support change of MHU
zoning to a less intensified MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. This enables
intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
neighbourhood and provides a transition in density between
THAB and MHS zones.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values
can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6443

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
38,48,44,42,36,40,50,52
, CASPAR ROAD,26,28,
ESPERANTO ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

38,48,44,42,36,40,5 Hunters Corner


0,52, CASPAR
ROAD,26,28,
ESPERANTO ROAD,
Papatoetoe

MHS

Rezone
38,48,46,44,42,40,
MAYFLOWER CLOSE,1,
WINTHROP
WAY,51,39,49,47,37,43,
35,41, HENWOOD
ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 38A,38,
CORNWALL
ROAD,122,130,126, TUI
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,48,46,44,42,40, Mangere East


MAYFLOWER
CLOSE,1,
WINTHROP
WAY,51,39,49,47,37
,43,35,41,
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East

MHS

38A,38, CORNWALL Hunters Corner


ROAD,122,130,126,
TUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

690

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Hunters Corner Town Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6944

839-6449

839-5455

839-6096

839-5712

839-6408

839-6451

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Rezone 39, GRAEME


39, GRAEME
AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Middlemore

Rezone 39, GRAY


AVENUE, MiddlemorePapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Middlemore

Rezone 39, GRAY


AVENUE,
MiddlemorePapatoetoe

Rezone 39, PAH ROAD, 39, PAH ROAD,


Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Rezone
39,33,31,29,35,29A,31A,
33A, MARGARET ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHU

Papatoetoe

39,33,31,29,35,29A, Papatoetoe
31A,33A,
MARGARET ROAD,
Papatoetoe

Rezone 39,37, KIMPTON 39,37, KIMPTON


ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS zone which is
compatible with the surrounding area zoning. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zoning as the area is also not in close
proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and the RFN for
considering change of zone to MHU zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to FN, employment (Light Industry) and


Centre consider MHU appropriate Zone. Do not support
Council principle of downzoning on basis of Pre-1944
Demolition Control Overlay.

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to FN consider MHU appropriate Zone,


particularly given scale of Corporation site and feasibility
of comprehensive in-site development. Do not support
Council principle of downzoning on basis of Pre-1944
Demolition Control Overlay.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6444

839-6912

839-8291

839-7637

839-5185

839-6078

839-6949

839-5777

839-5547

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 39,45,37,43,41, 39,45,37,43,41,


CASPAR ROAD,
CASPAR ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
39A,41A,41B,41,
EARLSWORTH
ROAD,53A,53,53B, HAIN
AVENUE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

39A,41A,41B,41,
EARLSWORTH
ROAD,53A,53,53B,
HAIN AVENUE,
Mangere East

LOCALITY

Hunters Corner

Middlemore

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

691

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a significant distance from Hunters Corner
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a significant distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Rezone 4 CALVERT
4 CALVERT AVENUE. Middlemore
AVENUE. Mangere East Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 4 KINGSWOOD 4 KINGSWOOD


ROAD. Papatoetoe from ROAD. Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

MHS

Hunters Corner

Rezone 4, CAMBOURNE 4, CAMBOURNE


Hunters Corner
ROAD,222, SHIRLEY
ROAD,222, SHIRLEY
ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 4, ESPERANTO
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 4,4A,
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

4, ESPERANTO
ROAD, Papatoetoe

4,4A, HENWOOD
ROAD, Mangere
East

Hunters Corner

Mangere East

Rezone 40, BUCKLAND 40, BUCKLAND


ROAD, Mangere East- ROAD, Mangere
Papatoetoe from Mixed East-Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere East

Rezone 40, HOKIANGA


STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

40, HOKIANGA
STREET, Mangere
East

MHU

THAB

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Site adjoins THAB has proximity to Centre and FN route
sufficient to support MHU zone.

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity of site to Hunters Corner, and other amenities


including Open Space and education site - consider site
suitable for THAB zone with integrated zoning pattern
applied

Meets Proximity Criteria

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Hunters Corner Town Centre nor to
the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the area is not in MHS
close proximity to Mangere and Papatoetoe Town Centres.
Support change of zoning from Single House to MHS. The area
is not constrained by flooding related environmental issues.
The proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe and Mangere Town
Centres nor to the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Given proximity to FN, and education facilities with


reasonable access to Centre, consider MHU appropriate
Zone. Do not support Council principle of downzoning on
basis of Pre-1944 Demolition Control Overlay.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5860

839-5342

839-7640

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 40A, ALLEN


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

40A, ALLEN STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

Rezone 41, CORNWALL 41, CORNWALL


ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

Rezone 41A BUCKLAND 41A BUCKLAND


ROAD. Mangere East- ROAD. Mangere
Papatoetoe from Mixed East-Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Middlemore

Rezone 41A OVERTON


ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 41A,41, FENTON
STREET, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

692

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe and Mangere Town
Centres nor to the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meets Proximity Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7577

839-6410

839-5444

839-6188

839-5843

839-5742

839-5765

839-6951

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (Central and Rezone 42, HADDON


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 42A, BERYL
West)
PLACE, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

41A OVERTON
ROAD. Papatoetoe

41A,41, FENTON
Papatoetoe
STREET, Papatoetoe

42, HADDON
STREET, Mangere

42A, BERYL PLACE,


Mangere East

Mangere East

Mangere East

Rezone 449, GREAT


449, GREAT SOUTH Hunters Corner
SOUTH ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Rezone 45, HILLCREST


ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 45, ROSELLA
west)
ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 450,450A,
West)
MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere-Otahuhu from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

45, HILLCREST
ROAD, Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

45, ROSELLA ROAD, Middlemore


Mangere East

450,450A, MASSEY
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu

Mangere East

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe and Mangere Town
Centres nor to the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and MHU zone. Support retention of MHS
as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the area is not in
close proximity to Mangere and Papatoetoe Town Centres.
Support the rezoning from SH to MHS zone where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to the

Oppose

Oppose
Meet Criteria
Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre and reasonable proximity to FN,


conclude that site appropriate for MHU zone

No change

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

MHS

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6913

839-6186

839-6922

839-6950

839-6460

839-6461

839-6462

839-6463

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 45A,45B,45,
45A,45B,45, HAIN
HAIN AVENUE, Mangere AVENUE, Mangere
East from Mixed
East
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Middlemore

Rezone 46,
46, KENDERDINE
KENDERDINE ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papatoetoe

Rezone 47,45, MILTON


ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Middlemore

47,45, MILTON
ROAD, Mangere
East

Rezone 472,470,
472,470, MASSEY
MASSEY ROAD,
ROAD, MangereMangere-Otahuhu from Otahuhu
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
10,12,20,14,16,18,8,21,
NATALIE
PLACE,12A,12,14,22,16,
10A, ASHTON AVENUE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Urban (Central and Rezone 24, ASHTON


West)
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 9,5,7, ASHTON
west)
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 1,3, EDWARD
West)
AVENUE,25,27,23,33,31,
29, ASHTON AVENUE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

693

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Mangere East

MHS

SH

10,12,20,14,16,18,8, Otara North


21, NATALIE
PLACE,12A,12,14,22
,16,10A, ASHTON
AVENUE, Otara

MHS

24, ASHTON
AVENUE, Otara

MHS

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the area is not in MHS
close proximity to Mangere and Papatoetoe Town Centres.
Support change of zoning from Single House to MHS. The area
is not constrained by flooding related environmental issues.
The proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
On FN route and proximity to Centre consider that MHU
zone appropriate

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

9,5,7, ASHTON
AVENUE, Otara

Otara North

Otara North

1,3, EDWARD
Otara North
AVENUE,25,27,23,3
3,31,29, ASHTON
AVENUE, Otara

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6464

839-6465

839-6466

839-6467

839-6468

839-6469

839-6470

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 8,4,6,
HARWOOD
CRESCENT,11,9,13,
NATALIE
PLACE,38,36,34,
ASHTON AVENUE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone
25,27,21,23,31,29,35,
EDWARD AVENUE,30,
OTARA ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
8,4,6, HARWOOD
CRESCENT,11,9,13,
NATALIE
PLACE,38,36,34,
ASHTON AVENUE,
Otara

LOCALITY

Otara North

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

694

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
25,27,21,23,31,29,3 Otara North
5, EDWARD
AVENUE,30, OTARA
ROAD, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 2,4, EDWARD


West)
AVENUE,39,41A,37,39A,
35,41, ASHTON
AVENUE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 3A,7A,7,
West)
HARWOOD CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

2,4, EDWARD
Otara North
AVENUE,39,41A,37,
39A,35,41, ASHTON
AVENUE, Otara

MHS

3A,7A,7, HARWOOD Otara North


CRESCENT, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 1,1A,3,


West)
HARWOOD CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1,1A,3, HARWOOD
CRESCENT, Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 8,6,4B,4A,


West)
FINLAY PLACE,89,
BAIRDS ROAD,24,26,22,
EDWARD AVENUE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

8,6,4B,4A, FINLAY
PLACE,89, BAIRDS
ROAD,24,26,22,
EDWARD AVENUE,
Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 32, OTARA


West)
ROAD,91,95A,93,95,97,
BAIRDS
ROAD,38,32,30,28,36,40
,34, EDWARD
AVENUE,3, FINLAY
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

32, OTARA
Otara North
ROAD,91,95A,93,95,
97, BAIRDS
ROAD,38,32,30,28,3
6,40,34, EDWARD
AVENUE,3, FINLAY
PLACE, Otara

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Otara North

Otara North

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
SH/MHU

THAB

Do not support change zoning of properties at 91, 93, 95, 97,


No change
99, Baids Road and 34 Edwards Avenue - growth is limited in
these areas due to significant flooding constraints and thereby
application of SH is consistent with the zone policy. Do not
support changes sought to THAB at 32 Otara Road, 28, 30, 32,
36, 38, 40 Edwards Avenue and 95 Bairds Road, and support
retention of MHU as the properties are not adjacent to Otara
Town Centre. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH/MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6471

839-6472

839-6473

839-6474

839-6475

839-6476

839-6477

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
10,12,14,2,4,6,8,
LAPPINGTON
ROAD,38,48,40A,46,42,
40, OTARA
ROAD,98,100,94,96,
BAIRDS ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 82,76,80,78,
West)
BAIRDS ROAD,1,3,
GILBERT
ROAD,24,26,20,22,18,30
,28, LAPPINGTON
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 1,2,5,4,7,6,8,
West)
CORDOBA COURT,4,
TOSO WAY,1,13,5,3,
BLAND PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 14,16, BLAND
West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9,13,15,23,
West)
GILBERT ROAD,18,16,
JULIAN PLACE,41,
LAPPINGTON ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

10,12,14,2,4,6,8,
Otara North
LAPPINGTON
ROAD,38,48,40A,46,
42,40, OTARA
ROAD,98,100,94,96,
BAIRDS ROAD,
Otara

MHS

82,76,80,78, BAIRDS Otara North


ROAD,1,3, GILBERT
ROAD,24,26,20,22,1
8,30,28,
LAPPINGTON ROAD,
Otara

MHS

1,2,5,4,7,6,8,
Otara North
CORDOBA COURT,4,
TOSO WAY,1,13,5,3,
BLAND PLACE,
Otara

MHS

14,16, BLAND
PLACE, Otara

MHS

11,9,13,15,23,
Otara North
GILBERT
ROAD,18,16, JULIAN
PLACE,41,
LAPPINGTON ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 8,4,6, GILBERT


West)
ROAD,74, BAIRDS
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
24,26,12,20,14,22,16,18
, GILBERT ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

8,4,6, GILBERT
ROAD,74, BAIRDS
ROAD, Otara

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

695

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
THAB

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
THAB

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Otara North

THAB

THAB

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Otara North

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meets Proximity Criteria

24,26,12,20,14,22,1 Otara North


6,18, GILBERT
ROAD, Otara

MHS

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meets Proximity Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6478

839-6479

839-6480

839-6481

839-6482

839-6483

839-6484

839-6485

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 33,31,27,29,


West)
GILBERT ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 50,52, OTARA
West)
ROAD,1, LAPPINGTON
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 51,53,49,
west)
GILBERT
ROAD,10,12,14,16,4,6,8,
FRANICH STREET,68,70,
OTARA ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
33,31,27,29,
GILBERT ROAD,
Otara

LOCALITY

Otara North

PAUP ZONE

MHS

50,52, OTARA
Otara North
ROAD,1,
LAPPINGTON ROAD,
Otara

MHS

51,53,49, GILBERT Otara North


ROAD,10,12,14,16,4
,6,8, FRANICH
STREET,68,70,
OTARA ROAD, Otara

MHS

Rezone 54B,56,54A,58, 54B,56,54A,58,


Otara North
OTARA ROAD, Otara
OTARA ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

MHS

Rezone
2/48,56,2/50,3/50,1 Otara North
2/48,56,2/50,3/50,1/50, /50,1/48, GILBERT
1/48, GILBERT ROAD,
ROAD, Otara
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 64,66, GILBERT


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 11,13,15,17,
west)
ECCLES PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 68,70, GILBERT
West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

696

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

64,66, GILBERT
ROAD, Otara

Otara North

11,13,15,17, ECCLES Otara North


PLACE, Otara

68,70, GILBERT
ROAD, Otara

Otara North

THAB

THAB

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS, as the property is not adjacent to any
centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Proximity Criteria


MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS, as the property is not adjacent to any
centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS, as the property is not adjacent to any
centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meets Proximity Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meets Proximity Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6486

839-6487

839-6488

839-6489

839-6490

839-6491

839-6492

839-6493

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 76,74, GILBERT


ROAD,10,12,14,4,6,8,
GAYE CRESCENT, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

76,74, GILBERT
Otara North
ROAD,10,12,14,4,6,
8, GAYE CRESCENT,
Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 9,7, FRANICH


West)
STREET,10,12,16,4,6,8,
HOPE
PLACE,59,57,61,63,71,6
9, GILBERT ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 77,75,79,
West)
GILBERT ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 3,5, HOPE
west)
PLACE,74,78, OTARA
ROAD,1,3,5, FRANICH
STREET, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 11,18,9, HOPE
West)
PLACE,82,80,86,84,
OTARA ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 94,96, OTARA
West)
ROAD,91,89, GILBERT
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 11,9,3,5,7, GAYE
west)
CRESCENT,8,4,6,
BENTLEY
ROAD,88,82,90,80,92,86
,84,78, GILBERT ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

9,7, FRANICH
Otara North
STREET,10,12,16,4,6
,8, HOPE
PLACE,59,57,61,63,7
1,69, GILBERT
ROAD, Otara

MHS

77,75,79, GILBERT
ROAD, Otara

MHS

11,9,3,5,7, GAYE
Otara North
CRESCENT,8,4,6,
BENTLEY
ROAD,88,82,90,80,9
2,86,84,78, GILBERT
ROAD, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 24,26, GAYE


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,26, GAYE
CRESCENT, Otara

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

697

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS, as the property is not adjacent to any
centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meets Proximity Criteria

Otara North

3,5, HOPE
Otara North
PLACE,74,78,
OTARA ROAD,1,3,5,
FRANICH STREET,
Otara

MHS

11,18,9, HOPE
Otara North
PLACE,82,80,86,84,
OTARA ROAD, Otara

MHS

94,96, OTARA
ROAD,91,89,
GILBERT ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Otara North

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS, as the property is not adjacent to any
centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Otara North

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6494

839-6495

839-6496

839-6497

839-6498

839-6499

839-6500

839-6501

839-6502

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 10,12,14,
10,12,14, BENTLEY
BENTLEY ROAD,28,
ROAD,28, GAYE
GAYE CRESCENT, Otara CRESCENT, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Otara North

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 96, GILBERT


West)
ROAD,11,13,15,1,3,5,7,9
, BENTLEY ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 1, LINDA
west)
PLACE,83,81,77A,79,
OTARA ROAD,4,6,
CLYDE ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 18,12,14,16,
West)
CLYDE
ROAD,25,13,27,15,23,
ALEXANDER
CRESCENT,11,10,9,4,6,
LINDA PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 24,26,
West)
ALEXANDER
CRESCENT,1,
FRANKLYNE ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

96, GILBERT
Otara North
ROAD,11,13,15,1,3,
5,7,9, BENTLEY
ROAD, Otara

MHS

1, LINDA
Otara North
PLACE,83,81,77A,79
, OTARA ROAD,4,6,
CLYDE ROAD, Otara

MHS

18,12,14,16, CLYDE Otara North


ROAD,25,13,27,15,2
3, ALEXANDER
CRESCENT,11,10,9,4
,6, LINDA PLACE,
Otara

MHS

24,26, ALEXANDER
CRESCENT,1,
FRANKLYNE ROAD,
Otara

Otara North

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 73A,71A,


West)
OTARA ROAD,1,3,5,
CLYDE ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 19,15,17, CLYDE
west)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 33,29,35,
west)
ALEXANDER CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

73A,71A, OTARA
ROAD,1,3,5, CLYDE
ROAD, Otara

Otara North

19,15,17, CLYDE
ROAD, Otara

Otara North

33,29,35,
ALEXANDER
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

108,106,110,
FRANKLYNE ROAD,
Otara

Otara North

Rezone 108,106,110,
FRANKLYNE ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

698

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS, as the property is not adjacent to any
centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre or to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6503

839-6504

839-6505

839-6506

839-6507

839-6508

839-6509

839-6510

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 1,3, RALEIGH


PLACE,82,80,
FRANKLYNE ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
1,3, RALEIGH
PLACE,82,80,
FRANKLYNE ROAD,
Otara

LOCALITY

Otara North

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 9,7, RALEIGH


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 10,8,4,6,
West)
RALEIGH PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9,7, RALEIGH PLACE, Otara North


Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 13,15, RALEIGH


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 11,13,3,5,7,9,
west)
CRAIG
PLACE,59,55,57,51,53,6
1,63,65,67,69,
FRANKLYNE ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

13,15, RALEIGH
PLACE, Otara

11,13,3,5,7,9, CRAIG Otara North


PLACE,59,55,57,51,5
3,61,63,65,67,69,
FRANKLYNE ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 77,75,73,
FRANKLYNE
ROAD,46,32,36,40,34,
ALEXANDER
CRESCENT,2,10,12,8,6,
CRAIG PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 10,12,
West)
HARWOOD CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

77,75,73,
Otara North
FRANKLYNE
ROAD,46,32,36,40,3
4, ALEXANDER
CRESCENT,2,10,12,8
,6, CRAIG PLACE,
Otara

MHS

10,12, HARWOOD
CRESCENT, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9,7, BLAIR


West)
PLACE,63, ALEXANDER
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

11,9,7, BLAIR
PLACE,63,
ALEXANDER
CRESCENT, Otara

10,8,4,6, RALEIGH
PLACE, Otara

Otara North

Otara North

Otara North

Otara North

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

699

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support change of zoning from Single House to MHS at 8, 4, 6
Raleigh Place. The area is not constrained by flooding related
environmental issues. The proposed zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS. Do not support change of zone from
Single House to MHU - The area is a considerable distance from
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located far away from Otara Town Centre and the
RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support changes sought to THAB for properties at


MHS
7,9,11 Blair Place as the property is not adjacent to Town
Centre zone. Support change of zone to MHS as less intensified
zone. It is appropriate to rezone from SH to MHS where
managing flooding risks on those sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. Support retention of MHS for 63
Alexander Crescent. The proposed zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6511

839-6512

839-6513

839-6514

839-6515

839-6516

839-6517

839-6518

839-6519

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 18,12,20,14,16,
CAREY
PLACE,194,196,190,192,
186,188, EAST TAMAKI
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,12,20,14,16,
Otara North
CAREY
PLACE,194,196,190,
192,186,188, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Rezone 11,13,15, CAREY


PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 11,9,13,15,7,
COSMO PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 8,4,6, HILLS
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 1,3,5, HAMILL
ROAD,2, GRUNDY
PLACE,9,7, HILLS ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,13,15, CAREY
PLACE, Otara

MHS

1,3,5, HAMILL
ROAD,2, GRUNDY
PLACE,9,7, HILLS
ROAD, Otara

Otara North

Rezone 1,3, CAREY


PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 234,232, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1,3, CAREY PLACE,


Otara

Otara North

Otara North

11,9,13,15,7,
COSMO PLACE,
Otara

Otara North

8,4,6, HILLS ROAD,


Otara

Otara North

234,232, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki

Otara North

Urban (Central and Rezone 8,12,14,6, GUBB 8,12,14,6, GUBB


West)
PLACE, Otara from
PLACE, Otara
Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

Otara North

Rezone 59, VELVET


CRESCENT,2,4,
LAWRENCE PLACE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

59, VELVET
CRESCENT,2,4,
LAWRENCE PLACE,
Otara

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

700

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - These sites


are affected by flooding and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone - the


No change
properties are located a considerable distance from Otara
Town Centre and the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6520

839-6521

839-6522

839-6523

839-6524

839-6525

839-6526

839-6527

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 1,3, LAWRENCE 1,3, LAWRENCE


PLACE,55, VELVET
PLACE,55, VELVET
CRESCENT, Otara from CRESCENT, Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Otara North

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone - the


No change
properties are located a considerable distance from Otara
Town Centre and the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Rezone
60A,60B,58B,58A,
BLAMPIED ROAD,8,
DAIRY ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 56A56D,50B,52A-52D,50A,
BLAMPIED ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

60A,60B,58B,58A, Otara North


BLAMPIED ROAD,8,
DAIRY ROAD, Otara

MHS

56A-56D,50B,52A- Otara North


52D,50A, BLAMPIED
ROAD, Otara

MHS

Rezone 19,31,27,29,17,
WILLIAMS
CRESCENT,39,37,43,35,
41, HILLS ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,31,27,29,17,
Otara North
WILLIAMS
CRESCENT,39,37,43,
35,41, HILLS ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Rezone 58,54,56,50,52,
HILLS ROAD,1/48-4/48,
VELVET CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

58,54,56,50,52,
HILLS ROAD,1/484/48, VELVET
CRESCENT, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 33,31,27,29,


West)
HILLS ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 8,7,6, TATE
West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
10,18A,14,16,6A,12,4,8,
VELVET CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

701

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone - the


No change
properties are located a considerable distance from Otara
Town Centre and the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone - the


No change
properties are located a considerable distance from Otara
Town Centre and the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

33,31,27,29, HILLS
ROAD, Otara

8,7,6, TATE PLACE,


Otara

Otara North

Otara North

Otara North

10,18A,14,16,6A,12, Otara North


4,8, VELVET
CRESCENT, Otara

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS at No change
10, 18A, 14, 16, 6A, 12, 8 Velvet Place. The area is constrained
by flooding related environmental issues. Retaining Single
House aligns with the objectives of the SH zone for these
properties. Support retention of MHS at 4 Velvet Place - The
area is a considerable distance from Town Centre and the RFN.

MHS

Support

MHS

Support
Recognise accessibility constraints in proximity assessment
for this area

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Meets Proximity Criteria when development area


considered

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support
Recognise accessibility constraints in proximity assessment
for this area

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6528

839-6529

839-6530

839-6531

839-6532

839-6533

839-6534

839-6535

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone


58,60,76,62,74,72,7 Otara North
West)
58,60,76,62,74,72,70,82 0,82,80,78, HAMILL
,80,78, HAMILL ROAD, ROAD, Otara
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 69,65,67,


West)
HAMILL ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 54,56,58,
west)
JOHNSTONES
ROAD,98,100,96, HILLS
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 11, BOLTON
west)
PLACE,66, JOHNSTONES
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

69,65,67, HAMILL
ROAD, Otara

MHS

11, BOLTON
Otara North
PLACE,66,
JOHNSTONES ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone
46,46A,48A,48,50,
JOHNSTONES
ROAD,73,71, HILLS
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 32,
west)
JOHNSTONES
ROAD,86,84, HAMILL
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 24,26,28,
West)
JOHNSTONES ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

46,46A,48A,48,50,
JOHNSTONES
ROAD,73,71, HILLS
ROAD, Otara

Otara North

MHS

32, JOHNSTONES
ROAD,86,84,
HAMILL ROAD,
Otara

Otara North

24,26,28,
Otara North
JOHNSTONES ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

10,12,20,14,22,18,4, Otara North


6,8, CLARKSON
CRESCENT,18,16A,2
0,14,16,
JOHNSTONES ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Rezone
10,12,20,14,22,18,4,6,8,
CLARKSON
CRESCENT,18,16A,20,14
,16, JOHNSTONES
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

54,56,58,
JOHNSTONES
ROAD,98,100,96,
HILLS ROAD, Otara

Otara North

Otara North

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

702

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Support
Meets Proximity Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6536

839-6537

839-6538

839-6539

839-6540

839-6541

839-6542

839-6543

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone
11,25,13,27,15,21,1 Otara North
11,25,13,27,15,21,17,9, 7,9, CLARKSON
CLARKSON CRESCENT, CRESCENT, Otara
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 33,35,


West)
CLARKSON CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

33,35, CLARKSON
CRESCENT, Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 13, VALDER


West)
AVENUE,1,3,5, FARLEY
STREET,6A,2A,4A,
SPRINGS ROAD, East
Tamaki from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Use.
Urban (central and Rezone 2,4,6, FARLEY
west)
STREET,7, VALDER
AVENUE,1,3, LATIMER
STREET, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Use.

13, VALDER
Otara North
AVENUE,1,3,5,
FARLEY
STREET,6A,2A,4A,
SPRINGS ROAD, East
Tamaki

MHS

2,4,6, FARLEY
STREET,7, VALDER
AVENUE,1,3,
LATIMER STREET,
Otara

Otara North

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 2,4, LATIMER


West)
STREET,13,
JOHNSTONES ROAD,3,
VALDER AVENUE,3,5A,
PEARL BAKER DRIVE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 10,12,8A,
west)
SPRINGS ROAD, East
Tamaki from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2,4, LATIMER
STREET,13,
JOHNSTONES
ROAD,3, VALDER
AVENUE,3,5A,
PEARL BAKER
DRIVE, Otara

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

20,22,16, SPRINGS Otara North


ROAD,49,47,57,45,5
1,43,41, PEARL
BAKER DRIVE,11,9,7,
MATAMATA PLACE,
East Tamaki

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 20,22,16,
SPRINGS
ROAD,49,47,57,45,51,43
,41, PEARL BAKER
DRIVE,11,9,7,
MATAMATA PLACE,
East Tamaki from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre RFN. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

703

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre RFN. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located far away from Otara Town Centre and too
close to Heavy Industry zone. Support retention of MHS as a
lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and too close to Heavy Industry zone. Support retention
of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meets Proximity Criteria when development area
considered

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets appropriate proximity for MHU


10,12,8A, SPRINGS Otara North
ROAD, East Tamaki

Rezone 18,20,14,16,
18,20,14,16,
VALDER AVENUE, Otara VALDER AVENUE,
from Single House to
Otara
Mixed Housing Urban.

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change


Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change
Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Consider appropriate to zoning of area

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Otara North

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change


Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6544

839-6545

839-6546

839-6547

839-6548

839-6549

839-6550

839-6551

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9,13A, PEARL


West)
BAKER DRIVE,4, VALDER
AVENUE, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9,13A, PEARL
BAKER DRIVE,4,
VALDER AVENUE,
Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 10,4,8,


West)
MATAMATA PLACE,10,
VALDER
AVENUE,19,25,21,17,23,
PEARL BAKER DRIVE,
Otara from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,4,8, MATAMATA Otara North


PLACE,10, VALDER
AVENUE,19,25,21,1
7,23, PEARL BAKER
DRIVE, Otara

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 12,14A, PEARL


West)
BAKER DRIVE, Otara
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

12,14A, PEARL
Otara North
BAKER DRIVE, Otara

SH

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 1, TYRONE
STREET,19,21,
JOHNSTONES ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1, TYRONE
Otara North
STREET,19,21,
JOHNSTONES ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Rezone 2,4,6, TYRONE


STREET,31,27,29,
JOHNSTONES ROAD,4,6,
ANGUS STREET, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2,4,6, TYRONE
STREET,31,27,29,
JOHNSTONES
ROAD,4,6, ANGUS
STREET, Otara

Otara North

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 18,16, ANGUS


West)
STREET, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,16, ANGUS
STREET, Otara

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

24,26,28,22, PEARL Otara North


BAKER DRIVE, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 24,26,28,22,
PEARL BAKER DRIVE,
Otara from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

704

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change


Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change
Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change
Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 60,54,62,58,52, 60,54,62,58,52,


West)
PEARL BAKER DRIVE,
PEARL BAKER
Otara from Single
DRIVE, Otara
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

SH

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of zoning from Single House to MHS. Support MHS


the rezoning from SH to MHS zone where managing flooding
risks on those sites does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change
Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change
Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6552

839-6553

839-6554

839-6555

839-6560

839-6557

839-5341

839-6559

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 11,9,3,5,7,
OROUA PLACE,40,
PEARL BAKER DRIVE,
Otara from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

11,9,3,5,7, OROUA Otara North


PLACE,40, PEARL
BAKER DRIVE, Otara

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 57,59, ANTRIM


West)
CRESCENT,11,9, PERTH
STREET, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

57,59, ANTRIM
CRESCENT,11,9,
PERTH STREET,
Otara

Otara North

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 51,53,49,


West)
ANTRIM CRESCENT,
Otara from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 38,36, PEARL
West)
BAKER
DRIVE,10,8,12,4,6,
OROUA PLACE, Otara
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

51,53,49, ANTRIM
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara North

38,36, PEARL BAKER Otara North


DRIVE,10,8,12,4,6,
OROUA PLACE,
Otara

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
27,29B,29A,33D,31C,31
B,31A,33B,33A,33C,31D,
O'CONNOR STREET,
Otara from Road to
Mixed Housing Urban.

27,29B,29A,33D,31C Otara South


,31B,31A,33B,33A,3
3C,31D, O'CONNOR
STREET, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
11,13,11A,9A,15A,9,
FLAT BUSH
ROAD,11,13,15,17,19,3,
9, PIAKO
STREET,8,12,20,22,
WAIMATE
STREET,25,27,21,23,29,
3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,11,10,13,
12,15,14,17,16,19,
ANTYCH PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13,11A,9A,15A,9, Otara South


FLAT BUSH
ROAD,11,13,15,17,1
9,3,9, PIAKO
STREET,8,12,20,22,
WAIMATE
STREET,25,27,21,23,
29,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,11
,10,13,12,15,14,17,1
6,19, ANTYCH
PLACE, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 271, BAIRDS


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 24,26,22, FLAT
west)
BUSH ROAD,90A90C,92,94, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

271, BAIRDS ROAD, Otara South


Otara

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

705

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change


Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
Do not support change from Single House to MHU, as the
MHS
property's location is not close to Otara Town Centre and to
the RFN. Support MHS as a less intensified zone change, as the
Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay does not apply to the
properties. The zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change
Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU - No change
Heavy Industry Air Quality overlay applies to the area. Growth
is limited due to significant adverse effects on amenity values
and thereby the application of SH zone is consistent with the
policy direction to manage the adverse effects in adjacent
areas to Heavy Industry zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
See evidence

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

24,26,22, FLAT
Otara South
BUSH ROAD,90A90C,92,94, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6583

839-5692

839-6584

839-6585

839-5310

839-5389

839-6566

839-6578

839-6568

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 278,288,286,


West)
BAIRDS ROAD,4,6,
GUTHREY PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

278,288,286,
BAIRDS ROAD,4,6,
GUTHREY PLACE,
Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 291, BAIRDS


West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 294,292,290,
west)
BAIRDS ROAD,2,
SUTCLIFFE PLACE,1,
GUTHREY PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

291, BAIRDS ROAD, Otara South


Otara

294,292,290,
Otara South
BAIRDS ROAD,2,
SUTCLIFFE PLACE,1,
GUTHREY PLACE,
Otara

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

296,300,298,
BAIRDS ROAD,8,6,
INGRAM
CRESCENT,1,3,5,
SUTCLIFFE PLACE,
Otara

MHS

Rezone 296,300,298,
BAIRDS ROAD,8,6,
INGRAM
CRESCENT,1,3,5,
SUTCLIFFE PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

Otara South

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Otara South

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Rezone 3, FLINDERS
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 3, RAPSON
West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 30,36, FLAT
West)
BUSH ROAD,99,95,97,
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, FLINDERS PLACE, Otara South


Otara

30,36, FLAT BUSH


ROAD,99,95,97,
PRESTON ROAD,
Otara

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

301,299, BAIRDS
ROAD, Otara

Otara South

Rezone 301,299,
BAIRDS ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 10,12,
West)
EMERSON ROAD, Clover
Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

706

3, RAPSON ROAD,
Otara

10,12, EMERSON
ROAD, Clover Park

Otara South

Otara South

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. Site is some No change
distance away from Dawson Road Local Centre. Retention of
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6565

839-6570

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone
312,318,316,314,
BAIRDS ROAD,40,
INGRAM CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

312,318,316,314,
Otara South
BAIRDS ROAD,40,
INGRAM CRESCENT,
Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 91,93,89,87,85,


West)
PRESTON ROAD,33,
FLAT BUSH ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

91,93,89,87,85,
Otara South
PRESTON ROAD,33,
FLAT BUSH ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 3, AWATERE


West)
STREET,1,3, CLUTHA
CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, AWATERE
Otara South
STREET,1,3, CLUTHA
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

MHS

Rezone 32,31,29,
32,31,29, PALERMO Otara South
PALERMO PLACE,
PLACE, Clover Park
Clover Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

707

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6571

839-6572

839-6573

839-6574

839-6575

839-6576

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (Central and Rezone 19,25,21,17,


19,25,21,17,
West)
PALERMO PLACE,
PALERMO PLACE,
Clover Park from Mixed Clover Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara South

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 24,26,22,


24,26,22, PALERMO Otara South
West)
PALERMO PLACE,
PLACE, Clover Park
Clover Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 60,62,64,58,66, 60,62,64,58,66,


FLAT BUSH ROAD, Otara FLAT BUSH ROAD,
from Mixed Housing
Otara
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

Rezone 24,18,26,20,22,
MURRAY ROAD,10,8,6,
RAPSON ROAD,38,
DESMOND PLACE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara South

24,18,26,20,22,
MURRAY
ROAD,10,8,6,
RAPSON ROAD,38,
DESMOND PLACE,
Otara

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
located close to Dawson Local Centre and the RFN. The zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


located close to Dawson Local Centre and the RFN. The zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


located close to Dawson Local Centre and the RFN. The zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6563

839-6564

839-5924

839-5459

839-5763

839-5069

839-5024

839-5638

839-5822

839-6586

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone
313,319,317,315,
BAIRDS ROAD,10, DON
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
327A,323,323A,327,325
,325A, BAIRDS ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
313,319,317,315,
BAIRDS ROAD,10,
DON PLACE, Otara

LOCALITY

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

327A,323,323A,327, Otara South


325,325A, BAIRDS
ROAD, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 34, FLINDERS


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 4, HERALD
west)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 46,44,44A,
West)
KUDU ROAD,128C,128B,
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34, FLINDERS
PLACE, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 5, DUNSTAN


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 6, CAPSTICK
west)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 7, HANNAH
West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 77, TE IRIRANGI
West)
DRIVE, Manukau from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, DUNSTAN PLACE, Otara South


Otara

Urban (central and


west)

11,13,15,3,5,7,9,
Otara South
INGRAM
CRESCENT,302,306,
BAIRDS ROAD,
Otara

Rezone
11,13,15,3,5,7,9,
INGRAM
CRESCENT,302,306,
BAIRDS ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, HERALD PLACE,
Otara

46,44,44A, KUDU
ROAD,128C,128B,
PRESTON ROAD,
Otara

Otara South

Otara South

Otara South

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

708

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meets Proximity Criteria when development area
considered

6, CAPSTICK ROAD, Otara South


Otara

7, HANNAH ROAD,
Otara

77, TE IRIRANGI
DRIVE, Manukau

Otara South

Otara South

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Manukau Metropolitan Centre and RFN. Support
retention of MHS as a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6587

839-6588

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 322, BAIRDS


West)
ROAD,32,30,34,
INGRAM
CRESCENT,19,21,23,
BIRCH
PLACE,120,114,116,110,
112,118,116A, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

322, BAIRDS
Otara South
ROAD,32,30,34,
INGRAM
CRESCENT,19,21,23,
BIRCH
PLACE,120,114,116,
110,112,118,116A,
PRESTON ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9,5,7, BIRCH


West)
PLACE,1,9,3,5,29, KUDU
ROAD,11,10,12,8,6,
SUTCLIFFE
PLACE,11,13,15,21,17,1
9,5,7,9, GUTHREY
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9,5,7, BIRCH
Otara South
PLACE,1,9,3,5,29,
KUDU
ROAD,11,10,12,8,6,
SUTCLIFFE
PLACE,11,13,15,21,1
7,19,5,7,9, GUTHREY
PLACE, Otara

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone
253,251,249,257,255,
BAIRDS ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 45,43,41,
west)
EVERITT ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 61,57,59,
West)
COOPER CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

253,251,249,257,25 Otara North


5, BAIRDS ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 33,37,35,


West)
COOPER CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

33,37,35, COOPER
CRESCENT, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

24,26,22,32,30,28,3 Otara North


4, COOPER
CRESCENT,11, ROSS
AVENUE, Otara

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

709

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6589

839-6590

839-6591

839-6592

839-6593

Rezone
24,26,22,32,30,28,34,
COOPER CRESCENT,11,
ROSS AVENUE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. The retention of MHS meets
the objectives of the MHS zone

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

45,43,41, EVERITT
ROAD, Otara

61,57,59, COOPER
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara North

Otara North

Otara North

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meets Proximity Criteria when development area
considered

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6594

839-6595

839-6596

839-6597

839-6598

839-6599

839-6600

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 29, EVERITT


West)
ROAD,1,3,5,7, ROSS
AVENUE,10,12,14,16,18,
2,6,8, COOPER
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 2,4,6, ROSS
west)
AVENUE,42,40, COOPER
CRESCENT,39,37,35,
EVERITT ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29, EVERITT
Otara North
ROAD,1,3,5,7, ROSS
AVENUE,10,12,14,1
6,18,2,6,8, COOPER
CRESCENT, Otara

MHS

2,4,6, ROSS
Otara North
AVENUE,42,40,
COOPER
CRESCENT,39,37,35,
EVERITT ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 57, WHITLEY


West)
CRESCENT,3, COOPER
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone
west)
245,237,241,239,243,
BAIRDS
ROAD,46,54,44,56,52,
EVERITT ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
224,222,218,220,
BAIRDS ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 33,39,37,35,
west)
CROWN
CRESCENT,236,238,240,
232, BAIRDS ROAD,69,
COBHAM CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

57, WHITLEY
Otara North
CRESCENT,3,
COOPER CRESCENT,
Otara

MHS

245,237,241,239,24 Otara North


3, BAIRDS
ROAD,46,54,44,56,5
2, EVERITT ROAD,
Otara

MHS

224,222,218,220,
BAIRDS ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

710

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Otara North

MHU

THAB

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less
MHU
intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less


intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

33,39,37,35,
Otara North
CROWN
CRESCENT,236,238,
240,232, BAIRDS
ROAD,69, COBHAM
CRESCENT, Otara

Rezone
252,258,256,254,
252,258,256,254,
BAIRDS ROAD,
BAIRDS ROAD, Otara
Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Otara North

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6601

839-6602

839-6603

839-6604

839-6605

839-6606

839-6607

839-6608

839-6609

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 26,28, TINDALL


CRESCENT,4, GARRETT
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

26,28, TINDALL
CRESCENT,4,
GARRETT PLACE,
Otara

Otara North

Urban (Central and Rezone 51,49, COBHAM 51,49, COBHAM


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from CRESCENT, Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

Otara South

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre and to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Rezone 39,45,37,43,41, 39,45,37,43,41,


HANNAH ROAD, Otara HANNAH ROAD,
from Mixed Housing
Otara
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
33,31,27,29,
HANNAH ROAD,
Otara

Otara South

25,23, HANNAH
ROAD, Otara

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

25,13,27,15,21,17,2 Otara North


3,19, NOLA
CRESCENT,208,206,
BAIRDS ROAD,
Otara

18,20,14,16,
HANNAH ROAD,
Otara

Otara South

9,7, WROUGHTON
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara South

56,58, FERGUSON
ROAD,15, SANDRA
AVENUE, Otara

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre and to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 33,31,27,29,


West)
HANNAH ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 25,23, HANNAH
West)
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 18,20,14,16,
West)
HANNAH ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 9,7,
West)
WROUGHTON
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 56,58,
West)
FERGUSON ROAD,15,
SANDRA AVENUE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
25,13,27,15,21,17,23,19
, NOLA
CRESCENT,208,206,
BAIRDS ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

711

Otara South

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect
to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6610

839-6611

839-6612

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 183,181,185,


West)
EAST TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 6-10,5West)
7,1,3,2,4,9, WYONA
PLACE, Otara from
Mixed Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

183,181,185, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki

Otara North

MHS

6-10,5-7,1,3,2,4,9,
WYONA PLACE,
Otara

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 1,3,5, COBHAM


CRESCENT,1,9,3, NOLA
CRESCENT,194,188,186,
190,192, BAIRDS ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1,3,5, COBHAM
Otara North
CRESCENT,1,9,3,
NOLA
CRESCENT,194,188,
186,190,192,
BAIRDS ROAD,
Otara

MHU

Rezone 11,13,15,17,7,9,
COBHAM
CRESCENT,24,12,14,22,
16,2,4,6,8, NOLA
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,13,15,17,7,9,
Otara North
COBHAM
CRESCENT,24,12,14,
22,16,2,4,6,8, NOLA
CRESCENT, Otara

MHU

33,37,33A,35A,35,
NOLA CRESCENT,
Otara

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

712

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the change of zone from MHS to THAB zone at this


THAB
property - It is located on a main arterial road with the RFN,
and is opposite to Town Centre. This change of zone aligns with
the objectives of THAB zone.

Support change of zone from MHS to THAB - the property is


located opposite the THAB zone adjoining Otara Town Centre
(across East Tamaki Road) and close to the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-6613

Urban (central and


west)

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHU zone. As the properties are adjacent
to MHS zone, this is appropriate with the existing
neighbourhood and provides a transition in density between
THAB and MHS. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6614

839-6615

839-6616

839-6617

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone
33,37,33A,35A,35,
NOLA CRESCENT, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 19,21,23,
West)
COBHAM CRESCENT,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 1, CROWN
West)
CRESCENT,33,31,27,39,
41, COBHAM
CRESCENT, Otara from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 2,4,6, BOND
West)
STREET,36, COBHAM
CRESCENT, Otara from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Otara North

THAB

Do not support change of zone from SH and MHS to THAB These sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

THAB

Oppose
Consider appropriate to Centre and FN access

19,21,23, COBHAM Otara North


CRESCENT, Otara

MHS

1, CROWN
Otara North
CRESCENT,33,31,27,
39,41, COBHAM
CRESCENT, Otara

SH

2,4,6, BOND
STREET,36,
COBHAM
CRESCENT, Otara

SH

THAB

THAB

Do not support changes sought to THAB - the property is


No change
adjoining SH zone where growth is limited due to flooding
constraints. MHS provides a transition in density between
MHU and SH. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - These sites
No change
are affected by flooding and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Otara North

THAB

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to THAB.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Consider appropriate to Centre and FN access

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6618

839-6619

839-6620

839-6621

839-6622

839-6623

839-6624

839-6625

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 3,5, FERGUSON


West)
ROAD,209, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD, Otara
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

3,5, FERGUSON
ROAD,209, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Otara

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 150,152,
PRESTON ROAD,1A,3,5,
IVON ROAD,68,
FERGUSON ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

150,152, PRESTON Otara South


ROAD,1A,3,5, IVON
ROAD,68,
FERGUSON ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Rezone 4, IVON
ROAD,25,23, SANDRA
AVENUE,62,64,62A,66,
FERGUSON ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

4, IVON
Otara South
ROAD,25,23,
SANDRA
AVENUE,62,64,62A,
66, FERGUSON
ROAD, Otara

MHS

Rezone 158,154,156,
PRESTON ROAD,11,9,7,
IVON ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

158,154,156,
Otara South
PRESTON
ROAD,11,9,7, IVON
ROAD, Otara

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 33,35, CAPSTICK


West)
ROAD,168, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33,35, CAPSTICK
ROAD,168,
PRESTON ROAD,
Otara

Otara South

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 169,171,
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

169,171, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara

Otara South

Rezone 6,2,2A,4,
RONGOMAI
ROAD,165,167B,
PRESTON ROAD,2,
DAWSON ROAD, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

6,2,2A,4,
RONGOMAI
ROAD,165,167B,
PRESTON ROAD,2,
DAWSON ROAD,
Flat Bush

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (Central and Rezone 18,12,14,16,


West)
RONGOMAI ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara South

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

713

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Otara South

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
18,12,14,16,
Otara South
RONGOMAI ROAD,
Otara

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6626

839-6627

839-6628

839-6629

839-6630

839-6631

839-6632

839-6633

839-6634

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 177,175,
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

177,175, PRESTON Otara South


ROAD, Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
183,189,187,185,
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

183,189,187,185,
PRESTON ROAD,
Otara

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
195,197,191,193,
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

195,197,191,193,
PRESTON ROAD,
Otara

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located far away from Otara Town Centre, and the
RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Rezone 11,10,12,14,7,9, 11,10,12,14,7,9,


Otara South
PATEA PLACE, Otara
PATEA PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 4, FISHER


West)
CRESCENT,174,
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

4, FISHER
CRESCENT,174,
PRESTON ROAD,
Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 32,30, FISHER


West)
CRESCENT,24,26,22,32,
30,28,34, CAPSTICK
ROAD, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,30, FISHER
Otara South
CRESCENT,24,26,22,
32,30,28,34,
CAPSTICK ROAD,
Otara

SH

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone
217,215,213,211,219,22
5,223,221, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

217,215,213,211,21 Otara South


9,225,223,221, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki

MHS

Rezone 251,249, EAST


TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

251,249, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki

Otara South

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 38,40, FISHER


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

251,249, EAST
TAMAKI ROAD,
Papatoetoe-East
Tamaki

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

REQUESTED
ZONE

714

Otara South

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone of properties at 211, 213, 215, 221,


MHS/MHU
223, 225 East Tamaki Road from SH and MSH to MHU zone they are close to Otara Town Centre , and close to the RFN.
This change of zone meets the objectives of the MHU zone. Do
not support the change of zone of properties at 217, 219 East
Tamaki Road - these sites are affected by flooding constraints
and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support partial change of properties at 249, 251 East Tamaki
MHU
Road from SH and MSH to MHU zone - they are close to Otara
Town Centre , and close to the RFN. This change of zone meets
the objectives of the MHU zone.

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6635

839-6636

839-6637

839-6638

839-6639

839-6640

839-6641

839-6642

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 33,31, FISHER


West)
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 188,190,
west)
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33,31, FISHER
CRESCENT, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 194,196,
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

194,196, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara

Rezone 200,198,
PRESTON ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

200,198, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara

Rezone
11,13,17,19,3,5,7,9,
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT,3,5,
GERALDINE
ROAD,217,215,205,213,
207,211,209,219,223,22
1, PRESTON ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,13,17,19,3,5,7,9, Otara South


FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT,3,5,
GERALDINE
ROAD,217,215,205,
213,207,211,209,21
9,223,221, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara

MHS

Rezone
227,231,229,233,
PRESTON ROAD,2,
GERALDINE ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

227,231,229,233,
PRESTON ROAD,2,
GERALDINE ROAD,
Otara

Otara South

MHS

Rezone 18,20,
18,20, BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY ROAD, Flat ROAD, Flat Bush
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
25,27,21,23,19,31,
CLUTHA
CRESCENT,73,71,
PRESTON
ROAD,39,37,41,
AWATERE STREET,
Clover Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

188,190, PRESTON
ROAD, Otara

Otara South

Otara South

Otara South

Otara South

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

715

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU zone - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from MHS to MHU zone - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change from MHS to MHU zone - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located far away from Otara Town Centre, and the
RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified zone.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

25,27,21,23,19,31,
CLUTHA
CRESCENT,73,71,
PRESTON
ROAD,39,37,41,
AWATERE STREET,
Clover Park

Otara South

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6643

839-6644

839-6645

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Urban (Central and Rezone 18,20,14,16,


18,20,14,16,
West)
AWATERE STREET,
AWATERE STREET,
Clover Park from Mixed Clover Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 3, SENA
West)
PLACE,26, SANDRINE
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 53, BOUNDARY
west)
ROAD,21,23, SANDRINE
AVENUE,6, COTY PLACE,
Clover Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Otara South

3, SENA PLACE,26, Otara South


SANDRINE AVENUE,
Clover Park

53, BOUNDARY
ROAD,21,23,
SANDRINE
AVENUE,6, COTY
PLACE, Clover Park

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 82,84,


82,84, BOUNDARY
West)
BOUNDARY ROAD, Flat ROAD, Flat Bush
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

716

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone - the
No change
properties are located a considerable distance from Dawson
Road Local Centre and the RFN. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone - the
properties are located a considerable distance from Dawson
Road Local Centre and the RFN. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6646

839-6647

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHS
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Rezone
164,150,152,110B,154,1
10A,158,112,114,130,13
6,134,138,118,170,160,
156,162,146,144,142,14
0,148,120,122,124,126,
128,166,106,104,108,11
6,168, TE IRIRANGI
DRIVE,60,56,58, ZELDA
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

164,150,152,110B,1 Otara South


54,110A,158,112,11
4,130,136,134,138,1
18,170,160,156,162,
146,144,142,140,14
8,120,122,124,126,1
28,166,106,104,108,
116,168, TE
IRIRANGI
DRIVE,60,56,58,
ZELDA AVENUE,
Clover Park

MHS

Rezone 4, MAYTIME
STREET,5, SERRANO
PLACE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
24,20,14,22,16,18,23,21
, CASERTA PLACE,
Clover Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

4, MAYTIME
Otara South
STREET,5, SERRANO
PLACE, Clover Park

MHS

24,20,14,22,16,18,2 Otara South


3,21, CASERTA
PLACE, Clover Park

MHS

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHS
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6648

839-6649

839-6650

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 8,6, PALERMO 8,6, PALERMO


PLACE, Clover Park from PLACE, Clover Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU - Sites


No change
align with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are
away from the RFN, and also adjoining sites are zoned SH due
to flooding constraints. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


located close to Dawson Local Centre and the RFN. The zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6651

839-6652

839-6653

839-6654

839-6655

839-6656

839-6657

839-6658

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 4,6, OTHELLO


DRIVE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 76,74,72, FLAT
BUSH ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4,6, OTHELLO
DRIVE, Clover Park

Rezone 82,80, FLAT


BUSH ROAD, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 88,86, FLAT
BUSH ROAD,13,15,
TOSCA PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
98,108,112,100,106,104
,96, FLAT BUSH
ROAD,83,77,75,89,73,97
,71,67,91,69,93,81,87,7
9,85, DAWSON ROAD,4,
FLINDERS PLACE, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

82,80, FLAT BUSH


ROAD, Otara

76,74,72, FLAT
BUSH ROAD, Otara

LOCALITY

Otara South

Otara South

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

88,86, FLAT BUSH


Otara South
ROAD,13,15, TOSCA
PLACE, Otara

MHS

98,108,112,100,106, Otara South


104,96, FLAT BUSH
ROAD,83,77,75,89,7
3,97,71,67,91,69,93,
81,87,79,85,
DAWSON ROAD,4,
FLINDERS PLACE,
Flat Bush

MHS

Rezone
52A,54,56,60B,62,60,60
D,58D,58B,58C,60C,58A
,60A,58, DAWSON
ROAD, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

52A,54,56,60B,62,6 Otara South


0,60D,58D,58B,58C,
60C,58A,60A,58,
DAWSON ROAD,
Flat Bush

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 241,239,


West)
PRESTON ROAD,7,
ORMISTON ROAD,3,
MURCHISON
ROAD,9,3,5,7, AMURI
PLACE, Manukau from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 4, MURCHISON
west)
ROAD,13, ORMISTON
ROAD, Manukau from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

241,239, PRESTON Otara South


ROAD,7, ORMISTON
ROAD,3,
MURCHISON
ROAD,9,3,5,7,
AMURI PLACE,
Manukau

MHS

4, MURCHISON
ROAD,13,
ORMISTON ROAD,
Manukau

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

717

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
Otara South

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align No change
with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone, and closer to
Light Industrial zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6659

839-6660

839-6661

839-6662

839-6663

839-6664

839-6665

839-6666

839-6667

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 11,13,15,
MURCHISON ROAD,4,
AMURI PLACE, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 10,8,6,
GERALDINE ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,13,15,
MURCHISON
ROAD,4, AMURI
PLACE, Otara

Otara South

10,8,6, GERALDINE
ROAD, Otara

Otara South

Rezone 10,8,
MURCHISON ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

10,8, MURCHISON
ROAD, Otara

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 18,22,


West)
MURCHISON
ROAD,18,20,
GERALDINE ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

18,22, MURCHISON Otara South


ROAD,18,20,
GERALDINE ROAD,
Otara

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

9, GERALDINE
ROAD,2,28,4,30,
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara

MHS

Rezone 9, GERALDINE
ROAD,2,28,4,30,
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone
west)
24,12,20,14,22,16,18,
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 1,3, PATEA
west)
PLACE,25,23,
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 5,7,3A-3F,
West)
DAWSON
ROAD,159,155,157,163,
PRESTON ROAD, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align


with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone, and closer to
Light Industrial zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align
with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone, and closer to
Light Industrial zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align
with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone, and closer to
Light Industrial zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align
with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone, and closer to
Light Industrial zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

718

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Otara South

24,12,20,14,22,16,1 Otara South


8, FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara

MHS

1,3, PATEA
PLACE,25,23,
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara

MHS

Otara South

5,7,3A-3F, DAWSON Otara South


ROAD,159,155,157,
163, PRESTON
ROAD, Flat Bush

Rezone 8,4,6, DAWSON 8,4,6, DAWSON


ROAD, Flat Bush from
ROAD, Flat Bush
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align No change
with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone, and closer to
Light Industrial zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align No change
with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from the Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone, and closer
to Light Industrial zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align No change
with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from the Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone, and closer
to Light Industrial zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Otara South

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6668

839-6669

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 11,9,5,7,
RONGOMAI
ROAD,20,22,16,18,30,32
, DAWSON
ROAD,11,13,15,21,17,19
,3,5,7,9, WYNTON
PLACE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 15,21,17,23,
RONGOMAI
ROAD,24,10,12,20,14,22
,16,18,2,4,6,8, WYNTON
PLACE,24,26,28,
COOMBE AVENUE,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

11,9,5,7,
Otara South
RONGOMAI
ROAD,20,22,16,18,3
0,32, DAWSON
ROAD,11,13,15,21,1
7,19,3,5,7,9,
WYNTON PLACE,
Flat Bush

MHS

15,21,17,23,
Otara South
RONGOMAI
ROAD,24,10,12,20,1
4,22,16,18,2,4,6,8,
WYNTON
PLACE,24,26,28,
COOMBE AVENUE,
Otara

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

719

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6670

839-6671

839-6672

839-6673

839-6674

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone
26,38,30,28,36,34,
26,38,30,28,36,34,
DUNSTAN PLACE,
DUNSTAN PLACE, Otara Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

Rezone
25,23,33,31,37,29,3 Otara South
25,23,33,31,37,29,35,
5, DUNSTAN PLACE,
DUNSTAN PLACE, Otara Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 2, DOSINA


West)
PLACE,25,13,15,21,17,2
3,19,31,29, NORRIE
SMITH AVENUE, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

2, DOSINA
Otara South
PLACE,25,13,15,21,1
7,23,19,31,29,
NORRIE SMITH
AVENUE, Flat Bush

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 32,30,28,


West)
NORRIE SMITH
AVENUE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 13,14, DOSINA
west)
PLACE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,30,28, NORRIE
Otara South
SMITH AVENUE, Flat
Bush

MHS

13,14, DOSINA
PLACE, Flat Bush

MHS

Otara South

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
located close to the Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN.
The zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6675

839-6676

839-6677

839-6688

839-6689

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 1,5, NORRIE


SMITH AVENUE,18,16,
PENION
DRIVE,11,9,3,5,7,
DOSINA PLACE, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1,5, NORRIE SMITH Otara South


AVENUE,18,16,
PENION
DRIVE,11,9,3,5,7,
DOSINA PLACE, Flat
Bush

Urban (Central and Rezone 1,3,5,7, PENION 1,3,5,7, PENION


West)
DRIVE, Flat Bush from DRIVE, Flat Bush
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 13, GERALDINE


West)
ROAD,43,
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9, SIDEY
West)
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

13, GERALDINE
ROAD,43,
FEATHERSTON
CRESCENT, Otara

Otara South

11,9, SIDEY
AVENUE, Clover
Park

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 46,44,38,42,40,


West)
DARNELL CRESCENT,
Clover Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

46,44,38,42,40,
DARNELL
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

720

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


located close to the Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN.
The zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


located close to the Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN.
The zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align No change
with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone, and closer to
Light Industrial zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as No change


the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to the Dawson Road Local Centre or to
the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-6690

839-6691

839-6692

839-6693

Urban (Central and Rezone 32,30,34,


32,30,34, DARNELL
West)
DARNELL CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Clover
Clover Park from Mixed Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 5,7, LEMA


PLACE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 33,31,29,
DILLON CRESCENT,
Clover Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

5,7, LEMA PLACE,


Clover Park

33,31,29, DILLON
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara South

Rezone 11,9, DILLON


CRESCENT, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9, DILLON
CRESCENT, Clover
Park

Otara South

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Sites align No change
with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are away
from Dawson Road Local Centre and MHU zone. Retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6694

839-6697

839-6698

839-6699

839-6700

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone
104C,104B,104D,
104C,104B,104D,
BOUNDARY ROAD,
BOUNDARY ROAD, Flat Flat Bush
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Otara South

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 8,6, SANDRINE


West)
AVENUE, Clover Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 69,71,67,
West)
BOUNDARY
ROAD,11,13,12,14,3,5,7,
9, TOWNLEY
PLACE,68,62,64,66, TE
IRIRANGI DRIVE, Clover
Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

8,6, SANDRINE
AVENUE, Clover
Park

69,71,67,
Otara South
BOUNDARY
ROAD,11,13,12,14,3
,5,7,9, TOWNLEY
PLACE,68,62,64,66,
TE IRIRANGI DRIVE,
Clover Park

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

1/75-3/75,73,
Otara South
BOUNDARY
ROAD,10,8,4,6,
TOWNLEY
PLACE,65,67B,67A,
OTHELLO
DRIVE,74,72,76A76C,70, TE IRIRANGI
DRIVE, Clover Park

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 1/75-3/75,73,
BOUNDARY
ROAD,10,8,4,6,
TOWNLEY
PLACE,65,67B,67A,
OTHELLO
DRIVE,74,72,76A76C,70, TE IRIRANGI
DRIVE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing
Urban.OTHELLO
Rezone 64,66,

Otara South

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

721

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone - the


No change
properties are located a considerable distance from Dawson
Road Local Centre and the RFN. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning of properties at 67,69,71
No change
Boundary Road, 3,5,7, Townley Place from Single House to
MHU as the growth is limited in this area due to flooding
constraints. Do not support change of zone at 9,11,13,14,12
Townley Place, and 62,64,66,68 Te Irirangi Road from MHS to
MHU - the properties are located a considerable distance from
Otara Town Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support
retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH/MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

64,66, OTHELLO
DRIVE,80,1/86DRIVE,80,1/863/86,1/82-3/82, TE
3/86,1/82-3/82, TE
IRIRANGI DRIVE,119,
IRIRANGI
BOUNDARY ROAD,
DRIVE,119,
Clover Park from Mixed BOUNDARY ROAD,
Housing Suburban to
Clover Park
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara South

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Dawson Road Local Centre or to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6701

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 83,89,87,85,
CHARNTAY AVENUE,72,
HOLLYFORD DRIVE,
Clover Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

83,89,87,85,
Otara South
CHARNTAY
AVENUE,72,
HOLLYFORD DRIVE,
Clover Park

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 1/70-3/70,1/74West)


3/74,68, CHARNTAY
AVENUE,101,95,97,105,
TE IRIRANGI DRIVE,
Clover Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1/70-3/70,1/74Otara South
3/74,68, CHARNTAY
AVENUE,101,95,97,
105, TE IRIRANGI
DRIVE, Clover Park

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6702

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6703

839-6704

839-6195

839-6406

839-6748

839-6749

839-6750

839-6751

839-6752

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 11,13,3,5,7,9,
LEILA PLACE, Clover
Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 56, DIORELLA


West)
DRIVE,3,7, PULMAN
PLACE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 20, LILI CHEN
West)
WAY, Mangere Bridge
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

11,13,3,5,7,9, LEILA Otara South


PLACE, Clover Park

MHS

MHS

153,155,
CORONATION
ROAD, Mangere
Bridge

SH

Mangere Bridge SH

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 21,23, KAMAKA 21,23, KAMAKA


ROAD, Mangere Bridge ROAD, Mangere
from Single House to
Bridge
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge SH

Rezone 64,66,
MOLESWORTH PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

64,66,
MOLESWORTH
PLACE, Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

2,14, PUTINI
ROAD,82,
MOUNTAIN ROAD,
Mangere Bridge

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 2,14, PUTINI


West)
ROAD,82, MOUNTAIN
ROAD, Mangere Bridge
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU - Sites


align with the objectives and policies of MHS zone. Sites are
away from the RFN and Dawson Road Local Centre.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU - the


No change
properties are located a considerable distance away from
Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. This retention of MHS
meets the objectives of MHS zone.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

20, LILI CHEN WAY, Mangere Bridge MHS


Mangere Bridge

Urban (Central and Rezone 8,4,6, KAMAKA 8,4,6, KAMAKA


West)
ROAD, Mangere Bridge ROAD, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Bridge
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

REQUESTED
ZONE

Meet Criteria
56, DIORELLA
Otara South
DRIVE,3,7, PULMAN
PLACE, Clover Park

Rezone 261,259,243,
261,259,243,
Mangere East
MASSEY
MASSEY
ROAD,5A,5B,24,12A,12B ROAD,5A,5B,24,12A,
,20,21,22,23,1,3,4,7,9,8, 12B,20,21,22,23,1,3,
6A,26,11,10,13,15,14,17 4,7,9,8,6A,26,11,10,
,16,19,18,6B,17A,15A, 13,15,14,17,16,19,1
EWART ROAD, Mangere- 8,6B,17A,15A,
Otahuhu from Single
EWART ROAD,
House to Mixed
Mangere-Otahuhu
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 153,155,


West)
CORONATION ROAD,
Mangere Bridge from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

722

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site at 20, Lili Chen Way, Mangere Bridge is a
significant distance from a TC or MU zone and is remote from
the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning.


This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA
Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH/MHS to MHU. Retain
SH/MHS zoning. This site at 8,4,6, Kamaka Road, Mangere
Bridge is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning.
This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA
Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain SH/MHS
zoning. This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and
HSA Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning.
This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA
Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6753

839-6754

839-6755

839-6756

839-6757

839-6758

839-6759

839-6760

839-6761

839-6762

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 52, KAPUKA


West)
ROAD,86, MOUNTAIN
ROAD, Mangere Bridge
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

52, KAPUKA
ROAD,86,
MOUNTAIN ROAD,
Mangere Bridge

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (central and


west)

108,106,
MOUNTAIN ROAD,
Mangere Bridge

Mangere Bridge SH

Rezone 108,106,
MOUNTAIN ROAD,
Mangere Bridge from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 18, MILLER


West)
ROAD,19, KAMBALDA
STREET, Mangere
Bridge from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

18, MILLER
Mangere Bridge MHS
ROAD,19,
KAMBALDA STREET,
Mangere Bridge

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 52A,50,48,52,


West)
MOLESWORTH PLACE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
25,27,21,17,23,19,23A,
MOLESWORTH PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

52A,50,48,52,
MOLESWORTH
PLACE, Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9,5,7,


West)
MOLESWORTH PLACE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 19,13,15,21,17,
west)
UMU PLACE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9,5,7,
MOLESWORTH
PLACE, Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

19,13,15,21,17,
UMU PLACE,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
10,12,20,14,16,18,8,
MOLESWORTH PLACE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 44,42,40,
West)
MOLESWORTH PLACE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,12,20,14,16,18,8, Mangere Bridge SH


MOLESWORTH
PLACE, Mangere

44,42,40,
MOLESWORTH
PLACE, Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 32,30,34,


West)
MOLESWORTH PLACE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,30,34,
MOLESWORTH
PLACE, Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

Mangere Bridge SH

Mangere Bridge MHS

MHU

25,27,21,17,23,19,2
3A, MOLESWORTH
PLACE, Mangere

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

723

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning.


No change
These site at 52, Kapuka Road and ,86, Mountain Road are
subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay with a
maximum permitted height limit of eight metres. Retention of
the SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Reject the change from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning - the site No change
is not located close to a TC zone or to the RFN. A change in the
zoning would also create a spot zone in this location and will
not achieve integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. Retention of the SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain SH/MHS
No change
zoning. This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and
HSA Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning.
No change
This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA
Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning.
No change
This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA
Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning.
This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA
Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is a significant distance from a TC or MU zone
and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The site
overlooks the South-western motorway and is within the Air
Quality Transport Corridor. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning.
This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA
Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zoning at
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. This site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zoning at
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. This site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

No change

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6763

839-6764

839-6765

839-6766

839-6767

839-6768

839-6769

839-6770

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 56, HALL


56, HALL AVENUE,3, Mangere Bridge MHS
AVENUE,3, UMU PLACE, UMU PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone
60,76,62,74,64,72,
60,76,62,74,64,72, HALL HALL AVENUE,
AVENUE, Mangere from Mangere
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 59, HALL


West)
AVENUE,24,26,
ELMDON STREET,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

59, HALL
AVENUE,24,26,
ELMDON STREET,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9,5,7, BEDE


West)
PLACE, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9,5,7, BEDE
PLACE, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 12, BADER


West)
DRIVE,11,10,13,12,15,1
4,17,1,3,2,5,7,6,9,8,5A,7
A, PITO PLACE,5,7,
HINAU ROAD,2,14,
VENTURA STREET,18,22,
MCKENZIE ROAD,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, BADER
Mangere Bridge SH
DRIVE,11,10,13,12,1
5,14,17,1,3,2,5,7,6,9
,8,5A,7A, PITO
PLACE,5,7, HINAU
ROAD,2,14,
VENTURA
STREET,18,22,
MCKENZIE ROAD,
Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 1A,1,3,5,7,3A,


West)
CESSNA
PLACE,1A,3B,3,3C,3A,
BADER
DRIVE,30A,26,30,28,26A
, MCKENZIE ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1A,1,3,5,7,3A,
Mangere Bridge MHS
CESSNA
PLACE,1A,3B,3,3C,3
A, BADER
DRIVE,30A,26,30,28,
26A, MCKENZIE
ROAD, Mangere

MHU

Mangere Bridge SH

MHU

MHU

REASONS

724

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is a significant distance from a TC or MU zone
and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The site
overlooks South-western motorway and is within the Air
Quality Transport Corridor. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is a significant distance from a TC or MU zone
and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The site
overlooks South-western motorway and is within the Air
Quality Transport Corridor. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and
HSA Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning.
No change
This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA
Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning.
No change
This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA
Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of eight
metres. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Do not support rezoning from SH & MHS to MHU. Retain SH & No change
MHS zoning. This site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV
and HSA Overlay with a maximum permitted height limit of
eight metres. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 18,20, VENTURA 18,20, VENTURA


West)
STREET, Mangere from STREET, Mangere
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 24,26, VENTURA 24,26, VENTURA


West)
STREET, Mangere from STREET, Mangere
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6771

839-6772

839-6773

839-6774

839-6775

839-6776

839-6777

839-6778

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 11,13,15,19,5,9,
KORIMAKO AVENUE,
Mangere Bridge from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13,15,19,5,9,
KORIMAKO
AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge

Mangere Bridge MHS

Rezone 51A,51,
MCKENZIE ROAD,12,
KORIMAKO AVENUE,
Mangere Bridge from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 27,29, KAMAKA
West)
ROAD, Mangere Bridge
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

51A,51, MCKENZIE
ROAD,12,
KORIMAKO
AVENUE, Mangere
Bridge

Mangere Bridge MHS

27,29, KAMAKA
ROAD, Mangere
Bridge

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (central and


west)

6, MASCOT
Mangere
AVENUE,631,633,62
7,635,637,639,629,6
41A, MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere

MHS

645,643A, MASSEY
ROAD,3,5,
PERSHORE PLACE,
Mangere

Mangere

MHS

10,8, MASCOT
AVENUE,26,28,
HEYFORD CLOSE,
Mangere

Mangere

12,14, HEYFORD
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 6, MASCOT
AVENUE,631,633,627,63
5,637,639,629,641A,
MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 645,643A,
MASSEY ROAD,3,5,
PERSHORE PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 10,8, MASCOT
AVENUE,26,28,
HEYFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 12,14, HEYFORD
CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 8,6, HEYFORD
CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.


Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

725

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is a significant distance from a TC or MU zone
and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The sites at 6, Mascot
MHU
Avenue and 631,633,627,635,637,639,629,641A, Massey Road,
Mangere are close to the Mangere TC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

8,6, HEYFORD
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


MHU
645,643A, Massey Road and 3, 5, Pershore Place, Mangere are
close to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN
for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at 10,8,


MHU
Mascot Avenue and 26,28, Heyford Close, Mangere are close to
the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at 12,14, MHU


Heyford Close, Mangere are close to the Mangere TC zone and
in close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning
this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. The properties at 8 ,6 MHU


Heyford Close, Mangere are close to the Mangere TC zone and
in close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning
this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

While outside proximity criteria rationalisation of


surrounding zoning makes THAB appropriate (to Massey
Road)

Meets Proximity criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6779

839-6780

839-6781

839-6782

839-6783

839-6784

839-6785

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
11,25,13,27,15,21,23,33
,49,29,7,9, HEYFORD
CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 39,37,43,41,
HEYFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone
38,48,46,32,44,42,36,40
,34,52,50, HEYFORD
CLOSE,19,15,21,17,
PERSHORE PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,25,13,27,15,21,2 Mangere
3,33,49,29,7,9,
HEYFORD CLOSE,
Mangere

MHS

39,37,43,41,
HEYFORD CLOSE,
Mangere

MHS

38,48,46,32,44,42,3 Mangere
6,40,34,52,50,
HEYFORD
CLOSE,19,15,21,17,
PERSHORE PLACE,
Mangere

MHS

Rezone
10,12,20,14,22,16,12A,6
,2,14C,18,8,4,
PERSHORE
PLACE,68,66,70,
WINDRUSH
CLOSE,661,659, MASSEY
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 54,62,56,58,

10,12,20,14,22,16,1 Mangere
2A,6,2,14C,18,8,4,
PERSHORE
PLACE,68,66,70,
WINDRUSH
CLOSE,661,659,
MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere

MHS

54,62,56,58,
HEYFORD CLOSE,
Mangere

Mangere

MHS

19,25,21,23,
MASCOT
AVENUE,40,
FORBURY PLACE,
Mangere

Mangere

11,13,5,3,7,
FORBURY
PLACE,27,29,
MASCOT AVENUE,
Mangere

Mangere

HEYFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 19,25,21,23,
MASCOT AVENUE,40,
FORBURY PLACE,
Mangere from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 11,13,5,3,7,
FORBURY PLACE,27,29,
MASCOT AVENUE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

726

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This properties at


MHU
11,25,13,27,15,21,23,33,49,29,7,9, Heyford Close, Mangere are
close to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN
for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Mangere

THAB

THAB

Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This properties at


MHU
39,37,43,41, Heyford Close, Mangere are close to the Mangere
TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. The properties at
MHU
38,48,46,32,44,42,36,40,34,52,50, Heyford Close 19,15,21,17
and Pershore Place, Mangere are close to the Mangere TC zone
and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
THAB

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


MHU
10,12,20,14,22,16,12A,6,2,14C,18,8,4, PERSHORE
PLACE,68,66,70, WINDRUSH CLOSE,661,659, MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere are close to the Mangere TC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. The properties at


MHU
54,62,56,58, Heyford Close, Mangere are near to the Mangere
TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support rezoning to from SH to MHU. The properties at
MHU
19,25,21,23, MASCOT AVENUE,40, FORBURY PLACE, Mangere
are near to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at
MHU
11,13,5,3,7, FORBURY PLACE,27,29, MASCOT AVENUE,
Mangere are near to the Mangere TC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6786

839-6787

839-6788

839-6789

839-6790

839-6791

839-6792

839-6793

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 24,26,28,
FORBURY PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 31,37,39,35,41,
MASCOT
AVENUE,77,75,77A,83,8
1,79, FRIESIAN
DRIVE,1,3,2,5,4,6,8,4A,
NEVIS
PLACE,10,12,20,14,16,1
8,4,6,8, FORBURY
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

24,26,28, FORBURY Mangere


PLACE, Mangere

MHS

31,37,39,35,41,
Mangere
MASCOT
AVENUE,77,75,77A,
83,81,79, FRIESIAN
DRIVE,1,3,2,5,4,6,8,
4A, NEVIS
PLACE,10,12,20,14,1
6,18,4,6,8, FORBURY
PLACE, Mangere

MHS

Rezone 76,74,72,78,70,
HEYFORD CLOSE,46,
MASCOT AVENUE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

76,74,72,78,70,
Mangere
HEYFORD CLOSE,46,
MASCOT AVENUE,
Mangere

MHS

Rezone 11,13, PAINE


11,13, PAINE PLACE, Mangere
PLACE, Mangere from Mangere
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 3,5, ORLY


AVENUE, Mangere from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 12,16,
STAVERTON CRESCENT,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

3,5, ORLY AVENUE, Mangere


Mangere

MHS

Rezone 18,22, JORDAN


ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 9A,9C,9B,9D,
CORNWALL ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

18,22, JORDAN
ROAD, Mangere

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

727

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. The properties at


MHU
24,26,28, Forbury Place, Mangere are near to the Mangere TC
zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. The properties at
MHU
31,37,39,35,41, Mascot Avenue 77,75,77A,83,81,79, Friesian
Drive 1,3,2,5,4,6,8,4A, Nevis Place,10,12,20,14,16,18,4,6,8,
Forbury Place, Mangere are near to the Mangere TC zone and
in close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning
this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
THAB

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at 46


MHU
Mascot Avenue and 76,74,72,78,70 Heyford Close, Mangere
are close to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

12,16, STAVERTON Mangere


CRESCENT, Mangere

9A,9C,9B,9D,
CORNWALL ROAD,
Mangere

Mangere

Mangere

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zoning at No change


due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. This site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This properties at 3,5, MHU
Orly Avenue, Mangere are close to the Mangere TC zone and in
close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is a significant distance from a TC or MU zone
and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The sites at 18,22, Jordan Road, Mangere, are a
significant distance from a TC or MU zone and is remote from
the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The sites 9A,9C,9B,9D, Cornwall Road, are a not close to
a TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6794

839-6795

839-6796

839-6797

839-6798

839-6799

839-6800

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 1,3, ANSTY


PLACE,13,15,21,17,23,1
9, WINDRUSH CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

1,3, ANSTY
Mangere
PLACE,13,15,21,17,2
3,19, WINDRUSH
CLOSE, Mangere

MHS

Rezone 2, ANSTY
PLACE,39,27,49,33,43B,
31,45,37,29,35,41,43C,3
,5,47,45A,45B,43A,
WINDRUSH CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

2, ANSTY
Mangere
PLACE,39,27,49,33,4
3B,31,45,37,29,35,4
1,43C,3,5,47,45A,45
B,43A, WINDRUSH
CLOSE, Mangere

MHS

Rezone 44,36,40,
COURT TOWN CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 2,5,4,7,6, TIORO
LANE,1,3,2,4,6, TEO
LANE, Mangere from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 4, ILFORD
CRESCENT,4, KENTON
LANE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone
24,26,14,22,16,18,28,
ILFORD
CRESCENT,24,18,20,22,
16, CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

44,36,40, COURT
TOWN CLOSE,
Mangere

MHS

24,26,14,22,16,18,2 Mangere
8, ILFORD
CRESCENT,24,18,20,
22,16, CHINGFORD
CLOSE, Mangere

MHS

Rezone 10,8,
CHINGFORD
CLOSE,32,34, ILFORD
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

10,8, CHINGFORD
CLOSE,32,34,
ILFORD CRESCENT,
Mangere

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

728

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties 1,3,


MHU
Anstry Place and ,13,15,21,17,23,19, Windrush Close, Mangere
are close to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
THAB

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are close MHU
to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Mangere

2,5,4,7,6, TIORO
Mangere
LANE,1,3,2,4,6, TEO
LANE, Mangere

SH

4, ILFORD
CRESCENT,4,
KENTON LANE,
Mangere

MHS

Mangere

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support rezoning from MHS to THAB. The sites are close to


THAB
the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning.
Mangere Two Precinct in the PAUP protects the character, lay
out and built form of the Tioro Lane and Teo Lane - retains
Single House zoning. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site is close to the
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. This site is close to the


Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Mangere

THAB

Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site is close to the MHU
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6801

839-6802

839-6803

839-6804

839-6805

839-6806

839-6807

839-6808

839-6809

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 38,40, ILFORD


CRESCENT,38,
ASHGROVE ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 8,4,6, PURLEY
PLACE, Mangere from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone
201,199,195,197,191,19
3, ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 108,106,3,104,
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

38,40, ILFORD
CRESCENT,38,
ASHGROVE ROAD,
Mangere

Mangere

8,4,6, PURLEY
PLACE, Mangere

Mangere

PAUP ZONE

MHS

201,199,195,197,19 Mangere East


1,193, ROBERTSON
ROAD, Mangere

MHS

Rezone 98,100,
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 82,90,88,86,84,
West)
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

98,100, CHINGFORD Mangere


CLOSE, Mangere

MHS

82,90,88,86,84,
Mangere
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

33,31,39,35,
Mangere
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere

MHS

11,13,15,21,17,49,1 Mangere
9,47,45,51,53,55,5,7
, CHINGFORD
CLOSE, Mangere

MHS

38,32,30,36,40,34, Mangere
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone
11,13,15,21,17,49,19,47
,45,51,53,55,5,7,
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
38,32,30,36,40,34,
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site is close to


MHU
the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

THAB

THAB

Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning to from MHS to MHU. This site is close to
MHU
the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

Rezone 33,31,39,35,
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

THAB

REASONS

Meet Criteria
SH

108,106,3,104,
Mangere
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

REQUESTED
ZONE

729

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

THAB

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6810

839-6811

839-6812

839-6813

839-6814

839-6815

839-6816

839-6817

839-6818

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
48,46,54,44,56,50,52,60
,62,64,66, CHINGFORD
CLOSE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Mangere

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

48,46,54,44,56,50,5
2,60,62,64,66,
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere

REASONS

730

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 74,72,


West)
CHINGFORD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

74,72, CHINGFORD Mangere


CLOSE, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 5,7, TRANENT


West)
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 3,5, DEBORAH
West)
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 617,615,
west)
MASSEY ROAD,3,5,
MASCOT AVENUE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 1,60,58,
west)
KEMBLE CLOSE,9,7,
MASCOT AVENUE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 605,603,
west)
MASSEY ROAD,54,
KEMBLE CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 595,597,
west)
MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere-Otahuhu from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 587,589,
west)
MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere-Otahuhu from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

5,7, TRANENT
ROAD, Mangere

3,5, DEBORAH
PLACE, Mangere

Mangere

Mangere

MHS

MHS

MHS

617,615, MASSEY Mangere


ROAD,3,5, MASCOT
AVENUE, Mangere

MHS

1,60,58, KEMBLE
Mangere
CLOSE,9,7, MASCOT
AVENUE, Mangere

MHS

605,603, MASSEY
ROAD,54, KEMBLE
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere

MHS

595,597, MASSEY
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu

Mangere

587,589, MASSEY
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu

Mangere

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is not close to TC or MU zones. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are close
to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The sites are close to the MHU
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The sites are close to the MHU
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The sites are close to the MHU
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The sites are close to the MHU
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6819

839-6820

839-6821

839-6822

839-6823

839-6824

839-6825

839-6826

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 602A,602,
602A,602, MASSEY Mangere
MASSEY ROAD,
ROAD, MangereMangere-Otahuhu from Otahuhu
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 32, FORBURY


PLACE,24,18,20,22,
KEMBLE CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
24,26,22,16,18,20A,20C,
20B,20D, BADER
DRIVE,11,13,21,17,23,1
9,3,5,7,9, VENTURA
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32, FORBURY
Mangere
PLACE,24,18,20,22,
KEMBLE CLOSE,
Mangere

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

731

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from SH to MHS. The sites are close to the


MHS
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. The properties at 602A, 602, Massey Road are
separated from the MHU zone by Massey Road. The MHU
zone is on the northern side. Rezoning this site to a MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The sites are close to the MHU
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meets criteria

24,26,22,16,18,20A, Mangere Bridge SH


20C,20B,20D,
BADER
DRIVE,11,13,21,17,2
3,19,3,5,7,9,
VENTURA STREET,
Mangere

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Urban (Central and Rezone 42,40, VENTURA 42,40, VENTURA


West)
STREET, Mangere from STREET, Mangere
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge SH

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
6A,4,2,2A,2B,6,4A,
ELMDON
STREET,11,10,13,12,14,
1,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,
TAGATA WAY, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

6A,4,2,2A,2B,6,4A, Mangere Bridge SH


ELMDON
STREET,11,10,13,12,
14,1,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,
TAGATA WAY,
Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 60, MCKENZIE


West)
ROAD,11,13B,13A,9,7,
BADER
DRIVE,11,10,13,12,14,1
7,19,4,6,8, CESSNA
PLACE, Mangere from
Single House and Mixed
House Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

60, MCKENZIE
Mangere Bridge MHS
ROAD,11,13B,13A,9,
7, BADER
DRIVE,11,10,13,12,1
4,17,19,4,6,8,
CESSNA PLACE,
Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 20, ELMDON


West)
STREET,10,17,8, BEDE
PLACE, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20, ELMDON
STREET,10,17,8,
BEDE PLACE,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 4, BEDE


West)
PLACE,22, ELMDON
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, BEDE PLACE,22,
ELMDON STREET,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Do not support rezoning from SH & MHS to MHU. Retain SH
(11,13B,13A,9,7, Bader Drive, Mangere) & MHS zoning due to
the site being affected by flooding constraints. Retention of
the SH/MHS zones is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6827

839-6828

839-6829

839-6830

839-6831

839-6832

839-6833

839-6834

839-6835

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 27,29,23,
ELMDON STREET,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
27,29,23, ELMDON
STREET, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone


11,13,15,17,19,9,
West)
11,13,15,17,19,9,
WELBY PLACE,
WELBY PLACE, Mangere Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Mangere Bridge MHS

Mangere Bridge SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
24,26,28,30,37,39,35,
WATCHFIELD CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

24,26,28,30,37,39,3 Mangere Bridge MHS


5, WATCHFIELD
CLOSE, Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 33,31,27,29,


West)
WATCHFIELD CLOSE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33,31,27,29,
WATCHFIELD
CLOSE, Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 14,16,


West)
WATCHFIELD CLOSE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14,16, WATCHFIELD Mangere Bridge SH


CLOSE, Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 4, WELBY


West)
PLACE,10,8,
WATCHFIELD CLOSE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9,13,15,7,
West)
WATCHFIELD CLOSE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, WELBY
PLACE,10,8,
WATCHFIELD
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

11,9,13,15,7,
WATCHFIELD
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

Mangere Bridge SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 3, WATCHFIELD 3, WATCHFIELD


Mangere Bridge SH
West)
CLOSE,17, ELMDON
CLOSE,17, ELMDON
STREET, Mangere from STREET, Mangere
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
10,12,14,16,2,2A,6,8,4,
HARVARD
PLACE,9,5,7A,7,
ELMDON STREET,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

10,12,14,16,2,2A,6,8 Mangere Bridge SH


,4, HARVARD
PLACE,9,5,7A,7,
ELMDON STREET,
Mangere

REASONS

732

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6836

839-6837

839-6838

839-6839

839-6840

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 19,20,17,


West)
HARVARD PLACE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,20,17, HARVARD Mangere Bridge SH


PLACE, Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9,13,15,


West)
HARVARD PLACE,46,
BADER DRIVE, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,9,13,15,
Mangere Bridge SH
HARVARD PLACE,46,
BADER DRIVE,
Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
39,27,33,43,31,45,37,29
,35,41,47, BADER
DRIVE, Mangere BridgeMangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39,27,33,43,31,45,3 Mangere Bridge SH


7,29,35,41,47,
BADER DRIVE,
Mangere BridgeMangere East

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 13,15,


West)
ASHMORE PLACE,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

13,15, ASHMORE
PLACE, Favona

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 24,28,26,20,22,


West)
ASHMORE PLACE,17,
CURLEW PLACE, Favona
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,28,26,20,22,
Favona
ASHMORE
PLACE,17, CURLEW
PLACE, Favona

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 39,37,


West)
ASHMORE PLACE,
Favona from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 10,8,6,
West)
ASHMORE PLACE,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

39,37, ASHMORE
PLACE, Favona

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
25,39,27,15,21,23,33,31
,37,29,41, COMET
CRESCENT,50,52,
BADER DRIVE, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

25,39,27,15,21,23,3 Mangere Bridge SH


3,31,37,29,41,
COMET
CRESCENT,50,52,
BADER DRIVE,
Manger

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 61,57,59,


West)
BADER DRIVE, Mangere
Bridge-Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

61,57,59, BADER
DRIVE, Mangere
Bridge-Mangere
East

MHU

REASONS

733

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints. The site
is also subject to the Mangere Mountain VV and HSA Overlay
with a maximum permitted height limit of eight metres.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Favona

MHS

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is not close to TC or MU zones and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6841

839-6842

839-6843

839-6844

10,8,6, ASHMORE
PLACE, Favona

Favona

Favona

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zones is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Mangere Bridge SH

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6845

839-6846

839-6847

839-6848

839-6849

839-6850

839-6851

839-6852

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 38,40,


West)
CARAVELLE
CLOSE,69,67, BADER
DRIVE, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,40, CARAVELLE Mangere Bridge SH


CLOSE,69,67, BADER
DRIVE, Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
77,75,73,83,81,79,85,
BADER
DRIVE,44,50,48,52,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 76,74,72,
west)
IDLEWILD
AVENUE,60,62,64,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 11,55,9,15,17,
West)
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

77,75,73,83,81,79,8 Mangere Bridge MHS


5, BADER
DRIVE,44,50,48,52,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere

THAB

76,74,72, IDLEWILD Mangere Bridge MHS


AVENUE,60,62,64,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere

THAB

11,55,9,15,17,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 25,49,47,21,23, 25,49,47,21,23,


West)
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere from Single
Mangere
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (central and


west)

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Support rezoning part of this site MHS to MHU. The properties MHU/MHS//SH
are close to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning part of this site to a MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. However, part of
the site needs to be retained as SH zoning due to the site being
affected by flooding constraints. There is therefore a mix of
zoning for the different properties covered by the submissionpoint (see zoning maps).
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are close MHU
to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Rezone
39,33,31,37,29,35,4 Mangere Bridge MHS
39,33,31,37,29,35,41,37 1,37A, CARAVELLE
A, CARAVELLE CLOSE,
CLOSE, Manger
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 18,20,22,


West)
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 12,14,
West)
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

REASONS

734

18,20,22,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

12,14, CARAVELLE
CLOSE, Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Oppose
Meet Criteria
Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6853

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 38,40, VALIANT 38,40, VALIANT


West)
STREET,10,8,4,6,
STREET,10,8,4,6,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge MHS

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 44, VALIANT


West)
STREET,3,5,7,96,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 88,86,84,
West)
CARAVELLE CLOSE,52,
VALIANT STREET,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 60,62,56,64,58,
West)
VALIANT STREET,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

44, VALIANT
STREET,3,5,7,96,
CARAVELLE CLOSE,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
47A,49,47,45,41,45A,
VALIANT
STREET,10,12,14,16,18,
2,6,8, CORSAIR
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban (Single
House) to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone
west)
64A,58,54,56,60,62,64,6
6,68, IDLEWILD
AVENUE,68, CARAVELLE
CLOSE,68,74,72,70,
VALIANT STREET,6,
PROCTOR PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

47A,49,47,45,41,45 Mangere Bridge MHS


A, VALIANT
STREET,10,12,14,16,
18,2,6,8, CORSAIR
CRESCENT, Mangere

MHU

64A,58,54,56,60,62, Mangere Bridge MHS


64,66,68, IDLEWILD
AVENUE,68,
CARAVELLE
CLOSE,68,74,72,70,
VALIANT STREET,6,
PROCTOR PLACE,
Mangere

THAB

Urban (central and


west)

63,65, IDLEWILD
AVENUE, Mangere

THAB

REASONS

735

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is not close to TC or MU zones and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6854

839-6855

839-6856

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

88,86,84,
Mangere Bridge SH
CARAVELLE
CLOSE,52, VALIANT
STREET, Mangere

MHU

60,62,56,64,58,
VALIANT STREET,
Mangere

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Mangere Bridge MHS

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-6857

839-6858

839-6859

Rezone 63,65,
IDLEWILD AVENUE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Do not support rezoning from SH/MHS to MHU. Retain SH


No change
zoning due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Support submission in part to rezone from MHS to MHU. The
sites are close to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity
to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

THAB

Support in part

Consider meets THAB criteria for part of site


Mangere Bridge MHS

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The sites are close to the MHU
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6860

839-6861

839-6862

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 69,73,71,
VISCOUNT
STREET,59A,59B,59,
IDLEWILD AVENUE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 32,30, VALIANT
West)
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

69,73,71, VISCOUNT Mangere Bridge MHS


STREET,59A,59B,59,
IDLEWILD AVENUE,
Mangere

THAB

32,30, VALIANT
STREET, Mangere

MHU

Urban (central and


west)

1,3,5, BETULA
Mangere Bridge MHS
PLACE,98,94,
MCKENZIE
ROAD,12A,12,20,22,
16,18,2,4, VALIANT
STREET, Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 6,2,2A,4,


West)
VICKERS CRESCENT,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

6,2,2A,4, VICKERS Mangere Bridge MHS


CRESCENT, Mangere

MHU

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone
24,10,26,12,20,14,22,16
,18,30,28,32, VICKERS
CRESCENT,11,25,13,27,
15,21,17,19, VALIANT
STREET,11,13,15,21,17,
19,3,5,7,9, FONO
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,10,26,12,20,14,2 Mangere Bridge MHS


2,16,18,30,28,32,
VICKERS
CRESCENT,11,25,13,
27,15,21,17,19,
VALIANT
STREET,11,13,15,21,
17,19,3,5,7,9, FONO
CRESCENT, Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
11,1A,13,15,1,3,9,
VICKERS
CRESCENT,1,3,5,
VALIANT
STREET,108,106,110,10
4,112, MCKENZIE ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,1A,13,15,1,3,9, Mangere Bridge MHS


VICKERS
CRESCENT,1,3,5,
VALIANT
STREET,108,106,110
,104,112, MCKENZIE
ROAD, Mangere

MHU

Rezone 19,25,27,21,23, 19,25,27,21,23,


Mangere Bridge MHS
VICKERS CRESCENT,
VICKERS CRESCENT,
Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 1,3,5, BETULA


PLACE,98,94, MCKENZIE
ROAD,12A,12,20,22,16,
18,2,4, VALIANT STREET,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge MHS

REASONS

736

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The sites are close to the MHU
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6863

839-6864

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6865

839-6866

Urban (central and


west)

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Waste Water Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6867

839-6868

839-6869

839-6870

839-6871

839-6872

839-6873

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 1, CORSAIR


West)
CRESCENT,33,31,29,35,
VALIANT
STREET,33,31,29,35,
VICKERS CRESCENT,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1, CORSAIR
Mangere Bridge MHS
CRESCENT,33,31,29,
35, VALIANT
STREET,33,31,29,35,
VICKERS CRESCENT,
Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 3,5,6, AUSTER


West)
PLACE,15, CONVAIR
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

3,5,6, AUSTER
Mangere Bridge SH
PLACE,15, CONVAIR
CRESCENT, Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 2-2A,2A,


West)
AUSTER PLACE,39,37,
CONVAIR CRESCENT,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 19,15,21,17,23,
West)
CORSAIR CRESCENT,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2-2A,2A, AUSTER
Mangere Bridge SH
PLACE,39,37,
CONVAIR
CRESCENT, Mangere

MHU

19,15,21,17,23,
Mangere Bridge SH
CORSAIR CRESCENT,
Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
46,44,42,50,40,52,
IDLEWILD
AVENUE,33,37,35,
CORSAIR
CRESCENT,57,59,
VALIANT STREET,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

46,44,42,50,40,52,
IDLEWILD
AVENUE,33,37,35,
CORSAIR
CRESCENT,57,59,
VALIANT STREET,
Manger

MHU

Urban (central and


west)

60,62,64, VISCOUNT Mangere Bridge MHS


STREET,9,3,5,7,
SOLENT
STREET,55,51,53,49,
IDLEWILD AVENUE,
Mangere

MHU

13,15, SOLENT
STREET, Mangere

MHU

Rezone 60,62,64,
VISCOUNT
STREET,9,3,5,7, SOLENT
STREET,55,51,53,49,
IDLEWILD AVENUE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 13,15, SOLENT


West)
STREET, Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REASONS

737

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS. These properties are also a mix of
zoning as some properties need to be retain SH zones due to
the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS. These properties are also a mix of
zoning as some properties need to be retain SH zones due to
the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Mangere Bridge MHS

Mangere Bridge SH

Reject the change from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning - the site No change
is not located close to a town centre or to public transport
frequent service network. A change in the zoning would also
create a spot zone in this location and will not achieve
integrated management of resources and does not recognise
the local context. Retention of the SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The sites are close to the MHU
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The sites are close to the MHU
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6874

839-6875

839-6876

839-6877

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 19,21, SOLENT


West)
STREET,39,37,35,
IDLEWILD AVENUE,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 21, WIMPEY
West)
STREET,23, IDLEWILD
AVENUE,31,29, SOLENT
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,21, SOLENT
Mangere Bridge SH
STREET,39,37,35,
IDLEWILD AVENUE,
Mangere

MHU

21, WIMPEY
STREET,23,
IDLEWILD
AVENUE,31,29,
SOLENT STREET,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

MHU

Urban (central and


west)

13, IDLEWILD
AVENUE,26,
WIMPEY STREET,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

38,36, MARINER
STREET,18,20,
WIMPEY STREET,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 13, IDLEWILD


AVENUE,26, WIMPEY
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 38,36, MARINER
STREET,18,20, WIMPEY
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REASONS

738

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Waste Water Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone and is remote
from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6878

Urban (Central and Rezone 3,5,7, ANSON


West)
ROW,11,10,13,12,15,14,
4,6,9,8, FAIREY
PLACE,10,12,22,18,
SOLENT STREET,5,13,15,
WIMPEY STREET,42,50,
VISCOUNT STREET,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

3,5,7, ANSON
Mangere Bridge MHS
ROW,11,10,13,12,15
,14,4,6,9,8, FAIREY
PLACE,10,12,22,18,
SOLENT
STREET,5,13,15,
WIMPEY
STREET,42,50,
VISCOUNT STREET,
Mangere

MHU

Urban (central and


west)

55,53, VISCOUNT
STREET, Mangere

THAB

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
(Some MHS zoned properties within submission parcel, retain)

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6879

839-6880

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 55,53,
VISCOUNT STREET,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone
39,49,33,47,31,45,37,43
,35,41, VISCOUNT
STREET,13, VIMY PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge MHS

39,49,33,47,31,45,3 Mangere Bridge MHS


7,43,35,41,
VISCOUNT
STREET,13, VIMY
PLACE, Mangere

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone. Next to
motorway and in with Air Quality Transport Corridor. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zone. Next to
motorway and in with Air Quality Transport Corridor. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6881

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 10,8,12,14,4,


West)
WIMPEY
STREET,12,20,14,16,18,
30,28,34,32, VISCOUNT
STREET,1,3,5,4,7,6,
VALETTA
PLACE,11,10,13,12,15,8,
ELECTRA
PLACE,25,15,21,17,23,1
9,29, MARINER STREET,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

10,8,12,14,4,
Mangere Bridge MHS
WIMPEY
STREET,12,20,14,16,
18,30,28,34,32,
VISCOUNT
STREET,1,3,5,4,7,6,
VALETTA
PLACE,11,10,13,12,1
5,8, ELECTRA
PLACE,25,15,21,17,2
3,19,29, MARINER
STREET, Mangere

MHU

Urban (Central and Rezone 1,3, ELECTRA


West)
PLACE,1,3, MARINER
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,3, ELECTRA
PLACE,1,3,
MARINER STREET,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

MHU

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 4, ELECTRA
PLACE,11,9,7, MARINER
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, ELECTRA
PLACE,11,9,7,
MARINER STREET,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

Rezone 90,88,
KIRKBRIDE ROAD,8,4,6,
MARINER STREET,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

90,88, KIRKBRIDE
ROAD,8,4,6,
MARINER STREET,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 2, SPERRY


West)
PLACE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, SPERRY PLACE,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 1, SPERRY


West)
PLACE,26,28, MARINER
STREET, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1, SPERRY
PLACE,26,28,
MARINER STREET,
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

Urban (central and


west)

60,62, KIRKBRIDE
ROAD, Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

REASONS

739

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Wastewater Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6882

839-6883

839-6884

839-6885

839-6886

839-6887

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 60,62,
KIRKBRIDE ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Wastewater Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Wastewater Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Wastewater Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Wastewater Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Wastewater Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This site is not close to the TC zone. Local context
concerns about intensification near Wastewater Treatment
Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6888

839-6889

839-6890

839-6890

839-6892

839-6893

839-6894

839-6895

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 92,94,96,
KIRKBRIDE ROAD,3,
VISCOUNT STREET,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

92,94,96, KIRKBRIDE Mangere Bridge MHS


ROAD,3, VISCOUNT
STREET, Mangere

Mixed Housing
Urban

Rezone 3,5,3A,
WESTNEY ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

3,5,3A, WESTNEY
ROAD, Mangere

THAB

Rezone 24,26,22,
FARNBOROUGH
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 24,26,22,
FARNBOROUGH
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone
9/654,6/654,5/654,8/65
4,1/654,3/654,2/654,7/
654,4/654,10/654,
MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere-Otahuhu from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
(Numbers should be
corrected as 654, 656,
658, 660, 662, 666, 668,
670, and 672)

24,26,22,
Mangere
FARNBOROUGH
CRESCENT, Mangere

MHS

24,26,22,
Mangere
FARNBOROUGH
CRESCENT, Mangere

MHS

9/654,6/654,5/654, Mangere
8/654,1/654,3/654,
2/654,7/654,4/654,
10/654, MASSEY
ROAD, MangereOtahuhu

MHS

Rezone 11,9,7,
FARNBOROUGH
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 44, PLUMLEY
CRESCENT,19,
FARNBOROUGH
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 50,48, PLUMLEY
CRESCENT, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9,7,
Mangere
FARNBOROUGH
CRESCENT, Mangere

MHS

44, PLUMLEY
CRESCENT,19,
FARNBOROUGH
CRESCENT

MHS

Mangere

MHS

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

740

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This site is not close to the TC or MU zone. Local
context concerns about intensification near Wastewater
Treatment Plant and reverse sensitivity issues related to odour.
The MHS zoning complements the suburban built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties at 3,5,3A, Westney Road, Mangere
are not close to the Mangere TC zone or a MU zone and are
remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Mangere

50,48, PLUMLEY
Mangere
CRESCENT, Mangere

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6896

839-6897

839-6898

839-6899

839-6900

839-6901

839-5315

839-5748

839-5135

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,13,


West)
MANSTON ROAD,
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
25,27,15,21,17,23,19,31
,25A,23A,29,21A,19A,
MANSTON ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,13, MANSTON
ROAD, Mangere

25,27,15,21,17,23,1 Mangere
9,31,25A,23A,29,21
A,19A, MANSTON
ROAD, Mangere

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 31, PLUMLEY


CRESCENT,18,8,6,14,16,
FARETI PLACE,14,
MANSTON ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

31, PLUMLEY
Mangere
CRESCENT,18,8,6,14
,16, FARETI
PLACE,14,
MANSTON ROAD,
Mangere

MHS

Rezone 11,13,
OUTRIGGER PLACE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,13, OUTRIGGER Mangere


PLACE, Mangere

MHS

Rezone 51, PLUMLEY


CRESCENT,53,
CYCLAMEN ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

51, PLUMLEY
CRESCENT,53,
CYCLAMEN ROAD,
Mangere

Rezone 143, NAYLORS


DRIVE,59,49,55,47,57,4
5,51,43,53,41,61,63,
MANSTON ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

143, NAYLORS
Mangere
DRIVE,59,49,55,47,5
7,45,51,43,53,41,61,
63, MANSTON
ROAD, Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

741

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties are not close to a TC zone or MU zone
and are remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties are not close to a TC zone or MU zone
and are remote from the RFN for public transport. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Mangere

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Rezone 48, HUIA ROAD, 48, HUIA ROAD,


Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

MHS

Rezone 48, LAVINIA


CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

48, LAVINIA
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Rezone 48, ROSELLA


ROAD, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

48, ROSELLA ROAD, Middlemore


Mangere East

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change


not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre and is also
outside the MHU zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as No change
the 1944 Demolition Control Overlay applies to this site. This
area is also under the Rosella Road Precinct which has SH zone
as the underlying zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5293

839-6441

839-5636

839-6428

839-5618

839-5441

839-6068

839-6435

839-6445

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 49, PARK


AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 5, GRANTHAM
west)
ROAD,12, CASPAR
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 5, WOBURN
West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

49, PARK AVENUE,


Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 5,7, ROSE


ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone
5/28,3/28,4/28,1/28,2/
28, KIMPTON ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

5,7, ROSE ROAD,


Papatoetoe

5/28,3/28,4/28,1/28 Hunters Corner


,2/28, KIMPTON
ROAD, Papatoetoe

MHS

Rezone 50, ASHLYNNE


AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 50, PEVERILL
CRESCENT, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

50, ASHLYNNE
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

MHS

50, PEVERILL
CRESCENT,
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

5, GRANTHAM
ROAD,12, CASPAR
ROAD, Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

5, WOBURN STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

Hunters Corner

Rezone 50B,50,50A,
50B,50,50A,
CENTRAL AVENUE,
CENTRAL AVENUE,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Hunters Corner

Rezone 51,49, CASPAR 51,49, CASPAR


ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

742

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS.
No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6430

839-7751

839-6093

839-7645

839-5145

839-6923

839-5481

839-5859

839-5196

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 510,504, GREAT


SOUTH
ROAD,11,10,13,12,15,14
,17,16,19, WILMSHURST
AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

510,504, GREAT
Hunters Corner
SOUTH
ROAD,11,10,13,12,1
5,14,17,16,19,
WILMSHURST
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

Rezone 52 OMANA
52 OMANA ROAD.
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

Rezone 52, MCLEAN


AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

52, MCLEAN
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

Rezone 54 CARRUTH
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 54, HOKIANGA
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

54 CARRUTH ROAD. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

54, HOKIANGA
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Rezone 54,54A,
LANDON AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 552, GREAT
SOUTH ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

54,54A, LANDON
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Middlemore

Rezone 56, CASPAR


ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 57, CASPAR
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

56, CASPAR ROAD,


Papatoetoe

552, GREAT SOUTH Hunters Corner


ROAD, Papatoetoe

7, CASPAR ROAD,
Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

Hunters Corner

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

743

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU for 504


Great South Road, 11, 10, 13, 12, 16, 19 Wilmshurst Avenue the property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
give effect to the RPS. For 14, 15, 17 Wilmshurst Avenue,
support rezoning of notified SH zone to MHS as although the
SH zone could be retained due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS. (This helps maintaining limited intensification in the
area between two Town Centres)
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner and Papatoetoe Town Centres and the RFN. Support
retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

No change

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6422

839-5139

839-6939

839-6456

839-6424

839-6921

839-5487

839-6434

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 57,57A,
57,57A, SWAFFIELD Middlemore
SWAFFIELD ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 58, LANDON


58, LANDON
AVENUE, Mangere East AVENUE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Middlemore

Rezone
58,54,82,56,52,60,76,62
,74,64,72,66,70,68,80,8
4,78, MAYFLOWER
CLOSE,25,39,27,15,21,2
3,19,31,37,29,35,33,9,
WINTHROP WAY,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

58,54,82,56,52,60,7 Mangere East


6,62,74,64,72,66,70,
68,80,84,78,
MAYFLOWER
CLOSE,25,39,27,15,2
1,23,19,31,37,29,35,
33,9, WINTHROP
WAY, Mangere East

MHS

Rezone 5A,5,5D,5C,5B,
WYMONDLEY ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

5A,5,5D,5C,5B,
WYMONDLEY
ROAD, Otara

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as No change


the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Rezone 5A,5,7A,7,
5A,5,7A,7, BARRIE
BARRIE AVENUE,
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Rezone 5A,5,7A,7,
FRANKLIN AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 6, ALABASTER
DRIVE, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 6, AVIS
AVENUE,35F,35E,35D,3
5C,35B,35A,35,
BIRDWOOD AVENUE,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

744

Wymondley

Papatoetoe

MHS

5A,5,7A,7,
Middlemore
FRANKLIN AVENUE,
Mangere East

MHS

6, ALABASTER
DRIVE, Papatoetoe

MHS

Papatoetoe

6, AVIS
Papatoetoe
AVENUE,35F,35E,35
D,35C,35B,35A,35,
BIRDWOOD
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara and
Hunters Corner Town Centres and the RFN. Support retention
of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5755

839-5143

839-6426

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 6, BERNARD


West)
STREET, Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

6, BERNARD STREET, Hunters Corner


Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

6, RAGLAN STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 6, RAGLAN
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
6/29,24/29,14/29,17/29
,15/29,18/29,5/29,10/2
9,26/29,23/29,9/29,8/2
9,4/29,12/29,19/29,11/
29,21/29,22/29,3/29,20
/29,25/29,13/29,16/29,
1/29,2/29,7/29,27/29,
TUI ROAD, Papatoetoe
from Town Centre to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Hunters Corner

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

TC

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

6/29,24/29,14/29,1
7/29,15/29,18/29,5/
29,10/29,26/29,23/
29,9/29,8/29,4/29,1
2/29,19/29,11/29,2
1/29,22/29,3/29,20/
29,25/29,13/29,16/
29,1/29,2/29,7/29,2
7/29, TUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe

REASONS

745

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support changes sought to MHU. Support change of


MHS
zoning from Single House to a less intensified MHS. Support the
rezoning from SH to MHS zone where managing flooding risks
on those sites does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified Town Centre zone . It is located
No change
on a main arterial road with good public transport access and is
part of the town centre. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the TC zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7500

839-6439

839-6906

839-6421

839-5388

839-6952

Urban (Central and Rezone 60 FITZROY


West)
STREET. Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

60 FITZROY STREET. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

Rezone 61,59,
61,59, MOTATAU
MOTATAU ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

Rezone 61,59, ROSELLA 61,59, ROSELLA


ROAD, Mangere East
ROAD, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Middlemore

SH

MHS

MHS

Rezone 61,61A,
61,61A, SWAFFIELD Middlemore
SWAFFIELD ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 62, BIRDWOOD 62, BIRDWOOD


AVENUE, Papatoetoe
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing
Papatoetoe
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Hunters Corner

MHS

Rezone 62,58, PEVERILL 62,58, PEVERILL


CRESCENT, Papatoetoe CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing
Papatoetoe
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS as


the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as No change
the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to employment faciltiies consider site


appropriate for MHU. Note that site adjoining to south is
MHU zone

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN - this is outside MHU zone. Support
retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6414

839-6446

839-6427

839-6413

839-5132

839-5352

839-6447

839-6423

839-6924

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 62,66,


62,66, KENDERDINE Papatoetoe
West)
KENDERDINE ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Urban (central and


west)

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Hunters Corner

Rezone 63A,63, TUI


ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 64,66,
CAMBRIDGE TERRACE,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

63A,63, TUI ROAD,


Papatoetoe

Hunters Corner

64,66, CAMBRIDGE Papatoetoe


TERRACE,
Papatoetoe

MHU

Rezone 65A, MILTON


ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 66, TUI ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

65A, MILTON ROAD, Middlemore


Mangere East

MHS

Hunters Corner

Rezone 68,64,66,70,
68,64,66,70,
CASPAR ROAD,
CASPAR ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

Rezone 68,70, MCLEAN 68,70, MCLEAN


AVENUE, Papatoetoe
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing
Papatoetoe
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

Rezone 68,70, PEVERILL 68,70, PEVERILL


CRESCENT, Papatoetoe CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing
Papatoetoe
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Rezone 63,65, CASPAR 63,65, CASPAR


ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

66, TUI ROAD,


Papatoetoe

REQUESTED
ZONE

746

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retaining No change
a less intensified MHU zone. MHU reflects surrounding zoning
and proximity to the RFN and Papatoetoe Town Centre. This
enables intensification in the area that is appropriate with the
neighbourhood and provides a transition in density between
THAB and MHS zones. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN - this is outside MHU zone. Support
retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN - this is outside MHU zone. Support
retention of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Consider this meets the proximity criteria for THAB and
logical to terminate at Overton Road

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Consider this meets the proximity criteria for THAB and
logical to terminate at Overton Road

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6902

839-6903

839-6953

839-6954

839-6955

839-6956

839-6957

839-6958

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone
77,75,73,71,83,81,79,
MANSTON ROAD,129,
NAYLORS DRIVE,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

77,75,73,71,83,81,7 Mangere
9, MANSTON
ROAD,129,
NAYLORS DRIVE,
Mangere

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 5, COLIN


West)
STREET,510,510A,512A,
508,512, MASSEY
ROAD, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 1,3,5, MASTERS
west)
PLACE,68,68A,70,
WALMSLEY ROAD,5,7,
DONNELL AVENUE,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

5, COLIN
Mangere
STREET,510,510A,51
2A,508,512,
MASSEY ROAD,
Mangere

MHS

1,3,5, MASTERS
Favona
PLACE,68,68A,70,
WALMSLEY
ROAD,5,7, DONNELL
AVENUE, Favona

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 11, DONNELL


AVENUE,2, MASTERS
PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 15,17, DONNELL
West)
AVENUE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, DONNELL
AVENUE,2,
MASTERS PLACE,
Favona

Favona

15,17, DONNELL
AVENUE, Favona

Favona

Urban (central and


west)

2,4, HARRIET
Favona
STREET,24,26,
DONNELL AVENUE,
Favona

MHS

1, HARRIET
Favona
STREET,32,
DONNELL AVENUE,
Favona

MHS

10,12,14,16,4,6,8,
Favona
DONNELL AVENUE,
Favona

MHS

Rezone 2,4, HARRIET


STREET,24,26, DONNELL
AVENUE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 1, HARRIET


West)
STREET,32, DONNELL
AVENUE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
10,12,14,16,4,6,8,
DONNELL AVENUE,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

747

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC or MU
zones and distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning complements
the suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Site (development block) on FN and within proximity to FN
route. Consider MHU zone appropriate

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties are not close to the Mangere TC zone
or a MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6959

839-6960

839-6961

839-6962

839-6963

839-6964

839-6965

839-6966

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
140,136A,138A,136,134
,134A,138, HALL
AVENUE, Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 116,118,
West)
WALMSLEY ROAD,
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

140,136A,138A,136, Favona
134,134A,138, HALL
AVENUE, Mangere

MHS

116,118, WALMSLEY Favona


ROAD, Mangere

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9,13,


11,9,13, CURLEW
West)
CURLEW PLACE, Favona PLACE, Favona
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 4,6, CURLEW


West)
PLACE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4,6, CURLEW PLACE, Favona


Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 11,9,13,15,7,


West)
CALTHORP CLOSE,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,9,13,15,7,
CALTHORP CLOSE,
Favona

Urban (central and


west)

77,83,81,79,
Favona
ROBERTSON
ROAD,6,4,8,83,81,7
9, CALTHORP
CLOSE, Favona

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 24,18,20,22,16,


West)
CALTHORP CLOSE,1,
CHINE PLACE, Favona
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,18,20,22,16,
Favona
CALTHORP CLOSE,1,
CHINE PLACE,
Favona

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 89,87,


West)
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

89,87, ROBERTSON Favona


ROAD, Mangere
East

MHS

Rezone 77,83,81,79,
ROBERTSON
ROAD,6,4,8,83,81,79,
CALTHORP CLOSE,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Favona

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

748

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

On basis of proximity to centre consider MHU zone


appropriate, note THAB zone to north of site no more
proximtate

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6967

839-6968

839-6969

839-6970

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone
58,10,12,14,46,32,44,30
,36,34,60,38,54,52,56,5
0, CALTHORP
CLOSE,13,12,2,4,7,6,9,
CHINE PLACE, Favona
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

58,10,12,14,46,32,4 Favona
4,30,36,34,60,38,54,
52,56,50, CALTHORP
CLOSE,13,12,2,4,7,6,
9, CHINE PLACE,
Favona

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 61,63,65,67,


West)
CALTHORP CLOSE,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

61,63,65,67,
CALTHORP CLOSE,
Favona

Favona

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 55,57,53,


West)
CALTHORP CLOSE,
Favona from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 24,18,26,20,28,
west)
WAKEFIELD
ROAD,18,13,5,21,36, TE
MOTU WAY, Favona
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban. (5, 13
TE MOTU WAY, Favona
is currently zoned Local
Centre)

55,57,53,
CALTHORP CLOSE,
Favona

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 10,2,4, TE


West)
MOTU WAY, Favona
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,2,4, TE MOTU
WAY, Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 20,22,


West)
CARDRONA PLACE,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

20,22, CARDRONA
PLACE, Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
11,13,21,17,19,7,9,
CARDRONA PLACE,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,13,21,17,19,7,9, Favona
CARDRONA PLACE,
Favona

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 26,30,28,


West)
FORBES ROAD, Favona
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

26,30,28, FORBES
ROAD, Favona

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

749

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

24,18,26,20,28,
Favona
WAKEFIELD
ROAD,18,13,5,21,36
, TE MOTU WAY,
Favona

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6971

839-6972

839-6973

839-6974

Favona

Favona

Favona

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6975

839-6976

839-6977

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 25,27, FORBES


ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25,27, FORBES
ROAD, Favona

Rezone 19,21, FORBES


ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,21, FORBES
ROAD, Favona

Rezone
11,10,12,14,4,6,9,8,
BORLASE LANE,35A,35,
WAKEFIELD ROAD,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,10,12,14,4,6,9,8, Favona
BORLASE
LANE,35A,35,
WAKEFIELD ROAD,
Favona

MHS

Rezone
11,15,17,3,5,7,9,
LANGIOLA DRIVE,3,5,
BORLASE LANE, Favona
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,15,17,3,5,7,9,
Favona
LANGIOLA
DRIVE,3,5, BORLASE
LANE, Favona

MHS

Rezone 46,10,44,38,36,
REGALWOOD
PLACE,108,110,112,102,
106,104,136, GADSBY
ROAD,24,20,22,
BURBRIDGE
ROAD,60,82,62,64,66,68
,86,84,26,20,48,46,44,4
2,40,4,6,8,78,76,38,72,7
0,58,10,12,14,16,18,56,
50,52,74,54, LANGIOLA
DRIVE, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46,10,44,38,36,
Favona
REGALWOOD
PLACE,108,110,112,
102,106,104,136,
GADSBY
ROAD,24,20,22,
BURBRIDGE
ROAD,60,82,62,64,6
6,68,86,84,26,20,48,
46,44,42,40,4,6,8,78
,76,38,72,70,58,10,1
2,14,16,18,56,50,52,
74,54, LANGIOLA
DRIVE, Favona

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 3,5, LENORE


West)
ROAD,125, GADSBY
ROAD, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3,5, LENORE
Favona
ROAD,125, GADSBY
ROAD, Favona

SH

Urban (central and


west)

96, GADSBY ROAD,


Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Favona

Favona

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

750

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6978

839-6979

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6980

839-6981

Rezone 96, GADSBY


ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain MHS zoning. No change


These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone or MU
zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport. A
change from SH zoning to MHU is not supported as a spot
zone in this location will not achieve integrated management
of resources and does not recognise local context. The SH
zoning complements the built character and retention of SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6982

839-6983

839-6984

839-6985

839-6986

839-6987

839-6988

839-6989

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 82,76,80,
82,76,80, GADSBY
GADSBY ROAD, Favona ROAD, Favona
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 62, GADSBY


West)
ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

62, GADSBY ROAD,


Favona

LOCALITY

Favona

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 55,57,59,


55,57,59, GADSBY
West)
GADSBY ROAD, Favona ROAD, Favona
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 18,20, GADSBY


West)
ROAD, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,20, GADSBY
ROAD, Favona

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 19,21,23, ATIU


West)
PLACE, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,21,23, ATIU
PLACE, Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 25,27,21,


West)
ENUAMANU ROAD,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

25,27,21,
Favona
ENUAMANU ROAD,
Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 3, GADSBY
3, GADSBY
ROAD,1,3,5, TUA PLACE, ROAD,1,3,5, TUA
Favona from Mixed
PLACE, Favona
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 10,12, GADSBY


West)
ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,12, GADSBY
ROAD, Favona

Favona

Favona

Favona

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

751

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6990

839-6991

839-6992

839-6993

839-6994

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 37,29,35, TUA


PLACE,11,9,7,
GLENPARK
PLACE,62,64,66,24,26,2
0,48,46,44,42,40,42A,42
B,42E,42D,66A66B,38,22,18,56,50,52,5
4,66G,66F,66E,66D,66C,
CRANMERE
CRESCENT,32,30,40,
ENUAMANU
ROAD,70,70D,70E,70A,7
0B,70C, ROBERTSON
ROAD, Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 72,70,
West)
CRANMERE CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37,29,35, TUA
Mangere East
PLACE,11,9,7,
GLENPARK
PLACE,62,64,66,24,2
6,20,48,46,44,42,40,
42A,42B,42E,42D,66
A66B,38,22,18,56,50,
52,54,66G,66F,66E,6
6D,66C, CRANMERE
CRESCENT,32,30,40,
ENUAMANU
ROAD,70,70D,70E,7
0A,70B,70C,
ROBERTSON ROAD

MHS

72,70, CRANMERE Mangere East


CRESCENT, Mangere
East

SH

Urban (central and


west)

19,25,21,23,
Mangere East
CRANMERE
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

39,37,35,
Mangere East
CRANMERE
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

10,8,4,7,6, LYTHAM Mangere East


LANE,36,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Rezone 19,25,21,23,
CRANMERE CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 39,37,35,
West)
CRANMERE CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 10,8,4,7,6,
west)
LYTHAM LANE,36,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

752

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6995

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
38A,26,36E,38D,38C,38
B,32,36D,30,28,36,40,34
,36C,38,36B,36A,38E,
ARCHBOYD
AVENUE,59,58,54,57,56,
51,50,53,60,61,62,64,66
,68, GARUS AVENUE,19,
GLENPARK
PLACE,82,64,66,68,86,8
4,48,44,42,40,40G,40F,4
0E,40D,40C,40B,40A,40
H,74,72,70,38,58,54,56,
50,52, COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT,10,12,14,16,
18,30,28,36,40,42,38,32
, KIRKELLA CRESCENT,
Favona from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

38A,26,36E,38D,38C Mangere East


,38B,32,36D,30,28,3
6,40,34,36C,38,36B,
36A,38E,
ARCHBOYD
AVENUE,59,58,54,5
7,56,51,50,53,60,61,
62,64,66,68, GARUS
AVENUE,19,
GLENPARK
PLACE,82,64,66,68,8
6,84,48,44,42,40,40
G,40F,40E,40D,40C,
40B,40A,40H,74,72,
70,38,58,54,56,50,5
2, COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT,10,12,14,
16,18,30,28,36,40,4
2,38,32, KIRKELLA
CRESCENT, Favona

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

109,111,113,
TENNESSEE
AVENUE, Mangere
East

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

753

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6996

839-6997

839-6998

839-6999

Rezone 109,111,113,
TENNESSEE AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 19,25,21,17,23,


West)
ARCHBOYD
AVENUE,50,52,
CHELBURN CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,25,21,17,23,
Mangere East
ARCHBOYD
AVENUE,50,52,
CHELBURN
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

21, KIRKELLA
CRESCENT,20,
ARCHBOYD
AVENUE,1, TAMAR
PLACE, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 21, KIRKELLA


CRESCENT,20,
ARCHBOYD AVENUE,1,
TAMAR PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 15,17, KIRKELLA
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere East

15,17, KIRKELLA
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zoning as No change


the site is remote from a TC or MU zone and the from the RFN.
Do not support the change from SH zone to MHS zone because
a spot zone in this location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the
Do not support rezoning from SH/MHS to MHU. Retain SH
No change
zoning due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Retain MHS. A change from MHS zoning to MHU is not
supported as a spot zone in this location will not achieve
integrated management of resources or recognise local
context. Retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

MHU

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7000

839-7001

839-7002

839-7003

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 2, TAMAR


West)
PLACE,10,12,14,
ARCHBOYD
AVENUE,11,1,3,5,7,9,
KIRKELLA CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 4,6, ARCHBOYD
west)
AVENUE,47,45,49,
GARUS AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, TAMAR
Mangere East
PLACE,10,12,14,
ARCHBOYD
AVENUE,11,1,3,5,7,
9, KIRKELLA
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

4,6, ARCHBOYD
AVENUE,47,45,49,
GARUS AVENUE,
Mangere East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 76,74,
CHELBURN CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 15, ARCHBOYD
West)
AVENUE,40, CHELBURN
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Single House
to Mixed Housing
Urban.

76,74, CHELBURN
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

15, ARCHBOYD
Mangere East
AVENUE,40,
CHELBURN
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 32,34,


West)
CHELBURN CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,34, CHELBURN
Mangere East
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 28, CHELBURN


West)
CRESCENT,1,
ARCHBOYD
AVENUE,33,39,37,35,41,
GARUS AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28, CHELBURN
Mangere East
CRESCENT,1,
ARCHBOYD
AVENUE,33,39,37,3
5,41, GARUS
AVENUE, Mangere
East

SH

Urban (central and


west)

38,46,44,42,36,40,3 Mangere East


4, GARUS
AVENUE,8,4,6,
CROMER PLACE,45,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

754

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Mangere East

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
There is also limited wastewater infrastructure. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7004

839-7005

839-7006

Rezone
38,46,44,42,36,40,34,
GARUS AVENUE,8,4,6,
CROMER PLACE,45,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone
or MU zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7007

839-7008

839-7009

839-7010

839-7011

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 11, CROMER


West)
PLACE,30, GARUS
AVENUE,3,5,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11, CROMER
Mangere East
PLACE,30, GARUS
AVENUE,3,5,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 11,13,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT,1, FOSTER
PLACE,9, CROMER
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 11,13,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT,1, FOSTER
PLACE,9, CROMER
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 3, CROMER
PLACE,43,41,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,13,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT,1,
FOSTER PLACE,9,
CROMER PLACE,
Mangere East

Mangere East

MHS

11,13,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT,1,
FOSTER PLACE,9,
CROMER PLACE,
Mangere East

Mangere East

3, CROMER
Mangere East
PLACE,43,41,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Rezone 33,25,31,29,35,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT,8,6, FOSTER
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33,25,31,29,35,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT,8,6,
FOSTER PLACE,
Mangere East

MHS

Rezone 2, FOSTER
PLACE,19,21,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

2, FOSTER
Mangere East
PLACE,19,21,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Rezone
76,82,80,86,84,78,
CRANMERE
CRESCENT,24,32,30,22,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

76,82,80,86,84,78, Mangere East


CRANMERE
CRESCENT,24,32,30,
22, COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

755

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Mangere East

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7012

839-7013

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7014

839-7015

839-7016

839-7017

839-7018

839-7019

839-7020

839-7021

839-7022

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 18,14,16,
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

18,14,16,
Mangere East
COTTINGHAM
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 19,18,20,


West)
PENDERFORD PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 14,16,
West)
PENDERFORD PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 36,
West)
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE,11,13,1,3,5,7,9,
PENDERFORD PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 8,2,4,6,
west)
PENDERFORD
PLACE,26,30,28,
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,18,20,
PENDERFORD
PLACE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHS

14,16,
PENDERFORD
PLACE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHS

36, MCNAUGHTON Mangere East


AVENUE,11,13,1,3,5
,7,9, PENDERFORD
PLACE, Mangere
East

NMHS

8,2,4,6,
PENDERFORD
PLACE,26,30,28,
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 18,20,


West)
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,20,
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

25,23, MCKINSTRY
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

113, GADSBY
ROAD,27, FREDA
PLACE, Favona

Favona

Rezone 33,37,35, FREDA 33,37,35, FREDA


PLACE, Favona from
PLACE, Favona
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 25,23,
MCKINSTRY AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 113, GADSBY
ROAD,27, FREDA PLACE,
Favona from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

756

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning. MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site at 19 Penderford Place,
Mangere East does not require maintaining a SH zoning. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning. MHS/SH
Managing the flood risk on this site at 13 Penderford Place,
Mangere East does not require maintaining a SH zoning. The
MHS zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

SH

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7023

839-7024

839-7025

839-7026

839-7027

839-7028

839-7029

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 10,8,
CRANMERE
CRESCENT,74A,72A,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 10, MCKINSTRY
AVENUE,6, PIKE
PLACE,1,3,5,7,
CRANMERE CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

10,8, CRANMERE
Mangere East
CRESCENT,74A,72A,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East

10, MCKINSTRY
Mangere East
AVENUE,6, PIKE
PLACE,1,3,5,7,
CRANMERE
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Rezone 3,5, PIKE PLACE, 3,5, PIKE PLACE,


Mangere East from
Mangere East
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 25,31,27,29,23,
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE,46, KIVELL
CLOSE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

757

Mangere East

MHS

25,31,27,29,23,
Mangere East
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE,46, KIVELL
CLOSE, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
309,301,303,305,299A,2
97,299, BUCKLAND
ROAD,74,64,72,66,
KIVELL CLOSE,98,100,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
289,285,293,287,291,
BUCKLAND ROAD,
Mangere EastPapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

309,301,303,305,29 Mangere East


9A,297,299,
BUCKLAND
ROAD,74,64,72,66,
KIVELL
CLOSE,98,100,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East

MHS

289,285,293,287,29 Mangere East


1, BUCKLAND
ROAD, Mangere
East-Papatoetoe

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
281,279,277,275,275A,
BUCKLAND
ROAD,39,37,43,35,41,
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

281,279,277,275,27 Mangere East


5A, BUCKLAND
ROAD,39,37,43,35,4
1, MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE, Mangere
East

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


MHU
Buckland Road, Kivell Rd and Robertson Road, Mangere East
are close to the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


MHU
289,285,293,287,291 Buckland Road, Mangere East are close to
the Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at
281,279,277,275,275A Buckland Road and 39, 37, 43, 35,41,
McNaughton Avenue, Mangere East are near to the Mangere
TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public transport.
Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7030

839-7031

839-7032

839-7033

839-7034

839-7035

839-7036

839-7037

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 3B,1/5,2/5,3A,7, 3B,1/5,2/5,3A,7, RYE Mangere East


RYE COURT, Mangere
COURT, Mangere
East from Mixed
East
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 2,1/4,2/4,4,6,
RYE COURT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone
308,314A,314B,318A,31
2,302,310,304,306,316A
,316B, BUCKLAND
ROAD,102, ROBERTSON
ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2,1/4,2/4,4,6, RYE
COURT, Mangere
East

MHS

Rezone 1,3, BARI


LANE,106A,106,104,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
114,116,118,112,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 10,12,8,
BELLARD PLACE,34,
HALSWELL STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 1,3,5, BELLARD
PLACE,32,34, LYNCROFT
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1,3, BARI
Mangere East
LANE,106A,106,104,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East

MHS

1,3, BARI
Mangere East
LANE,106A,106,104,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East

MHS

10,12,8, BELLARD
PLACE,34,
HALSWELL STREET,
Mangere East

Mangere East

MHS

1,3,5, BELLARD
PLACE,32,34,
LYNCROFT STREET,
Mangere East

Mangere East

Rezone
39,35A,33,37,39A,35,37
A, LYNCROFT STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39,35A,33,37,39A,3 Mangere East


5,37A, LYNCROFT
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Mangere East

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

308,314A,314B,318
A,312,302,310,304,3
06,316A,316B,
BUCKLAND
ROAD,102,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

758

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


3B,1/5,2/5,3A,7, Rye Court, Mangere East are close to the
Mangere TC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


Mangere East are near to the Mangere TC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


Mangere East are close to the Mangere TC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


Mangere East are close to the Mangere TC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


Mangere East are near to the Mangere TC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


MHU
Mangere East are near to the Mangere East LC zone and in
close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at
MHU
Mangere East are close to the Mangere East LC zone and in
close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties in
MHU
Mangere East are close to the Mangere East LC zone and in
close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7038

839-7039

839-7040

839-7041

839-7042

839-7043

839-7044

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 25,27,29,23,
LYNCROFT STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 30A,30,28,
LYNCROFT STREET,2,4,
BELLARD PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone
11,13,15,3,5,7,9,
CARVER
PLACE,217,215,219,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

25,27,29,23,
LYNCROFT STREET,
Mangere East

Mangere East

30A,30,28,
LYNCROFT
STREET,2,4,
BELLARD PLACE,
Mangere East

Mangere East

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

11,13,15,3,5,7,9,
Mangere East
CARVER
PLACE,217,215,219,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone


West)
10,12,14,2,4,6,8,
CARVER PLACE,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,12,14,2,4,6,8,
CARVER PLACE,
Mangere East

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 50,52, STEVEN


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

50,52, STEVEN
STREET, Mangere
East

Urban (Central and Rezone 47,45,51,43,


West)
STEVEN
STREET,229,227,235,22
5,237,231,233,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

47,45,51,43,
Mangere East
STEVEN
STREET,229,227,235
,225,237,231,233,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
Mangere East

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 33,37,35, JAMES


West)
STREET,10, MOFFITT
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33,37,35, JAMES
Mangere East
STREET,10, MOFFITT
PLACE, Mangere
East

MHS

Mangere East

Mangere East

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

759

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at


MHU
25,27,29,23, Lyncroft Street, Mangere East are close to the
Mangere East LC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for
public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties at
MHU
Mangere East are close to the Mangere East LC zone and in
close proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this
site to a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS. The
properties at 11,13,15,3,5,7,9, Carver Place 217,215,219,
Robertson Road, Mangere East are not close to the LC zone,
but are within walking distance of the RFN. A change in the
zoning MHS would recognise the local context and achieve
integrated management of resources for this area. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part rezone from SH to MHS. The
properties at 10,12,14,2,4,6,8, Carver Place, Mangere East are
not close to the LC zone, but are within walking distance of the
RFN. A change in the zoning to MHS would recognise the local
context and achieve integrated management of resources for
this area. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS. The
properties at 50, 52 Stevens Street, Mangere East are not
close to the LC zone, but are within walking distance of the
RFN. A change in the zoning to MHS would recognise the local
context and achieve integrated management of resources for
this area. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from SH to MHS. The properties at
47,45,51,43 Stevens Street and 229, 227, 235, 225,237,231,233,
Robertson Road, Mangere East are not close to the LC zone,
however they are within walking distance of the RFN. A
change in the zoning MHS would recognise the local context
and achieve integrated management of resources for this area
of Mangere East. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones. The MHS zone recognises the local context
and achieve integrated management of resources for this area
of Mangere East. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7045

839-7046

839-7047

839-7048

839-7049

839-7050

839-7051

839-7052

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 1/191West)


20/191,199, BUCKLAND
ROAD, Mangere EastPapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1/191-20/191,199,
BUCKLAND ROAD,
Mangere EastPapatoetoe

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 28A,28, YATES


ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 217,217A,
BUCKLAND ROAD,
Mangere EastPapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

28A,28, YATES
ROAD, Mangere
East

Mangere East

217,217A,
BUCKLAND ROAD,
Mangere EastPapatoetoe

Mangere East

Rezone 6A,6B,6C,
CHALFONT STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6A,6B,6C,
Mangere East
CHALFONT STREET,
Mangere East

MHS

18,20,14,16,
Mangere East
CHALFONT STREET,
Mangere East

MHS

9,10,3,5,7, BODMIN Mangere East


PLACE,5,7,
CHALFONT STREET,
Mangere East

MHS

1,9,5,7, BALNOON
PLACE,11,9,13,15,
CHALFONT
STREET,4,6,
BODMIN PLACE,
Mangere East

Mangere East

MHS

76,74, YATES
ROAD,19,17,
CHALFONT
STREET,8,4,6,
BALNOON PLACE,
Mangere East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (Central and Rezone 18,20,14,16,


West)
CHALFONT STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 9,10,3,5,7,
West)
BODMIN PLACE,5,7,
CHALFONT STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 1,9,5,7,
West)
BALNOON
PLACE,11,9,13,15,
CHALFONT STREET,4,6,
BODMIN PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 76,74, YATES
West)
ROAD,19,17, CHALFONT
STREET,8,4,6, BALNOON
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

760

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones. The MHS zone recognises the local context
and achieve integrated management of resources for this area
of Mangere East. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties in Yates
Road, Mangere East are close to the LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC
or MU zones. The MHS zone recognises the local context and
achieve integrated management of resources for this area of
Mangere East. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC
or MU zones. The MHS zone recognises the local context and
achieve integrated management of resources for this area of
Mangere East. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties in
18,20,14,16, Chalfont Street, Mangere East, Mangere are close
to the LC zone and in close proximity to the RFN for public
transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties in
9,10,3,5,7, Bodkin Place and ,5,7, Chalfont Street, Mangere
East, are close to the LC zone and in close proximity to the RFN
for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties in 4,6,


Bodmin Place,11,9,13,15 Chalfont Street and 1,9,5,7 Balnoon
Place, Mangere East, are near to the LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS. (1
Bodnoon Place, 9, 11 Chalford Street, 4 Bodmin Place retained
as SH due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.)

MHU/SH

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located near to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

On basis of proximity to FN (Massey Road) and community


facilities (education) consider MHU appropriate zoning.
Oppose position of Council for spot zoning as fails to
consider the Corporations wider integrated review of
zoning

MHU

No change

On basis of proximity to FN (Massey Road) and community


facilities (education) consider MHU appropriate zoning.
Oppose position of Council for spot zoning as fails to
consider the Corporations wider integrated review of
zoning

No change

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7053

839-7054

839-7055

839-7056

839-7057

839-7058

839-7059

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 25,31,27,29,


West)
CHALFONT STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone
west)
24,26,32,30,28,34,
CHALFONT STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 11, CARNAC
west)
PLACE,61,63, YATES
ROAD, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
58,54,56,50,52,60,
FERGUSON STREET,75,
YATES ROAD,5,7,
CARNAC PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
76,74,64,66,70,68,78,
FERGUSON
STREET,83,81,87,85,
YATES ROAD, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

PAUP ZONE

25,31,27,29,
Mangere East
CHALFONT STREET,
Mangere East

MHS

24,26,32,30,28,34, Mangere East


CHALFONT STREET,
Mangere East

MHS

11, CARNAC
Mangere East
PLACE,61,63, YATES
ROAD, Mangere
East

MHS

58,54,56,50,52,60, Mangere East


FERGUSON
STREET,75, YATES
ROAD,5,7, CARNAC
PLACE, Mangere
East

MHS

76,74,64,66,70,68,7 Mangere East


8, FERGUSON
STREET,83,81,87,85,
YATES ROAD,
Mangere East

MHS

Rezone 8,4,6, BEDLOW 8,4,6, BEDLOW


PLACE, Mangere East
PLACE, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 55,51,53,49,


West)
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE,2,2A,
WICKMAN
WAY,271,265,
BUCKLAND ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

55,51,53,49,
MCNAUGHTON
AVENUE,2,2A,
WICKMAN
WAY,271,265,
BUCKLAND ROAD,
Mangere East

Mangere East

Mangere East

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

761

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN. Rezoning this site to a MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7060

839-7061

839-7062

839-7063

839-7064

839-7065

839-7066

839-7067

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 44,42,


West)
CHALFONT
STREET,88,86, YATES
ROAD,11,9,5,7,
BEDLOW PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 10,8,12,4,6,
west)
CLYRO PLACE,9,7A,7,
ETTRICK
PLACE,25,27,15,17,23,1
9,29, CHELBURN
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

44,42, CHALFONT
STREET,88,86,
YATES
ROAD,11,9,5,7,
BEDLOW PLACE,
Mangere East

Mangere East

10,8,12,4,6, CLYRO Mangere East


PLACE,9,7A,7,
ETTRICK
PLACE,25,27,15,17,2
3,19,29, CHELBURN
CRESCENT, Mangere

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 11,9, CLYRO


PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 10,8, ETTRICK
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 4, ETTRICK
PLACE,43, CHELBURN
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

11,9, CLYRO PLACE, Mangere East


Mangere East

MHS

4, ETTRICK
Mangere East
PLACE,43,
CHELBURN
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 88,86,84,


West)
CHELBURN CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 64, WICKMAN
West)
WAY,12,14, TANNOCK
PLACE, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

88,86,84,
Mangere East
CHELBURN
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

64, WICKMAN
WAY,12,14,
TANNOCK PLACE,
Mangere

SH

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

762

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.


Managing the flood risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

10,8, ETTRICK
PLACE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support submission to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.


MHS
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties are not close to a TC zone or MU
zone. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties are not close to a TC zone or MU zone
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 24,26,20,


24,26,20,
Mangere East
West)
FERGUSON STREET,1/33- FERGUSON
23/33, YATES ROAD,
STREET,1/33-23/33,
Mangere East from
YATES ROAD,
Mixed Housing
Mangere East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties are not close to a TC zone or MU zone
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7068

839-7069

839-7070

839-7071

839-7072

839-7073

839-7074

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Urban (Central and Rezone 44,42,40,


West)
FERGUSON STREET,4,
CARNAC PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 32,36,34,
West)
FERGUSON STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 14, CLEEK
West)
ROAD,11,13,1,3,5,7,9,
CHADWICK
CRESCENT,39,45,41,
FERGUSON STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

44,42,40,
FERGUSON
STREET,4, CARNAC
PLACE, Mangere
East

LOCALITY

Mangere East

PAUP ZONE

MHS

32,36,34,
Mangere East
FERGUSON STREET,
Mangere East

MHS

14, CLEEK
Mangere East
ROAD,11,13,1,3,5,7,
9, CHADWICK
CRESCENT,39,45,41,
FERGUSON STREET,
Mangere East

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 19,21,17,


West)
CHADWICK CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,21,17,
Mangere East
CHADWICK
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

24,24A,24C,24B,
TENNESSEE
AVENUE, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 24,24A,24C,24B,
TENNESSEE AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone
10,26,12,14,16,18,28,2,
4,8, CHADWICK
CRESCENT,59,57,51,61,
63,65,71,67,69,
FERGUSON STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone
West)
27,33,31,37,29,35,
CHADWICK CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

763

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


MHS
zoning. (See below-1 Chadwick Crescent, SH to MHS.) These
properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC or MU zones.
The MHS zone recognises the local context and achieve
integrated management of resources for this area of Mangere
East. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezone from SH to MHS zoning 1 Chadwick Crescent .
Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC
or MU zones. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Mangere East

10,26,12,14,16,18,2 Mangere East


8,2,4,8, CHADWICK
CRESCENT,59,57,51,
61,63,65,71,67,69,
FERGUSON STREET,
Mangere East

MHS

27,33,31,37,29,35, Mangere East


CHADWICK
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC
or MU zones. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are
located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support submission in part change of zone from SH to MHS.


That is 35 and 37 Chadwick Crescent to MHS as managing
flooding risk on those sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The are also not effect by the nearby NGC. The MHS
zoning complements the neighbourhood's planned suburban
built character and retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Centre and FN consider that MHU zone
appropriate

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7075

839-7076

839-7077

839-7078

839-7079

839-7080

839-7082

839-7083

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 39,41,


West)
CHADWICK CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39,41, CHADWICK Mangere East


CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 69, WICKMAN


West)
WAY,49, CHADWICK
CRESCENT, Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

69, WICKMAN
Mangere East
WAY,49, CHADWICK
CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 49, WICKMAN


West)
WAY,99,103,101,97,
YATES
ROAD,89,91,83,81,87,85
, FERGUSON STREET,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 55,57,
West)
CHADWICK CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

49, WICKMAN
Mangere East
WAY,99,103,101,97,
YATES
ROAD,89,91,83,81,8
7,85, FERGUSON
STREET, Mangere
East

MHS

55,57, CHADWICK Mangere East


CRESCENT, Mangere
East

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 19,20,21,17,


West)
TANNOCK PLACE,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 3,5, TANNOCK
west)
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 139, TENNESSEE
west)
AVENUE,103,105, VINE
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

19,20,21,17,
TANNOCK PLACE,
Mangere East

Mangere East

MHS

3,5, TANNOCK
PLACE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

39, TENNESSEE
AVENUE,103,105,
VINE STREET,
Mangere East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

99,97, VINE STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

Rezone 99,97, VINE


STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

764

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are


MHU
located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zone. The No change
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zone. The No change
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity constraints. The property is also a significant
distance from town centre and public transport networks. The
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7084

839-7085

839-7086

839-7087

839-7088

839-7089

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (Central and Rezone 46,48, BLAKE


West)
ROAD, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

46,48, BLAKE ROAD, Mangere East


Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 2, BLAKE


West)
ROAD,69,75,73,71,67,
VINE STREET, Mangere
East from Single House
to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

2, BLAKE
Mangere East
ROAD,69,75,73,71,6
7, VINE STREET,
Mangere East

SH

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 3,5, FARMER


STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

3,5, FARMER
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

SH

Rezone 10,8,2,4,6,
TREMBATH
AVENUE,8,6, FARMER
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

10,8,2,4,6,
TREMBATH
AVENUE,8,6,
FARMER STREET,
Mangere East

Mangere East

Rezone 7B,7A, BLAKE


ROAD, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

7B,7A, BLAKE
ROAD, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 19,15,21,17,23, 19,15,21,17,23,


FARMER STREET,
FARMER STREET,
Mangere East from
Mangere East
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

765

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zone. The No change


property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zone. The No change
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from TC of LC zone. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity constraints. The property is also a significant
distance from TC of LC zone. The SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity constraints. The property is also a significant
distance from town centre and public transport networks. The
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from town centre and public transport networks. The SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Support rezoning from SH to MHS. The properties are located
close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7090

839-7091

839-7092

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 67A,67,
TENNESSEE AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

67A,67, TENNESSEE Mangere East


AVENUE, Mangere
East

SH

Rezone 61,59,
TENNESSEE
AVENUE,3,7,
TREMBATH AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

61,59, TENNESSEE
AVENUE,3,7,
TREMBATH
AVENUE, Mangere
East

Mangere East

SH

Rezone 33,35,
TENNESSEE AVENUE,40,
VINE STREET, Mangere
East from Single House
to Mixed Housing
Urban.

33,35, TENNESSEE
AVENUE,40, VINE
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning from SH to MHS. The properties are located MHS


close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from SH to MHS. The properties are located MHS
close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
SH

MHU

Support rezoning from SH to MHS. The properties are located MHS


close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7093

839-7094

839-7398

839-7095

839-7417

839-5329

839-6561

839-7422

839-7423

839-8167

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Urban (Central and Rezone 20A,20C,20B,20, 20A,20C,20B,20,


West)
VINE STREET, Mangere VINE STREET,
East from Single House Mangere East
to Mixed Housing
Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

LOCALITY

Mangere East

Rezone 15A,15,
TENNESSEE AVENUE,
Mangere East from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15A,15, TENNESSEE Mangere East


AVENUE, Mangere
East

Rezone 45,43,41,
GILBERT ROAD, Otara
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 11, TENNESSEE
AVENUE,18,18A,
DRIVER ROAD, Mangere
East from Single House
to Mixed Housing
Urban.

45,43,41, GILBERT
ROAD, Otara

11, TENNESSEE
AVENUE,18,18A,
DRIVER ROAD,
Mangere East

Otara North

Mangere East

2-6,1-5, VILMA
PLACE, Otara

Urban (central and


west)

8,2,4,6, DON
Otara South
PLACE,303,305,307,
BAIRDS ROAD,8,2,
O'CONNOR STREET,
Otara

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

8, CIVIL PLACE,
Otara

SH

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The No change


property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from TC of LC zone. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from SH to MHS. The properties are located MHS
close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support a less
intensified zone change to MHU, as the property is not
adjacent to any centre to apply THAB zone. The zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Proximity to Centre and FN consider that MHU zone
appropriate

MHU

Support rezoning from SH to MHS. The properties are located MHS


close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to a MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Otara North

Otara South

SH

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to THAB as No change


the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Rezone 137,
137, BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY ROAD, Flat ROAD, Flat Bush
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Rezone 19, ORETI


PLACE, Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 69 CAMBRIDGE
West)
TERRACE. Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

Proximity to Centre and FN consider that MHU zone


appropriate

Urban (Central and Rezone 2-6,1-5, VILMA


West)
PLACE, Otara from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 8, CIVIL PLACE,
west)
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
Rezone 8,2,4,6, DON
PLACE,303,305,307,
BAIRDS ROAD,8,2,
O'CONNOR STREET,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

766

19, ORETI PLACE,


Clover Park

69 CAMBRIDGE
TERRACE.
Papatoetoe

Otara South

Otara South

Papatoetoe

MHS

MHS

SH

THAB

THAB

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. (This is away from Otara
Town Centre). Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to THAB as No change
the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8166

839-6930

839-7454

839-7477

839-8215

839-7781

839-5960

839-6013

839-7401

839-7492

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (Central and Rezone 69A


West)
CAMBRIDGE TERRACE.
Papatoetoe from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 6A,6, ROBYN
west)
PLACE, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 16 FRANKLYNE
West)
ROAD. Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 7 AVIS AVENUE.
west)
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
69A CAMBRIDGE
TERRACE.
Papatoetoe

LOCALITY

Papatoetoe

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to THAB as No change


the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

6A,6, ROBYN PLACE, Mangere East


Mangere East

16 FRANKLYNE
ROAD. Otara

7 AVIS AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

Otara North

Papatoetoe

Urban (Central and Rezone 7 GORDON


7 GORDON ROAD.
West)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Papatoetoe

Rezone 7 MAHON
PLACE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 70, TUI
west)
ROAD,1,1A, OVERTON
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 71, TUI ROAD,
West)
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

7 MAHON PLACE.
Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

32,30, CRANMERE Mangere East


CRESCENT, Mangere
East

Rezone 32,30,
CRANMERE CRESCENT,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 1 FARETI PLACE.
West)
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

767

70, TUI ROAD,1,1A, Hunters Corner


OVERTON ROAD,
Papatoetoe

71, TUI ROAD,


Papatoetoe

1 FARETI PLACE.
Mangere

Hunters Corner

Mangere

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Otara Town Centre nor to the RFN.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as No change
the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. This allows intensification in
the area that is appropriate with the neighbourhood. Retention
of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere are not close to a TC, LC
or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Proximity to Centre and FN consider that MHU zone


appropriate

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Proximity to Centre (Papatoetoe) and FN consider that
THAB zone appropriate

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Consider the transition to MHU appropriate at Overton


Road and therefore support MHU zone by proximity
criteria.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6005

839-7498

839-5525

839-7495

839-5162

839-7501

839-7531

839-6558

839-7541

839-7552

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 72, CAMBRIDGE 72, CAMBRIDGE


West)
TERRACE, Papatoetoe TERRACE,
from Mixed Housing
Papatoetoe
Urban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Papatoetoe

Urban (Central and Rezone 2 CLARKSON


West)
CRESCENT. Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 72, FERNDOWN
West)
AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

2 CLARKSON
CRESCENT. Otara

72, FERNDOWN
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

Mangere East

Rezone 72, HALLBERRY 72, HALLBERRY


ROAD, Mangere East
ROAD, Mangere
from Mixed Housing
East
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

19 WAKEFIELD
ROAD. Favona

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 17 ULAY PLACE. 17 ULAY PLACE.


West)
Clover Park from Single Clover Park
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

Urban (central and


west)

Otara South

Rezone 8,2,4,6, PIAKO


STREET, Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 7 ESPADA
west)
PLACE. Clover Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 61 HILLS ROAD.
West)
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

8,2,4,6, PIAKO
STREET, Otara

7 ESPADA PLACE.
Clover Park

61 HILLS ROAD.
Otara

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. This enables intensification
in the area that is appropriate with the neighbourhood and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS zones.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Rezone 42 VINE STREET. 42 VINE STREET.


Mangere East from
Mangere East
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 19 WAKEFIELD


West)
ROAD. Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

768

Otara South

Otara North

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre RFN. Support retention of
MHS as a lesser intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity constraints. The property is also a significant
distance from TC of LC zone. The SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the PAUP and
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. These properties in Favona are not close to a TC, LC or
MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Dawson Road
Local Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, Dawson Road Local Centre and the RFN. The retention
of MHS zone meets the objectives of MHU zone.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and Dawson Road Local Centre. Support retention of
MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7522

839-7632

839-7553

839-8254

839-5544

839-5404

839-8255

839-7598

839-7559

839-8256

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 15 BOYD
AVENUE. Mangere
Bridge from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15 BOYD AVENUE.
Mangere Bridge

LOCALITY

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 73 FERNDOWN 73 FERNDOWN


West)
AVENUE. Papatoetoe
AVENUE.
from Single House to
Papatoetoe
Mixed Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

Urban (Central and Rezone 7 BLAKE ROAD. 7 BLAKE ROAD.


West)
Mangere East from
Mangere East
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Papatoetoe

Rezone 73 PARK
AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 73, CASPAR
west)
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 73, SKIPTON
West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 73A PARK
west)
AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 33 EDWARD
West)
AVENUE. Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (central and Rezone 9 COLIN STREET.
west)
Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

73 PARK AVENUE.
Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

73B PARK AVENUE. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

Rezone 73B PARK


AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

73, CASPAR ROAD,


Papatoetoe

73, SKIPTON
STREET, Mangere
East

Hunters Corner

Mangere East

73A PARK AVENUE. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

33 EDWARD
AVENUE. Otara

9 COLIN STREET.
Mangere

PAUP ZONE

Otara North

Mangere

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

769

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain zoning.


No change
These properties in Favona are not close to a TC zone or MU
zone and are remote from the RFN. A change from SH zoning
to MHU is not supported as it would create a spot zone in this
location will not achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The SH zoning
complements the built character and retention of SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from TC of LC zone. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. These properties in Mangere East are not close to a TC,
LC or MU zones and are remote from the RFN for public
transport. The MHS zoning complements the built character
and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8257

839-7599

839-6936

839-7628

839-7614

839-6411

839-7510

839-8014

839-7556

839-5717

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 73C PARK


AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 1 ASHGROVE
west)
ROAD. Mangere from
Single House to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 74,72, RAGLAN
West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

73C PARK AVENUE. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

74,72, RAGLAN
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 11 CLAYTON
AVENUE. Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 18 TANNOCK
West)
PLACE. Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 75, WYLLIE
west)
ROAD,28, FENTON
STREET, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 759 GREAT
west)
SOUTH ROAD. Otahuhu
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11 CLAYTON
AVENUE. Otara

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

75A PARK AVENUE. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 75A PARK


AVENUE. Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 76 BUCKLAND
ROAD. Mangere EastPapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1 ASHGROVE
ROAD. Mangere

Mangere

18 TANNOCK PLACE. Mangere East


Mangere East

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

75, WYLLIE
Papatoetoe
ROAD,28, FENTON
STREET, Papatoetoe

MHS

759 GREAT SOUTH


ROAD. Otahuhu

MHS

76 BUCKLAND
ROAD. Mangere
East-Papatoetoe

Urban (Central and Rezone 76, CAMBRIDGE 76, CAMBRIDGE


West)
TERRACE, Papatoetoe TERRACE,
from Mixed Housing
Papatoetoe
Urban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

Hunters Corner

Mangere East

Papatoetoe

MHS

MHS

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

770

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from SH to THAB. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the growth is
No change
limited in this area due to flooding constraints. Support
retention of MHS zoning. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MSH to THAB - the
No change
property is not adjacent to Otara Town Centre to apply THAB
zone. Support retention of MHS which is compatible with
Retention of the zone of adjoining properties. Retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The properties are
MHU
located close to the Mangere East LC zone and in close
proximity to the RFN for public transport. Rezoning this site to
a MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe and Mangere Town
Centres nor to the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as
a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe and Mangere Town
Centres nor to the RFN. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHU zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. This enables intensification
in the area that is appropriate with the neighbourhood and
provides a transition in density between THAB and MHS zones.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7635

839-7662

839-5281

839-5751

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Urban (Central and Rezone 17 CAMEO


West)
COURT ROAD. Favona
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

17 CAMEO COURT
ROAD. Favona

Urban (central and


west)

389B MASSEY
ROAD. MangereOtahuhu

Rezone 389B MASSEY


ROAD. MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Town Centre.
Urban (central and Rezone 76, CASPAR
west)
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 76, FERNDOWN
West)
AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Favona

Mangere East

76, CASPAR ROAD, Hunters Corner


Papatoetoe

76, FERNDOWN
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

TC

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.


Managing the flood risk on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS zoning complements the
suburban built character and retention of MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to TC. Retain MHS zoning.
The PAUP aims to consolidate TC and LC zone as a The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and RFN. Support retention of MHS as a
less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS.
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

771

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

TC

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7665

839-7682

839-7687

839-7898

839-6928

839-7691

839-7737

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 7 COLIN STREET. 7 COLIN STREET.


Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 51 LENORE


West)
ROAD. Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

51 LENORE ROAD.
Favona

Urban (central and


west)

389A MASSEY
ROAD. MangereOtahuhu

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 389A MASSEY


ROAD. MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Town Centre.

Mangere

Favona

Mangere East

Rezone 78 TUI ROAD.


78 TUI ROAD.
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Hunters Corner

Rezone 78A,78, PARK


AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 1 PENINSULA
ROAD. Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

78A,78, PARK
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

1 PENINSULA
ROAD. Mangere

Mangere

Rezone 85
CORONATION ROAD.
Mangere Bridge from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

85 CORONATION
ROAD. Mangere
Bridge

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Mangere Bridge MHS

MHU

MHS

TC

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning


No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to TC (LC) . Retain MHS


No change
zoning size of current Local Centre. The PAUP seeks to
consolidate existing as a means of revitalising and supporting
town centres and local centres. These objectives and policies
are set out in the RPS. retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU zone. Retain MHS No change
zoning. The site is not close to a TC or MU zones. MHS is the
appropriate zone for this location and promotes local context
as outlined in the Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site not close to a TC or MU zones. MHS is the
appropriate zone for this location and promotes local context
as outlined in the Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

Oppose
Meet Criteria
Oppose
Meet Criteria

TC

Support

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7749

839-5590

839-5053

839-7738

839-8214

839-8213

839-6579

839-6947

839-6556

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 248 BAIRDS


ROAD. Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 79, CASPAR
ROAD, Papatoetoe from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
248 BAIRDS ROAD.
Otara

79, CASPAR ROAD,


Papatoetoe

LOCALITY

Otara North

Hunters Corner

Rezone 79,
79, KENDERDINE
KENDERDINE ROAD,
ROAD, Papatoetoe
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

Rezone 25 OPAWA
25 OPAWA
CRESCENT. Favona from CRESCENT. Favona
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 7A GORDON


7A GORDON ROAD. Papatoetoe
West)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 7B GORDON


7B GORDON ROAD. Papatoetoe
West)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 8,2,4,6,


West)
SANDBROOK
AVENUE,11,10,9,8,
HERALD
PLACE,281,279,283,285,
287, BAIRDS ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

8,2,4,6,
Otara South
SANDBROOK
AVENUE,11,10,9,8,
HERALD
PLACE,281,279,283,
285,287, BAIRDS
ROAD, Otara

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

8,6, WINTHROP
Mangere East
WAY,4, COURTENAY
CRESCENT,27,29,
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East

MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 8,6, WINTHROP


WAY,4, COURTENAY
CRESCENT,27,29,
HENWOOD ROAD,
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from Single House to MHU the property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support change zoning to
MHS as a less intensified zone. The proposed zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site not close to a TC or MU zones. MHS is the
appropriate zone for this location and promotes local context
as outlined in the Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as
the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

772

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

SH

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as No change


the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Rezone 80,78, PRESTON 80,78, PRESTON


ROAD, Otara from
ROAD, Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

MHS

MHU

MHU

4, 6, 8 Winthrop Way - Do not support change of zoning from No change


MHS to MHU as the area is not close to Papatoetoe Town
Centre. Retention of MHS aligns with the objectives of MHS
zone. 27, 29 Henwood Road - Do not support change of zoning
from Single House to MHU as the area is constrained by
flooding-related environmental issues. Retention of SH aligns
with the objectives of the SH zone for this property.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7785

839-5733

839-7676

839-7812

839-7813

839-7602

839-7760

839-7831

839-7833

839-7834

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone 45 FRANKLYNE
ROAD. Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 80, HUIA ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Urban (central and


west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
45 FRANKLYNE
ROAD. Otara

80, HUIA ROAD,


Papatoetoe

LOCALITY

Otara North

Hunters Corner

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Rezone 81 PUHINUI
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 47A FLAT BUSH
West)
ROAD. Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 47A FLAT BUSH
West)
ROAD. Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 81 WALLACE
West)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

81 PUHINUI ROAD.
Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 748 MASSEY


ROAD. MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 389D MASSEY
West)
ROAD. MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Town Centre.

748 MASSEY ROAD. Mangere


Mangere-Otahuhu

389D MASSEY
ROAD. MangereOtahuhu

Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

8 UMU PLACE.
Mangere

Mangere Bridge MHS

Rezone 8 UMU PLACE.


Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone - 36A


West)
Cottingham Crescent
Lot 4 DP 180046 from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

47A FLAT BUSH


ROAD. Otara

47A FLAT BUSH


ROAD. Otara

Papatoetoe

Otara South

Otara South

81 WALLACE ROAD. Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

36A Cottingham
Crescent Lot 4 DP
180046, Mangere
East

Mangere East

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

TC

MHU

MHU

REASONS

773

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is


MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre. Support retention of MHS as a less intensified
zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zoning to MHU as the area is not
close to Papatoetoe Town Centre. Support change of zoning
from Single House to MHS where managing flooding risks on
those sites does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to THAB. Retain MHS
zoning. The site not close to a TC or MU zones. MHS is the
appropriate zone for this location and promotes local context
as outlined in the Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to TC (LC) . Retain MHS
zoning size of current Local Centre. The PAUP seeks to
consolidate existing as a means of revitalising and supporting
town centres and local centres. These objectives and policies
are set out in the RPS. retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site not close to a TC or MU zones. MHS is the
appropriate zone for this location and promotes local context.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The site not close to a TC or MU zones. MHS is the
appropriate zone for this location and promotes local context
as outlined in the Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

TC

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7843

839-5726

839-7847

839-6927

839-7592

839-7836

839-5734

839-7853

839-6415

839-7860

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

LOCALITY

Rezone 22 JOHNSTONES 22 JOHNSTONES


ROAD. Otara from
ROAD. Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara North

Rezone 82, TUI ROAD, 82, TUI ROAD,


Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Hunters Corner

Rezone 47 GILBERT
ROAD. Otara from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 82,84, PARK
AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 83 PORTAGE
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 1 PARKSTONE
PLACE. Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Otara North

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 83, SKIPTON


STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone Section 2 SO
West)
68663 [Closed
pedestrian path
between 17 and 19
Penderford Place,
Mangere East] from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

47 GILBERT ROAD.
Otara

82,84, PARK
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe

Papatoetoe

83 PORTAGE ROAD. Middlemore


Papatoetoe

1 PARKSTONE
PLACE. Favona

83, SKIPTON
STREET, Mangere
East

Favona

Mangere East

Section 2 SO 68663 Mangere East


,Closed pedestrian
path between 17
and 19 Penderford
Place, Mangere East

Rezone 83,83A,85A,
83,83A,85A,
Papatoetoe
KENDERDINE ROAD,
KENDERDINE ROAD,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Urban (Central and Rezone 10 HARDIE


West)
STREET. Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10 HARDIE STREET. Mangere East


Mangere East

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

774

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change
of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the property is
MHU
located close to Otara Town Centre and the RFN. The zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zone. The
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from TC of LC zone. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support submission in part rezoning 17 Penderford Road,
Mangere from SH to MHS zone (19 Penderford Road is part of
submission 839-7015). Managing flooding risks on this site
does not require maintaining a SH zone, this site is proposed to
be rezoned to MHS. The site complements the
neighbourhood's planned suburban built character and the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of this zone and gives effect to the RPS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Proximity Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


No change
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site not close to a TC or MU zones. MHS is the
appropriate zone for this location and promotes local context
as outlined in the Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5115

839-7874

839-7896

839-5214

839-5815

839-7920

839-8210

839-7935

839-7969

839-7978

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 84, HUIA ROAD, 84, HUIA ROAD,


Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Hunters Corner

Rezone 14 CRANMERE
CRESCENT. Mangere
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

14 CRANMERE
CRESCENT.
Mangere East

Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 24 CONVAIR


West)
CRESCENT. Mangere
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

24 CONVAIR
CRESCENT.
Mangere

Mangere Bridge SH

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 88, FITZROY


STREET, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 88, PARK
west)
AVENUE, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 161 BADER
west)
DRIVE. Mangere BridgeMangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.
Urban (Central and Rezone 9 GORDON
West)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

88, FITZROY STREET, Papatoetoe


Papatoetoe

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 3 MERVAN
STREET. Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3 MERVAN STREET. Mangere East


Mangere East

Rezone 389C MASSEY


ROAD. MangereOtahuhu from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Town Centre.

389C MASSEY
ROAD. MangereOtahuhu

Rezone 31 BICKNELL
ROAD. Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

31 BICKNELL ROAD. Favona


Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

88, PARK AVENUE,


Papatoetoe

161 BADER DRIVE.


Mangere BridgeMangere East

9 GORDON ROAD.
Papatoetoe

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

775

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support changes sought to THAB and support retention No change


of a less intensified MHS zone, as the property is not adjacent
to any centre to apply THAB zone. Retention of MHS aligns
with objectives of the MHS zone for this property .

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose in Part
Recognise edge of proximity criteria

Papatoetoe

Mangere East

Papatoetoe

Mangere East

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

TC

MHS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. The site not close to a TC or MU zones or the RFN.
MHS is the appropriate zone for this location and promotes
local context as outlined in the Mangere-Otahuhu Area Plan.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is No change
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. The property at 161
MHU
Bader Drive, Mangere East is located close to the Mangere TC
zone and in close proximity to the RFN. Rezoning this site to a
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as No change
the growth is limited in this area due to flooding constraints.
Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. The site not close to a TC or MU zones. MHS is the
appropriate zone for this location and promotes local context.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to TC (LC) . Retain MHS
No change
zoning size of current Local Centre. The PAUP seeks to
consolidate existing as a means of revitalising and supporting
town centres and local centres. These objectives and policies
are set out in the RPS. retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHS. Retain SH zone. The No change
property is in close proximity to the Otahuhu HI zoned area and
further residential intensification may result in reverse
sensitivity issues. The property is also a significant distance
from TC of LC zone. The SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support
Recognise accessibility constraints in proximity assessment
for this area

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

TC

Support
Consider appropriate alternative relief to outcomes of
zone

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7449

839-7985

839-7994

839-5938

839-6457

839-6074

839-5111

839-6431

839-6029

839-7995

839-8083

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 9 KIMPTON


9 KIMPTON ROAD.
West)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Hunters Corner

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere

Rezone 149 NAYLORS


DRIVE. Mangere from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

149 NAYLORS
DRIVE. Mangere

Rezone 5 DOLE PLACE.


Mangere from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

5 DOLE PLACE.
Mangere

Rezone 9, RAGLAN
STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 9,9A,7B,7,
WYMONDLEY ROAD,
Otara from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

9, RAGLAN STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

Urban (Central and Rezone 91, RAGLAN


West)
STREET, Mangere East
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

91, RAGLAN STREET, Mangere East


Mangere East

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

9,9A,7B,7,
WYMONDLEY
ROAD, Otara

Urban (Central and Rezone 93, MOTATAU 93, MOTATAU


West)
ROAD, Papatoetoe from ROAD, Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and
west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Mangere

Wymondley

Hunters Corner

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

Rezone 93,93A, FITZROY 93,93A, FITZROY


Papatoetoe
STREET, Papatoetoe
STREET, Papatoetoe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 94, SKIPTON


STREET, Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 7 RETREAT
DRIVE. Mangere from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

94, SKIPTON
STREET, Mangere
East

Mangere East

7 RETREAT DRIVE.
Mangere

Mangere

Rezone 1 REHUA PLACE. 1 REHUA PLACE.


Favona from Mixed
Favona
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Favona

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

776

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHS.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property in Mangere is not close to the Mangere
TC zone and are remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property in Mangere is not close to the Mangere
TC zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport. The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Otara and
Hunters Corner Town Centres and the RFN. Support retention
of MHS as a less intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - These sites
are affected by flooding and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU.


No change
These sites are affected by flooding and retaining the notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from MHS to MHU.This area is
not in close proximity to Papatoetoe Town Centre nor to the
RFN. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support is submission in part rezone from SH to MHS. The
property at Retreat Drive, Mangere is in close proximity to the
RFN for public transport. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property in Favona is not close to a TC or MU zone
and is distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6907

839-8084

839-8092

839-8130

839-8148

839-8154

839-8155

839-6929

839-8211

839-8212

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone
99,101,99A,101A, GRAY
AVENUE, MiddlemorePapatoetoe from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
99,101,99A,101A,
GRAY AVENUE,
MiddlemorePapatoetoe

LOCALITY

Middlemore

PAUP ZONE

MHU

Rezone 34 MASTERS
Urban (central and west)
PLACE. Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 9 LILI CHEN
Urban (central and west)
WAY. Mangere Bridge
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 12 SAM PLACE.
Urban (Central and West)
Mangere from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34 MASTERS PLACE. Favona


Favona

Rezone 21 LILI CHEN


Urban (Central and West)
WAY. Mangere Bridge
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 75A MOUNTAIN
Urban (central and west)
ROAD. Mangere Bridge
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21 LILI CHEN WAY. Mangere


Mangere
Bridge
Bridge MHS

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

9 LILI CHEN WAY.


Mangere Bridge

12 SAM PLACE.
Mangere

MHS

Mangere Bridge MHS

Mangere Bridge SH

75A MOUNTAIN
ROAD. Mangere
Bridge

Mangere Bridge MHS

Rezone 79A MOUNTAIN 79A MOUNTAIN


ROAD. Mangere Bridge ROAD. Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Bridge
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Mangere Bridge MHS

Rezone 99,97A,97,
99,97A,97, PARK
PARK AVENUE,
AVENUE,
Papatoetoe from Mixed Papatoetoe
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Papatoetoe

MHS

Urban (Central and Rezone 9A GORDON


9A GORDON ROAD. Papatoetoe
West)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Urban (Central and Rezone 9B GORDON


9B GORDON ROAD. Papatoetoe
West)
ROAD. Papatoetoe from Papatoetoe
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

777

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zoning from MHU to THAB as the


No change
growth is limited in the adjoining area which is zoned Single
House due to flooding constraints. Retention of the zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


No change
zoning. This property in Favona is not close to a TC or MU zone
and is distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning complements the
built character and retention of MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone and
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
No change
zoning. This property at 9 Lili Chen Way is not close to a TC
zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from SH to MHU. Retain SH zoning
No change
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints.
Retention of the SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the PAUP and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 21 Lili Chen Way is not close to a TC
zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property is not close to a TC zone and is distant
from the RFN. The site is subject to the Mangere Mountain VV
& HSA which provides for a permitted height of 8 metres The
MHS zoning complements the built character and retention of
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property Mountain Road is not close to a TC zone
and is distant from the RFN. The site is subject to the Mangere
Mountain VV & HSA which provides for a permitted height of 8
metres. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the
property is located a considerable distance from Papatoetoe
Town Centre and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as
the growth is limited in this area due to significant flooding
constraints. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of zoning from Single House to MHU as
the growth is limited in this area due to significant flooding
constraints. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7844

839-8156

839-8276

839-8277

839-8278

839-8279

839-8280

839-8281

839-8282

839-8284

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

Rezone Part Lot 1 DP


41316 from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Part Lot 1 DP 41316 Hunters Corner

Rezone 77A MOUNTAIN 77A MOUNTAIN


ROAD. Mangere Bridge ROAD. Mangere
from Mixed Housing
Bridge
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 2 CEASAR
PLACE. Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 4 CEASAR
west)
PLACE. Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 6 CEASAR
west)
PLACE. Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 8 CEASAR
West)
PLACE. Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 2 ROY DOUGLAS
West)
PLACE, Favona from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

2 CEASAR PLACE.
Favona

4 CEASAR PLACE.
Favona

6 CEASAR PLACE

8 CEASAR PLACE.
Favona

2 ROY DOUGLAS
PLACE, Favona

SH

Mangere Bridge MHS

Favona

Favona

Favona

Favona

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 4 ROY DOUGLAS 4 ROY DOUGLAS


West)
PLACE. Favona from
PLACE. Favona
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 6 ROY DOUGLAS 6 ROY DOUGLAS


West)
PLACE. Favona from
PLACE. Favona
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Favona

Urban (central and


west)

Favona

Rezone 3 ROY DOUGLAS 3 ROY DOUGLAS


PLACE. Favona from
PLACE. Favona
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from Single House to MHU the property is located a considerable distance from Hunters
Corner Town Centre and the RFN. Support change zoning to
MHS as a less intensified zone. The proposed zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property Mountain Road is not close to a TC zone
and is distant from the RFN. The site is subject to the Mangere
Mountain VV & HSA which provides for a permitted height of 8
metres. The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 2 Ceaser Place, Favona is not close to
a TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 4 Ceaser Place, Favona is not close to a
TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 6 Ceaser Place, Favona is not close to a
TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 8 Ceaser Place, Favona is not close to
a TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site at 2 Roy Douglas Place,
Favona does not require maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site at 4 Roy Douglas Place,
Favona does not require maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support submission in part to rezone from SH to MHS zoning.
Managing the flood risk on this site at 6 Roy Douglas Place,
Favona does not require maintaining a SH zoning. The MHS
zoning complements the suburban built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 1 Roy Douglas Place, Favona is not
close to a TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

778

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8285

839-8286

839-8287

839-8288

839-8304

839-8305

839-8306

839-8318

839-8319

839-8320

839-8321

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 1 ROY DOUGLAS 1 ROY DOUGLAS


PLACE. Favona from
PLACE. Favona
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 12 CEASAR
PLACE. Favona from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 10B
west)
ROBERTSON ROAD.
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 10C
west)
ROBERTSON ROAD.
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 20B
west)
ROBERTSON ROAD.
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (central and Rezone 20A
west)
ROBERTSON ROAD.
Mangere East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (Central and Rezone 20 ROBERTSON
West)
ROAD. Mangere East
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12 CEASAR PLACE.
Favona

LOCALITY

Favona

Favona

10B ROBERTSON
ROAD. Mangere
East

Favona

10C ROBERTSON
ROAD. Mangere
East

Favona

20B ROBERTSON
ROAD. Mangere
East

Favona

20A ROBERTSON
ROAD. Mangere
East

Favona

20 ROBERTSON
ROAD. Mangere
East

Favona

Urban (Central and Rezone 32 TIDAL ROAD. 32 TIDAL ROAD.


West)
Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 30 TIDAL ROAD. 30 TIDAL ROAD.


Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

Rezone 28 TIDAL ROAD. 28 TIDAL ROAD.


Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 26 TIDAL ROAD. 26 TIDAL ROAD.


West)
Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS


zoning. This property at, 1 Roy Douglas Place, Favona is not
close to a TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 12 Ceaser Place, Favona is not close to
a TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning
complements the built character and retention of MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property is not close to a TC or MU zone and is
distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property is not close to a TC or MU zone and is
distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property is not close to a TC or MU zone and is
distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property is not close to a TC or MU zone and is
distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property is not close to a TC or MU zone and is
distant from the RFN. The MHS zoning complements the built
character and retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 32 Tidal Road, Mangere is not close to
the Mangere TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 30 Tidal Road, Mangere is not close to
the Mangere TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 28 Tidal Road, Mangere is not close to
the Mangere TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 26 Tidal Road, Mangere is not close to
the Mangere TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

779

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Consider site meets zone criteria and consider other values


can be addressed through appropriate Overlay controls.
Do not support Pre-1944 Demolition Control

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5808

839-8322

839-8323

839-8324

839-8325

839-8326

839-8327

839-106

839-146

839-1504

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (Central and Rezone 9, SANDBROOK 9, SANDBROOK


West)
AVENUE, Otara from
AVENUE, Otara
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Otara South

Urban (Central and Rezone 24 TIDAL ROAD. 24 TIDAL ROAD.


West)
Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

Urban (central and


west)

Rezone 22 TIDAL ROAD. 22 TIDAL ROAD.


Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

Rezone 20 TIDAL ROAD. 20 TIDAL ROAD.


Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

Rezone 18 TIDAL ROAD. 18 TIDAL ROAD.


Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 16 TIDAL ROAD. 16 TIDAL ROAD.


West)
Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

Urban (Central and Rezone 14 TIDAL ROAD. 14 TIDAL ROAD.


West)
Mangere from Mixed
Mangere
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Mangere

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 31,
REELICK AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights.

31, REELICK
AVENUE,
Pakuranga
Heights.

Pakuranga

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 2A, LA
TROBE STREET,
Pakuranga Heights.

2A, LA TROBE
STREET,
Pakuranga
Heights.

Pakuranga

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (central and


west)

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 5, 7 Whitford


East)
Suburban at 5,7,
Road, Howick
WHITFORD ROAD,
Howick-Whitford.

Howick

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the


property is located a considerable distance from Otara Town
Centre, and the RFN. Support retention of MHS as a less
intensified zone. Retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 24 Tidal Road, Mangere is not close to
the Mangere TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. The property is located a considerable distance from a
TC or MU zone and is remote from the RFN for public transport.
The MHS zoning complements the built character and
retention of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 20 Tidal Road, Mangere is not close to
the Mangere TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 18 Tidal Road, Mangere is not close to
the Mangere TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 16 Tidal Road, Mangere is not close to
the Mangere TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Do not support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Retain MHS
zoning. This property at 14 Tidal Road, Mangere is not close to
the Mangere TC zone and is distant from the RFN. The MHS
zoning complements the built character and retention of MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of

780

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1511

839-1512

839-1513

839-1514

839-1515

839-1516

839-1517

839-1532

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 122,
GILLS ROAD,341,
BUCKLANDS BEACH
ROAD, Bucklands
Beach.

122, GILLS
Bucklands
ROAD,341,
Beach
BUCKLANDS
BEACH ROAD,
Bucklands Beach.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 70A,70,
SUNDERLANDS
ROAD, Half Moon
Bay.

70A,70,
Bucklands
SUNDERLANDS
Beach
ROAD, Half Moon
Bay.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 5A,5, CRANBERRY Highland Park
East)
Urban at 5A,5,
PLACE, Bucklands
CRANBERRY PLACE, Beach
Bucklands Beach.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Terrace


East)
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 513,513A,
PAKURANGA ROAD,
Pakuranga-Howick.

513,513A,
Highland Park
PAKURANGA
ROAD, PakurangaHowick

THAB

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 122,124,
CASCADES ROAD,
Pakuranga HeightsBotany Downs.

122,124,
Pakuranga
CASCADES ROAD,
Pakuranga HeightsBotany Downs.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 146,148,


Pakuranga
East)
Urban at 146,148,
EDGEWATER
EDGEWATER DRIVE, DRIVE, Pakuranga.
Pakuranga.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 33,
MEGAN AVENUE,11,
BELDON PLACE,
Pakuranga Heights.

33, MEGAN
AVENUE,11,
BELDON PLACE,
Pakuranga
Heights.

Pakuranga

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 3,
ROTOITI AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights.

3, ROTOITI
AVENUE,
Pakuranga
Heights.

Pakuranga

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

781

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU Zone. MHU is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone,
the site is in close proximity to Highland Park TC and an
RFN (Pakuranga Road) and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of the THAB zone. Retention of the


THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is adjacent to Highland Park
TC and a RFN (Pakuranga Road) and gives effect to the
RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of MHU is


the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone, it is in close proximity to open space and an
RFN, and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of MHU is


the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone, it is in close proximity to open space and an
RFN, and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1533

839-1534

839-1602

839-164

839-1714

839-1747

839-176

839-1785

839-1798

839-1801

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 5A, OKAREKA


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 5A,
PLACE, Pakuranga
OKAREKA PLACE,
Heights.
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 9, OKAREKA


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 9,
PLACE, Pakuranga
OKAREKA PLACE,
Heights.
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 185 Te Irirangi


East)
Urban at 185, TE
Drive, Flat Bush
IRIRANGI DRIVE,
Manukau.

MHU

Botany
Junction

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 103, GOSSAMER Pakuranga


East)
Suburban at 103,
DRIVE, Pakuranga
GOSSAMER DRIVE,
Heights.
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 1, ERIC RUSH


Botany
East)
Urban at 1, ERIC
PLACE, Flat Bush. Junction
RUSH PLACE, Flat
Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 195, TE IRIRANGI Botany


East)
Urban at 195, TE
DRIVE, Manukau. Junction
IRIRANGI DRIVE,
Manukau.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 97,
ENNIS AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

97, ENNIS
AVENUE,
Pakuranga
Heights.

Pakuranga

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 11, BLOWERS


Botany
East)
Urban at 11,
PLACE, Flat Bush. Junction
BLOWERS PLACE, Flat
Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 31, TITCHMARSH Botany


East)
Urban at 31,
CRESCENT, Flat
Junction
TITCHMARSH
Bush.
CRESCENT, Flat Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 159, TE IRIRANGI Botany


East)
Urban at 159, TE
DRIVE, Manukau. Junction
IRIRANGI DRIVE,
Manukau.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

782

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of MHU is No change
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone, the sites is in close proximity to an RFN, and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of MHU is No change
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone, the site is in close proximity to an RFN, and
MHU zone gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of MHU is No change
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone, the site is in close proximity to open space and
an RFN, and MHU zone gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of MHU is No change
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of MHU is


the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change
MHU

Support

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of MHU is


the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone, it is in close proximity to a LC and an RFN, and
gives effect to the RPS.

No change
MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1812

839-184

839-1846

839-1879

839-1889

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 27, TITCHMARSH Botany


East)
Urban at 27,
CRESCENT, Flat
Junction
TITCHMARSH
Bush.
CRESCENT, Flat Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 27,
ARCHMILLEN
AVENUE, Pakuranga
Heights.
Urban (North and 16, SHEDDINGS LANE,
East)
East Tamaki.
Submission
incorrectly
summarised, refers to
retention of notified
zone.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Urban at 3,2,5,4,7,8,
MONIQUE
PLACE,9,8,3,4,6,
DANIELLE
PLACE,59,55,53,63,65
,67, BAVERSTOCK
ROAD,10,8,2,4,6,
KENSWAY DRIVE, Flat
Bush.

MHU

27, ARCHMILLEN
AVENUE,
Pakuranga
Heights.

Pakuranga

16, SHEDDINGS
Botany
LANE, East Tamaki Junction

MHU

3,2,5,4,7,8,
Flat Bush
MONIQUE
PLACE,9,8,3,4,6,
DANIELLE
PLACE,59,55,53,6
3,65,67,
BAVERSTOCK
ROAD,10,8,2,4,6,
KENSWAY DRIVE,
Flat Bush

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 1, MARC ELLIS


Botany
East)
Urban at 1, MARC
PLACE, Flat Bush. Junction
ELLIS PLACE, Flat
Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 6, ERIC RUSH


Botany
East)
Urban at 6, ERIC
PLACE, Flat Bush. Junction
RUSH PLACE, Flat
Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 82, CHAPEL ROAD, Botany
East)
Urban at 82, CHAPEL Flat BushJunction
ROAD, Flat BushShamrock Park.
Shamrock Park.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 37, THOMAS


East)
Suburban at 37,
ROAD, Flat Bush.
THOMAS ROAD, Flat
Bush.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

783

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of MHU is


the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of MHU is


the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of MHU is the No change


most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of MHU is the No change


most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of MHU is the No change


most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone. The site is close to an RFN and MHU zone gives
effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-1892

MHU

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of MHU is the No change


most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1893

MHU

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of MHU is the No change


most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone. The site is close to an RFN and MHU zone gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1907

Flat Bush

MHS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1908

839-1913

839-193

839-195

839-2058

839-2059

839-2060

839-2061

839-2062

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 7, ANDRUSHA


Flat Bush
East)
Suburban at 7,
PLACE, Flat Bush.
ANDRUSHA PLACE,
Flat Bush.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 35, DONEGAL


East)
Suburban at 35,
PARK DRIVE, Flat
DONEGAL PARK
Bush.
DRIVE, Flat Bush.

MHS

Flat Bush

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 3, CASCADES


Pakuranga
East)
Urban at 3,
ROAD, Pakuranga
CASCADES ROAD,
Heights
Pakuranga HeightsBotany Downs.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 172, TI RAKAU


Pakuranga
East)
Urban at 172, TI
DRIVE, PakurangaRAKAU DRIVE,
Northpark.
PakurangaNorthpark.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 35, ROBIN
BROOKE DRIVE,2,4,6,
MIKA COURT, Flat
Bush.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Urban at 19,25,
ROBIN BROOKE
DRIVE,9,3,5,7, MIKA
COURT,10,12,14,4,6,
8, VIDIRI COURT, Flat
Bush.

35, ROBIN
Botany
BROOKE
Junction
DRIVE,2,4,6, MIKA
COURT, Flat Bush.

MHU

19,25, ROBIN
Botany
BROOKE
Junction
DRIVE,9,3,5,7,
MIKA
COURT,10,12,14,4
,6,8, VIDIRI
COURT, Flat Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 20,22, ROBIN


East)
Urban at 20,22,
BROOKE DRIVE,
ROBIN BROOKE
Flat Bush.
DRIVE, Flat Bush.

Botany
Junction

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 11,9, VIDIRI


Botany
East)
Urban at 11,9, VIDIRI COURT, Flat Bush. Junction
COURT, Flat Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 30,28, FRANK


East)
Urban at 30,28,
BUNCE GROVE,
FRANK BUNCE
Flat Bush.
GROVE, Flat Bush.

MHU

Botany
Junction

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

784

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to a
RFN (Pakuranga Road) and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to a
RFN (Ti Rakau Drive) and gives effect to the RPS. The area
will be served by AMETI which will deliver a rapid bus
way once constructed. This is funded in the Long Term
Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to a
RFN (Chapel Road) and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2063

839-2064

839-2065

839-2066

839-2067

839-2068

839-2069

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 10,12,14,16,
TONU'U
COURT,19,17, VIDIRI
COURT,5,7, BLOWERS
PLACE, Flat Bush.

10,12,14,16,
Botany
TONU'U
Junction
COURT,19,17,
VIDIRI COURT,5,7,
BLOWERS PLACE,
Flat Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 38,36,34,
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE,4,6, BLOWERS
PLACE, Flat Bush.

38,36,34,
Botany
MICHAEL JONES Junction
DRIVE,4,6,
BLOWERS PLACE,
Flat Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 7, ROBIN
BROOKE
DRIVE,18,15,14,16,
BLOWERS PLACE,3,
VIDIRI COURT, Flat
Bush.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Urban at 27,29,
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE,7, IAN JONES
COURT, Flat Bush.

7, ROBIN BROOKE Botany


DRIVE,18,15,14,1 Junction
6, BLOWERS
PLACE,3, VIDIRI
COURT, Flat Bush.

MHU

27,29, MICHAEL Botany


JONES DRIVE,7,
Junction
IAN JONES
COURT, Flat Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 12,5,7,
MARC ELLIS PLACE,3,
FRANK BUNCE
GROVE,11,13,
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE, Flat Bush.

12,5,7, MARC
ELLIS PLACE,3,
FRANK BUNCE
GROVE,11,13,
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE, Flat Bush.

MHU

Botany
Junction

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 3,5, MICHAEL


Botany
East)
Urban at 3,5,
JONES DRIVE, Flat Junction
MICHAEL JONES
Bush.
DRIVE, Flat Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 2,6, DOWD
PLACE,10,8,12,14,6,
ROBIN BROOKE
DRIVE, Flat Bush.

MHU

2,6, DOWD
Botany
PLACE,10,8,12,14, Junction
6, ROBIN BROOKE
DRIVE, Flat Bush.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.

785

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and a RFN (Chapel Road) and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to a
RFN (Chapel Road) and open space (Barry Curtis Park)
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to a
RFN (Chapel Road) and open space (Barry Curtis Park)
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2070

839-2071

839-2072

839-2073

839-2074

839-2075

839-2262

839-2272

839-2298

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 11,13,
DOWD PLACE,14,
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE,5, ERIC RUSH
PLACE, Flat Bush.

11,13, DOWD
Botany
PLACE,14,
Junction
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE,5, ERIC
RUSH PLACE, Flat
Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 12, ERIC
RUSH PLACE,5,
DOWD PLACE, Flat
Bush.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Urban at 12,14,
CASHMORE PLACE,
Flat Bush.

12, ERIC RUSH


Botany
PLACE,5, DOWD Junction
PLACE, Flat Bush.

MHU

12,14, CASHMORE Botany


PLACE, Flat Bush. Junction

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 10,12,14,
WALTER LITTLE
WAY,76,74,72,70,
CHAPEL ROAD, Flat
Bush.

10,12,14, WALTER Botany


LITTLE
Junction
WAY,76,74,72,70,
CHAPEL ROAD,
Flat Bush.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at
38,36,40, DONEGAL
PARK DRIVE, Flat
Bush.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Suburban at 18,16,
KILLEEN PLACE, Flat
Bush.

38,36,40,
DONEGAL PARK
DRIVE, Flat Bush.

MHS

Flat Bush

18,16, KILLEEN
Flat Bush
PLACE, Flat Bush.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 7 OKAREKA


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 7
PLACE. Pakuranga
OKAREKA PLACE.
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 20 OKAREKA


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 20
PLACE. Pakuranga
OKAREKA PLACE.
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 175 WELLINGTON Howick


East)
Suburban at 175
STREET. 3 PEGLER
WELLINGTON
DRIVE. Howick
STREET. 3 PEGLER
DRIVE. Howick.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

786

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to
open space and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, which is in close proximity to a
RFN (Chapel Road) and open space (Barry Curtis Park)
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2364

839-2367

839-2399

839-243

839-2446

839-2447

839-245

839-2482

839-2533

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 26 OKAREKA


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 26
PLACE. Pakuranga
OKAREKA PLACE.
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 23 OKAREKA


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 23
PLACE. Pakuranga
OKAREKA PLACE.
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Terrace


East)
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/20, 2/20
HIGHLAND PARK
DRIVE. Howick.

THAB

1/20, 2/20
HIGHLAND PARK
DRIVE. Howick

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 26, CAROLE


East)
Urban at 26, CAROLE CRESCENT,
CRESCENT,
Pakuranga
Pakuranga.
Urban (North and Retain
East)
Neighbourhood
Centre at 126 TI
RAKAU DRIVE. 1
MARRIOTT ROAD.
PakurangaNorthpark.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Urban at 12 BOTANY
ROAD. Howick.

Highland Park

Pakuranga

MHU

126 TI RAKAU
Pakuranga
DRIVE. 1
MARRIOTT ROAD,
Pakuranga

NC

12 BOTANY ROAD. Howick


Howick

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 17, GOSSAMER


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 17,
DRIVE, Pakuranga
GOSSAMER DRIVE,
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 31
GREENHILL
CRESCENT.
Pakuranga.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Suburban at 33
ROTOITI AVENUE.
Pakuranga Heights.

MHU

31 GREENHILL
CRESCENT.
Pakuranga.

Pakuranga

33 ROTOITI
Pakuranga
AVENUE.
Pakuranga Heights

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

NC

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

787

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone. Retention of the
No change
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone, sites are adjacent to Highland Park
and an RFN (Pakuranga Road) and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of zone. The site is in close proximity to THAB
zoning and the Pakuranga TC and MHU zoning gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the NC is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and give effect to the RPS. The site serves a
adjacent residential catchment and is located on an RFN
(Ti Rakau Drive) which will be served by the AMETI rapid
bus way once constructed. This has funding secured in
the Long Term Plan.
Support retention of the MHU Zone. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity to
Highland Park and a RFN (Pakuranga Road) and MHU
zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity to
THAB zoning and the Pakuranga TC and MHU zoning
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

NC

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2570

839-2585

839-2593

839-261

839-264

839-2756

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 20 ANDRUSHA


Flat Bush
East)
Suburban at 20
PLACE. Flat Bush.
ANDRUSHA PLACE.
Flat Bush.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Terrace


East)
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 124 STANCOMBE
ROAD. Flat Bush.

124 STANCOMBE Flat Bush


ROAD. Flat Bush

THAB

Urban (North and Retain Terrace


East)
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1/5-24/5 CARLOS
DRIVE. 1/128-20/128
STANCOMBE ROAD.
Flat Bush.

1/5-24/5 CARLOS Flat Bush


DRIVE. 1/12820/128
STANCOMBE
ROAD. Flat Bush

THAB

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 12,
WAIKAREMOANA
PLACE, Pakuranga
Heights.

12,
Pakuranga
WAIKAREMOANA
PLACE, Pakuranga
Heights

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Terrace


East)
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 22, CROMDALE
AVENUE, Howick.

22, CROMDALE
AVENUE, Howick

THAB

Highland Park

Urban (North and Rezone 91, TI RAKAU 91, TI RAKAU


Pakuranga
East)
DRIVE, PakurangaDRIVE, Pakuranga
Northpark from
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

THAB

THAB

MHS

THAB

THAB

REASONS

788

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of THAB zoning. Retention of THAB No change
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is located on an RFN and close to an
open space network, the THAB zoning gives effect to the
RPS.
Support the retention of THAB zoning. Retention of THAB No change
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is located on an RFN and close to an
open space network, the THAB zoning gives effect to the
RPS.

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone. Retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is adjacent to Highland
Park TC and an RFN (Pakuranga Road), the THAB zoning
gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB.


No change
Retention of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS. The site is adjacent to a SEA, provides transition
from THAB along Ti Rakau Drive to the coastline.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2757

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Urban (North and Rezone 87, TI RAKAU 87, TI RAKAU


Pakuranga
East)
DRIVE, PakurangaDRIVE, Pakuranga
Northpark from
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

THAB

Urban (North and Rezone 335,337,333,


East)
BUCKLANDS BEACH
ROAD, Bucklands
Beach from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

335,337,333,
BUCKLANDS
BEACH ROAD,
Bucklands Beach

SH, MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 4, IAN JONES


East)
COURT,20,22, FRANK
BUNCE GROVE, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Urban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, IAN JONES
COURT,20,22,
FRANK BUNCE
GROVE

Urban (North and Rezone 12,4, FRANK


East)
BUNCE
GROVE,10,12,14,16,1
8,8, IAN JONES
COURT, Flat Bush
from Mixed Housing
Urban, Single House
to Mixed Housing
Urban.

12, 4, FRANK
Botany
BUNCE
Junction
GROVE,10,12,14,1
6,18,8, IAN JONES
COURT

MHU and SH MHU

Urban (North and Rezone


East)
11,13,21,17,23,19,
FRANK BUNCE
GROVE,4, MARC ELLIS
PLACE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Urban, Single House
to Mixed Housing
Urban.

11,13,21,17,23,19 Botany
, FRANK BUNCE
Junction
GROVE,4, MARC
ELLIS PLACE

MHU and SH MHU

REASONS

789

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB.


No change
Retention of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to
the RPS. The site is adjacent to a SEA, provides transition
from THAB along Ti Rakau Drive to the coastline.
THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2796

839-2812

Bucklands
Beach

Botany
Junction

MHS

MHU and SH MHU

Support in part. 335 Bucklands Beach Road can be


rezoned to MHS. Rezoning this site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone, managing flooding risks on this site does not
require a SH zone. 333 Bucklands Beach Road remains
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS. 337
Bucklands Beach Road was MHS in the notified plan,
Support retention of notified zones. 22 Frank Bunce
Grove is affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified version is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to
the RPS.

MHS, SH

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2813

839-2814

Support the change of zone for 4 Frank Bunce Drive from MHU
SH to MHU as managing flooding risk on this site does
not require maintaining a SH zone. The remainder of sites
are zoned MHU, support the retention of this zoning as
the most appropriate zone.

Do not support rezoning of 17, 19, 21, 23 Frank Bunce


MHU, SH
Grove as these sites are affected by flooding constraints
and retaining the notified version is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give
effect to the RPS. The driveway to 4 Marc Ellis Drive can
be rezoned to MHU inline with the zoning for the
remainder of the property to correct this error.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2815

839-2847

839-2853

839-2920

839-2930

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (North and Rezone 9,5,7,


East)
DUNAFF PLACE, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Urban (North and Rezone 6, NAN
East)
PLACE, Pakuranga
Heights from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

9,5,7, DUNAFF
PLACE

Flat Bush

Urban (North and Rezone 14, TIAKA


East)
PLACE, Pakuranga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, TIAKA PLACE, Pakuranga


Pakuranga

Urban (North and Rezone 138, GILLS


East)
ROAD, Pigeon
Mountain-Mellons
Bay from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.
Urban (North and Rezone 11, STUDFALL
East)
STREET, Pakuranga
Heights from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

138, GILLS ROAD, Bucklands


Pigeon Mountain- Beach
Mellons Bay

6, NAN PLACE,
Pakuranga
Pakuranga Heights

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

790

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from SH to MHS as managing


flooding risk on this site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.

MHS

Support change of zone from SH to MHS as managing


flooding risk on this site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.

MHS

Support change from MHS to MHU. Rezoning to MHU is MHU


the most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of
the zone. The site is in close proximity to THAB zoning
and the Pakuranga TC, and the MHU zone gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of SH Zone as the site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified version is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
11, STUDFALL
Pakuranga
STREET,
Pakuranga Heights

SH

MHS

Support retention of SH Zone as the site is affected by


flooding constraints and retaining the notified version is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-295

839-2956

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 157, GOSSAMER Pakuranga


East)
Suburban at 157,
DRIVE, Pakuranga
GOSSAMER DRIVE,
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 22, BUTLEY


East)
DRIVE, Pakuranga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

22, BUTLEY DRIVE, Bucklands


Pakuranga
Beach

MHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone as it is not in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of from MHS to MHU zone
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-2988

Urban (North and Rezone 1, PANDORA 1, PANDORA


Pakuranga
East)
PLACE, Pakuranga
PLACE, Pakuranga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

Support for the change of zone from MHS to MHU.


MHU
Rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and give effect to the RPS. The
site in close proximity to THAB zoning, Pakuranga TC and
Ti Rakau Drive which will be served by AMETI rapid
busway. This transport initiative is funded in the Long

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3032

839-3108

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (North and Rezone 30,


East)
GOSSAMER DRIVE,
Pakuranga Heights
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Urban (North and Rezone 21, LYREN
East)
PLACE, Half Moon
Bay from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

30, GOSSAMER
Pakuranga
DRIVE, Pakuranga
Heights

SH

21, LYREN PLACE, Bucklands


Half Moon Bay
Beach

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

REASONS

791

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from SH to MHS where managing


MHS
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.

Support retention of SH Zone as the site is affected by


flooding constraints and retaining the notified version is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Meet Criteria
839-3124

Urban (North and Rezone 12, PAUL


12, PAUL PLACE,
East)
PLACE, Pakuranga
Pakuranga
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pakuranga

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone to from MHU to THAB.


No change
Retention of the MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS. The site as it provides a transition between the
THAB zone and the reserve to the south. It is also
adjacent to a NGC and the South Eastern Arterial.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3139

Urban (North and Rezone 19, MEDINA 19, MEDINA


Bucklands
East)
PLACE, Half Moon
PLACE, Half Moon Beach
Bay from Mixed
Bay
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 34, STUDFALL


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 34,
STREET,
STUDFALL STREET,
Pakuranga Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 16,


East)
GLENNANDREW
DRIVE, Half Moon Bay
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Urban (North and Rezone 4, CINDY
East)
PLACE, Pakuranga
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

16,
Bucklands
GLENNANDREW Beach
DRIVE, Half Moon
Bay

SH

2, 4, 6, 8, 7, 5, 3, 1 Pakuranga
Cindy Place and
47 Cardiff Road,
Pakuranga.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Terrace


East)
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 57, MOORE
STREET, Howick.

57 Moore Street,
Howick

THAB

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning of MHU in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-314

839-3146

839-3172

839-318

MHS

MHS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of SH Zone as the site is affected by
No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified version is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Howick

THAB

THAB

Support change of zone from MHU to THAB. Rezoning to THAB


THAB is the Subsequent change to adjacent properties to
THAB outside of scope, see Attachment F. Sites are
adjacent to public open space (Ti Rakau Park), THAB
zoning and in close proximity to Pakuranga TC and RFN.
Rezoning to THAB gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone. THAB is the most
appropriate zone as the site is in close proximity to
Howick Village and RFN along Picton Street giving effect
to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3218

839-328

839-3346

839-3365

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Urban (North and Rezone 24 OSPREY


24 OSPREY
East)
STREET, Pakuranga
STREET,
from Mixed Housing Pakuranga
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Pakuranga

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

792

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB, instead


MHU
support change to MHU. MHU is an appropriate zone for
the site as it is close to open space and the Pakuranga TC,
giving effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support
Recognise accessibility constraints in proximity assessment
for this area

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 128,
CASCADES ROAD,
Pakuranga HeightsBotany Downs.

128, CASCADES
Pakuranga
ROAD, Pakuranga
Heights-Botany
Downs

MHU

Urban (North and Rezone 97, UNION


East)
ROAD, Howick from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

97, UNION ROAD, Howick


Howick

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 143, PIGEON


East)
MOUNTAIN ROAD,
Half Moon Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

143, PIGEON
Bucklands
MOUNTAIN
Beach
ROAD, Half Moon
Bay

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 41,


East)
EDGEWATER DRIVE,
Pakuranga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

41, EDGEWATER Pakuranga


DRIVE, Pakuranga

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 75A, UDYS


East)
ROAD, Pakuranga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

75A, UDYS ROAD, Pakuranga


Pakuranga

Urban (North and Retain Terrace


East)
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 105, PAKURANGA
ROAD, PakurangaHowick.

105, PAKURANGA Pakuranga


ROAD, PakurangaHowick.

MHU

MHU

Support retention of the MHU zone. MHU is the most


appropriate zone as the site is adjacent to open space
and close to a LC.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3373

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3374

MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-338

THAB

THAB

Support retention of notified zone of THAB. Retention of No change


the THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity
to the Pakuranga TC and the RFN and THAB zoning gives
effect to the RPS. AMETI rapid busway will service the
area once constructed. AMETI is funded in the Long Term
Plan.

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3384

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Rezone 15, MEDINA 15, MEDINA


Bucklands
East)
PLACE, Half Moon
PLACE, Half Moon Beach
Bay from Mixed
Bay
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 19, AUREA


19, AUREA
East)
AVENUE, Pakuranga AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Pakuranga
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

793

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3401

Pakuranga

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB.


No change
Retention of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone. This site provides a
transition from THAB to the coast and MHU zoning gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3530

839-361

839-3650

Urban (North and Rezone 32,


East)
MARRIOTT ROAD,
Pakuranga from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Suburban at 114,
EDGEWATER DRIVE,
Pakuranga.

32, MARRIOTT
Pakuranga
ROAD, Pakuranga

Urban (North and Rezone 54,


East)
CASUARINA ROAD,
Bucklands Beach
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

54, CASUARINA
Highland Park
ROAD, Bucklands
Beach

SH

MHU

Support retention of SH Zone as the site is affected by


flooding constraints and retaining the notified version is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

114, EDGEWATER Pakuranga


DRIVE, Pakuranga.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3665

839-3700

Urban (North and Rezone 14, BLANCHE 14, BLANCHE


East)
WAY, Half Moon Bay WAY, Half Moon
from Mixed Housing Bay
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bucklands
Beach

Urban (North and Rezone 181,


181,
East)
WELLINGTON
WELLINGTON
STREET, Howick from STREET, Howick
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Howick

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU as a


No change
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. Support
retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is not in close proximity to a centre or
an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3784

839-3819

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (North and Rezone 86, UNION


East)
ROAD, Howick from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

86, UNION ROAD, Howick


Howick

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

794

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Urban (North and Rezone 3, CHALLINOR 3, CHALLINOR


East)
STREET, Pakuranga
STREET,
from Mixed Housing Pakuranga
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pakuranga

Urban (North and Rezone 40A, MILLEN 40A, MILLEN


East)
AVENUE, Pakuranga AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Pakuranga
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pakuranga

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context in close proximity to the
coast.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context in close proximity to the
coast.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3821

MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3833

Urban (North and Rezone 7, PELORUS


East)
PLACE, Pakuranga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7, PELORUS
Pakuranga
PLACE, Pakuranga

MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-386

839-3926

839-397

839-404

Urban (North and Retain Single House 66, ROBBIES


Howick
East)
at 66, ROBBIES ROAD, ROAD, Shelly Park
Shelly Park.

SH

Urban (North and Rezone 78, LA TROBE 78, LA TROBE


East)
STREET, Pakuranga
STREET
Heights from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Pakuranga

SH

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 61, LA
TROBE STREET,
Pakuranga Heights.

Pakuranga

61, LA TROBE
STREET,
Pakuranga
Heights.

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 6, DE THIERY


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 6, DE
PLACE, Pakuranga
THIERY PLACE,
Heights.
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support the retention of the SH zone. This site is affected No change


by flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support the rezoning from SH to MHS where managing
MHS
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-407

839-459

839-466

839-471

839-476

839-4908

839-4927

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 5, MILLEN


East)
Urban at 5, MILLEN
AVENUE,
AVENUE, Pakuranga. Pakuranga.

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 13,
MARVON DOWNS
AVENUE, Pakuranga
Heights.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Suburban at 24,
CHATSWORTH
CRESCENT, Pakuranga
Heights.

LOCALITY

Pakuranga

PAUP ZONE

MHU

13, MARVON
Pakuranga
DOWNS AVENUE,
Pakuranga
Heights.

MHS

24, CHATSWORTH Pakuranga


CRESCENT,
Pakuranga
Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 107, UDYS ROAD, Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 107,
Pakuranga.
UDYS ROAD,
Pakuranga.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 100,
CASCADES ROAD,
Pakuranga HeightsBotany Downs.

MHU

100, CASCADES
Pakuranga
ROAD, Pakuranga
Heights-Botany
Downs.

Urban (North and Rezone 145,145A,


145,145A, RIDGE
East)
RIDGE ROAD, Howick ROAD, Howick
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Howick

Urban (North and Rezone 18,20,


East)
MEDINA PLACE, Half
Moon Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,20, MEDINA
Bucklands
PLACE, Half Moon Beach
Bay

Urban (North and Rezone 107B,107A,


East)
PIGEON MOUNTAIN
ROAD, Half Moon Bay
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

107B,107A,
Bucklands
PIGEON
Beach
MOUNTAIN
ROAD, Half Moon
Bay

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of the notified zone. Retention of MHU


is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and give effect to the RPS. The site is adjacent to
THAB zone and a RFN that will be served by the AMETI
busway once constructed. This project is funded in the
Long Term Plan.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of zone. The site is in close proximity to open
space and a LC, and the MHU zoning gives effect to the
RPS.

795

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support rezoning from MHS to MHU. Rezoning to MHU is MHU


the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is located along an arterial and on a
RFN and MHU zone gives effect to the RPS. Proposed out
of scope change to surrounding sites from MHS to MHU,
see Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

Meet Criteria
839-4928

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4929

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Rezone 139,139A,


East)
PIGEON MOUNTAIN
ROAD, Half Moon Bay
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

139,139A,
Bucklands
PIGEON
Beach
MOUNTAIN
ROAD, Half Moon
Bay

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone


East)
151,149A,149,
PIGEON MOUNTAIN
ROAD, Half Moon Bay
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

151,149A,149,
Bucklands
PIGEON
Beach
MOUNTAIN
ROAD, Half Moon
Bay

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone


East)
155A,159,157A,155,1
57, PIGEON
MOUNTAIN ROAD,1,
FORTUNES ROAD,
Half Moon Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

155A,159,157A,15 Bucklands
5,157, PIGEON
Beach
MOUNTAIN
ROAD,1,
FORTUNES ROAD,
Half Moon Bay

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 11,9,11A,9A, 11,9,11A,9A,


Bucklands
East)
FORTUNES ROAD,
FORTUNES ROAD, Beach
Half Moon Bay from Half Moon Bay
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 15A,13A,15,


East)
FORTUNES ROAD,
Half Moon Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15A,13A,15,
Bucklands
FORTUNES ROAD, Beach
Half Moon Bay

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 145A,145B,


East)
GILLS ROAD, Pigeon
Mountain-Mellons
Bay from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

145A,145B, GILLS Bucklands


ROAD, Pigeon
Beach
MountainMellons Bay

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

796

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4930

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4931

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4932

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No change

Support retention of SH Zone as the site is affected by


flooding constraints and retaining the notified version is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4933

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4934

SH

MHS

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4935

839-4936

839-4937

839-4938

839-4939

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (North and Rezone 6, OPAL


East)
AVENUE,24,26,22,
CARDIFF ROAD,
Pakuranga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (North and Rezone 39, AUREA
East)
AVENUE,10,8,6,
TIAKA PLACE,
Pakuranga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (North and Rezone 6A, SWAN
East)
CRESCENT,3,5,7,
TIAKA PLACE,
Pakuranga from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Urban (North and Rezone 5, PANDORA
East)
PLACE,6, OSPREY
STREET, Pakuranga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

6, OPAL
Pakuranga
AVENUE,24,26,22,
CARDIFF ROAD,
Pakuranga

MHS

39, AUREA
AVENUE,10,8,6,
TIAKA PLACE,
Pakuranga

Pakuranga

MHS

6A, SWAN
CRESCENT,3,5,7,
TIAKA PLACE,
Pakuranga

Pakuranga

5, PANDORA
PLACE,6, OSPREY
STREET,
Pakuranga

Pakuranga

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

797

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 81A,81B,81, 81A,81B,81, DALE Pakuranga


East)
DALE CRESCENT,
CRESCENT,
Pakuranga from
Pakuranga
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 3A,5,


East)
FORTUNES ROAD,
Half Moon Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3A,5, FORTUNES Bucklands


ROAD, Half Moon Beach
Bay

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 38,
MARVON DOWNS
AVENUE, Pakuranga
Heights.

38, MARVON
Pakuranga
DOWNS AVENUE,
Pakuranga
Heights.

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. Rezoning to


MHU is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone. The sites is in close proximity to
THAB, the Pakuranga TC and RFN along Ti Rakua Drive,
and MHU zone gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. Rezoning to


MHU is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone. The sites is in close proximity to
THAB, the Pakuranga TC and RFN along Ti Rakua Drive,
and MHU zone gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. Rezoning to


MHU is the most appropriate way of achieving the
objectives of the zone. The sites is in close proximity to
THAB, the Pakuranga TC and RFN along Ti Rakua Drive,
and MHU zone gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change in zone from MHS to THAB.


MHU
Support rezoning to MHU. Rezoning to MHU is the most
appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the zone.
The sites is in close proximity to THAB, the Pakuranga TC
and RFN along Ti Rakua Drive, and MHU zone gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

Meets proximity criteria


839-4951

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Sites are not in close proximity to
a centre or RFN.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-518

MHS

MHS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5186

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Rezone 7, GLENLEA 7, GLENLEA PLACE Flat Bush


East)
PLACE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 353,
BUCKLANDS BEACH
ROAD, Bucklands
Beach.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Suburban at 58,
WALWORTH
AVENUE, Pakuranga
Heights.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Suburban at 45,
MARVON DOWNS
AVENUE,2, PIXIE
PLACE, Pakuranga
Heights.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Suburban at 8,
PAULANGE PLACE,
Pakuranga Heights.

353, BUCKLANDS Bucklands


BEACH ROAD,
Beach
Bucklands Beach

MHS

58, WALWORTH
AVENUE,
Pakuranga
Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 54,
CASCADES ROAD,
Pakuranga HeightsBotany Downs.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

798

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context as it is not adjacent to THAB
zone or a centre.

No change

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of the MHU zone. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is adjacent to open space
and close to a local centre, the MHU zone gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-523

839-524

839-533

839-536

839-540

839-546

839-553

839-558

Pakuranga

45, MARVON
Pakuranga
DOWNS
AVENUE,2, PIXIE
PLACE, Pakuranga
Heights.

MHS

8, PAULANGE
Pakuranga
PLACE, Pakuranga
Heights

MHS

54, CASCADES
Pakuranga
ROAD, Pakuranga
Heights-Botany
Downs

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Use at 3, TIRAUMEA


Pakuranga
East)
3, TIRAUMEA DRIVE, DRIVE, Pakuranga.
Pakuranga.

MU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 48, REELICK


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 48,
AVENUE,
REELICK AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 7, HOPE
FARM AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

7, HOPE FARM
AVENUE,
Pakuranga
Heights.

Pakuranga

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MU

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of the MU zone. Retention of the MHU No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is adjacent to the
Pakuranga TC and on a RFN (Ti Rakau Drive) which will be
served by AMETI that has funding secured in the Long
Term Plan. The MU zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-563

839-572

839-5811

839-5832

839-592

839-603

839-617

839-654

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 42, ARCHMILLEN Pakuranga


East)
Suburban at 42,
AVENUE,
ARCHMILLEN
Pakuranga Height
AVENUE, Pakuranga
Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 76,
SUNDERLANDS
ROAD,2, JILLTERESA
CRESCENT, Half Moon
Bay.

76,
SUNDERLANDS
ROAD,2,
JILLTERESA
CRESCENT, Half
Moon Bay

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 34,


East)
BURSWOOD DRIVE,
Burswood from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34, BURSWOOD Botany


DRIVE, Burswood

Urban (North and Rezone 11, ALTA


East)
TERRACE, Flat Bush
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Bucklands
Beach

11, ALTA TERRACE Flat Bush

MHS

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 40, EDGEWATER Pakuranga


East)
Suburban at 40,
DRIVE, Pakuranga
EDGEWATER DRIVE,
Pakuranga.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 141, EDGEWATER Pakuranga


East)
Suburban at 141,
DRIVE, Pakuranga
EDGEWATER DRIVE,
Pakuranga.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 30, LARNE


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 30,
AVENUE,
LARNE AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 6, TOWRA PLACE, Howick


East)
Suburban at 6,
Botany Downs
TOWRA PLACE,
Botany Downs.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

799

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of notified zone. Rezoning to


MHU
MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. The
site is in close proximity to THAB (consequence of
submission number 5277-185). This change is out of
scope, see Attachment F.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Support retention of the notified zone because spot


zoning of MHU in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone. The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an
RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the notified zone because spot
zoning of MHU in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone. The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an
RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-656

839-667

839-6678

839-6679

839-6680

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 141, TI RAKAU


Pakuranga
East)
Urban at 141, TI
DRIVE, PakurangaRAKAU DRIVE,
Northpark
PakurangaNorthpark.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 13, USSHER


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 13,
PLACE, Pakuranga
USSHER PLACE,
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone


East)
11,13,15,3,5,7,9,
RIECHELMANN
COURT,76,72,
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

11,13,15,3,5,7,9,
RIECHELMANN
COURT,76,72,
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE

MHU

Urban (North and Rezone


East)
24,10,12,20,14,22,16,
18,2,4,6,8, ERONI
CLARKE CLOSE, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

24,10,12,20,14,22 Botany
,16,18,2,4,6,8,
Junction
ERONI CLARKE
CLOSE

Urban (North and Rezone


East)
58,48,54,56,50,52,60,
62,64,66,68,
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE,10,12,14,4,6,8,
RIECHELMANN
COURT,11,13,1,3,5,7,
9, TONU'U COURT,
Flat Bush from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

58,48,54,56,50,52 Botany
,60,62,64,66,68, Junction
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE,10,12,14,4,
6,8,
RIECHELMANN
COURT,11,13,1,3,
5,7,9, TONU'U
COURT

Botany
Junction

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

800

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU zone. Retention of MHU is the No change


most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone. The site as it is in close proximity to a RFN (Ti Rakau
Drive) and gives effect to the RPS. This area will also be
served by AMETI once constructed. This project has
funding in the Long Term Plan.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support change of zone from MHU to THAB. Rezoning to THAB
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The sites are in close proximity of
Botany Junction (Local Centre) and close to a RFN and
THAB zoning gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHU to THAB. Rezoning to THAB


THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. Sites are in close proximity of
Botany Junction LC and close to a RFN (Chapel Road) and
give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Support change of zone from MHU to THAB. Rezoning to THAB


THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. Sites are in close proximity of
Botany Junction LC and close to a RFN (Chapel Road) and
give effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6681

839-6682

839-6683

839-6684

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (North and Rezone 65, MICHAEL


East)
JONES DRIVE,1,3,
MARK CARTER
PLACE,3, ERONI
CLARKE CLOSE, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

65, MICHAEL
Botany
JONES DRIVE,1,3, Junction
MARK CARTER
PLACE,3, ERONI
CLARKE CLOSE

Urban (North and Rezone 61,57,59,


61,57,59,
East)
MICHAEL JONES
MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE, Flat Bush from DRIVE, Flat Bush
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Botany
Junction

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

Urban (North and Rezone


East)
24,26,20,14,22,16,18,
28, GLEN OSBORNE
TERRACE,10,8, MARK
CARTER
PLACE,11,9,7, ERONI
CLARKE CLOSE, Flat
Bush from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

24,26,20,14,22,16 Botany
,18,28, GLEN
Junction
OSBORNE
TERRACE,10,8,
MARK CARTER
PLACE,11,9,7,
ERONI CLARKE
CLOSE

MHU

Urban (North and Rezone 13,15, MARK


East)
CARTER
PLACE,10,4,6, GLEN
OSBORNE
TERRACE,39,45,43,41
, MICHAEL JONES
DRIVE, Flat Bush from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

13,15, MARK
Botany
CARTER
Junction
PLACE,10,4,6,
GLEN OSBORNE
TERRACE,39,45,43
,41, MICHAEL
JONES DRIVE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

801

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHU to THAB. Rezoning to THAB


THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The sites as they are in close
proximity of Botany Junction LC and close to a RFN
(Chapel Road) and THAB zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Zone changes have been made on adjacent sites, outside
of the scope of this submission to achieve integrated
management of resources and recognise local context,
see Attachment F.

Support change of zone from MHU to THAB. Rezoning to THAB


THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The sites as they are in close
proximity of Botany Junction LC and close to a RFN
(Chapel Road) and THAB zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Zone changes have been made on adjacent sites, outside
of the scope of this submission to achieve integrated
management of resources and recognise local context,
Support change of zone from MHU to THAB. Rezoning to THAB
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The sites as they are in close
proximity of Botany Junction LC and close to a RFN
(Chapel Road) and THAB zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Zone changes have been made on adjacent sites, outside
of the scope of this submission to achieve integrated
management of resources and recognise local context,
see Attachment F.

Support change of zone from MHU to THAB. Rezoning to THAB


THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The sites as they are in close
proximity of Botany Junction LC and close to a RFN
(Chapel Road) and THAB zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Zone changes have been made on adjacent sites, outside
of the scope of this submission to achieve integrated
management of resources and recognise local context,
see Attachment F.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6685

839-6686

839-6687

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Rezone 10,8,


10,8, INNISOWEN Flat Bush
East)
INNISOWEN PLACE, PLACE, Flat Bus
Flat Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 5, ALTA


East)
TERRACE,36,
ASPIRING AVENUE,
Flat Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Urban (North and Rezone 18,20,
East)
MATTHEWS
ROAD,2A,2B,4, ALTA
TERRACE, Flat Bush
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, ALTA
TERRACE,36,
ASPIRING
AVENUE, Flat
Bush

Flat Bush

MHS

18,20,
MATTHEWS
ROAD,2A,2B,4,
ALTA TERRACE,
Flat Bush

Flat Bush

Urban (North and Rezone 32,30,28,34,


East)
MANDIVAL AVENUE,
Flat Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

32,30,28,34,
MANDIVAL
AVENUE, Flat
Bush

Flat Bush

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

802

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU as a


No change
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context. Support
retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is not in close proximity to a centre or
an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre and does not give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre and does not give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6695

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre and does not give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

839-6696

Urban (North and Rezone 46,44,42,40,


East)
MANDIVAL AVENUE,
Flat Bush from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

46,44,42,40,
MANDIVAL
AVENUE, Flat
Bush

Flat Bush

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 6, CHESLEY
PLACE, Half Moon
Bay.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Urban at 16, CHESLEY
PLACE, Half Moon
Bay.

6, CHESLEY PLACE, Highland Park


Half Moon Bay

MHU

16, CHESLEY
Highland Park
PLACE, Half Moon
Bay

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre and does not give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-679

839-680

MHU

MHU

Support retention of MHU. Retention of the MHU zone is No change


the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is in close proximity to Highland Park
and an RFN (Pakuranga Road), and MHU zoning gives
Support retention of MHU. Retention of the MHU zone is No change
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is in close proximity to Highland Park
and an RFN (Pakuranga Road), and MHU zoning gives

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-693

839-708

839-710

839-717

839-718

839-724

839-741

839-7545

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 16,
MARVON DOWNS
AVENUE, Pakuranga
Heights.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Suburban at 18,
MANAPOURI PLACE,
Pakuranga Heights.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

MHS

18, MANAPOURI Pakuranga


PLACE, Pakuranga
Heights

MHS

Pakuranga

MHU

404, BUCKLANDS Highland Park


BEACH ROAD,
Bucklands Beach

MHU

1, CRANBERRY
Highland Park
PLACE, Bucklands
Beach

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 131, MOORE


East)
Urban at 131, MOORE STREET, Howick
STREET, Howick.

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 357,
BUCKLANDS BEACH
ROAD, Bucklands
Beach.
Urban (North and Rezone 117 PIGEON
East)
MOUNTAIN ROAD.
Half Moon Bay from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

16, MARVON
Pakuranga
DOWNS AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 1, UNDINE


East)
Urban at 1, UNDINE STREET,
STREET, Pakuranga. Pakuranga

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Urban at 404,
BUCKLANDS BEACH
ROAD, Bucklands
Beach.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Urban at 1,
CRANBERRY PLACE,
Bucklands Beach.

LOCALITY

Howick

MHU

357, BUCKLANDS Bucklands


BEACH ROAD,
Beach
Bucklands Beach

MHS

117 PIGEON
Bucklands
MOUNTAIN
Beach
ROAD. Half Moon
Bay

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 71, ENNIS


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 71,
AVENUE,
ENNIS AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHU. Retention of the MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is in close proximity to a RFN (Ti Rakau
Drive) and Pakuranga TC, and the MHU zone gives effect
to the RPS. This area will also be served by AMETI once
constructed. This project has funding in the Long Term
Support retention of MHU. Retention of the MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is in close proximity to Highland Park
and an RFN (Pakuranga Road), and MHU zoning gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. Retention of the MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is in close proximity to Highland Park
and an RFN (Pakuranga Road), and MHU zoning gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU. Retention of the MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is in close proximity to Howick Village
and a RFN along Picton Street, and the MHU zone gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre and does not give effect to the RPS.

803

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
839-758

MHS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-759

839-763

839-7651

839-7653

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 71, ENNIS


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 67,
AVENUE,
ENNIS AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Terrace


East)
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4, MATTSON
ROAD, Pakuranga.

4, MATTSON
Pakuranga
ROAD, Pakuranga

THAB

Urban (North and Rezone 11 WARE


East)
PLACE. Pakuranga
Heights from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Urban (North and Rezone 26 PANDORA
East)
PLACE. Pakuranga
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11 WARE PLACE, Pakuranga


Pakuranga Heights

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

THAB

MHU

REASONS

804

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of THAB. Retention of the THAB zone is No change
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is adjacent to Pakuranga TC and Ti
Rakau Drive (a RFN), and the THAB zone gives effect to
the RPS. This area will also be served by AMETI once
constructed. This project has funding in the Long Term
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre and does not give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
26 PANDORA
Pakuranga
PLACE. Pakuranga

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre and does not give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-767

839-7673

839-7709

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 33A, ANDREW


East)
Suburban at 33A,
ROAD, Howick
ANDREW ROAD,
Howick.
Urban (North and Rezone 6 BOYS
East)
PLACE. Pakuranga
Heights from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Urban (North and Rezone 39
East)
GOSSAMER DRIVE.
Pakuranga Heights
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Howick

6 BOYS PLACE.
Pakuranga
Pakuranga Heights

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre and does not give effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

39 GOSSAMER
Pakuranga
DRIVE. Pakuranga
Heights

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre and does not give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7765

Urban (North and Rezone 7 FORTUNES 7 FORTUNES


Bucklands
East)
ROAD. Half Moon Bay ROAD. Half Moon Beach
from Mixed Housing Bay
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre, is under a VV and does not give
effect to the RPS

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-778

839-7794

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 24, HOPE FARM Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 24, HOPE AVENUE,
FARM AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 10 TANGELO 10 TANGELO


Highland Park
East)
PLACE. Bucklands
PLACE. Bucklands
Beach from Single
Beach
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Urban (North and Rezone 39 ASPIRING 39 ASPIRING


East)
AVENUE. Manukau
AVENUE, Flat
from Mixed Housing Bush
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

THAB

REASONS

805

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. Support No change
retention of SH Zone as the site is affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified version is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-7803

Flat Bush

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not close to a
THAB zone or centre and does not give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-784

839-7876

839-7900

839-792

839-7946

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 51, ARCHMILLEN Pakuranga


East)
Suburban at 51,
AVENUE,
ARCHMILLEN
Pakuranga Heights
AVENUE, Pakuranga
Heights.

Urban (North and Rezone 147 GILLS


East)
ROAD. Pigeon
Mountain-Mellons
Bay from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Urban (North and Rezone 10 HAGEN
East)
CLOSE. Golflands
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

147 GILLS ROAD. Bucklands


Pigeon Mountain- Beach
Mellons Bay

10 HAGEN CLOSE. Botany


Golflands and GIS
to complete
additional out of
scope properties.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

Do not support retention of notified zone. Rezoning to


MHU
MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site as it is in close proximity
to THAB (consequence of submission number 5277-185),
a RFN (along Pakuranga Rd) and MHU zoning gives effect
to the RPS. This change is proposed out side of the scope
of the submission, refer to Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. Retention of MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone as
the site is not close to a THAB zone or centre and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning to THAB. Rezoning to MHU is
MHU
supported as the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is adjacent to THAB and
close to Ti Rakau Drive (an RFN) and Botany TC, and the
MHU zoning gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support
Recognise accessibility constraints in proximity assessment
for this area

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 16, BELDON


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 16,
PLACE, Pakuranga
BELDON PLACE,
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Rezone 4 HILLTOP


4 HILLTOP ROAD, Flat Bush
East)
ROAD. Manukau from Flat Bush
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
No change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone as the site is not close to a THAB zone or centre
and MHS zoning gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7957

839-8100

839-8101

839-840

839-852

839-860

839-862

839-865

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Urban (North and Rezone 37


37 RIVERHILLS
East)
RIVERHILLS AVENUE. AVENUE.
Pakuranga from
Pakuranga
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pakuranga

Urban (North and Rezone 50 ASPIRING 50 ASPIRING


East)
AVENUE. Manukau
AVENUE, Flat
from Mixed Housing Bush
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Flat Bush

Urban (North and Rezone 48 ASPIRING 48 ASPIRING


East)
AVENUE. Manukau
AVENUE, Flat
from Mixed Housing Bush
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Flat Bush

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 3, OKATAINA


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 3,
STREET,
OKATAINA STREET,
Pakuranga Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 11, CHEVIS PLACE, Pakuranga
East)
Urban at 11, CHEVIS Pakuranga
PLACE, Pakuranga.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 6, AMERCE PLACE, Highland Park
East)
Suburban at 6,
Highland Park
AMERCE PLACE,
Highland Park.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 6, OKAREKA


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 6,
PLACE, Pakuranga
OKAREKA PLACE,
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Terrace


East)
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 652, PAKURANGA
ROAD, PakurangaHowick.

THAB

652, PAKURANGA Highland Park


ROAD, PakurangaHowick

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone as the site is not close to a THAB zone or centre
and MHS zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone as the site is not close to a THAB zone or centre
and MHS zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone as the site is not close to a THAB zone or centre
and MHS zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of the notified zone. Retention of the
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is close to an RFN (Ti
Rakau Drive) and a LC, and the MHU zoning gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of THAB zone. Retention of the THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site sits adjacent to Highland
Park TC and a RFN (Pakuranga Road), and THAB zoning
gives effect to the RPS.

806

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-883

839-901

839-902

839-931

839-933

839-94

839-941

839-948

839-95

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 9, MARRIOTT


Pakuranga
East)
Urban at 9,
ROAD, Pakuranga
MARRIOTT ROAD,
Pakuranga.

MHU

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 26, GOSSAMER


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 26,
DRIVE, Pakuranga
GOSSAMER DRIVE,
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing


East)
Suburban at 12,
MARVON DOWNS
AVENUE, Pakuranga
Heights.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Urban at 402,
BUCKLANDS BEACH
ROAD, Bucklands
Beach.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Suburban at 5,
WALWORTH
AVENUE, Pakuranga
Heights.
Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing
East)
Suburban at 69,
TIRAUMEA DRIVE,
Pakuranga.

12, MARVON
Pakuranga
DOWNS AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights

MHS

402, BUCKLANDS Highland Park


BEACH ROAD,
Bucklands Beach

MHU

5, WALWORTH
Pakuranga
AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights

MHS

69, TIRAUMEA
Pakuranga
DRIVE, Pakuranga

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 12, PIXIE PLACE, Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 12, PIXIE Pakuranga Heights
PLACE, Pakuranga
Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 14, CHEAM


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 14,
PLACE, Pakuranga
CHEAM PLACE,
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 144, AVIEMORE


East)
Suburban at 144,
DRIVE, Howick
AVIEMORE DRIVE,
Howick.

MHS

Highland Park

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

807

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the notified zone. Retention of the No change


MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is close to a RFN (Ti Rakau
Drive) and a LC, and MHU zoning gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of notified zone. Rezoning to
MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity to
THAB (consequence of submission number 5277-185), an
RFN (Pakuranga Road) and MHU zoning gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of MHU. Retention of the MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. The site is in close proximity to Howick Village,
an RFN (Picton Road) and MHU zoning gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. Managing flooding risks on this
site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The site is
not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. Managing flooding risks on this
site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The site is
not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-96

839-97

839-972

839-98

839-5595

839-6154

839-6733

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 51, HOPE FARM Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 51, HOPE AVENUE,
FARM AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Terrace


East)
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4, DOLPHIN
STREET, Pakuranga.

THAB

4, DOLPHIN
STREET,
Pakuranga

Pakuranga

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 40, ENNIS


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 40,
AVENUE,
ENNIS AVENUE,
Pakuranga Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (North and Retain Mixed Housing 55, GOSSAMER


Pakuranga
East)
Suburban at 55,
DRIVE, Pakuranga
GOSSAMER DRIVE,
Heights
Pakuranga Heights.

MHS

Urban (South)

Rezone 21, WAIARI


21, WAIARI ROAD, Conifer Grove
ROAD, Conifer Grove Conifer Grove
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 2/35,1/35,
CHALLEN CLOSE,
Conifer Grove from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone
20A,1/22,2/22,
BERWYN AVENUE,
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

2/35 and 1/35


Challen Close,
Conifer Grove

Conifer Grove

20A,1/22,2/22,
Takinini
BERWYN AVENUE,
Takanini

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of the THAB zone. Retention of the
THAB zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity to
the Pakuranga TC and an RFN (Ti Rakau Drive), and THAB
zoning gives effect to the RPS. Ti Rakau Drive will be
served by the AMETI rapid busway once constructed. This
project is funding in the Long Term Plan.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. Managing coastal inundation on
the site does not require a maintaining a SH zone. The
site is not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. Managing flooding risks on this
site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The site is
not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHS. The site is
significantly affected by flooding constraints, however
this site already contains two dwellings. The MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. MHS zone
recognises the established uses.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. Site
adjoins FU zone and MHS zone aligns with Takanini
residential development area zoning. MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

808

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5203

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 106,
MANUROA ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

106, MANUROA
ROAD, Takanini

Rezone 263A,
PORCHESTER ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

263A,
PORCHESTER
ROAD, Takanini

Rezone 49,
CHICHESTER
DRIVE,1,3,2,4,
DUMAS PLACE,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 8,
GOODWIN DRIVE,
Rosehill.
Rezone 81,
MANUROA ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

49, CHICHESTER
DRIVE,1,3,2,4,
DUMAS PLACE,
Rosehill

LOCALITY

Takinini

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

809

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5336

839-7314

839-1596

839-5668

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Takinini

SH

Papakura - SouthMHS

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from SH to MHS. The site is


MHS
affected by flooding constraints and although the SH
zone could be retained, a spot zone would occur. A spot
zone will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the
local context. A MHS zone maintains the planned
suburban built character and is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meets proximity criteria to education facilities, and
proximat to the Hingaia Local Centre and Mixed Use Zone
(Beach Road access).

8, GOODWIN
DRIVE, Rosehill

Papakura - SouthMHS

81, MANUROA
ROAD, Takanini

Takinini

SH

MHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change
is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1726

839-5858

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Papakura - SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 2/3,1/3,
Suburban at 2/3,1/3, SUNNYPARK
SUNNYPARK AVENUE, AVENUE, Rosehill.
Rosehill.

MHS

Rezone 61,
MANUROA ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

61, MANUROA
ROAD, Takanini

Takinini

SH

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change
is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5067

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone
116,2/124,1/124,
CHICHESTER DRIVE,5,
MARYBETH PLACE,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

116,2/124,1/124, Papakura - SouthMHS


CHICHESTER
DRIVE,5,
MARYBETH
PLACE, Rosehill

MHU

Rezone 108A,
MANUROA ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

108A, MANUROA Takinini


ROAD, Takanini

MHU

REASONS

810

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5888

Urban (South)

SH

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-6118

Urban (South)

Rezone 19, TAKA


19, TAKA STREET, Takinini
STREET, Takanini
Takanini
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5153

Urban (South)

Rezone 48,
48, EDINBURGH Papakura - SouthMHS
EDINBURGH AVENUE, AVENUE, Rosehill
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5187

Urban (South)

Rezone 162,
CHICHESTER DRIVE,
Rosehill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

162, CHICHESTER Papakura - SouthSH


DRIVE, Rosehill

Rezone 2/65,1/65,
CHICHESTER DRIVE,
Rosehill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2/65,1/65,
CHICHESTER
DRIVE, Rosehill

Papakura - SouthSH

Rezone 54,1/52-6/52,
AIRFIELD ROAD,254,
PORCHESTER ROAD,
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

54,1/52-6/52,
AIRFIELD
ROAD,254,
PORCHESTER
ROAD, Takanini

Takinini

MHU

Do not support change to MHU, however support change MHS


of zone from SH to MHS. Managing flooding risks on this
site does not require maintaining a SH zone. MHS is the
most appropriate to maintain the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5313

Urban (South)

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-6163

Urban (South)

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6170

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 13, OLD PARK 13, OLD PARK


PLACE, Takanini from PLACE, Takanini
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Takinini

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

811

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-6721

839-6722

839-6723

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone
4/10,3/10,6/10,6,1/1
3,2/13,2/10,1/10,1/1
7,2/17,2/14,2/15,1/7,
1/5,9,6/5,3/5,8,5/10,
2/5,2/7,11,5/5,4/5,1/
15,1/14, MATAWALU
PLACE,1/5-6/5,1/155/15, MANUROA
ROAD, Takanini from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

4/10,3/10,6/10,6, Takinini
1/13,2/13,2/10,1/
10,1/17,2/17,2/14
,2/15,1/7,1/5,9,6/
5,3/5,8,5/10,2/5,2
/7,11,5/5,4/5,1/1
5,1/14,
MATAWALU
PLACE,1/56/5,1/15-5/15,
MANUROA ROAD,
Takanini

Rezone 4,4A,
PRINCESS
STREET,5/2,1/2,4/2,7
/2,3/2,6/2,2/2,
STATION ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4,4A, PRINCESS
Takinini
STREET,5/2,1/2,4/
2,7/2,3/2,6/2,2/2,
STATION ROAD,
Takanini

Rezone 5A,5,
STATION ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5A,5, STATION
ROAD, Takanini

SH

MHU

Support change of zone from SH to MHU at 5, 7, 9, 11,


SH/MHU
13, 15 and 17 Matawalu Place, and 15 Manuroa Road
where managing flooding risks on those sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The sites are in close
proximitiy to the RFN. MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Do not support change from SH to MHU at the remaining


properties - the sites are affected by flooding constraints
and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.
SH

MHU

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
Takinini

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-6724

Urban (South)

Rezone
42A,44,42,44A,
42A,44,42,44A, TAKA TAKA STREET,
STREET, Takanini
Takanini
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Takinini

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6725

Urban (South)

Rezone 46,46A,
MANUROA ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

46,46A,
Takinini
MANUROA ROAD,
Takanini

SH

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6726

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
2/48,2/52,2/50,1/408/40,1/52,1/50,1/48,
STATION ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2/48,2/52,2/50,1/ Takinini
408/40,1/52,1/50,1/
48, STATION
ROAD, Takanini

SH

Rezone
76B,76A,78A,78B,78,
MANUROA
ROAD,50B,50C,50A,
TAKANINI SCHOOL
ROAD, Takanini from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

76B,76A,78A,78B, Takinini
78, MANUROA
ROAD,50B,50C,50
A, TAKANINI
SCHOOL ROAD,
Takanini

SH

Rezone 60,
CHICHESTER DRIVE,
Rosehill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

60, CHICHESTER
DRIVE, Rosehill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

812

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6727

Urban (South)

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5354

Urban (South)

Papakura - SouthSH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5504

839-5505

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 397, GREAT 397, GREAT


SOUTH ROAD,
SOUTH ROAD,
Papakura from Single Papakura
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Papakura - SouthSH

Rezone 29, TAIRERE


CRESCENT, Rosehill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

29, TAIRERE
CRESCENT,
Rosehill

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5674

Urban (South)

Rezone 155,
155, CHICHESTER Papakura - SouthMHS
CHICHESTER DRIVE, DRIVE, Rosehill
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6728

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 10, JADON


CLOSE,37A,37C,37B,3
7, TAKANINI SCHOOL
ROAD, Takanini from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

10, JADON
Takinini
CLOSE,37A,37C,37
B,37, TAKANINI
SCHOOL ROAD,
Takanini

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

813

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6115

Urban (South)

Rezone 17, JUPITER 17, JUPITER


STREET, Rosehill from STREET, Rosehill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7315

839-7316

839-7317

839-6729

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 3,2,5,4,6,
GYPSY MOTH
PLACE,46,56,50,52,
CHICHESTER DRIVE,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

3,2,5,4,6, GYPSY Papakura - SouthSH, MHS


MOTH
PLACE,46,56,50,5
2, CHICHESTER
DRIVE, Rosehill

Rezone 55,57,53,
CHICHESTER DRIVE,
Rosehill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

55,57,53,
CHICHESTER
DRIVE, Rosehill

Papakura - SouthSH

Rezone 74,72,
CHICHESTER DRIVE,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
24,25,26,27,20,21,22,
23,28,3,5,7,6,9,8,11,1
3,12,15,14,17,16,19,1
8, JADON CLOSE,14,
AIRFIELD ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

74,72,
CHICHESTER
DRIVE, Rosehill

Papakura - SouthSH, MHS

24,25,26,27,20,21 Takinini
,22,23,28,3,5,7,6,
9,8,11,13,12,15,1
4,17,16,19,18,
JADON CLOSE,14,
AIRFIELD ROAD,
Takanini

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change to MHU, however support change MHS


of zone from SH to MHS at 6 Gypsy Moth Place.
Managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. MHS is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Support retention of notified zone for
reminder of properties. Retention of the MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone. They are not in close proximitiy to centres and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change
is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from SH to MHS at 72 Chichester MHS


Drive. Managing flooding risks on this site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. Site is not close to a
centre. MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone for reminder of
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change
is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to education facilities, and


proximat to the Hingaia Local Centre and Mixed Use Zone
(Beach Road access). Given existing development on site,
consider intensification zoning can enable redevelopment
including addressing flooding issues.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6730

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 1/260,1/2583/258,2/260,
PORCHESTER
ROAD,1/4,1/2,1/8,2/
8,6,2/12,1/12,2/10,1/
10,2/4,2/2,2/14,1/14,
CLARICE PLACE,
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

1/260,1/258Takinini
3/258,2/260,
PORCHESTER
ROAD,1/4,1/2,1/8
,2/8,6,2/12,1/12,2
/10,1/10,2/4,2/2,
2/14,1/14,
CLARICE PLACE,
Takanini

PAUP ZONE

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

814

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 4, 6, 8, No change


10, 12, 2/12, 14 Clarice Place the sites are affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at 258,
260 Porchester Road and 2 Clarice Place - MHS is the
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
839-7318

839-6731

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 11,13,
JUPITER STREET,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
279B,279C,279A,279
D,279E,271A,273A,
PORCHESTER ROAD,
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11,13, JUPITER
STREET, Rosehill

Papakura - SouthMHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

279B,279C,279A,2 Takinini
79D,279E,271A,27
3A, PORCHESTER
ROAD, Takanini

SH, MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 271, SH, MHS


271A, 273A, 279A, 279B, 279E Porchester Road, support
alternative change to MHS Although the SH zone could
be applied due to the sites being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location
a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the
local context. MHS is the most appropriate zone for the
site as it is not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. Rezoning to MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at
279C and 279D Porchester Road - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6732

839-7693

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone
2/274,2/276,1/282,1/
280,2/280,2/282,1/2
78,2/278,1/276,284,1
/274, PORCHESTER
ROAD, Takanini from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 106A
MANUROA ROAD.
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

2/274,2/276,1/28 Takinini
2,1/280,2/280,2/2
82,1/278,2/278,1/
276,284,1/274,
PORCHESTER
ROAD, Takanini

PAUP ZONE

SH, MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

815

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Takinini

SH

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 278


SH, MHS
Porchester Road the site is affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 282,
276 Porchester Road, support alternative change to MHS Managing flooding risks on the sites does not require a
SH zone. MHS is the most appropriate zone for the site as
it is not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. Rezoning to MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

106A MANUROA
ROAD. Takanini

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at 274,


280, 1/280, 2/280, 284 Porchester Road - MHS is the
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change
is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7904

Urban (South)

Rezone 99 MANUROA 99 MANUROA


ROAD. Takanini from ROAD. Takanini
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Takinini

SH

Rezone 87,85,
87,85,
CHICHESTER DRIVE, CHICHESTER
Rosehill from Mixed DRIVE, Rosehill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7323

Urban (South)

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meets proximity criteria to education facilities, and


proximat to the Hingaia Local Centre and Mixed Use Zone
(Beach Road access).

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7327

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone
47,45,51,53,49, PARK
ESTATE
ROAD,147,145,1/143,
141,149,133,131,137,
135,2/143,129,139,
CHICHESTER
DRIVE,11,10,13,12,20
,22,16,18,3,5,7,24,9,8
, JOANNE PLACE,
Rosehill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

47,45,51,53,49, Papakura - SouthSH, MHS


PARK ESTATE
ROAD,147,145,1/
143,141,149,133,
131,137,135,2/14
3,129,139,
CHICHESTER
DRIVE,11,10,13,1
2,20,22,16,18,3,5,
7,24,9,8, JOANNE
PLACE, Rosehill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

816

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change to MHU, however support change MHS


of zone at 49 Park Estate Road from SH to MHS.
Managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. Support retention of SH for 137,
139, 141, 143, 145, 147, 149 Chichester Drive, 5, 7, 9, 11,
13, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24 Joanne Place and 51, 55 Park Estate
Road as they are significantly affected by flooding
constraints. Support retention of the MHS zone for 45, 47
Park Estate Road, 3, 8, 10 and 12 Joanne Place and 129,
131, 133 amd 135 Chichester Drive as the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone. It maintains the planned suburban built
Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7328

Urban (South)

Rezone
1/144,150,152,1/140,
154,1/142,2/126,2/1
28,1/128,2/140,120,1
22,2/142,1/126,138,2
/144, CHICHESTER
DRIVE, Rosehill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

MHU

1/144,150,152,1/
140,154,1/142,2/
126,2/128,1/128,
2/140,120,122,2/
142,1/126,138,2/
144, CHICHESTER
DRIVE, Rosehill

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7329

839-8082

839-8217

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 165,163,
CHICHESTER DRIVE,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 1 BERWYN
AVENUE. Takanini
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

165,163,
CHICHESTER
DRIVE, Rosehill

Papakura - SouthMHS

1 BERWYN
Takinini
AVENUE. Takanini

Rezone 54 TAKANINI 54 TAKANINI


SCHOOL ROAD.
SCHOOL ROAD.
Takanini from Single Takanini
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Takinini

SH

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support MHS
alternative change to MHS - Although the SH zone could
be applied due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location
a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the
local context. MHS is the most appropriate zone for the
site as it is not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. Rezoning to MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change
is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8294

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 7 OAKLEIGH 7 OAKLEIGH


AVENUE. Takanini
AVENUE
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Takinini

MHS

Rezone 36A
TAKANINI SCHOOL
ROAD. Takanini from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 62,
CHICHESTER DRIVE,
Rosehill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

36A TAKANINI
SCHOOL ROAD.
Takanini

Takinini

62, CHICHESTER
DRIVE, Rosehill

Papakura - SouthSH

Rezone 1/81, 2/81


CLARK ROAD.
Pahurehure from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 2/2, 1/2
ROSEHILL DRIVE.
Rosehill from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

1/81, 2/81 CLARK Papakura - SouthSH


ROAD.
Pahurehure

MHU

2/2, 1/2 ROSEHILL Papakura - SouthSH


DRIVE. Rosehill

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
1/19,2/19,
SUNNYPARK AVENUE,
Rosehill.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 10,
MARYBETH PLACE,
Rosehill.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at
121,123,121A,
CHICHESTER DRIVE,
Rosehill.
Rezone 56, TATARIKI
STREET, Rosehill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS
1/19,2/19,
SUNNYPARK
AVENUE, Rosehill.

MHS

10, MARYBETH
PLACE, Rosehill

Papakura - SouthMHS

MHS

121,123,121A,
CHICHESTER
DRIVE, Rosehill

Papakura - SouthMHS

56, TATARIKI
STREET, Rosehill

Papakura - SouthMHS

REASONS

817

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-8299

839-7409

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7476

839-7519

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Do not support change to MHU, however support change MHS


of zone from SH to MHS. It maintains the planned
suburban built Rosehill character of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1572

839-1759

839-2161

839-5082

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

MHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5188

839-5359

839-5445

839-5582

839-6737

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 56, TATARIKI 56, TATARIKI


STREET, Rosehill
STREET, Rosehill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 35, ROSEHILL 35, ROSEHILL


DRIVE, Rosehill from DRIVE, Rosehill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 25, JUPITER 25, JUPITER


STREET, Rosehill from STREET, Rosehill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 7, BRAEBURN 7, BRAEBURN


PLACE, Takanini from PLACE, Takanini
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Takinini

Rezone
1/62,2/62,1/64,2/ Takinini
1/62,2/62,1/64,2/64, 64, TIRONUI
TIRONUI ROAD,
ROAD, Takanini
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB, support
alternative change to MHU - managing flooding risks on
the site does not require maintaining a SH zone. MHU
aligns with the zoning immediately east of the railway
line as far east as Porchester Road between the Takanini
Town Centre and the Papakura Metropolitan Centre.
Rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. These
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

818

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5446

839-5503

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 24,
24, GOODWIN
GOODWIN DRIVE,
DRIVE, Rosehill
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 22, TAIRERE


CRESCENT, Rosehill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

22, TAIRERE
CRESCENT,
Rosehill

MHU

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5646

839-5729

839-5819

839-5977

839-6034

839-6090

839-7319

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 17, TAIRERE


CRESCENT, Rosehill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
17, TAIRERE
CRESCENT,
Rosehill

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 34,
34, GOODWIN
GOODWIN DRIVE,
DRIVE, Rosehill
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 4, JUPITER
4, JUPITER
STREET, Rosehill from STREET, Rosehill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 33, ORCHARD 33, ORCHARD


RISE, Rosehill from
RISE, Rosehill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 42,
42, GOODWIN
GOODWIN DRIVE,
DRIVE, Rosehill
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 37, TAIRERE


CRESCENT, Rosehill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37, TAIRERE
CRESCENT,
Rosehill

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 3, JUPITER
STREET,25A,
EDINBURGH AVENUE,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS
3, JUPITER
STREET,25A,
EDINBURGH
AVENUE, Rosehill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

819

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7320

839-7321

839-7322

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Papakura - SouthMHS
Rezone 19,17,
19,17,
EDINBURGH AVENUE, EDINBURGH
Rosehill from Mixed AVENUE, Rosehill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Papakura - SouthMHS

MHU

Rezone 39,43,41,
ROSEHILL DRIVE,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 18,20,14,16,
EDINBURGH AVENUE,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

39,43,41,
ROSEHILL DRIVE,
Rosehill

Rezone 26, JUPITER


STREET,23, TAIRERE
CRESCENT, Rosehill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

26, JUPITER
STREET,23,
TAIRERE
CRESCENT,
Rosehill

REASONS

820

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Papakura - SouthSH, MHS


18,20,14,16,
EDINBURGH
AVENUE, Rosehill

MHU

Support rezoning of 20 Edinburgh Avenue from SH to


SH/MHS
MHS where managing flooding risk does not require
maintaining a SH zone. MHS is appropriate given the site
is not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN. The MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7324

839-6738

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 13A,15,
13A,15, TIRONUI
TIRONUI STATION
STATION ROAD
ROAD EAST, Papakura EAST, Papakura
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Takinini

SH

MHU

THAB

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB at 15
SH/MHU
Tironui Station Road East - this site is affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB at 13A
Tironui Station Road East, support alternative change to
MHU - managing flooding risks on the sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. Site is close to RFN and
MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

839-7456

Urban (South)

Rezone 3/94, 2/94,


3/94, 2/94, 1/94
1/94 PORCHESTER
PORCHESTER
ROAD. Takanini from ROAD. Takanini
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Takinini

SH

MHU

Support change of zone from SH to MHU - managing


MHU
flooding risks on the sites does not require maintaining a
SH zone. MHU aligns with the zoning immediately east of
the railway line as far east as Porchester Road between
the Takanini Town Centre and the Papakura Metropolitan
Centre. MHU is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7325

839-7326

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 30,28,
30,28, TAIRERE
TAIRERE CRESCENT, CRESCENT,
Rosehill from Mixed Rosehill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 47, TATARIKI


STREET,10,12,
TAIRERE CRESCENT,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

47, TATARIKI
STREET,10,12,
TAIRERE
CRESCENT,
Rosehill

Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 22, ORCHARD


RISE,2/29,1/29,
ROYSTON STREET,
Rosehill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS
22, ORCHARD
RISE,2/29,1/29,
ROYSTON STREET,
Rosehill

MHU

Papakura - SouthMHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

821

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7330

839-7790

839-6734

839-6736

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 20 ORCHARD 20 ORCHARD


RISE. Rosehill from
RISE. Rosehill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 38A,38,
38A,38, TAKANINI Takinini
TAKANINI ROAD,
ROAD, Takanini
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 8B,8,8A,
8B,8,8A,
GLENORA ROAD,
GLENORA ROAD,
Takanini from Mixed Takanini
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Takinini

THAB

THAB

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It maintains the planned suburban
built Rosehill character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS. Also do not support change to MHU zone, spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. MHU
aligns with the zoning immediately west of the railway
line as far west as Great South Road north of the Takanini
Town Centre. The notified zoning maintains the planned
character of this zone. Otherwise, a spot zone would
occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise the local context. Retaining the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - a
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context. MHU
aligns with the zoning immediately west of the railway
line as far west as Great South Road north of the Takanini
Town Centre. Retaining the MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6739

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 5,
MATHESON
STREET,88,84, GROVE
ROAD,11,10,13,12,15
,14,17,16,19,18,3,2,5,
4,7,6,9,20,8, CORKILL
PLACE, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

5, MATHESON
Takinini
STREET,88,84,
GROVE
ROAD,11,10,13,12
,15,14,17,16,19,1
8,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,20,
8, CORKILL PLACE,
Papakura

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

822

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone.
Managing flooding risks on one of the sites does not
require a SH zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
839-1540

839-1541

839-1543

839-2158

839-1544

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Clendon Park
Retain Mixed Housing 73, BURUNDI
Suburban at 73,
AVENUE, Clendon
BURUNDI AVENUE,
Park
Clendon Park.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 3, HOOKS ROAD,


Suburban at 3,
Manurewa
HOOKS ROAD,
Manurewa.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 91, SYKES ROAD,


Suburban at 91,
Weymouth
SYKES ROAD,
Weymouth.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2,2A,2B, CHAPEL
STREET,292A,292B,29
2, GREAT SOUTH
ROAD, Papakura.

2,2A,2B, CHAPEL Papakura


STREET,292A,292
B,292, GREAT
SOUTH ROAD,
Papakura

THAB

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 10, CELMISIA
Suburban at 10,
PLACE, Weymouth
CELMISIA PLACE,
Weymouth.

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of THAB zone. THAB is the most
appropriate zone as it is adjacent to Pakuranga Town
Centre and close to the RFN. Retention of the THAB zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the relevant
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5339

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 3/3,2/3,1/3, 3/3,2/3,1/3, DON Papakura


DON STREET,
STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

823

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. A


No change
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context.
Retaining the notified MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and give
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1549

839-1552

839-7305

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24, MCANNALLEY
STREET, Manurewa
East.

24, MCANNALLEY Manurewa


STREET,
Manurewa East.

Retain Mixed Housing 28, HYPERION


Suburban at 28,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

Rezone 11,11A,11B, 11,11A,11B,


PORCHESTER ROAD, PORCHESTER
Takanini from Mixed ROAD, Takanini
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura

THAB

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHS

THAB

Support retention of notified THAB zone - The site is


No change
across the road from a Neighbourhood Centre, adjacent
to Gallaher Park, in close proximity to Manurewa Town
Centre and RFN. Retention of the THAB zone gives effects
to the objectives and policies of the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. A
No change
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context.
Retaining the notified MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and give
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7306

839-7311

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone
25,27B,27,27A,31,29
B,29,29A,
PORCHESTER ROAD,
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

25,27B,27,27A,31, Papakura
29B,29,29A,
PORCHESTER
ROAD, Takanini

Rezone 25,25A,
25,25A, PRICTOR Papakura
PRICTOR STREET,
STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH, MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

Support change of zone of SH to MHU at 31 Porchester


MHU
Road where managing flooding risks on those sites does
not require maintaining a SH zone. Support retention of
MHU for the remaining sites. MHU is the most
appropriate zone given the proximity of the block to the
Papakura Metropolitan Centre. North of Ingram Street,
MHU is considered more appropriate than THAB because
of its distance from the Papakura Railway Station. The
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. A
No change
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context.
Retaining the notified MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and give
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1553

839-1562

839-1564

839-1567

839-7464

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 94, COXHEAD
Suburban at 94,
ROAD,27, HOOKS
COXHEAD ROAD,27, ROAD, Manurewa
HOOKS ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 21, VOLANTE


Suburban at 21,
AVENUE, Wattle
VOLANTE AVENUE,
Downs.
Wattle Downs.

Manurewa SouthMHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 25,
GAINSBOROUGH
STREET, Manurewa.

Manurewa

25,
GAINSBOROUGH
STREET,
Manurewa

MHS

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 22, BERNINA
Suburban at 22,
PLACE, Weymouth
BERNINA PLACE,
Weymouth.

MHS

Rezone 4/3, 3/3, 2/3, 4/3, 3/3, 2/3, 1/3 Papakura


1/3 ONSLOW ROAD. ONSLOW ROAD.
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

THAB

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. A
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context.
Retaining the notified MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and give
effect to the RPS.

824

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
839-1569

839-1573

839-2245

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 7, SENECIO PLACE, Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 7,
Weymouth
SENECIO PLACE,
Weymouth.

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 2,
RONDORLYN PLACE,
Manurewa.
Retain Mixed Use at
1/18-6/18 COLES
CRESCENT. Papakura.

Manurewa
2, RONDORLYN
PLACE, Manurewa

MHU

1/18-6/18 COLES
CRESCENT.
Papakura

MU

Papakura

MHS

MHU

MU

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within
No change
close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and a RFN.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of notified MU zone. The MU zone is No change
appropriate for character of area and its proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre and Great South Road.
Retaining the notified MU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MU zone and give
effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1574

839-1579

839-1580

839-1585

839-1587

839-1592

839-1593

839-1594

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 152, COXHEAD
Suburban at 152,
ROAD, Manurewa
COXHEAD ROAD,
Manurewa.

Retain Mixed Housing 24, BROWNS


Suburban at 24,
ROAD, Wiri
BROWNS ROAD, Wiri.

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 20,
DREADON ROAD,
Manurewa.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 10,
CAPELLA PLACE,
Manurewa.

Manurewa

Manurewa
20, DREADON
ROAD, Manurewa

MHS

MHU

Manurewa SouthMHS
10, CAPELLA
PLACE, Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 109, HYPERION


Suburban at 109,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 7, MALMO PLACE, Clendon Park


Suburban at 7,
Manurewa
MALMO PLACE,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 31, BURBANK


Suburban at 31,
AVENUE,
BURBANK AVENUE, Manurewa.
Manurewa.

Clendon Park

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 33, FEASEGATE


Suburban at 33,
STREET,
FEASEGATE STREET, Manurewa
Manurewa.

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within
close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and a RFN.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

825

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1599

839-1600

839-1601

839-1603

839-1604

839-1605

839-1607

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 220, BROWNS


Suburban at 220,
ROAD, Wiri.
BROWNS ROAD, Wiri.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 15, BILL PHILLIP


Suburban at 15, BILL PLACE, Clendon
PHILLIP PLACE,
Park
Clendon Park.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 29, KOPARA


Suburban at 29,
PLACE, Clendon
KOPARA PLACE,
Park.
Clendon Park.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 126,
SHIFNAL DRIVE,6,
RIBOT PLACE,
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

126, SHIFNAL
DRIVE,6, RIBOT
PLACE, Randwick
Park.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Clendon Park
Retain Mixed Housing 18, YEARSLEY
Suburban at 18,
PLACE, Manurewa
YEARSLEY PLACE,
Manurewa.

MHS

The Gardens
Retain Mixed Housing 19, BALLOCH
Suburban at 19,
STREET, Randwick
BALLOCH STREET,
Park
Randwick Park.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 33, ROSEMEAD


Suburban at 33,
PLACE, Randwick
ROSEMEAD PLACE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Although the SH
zone could be applied due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

826

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1612

839-1614

839-1615

839-1616

839-1620

839-1623

839-1626

839-1628

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 40, WAIMAHIA


Suburban at 40,
AVENUE,
WAIMAHIA AVENUE, Weymouth.
Weymouth.

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 8, ASHMERE
Suburban at 8,
LANE, Weymouth
ASHMERE LANE,
Weymouth.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 4, ASHMERE
Suburban at 4,
LANE, Weymouth
ASHMERE LANE,
Weymouth.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 1, PIRITI PLACE,


Suburban at 1, PIRITI Weymouth.
PLACE, Weymouth.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 55, THOMPSON


Suburban at 55,
TERRACE,
THOMPSON
Manurewa
TERRACE, Manurewa.

Manurewa SouthMHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 26, HOOKS ROAD, Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 26,
Manurewa
HOOKS ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 267, MAHIA
Suburban at 267,
ROAD, Manurewa.
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 30, HOBART
Suburban at 30,
CRESCENT, Wattle
HOBART CRESCENT, Downs
Wattle Downs.

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the

827

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1629

839-1632

839-1633

839-1634

839-1637

839-1640

839-1641

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Homai Station
Retain Mixed Housing 5, BERKELEY
Urban at 5, BERKELEY ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa.

Retain Mixed Housing 25, FELLBROOK


Suburban at 25,
STREET,
FELLBROOK STREET, Manurewa
Manurewa.

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 102, MAHIA
Suburban at 102,
ROAD, Manurewa
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 31, ROSEANNE
Suburban at 31,
ROAD, Manurewa
ROSEANNE ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 3, BULLER


Urban at 3, BULLER
CRESCENT,
CRESCENT,
Manurewa.
Manurewa.

Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 26, VOLANTE


Suburban at 26,
AVENUE, Wattle
VOLANTE AVENUE,
Downs
Wattle Downs.

Manurewa SouthMHS

The Gardens
Retain Mixed Housing 29, LIMOND
Suburban at 29,
STREET, Randwick
LIMOND STREET,
Park.
Randwick Park.

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support the retention of MHU zone - the property is


within close proximity to Homai Train Station and
achieves the MHU zone objectives. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Although the SH
zone could be applied due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the property is
within close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and
RFN. Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
a SH zone. Retaining the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

828

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1642

839-1643

839-1644

839-1645

839-1647

839-1648

839-1649

839-1650

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

The Gardens
Retain Mixed Housing 4, BALLOCH
Suburban at 4,
STREET, Randwick
BALLOCH STREET,
Park.
Randwick Park.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 42, HYPERION


Suburban at 42,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 17, HYPERION


Suburban at 17,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

Retain Mixed Housing 17, INNISMARA


Suburban at 17,
AVENUE, Wattle
INNISMARA AVENUE, Downs
Wattle Downs.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 3, KIRTON


Suburban at 3,
CRESCENT,
KIRTON CRESCENT,
Manurewa
Manurewa.

Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 1, HYPERION


Suburban at 1,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 9, ZURICH PLACE, Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 9,
Weymouth
ZURICH PLACE,
Weymouth.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 28, BERNINA
Suburban at 28,
PLACE, Weymouth
BERNINA PLACE,
Weymouth.

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the

829

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1652

839-1656

839-1660

839-1661

839-1662

839-1663

839-1665

839-1668

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 10, COTTRELL


Suburban at 10,
PLACE, Clendon
COTTRELL PLACE,
Park
Clendon Park.

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 16, CLAYTON
Suburban at 16,
ROAD, Manurewa
CLAYTON ROAD,
Manurewa.

Retain Mixed Housing 2, BARCROFT


Suburban at 2,
PLACE, Clendon
BARCROFT PLACE,
Park.
Clendon Park.

Clendon Park

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 18, FIELDS ROAD, Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 18,
Manurewa
FIELDS ROAD,
Manurewa.

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 30,
GAINSBOROUGH
STREET, Manurewa.

30,
GAINSBOROUGH
STREET,
Manurewa

Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 7, LYNDON PLACE, Manurewa


Suburban at 7,
Manurewa
LYNDON PLACE,
Manurewa.

Retain Mixed Housing 15, MASSINE


Suburban at 15,
PLACE, Randwick
MASSINE PLACE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

MHS

MHS

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 202, MAHIA
Suburban at 202,
ROAD, Manurewa
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of 1 Nina Place, 11 and 13
Burbank Avenue from SH to MHU zone. Support change
to MHS as an alternative - Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

830

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1915

839-1670

839-1684

839-1685

839-1686

839-1687

839-1690

839-1693

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 2/11A,1/11A,
RAILWAY STREET
WEST, Papakura.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

2/11A,1/11A,
Papakura
RAILWAY STREET
WEST

PAUP ZONE

THAB

Retain Mixed Housing 11, MOUNTFORT Manurewa


Suburban at 11,
STREET,
MOUNTFORT STREET, Manurewa
Manurewa.

MHS

125, WEYMOUTH Manurewa


ROAD, WeymouthManurewa East

MHU

Manurewa

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 125,
WEYMOUTH ROAD,
WeymouthManurewa East.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 23,
EDDOWES STREET,
Manurewa.

23, EDDOWES
STREET,
Manurewa

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHU

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 235, MAHIA
Suburban at 235,
ROAD, Manurewa
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 8, ROSEANNE
Suburban at 8,
ROAD, Manurewa
ROSEANNE ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 32, THOMPSON


Suburban at 32,
TERRACE,
THOMPSON
Manurewa
TERRACE, Manurewa.

Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 6, SEAWARD


Suburban at 6,
PLACE, Wattle
SEAWARD PLACE,
Downs
Wattle Downs.

Manurewa SouthMHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

831

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. The site is in close


No change
proximity to the RFN and Papakura Metropolitan Centre.
Retaining the THAB zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within
close proximity to Mountfort Park and located on an
arterial road. The notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the property is
within close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and
RFN. Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
a SH zone. Retaining the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1694

839-1695

839-2159

839-1698

839-1701

839-2583

839-1702

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 19, SEAWARD


Suburban at 19,
PLACE, Wattle
SEAWARD PLACE,
Downs
Wattle Downs.

LOCALITY

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 23A,23B,
WEYMOUTH ROAD,
WeymouthManurewa East.

Manurewa
23A,23B,
WEYMOUTH
ROAD, WeymouthManurewa East

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 11,11A,
MANSE
ROAD,12A,12, CLARK
ROAD, Pahurehure.

11,11A, MANSE
ROAD,12A,12,
CLARK ROAD,
Pahurehure.

Retain Mixed Housing 9, ASTOR PLACE,


Suburban at 9, ASTOR Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa.

PAUP ZONE

Papakura

THAB

MHU

Manurewa SouthMHS

Clendon Park
Retain Mixed Housing 12, EWBANK
Suburban at 12,
PLACE, Manurewa
EWBANK PLACE,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 5 MAADI PLACE.


Urban at 5 MAADI
Papakura.
PLACE. Papakura.

Papakura

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 35, BURBANK


Suburban at 35,
AVENUE,
BURBANK AVENUE, Manurewa
Manurewa.

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

832

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support a change of zone to THAB and support


No change
change to MHU - the sites are located in close walking
distance from the Clendon Park Local Centre however
crossing to the Local Centre from this area does not have
a safe pedestrian environment. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of THAB zone - The sites are in
No change
close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and within
walking distance to the RFN. Managing flooding risks on
the site does not require a SH zone. Although the SH zone
could be applied to one of the sites due to the site being
affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur
and in this location a spot zone will not generally achieve
the integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. Retaining the notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU. Site is within close
No change
proximity to the RFN, parks and community facilities. The
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - MHS


is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support retention of notified zone. The site is in close
proximity to the RFN and Papakura Metropolitan Centre.
Retaining the MHU zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1711

839-1712

839-1716

839-1720

839-1722

839-1724

839-2832

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 27, BERNINA
Suburban at 27,
PLACE, Weymouth
BERNINA PLACE,
Weymouth.

Retain Mixed Housing 7, MASSINE


Suburban at 7,
PLACE, Randwick
MASSINE PLACE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 2, CLAYTON
Suburban at 2,
ROAD, Manurewa.
CLAYTON ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 4, BLUEWATER


Suburban at 4,
PLACE, Wattle
BLUEWATER PLACE, Downs
Wattle Downs.

Homai Station
Retain Mixed Housing 81, JELLICOE
Urban at 81, JELLICOE ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa.

Retain Mixed Housing 62, THOMPSON


Suburban at 62,
TERRACE,
THOMPSON
Manurewa
TERRACE, Manurewa.

MHU

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 31,31A,
31,31A,
Papakura
CLEVEDON ROAD,
CLEVEDON ROAD,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Urban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH, MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone - The site is within close
proximity to Homai Train Station and a higher level of
intensification will increase the capacity of housing with
good access to public transport. The notified zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
31 Clevedon Road is already MHU. Support retention of
SH zone at 31A Clevedon Road. The site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

833

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
839-1725

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 8, KIRTON


Urban at 8, KIRTON CRESCENT,
CRESCENT,
Manurewa
Manurewa.

Manurewa

MHU

MHU

Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within


No change
close proximity to Mountfort Park and located nearby an
arterial road. The notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5386

839-1728

839-1731

839-1732

839-1733

839-1734

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 2/6A,1/6A,
SHORT STREET,
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 16, MCANNALLEY
STREET, Manurewa
East.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

2/6A,1/6A, SHORT Papakura


STREET, Papakura
(part of area of
residential
properties
bounded by
Onslow Road to
the north, Railway
Street West to the
east, Short Street
to the South, and
Liverpool Street to
the west, and by
Settlement Road
and Opaheke
Road)

SH

16, MCANNALLEY Manurewa


STREET,
Manurewa East.

THAB

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 61, HOBART
Suburban at 61,
CRESCENT, Wattle
HOBART CRESCENT, Downs
Wattle Downs.

Retain Mixed Housing 17, RIVERTON


Suburban at 17,
DRIVE, Randwick
RIVERTON DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

Retain Mixed Housing 102, HYPERION


Suburban at 102,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

Retain Mixed Housing 13, ADAMS ROAD, Manurewa


Suburban at 13,
Manurewa
ADAMS ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

834

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from SH to MHU where


MHU
managing flooding risks on those sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone.The residential properties
bounded by Onslow Road to the north, Railway Street
West to the east, Short Street to the South, and Liverpool
Street to the west, and by Settlement Road and Opaheke
Road are on the southern periphery of central Papakura,
parks and community facilities. The MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

Support retention of THAB zone. THAB is the most


No change
appropriate zone as it is adjacent to Pakuranga Town
Centre and close to the RFN. Retention of the THAB zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the relevant
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1736

839-5436

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 71, FERGUSON


Urban at 71,
STREET,
FERGUSON STREET, Manurewa East
Manurewa East.

Manurewa

Rezone 61,1/5761,1/57-18/57,
18/57, MARNE ROAD, MARNE ROAD,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura

Rezone 24,26,30,28, 24,26,30,28,


SETTLEMENT ROAD, SETTLEMENT
Papakura from Single ROAD, Papakura
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura

Retain Mixed Housing 42, INNISMARA


Suburban at 42,
AVENUE, Wattle
INNISMARA AVENUE, Downs
Wattle Downs.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 26, RIVERTON


Suburban at 26,
DRIVE, Randwick
RIVERTON DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

835

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of MHU zone - the property is


No change
within close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and
RFN. Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
a SH zone. Retaining the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone. The land is on No change
the south eastern periphery of central Papakura, parks
and community facilities which is suitable for MHU
zoning. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the relevant objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-7282

839-1739

839-1745

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SH

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB,


MHU
however support change of zone from SH to MHU where
managing flooding risks on those sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The land is on the south eastern
periphery of central Papakura, parks and community
facilities which is suitable for MHU zoning. Change to
alternative zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the relevant objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7287

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 12A,12,
ALBERT STREET,
Papakura from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

12A,12, ALBERT
Papakura
STREET, Papakura
(part of area of
residential
properties
bounded by
Onslow Road to
the north, Railway
Street West to the
east, Short Street
to the South, and
Liverpool Street to
the west, and by
Settlement Road
and Opaheke
Road)

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

836

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB,


MHU
however support change of zone from SH to MHU. As
although the SH zone could be retained due to the site
being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would
occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise the local context. The MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the relevant
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1746

839-1749

839-1751

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 121, FINLAYSON Clendon Park


Suburban at 121,
AVENUE, Clendon
FINLAYSON AVENUE, Park
Clendon Park.

MHS

The Gardens

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 4, MELLERAY


Suburban at 4,
PLACE, Randwick
MELLERAY PLACE,
Park
Randwick Park.

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 50, MARR ROAD,
Manurewa.

50, MARR ROAD,


Manurewa

Homai Station

THAB

MHS

MHS

THAB

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of 1, 3, 5 Oratu Place from SH to No change
MHU zone. Support change to MHS as an alternative Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of 7, 11, 15, 17 Oratu Place from
MHS to MHU zone - the sites are not within close
proximity to a centre or RFN and are not suitable for
further intensification. The notified zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of notified THAB zone - The site is
No change
within walking distance to Homai Train Station and Local
Centre. Retention of the THAB zone gives effects to the
objectives and policies of the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone.

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7289

839-7304

839-1754

839-1757

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 29B,29,29A,
OPAHEKE ROAD,
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone
3,5,3C,3B,3A,5A,5B,
COLES CRESCENT,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

29B,29,29A,
Papakura
OPAHEKE ROAD,
Papakura (part of
area of residential
properties
bounded by
Onslow Road to
the north, Railway
Street West to the
east, Short Street
to the South, and
Liverpool Street to
the west, and by
Settlement Road
and Opaheke
Road)

Papakura

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH, MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

3,5,3C,3B,3A,5A,5
B, COLES
CRESCENT,
Papakura

Retain Mixed Housing 3, MATUA PLACE, Clendon Park


Suburban at 3,
Clendon Park
MATUA PLACE,
Clendon Park.

MHS

The Gardens
Retain Mixed Housing 28, LIMOND
Suburban at 28,
STREET, Randwick
LIMOND STREET,
Park.
Randwick Park.

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

837

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support change of zone from SH to MHU. As although the MHU


SH zone could be retained due to the site being affected
by flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in
this location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. The MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the relevant objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone to THAB, however,


MHU
support change of zone from SH to MHU at 3C Coles
Crescent as although the SH zone could be retained due
to the site being affected by flooding constraints, a spot
zone would occur and in this location a spot zone will not
generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context.
Support change of zone from SH to MHU at 3B Coles
Crescent where managing flood risks on those sites does
not require maintaining a SH zone. The MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the relevant objectives
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7307

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 8,6, OLD


WAIROA ROAD,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

8,6, OLD WAIROA Papakura


ROAD, Papakura
(part of block of
land between
Waitaua Street,
Porchester Road,
Old Wairoa Road
and View Road,
Papakura)

MHU

Rezone 18,18A,
18,18A, INGRAM Papakura
INGRAM STREET,
STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

838

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. A


No change
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context.
Retaining the notified MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and give
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7309

839-1758

839-1770

839-7310

839-1771

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 132, MAHIA
Suburban at 132,
ROAD, Manurewa
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 63,
WEYMOUTH ROAD,
WeymouthManurewa East.
Rezone 21B,21,21A,
INGRAM STREET,
Papakura from Single
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

63, WEYMOUTH Manurewa


ROAD, WeymouthManurewa East

MHU

21B,21,21A,
Papakura
INGRAM STREET,
Papakura

SH, THAB

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 3, ROSEANNE
Suburban at 3,
ROAD, Manurewa
ROSEANNE ROAD,
Manurewa.

THAB

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB.


North of Ingram Street, MHU is considered more
appropriate than THAB because of its distance from the
Papakura Railway Station. It would also result in a spot
zone which will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does ot recognise the
local context. The notified MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Although the SH
zone could be applied due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within
close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and a RFN.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to THAB where
managing flooding risks on those sites does not require
retaining a SH zone. Papakura character and intensity
most suited to THAB. The THAB zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the purposes of the zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

No change

THAB

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7589

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 38, 32, 42, 36, 38, 32, 42, 36, 40, Papakura
40, 34 SETTLEMENT 34 SETTLEMENT
ROAD. Papakura from ROAD. Papakura
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

839

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The


sites are on the south eastern periphery of central
Papakura, parks and community facilities, and given its
distance from the Papakura Railway Station, MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB.
Support retention of notified MHU zone. The property is
located on the southern periphery of central Papakura,
within close proximity to parks and community facilities
which makes it suitable for the MHU zone. It is not
adjacent to the Metropolitan Centre or the Papakura
Train station. MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the property is
within close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and
RFN. Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
a SH zone. Retaining the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone. THAB is the most
appropriate zone as it is adjacent to Pakuranga Town
Centre and close to the RFN. Retention of the THAB zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the relevant
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1773

839-1776

839-7905

839-1778

839-1784

839-1786

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 82,86, MAHIA
Suburban at 82,86,
ROAD, Manurewa
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

Retain Mixed Housing 21, KAIMOANA


Suburban at 21,
STREET,
KAIMOANA STREET, Weymouth
Weymouth.

Clendon Park

Rezone 1/29-3/29
KING EDWARD
AVENUE. Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura

1/29-3/29 KING
EDWARD
AVENUE.
Papakura

Retain Mixed Housing 216, BROWNS


Suburban at 216,
ROAD, Wiri.
BROWNS ROAD, Wiri.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 6, TUI CRESCENT, Manurewa


Urban at 6, TUI
Manurewa
CRESCENT,
Manurewa.

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 38, GLOUCESTER
ROAD, Manurewa.

38, GLOUCESTER Homai Station


ROAD, Manurewa

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1788

839-1789

839-1790

839-1817

839-1795

839-2160

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 55, FERGUSON


Urban at 55,
STREET,
FERGUSON STREET, Manurewa East
Manurewa East.

Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 46, INNISMARA


Suburban at 46,
AVENUE, Wattle
INNISMARA AVENUE, Downs
Wattle Downs.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 10, HYPERION


Suburban at 10,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

Retain Mixed Housing 2/50,1/50, OLD


Urban at 2/50,1/50, WAIROA ROAD,
OLD WAIROA ROAD, Papakura.
Papakura.

Papakura

Retain Mixed Housing 2, TAATAHI


Suburban at 2,
STREET,
TAATAHI STREET,
Weymouth
Weymouth.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 22A,22,22B,
SHORT STREET,
Papakura.

22A,22,22B,
Papakura
SHORT STREET,
Papakura (part of
area of residential
properties
bounded by
Onslow Road to
the north, Railway
Street West to the
east, Short Street
to the South, and
Liverpool Street to
the west, and by
Settlement Road
and Opaheke
Road)

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within


close proximity to Te Mahia Train Station. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

840

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and it gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity to a
centre and RFN and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1799

839-1802

839-1803

839-1804

839-1806

839-1809

839-1811

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 16, BLUEWATER


Suburban at 16,
PLACE, Wattle
BLUEWATER PLACE, Downs
Wattle Downs.

Retain Mixed Housing 41, FEASEGATE


Suburban at 41,
STREET,
FEASEGATE STREET, Manurewa
Manurewa.

LOCALITY

Manurewa SouthMHS

Clendon Park

Clendon Park
Retain Mixed Housing 85, BURUNDI
Suburban at 85,
AVENUE, Clendon
BURUNDI AVENUE,
Park.
Clendon Park.

Retain Mixed Housing 12, RANGER


Suburban at 12,
PLACE, Wattle
RANGER PLACE,
Downs.
Wattle Downs.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

Clendon Park
Retain Mixed Housing 8, YEARSLEY
Suburban at 8,
PLACE, Manurewa
YEARSLEY PLACE,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 89, THOMPSON


Suburban at 89,
TERRACE,
THOMPSON
Manurewa
TERRACE, Manurewa.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 3, COTTRELL


Suburban at 3,
PLACE, Clendon
COTTRELL PLACE,
Park
Clendon Park.

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Although the SH
zone could be applied due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

841

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1813

839-1814

839-2371

839-1815

839-2542

839-1825

839-1827

839-1828

839-1829

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 24, MARR ROAD,


Urban at 24, MARR
Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa.

Homai Station

Retain Mixed Housing 58, BURBANK


Suburban at 58,
AVENUE,
BURBANK AVENUE, Manurewa.
Manurewa.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 2/48, 1/48


Papakura
Urban at 2/48, 1/48 SHIRLEY AVENUE.
SHIRLEY AVENUE.
Papakura
Papakura.

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 103, MAHIA
Suburban at 103,
ROAD, Manurewa
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 2/40, 1/40
INGRAM STREET.
Papakura.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 54,
HOBART CRESCENT,
Wattle Downs.

2/40, 1/40
Papakura
INGRAM STREET.
Papakura

MHU

Manurewa SouthMHS
54, HOBART
CRESCENT, Wattle
Downs

MHS

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 135, RUSSELL
ROAD, Manurewa.

Homai Station
135, RUSSELL
ROAD, Manurewa.

THAB

MHU

THAB

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 181, COXHEAD
Suburban at 181,
ROAD, Manurewa
COXHEAD ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 5, CAPELLA PLACE, Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 5,
Manurewa
CAPELLA PLACE,
Manurewa.

MHS

REASONS

842

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of MHU zone - the property is


No change
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and
achieves the MHU zone objectives. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity to a
centre and RFN and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - The site is
within walking distance to Homai Train Station and Local
Centre. Retention of the THAB zone gives effects to the
objectives and policies of the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1830

839-1831

839-1832

839-2576

839-1833

839-1839

839-1840

839-1841

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

The Gardens
Retain Mixed Housing 23, LIMOND
Suburban at 23,
STREET, Randwick
LIMOND STREET,
Park.
Randwick Park.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 18, SOLO PLACE,


Suburban at 18, SOLO Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Use at 307A, GREAT


307A, GREAT SOUTH SOUTH ROAD,
ROAD, Manurewa.
Manurewa.

Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 24A WILLIS ROAD. Papakura


Urban at 24A WILLIS Papakura
ROAD. Papakura.

Retain Mixed Housing 15, FRANGIPANI


Suburban at 15,
AVENUE,
FRANGIPANI
Manurewa
AVENUE, Manurewa.

MU

MHU

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 438, PORCHESTER The Gardens


Suburban at 438,
ROAD, Takanini
PORCHESTER ROAD,
Takanini.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 20, KOPARA


Suburban at 20,
PLACE, Clendon
KOPARA PLACE,
Park
Clendon Park.

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 110, COXHEAD
Suburban at 110,
ROAD, Manurewa.
COXHEAD ROAD,
Manurewa.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MU zone - the zone
provides flexibility for a mix of uses including residential
which is well suited to this location being on a RFN and
close to Te Mahia train station. The notified zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and parks. Retaining the notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

843

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1842

839-1843

839-1844

839-2601

839-1845

839-1850

839-1852

839-1854

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 49, ORAMS ROAD, Manurewa


Suburban at 49,
Manurewa
ORAMS ROAD,
Manurewa.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 38, INNISMARA


Suburban at 38,
AVENUE, Wattle
INNISMARA AVENUE, Downs
Wattle Downs.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 13, RIVERTON


Suburban at 13,
DRIVE, Randwick
RIVERTON DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

Retain Mixed Housing 9A CAMPBELL


Urban at 9A
PLACE. Papakura
CAMPBELL PLACE.
Papakura.

Papakura

Retain Mixed Housing 5, PALLANT


Suburban at 5,
STREET,
PALLANT STREET,
Manurewa.
Manurewa.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 8, STOLL PLACE,


Suburban at 8, STOLL Clendon Park
PLACE, Clendon Park.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 20, BLUEWATER


Suburban at 20,
PLACE, Wattle
BLUEWATER PLACE, Downs
Wattle Downs.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 11, MASSINE


Suburban at 11,
PLACE, Randwick
MASSINE PLACE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is in close proximity to a
centre or an RFN and parks. Retaining the notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

844

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5147

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone
5/17,3/17,4/17,1/17,
2/17, SMITHS
AVENUE, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

5/17,3/17,4/17,1/ Papakura
17,2/17, SMITHS
AVENUE,
Papakura

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

845

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The


sites are not in close proximity to Metropolitan Centre
and RFN to be zoned as THAB. Retaining the notified
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within
close proximity to Mountfort Park and located nearby an
arterial road. The notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The
sites are not in close proximity to Metropolitan Centre
and RFN to be zoned as THAB. Retaining the notified
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The


sites are not in close proximity to Metropolitan Centre
and RFN to be zoned as THAB. Retaining the notified
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1855

839-1864

839-1865

839-5575

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 98, HYPERION


Suburban at 98,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

MHS

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 2, BERNINA
Suburban at 2,
PLACE,109, SYKES
BERNINA PLACE,109, ROAD, Weymouth
SYKES ROAD,
Weymouth.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 11, COLES PLACE, Manurewa


Urban at 11, COLES
Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa.

MHU

MHU

Rezone 23,
23, TRENTHAM
TRENTHAM ROAD,
ROAD, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Papakura

THAB

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
839-6054

Urban (South)

Rezone
3/25,2/25,1/25, Papakura
3/25,2/25,1/25,
SMITHS AVENUE,
SMITHS AVENUE,
Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7281

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 23A,23,
RAILWAY STREET
WEST, Papakura from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

23A,23, RAILWAY Papakura


STREET WEST,
Papakura (part of
area of residential
properties
bounded by
Onslow Road to
the north, Railway
Street West to the
east, Short Street
to the South, and
Liverpool Street to
the west, and by
Settlement Road
and Opaheke
Road)

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

846

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. A


No change
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context.
Retaining the notified MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and give
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1867

839-1872

839-7283

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 117, HYPERION


Suburban at 117,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

Retain Mixed Housing 23, BURBANK


Suburban at 23,
AVENUE,
BURBANK AVENUE, Manurewa
Manurewa.

Clendon Park

Rezone
15A,15B,17C,17B, Papakura
15A,15B,17C,17B,17A 17A, PRATT
, PRATT STREET,
STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

THAB

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Although the SH
zone could be applied due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The No change
sites are not in close proximity to Metropolitan Centre
and RFN to be zoned as THAB. Retaining the notified
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7284

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 6A,6, PRATT 6A,6, PRATT


Papakura
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

The Gardens
Retain Mixed Housing 4, FOXLAW
Suburban at 4,
STREET, Randwick
FOXLAW STREET,
Park.
Randwick Park.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

847

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1875

839-1878

839-1881

839-1883

839-1884

839-1885

839-1887

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 6, PALLANT


Suburban at 6,
STREET,
PALLANT STREET,
Manurewa
Manurewa.

Clendon Park
Retain Mixed Housing 8, EWBANK
Suburban at 8,
PLACE, Manurewa
EWBANK PLACE,
Manurewa.

MHS

The Gardens
Retain Mixed Housing 27, BALLOCH
Suburban at 27,
STREET, Randwick
BALLOCH STREET,
Park
Randwick Park.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 1, VALENCIA
Suburban at 1,
PLACE, Manurewa
VALENCIA PLACE,
Manurewa.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 3, RAINBOW


Suburban at 3,
PLACE, Wattle
RAINBOW PLACE,
Downs
Wattle Downs.

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 14, BERNINA
Suburban at 14,
PLACE, Weymouth
BERNINA PLACE,
Weymouth.

MHS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1891

839-7285

839-7286

839-7288

839-7308

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 21, HOBART
Suburban at 21,
CRESCENT, Wattle
HOBART CRESCENT, Downs
Wattle Downs.

MHS

Rezone 11,11A,11B, 11,11A,11B,


PRATT STREET,
PRATT STREET,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

THAB

Papakura

MHU

Rezone 3,3A, PRATT 3,3A, PRATT


Papakura
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 56A,56,
56A,56, MARNE
MARNE ROAD,
ROAD, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura

MHU

Rezone 15A,15, VIEW 15A,15, VIEW


ROAD, Papakura from ROAD, Papakura
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Papakura

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone to THAB. Support
retention of notified zone. The site is in close proximity
to the Papakura Metropolitan Center making MHU
appropriate. However, it is not within a suitable distance
to the Metropolitan Centre and Papakura Railway Station
to be zoned as THAB. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone to THAB. Support
retention of notified zone. The site is in close proximity
to the Papakura Metropolitan Center making MHU
appropriate. However, it is not within a suitable distance
to the Metropolitan Centre and Papakura Railway Station
to be zoned as THAB. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone to THAB. Support
retention of notified zone. The site is in close proximity
to the Papakura Metropolitan Center making MHU
appropriate. However, it is not within a suitable distance
to the Metropolitan Centre and Papakura Railway Station
to be zoned as THAB. Retention of the MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The
sites are not in close proximity to Metropolitan Centre
and RFN to be zoned as THAB. Retaining the notified
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

848

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1895

839-1903

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 11, FIELDS ROAD, Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 11,
Manurewa
FIELDS ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 63A, STRATFORD The Gardens


Suburban at 63A,
ROAD, Manurewa.
STRATFORD ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7453

839-7889

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 2/27, 1/27


2/27, 1/27
SETTLEMENT ROAD. SETTLEMENT
Papakura from Mixed ROAD. Papakura
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura

Rezone 5 SMITHS
5 SMITHS
AVENUE. Papakura
AVENUE.
from Mixed Housing Papakura
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

849

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The No change


site is on the southern periphery of central Papakura,
within close proximity to parks and community facilities
which makes it appropriate for MHU zoning. THAB zoning
would create a spot zone and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recongise the local context.
Retaining the notified MHU zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and give
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The No change
sites are not in close proximity to Metropolitan Centre
and RFN to be zoned as THAB. Retaining the notified
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1909

839-2076

839-2077

839-2078

839-2079

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 456, PORCHESTER The Gardens


Suburban at 456,
ROAD, Takanini.
PORCHESTER ROAD,
Takanini.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 196D,196E, HILL The Gardens


Suburban at
ROAD, Manurewa.
196D,196E, HILL
ROAD, Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 3, ADVOCATE


Suburban at 3,
PLACE, Randwick
ADVOCATE PLACE,
Park
Randwick Park.

The Gardens

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
24,10,12,20,14,22,16,
18, FOXLAW STREET,
Randwick Park.

The Gardens
24,10,12,20,14,22
,16,18, FOXLAW
STREET, Randwick
Park

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
11,13,15,17, NERISSA
PLACE,472,478,476,4
74,480, PORCHESTER
ROAD, Randwick
Park.

The Gardens
11,13,15,17,
NERISSA
PLACE,472,478,47
6,474,480,
PORCHESTER
ROAD, Randwick
Park.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - MHS


is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2080

839-2081

839-2082

839-2083

839-2084

839-2085

839-1547

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

The Gardens
Retain Mixed Housing 125,127,
Suburban at 125,127, HYPERION DRIVE,
HYPERION DRIVE,
Randwick Park.
Randwick Park.

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 63,65,67,
FERGUSON STREET,
Manurewa East.

63,65,67,
FERGUSON
STREET,
Manurewa East

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 4, RIBOT PLACE,4, The Gardens


Suburban at 4, RIBOT HYPERION DRIVE,
PLACE,4, HYPERION Randwick Park.
DRIVE, Randwick
Park.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 3,5, RIBOT PLACE, The Gardens


Suburban at 3,5,
Randwick Park.
RIBOT PLACE,
Randwick Park.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 18,16, HYPERION The Gardens


Suburban at 18,16,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park
Randwick Park.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 39,37, HYPERION The Gardens


Suburban at 39,37,
DRIVE, Randwick
HYPERION DRIVE,
Park.
Randwick Park.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 36, Kindergarten Conifer Grove


Suburban at 36,
Drive, Conifer
KINDERGARTEN
Grove
DRIVE, Conifer Grove.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

850

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the sites are within No change
close proximity to Te Mahia Train Station. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Although
the SH zone could be applied due to one of the sites
being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would
occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise the local context. Retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It is not in close proximity to
centres and maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8127

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 1 ALPHA
1 ALPHA STREET. Papakura
STREET. Papakura
Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 41,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE, Conifer Grove.

41,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE, Conifer
Grove

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 116,
SHIFNAL DRIVE,3,5,7,
BALLOCH STREET,
Randwick Park.

The Gardens
116, SHIFNAL
DRIVE,3,5,7,
BALLOCH STREET,
Randwick Park.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
322,320,318,
ROSCOMMON ROAD,
Wiri-Manurewa.

322,320,318,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD, WiriManurewa

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

851

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. The


sites are not in close proximity to Metropolitan Centre
and RFN to be zoned as THAB. Retaining the notified
MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. Deletion of Integrated
Development sub-precinct B supported in Topic 080
Council evidence. Site is not in close proximity to centres
and MHS maintains the planned suburban built character
of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Although
the SH zone could be applied due to the sites being
affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur
and in this location a spot zone will not generally achieve
the integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1782

839-2086

839-2122

839-2123

839-2124

839-2125

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Conifer Grove

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 4,
EWBANK
PLACE,14,16,
FELLBROOK STREET,
Manurewa.

4, EWBANK
PLACE,14,16,
FELLBROOK
STREET,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 312,310,
ROSCOMMON ROAD,
Wiri-Manurewa.

312,310,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD, WiriManurewa

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 10,8, FINLAYSON Clendon Park


Suburban at 10,8,
AVENUE, Clendon
FINLAYSON AVENUE, Park
Clendon Park.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the sites does not require a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2126

839-2127

839-2128

839-2129

839-2130

839-2131

839-2132

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 226,
BROWNS ROAD,3,
FELLBROOK STREET,
Manurewa.

226, BROWNS
ROAD,3,
FELLBROOK
STREET,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
26,30,28, WINSFORD
STREET, Manurewa.

26,30,28,
WINSFORD
STREET,
Manurewa

Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 93,95,97,
WEYMOUTH ROAD,
WeymouthManurewa East.

Manurewa
93,95,97,
WEYMOUTH
ROAD, WeymouthManurewa East

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 24,26,19,30,28,2/ Clendon Park


Suburban at
32, JUSTAMERE
24,26,19,30,28,2/32, PLACE, Weymouth
JUSTAMERE PLACE,
Weymouth.

MHS

Clendon Park
Retain Mixed Housing 11,9,13,
Suburban at 11,9,13, REREMANU
REREMANU PLACE,
PLACE, Weymouth
Weymouth.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 13,14, ZURICH


Suburban at 13,14,
PLACE,
ZURICH PLACE,
Weymouth.
Weymouth.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 227, MAHIA
Suburban at 227,
ROAD,3, ANGLERS
MAHIA ROAD,3,
WAY, Manurewa.
ANGLERS WAY,
Manurewa.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

852

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the sites are within No change
close proximity to Mountfort Park and located on an
arterial road. The notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2133

839-2134

839-2135

839-2136

839-2137

839-2138

839-2139

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 9,14, CELMISIA
Suburban at 9,14,
PLACE,4, SENECIO
CELMISIA PLACE,4,
PLACE, Weymouth
SENECIO PLACE,
Weymouth.

Retain Mixed Housing 69,71, FINLAYSON Clendon Park


Suburban at 69,71,
AVENUE, Clendon
FINLAYSON AVENUE, Park.
Clendon Park.

MHS

Retain Mixed Use at


297,301,299, GREAT
SOUTH ROAD,
Manurewa.

Manurewa
297,301,299,
GREAT SOUTH
ROAD, Manurewa.

MU

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,
ROSEMARY LANE,
Manurewa.

Manurewa
1,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,
ROSEMARY LANE,
Manurewa

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MU

THAB

Retain Mixed Housing 150,148, MAHIA Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 150,148, ROAD, Manurewa
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 129,131, MAHIA Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 129,131, ROAD, Manurewa
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 142,140, MAHIA Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 142,140, ROAD, Manurewa
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Although
the SH zone could be applied due to the one of the sites
being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would
occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise the local context. Retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MU zone - the zone
provides flexibility for a mix of uses including residential
which is well suited to this location being on a RFN and
close to Te Mahia train station. The notified zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of THAB zone - The sites are in
close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and within
walking distance to the RFN. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

853

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2140

839-2141

839-2142

839-2143

839-2144

839-2145

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 18,16,
INNISMARA AVENUE,
Wattle Downs.

18,16,
INNISMARA
AVENUE, Wattle
Downs

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 10,8,4,6,
INNISMARA
AVENUE,134, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa.

10,8,4,6,
INNISMARA
AVENUE,134,
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 9,5,7, KENDALL


Suburban at 9,5,7,
COURT, Wattle
KENDALL COURT,
Downs.
Wattle Downs.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 17,
ASTOR PLACE,93,
THOMPSON
TERRACE,123, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa.

Manurewa SouthMHS

17, ASTOR
PLACE,93,
THOMPSON
TERRACE,123,
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 12,14, SOLO
Suburban at 12,14,
PLACE,18, ASTOR
SOLO PLACE,18,
PLACE, Manurewa
ASTOR PLACE,
Manurewa.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
90,88,92, THOMPSON
TERRACE, Manurewa.

90,88,92,
THOMPSON
TERRACE,
Manurewa.

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

854

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Although
the SH zone could be applied due to the one of the sites
being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would
occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise the local context. Retention of the
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2146

839-2147

839-2148

839-2149

839-2150

839-2151

839-2152

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Manurewa SouthMHS
121, COXHEAD
ROAD,109,111,11
3, MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 4,6, HOBART
Suburban at 4,6,
CRESCENT, Wattle
HOBART CRESCENT, Downs
Wattle Downs.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 121,
COXHEAD
ROAD,109,111,113,
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa.

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
77,75,81,79,85,
THOMPSON
TERRACE, Manurewa.

77,75,81,79,85,
THOMPSON
TERRACE,
Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
103,109,111,107,113,
COXHEAD
ROAD,82,84,78,
THOMPSON
TERRACE, Manurewa.

103,109,111,107, Manurewa SouthMHS


113, COXHEAD
ROAD,82,84,78,
THOMPSON
TERRACE,
Manurewa

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 95,
COXHEAD
ROAD,68,66,
THOMPSON
TERRACE, Manurewa.

95, COXHEAD
ROAD,68,66,
THOMPSON
TERRACE,
Manurewa

Manurewa SouthMHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 96,
MAHIA
ROAD,25,13,15,21,17
,23,19, HOOKS
ROAD,98, COXHEAD
ROAD, Manurewa.

Manurewa SouthMHS
96, MAHIA
ROAD,25,13,15,21
,17,23,19, HOOKS
ROAD,98,
COXHEAD ROAD,
Manurewa

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 9,7, HOOKS ROAD, Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 9,7,
Manurewa.
HOOKS ROAD,
Manurewa.

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

855

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2153

839-2154

839-2155

839-2156

839-2823

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 11,9, EDDOWES


Urban at 11,9,
STREET,
EDDOWES STREET,
Manurewa
Manurewa.

LOCALITY

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
24,26,32,30,28,34,
INNISMARA AVENUE,
Wattle Downs.

24,26,32,30,28,34 Manurewa SouthMHS


, INNISMARA
AVENUE, Wattle
Downs.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 40,
HOOKS
ROAD,102,100,
COXHEAD ROAD,
Manurewa.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 6,
CLAYTON ROAD,18,
CAPELLA PLACE,
Manurewa.

40, HOOKS
ROAD,102,100,
COXHEAD ROAD,
Manurewa.

Manurewa SouthMHS

MHS

6, CLAYTON
ROAD,18,
CAPELLA PLACE,
Manurewa

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 38A,38,
BOUNDARY
ROAD,58,58A,
GREENHAVEN
AVENUE, Opaheke
from Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

38A,38,
BOUNDARY
ROAD,58,58A,
GREENHAVEN
AVENUE

Papakura - SouthSH, MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support the retention of MHU zone - the sites are within


close proximity to Mountfort Park and located nearby an
arterial road. The notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS. These
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to
the RPS.

856

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
839-4979

Urban (South)

Rezone 33, TASMAN 33, TASMAN


DRIVE, Opaheke from DRIVE, Opaheke
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS

MHU

Support change of zone from SH to MHS. Managing


No change
flooding risks on this site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. Site is not in close proximity to a center or RFN.
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5042

Urban (South)

Papakura - SouthSH
Rezone 39, ORION
39, ORION
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS. This site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5090

839-5140

839-5173

839-5884

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 26,
GREENHAVEN
AVENUE, Opaheke
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 3, MONTANA
PLACE, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

26, GREENHAVEN Papakura - SouthSH


AVENUE, Opaheke

Rezone 61,
GREENHAVEN
AVENUE, Opaheke
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 2/50,1/50,
ORION STREET,
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

61, GREENHAVEN Papakura - SouthSH


AVENUE, Opaheke

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

857

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS. This site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

3, MONTANA
PLACE, Papakura

Papakura - SouthMHS

2/50,1/50, ORION Papakura - SouthSH


STREET, Papakura

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone to MHU, however,
MHS
support change of zone from SH to MHS as managing
flooding risks on this site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. Site is not in close proximity to a center or RFN.
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. These No change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7291

839-7295

839-7296

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 45,43,41,
45,43,41, SMITHS Papakura - SouthSH, MHS
SMITHS AVENUE,
AVENUE,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone
24,20,14,22,16,18 Papakura - SouthSH, MHS
24,20,14,22,16,18,
, CALVERT STREET,
CALVERT STREET,
Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura - SouthMHS
Rezone 8,6, CALVERT 8,6, CALVERT
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

THAB

THAB

MHU

Do not support change of zone to THAB, however


MHS
support change of zone from SH to MHS as managing
flooding risks on these sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. These sites are not in close proximity to a
center or RFN. MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone to THAB, however,
SH/MHS
support change of zone from SH to MHS for 14 and 18
Calvert Street as managing flooding risks on those sites
does not require maintaining a SH zone. Do not support
change of zone from SH to MHS for 16, 20 and 22 as
these sites are affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give
effect to the RPS. Support retention of MHS on 24 Calvert
Street as site is not in close proximity to a center or RFN.
The notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7297

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 19,21,23,
HUNUA
ROAD,1,3,5,7,
CALVERT
STREET,46,50,48,
BATES STREET, Hunua
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,21,23, HUNUA Papakura - SouthMHS


ROAD,1,3,5,7,
CALVERT
STREET,46,50,48,
BATES STREET

MHU

Rezone 9,7, HUNUA


ROAD, Hunua from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9,7, HUNUA ROAD Papakura - SouthMHS

MHU

REASONS

858

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7298

839-7299

839-7300

839-7303

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone
26,38,32,30,28,36 Papakura - SouthSH, MHS
26,38,32,30,28,36,40, ,40,34, BATES
34, BATES STREET,
STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Papakura - SouthMHS
Rezone 20,22, BATES 20,22, BATES
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone
11,19,13,15,17,
CALVERT
STREET,11,9,3,5,7,
OSBORNE
PLACE,11,25,39,27,15
,21,17,23,19,31,37,29
,35,2/41,1/41,33,
BATES STREET,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura - SouthSH, MHS


11,19,13,15,17,
CALVERT
STREET,11,9,3,5,7,
OSBORNE
PLACE,11,25,39,2
7,15,21,17,23,19,
31,37,29,35,2/41,
1/41,33, BATES
STREET, Papakura

THAB

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone to MHU. However,
support change of zone from SH to MHS for 34 Bates
Street, as managing stormwater does not require the
maintaining a SH zone. Support retention of SH at 26, 28,
30 and 32 Bates Street as these sites are affected by
flooding constraints. Retaining the notified SH zone at is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS. Support retention
of MHS at 36, 38 and 40 Bates Street, these sites are not
in close proximity to a center or a RFN. Retaining the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change to MHU. Support retention of
notified zone. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The site is not in close proximity to an RFN or centre and
MHS maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone to THAB, however
support re-zoning from SH to MHS for 13 Calvert Street,
as managing stormwater for this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. Support retention of SH where
notified for other sites as those sites are affected by
flooding constraints. Retaining the notified SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and give effect to the RPS. Support retention of
MHS where notified as those sites are not in close
proximity to an RFN and MHS maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Retaining the
notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect to
the RPS.

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

SH/MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

SH/MHS

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7312

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 29,29A,
GREENHAVEN
AVENUE, Opaheke
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - SouthMHS
29,29A,
GREENHAVEN
AVENUE, Opaheke

Rezone
2/49,47,1/49,1/51,2/
51, GREENHAVEN
AVENUE, Opaheke
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2/49,47,1/49,1/51 Papakura - SouthSH, MHS


,2/51,
GREENHAVEN
AVENUE, Opaheke

MHU

Rezone 8A
GREENHAVEN
AVENUE. Opaheke
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 11A
LIVERPOOL STREET.
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 14A
GREENHAVEN
AVENUE. Opaheke
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 1/4,2/4,
LORELEI PLACE,
Opaheke.

8A GREENHAVEN Papakura - SouthSH


AVENUE. Opaheke

MHU

MHU

REASONS

859

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to an RFN and MHS maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7313

Urban (South)

Do not support change of zonefrom SH/MHS to MHU.


MHS
Support change of zone from SH to MHS where managing
flooding risks on those sites does not require maintaining
a SH zone. Site is not in close proximity to a center or
RFN. MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7642

839-7878

839-8195

839-1681

839-1779

839-1899

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. These


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to
the RPS.

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Papakura - SouthMHS
11A LIVERPOOL
STREET. Papakura

14A GREENHAVEN Papakura - SouthSH


AVENUE. Opaheke

MHU

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. This site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

1/4,2/4, LORELEI
PLACE, Opaheke.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 33, BOUNDARY


Suburban at 33,
ROAD, Papakura.
BOUNDARY ROAD,
Papakura.

Papakura - SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 70, OPAHEKE


Suburban at 70,
ROAD, Papakura.
OPAHEKE ROAD,
Papakura.

Papakura - SouthMHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The sites are not in close
proximity to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone and gives
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4997

839-5129

839-5202

839-7301

839-8146

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 9A,9B,
9A,9B,
BOUNDARY ROAD,
BOUNDARY
Papakura from Mixed ROAD, Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 15, HUNUA


ROAD, Hunua from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

Papakura - SouthMHS

15, HUNUA ROAD Papakura - SouthMHS

Rezone 114, MARNE 114, MARNE


ROAD, Papakura from ROAD, Papakura
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 3,2,5,4,7,6,
TENSING
PLACE,10,12,18,16,
BATES STREET,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 15 ORION
STREET. Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Papakura - SouthMHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

Papakura - SouthMHS
3,2,5,4,7,6,
TENSING
PLACE,10,12,18,1
6, BATES STREET,
Papakura

MHU

15 ORION STREET. Papakura - SouthMHS


Papakura

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU.


Retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The sites are not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS. Also do not support
change to the MHU zone, spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU.
Retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS. Also do not support
change to the MHU zone, spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU.
Retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS. Also do not support
change to the MHU zone, spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU.
Retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

860

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU.
No change
Retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS. Also do not support
change to the MHU zone, spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8147

839-7290

839-7292

839-7293

839-7294

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 15A ORION


STREET. Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

PAUP ZONE

Papakura - SouthMHS
15A ORION
STREET. Papakura

Rezone 31,29,
31,29, SMITHS
SMITHS AVENUE,
AVENUE,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone
2/49,1/47,1/49,2/47,
49A, SMITHS
AVENUE,1/30,2/30,1/
28,2/28, ORION
STREET, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Papakura - SouthMHS

Papakura - SouthMHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

2/49,1/47,1/49,2/
47,49A, SMITHS
AVENUE,1/30,2/3
0,1/28,2/28,
ORION STREET,
Papakura

REASONS

861

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU.


No change
Retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS. Also do not support
change to the MHU zone, spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. MHS is
No change
appropriate for the site given its distance from the
Papakura Metropolitan Centre. The site is part of the
boundary between the MHS to the south and MHU zone
to the north. THAB zoning would create a spot zone and a
spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resoureces and does not recognise the
local context. The MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and give effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU.
No change
Retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose in Part
Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian
access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

THAB

Oppose in Part

Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian


access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

Rezone
28,26,30,20,32,
SMITHS
AVENUE,10,2,8,6,
OSBORNE PLACE,23,
CALVERT STREET,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

28,26,30,20,32, Papakura - SouthMHS


SMITHS
AVENUE,10,2,8,6,
OSBORNE
PLACE,23,
CALVERT STREET,
Papakura

Rezone 32,30,28,
CALVERT
STREET,36,34,
SMITHS AVENUE,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Papakura - SouthMHS
32,30,28,
CALVERT
STREET,36,34,
SMITHS AVENUE,
Papakura

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU.


No change
Retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose in Part

Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian


access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions
THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU.


No change
Retention of the notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose in Part
Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian
access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7302

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 10,18,16,
SMITHS
AVENUE,2/9,3,5,7,1/
9, BATES STREET,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

10,18,16, SMITHS Papakura - SouthMHS, MHU


AVENUE,2/9,3,5,7
,1/9, BATES
STREET, Papakura

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

862

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning MHS/MHU to THAB. Notified


No change
MHS and MHU within the block is not in the proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre which would be
appropriate for THAB zoning. Retention of notified
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
relevant objectives of the respective zones and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
839-2091

839-2157

839-2234

839-2250

839-2251

839-2252

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
47,45,51,49,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE, Conifer Grove.

47,45,51,49,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE, Conifer
Grove

Conifer Grove

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 9,13,5, SEAWARD Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 9,13,5, PLACE, Wattle
SEAWARD PLACE,
Downs
Wattle Downs.

Retain Mixed Housing 27, BURBANK


Suburban at 27,
AVENUE,
BURBANK AVENUE, Manurewa
Manurewa.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 9 RHINE PLACE.


Suburban at 9 RHINE Weymouth
PLACE. Weymouth.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Clendon Park
Retain Mixed Housing 6 NEWBEGIN
Suburban at 6
PLACE. Weymouth
NEWBEGIN PLACE.
Weymouth.

MHS

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
Retain Mixed Housing 58 ST ANNES
Suburban at 58 ST
CRESCENT. Wattle
ANNES CRESCENT.
Downs
Wattle Downs.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. Deletion of Integrated
Development sub-precinct B supported in Topic 080
Council evidence. Site is not in close proximity to centres
and MHS maintains the planned suburban built character
of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2255

839-2286

839-2289

839-2294

839-2299

839-2301

839-2307

839-2311

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

The Gardens
Retain Mixed Housing 4 TRIMDON
Suburban at 4
STREET. Randwick
TRIMDON STREET.
Park
Randwick Park.

Retain Mixed Housing 15 PINEHURST


Suburban at 15
PLACE. Wattle
PINEHURST PLACE.
Downs
Wattle Downs.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

Clendon Park
Retain Mixed Housing 10 REREMANU
Suburban at 10
PLACE. Weymouth
REREMANU PLACE.
Weymouth.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 12 MYERS ROAD. Manurewa


Urban at 12 MYERS Manurewa
ROAD. Manurewa.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 37 ARNWOOD


Suburban at 37
STREET.
ARNWOOD STREET. Manurewa
Manurewa.

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 229 MAHIA ROAD. Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 229
1 ANGLERS WAY.
MAHIA ROAD. 1
Manurewa
ANGLERS WAY.
Manurewa.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 9 JELLICOE ROAD. Manurewa


Urban at 9 JELLICOE Manurewa
ROAD. Manurewa.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 10 SAMARA


Suburban at 10
PLACE. Clendon
SAMARA PLACE.
Park
Clendon Park.

Clendon Park

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the property is
within close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and
RFN. Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
a SH zone. Retaining the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the property is
within close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and
RFN. Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
a SH zone. Retaining the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

863

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2314

839-2326

839-2328

839-2342

839-2344

839-2351

839-2354

839-2361

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 9 CARNOUSTIE


Suburban at 9
DRIVE. Wattle
CARNOUSTIE DRIVE. Downs.
Wattle Downs.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 10 HALSEY ROAD. Manurewa


Urban at 10 HALSEY Manurewa
ROAD. Manurewa.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 20 NEWBEGIN


Suburban at 20
PLACE.
NEWBEGIN PLACE.
Weymouth.
Weymouth.

Clendon Park

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 31 MARR ROAD.
Manurewa.

31 MARR ROAD.
Manurewa.

Homai Station

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 219A GREAT
SOUTH ROAD.
Manurewa.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 99 SYKES
ROAD. Weymouth.

219A GREAT
SOUTH ROAD.
Manurewa.

Manurewa

99 SYKES ROAD.
Weymouth

Manurewa SouthMHS

Retain Mixed Housing 9 KAIMOANA


Suburban at 9
STREET.
KAIMOANA STREET. Weymouth
Weymouth.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 2 LYNDON PLACE. Manurewa


Suburban at 2
Manurewa
LYNDON PLACE.
Manurewa.

MHS

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

THAB

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within
close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and a RFN.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of notified THAB zone - The site is
within walking distance to Homai Train Station and Local
Centre. Retention of the THAB zone gives effects to the
objectives and policies of the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - The site is in
close proximity to Gallaher Park, Manurewa Town Centre
and RFN. Retention of the THAB zone gives effects to the
objectives and policies of the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

864

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2370

839-2380

839-2383

839-2386

839-2388

839-2401

839-2402

839-2407

839-2408

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 270 GREAT
SOUTH ROAD.
Manurewa.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 7 BEESTON
CRESCENT.
Manurewa.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

270 GREAT
SOUTH ROAD.
Manurewa

Manurewa

7 BEESTON
CRESCENT.
Manurewa

Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 131 PALMERS


Suburban at 131
ROAD. Clendon
PALMERS ROAD.
Park
Clendon Park.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 61 WAIMAHIA


Suburban at 61
AVENUE.
WAIMAHIA AVENUE. Weymouth
Weymouth.

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 86
WEYMOUTH ROAD.
WeymouthManurewa East.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 61
FERGUSON STREET.
Manurewa East.

Manurewa
86 WEYMOUTH
ROAD. WeymouthManurewa East

MHU

Manurewa

MHU

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 32 WEYMOUTH
ROAD. WeymouthManurewa East.

Manurewa
32 WEYMOUTH
ROAD. WeymouthManurewa East

61 FERGUSON
STREET.
Manurewa East

THAB

Clendon Park
Retain Mixed Housing 39 SANDWICK
Suburban at 39
DRIVE. Weymouth
SANDWICK DRIVE.
Weymouth.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 12 SAMARA


Suburban at 12
PLACE. Clendon
SAMARA PLACE.
Park
Clendon Park.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHS

MHS

REASONS

865

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within


close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and a RFN.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within
close proximity to Mountfort Park and located nearby an
arterial road. The notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within
close proximity to Te Mahia Train Station. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within


close proximity to Te Mahia Train Station. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support the retention of THAB zone - The site is in close No change


proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and within walking
distance to the RFN. Managing flooding risks on the site
does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4995

839-2421

839-2452

839-2457

839-2466

839-6744

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 29,
ROUNTREE PLACE,
Conifer Grove from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
29, ROUNTREE
PLACE, Conifer
Grove

Retain Mixed Housing 2 CELMISIA


Suburban at 2
PLACE.
CELMISIA PLACE.
Weymouth.
Weymouth.

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1 LUPTON ROAD.
Manurewa.

LOCALITY

Conifer Grove

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

1 LUPTON ROAD. Manurewa


Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 7 INNISMARA


Suburban at 7
AVENUE. Wattle
INNISMARA AVENUE. Downs
Wattle Downs.

PAUP ZONE

THAB

Manurewa SouthMHS

Manurewa
Retain Mixed Housing 12 COXHEAD
Urban at 12
ROAD. Manurewa
COXHEAD ROAD.
Manurewa.

MHU

Rezone
24,10,12,22,4,6,8,
ROUNTREE
PLACE,11,10,13,12,15
,14,17,16,19,18,22,3,
5,4,7,6,9,20,8,21,
VERNER
PLACE,2/71,65A,61,7
5,63,73,65,69,1/71,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE, Conifer Grove
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

24,10,12,22,4,6,8, Conifer Grove


ROUNTREE
PLACE,11,10,13,1
2,15,14,17,16,19,
18,22,3,5,4,7,6,9,
20,8,21, VERNER
PLACE,2/71,65A,6
1,75,63,73,65,69,
1/71,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE, Conifer
Grove

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU. MHS


is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Deletion
of Integrated Development sub-precinct B supported in
Topic 080 Council evidence. Retention of the MHS zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of THAB zone - The site is in close
proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and within walking
distance to the RFN. Managing flooding risks on the site
does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is located
nearby an arterial road with good access to Manurewa
Town Centre and a RFN. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

866

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2475

839-2481

839-2487

839-2496

839-2532

839-2539

839-1609

839-2540

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Terrace
11A JAMES ROAD. Manurewa
Housing and
Manurewa
Apartment Buildings
at 11A JAMES ROAD.
Manurewa.
Retain Mixed Housing 5 KAIMOANA
Suburban at 5
STREET.
KAIMOANA STREET. Weymouth
Weymouth.

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

THAB

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 289 MAHIA ROAD. Manurewa SouthMHS


Suburban at 289
Manurewa
MAHIA ROAD.
Manurewa.

The Gardens
Retain Mixed Housing 25 LIMOND
Suburban at 25
STREET. Randwick
LIMOND STREET.
Park.
Randwick Park.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 7 KAIMOANA


Suburban at 7
STREET.
KAIMOANA STREET. Weymouth
Weymouth.

Manurewa
Retain Mixed Housing 81 CHRISTMAS
Urban at 81
ROAD. Manurewa
CHRISTMAS ROAD.
Manurewa.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 1/7,2/7, PUKEROA Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 1/7,2/7, PLACE, Papakura.
PUKEROA PLACE,
Papakura.

MHS

Manurewa
Retain Mixed Housing 4 HOLLINBRIGG
Urban at 4
PLACE. Manurewa
HOLLINBRIGG PLACE.
Manurewa.

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of THAB zone - The site is in close


proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and within walking
distance to the RFN. Managing flooding risks on the site
does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Although the SH
zone could be applied due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is located
nearby an arterial road with good access to Manurewa
Town Centre and a RFN. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support the retention of MHU zone - the site is within
close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and a RFN.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the

867

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1704

839-1744

839-1748

839-1756

839-1762

839-1797

839-6745

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 21, CARISBROOK Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 21,
CRESCENT,
CARISBROOK
Papakura.
CRESCENT, Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 7, FAIRDALE


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 7,
AVENUE, Red Hill.
FAIRDALE AVENUE,
Red Hill.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 17, TILBROOK


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 17,
PLACE, Papakura.
TILBROOK PLACE,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 189, OLD WAIROA Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 189, OLD ROAD, Papakura.
WAIROA ROAD,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 6, PRESIDENT


Suburban at 6,
AVENUE,
PRESIDENT AVENUE, Papakura.
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 23, LIDDESDALE


Suburban at 23,
PLACE, Papakura
LIDDESDALE PLACE,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 3, CHIBNALL
PLACE,48,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE, Conifer Grove
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Conifer Grove

3, CHIBNALL
PLACE,48,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE, Conifer
Grove

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support rezoning from MHS to SH. The site is significantly
affected by flooding constraints. Rezoning to SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and recognise the flooding constraints, giving effect
to the RPS. Change proposed is out of scope (refer
Attachment F)
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

868

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

SH

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
839-1800

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 23, PUKEROA


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 23,
PLACE, Papakura.
PUKEROA PLACE,
Papakura.

MHS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2547

839-2621

839-2627

839-6746

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 52 MARR ROAD.
Manurewa.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
52 MARR ROAD.
Manurewa.

LOCALITY

Homai Station

Retain Mixed Housing 7A CLARK STREET. Manurewa


Suburban at 7A
Manurewa
CLARK STREET.
Manurewa.

Retain Mixed Housing 16A Marr Road,


Urban at Lot 2 DP
Manurewa
398305.

Rezone 59,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE,3, ROUNTREE
PLACE, Conifer Grove
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station

PAUP ZONE

THAB

MHS

MHU

59,
Conifer Grove
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE,3,
ROUNTREE PLACE,
Conifer Grove

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of notified THAB zone - The site is


within walking distance to Homai Train Station and Local
Centre. Retention of the THAB zone gives effects to the
objectives and policies of the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone - the property is within
close proximity to Homai Train Station and POS and
achieves the MHU zone objectives. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The property
is covered by the Pre 1944 Building Demolition Control
overlay however the MHU zone should be retained to
avoid spot zoning. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

869

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
839-2724

839-2746

839-2749

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 81A TEMPLETON


Suburban at 81A
PLACE. Clendon
TEMPLETON PLACE. Park
Clendon Park.

Retain Mixed Housing 51A GLOUCESTER Homai Station


Urban at 51A
ROAD. Manurewa
GLOUCESTER ROAD.
Manurewa.

MHU

Homai Station
143A RUSSELL
ROAD. Manurewa.

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 143A RUSSELL
ROAD. Manurewa.

MHS

MHU

THAB

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone - The site is within close No change
proximity to Homai Train Station and a higher level of
intensification will increase the capacity of housing with
good access to public transport. The notified zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone - The site is
No change
within walking distance to Homai Train Station and Local
Centre. Retention of the THAB zone gives effects to the
objectives and policies of the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone.

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2751

839-2752

839-1863

839-2753

839-1914

839-2816

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 3 CLARK STREET.


Suburban at 3 CLARK Manurewa
STREET. Manurewa.

LOCALITY

Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 3A CLARK STREET. Manurewa


Suburban at 3A
Manurewa
CLARK STREET.
Manurewa.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 1, TILBROOK


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 1,
PLACE, Papakura.
TILBROOK PLACE,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 1A CLARK STREET. Manurewa


Suburban at 1A
Manurewa
CLARK STREET.
Manurewa.

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 11, SUNBURST


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 11,
STREET, Papakura.
SUNBURST STREET,
Papakura.

Rezone
53,98,88,74,82,90,80,
92,86,94,96,
TRIMDON STREET,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

53,98,88,74,82,90 The Gardens


,80,92,86,94,96,
TRIMDON STREET,
Randwick Park

SH, MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - these
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

870

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No Change

No change

Meet Criteria
839-2089

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 118,118A, OLD


Suburban at
WAIROA ROAD,
118,118A, OLD
Papakura.
WAIROA ROAD,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2090

839-2177

839-2180

839-2182

839-2183

839-2187

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 60,56,58,


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at
ARTILLERY DRIVE,
60,56,58, ARTILLERY Papakura
DRIVE, Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 67,
EASTBURN
STREET,143,
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 56,58,
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura.

67, EASTBURN
Papakura - East MHS
STREET,143,
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura.

MHS

56,58, DOMINION Papakura - East MHS


ROAD, Papakura

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 13,14, YARROW


Suburban at 13,14,
LANE, Papakura.
YARROW LANE,
Papakura.

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 6,
LANSDOWN
PLACE,2/67,51A,51B,
49A,49B,59,1/67,57B,
57A,65, HEATHDALE
CRESCENT, Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

6, LANSDOWN
Papakura - East MHS
PLACE,2/67,51A,5
1B,49A,49B,59,1/
67,57B,57A,65,
HEATHDALE
CRESCENT,
Papakura.

Retain Mixed Housing 24,26, SHERALEE


Suburban at 24,26,
PLACE, Red Hill.
SHERALEE PLACE, Red
Hill.

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

871

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

Do not support retention of MHS zone at 24 Sheralee


SH/MHS
Place, support change of zone from MHS to SH. The site is
significantly affected by flooding constraints. Rezoning to
SH is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and recognise the flooding constraints, giving
effect to the RPS. This change is out of scope (refer
Attachment F).
Support retention of MHS zone at 26 Sheralee Place MHS is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not
in close proximity to the Papakura Metropolitan Centre
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. Retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2189

839-2191

839-2192

839-2822

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 13,15,17,16,19,18 Papakura - East SH, MHS


Suburban at
, FULMEN PLACE,
13,15,17,16,19,18,
Red Hill.
FULMEN PLACE, Red
Hill.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 11,1/6,10,1/9,2/9, Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at
7,8,2/6, FULMEN
11,1/6,10,1/9,2/9,7,8 PLACE, Red Hill.
,2/6, FULMEN PLACE,
Red Hill.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
2,1/3,4,2/3, FULMEN
PLACE,8, REDCREST
AVENUE, Papakura.

2,1/3,4,2/3,
Papakura - East MHS
FULMEN PLACE,8,
REDCREST
AVENUE,
Papakura

MHS

Rezone 36, COXHEAD


ROAD,27, BULLER
CRESCENT,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Urban, Single House
to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Manurewa
36, COXHEAD
ROAD,27, BULLER
CRESCENT,
Manurewa

MHU

SH, MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS on some sites. However,


support rezoning from MHS to SH on 15, 16 and 17
Fulmen Place as these sites are affected by flooding
constraints. Rezoning to SH is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and recognise the
flooding constraints, giving effect to the RPS. This change
is out of scope (refer Attachment F).
Support retention of MHS for 13, 18 and 19 Fulmen Place
as the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to the Papakura Metropolitan Centre and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. This zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support the retention of MHU zone at 36 Coxhead Road the property is within close proximity to Manurewa Town
Centre and RFN. Retaining the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

872

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH/MHS

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No Change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No Change

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 27


Buller Crescent - this site is affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-4957

Urban (South)

Rezone 2, HEYBRIDGE 2, HEYBRIDGE


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4958

839-4967

839-4968

839-4969

839-4971

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 23,
23, MCDOUGALL
MCDOUGALL STREET, STREET,
Manurewa East from Manurewa East
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 40,
WINSFORD STREET,2,
FAIRLIGHT PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 8, MAIDA
VALE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Manurewa

Manurewa
40, WINSFORD
STREET,2,
FAIRLIGHT PLACE,
Manurewa

8, MAIDA VALE,
Manurewa

Rezone 32, AARTS


AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32, AARTS
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Rezone 3, SURREY
STREET, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, SURREY
STREET,
Manurewa

Homai Station

Homai Station

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Sufficient intensification has
already been provided for around Homai Station.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

873

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4973

839-2193

839-4977

839-4980

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 21, TOTARA


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
21, TOTARA
ROAD, Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
24,25,1/20,23,18,22B
,22A,1/19,2/19,21B,2
1A,2/20, GAME
PLACE, Red Hill.

24,25,1/20,23,18, Papakura - East MHS


22B,22A,1/19,2/1
9,21B,21A,2/20,
GAME PLACE, Red
Hill.

MHS

Rezone 5, CARTER
5, CARTER PLACE, Clendon Park
PLACE, Manurewa
Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Homai Station
Rezone 88, JELLICOE 88, JELLICOE
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
change to MHS - Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The site is not
within close proximity to a centre or RFN and therefore
the area is not suitable for further intensification.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

874

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No Change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-4983

839-4991

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 12,
WINSFORD STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, WINSFORD
STREET,
Manurewa

Manurewa

Clendon Park
Rezone 51, BURUNDI 51, BURUNDI
AVENUE, Clendon
AVENUE, Clendon
Park from Mixed
Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6747

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 46,44,42,40,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE, Conifer Grove
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
46,44,42,40,
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE, Conifer
Grove

LOCALITY

Conifer Grove

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

875

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

839-4994

839-2194

839-4996

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 24,
ROSEANNE ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
24, ROSEANNE
ROAD, Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 9,3,5,3A,7,


Suburban at
PALISADE PLACE,
9,3,5,3A,7, PALISADE Red Hill.
PLACE, Red Hill.

Papakura - East SH, MHS

Rezone 8, CLARK
8, CLARK STREET, Manurewa
STREET, Manurewa Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

MHU

MHS

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support rezoning from MHS to SH on 3A, 5 and 7 Palisade SH/MHS
Place as these sites are affected by flooding constraints.
Rezoning to SH is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and recognise the flooding
constraints, giving effect to the RPS. This change is out of
scope (refer Attachment F).
This
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS for 3 and 9 Palisade Place as
the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to the Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. This zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - these
No change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-4998

Urban (South)

Rezone 3, GARTH
3, GARTH PLACE,
PLACE, Manurewa
Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Clendon Park

SH

MHS

Support change of zone from SH to MHS - Managing


MHS
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. Rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS. The surrounding block should also be rezoned
to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2195

839-5000

839-5002

839-5003

839-2199

839-2200

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 1/7,11,13,15,17,9, Papakura - East SH, MHS


Suburban at
2/7, GALILEE
1/7,11,13,15,17,9,2/7 AVENUE, Red Hill.
, GALILEE AVENUE,
Red Hill.

Rezone 17,
17, SHARLAND
SHARLAND AVENUE, AVENUE,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 15, RIRINO


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

15, RIRINO PLACE, Clendon Park


Manurewa

MHS

MHS

Rezone 33,
33, CHURCHILL
CHURCHILL AVENUE, AVENUE,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 13,15, PUKEROA


Suburban at 13,15,
PLACE, Papakura
PUKEROA PLACE,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 50,52, PUKEROA Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 50,52,
PLACE, Papakura.
PUKEROA PLACE,
Papakura.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support rezoning from MHS to SH on 7, 13 and 15 Galilee


Avenue as these sites are affected by flooding
constraints. Rezoning to SH is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone and recognise the
flooding constraints, giving effect to the RPS. This change
is out of scope (refer Attachment F).
Support retention of MHS for 3 and 9 Galilee Ave as the
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to the Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. This zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is
located within close proximity to the Manurewa Town
Centre and RFN. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,
see Attachment F.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

876

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH/MHS

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2201

839-5007

839-5032

839-5033

839-5036

839-2293

839-2491

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 60,58, PUKEROA Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 60,58,
PLACE, Papakura.
PUKEROA PLACE,
Papakura.

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 11, CARBERY 11, CARBERY
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 35,
35, SHARLAND
SHARLAND AVENUE, AVENUE,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 62, JOHN


WALKER DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

62, JOHN WALKER Clendon Park


DRIVE, Manurewa

Rezone 18,
RANGATAUA PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18, RANGATAUA Clendon Park


PLACE, Manurewa

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 9B HILL


Suburban at 9B HILL CRESCENT.
CRESCENT. Papakura. Papakura

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 196A OLD


Suburban at 196A
WAIROA ROAD.
OLD WAIROA ROAD. Papakura.
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
change to MHS - Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The site is not
within close proximity to a centre or RFN and therefore
the area is not suitable for further intensification.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

877

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5040

839-5044

839-5045

839-5048

839-5050

839-5054

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 9,
BRENTFORD PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
9, BRENTFORD
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 3,
BRENTFORD PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
3, BRENTFORD
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 28,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28, ADDINGTON
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 8, SISKA
8, SISKA PLACE,
PLACE, Wattle Downs Wattle Downs
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 393,
ROSCOMMON ROAD,
Wiri-Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

393,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD, WiriManurewa

Clendon Park

Rezone 1, SELAGO
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1, SELAGO PLACE, Clendon Park


Manurewa

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

878

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5057

839-5059

839-2500

839-5062

839-5075

839-5076

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 4, GAMBARE 4, GAMBARE


PLACE, Wattle Downs PLACE, Wattle
from Mixed Housing Downs
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 209, MAHIA


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa SouthMHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
209, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa

Retain Mixed Housing 11 YARROW


Suburban at 11
LANE. Papakura.
YARROW LANE.
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 14, BETTINA


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
14, BETTINA
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 3, BURBANK
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, BURBANK
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Rezone 50, SHIFNAL 50, SHIFNAL


DRIVE, Randwick Park DRIVE, Randwick
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

The Gardens

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

879

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5078

839-2538

839-5081

839-5084

839-5085

839-2563

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 1, HYDE
1, HYDE STREET,
STREET, Manurewa Manurewa East
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 2A SUNBURST


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 2A
STREET. Papakura.
SUNBURST STREET.
Papakura.

Rezone 432,
PORCHESTER ROAD,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

432, PORCHESTER The Gardens


ROAD, Takanini

Rezone 22, HINTON


PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
22, HINTON
PLACE, Weymouth

Clendon Park
Rezone 12, LANDETTE 12, LANDETTE
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Retain Mixed Housing 4 CARISBROOK


Suburban at 4
CRESCENT.
CARISBROOK
Papakura.
CRESCENT. Papakura.

SH

MHS

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

880

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is


MHU
located within close proximity to the Manurewa Town
Centre, Gallaher Park and a RFN. Increased density in this
location achieves the objectives of the MHU zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support change of zone from SH to MHS - managing
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. MHS is the most appropriate zone for the site as
it is not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5086

839-2817

839-5093

839-5096

839-5099

839-5102

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Clendon Park
Rezone 46,
46, MONCRIEFF
MONCRIEFF AVENUE, AVENUE, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 21,21A,
FERNAIG STREET,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 8, ADAMS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21,21A, FERNAIG Papakura - East SH


STREET, Papakura

Rezone 110,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

110, ROWANDALE Clendon Park


AVENUE,
Manurewa

Rezone 65, GREAT


SOUTH ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

REASONS

881

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone to MHS. These sites are
No change
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
8, ADAMS ROAD, Manurewa
Manurewa

65, GREAT SOUTH Manurewa


ROAD, Manurewa

Clendon Park
Rezone 15, CARTER 15, CARTER
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is
located on a RFN and has good access to Manurewa
Town Centre and Manurewa Train Station. Increased
density along this transport corridor achieves the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Adjoining properties also need to be rezoned to MHU
(out of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - The site
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5103

839-5104

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 129,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
129,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 63,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE,1, AARTS
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

63, ROWANDALE Homai Station


AVENUE,1, AARTS
AVENUE,
Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

882

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2824

839-5113

839-2825

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 2,4,
2,4, PEMBROOK Papakura - East SH/MHS
PEMBROOK STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Rezone 190, BROWNS 190, BROWNS


ROAD, Wiri from
ROAD, Wiri
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 3,5, WING


CRESCENT,137,
DOMINION
ROAD,50,52,
EASTBURN STREET,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Clendon Park

MHS

3,5, WING
Papakura - East SH, MHS
CRESCENT,137,
DOMINION
ROAD,50,52,
EASTBURN
STREET, Papakura

MHS

MHU

MHS

Support rezoning from SH to MHS on 2 Pembrook Street SH/MHS


where managing flooding risks on those sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. This rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS. Support retention of MHS for
4 Pembrook Street as the most appropriate zone for the
site as it is not in close proximity to the Papakura
Metropolitan Centre and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. This zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support rezoning from SH to MHS as managing flood
MHS
risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2826

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 10, ORPHEUS


PLACE,39,41,
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

10, ORPHEUS
Papakura - East SH, MHS
PLACE,39,41,
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

883

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support rezoning from SH to MHS at 10 Orpheus Place,


SH/MHS
Papakura as managing flood risks on these sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5122

839-2827

839-5133

839-5141

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 21,
21, MOUNTFORT Manurewa
MOUNTFORT STREET, STREET,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 10, WINIATA


TERRACE,9, CARGILL
STREET, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

10, WINIATA
TERRACE,9,
CARGILL STREET,
Papakura

Papakura - East SH, MHS

Rezone 83,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
83,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

Manurewa
Rezone 34, BOWATER 34, BOWATER
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from SH to MHS as managing flood
MHS
risks on these sites does not require maintaining a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is
MHU
located within close proximity to the Manurewa Town
Centre and RFN. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2828

839-2830

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
10A,12A,1/33,1/35,2
2,10B,1/27A,28,2/27
A,2,6,2/35,2/33,1/4,2
5,12B,8,2/4,14,1/26,1
/27,39,1/23,16,18,31,
37,1/29,2/29,2/27,2/
26,2/23, ELSIE
MORTON PLACE,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

10A,12A,1/33,1/3 Papakura - East SH, MHS


5,22,10B,1/27A,2
8,2/27A,2,6,2/35,
2/33,1/4,25,12B,8
,2/4,14,1/26,1/27,
39,1/23,16,18,31,
37,1/29,2/29,2/27
,2/26,2/23, ELSIE
MORTON PLACE,
Papakura

Rezone
13,17,1/9,1,2/9,3,7,5
B,1/11,2/11,5A,1/15,
2/15, JACK FARRELL
PLACE,43A,43B,45,41
, HEATHDALE
CRESCENT, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

13,17,1/9,1,2/9,3, Papakura - East SH, MHS


7,5B,1/11,2/11,5A
,1/15,2/15, JACK
FARRELL
PLACE,43A,43B,45
,41, HEATHDALE
CRESCENT,
Papakura

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

Support rezoning at 10 and 12 Elsie Morton Place from


SH to MHS as managing flood risks on these sites does
not require maintaining a SH zone. Support retention of
the MHS to other sites. The MHS zone is appropriate for
the sites given their distance from the Papakura
Metropolitan Centre and is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.

884

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH/MHS

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
MHS

Support rezoning at 1, 7, 9, and 1/11 Jack Farrell Place


from SH to MHS as managing flood risks on these sites
does not require maintaining a SH zone. Support
retention of the MHS to other sites. The MHS zone is
appropriate for the sites given their distance from the
Papakura Metropolitan Centre and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone.

SH/MHS

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
839-5142

839-2831

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 5,
ALBERTSON PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
5, ALBERTSON
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone
12,1/22,1/20,16,18,2
/20,1/4,6,8,2/10,1/10
,2/4,2/22,2/14,1/14,
JACK FARRELL PLACE,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

12,1/22,1/20,16,1 Papakura - East SH, MHS


8,2/20,1/4,6,8,2/1
0,1/10,2/4,2/22,2
/14,1/14, JACK
FARRELL PLACE,
Papakura

MHS

MHU

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning at 6, 8 and 10 Jack Farrell Place from SH SH/MHS
to MHS as managing flood risks on these sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. Support retention of the
MHS to other sites. The MHS zone appropriate for the
sites given their distance from the Papakura
Metropolitan Centre and is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5152

839-5155

839-5168

839-5029

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa
Rezone 43, RUSSELL 43, RUSSELL
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 6, HEYBRIDGE 6, HEYBRIDGE


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 22,
FROBISHER WAY,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

22, FROBISHER
WAY, Clendon
Park

MHS

Rezone 21, CARGILL 21, CARGILL


Papakura - East SH
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the


property is not adjacent to the Manurewa Town Centre
and is not suitable for further intensification. Sufficient
additional growth has been provided for in the areas
within close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre
and spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHU is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it acts as a transition between THAB
and MHS. The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone to MHS. These sites are
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

885

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5171

Urban (South)

Rezone 15,
FEASEGATE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15, FEASEGATE
STREET,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5175

839-5178

839-5181

839-5182

839-5041

839-5119

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 2, CARBERY
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 9, DOMAIN
ROAD, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Clendon Park
2, CARBERY
PLACE, Manurewa

9, DOMAIN ROAD, Clendon Park


Weymouth

Rezone 13, FRANCES 13, FRANCES


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manurewa

Homai Station
Rezone 136, RUSSELL 136, RUSSELL
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

Rezone 37, CARGILL 37, CARGILL


Papakura - East SH
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

MHS

Rezone 2, LEILANI
PLACE, Red Hill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

2, LEILANI PLACE, Papakura - East MHS


Red Hill

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the
property is not adjacent to the Manurewa Town Centre
and is not suitable for further intensification. Sufficient
additional growth has been provided for in the areas
within close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre
and spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHU is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it acts as a transition between THAB
and MHS. Managing flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The notified zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support the rezoning of this site as although the SH zone
could be retained due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context.
Support rezoning from MHS to SH. The site is significantly
affected by flooding constraints. Rezoning to SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and recognise the flooding constraints, giving effect
to the RPS. This change is out of scope (refer Attachment
F)

886

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

SH

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5183

839-5190

839-5191

839-5195

839-5131

839-5300

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 14, BUNDENA 14, BUNDENA


PLACE, Clendon Park PLACE, Clendon
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 406,
ROSCOMMON ROAD,
Wiri-Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

406,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD, WiriManurewa

Rezone 16,
SUNLANDS DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
16, SUNLANDS
DRIVE, Manurewa

Rezone 77,
GLOUCESTER ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

77, GLOUCESTER Manurewa


ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 36, REDCREST 36, REDCREST


AVENUE, Papakura
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Papakura
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 49,
49, VALENTINE
Papakura - East MHS
VALENTINE STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site. As it is not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support the rezoning of this site as although the SH zone
could be retained due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. The SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone

887

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5199

839-5205

839-5206

839-5211

839-5213

839-5226

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 15, HINTON


PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
15, HINTON
PLACE, Weymouth

Rezone 23,
SOUTHVIEW PLACE,
Wattle Downs from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

23, SOUTHVIEW
PLACE, Wattle
Downs

Rezone 53,
53, CHURCHILL
CHURCHILL AVENUE, AVENUE,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 31, MON
DESIR PLACE,
Manurewa from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

Manurewa

Clendon Park
31, MON DESIR
PLACE, Manurewa

Clendon Park
Rezone 17, YEARSLEY 17, YEARSLEY
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 17, CLARK


17, CLARK STREET, Manurewa
STREET, Manurewa Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is
located within close proximity to the Manurewa Town
Centre and RFN. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,
see Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
change to MHS - The site is not within close proximity to
a centre or RFN and therefore the area is not suitable for
further intensification. Although the SH zone could be
retained due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location
a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the
local context. The rezoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - these
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

888

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7434

839-5227

839-5239

839-5240

839-5246

839-5250

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone Lot 2 DP
397587 from
Papakura Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 9,
BEDLINGTON
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
N/A

LOCALITY

Takinini

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Unclear where this property is - legal description not


found in Council's system

889

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

N/A
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

9, BEDLINGTON
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

Rezone 24,
24, SHARLAND
SHARLAND AVENUE, AVENUE,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 41,
ROSEMEAD PLACE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

The Gardens

41, ROSEMEAD
PLACE, Randwick
Park

MHS

SH

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 5, SEALORD
5, SEALORD
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 3, PITT
3, PITT AVENUE,
AVENUE, Clendon
Clendon Park
Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
change to MHS - Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The site is not
within close proximity to a centre or RFN and therefore
the area is not suitable for further intensification.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone in part - areas
surrounding the Clendon Park Local Centre are suited to
be rezoned to THAB and MHU to create a compact urban
form, refer to Attachment F for out of scope changes.
Properties not within walking distance to Clendon Park
Local Centre should remain MHS. The rezoning, as shown
in Attachment E - S11a proposed zoning map, is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS,
MHU and THAB zones and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone to THAB - the sites are located
around the Clendon Park Local Centre and POS and are
suitable for intensification. Increased density in this
location will promote a walkable neighbourhood and
could improve the vitality of the centre. The area is not
currently serviced by a RFN, however it is connected by
buses to Manurewa Train Station. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
THAB

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5255

839-5309

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 16,
16, CASTLEFINN Clendon Park
CASTLEFINN DRIVE, DRIVE, Manurewa
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 63,
63, EASTBURN
Papakura - East SH
EASTBURN STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

REASONS

890

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support a change to THAB and support change to MHU


MHU - the site is not located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient
intensification has been provided for in areas directly
adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
This site is affected by flooding constraints and retaining No change
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-5256

839-5259

839-5261

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 52,
CASTLEFINN DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

52, CASTLEFINN Clendon Park


DRIVE, Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 58, MAICH


58, MAICH ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

36, MYERS ROAD, Manurewa


Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 36, MYERS


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

THAB

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the No change
property is not adjacent to the Manurewa Town Centre
and is not suitable for further intensification. Sufficient
additional growth has been provided for in the areas
within close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre
and spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHU is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it acts as a transition between THAB
and MHS. The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5263

839-5266

839-5267

839-5268

839-5272

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 45, RIMU


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
45, RIMU ROAD,
Manurewa

LOCALITY

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 117, RUSSELL 117 Russell Road, Homai Station


ROAD, Manurewa
Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Rezone 269,
269, WEYMOUTH Clendon Park
WEYMOUTH ROAD, ROAD, Clendon
WeymouthPark
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 253,
253, WEYMOUTH Clendon Park
WEYMOUTH ROAD, ROAD, Clendon
WeymouthPark
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 6, NIELD
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6, NIELD ROAD,
Manurewa

Manurewa

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

891

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHU The site is
MHU
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and POS.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
maintaing a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The adjoining properties
(113, 115, 119 Russell Road) also need to be rezoned to
MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS THAB
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS THAB


is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5273

839-5275

839-5284

839-5285

839-5287

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 32, MAIDA


VALE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
32, MAIDA VALE,
Manurewa

LOCALITY

Homai Station

Manurewa

Rezone 50,
WINSFORD STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

50, WINSFORD
STREET,
Manurewa

Rezone
289,285,287,291,
WEYMOUTH ROAD,
WeymouthManurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

289,285,287,291, Clendon Park


WEYMOUTH
ROAD, Clendon
Park

Rezone 46, HALSEY


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

46, HALSEY ROAD, Manurewa


Manurewa

Homai Station
Rezone 13, AWAKINO 13, AWAKINO
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

892

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - MHS THAB
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - the site is


MHU
located adjacent to a Neighbourhood Centre and is
within close proximity to a RFN and therefore achieves
the objectives of the MHU zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5288

839-5312

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Homai Station
Rezone 4, SUNLANDS 4, SUNLANDS
DRIVE, Manurewa
DRIVE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 2,
2, BRIGHTWELL
Papakura - East SH
BRIGHTWELL STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

REASONS

893

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
This site is affected by flooding constraints and retaining No change
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5289

839-5302

839-5303

839-5306

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 37,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
37,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 148,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
148,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 154,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
154,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 9A,15,
GAMBARE PLACE,
Wattle Downs from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9A,15, GAMBARE Manurewa SouthMHS


PLACE, Wattle
Downs

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5366

839-5307

839-5371

839-5468

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 28,
CHRISARDA PLACE,
Red Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 42, RIMU
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28, CHRISARDA
PLACE, Red Hill

Rezone 3, YANG
PLACE, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, YANG PLACE,
Papakura

42, RIMU ROAD,


Manurewa

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Papakura - East MHS

Manurewa

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 1, CARGILL
1, CARGILL
Papakura - East SH
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
This site is affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to
the RPS.

894

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5311

839-5316

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 70, GREAT


SOUTH ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

70, GREAT SOUTH Manurewa


ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 29,
29, INNISMARA
INNISMARA AVENUE, AVENUE, Wattle
Wattle Downs from Downs
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is


MHU
located on a RFN and has good access to Manurewa
Town Centre and Manurewa Train Station. Increased
density along this transport corridor achieves the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Adjoining properties also need to be rezoned to MHU
(out of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone to MHU - MHS is the most No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Although the SH
zone could be applied due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5319

839-5320

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 24,
CHRISTMAS ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Manurewa
24, CHRISTMAS
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 8, ROSEMEAD 8, ROSEMEAD


PLACE, Randwick Park PLACE, Randwick
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

The Gardens

Rezone 11, MAIDA


VALE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

895

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the
No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5324

839-5328

839-5330

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

11, MAIDA VALE,


Manurewa

Rezone 5, PAWA
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, PAWA PLACE,
Manurewa

Rezone 31,
FROBISHER WAY,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31, FROBISHER
WAY, Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Sufficient intensification has
already been provided for around Homai Station.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5334

839-5335

839-5511

839-5338

839-5340

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 12, WAI ITI


12, WAI ITI PLACE, Clendon Park
PLACE, Clendon Park Clendon Park
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 39,
FROBISHER WAY,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39, FROBISHER
WAY, Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

Rezone 25, SHEEHAN 25, SHEEHAN


AVENUE, Papakura
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Papakura
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 24, RIMU


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Submission number
and address do not
match up.

Manurewa

24, RIMU ROAD,


Manurewa

Clendon Park
Rezone 21, YEARSLEY 21, YEARSLEY
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Submission number
and address do not
match up.

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support


change to MHS - Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The site is not
within close proximity to a centre or RFN and therefore
the area is not suitable for further intensification.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

896

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5343

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 60,
GREENMEADOWS
AVENUE, Manurewa
East from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Submission number
and address do not
match up.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Manurewa
60,
GREENMEADOWS
AVENUE,
Manurewa East

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

897

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5585

Urban (South)

Rezone 13, RESOLUTE 13, RESOLUTE


WAY, Papakura from WAY, Papakura
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - East SH

MHU

Support rezoning from SH to MHS where managing flood MHS


risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5345

Urban (South)

Rezone 78, JOHN


WALKER DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban. Submission
number and address
do not match up.

78, JOHN WALKER Clendon Park


DRIVE, Manurewa

Rezone 36, POUTINI


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Submission number
and address do not
match up.

Clendon Park
36, POUTINI
PLACE, Manurewa

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - The site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5347

Urban (South)

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5348

Urban (South)

Rezone 52,
52, SHARLAND
SHARLAND AVENUE, AVENUE,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Submission number
and address do not
match up.

Clendon Park

MHS

THAB

Do not support a change of zone from MHS to THAB,


MHU
support change to MHU - the site is not located in close
walking distance from the Clendon Park Local Centre,
sufficient intensification has been provided for in areas
directly adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. Managing flooding risks
on the site does not require a SH zone. The rezoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5350

839-5606

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 19, POUTINI


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Submission number
and address do not
match up.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Clendon Park
19, POUTINI
PLACE, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 56, CARGILL 56, CARGILL


Papakura - East SH
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

REASONS

898

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support rezoning from SH to MHS where managing flood No change
risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5353

839-5357

839-5645

839-5358

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 400,
ROSCOMMON ROAD,
Wiri-Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

400,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD, WiriManurewa

Clendon Park

Rezone 4,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, ADDINGTON
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

Rezone 9, IGLOO
PLACE, Red Hill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9, IGLOO PLACE,
Red Hill

Rezone 6, ROMNEY
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
6, ROMNEY
PLACE, Manurewa

MHS

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support
Proximity constraints

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5360

839-5362

839-5363

839-5660

839-5365

839-5367

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 74,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

74, ROWANDALE Clendon Park


AVENUE,
Manurewa

Rezone 21,
CLAYMORE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21, CLAYMORE
STREET,
Manurewa

Rezone 11, WHITE


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, WHITE ROAD, Homai Station


Manurewa

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

Rezone 40,
40, VALENTINE
Papakura - East SH
VALENTINE STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

MHS

Rezone 84,
84, MCANNALLEY Manurewa
MCANNALLEY
STREET,
STREET, Manurewa Manurewa East
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 7, BRENT
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7, BRENT PLACE, Homai Station


Manurewa

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification will increase the capacity of
housing with good access to public transport. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Surrounding properties need to be rezoned to MHU (out
of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Support the rezoning of SH on this site to MHS as
managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. MHS is the most appropriate zone
for the sites as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

899

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5369

839-5911

839-5370

839-5372

839-5378

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Clendon Park
Rezone 9, BURUNDI 9, BURUNDI
AVENUE, Clendon
AVENUE, Clendon
Park from Mixed
Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 66,
66, VALENTINE
Papakura - East SH
VALENTINE STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Rezone 29,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 9, TUNA
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 159, MAHIA


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29, ADDINGTON
AVENUE,
Manurewa

9, TUNA PLACE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
159, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support the rezoning of SH on this site to MHS as
managing flooding risks on this site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. MHS is the most appropriate zone
for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Sufficient intensification has
already been provided for around Homai Station.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone to MHU - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Although the SH
zone could be applied due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

900

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5379

839-5380

839-5381

839-5384

839-6010

839-5385

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 174, MAHIA


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
174, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 3, BECKER
DRIVE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, BECKER DRIVE, Clendon Park


Weymouth

Rezone 19, MCDIVITT 19, MCDIVITT


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 7, SISKA
7, SISKA PLACE,
PLACE, Wattle Downs Wattle Downs
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 14, RESOLUTE 14, RESOLUTE


WAY, Papakura from WAY, Papakura
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 15, ANTALYA 15, ANTALYA
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone to MHU - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Although the SH
zone could be applied due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for this site as it is not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

901

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5387

839-5390

839-5392

839-5395

839-5396

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 5, ADEN
5, ADEN PLACE,
PLACE, Clendon Park Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 5, ROMNEY
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 7, HARROW
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
5, ROMNEY
PLACE, Manurewa

Homai Station
7, HARROW
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 2, RAKO
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2, RAKO PLACE,
Manurewa

Rezone 160,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,2, JOHN
WALKER DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

160,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,2, JOHN
WALKER DRIVE,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Sufficient intensification has
already been provided for around Homai Station.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

902

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5397

839-6011

839-5399

839-5405

839-5408

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 241, GREAT 241, GREAT


SOUTH ROAD,
SOUTH ROAD,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Manurewa

Rezone 22,
22, HEATHDALE
HEATHDALE
CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Papakura Papakura
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 33,
CHRISTMAS ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33, CHRISTMAS Manurewa


ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 40,
FROBISHER WAY,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

40, FROBISHER
WAY, Clendon
Park

Rezone 9, GIBBONS
ROAD, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
9, GIBBONS
ROAD, Weymouth

Clendon Park

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the


property is not adjacent to the Manurewa Town Centre
and is not suitable for further intensification. Sufficient
additional growth has been provided for in the areas
within close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre
and spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHU is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it acts as a transition between THAB
and MHS. Managing flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The notified zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for this site as it is not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

903

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5412

839-5415

839-5416

839-5417

839-5419

839-5422

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 3, SLIM
3, SLIM PLACE,
PLACE, Clendon Park Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 11, SMEDLEY 11, SMEDLEY


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 40,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

40, ROWANDALE Clendon Park


AVENUE,
Manurewa

Rezone 18, CARTER


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
18, CARTER
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 16,
16, KENNINGTON Clendon Park
KENNINGTON DRIVE, DRIVE, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 11,
CRAMPTON PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
11, CRAMPTON
PLACE, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the

904

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6083

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 22, RESOLUTE 22, RESOLUTE


WAY, Papakura from WAY, Papakura
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - East SH

Rezone 14, AARTS


AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

905

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

This site is affected by flooding constraints and retaining No change


the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5423

839-5426

839-5429

839-6100

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

14, AARTS
AVENUE,
Manurewa

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 25A, PITT
25A, PITT
AVENUE, Clendon
AVENUE, Clendon
Park from Mixed
Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 61, PALLANT 61, PALLANT


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 19,
19, DOMINION
DOMINION ROAD,
ROAD, Papakura
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Papakura - East SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
This site is affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5433

839-6111

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 3, BROOK
3, BROOK HAVEN Clendon Park
HAVEN RISE, Clendon RISE, Clendon
Park from Mixed
Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 31A,
31A, SHEEHAN
SHEEHAN AVENUE,
AVENUE,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6126

839-5437

839-5457

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 2/129,1/129, 2/129,1/129, OLD Papakura - East MHS


OLD WAIROA ROAD, WAIROA ROAD,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 26,
26, KENNINGTON Clendon Park
KENNINGTON DRIVE, DRIVE, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

Rezone 35, RIVERTON 35, RIVERTON


DRIVE, Randwick Park DRIVE, Randwick
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

The Gardens

MHS

Rezone 16,
16, HEATHDALE
HEATHDALE
CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Papakura Papakura
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Papakura - East SH

Rezone 103,
HYPERION DRIVE,
Randwick Park from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 7, CRISPIAN
PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

103, HYPERION
DRIVE, Randwick
Park

The Gardens

Rezone 6,
RANGATAUA PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
6, RANGATAUA
PLACE, Manurewa

MHU

REASONS

906

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the
No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6136

839-5466

839-5469

839-5471

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

MHS

This site is affected by flooding constraints and retaining No change


the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to
the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

SH

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - The site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Clendon Park
7, CRISPIAN
PLACE, Weymouth

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
MHU
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5472

839-5473

839-5477

839-5479

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 91,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
91,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 17,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
17,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Clendon Park
Rezone 52,
52, MONCRIEFF
MONCRIEFF AVENUE, AVENUE, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
Rezone 56,
56, MONCRIEFF
MONCRIEFF AVENUE, AVENUE, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Although the SH zone could be
applied due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location
a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the
local context. The notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Although the SH zone could be
applied due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location
a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the
local context. The notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives

907

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5480

839-5486

839-5491

839-5496

839-5497

839-6174

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Clendon Park
Rezone 36,
36, FINLAYSON
FINLAYSON AVENUE, AVENUE, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 396,
ROSCOMMON ROAD,
Wiri-Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

396,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD, WiriManurewa

Rezone 179,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
179,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 41, PALLANT 41, PALLANT


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 114,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

114, ROWANDALE Clendon Park


AVENUE,
Manurewa

Rezone 158C, OLD


158C, OLD
WAIROA ROAD,
WAIROA ROAD,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

908

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6740

839-6742

839-5499

839-7335

839-5508

839-7337

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 29,29A,
29,29A, FERNAIG Papakura - East SH
FERNAIG STREET,
STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 11,10, YANG 11,10, YANG


PLACE, Papakura
PLACE, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 18, HYWELL


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
18, HYWELL
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 36, CARGILL


STREET,15,
PRESIDENT AVENUE,
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

36, CARGILL
STREET,15,
PRESIDENT
AVENUE,
Papakura

MHS

Papakura - East SH, MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 7, TROUNSON 7, TROUNSON
AVENUE, Clendon
AVENUE, Clendon
Park from Mixed
Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 56,58,
56,58, VALENTINE Papakura - East SH
VALENTINE STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone at 29A Fernaig Street,


Papakura - MHS is the most appropriate zone for the sites
as they are not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS. Do not support
rezoning of 29 Fernaig Street, Papakura from SH to MHS
as this site is affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of SH zone at 36 Cargill Street - SH is
the most appropriate zone as this site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS. Support rezoning
of site at 15 President Avenue from SH to MHS where
managing flood risks on these sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Support the rezoning of sites from SH to MHS as
managing flood risks on these sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone.

909

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
SH/MHS

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS
MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5513

839-5515

839-5517

839-5521

839-5523

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 9, HINTON
PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

9, HINTON PLACE, Clendon Park


Weymouth

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Manurewa
Rezone 3, BARNARD 3, BARNARD
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
East from Mixed
East
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Manurewa
Rezone 6, BARNARD 6, BARNARD
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
East from Mixed
East
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 28,
SOUTHVIEW PLACE,
Wattle Downs from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28, SOUTHVIEW
PLACE, Wattle
Downs

Rezone 7, HOBMAN
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
7, HOBMAN
PLACE, Manurewa

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The
site is in close proximity to Te Mahia Train Station,
however Te Mahia has not been identified as a centre
and intensification here may compete with Manurewa
Town Centre. Sufficient additional growth has been
provided for surrounding Manurewa Town Centre which
is more appropriate for intensification. The notified
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU The
properties are in close proximity to Te Mahia Train
Station, however Te Mahia has not been identified as a
centre and intensification here may compete with
Manurewa Town Centre. Sufficient additional growth has
been provided for surrounding Manurewa Town Centre
which is more appropriate for intensification. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

910

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5524

839-5526

839-5529

839-5541

839-5543

839-5546

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 202, BROWNS 202, BROWNS


ROAD, Wiri from
ROAD, Wiri
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 30,
FROBISHER WAY,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

30, FROBISHER
WAY, Clendon
Park

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Rezone 77, PALMERS 77, PALMERS


ROAD, Clendon Park ROAD, Clendon
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 15, VOLANTE 15, VOLANTE


AVENUE, Wattle
AVENUE, Wattle
Downs from Mixed
Downs
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 49,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
49,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 5, ANTALYA
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
5, ANTALYA
PLACE, Manurewa

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

911

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5559

839-5560

839-5561

839-5569

839-5570

839-7340

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 58,
CASTLEFINN DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 64,
CASTLEFINN DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

58, CASTLEFINN Clendon Park


DRIVE, Manurewa

64, CASTLEFINN Clendon Park


DRIVE, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Rezone 43,
43, CASTLEFINN Clendon Park
CASTLEFINN DRIVE, DRIVE, Manurewa
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

102, ROWANDALE Clendon Park


AVENUE,
Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 102,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 19, HYDE


19, HYDE STREET, Manurewa
STREET, Manurewa Manurewa East
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone
47B,47A,47,45,45 Papakura - East MHS
47B,47A,47,45,45A,4 A,45B, KELVIN
5B, KELVIN ROAD,
ROAD, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

912

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB - MHS is the
No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose in Part
Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian
access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5573

839-5580

839-5581

839-5583

839-7341

839-5584

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 12, CARTER


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
12, CARTER
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 15, MINTON


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
15, MINTON
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 39, AARTS


AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39, AARTS
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Rezone 95,
GLOUCESTER ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

95, GLOUCESTER Manurewa


ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 53C,53A,
KELVIN ROAD,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 14, SURREY
STREET, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

53C,53A, KELVIN
ROAD, Papakura

14, SURREY
STREET,
Manurewa

Homai Station

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

Manurewa

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

913

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5591

839-5592

839-5594

839-5596

839-5597

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 92,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Homai Station
92,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 12, VOLANTE 12, VOLANTE


AVENUE, Wattle
AVENUE, Wattle
Downs from Mixed
Downs
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

73, HEYBRIDGE
STREET,
Manurewa

Rezone 52,
HEYBRIDGE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

52, HEYBRIDGE
STREET,
Manurewa

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 47, BURUNDI 47, BURUNDI
AVENUE, Clendon
AVENUE, Clendon
Park from Mixed
Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 73,
HEYBRIDGE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa

Manurewa

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

914

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5598

839-5599

839-7342

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 17, RIMU


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

17, RIMU ROAD,


Manurewa

Rezone 2,
BEDLINGTON
AVENUE,107,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
2, BEDLINGTON
AVENUE,107,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 37,
EASTBURN
STREET,24,26,22,
HARPER STREET,8,7,
LIDDY PLACE,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

37, EASTBURN
Papakura - East MHS
STREET,24,26,22,
HARPER
STREET,8,7, LIDDY
PLACE, Papakura

MHU

Rezone 70,
GLOUCESTER ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

70, GLOUCESTER Homai Station


ROAD, Manurewa

MHU

Rezone 27, BECKER


DRIVE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
27, BECKER
DRIVE, Weymouth

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

915

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5603

839-5609

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is


MHU
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification here will increase the
capacity of housing with good access to public transport.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5610

839-5613

839-5615

839-5617

839-7343

839-5619

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 10,
SWALLOW DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
10, SWALLOW
DRIVE, Manurewa

Rezone 8,
TAMWORTH CLOSE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
8, TAMWORTH
CLOSE, Manurewa

Rezone 34,
TAMWORTH CLOSE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34, TAMWORTH Clendon Park


CLOSE, Manurewa

Rezone 149,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
149,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 11,10,12,
HARRIER PLACE,10,
EASTBURN STREET,
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

11,10,12,
Papakura - East SH
HARRIER
PLACE,10,
EASTBURN
STREET, Papakura

Rezone 23, SMEDLEY 23, SMEDLEY


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. Managing flooding risks on the site does
not require a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties
need to be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change to MHU. These sites are affected
by flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

916

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

No change

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Clendon Park

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5622

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

The Gardens

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 12,
ADVOCATE PLACE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, ADVOCATE
PLACE, Randwick
Park

MHS

Rezone 3,
MCDOUGALL
STREET,19, LINCOLN
ROAD, Manurewa
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

3, MCDOUGALL
STREET,19,
LINCOLN ROAD,
Manurewa East

Rezone 59,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
59,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 3, TRIMDON
STREET, Randwick
Park from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

The Gardens
3, TRIMDON
STREET, Randwick
Park

Rezone 17,
CHRISTMAS ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
17, CHRISTMAS
ROAD, Manurewa

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

917

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5623

839-5624

839-5625

839-5626

839-5627

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Manurewa

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - The site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

The Gardens
Rezone 26, TRIMDON 26, TRIMDON
STREET, Randwick
STREET, Randwick
Park from Single
Park
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

MHS

SH

MHU

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - The site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5632

839-5634

839-7344

839-7345

839-5643

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 292, MAHIA


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Clendon Park
292, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa

Clendon Park
Rezone 12, FUNNELL 12, FUNNELL
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 5,6, HARRIER 5,6, HARRIER


PLACE, Papakura
PLACE, Papakura
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 2,4, HARRIER
PLACE,12, EASTBURN
STREET,11,9,13,
WING CRESCENT,
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 24,
RANGATAUA PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Papakura - East SH

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change to MHU. These sites are affected No change
by flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

2,4, HARRIER
Papakura - East SH
PLACE,12,
EASTBURN
STREET,11,9,13,
WING CRESCENT,
Papakura

24, RANGATAUA Clendon Park


PLACE, Manurewa

REQUESTED
ZONE

918

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 13


SH/MHS
Wing Crescent, support change to MHS as an alternative
zone - MHS is the most appropriate zone for the site as it
is not in close proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 2, 4
Harrier Place, 12 Eastburn Street and 9, 11 Wing Cresent these sites are affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give
effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
MHU
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5647

839-5648

839-5649

839-5650

839-5651

839-5656

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Homai Station
Rezone 17, HARROW 17, HARROW
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 179,
179, WEYMOUTH Manurewa
WEYMOUTH ROAD, ROAD, WeymouthWeymouthManurewa East
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 49,
49, SHARLAND
SHARLAND AVENUE, AVENUE,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 23,
RANGATAUA PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

23, RANGATAUA Clendon Park


PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 1, MINTON
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1, MINTON PLACE, Manurewa


Manurewa

Rezone 138,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

138, ROWANDALE Clendon Park


AVENUE,
Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

919

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5657

839-5658

839-7346

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 42, WATTS


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

42, WATTS ROAD, Homai Station


Manurewa

Rezone 9, HEALY
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9, HEALY ROAD,
Manurewa

Homai Station

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Rezone
10,12B,4,8,12A, Papakura - East SH, MHS
10,12B,4,8,12A,
WING CRESCENT,
WING CRESCENT,
Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

920

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is


MHU
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification will increase the capacity of
housing with good access to public transport. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Surrounding properties need to be rezoned to MHU (out
of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is
MHU
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification will increase the capacity of
housing with good access to public transport. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Surrounding properties need to be rezoned to MHU (out
of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at 12A No change
and 12B Wing Crescent - MHS is the most appropriate
zone for these sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 4, 8,


10 Wing Crescent - these sites are affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and give effect to the RPS.
Meet Criteria
839-5659

839-5661

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 3, FROBISHER 3, FROBISHER


WAY, Clendon Park
WAY, Clendon
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 68,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Manurewa
68,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5664

839-5669

839-5671

839-7348

839-5672

839-5679

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 4, FROBISHER 4, FROBISHER


WAY, Clendon Park
WAY, Clendon
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 24, MCDIVITT 24, MCDIVITT


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 177, MAHIA


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS
177, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 67A,67,
67A,67, KELVIN
KELVIN ROAD,
ROAD, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 11, SISKA


11, SISKA PLACE,
PLACE, Wattle Downs Wattle Downs
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Homai Station
Rezone 23, ROMNEY 23, ROMNEY
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone.
Managing flooding risks on the sites does not require a
SH zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

921

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5682

839-5683

839-5684

839-5690

839-5695

839-5714

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 4, MINTON
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

4, MINTON PLACE, Manurewa


Manurewa

Rezone 11,
11, SHARLAND
SHARLAND AVENUE, AVENUE,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 15,
SUNLANDS DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
15, SUNLANDS
DRIVE, Manurewa

Rezone 13,
PRIMROSE PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
13, PRIMROSE
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 26,
SUNLANDS DRIVE,47,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

26, SUNLANDS
DRIVE,47,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

Rezone 23, STOLL


23, STOLL PLACE, Clendon Park
PLACE, Clendon Park Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

922

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5716

839-5721

839-5724

839-7349

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 23,
23, KENNINGTON Clendon Park
KENNINGTON DRIVE, DRIVE, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.
Rezone 22,
SOUTHVIEW PLACE,
Wattle Downs from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

22, SOUTHVIEW
PLACE, Wattle
Downs

Rezone 2,
BLACKGATE
PLACE,30, TAITIMU
DRIVE, Weymouth
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

2, BLACKGATE
PLACE,30,
TAITIMU DRIVE,
Weymouth

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

Clendon Park

SH

Rezone 8,6, HARPER 8,6, HARPER


Papakura - East SH
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support retention of MHS zone - the sites are


within the Mill Road Precinct and have been subject to
zoning changes due to the precinct provisions. Support
rezoning to SH - refer to Mill Road Precinct evidence.
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and the relevant precinct
objectives, and gives effect to the RPS. This is an out of
scope change - see Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone to MHU - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Although the SH
zone could be applied due to the site being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. Retention of the MHS zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
change to MHS - Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The sites are not
within close proximity to a centre or RFN and therefore
the area is not suitable for further intensification.
Managing flooding risks on the sites does not require a
SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the sites
are affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

923

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5727

839-5730

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 8,
CRAMPTON PLACE,
Manurewa from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 18, SMEDLEY
STREET, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
8, CRAMPTON
PLACE, Manurewa

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

18, SMEDLEY
STREET,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5731

839-5735

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa
Rezone 7, BARNARD 7, BARNARD
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
East from Mixed
East
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 46,
46, ROWANDALE Clendon Park
ROWANDALE
AVENUE,
AVENUE, Manurewa Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

924

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU The No change


properties are in close proximity to Te Mahia Train
Station, however Te Mahia has not been identified as a
centre and intensification here may compete with
Manurewa Town Centre. Sufficient additional growth has
been provided for surrounding Manurewa Town Centre
which is more appropriate for intensification. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - The site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5736

839-5737

839-5743

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 18, RONALD


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
18, RONALD
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 7, BROOK
7, BROOK HAVEN Clendon Park
HAVEN RISE, Clendon RISE, Clendon
Park from Mixed
Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 74,
GLOUCESTER ROAD,
Manurewa from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

74, GLOUCESTER Homai Station


ROAD, Manurewa

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support MHS
change to MHS - MHS is the most appropriate zone for
the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. Although the SH zone could be retained due to
the site being affected by flooding constraints, a spot
zone would occur and in this location a spot zone will not
generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS. The adjoining properties (72 and 76
Gloucester Road) also need to be rezoned to MHS (out of

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5750

839-5757

839-5767

839-5770

839-7352

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Clendon Park
Rezone 31, MCINNES 31, MCINNES
ROAD, Weymouth
ROAD, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 26, BECKER


DRIVE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
26, BECKER
DRIVE, Weymouth

MHS

Rezone 4, JOSHUA
PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, JOSHUA PLACE, Clendon Park


Weymouth

Rezone 168, MAHIA


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
168, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Rezone 24,1/22,2/22, 24,1/22,2/22,


Papakura - East MHS
GALILEE AVENUE,
GALILEE AVENUE,
Red Hill from Mixed Red Hill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Manurewa
Rezone 10, JENKINS 10, JENKINS
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
East from Mixed
East
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU,
support alternative change to SH - These sites are
affected by flooding constraints and rezoning to SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

925

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
SH

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5778

Urban (South)

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5784

839-5785

839-5786

839-5790

839-5798

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 45,
HEYBRIDGE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

45, HEYBRIDGE
STREET,
Manurewa

Rezone 15,
HEYBRIDGE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15, HEYBRIDGE
STREET,
Manurewa

LOCALITY

Manurewa

Manurewa

Rezone 133,
133, WEYMOUTH Manurewa
WEYMOUTH ROAD, ROAD, WeymouthWeymouthManurewa East
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 12, MON


DESIR PLACE,16,
SELAGO PLACE,
Manurewa from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 18, AARTS
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
12, MON DESIR
PLACE,16, SELAGO
PLACE, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

926

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
18, AARTS
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5799

839-7355

839-5800

839-5802

839-5803

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 31, MCDIVITT 31, MCDIVITT


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa SouthMHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

Rezone 10B,9,10A,
CITRIL
PLACE,7B,7A,10B,10A
,6,9,8,1/11,2/11,
DULCIE PLACE,47,
REDCREST AVENUE,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

10B,9,10A, CITRIL Papakura - East MHS


PLACE,7B,7A,10B,
10A,6,9,8,1/11,2/
11, DULCIE
PLACE,47,
REDCREST
AVENUE,
Papakura

MHU

Rezone 63,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
63,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

MHU

Rezone 24, SMEDLEY 24, SMEDLEY


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 9, BUNDENA 9, BUNDENA


PLACE, Clendon Park PLACE, Clendon
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

927

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at 47 SH and MHS
Redcrest Avenue, support alternative change to SH - This
site is affected by flooding constraints and rezoning to SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS. This
change is out scope (refer Attachment F).
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU for the
remaining properties - MHS is the most appropriate zone
for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone.
Managing flooding risks on these sites does not require a
SH zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5804

839-5805

839-5807

839-5809

839-5812

839-7356

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 16, ADAMS


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

16, ADAMS ROAD, Manurewa


Manurewa

Rezone 28, SMEDLEY 28, SMEDLEY


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 19,
SUNLANDS DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

Homai Station
19, SUNLANDS
DRIVE, Manurewa

Rezone 23, PALLANT 23, PALLANT


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Homai Station
Rezone 3, AWAKINO 3, AWAKINO
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 35, REDCREST 35, REDCREST


AVENUE, Papakura
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Papakura
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

928

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7359

839-5813

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 11,10,9,7,8, 11,10,9,7,8,


LEILANI PLACE, Red LEILANI PLACE,
Hill from Mixed
Red Hill
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 9, NIELD
9, NIELD ROAD,
ROAD, Manurewa
Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Manurewa

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

929

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone.
Managing flooding risks on the sites does not require a
SH zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these No change
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7365

Urban (South)

Rezone
120,120A,120C,12 Papakura - East SH
120,120A,120C,120B, 0B, CLEVEDON
CLEVEDON ROAD,
ROAD, Papakura
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Clendon Park
Rezone 25, HOTUROA 25, HOTUROA
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

Clendon Park
7, CARBERY
PLACE, Manurewa

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the sites No change


are affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5817

839-5825

839-5826

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 7, CARBERY
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 5, TUNA
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, TUNA PLACE,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7366

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 142A,142,
142A,142,
Papakura - East SH
CLEVEDON ROAD,
CLEVEDON ROAD,
Papakura from Single Papakura
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

930

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the sites No change


are affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5827

839-5837

839-5839

839-5840

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 8,
DALMAHOY PLACE,
Wattle Downs from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8, DALMAHOY
PLACE, Wattle
Downs

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 1/109-6/109, 109 Maich Road,


MAICH ROAD,
Manurewa
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa

Rezone 23, ANGLERS 23, ANGLERS


WAY, Wattle Downs WAY, Wattle
from Mixed Housing Downs
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 8, FEASEGATE 8, FEASEGATE


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Although the SH zone could be
applied due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location
a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the
local context. The notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5841

839-5842

839-5847

839-5850

839-5861

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 3,
3, DAGENHAM
DAGENHAM STREET, STREET,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

Rezone 23, GARTH


23, GARTH PLACE, Clendon Park
PLACE, Manurewa
Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Rezone 18,
18, BEAUMONTS
BEAUMONTS WAY,
WAY, Manurewa
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Manurewa

Rezone 27, SMEDLEY 27, SMEDLEY


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 6,
WOODLARK CLOSE,
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6, WOODLARK
CLOSE,
Weymouth

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH

MHU

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support a change of zone to THAB and support
change to MHU - the site is not located in close walking
distance from the Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient
intensification has been provided for in areas directly
adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support change of zone to THAB, support a
change to MU zone - the site is adjacent to properties
zoned MU, so a change to THAB would be considered
spot zoning. Spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is within close
proximity to the Manurewa Town Centre and RFN and
achieves the MU zone objectives and gives effect to the
RPS. This is an out of scope change - refer to Attachment
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

931

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5864

839-5869

839-5871

839-5872

839-5877

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 18, PALLANT 18, PALLANT


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

Rezone 43,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
43,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 4, PAWA
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, PAWA PLACE,
Manurewa

Rezone 19, MINTON


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
19, MINTON
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 28,
28, BURNDALE
BURNDALE TERRACE, TERRACE,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

932

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7367

839-5878

839-5886

839-5887

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 160A,162,
OLD WAIROA
ROAD,12, PUKEROA
PLACE, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

160A,162, OLD
Papakura - East SH, MHS
WAIROA
ROAD,12,
PUKEROA PLACE,
Papakura

Rezone 4, TAITIMU
DRIVE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4, TAITIMU DRIVE, Clendon Park


Weymouth

Rezone 23,
LOUGHINISLAND
PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
23,
LOUGHINISLAND
PLACE, Weymouth

Rezone 257,
257, WEYMOUTH Clendon Park
WEYMOUTH ROAD, ROAD, Clendon
WeymouthPark
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

933

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 162


MHS
Old Wairoa Road, support change to MHS as an
alternative zone - MHS is the most appropriate zone for
the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU at
160A Old Wairoa Road and 12 Pukeroa Place - MHS is the
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone to THAB - the sites are located
THAB
around the Clendon Park Local Centre and POS and are
suitable for intensification. Increased density in this
location will promote a walkable neighbourhood and
could improve the vitality of the centre. The area is not
currently serviced by a RFN, however it is connected by
buses to Manurewa Train Station. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5890

839-7369

839-5896

839-5901

839-5902

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 21A,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

21A, ROWANDALE Manurewa


AVENUE,
Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 31,29,
31,29, FAIRDALE Papakura - East MHS
FAIRDALE AVENUE, AVENUE, Red Hill
Red Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 281,
281, WEYMOUTH Clendon Park
WEYMOUTH ROAD, ROAD, Clendon
WeymouthPark
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Homai Station
Rezone 9, SUNLANDS 9, SUNLANDS
DRIVE, Manurewa
DRIVE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

4, HYWELL PLACE, Homai Station


Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 4, HYWELL
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support change of zone to THAB - the sites are located
around the Clendon Park Local Centre and POS and are
suitable for intensification. Increased density in this
location will promote a walkable neighbourhood and
could improve the vitality of the centre. The area is not
currently serviced by a RFN, however it is connected by
buses to Manurewa Train Station. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Sufficient
intensification has already been provided for around
Homai Station. Although the SH zone could be applied
due to the site being affected by flooding constraints, a
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

934

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
THAB

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5904

839-5905

839-5907

839-5908

839-7801

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 52,
GAINSBOROUGH
STREET, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 4, DEVERON
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
52,
GAINSBOROUGH
STREET,
Manurewa

LOCALITY

Manurewa

Homai Station
4, DEVERON
ROAD, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Manurewa
Rezone 7, KERRYDALE 7, KERRYDALE
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Manurewa
Rezone 12, FAIRLIGHT 12, FAIRLIGHT
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 16 MCENTEE 16 MCENTEE


Papakura - East MHS
STREET. Papakura
STREET. Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

935

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5909

839-5912

839-5916

839-5920

839-5933

839-5934

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 8, DEVERON
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
8, DEVERON
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 7,
FRANGIPANI
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7, FRANGIPANI
AVENUE,
Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

Homai Station
Rezone 1, SUNLANDS 1, SUNLANDS
DRIVE, Manurewa
DRIVE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 76,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
76,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 12, DR
PICKERING AVENUE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, DR PICKERING Manurewa SouthMHS


AVENUE,
Manurewa

Rezone 35,
INNISMARA
AVENUE,9, GAMBARE
PLACE, Wattle Downs
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
35, INNISMARA
AVENUE,9,
GAMBARE PLACE,
Wattle Downs

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

936

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5936

839-5940

839-5941

839-5942

839-5945

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

The Gardens

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 18,
ROSEMEAD PLACE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18, ROSEMEAD
PLACE, Randwick
Park

MHS

Rezone 8, ASTOR
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8, ASTOR PLACE,
Manurewa

Rezone 108,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
108,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 73,
GLOUCESTER ROAD,
Manurewa from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

73, GLOUCESTER Homai Station


ROAD, Manurewa

Manurewa SouthMHS

SH

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 30, GAMBARE


PLACE,154, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

30, GAMBARE
PLACE,154,
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa

Rezone 24,
TAMWORTH CLOSE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24, TAMWORTH Clendon Park


CLOSE, Manurewa

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support a change in zoning - the Manurewa Town


Centre Concept Plan was taken into account and the
Local Board was consulted on the draft and PAUP. The
zoning proposed in and around the Town Centre provides
for further intensification and revitalisation of the Centre.
The notified zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
change to MHS - MHS is the most appropriate zone for
the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. Managing flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
The adjoining properties (71 and 75 Gloucester Road)
also need to be rezoned to MHS (out of scope) to prevent
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

937

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5952

Urban (South)

MHS

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased


MHU
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5955

839-5957

839-5959

839-5964

839-5965

839-5966

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 163, MAHIA


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa SouthMHS
163, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 9, ADEN
9, ADEN PLACE,
PLACE, Clendon Park Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 9, ANTALYA
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

Clendon Park
9, ANTALYA
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 36,
36, DAGENHAM
DAGENHAM STREET, STREET,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 18,
CLAYMORE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18, CLAYMORE
STREET,
Manurewa

Manurewa

Rezone 142,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

142, ROWANDALE Clendon Park


AVENUE,
Manurewa

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

938

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5967

839-5968

839-5971

839-5975

839-7877

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 54, WATTS


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

54, WATTS ROAD, Homai Station


Manurewa

Rezone 38, WATTS


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38, WATTS ROAD, Homai Station


Manurewa

Rezone 73, JOHN


WALKER DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

73, JOHN WALKER Clendon Park


DRIVE, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 184, BROWNS 184, BROWNS


ROAD, Wiri from
ROAD, Wiri
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 168
168 CLEVEDON
CLEVEDON ROAD.
ROAD. Papakura
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Papakura - East SH

Rezone 343,
ROSCOMMON ROAD,
Wiri-Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

939

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change to MHU. The site is in close proximity to


Homai Train Station and a LC. Rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support change to MHU. The site is in close proximity to


Homai Train Station and a LC. Rezoning to MHU is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5976

839-5978

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

343,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD, WiriManurewa

Homai Station
Rezone 10, HARROW 10, HARROW
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5979

839-5981

839-5985

839-5986

839-5988

839-5989

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 58, MYERS


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

58, MYERS ROAD, Manurewa


Manurewa

Rezone
3/502,2/502,1/50 Clendon Park
3/502,2/502,1/502, 2, ROSCOMMON
ROSCOMMON ROAD, ROAD, Manurewa
Wiri-Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Rezone 11, VOLANTE 11, VOLANTE


AVENUE, Wattle
AVENUE, Wattle
Downs from Mixed
Downs
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 28, PALLANT 28, PALLANT


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 5, BETTINA
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, BETTINA PLACE, Homai Station


Manurewa

Rezone 442,
ROSCOMMON ROAD,
Wiri-Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

442,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD, WiriManurewa

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

940

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone to THAB - the sites are located
THAB
around the Clendon Park Local Centre and POS and are
suitable for intensification. Increased density in this
location will promote a walkable neighbourhood and
could improve the vitality of the centre. The area is not
currently serviced by a RFN, however it is connected by
buses to Manurewa Train Station. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7984

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 10 MILSON
10 MILSON DRIVE. Papakura - East SH
DRIVE. Papakura from Papakura
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

941

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - the site No change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5990

839-5998

839-8159

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 97, MAICH


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

97, MAICH ROAD, Manurewa


Manurewa

Rezone 48,
48, DAGENHAM
DAGENHAM STREET, STREET,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Rezone 86A
86A SETTLEMENT Papakura - East SH
SETTLEMENT ROAD. ROAD. Papakura
Papakura from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 7A LAURIE
AVENUE. Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7A LAURIE
AVENUE.
Papakura

MHU

Rezone 15,
TAMWORTH CLOSE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15, TAMWORTH Clendon Park


CLOSE, Manurewa

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-8227

839-6004

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a
RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
MHU
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6012

839-6017

839-6022

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 66,
ALFRISTON ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Manurewa
66, ALFRISTON
ROAD, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 102, PITT
102, PITT
AVENUE, Clendon
AVENUE, Clendon
Park from Mixed
Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Homai Station
Rezone 12A,12, KENT 12A,12, KENT
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

942

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 12
No change
Kent Road, Manurewa - the site ia affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 12A


Kent Road, Manurewa - spot zoning in this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of
resources and does not recognise local context.
Meet Criteria
839-6023

839-6024

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Clendon Park
Rezone 98,
98, FINLAYSON
FINLAYSON AVENUE, AVENUE, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 15, SMEDLEY 15, SMEDLEY


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6025

839-6028

839-6031

839-6032

839-8228

839-6033

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 137,
137, WEYMOUTH Manurewa
WEYMOUTH ROAD, ROAD, WeymouthWeymouthManurewa East
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 22, AARTS


AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

22, AARTS
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

Rezone 69,
69, MCANNALLEY Manurewa
MCANNALLEY
STREET,
STREET, Manurewa Manurewa East
East from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 19, HORLICKS 19, HORLICKS


PLACE, Randwick Park PLACE, Randwick
from Single House to Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

The Gardens

Rezone 7B LAURIE
AVENUE. Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7B LAURIE
AVENUE.
Papakura

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 56, JOHN


WALKER DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

56, JOHN WALKER Clendon Park


DRIVE, Manurewa

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre and Weymouth Road is no
longer on the RFN and therefore further intensification is
not appropriate in this area. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - The site
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

943

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a
RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6036

839-6037

839-6041

839-6045

839-6046

839-6053

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 29, TAITIMU


DRIVE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Clendon Park
29, TAITIMU
DRIVE, Weymouth

Rezone 6, KERN
6, KERN PLACE,
PLACE, Manurewa
Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 19,
TAMWORTH CLOSE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

19, TAMWORTH Clendon Park


CLOSE, Manurewa

Rezone 56, PALMERS 56, PALMERS


ROAD, Clendon Park ROAD, Clendon
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 3, BRENT
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, BRENT PLACE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

Rezone 20, JOHN


WALKER DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20, JOHN WALKER Clendon Park


DRIVE, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support a change to THAB and support change to
MHU - the site is not located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient
intensification has been provided for in areas directly
adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. Managing flooding risks on the site does
not require a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties
need to be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

944

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

MHU

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6058

839-6070

839-6076

839-6087

839-6091

839-1545

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 38,
TAMWORTH CLOSE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

38, TAMWORTH Clendon Park


CLOSE, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Homai Station
Rezone 9, BERKELEY 9, BERKELEY
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Rezone 297,
297, WEYMOUTH Clendon Park
WEYMOUTH ROAD, ROAD, WeymouthWeymouthManurewa East
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Manurewa

Rezone 34,
HEYBRIDGE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34, HEYBRIDGE
STREET,
Manurewa

Rezone 10, COLES


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10, COLES PLACE, Manurewa


Manurewa

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 4B,4A, CAMERON Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 4B,4A,
STREET, Papakura
CAMERON STREET,
Papakura.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased


residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. Managing flooding risks on the site does
not require a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties
need to be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Support change of zone from SH to MHU The site is
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and POS.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
maintaing a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The adjoining properties
also need to be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to
Do not support a change to THAB and support change to
MHU - the site is not located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient
intensification has been provided for in areas directly
adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre and Weymouth Road is no
longer on the RFN and therefore further intensification is
not appropriate in this area. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

945

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

MHU

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6099

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 29,
29, SECRETARIAT The Gardens
SECRETARIAT PLACE, PLACE, Randwick
Randwick Park from Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

946

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6101

839-6102

839-6103

839-6104

839-6105

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 40, PALLANT 40, PALLANT


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 57, PALLANT 57, PALLANT


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Clendon Park
Rezone 25, YEARSLEY 25, YEARSLEY
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
Rezone 13, HOBMAN 13, HOBMAN
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 26,
FEASEGATE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

26, FEASEGATE
STREET,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1551

839-6106

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 25, BELGRAVE


Suburban at 25,
PLACE, Papakura
BELGRAVE PLACE,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 41, BURBANK 41, BURBANK


AVENUE, Manurewa AVENUE,
from Single House to Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Clendon Park

Retain Mixed Housing 19, WINIATA


Suburban at 19,
TERRACE,
WINIATA TERRACE, Papakura
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 14,
14, THOMPSON
THOMPSON
TERRACE,
TERRACE, Manurewa Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

REASONS

947

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - The site No change
is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-1557

839-6112

839-6116

839-6117

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 171,
171, FINLAYSON Clendon Park
FINLAYSON AVENUE, AVENUE, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
Rezone 13,
13, TROUNSON
TROUNSON AVENUE, AVENUE, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6119

839-6122

839-1558

839-6124

839-6127

839-6128

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 275,
WEYMOUTH ROAD,6,
PALMERS ROAD,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

275, WEYMOUTH Clendon Park


ROAD,6, PALMERS
ROAD, Clendon
Park

Rezone 205,
205, WEYMOUTH Clendon Park
WEYMOUTH ROAD, ROAD, WeymouthWeymouthManurewa East
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing 4, CADIZ PLACE,
Suburban at 4, CADIZ Red Hill
PLACE, Red Hill.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 12, ANTALYA 12, ANTALYA
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 12,
FEASEGATE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12, FEASEGATE
STREET,
Manurewa

Rezone 7, BALWYN
7, BALWYN
PLACE, Clendon Park PLACE, Clendon
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

948

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support change of zone from MHS to THAB. The site is in THAB


close proximity to Clendon LC and rezoning to THAB is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6130

839-6131

839-1559

839-6133

839-1578

839-6139

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 22,
22, FERGUSON
FERGUSON STREET, STREET,
Manurewa East from Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 120, MAICH


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Manurewa

Manurewa
120, MAICH
ROAD, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 22, BELGRAVE


Suburban at 22,
PLACE, Papakura
BELGRAVE PLACE,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 27,
FROBISHER WAY,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

27, FROBISHER
WAY, Clendon
Park

Retain Mixed Housing 10B,10A,


Suburban at 10B,10A, CHANTAL PLACE,
CHANTAL PLACE, Red Red Hill
Hill.

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 34, YEARSLEY 34, YEARSLEY
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support a change of zone to THAB - The


properties are in close proximity to Te Mahia Train
Station, however Te Mahia has not been identified as a
centre and intensification here may compete with
Manurewa Town Centre. Sufficient additional growth has
been provided for surrounding Manurewa Town Centre
which is more appropriate for intensification. The
notified zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

949

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose in Part
Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian
access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6155

839-6156

839-6162

839-6171

839-6172

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 4, WAIMAI
4, WAIMAI
AVENUE, Weymouth AVENUE,
from Single House to Weymouth
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

SH

Rezone 71, PITT


71, PITT AVENUE, Clendon Park
AVENUE, Clendon
Clendon Park
Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 41, BARNEYS 41, BARNEYS


FARM ROAD, Clendon FARM ROAD,
Park from Mixed
Clendon Park
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 17, PIRITI


PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

17, PIRITI PLACE,


Weymouth

Clendon Park

Rezone 9, PIRITI
PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9, PIRITI PLACE,
Weymouth

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support


change to MHS - Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The site is not
within close proximity to a centre or RFN and therefore
the area is not suitable for further intensification.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support a change to THAB and support change to
MHU - the site is not located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient
intensification has been provided for in areas directly
adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

950

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1588

839-6173

839-6183

839-6184

839-6185

839-6191

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 14, PRESIDENT


Suburban at 14,
AVENUE,
PRESIDENT AVENUE, Papakura
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 7, CARN
PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 2, JOSIE
LANE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7, CARN PLACE,
Weymouth

2, JOSIE LANE,
Manurewa

Manurewa

Rezone 6, JOSIE
6 Josie Lane,
LANE, Manurewa
Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Manurewa

Rezone 13, JOSIE


13, JOSIE LANE,
LANE, Manurewa
Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Manurewa

Clendon Park
Rezone 18A, MCLEOD 18A, MCLEOD
ROAD, Weymouth
ROAD, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone to MHU, support a less
intensive zone of MHS - MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone to MHU, support a less
intensive zone of MHS - MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS. Adjoining properties also need to be changed to
MHS zone (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

951

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6705

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone
43,115,61,117,63,2/4
7,113,67,83,81,119,8
7,49,45,29,35,97,65,7
5,71,91,103,93,95,10
7,79,105,77,39,59,33,
57,51,53,1/47,1/254/25, SHIFNAL DRIVE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

43,115,61,117,63, The Gardens


2/47,113,67,83,81
,119,87,49,45,29,
35,97,65,75,71,91
,103,93,95,107,79
,105,77,39,59,33,
57,51,53,1/47,1/2
5-4/25, SHIFNAL
DRIVE, Randwick
Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

952

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
839-6706

Urban (South)

The Gardens

Rezone 30,28,
SHIFNAL DRIVE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

30,28, SHIFNAL
DRIVE, Randwick
Park

MHS

Rezone 10,8,
SECRETARIAT PLACE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,8,
SECRETARIAT
PLACE, Randwick
Park

Rezone 77,81,79,
ALFRISTON ROAD,2,4,
SCOTTS ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
77,81,79,
ALFRISTON
ROAD,2,4, SCOTTS
ROAD, Manurewa

MHS

Manurewa

MHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6707

Urban (South)

The Gardens

MHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6708

Urban (South)

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6709

Urban (South)

Rezone
32,38,30,36,34,
32,38,30,36,34,
SCOTTS ROAD,
SCOTTS ROAD,
Manurewa East
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone.
Sufficient additional growth has been provided for in the
areas within close walking distance to Manurewa Town
Centre. Managing flooding risks on the sites does not
require a SH zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6710

839-6711

839-6712

839-6713

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Manurewa
Rezone 42,40, MYERS 42,40, MYERS
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

The Gardens

Rezone 24,22,
SECRETARIAT PLACE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,22,
SECRETARIAT
PLACE, Randwick
Park

Rezone 32,30,
SECRETARIAT PLACE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,30,
SECRETARIAT
PLACE, Randwick
Park

Rezone 38,40,
SHIFNAL DRIVE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38,40, SHIFNAL
DRIVE, Randwick
Park

Rezone 62,64,
SHIFNAL DRIVE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

62,64, SHIFNAL
DRIVE, Randwick
Park

Rezone 50,48,
HYPERION DRIVE,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

50,48, HYPERION The Gardens


DRIVE, Randwick
Park

The Gardens

The Gardens

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

953

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the
No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the
No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6714

Urban (South)

The Gardens

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the


No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6715

Urban (South)

MHS

MHU

Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the


No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6716

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 76,74,
HYPERION DRIVE,2,
NEARCO STREET,
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

76,74, HYPERION The Gardens


DRIVE,2, NEARCO
STREET, Randwick
Park

Rezone 31,29,
HORLICKS PLACE,
Randwick Park from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone
58,56,60,62,64,66,70,
68, TRIMDON
STREET, Randwick
Park from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.
Rezone
11,13,38,15,17,23,19,
32,30,28,13A,34,9A,3
,36,5,7,9,11A, KERI
ANNE PLACE,
Goodwood Heights
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31,29, HORLICKS
PLACE, Randwick
Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

954

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the


No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6717

839-6718

839-6719

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

The Gardens

SH

58,56,60,62,64,66 The Gardens


,70,68, TRIMDON
STREET, Randwick
Park

SH

11,13,38,15,17,23 The Gardens


,19,32,30,28,13A,
34,9A,3,36,5,7,9,1
1A, KERI ANNE
PLACE, Goodwood
Heights

MHS

MHS

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHS

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Do not support change of zone to MHU, support change No change


to THAB. The site is within close proximity to the
Manurewa Town Centre and Manurewa Train Station and
can support more intensive growth. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
This is an out of scope change - please see Attachment F.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1554

839-1624

839-1880

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 1/28,2/28,


Suburban at
CHALLEN CLOSE,
1/28,2/28, CHALLEN Conifer Grove.
CLOSE, Conifer Grove.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at
1/24,2/24,
BALGOWAN
TERRACE, Conifer
Grove.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 21,
GREAT SOUTH ROAD,
Takanini.

Conifer Grove

MHS

1/24,2/24,
Conifer Grove
BALGOWAN
TERRACE, Conifer
Grove.

MHS

21, GREAT SOUTH Conifer Grove


ROAD, Takanini.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It is not in close proximitiy to
centres and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It is not in close proximitiy to
centres or an RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It is not in close proximitiy to
centres and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2434

839-4999

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 1/32,
2/32 KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE. Conifer Grove.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
1/32, 2/32
KINDERGARTEN
DRIVE. Conifer
Grove

Rezone 16, CHIBNALL 16, CHIBNALL


PLACE, Conifer Grove PLACE, Conifer
from Mixed Housing Grove
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Conifer Grove

Conifer Grove

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

REASONS

955

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It is not in close proximitiy to
centres and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. It is not in close proximitiy to
centres and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-5079

Urban (South)

Rezone
49H,49J,49K,49D,49E,
49F,49G,49A,49B,49C
, TAKA STREET,
Takanini from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

49H,49J,49K,49D, Takinini
49E,49F,49G,49A,
49B,49C, TAKA
STREET, Takanini

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - the site No change


is significantly affected by flooding constraints. SH is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-1606

839-1636

839-5993

839-1654

839-2087

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Retain Mixed Housing 38A, BERWYN


Takinini
Suburban at 38A,
AVENUE, Takanini
BERWYN AVENUE,
Takanini.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 47B,47A, BERWYN Takinini


Suburban at 47B,47A, AVENUE, Takanini
BERWYN AVENUE,
Takanini.

MHS

Rezone 1/7,2/7,
BERWYN AVENUE,
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at
3/106,2/106,1/106,
PORCHESTER ROAD,
Takanini.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at
20C,18A,20B,16A,20
D, WATERVIEW ROAD
WEST, Takanini.

MHS

1/7,2/7, BERWYN Takinini


AVENUE, Takanini

3/106,2/106,1/10 Takinini
6, PORCHESTER
ROAD, Takanin

MHU

20C,18A,20B,16A, Takinini
20D, WATERVIEW
ROAD WEST,
Takanini.

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support retention of notified MHS zone. Adjoins FU zone.


Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone. The site is not in
close proximity to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHS zone. Adjoins FU zone.
Retention of the MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the zone. The site is not in
close proximity to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU.
Adjoins FU zone. Retention of the MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone.
The site is not in close proximity to a centre or an RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone - the site is in close
proximity to a RFN and Takanini Town Centre. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

Support retention of MHU zone - the site is in close


No change
proximity to a RFN and Takanini Town Centre. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2225

839-2594

839-1591

839-1597

839-1610

839-2738

839-2477

839-6720

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 1/285/28,22, WATERVIEW
ROAD WEST,
Takanini.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 109
PORCHESTER ROAD.
Takanini.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 1,
LANSDOWN PLACE,
Papakura.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
1/28-5/28,22,
WATERVIEW
ROAD WEST,
Takanini

LOCALITY

Takinini

109 PORCHESTER Takinini


ROAD. Takanini

1, LANSDOWN
PLACE, Papakura

Retain Mixed Housing 87, DOMINION


Suburban at 87,
ROAD, Papakura
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura.

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

Papakura - East MHS

Papakura - East MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 62, CARGILL


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 62,
STREET, Papakura
CARGILL STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 18A ARIMU


Urban at 18A ARIMU ROAD. Papakura.
ROAD. Papakura.

Takinini

MHU

Retain Mixed Rural at 140 HAMLIN


140 HAMLIN ROAD. ROAD. Ardmore
Ardmore.

Rural

Rezone
24,10,12,20,14,22,16,
18,4,6,8, KERI ANNE
PLACE, Goodwood
Heights from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

24,10,12,20,14,22 The Gardens


,16,18,4,6,8, KERI
ANNE PLACE,
Goodwood
Heights

MHU

MR

MHS

MR

MHU

REASONS

956

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU zone - the site is in close


No change
proximity to a RFN and Takanini Town Centre. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone - the site is in close
proximity to a RFN and Takanini Town Centre. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHU zone - the site is in close
proximity to a RFN and Takanini Town Centre. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MR zone. MR zone
accommodates a range of rural production activities and
associated non-residential activities while still ensuring
good amenity levels for residents who use their land for
rural lifestyle purposes. Retention of the MR Zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MR

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7119

839-7120

839-7121

839-7122

839-7123

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone
388,382,390,384,386,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD,9, NEEMS
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

388,382,390,384, Clendon Park


386,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD,9, NEEMS
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 195,197,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
195,197,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Clendon Park
Rezone 12,14, NEEMS 12,14, NEEMS
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 4,6, NEEMS


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 47,51,49,
PALLANT STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
4,6, NEEMS
PLACE, Manurewa

Clendon Park
47,51,49,
PALLANT STREET,
Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

957

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7124

839-7125

839-7126

839-7127

839-7128

839-7129

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Clendon Park
Rezone 200,202,204, 200,202,204,
WORDSWORTH
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 5, POUTINI
PLACE,188,186,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,3, FUNNELL
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
5, POUTINI
PLACE,188,186,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,3, FUNNELL
PLACE, Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 175,173,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,60,58,
PALLANT STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 52, PALLANT
STREET,34, SMEDLEY
STREET, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
175,173,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,60,58,
PALLANT STREET,
Manurewa

Rezone 27, PALLANT


STREET,380,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD,8,4,6, PUSHON
PLACE, Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 15,17,
PALLANT STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
52, PALLANT
STREET,34,
SMEDLEY STREET,
Manurewa

27, PALLANT
STREET,380,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD,8,4,6,
PUSHON PLACE,
Clendon Park

15,17, PALLANT
STREET,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

958

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7130

839-7131

839-7132

839-7133

839-7134

839-7135

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 24, BURBANK


AVENUE,24,26,22,
YEARSLEY PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
24, BURBANK
AVENUE,24,26,22,
YEARSLEY PLACE,
Manurewa

Rezone 14, SMEDLEY


STREET,40,
ARNWOOD STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, SMEDLEY
STREET,40,
ARNWOOD
STREET,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

Rezone 24,24A,
BRENTFORD PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
24,24A,
BRENTFORD
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 11,13,
BURBANK
AVENUE,11,13,15,17,
18,1,3,5,7,9, NINA
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,13, BURBANK Clendon Park


AVENUE,11,13,15,
17,18,1,3,5,7,9,
NINA PLACE,
Manurewa

Rezone 12,14,16,
NINA PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
12,14,16, NINA
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 8,4,6, NINA


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change to MHU. Support rezoning from
SH to MHS. Managing flooding risks on these sites does
not require maintaining a SH zone. MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

959

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Clendon Park
8,4,6, NINA
PLACE, Manurewa

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7136

839-7137

839-7138

839-7139

839-7140

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 27,
BRENTFORD
PLACE,28,
DAGENHAM STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

27, BRENTFORD
PLACE,28,
DAGENHAM
STREET,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

Rezone 20,21,16,
WENLOCK PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
20,21,16,
WENLOCK PLACE,
Manurewa

Rezone 19,17,
WENLOCK PLACE,24,
ARNWOOD STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,17, WENLOCK Clendon Park


PLACE,24,
ARNWOOD
STREET,
Manurewa

Rezone 14,
ARNWOOD
STREET,155,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,11,13,1,3,5,7,9
, WENLOCK PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
14, ARNWOOD
STREET,155,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,11,13,1,3,5,
7,9, WENLOCK
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 10,12,4,6,
WENLOCK
PLACE,10,8,12,14,6,
HOBMAN PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
10,12,4,6,
WENLOCK
PLACE,10,8,12,14,
6, HOBMAN
PLACE, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of driveway to SH zone - the
property that this driveway serves has been rezoned to
MHS as managing flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. Therefore the driveway
subject to this submission is no longer a spot zone and
does not require amending. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

960

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
MHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7141

839-7142

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 161,163,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
161,163,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 137,135,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,82,80,86,88,78
, ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
137,135,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,82,80,86,88
,78, ROWANDALE
AVENUE,
Manurewa

MHS

Rezone
138,136,140,134,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,32,39,30,
ORATU PLACE,64,66,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

138,136,140,134, Clendon Park


WORDSWORTH
ROAD,32,39,30,
ORATU
PLACE,64,66,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE,
Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 56A-56F,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE,31,37,29,35,
ORATU PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 6, JOHN
WALKER
DRIVE,11,15,17,1A,3,
1B,5,7, ORATU
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
56A-56F,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE,31,37,29,
35, ORATU PLACE,
Manurewa

MHS

6, JOHN WALKER Clendon Park


DRIVE,11,15,17,1
A,3,1B,5,7,
ORATU PLACE,
Manurewa

SH, MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

961

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7143

Urban (South)

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7144

839-7145

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

Support rezoning from SH to MHS. Managing flooding


MHS
risks on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7146

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Clendon Park
Rezone 164,168,170, 164,168,170,
WORDSWORTH
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

962

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

839-7147

839-7148

839-7149

839-7150

839-7151

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 6, TUNA
PLACE,8, POUTINI
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

6, TUNA PLACE,8, Clendon Park


POUTINI PLACE,
Manurewa

Rezone 176,178,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
176,178,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 10,8, STELLA


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
10,8, STELLA
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 55,57,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

55,57,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

Rezone 39,41, JOHN


WALKER DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39,41, JOHN
WALKER DRIVE,
Manurewa

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7152

839-7153

839-7154

839-7155

839-7156

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Homai Station

Rezone
212A,212B,212,
RUSSELL ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

212A,212B,212,
RUSSELL ROAD,
Manurewa

Rezone 3,5, HEALY


ROAD,1, WHITE
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
3,5, HEALY
ROAD,1, WHITE
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 5,7, WHITE


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5,7, WHITE ROAD, Homai Station


Manurewa

Rezone 13,15, HEALY


ROAD,25,21,23,
WATTS ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

13,15, HEALY
ROAD,25,21,23,
WATTS ROAD,
Manurewa

Rezone 18,14,16,
HEALY ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,14,16, HEALY Homai Station


ROAD, Manurewa

Homai Station

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is


within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification will increase the capacity of
housing with good access to public transport. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Surrounding properties need to be rezoned to MHU (out
of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification here will increase the
capacity of housing with good access to public transport.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be rezoned to
MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification here will increase the
capacity of housing with good access to public transport.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be rezoned to
MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification will increase the capacity of
housing with good access to public transport. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Surrounding properties need to be rezoned to MHU (out
of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU. Site is in
close proximity to Homai Train Station, THAB zoning and
a LC. Rezoning to MHU is the most approproiate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

963

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7157

839-7158

839-7159

839-7160

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 6, HEALY
ROAD,11,13,15,17,3,
5,7,9, ARBOR CLOSE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Homai Station
6, HEALY
ROAD,11,13,15,17
,3,5,7,9, ARBOR
CLOSE, Manurewa

Rezone 12,14,
ROMNEY PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12,14, ROMNEY Homai Station


PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 25,21,23,
ARBOR CLOSE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25,21,23, ARBOR Homai Station


CLOSE, Manurewa

Rezone 31,30,28,29,
ARBOR CLOSE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31,30,28,29,
ARBOR CLOSE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

PAUP ZONE

MHS, MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

964

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support retention of MHU zone at properties 6 Healy


MHU
Road, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 Arbor Close the sites are
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and are
suitable for intensification. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone at 17 Arbor Close from MHS to
MHU The site is within close proximity to Homai Train
Station and a higher level of intensification here will
increase the capacity of housing with good access to
public transport. Managing flooding risks on the site does
not require a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties
need to be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Sufficient intensification has
already been provided for around Homai Station.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The sites are MHU
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification here will increase the
capacity of housing with good access to public transport.
Managing flooding risks on the sites does not require a
SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The sites are MHU
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification here will increase the
capacity of housing with good access to public transport.
Managing flooding risks on the sites does not require a
SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7161

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone
24,10,12,20,14,16,18,
8, ARBOR
CLOSE,18,14,
PRIMROSE PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Homai Station

PAUP ZONE

MHS, MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

24,10,12,20,14,16
,18,8, ARBOR
CLOSE,18,14,
PRIMROSE PLACE,
Manurewa

REASONS

965

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support retention of MHU zone at properties 8, 10, 12,


No change
14, 16, 18, 20, 24 Arbor Close the sites are within close
proximity to Homai Train Station and are suitable for
intensification. Managing flooding risks on the site does
not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone at 14 and 18 Primrose
Place from MHS to MHU MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Sufficient intensification has
already been provided for around Homai Station. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7162

839-7163

839-7164

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 39,37,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 45,43,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE,2, HARROW
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 60,62,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

39,37,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE,
Manurewa

45,43,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE,2,
HARROW PLACE,
Manurewa

60,62,
ADDINGTON
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

Homai Station

Homai Station

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Sufficient intensification has
already been provided surrounding Homai Train Station.
MHS is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they
are not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Sufficient intensification has
already been provided surrounding Homai Train Station.
MHS is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they
are not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7165

839-7166

839-7167

839-7168

839-7169

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 54,52,
SUNLANDS
DRIVE,24,22, MAIDA
VALE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 8B,8A,
SUNLANDS DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

54,52, SUNLANDS Homai Station


DRIVE,24,22,
MAIDA VALE,
Manurewa

8B,8A, SUNLANDS Homai Station


DRIVE, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Rezone 8,4,6, BRENT


PLACE,39,37,
SUNLANDS DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
8,4,6, BRENT
PLACE,39,37,
SUNLANDS DRIVE,
Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 19,21,17,
BEDLINGTON
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

19,21,17,
BEDLINGTON
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

MHS

Rezone 33,31,
BEDLINGTON
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33,31,
BEDLINGTON
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Homai Station

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Sufficient intensification has
already been provided for around Homai Station.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

966

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7170

839-7171

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 99,101,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
99,101,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone
111A,115,121,117,12
3,125,113,127,119,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,10,20,22,
BEDLINGTON
AVENUE,103,101,107
,109,105,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

111A,115,121,117 Homai Station


,123,125,113,127,
119,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,10,20,22,
BEDLINGTON
AVENUE,103,101,
107,109,105,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE,
Manurewa

MHS

Rezone
132,122,130,124,126,
128, WORDSWORTH
ROAD,99,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

132,122,130,124, Homai Station


126,128,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,99,
ROWANDALE
AVENUE,
Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 17, AWAKINO


PLACE,114,108,116,1
10,112,106,118,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
17, AWAKINO
PLACE,114,108,11
6,110,112,106,11
8, WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

967

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change
is the most appropriate zone for the sites are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the sites does not require a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7172

Urban (South)

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7173

Urban (South)

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the sites are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the sites does not require a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7174

839-7175

839-7176

839-7177

839-7178

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 55,57, AARTS 55,57, AARTS


AVENUE, Manurewa AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Homai Station

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 68,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,19,21,
FAIRLIGHT PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
68,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD,19,21,
FAIRLIGHT PLACE,
Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 11,13,
RONALD PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station
11,13, RONALD
PLACE, Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 25,23,
FUNNELL PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25,23, FUNNELL Clendon Park


PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 21, JOHN


WALKER
DRIVE,24,26,14,22,18
,30,34,32, POUTINI
PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21, JOHN WALKER Clendon Park


DRIVE,24,26,14,2
2,18,30,34,32,
POUTINI PLACE,
Manurewa

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

968

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7179

839-7180

839-7181

839-7182

839-7183

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 428,432,430,
ROSCOMMON ROAD,
Wiri-Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
428,432,430,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD, WiriManurewa

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 3,5, KERN


3,5, KERN PLACE, Clendon Park
PLACE, Manurewa
Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 464,462,
464,462,
ROSCOMMON ROAD, ROSCOMMON
Wiri-Manurewa from ROAD, Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 472,470,
472,470,
ROSCOMMON ROAD, ROSCOMMON
Wiri-Manurewa from ROAD, Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 486,484,482, 486,484,482,
ROSCOMMON ROAD, ROSCOMMON
Wiri-Manurewa from ROAD, Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

969

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased


MHU
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,
see Attachment F.
Do not support a change of zone from MHS to THAB,
MHU
support change to MHU - the sites are not located in
close walking distance from the Clendon Park Local
Centre, sufficient intensification has been provided for in
areas directly adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will
provide an appropriate level of growth and will act as a
transition between the THAB area and MHS. The
surrounding block should also be rezoned to MHU (out of
scope) to prevent spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Managing flooding risks on the sites does not require a
SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Support change of MHS to THAB. These sites are in close THAB
proximity to the Clendon LC and are suitable for more
intensive residential development. Rezoning to THAB is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to THAB. These sites are in close THAB


proximity to the Clendon LC and are suitable for more
intensive residential development. Rezoning to THAB is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support change of MHS to THAB. These sites are in close THAB


proximity to the Clendon LC and are suitable for more
intensive residential development. Rezoning to THAB is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7184

839-7185

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 11,13,
LANDETTE ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

11,13, LANDETTE Clendon Park


ROAD, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 14, SELAGO 14, SELAGO
PLACE, Manurewa
PLACE, Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Clendon Park
Rezone 494,492,
494,492,
ROSCOMMON ROAD, ROSCOMMON
Wiri-Manurewa from ROAD, Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

970

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - The site No change
and surrounding properties are affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7186

839-7187

839-7188

839-7189

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 14,16,
MINTON PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
14,16, MINTON
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 8,6, RIRINO


PLACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
8,6, RIRINO
PLACE, Manurewa

Rezone 18,20,
GAINSBOROUGH
STREET, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,20,
GAINSBOROUGH
STREET,
Manurewa

Manurewa

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support change of MHS to THAB. These sites are in close THAB


proximity to the Clendon LC and are suitable for more
intensive residential development. Rezoning to THAB is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the sites does not require a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7190

839-7191

839-7192

839-7193

839-7194

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 55,51,53,
RUSSELL ROAD,103,
GLOUCESTER
ROAD,22, JUTLAND
ROAD,9,13,12,7,
BALFOUR ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 22C,22B,22A,
FRANCES STREET,
Manurewa from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
55,51,53,
RUSSELL
ROAD,103,
GLOUCESTER
ROAD,22,
JUTLAND
ROAD,9,13,12,7,
BALFOUR ROAD,
Manurewa

LOCALITY

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

971

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS the site is significantly affected by flooding
constraints. SH is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and give
effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone to THAB, support


alternative change to MHU. The site is not located in
close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre,
sufficient intensification has been provided for in areas
directly adjacent to the Town Centre. MHU will provide
an appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. Although the SH zone
could be applied due to the sites being affected by
flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this
location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise the local context. The proposed zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone.
Sufficient additional growth has been provided for in the
areas within close walking distance to Manurewa Town
Centre. Managing flooding risks on the sites does not
require a SH zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Manurewa
22C,22B,22A,
FRANCES STREET,
Manurewa

SH

Manurewa
Rezone 24, JUTLAND 24, JUTLAND
ROAD,138,142,140, ROAD,138,142,14
GLOUCESTER ROAD, 0, GLOUCESTER
Manurewa from
ROAD, Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 21,23,
DEVERON ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21,23, DEVERON Manurewa


ROAD, Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 18,16,
DEVERON ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

18,16, DEVERON Homai Station


ROAD, Manurewa

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7195

839-7196

839-7197

839-7198

839-7199

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 13,15,
CAMBRIDGE ROAD,
Manurewa from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 11,9,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Homai Station
13,15,
CAMBRIDGE
ROAD, Manurewa

Manurewa
11,9,
WORDSWORTH
ROAD, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 2,4,
2,4, MCGREAL
MCGREAL PLACE,5,
PLACE,5, TAITIMU
TAITIMU DRIVE,
DRIVE, Weymouth
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 437,435,
WEYMOUTH ROAD,
WeymouthManurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
437,435,
WEYMOUTH
ROAD, WeymouthManurewa East

MHS

Rezone 476,474,
WEYMOUTH ROAD,4,
JUSTAMERE
PLACE,11,12,15,14,1,
3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8, GILA
PLACE,13, JOSHUA
PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
476,474,
WEYMOUTH
ROAD,4,
JUSTAMERE
PLACE,11,12,15,1
4,1,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8
, GILA PLACE,13,
JOSHUA PLACE,
Weymouth

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

972

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support MHS


change to MHS - MHS is the most appropriate zone for
the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. Managing flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
The adjoining property (11 Cambridge Street) also need
to be rezoned to MHS (out of scope) to prevent spot
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB - MHS is the
No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose in Part
Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian
access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7200

839-7201

839-7202

839-7203

839-7204

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 479,
WEYMOUTH
ROAD,1,3,5,
SETTLERS COVE,1,
TONSON PLACE,
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 15,17, ADEL
PLACE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

479, WEYMOUTH Clendon Park


ROAD,1,3,5,
SETTLERS COVE,1,
TONSON PLACE,
Weymouth

MHS

Clendon Park
15,17, ADEL
PLACE, Weymouth

MHS

Rezone 11,11A,
BLANES ROAD,
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,11A, BLANES Clendon Park


ROAD, Weymouth

Rezone 507,
507, WEYMOUTH Clendon Park
WEYMOUTH ROAD,3, ROAD,3, GIBBONS
GIBBONS ROAD,
ROAD, Weymouth
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 8,
WOODLARK
CLOSE,501,
WEYMOUTH ROAD,
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
8, WOODLARK
CLOSE,501,
WEYMOUTH
ROAD, Weymouth

MHS

MHS

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the sites does not require a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of 8 Woodlark Close from SH to
MHU. Support change to MHS as an alternative Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS. The adjoining property
zoned SH (499 Weymouth Road) should also be rezoned
to MHS (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see
Attachment F.
Do not support change of 501 Weymouth Road from
MHS to MHU - the sites are not within close proximity to
a centre or RFN and are not suitable for further
intensification. The notified zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

973

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7205

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 73, PALMERS


ROAD,1,9,5,7,
KENNINGTON DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

73, PALMERS
ROAD,1,9,5,7,
KENNINGTON
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

974

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7206

839-7207

839-7208

839-7209

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 57,59,
57,59, PALMERS
PALMERS ROAD,
ROAD, Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Clendon Park

SH

300,1/296,298,2/ Clendon Park


296,294,
WEYMOUTH
ROAD,318,312,32
2,320,326,324,32
8, MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 310,
310, WEYMOUTH Clendon Park
WEYMOUTH ROAD,8, ROAD,8, DAMIAN
DAMIAN WAY,
WAY, Weymouth
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 11,9,7,
11,9,7, LEAVER
LEAVER PLACE,
PLACE, Weymouth
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone
300,1/296,298,2/296,
294, WEYMOUTH
ROAD,318,312,322,3
20,326,324,328,
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Do not support a change to THAB and support change to MHU


MHU - the sites are not located in close walking distance
from Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient intensification
has been provided for in areas directly adjacent to the
Local Centre. MHU will provide an appropriate level of
growth and will act as a transition between the THAB
area and MHS. Managing flooding risks on the site does
not require maintaining a SH zone. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support a change to THAB and support change to MHU
MHU - the sites are located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre however crossing to
the Local Centre from this area does not have a safe
pedestrian environment. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support a change to THAB and support change to MHU


MHU - the sites are located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre however crossing to
the Local Centre from this area does not have a safe
pedestrian environment. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone to THAB - The sites are in close
No change
proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and RFN. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose in Part
Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian
access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7210

839-7211

839-7212

839-7213

839-7214

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 6,12,14,16,
LEAVER
PLACE,296,300,302,3
04,298, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Clendon Park
6,12,14,16,
LEAVER
PLACE,296,300,30
2,304,298, MAHIA
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone
345,347,349,343,
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

345,347,349,343, Clendon Park


MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB - MHS is the


No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose in Part
Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian
access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

Rezone 10,
LOUGHINISLAND
PLACE,73,71,
GLENVEAGH PARK
DRIVE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
10,
LOUGHINISLAND
PLACE,73,71,
GLENVEAGH PARK
DRIVE, Weymouth

Rezone 72,70,
CASTLEFINN DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
72,70,
CASTLEFINN
DRIVE, Manurewa

Rezone 365,363,361,
MAHIA
ROAD,55,47,65,67,
CASTLEFINN DRIVE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

975

Clendon Park
365,363,361,
MAHIA
ROAD,55,47,65,67
, CASTLEFINN
DRIVE, Manurewa

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to THAB - MHS is the
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose in Part

Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian


access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7215

839-7216

839-7217

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Clendon Park
Rezone 46,44,42,
46,44,42,
CASTLEFINN DRIVE, CASTLEFINN
Manurewa from
DRIVE, Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 371,373,375, 371,373,375,


MAHIA ROAD,
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

379,381,389,385, Clendon Park


387, MAHIA
ROAD,25,27,21,33
,31,29,35,5,
CASTLEFINN
DRIVE, Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 8,6,
8,6, CASTLEFINN Clendon Park
CASTLEFINN DRIVE, DRIVE, Manurewa
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone
379,381,389,385,387,
MAHIA
ROAD,25,27,21,33,31
,29,35,5, CASTLEFINN
DRIVE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

976

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB - MHS is the


No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support a change to THAB and support change to MHU
MHU - the sites are located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre however crossing to
the Local Centre from this area does not have a safe
pedestrian environment. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support a change to THAB and support change to MHU
MHU - the sites are located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre however crossing to
the Local Centre from this area does not have a safe
pedestrian environment. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose in Part
Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian
access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

MHU

Support
Meets criteria for MHU - consider safety of pedestrian
access can be addressed in network upgrades with
development and subdivisions

MHU

Support

Meets criteria for MHU


839-7218

839-7219

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Clendon Park
Rezone 26,28,
26,28,
CASTLEFINN DRIVE, CASTLEFINN
Manurewa from
DRIVE, Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

THAB

THAB

Do not support a change of zone from MHS to THAB,


MHU
support change to MHU - the sites are not located in
close walking distance from the Clendon Park Local
Centre, sufficient intensification has been provided for in
areas directly adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will
provide an appropriate level of growth and will act as a
transition between the THAB area and MHS. The
surrounding block should also be rezoned to MHU (out of
scope) to prevent spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Managing flooding risks on the sites does not require a
SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support a change to THAB and support change to MHU
MHU - the site is not located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient
intensification has been provided for in areas directly
adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU

MHU

Support

Meets criteria for MHU - consider flooding constraints can


be addressed through development controls of Plan

MHU

Support

Meets criteria for MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7220

839-7221

839-7222

839-7223

839-7224

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 88,86,
GLENVEAGH PARK
DRIVE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Clendon Park
88,86,
GLENVEAGH PARK
DRIVE, Weymouth

Rezone 45,49,41,
PALMERS
ROAD,11,13,15,17,7,
9, HATHERLEY PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Clendon Park
45,49,41,
PALMERS
ROAD,11,13,15,17
,7,9, HATHERLEY
PLACE, Clendon
Park

Rezone 19,15,
KENNINGTON DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

19,15,
KENNINGTON
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

Rezone 102,94,96,
GLENVEAGH PARK
DRIVE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
102,94,96,
GLENVEAGH PARK
DRIVE, Weymouth

Rezone 339,341,
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

339,341, MAHIA Clendon Park


ROAD, Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

SH, MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support a change of zone from SH and MHS to
THAB, support change to MHU - the site is not located in
close walking distance from the Clendon Park Local
Centre, sufficient intensification has been provided for in
areas directly adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will
provide an appropriate level of growth and will act as a
transition between the THAB area and MHS. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support a change to THAB and support change to
MHU - the site is not located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient
intensification has been provided for in areas directly
adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

977

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meets Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

Meets criteria for MHU


No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change
MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7225

839-7226

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 18,20,14,16,
CARN PLACE,
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone
43,25,26,27,21,23,28,
29,41,3,5,7,9,39A,11,
39B,13,15,17,19,32,3
1,30,37,35,33,
HANFORD
PLACE,11,1A,13,11A,
11C,11B,1,1B,15,
FINLAYSON
AVENUE,295,273,291
A,291B,289,285A,2/2
73A,1/273A,275,277,
281,279,283,285B,28
7, ROSCOMMON
ROAD, Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
18,20,14,16,
CARN PLACE,
Weymouth

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

43,25,26,27,21,23 Clendon Park


,28,29,41,3,5,7,9,
39A,11,39B,13,15,
17,19,32,31,30,37
,35,33, HANFORD
PLACE,11,1A,13,1
1A,11C,11B,1,1B,1
5, FINLAYSON
AVENUE,295,273,
291A,291B,289,28
5A,2/273A,1/273
A,275,277,281,27
9,283,285B,287,
ROSCOMMON
ROAD, Clendon
Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

978

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change
is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Although
the SH zone could be applied due to some of the sites
being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would
occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise the local context. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
839-7227

Urban (South)

Rezone 19,21,17,
FINLAYSON
AVENUE,12,20,14,16,
1/22-6/22,6,4,18,8,
HANFORD
PLACE,1,11,3,5,7,
BRAVA PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
19,21,17,
FINLAYSON
AVENUE,12,20,14,
16,1/226/22,6,4,18,8,
HANFORD
PLACE,1,11,3,5,7,
BRAVA PLACE,
Clendon Park

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7228

839-7229

839-7230

839-7231

839-7232

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone
27,33,31,29,35,43,
FINLAYSON
AVENUE,10,13,14,1/8
,2/8,2,4,6,2/12,1/12,
BRAVA PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

27,33,31,29,35,43 Clendon Park


, FINLAYSON
AVENUE,10,13,14,
1/8,2/8,2,4,6,2/12
,1/12, BRAVA
PLACE, Clendon
Park

Rezone 51,53,49,
FINLAYSON
AVENUE,3, KOPU
PLACE, Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
51,53,49,
FINLAYSON
AVENUE,3, KOPU
PLACE, Clendon
Park

Rezone 11,13,15,
COTTRELL PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
11,13,15,
COTTRELL PLACE,
Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

979

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Although
the SH zone could be applied due to some of the sites
being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would
occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise the local context. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change
is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHS

Rezone 14, ADEN


PLACE,9, DORENDIA
PLACE, Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
14, ADEN
PLACE,9,
DORENDIA PLACE,
Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 21,23,
COTTRELL PLACE,13,
MONCRIEFF AVENUE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21,23, COTTRELL Clendon Park


PLACE,13,
MONCRIEFF
AVENUE, Clendon
Park

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7233

839-7234

839-7235

839-7236

839-7237

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 10,8, ADEN


10,8, ADEN
PLACE, Clendon Park PLACE, Clendon
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Clendon Park
15, STOLL
PLACE,39,
MONCRIEFF
AVENUE, Clendon
Park

MHS

Rezone 8,6, NGATIRA 8,6, NGATIRA


PLACE, Clendon Park PLACE, Clendon
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 3,
TEMPLETON PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, TEMPLETON
PLACE, Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

Rezone 60,62,56,58,
BELLVILLE DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
60,62,56,58,
BELLVILLE DRIVE,
Clendon Park

Rezone 15, STOLL


PLACE,39,
MONCRIEFF AVENUE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

SH, MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of 56 Bellville Drive from SH to
MHU - the site is affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of 58, 60, 62 Bellville Drive from
MHS to MHU - Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The sites are not
within close proximity to a centre or RFN and therefore
the area is not suitable for further intensification. The
notified zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the

980

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7238

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 61,63,64,66,
BELLVILLE DRIVE,20,
WAI ITI PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Clendon Park
61,63,64,66,
BELLVILLE
DRIVE,20, WAI ITI
PLACE, Clendon
Park

SH

Rezone 68,64,66,
PITT AVENUE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
68,64,66, PITT
AVENUE, Clendon
Park

MHS

Rezone 12,14,
MAPLESDEN DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12,14,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

Rezone 34,
KENNINGTON
DRIVE,1/23,17,19,2/2
3,21,17A,19A,19B,
MAPLESDEN DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

34, KENNINGTON Clendon Park


DRIVE,1/23,17,19,
2/23,21,17A,19A,
19B, MAPLESDEN
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

MHS

Rezone
51,39,27,49,33,43,45,
37,29,35,41,47,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE,31,29,
KENNINGTON DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

981

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7239

839-7240

839-7241

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Clendon Park

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change
is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7242

Urban (South)

51,39,27,49,33,43
,45,37,29,35,41,4
7, MAPLESDEN
DRIVE,31,29,
KENNINGTON
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

THAB

Do not support change of zone to MHU, support change No change


to THAB. The site is within close proximity to the
Manurewa Town Centre and Manurewa Train Station and
can support more intensive growth. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
Rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
This is an out of scope change - please see Attachment F.

MHU

Oppose in Part

Meets criteria for MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7243

839-7244

839-7245

839-7246

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 57,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE,42A,44,42,44A
, BARNEYS FARM
ROAD, Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

57, MAPLESDEN Clendon Park


DRIVE,42A,44,42,
44A, BARNEYS
FARM ROAD,
Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 48A,48,50,
BARNEYS FARM
ROAD,61,
MAPLESDEN DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

48A,48,50,
BARNEYS FARM
ROAD,61,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 42,40,
MAPLESDEN DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

42,40,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

Rezone 24,30,28,
MAPLESDEN DRIVE,3,
DE BLOGE PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24,30,28,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE,3, DE
BLOGE PLACE,
Clendon Park

Clendon Park

Rezone 2,4,6, DE
BLOGE PLACE,20,
MAPLESDEN DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2,4,6, DE BLOGE
PLACE,20,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support a change to THAB and support change to


MHU - the site is not located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient
intensification has been provided for in areas directly
adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support a change to THAB and support change to
MHU - the site is not located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient
intensification has been provided for in areas directly
adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

982

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Oppose in Part

Meets criteria for MHU


MHU

MHU

Oppose in Part

Meets criteria for MHU


No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7247

Urban (South)

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7248

839-7249

839-7250

839-7251

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 10,8, DE
BLOGE PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10,8, DE BLOGE
PLACE, Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

Rezone 9,7, DE
BLOGE PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9,7, DE BLOGE
PLACE, Clendon
Park

Rezone
18,13,20,14,16, DE
BLOGE PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
18,13,20,14,16,
DE BLOGE PLACE,
Clendon Park

Rezone
24,10,26,12,20,14,22,
16,18,8, ROBERT
SKELTON PLACE,21,
ROBERT ROSS PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

24,10,26,12,20,14 Clendon Park


,22,16,18,8,
ROBERT SKELTON
PLACE,21, ROBERT
ROSS PLACE,
Clendon Park

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to THAB the sites are
located in close proximity to the Clendon Park Local
Centre and POS and are suitable for intensification.
Increased density around the centre will promote a
walkable neighbourhood, could improve the vitality of
the centre and achieves the THAB zone objectives. The
area is not currently serviced by a RFN, however is
connected to Manurewa Train Station by buses. Although
the SH zone could be applied due to three of the sites
being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would
occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise the local context. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the

983

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
THAB

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7252

839-7253

839-7254

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone
11,25,13,27,15,21,17,
23,19,31,37,29,35,33,
ROBERT SKELTON
PLACE, Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

11,25,13,27,15,21 Clendon Park


,17,23,19,31,37,2
9,35,33, ROBERT
SKELTON PLACE,
Clendon Park

Rezone
38,58,48,46,54,44,56,
42,36,40,34,60,62,64,
52,50, ROBERT
SKELTON
PLACE,87,91,89,85A,
85, MAPLESDEN
DRIVE, Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

38,58,48,46,54,44 Clendon Park


,56,42,36,40,34,6
0,62,64,52,50,
ROBERT SKELTON
PLACE,87,91,89,8
5A,85,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

Rezone
73A,75,73,75A,
MAPLESDEN DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

73A,75,73,75A,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

984

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from MHS to THAB the sites are THAB
located in close proximity to the Clendon Park Local
Centre and POS and are suitable for intensification.
Increased density around the centre will promote a
walkable neighbourhood, could improve the vitality of
the centre and achieves the THAB zone objectives. The
area is not currently serviced by a RFN, however is
connected to Manurewa Train Station by buses. Although
the SH zone could be applied due to three of the sites
being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would
occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise the local context. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of 85, 85A, 87, 89, 91 Maplesden MHU
Drive from MHS to THAB - The sites are not within close
proximity to a centre or RFN and therefore the area is not
suitable for further intensification. Managing flooding
risks on the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support a change to THAB for the properties on
Robert Skelton Place, support change to MHU - the sites
are not located in close walking distance from the
Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient intensification has
been provided for in areas directly adjacent to the Local
Centre. MHU will provide an appropriate level of growth
and will act as a transition between the THAB area and
MHS. Managing flooding risks on the sites does not
require a SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support a change to THAB and support change to MHU
MHU - the site is not located in close walking distance
from the Clendon Park Local Centre, sufficient
intensification has been provided for in areas directly
adjacent to the Local Centre. MHU will provide an
appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. The surrounding block
should also be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose in Part

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meets criteria for MHU

MHU

Oppose in Part

Meets criteria for MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7255

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone
26,45,49,32,30,34,47,
DUNGARVON
PLACE,52A,52B,52C,5
0B,50,52,60,62,64,50
C,50A,62A,
MAPLESDEN DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

26,45,49,32,30,34 Clendon Park


,47, DUNGARVON
PLACE,52A,52B,52
C,50B,50,52,60,62
,64,50C,50A,62A,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

MHS

Rezone 28,20,22,32,
TEMPLETON PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

28,20,22,32,
TEMPLETON
PLACE, Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

985

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone to MHU or THAB - MHS is No change


the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7256

Urban (South)

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

839-7257

Urban (South)

Rezone
37A,29A,39A,3A,5A,2
1,23,9A,29,41,3,5,7,9
,39,13A,11A,11,13,15
,31,37,23A,15A,15B,2
1A,31A,
DUNGARVON PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

37A,29A,39A,3A,5 Clendon Park


A,21,23,9A,29,41,
3,5,7,9,39,13A,11
A,11,13,15,31,37,
23A,15A,15B,21A,
31A,
DUNGARVON
PLACE, Clendon
Park

MHS

Rezone 88,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE,10,8A,12,14,16
,6,16A,14A,
DUNGARVON PLACE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

88, MAPLESDEN Clendon Park


DRIVE,10,8A,12,1
4,16,6,16A,14A,
DUNGARVON
PLACE, Clendon
Park

MHS

MHU

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the No change


MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone. The site is not in close
proximity to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7258

Urban (South)

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change


is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7259

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone
111A,123,117A,121,1
19,103A,115B,115,10
5A,117,121A,111,123
A,113,119A,103,113A
,101,115A,105,
MAPLESDEN DRIVE,
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

111A,123,117A,12 Clendon Park


1,119,103A,115B,
115,105A,117,121
A,111,123A,113,1
19A,103,113A,101
,115A,105,
MAPLESDEN
DRIVE, Clendon
Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

986

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change from MHS to THAB - MHS is the


No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose in Part

Meets criteria for MHU


839-7260

839-7261

839-7262

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone
25B,27A,27B,25A, Manurewa
25B,27A,27B,25A,
ALFRISTON ROAD,
ALFRISTON ROAD,
Manurewa
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Manurewa

MHU

Rezone
21,17,23,19,17A,19A,
FERGUSON STREET,
Manurewa East from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 83,
BEAUMONTS
WAY,279, GREAT
SOUTH ROAD,1/731/7, KEVALE PLACE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

17, 21, 23,


FERGUSON
STREET,
Manurewa East

83, BEAUMONTS Manurewa


WAY,279, GREAT
SOUTH ROAD,1/731/7, KEVALE
PLACE, Manurewa

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support change to THAB zone - The sites are in close


proximity to Gallaher Park, Manurewa Town Centre and
within walking distance to the RFN. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Do not support change of 17 and 21 Ferguson Street to


No change
THAB The properties are in close proximity to Te Mahia
Train Station, however Te Mahia has not been identified
as a centre and intensification here may compete with
Manurewa Town Centre. Sufficient additional growth has
been provided for surrounding Manurewa Town Centre
which is more appropriate for intensification. The
notified zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of 23 Ferguson Street to THAB,
support change to an alternative zone of MHU - in
keeping with the adjoining properties. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone to THAB, support
MHU
alternative change to MHU. The site is not located in
close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre,
sufficient intensification has been provided for in areas
directly adjacent to the Town Centre. MHU will provide
an appropriate level of growth and will act as a transition
between the THAB area and MHS. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7263

839-7264

839-7265

839-7266

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 33,31,29,35,
FERGUSON STREET,
Manurewa East from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 39,37,43,41,
MYERS ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
33,31,29,35,
FERGUSON
STREET,
Manurewa East

39,37,43,41,
MYERS ROAD,
Manurewa

LOCALITY

Manurewa

Manurewa

Manurewa
Rezone 55,57, MAICH 55,57, MAICH
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 5A,5, RIMU


ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5A,5, RIMU ROAD, Manurewa


Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

987

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of 33 and 35 Ferguson Street to


No change
THAB The properties are in close proximity to Te Mahia
Train Station, however Te Mahia has not been identified
as a centre and intensification here may compete with
Manurewa Town Centre. Sufficient additional growth has
been provided for surrounding Manurewa Town Centre
which is more appropriate for intensification. The
notified zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support change of 29 and 31 Ferguson Street to
THAB, support change to an alternative zone of MHU - in
keeping with the adjoining properties. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
The proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the No change
property is not adjacent to the Manurewa Town Centre
and is not suitable for further intensification. Sufficient
additional growth has been provided for in the areas
within close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre
and spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHU is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it acts as a transition between THAB
and MHS. The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7267

839-7268

839-7269

839-7270

839-7271

839-7272

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 57,59, TAWA 57,59, TAWA


CRESCENT,
CRESCENT,
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 99,95,97,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
99,95,97,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 36,34,
MCDIVITT STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

36,34, MCDIVITT
STREET,
Manurewa

Rezone 12,14,16,
MCDIVITT STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
12,14,16,
MCDIVITT STREET,
Manurewa

Rezone 77,75,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
77,75,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone
158,160,162,156,
MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

158,160,162,156, Manurewa SouthMHS


MAHIA ROAD,
Manurewa

Manurewa SouthMHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

988

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7273

839-7274

839-7275

839-7276

839-7277

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 1, ASTOR
PLACE,145, MAHIA
ROAD,114,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa SouthMHS
1, ASTOR
PLACE,145,
MAHIA ROAD,114,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

MHU

Rezone 21,23,
GAMBARE PLACE,23,
INNISMARA AVENUE,
Wattle Downs from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

21,23, GAMBARE Manurewa SouthMHS


PLACE,23,
INNISMARA
AVENUE, Wattle
Downs

MHU

Rezone 18B,18A,
THOMPSON
TERRACE, Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

18B,18A,
THOMPSON
TERRACE,
Manurewa

Manurewa

Manurewa

Rezone 10, MORRIN


STREET,1,
THOMPSON
TERRACE, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

10, MORRIN
STREET,1,
THOMPSON
TERRACE,
Manurewa

Rezone 16,
MOUNTFORT
STREET,10,
CLAYMORE STREET,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

16, MOUNTFORT Manurewa


STREET,10,
CLAYMORE
STREET,
Manurewa

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone to MHU, support a less
intensive zone of MHS - MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. Sufficient intensification has already been
provided around the Town Centre. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on
the sites does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

989

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
MHS

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7278

839-7279

839-1639

839-1666

839-1675

839-1679

839-1682

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 45,43,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
45,43,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD, Manurewa

Rezone 55,53,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD,1, DR
PICKERING AVENUE,
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

55,53,
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD,1, DR
PICKERING
AVENUE,
Manurewa

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 3, FAIRDALE


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 3,
AVENUE, Red Hill
FAIRDALE AVENUE,
Red Hill.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 4, SHERALEE


Suburban at 4,
PLACE, Red Hill
SHERALEE PLACE, Red
Hill.

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 38, RICE


Suburban at 38, RICE CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Papakura. Papakura

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 106, CARGILL


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 106,
STREET, Papakura
CARGILL STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 40, PRESIDENT


Suburban at 40,
AVENUE,
PRESIDENT AVENUE, Papakura
Papakura.

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

990

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1683

839-1700

839-1730

839-1740

839-1755

839-1772

839-1774

839-1783

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 13, VALENTINE


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 13,
STREET, Papakura
VALENTINE STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
2/16,1/16, SHERALEE
PLACE,2/133,1/133,
SETTLEMENT ROAD,
Papakura.

2/16,1/16,
Papakura - East MHS
SHERALEE
PLACE,2/133,1/13
3, SETTLEMENT
ROAD, Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 1, FAIRDALE


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 1,
AVENUE, Red Hill
FAIRDALE AVENUE,
Red Hill.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 1/32A,2/32A,


Suburban at
KELVIN ROAD,
1/32A,2/32A, KELVIN Papakura
ROAD, Papakura.

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 93,93A,


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 93,93A, DOMINION ROAD,
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 10, ROMILLY


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 10,
COURT, Papakura
ROMILLY COURT,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 8, BELGRAVE


Suburban at 8,
PLACE, Papakura
BELGRAVE PLACE,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 15, CHANTAL


Suburban at 15,
PLACE, Red Hill
CHANTAL PLACE, Red
Hill.

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

991

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1792

839-1826

839-1834

839-1847

839-1868

839-1869

839-1870

839-1876

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 152A,152B,


Suburban at
SETTLEMENT
152A,152B,
ROAD, Papakura
SETTLEMENT ROAD,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 15, TILBROOK


Suburban at 15,
PLACE, Papakura
TILBROOK PLACE,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 22, PRESIDENT


Suburban at 22,
AVENUE,
PRESIDENT AVENUE, Papakura
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 27, VALENTINE


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 27,
STREET, Papakura
VALENTINE STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 7, ROMILLY


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 7,
COURT, Papakura
ROMILLY COURT,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 69, CARGILL


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 69,
STREET, Papakura
CARGILL STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 21, VALENTINE


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 21,
STREET, Papakura
VALENTINE STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 7, TILBROOK


Suburban at 7,
PLACE, Papakura
TILBROOK PLACE,
Papakura.

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

992

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1877

839-1897

839-1900

839-1902

839-2088

839-2162

839-2163

839-2164

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 14, WESLEYDALE


Suburban at 14,
PLACE, Papakura
WESLEYDALE PLACE,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 48, ALMA


Suburban at 48,
CRESCENT,
ALMA CRESCENT,
Papakura.
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 16A, GROVE


Suburban at 16A,
ROAD, Papakura.
GROVE ROAD,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 2A, CAMERON


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 2A,
STREET, Papakura
CAMERON STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
114A,118B, OLD
WAIROA
ROAD,6A,6,4,4A,
SUNBURST STREET,
Papakura.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at
15A,15B,15, WILSON
PLACE, Papakura.

114A,118B, OLD Papakura - East MHS


WAIROA
ROAD,6A,6,4,4A,
SUNBURST
STREET, Papakura

MHS

15A,15B,15,
WILSON PLACE,
Papakura

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 10,10A, WILSON


Suburban at 10,10A, PLACE, Papakura
WILSON PLACE,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
1/32,2/32, SUTTON
CRESCENT,33, RICE
CRESCENT, Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

1/32,2/32,
SUTTON
CRESCENT,33,
RICE CRESCENT,
Papakura

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

993

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2165

839-2166

839-2167

839-2168

839-2169

839-2170

839-2171

839-2172

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
38A,2/36,38,1/36,
SUTTON
CRESCENT,39,37,41,
RICE CRESCENT,
Papakura.

38A,2/36,38,1/36, Papakura - East MHS


SUTTON
CRESCENT,39,37,4
1, RICE CRESCENT,
Papakura

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 78,
CARGILL
STREET,20,22,
VALENTINE STREET,
Papakura.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 47,49,
CARGILL STREET,
Papakura.

78, CARGILL
Papakura - East MHS
STREET,20,22,
VALENTINE
STREET, Papakura

MHS

47,49, CARGILL
Papakura - East MHS
STREET, Papakura

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 6A,6, CROSS


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 6A,6,
STREET, Papakura
CROSS STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 29,29A,


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 29,29A, ROLLERSON
ROLLERSON STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 33,33A,


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 33,33A, ROLLERSON
ROLLERSON STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 51A,47A,51B,49A, Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at
49B, ROLLERSON
51A,47A,51B,49A,49B STREET, Papakura
, ROLLERSON STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 14,14A, CROSS


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at 14,14A, STREET, Papakura
CROSS STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

REASONS

994

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2173

839-2174

839-2175

839-2176

839-2178

839-2179

839-2181

839-2184

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 2/40,2/42,1/40,1/ Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at
42, ROLLERSON
2/40,2/42,1/40,1/42, STREET, Papakura
ROLLERSON STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 32,34, PRESIDENT Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 32,34,
AVENUE,
PRESIDENT AVENUE, Papakura
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 12,14, BELGRAVE Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 12,14,
PLACE, Papakura
BELGRAVE PLACE,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 115,115A,


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at
DOMINION ROAD,
115,115A,
Papakura
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 79,
DOMINION ROAD,29,
BELGRAVE PLACE,
Papakura.

79, DOMINION
Papakura - East MHS
ROAD,29,
BELGRAVE PLACE,
Papakura

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 23,
HEATHDALE
CRESCENT,80,
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura.

23, HEATHDALE
Papakura - East MHS
CRESCENT,80,
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 3,5, DOMINION


Suburban at 3,5,
ROAD, Papakura
DOMINION ROAD,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 140C,140B,


Suburban at
SETTLEMENT
140C,140B,
ROAD, Papakura.
SETTLEMENT ROAD,
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on one of the sites does not require a SH
zone.The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

995

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2185

839-2186

839-2188

839-2190

839-2196

839-2197

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 10,12,20,18,2/14, Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at
1/14, SHERALEE
10,12,20,18,2/14,1/1 PLACE, Red Hill
4, SHERALEE PLACE,
Red Hill.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
2/9,7,1/9, REDCREST
AVENUE,11,13,15,
SHERALEE PLACE,
Papakura.

MHS

2/9,7,1/9,
Papakura - East MHS
REDCREST
AVENUE,11,13,15,
SHERALEE PLACE,
Papakura

Retain Mixed Housing 1,3,5, SHERALEE


Suburban at 1,3,5,
PLACE, Red Hill
SHERALEE PLACE, Red
Hill.

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 12, FULMEN


Suburban at 12,
PLACE, Red Hill
FULMEN PLACE, Red
Hill.

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 28A,30A,30,28,


Papakura - East MHS
Suburban at
CAMERON
28A,30A,30,28,
STREET, Papakura
CAMERON STREET,
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 11,9A,13,9B,15,


Suburban at
GROVE ROAD,
11,9A,13,9B,15,
Papakura
GROVE ROAD,
Papakura.

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

REASONS

996

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


No change
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHS zone at 7 Redcrest
SH/MHS
Avenue, support alternative change to SH - This site is
affected by flooding constraints and rezoning to SH zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS. This change is out
of scope. (refer Attachment F).
Support retention of MHS zone for the remaining
properties - MHS is the most appropriate zone for the
sites as they are not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on these sites does not require a SH zone.
The notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2198

839-2226

839-2257

839-2259

839-2303

839-2437

839-2473

839-2476

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
53A,49,51A,51,49A,5
3, ALMA CRESCENT,
Papakura.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

53A,49,51A,51,49 Papakura - East MHS


A,53, ALMA
CRESCENT,
Papakura.

Retain Mixed Housing 23A, WINIATA


Suburban at 23A,
TERRACE,
WINIATA TERRACE, Papakura
Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 2/10, 1/10, 4/10, Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 2/10,
3/10 KELVIN
1/10, 4/10, 3/10
ROAD. Papakura
KELVIN ROAD.
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 20 ELSIE MORTON Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 20 ELSIE PLACE. Papakura
MORTON PLACE.
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 142 SETTLEMENT Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 142
ROAD. Papakura
SETTLEMENT ROAD.
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 1/20,
2/20 WINIATA
TERRACE. Papakura.

MHS

1/20, 2/20
WINIATA
TERRACE.
Papakura

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 5 YARROW LANE. Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 5
Papakura
YARROW LANE.
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 1/20, 2/20 KELVIN Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 1/20,
ROAD. Papakura
2/20 KELVIN ROAD.
Papakura.

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the sites as they are not in close
proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and
it maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

997

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2501

839-2558

839-2559

839-2564

839-2755

839-2829

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 30 RICE


Suburban at 30 RICE CRESCENT.
CRESCENT. Papakura. Papakura

Papakura - East MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 4 LORIS PLACE.


Suburban at 4 LORIS Papakura
PLACE. Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 140 SETTLEMENT Papakura - East MHS


Suburban at 140
ROAD. Papakura
SETTLEMENT ROAD.
Papakura.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 6 CARISBROOK


Suburban at 6
CRESCENT.
CARISBROOK
Papakur
CRESCENT. Papakura.

Papakura - East MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 30A HILL


Suburban at 30A HILL CRESCENT.
CRESCENT. Papakura. Papakura

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 1, ETTRICK
LANE,10, YARROW
LANE,11,13,15,17,19,
1,3,21B,7,21A,9,5,
ELSIE MORTON
PLACE, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

1, ETTRICK
Papakura - East SH, MHS
LANE,10,
YARROW
LANE,11,13,15,17,
19,1,3,21B,7,21A,
9,5, ELSIE
MORTON PLACE,
Papakura

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most


appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone - MHS is the most
appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close proximity
to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Support retention of MHS zone at 1, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21A,
21B Elsie Morton Place and 10 Yarrow Lane - MHS is the
most appropriate zone for these sites as they are not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

998

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS at 3, 5, 7,


9, 11 Elise Morton Place and 1 Ettrick Lane - these sites
are affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5001

839-5008

839-5009

839-5095

839-5148

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 8, SALAS
PLACE, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
8, SALAS PLACE,
Papakura

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Papakura - East MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

Rezone 14, MCENTEE 14, MCENTEE


Papakura - East MHS
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 12, SHEEHAN 12, SHEEHAN


AVENUE, Papakura
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Papakura
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 20,
20, EASTBURN
Papakura - East MHS
EASTBURN STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 5, CITRIL
PLACE, Red Hill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

5, CITRIL PLACE,
Red Hill

Papakura - East MHS

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

999

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5200

839-5257

839-5346

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 6, KERRY
PLACE, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
6, KERRY PLACE,
Papakura

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Papakura - East MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

Rezone 48, KELVIN


48, KELVIN ROAD, Papakura - East MHS
ROAD, Papakura from Papakura
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 17, CITRIL


17, CITRIL PLACE, Papakura - East MHS
PLACE, Red Hill from Red Hill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban. This
submission point
does not match up
(address and existing
zoning).

MHU

Rezone 3, RICE
3, RICE CRESCENT, Papakura - East MHS
CRESCENT, Papakura Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 34,
34, EASTBURN
Papakura - East MHS
EASTBURN STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

REASONS

1000

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5401

839-5424

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No Change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5621

839-5783

839-5801

839-5814

839-5816

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 1/46,2/46,
1/46,2/46,
Papakura - East MHS
COSGRAVE ROAD,
COSGRAVE ROAD,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 14, DULCIE


PLACE, Red Hill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

14, DULCIE PLACE, Papakura - East MHS


Red Hill

Rezone 17, RICE


17, RICE
CRESCENT, Papakura CRESCENT,
from Mixed Housing Papakura
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 1, DULCIE
PLACE, Red Hill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

1, DULCIE PLACE, Papakura - East MHS


Red Hill

Rezone 19, SHEEHAN 19, SHEEHAN


AVENUE, Papakura
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Papakura
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1001

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5829

839-5897

839-5996

839-6152

839-6741

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 27,
27, EASTBURN
Papakura - East MHS
EASTBURN STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 11, MAURICE 11, MAURICE


Papakura - East MHS
STREET, Papakura
STREET, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 24, SHEEHAN 24, SHEEHAN


AVENUE, Papakura
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Papakura
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

MHU

Rezone 20, SHEEHAN 20, SHEEHAN


AVENUE, Papakura
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Papakura
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 53A,53,
FERNAIG
STREET,154,154A,
OLD WAIROA ROAD,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

53A,53, FERNAIG Papakura - East MHS


STREET,154,154A,
OLD WAIROA
ROAD, Papakura

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone.
Managing flooding risks on the sites does not require a
SH zone. The notified zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives

1002

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7331

839-7332

839-7333

839-7334

839-7280

839-7399

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 7A,7,
7A,7, ROLLERSON Papakura - East MHS
ROLLERSON STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 2,2A,
2,2A, ROLLERSON Papakura - East MHS
ROLLERSON STREET, STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 15,17A,17,
15,17A,17,
Papakura - East MHS
ROLLERSON STREET, ROLLERSON
Papakura from Mixed STREET, Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 10,12,14,8,
10,12,14,8, RICE
RICE CRESCENT,
CRESCENT,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 37,
37, INNISMARA
INNISMARA AVENUE, AVENUE, Wattle
Wattle Downs from Downs
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Manurewa SouthMHS

Rezone 19,1/2119,1/21-4/21,17, The Gardens


4/21,17, SHIFNAL
SHIFNAL DRIVE,
DRIVE, Randwick Park Randwick Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1003

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission
No change

MHU

Oppose
Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given
Corporations submission

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7400

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 5,
5, SECRETARIAT
SECRETARIAT PLACE, PLACE, Randwick
Randwick Park from Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

The Gardens

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

1004

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7402

839-7403

839-7336

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 20, TAITIMU


DRIVE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
20, TAITIMU
DRIVE, Weymouth

Rezone 22, TAITIMU


DRIVE, Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
22, TAITIMU
DRIVE, Weymouth

Rezone 57,
ROLLERSON
STREET,6A,8B,4,6,8,4
A, SHEEHAN AVENUE,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

57, ROLLERSON
Papakura - East MHS
STREET,6A,8B,4,6,
8,4A, SHEEHAN
AVENUE,
Papakura

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No change
is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a
RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7405

839-7414

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 4, WINSFORD 4, WINSFORD


STREET, Manurewa STREET,
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa

Manurewa
Rezone 2, KERRYDALE 2, KERRYDALE
ROAD, Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7441

839-7443

839-7450

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 14 WAIMAI 14 WAIMAI


AVENUE. Weymouth AVENUE.
from Mixed Housing Weymouth
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

Manurewa
Rezone 28 FAIRLIGHT 28 FAIRLIGHT
PLACE. Manurewa
PLACE. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 16
ROSEMEAD PLACE.
Randwick Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

16 ROSEMEAD
PLACE. Randwick
Park

The Gardens

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1005

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7338

839-7451

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 5,7, SHEEHAN 5,7, SHEEHAN


AVENUE, Papakura
AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Papakura
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 7 ADVOCATE 7 ADVOCATE


PLACE. Randwick Park PLACE. Randwick
from Single House to Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

The Gardens

SH

MHU

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHS - managing
MHS
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. MHS is the most appropriate zone for the site as
it is not in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7339

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone
5A,5,6,3B,3A,4B,4A,
LIDDY PLACE,31,
EASTBURN
STREET,10,12,
MAURICE STREET,1,3,
KERRY PLACE,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

5A,5,6,3B,3A,4B,4 Papakura - East MHS


A, LIDDY
PLACE,31,
EASTBURN
STREET,10,12,
MAURICE
STREET,1,3,
KERRY PLACE,
Papakura

MHU

Rezone 12 BOOKER
PLACE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
12 BOOKER
PLACE. Weymouth

MHU

REASONS

1006

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No Change


is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a
RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7458

839-7466

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 139 SHIFNAL 139 SHIFNAL


DRIVE. Randwick Park DRIVE. Randwick
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

The Gardens

MHS

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the
No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7470

839-7347

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 15 ARTHUR
ROAD. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15 ARTHUR ROAD. Manurewa


Manurewa

MHS

Rezone
80C,80B,80A,80F, Papakura - East MHS
80C,80B,80A,80F,80E 80E,80D, KELVIN
,80D, KELVIN ROAD, ROAD, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7475

839-7491

839-7493

839-7502

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 12 BELLVILLE 12 BELLVILLE


DRIVE. Clendon Park DRIVE. Clendon
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 28 YEARSLEY 28 YEARSLEY
PLACE. Manurewa
PLACE. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 63 ROBERT
SKELTON PLACE.
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

63 ROBERT
SKELTON PLACE.
Clendon Park

Rezone 11
11 KENNINGTON
KENNINGTON DRIVE. DRIVE. Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 20
20 KENNINGTON
KENNINGTON DRIVE. DRIVE. Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be
rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning,
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1007

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
839-7506

839-7508

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 11 VOLTA
11 VOLTA PLACE. Clendon Park
PLACE. Clendon Park Clendon Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7512

839-7515

839-7350

839-7517

839-7526

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 30
30 CHURCHILL
CHURCHILL AVENUE. AVENUE.
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Manurewa

Rezone 1 BEACH
ROAD. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1 BEACH ROAD.
Weymouth

Clendon Park

Rezone 1/6,2/6,
PALISADE
PLACE,25,27,21,23,19
,29, GALILEE AVENUE,
Red Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1/6,2/6, PALISADE Papakura - East MHS


PLACE,25,27,21,2
3,19,29, GALILEE
AVENUE, Red Hill

MHU

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 29 ETHERTON 29 ETHERTON
DRIVE. Weymouth
DRIVE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

10 NEEMS PLACE. Clendon Park


Manurewa

MHS

Rezone 10 NEEMS
PLACE. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1008

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the No change


property is not adjacent to the Manurewa Town Centre
and is not suitable for further intensification. Sufficient
additional growth has been provided for in the areas
within close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre
and spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHU is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it acts as a transition between THAB
and MHS. The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS No Change
is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone.
Managing flooding risks on one of the sites does not
require a SH zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on spot zoning given


Corporations submission

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7535

839-7539

839-7351

839-7540

839-7353

839-7554

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 105 MAICH


ROAD. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

105 MAICH ROAD. Manurewa


Manurewa

Rezone 7 SENATOR
DRIVE. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7 SENATOR DRIVE. The Gardens


Manurewa

Rezone 13,15,14,
IGLOO PLACE,12,14,
GALILEE AVENUE,
Red Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

13,15,14, IGLOO Papakura - East MHS


PLACE,12,14,
GALILEE AVENUE,
Red Hill

Rezone 8 HONEY
PLACE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8 HONEY PLACE.
Weymouth

Rezone 2,3,1/4,2/4,
IGLOO PLACE,6,
GALILEE AVENUE,
Red Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

2,3,1/4,2/4,
Papakura - East MHS
IGLOO PLACE,6,
GALILEE AVENUE,
Red Hill

Clendon Park

Clendon Park
Rezone 30 SETTLERS 30 SETTLERS
COVE. 1 MATILDA
COVE. 1 MATILDA
PLACE. Weymouth
PLACE. Weymouth
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from MHS to MHU - MHS is the
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from SH to MHS - Although the
SH zone could be retained to one of the sites due to the
site being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone
would occur and in this location a spot zone will not
generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context.
Rezoning to MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

1009

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No Change

MHS

Support
Recognise accessibility constraints in proximity assessment
for this area

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No Change

MHS

Support

Proximity constraints
MHS

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7570

839-7354

839-7571

839-7591

839-7601

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Clendon Park
Rezone 219
219 FINLAYSON
FINLAYSON AVENUE. AVENUE. Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 8,7,6, IGLOO 8,7,6, IGLOO


PLACE, Red Hill from PLACE, Red Hill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 4 NICHOLAS
GIBBONS DRIVE.
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4 NICHOLAS
GIBBONS DRIVE.
Clendon Park

Clendon Park

Rezone 4
TAMWORTH CLOSE.
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
4 TAMWORTH
CLOSE. Manurewa

Rezone 9
9 DAGENHAM
DAGENHAM STREET. STREET.
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased
residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. Managing flooding risks on the site does
not require a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties
need to be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Although the SH zone could be
applied due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and in this location
a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the
local context. The notified zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives

1010

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No Change

MHS

Support

Proximity constraints
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7603

839-7605

839-7613

839-7615

839-7617

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 41 MAHIA
ROAD. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

41 MAHIA ROAD. Manurewa


Manurewa

Rezone 12 WHITE
ROAD. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

12 WHITE ROAD.
Manurewa

Rezone 1
ADDINGTON
AVENUE. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1 ADDINGTON
AVENUE.
Manurewa

Rezone 64 SHARLAND 64 Sharland


AVENUE. Manurewa Avenue
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Homai Station

Homai Station

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

The Gardens
Rezone 60 STELLATA 60 STELLATA
COURT. Randwick
COURT. Randwick
Park from Mixed
Park
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 9 BENTON
9 BENTON PLACE. Clendon Park
PLACE. Manurewa
Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The site is
within close proximity to Homai Train Station and a
higher level of intensification here will increase the
capacity of housing with good access to public transport.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS. Surrounding properties need to be rezoned to
MHU (out of scope) to prevent spot zoning, see
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU,
support change to THAB - the site is located across the
road from Clendon Park Local Centre and increased
density in this location would create a compact urban
form and promote a walkable neighbourhood. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Scope provided by submissions 5277-205 and 5280-207,
Support change of zone to THAB - The sites are in close
proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and RFN. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1011

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
THAB

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
839-7623

Urban (South)

THAB

Do not support change from MHS to THAB - MHS is the


No change
most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in close
proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN and it
maintains the planned suburban built character of this
zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose in Part

Meets criteria for MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7626

839-7357

839-7633

839-7358

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 56 SCENIC
DRIVE. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

56 SCENIC DRIVE. Manurewa


Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 15,14, CITRIL 15,14, CITRIL


PLACE, Red Hill from PLACE, Red Hill
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 22
22 KENNINGTON
KENNINGTON DRIVE. DRIVE. Clendon
Clendon Park from
Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 28, REDCREST


AVENUE,11,10,13,12,
14,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8,
GAME PLACE,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

28, REDCREST
Papakura - East MHS
AVENUE,11,10,13,
12,14,3,2,5,4,7,6,
9,8, GAME PLACE,
Papakura

Rezone 69
TEMPLETON PLACE.
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

69 TEMPLETON
PLACE. Clendon
Park

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the sites as they are not
in close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1012

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Consider MHU proximate and wider zoning pattern


839-7647

Urban (South)

Clendon Park

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7655

839-7360

839-7675

839-7705

839-7361

839-7707

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 16
DERRYVEAGH LANE.
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

16 DERRYVEAGH Clendon Park


LANE. Weymouth

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

Rezone 11,9A,11A,
11,9A,11A, MACK Papakura - East MHS
MACK PLACE, Red Hill PLACE, Red Hill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Clendon Park
Rezone 75 ETHERTON 75 ETHERTON
DRIVE. Weymouth
DRIVE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 56 HALSEY
ROAD. 1/47, 2/47
JELLICOE ROAD.
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 8B,8C,8A,
LAURIE AVENUE,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

56 HALSEY ROAD. Manurewa


1/47, 2/47
JELLICOE ROAD.
Manurewa

MHS

MHS

8B,8C,8A, LAURIE Papakura - East MHS


AVENUE,
Papakura

Rezone 86 PITT
86 PITT AVENUE.
AVENUE. Clendon
Clendon Park
Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to Clendon Park Local Centre or a RFN
and it maintains the planned suburban built character of
this zone. . The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

1013

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7710

839-7711

839-7712

839-7718

839-7362

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 38 BEESTON
CRESCENT.
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

38 BEESTON
CRESCENT.
Manurewa

Rezone 88
FRIEDLANDERS
ROAD. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

88 FRIEDLANDERS Manurewa SouthMHS


ROAD. Manurewa

Rezone 87
BEAUMONTS WAY.
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

87 BEAUMONTS
WAY. Manurewa

Rezone 23 TAWA
CRESCENT.
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

23 TAWA
CRESCENT.
Manurewa

Manurewa

Manurewa

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone
11,13,13A,11B,
Papakura - East MHS
11,13,13A,11B,
ELIZABETH
ELIZABETH STREET,
STREET, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1014

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No Change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7722

839-7726

839-7731

839-7740

839-7745

839-7752

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 15 SILVER
CREEK ROAD.
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15 SILVER CREEK Clendon Park


ROAD. Weymouth

Rezone 139 MAHIA


ROAD. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

139 MAHIA ROAD. Manurewa SouthMHS


Manurewa

Rezone 31 SHIFNAL 31 SHIFNAL


DRIVE. Randwick Park DRIVE. Randwick
from Mixed Housing Park
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

The Gardens

Rezone 12
TEMPLETON PLACE.
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

12 TEMPLETON
PLACE. Clendon
Park

Rezone 7 COLT
7 COLT PLACE.
PLACE. Randwick Park Randwick Park
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 20 SILVER
CREEK ROAD.
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

The Gardens

20 SILVER CREEK Clendon Park


ROAD. Weymouth

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change in zoning. The Manurewa Town
Centre Concept Plan was taken into account and the
Local Board was consulted on the draft and PAUP. The
zoning proposed in and around the Town Centre provides
for further intensification and revitalisation of the Centre.
The notified zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the zone objectives and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

1015

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7753

839-7757

839-7759

839-7761

839-7770

839-7776

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 7 SUWYN
PLACE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
7 SUWYN PLACE.
Weymouth

Rezone 12
12 WAIMAHIA
WAIMAHIA AVENUE. AVENUE.
Weymouth from
Weymouth
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Clendon Park

Clendon Park

Rezone 23 SILVER
CREEK ROAD.
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

23 SILVER CREEK Clendon Park


ROAD. Weymouth

Rezone 25 MON
DESIR PLACE.
Manurewa from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Clendon Park
25 MON DESIR
PLACE. Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

Rezone 545
545 WEYMOUTH Clendon Park
WEYMOUTH ROAD. ROAD. WeymouthWeymouthManurewa East
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 482
482 PORCHESTER The Gardens
PORCHESTER ROAD. ROAD. Takanini
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU, support
change to MHS - Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The site is not
within close proximity to a centre or RFN and therefore
the area is not suitable for further intensification.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require a SH
zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone to THAB - The sites are in close
proximity to Manurewa Town Centre and RFN. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1016

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7363

839-7364

839-7784

839-7808

839-7810

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 8,8A,
EDMUND HILLARY
AVENUE,7A,7,
ELIZABETH STREET,
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

8,8A, EDMUND
Papakura - East MHS
HILLARY
AVENUE,7A,7,
ELIZABETH
STREET, Papakura

Rezone 54,54A,
54,54A, WILLIS
WILLIS ROAD,
ROAD, Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 9 SPARROW
PLACE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
9 SPARROW
PLACE. Weymouth

Rezone 11 TONSON
PLACE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
11 TONSON
PLACE. Weymouth

Rezone 7 SPARROW
PLACE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park
7 SPARROW
PLACE. Weymouth

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

1017

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7816

839-7827

839-7830

839-7837

839-7846

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 3 WAIMAI
3 WAIMAI
AVENUE. Weymouth AVENUE.
from Mixed Housing Weymouth
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 7A FLEMING 7A FLEMING


STREET. Manurewa STREET.
East from Mixed
Manurewa East
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manurewa

Rezone 65 PITT
65 PITT AVENUE.
AVENUE. Clendon
Clendon Park
Park from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Clendon Park

Rezone 11 MARK
EDGAR PLACE.
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

11 MARK EDGAR
PLACE. Clendon
Park

Rezone 6 WINSFORD 6 WINSFORD


STREET. Manurewa STREET.
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the
property is not adjacent to the Manurewa Town Centre
and is not suitable for further intensification. Sufficient
additional growth has been provided for in the areas
within close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre
and spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHU is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it acts as a transition between THAB
and MHS. The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - MHS
is the most appropriate zone for the site as it is not in
close proximity to a centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1018

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7851

839-7858

839-7368

839-7551

839-7867

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 146F GREAT 146F GREAT


SOUTH ROAD.
SOUTH ROAD.
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Rezone 7 GIBBONS
ROAD. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Manurewa

7 GIBBONS ROAD. Clendon Park


Weymouth

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

Rezone 41A,41,
41A,41,
Papakura - East MHS
COSGRAVE ROAD,
COSGRAVE ROAD,
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 11
11 CHRISARDA
CHRISARDA PLACE.
PLACE. Red Hill
Red Hill from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 2-4 REBECCA 2-4 REBECCA RISE. Clendon Park


RISE. Weymouth
Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the


property is not adjacent to the Manurewa Town Centre
and is not suitable for further intensification. Sufficient
additional growth has been provided for in the areas
within close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre
and spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHU is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it acts as a transition between THAB
and MHS. Managing flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The notified zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

1019

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7557

839-7885

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 1/76, 2/76


SUTTON CRESCENT.
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
1/76, 2/76
SUTTON
CRESCENT.
Papakura

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 3
3 SECRETARIAT
SECRETARIAT PLACE. PLACE. Randwick
Randwick Park from Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

The Gardens

Rezone 7 KERN
PLACE. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1020

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7894

839-7649

839-7895

839-7907

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

7 KERN PLACE.
Manurewa

MHS

MHU

Rezone 2/12, 1/12


2/12, 1/12 CITRIL Papakura - East MHS
CITRIL PLACE. Red Hill PLACE. Red Hill
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Clendon Park
Rezone 17 LANDETTE 17 LANDETTE
ROAD. Manurewa
ROAD. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

Clendon Park
1/32-2/32
TAITIMU DRIVE. 1
BLACKGATE
PLACE. Weymouth

MHS

Rezone 1/32-2/32
TAITIMU DRIVE. 1
BLACKGATE PLACE.
Weymouth from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Increased


residential density around Clendon Park Local Centre will
create a compact urban form and promote a walkable
neighbourhood. Managing flooding risks on the site does
not require a SH zone. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS. Surrounding properties
need to be rezoned to MHU (out of scope) to prevent
spot zoning, see Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to a
centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban
built character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7909

839-7912

839-7922

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 514
514 WEYMOUTH Clendon Park
WEYMOUTH ROAD. ROAD. WeymouthWeymouthManurewa East
Manurewa East from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Manurewa
Rezone 26 ALFRISTON 26 ALFRISTON
ROAD. Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 484
484 PORCHESTER The Gardens
PORCHESTER ROAD. ROAD. Takanini
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

1021

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support change of zone from MHU to THAB - The site is THAB
in close proximity to Gallaher Park, Manurewa Town
Centre and RFN. The rezoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified zone. Retention of the MHS No change


zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone. The site is not in close proximity
to a centre or an RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7923

839-7934

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 53
WEYMOUTH ROAD.
WeymouthManurewa East from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 32
GREENMEADOWS
AVENUE. Manurewa
East from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
53 WEYMOUTH
ROAD. WeymouthManurewa East

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Manurewa
32
GREENMEADOWS
AVENUE.
Manurewa East

SH

MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7937

Urban (South)

Rezone 16 BURBANK 16 BURBANK


AVENUE. Manurewa AVENUE.
from Mixed Housing Manurewa
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. Managing flooding risks on the
site does not require a SH zone. The notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7942

839-7945

839-7952

839-7953

839-7703

839-7973

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 48
48 CHURCHILL
CHURCHILL AVENUE. AVENUE.
Manurewa from
Manurewa
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

LOCALITY

Manurewa

Rezone 9 MONTILLA
PLACE. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Manurewa
9 MONTILLA
PLACE. Manurewa

Rezone 9 TONSON
PLACE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

9 TONSON PLACE. Clendon Park


Weymouth

Rezone 29
TEMPLETON PLACE.
Clendon Park from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29 TEMPLETON
PLACE. Clendon
Park

Clendon Park

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 2/2, 1/2


2/2, 1/2 ALBION
ALBION PLACE.
PLACE. Papakura
Papakura from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 17
17 WAIMAHIA
WAIMAHIA AVENUE. AVENUE.
Weymouth from
Weymouth
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1022

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from SH to MHU - Managing


flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining a
SH zone. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. The notified zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7980

839-7708

839-7982

839-7991

839-7992

839-7993

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 5A LUCAS
PLACE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5A LUCAS PLACE. Clendon Park


Weymouth

Rezone 2/9, 1/9


EDMUND HILLARY
AVENUE. Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2/9, 1/9 EDMUND Papakura - East MHS


HILLARY AVENUE.
Papakura

Rezone 11 PIRITI
PLACE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11 PIRITI PLACE.
Weymouth

Rezone 53 NICHOLAS 53 NICHOLAS


GIBBONS DRIVE.
GIBBONS DRIVE.
Clendon Park from
Clendon Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Clendon Park

Clendon Park

MHS

MHS

MHS

Clendon Park
Rezone 76 ETHERTON 76 ETHERTON
DRIVE. Weymouth
DRIVE. Weymouth
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Clendon Park

MHS

Rezone 42 NICHOLAS 42 NICHOLAS


GIBBONS DRIVE.
GIBBONS DRIVE.
Clendon Park from
Clendon Park
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Clendon
Park Local Centre or a RFN and it maintains the planned
suburban built character of this zone. Managing flooding
risks on the site does not require a SH zone. The notified
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

1023

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7725

839-7997

839-7974

839-7998

839-8311

839-8098

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (south)

SUMMARY

Rezone 13 DULCIE
PLACE. Red Hill from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

13 DULCIE PLACE. Papakura - East MHS


Red Hill

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

Rezone 46 BELFRY
46 BELFRY PLACE. Manurewa SouthMHS
PLACE. Wattle Downs Wattle Downs
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 17 MCENTEE 17 MCENTEE


Papakura - East MHS
STREET. Papakura
STREET. Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 1 ROLLERSON 1 ROLLERSON


Papakura - East MHS
STREET. Papakura
STREET. Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 15A EDMUND 15A EDMUND


Papakura - East MHS
HILLARY AVENUE.
HILLARY AVENUE.
Papakura from Mixed Papakura
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 268 MAHIA


ROAD. Manurewa
from Road [i] to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

268 Mahia Road,


Manurewa

Clendon Park

Road

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to Papakura
Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support a change of zone to MHU - the property
has been incorrectly zoned as Road however the site is
not within close proximity to a town centre or RFN and
does not achieve the MHU zone objectives. Support
change of the property to MHS in keeping with
surrounding properties. The rezoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS

1024

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8149

839-5236

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Manurewa
Rezone 20A
20A BOWATER
BOWATER PLACE.
PLACE. Manurewa
Manurewa from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 2/2,1/2,
2/2,1/2,
GLENBURN PLACE,
GLENBURN
Papakura from Mixed PLACE, Papakura
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Takinini

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

REASONS

1025

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support a change to THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - sufficient additional growth has
been provided for in the areas within close walking
distance to Manurewa Town Centre and spot zoning in
this location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. MHU is the most appropriate zone for the site as
it acts as a transition between THAB and MHS. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the No change
property is not adjacent to the Takanini Town Centre and
is not suitable for further intensification. The notified
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-8160

839-5237

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Manurewa
Rezone 45 ALFRISTON 45 ALFRISTON
ROAD. Manurewa
ROAD, Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

Rezone 1/6,2/6,
1/6,2/6,
GLENBURN PLACE,
GLENBURN
Papakura from Mixed PLACE, Papakura
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Takinini

MHU

Rezone 2/2,3/2,1/2, 2/2,3/2,1/2,


BEACH ROAD,
BEACH ROAD,
Takanini from Mixed Takanini
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Takinini

THAB

THAB

Do not support a change to THAB zone and support a


MHU
change to MHU zone - sufficient additional growth has
been provided for in the areas within close walking
distance to Manurewa Town Centre and spot zoning in
this location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. MHU is the most appropriate zone for the site as
it acts as a transition between THAB and MHS. The
proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the No change
property is not adjacent to the Takanini Town Centre and
is not suitable for further intensification. The notified
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meets Assessment criteria

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5393

Urban (South)

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB. MHU No change


aligns with the zoning immediately west of the railway
line as far west as Great South Road, north of the
Takanini Town Centre. It is not close enough to the
Papakura Metropolitan Centre to make it suitable for
THAB. The notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8269

839-6735

839-8309

839-8316

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 9A FLEMING 9A FLEMING


STREET. Manurewa STREET,
East from Mixed
Manurewa East
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Manurewa

Rezone 44B,44,44A, 44B,44,44A,


TAKANINI ROAD,
TAKANINI ROAD
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Takinini

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

Manurewa SouthMHS
Rezone 1A CLAYTON 1A CLAYTON
ROAD. Manurewa
ROAD. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Manurewa
Rezone 52 COXHEAD 52 COXHEAD
ROAD. Manurewa
ROAD. Manurewa
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

MHU

Manurewa
52A COXHEAD
ROAD. Manurewa

SH

REASONS

1026

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - the


property is not adjacent to the Manurewa Town Centre
and is not suitable for further intensification. Sufficient
additional growth has been provided for in the areas
within close walking distance to Manurewa Town Centre
and spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHU is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it acts as a transition between THAB
and MHS. The notified zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - a
spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of
resources and does not recognise the local context. MHU
aligns with the zoning immediately west of the railway
line as far west as Great South Road north of the Takanini
Town Centre. Retaining the MHU zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to a centre
or a RFN and it maintains the planned suburban built
character of this zone. The notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these
sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU - these


sites are affected by flooding constraints and retaining
the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-8317

839-8315

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rezone 52A
COXHEAD ROAD.
Manurewa from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 81A
PORCHESTER ROAD.
Takanini from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

81A PORCHESTER Takinini


ROAD. Takanini

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB - Spot No change


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHU aligns with the zoning east
of the railway in the vicinity of Porchester Road for
established residential areas between the Takanini Town
Centre and the Papakura Metropolitan Centre. Retention
of the MHU zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8329

839-5514

839-1563

839-1565

839-1568

839-1577

839-1586

839-1590

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Urban (South)

Urban (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 1 CLARK
STREET. Manurewa
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1 CLARK STREET.
Manurewa

Rezone 3, SALAS
PLACE, Papakura
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, SALAS PLACE,
Papakura

LOCALITY

Manurewa

Waiuku

Retain Future Urban


at 3, FITZGERALD
ROAD, Drury.

Drury and
Opaheke

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 47,
Paerata Road,
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 15, LINA
PLACE, Waiuku.

47, Paerata Rd,


Pukekohe

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 18,
Paerata Road,
Pukekohe.
Retain Rural
Production at 388,
UNION ROAD,
Mauku.

18, Paerata Rd,


Pukekohe

15 Lina Place,
Waiuku

388 Union Rd,


Mauku

MHS

Papakura - East MHS

Rezone 42, HUIA


42 Huia St,
STREET, Waiuku from Waiuku
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban
3 Fitzgerald Rd,
Drury

PAUP ZONE

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential
Waiuku

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential
Patumahoe

SH

FU

MHS

MHS

MHS

RP

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

FU

MHS

MHS

MHS

RP

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot


zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the site as it is not in close proximity to
Manurewa Town Centre or a RFN and it maintains the
planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - Spot
zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. MHS is the most appropriate
zone for the sites as they are not in close proximity to
Papakura Metropolitan Centre or a RFN and it maintains
the planned suburban built character of this zone. The
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change to MHS. The request will result in
spot zoning in this location and will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Retention of the RP zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the RP
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of FU zone. Site is within the notified
RUB. No rezoning of the FU is proposed because detailed
assessment of any constraints needs to occur, and
structure planning needs to be undertaken in accordance
with RPS B2.3 before an appropriate live zone can be
determined for land within the FU. Retention of the FU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the FU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support notified zone. Applying the SH zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the zone's objectives as it is consistent with local
context.
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support retention of the RP zone. RP is appropriate in the
local context. Retention of the RP zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the RP zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1027

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

FU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

RP

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1611

839-1671

839-1688

839-1692

839-1708

839-1709

839-1742

839-1763

839-1765

839-1777

839-1882

839-1888

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 34,
Kayes Road,
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 2, MATAI
STREET, Waiuku.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
34, Kayes Rd,
Pukekohe

2 Matai St,
Waiuku.

LOCALITY

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential
Waiuku

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 25 Lina Place,


Suburban at 25, LINA Waiuku
PLACE, Waiuku.

Waiuku

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 8,
Arnhem Place,
Pukekohe.
Retain Large Lot at
255, WAIUKU-OTAUA
ROAD, WaiukuOtaua.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 98, KING
STREET, Waiuku.

8, Arnhem Place,
Pukekohe

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential
Waiuku

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 54,
Tasman Street,
Pukekohe.
Retain Single House
at 1018, Paerata
Road, Pukekohe.

54, Tasman St,


Pukekohe

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential
1018, Paerata Rd, Pukekohe Pukekohe
Paerata and
Paerata East

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 11,
Birdwood Road,
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 106,
KITCHENER ROAD,
Waiuku.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 11A,11B,
LINA PLACE, Waiuku.

11, Birdwood Rd, Pukekohe Pukekohe


North
Pukekohe
residential
106 Kitchener Rd, Waiuku
Waiuku

MHS

11A and 11B Lina Waiuku


Place, Waiuku

MHS

255 WaiukuOtaua Rd, WaiukuOtaua


98 King St,
Waiuku

Retain Mixed Housing 29, London St,


Suburban at 29,
Pukekohe
London Street,
Pukekohe.

Waiuku

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

MHS

LL

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

LL

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site


gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support retention of LL. The site is on the periphery of
Waiuku and is unserviced. Retention of the notified zone
achieves the objectives of the LL zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.

1028

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

LL

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1894

839-2202

839-2203

839-2204

839-2205

839-2206

839-2207

839-2208

839-2209

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing 3, Ranch Place,


Suburban at 3, Ranch Pukekohe
Place, Pukekohe.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential
Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
26,24A,24B, Frank
Hewitt Street,
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 2,4,
Times Place,11,13,15,
Frank Hewitt Street,
Pukekohe.

26,24A,24B, Frank Pukekohe Hewitt St,


North
Pukekohe.
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

2,4, Times
Place,11,13,15,
Frank Hewitt St,
Pukekohe

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
11,15,11A, Times
Place, Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 1,3,5,7,
Times Place,9,5,7,
Frank Hewitt Street,
Pukekohe.

11,15,11A, Times Pukekohe Place, Pukekohe North


Pukekohe
residential
1,3,5,7, Times
Pukekohe Place,9,5,7, Frank North
Hewitt St,
Pukekohe
Pukekohe.
residential

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 30B,30, Frank


Suburban at 30B,30, Hewitt St,
Frank Hewitt Street, Pukekohe.
Pukekohe.

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 4,6, Frank Hewitt


Suburban at 4,6,
St, Pukekohe.
Frank Hewitt Street,
Pukekohe.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 52, Birdwood Rd


Suburban at 52,
East ,63,65, Beatty
Birdwood Road East, Rd, Pukekohe.
63,65, Beatty Road,
Pukekohe.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Pukekohe Suburban at
58,56,60,62,64,66 North
58,56,60,62,64,66,
, Birdwood Rd
Pukekohe
Birdwood Road EAST, East, Pukekohe.
residential
Pukekohe.

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

1029

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.

Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.

Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.

Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2210

839-2211

839-2212

839-2213

839-2214

839-2215

839-2216

839-2217

839-2218

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
67C,67A,67B,67,
Birdwood Road EAST,
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at
19,21,17, Windmill
Road,2,4,6, Tasman
Street,33,35,
Birdwood Road,
Pukekohe.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

67C,67A,67B,67, Pukekohe Birdwood Rd East, North


Pukekohe.
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

19,21,17,
Windmill Rd,2,4,6,
Tasman St,33,35,
Birdwood Rd,
Pukekohe

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 31,27,29, Holland


Suburban at
St,12, Tasman St,
31,27,29, Holland
Pukekohe.
Street,12, Tasman
Street, Pukekohe.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 1,3,5,7,
Arnhem Place,19,
Birdwood Road,9,17,
Tasman Street,
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 95A,
93B, 93A, 95B, 95,
Helvetia Road,
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 4,
Arnhem Place,
25,27,21,23, Tasman
Street, Pukekohe.

1,3,5,7, Arnhem
Place,19,
Birdwood Rd,9,17,
Tasman St,
Pukekohe.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

95A, 93B, 93A,


95B, 95, Helvetia
Rd, Pukekohe.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

4, Arnhem Place,
25,27,21,23,
Tasman St,
Pukekohe

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 14,16,
Tasman Street,42,
Holland Street,
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Use at
16, Harrington
Avenue,24,24A,
Victoria Street,
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 14,16,
Marblewood Grove,
Pukekohe.

14,16, Tasman St, Pukekohe 42, Holland St,


North
Pukekohe
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

16, Harrington
Avenue, 24,24A,
Victoria St,
Pukekohe.

Pukekohe MU
Town centre &
surrounds

14,16,
Pukekohe Marblewood
North
Grove, Pukekohe. Pukekohe
residential

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MU

MHS

REASONS

1030

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.

Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.

Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.

Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.

Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site No change
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MU

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2219

839-2220

839-2221

839-2222

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
10,12,12A, LINA
PLACE, Waiuku.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 3,3A,
KAURI DRIVE,
Waiuku.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at
108,108A,
RACECOURSE ROAD,
Waiuku.
Rezone 12,14,6,
BREAKER GROVE,
Waiuku from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban

10,12 and 12A


Lina Place,
Waiuku

LOCALITY

Waiuku

PAUP ZONE

MHS

3 and 3A Kauri Dr, Waiuku


Waiuku

MHS

108 and 108A,


Racecourse Rd,
Waiuku

Waiuku

MHS

12,14 and 6
Breaker Grove,
Waiuku

Waiuku

Retain Mixed Use at


10 Wesley Street.
Pukekohe.

10 Wesley St

Pukekohe MU
Town centre &
surrounds

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 17
McNally Road.
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 207
Queen Street.
Pukekohe.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 9 Merlot
Lane. Pukekohe.

17 McNally Rd.
Pukekohe

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

1031

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the No change


objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the No change
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the No change
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS. The site No change
is affected by flooding constraints. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-2296

839-2327

839-2426

839-2595

839-2596

839-2833

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential
207 Queen St.
Pukekohe Pukekohe
Rest of
Pukekohe
residential
9 Merlot Lane,
Pukekohe Pukekohe.
North
Pukekohe
residential
Retain Mixed Housing 11 Merlot Lane,
Pukekohe Suburban at 11
Pukekohe.
North
Merlot Lane.
Pukekohe
Pukekohe.
residential
Rezone
24,12,20,14,22,16 Pukekohe 24,12,20,14,22,16,18, ,18, Times Place, North
Times Place, 56,58,
56,58, Beatty Rd, Pukekohe
Beatty Road,
Pukekohe
residential
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support notified zone. Applying the notified zone to the


site is the most appropriate way to achieve the MU
zone's objectives. The MU zoning will provide for a
compatible mix of residential and employment activities
on the periphery of the town centre.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support notified zone. Applying the MHS zone to the site
gives effect to the RPS, is the most appropriate way to
achieve the MHS zone's objectives and is consistent with
local context.
Support submitter's proposed zoning for
24,12,20,14,22,16,18, Times Place and 58 Beatty Road,
Pukekohe as is the most appropriate way to achieve the
MHS zone's objectives. 56 Beatty Rd which has a flooding
constraint such that it should be zoned SH.

No change
MU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

MHS - except
56 Beatty Rd
which should
be zoned SH.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2834

839-2835

839-2836

839-4956

839-4965

839-4992

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 19,21,23,
Times Place, 54,52,
Beatty Road,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
19,21,23, Times
Place,54,52,
Beatty Rd,
Pukekohe

Rezone 24,26,28,22, 24,26,28,22,


Tasman Street,
Tasman St
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban,
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Rezone 3232B,30,28,36,34A34B, Victoria Street,


Pukekohe from Mixed
Use, Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Use.

LOCALITY

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

32Pukekohe MU, MHS


32B,30,28,36,34A- Town centre &
34B, Victoria St,
surrounds
Pukekohe

Rezone 26, Kayes


26, Kayes Rd
Road, Pukekohe from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 5, Garden
5, Garden Terrace,
Terrace, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

SH

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 88,88A,
88,88A, Seddon
Seddon Street,
St, Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MU

MHS

MHU

MHU and
THAB

REASONS

Support change of zone in part. Support the rezoning of


19 and 21 Times Place and 52 and 54 Beatty Road where
managing flood risks on these sites does not require
maintaining a SH zoning. Zoning the sites MHS would be
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives for
the MHS zone which provides for a variety of detached
and attached housing types. 23 Times Place is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone in part. Managing flooding risks
does not require maintaining a SH zone for 28 Tasman St.
This site and No 22 can be zoned MHS, being the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives for the MHS
zone, - which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types. 24 and 26 Tasman St are affected
by flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone
is considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone. The zoning proposed gives
Proposed change to THAB - applying the proposed zone
to the sites gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives. The
THAB zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres and close to public
transport, enables efficient use of land and
infrastructure. The site offers the opportunity to achieve
quality compact residential development within walkable
distance of the town centre and/or railway station.
Support change to MHS. Managing flooding risk on this
site does not require maintaining a SH zone. Zoning the
site MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone which provides for a variety
of detached and attached housing types and gives effect
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone, which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.
Support proposed change to THAB - applying the
proposed zone to the sites gives effect to the RPS and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives.
The THAB zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres and close to public
transport, enables efficient use of land and
infrastructure. The site offers the opportunity to achieve
quality compact residential development within walkable
distance of the town centre and/or railway station.

1032

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH and MHS

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
SH and MHS

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
THAB

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

No change

Meet Criteria
THAB

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5017

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 12, McShane 12 McShane St,


Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

SH

Rezone 79A-79C,79, 79A-79C,79,


Princes Street,
Princes St,
Pukekohe from Single Pukekohe
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

SH

Rezone 17, Childs


17, Childs Avenue,
Avenue, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

SH

Rezone 8, Duke
8, Duke Avenue,
Avenue, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

SH

Rezone 2, Henry Curd 2, Henry Curd


Terrace, Pukekohe
Terrace, Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

SH

Rezone 37,
37, Montgomery
Montgomery Avenue, Avenue, Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 88, Kayes


88, Kayes Rd,
Road, Pukekohe from Pukekohe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

1033

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support proposed change. The site is affected by No change


flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5025

839-5046

839-5063

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

MHU

MHU

MHS

Support change of zone to MHS. Managing flooding risk MHS


on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
submitter's requested zone would however result in a
spot zone, which would not recognise local context.
Zoning the site MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone which provides
for a variety of detached and attached housing types and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone to MHS. Managing flooding risk MHS
on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
submitter's requested zone would however result in a
spot zone, which would not recognise local context.
Zoning the site MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone which provides
for a variety of detached and attached housing types and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support proposed change. The site is affected by No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-5068

839-5073

839-5100

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support zone as notified. Managing flooding risks on


these sites does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
submitter's requested zone would however result in a
spot zone, which would not recognise local context. The
most appropriate zoning is MHS. This is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types and gives effect to the RPS.
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
would result in a spot zone which would not generally
achieve intergarted management of resouce and would
not recognise local context. Zoning the site MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone, which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types and gives effect to the RPS.
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5184

839-5198

839-5208

839-5219

839-5225

839-5283

839-5351

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 2-2B, VALLEY 2-2B Valley Rd,


ROAD, Waiuku from Waiuku
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Suburban.
This is a retained
submission.

Waiuku

Rezone 34, McShane 34, McShane St,


Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 7, HOWDEN 7 Howden St,


STREET, Waiuku from Waiuku
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Suburban.
This is a retained
submission

Waiuku

MHS

Rezone 94, Kayes


94, Kayes Rd,
Road, Pukekohe from Pukekohe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

Rezone 32-34, Queen 32-34, Queen St,


Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Town Centre to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe TC
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 3, Hooper
Avenue, Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3, Hooper
Pukekohe Avenue, Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

Rezone 82,82A,
82,82A, Seddon
Seddon Street,
St, Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHS

MHS

MHS

Pukekohe MHS
Town centre &
surrounds

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

REASONS

1034

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the No change


objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


No change
would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the No change
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


No change
would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter. THAB
Applying the THAB zone gives effect to the RPS and is the
most appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone
objectives.

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.
MHU or THAB Support proposed change to THAB - applying the
proposed zone to the sites gives effect to the RPS and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone
objectives. The THAB zone allows terraced housing and
apartment residential living around town centres and
close to public transport, enables efficient use of land
and infrastructure. The site offers the opportunity to
achieve quality compact residential development within
walkable distance of the town centre and/or railway

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
THAB

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5407

839-5485

839-5509

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 48, Tasman


Street, Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
48, Tasman St,
Pukekohe

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 15, Duke


15, Duke Avenue,
Avenue, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

SH

Rezone 36,
36, Montgomery
Montgomery Avenue, Avenue, Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 7, Churchill
7, Churchill St,
Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban
or THAB.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

SH

Rezone 134,
Wellington Street,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 17, McShane
Street, Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

1035

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


No change
would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone to MHS. Managing flooding risk MHS
on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone.
Zoning the site MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone which provides
for a variety of detached and attached housing types and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
No change
would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-5548

Rural (South)

MHU or THAB Do not support proposed change. Site affected by


No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU or THAB

Oppose
Consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles

839-5577

839-5593

839-5688

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

134, Wellington
St, Pukekohe

17, McShane St,


Pukekohe

Rezone 65, Princes


65, Princes St,
Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


No change
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone,
which provides for a variety of detached and attached
housing types.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU - The No change
submitter's requested zone would result in a spot zone,
which would not recognise local context. Retaining the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone which provides for a variety
of detached and attached housing types and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support change of zone to MHS. Managing flooding risk MHS
on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
submitter's requested zone would however result in a
spot zone, which would not recognise local context.
Zoning the site MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone which provides
for a variety of detached and attached housing types and
gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-5722

839-5728

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 6, Prospect
6, Prospect
Pukekohe MHU
Terrace, Pukekohe
Terrace, Pukekohe Town centre &
from Mixed Housing
surrounds
Urban to Mixed
Housing Urban or
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Rezone 2, McShane 2, McShane St,


Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

SH

Rezone 40-40C,
40-40C, Dublin St,
Dublin Street,
Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

REASONS

1036

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

MHU or THAB Support proposed change to THAB - applying the


THAB
proposed zone to the site gives effect to the RPS and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone
objectives. The THAB zone allows terraced housing and
apartment residential living around town centres and
close to public transport, enables efficient use of land
and infrastructure. The site offers the opportunity to
achieve quality compact residential development within
walkable distance of the town centre and/or railway
MHU
Do not support proposed change. The site is affected by No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-5835

Rural (South)

THAB

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose in Part
Recognise the peripheral nature of this Centre and the
lower scale of development consider MHU appropriate

839-5879

839-5899

839-5962

839-5972

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rezone 68A,68B,
68A,68B, Kayes
Kayes Road,
Rd, Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 3, Holland
Street, Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 9, Henry Curd 9, Henry Curd


Terrace, Pukekohe
Terrace, Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 64, West


64, West St,
Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe SH
Town centre &
surrounds

3, Holland St,

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone to MHS. Managing


flooding risk on these sites does not require applying a
SH zone. The submitter's requested zone would however
result in a spot zone, which would not recognise local
context. Zoning the sites MHS is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone which
provides for a variety of detached and attached housing
types and gives effect to the RPS.
The submitter's requested zone would result in a spot
zone which would not recognise local context. Zoning the
site MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone which provides for a variety
of detached and attached housing types, and gives effect
to the RPS.
The submitter's requested zone would result in a spot
zone which would not recognise local context. Zoning the
site MHS is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone which provides for a variety
of detached and attached housing types, and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support change of zone to MHS. Managing flooding risk
on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
submitter's requested zone would however result in a
spot zone, which would not recognise local context.
Zoning the site MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone which provides
for a variety of detached and attached housing types and
gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6120

839-6134

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 3, Kennelly
3, Kennelly
Crescent, Pukekohe Crescent,
from Mixed Housing Pukekohe
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban or
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Pukekohe MHS
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 4,
4, Montgomery
Pukekohe MHS
Montgomery Avenue, Avenue, Pukekohe Town centre &
Pukekohe from Mixed
surrounds
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

REQUESTED
ZONE

REASONS

1037

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

MHU or THAB Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter. THAB
Managing flooding risks on these sites does not require
maintaining the notified zone. Applying THAB to the site
gives effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate way to
achieve the THAB zone objectives. The THAB zone allows
terraced housing and apartment residential living around
town centres, enables efficient use of land and
infrastructure. The site offers the opportunity to achieve
quality compact residential development within walkable
distance of the town centre.
MHU or THAB Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
No change
would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU or THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles


839-6151

Rural (South)

Rezone 30,
30, Montgomery
Montgomery Avenue, Avenue, Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 196,
Wellington Street,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 41-43, Beatty
Road, Pukekohe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

41-43, Beatty Rd, Pukekohe Pukekohe


North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

MHU

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-6157

839-6187

839-6385

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

196, Wellington
St, Pukekohe

Rezone
152,152A,152B,
152,152A,152B,
Great South Rd,
GREAT SOUTH ROAD, Drury
Drury from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Drury and
Opaheke

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


No change
would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
No change
would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the sites MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU. The site No change
is affected by flooding constraints. Retention of the SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-6386

839-7370

839-7371

839-7372

839-7373

839-7374

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone
183B,183,183A,
GREAT SOUTH ROAD,
Drury from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 47,45,49,
Birdwood
Road,9,3,5,7,
Windmill Road,44,
Beatty Road,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 10,12,14,8,
Windmill Road,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
183B,183,183A,
Great South Rd,
Drury

LOCALITY

Drury and
Opaheke

PAUP ZONE

SH and MHS MHU

REASONS

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH and MHS to


No change
MHU. MHS rather than MHU aligns with the residential
zoning pattern in Drury given its distance from the
Papakura Metropolitan Centre and a RFN. Retention of
the notified zones is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of those zones and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
47,45,49,
Birdwood Rd,
9,3,5,7, Windmill
Rd, 44, Beatty Rd,
Pukekohe

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

10,12,14,8,
Windmill Rd,
Pukekohe

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 24,26,
24,26, McShane
McShane Street,
St, Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 54,56, Princes 54,56, Princes St,


Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 5,7,
Montgomery
Avenue,32,30,28,
Kennelly Crescent,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

REQUESTED
ZONE

1038

MHS

MHU

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the sites MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

5,7, Montgomery Pukekohe MHS


Avenue, 32,30,28, Town centre &
Kennelly Crescent, surrounds
Pukekohe

MHU

Support zone as notified. Managing flooding risks on


these sites does not require a SH zoning however the
submitter's requested MHU zone would result in a spot
zone which would not recognise local context. Retention
of MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone which provides for a variety
of detached and attached housing types, and gives effect
MHU
Support change of zone to MHS. Managing flooding risk
on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
submitter's requested zone would however result in a
spot zone, which would not recognise local context.
Zoning the sites MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone which provides
for a variety of detached and attached housing types and
gives effect to the RPS.
MHU
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
would result in a spot zone which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the sites MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.
MHU or THAB Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.
Applying THAB zoning close to town centre and railway
station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town
centre.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7375

839-7376

839-7377

839-7378

839-7379

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 1,
Montgomery
Avenue,51,49,
Victoria Street,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
1, Montgomery
Avenue,51,49,
Victoria St,
Pukekohe

LOCALITY

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Rezone 24,18,20,22, 24,18,20,22,


Pukekohe MHS
Kennelly Crescent,
Kennelly Crescent, Town centre &
Pukekohe from Mixed Pukekohe
surrounds
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Rezone 10,12,8,
10,12,8, Kennelly Pukekohe MHS
Kennelly Crescent,
Crescent,
Town centre &
Pukekohe from Mixed Pukekohe
surrounds
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.
Rezone 27,29,
Victoria Street,4,
Kennelly Crescent,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

27,29, Victoria St, Pukekohe MHS


4, Kennelly
Town centre &
Crescent,
surrounds
Pukekohe

Rezone 8,8A, Kiwi


8,8A, Kiwi Place,
Place, Pukekohe from Pukekohe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Pukekohe MHS
Town centre &
surrounds

REQUESTED
ZONE

REASONS

1039

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

MHU or THAB Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.


Applying THAB zoning close to town centre and railway
station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town
centre.

THAB

MHU or THAB Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.


Applying THAB zoning close to town centre and railway
station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town
centre.
MHU or THAB Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.
Applying THAB zoning close to town centre and railway
station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town
MHU or THAB Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.
Applying THAB zoning close to town centre and railway
station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town
centre.
MHU or THAB Support notified zone. Zoning the sites MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone, which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types, and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU or THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

THAB

THAB

No change

Consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7380

839-7381

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

Rezone 2, Alamein
Place,13,15,17,
Kennelly Crescent,
Pukekohe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

2, Alamein
Pukekohe SH
Place,13,15,17,
Town centre &
Kennelly Crescent, surrounds
Pukekohe

Rezone 11,12,
11,12, Alamein
Alamein Place,
Place, Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Pukekohe SH
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 11, Kennelly 11, Kennelly


Crescent,1,3,3A,
Crescent,1,3,3A,
Alamein Place,
Alamein Place
Pukekohe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Pukekohe SH
Town centre &
surrounds

REQUESTED
ZONE

REASONS

1040

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone in part. Managing the flooding


SH and MHS
risks for 13 and 15 Kennelly Crescent does not require
maintaining a SH zone. Zoning these sites MHS is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives for the
MHS zone - which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types. 23 Alamein Place and 17
Kennelly are affected by flooding constraints and
maintaining the SH zone for these sites is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives for the zone.
Applying the zoning as above will gives effect to the RPS.
MHU or THAB Do not support proposed change. These sites are
No change
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is considered the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

THAB

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU or THAB

Oppose

Consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles


839-7382

Rural (South)

MHU or THAB Do not support proposed change. These sites are


No change
affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is considered the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
MHU or THAB

Oppose

Consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles


839-7383

839-7384

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rezone 76,78,
76,78, Seddon
Pukekohe MHS
Seddon Street,1,3,
St,1,3, Victoria St, Town centre &
Victoria Street,
Pukekohe
surrounds
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU or THAB Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter. THAB
Applying the THAB zone to the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone's objectives. The
THAB zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The site offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town centre

Rezone
82E,82D,82A,82C,82B
,76B,76A,78, Kayes
Road, Pukekohe from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

82E,82D,82A,82C,
82B,76B,76A,78,
Kayes Rd,
Pukekohe

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the sites MHS gives effect to the
RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety
of detached and attached housing types.

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7385

839-7386

839-7387

839-7388

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 10,3,4,8,
Sapling Drive,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 26,30,28,
Prospect Terrace,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

10,3,4,8, Sapling
Dr, Pukekohe

Rezone 176,174174B,172,178,
Wellington Street,
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 65,65A,
Harris Street,
Pukekohe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

176,174174B,172,178,
Wellington St,
Pukekohe

LOCALITY

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

PAUP ZONE

MHS

26,30,28,
Pukekohe MHU
Prospect Terrace, Town centre &
Pukekohe
surrounds

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the sites MHS gives effect to the
RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety
of detached and attached housing types.
MHU or THAB Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.
Applying THAB zoning close to town centre and railway
station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town
MHU
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the sites MHS gives effect to the
RPS and is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety
of detached and attached housing types.

1041

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
65,65A, Harris St, Pukekohe SH
Pukekohe
Town centre &
surrounds

MHU or THAB Support change of zone to MHU. Applying the proposed MHU
zone gives effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the MHU zone objectives. The zone allows
three storey dwellings in locations close to centres.
MHU or THAB

Oppose

Consistent with the Corporation's zoning principles


839-7389

839-7390

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rezone 8,6, Wesley


8,6, Wesley
Street, Pukekohe
Street, Pukekohe
from Mixed Use to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MU
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 11,13, Harris 11,13, Harris St,


Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Mixed
Housing Urban
or Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

Pukekohe MHU
Town centre &
surrounds

THAB

Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter. THAB


Applying the THAB zone to the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the zone's objectives. The
THAB zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The site offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town centre
MHU or THAB Support proposed change to THAB - applying the
THAB
proposed zone to the sites gives effect to the RPS and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone
objectives. The zone allows terraced housing and
apartment residential living around town centres and
close to public transport, enables efficient use of land
and infrastructure. The sites offer the opportunity to
achieve quality compact residential development within
walkable distance of the town centre and/or railway

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7391

839-7392

839-7393

839-7446

839-7459

839-7490

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 8,2,4,6,
8,2,4,6, Carlton
Carlton Road,
Rd, Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Urban to
Mixed Housing Urban
or THAB.

Pukekohe MHU
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 11,11A,
11 and 11A
SEAVIEW RISE,
Seaview Rise,
Waiuku from Mixed Waiuku
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Suburban. This is a
retained submission

Waiuku

Rezone 29,29A,
29 and 29A
VICTORIA AVENUE,
Victoria Avenue,
Waiuku from Mixed Waiuku
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Suburban. This is a
retained submission

Waiuku

Rezone 137 Victoria 137 Victoria St


Street West.
West
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 8, 8A HUIA
8 and 8A Huia St,
STREET. Waiuku from Waiuku
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Waiuku

SH

Rezone 12A Helvetia 12A Helvetia Rd.


Road. Pukekohe from Pukekohe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

REASONS

1042

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

MHU or THAB Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter. THAB
Applying THAB zoning close to town centre and railway
station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town
MHS
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the No change
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the No change


objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.

Support zone as notified. Managing flood risk on the site No change


does not require a SH zone being applied. The
submitter's requested zone would however result in a
spot zone. This would not recognise local context. The
most appropriate zoning is MHS this being the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone which provides for a variety of detached and
attached housing types and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change from SH to MHU. However,
MHS
support MHS. Managing flooding risks on this property
does not require SH. MHS is more compatible with
surrounding site, and the distance from LC means MHU is
not appropriate. Change to MHS gives effect to the RPS
and achieves the objectives of the MHS zone.
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
No change
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety of
detached and attached housing types.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7518

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 54A-54D
54A-54D Prospect
Prospect Terrace.
Terrace. Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

1043

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


No change
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety of
detached and attached housing types.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose in Part
Recognise the peripheral nature of this Centre and the
lower scale of development consider MHU appropriate

839-7581

839-7671

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rezone 12 Helvetia
12 Helvetia Rd,
Road, Pukekohe from Pukekohe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 14 SEAVIEW
RISE. Waiuku from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Waiuku

MHS

14 Seaview Rise,
Waiuku

MHU

MHU

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


No change
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety of
detached and attached housing types.
Support retention of MHS. The notified zone achieves the MHS
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS
growth objectives, and is appropriate for the local
context of Waiuku in areas away from the local centre.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7683

839-7689

839-7873

839-8004

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rezone 12B Helvetia 12B Helvetia Rd,


Road, Pukekohe from Pukekohe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 12C Helvetia 12C Helvetia Rd,


Road, Pukekohe from Pukekohe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 38 Ranch
38 Ranch Place,
Place, Pukekohe from Pukekohe
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 23
23 Willowgrange
Willowgrange Place. Place. Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

SH

Rezone 124 Princes 124 Princes St


Street West,
West, Pukekohe
Pukekohe from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety of
detached and attached housing types.
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety of
detached and attached housing types.
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety of
detached and attached housing types.
Do not support proposed change. The site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-8015

Rural (South)

MHU

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


No change
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety of
detached and attached housing types.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8235

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 7 Alamein
7 Alamein Place,
Place. Pukekohe from Pukekohe
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Pukekohe SH
Town centre &
surrounds

THAB

Rezone 7A Alamein
7A Alamein Place. Pukekohe SH
Place. Pukekohe from Pukekohe
Town centre &
Single House to
surrounds
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

THAB

Rezone 81 Harris
81 Harris Street
Street. Pukekohe
St. Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHS
Town centre &
surrounds

THAB

Rezone 81A Harris


81A Harris St.
Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHS
Town centre &
surrounds

REASONS

1044

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support proposed change. Site affected by


No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-8236

Rural (South)

Do not support proposed change. The site is affected by No change


flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-8237

839-8238

839-8246

839-8247

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rezone 24 Roulston 24 Roulston St.


Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHU
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 23 Harris
23 Harris St.
Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHU
Town centre &
surrounds

THAB

THAB

THAB

Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone


No change
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety of
detached and attached housing types.
Support change of zone to MHS. Managing flooding risk MHS
on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
submitter's requested zone would however result in a
spot zone, which would not recognise local context.
Zoning the site MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone which provides
for a variety of detached and attached housing types and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter. THAB
Applying THAB zoning close to town centre and railway
station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town
Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter. THAB
Applying THAB zoning close to town centre and railway
station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town

MHU

Oppose in Part
Recognise the peripheral nature of this Centre and the
lower scale of development consider MHU appropriate

MHU

Oppose in Part
Recognise the peripheral nature of this Centre and the
lower scale of development consider MHU appropriate

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8262

839-8263

839-8264

839-8265

839-8266

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 9 Graham
9 Graham St.
Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHU
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 11 Graham
11 Graham St.
Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHU
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 19, 17 Harris 19, 17 Harris St.


Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHU
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 17A Harris


17A Harris St.
Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHU
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 17B Harris


17B Harris St.
Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHS
Town centre &
surrounds

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.


Applying THAB to the site gives effect to the RPS and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone
objectives. The zone allows terraced housing and
apartment residential living around town centres,
enables efficient use of land and infrastructure. The site
offers the opportunity to achieve quality compact
residential development within walkable distance of the
Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.
Applying THAB zoning close to the town centre and
railway station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town
Support proposed change to THAB - applying the
proposed zone to the sites gives effect to the RPS and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres and close to public
transport, enables efficient use of land and
infrastructure. The sites offers the opportunity to achieve
quality compact residential development within walkable
distance of the town centre and/or railway station.
Support proposed change to THAB - applying the
proposed zone to the site gives effect to the RPS and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres and close to public
transport, enables efficient use of land and
infrastructure. The sites offers the opportunity to achieve
quality compact residential development within walkable
distance of the town centre and/or railway station.
Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.
Applying THAB zoning close to the town centre and
railway station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town

1045

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8267

839-8268

839-8330

839-8331

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 11 Dublin
11 Dublin St.
Street. Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHS
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 13 Dublin
13 Dublin St,
Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe North
Pukekohe
residential

Rezone 44 Victoria
44 Victoria St,
Street, Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Pukekohe MHS
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 96A Harris


96A Harris St.
Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe SH
Town centre &
surrounds

MHU

Rezone 96B Harris


96B Harris St.
Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe SH
Town centre &
surrounds

MHU

Rezone 96C Harris


96C Harris St.
Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe SH
Town centre &
surrounds

MHU

MHS

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.


Applying THAB to the site gives effect to the RPS and is
the most appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone
objectives. The zone allows terraced housing and
apartment residential living around town centres,
enables efficient use of land and infrastructure. The site
offers the opportunity to achieve quality compact
residential development within walkable distance of the
Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.
Managing flooding risks on the site does not require
maintaining the notified MHS zone. Applying THAB to the
site gives effect to the RPS and is the most appropriate
way to achieve the THAB zone objectives. The zone
allows terraced housing and apartment residential living
around town centres, enables efficient use of land and
infrastructure. The site offers the opportunity to achieve
quality compact residential development within walkable
distance of the town centre.
Support the change of zone proposed by the submitter.
Applying THAB zoning close to the town centre and
railway station gives effect to the RPS and is the most
appropriate way to achieve the THAB zone objectives.
The zone allows terraced housing and apartment
residential living around town centres, enables efficient
use of land and infrastructure. The area offers the
opportunity to achieve quality compact residential
development within walkable distance of the town
Do not support proposed change. The site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1046

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

THAB

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

THAB

THAB

No change

Meet Criteria
839-8332

Rural (South)

Do not support proposed change. The site is affected by No change


flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-8333

Rural (South)

Do not support proposed change. The site is affected by No change


flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
considered the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8334

839-8335

839-8336

839-3818

839-3176

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Rural (South)

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 96D Harris


96D Harris St.
Street. Pukekohe
Pukekohe
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Pukekohe SH
Town centre &
surrounds

Rezone 60B Prospect 60B Prospect


Terrace, Pukekohe
Terrace, Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 60A Prospect 60A Prospect


Terrace. Pukekohe
Terrace. Pukekohe
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Pukekohe Rest of
Pukekohe
residential

MHS

Rezone 15,
15, ASHBOURNE Glendene
ASHBOURNE PLACE, PLACE, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.
Located in HI Air
Quality overlay so
management of
reverse sensitivity
important to zoning
pattern around HI
zone.

SH

Rezone 16,
16, BARNFIELD
Glendene
BARNFIELD PLACE,
PLACE, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Support change of zone to MHS. Managing flooding risk


on this site does not require maintaining a SH zone. The
submitter's requested zone would however result in a
spot zone, which would not recognise local context.
Zoning the site MHS is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone which provides
for a variety of detached and attached housing types and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS gives effect to the RPS
and is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHS zone, which provides for a variety of
detached and attached housing types.
Support notified zone. The submitter's requested zone
would result in a spot zone, which would not recognise
local context. Zoning the site MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone,
which provides for a variety of detached and attached
housing types.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1047

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
MHS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4069

839-3199

839-3651

839-4038

839-3392

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Rezone
26,22C,22B,22A,
BARRYS
ROAD,11,24,13,38,15
,22,17,16,19,18,30,28
,26,34,36,32,9,20,
SCOWNS WAY,
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

26,22C,22B,22A, Glendene
BARRYS
ROAD,11,24,13,38
,15,22,17,16,19,1
8,30,28,26,34,36,
32,9,20, SCOWNS
WAY, Glendene

SH

Rezone 45, BARRYS 45, BARRYS ROAD, Glendene


ROAD, Glendene
Glendene
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 48, BARRYS 48, BARRYS ROAD, Glendene


ROAD, Glendene
Glendene
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 63A,63,
63A,63,
Glendene
FARQUHAR ROAD,
FARQUHAR ROAD,
Glendene from Single Glendene
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 73,
73, FARQUHAR
FARQUHAR ROAD,
ROAD, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Glendene

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1048

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3861

839-3464

839-7472

839-7835

839-7487

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 9, GLEN
9, GLEN MARINE Glendene
MARINE PARADE,
PARADE,
Glendene from Single Glendene
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

Rezone 32, GLEN


32, GLEN MARINE Glendene
MARINE PARADE,
PARADE,
Glendene from Single Glendene
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

Rezone 33 GLEN
33 GLEN MARINE Glendene
MARINE PARADE.
PARADE.
Glendene from Single Glendene
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

Rezone 27A, 27 GLEN 27A, 27 GLEN


Glendene
MARINE PARADE.
MARINE PARADE.
Glendene from Single Glendene
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 34 GLENDENE 34 GLENDENE


AVENUE. Glendene AVENUE.
from Single House to Glendene
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Glendene

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1049

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4061

839-4062

839-4068

839-3868

839-3355

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 62,62A,
62,62A, HEPBURN Glendene
HEPBURN ROAD,
ROAD, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 78A,78,
78A,78, HEPBURN Glendene
HEPBURN ROAD,
ROAD, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

Rezone 160,170,
HEPBURN ROAD,1,
JULIANA WAY,
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

160,170,
Glendene
HEPBURN
ROAD,1, JULIANA
WAY, Glendene

Rezone 225,
225, HEPBURN
HEPBURN ROAD,
ROAD, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Rezone 2, JULIANA
2, JULIANA WAY,
WAY, Glendene from Glendene
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glendene

Glendene

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support the submission seeking the rezoning of the site.


The management of flooding risks does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The site is located in proximity to
the RFN and centres, and therefore has opportunities to
support residential growth based on land use and
transport integration. The change of zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1050

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3934

839-3203

839-480

839-837

839-2273

839-2253

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 2, NEESONS 2, NEESONS WAY, Glendene


WAY, Glendene from Glendene
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PAUP ZONE

SH

Rezone 49,
49, THORNLOW Glendene
THORNLOW STREET, STREET, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 112, FARQUHAR Glendene


Urban at 112,
ROAD, Glendene.
FARQUHAR ROAD,
Glendene.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 23, FELGROVE


Urban at 23,
STREET,
FELGROVE STREET,
Glendene.
Glendene.

Glendene

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 88A GLENDENE


Urban at 88A
AVENUE.
GLENDENE AVENUE. Glendene.
Glendene.

Glendene

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 4225, 4223 GREAT Kelston


Urban at 4225, 4223 NORTH ROAD.
GREAT NORTH ROAD. Auckland.
Auckland.

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1051

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2458

839-2637

839-1106

839-2270

839-2763

839-2681

839-2682

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 4255 GREAT


Urban at 4255 GREAT NORTH ROAD.
NORTH ROAD.
Auckland.
Auckland.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 4203A GREAT


Urban at 4203A
NORTH ROAD.
GREAT NORTH ROAD. Auckland.
Auckland.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 56A,56, HEPBURN Glendene


Urban at 56A,56,
ROAD, Glendene.
HEPBURN ROAD,
Glendene.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 17 JENELIN ROAD. Glendene


Urban at 17 JENELIN Glendene.
ROAD. Glendene.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 8, KARO
PLACE,44,
THORNLOW STREET,
Glendene from Mixed
Housing Urban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

8, KARO
Glendene
PLACE,44,
THORNLOW
STREET, Glendene

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 14 KARO PLACE.


Urban at 14 KARO
Glendene.
PLACE. Glendene.

Glendene

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 14A KARO PLACE. Glendene


Urban at 14A KARO Glendene.
PLACE. Glendene.

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The retention of the notified zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1052

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

MHU

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1040

839-2249

839-2357

839-1108

839-482

839-2622

839-2460

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
95A,95,
MANHATTAN
HEIGHTS,
Glendene.

LOCALITY

Glendene

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 95A,95,
MANHATTAN
HEIGHTS, Glendene.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 108 MANHATTAN Glendene


Urban at 108
HEIGHTS.
MANHATTAN
Glendene.
HEIGHTS. Glendene.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 1/49, 49 AWAROA Sunnyvale


Urban at 1/49, 49
ROAD. Sunnyvale.
AWAROA ROAD.
Sunnyvale.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 10,4,6,
DENVER AVENUE,13,
MCKINLEY ROAD,
Sunnyvale.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 7, DENVER


Urban at 7, DENVER AVENUE,
AVENUE, Sunnyvale. Sunnyvale.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 1A GAEDE


Urban at 1A GAEDE TERRACE.
TERRACE. Sunnyvale. Sunnyvale.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 2 GREGG PLACE. Sunnyvale


Urban at 2 GREGG
12 AWAROA
PLACE. 12 AWAROA ROAD. Sunnyvale.
ROAD. Sunnyvale.

10,4,6, DENVER
Sunnyvale
AVENUE,13,
MCKINLEY ROAD,
Sunnyvale.

Sunnyvale

Sunnyvale

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1053

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-118

839-2552

839-2641

839-2625

839-2336

839-2425

839-800

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Henderson

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 52, KAIKOURA


Urban at 52,
STREET,
KAIKOURA STREET,
Henderson.
Henderson.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 50 SUNNYSIDE


Sunnyvale
Urban at 50
ROAD. Sunnyvale.
SUNNYSIDE ROAD.
Sunnyvale.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 70 SUNNYSIDE


Sunnyvale
Urban at 70
ROAD. Sunnyvale.
SUNNYSIDE ROAD.
Sunnyvale.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 140 VIEW ROAD.


Urban at 140 VIEW
Henderson.
ROAD. Henderson.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 157 VIEW ROAD.


Urban at 157 VIEW
Henderson.
ROAD. Henderson.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

RRetain Mixed
127A View Road,
Housing Urban at Lot Sunnyvale
2 DP 166763 [127A
View Road,
Sunnyvale]

Sunnyvale

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 11, WAARI


Urban at 11, WAARI AVENUE,
AVENUE, Sunnyvale. Sunnyvale.

Sunnyvale

Henderson

Henderson

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1054

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4048

839-8298

839-3226

839-3132

839-2274

839-468

839-1045

839-1046

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 18,18A,
AWAROA ROAD,
Sunnyvale from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Rezone 18,18A,
AWAROA ROAD,
Sunnyvale

Sunnyvale

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 2
RIBBLESDALE ROAD.
Henderson from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2 RIBBLESDALE
Henderson
ROAD. Henderson

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 5, SUNHILL
ROAD, Sunnyvale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

5, SUNHILL ROAD, Sunnyvale


Sunnyvale

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 36, WAARI


AVENUE, Sunnyvale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

36, WAARI
AVENUE,
Sunnyvale

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 37 TIRIMOANA
ROAD. 96 GLENDENE
AVENUE. Glendene.

37 TIRIMOANA
ROAD. 96
GLENDENE
AVENUE.
Glendene.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 3, SERWAYNE
PLACE, Sunnyvale.

3, SERWAYNE
Sunnyvale
PLACE, Sunnyvale.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 13,5,7, VIRGO
PLACE, Glen Eden.

13,5,7, VIRGO
Glen Eden
PLACE, Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 1, ADAM SUNDE
PLACE,122, SOLAR
ROAD, Glen Eden.

1, ADAM SUNDE Glen Eden


PLACE,122, SOLAR
ROAD, Glen Eden.

Sunnyvale

Glendene

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

SH

SH

SH

REASONS

1055

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in


MHU
proximity to the RFN and centres. The site is in a location
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. The rezoning would
be consistent with the local context of the site. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Do not support the change of zone because it would
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of zone because it would
No change
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of zone because it would
No change
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
No change
distant from the RFN and centres. It contains an SEA. The
SH zone is appropriate in the local context. The retention
of the notified zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

No change

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission, but proximity
criteria support MHS

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1047

839-1048

839-1049

839-1050

839-1051

839-1052

839-1053

839-1054

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 31,29, ADAM
SUNDE PLACE, Glen
Eden.

31,29, ADAM
SUNDE PLACE,
Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 24,26, DANUBE
LANE, Glen Eden.

24,26, DANUBE Glen Eden


LANE, Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 50, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

50, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 2,2A, DANUBE
LANE,54,56,58,
MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

2,2A, DANUBE
LANE,54,56,58,
MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 24,18,20,
MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at
24,24A,22,30,28,22A,
ROICK PARADE, Glen
Eden.

24,18,20,
MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

SH

SH

REASONS

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

SH

1056

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

No change

24,24A,22,30,28,2 Glen Eden


2A, ROICK
PARADE, Glen
Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 2,4, KARINA


Glen Eden
Urban at 2,4, KARINA PLACE, Glen Eden.
PLACE, Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 25,27,29,23,
WOODBANK DRIVE,
Glen Eden.

25,27,29,23,
Glen Eden
WOODBANK
DRIVE, Glen Eden.

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

SH

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

No change

No change

No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

SH

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1055

839-1056

839-1058

839-113

839-126

839-127

839-136

839-158

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 31,31A,
NANDANA DRIVE,4,6,
MATAMA ROAD, Glen
Eden.

31,31A,
NANDANA
DRIVE,4,6,
MATAMA ROAD,
Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
9C,9B,9E,9D,9G,9F,9,
BRANDON ROAD,
Glen Eden.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 6A,6B,6C,6D,6E,6F,
MALAM STREET, Glen
Eden.

9C,9B,9E,9D,9G,9 Glen Eden


F,9, BRANDON
ROAD, Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 8, ADAM SUNDE
PLACE, Glen Eden.

8, ADAM SUNDE Glen Eden


PLACE, Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 4, GLUCINA


Glen Eden
Urban at 4, GLUCINA PLACE, Glen Eden.
PLACE, Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 294, GLENGARRY
ROAD, Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House 173, SOLAR ROAD, Glen Eden


at 173, SOLAR ROAD, Glen Eden.
Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 24, CLAYBURN
ROAD, Glen Eden.

THAB

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

6A,6B,6C,6D,6E,6F Glen Eden


, MALAM STREET,
Glen Eden.

294, GLENGARRY Glen Eden


ROAD, Glen Eden.

24, CLAYBURN
Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden.

MHS

THAB

THAB

SH

MHU

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

THAB

THAB

SH

MHU

SH

SH

THAB

REASONS

1057

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

THAB

Support

No change

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-161

839-219

839-2247

839-225

839-226

839-2278

839-228

839-2329

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 85, GLENDALE


Glen Eden
Urban at 85,
ROAD, Glen Eden.
GLENDALE ROAD,
Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 35, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

35, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 73 MILAN DRIVE.
Glen Eden.

73 MILAN DRIVE. Glen Eden


Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 2/29,1/29,
MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

2/29,1/29,
MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 2/34,1/34,
MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

2/34,1/34,
MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 8 MATAMA ROAD. Glen Eden


Suburban at 8
32 NANDANA
MATAMA ROAD. 32 DRIVE. Glen Eden.
NANDANA DRIVE.
Glen Eden.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 25, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

25, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 3 DANUBE LANE.
Glen Eden.

3 DANUBE LANE. Glen Eden


Glen Eden.

Glen Eden

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

SH

SH

REASONS

1058

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Glen Eden

Support

No change

SH

MHS

MHU

No change

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
SH

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-238

839-2416

839-2429

839-247

839-2484

839-2511

839-2569

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 105, WOODGLEN Glen Eden


Urban at 105,
ROAD, Glen Eden.
WOODGLEN ROAD,
Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 63 WOODGLEN Glen Eden


Urban at 63
ROAD. Glen Eden.
WOODGLEN ROAD.
Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 70 WEST COAST
ROAD. WaiataruaKelston.

70 WEST COAST Glen Eden


ROAD. WaiataruaKelston.

THAB

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 4, PISCES ROAD,
Glen Eden.

4, PISCES ROAD,
Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 68 WOODGLEN


Glen Eden
Urban at 68
ROAD. Glen Eden.
WOODGLEN ROAD.
Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 6A NICOLAS
AVENUE. Glen Eden.

6A NICOLAS
AVENUE. Glen
Eden.

Glen Eden

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 5 SARONA


Urban at 5 SARONA AVENUE. Glen
AVENUE. Glen Eden. Eden.

Glen Eden

Glen Eden

SH

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

SH

MHU

SH

MHU

REASONS

1059

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2579

839-2600

839-2640

839-2645

839-267

839-2689

839-2727

839-280

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
17B GLENORCHY
STREET. Glen
Eden.

LOCALITY

Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 17B GLENORCHY
STREET. Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 3A CLARIDGE


Urban at 3A
STREET. Glen
CLARIDGE STREET.
Eden.
Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 144C GLENGARRY Glen Eden


Suburban at 144C
ROAD. Glen Eden.
GLENGARRY ROAD.
Glen Eden.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 18D ROSIER


Glen Eden
Urban at 18D ROSIER ROAD. Glen Eden.
ROAD. Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 17, KARINA


Glen Eden
Urban at 17, KARINA PLACE, Glen Eden.
PLACE, Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 113D WOODGLEN Glen Eden


Urban at 113D
ROAD. Glen Eden.
WOODGLEN ROAD.
Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 90A SUNVUE
ROAD. Glen Eden.

90A SUNVUE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 24, WOODBANK
DRIVE, Glen Eden.

24, WOODBANK Glen Eden


DRIVE, Glen Eden.

Glen Eden

THAB

MHU

MHU

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

SH

REASONS

1060

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2861

839-2862

839-287

839-2917

839-2923

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 40, BRUNNER 40, BRUNNER


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PAUP ZONE

SH

Rezone 83, SOLAR


83, SOLAR ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 14, NANDANA


Glen Eden
Suburban at 14,
DRIVE, Glen Eden.
NANDANA DRIVE,
Glen Eden.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 109, SOLAR


109, SOLAR
Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 49, CAPTAIN


SCOTT ROAD,1, JOHN
F KENNEDY PLACE,
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

49, CAPTAIN
Glen Eden
SCOTT ROAD,1,
JOHN F KENNEDY
PLACE, Glen Eden

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1061

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


No change
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support partial change to the zoning of the site. The site MHU / SH
adjoins higher density residential zones and is well
located to support land use and transport integration. It
is located in proximity to the RFN and adjoining centres.
The management of flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The rezoning of the site is
the most appropriate way to achieve the relevant
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS. 1 John
Kennedy Place is subject to flooding constraints. Due to
this constraint, the zoning of this site is considered to be
consistent with the objectives of the zone and gives

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2933

839-2947

839-3011

839-3067

839-311

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Rezone 9,
CAPRICORN PLACE,
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

9, CAPRICORN
Glen Eden
PLACE, Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

Rezone 9, SURMAN
9, SURMAN
Glen Eden
PLACE, Glen Eden
PLACE, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 20, BRUNNER 20, BRUNNER


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 53, BRUNNER 53, BRUNNER


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Retain Mixed Housing 89A-89E,


Glen Eden
Urban at 89A-89E,
GLENDALE ROAD,
GLENDALE ROAD,
Glen Eden.
Glen Eden.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1062

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3200

839-3210

839-325

839-3277

839-3292

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 15, SEAKENS 15, SEAKENS


WAY, Glen Eden from WAY, Glen Eden
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

LOCALITY

Glen Eden

Rezone 80, SOLAR


80, SOLAR ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 50A, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT,8, DANUBE
LANE, Glen Eden.

50A, MAYWOOD Glen Eden


CRESCENT,8,
DANUBE LANE,
Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 16, BRUNNER 16, BRUNNER


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 51,49,
51,49,
MEADOWVALE RISE, MEADOWVALE
Titirangi from Single RISE, Titirangi
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glen Eden

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

SH

1063

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
SH

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


No change
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the change in zone. The management of flooding MHS
risks does not require maintaining a SH zone, and the
spot zoning of the site is not considered to be
appropriate. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

SH

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3299

839-3334

839-335

839-3434

839-3480

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 95, SOLAR


95, SOLAR ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 22, SOLAR


22, SOLAR ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 12, GEORGE


Urban at 12, GEORGE HERRING PLACE,
HERRING PLACE, Glen Glen Eden.
Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 19, BRUNNER 19, BRUNNER


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 7, SUNVUE
7, SUNVUE ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glen Eden

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1064

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3490

839-3502

839-3511

839-3523

839-3531

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 6, LUCINDA 6, LUCINDA


Glen Eden
PLACE, Glen Eden
PLACE, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Rezone 10, SURMAN 10, SURMAN


Glen Eden
PLACE, Glen Eden
PLACE, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 97, KAMARA 97, KAMARA


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 43, BRUNNER 43, BRUNNER


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 5, AQUARIUS 5, AQUARIUS


AVENUE, Glen Eden AVENUE, Glen
from Single House to Eden
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Glen Eden

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support partial change to the zoning of the site. The site


adjoins higher density residential zones and is well
located to support land use and transport integration. It
is located in proximity to the RFN and adjoining centres.
The management of flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The site adjoins MHU
zone and in this local content the MHU zone is a more
appropriate alternative zone than the THAB zone. The
rezoning of the site to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the relevant objectives of the zone and gives
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1065

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3537

839-3547

839-358

839-3609

839-3624

839-364

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 11, GLEN


11, GLEN CLOSE,
CLOSE, Glen Eden
Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 11,9,
11,9,
MEADOWVALE RISE, MEADOWVALE
Titirangi from Single RISE, Titirangi
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 1/229,229,
GLENGARRY ROAD,
Glen Eden.

1/229,229,
Glen Eden
GLENGARRY
ROAD, Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 70, KAMARA 70, KAMARA


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 53, KAMARA 53, KAMARA


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Retain Single House


at 15, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

15, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

Glen Eden

SH

SH/MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

REASONS

1066

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


No change
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the change in zone. The management of flooding MHS
risks does not require maintaining a SH zone, and the
spot zoning of the site is not considered to be
appropriate. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
SH

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3641

839-3642

839-3681

839-3690

839-372

839-3722

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn
Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 85, BRUNNER 85, BRUNNER


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PAUP ZONE

SH

Rezone 73, BRUNNER 73, BRUNNER


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 18,
AQUARIUS AVENUE,
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

18, AQUARIUS
AVENUE, Glen
Eden

SH

Rezone 9, COEY
PLACE, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4015, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

9, COEY PLACE,
Glen Eden

Rezone 33,
KAURILANDS ROAD,
Titirangi from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

33, KAURILANDS
ROAD, Titirangi

4015, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

Glen Eden

Glen Eden

Glen Eden

Glen Eden

SH

THAB

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHS

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support rezoning the site. The site is subject to
flooding constraints. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1067

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the change in zone. The management of flooding MHS
risks does not require maintaining a SH zone, and the
spot zoning of the site is not considered to be
appropriate. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Consider meets proximity for MHU / MHS

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3756

839-3923

839-3943

839-4049

839-4050

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 63,65,
63,65,
MEADOWVALE RISE, MEADOWVALE
Titirangi from Single RISE, Titirangi
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 57, BRUNNER 57, BRUNNER


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 8A,
CAPRICORN PLACE,
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

8A, CAPRICORN
Glen Eden
PLACE, Glen Eden

Rezone 111,109A,
111,109A,
KAMARA ROAD, Glen KAMARA ROAD,
Eden from Single
Glen Eden.
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Rezone 64,66,
BRUNNER ROAD,
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

Glen Eden

64,66, BRUNNER Glen Eden


ROAD, Glen Eden

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support the change in zone. The management of flooding


risks does not require maintaining a SH zone, and the
spot zoning of the site is not considered to be
appropriate. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1068

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4051

839-4052

839-4053

839-4054

839-4055

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 95, BRUNNER


ROAD,79, SUNVUE
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

95, BRUNNER
ROAD,79,
SUNVUE ROAD,
Glen Eden

Rezone 123, SOLAR


ROAD,83,85, SUNVUE
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

123, SOLAR
ROAD,83,85,
SUNVUE ROAD,
Glen Eden

LOCALITY

Glen Eden

Glen Eden

Rezone 13,15, SOLAR 13,15, SOLAR


Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Rezone 36,34,
BRUNNER ROAD,
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

36,34, BRUNNER Glen Eden


ROAD, Glen Eden

Rezone 4,6, SURMAN 4,6, SURMAN


Glen Eden
PLACE,7, SOLAR
PLACE,7, SOLAR
ROAD, Glen Eden
ROAD, Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1069

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

MHS

Oppose

Do not support Council's position on Spot Zoning recognise Corporations wider submission
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4056

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Rezone 1, WHEATON
PLACE,444, WEST
COAST
ROAD,43,25,26,21,22
,23,44,45,42,29,40,41
,3,5,7,9,39,11,13,38,1
5,17,19,32,31,30,37,3
6,35, SELAK PLACE,
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

1, WHEATON
Glen Eden
PLACE,444, WEST
COAST
ROAD,43,25,26,21
,22,23,44,45,42,2
9,40,41,3,5,7,9,39
,11,13,38,15,17,1
9,32,31,30,37,36,
35, SELAK PLACE,
Glen Eden

SH

Rezone
431A,431B,431, Glen Eden
431A,431B,431,
WEST COAST
WEST COAST ROAD, ROAD, WaiataruaWaiatarua-Kelston
Kelston
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 4, ANNISON


Suburban at 4,
AVENUE, Glen
ANNISON AVENUE,
Eden.
Glen Eden.

Glen Eden

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 26, LEO STREET,
Glen Eden.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 9, KARINA PLACE, Glen Eden


Urban at 9, KARINA Glen Eden.
PLACE, Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 41C, GLENGARRY Glen Eden


Suburban at 41C,
ROAD, Glen Eden.
GLENGARRY ROAD,
Glen Eden.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1070

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4057

839-414

839-462

839-494

839-510

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

26, LEO STREET,


Glen Eden.

SH

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


No change
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-541

839-555

839-565

839-605

839-611

839-618

839-670

839-675

839-702

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


110, SOLAR
Glen Eden
at 110, SOLAR ROAD, ROAD, Glen Eden.
Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 12, INVER STREET, Glen Eden


Suburban at 12,
Glen Eden.
INVER STREET, Glen
Eden.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 19, ADAM SUNDE
PLACE, Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 19, SUNRAY


Glen Eden
Suburban at 19,
AVENUE, Titirangi.
SUNRAY AVENUE,
Titirangi.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 49, VIRGO PLACE,
Glen Eden.

49, VIRGO PLACE, Glen Eden


Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 38, PISCES ROAD,
Glen Eden.

38, PISCES ROAD, Glen Eden


Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 31, GLENGARRY Glen Eden


Suburban at 31,
ROAD, Glen Eden.
GLENGARRY ROAD,
Glen Eden.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 19, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

19, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

Glen Eden

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 308A, WEST COAST
ROAD, WaiataruaKelston.

308A, WEST
COAST ROAD,
WaiataruaKelston.

Glen Eden

19, ADAM SUNDE Glen Eden


PLACE, Glen Eden.

SH

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

THAB

REASONS

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1071

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
SH

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7511

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 16A
16A WOODGLEN Glen Eden
WOODGLEN ROAD. ROAD. Glen Eden
Glen Eden from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 10
10 WOODVALE
Glen Eden
WOODVALE ROAD.
ROAD. Glen Eden
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Rezone 47, 2/47


SOLAR ROAD. Glen
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

REASONS

THAB

1072

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
Do not support the rezoning of the site. The notified
zones of the PAUP support appropriate degrees of land
use and transport integration, reflecting the objectives of
the zone and the requirements of the RPS. The notified
zone the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7547

839-7619

839-7634

839-768

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

47, 2/47 SOLAR


Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 93 KAMARA 93 KAMARA


Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Retain Single House


at 9, ADAM SUNDE
PLACE, Glen Eden.

SH

9, ADAM SUNDE Glen Eden


PLACE, Glen Eden.

THAB

MHS

MHU

SH

Support partial change to the zoning of the site. The site MHU
adjoins higher density residential zones and is well
located to support land use and transport integration. It
is located in proximity to the RFN and adjoining centres.
The management of flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The site adjoins MHU
zone and in this local content the MHU zone is a more
appropriate alternative zone than the THAB zone. The
rezoning of the site to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the relevant objectives of the zone and gives
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
No change
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
No change
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

SH

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7743

839-777

839-7777

839-783

839-7839

839-785

839-788

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 1 AUTUMN
1 AUTUMN
AVENUE. Glen Eden AVENUE. Glen
from Single House to Eden
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

LOCALITY

Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House 136, SOLAR ROAD, Glen Eden


at 136, SOLAR ROAD, Glen Eden.
Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 1/17
1/17 WOODVALE Glen Eden
WOODVALE ROAD.
ROAD. Glen Eden
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 5, ADAM SUNDE
PLACE, Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 5 PISCES
5 PISCES ROAD.
ROAD. Glen Eden
Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

5, ADAM SUNDE Glen Eden


PLACE, Glen Eden.

Glen Eden

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 19, GLENGARRY Glen Eden


Suburban at 19,
ROAD, Glen Eden.
GLENGARRY ROAD,
Glen Eden.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 17, VIRGO PLACE,
Glen Eden.

SH

17, VIRGO PLACE, Glen Eden


Glen Eden.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

SH

THAB

SH

MHU

MHS

SH

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1073

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

Support partial change to the zoning of the site. The site MHU
adjoins higher density residential zones and is well
located to support land use and transport integration. It
is located in proximity to the RFN and adjoining centres.
The management of flooding risks on the site does not
require maintaining a SH zone. The site adjoins MHU
zone and in this local content the MHU zone is a more
appropriate alternative zone than the THAB zone. The
rezoning of the site to MHU is the most appropriate way
to achieve the relevant objectives of the zone and gives
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

SH

Support

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

SH

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change
MHS

Support

SH

Support

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7883

839-7884

839-7901

839-7929

839-793

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Rezone 17
GLENGARRY ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 11 SUNVUE
ROAD. Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

17 GLENGARRY
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

11 SUNVUE ROAD. Glen Eden


Glen Eden

Rezone 5 GLEN
5 GLEN CLOSE.
CLOSE. Glen Eden
Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glen Eden

Rezone 7 HYDRA
7 HYDRA PLACE.
PLACE. Glen Eden
Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glen Eden

Retain Mixed Housing 2B, SARONA


Urban at 2B, SARONA AVENUE, Glen
AVENUE, Glen Eden. Eden.

Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support the change in zone. The management of flooding


risks does not require maintaining a SH zone, and the
spot zoning of the site is not considered to be
appropriate. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1074

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHS
MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7943

839-7988

839-7989

839-8017

839-802

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 48 KAMARA 48 KAMARA


Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Rezone 53
WOODBANK DRIVE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

53 WOODBANK
Glen Eden
DRIVE. Glen Eden

SH

Rezone 67
WOODBANK DRIVE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

67 WOODBANK
Glen Eden
DRIVE. Glen Eden

Rezone 70
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

70 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

Retain Single House


196, SOLAR
Glen Eden
at 196, SOLAR ROAD, ROAD, Glen Eden.
Glen Eden.

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

SH

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1075

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change
SH

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8022

839-8024

839-8025

839-8026

839-8027

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 80
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

80 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 84
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

84 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 98
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

98 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 96
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

96 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 94
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

94 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1076

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8029

839-8031

839-8032

839-8033

839-8034

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 92
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

92 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 90
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

90 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 102
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

102 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 104
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

104 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 106
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

106 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1077

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8035

839-8036

839-8037

839-8038

839-8039

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 108
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

108 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 110
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

110 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

Rezone 1 TUCK
1 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 3 TUCK
3 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 5 TUCK
5 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1078

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-804

839-8040

839-8041

839-8042

839-8043

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Single House


at 14, PLUMSTEAD
RISE, Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 7 TUCK
7 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 9 TUCK
9 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 11 TUCK
11 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 13 TUCK
13 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

14, PLUMSTEAD
RISE, Glen Eden.

LOCALITY

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1079

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
SH

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8044

839-8045

839-8046

839-8047

839-8048

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 15 TUCK
15 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 17 TUCK
17 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 19 TUCK
19 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 21 TUCK
21 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 23 TUCK
23 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1080

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8050

839-8052

839-8053

839-8054

839-8055

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 25 TUCK
25 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 29 TUCK
29 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 114
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

114 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 33 TUCK
33 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 159
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

159 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1081

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8056

839-8057

839-8058

839-8059

839-8060

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 5 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

5 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 161
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

161 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 3 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

3 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 157
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

157 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 155
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

155 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1082

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8061

839-8062

839-8063

839-8064

839-8066

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 1 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

1 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 139
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

139 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 153
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

153 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 137
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

137 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 135
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

135 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1083

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8067

839-8068

839-8069

839-8070

839-8071

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 149
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

149 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 147
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

147 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 143
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

143 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 4 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

4 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 6 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

6 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1084

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8072

839-8073

839-8074

839-8075

839-8076

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 8 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

8 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 10 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

10 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 12 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

12 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 14 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

14 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 16 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

16 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1085

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8077

839-8078

839-8079

839-8080

839-8142

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 18 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

18 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 7 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

7 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 9 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

9 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 11 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

11 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 43A ADAM


SUNDE PLACE. Glen
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

43A ADAM SUNDE Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1086

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8143

839-819

839-827

839-828

839-8308

839-8328

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 28A LEO


28A LEO STREET.
STREET. Glen Eden
Glen Eden
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 37,35,


Suburban at 37,35,
KAURILANDS
KAURILANDS ROAD, ROAD, Titirangi.
Titirangi.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 6, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 145, ROSIER


Glen Eden
Suburban at 145,
ROAD, Glen Eden.
ROSIER ROAD, Glen
Eden.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 22
22 FOUNDATION Glen Eden
FOUNDATION PLACE. PLACE. Glen Eden
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 405A WEST


COAST ROAD.
Waiatarua-Kelston
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

6, MAYWOOD
CRESCENT, Glen
Eden.

405A WEST
COAST ROAD.
WaiataruaKelston

Glen Eden

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

1087

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


No change
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
No change
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
No change
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-845

839-854

839-882

839-897

839-898

839-904

839-930

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 16, KOTINGA


Suburban at 16,
AVENUE, Glen
KOTINGA AVENUE,
Eden.
Glen Eden.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Town Centre 4-14, OATES


Glen Eden
at 4-14, OATES ROAD, ROAD, Glen Eden.
Glen Eden.

Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 38,


Suburban at 38,
MEADOWVALE
MEADOWVALE RISE, RISE, Titirangi.
Titirangi.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 16, PISCES ROAD,
Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 47, WOODGLEN Glen Eden


Urban at 47,
ROAD, Glen Eden.
WOODGLEN ROAD,
Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 16, COEY PLACE,


Suburban at 16, COEY Glen Eden.
PLACE, Glen Eden.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 21, SARONA


Urban at 21, SARONA AVENUE, Glen
AVENUE, Glen Eden. Eden.

Glen Eden

Glen Eden

MHS

Town Centre Town Centre

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

16, PISCES ROAD, Glen Eden


Glen Eden.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

SH

MHU

MHS

SH

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

1088

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the notified zone. The site is located No change
within the town centre. It provides opportunities for land
use and transport integration. The zoning of the site is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

TC

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-957

839-980

839-424

839-799

839-2358

839-381

839-188

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 71B, WOODGLEN Glen Eden


Urban at 71B,
ROAD, Glen Eden.
WOODGLEN ROAD,
Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 1/410031/4100,4102, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 48,


Glendene
Suburban at 48,
BUTTERWORTH
BUTTERWORTH
DRIVE, Glendene.
DRIVE, Glendene.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 54,


Glendene
Suburban at 54,
BUTTERWORTH
BUTTERWORTH
DRIVE, Glendene.
DRIVE, Glendene.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 4173A GREAT


Urban at 4173A
NORTH ROAD.
GREAT NORTH ROAD. Auckland.
Auckland.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 49A, HEPBURN


Glendene
Suburban at 49A,
ROAD, Glendene.
HEPBURN ROAD,
Glendene.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
42,24,25,26,27,20,21,
22,23,44,28,29,40,38,
15,17,19,18,31,30,36,
34,32, PALMER
AVENUE, Glen Eden.

MHU

1/410031/4100,4102,
GREAT NORTH
ROAD, Auckland.

Glen Eden

Glen Eden

42,24,25,26,27,20 Glen Eden


,21,22,23,44,28,2
9,40,38,15,17,19,
18,31,30,36,34,32
, PALMER
AVENUE, Glen
Eden.

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support an alternative zone for the site. The local context
of the site makes it appropriate for this land to be
identified as MHU. It is located in proximity to the RFN
and adjoining centres. The rezoning of the site is the
most appropriate way to provide for the integrated
management of resources, to achieve the relevant
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support an alternative zone for the site. The local context
of the site makes it appropriate for this land to be
identified as MHU. It is located in proximity to the RFN
and adjoining centres. The rezoning of the site is the
most appropriate way to provide for the integrated
management of resources, to achieve the relevant
objectives of the MHU zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1089

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

MHU

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2764

839-2940

839-3114

839-3123

839-3189

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Rezone 46,44,42,
ROSEWARNE
CRESCENT, Glendene
from Mixed Housing
Urban, Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
46,44,42,
ROSEWARNE
CRESCENT,
Glendene

LOCALITY

Glendene

PAUP ZONE

MHU/MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

REASONS

MHU

1090

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Glendene

Rezone 107B,
107B, HEPBURN
HEPBURN ROAD,
ROAD, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Glendene

Rezone 20, PATTS


20, PATTS
AVENUE, Glendene AVENUE,
from Single House to Glendene
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glendene

Rezone 88,
88,
BUTTERWORTH
BUTTERWORTH
DRIVE, Glendene
DRIVE, Glendene
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glendene

SH

SH

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

MHU
Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in
proximity to the RFN and centres. The site is in a location
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. The rezoning would
be consistent with the local context of the site. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Rezone 30, PATTS


30, PATTS
AVENUE, Glendene AVENUE,
from Single House to Glendene
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

MHU

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

Do not support rezoning the site. The site is subject to


flooding constraints. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3212

839-3483

839-4063

839-4064

839-4065

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 36, PATTS


36, PATTS
AVENUE, Glendene AVENUE,
from Single House to Glendene
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glendene

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 53,
53, ROSEWARNE
ROSEWARNE
CRESCENT,
CRESCENT, Glendene Glendene
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Glendene

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone
1/27,1/25,17,3/25,19
,4/27,15A,15C,15B,5/
27,2/27,2/25,4/25,3/
27, PATTS AVENUE,
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

1/27,1/25,17,3/25 Glendene
,19,4/27,15A,15C,
15B,5/27,2/27,2/2
5,4/25,3/27,
PATTS AVENUE,
Glendene

Rezone 50,48, PATTS 50,48, PATTS


AVENUE, Glendene AVENUE,
from Single House to Glendene
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glendene

Rezone 54,56,
54,56, HARMEL
HARMEL ROAD,
ROAD, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Glendene

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHS

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in
proximity to the RFN and centres. The site is in a location
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. The rezoning would
be consistent with the local context of the site. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1091

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4066

839-4067

839-4070

839-7576

839-7611

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 60,58,
60,58, HARMEL
HARMEL ROAD,
ROAD, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

LOCALITY

Glendene

PAUP ZONE

SH

Rezone
115,113A,115A,11 Glendene
115,113A,115A,113,1 3,115B, HEPBURN
15B, HEPBURN ROAD, ROAD, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

Rezone 85A,85,
85A,85, HEPBURN Glendene
HEPBURN ROAD,
ROAD, Glendene
Glendene from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 2
BUTTERWORTH
DRIVE. Glendene
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2 BUTTERWORTH Glendene
DRIVE. Glendene

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 20 ADDISON
DRIVE. 2 MADIGAN
PLACE. Glendene
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

20 ADDISON
Glendene
DRIVE. 2
MADIGAN PLACE.
Glendene

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in
proximity to the RFN and centres. The site is in a location
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. The rezoning would
be consistent with the local context of the site. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1092

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7791

839-206

839-2478

839-579

839-803

839-321

839-457

839-1075

839-1074

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 55 HEPBURN 55 HEPBURN


ROAD. Glendene
ROAD. Glendene
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 19, ALBERT ROAD, Kelston


Suburban at 19,
Kelston.
ALBERT ROAD,
Kelston.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 45 ARCHIBALD


Urban at 45
ROAD. Kelston.
ARCHIBALD ROAD.
Kelston.

Kelston

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 16, COBHAM
CRESCENT, Kelston.

16, COBHAM
CRESCENT,
Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 76, COBHAM
CRESCENT, Kelston.

76, COBHAM
CRESCENT,
Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 92, COBHAM


Suburban at 92,
CRESCENT,
COBHAM CRESCENT, Kelston.
Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 32, COPLEY
STREET, New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


9,3,5,7,
New Lynn
at 9,3,5,7, DURRANT DURRANT PLACE,
PLACE, New Lynn.
New Lynn.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 8B,10,8A,4,6,
DURRANT PLACE,
New Lynn.

SH

32, COPLEY
STREET, New
Lynn.

Glendene

PAUP ZONE

8B,10,8A,4,6,
New Lynn
DURRANT PLACE,
New Lynn.

SH

SH

SH

MHS

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

SH

SH

MHS

SH

SH

SH

REASONS

1093

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in


MHU
proximity to the RFN and centres. The site is in a location
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. The rezoning would
be consistent with the local context of the site. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zone. The site is subject to
flooding constraints. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-490

839-1072

839-1073

839-1107

839-2406

839-651

839-3279

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 37, KELWYN


Suburban at 37,
ROAD, Kelston.
KELWYN ROAD,
Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 55,51,49,


Suburban at
KELWYN ROAD,
55,51,49, KELWYN
Kelston.
ROAD, Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 58,58A, KELWYN


Suburban at 58,58A, ROAD, Kelston.
KELWYN ROAD,
Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 17A,17,17B,
KIERNAN PLACE,
Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 116 LYNWOOD


New Lynn
Suburban at 116
ROAD. New Lynn.
LYNWOOD ROAD.
New Lynn.

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 20, MARTIN


Suburban at 20,
PLACE, Kelston.
MARTIN PLACE,
Kelston.

Kelston

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 35, COBHAM 35, COBHAM


CRESCENT, Kelston
CRESCENT,
from Single House to Kelston
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 17, ST LEONARDS Kelston


Urban at 17, ST
ROAD, Kelston.
LEONARDS ROAD,
Kelston.

17A,17,17B,
KIERNAN PLACE,
Kelston.

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

1094

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change
Do not support rezoning the site. The site is subject to
flooding constraints. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-303

MHU

MHU

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7486

839-7607

839-7639

839-7913

839-7939

839-8310

839-659

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Rezone 33 NILE
ROAD. Kelston from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
33 NILE ROAD.
Kelston

LOCALITY

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 63 COBHAM 63 COBHAM


CRESCENT. Kelston
CRESCENT.
from Single House to Kelston
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 128
128 LYNWOOD
LYNWOOD ROAD.
ROAD. New Lynn
New Lynn from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

New Lynn

Rezone 1/26, 26
VANGUARD ROAD.
Kelston from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 12 ALBERT
ROAD. Kelston from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

1/26, 26
VANGUARD
ROAD. Kelston

Kelston

Rezone 25A
VANGUARD ROAD.
Kelston from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 18,
VANGUARD ROAD,
Kelston.

25A VANGUARD
ROAD. Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

12 ALBERT ROAD. Kelston


Kelston

18, VANGUARD
ROAD, Kelston.

Kelston

Kelston

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the change in the zone. The management of
flooding risks does not require maintaining a SH zone,
and the spot zoning of the site is not appropriate. The
rezoning of the site is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change of zone because it would
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of zone because it would
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of zone because it would
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1095

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS
MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change
MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2320

839-278

839-410

839-1071

839-1070

839-1065

839-629

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Kelston

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 50 ARCHIBALD


Urban at 50
ROAD. Kelston.
ARCHIBALD ROAD.
Kelston.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 11, BARBARY


Kelston
Urban at 11,
AVENUE, Kelston.
BARBARY AVENUE,
Kelston.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 2, HURLEY PLACE, Kelston


Urban at 2, HURLEY Kelston.
PLACE, Kelston.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 9,3,5,
KELKIRK
STREET,46,48, ST
LEONARDS ROAD,
Kelston.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 6A,8,6, KELKIRK


Urban at 6A,8,6,
STREET, Kelston.
KELKIRK STREET,
Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
33,31,31A,35,
KELMAN ROAD,25,
LAURA STREET,
Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 51, KELMAN


Urban at 51, KELMAN ROAD, Kelston.
ROAD, Kelston.

9,3,5, KELKIRK
Kelston
STREET,46,48, ST
LEONARDS ROAD,
Kelston.

33,31,31A,35,
KELMAN
ROAD,25, LAURA
STREET, Kelston.

Kelston

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1096

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1069

839-1068

839-401

839-543

839-1064

839-1066

839-2260

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 61,63, KELMAN


Urban at 61,63,
ROAD, Kelston.
KELMAN ROAD,
Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 68,64,66,70,


Urban at 68,64,66,70, KELMAN ROAD,
KELMAN ROAD,
Kelston.
Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 74, KELMAN


Urban at 74, KELMAN ROAD, Kelston.
ROAD, Kelston.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 80, KELMAN


Urban at 80, KELMAN ROAD, Kelston.
ROAD, Kelston.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
12A,12B,12,10B,10C,
10A,10D, LAURA
STREET, Kelston.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 32,38,30,36,34,


Urban at
LAURA STREET,
32,38,30,36,34,
Kelston.
LAURA STREET,
Kelston.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 46 LYNWOOD


New Lynn
Urban at 46
ROAD. New Lynn.
LYNWOOD ROAD.
New Lynn.

Kelston

12A,12B,12,10B,1 Kelston
0C,10A,10D,
LAURA STREET,
Kelston.

Kelston

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1097

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-436

839-411

839-133

839-2761

839-4058

839-302

839-1063

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 13,13A,


New Lynn
Urban at 13,13A,
LYNWOOD ROAD,
LYNWOOD ROAD,
New Lynn.
New Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 4B,4,4A, NIKAU


Urban at 4B,4,4A,
STREET, New
NIKAU STREET, New Lynn.
Lynn.

New Lynn

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 36, NIKAU


Urban at 36, NIKAU STREET, New
STREET, New Lynn.
Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 54,56,58,52, 54,56,58,52,


KELMAN ROAD,
KELMAN ROAD,
Kelston from Mixed Kelston
Housing Urban, Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 47,45,43,41,
KELMAN ROAD,
Kelston from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Kelston

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 6, REWA STREET, New Lynn


Urban at 6, REWA
New Lynn.
STREET, New Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 54,54A, RIMU


Urban at 54,54A,
STREET, New
RIMU STREET, New
Lynn.
Lynn.

47,45,43,41,
KELMAN ROAD,
Kelston

New Lynn

MHU

MHU / SH

SH

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1098

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
MHU
Support the change in the zone. The management of
flooding risks does not require maintaining a SH zone,
and the spot zoning of the site is not appropriate. The
rezoning of the site is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
RPS.
Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in
MHU
close proximity to the RFN. It provides opportunities for
land use and transport integration associated with more
intensive forms of residential development. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining an
SH zone. The zoning of the site is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2414

839-115

839-2449

839-1067

839-869

839-1077

839-1062

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 71 RIMU STREET. New Lynn


Urban at 71 RIMU
New Lynn.
STREET. New Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
1/33,1/35,1/37,33,31
,37,39,35, SABULITE
ROAD, Kelston.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 34 ST LEONARDS


Urban at 34 ST
ROAD. Kelston.
LEONARDS ROAD.
Kelston.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 11,13,15,17,1,3,5, Kelston


Urban at
7,9, STANDAGE
11,13,15,17,1,3,5,7,9, LANE, Kelston.
STANDAGE LANE,
Kelston.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 12, AOTEA ROAD,
Glen Eden.

THAB

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
11, ARAWA
Housing and
STREET,3160,
Apartment Buildings GREAT NORTH
at 11, ARAWA
ROAD
STREET,3160, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 56A,56, ARAWA
STREET, New Lynn.

New Lynn

1/33,1/35,1/37,33 Kelston
,31,37,39,35,
SABULITE ROAD,
Kelston.

Kelston

12, AOTEA ROAD, Glen Eden


Glen Eden.

56A,56, ARAWA
STREET, New
Lynn.

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1099

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-385

839-719

839-1060

839-1078

839-2708

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 68, ARAWA
STREET, New Lynn.

68, ARAWA
STREET, New
Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 71, ARAWA
STREET, New Lynn.

71, ARAWA
STREET, New
Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 76,74,78, ARAWA
STREET, New Lynn.

76,74,78, ARAWA New Lynn


STREET, New
Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3148,3146, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,3,5,
TITIRANGI ROAD,
Auckland.

3148,3146, GREAT New Lynn


NORTH ROAD,3,5,
TITIRANGI ROAD,
Auckland.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3168 GREAT
NORTH ROAD.
Auckland.

3168 GREAT
NORTH ROAD.
Auckland.

New Lynn

New Lynn

New Lynn

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1100

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-345

839-570

839-1076

839-505

839-1061

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3184, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

3184, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3188, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

3188, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

LOCALITY

New Lynn

New Lynn

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

Retain Terrace
3194,3192, GREAT New Lynn
Housing and
NORTH ROAD,
Apartment Buildings Auckland.
at 3194,3192, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3216, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

THAB

3216, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

Retain Terrace
3230,3228,
Housing and
GREAT NORTH
Apartment Buildings ROAD, Auckland.
at 3230,3228, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Auckland.

New Lynn

New Lynn

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

1101

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2709

839-355

839-1079

839-1080

839-1082

839-433

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3168A GREAT
NORTH ROAD.
Auckland.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
3168A GREAT
NORTH ROAD.
Auckland.

LOCALITY

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 14, MIRO STREET,
New Lynn.

14, MIRO STREET, New Lynn


New Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3B,3A, NIKAU
STREET, New Lynn.

3B,3A, NIKAU
STREET, New
Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 6A,8A,8,6, PINE
STREET, New Lynn.

6A,8A,8,6, PINE
STREET, New
Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 12A,12, PINE
STREET, New Lynn.

12A,12, PINE
STREET, New
Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 13,13A, PINE
STREET, New Lynn.

13,13A, PINE
STREET, New
Lynn.

New Lynn

New Lynn

New Lynn

New Lynn

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

1102

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2760

839-2284

839-1081

839-3711

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 8J,8K,8H,8G, 8J,8K,8H,8G,


AOTEA ROAD, Glen
AOTEA ROAD,
Eden from Terrace
Glen Eden
Housing and
Apartment Buildings,
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Glen Eden

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 42 RATA STREET.
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 8B,8A, RATA
STREET, New Lynn.

42 RATA STREET.
New Lynn.

8B,8A, RATA
STREET, New
Lynn.

New Lynn

Rezone 11, KUAKA


11, KUAKA PLACE, New Lynn
PLACE, New Lynn
New Lynn
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

PAUP ZONE

THAB / SH

THAB

THAB

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

1103

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in


THAB
close proximity to the RFN. It provides opportunities for
land use and transport integration associated with more
intensive forms of residential development. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining an
SH zone. The zoning of the site is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose in part

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support the change of zone because it would


result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Consider meets proximity for MHU

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3946

839-2667

839-2668

839-715

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 56, RATA


56, RATA STREET, New Lynn
STREET, New Lynn
New Lynn
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

6 HUGH BROWN New Lynn


DRIVE. New Lynn.

PAUP ZONE

MHS /
General
Coastal
Marine

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 6 HUGH BROWN
DRIVE. New Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
6A HUGH BROWN New Lynn
Housing and
DRIVE. New Lynn.
Apartment Buildings
at 6A HUGH BROWN
DRIVE. New Lynn.

THAB

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 14, REID ROAD,
New Lynn.

THAB

14, REID ROAD,


New Lynn.

New Lynn

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

1104

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in


THAB
close proximity to the RFN. It provides opportunities for
land use and transport integration associated with more
intensive forms of residential development. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining an
SH zone. The zoning of the site is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1083

839-1089

839-1084

839-1088

839-779

839-316

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 42,28,36,34, REID
ROAD, New Lynn.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

42,28,36,34, REID New Lynn


ROAD, New Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 1, HILL
CRESCENT,44, ASTLEY
AVENUE, New Lynn.

1, HILL
CRESCENT,44,
ASTLEY AVENUE,
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
4,6, HILL
Housing and
CRESCENT, New
Apartment Buildings Lynn.
at 4,6, HILL
CRESCENT, New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
9,9A,7, HILL
Housing and
CRESCENT, New
Apartment Buildings Lynn.
at 9,9A,7, HILL
CRESCENT, New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
14, HILL
Housing and
CRESCENT, New
Apartment Buildings Lynn.
at 14, HILL CRESCENT,
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
18, HILL
Housing and
CRESCENT, New
Apartment Buildings Lynn.
at 18, HILL CRESCENT,
New Lynn.

New Lynn

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

1105

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1085

839-1087

839-1086

839-515

839-528

839-1057

839-1090

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
24,20,22, HILL
Housing and
CRESCENT, New
Apartment Buildings Lynn.
at 24,20,22, HILL
CRESCENT, New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
25,27,21, HILL
Housing and
CRESCENT, New
Apartment Buildings Lynn.
at 25,27,21, HILL
CRESCENT, New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
33,37A,37,35,
Housing and
HILL CRESCENT,
Apartment Buildings New Lynn.
at 33,37A,37,35, HILL
CRESCENT, New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4, LINKS ROAD,
New Lynn.

4, LINKS ROAD,
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 101, PORTAGE
ROAD, New Lynn.

101, PORTAGE
New Lynn
ROAD, New Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 5A,5,7, TAHI


Urban at 5A,5,7, TAHI TERRACE, Glen
TERRACE, Glen Eden. Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
75C,75B,75,77,75A,
MARGAN AVENUE,
New Lynn.

Glen Eden

75C,75B,75,77,75 New Lynn


A, MARGAN
AVENUE, New
Lynn.

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1106

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1091

839-1092

839-1093

839-1094

839-231

839-2427

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 47, MARGAN
AVENUE,2,10,12,4,6,
THOM STREET, New
Lynn.

47, MARGAN
New Lynn
AVENUE,2,10,12,4
,6, THOM STREET,
New Lynn.

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 51, MARGAN
AVENUE,14,16,
ISLINGTON
AVENUE,11,1,3,5,7,9,
THOM STREET, New
Lynn.

51, MARGAN
New Lynn
AVENUE,14,16,
ISLINGTON
AVENUE,11,1,3,5,
7,9, THOM
STREET, New
Lynn.

THAB

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 5,7B,7, MAYVILLE New Lynn


Urban at 5,7B,7,
AVENUE, New
MAYVILLE AVENUE, Lynn.
New Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 75,75A,
ASTLEY AVENUE,4,6,
MAYVILLE AVENUE,
New Lynn.

75,75A, ASTLEY
AVENUE,4,6,
MAYVILLE
AVENUE, New
Lynn.

New Lynn

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 22, SEABROOK


Urban at 22,
AVENUE, New
SEABROOK AVENUE, Lynn.
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 31B, 31A RUA


Glen Eden
Urban at 31B, 31A
ROAD. Glen Eden.
RUA ROAD. Glen
Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

THAB

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1107

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-246

839-2699

839-2700

839-2701

839-3107

839-3451

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 25B,25A,
ISLINGTON AVENUE,
New Lynn.

25B,25A,
ISLINGTON
AVENUE, New
Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 24 MAYVILLE


Urban at 24
AVENUE. New
MAYVILLE AVENUE. Lynn.
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 26 MAYVILLE


Urban at 26
AVENUE. New
MAYVILLE AVENUE. Lynn.
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 17 MAYVILLE


Urban at 17
AVENUE. New
MAYVILLE AVENUE. Lynn.
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 8, GARDNER 8, GARDNER


AVENUE, New Lynn AVENUE, New
from Single House to Lynn
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

New Lynn

Rezone 2, GARDNER 2, GARDNER


AVENUE, New Lynn AVENUE, New
from Mixed Housing Lynn
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

THAB

1108

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

Do not support the change of zone because it would


result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3538

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 11,
11, SEABROOK
SEABROOK AVENUE, AVENUE, New
New Lynn from
Lynn
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 52A, TAHI


52A, TAHI
TERRACE, Glen Eden TERRACE, Glen
from Single House to Eden
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Glen Eden

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 14,
14, SEABROOK
SEABROOK AVENUE, AVENUE, New
New Lynn from
Lynn
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 11,9,11A,
ISLINGTON
AVENUE,24,
CRAIGBANK AVENUE,
New Lynn from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

11,9,11A,
ISLINGTON
AVENUE,24,
CRAIGBANK
AVENUE, New
Lynn

New Lynn

Rezone 32,30,36,34,
HUTCHINSON
AVENUE, New Lynn
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

32,30,36,34,
HUTCHINSON
AVENUE, New
Lynn

New Lynn

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

REASONS

THAB

1109

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
Do not support the change of zone because it would
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3705

SH

MHU

No change
Do not support rezoning the site. The site is subject to
flooding constraints. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3872

MHU

THAB

No change
Do not support the change of zone because it would
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4059

839-4060

839-452

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 25, CRAIGBANK


Urban at 25,
AVENUE, New
CRAIGBANK AVENUE, Lynn.
New Lynn.

MHU

THAB

THAB
Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in
proximity to the RFN and centres. The site is in a location
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. The rezoning would
be consistent with the local context of the site. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

New Lynn

MHU

MHU

THAB

Support

Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in


proximity to the RFN and centres. The site is in a location
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. The rezoning would
be consistent with the local context of the site. The
rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

THAB

MHU

THAB

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-513

839-922

839-949

839-1059

839-1095

839-1096

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

New Lynn

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 63, ASTLEY


Urban at 63, ASTLEY AVENUE, New
AVENUE, New Lynn. Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 5, CRAIGBANK


Urban at 5,
AVENUE, New
CRAIGBANK AVENUE, Lynn.
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 15, MAYVILLE


Urban at 15,
AVENUE, New
MAYVILLE AVENUE, Lynn.
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 31,29, NORTHALL New Lynn


Urban at 31,29,
ROAD, New Lynn.
NORTHALL ROAD,
New Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 19,17, NORTHALL New Lynn


Urban at 19,17,
ROAD,4, WESTALL
NORTHALL ROAD,4, ROAD, New Lynn.
WESTALL ROAD, New
Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
12A,8A,12,6A,10B,10
C,10A,10F,10D,10E,6,
8, WILLERTON
AVENUE, New Lynn.

MHU

12A,8A,12,6A,10B New Lynn


,10C,10A,10F,10D,
10E,6,8,
WILLERTON
AVENUE, New
Lynn.

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1110

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1097

839-1098

839-1099

839-1102

839-1103

839-1104

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
11A,11C,11B,9A,9C,9
B, WILLERTON
AVENUE,39,56,58,48,
33,42,31,45,37,43,35,
41,46,40,54,52,44,50,
TROJAN CRESCENT,
New Lynn.

11A,11C,11B,9A,9 New Lynn


C,9B, WILLERTON
AVENUE,39,56,58,
48,33,42,31,45,37
,43,35,41,46,40,5
4,52,44,50,
TROJAN
CRESCENT, New
Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
105A,105B,105C,105
D,105E, HUTCHINSON
AVENUE, New Lynn.

105A,105B,105C,1 New Lynn


05D,105E,
HUTCHINSON
AVENUE, New
Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 49A,49,
WILLERTON AVENUE,
New Lynn.

49A,49,
WILLERTON
AVENUE, New
Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 11,9,5,7,


New Lynn
Urban at 11,9,5,7,
COPPLESTONE
COPPLESTONE PLACE, PLACE, New Lynn.
New Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 40A,40,40B,
SEABROOK AVENUE,
New Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 61,61A, GARDNER New Lynn


Urban at 61,61A,
AVENUE, New
GARDNER AVENUE, Lynn.
New Lynn.

40A,40,40B,
SEABROOK
AVENUE, New
Lynn.

New Lynn

New Lynn

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1111

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1105

839-131

839-189

839-2281

839-2423

839-2550

839-3009

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
39C,39B,39A,
HUTCHINSON
AVENUE, New
Lynn.

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at
39C,39B,39A,
HUTCHINSON
AVENUE, New Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 44, WILLERTON


Urban at 44,
AVENUE, New
WILLERTON AVENUE, Lynn.
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 18, TROJAN


Urban at 18, TROJAN CRESCENT, New
CRESCENT, New Lynn. Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 42 SEABROOK


Urban at 42
AVENUE. New
SEABROOK AVENUE. Lynn.
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 1/107-5/107
HUTCHINSON
AVENUE. New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 1, 1A NORTHALL New Lynn


Urban at 1, 1A
ROAD. New Lynn.
NORTHALL ROAD.
New Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 95,
95, SEABROOK
SEABROOK AVENUE, AVENUE, New
New Lynn from Single Lynn
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

1/107-5/107
HUTCHINSON
AVENUE. New
Lynn.

New Lynn

PAUP ZONE

New Lynn

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

1112

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change
Do not support rezoning the site. The site is subject to
flooding constraints. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3121

839-444

839-472

839-538

839-632

839-720

839-761

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn
Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Rezone 47, PARKER


AVENUE, New Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 3, REIMAN
STREET, New Lynn.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

47, PARKER
AVENUE, New
Lynn

New Lynn

3, REIMAN
STREET, New
Lynn.

New Lynn

PAUP ZONE

SH

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 7B,7A, NORTHALL New Lynn


Urban at 7B,7A,
ROAD, New Lynn.
NORTHALL ROAD,
New Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 106,
HUTCHINSON
AVENUE, New Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 13, HINAU


Urban at 13, HINAU STREET, New
STREET, New Lynn.
Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 22, NORTHALL


New Lynn
Urban at 22,
ROAD, New Lynn.
NORTHALL ROAD,
New Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 10, NORTHALL


New Lynn
Urban at 10,
ROAD, New Lynn.
NORTHALL ROAD,
New Lynn.

MHU

106,
HUTCHINSON
AVENUE, New
Lynn.

New Lynn

New Lynn

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support rezoning the site. The site is subject to


flooding constraints. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1113

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-838

839-891

839-951

839-979

839-1100

839-1101

839-163

839-4074

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 5-7, TROJAN


Urban at 5-7, TROJAN CRESCENT, New
CRESCENT, New Lynn. Lynn.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 58, SEABROOK


Urban at 58,
AVENUE, New
SEABROOK AVENUE, Lynn.
New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 127, TITIRANGI


Urban at 127,
ROAD, TitirangiTITIRANGI ROAD,
New Lynn.
Titirangi-New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 38A, FRUITVALE New Lynn


Urban at 38A,
ROAD, New Lynn.
FRUITVALE ROAD,
New Lynn.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 3,5,7,
GRANDISON
CRESCENT, New Lynn.

3,5,7,
GRANDISON
CRESCENT, New
Lynn.

New Lynn

MHS

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
12,14,16,
GRANDISON
CRESCENT, New Lynn.

12,14,16,
GRANDISON
CRESCENT, New
Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 20 GRANDISON


Suburban at 20
CRESCENT, New
GRANDISON
Lynn.
CRESCENT, New Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 47B,47A,
STOTTHOLM ROAD,
Titirangi from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Titirangi

47B,47A,
STOTTHOLM
ROAD, Titirangi

New Lynn

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

1114

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

SH

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

MHS

MHS

MHU

No change

No change
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
MHS

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

No change

No change
Do not support rezoning the site. The site is subject to
flooding constraints. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Consider appropriate zoning from criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2762

839-3398

839-3425

839-344

839-470

839-7684

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Rezone 90,90A,
ASTLEY
AVENUE,6A,6B,6C,6,
TANE STREET, New
Lynn from Mixed
Housing Urban,
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

90,90A, ASTLEY
New Lynn
AVENUE,6A,6B,6C
,6, TANE STREET,
New Lynn

Rezone
133A,133B,PORTA New Lynn
133A,133B,PORTAGE GE ROAD,New
ROAD,New
Lynn
Lynn,Auckland from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PAUP ZONE

MHS / MHU MHU

MHS

Rezone 116, BOLTON 116, BOLTON


STREET, Blockhouse STREET,
Bay from Single
Blockhouse Bay
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Blockhouse Bay SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 35, CUTLER


Suburban at 35,
STREET, New
CUTLER STREET, New Lynn.
Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 108, ASTLEY


Urban at 108, ASTLEY AVENUE, New
AVENUE, New Lynn. Lynn.

New Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 100 PORTAGE 100 PORTAGE


ROAD. New Lynn
ROAD. New Lynn
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

New Lynn

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1115

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the rezoning of the site. The site is located in


MHU
close proximity to the RFN. It provides opportunities for
land use and transport integration associated with more
intensive forms of residential development. Managing
flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining an
SH zone. The zoning of the site is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support the change of zone because it would
No change
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-150

839-2322

839-2442

839-2642

839-2643

839-2644

839-2646

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


210, SOLAR
Glen Eden
at 210, SOLAR ROAD, ROAD, Glen Eden.
Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House 5A DANUBE LANE. Glen Eden


at 5A DANUBE LANE. Glen Eden.
Glen Eden.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 8 ROICK PARADE. Glen Eden


Urban at 8 ROICK
Glen Eden.
PARADE. Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 18A ROSIER


Glen Eden
Urban at 18A ROSIER ROAD. Glen Eden.
ROAD. Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 18B ROSIER


Glen Eden
Urban at 18B ROSIER ROAD. Glen Eden.
ROAD. Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 18C ROSIER


Glen Eden
Urban at 18C ROSIER ROAD. Glen Eden.
ROAD. Glen Eden.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 18E ROSIER


Glen Eden
Urban at 18E ROSIER ROAD. Glen Eden.
ROAD. Glen Eden.

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is


distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

1116

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change
SH

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2647

839-2690

839-7474

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 18F ROSIER ROAD. Glen Eden


Urban at 18F ROSIER Glen Eden.
ROAD. Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 113C WOODGLEN Glen Eden


Urban at 113C
ROAD. Glen Eden.
WOODGLEN ROAD.
Glen Eden.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 14A
14A WOODGLEN Glen Eden
WOODGLEN ROAD. ROAD. Glen Eden
Glen Eden from
Mixed Housing Urban
to Terrace Housing
and Apartment
Buildings.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 72
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

72 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

SH

Rezone 74
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

74 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

THAB

REASONS

1117

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is No change
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
No change
Do not support the change of zone because it would
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-8018

839-8019

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8020

839-8021

839-8023

839-8028

839-8030

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 76
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

76 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 78
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

78 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 82
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

82 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 86
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

86 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

Rezone 88
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

88 ALBIONVALE
Glen Eden
ROAD. Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1118

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8065

839-8049

839-8051

839-8081

839-3472

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

SUMMARY

Rezone 151
ALBIONVALE ROAD.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

151 ALBIONVALE Glen Eden


ROAD. Glen Eden

PAUP ZONE

SH

Rezone 27 TUCK
27 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 31 TUCK
31 TUCK NATHAN Glen Eden
NATHAN DRIVE. Glen DRIVE. Glen Eden
Eden from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

Rezone 13 HAKI
WIHONGI PLACE.
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

13 HAKI WIHONGI Glen Eden


PLACE. Glen Eden

Rezone 51, HARMEL 51, HARMEL


ROAD, Glendene
ROAD, Glendene
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Glendene

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher


density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
Do not support the change from SH zone to a higher
density residential zone. The site is not located in
proximity to the RFN or a metropolitan, town or local
centre. Consequently the site is distant from locations
where land use and transport integration opportunities
would support a higher density zone. A spot zone in this
location will not generally achieve integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local
context. Retention of the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone

1119

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2623

839-2624

839-2557

839-2347

839-7702

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Sunnyvale

PAUP ZONE

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 138 VIEW ROAD.


Urban at 138 VIEW
Sunnyvale.
ROAD. Sunnyvale.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 140A VIEW ROAD. Sunnyvale


Urban at 140A VIEW Sunnyvale.
ROAD. Sunnyvale.

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Mixed Housing 58D SUNNYSIDE Sunnyvale


Urban at 58D
ROAD. Sunnyvale.
SUNNYSIDE ROAD.
Sunnyvale.

MHU

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn
Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Retain Single House


at 135 SOLAR ROAD.
Glen Eden.

135 SOLAR ROAD. Glen Eden


Glen Eden.

SH

Rezone 16B
16B WOODGLEN Glen Eden
WOODGLEN ROAD. ROAD. Glen Eden
Glen Eden from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

SH

Glendene,
Sunnyvale, Glen
Eden and New
Lynn

Rezone 82A NIKAU


STREET. New Lynn
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

82A NIKAU
New Lynn
STREET. New Lynn

MHS

Te Atatu

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 703, TE ATATU
ROAD, Te AtatuGlendene.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 13,
GWENDOLINE
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

703 Te Atatu Road Te Atatu


Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula

THAB

13 Gwendoline
Avenue Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHU

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

REASONS

Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is


located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the zoning of the site. The site is
located in close proximity to the RFN. It provides
opportunities for land use and transport integration
associated with more intensive forms of residential
development. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support the retention of the notified zone. The site is
distant from the RFN and centres. The retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

1120

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

THAB

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change
Do not support rezoning the site. The site is subject to
flooding constraints. The zoning of the site is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-7888

839-101

839-104

Te Atatu

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHU

THAB

MHU

Do not support the change of zone because it would


No change
result in a spot zone. Spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the
notified zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change
close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
No Change
RFN route and to THAB zoning. Will enable intensification
in the neighbourhood and a transition from the nearby
THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1109

839-1110

839-1111

839-1112

839-1113

839-1114

839-1115

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 59A,59C,59B,59,
TAIKATA ROAD,3,
RIXON PLACE, Te
Atatu Peninsula.

59A,59C,59B,59, Te Atatu
TAIKATA ROAD, 3 Peninsula
Rixon Place Te
Atatu Peninsula

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 11,11A, RIXON
PLACE, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

11 and 11a Rixon Te Atatu


Place Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 26,26A, KERVIL
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

26 and 26a Kervil Te Atatu


Avenue Te Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 56A,56, NEIL
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

56 and 56a Neil


Avenue Te Atatu
Peninsula

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 31,29, BEACH
ROAD, Te Atatu
Peninsula.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 618,618A, TE
ATATU ROAD, Te
Atatu-Glendene.

29 and 31 Beach
Road Te Atatu
Peninsula

Te Atatu
Peninsula

618 and 618a Te


Atatu Road Te
Atatu Peninsula

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Retain Mixed Housing 77, 77a, 79 Kervil Te Atatu


Urban at 77,77A,79, Avenue Te Atatu Peninsula
KERVIL AVENUE, Te Peninsula
Atatu Peninsula.

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

REASONS

1121

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change


close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change


close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change


close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change


close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change


close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change
close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the MHU zone located close to


No Change
RFN. Will enable intensification in the neighbourhood
Retention of notified zoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1116

839-1117

839-1118

839-1119

839-112

839-1120

839-1121

839-1122

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 3,5,3A,
GWENDOLINE
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

3, 3a and 5
Gwendoline
Avenue Te Atatu
Peninsula

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 10,12,8,
GWENDOLINE
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

8, 10 and 12
Gwendoline
Avenue Te Atatu
Peninsula

Te Atatu
Peninsula

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 731A and 731B Te Te Atatu


Urban at 731A,731B, Atatu Road Te
Peninsula
TE ATATU ROAD, Te Atatu Peninsula
Atatu-Glendene.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 49 Totara Road,


Te Atatu
Suburban at 49,
23 Justin Place Te Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD,23,
Atatu Peninsula
JUSTIN PLACE, Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 54 Vodanovich


Urban at 54,
Road
VODANOVICH ROAD,
Te Atatu South.

Te Atatu South MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 734 A-D Te Atatu


Suburban at
Road Te Atatu
734D,734E,734B,734 Peninsula
C,734A, TE ATATU
ROAD, Te AtatuGlendene.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 4,4A,
HIKURANGI STREET,
Te Atatu Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

4 and 4a
Hikurangi Street
Te Atatu
Peninsula

Retain Mixed Housing 28, 30, 34 and 34a Te Atatu


Suburban at
Totara Road Te
Peninsula
30,28,34A,34,
Atatu Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD, Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of the MHU zone located close to


RFN and to THAB zoning. Will enable intensification in
the neighbourhood and a transition from the nearby
THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
RFN and to THAB zoning. Will enable intensification in
the neighbourhood and a transition from the nearby
THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
RFN and to THAB zoning. Will enable intensification in
the neighbourhood and a transition from the nearby
THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.

1122

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

Support retention of the MHU zone Close to town


No Change
centre, public open space, THAB zoning and arterial
roads. Will enable an appropriate degree of
intensification in the neighbourhood with a transition
from the more intensive THAB zone. MHU zone is the
most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the No Change
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.

Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the No Change


most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the No Change
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1123

839-1124

839-1125

839-1126

839-1127

839-1128

839-1129

839-1130

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 3, 5 and 9 Crieff


Suburban at 9,3,5,
Place Te Atatu
CRIEFF PLACE, Te
Peninsula
Atatu Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Retain Mixed Housing 5 and 7 Durham


Urban at 5, LONDON Street Te Atatu
STREET,7, DURHAM Peninsula
STREET, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 12B Halyard Place Te Atatu


Suburban at 12A,12B, Te Atatu
Peninsula
HALYARD PLACE, Te Peninsula
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 34A Enderby Drive Te Atatu


Urban at 34A,34B,
Te Atatu
Peninsula
ENDERBY DRIVE, Te Peninsula
Atatu Peninsula.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 19 and 19a


Urban at 19,19A,
Kotuku Street Te
KOTUKU STREET, Te Atatu Peninsula
Atatu Peninsula.

MHU

Te Atatu
Peninsula

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 496B,496A, TE
ATATU ROAD, Te
Atatu-Glendene.

496A and 496B Te Te Atatu


Atatu Road Te
Peninsula
Atatu Peninsula

THAB

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 69,69A,
FLANSHAW
ROAD,10,8,12,4,6,
COLE PLACE, Te Atatu
South.

69,69A,
Te Atatu South MHU
FLANSHAW
ROAD,10,8,12,4,6,
COLE PLACE, Te
Atatu South

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 9,9A, ROYAL VIEW Te Atatu South MHU


Urban at 9,9A, ROYAL ROAD, Te Atatu
VIEW ROAD, Te Atatu South
South.

MHU

REASONS

1123

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the No Change


most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
No Change
RFN and to THAB zoning. Will enable intensification in
the neighbourhood and a transition from the nearby
THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the No Change
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
No Change
town centre, public open space and to THAB zoning. Will
enable intensification in the neighbourhood and a
transition from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of
notified zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
The retention of the notified MHU zoning is not
THAB
supported, alternatively rezoning to THAB is supported in
response to submission point 2951-1. THAB zoning is
supported given the location of the site close to the RFN,
local facilities, neighbourhood centre and areas of public
open space. THAB zoning is the most appropriate zone to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change
close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the MHU zone Close to


No Change
neighbourhood centre and public open space and within
walking distance of the Te Atatu South local centre. Will
enable an appropriate degree of intensification in the
neighbourhood. MHU zone is the most appropriate zone
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone Close to
No Change
neighbourhood centre and public open space and within
walking distance of the Te Atatu South local centre. Will
enable an appropriate degree of intensification in the
neighbourhood.MHU zone is the most appropriate zone
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-153

839-191

839-2230

839-2261

839-2265

839-2275

839-2280

839-2287

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 90 Taikata Road


Urban at 90, TAIKATA Te Atatu
ROAD, Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 46, ROBERTS


Urban at 46,
ROAD, Te Atatu
ROBERTS ROAD, Te
South.
Atatu South.

Te Atatu South MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 101 Kervil Avenue Te Atatu


Urban at 101, KERVIL Te Atatu
Peninsula
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 1 Hughes Terrace Te Atatu


Urban at 1 HUGHES Te Atatu
Peninsula
TERRACE. 8 WAIONE Peninsula
AVENUE. Te Atatu
Peninsula.

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 29 TIROROA


Te Atatu South MHU
Urban at 29 TIROROA AVENUE. Te Atatu
AVENUE. Te Atatu
South.
South.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 13 MERVILLE


Te Atatu South MHU
Urban at 13
AVENUE. Te Atatu
MERVILLE AVENUE. South.
Te Atatu South.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 97A MCLEOD


Urban at 97A
ROAD. Te Atatu
MCLEOD ROAD. Te
South.
Atatu South.

MHU

Te Atatu South MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 10 VODANOVICH Te Atatu South MHU


Urban at 10
ROAD. Te Atatu
VODANOVICH ROAD. South.
Te Atatu South.

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of the MHU zone located close to


RFN and to THAB zoning. Will enable intensification in
the neighbourhood and a transition from the nearby
THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
rapid and frequent service network and to
neighbourhood centre on corner of Roberts Road and Te
Atatu Road. Will enable an appropriate level of
intensification in the neighbourhood. MHU zone is the
most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
RFN and to THAB zoning in between the Neighbourhood
centre and Te Atatu Peninsula Town Centre. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
RFN and to THAB zoning. Will enable intensification in
the neighbourhood and a transition from the nearby
THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
rapid and frequent service network and to THAB zoning.
Will enable intensification in the neighbourhood and a
transition from the nearby THAB zone. MHU zone is the
most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
rapid and frequent service network and to THAB zoning.
Will enable intensification in the neighbourhood and a
transition from the nearby THAB zone. MHU zone is the
most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
rapid and frequent service network. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood. MHU zone is the
most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
rapid and frequent service network and to THAB zoning.
Will enable intensification in the neighbourhood and a
transition from the nearby THAB zone. MHU zone is the
most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1124

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2315

839-2346

839-2363

839-2374

839-2375

839-2385

839-2395

839-2438

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
39 Taikata Road
Housing and
Te Atatu
Apartment Buildings Peninsula
at 39 TAIKATA ROAD.
Te Atatu Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Retain Mixed Housing 151 EDMONTON


Urban at 151
ROAD. Te Atatu
EDMONTON ROAD. South
Te Atatu South.

Te Atatu South MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 9, 2/9, 1/9


Urban at 9, 2/9, 1/9 CONISTON
CONISTON AVENUE. AVENUE
Te Atatu South.

Te Atatu South MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 111 MCLEOD


Urban at 111
ROAD
MCLEOD ROAD. Te
Atatu South.

Te Atatu South MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 9 Hamurana Place Te Atatu


Urban at 9
Te Atatu
Peninsula
HAMURANA PLACE. Peninsula
Te Atatu Peninsula.
Retain Mixed Housing 332A TE ATATU
Urban at 332A TE
ROAD. Te AtatuATATU ROAD. Te
Glendene.
Atatu-Glendene.

MHU

Te Atatu South MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 25 Toru Street Te Te Atatu


Urban at 25 TORU
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
STREET. Te Atatu
Peninsula.

Retain Mixed Housing 61, 63 TE ATATU


Urban at 61, 63 TE
ROAD
ATATU ROAD. Te
Atatu-Glendene.

THAB

MHU

Te Atatu South MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1125

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change


close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
public open space and arterial road. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood. MHU zone is the
most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone Close to
neighbourhood centre and public open space and within
walking distance of the Te Atatu South local centre. Will
enable an appropriate degree of intensification in the
neighbourhood. MHU zone is the most appropriate zone
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone Close to
neighbourhood centre and RFN route. Will enable an
appropriate degree of intensification in the
neighbourhood. MHU zone is the most appropriate zone
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
RFN. Will enable intensification in the neighbourhood
around local RFN routes. Retention of notified zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
rapid and frequent service network and to the Te Atatu
South Local Centre. Will enable intensification in the
neighbourhood and a transition from the nearby THAB
zone. MHU zone is the most appropriate zone to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
The retention of the notified MHU zoning is not
supported, alternatively rezoning to THAB is supported in
response to submission point 2951-1. THAB zoning is
supported given the location of the site close to the RFN,
local facilities, neighbourhood centre and areas of public
open space. THAB zoning is the most appropriate zone to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
rapid and frequent service network and to THAB zoning.
and within walking distance of the Glendene Local
Centre. Will enable intensification in the neighbourhood
and a transition from the nearby THAB zone. MHU zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

THAB

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2450

839-2453

839-2461

839-2486

839-2509

839-252

839-2534

839-2561

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing 48 Titoki Street Te Te Atatu


Urban at 48 TITOKI
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
STREET. Te Atatu
Peninsula.

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 262 TE ATATU
ROAD. Te AtatuGlendene.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 52 TAIKATA ROAD.
78 YEOVIL ROAD. Te
Atatu Peninsula.

262 TE ATATU
ROAD. Te AtatuGlendene

PAUP ZONE

MHU

Te Atatu South THAB

78 Yeovil Road Te Te Atatu


Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula

THAB

Retain Mixed Housing 205 EDMONTON


Urban at 205
ROAD. Te Atatu
EDMONTON ROAD. South
Te Atatu South.

Te Atatu South MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 198 EDMONTON


Urban at 198
ROAD, Te Atatu
EDMONTON ROAD. South
Te Atatu South.

Te Atatu South MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 9, AMBERLEY


Te Atatu South MHU
Urban at 9,
AVENUE, Te Atatu
AMBERLEY AVENUE, South
Te Atatu South.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 241 EDMONTON


Urban at 241
ROAD Te Atatu
EDMONTON ROAD Te South
Atatu South.

MHU

Te Atatu South MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 4 SCHOOL ROAD, Te Atatu South MHU


Urban at 4 SCHOOL
Te Atatu South
ROAD. Te Atatu
South.

MHU

REASONS

1126

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the MHU zone located close to


No Change
RFN, public open space and to THAB zoning. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change
close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change
close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the MHU zone located on arterial


road and close to THAB zoning. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. MHU zone is the most
appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support retention of the MHU zone located on arterial
road and close to THAB zoning. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. MHU zone is the most
appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the MHU
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
town centre, neighbourhood centre and to THAB zoning.
Will enable intensification in the neighbourhood and a
transition from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of
notified zoning is the most appropriate zone to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
town centre, public open space and to THAB zoning. Will
enable intensification in the neighbourhood and a
transition from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of
notified zoning is the most appropriate zone to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
town centre and to THAB zoning. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-257

839-2602

839-2603

839-2617

839-2618

839-2619

839-2638

839-2639

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 103 Kervil Avenue Te Atatu


Urban at 666, TE
Te Atatu
Peninsula
ATATU ROAD,103,
Peninsula
KERVIL AVENUE, Te
Atatu-Peninsula.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 724 Te Atatu Road Te Atatu


Suburban at 724 TE Te Atatu
Peninsula
ATATU ROAD. Te
Peninsula
Atatu-Glendene.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 724A Te Atatu


Suburban at 724A TE Road Te Atatu
ATATU ROAD. Te
Peninsula
Atatu-Glendene.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 87 Kervil Avenue


Urban at 87 KERVIL
Te Atatu
AVENUE. Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 87A Kervil Avenue Te Atatu


Urban at 87A KERVIL Te Atatu
Peninsula
AVENUE. Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 89 Kervil Avenue


Urban at 89 KERVIL
Te Atatu
AVENUE. Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula.

MHU

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 648 TE ATATU
ROAD. Te AtatuGlendene.
Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 648A TE ATATU
ROAD. Te AtatuGlendene.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

648 Te Atatu Road Te Atatu


Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula

THAB

648A Te Atatu
Road Te Atatu
Peninsula

THAB

Te Atatu
Peninsula

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

THAB

THAB

REASONS

Support retention of the MHU zone located close to


RFN, public open space and to THAB zoning. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
RFN, public open space and to THAB zoning. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
RFN, public open space and to THAB zoning. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
RFN, public open space and to THAB zoning. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being
close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1127

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No Change
MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change


close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-271

839-2729

839-2730

839-2731

839-2732

839-2733

839-2734

839-2735

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 80, VODANOVICH Te Atatu South MHU


Urban at 80,
ROAD, Te Atatu
VODANOVICH ROAD, South
Te Atatu South.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 8 Totara Road Te


Suburban at 8
Atatu Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD. Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 8A Totara Road Te Te Atatu


Suburban at 8A
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD. Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 8B Totara Road Te Te Atatu


Suburban at 8B
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD. Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 8C Totara Road Te Te Atatu


Suburban at 8C
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD. Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 8D Totara Road Te Te Atatu


Suburban at 8D
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD. Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 8E Totara Road Te Te Atatu


Suburban at 8E
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD. Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 8F Totara Road Te Te Atatu


Suburban at 8F
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD. Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

REASONS

Support retention of the MHU zone rezoning would


result in spot zoning. Will enable intensification in the
neighbourhood. MHU zone is the most appropriate zone
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
The request to retain the existing MHS zoning on these
sites is not supported. Instead it is proposed to rezone to
MHU zone as an out of scope change (see Attachment F).
The properties are close to the planned RFN route on
Taikata Road, Matipo Road, Imelda Road and Abbotleigh
Road. MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
The request to retain the existing MHS zoning on these
sites is not supported. Instead it is proposed to rezone to
MHU zone as an out of scope change (see Attachment F).
The properties are close to the planned RFN route on
Taikata Road, Matipo Road, Imelda Road and Abbotleigh
Road. MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
The request to retain the existing MHS zoning on these
sites is not supported. Instead it is proposed to rezone to
MHU zone as an out of scope change (see Attachment F).
The properties are close to the planned RFN route on
Taikata Road, Matipo Road, Imelda Road and Abbotleigh
Road. MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
The request to retain the existing MHS zoning on these
sites is not supported. Instead it is proposed to rezone to
MHU zone as an out of scope change (see Attachment F).
The properties are close to the planned RFN route on
Taikata Road, Matipo Road, Imelda Road and Abbotleigh
Road. MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
The request to retain the existing MHS zoning on these
sites is not supported. Instead it is proposed to rezone to
MHU zone as an out of scope change (see Attachment F).
The properties are close to the planned RFN route on
Taikata Road, Matipo Road, Imelda Road and Abbotleigh
Road. MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the

1128

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

MHU

Meet Criteria
No Change
MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No Change

MHU

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2736

839-2737

839-2765

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 8G Totara Road Te Te Atatu


Suburban at 8G
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD. Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 8H Totara Road Te Te Atatu


Suburban at 8H
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
TOTARA ROAD. Te
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Rezone
62 Beach Road Te Te Atatu
76,62,74,64,72,66,70, Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
68,78, BEACH ROAD,
Te Atatu Peninsula
from Mixed Housing
Urban, Single House
to Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

REASONS

1129

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

The request to retain the existing MHS zoning on these


MHU
sites is not supported. Instead it is proposed to rezone to
MHU zone as an out of scope change (see Attachment F).
The properties are close to the planned RFN route on
Taikata Road, Matipo Road, Imelda Road and Abbotleigh
Road. MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
The request to retain the existing MHS zoning on these
MHU
sites is not supported. Instead it is proposed to rezone to
MHU zone as an out of scope change (see Attachment F).
The properties are close to the planned RFN route on
Taikata Road, Matipo Road, Imelda Road and Abbotleigh
Road. MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Support partial change, with only the rezoning of 72
SH, MHU
Beach Road supported. It is only recommended to rezone
no. 72 as nos 78, 76, 74 and 68 are constrained by
flooding risk and should remain in SH zoning, which is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2857

839-2867

839-2942

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Rezone 129A,
129A, TIRIMOANA Te Atatu South SH
TIRIMOANA ROAD, Te ROAD
Atatu South from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

MHS

Rezone 2, EDGERTON 2 Edgerton Road


ROAD, Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula from Mixed Peninsula
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHU

Rezone 135, MATIPO 1/135 Matipo


ROAD, Te Atatu
Road Te Atatu
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHS

SH

MHS

Support rezoning to MHS in conjunction with rezoning of MHS


the wider area. Rezoning this site on its own is not
supported as it would result in spot zoning, however in
this instance an out of scope change (see attachment F)
to rezone this wider area of SH zone to MHS is supported.
The out of scope change is supported as it would remove
a wider area of SH zoning with no local constraints to the
sites being zoned for MHS. MHS zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support rezoning to MHU given the location of the site
MHU
close to the RFN and open space. MHU zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support rezoning to MHU. The sites are within


No Change
500m of a Heavy Industry zone and may generate reverse
sensitivity effects. These houses are generally SH plots, as
such SH zoning would be consistent with the existing
context. SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2966

839-2983

839-3064

839-3117

839-3183

839-3184

839-3250

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 19, BRIDGENS 19 Bridgens


AVENUE, Te Atatu
Avenue Te Atatu
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Rezone 94, KERVIL


AVENUE,7,
GLENFORD LANE, Te
Atatu Peninsula from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 9, THOMAS
REA PLACE, Te Atatu
South from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

7 Glenford Lane
Te Atatu
Peninsula

9, THOMAS REA
PLACE, Te Atatu
South

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

Te Atatu South SH

Rezone 110,
110, TIRIMOANA
TIRIMOANA ROAD, Te ROAD, Te Atatu
Atatu South from
Sout
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

Te Atatu South SH

Rezone 7, SHAMROCK 7 Shamrock Lane


LANE, Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Rezone 394, TE
394 Te Atatu Road Te Atatu
ATATU ROAD, Te
Te Atatu
Peninsula
Atatu-Glendene from Peninsula
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Rezone 71, NUI


MANA PLACE, Te
Atatu South from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

71, NUI MANA


PLACE, Te Atatu
South

SH

SH

Te Atatu South MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1130

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support rezoning to MHU. The sites are within


No Change
500m of a Heavy Industry zone and may generate reverse
sensitivity effects. These houses are generally SH plots, as
such SH zoning would be consistent with the existing
context. SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Managing flood risks on this site does not require
MHU
maintaining the SH zone, as such MHU is appropriate
given surrounding zoning and site location. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support rezoning to MHU. The sites are within


No Change
500m of a Heavy Industry zone and may generate reverse
sensitivity effects. These houses are generally SH plots, as
such SH zoning would be consistent with the existing
context. SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
Support rezoning to MHS in conjunction with rezoning of MHS
the wider area. Rezoning this site on its own is not
supported as it would result in spot zoning, however in
this instance an out of scope change (see attachment F)
to rezone this wider area of SH zone to MHS is supported.
The out of scope change is supported as it would remove
a wider area of SH zoning with no local constraints to the
sites being zoned for MHS. MHS zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support rezoning of the property to THAB. Managing
THAB
flooding risk does not require SH zoning to be maintained
on this site. THAB zone is consistent with surrounding
properties and proximate to Te Atatu town centre. THAB
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support alternative rezoning to THAB (scope provided by THAB
submission 2951-1). Given other submissions received it
is appropriate to rezone this and surrounding sites to
THAB due to the location of the site adjacent to the RFN,
to the nearby facilities and to the large amount of public
open space in the close vicinity. THAB zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support requested change of zone to MHU,
No Change
support retention of the notified MHS zone given the
relatively remote location of the site and to avoid spot
zoning effect. MHU zoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose
Consider appropriate zoning from criteria

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3285

839-3457

839-3486

839-3505

839-351

839-3545

839-3549

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 90, KERVIL


90 Kervil Avenue
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Rezone 10, HUGHES 10 Hughes Terrace Te Atatu


TERRACE, Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 14,
GRAINGER ROAD, Te
Atatu South from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 119,
TIRIMOANA ROAD, Te
Atatu South from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

14, GRAINGER
ROAD, Te Atatu
South

Te Atatu South SH

119, TIRIMOANA
ROAD, Te Atatu
South

Te Atatu South SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1131

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Managing flood risks on this site does not require


MHU
maintaining the SH zone, as such MHU is appropriate
given surrounding zoning and site location. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning to MHU. The sites are within
No Change
500m of a Heavy Industry zone and may generate reverse
sensitivity effects. These houses are generally SH plots, as
such SH zoning would be consistent with the existing
context. SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
Do not support change of zone to MHU. The sites are
No Change
affected by constrained by the NTC overlay and retaining
the SH zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Retain Mixed Housing 11, COLE PLACE,


Urban at 11, COLE
Te Atatu South
PLACE, Te Atatu
South.

Te Atatu South MHU

MHS

MHU

Rezone 20, PATON


AVENUE, Te Atatu
South from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

20, PATON
Te Atatu South SH
AVENUE, Te Atatu
South

MHS

Rezone 4, MATIPO
ROAD,2, IMELDA
ROAD, Te Atatu
Peninsula from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

4, MATIPO
ROAD,2, IMELDA
ROAD, Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHU

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHS

Support rezoning to MHS in conjunction with rezoning of


the wider area. Rezoning this site on its own is not
supported as it would result in spot zoning, however in
this instance an out of scope change (see attachment F)
to rezone this wider area of SH zone to MHS is supported.
The out of scope change is supported as it would remove
a wider area of SH zoning with no local constraints to the
sites being zoned for MHS. MHS zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
public open space and neighbourhood centre. Will
enable intensification in the neighbourhood. MHU zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support rezoning to MHU. The sites are within
500m of a Heavy Industry zone and may generate reverse
sensitivity effects. These houses are generally SH plots, as
such SH zoning would be consistent with the existing
context. SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
Support rezoning to MHU given the location of the site
close to the RFN, open space and neighbourhood centre.
Although rezoning this site on its own would result in
spot zoning it is proposed to rezone all of Matipo Road
where the RFN route runs to MHU as an out of scope
change (see attachment F). MHU zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU

MHS

MHS

Support

Note Corporation Submission in suport


No Change
MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

No Change

Meet Criteria
MHU

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3562

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 6, CASTAING 6, CASTAING


CRESCENT, Te Atatu CRESCENT, Te
South from Mixed
Atatu South
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Te Atatu South MHS

Rezone 76, KERVIL


76 Kervil Avenue
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Rezone 49,
49, GLENDENE
GLENDENE AVENUE, AVENUE,
Glendene from Single Glendene
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Te Atatu South SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

1132

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning this site to MHU is not supported as it would


No Change
result in a spot zoning effect, contrary to achieving an
integrated management of resources. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3577

839-3615

839-3618

839-362

839-3656

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SH

MHU

MHU

Rezone 14, MARIE


CRESCENT, Te Atatu
South from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 35,
GLYNNBROOKE
STREET, Te Atatu
South.
Rezone 143, MCLEOD
ROAD, Te Atatu South
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

14, MARIE
CRESCENT, Te
Atatu South

Te Atatu South MHS

MHU

35,
GLYNNBROOKE
STREET, Te Atatu
South

Te Atatu South MHU

143, MCLEOD
Te Atatu South MHS
ROAD, Te Atatu
South from Mixed
Housing Suburban
to Mixed Housing
Urban

MHU

Rezone 101,
VODANOVICH ROAD,
Te Atatu South from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

101,
Te Atatu South SH
VODANOVICH
ROAD, Te Atatu
South from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Urban

MHU

Managing flood risks on this site does not require


MHU
maintaining the SH zone, as such MHU is appropriate
given surrounding zoning and site location. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning this site to MHU is not supported, however
MHS
rezoning the site to MHS as part of a wider out of scope
(see attachment F) rezoning of this area is supported. The
out of scope change is supported as it would remove an
unjustified area of SH zoning with no local constraints to
the sites being zoned for MHS. MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning this site to MHU is not supported as it would
No Change
result in a spot zoning effect, contrary to achieving an
integrated management of resources. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Consider zoning to MHU would connect aeras of MHU
zoning pattern appropriately

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Support retention of the MHU zone located close to


No Change
RFN and neighbourhood centre. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood. MHU zone is the
most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Rezoning this site to MHU is not supported as it would
No Change
result in a spot zoning effect, contrary to achieving an
integrated management of resources. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-3658

Te Atatu

Managing flood risks on this site does not require


MHU
maintaining the SH zone, as such MHU is appropriate
given surrounding zoning and site location. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3717

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 32, WAIPANI 32 Waipani Road


ROAD, Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

LOCALITY

Te Atatu
Peninsula

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

These sites are affected by flooding constraints and


retaining the SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

1133

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3752

839-3768

839-378

839-3794

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Rezone 25,
AMBERLEY AVENUE,
Te Atatu South from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25, AMBERLEY
Te Atatu South MHS
AVENUE, Te Atatu
South

Rezone 98, KERVIL


98 Kervil Avenue
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

SH

Retain Mixed Housing 103 Taikata Road Te Atatu


Suburban at 103,
Te Atatu
Peninsula
TAIKATA ROAD, Te
Peninsula
Atatu Peninsula.

MHS

Rezone 94A, KERVIL 94A Kervil Avenue Te Atatu


AVENUE, Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

Do not support rezoning to MHU, MHS is the appropriate No Change


given the character of the area and the location of the
site at a distance from the town centre, local transport or
THAB zoning. MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Managing flood risks on this site does not require
MHU
maintaining the SH zone, as such MHU is appropriate
given surrounding zoning and site location. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
The request to retain the existing MHS zoning on these
MHU
sites is not supported. Instead it is proposed to rezone to
MHU zone as an out of scope change (see Attachment F).
The properties are close to the planned RFN route on
Taikata Road, Matipo Road, Imelda Road and Abbotleigh
Road. MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
These sites are affected by flooding constraints and
No Change
retaining the SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3812

839-3843

839-394

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Rezone 68,
68, TIRIMOANA
TIRIMOANA ROAD, Te ROAD, Te Atatu
Atatu South from
South
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Te Atatu South MHS

Rezone 84, KERVIL


84 Kervil Avenue
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 19,19A,
DAWNHAVEN DRIVE,
Te Atatu Peninsula.

19 and 19a
Te Atatu
Dawnhaven Drive Peninsula
Te Atatu
Peninsula

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

Do not support requested change of zone to MHU,


No Change
support retention of the notified MHS zone given the
relatively remote location of the site and to avoid a spot
zoning effect which is contrary to achieving an integrated
management of resources in this location. MHS zoning is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Managing flood risks on this site does not require
MHU
maintaining the SH zone, as such MHU is appropriate
given surrounding zoning and site location. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the No Change
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4037

839-4075

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

Rezone 11,13,
VALRON ROAD, Te
Atatu South from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
11,13, VALRON
ROAD, Te Atatu
South

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Te Atatu South SH

Rezone 9,9A, MOOR 9 and 9A Moor


AVENUE, Te Atatu
Avenue Te Atatu
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Rezone 70, KERVIL


70 Kervil Avenue
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula from Single Peninsula
House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

THAB

REASONS

1134

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Rezoning this site to MHU is not supported. The


MHS
alternative rezoning is supported as it would remove an
area of SH zoning with no local constraints to the sites
being zoned for MHS. MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS. The zoning change avoids creating a
spot zoning effect due to the wider rezoning of the
surrounding area as an out of scope change (see
These sites are affected by flooding constraints and
No Change
retaining the SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-4076

839-4077

839-4078

839-4079

839-4080

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Rezone 8,8A,
GLENFORD LANE, Te
Atatu Peninsula from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone
38,32,30,28,36,40,34,
HALYARD PLACE, Te
Atatu Peninsula from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

SH

8 and 8a Glenford Te Atatu


Lane Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula

SH

38,32,30,28,36,40 Te Atatu
,34, HALYARD
Peninsula
PLACE, Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHS

Rezone 13,13A,
13 and 13A Bosun Te Atatu
BOSUN PLACE, Te
Place Te Atatu
Peninsula
Atatu Peninsula from Peninsula
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 19,15,17A,17, 19,15,17A,17


TITOKI STREET, Te
Titoki Street Te
Atatu Peninsula from Atatu Peninsula
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

MHU

MHU

Managing flood risks on this site does not require


MHU
maintaining the SH zone, as such MHU is appropriate
given surrounding zoning and site location. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
These sites are affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No Change

Meet Criteria

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support rezoning to MHU given the location of the site


MHU
close to the RFN and open space and adjacent to MHU
zoned properties. MHU zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Do not support requested change of zone to MHU. The


No Change
retention of the notified MHS zoning is supported in
order to avoid spot zoning, which in the location would
not generally achieve an integrated management of
resources. THAB and MHU not appropriate due to the
location of the site. MHS zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Support partial change, with rezoning of 19 Titoki Street SH, MHU
to MHU but retention of the notified SH zone for
numbers 15, 17 and 17a. Whilst it is recommended that
19 Titoki Street be rezoned to MHU (to match the
adjacent zoning), numbers 15, 17 and 17a Titoki Street
need to remain as SH in order to manage flooding risks at
these properties. SH and MHU zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the relevant

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4081

839-4082

839-4083

839-4084

839-4085

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

Rezone 7A,7,
GLENVIL LANE, Te
Atatu Peninsula from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 14,16,
CASTAING CRESCENT,
Te Atatu South from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
7 and 7a Glenvil
Lane Te Atatu
Peninsula

LOCALITY

Te Atatu
Peninsula

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

These sites are affected by flooding constraints and


retaining the SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

1135

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change
MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

14,16, CASTAING Te Atatu South MHS


CRESCENT, Te
Atatu South

MHU

Rezone 6A,8,6,
8,6 and 6a MARIE Te Atatu South MHS
MARIE CRESCENT, Te CRESCENT, Te
Atatu South from
Atatu South
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone
69A,65,71,67,69,67A,
VODANOVICH
ROAD,2, BLETHYN
PLACE, Te Atatu
South from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 2, MAREWA
STREET,8,8A, PATON
AVENUE, Te Atatu
South from Single
House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

69A,65,71,67,69,6 Te Atatu South MHS


7A, VODANOVICH
ROAD,2, BLETHYN
PLACE, Te Atatu
South

MHU

2, MAREWA
STREET,8,8A,
PATON AVENUE

MHS

Rezone
68E,68D,68G,68F,68A
,68C,68B, ROBERTS
ROAD, Te Atatu South
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

68E,68D,68G,68F, Te Atatu South MHS


68A,68C,68B,
ROBERTS ROAD,
Te Atatu South

Do not support requested change of zone to MHU. The


No Change
retention of the notified MHS zoning is supported in
order to avoid spot zoning, which in this location would
not generally achieve an integrated management of
resources, and given the location of the site. MHS zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support requested change of zone to MHU. The
No Change
retention of the notified MHS zoning is supported in
order to avoid spot zoning, which in the location would
not generally achieve an integrated management of
resources. THAB and MHU not appropriate due to the
location of the site. MHS zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
Rezoning of these sites to MHU is not supported on this No Change
site, due to the distance from town centre and THAB
zones. Although the properties are close to an area of
open space there is no immediate access available. MHS
zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Te Atatu South SH

Do not support rezoning to MHU. The sites are within


No Change
500m of a Heavy Industry zone and may generate reverse
sensitivity effects. These houses are generally SH plots, as
such SH zoning would be consistent with the existing
context. SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-4086

839-441

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Retain Single House 16A GILL AVENUE Te Atatu


at 16A, GILL AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula
Te Atatu Peninsula. Peninsula.

SH

MHU

SH

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU zone the


sites are in walking distance of the RFN and the
neighbourhood centre on the corner of Te Atatu Road
and Roberts Road. This rezoning gives effect to the RPS,
achieves the objectives of the MHU zone and would be
contiguous with the adjacent MHU zoning.

MHU

The request to retain the existing SH zoning on this sites MHS


is not supported. Flooding constraints on this property
should not prevent a higher density zoning. Support
alternative zoning to MHS in accordance with submission
5858-2. MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect

MHU

Support

MHS

Support
Meets proximity criteria to upzone

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-486

839-512

839-514

839-583

839-590

839-615

839-642

839-649

839-674

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Terrace
30 Harbour View
Housing and
Road Te Atatu
Apartment Buildings Peninsula
at 30, HARBOUR
VIEW ROAD, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

THAB

Retain Mixed Housing 10, MACKENZIE


Urban at 10,
STREET, Te Atatu
MACKENZIE STREET, South
Te Atatu South.

Te Atatu South MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 159, EDMONTON Te Atatu South MHU


Urban at 159,
ROAD, Te Atatu
EDMONTON ROAD, South
Te Atatu South.

MHU

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 3, MONTMERE
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

THAB

3 Montmere
Avenue Te Atatu
Peninsula

Te Atatu
Peninsula

THAB

Retain Mixed Housing 7, COLE PLACE, Te Te Atatu South MHU


Urban at 7, COLE
Atatu South
PLACE, Te Atatu
South.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 53, ROYAL VIEW


Urban at 53, ROYAL ROAD, Te Atatu
VIEW ROAD, Te Atatu South.
South.

MHU

Te Atatu South MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 58, DIVICH


Te Atatu South MHS
Suburban at 58,
AVENUE, Te Atatu
DIVICH AVENUE, Te South.
Atatu South.

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 8, BEDFORD


Suburban at 8,
STREET, Te Atatu
BEDFORD STREET, Te South.
Atatu South.

MHS

Retain Single House


at 20, GILL AVENUE,
Te Atatu Peninsula.

Te Atatu South MHS

20 Gill Avenue Te Te Atatu


Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula

SH

SH

REASONS

1136

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change


close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the MHU zone located close to


No Change
RFN, Te Atatu South Local Centre and public open space.
Will enable intensification in the neighbourhood. MHU
zone is the most appropriate zone to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone Close to arterial
No Change
road. Will enable an appropriate degree of intensification
in the neighbourhood . MHU zone is the most
appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change
close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of the MHU zone located close to


RFN, public open space and neighbourhood centre. Will
enable intensification in the neighbourhood. MHU zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
RFN, public open space and neighbourhood centre. Will
enable intensification in the neighbourhood. MHU zone
is the most appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
The request to retain the existing SH zoning on this sites
is not supported. Managing flooding risks does not
require maintenance of the SH zone. Support alternative
zoning to MHS in accordance with submission 5858-2.
MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

MHS

Meets proximity criteria to upzone

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-687

839-713

839-733

839-734

839-742

839-7612

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing 6A,6B,6C, CRON Te Atatu South MHU


Urban at 6A,6B,6C,
AVENUE, Te Atatu
CRON AVENUE, Te
South.
Atatu South.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 14 Waione


Urban at 14, WAIONE Avenue Te Atatu
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula.

MHU

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 68, NEIL AVENUE,
Te Atatu Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

68 Neil Avenue Te Te Atatu


Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula

MHU

THAB

Retain Mixed Housing 71 Kervil Avenue


Urban at 71, KERVIL Te Atatu
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 26, CHILCOTT


Urban at 26,
ROAD,
CHILCOTT ROAD,
Henderson.
Henderson.

Te Atatu South MHU

Rezone 23A
23A CASTAING
CASTAING CRESCENT. CRESCENT, Te
Te Atatu South from Atatu South
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Te Atatu South SH

Rezone 86
86 TIRIMOANA
TIRIMOANA ROAD. Te ROAD, Te Atatu
Atatu South from
South
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Te Atatu South SH

Rezone 66 MCLEOD 66 MCLEOD


ROAD. Te Atatu South ROAD, Te Atatu
from Single House to South
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Te Atatu South SH

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1137

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the MHU zone this area is


No Change
adequately serviced by infrastructure and within 500m of
RFN, close to NW motorway and potential transport
interchange. Will enable intensification in the
neighbourhood. MHU zone is the most appropriate zone
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Support retention of the MHU zone, the site is close to
No Change
the planned RFN route along Taikata Road and benefits
from access to a large area of public open space.
Retention of notified zoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change
close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
No Change
RFN, public open space and to THAB zoning. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone, the site is close to
No Change
the planned RFN route along Taikata Road and benefits
from access to a large area of public open space.
Retention of notified zoning is the most appropriate zone
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
These sites are affected by flooding constraints and
No Change
retaining the SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-7700

839-7706

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

MHU

MHU

Rezoning this site to MHU is not supported. The


MHS
alternative rezoning is supported as it would remove an
area of SH zoning with no local constraints to the sites
being zoned for MHS. MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS. The zoning change avoids creating a
spot zoning effect due to the wider rezoning of the
surrounding area as an out of scope change (see
Support rezoning of 1/66 Mcleod Road to MHU, along
MHU
with out of scope rezoning of surrounding properties to
MHU (see attachment F), given the location of these sites
close to the RFN along Te Atatu Road. Managing flooding
risks does not require maintenance of the SH zone and it
is appropriate that they be rezoned to MHU given their
location. MHU is the appropriate zone to give effect to
the objectives of the MHU zone and to give effect to the

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7762

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Rezone 51 JAEMONT 51 JAEMONT


Te Atatu South MHS
AVENUE. Te Atatu
AVENUE. Te Atatu
South from Mixed
South
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

Rezone 12 COLETTA 12 COLETTA LANE. Te Atatu South MHS


LANE. Te Atatu South Te Atatu South
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

Rezone 23
CORNWALL STREET.
Te Atatu South from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHU

REASONS

Do not support rezoning to MHU. MHS zoning is the


most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1138

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7820

839-7880

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

23 CORNWALL
STREET. Te Atatu
South

Te Atatu South MHS

Do not support requested change of zone to MHU,


No Change
support retention of the notified MHS zone given the
relatively remote location of the site (making it
inappropriate for MHU or THAB). MHS zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support requested change of zone to MHU,
No Change
support retention of the notified MHS zone given the
relatively remote location of the site (making it
inappropriate for MHU or THAB). MHS zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7881

Te Atatu

Rezone 25A
25A CASTAING
CASTAING CRESCENT. CRESCENT. Te
Te Atatu South from Atatu South
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Te Atatu South SH

MHU

These sites are affected by flooding constraints and


retaining the SH zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No Change

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-7925

Te Atatu

Rezone 26 BRIDGE
AVENUE. 5
BRAEBANK LANE. Te
Atatu South from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

26 BRIDGE
Te Atatu South MHS
AVENUE. 5
BRAEBANK LANE.
Te Atatu South

MHU

Do not support requested change of zone to MHU,


No Change
support retention of the notified MHS zone given the
relatively remote location of the site (making it
inappropriate for MHU or THAB). MHS zoning is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-813

839-8230

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Retain Mixed Housing 20 Compass Place Te Atatu


Urban at 20,
Te Atatu
Peninsula
COMPASS PLACE, Te Peninsula
Atatu Peninsula.

MHU

Rezone 13 CRIEFF
13 Crieff Place Te Te Atatu
PLACE. Te Atatu
Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
Peninsula from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

MHU

MHU

Support retention of the MHU zone, the site is close to


No Change
the planned RFN route along Beach Road and benefits
from access to a large amount of public open space.
Retention of notified zoning is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
The retention of the notified MHS zoning is supported in No Change
order to avoid spot zoning, and because MHS is the go to
zone where THAB and MHU not appropriate due to the
location of the site. MHS zoning is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8231

839-829

839-844

839-861

839-876

839-880

839-908

839-914

839-946

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 13A CRIEFF


13A Crieff Place
PLACE. Te Atatu
Te Atatu
Peninsula from Mixed Peninsula
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 24,
AYRTON STREET,1,
BEDFORD STREET, Te
Atatu South.

LOCALITY

Te Atatu
Peninsula

PAUP ZONE

MHS

24, AYRTON
Te Atatu South MHS
STREET,1,
BEDFORD STREET,
Te Atatu South.

Retain Mixed Housing 188, TE ATATU


Urban at 188, TE
ROAD, Te AtatuATATU ROAD, Te
Glendene.
Atatu-Glendene.

Te Atatu South MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHS

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 25, PATON


Te Atatu South MHU
Urban at 25, PATON AVENUE, Te Atatu
AVENUE, Te Atatu
South.
South.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing 13 Gill Avenue Te Te Atatu


Suburban at 13, GILL Atatu Peninsula
Peninsula
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

MHS

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing 97 Kervil Avenue


Urban at 97, KERVIL Te Atatu
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula
Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


Urban at 19,
GLYNNBROOKE
STREET, Te Atatu
South.
Retain Mixed Housing
Urban at 6, NORMA
AVENUE, Te Atatu
South.

19,
GLYNNBROOKE
STREET, Te Atatu
South.

Te Atatu South MHU

6, NORMA
Te Atatu South MHU
AVENUE, Te Atatu
South

MHU

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 19, KERVIL
AVENUE, Te Atatu
Peninsula.

19 Kervil Avenue
Te Atatu
Peninsula

THAB

Te Atatu
Peninsula

THAB

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1139

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

The retention of the notified MHS zoning is supported in No Change


order to avoid spot zoning, which in this location will not
generally achieve the integrated management of
resources,and because MHS is the go to zone where
THAB and MHU not appropriate due to the location of
the site. MHS zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the No Change
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Support retention of the MHU zone Close to arterial
road. Will enable an appropriate degree of intensification
in the neighbourhood . MHU zone is the most
appropriate zone to achieve the objectives of the MHU
zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the MHU zone this area is
adequately serviced by infrastructure and within 500m of
RFN, close to NW motorway and potential transport
interchange. Will enable intensification in the
neighbourhood. MHU zone is the most appropriate zone
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Support retention of the MHU zone located close to
RFN, public open space and to THAB zoning. Will enable
intensification in the neighbourhood and a transition
from the nearby THAB zone. Retention of notified zoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone as consistent
with the objectives of the RPS and MHU zone. MHU is
consistent with surrounding zoning. And is in walking
distance of the RFN.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

No Change

Support retention of notified MHU zone. MHU is


No Change
consistent with surrounding zoning and the site is in
walking distance of the RFN, town centre and close to
THAB zone. MHU zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the zone and gives effect to the
Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change
close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-962

839-966

839-975

839-201

839-7686

839-2471

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

Te Atatu

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Terrace
50C Yeovil Road
Housing and
Te Atatu
Apartment Buildings Peninsula
at 50C, YEOVIL ROAD,
Te Atatu Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Retain Mixed Housing 1A Hikurangi


Suburban at 1A,
Street Te Atatu
HIKURANGI STREET, Peninsula
Te Atatu Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

Retain Mixed Housing 5A Stafson Lane


Suburban at 5A,
Te Atatu
STAFSON LANE, Te
Peninsula
Atatu Peninsula.

Te Atatu
Peninsula

96 Fred Taylor
Redhills
Drive, Whenuapai

PAUP ZONE

THAB

MHS

MHS

North-West
Waitakere and
Hobsonville,
West Harbour &
Herald Island

Retain Future Urban


at 96, FRED TAYLOR
DRIVE, WestgateWhenuapai.

North-West
Waitakere and
Hobsonville,
West Harbour &
Herald Island

Rezone 195
195 Hobsonville Hobsonville
HOBSONVILLE ROAD. Road, Hobsonville
West HarbourHobsonville from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

WRHA

Retain Countryside
Living at Lot 2 DP
46301 [158 Shaw
Road, Oratia].

CL

158 Shaw Road,


Oratia

Oratia

FUZ

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHS

MHS

FUZ

MHU

CL

REASONS

1140

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of the THAB zone. In addition to being No Change


close to the planned RFN route, the property is in easy
walking distance from the town centre and local facilities.
THAB is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Retention of MHS zoning is supported. MHS zoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS due to the distance
of the site/s from RFN, town centre and other local
facilities.
Support retention of FU zone. No operative zoning is
supported on these sites until redevelopment is enabled
via the structure plan and plan change process or a
Special Housing Area variation. The retention of the FU
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the FU zone and gives effect to the
objectives and policies of the RPS.
Support change of MHS to MHU. The site is adjacent to
RFN and is in close proximity to future employment
growth within the LI on opposite side of Hobsonville
Road. Rezoning to MHU is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

FUZ

Support

MHU

Support

CL

Support

MHU

Support

No Change

No Change

No Change

MHU

Support retention of notified CL zone because the


No Change
property is located outside the RUB and is part of a larger
CL zoned area in Oratia.
Significant part of the property consists of SEA and
application of CL zone on the property is appropriate
because in conjunction with the Foothills Precinct
provisions, it provides for rural lifestyle living in rural
land closer to urban Auckland while maintaining,
protecting and enhancing the quality of rural
environment.
The proposed retention of the notified zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the CL zone
and the relevant objectives of the Foothills Precinct and

839-301

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 11, WOODMAN PLACE,
West Harbour.

11 WOODMAN PLACE,
West Harbour

West Harbour

MHU

MHU

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3140

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Rezone 13, KATRINA PLACE,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
13 KATRINA PLACE,
Massey

LOCALITY

West Harbour

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU as spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

1141

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

SH to MHS

Support in scope zone change of 13 Katrina Place to MHS and support an out of
scope rezoning of properties on Moire Road, Katrina Place, Fresil Lane,
Jadewyn Drive and Ruze Vida Drive from SH to MHS as the location is not
proximate to Centres, THAB zone or a RFN and do not have significant
environmental, infrastructure, accessibility or flooding constraints that would
lead to the application of the SH zone. See Attachment F for the address of
properties supported for the out of scope rezoning. The out of scope rezoning
avoids spot zoning on 13 Katrina Place.

MHU

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
839-3238

839-3386

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 12, RENA PLACE, West 12 RENA PLACE, West


Harbour from Mixed Housing Harbour
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

West Harbour

Rezone 6, FRESIL LANE,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

West Harbour

6 FRESIL LANE, Massey

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU as spot zoning in this location
will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 14, KATRINA PLACE,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

14 KATRINA PLACE,
Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHU

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
thenot
MHS
zone and
givesofeffect
theSH
RPS.
Do
support
change
zoneto
from
to MHU as spot zoning in this location

Oppose
Meet Criteria

SH to MHS

Support in scope zone change of 6 Fresil Lane to MHS and support an out of
scope rezoning of properties on Moire Road, Katrina Place, Fresil Lane,
Jadewyn Drive and Ruze Vida Drive from SH to MHS as the location is not
proximate to Centres, THAB zone or a RFN and do not have significant
environmental, infrastructure, accessibility or flooding constraints that would
lead to the application of the SH zone. See Attachment F for the address of
properties supported for the out of scope rezoning. The out of scope rezoning
avoids spot zoning on 6 Fresil Lane.

839-3389

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
SH to MHS

will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.
Support in scope zone change of 14 Katrina Place to MHS and support an out of
scope rezoning of properties on Moire Road, Katrina Place, Fresil Lane,
Jadewyn Drive and Ruze Vida Drive from SH to MHS as the location is not
proximate to Centres, THAB zone or a RFN and do not have significant
environmental, infrastructure, accessibility or flooding constraints that would
lead to the application of the SH zone. See Attachment F for the address of
properties supported for the out of scope rezoning. The out of scope rezoning
avoids spot zoning on 14 Katrina Place.

MHU

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
839-3462

839-3648

839-3653

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 24, CROSBY ROAD,


West Harbour from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

24 CROSBY ROAD, West


Harbour

Rezone 13A, KAYLE GLEN,


West Harbour from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

13A KAYLE GLEN, West


Harbour

Rezone 16, RENA PLACE, West 16 RENA PLACE, West


Harbour from Mixed Housing Harbour
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3718

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 31,27, BEAUCHAMP


DRIVE, Massey from Mixed
Housing Urban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

31,27 BEAUCHAMP
DRIVE, Massey

Rezone 116, MOIRE ROAD,


West Harbour from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

116 MOIRE ROAD, West


Harbour

LOCALITY

Massey

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

1142

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The retention of notified MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3879

839-4117

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

West Harbour

Rezone 19,21,17,23,
19,21,17,23
BEAUCHAMP DRIVE, Massey BEAUCHAMP DRIVE,
from Mixed Housing Urban to Massey
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Massey

Rezone 18,20, BEAUCHAMP 18,20 BEAUCHAMP


DRIVE,8,4,6, REVERIE PLACE, DRIVE; 8,4,6 REVERIE
Massey from Mixed Housing PLACE, Massey
Urban to Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Massey

MHS

MHU

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The retention of notified MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-4118

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The retention of notified MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-4119

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone
11,24,13,12,15,14,22,16, Massey
11,24,13,12,15,14,22,16,18,26 18,26,3,5,7,9,20 REVERIE
,3,5,7,9,20, REVERIE PLACE,
PLACE, Massey
Massey from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHU

Rezone 77,79, METCALFE


ROAD,24,10,26,12,20,14,22,16
,33,18,31,30,28,32, AFTON
PLACE, Ranui from Mixed
Housing Urban, Single House
to Mixed Housing Urban.

77A,79 METCALFE
Ranui
ROAD,24,10,26,12,20,14,
22,16,33,18,31,30,28,32
AFTON PLACE, Ranui

Multiple - SH,
MHU

Rezone 21,23, KATRINA


PLACE, Massey from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

21,23 KATRINA PLACE,


Massey

SH

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB because although the sites No change
are located in close proximity to RFN, a Local Centre and a large POS, they are
isolated and surrounded by MHS zone. The retention of notified MHU zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-2766

839-4127

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

West Harbour

MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from SH to MHU of properties at 77A Metcalfe Road


and 31 Afton Place, Ranui to avoid spot zoning because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated management of resources and
does not recognise local context. The other properties in the submission are
zoned MHU and retention of MHU on those properties is supported.

SH to MHU

MHU

Oppose

The above zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU as spot zoning in this location SH to MHS
will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.
Support in scope zone change of 21 and 23 Katrina Place to MHS and support
an out of scope rezoning of properties on Moire Road, Katrina Place, Fresil
Lane, Jadewyn Drive and Ruze Vida Drive from SH to MHS as the location is not
proximate to Centres, THAB zone or a RFN and do not have significant
environmental, infrastructure, accessibility or flooding constraints that would
lead to the application of the SH zone. See Attachment F for the address of
properties supported for the out of scope rezoning. The out of scope rezoning
avoids spot zoning on 21 and 23 Katrina Place.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
839-4128

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 11,9,13,5,7, HOLMES


DRIVE, West Harbour from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11,9,13,5,7 HOLMES
DRIVE, West Harbour

West Harbour

Multiple - SH,
MHU

MHU

Support change of zone from SH to MHU as the sites are located in close
SH to MHU
proximity to THAB zone and a RFN. Support rezoning of 5 Holmes Dr as
although SH zone could be retained due to the site being affected by flooding
constraints, a spot zone would occur and a spot zone will not generally achieve
the integrated management of resources and does not recognise the local
context.
The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4129

839-4130

839-4131

839-4132

839-4133

839-4134

839-4135

839-4136

839-4137

839-4138

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 15A,15, BUISSON


GLADE, West Harbour from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

15A,15 BUISSON GLADE, West Harbour


West Harbour

MHS

Rezone 4,4A, CROSBY


ROAD,152, MOIRE ROAD,
West Harbour from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

4,4A CROSBY ROAD; 152 West Harbour


MOIRE ROAD, West
Harbour

MHS

Rezone 12A,12, ELIZABETH


DRIVE, West Harbour from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

12A,12 ELIZABETH DRIVE, West Harbour


West Harbour

MHS

Rezone
115,119,117,115A,113, MOIRE
ROAD,24,10,26,12,20,14,16,28
A,18,30,28,36,40,34,2,4,32,24
A,42,8, BROUGHAM PLACE,12,
WEST HARBOUR DRIVE, West
Harbour from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

115,119,117,115A,113
West Harbour
MOIRE ROAD;
24,10,26,12,20,14,16,28A
,18,30,28,36,40,34,2,4,32
,24A,42,8 BROUGHAM
PLACE; 12 WEST
HARBOUR DRIVE, West
Harbour

Rezone 17, RENA


PLACE,33,31,29,44,
BROUGHAM PLACE, West
Harbour from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 25, BROUGHAM
PLACE,11,13,15,19,7,9, RENA
PLACE, West Harbour from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

17 RENA PLACE;
West Harbour
33,31,29,44 BROUGHAM
PLACE, West Harbour

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because they are not in
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and are located within a contiguous
block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

1143

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Site has proximity to schools and parks and scale of site
enable comprehensive development.

25 BROUGHAM PLACE;
11,13,15,19,7,9 RENA
PLACE, West Harbour

Rezone 19,21,23, BROUGHAM 19,21,23 BROUGHAM


PLACE,25,27, RENA PLACE,
PLACE; 25,27, RENA
West Harbour from Mixed
PLACE West Harbour
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

West Harbour

West Harbour

MHS

MHS

MHS

Rezone 33, RENA


PLACE,11,15,3,5,7,9,
BROUGHAM PLACE, West
Harbour from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 35,34, RENA PLACE,
West Harbour from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

33 RENA PLACE;
West Harbour
11,15,3,5,7,9
BROUGHAM PLACE, West
Harbour

MHS

35,34 RENA PLACE, West West Harbour


Harbour

MHS

Rezone 32,30, RENA PLACE,


West Harbour from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

32,30 RENA PLACE, West West Harbour


Harbour

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because they are not in
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and are located within a contiguous
block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because they are not in
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and are located within a contiguous
block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because they are not in
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and are located within a contiguous
block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because they are not in
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and are located within a contiguous
block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

No change

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4139

839-4140

839-428

839-491

839-4952

839-549

839-610

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-645

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-666

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-751

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-769

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-771

839-772

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 24,26,20,22, RENA


PLACE, West Harbour from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

24,26,20,22 RENA PLACE, West Harbour


West Harbour

Rezone 3,3A, KAYLE GLEN,


West Harbour from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3,3A KAYLE GLEN, West


Harbour

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 23, MONA VALE, West
Harbour.

23 MONA VALE, West


Harbour

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 33, JADEWYNN DRIVE,
Massey.

33 JADEWYNN DRIVE,
Massey

Rezone 50-56,58,48,36-46,
MOIRE ROAD, West Harbour
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

50-56,58,48,36-46 MOIRE West Harbour


ROAD, West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHU as this large site is located in close
proximity to a RFN.

1144

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

West Harbour

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 46, FITZHERBERT
AVENUE,1, HUEGLOW RISE,
West Harbour.

46 FITZHERBERT
AVENUE; 1 HUEGLOW
RISE, West Harbour

West Harbour

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 62, OREIL AVENUE, West
Harbour.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 37, ELIZABETH DRIVE, West
Harbour.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 28, FITZHERBERT AVENUE,
West Harbour.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 7, LUXOR PLACE, Massey.

62 OREIL AVENUE, West West Harbour


Harbour

MHU

MHU

37 ELIZABETH DRIVE,
West Harbour

West Harbour

MHU

MHU

28 FITZHERBERT
AVENUE, West Harbour

West Harbour

MHU

MHU

7 LUXOR PLACE, Massey

West Harbour

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 35 HOLMES DRIVE


at 35, HOLMES DRIVE SOUTH, SOUTH, Massey
Massey.

West Harbour

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 11 HOLMES DRIVE


at 11, HOLMES DRIVE SOUTH, SOUTH, Massey
Massey.

West Harbour

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

The above proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located adjacent to a
school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

No change

SH to MHU

Support an out of scope rezoning of the adjacent 12 sites located at 60, 66


Moire Road; 2,4,6,8,14,16,18 Ruze Vida Drive and 10,12,18 Berkshire Terrace.
This out of scope rezoning achieves a clearly defensible MHU zone boundary
following roads on Moire Rd and Ruze Vida Drive. See Attachment F.

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 26 HOLMES DRIVE


at 26, HOLMES DRIVE SOUTH, SOUTH, Massey
Massey.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7854

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 4 WOODMAN PLACE. 4 WOODMAN PLACE,


West Harbour from Mixed
West Harbour
Housing Urban to Terrace
Housing and Apartment
Buildings.

West Harbour

Rezone 25 HOBSONVILLE
25 HOBSONVILLE ROAD;
ROAD. 2 OREIL AVENUE. West 2 OREIL AVENUE, West
Harbour-Hobsonville from
Harbour
Mixed Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

West Harbour

PAUP ZONE

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

REASONS

1145

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The retention of notified MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7856

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

MHU

THAB

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The retention of notified MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-7864

839-841

839-863

839-958

839-103

839-1155

839-1157

839-1158

839-1159

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

26 HUEGLOW RISE. West


Harbour (Understood as
change zone from MHS to
MHU.)

26 HUEGLOW RISE, West West Harbour


Harbour

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 5, MIDGLEY ROAD, West
Harbour.

5 MIDGLEY ROAD, West


Harbour

West Harbour

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 51 HOLMES DRIVE


at 51, HOLMES DRIVE SOUTH, SOUTH, Massey
Massey.

West Harbour

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 9, WHITSHIRE MEWS,
Massey.

9 WHITSHIRE MEWS,
Massey

West Harbour

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 106, REYNELLA DRIVE,19,
HEWLETT ROAD, Massey.

19 HEWLETT ROAD,
Massey

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
48,46,54,56,50,52, SUNLINE
AVENUE, Massey.

48,46,54,56,50,52
SUNLINE AVENUE,
Massey

Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 39,37,35, TIRIWA DRIVE,
Massey.

39,37,35 TIRIWA DRIVE,


Massey

Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 45,43, TIRIWA DRIVE,
Massey.

5,43 TIRIWA DRIVE,


Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 46,44,42,50,48, TIRIWA
DRIVE, Massey.

46,44,42,50,48 TIRIWA
DRIVE, Massey

Massey

Massey

Massey

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

839-1179

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 19,17 YULE PLACE,


at 19,17, YULE PLACE, Massey. Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-1180

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 33,31, CARILLON PLACE,
Massey.

Massey

MHU

MHU

33,31 CARILLON PLACE,


Massey

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone as sites are located adjacent to a large POS.
This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1181

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 141A,139,139A,141


at 141A,139,139A,141, ROYAL ROYAL ROAD, Massey
ROAD, Massey.

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 120, DON BUCK ROAD,
Ranui-West Harbour.

120 DON BUCK ROAD,


Massey

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 62,64,66,70,68,86, KEEGAN
DRIVE,271,273,275, TRIANGLE
ROAD,4,6, DOONE PLACE,
Massey.

62,64,66,70,68,86
Massey
KEEGAN DRIVE;
271,273,275 TRIANGLE
ROAD; 4,6 DOONE PLACE,
Massey

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 21,17,23, DOONE PLACE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 262,264, TRIANGLE ROAD,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 10, KEARNEY PLACE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 32,30, GARTON DRIVE,
Massey.

21,17,23 DOONE PLACE,


Massey

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 9,7, ARDE PLACE,8,12,6,
GLENFINN PLACE, Massey.

9,7 ARDE PLACE; 8,12,6


GLENFINN PLACE,
Massey

Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 82,80,84, GALLONY
AVENUE, Massey.

82,80,84 GALLONY
AVENUE, Massey

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 77,79, REYNELLA DRIVE,
Massey.

77,79 REYNELLA DRIVE,


Massey

Massey

839-1206

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

10,12,14,8 SUNPARK
PLACE, Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-1207

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 10,12,14,8, SUNPARK
PLACE, Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 4, NORTHRIDGE
TERRACE,107, LINCOLN PARK
AVENUE, Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 24,22, NORTHRIDGE
TERRACE, Massey.

4 NORTHRIDGE TERRACE; Massey


107 LINCOLN PARK
AVENUE, Massey

MHU

MHU

24,22 NORTHRIDGE
TERRACE, Massey

MHU

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 10,12,14,16, TIMANDRA
PLACE, Massey.

10,12,14,16 TIMANDRA
PLACE, Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 19,17, TIMANDRA PLACE,
Massey.

19,17 TIMANDRA PLACE, Massey


Massey

839-119

839-1195

839-1196

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-1197

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-120

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-1202

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-1203

839-1204

839-1205

839-1208

839-1209

839-1210

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 12,14 CARILLON PLACE;


at 12,14, CARILLON PLACE,52, 52 TRIANGLE ROAD,
TRIANGLE ROAD, Massey.
Massey

839-1182

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

262,264 TRIANGLE ROAD, Massey


Massey

MHU

MHU

10 KEARNEY PLACE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

32,30 GARTON DRIVE,


Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1146

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
No change
proximity to a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
a RFN and school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
proximity to a RFN and school. This retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
proximity to a RFN and school. This retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
proximity to a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
proximity to a RFN and adjacent to a large POS. This retention is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
proximity to a RFN and a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
proximity to a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
No change
proximity to a school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
No change
proximity to a school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1211

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 195E,195D,195G,195F,19 Massey


at
5A,195C,195B,195H DON
195E,195D,195G,195F,195A,1 BUCK ROAD, Massey
95C,195B,195H, DON BUCK
ROAD, Ranui-West Harbour.

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 13, SHALE
AVENUE,41, SUNLINE
AVENUE, Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 63, HELENA
STREET, Massey.

13 SHALE AVENUE; 41,


SUNLINE AVENUE,
Massey

Massey

MHS

63 HELENA STREET,
Massey

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 2, KEARNEY PLACE,20,
ALDERN ROAD, Massey.

20 ALDERN ROAD,
Massey

Massey

839-141

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

6 TIMANDRA PLACE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-148

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 6, TIMANDRA PLACE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 27, VINA PLACE, Massey.

27 VINA PLACE, Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-154

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 4 TALMAR PLACE,


at 4, TALMAR PLACE, Massey. Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 37, CARILLON PLACE,
Massey.

37 CARILLON PLACE,
Massey

Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 12, CHERRY TREE PLACE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 60, GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey.

12 CHERRY TREE PLACE,


Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

60 GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 8, CARILLON PLACE,
Massey.

8 CARILLON PLACE,
Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 95, REYNELLA DRIVE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 7, VINA PLACE, Massey.

95 REYNELLA DRIVE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

7 VINA PLACE, Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 4, TIMANDRA PLACE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 53 ROYAL ROAD. 1 KEMP
ROAD. Massey.

4 TIMANDRA PLACE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

1 KEMP ROAD, Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 52 ZITA MARIA DRIVE.
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 15A DONOVAN AVENUE.
Massey.

52 ZITA MARIA DRIVE,


Massey

839-124

839-128

839-157

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-172

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-175

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-183

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-204

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-214

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2233

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2256

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2300

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2308

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 11,9,13,5,7, TIMANDRA
PLACE, Massey.

839-1213

Massey

PAUP ZONE

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-1212

11,9,13,5,7 TIMANDRA
PLACE, Massey

LOCALITY

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Massey

MHU

MHU

15A DONOVAN AVENUE, Massey


Massey

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1147

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
No change
proximity to a school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the properties are located in close
proximity to a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to


No change
THAB zone and a RFN, and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
No change
THAB zone and a RFN, and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
a RFN and a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

839-2312

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2334

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2335

839-2337

REQUESTED
ZONE

Massey

MHU

MHU

51 ROYAL ROAD, Massey Massey

MHU

MHU

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 79 TRIANGLE ROAD.
Massey.

79 TRIANGLE ROAD,
Massey

Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 30 HEWLETT ROAD.
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 16, SUNPARK PLACE,
Massey.

30 HEWLETT ROAD,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

16 SUNPARK PLACE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 146A DON BUCK ROAD.
Ranui-West Harbour.

146A DON BUCK ROAD,


Massey

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 4 LOUGHANURE PLACE.
Massey.

4 LOUGHANURE PLACE,
Massey

Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 28 LOUGHANURE PLACE.
Massey.

28 LOUGHANURE PLACE, Massey


Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2485

PAUP ZONE

37 ALDERN ROAD,
Massey

839-2412

839-2467

48 REYNELLA DRIVE,
Massey

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 2 LOWELL PLACE. 37
ALDERN ROAD. Massey.

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2463

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 48 REYNELLA DRIVE.
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 51 ROYAL ROAD. Massey.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2411

839-2448

SUMMARY

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 26 ALDERN ROAD,


at 26 ALDERN ROAD. Massey. Massey

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 61 GALLONY AVENUE.
Massey.

61 GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 2A SHALE
AVENUE. Massey.

2A SHALE AVENUE,
Massey

839-2508

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 5 LANHAM LANE. Massey.

5 LANHAM LANE, Massey Massey

MHU

MHU

839-2543

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

18 DONOVAN AVENUE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-2554

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 18 DONOVAN AVENUE.
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 42 HEWLETT ROAD.
Massey.

42 HEWLETT ROAD,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-2493

839-2498

Massey

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHS

REASONS

1148

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located adjacent to a large No change
POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
a RFN and school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and Local Centre. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2555

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Local Centre at 42, 24,


25, 26, 27, 20, 21, 22, 23, 28,
29, 40, 41, 1, 3, 2, 5, 4, 7, 6, 9,
8, 39, 38, 11, 10, 13, 12, 15,
14, 17, 16, 19, 18, 31, 30, 37,
36, 35, 34, 33, 32 PATIENCE
WAY. 393-395 DON BUCK
ROAD. Ranui-West Harbour.

42, 24, 25, 26, 27, 20, 21, Massey


22, 23, 28, 29, 40, 41, 1,
3, 2, 5, 4, 7, 6, 9, 8, 39,
38, 11, 10, 13, 12, 15, 14,
17, 16, 19, 18, 31, 30, 37,
36, 35, 34, 33, 32
PATIENCE WAY; 393-395
DON BUCK ROAD,
Massey

LC

LC

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 59 CARTMEL AVENUE.
Massey.

59 CARTMEL AVENUE,
Massey

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 18 CARTMEL AVENUE.
Massey.

18 CARTMEL AVENUE,
Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 24 CARTMEL AVENUE.
Massey.

24 CARTMEL AVENUE,
Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 32 GLENFINN PLACE.
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 30 GLENFINN PLACE.
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 84A HELENA
STREET. Massey.

32 GLENFINN PLACE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

30 GLENFINN PLACE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

84A HELENA STREET,


Massey

Massey

REASONS

1149

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support retention of LC zone and support an out of scope zone change
from LC to THAB zone. See Attachment F. The site is occupied by residential
apartments and is located adjacent to a RFN and a POS. The rezoning is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

LC to THAB

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN, a primary school and a high school. This retention is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS. retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
Support
a RFN, a primary school and a high school. This retention is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS. retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
Support
THAB zone and a RFN, and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because this site is affected by
flooding constraints and Heavy Industry Air Quality. The retention of notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

LC

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2586

839-2587

839-2588

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2608

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2609

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-2648

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey

Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

839-2721

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 9A TALMAR PLACE,


at 9A TALMAR PLACE. Massey. Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-274

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

2 TIMANDRA PLACE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-2842

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 2, TIMANDRA PLACE,
Massey.
Rezone 26, GLENBERVIE
CRESCENT, Massey from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

26 GLENBERVIE
CRESCENT, Massey

Massey

MHS

MHU

Rezone 4, VALLANCE PLACE,


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

4 VALLANCE PLACE,
Massey

839-2860

839-2886

839-2888

839-2998

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey

MHS

Rezone 25,23, SUNLINE


25,23 SUNLINE AVENUE; Massey
AVENUE,37, HELENA STREET, 37 HELENA STREET,
Massey from Mixed Housing Massey
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

Rezone 20, SUNLINE AVENUE, 20 SUNLINE AVENUE,


Massey from Mixed Housing Massey
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Massey

MHS

Rezone 290, TRIANGLE ROAD, 290 TRIANGLE ROAD,


Massey from Single House to Massey
Mixed Housing Urban.

Massey

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHS

Support in part

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but


acknowledge proximity constraints for site
No change

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3016

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 90, WAIMUMU ROAD, 90 WAIMUMU ROAD,


Massey from Single House to Massey
Mixed Housing Suburban.

Massey

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

839-305

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 24 DOONE PLACE,


at 24, DOONE PLACE, Massey. Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-3080

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 26, LILBURN


CRESCENT, Massey from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

26 LILBURN CRESCENT,
Massey

Massey

MHS

MHU

Rezone 30, KEMP ROAD,


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

30 KEMP ROAD, Massey

Rezone 7A ANGELINE PLACE.


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

7A Angeline Place,
Massey

839-3125

839-8196

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey

Massey

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and a school. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU because the site is located in close
proximity to RFN, a large POS and Don Buck Primary School. Support change of
zone as although the SH zone could be retained due to the site being affected
by flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur. In this location a spot zone
will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and does
not recognise the local context.

1150

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

839-3296

839-330

839-3797

839-333

839-334

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 23, ALDERN ROAD,


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

23 ALDERN ROAD,
Massey

Massey

MHS

MHU

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU because the site is located in close
proximity to RFN, a large POS and Don Buck Primary School.

MHS

Rezone 6, GLENBERVIE
CRESCENT, Massey from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

6 GLENBERVIE
CRESCENT, Massey

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 45,


CHORLEY AVENUE, Massey.

45 CHORLEY AVENUE,
Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 24, ARODELLA


CRESCENT, Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

24 ARODELLA CRESCENT, Ranui


Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 34, SUNLINE
AVENUE, Massey.

34 SUNLINE AVENUE,
Massey

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 50, REYNELLA DRIVE,
Massey.

50 REYNELLA DRIVE,
Massey

Massey

Massey

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

SH

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

MHS to MHU

MHS to MHU

Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning. However, support
an out of scope rezoning of sites on Angeline Place, Lowell Place, Aldern Road
and Alidade Place from MHS to MHU. See Attachment F. The sites are located
in close proximity to a RFN, a large POS and Don Buck Primary School.
This rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as the site has poor accessibility to Centres or
existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in a close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Support an out of scope rezoning of sites on Angeline Place, Lowell Place,


Aldern Road and Alidade Place from MHS to MHU. See Attachment F. The sites
are located in close proximity to a RFN, a large POS and Don Buck Primary
School. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

839-3161

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3410

839-3412

839-3413

839-342

839-3824

839-7768

839-354

839-3600

839-3604

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui /
Non-Rural
Swanson

839-976

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-3644

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 4,6, SHALE AVENUE,


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

4,6 SHALE AVENUE,


Massey

Rezone 25, HELENA STREET,


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

25 HELENA STREET,
Massey

Rezone 25, ALDERN ROAD,


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

25 ALDERN ROAD,
Massey

LOCALITY

Massey

Massey

Massey

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU because the site is located in close
proximity to RFN, a large POS and Don Buck Primary School.

1151

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

2 LOUGHANURE PLACE,
Massey

Massey

Rezone 18, ARODELLA


CRESCENT, Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

18 ARODELLA CRESCENT, Ranui


Ranui

Rezone 33 BIRDWOOD ROAD. 33 BIRDWOOD ROAD,


Swanson-Massey from Single Ranui
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Ranui

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 57, GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey.

Massey

57 GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey

Rezone 42, KEMP ROAD,9,


42 KEMP ROAD; 9
VALLANCE PLACE, Massey
VALLANCE PLACE,
from Mixed Housing Suburban Massey
to Mixed Housing Urban.

Massey

Rezone 311,
311 TRIANGLE
TRIANGLE ROAD,
ROAD, Massey
Massey from Mixed
Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Massey

Retain Single House at 50,


50 Candia Road Swanson Ranui
CANDIA ROAD, RanuiHenderson Valley.
Rezone 102, LINCOLN PARK
102 LINCOLN PARK
Massey
AVENUE, Massey from Single AVENUE, Massey
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHU

SH

SH

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

SH

SH

MHU

This rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS. retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
Support
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Support in part

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but


acknowledge proximity constraints for site
MHS to MHU

Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning. However, support
an out of scope rezoning of sites on Angeline Place, Lowell Place, Aldern Road
and Alidade Place from MHS to MHU. See Attachment F. The sites are located
in close proximity to a RFN, a large POS and Don Buck Primary School.

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 45, GARTON DRIVE,2,
LOUGHANURE PLACE,
Massey.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

SH

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and
does not recognise local context. Retention of notified
MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of SH zone because the site is affected by flooding


constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Consistent with zoning principles for MHU and request to


consider Corporation's zone change request alongside
wider pattern of zoning (change)

No change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3685

839-3686

839-3688

839-3697

839-379

839-4102

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson


Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 28, SUNLINE AVENUE, 28 SUNLINE AVENUE,


Massey from Mixed Housing Massey
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Massey

Rezone 11-13, ALDERN ROAD, 11 ALDERN ROAD,


Massey from Mixed Housing Massey
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Massey

PAUP ZONE

MHS

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU because the site is located in close
proximity to a RFN, a large POS and Don Buck Primary School.

1152

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Massey

Rezone 52, GLENBERVIE


CRESCENT, Massey from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

52 GLENBERVIE
CRESCENT, Massey

Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 15, HALLORAN PLACE,
Massey.
Rezone 25,27,33,31,29,35,
CLOVER DRIVE, Henderson
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15 HALLORAN PLACE,
Massey

Massey

25,27,33,31,29,35
CLOVER DRIVE,
Henderson

Massey

MHS

MHS

MHU

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

This rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU and support retention of the
notified SH zone because the site is affected by flooding constraints and
retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

MHS to MHU

Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning. However, support
an out of scope rezoning of sites on Angeline Place, Lowell Place, Aldern Road
and Alidade Place from MHS to MHU. See Attachment F. The sites are located
in close proximity to RFN, a large POS and Don Buck Primary School.

Rezone 24, SUNLINE AVENUE, 24 SUNLINE AVENUE,


Massey from Mixed Housing Massey
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
839-4104

839-4105

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 10,12,14,16,2,4,6,8,
10,12,14,16,2,4,6,8
SUNLINE AVENUE, Massey
SUNLINE AVENUE,
from Mixed Housing Suburban Massey
to Mixed Housing Urban.

Massey

Rezone 1,3,5, SUNLINE


1,3,5 SUNLINE AVENUE,
AVENUE, Massey from Single Massey
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Massey

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because they are not in
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and are located within a contiguous
block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

No change

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

Do not support change sought to MHU zone and support zone change to MHS SH to MHS
as spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise local context. The location is
not in close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN. 3 and 5 Sunline Avenue is
affected by SEA. However, retention of SH zone is not required as the extent of
SEA is less than 80% of the site.

MHU

Support an out of scope rezoning of properties located at 7 Sunline Avenue,


25A Helena Street and 27 Helena Street from SH to MHS to avoid spot zoning.
See Attachment F. 25A Helena Street is affected by SEA, however, retention of
SH zone is not required as the extent of SEA is less than 80%.

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
839-4106

839-4107

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 11,9, SUNLINE


11,9 SUNLINE AVENUE,
AVENUE, Massey from Mixed Massey
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Massey

Rezone 10B,8,10A, SHALE


AVENUE,27,21,17,19,31,29,35
,33, SUNLINE AVENUE,
Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Massey

10B,8,10A SHALE
AVENUE;
27,21,17,19,31,29,35,33
SUNLINE AVENUE,
Massey

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because they are not in
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and are located within a contiguous
block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support in part
Do not agree with Council position on spot zoning, but
acknowledge proximity constraints for site

No change

MHS

Support in part

Oppose Council's position on spot zoning, given


Corporation's submission and scale of property. Accept
proximity constraints to FN route on this site.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4120

839-4121

839-4122

839-4123

839-4124

839-4125

839-4147

839-909

839-4154

839-4155

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 1,9,3,5,7, YULE PLACE, 1,9,3,5,7 YULE PLACE,


Massey from Mixed Housing Massey
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.
(Understood as Rezone 1,3
Yule Place, Massey from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.)

LOCALITY

Massey

PAUP ZONE

MHS

19,21,17,23 GLENBERVIE Massey


CRESCENT; 10,12,14,8
VALLANCE PLACE,
Massey

MHS

Rezone 36, KEMP


ROAD,13,15, VALLANCE
PLACE, Massey from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

36 KEMP ROAD; 13,15


VALLANCE PLACE,
Massey

Massey

MHS

Rezone 3,5,7, VALLANCE


PLACE, Massey from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

3,5,7 VALLANCE PLACE,


Massey

Massey

Rezone 83,85, KEMP ROAD,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

83,85 KEMP ROAD,


Massey

Rezone 125,127, KEMP ROAD,


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 282,284,286,
TRIANGLE ROAD, Massey
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

125,127 KEMP ROAD,


Massey

Massey

282,284,286 TRIANGLE
ROAD, Massey

Massey

Retain Single House at 22,


CLYMA PLACE, Massey.

22 CLYMA PLACE, Massey Massey

32,34 LILBURN
CRESCENT, Massey

Rezone 20,22, LILBURN


CRESCENT, Massey from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

20,22 LILBURN
CRESCENT, Massey

13 ARDE PLACE, Massey

839-419

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 13, ARDE PLACE, Massey.

839-435

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 57 LINCOLN PARK


at 57, LINCOLN PARK AVENUE, AVENUE, Massey
Massey.

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because they are not in
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and are located within a contiguous
block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Rezone 19,21,17,23,
GLENBERVIE
CRESCENT,10,12,14,8,
VALLANCE PLACE, Massey
from Mixed Housing Suburban
to Mixed Housing Urban.

Rezone 32,34, LILBURN


CRESCENT, Massey from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

REQUESTED
ZONE

1153

Massey

Massey

Massey

MHS

SH

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

SH

MHU

MHU

Massey

MHU

MHU

Massey

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because they are not in
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and are located within a contiguous
block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The sites are affected by flooding
constraints and SEA. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS. change of zone from MHS to MHU as this location is in close proximity
Support
to a RFN. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The properties are located within a
contiguous block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of the proposed SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone and support an out of scope change to
MHU because the site is located in close proximity to a RFN and where
managing flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone. See
Attachment F. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN, a primary school and a high school. This retention is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS. retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
Support
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

MHS to MHU

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meet Criteria
SH to MHU

MHU

Support
Meets proximity criteria to upzone

No change

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

839-443

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-450

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-463

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-529

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-542

839-627

839-640

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson


Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-688

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-699

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-705

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-716

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-735

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-7457

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

REQUESTED
ZONE

Massey

MHU

MHU

15 GLEN ROAD, Ranui

Ranui

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 16, GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 6, GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 14, LOUGHANURE PLACE,
Massey.

16 GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

6 GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 27, GLENFINN PLACE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 56, KEEGAN DRIVE, Massey.

27 GLENFINN PLACE,
Massey

Massey

56 KEEGAN DRIVE,
Massey

Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 58, MAKORA ROAD,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 23, WAIMUMU ROAD,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 27, SCARLET DRIVE, Ranui.

58 MAKORA ROAD,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

23 WAIMUMU ROAD,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

27 SCARLET DRIVE, Ranui Massey

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 25, CARLING AVENUE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 20, SUNPARK PLACE,
Massey.

25 CARLING AVENUE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

20 SUNPARK PLACE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

Rezone 45 REYNELLA DRIVE.


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

45 REYNELLA DRIVE,
Massey

4 ARDE PLACE, Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 4, ARDE PLACE, Massey.

839-7463

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-7587

PAUP ZONE

38 GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-7583

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 38, GALLONY AVENUE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 15, GLEN ROAD, Ranui.

839-746

839-748

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

14 LOUGHANURE PLACE, Massey


Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Massey

MHU

MHU

Rezone 3 BELLRINGER ROAD. 3 BELLRINGER ROAD,


Massey from Single House to Massey
Mixed Housing Urban.

Massey

SH

MHU

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 6, YULE PLACE, Massey.

6 YULE PLACE, Massey

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 5 FARAM PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

5 FARAM PLACE, Massey Massey

Rezone 122 WAIMUMU


ROAD. Massey from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

122 WAIMUMU ROAD,


Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey

MHU

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and is adjacent to a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN, a primary school and a high school. This retention is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS. retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
Support
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN, a primary school and a high school. This retention is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS. retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
Support
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN, a primary school and a high school. This retention is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
thenot
RPS.support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
Do
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The properties are located within a
contiguous block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of the proposed SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The properties are located within a
contiguous block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of the proposed SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

1154

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7594

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 28 KEMP ROAD.


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

28 KEMP ROAD, Massey

LOCALITY

Massey

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

839-770

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 16, YULE PLACE, Massey.

16 YULE PLACE, Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-7701

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 7 CROMPTON ROAD.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

7 CROMPTON ROAD,
Massey

Massey

SH

MHU

Rezone 133 WAIMUMU


ROAD. Massey from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

133 WAIMUMU ROAD,


Massey

839-7755

839-7862

839-7908

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey

Rezone 18 MOXHAM GROVE. 18 MOXHAM GROVE,


Massey from Single House to Massey
Mixed Housing Suburban.

Massey

Rezone 132 WAIMUMU


ROAD. Massey from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Massey

132 WAIMUMU ROAD,


Massey

SH

SH

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

839-795

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 41 ALDERN ROAD,


at 41, ALDERN ROAD, Massey. Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-7954

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 23 HARTLEY TERRACE. 23 HARTLEY TERRACE,


Massey from Mixed Housing Massey
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Massey

MHS

MHU

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 1, KEARNEY PLACE,22,
ALDERN ROAD, Massey.

22 ALDERN ROAD,
Massey

Massey

839-797

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 33 ALDERN ROAD,


at 33, ALDERN ROAD, Massey. Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

839-798

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 60, SUNLINE
AVENUE, Massey.

60 SUNLINE AVENUE,
Massey

Massey

MHS

MHS

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 1 NIELSEN PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

1 NIELSEN PLACE, Massey Massey

Rezone 1/7,2/7, DON BUCK


ROAD, Ranui-West Harbour
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7 Don Buck Road, Ranui

839-796

839-8128

839-3094

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey

MHU

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1155

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and a primary school. This retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB and a RFN. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and a primary school. This retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and a primary school. This retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS. change of zone from SH to MHU because as although the SH zone
Support
could be retained due to the site being affected by flooding constraints, a spot
zone would occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not recognise the local context.

No change

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 90, REYNELLA DRIVE,
Massey.

90 REYNELLA DRIVE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
SH to MHU

Support an out of scope change of zone from SH to MHU of properties within


frontage on Don Buck Rd between Universal Drive and Woodside Rd / Glen Rd.
See Attachment F. The sites are located in close proximity to RFN.

839-842

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

839-856

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-866

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-895

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-3273

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-924

839-954

839-2858

839-3099

839-3792

839-1183

839-1184

839-1185

839-1186

839-1187

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 16, HALLORAN PLACE,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 149, TRIANGLE ROAD,
Massey.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 8, SCARLET DRIVE, Ranui.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

16 HALLORAN PLACE,
Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

149 TRIANGLE ROAD,


Massey

Massey

MHU

MHU

8 SCARLET DRIVE, Ranui

Ranui

MHU

MHU

Ranui

SH

MHU

Rezone 12, DON BUCK ROAD, 12 DON BUCK ROAD,


Ranui-West Harbour from
Ranui
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 38 CLYMA PLACE, Massey Massey


at 38, CLYMA PLACE, Massey.

MHU

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 26A,


CHORLEY AVENUE, Massey.

SH

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 21, EDWIN FREEMAN 21 EDWIN FREEMAN


PLACE, Ranui from Mixed
PLACE, Ranui
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ranui

Rezone 20, EDWIN FREEMAN 20 EDWIN FREEMAN


PLACE, Ranui from Mixed
PLACE, Ranui
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ranui

Rezone 25, EDWIN FREEMAN 25 EDWIN FREEMAN


PLACE, Ranui from Mixed
PLACE, Ranui
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

26A CHORLEY AVENUE,


Massey

Massey

MHS

MHS

MHS

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 76,74,72, CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey.

76,74,72 CEDAR HEIGHTS West Harbour


AVENUE, Massey

MHU

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 68,66, CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey.

68,66 CEDAR HEIGHTS


AVENUE, Massey

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 46,56,50,48,52, CEDAR
HEIGHTS AVENUE, Massey.

46,56,50,48,52 CEDAR
HEIGHTS AVENUE,
Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 18B,18A,16A,16B,14B,14A,
BENCHMARK
DRIVE,55,47,57,53,49, CEDAR
HEIGHTS AVENUE, Massey.

18B,18A,16A,16B,14B,14 West Harbour


A BENCHMARK DRIVE;
55,47,57,53,49 CEDAR
HEIGHTS AVENUE,
Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 24 BENCHMARK DRIVE;


at 24, BENCHMARK
63,65 CEDAR HEIGHTS
DRIVE,63,65, CEDAR HEIGHTS AVENUE, Massey
AVENUE, Massey.

REASONS

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN and a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHU as the site is located in close
proximity to a RFN.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as the site has poor accessibility to Centres or
existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The property is not in a close proximity to
a RFN and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned properties.
Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The property is not in a close proximity to
a RFN and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned properties.
Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The property is not in a close proximity to
a RFN and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned properties.
Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the sites are located in close proximity
to a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

SH to MHU

Support an out of scope change of zone from SH to MHU of properties within


frontage on Don Buck Rd between Universal Drive and Woodside Rd / Glen Rd.
See Attachment F. The sites are located in close proximity to RFN.

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

REQUESTED
ZONE

1156

Meet Criteria
No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1188

839-1198

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 19,15,23, BENCHMARK
DRIVE, Massey.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
19,15,23 BENCHMARK
DRIVE, Massey

LOCALITY

West Harbour

Retain Mixed housing urban 11,13,15,21,17,16,19,18, West Harbour


at
22,9,20 HANUI PLACE,
11,13,15,21,17,16,19,18,22,9, Massey
20, HANUI PLACE, Massey.

PAUP ZONE

MHU

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1157

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because they are not in
No change
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and are located within a contiguous
block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Interpreted as - Rezone
11,13,15,21,17,16,19,18,22,9,
20, HANUI PLACE, Massey
from MHS to MHU.

839-1199

839-1200

839-1201

839-1523

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 10,10A, 10,10A DARCY PLACE,


DARCY PLACE, Massey.
Massey

West Harbour

SH

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at


61B,61A, COLWILL ROAD,
Massey.

61B,61A COLWILL ROAD, West Harbour


Massey

SH

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 46,44,


ALLINGTON ROAD, Massey.

46,44 ALLINGTON ROAD, West Harbour


Massey

SH

SH

SH

SH

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 161 ROYAL ROAD,


at 161, ROYAL ROAD, Massey. Massey

West Harbour

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed housing urban


at 16, REDWOOD DRIVE,
Massey.

West Harbour

16 Redwood Drive,
Massey

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

Interpreted as - Rezone 16
REDWOOD DRIVE FROM
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.
839-178

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 8,


QUINCEY PLACE, Massey.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review
Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres
or a RFN. The retention of the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres


or a RFN. The retention of the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

8 QUINCEY PLACE,
Massey

West Harbour

SH

SH

SH

Support

SH

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Do not support retention of SH zone and support an out of scope change from SH to MHS
SH to MHS. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-149

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The property is not in a close proximity to
a RFN and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned properties.
Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meets proximity criteria to upzone

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Do not support retention of SH zone and support an out of scope change from SH to MHS
SH to MHS. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.
The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Support

Meets proximity criteria to upzone

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-180

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Retain Single House at 17,


QUINCEY PLACE, Massey.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
17 QUINCEY PLACE,
Massey

LOCALITY

West Harbour

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

REASONS

1158

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

839-2499

839-2767

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 11 BENCHMARK DRIVE. 2
FERNHAVEN PLACE. Massey.

2 FERNHAVEN PLACE,
Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 10 BENCHMARK DRIVE.
Massey.

10 BENCHMARK DRIVE,
Massey

Rezone 10,8,12,14,6, HANUI


PLACE, Massey from Mixed
Housing Suburban, Single
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

10,8,12,14,6 HANUI
PLACE, Massey

West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

MHU

MHU

Multiple - SH:
8,10,12 Hanui Pl;
MHS: 6 and 14
Hanui Pl

MHU

MHU

MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support retention of SH zone and support an out of scope change from SH to MHS
SH to MHS. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-2243

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change sought to MHU zone and support a less intensified zone SH to MHS
change to MHS on 8,10,12 Hanui Pl as spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources and does not recognise
local context.
MHS zone on 10 Hanui Place is supported despite the site being affected by
SEA as the extent of SEA does not require it to maintain a SH zone.

MHS

Support

Meets proximity criteria to upzone


MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Support retaining MHS zone on 6 and 14 Hanui Place as the sites are not in
close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN.

839-2949

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 9A, SPARGO ROAD,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

9A Spargo Road, Massey West Harbour

SH

MHS

The proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS as the site is located in close proximity to a
SH to MHS
large POS and a Neighbourhood Centre. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-2950

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 128, COLWILL ROAD,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

128 Colwill Road, Massey West Harbour

SH

MHS

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 19, TAITAPU STREET,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

19 Taitapu Street,
Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS as the site does not have significant
SH to MHS
constraints that would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in
isolation would result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the
surrounding properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot
zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-3000

Meet Criteria

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
thenot
MHS
zone and
givesofeffect
theSH
RPSto MHS because spot zoning in this
Do
support
change
zoneto
from
No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The site is affected by Heavy Industry Air
Quality and retention of the proposed SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3013

839-3060

839-309

839-3118

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 21, KOPI PLACE,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

21 Kopi Place, Massey

West Harbour

Rezone 25, KOPI PLACE,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

25 Kopi Place, Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 14, CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey.

14 CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey

Rezone 142, COLWILL ROAD,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

142 Colwill Road, Massey West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHU

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated management of resources and
does not recognise local context. The site is affected by Heavy Industry Air
Quality and retention of the proposed SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The site is affected by Heavy Industry Air
Quality and NGC and retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS. retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
Support
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS as the site does not have significant
constraints that would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in
isolation would result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the
surrounding properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot
zoning.

1159

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 23, CLAVERDON


DRIVE, Massey from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

23 Claverdon Drive,
Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

MHS

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 6, SPARGO ROAD,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

6 Spargo Road, Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Meet Criteria
MHS

839-352

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 3, CEDAR HEIGHTS


AVENUE, Massey from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 3, BENCHMARK DRIVE,
Massey.

3 CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey

West Harbour

3 BENCHMARK DRIVE,
Massey

West Harbour

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

SH to MHS

Meet Criteria

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHSchange
zone and
gives
toas
thealthough
RPS. the site has SEA, the extent of it
Support
from
SH effect
to MHS
SH to MHS
does not require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS as the site is located adjacent to a
SH to MHS
Neighbourhood Centre. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot
zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from
SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-3494

Oppose

No change

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-3481

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the site is located in close
proximity to a large POS. The rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-3221

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

MHS to MHU

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

Meet Criteria
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3637

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Rezone
60,61,62,64,65,66,67,68,69,80
,86,84,48,82,76,74,72,70,90,9
2,94,78,59,58,54,57,56,50,52,
88, CLAVERDON DRIVE,
Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

60,61,62,64,65,66,67,68, West Harbour


69,80,86,84,48,82,76,74,
72,70,90,92,94,78,59,58,
54,57,56,50,52,88
CLAVERDON DRIVE,
Massey

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

1160

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support change from SH to MHS as the sites are located in close proximity to a SH to MHS
POS. Rezoning at this location in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

Support rezoning of 92 Claverdon Dr as although the SH zone could be retained


due to the site being affected by flooding constraints, a spot zone would occur
and in this location a spot zone will not generally achieve the integrated
management of resources and does not recognise the local context.
The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
839-367

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 6,


EBONY PLACE, Massey.

6 EBONY PLACE, Massey West Harbour

SH

SH

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-3760

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 138, COLWILL ROAD,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

138 Colwill Road, Massey West Harbour

SH

MHS

839-3785

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 14,16, KOPI PLACE,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

14 and 16 Kopi Place,


Massey

Rezone 29, BACKHURST


GROVE, Massey from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

29 Backhurst Grove,
Massey

West Harbour

West Harbour

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS as the site does not have significant
SH to MHS
constraints that would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in
isolation would result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the
surrounding properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot
zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-3782

Meet Criteria

Do not support retention of SH zone and support an out of scope change from SH to MHS
SH to MHS. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
thenot
MHS
zone and
givesofeffect
theSH
RPS.
Do
support
change
zoneto
from
to MHS because spot zoning in this
No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The site is affected by Heavy Industry Air
Quality and retention of the proposed SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS as the site is located adjacent to a large POS. SH to MHS
Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning. However, an out
of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to MHS, described
below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.
The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meets proximity criteria to upzone

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-383

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Retain Single House at 4,


PATRICE PLACE, Massey.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

4 PATRICE PLACE, Massey West Harbour

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

REASONS

1161

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 28,


PIPITEA PLACE, Massey.

28 PIPITEA PLACE,
Massey

West Harbour

SH

SH

MHS

839-4142

839-4143

839-4144

839-4145

839-4146

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 16, TAITAPU


STREET,3, KOPI PLACE,
Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

16 Taitapu Street,
Massey

Rezone 9,7, KOPI PLACE,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

7 and 9 Kopi Place,


Massey

West Harbour

West Harbour

SH

SH

Rezone 13,15,17, KOPI PLACE, 13, 15 and 17 Kopi Place, West Harbour
Massey from Single House to Massey
Mixed Housing Suburban.

SH

Rezone 10,10A, TAITAPU


STREET,4,6, KOPI PLACE,
Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

10 and 10A Taitapu


Street; 4,6 Kopi Place,
Massey

West Harbour

SH

Rezone 10,12, KOPI PLACE,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

10 and 12 Kopi Place,


Massey

West Harbour

Rezone 33,31,29,35, KOPI


PLACE, Massey from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

29, 31, 33 and 35 Kopi


Place, Massey

West Harbour

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Support

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone and support an out of scope change from SH to MHS
SH to MHS. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-4141

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support retention of SH zone and support an out of scope change from SH to MHS
SH to MHS. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-406

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is also affected by Heavy
Industry Air Quality and retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
thenot
RPS.support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
Do
location will not generally achieve integrated management of resources and
does not recognise local context. The location is affected by Heavy Industry Air
Quality and retention of the proposed SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is affected by Heavy Industry
Air Quality and retention of the proposed SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is affected by Flooding
constraints and Heavy Industry Air Quality and retention of the proposed SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is affected by Heavy Industry
Air Quality and retention of the proposed SH zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is affected by Heavy Industry
Air Quality and NGC and retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

Meets proximity criteria to upzone

MHS

Support

Meets proximity criteria to upzone


No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4148

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Rezone
11,13,15,21,17,23,19,5,7,9,
BACKHURST GROVE, Massey
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

11,13,15,21,17,23,19,5,7, West Harbour


9 BACKHURST GROVE,
Massey

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

1162

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 10,12,14,16,6,8,
BACKHURST GROVE, Massey
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

10,12,14,16,6,8
BACKHURST GROVE,
Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 332A,332, ROYAL


ROAD, Massey from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

332 and 332A ROYAL


ROAD, Masse

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 18,14,16, CLAVERDON 18,14,16 CLAVERDON


DRIVE,11,13,1,3,5,7,9, REINGA DRIVE; 11,13,1,3,5,7,9
PLACE, Massey from Single
REINGA PLACE, Massey
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS as the sites are located in close proximity to a SH to MHS
large POS. Rezoning of these sites in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-4151

MHS

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS as the sites are located in close proximity to a SH to MHS
large POS. Rezoning of these sites in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-4150

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support change from SH to MHS as the sites are located in close proximity to a SH to MHS
large POS. Rezoning of these sites in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

839-4149

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS as the sites do not have significant constraints SH to MHS
to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of these sites in isolation would result in spot
zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from
SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

Support rezoning of 3 and 5 Reinga Pl from SH to MHS as although the SH zone


could be retained due to the sites being affected by flooding constraints, a spot
zone would occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally achieve the
integrated management of resources and does not recognise the local context.
The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4152

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Rezone 10,12,14,16,18,4,6,8,
REINGA PLACE,4, CLAVERDON
DRIVE,154,156,168,164,166,1
62, COLWILL ROAD, Massey
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

10,12,14,16,18,4,6,8
West Harbour
REINGA PLACE; 4
CLAVERDON DRIVE;
154,156,168,164,166,162
COLWILL ROAD, Massey

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

1163

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support change from SH to MHS as the sites do not have significant constraints SH to MHS
to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of these sites in isolation would result in spot
zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from
SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

Support rezoning of 4 and 18 Reinga Pl from SH to MHS as although the SH


zone could be retained due to the sites being affected by flooding constraints,
a spot zone would occur and in this location a spot zone will not generally
achieve the integrated management of resources and does not recognise the
local context.

839-438

839-479

839-4944

839-534

839-665

839-684

839-694

839-7585

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 62, CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey.

62 CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 26, CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey.

26 CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey

Rezone 3,5, HANUI PLACE,


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

3,5 HANUI PLACE,


Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 17, FERNHAVEN PLACE,
Massey.

17 FERNHAVEN PLACE,
Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 71, CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey.

71 CEDAR HEIGHTS
AVENUE, Massey

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 8, JARRAH PLACE, Massey.

8 JARRAH PLACE, Massey West Harbour

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 12 JARRAH PLACE,


at 12, JARRAH PLACE, Massey. Massey

Rezone 12 WICKSTEAD PLACE. 1/12 Wickstead Place,


Massey from Single House to Massey
Mixed Housing Suburban.

West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

West Harbour

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHSretention
zone and of
gives
effectMHU
to the
RPS.because the properties are located in
Support
notified
zone
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that
would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

No change

No change

No change

SH to MHS

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7604

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Rezone 316 ROYAL ROAD.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
316 Royal Road, Massey

LOCALITY

West Harbour

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

Support change from SH to MHS as the site is located in close proximity to a


large POS. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

1164

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH to MHS

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-7620

839-7763

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 7 HANUI PLACE.


Massey from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

2/7 Hanui Place, Massey West Harbour

Rezone 2 BACKHURST GROVE. 2 Backhurst Grove,


267 ROYAL ROAD. Massey
Massey
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

West Harbour

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU and support a less intensive
SH to MHS
zone change to MHS as there are no significant constraints that would require
to maintain a SH zone, and the location is not in close proximity to THAB zones
and a RFN. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-7772

839-7845

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 5 TAITAPU STREET.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

5 Taitapu Street, Massey West Harbour

Rezone 30 WIDMORE DRIVE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

2/30 Widmore Drive,


Massey

West Harbour

SH

SH

MHU

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS. change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that
Support
would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

SH to MHS

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-7919

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 14 DARCY PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

14 Darcy Place, Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8176

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Rezone 13 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
13 Sari Place, Massey

LOCALITY

West Harbour

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

1165

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU and support a less intensive
SH to MHS
zone change to MHS as there are no significant constraints that would require
to maintain a SH zone, and are not in a close proximity to THAB zone and a
RFN. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning. However, an
out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to MHS, described
below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHU

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-8177

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 17 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

17 Sari Place, Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU and support a less intensive
SH to MHS
zone change to MHS as there are no significant constraints that would require
to maintain a SH zone, and are not in a close proximity to THAB zone and a
RFN. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning. However, an
out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to MHS, described
below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHU

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-8178

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 31 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

31 Sari Place, Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Support change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that


would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

SH to MHS

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-8179

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 29 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

29 Sari Place, Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Support change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that


would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

SH to MHS

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8180

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Rezone 27 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
27 Sari Place, Massey

LOCALITY

West Harbour

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

Support change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that


would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

1166

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH to MHS

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-8181

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 25 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

25 Sari Place, Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Support change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that


would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

SH to MHS

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-8182

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 33 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

33 Sari Place, Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Support change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that


would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

SH to MHS

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-8183

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 21 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

21 Sari Place, Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Support change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that


would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

SH to MHS

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-8184

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

Rezone 23 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
23 Sari Place, Massey

LOCALITY

West Harbour

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

Support change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that


would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

1167

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH to MHS

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-8185

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 39 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

39 Sari Place, Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Support change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that


would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

SH to MHS

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-8186

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 41 SARI PLACE.


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

41 Sari Place, Massey

West Harbour

SH

MHS

Support change from SH to MHS as there are no significant constraints that


would require to maintain a SH zone. Rezoning of this site in isolation would
result in spot zoning. However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding
properties from SH to MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.

SH to MHS

Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to


MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Oppose

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
839-833

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 1, TAITAPU
STREET, Massey.

1 TAITAPU STREET,
Massey

West Harbour

MHS

MHS

839-846

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

56 WIDMORE DRIVE,
Massey

West Harbour

MHU

MHU

839-91

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 56, WIDMORE DRIVE,
Massey.
Retain Single House at 47,
ALLINGTON ROAD, Massey.

47 ALLINGTON ROAD,
Massey

West Harbour

SH

SH

Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to


No change
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
a RFN and a Neighbourhood Centre. This retention is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of SH zone and support an out of scope change from SH to MHS
SH to MHS. Rezoning of this site in isolation would result in spot zoning.
However, an out of scope rezoning of the surrounding properties from SH to
MHS, described below, avoids this spot zoning.
Support an out of scope rezoning of a wider area in West Harbour from SH to
MHS as the location does not have significant constraints that would require
maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F. This wider out of scope rezoning is
proposed in response to 40 submissions received to rezone sites located within
Submission Area W4 from SH to MHS or MHU.

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meets proximity criteria to upzone


839-913

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 4, JARRAH PLACE, Massey.

4 JARRAH PLACE, Massey West Harbour

MHU

MHU

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

MHU

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-920

839-3272

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 6, BENCHMARK DRIVE,
Massey.

6 BENCHMARK DRIVE,
Massey

West Harbour

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 2, GLEN ROAD, Ranui


from Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

2 GLEN ROAD, Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 8, HAMBLYN PLACE,


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

8 HAMBLYN PLACE, Ranui Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 10,12,14,16,18,6,8,
DUNBARTON
DRIVE,11,13,3,5,7,9,
CHILDERS ROAD, Ranui.

10,12,14,16,18,6,8
DUNBARTON
DRIVE;11,13,3,5,7,9
CHILDERS ROAD, Ranui

Ranui

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 19,25,21,23, ELISA
LANE,24,22, DUNBARTON
DRIVE, Ranui.

19,25,21,23 ELISA LANE;


24,22 DUNBARTON
DRIVE, Ranui

Ranui

Ranui

PAUP ZONE

MHU

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1168

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in No change
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because the site is affected by No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-3260

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because the site is affected by No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-1144

839-1145

839-1146

839-1147

839-1148

839-1149

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 303,305 SWANSON


at 303,305, SWANSON ROAD, ROAD, Ranui
Swanson-Henderson.

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 5A,7A, METCALFE ROAD,
Ranui.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 8,2,4,6, KINVIG PLACE,10,6,
RISERRA DRIVE, Ranui.

5A,7A METCALFE ROAD,


Ranui

Ranui

8,2,4,6 KINVIG PLACE;


10,6 RISERRA DRIVE,
Ranui

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-1150

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-1151

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-1152

839-1153

839-1154

839-1160

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 3,5 RISERRA DRIVE, Ranui Ranui


at 3,5, RISERRA DRIVE, Ranui.

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 6A,6B,6, IRELAND PLACE,
Ranui.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 388, SWANSON
ROAD,6A,6B,4B,4A, AFTON
PLACE, Ranui.

6A,6B,6 IRELAND PLACE, Ranui


Ranui

MHU

MHU

388 SWANSON ROAD;


6A,6B,4B,4A AFTON
PLACE, Ranui

MHU

MHU

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at
11,13,11A,21,19,13A,17A,17B,
3,5,7,9, AFTON
PLACE,398,396, SWANSON
ROAD, Ranui.
Retain Mixed Housing
Suburban at 56,58, LUANDA
DRIVE, Ranui.

11,13,11A,21,19,13A,17A, Ranui
17B,3,5,7,9 AFTON
PLACE; 398,396
SWANSON ROAD, Ranui

MHU

56,58 LUANDA DRIVE,


Ranui

MHS

Retain Mixed Housing


64A,64C,64B,64D
Suburban at
WOODSIDE ROAD,
64A,64C,64B,64D, WOODSIDE Massey
ROAD, Massey.
Retain Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings at
26C,24A, RANUI STATION
ROAD, Ranui.

Ranui

Ranui

Massey

26C,24A RANUI STATION Ranui


ROAD, Ranui

MHS

THAB

MHU

MHS

MHS

THAB

Support retention of MHU zone because the sites are located in close proximity No change
to a Local Centre and a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Support retention of MHU zone because the sites are located in close proximity No change
to a Local Centre and a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

Support retention of MHU zone because the sites are located in close proximity No change
to a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

THAB

Support

Support retention of MHU zone because the sites are located in close proximity
to a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the sites are located in close proximity
to a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to


No change
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
No change
THAB zone, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone as the sites are located in close proximity to
Ranui Railway Station, Ranui Local Centre and Ranui Primary School. This
retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB
zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1161

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

27,29 RISERRA DRIVE;


10,1,3,2,5,4,6,8 SACHEL
PLACE, Ranui

Ranui

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 10,12,8, DIANA PLACE,
Ranui.

10,12,8 DIANA PLACE,


Ranui

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 1,3,5,


VANHEST WAY, Ranui.

1,3,5 VANHEST WAY,


Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 19,


VIEW RIDGE
DRIVE,19,18,20,22,17,
VANHEST WAY, Ranui.
Retain Single House at 68,76,
VIEW RIDGE DRIVE, Ranui.

19 VIEW RIDGE DRIVE;


Ranui
19,18,20,22,17 VANHEST
WAY, Ranui

SH

68,76 VIEW RIDGE DRIVE, Ranui


Ranui

SH

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 165B,163A,163B,165A,
METCALFE ROAD, Ranui.

165B,163A,163B,165A
METCALFE ROAD, Ranui

MHU

839-145

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 6 FROSTBITE PLACE,


at 6, FROSTBITE PLACE, Ranui. Ranui

Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-162

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 40,


VIEW RIDGE DRIVE, Ranui.

40 VIEW RIDGE DRIVE,


Ranui

Ranui

SH

SH

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Terrace Housing and


Apartment Buildings at 8,
RANUI AVENUE, Ranui.

8 RANUI AVENUE, Ranui

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Terrace Housing and


Apartment Buildings at 4,
JILLIAN DRIVE, Ranui.

4 JILLIAN DRIVE, Ranui

839-2276

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 3 METCALFE ROAD. Ranui.

3 METCALFE ROAD, Ranui Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-229

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 65, URLICH
DRIVE, Ranui.

65 URLICH DRIVE, Ranui

MHS

MHS

839-233

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 18, SABOT PLACE, Massey.

18 SABOT PLACE, Massey Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-234

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 1/408/40, BIRDWOOD ROAD,


Swanson-Massey.

1/40-8/40 BIRDWOOD
ROAD, Ranui

SH

SH

839-235

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 22, SABOT PLACE, Massey.

22 SABOT PLACE, Massey Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-236

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 10, SABOT PLACE, Massey.

10 SABOT PLACE, Massey Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-2444

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 44


44 HETHERINGTON
HETHERINGTON ROAD. Ranui. ROAD, Ranui

Ranui

SH

SH

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Terrace Housing and


Apartment Buildings at 7
CARLAS WAY. Ranui.

Ranui

839-1163

839-1164

839-1165

839-1166

839-194

839-202

839-2560

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

7 CARLAS WAY, Ranui

Ranui

Ranui

Ranui

Ranui

Ranui

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 27,29, RISERRA
DRIVE,10,1,3,2,5,4,6,8,
SACHEL PLACE, Ranui.

839-1162

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

MHU

SH

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

MHU

SH

SH

SH

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

1169

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres
or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres
or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres
or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the sites are located in close proximity
to THAB zone. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres
or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone as the site is located in close proximity to
Ranui Railway Station, Ranui Local Centre, a large POS and Ranui Primary
School. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone as the site is located in close proximity to
Ranui Railway Station, a large POS and Ranui Primary School. This retention is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres
or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres
or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone as the site is located in close proximity to
Ranui Railway Station, a large POS and Ranui Primary School. This retention is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

No change

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

839-2687

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 14A ILLANA PLACE. Ranui.

14A ILLANA PLACE, Ranui Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-2688

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 14 ILLANA PLACE. Ranui.

14 ILLANA PLACE, Ranui

Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-2742

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


1/52 WOODSIDE ROAD,
Suburban at 1/52 WOODSIDE Massey
ROAD. Massey.

Massey

MHS

MHS

839-2744

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 21 SABOT PLACE. Massey.

839-3813

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 11, HAMBLYN PLACE, 11 HAMBLYN PLACE,


Ranui from Single House to
Ranui
Mixed Housing Urban.

21 SABOT PLACE, Massey Ranui

Ranui

MHU

MHU

SH

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
THAB zone. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
THAB zone. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change sought to MHU as spot zoning in this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources and does not recognise
local context. The location is not in close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN.
Instead, support zone change to MHS.

1170

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

839-4126

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 70, WOODSIDE
ROAD, Massey.

70 WOODSIDE ROAD,
Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 10B,10C,10A, HOLMES 10B,10C,10A HOLMES


DRIVE SOUTH, Massey from DRIVE SOUTH, Massey
Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Massey

West Harbour

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

839-3062

839-3065

839-307

839-3075

839-3325

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 27, URLICH DRIVE,


Ranui from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

27 URLICH DRIVE, Ranui

Rezone 33, KELLETT ROAD,


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

33 KELLETT ROAD, Ranui Ranui

Rezone 81, POOKS ROAD,


Swanson-Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

81 POOKS ROAD, Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 14, MAYER
PLACE, Ranui.

14 MAYER PLACE, Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 76A, GLEN ROAD,


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

76A GLEN ROAD, Ranui

Rezone 96, KEEGAN


DRIVE,281, TRIANGLE ROAD,
Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

96 Keegan Drive, Massey Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Ranui

Ranui

Ranui

Ranui

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

SH

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

SH to MHS

Do not support the change from SH to MHS on 10C Holmes Drive South
because spot zoning of this single site in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not recognise local context.

839-2944

MHU
No change

The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
No change
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS on 10A and 10B Holmes Drive No change
South because the sites are affected by flooding constraints and managing
flooding risks on those sites require to maintain a SH zone.

Retention of notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the


objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated management of resources and
does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because the site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

An out of scope rezoning of 7,9, 10, 12 Hamblyn Place; 1/204, 206 Waitemata
Drive; 5,7,9 Armada Drive and 2/3,5,7 Edwin Freeman Place from SH to MHS is
supported. See Attachment F. Managing flooding risks on those sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone.

839-279

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Meet Criteria
MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3496

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
101 Keegan Drive,
Massey

LOCALITY

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 101, KEEGAN DRIVE,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 550, SWANSON ROAD, 550 SWANSON ROAD,


Swanson-Henderson from
Ranui
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Ranui

Rezone 9, ELVIRA PLACE,


Ranui from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

9 ELVIRA PLACE, Ranui

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 107, KEEGAN DRIVE,


Massey from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

107 Keegan Drive,


Massey

Massey

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 31, LILBURN


CRESCENT, Massey from
Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

31 LILBURN CRESCENT,
Massey

Massey

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

1171

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because the site is affected by No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHU

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3144

839-3187

839-3610

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

MHS

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because the site is affected by No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meet Criteria
839-3922

839-4103

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 1, LINCOLN GARDEN 40 and 42 Universal


CLOSE,42,40, UNIVERSAL
Drive, Henderson
DRIVE, Henderson from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

Massey

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support zone change sought to MHU as spot zoning in this location will SH to MHS
not generally achieve the integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. Instead, support zone change to MHS as the site is not
in close proximity to THAB zone and a RFN and managing flooding risk on the
site does not require maintaining a SH zone. This rezoning to MHS is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU at 42 Universal Drive because SH to MHU
this site is affected by flooding constraints and retention of SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Support change of zone at 40 Universal Drive from SH to MHU because
managing flooding risks on the site does not require maintaining a SH zone and
the site is located in close proximity to RFN.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Oppose

Support an out of scope change of zone of 23,34,36,41,43 Universal Drive from


SH to MHU zone as the sites are located in close proximity to a RFN. See
Attachment F.
The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
839-3343

839-3352

839-3459

839-3479

839-3558

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 105, POOKS ROAD,


Swanson-Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

105 POOKS ROAD, Ranui Ranui

Rezone 23, SIMPSON ROAD,


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

23 SIMPSON ROAD, Ranui Ranui

Rezone 31, LUANDA DRIVE,


Ranui from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

31 LUANDA DRIVE, Ranui Ranui

Rezone 117, POOKS ROAD,


Swanson-Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

117 POOKS ROAD, Ranui Ranui

Rezone 8B,10,8A, EDWIN


8B,10,8A EDWIN
FREEMAN PLACE, Ranui from FREEMAN PLACE, Ranui
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Ranui

SH

SH

MHS

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate way
to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3578

839-3580

839-3620

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 16, KAREPO


CRESCENT, Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

16 KAREPO CRESCENT,
Ranui

Rezone 19, SIMPSON ROAD,


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

19 SIMPSON ROAD, Ranui Ranui

Rezone 467, SWANSON ROAD, 467 SWANSON ROAD,


Swanson-Henderson from
Ranui
Mixed Housing Urban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Ranui

Ranui

PAUP ZONE

SH

SH

MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

THAB

REASONS

1172

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB because spot zoning in this No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The retention of notified MHU zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

THAB

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3638

839-3655

839-3721

839-3771

839-3158

839-4153

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 37, KELLETT ROAD,


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

37 KELLETT ROAD, Ranui Ranui

Rezone 11, LUANDA DRIVE,


Ranui from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

11 LUANDA DRIVE, Ranui Ranui

Rezone 91, POOKS ROAD,


Swanson-Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

91 POOKS ROAD, Ranui

Rezone 113, POOKS ROAD,


Swanson-Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

113 POOKS ROAD, Ranui Ranui

Rezone 39, LOUGHANURE


PLACE, Massey from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.
Rezone 33,21, LOUGHANURE
PLACE, Massey from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

39 LOUGHANURE PLACE, Massey


Massey

SH

21 and 33 LOUGHANURE Massey


PLACE, Massey

SH

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 19, DRUMMOND DRIVE,
Ranui.

19 DRUMMOND DRIVE,
Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone
11,10,12,20,14,22,16,18,6,1,3,
2,5,4,7,24,9,8, MAYFAIR
PLACE, Henderson from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

11,10,12,20,14,22,16,18, Massey
6,1,3,2,5,4,7,24,9,8
MAYFAIR PLACE,
Henderson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Ranui

SH

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because the site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because the site is affected by No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-380

839-4099

Ranui

MHU

SH

MHU

MHU

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Do not support change of zone at 1,3,5,7,9,11 Mayfair Place from SH to MHU SH to MHU
because the sites are affected by flooding constraints and retention of notified
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone at 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24 Mayfair Place from
SH to MHU because managing flooding risk on those sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone and are located in close proximity to RFN. The rezoning
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support an out of scope zone change of multiple sites from SH to MHU on
Clover Drive, Mayfair Place, Meadowcroft Way and Woodside Road. See
Attachment F. These sites are located in close proximity to a RFN and managing
flooding risk on those sited does not require to maintain a SH zone.
The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3889

839-3892

839-3894

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-396

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-399

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-400

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-408

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-4092

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

839-4094

839-4095

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Rezone 8, HETHERINGTON
ROAD, Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

8 HETHERINGTON ROAD, Ranui


Ranui

Rezone 15, KAREPO


CRESCENT, Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

15 KAREPO CRESCENT,
Ranui

Rezone 17, URLICH DRIVE,


Ranui from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

17 URLICH DRIVE, Ranui

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 1/120,9/120, METCALFE
ROAD, Ranui.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 1/96,9/96, METCALFE
ROAD, Ranui.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 10, MARTIN JUGUM LANE,
Ranui.
Retain Mixed Housing Urban
at 13, ARMADA DRIVE, Ranui.

1/120,9/120 METCALFE
ROAD, Ranui

Ranui

MHU

MHU

1/96,9/96 METCALFE
ROAD, Ranui

Ranui

MHU

MHU

10 MARTIN JUGUM
LANE, Ranui

Ranui

MHU

MHU

13 ARMADA DRIVE, Ranui Ranui

MHU

MHU

Rezone
521A,519,527,521,523,51 Ranui
521A,519,527,521,523,513,51 3,515,517 SWANSON
5,517, SWANSON ROAD,
ROAD, Ranui
Swanson-Henderson from
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

MHS

THAB

Rezone 24,22, ARMADA


DRIVE, Ranui from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

24,22 ARMADA DRIVE,


Ranui

Ranui

Ranui

Ranui

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1173

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the notified MHU zone because the sites are located in
close proximity to THAB zone. This retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the sites are located in close proximity
to THAB zone. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
THAB zone. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
Ranui Local Centre. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to THAB because although the sites
are within close proximity to Ranui Local Centre, they are isolated and
surrounded by MHS zone. The retention of notified MHS zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS.

No change

Support change of zone from MHS to MHU as the sites are located in close
proximity to Ranui Local Centre.

MHS to MHU

MHS

233A,233B,231B,231A
WAITEMATA DRIVE,
Ranui

Ranui

SH

Rezone 64, ARODELLA


CRESCENT,218C,218B,218A,21
4B,214A,216A,216B,
WAITEMATA DRIVE, Ranui
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

64 ARODELLA CRESCENT; Ranui


218C,218B,218A,214B,21
4A,216A,216B
WAITEMATA DRIVE,
Ranui

SH

Rezone 6, HILLMAN PLACE,


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

6 HILLMAN PLACE, Ranui Ranui

SH

Rezone 228, WAITEMATA


DRIVE, Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Suburban.

228 WAITEMATA DRIVE, Ranui


Ranui

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support an out of scope change of zone of a single site located at 1/20 Armada
Drive. See Attachment F to avoid spot zoning. Spot zoning at this location will
not generally achieve integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

Rezone
233A,233B,231B,231A,
WAITEMATA DRIVE, Ranui
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

These rezoning are the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-4096

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
No change
location will not generally achieve integrated management of resources and
does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-4097

839-4098

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

SH

MHS

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
No change
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-7996

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 56A METCALFE ROAD. 56A METCALFE ROAD,


Ranui from Single House to
Ranui
Mixed Housing Urban.

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 70 MILI WAY SOUTH.


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

70 MILI WAY SOUTH,


Ranui

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 25B,25A, WOODSIDE


ROAD, Massey from Mixed
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

25B,25A WOODSIDE
ROAD, Massey

Massey

Rezone 7, KELLETT
ROAD,138,138D,130,136,138B
, POOKS ROAD,11,19,9,15,
HETHERINGTON ROAD, Ranui
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

7 KELLETT ROAD;
Ranui
138,138D,130,136,138B
POOKS ROAD;11,19,9,15
HETHERINGTON ROAD,
Ranui

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Support change of zone from SH to MHU as the site is located in close


proximity to a RFN. The proposed zoning is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

1174

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

SH to MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-8239

SH

MHS

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because the site is affected by No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-4101

839-4108

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

MHS

SH

MHU

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The properties are located within a
contiguous block of other MHS zoned properties. Retention of notified MHS
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS as the location has poor
accessibility to Centres or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities.
Retention of the notified SH zone is the most appropriate way achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated management of resources and
does not recognise local context. The location has poor accessibility to Centres
or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the proposed
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve integrated management of resources and
does not recognise local context. The location has poor accessibility to Centres
or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the proposed
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the notified MHU zone because the property is located in
close proximity to a RFN and THAB zone. The proposed retention is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as the property is not located in close proximity
to a RFN and THAB zone, and it is located within a contiguous block of other
MHS zoned properties. The proposed retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as the property is not located in close proximity
to a RFN and THAB zone, and it is located within a contiguous block of other
MHS zoned properties. The proposed retention is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of the notified MHU zone as the property is located within a
contiguous block of other MHU zoned properties. The proposed retention is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zones and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone as the site is located in close proximity to
Ranui Railway Station, a large POS and Ranui Primary School. This retention is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Meet Criteria
839-4109

Rezone
10,12,14,16,18,2,4,6,8
10,12,14,16,18,2,4,6,8, MILI
MILI WAY, Ranui
WAY, Ranui from Single House
to Mixed Housing Suburban.

Ranui

Rezone 80,82A,82C,82B,
80,82A,82C,82B POOKS
POOKS ROAD, Swanson-Ranui ROAD, Ranui
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 27, AFTON PLACE, Ranui.

27 AFTON PLACE, Ranui

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 23, ARODELLA
CRESCENT, Ranui.

23 ARODELLA CRESCENT, Ranui


Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


5 MAYER PLACE, Ranui
Suburban at 5, MAYER PLACE,
Ranui.

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 49, BAHARI DRIVE, Ranui.

49 BAHARI DRIVE, Ranui

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Terrace Housing and


Apartment Buildings at 28,
JILLIAN DRIVE, Ranui.

28 JILLIAN DRIVE, Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 277, SWANSON ROAD,
Swanson-Henderson.

277 SWANSON ROAD,


Ranui

Ranui

839-609

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

11 UNIVERSAL DRIVE,
Ranui

Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-648

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 11, UNIVERSAL DRIVE,
Henderson.
Retain Single House at
555,555A, SWANSON ROAD,
Swanson-Henderson.

555,555A SWANSON
ROAD, Ranui

Ranui

SH

SH

839-4110

839-432

839-440

839-448

839-484

839-561

839-584

839-669

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 52 CHILDERS ROAD,


at 52, CHILDERS ROAD, Ranui. Ranui

Ranui

Ranui

SH

SH

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHU

THAB

MHU

MHU

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Support

No change

No change

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres No change
or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-677

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

REQUESTED
ZONE

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 196, WAITEMATA DRIVE,
Ranui.

196 WAITEMATA DRIVE, Ranui


Ranui

MHU

839-682

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 9, SABOT PLACE, Massey.

9 SABOT PLACE, Massey

Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-709

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 4, CHILDERS ROAD, Ranui.

4 CHILDERS ROAD, Ranui Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-725

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

13 DUNBARTON DRIVE,
Ranui

MHU

MHU

839-7550

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 13, DUNBARTON DRIVE,
Ranui.
Rezone 224 WAITEMATA
DRIVE. Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

MHU

839-7561

839-7664

839-7669

839-7674

839-3515

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Ranui

224 WAITEMATA DRIVE, Ranui


Ranui

Rezone 544 SWANSON ROAD. 544 SWANSON ROAD,


Swanson-Henderson from
Ranui
Mixed Housing Suburban to
Mixed Housing Urban.

Ranui

Rezone 68 GLEN ROAD. Ranui 68 GLEN ROAD, Ranui


from Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Ranui

Rezone 10 HILLMAN PLACE.


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

10 HILLMAN PLACE,
Ranui

Ranui

Rezone 75 LUANDA DRIVE.


Ranui from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

75 LUANDA DRIVE, Ranui Ranui

Rezone 143, TRIANGLE ROAD, 143 TRIANGLE ROAD,


Massey from Single House to Massey
Mixed Housing Urban.

Massey

MHS

SH

SH

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

REASONS

1175

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to No change
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
Ranui Local Centre This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
Ranui Local Centre This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
thenot
RPS.support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
Do
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
thenot
RPS.support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
Do
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
thenot
RPS.support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
Do
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support change of zone from SH to MHU as the site is located in close
proximity to a RFN.

839-7941

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 226 WAITEMATA


DRIVE. Ranui from Single
House to Mixed Housing
Urban.

226 WAITEMATA DRIVE, Ranui


Ranui

Rezone 39 UNIVERSAL DRIVE. 39 UNIVERSAL DRIVE,


Henderson from Single House Massey
to Mixed Housing Suburban.

Massey

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

The proposed rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives
of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS. change of zone from SH to MHU as the site is located in close
Support
proximity to RFN and managing flooding risk on the site does not require
maintaining a SH zone.
Support an out of scope rezoning of 23 Universal Drive from SH to MHU as the
site is located in close proximity to a RFN and managing flooding risk on the site
does not require maintaining a SH zone. A spot zoning on this site will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources and does not recognise
local context. See Attachment F.
The above rezoning is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No change

No change

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

SH to MHU

The adjacent sites located at 1/141 and 145 Triangle Road are supported for an
out of scope rezoning from SH to MHU as spot zoning at this location will not
generally achieve integrated management of resources and does not recognise
local context. These sites are located within a contiguous block of other MHU
zoned properties. See Attachment F.

839-7926

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

SH to MHU

MHU

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3826

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
74 URLICH DRIVE, Ranui

LOCALITY

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 74, URLICH DRIVE,


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban 10 CHILDERS ROAD,


at 10, CHILDERS ROAD, Ranui. Ranui

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 6 BURTONS DRIVE.


6 BURTONS DRIVE,
Swanson from Single House to Swanson
Mixed Housing Suburban.

Ranui

Rezone 14 BURTONS DRIVE.


25 CANDIA ROAD. Swanson
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Suburban.

Ranui

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

1176

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because the site is affected by No change
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081
MHS

Oppose

MHU

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-807

839-8093

839-8094

839-8095

839-811

839-8153

839-8168

839-8169

839-4093

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

14 BURTONS DRIVE; 25
CANDIA ROAD, Ranui

MHU

SH

SH

Rezone 7 BURTONS DRIVE.


7 BURTONS DRIVE, Ranui Ranui
Swanson from Single House to
Mixed Housing Suburban.

SH

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 40, RISERRA DRIVE, Ranui.

MHU

Rezone 99 SIMPSON ROAD.


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

40 RISERRA DRIVE, Ranui Ranui

99 SIMPSON ROAD, Ranui Ranui

SH

Rezone 57 ARODELLA
57 ARODELLA CRESCENT, Ranui
CRESCENT. Ranui from Mixed Ranui
Housing Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Rezone 68 LUANDA DRIVE.


Ranui from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed Housing
Urban.

MHS

68 LUANDA DRIVE, Ranui Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 88,86, URLICH DRIVE, 88,86 URLICH DRIVE,


Ranui from Single House to
Ranui
Mixed Housing Suburban.

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone 3 URBAN GROVE.


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

3 URBAN GROVE, Ranui

Ranui

Rezone 72A GLEN ROAD.


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

72A GLEN ROAD, Ranui

Rezone 18 AIRDRIE ROAD.


Ranui from Single House to
Mixed Housing Urban.

18 AIRDRIE ROAD, Ranui Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 51, URLICH
DRIVE, Ranui.

51 URLICH DRIVE, Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 192, WAITEMATA DRIVE,
Ranui.

192 WAITEMATA DRIVE, Ranui


Ranui

SH

MHU

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
Ranui Local Centre. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
thenot
RPS.support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
Do
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
thenot
RPS.support change of zone from SH to MHS because spot zoning in this
Do
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to
the RPS. retention of notified MHU zone because the properties are located in
Support
an area which is able to be adequately serviced by existing infrastructure and
the MHU zoning recognises local context. The retention of the zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to
the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
thenot
RPS.support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
Do
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of notified MHS zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because the site is affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
thenot
RPS.support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
Do
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
thenot
RPS.support change of zone from SH to MHU because spot zoning in this
Do
location will not generally achieve the integrated management of resources
and does not recognise local context. The location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN. Retention of the proposed SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to
the RPS. retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
Support
THAB zone and a RFN, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a large POS. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

No change

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

Meet Criteria
No change

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No change

Meet Criteria
839-8240

839-8283

839-8307

839-868

839-893

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Ranui

Ranui

SH

SH

SH

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHU

MHS

MHU

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

No change

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

No change

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-943

839-965

839-974

839-4100

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
64 VIEW RIDGE DRIVE,
Ranui

LOCALITY

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 64,


VIEW RIDGE DRIVE, Ranui.

Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Terrace Housing and


500A SWANSON ROAD,
Apartment Buildings at 500A, Ranui
SWANSON ROAD, Ranui.

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Single House at 11,


VANHEST WAY, Ranui.

11 VANHEST WAY, Ranui Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Rezone
33,31,31C,31B,31A,33A,31E,3
1D, WOODSIDE
ROAD,48,46,54,44,42,50,40,52
, CLOVER DRIVE, Henderson
from Single House to Mixed
Housing Urban.
In the PAUP Woodside Road
sites are zoned MHU and
MHS; 50,52 Clover Drive sites
are zoned MHU.

33,31,31C,31B,31A,33A,3 Massey
1E,31D WOODSIDE
ROAD;
48,46,54,44,42,50,40,52,
CLOVER DRIVE, Massey

Ranui

PAUP ZONE

SH

THAB

SH

Multiple - SH,
MHS, MHU

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

THAB

SH

MHU

REASONS

Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres


or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of THAB zone as the site is located in close proximity to
Ranui Railway Station, Ranui Local Centre, a large POS and Ranui Primary
School. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of SH zone as the location has poor accessibility to Centres
or existing or planned RFN or large urban facilities. Retention of the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way achieve the objectives of the SH zone and
gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS of sites on Clover Drive
because the sites are affected by flooding constraints.

1177

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

No change

SH

Support

THAB

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Oppose

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of MHU zone on 50, 52 Clover Drive and 31B, 31C, 31D and
31E Woodside Road as managing flooding risks on those sites does not require
maintaining a SH zone. The sites are located in close proximity to a RFN.
Support retention of MHS zone Properties on 31, 31A, 33 and 33A Woodside
Road to align with MHS zone on properties located on Woodside Road.
Support an out of scope change of 3/59, 61, 61A, 61B, 63, 65 and 67 Woodside
Rd from SH to MHS zone as managing flooding risks on those sites does not
require maintaining a SH zone. See Attachment F.
The above mentioned retention of the notified zones and out of scope change
of zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH, MHU
and MHS zones and gives effect to the RPS.

839-977

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


60A WOODSIDE ROAD,
Suburban at 60A, WOODSIDE Massey
ROAD, Massey.

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 69A, URLICH
DRIVE, Ranui.

69A URLICH DRIVE, Ranui Ranui

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at 69, URLICH
DRIVE, Ranui.

69 URLICH DRIVE, Ranui

839-99

Massey / Ranui / NonRural Swanson

Retain Mixed Housing Urban


at 10, UNIVERSAL DRIVE,
Henderson.

10 UNIVERSAL DRIVE,
Massey

839-2630

Henderson

Retain Terrace
9 Kereru Street
Housing and
Henderson
Apartment Buildings
at 9 KERERU STREET.
Henderson.

839-981

839-982

839-1035

Henderson

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Massey

Ranui

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

MHS

Massey

MHU

MHU

Henderson

THAB

THAB

Retain Terrace
9 Newington Road Henderson
Housing and
Henderson
Apartment Buildings
at 9,9A, NEWINGTON
ROAD, Henderson.

THAB

THAB

Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to


THAB zone, and are located within a contiguous block of other MHS zoned
properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHS zone as this location is not in close proximity to
THAB zone and a RFN, and is located within a contiguous block of other MHS
zoned properties. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of MHU zone because the site is located in close proximity to
a RFN. This retention is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHU zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria
No change

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHS

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

No change

No change

No change

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2241

839-2389

839-1036

839-3566

839-2613

839-299

839-1039

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Retain Terrace
16 Norcross
Housing and
Avenue
Apartment Buildings Henderson
at 16 NORCROSS
AVENUE. Henderson.

LOCALITY

Henderson

PAUP ZONE

THAB

Retain Mixed Housing 17 James Laurie Henderson


Urban at 17 JAMES
Street Henderson
LAURIE STREET.
Henderson.

MHU

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 18,18A,20,
NORCROSS AVENUE,
Henderson.

THAB

18,18A,20
NORCROSS
AVENUE,
Henderson.

Henderson

Rezone 19, CHOICE


19 Choice Avenue Henderson
AVENUE, Henderson Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

Retain Terrace
24 Norcross
Housing and
Avenue
Apartment Buildings Henderson
at 24 NORCROSS
AVENUE. Henderson.

Henderson

THAB

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 42, NEWINGTON
ROAD, Henderson.

42 Newington
Road Henderson

Henderson

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
45A,45,43B,43,43A,
NEWINGTON ROAD,
Henderson.

45A,45,43B,43,43 Henderson
A, NEWINGTON
ROAD, Henderson

THAB

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

1178

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m of LC zone. The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified MHU zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m walking distance of a THAB
zone. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and gives
effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change
it is located within 250m of LC zone. The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context and the site is not within
approximately 250m walking distance of any THAB zone
and MU zone.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change
it is located within 250m of LC zone. The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1037

839-90

839-2310

839-1034

839-7975

839-2562

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 237,239, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Henderson.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
237, 239 Great
North Road
Henderson

LOCALITY

Henderson

Retain Terrace
255 Great North
Housing and
Road Henderson
Apartment Buildings
at 255, GREAT NORTH
ROAD, Henderson.

Henderson

Retain Terrace
288 Great North
Housing and
Road Henderson
Apartment Buildings
at 288 GREAT NORTH
ROAD. Henderson.

Henderson

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 292,290, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Henderson.

Henderson

292,290, GREAT
NORTH ROAD,
Henderson

Rezone 40 VIEW
40 View Road
ROAD. Henderson
Henderson
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Henderson

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 16A MILLBROOK
ROAD. HendersonSunnyvale.

Henderson

16A Millbrook
Road Henderson

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

SH

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

REASONS

1179

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified THAB zone at these


No Change
properties-they are located within 250m of LC zone. The
retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at these


No Change
properties-they are located within 250m of LC zone. The
retention of the zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect
to the RPS.

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

THAB

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. This site is affected by flooding
constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is the most
appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the SH zone
and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change
it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Meet Criteria

THAB

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2614

839-2726

839-4036

839-602

839-1038

839-2725

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Retain Terrace
24A Norcross
Housing and
Avenue
Apartment Buildings Henderson
at 24A NORCROSS
AVENUE. Henderson.

Henderson

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 30A MILLBROOK
ROAD. HendersonSunnyvale.

30A Millbrook
Road Henderson

Henderson

Rezone
40D,40C,40B,40A,
JAMES LAURIE
STREET, Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Urban to Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

40D,40C,40B,40A, Henderson
JAMES LAURIE
STREET,
Henderson

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at
46Q,46P,46R,46M,46
L,46N,46H,46K,46J,46
E,46D,46G,46F,46A,4
6C,46B, MILLBROOK
ROAD, HendersonSunnyvale.

46Q,46P,46R,46M Henderson
,46L,46N,46H,46K
,46J,46E,46D,46G,
46F,46A,46C,46B,
MILLBROOK
ROAD, HendersonSunnyvale

Retain Mixed Housing 4B,4C,4A, JAMES


Urban at 4B,4C,4A,
LAURIE STREET,
JAMES LAURIE
Henderson
STREET, Henderson.

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 4A MILLBROOK
ROAD. HendersonSunnyvale.

Henderson

4A Millbrook Road Henderson


Henderson

PAUP ZONE

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

MHU

THAB

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

THAB

THAB

MHU

THAB

REASONS

1180

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m of LC zone. The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Support

THAB

Support

Do not support change of zone from MHU to THAB


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No Change

Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified MHU zone at this property- No Change


it is located within 250m walking distance of a THAB
zone. The retention of the zone is the most appropriate
way to achieve the objectives of the MHU zone and
givess effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change
it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3317

839-2631

839-356

839-589

839-3083

839-3725

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 61A, VIEW


61A View Road
ROAD, Henderson
Henderson
from Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Henderson

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 9A KERERU
STREET. Henderson.

9A Kereru Street
Henderson

Henderson

Retain Metropolitan
Centre at 11,9,
MONTEL AVENUE,
Henderson.

9, 11 Montel
Avenue
Henderson

Retain Terrace
Housing and
Apartment Buildings
at 16, WILSHER
CRESCENT,
Henderson.

16 Wilsher
Crescent
Henderson

Rezone 29, CORBAN


AVENUE,45, BRUCE
MCLAREN ROAD,
Henderson from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

29 Corban Avenue Henderson


and 45 Bruce
Mclaren Road,
Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

PAUP ZONE

SH

THAB

MC

THAB

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

THAB

THAB

MC

THAB

MHU

REASONS

1181

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support change of zone from SH to THAB - the property is THAB


located close to a RFN and will enable intensification in
the neighbourhood. The change of zoning to THAB is the
most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the
THABzone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change
it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Support retention of notified MC zone - these properties No Change


are within 250m walking distance of the Henderson Rail
Station, they will enable intensification in the area that is
appropriate and is in close proximity to community
facilities and large open space areas. The retention of the
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MC zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified THAB zone at this property- No Change
it is located within 250m of MC zone. The retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the THAB zone and gives effect to the RPS.

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

THAB

Support

THAB

Support

MC

Support

THAB

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Rezone 29, WILSHER 29 Wilsher


CRESCENT,
Crescent
Henderson from
Henderson
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Henderson

Rezone 43, WILSHER 43 Wilsher


CRESCENT,
Crescent
Henderson from
Henderson
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Henderson

SH

THAB

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. This site No Change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS..

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria
839-2873

Henderson

SH

THAB

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB. This site No Change


is affected by flooding constraints and retaining the
notified SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve
the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS..

THAB

Oppose

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4047

839-1139

839-775

839-4046

839-3639

839-7504

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 51A, BRUCE


MCLAREN ROAD,
Henderson from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

51A Bruce
Mclaren Road
Henderson

Retain Single House


at 69, PARRS CROSS
ROAD,1, HOLDENS
ROAD, Henderson.

69, PARRS CROSS Henderson


ROAD,1 HOLDENS
ROAD, Henderson

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Retain Single House 2 Andelko Place


at 2, ANDELKO PLACE, Henderson
Henderson.

Rezone 2, TARANUI
PLACE,47, BORDER
ROAD, Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Henderson

PAUP ZONE

1182

Henderson

2, TARANUI
Henderson
PLACE,47 BORDER
ROAD, Henderson

Rezone 3,5, GARELJA 3, 5 Garelja Road


ROAD, Henderson
Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Henderson

Rezone 3 OHIRA
3 Ohira Place
PLACE. Henderson
Henderson
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Henderson

Rezone 3 TARANUI
PLACE. Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Henderson

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

MHU

Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change


is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change
is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context. The site is not within 250m
walking distance from any THAB or MU zone or RFN
route, bus station or train station.

No Change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No Change

SH

Support

SH

Support

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meet Criteria
839-7455

839-7440

Henderson

Henderson

3 Taranui Place
Henderson

Rezone 4 ANDELKO 4 Andelko Place


PLACE. Henderson
Henderson
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

Henderson

MHS

SH

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No Change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. This site is also affected by a
flooding constraint and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives SH

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-1042

839-7629

839-254

839-4089

839-4087

839-1142

839-1138

839-2391

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

PAUP ZONE

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
175,173,169,
HENDERSON VALLEY
ROAD,4,6, BORDER
ROAD, Henderson.

175,173,169,
Henderson
HENDERSON
VALLEY ROAD,4,6,
BORDER ROAD,
Henderson

MHS

Rezone 4
HINDMARSH STREET.
Henderson from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Single House
at 4, STYCA PLACE,
Sunnyvale.

4 Hindmarsh
Henderson
Street Henderson

SH

Rezone 4,6,
TAREMARO PLACE,
Henderson from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone
11,13,15,21,17,23,19,
5,7,9, TAREMARO
PLACE, Henderson
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Retain Single House
at 10,12,6, MISTY
VALLEY DRIVE,
Henderson.

4, 6 Taremaro
Place Henderson

Retain Single House


at 92,94,94A, PARRS
CROSS ROAD,8,6,
STARFORTH PLACE,
Henderson.

92,94,94A, PARRS Henderson


CROSS ROAD,8,6,
STARFORTH
PLACE, Henderson

SH

Retain Single House


at 6 STYCA PLACE.
Sunnyvale.

6 Styca Place
Sunnyvale

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHU

REASONS

1183

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified MHS zone at these


No Change
properties - they do not meet the locational principles of
THAB and MHU and are located within a contiguous block
of other MHS zoned properties. The retention of the zone
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the MHS zone and givess effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because No Change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Support

MHU

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
4 Styca Place
Sunnyvale

Henderson

Henderson

SH

SH

SH

MHS

Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change


is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because No Change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

SH

Support

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

11,13,15,21,17,23 Henderson
,19,5,7,9,
TAREMARO
PLACE, Henderson

SH

10,12,6, MISTY
VALLEY DRIVE,
Henderson

SH

Henderson

Henderson

MHS

SH

SH

SH

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. These sites are affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change
is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change
is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change
is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

MHS

Oppose

Meet Criteria

SH

Support

SH

Support

SH

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-2965

839-3385

839-453

839-3234

839-7579

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone 7,
CHISLEHURST STREET,
Henderson from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 7, LENDIC
AVENUE, Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

7 Chislehurst
Henderson
Street Henderson

Retain Single House


at 9, BORICH ROAD,
Sunnyvale.

9 Borich Road
Sunnyvale

Rezone 9, WALLY
NOLA PLACE,
Henderson from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 10 LANDOW
PLACE. Henderson
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

9 Wally Nola Place Henderson


Henderson

Rezone 11, SOLEA


ROAD, Sunnyvale
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11 Solea Road
Sunnyvale

Retain Single House


at 11, STYCA PLACE,
Sunnyvale.

11 Styca Place
Sunnyvale

Rezone 11,13,15,
TARANUI PLACE,
Henderson from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

11, 13, 15 Taranui Henderson


Place Henderson

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

1184

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose
Meet Criteria

7 Lendic Avenue
Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

MHS

SH

SH

MHU

SH

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No Change

Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change


is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because No Change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

SH

Support

MHS

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meet Criteria
10 Landow Place
Henderson

Henderson

SH

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

839-3274

839-921

839-4045

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

MHS

SH

SH

MHU

SH

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No Change

Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change


is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

SH

Support

MHS

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

No Change

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4091

839-3822

839-4071

839-1133

839-3780

839-1135

839-2887

839-3828

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

Rezone 12,14,
FOREST HILL ROAD,
HendersonWaiatarua from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Rezone 12, NEWHAM
PLACE, Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION
12, 14 Forest Hill
Road Henderson

LOCALITY

Henderson

PAUP ZONE

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

REASONS

1185

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria
12 Newham Place Henderson
Henderson

Rezone 11,13,
11, 13 Benita
BENITA PLACE,
Place Sunnyvale
Sunnyvale from
Single House to
Terrace Housing and
Apartment Buildings.

Henderson

MHS

SH

Retain Single House


at
14,22,16A,16B,16C,8,
POSA AVENUE,
Henderson.

14,22,16A,16B,16 Henderson
C,8, POSA
AVENUE,
Henderson

SH

Rezone 14,
SILVERSTONE PLACE,
Henderson from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Retain Single House
at 15A,15,17,
APPLEWOOD DRIVE,
Henderson.

14 Silverstone
Place Henderson

SH

15A,15,17,
Henderson
APPLEWOOD
DRIVE, Henderson

SH

Rezone 15, COBURG


STREET, Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

15 Coburg Street
Henderson

MHS

Henderson

MHU

THAB

SH

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No Change

Do not support change of zone from SH to THAB because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. This site is also affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the notified SH zone is
the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change
is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because No Change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

THAB

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meet Criteria

SH

Support

MHS

Oppose
Meet Criteria

Henderson

Rezone 15, IMPERIAL 15 Imperial Place Henderson


PLACE, Henderson
Henderson
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

SH

MHU

MHS

Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change


is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

SH

Support

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

No Change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meet Criteria

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-3178

839-805

839-2889

839-2964

839-109

839-1041

839-967

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

Rezone 15, SPODE


15 Spode Place
PLACE, Henderson
Henderson
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

LOCALITY

Henderson

PAUP ZONE

SH

Retain Mixed Housing 16, 18, 20 Border Henderson


Suburban at
Road Henderson
18,20,16, BORDER
ROAD, Henderson.

MHS

Rezone 17, BORDER


ROAD, Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

17 Border Road
Henderson

MHS

Rezone 19,
SILVERSTONE PLACE,
Henderson from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.
Retain Single House
at 19, STARFORTH
PLACE, Henderson.

19 Silverstone
Place Henderson

Retain Mixed Housing


Suburban at
24,26,48,22,46,32,30,
28,36,40,34,46A,
BORDER ROAD,36,
TABITHA CRESCENT,
Henderson.

24,26,48,22,46,32 Henderson
,30,28,36,40,34,4
6A, BORDER
ROAD,36,
TABITHA
CRESCENT,
Henderson

MHS

Retain Single House


at 22, MISTY VALLEY
DRIVE, Henderson.

22 Misty Valley
Drive Henderson

SH

Henderson

Henderson

SH

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHS

MHS

MHU

MHS

REASONS

1186

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context. This site is also affected by
flooding constraints and retaining the the notified SH
zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and give effect to the RPS.
Do not support retention of MHS zone and support out of SH
scope change from MHS to SH. This site is affected by
flooding constraints and amending the zone from MHS to
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. See
Attachment F.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
No Change
because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context..

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

MHS

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Oppose

Meet Criteria

MHS

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meet Criteria
19 Starforth Place Henderson
Henderson

Henderson

SH

SH

MHS

SH

Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change


is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
I support the retaining of the MHS zone at 34, 36, 40, 46, SH
46A, 48 Border Road and 36 Tabitha as the retention of
the zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the MHS zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do I do not support the retaining of the MHS zone at 22,
24, 26, 28, 30 and 32 Border Road and consider a out of
scope zoning change to SH. These sites are affected by
flooding constraints and amending the zone from MHS to
SH zone is the most appropriate way to achieve the
objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. See
Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change
is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.

SH

Support

MHS

Oppose

SH

Support

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review and
scale of site being submitted on. Furthermore, consider
site flooding constraints can be managed by appropriate
development controls (again, particularly on a site of this
scale / redevelopment opportunity)

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-4041

839-4040

839-3300

839-7503

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

Rezone
23 Coburg Street
25,39,27,23,45,43,41, Henderson
49, COBURG STREET,
Henderson from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Henderson

Rezone 23A,23,
GARELJA ROAD,
Henderson from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Rezone 24, LENDIC
AVENUE, Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

Henderson

23, 23A Garelja


Road Henderson

PAUP ZONE

MHS

REQUESTED
ZONE

MHU

REASONS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

1187

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

No Change

MHU

Oppose
Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support
the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

24 Lendic Avenue Henderson


Henderson

MHS

MHS

Rezone 25 FARWOOD 25 Farwood Drive Henderson


DRIVE. Henderson
Henderson
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.

SH

Rezone 26, COBURG


STREET, Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

MHS

MHU

MHU

MHU

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No Change

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No Change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

MHU

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meet Criteria
839-2903

839-2962

Henderson

Henderson

26 Coburg Street
Henderson

Henderson

Rezone 27, HINERAU 27 Hinerau Street Henderson


STREET, Henderson Henderson
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Retain Single House


at 27, MISTY VALLEY
DRIVE, Henderson.

SH

MHU

MHS

Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU


because spot zoning in this location will not generally
achieve integrated management of resources and does
not recognise local context.

No Change

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose

MHS

Oppose

Site considered to meet proximity criteria - do not support


the conclusion of spot zoning as fails to consider the
Corporation's submission for wider zoning review

Meet Criteria
839-971

Henderson

27 Misty Valley
Drive Henderson

Henderson

SH

Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change


is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS. This site is
affected by flooding constraints and amending the zone
from MHS to SH zone is the most appropriate way to
achieve the objectives of the SH zone and gives effect to

SH

Support

Attachment C

SUB
POINT

839-519

839-2968

Linzey Lindenberg

TOPIC

Henderson

Henderson

SUMMARY

Retain Single House


at 28, FARWOOD
DRIVE, Henderson.

PROPERTIES
SUBJECT TO
SUBMISSION

LOCALITY

28 Farwood Drive Henderson


Henderson

PAUP ZONE

SH

Rezone 28, HINERAU 28 Hinerau Street Henderson


STREET, Henderson Henderson
from Single House to
Mixed Housing
Suburban.

SH

Rezone 28
SILVERSTONE PLACE.
Henderson from
Single House to
Mixed Housing
Urban.
Retain Single House
at 29, BORICH ROAD,
Sunnyvale.

28 Silverstone
Place Henderson

SH

Retain Single House


at 29, STARFORTH
PLACE, Henderson.

29 Starforth Place Henderson


Henderson

Rezone 30, COBURG


STREET, Henderson
from Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.

30 Coburg Street
Henderson

Rezone 30, 28
GARELJA ROAD.
Henderson from
Mixed Housing
Suburban to Mixed
Housing Urban.
Retain Single House
at 30, PINE
AVENUE,31,31A,
PARRS CROSS ROAD,
Henderson.

28, 30 Garelja
Road Henderson

REQUESTED
ZONE

SH

MHS

REASONS

1188

PROPOSED
ZONE CHANGE

Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change


is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from SH to MHS because No Change
spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

Housing NZ
Alignment with
Position on Council's position
Zoning - based
on 081

SH

Support

MHS

Oppose

Summary of Reasons - See evidence for further


explanation of these reasons

Meet Criteria
839-7916

839-144

839-1522

839-3366

839-7546

839-1140

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

MHU

Do not support change of zone from SH to MHU because No Change


spot zoning in this location will not generally achieve
integrated management of resources and does not
recognise local context.

MHU

Oppose
Meet Criteria

29 Borich Road
Sunnyvale

30, 31, 31A Pine


Avenue
Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

Henderson

SH

SH

MHS

MHS

SH

SH

SH

MHU

MHU

SH

Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change


is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Support retention of notified SH zone at this property - it No Change
is located in a serviced suburban area and part of a large
contiguous block of other SH zoned properties. Retention
is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of
the SH zone and gives effect to the RPS.
Do not support change of zone from MHS to MHU
because spot zoning in th

You might also like