Auckland Transport = ‘An Auckland Counc! Opansation Project Mandate Papakura Park and Ride ‘Type e document rum ee 1 August 2016- Version 10 a)Change History and Approval ‘Anproval ices an understanding of te purpose and conten descrbedin this document. By ‘ining tis document each indi agree work shoul be ited on ts peect and necessary ‘resources sould be commited ae described heh OF August 2016 | Revision Status 0 Os ag 2016 Incorporating 0 Caauhou eotack 0 08 Aut 2016 Ireepondoncy wth Papua ton gating rated oa oe Agua 2016 | Footoack rom Sigh os 00 Apia 2016 | Mire nd oadbock tom varcia overs 10 emp 2016 Peprved sueContents. 1 Background (Problem / Opportunity. 4 2 Strategie Fi. : 4 3 Seriousness and Urgency. 2 4 a 5 3 6 4 1 5 8 6 9 Project Roles. 6 40 Relevant Documentation eT 11 Timing and Coat 7 42 Qualty Expectations 13 Project Tolerance on‘Auckland ‘Transport: 1 Background (Problem / Opportunity) ‘Auckland is airoady facing ruption ote stele rod network and oly cere set ewok, and this willortine over coming years. With this oreased Gerupton Is Imperative to increase cy centre access by pubic anspor (PT). Parc ara Ride PR) ‘ignicanterivr of patonage on the Rapid Transport Network (RTA). Pepekurs has been Ident as a pony ste fran hereare in Pn capac 1s already at capac and thee fs conscerabi lator mand, 2 Strategic Fit Por isa key crivor of RTN patronage; formal Pa generates around 10% of RTN patronage ‘and theres significant overow in many PAR locals. A recent survey showed fr instance, ‘hat 32% of moming peak car avast Albany parked on-veot duo to lak of aralable PaR spaces ‘There strong algnment between Auckland Transports strategic themes and imarving Pn capaciy *+Priortise rapid, high frequency public tranepor Pr isan iri pt of the PT system suportng RT and ery services. ‘+ Transform and elevate the customer experince: Customer experiere curenty frosted by ink of capac ‘+ Bulld network optimisation and resiionce: Supporting RTN services and bulls more restenc noth vansport network by removing vehi frm congested roads (4.000 Pr bays are approximately equivalent to are moto ne a sa. Regioral PT Plan 2015 oR is detaled 28 one of a number of publ Yanspert improvement projets and a key ‘comport of an tegratesnetwerk (Ch 8 Implementation), Regioral Land Transport Plan 2018-2025 CConsutatonhighighted the strong publ support for grester Pa capac. Papekura sone of the fou printy Po feces that are proposed in thors tree years of he RLTP (102). Inthe rrtsed st of transport projects, a PR facity at Papakura i ranked #50 out ofa ‘rancpart projects wih an AT profile of High / Meum gh HMH (p76), PoR at Papakurs forms pat of the publsed Accslratod Transport Programe targeted Parking Strategy 2015 ‘A Po at Paoakura has ston algnment wih adopt prindples of where fo ect fture ‘apacty in Auckind. This i 1 maximise decongeston and patronage bene of ftirefee 2 Draft TP 2015: The primary strategic Benet (based on tho ITP v2 Investment Loge Map) thatthe new Pepekura Park and Ride supers include: 4. Botte use of transprt investment - supports the siglcant mprovement inal services atonage by increasing soess to PT service, 2. Increased access toa wiser range of qualy affordable transport choles ~ encourages commuters to use the RIN services by providing car based access, serving the large tatchment tthe south of Papekars {4 Auctanas anspor system moves people and goode eceny ~an extended PaR wil be able to Interop more single ootupant car travel, reducing downstream vale ‘congestion on SH dung peak vavel ‘The sratoge ft assessment or the Papakura Po ated a¢ Madum (eer abe below), 791 Pok at Re settee 3 Seriousness and Urgency ‘Auctan s expected to face creasing dsrpton in coming years a sgifean construction Projects are commenced, mest notably: + Gty conto under constucton over next 6 years due to Cty Ral Link and private bung investment ‘+ Stniieant eruption on th Northern, Nort. Westem and Souther motorways cu to widening ard ipeoverents. ‘To mii the effects of he carupton its Imperative to inerease cy conve acess by PT, ‘and in gareular the RT. When compared wih ther congeston mitgaton matheds, PMR is Davicullyefecve atthe perphery ofthe RTNVFTN network where alternatives aa Kod ‘oF fest cot o delve.ie S 4 Objectives “This Project Mandate propos the ceiver of@ PnR extension at Papakre ta wl Provide for approximately 200 adstonal bys athe curent se, ‘Be empl by 30 Jr 2017 Be delivered at total capital costo 45m, Be delivered vis ight eight prefabricated ste! structure that sproven in simise oba parking envronments, wth amirimum fe of 30 years 5 Scope Pepsku vain station hs two existing PoRlacatone an onthe westem se of the racks on AT land (18-22 Radway Sveet West), the ober onthe easorn sce anand hased to AT ‘tom KiwiRa (accent to Ran Kest Drive). The easton sl isthe peoed locaton for he Par du toto key factors: +The natwalopogrephy of the land onthe easter se wit th road beng potently Ales foo evel of sboctrebulon he exiting Pr sie (eee Fa 2), ‘+The town conze zoning an the west sde permis higher and beter us, Le tis more ely 0 be sable fog hous Joven en a a2 bectigEasem oR Intel advice suggests the ste onthe eastern sido is eubject to Kiwral Delgration 6302 in {the Untay Pian for ratway purposes. The underyng zone i for Strategic Transport Cott dori options ince: 1. An olin olan of werks (OPW) depending onthe scope of deignaten to cover ata buléing and Kia agreement or 2, Arestrte cseretonary resource consent ‘The main se ae tke tobe trae gneration the rts rontage cots and toa lesser extent, desigr/appearance. Stormwaordscharge consent would be requred and torrwater ‘management measures provided erie. Pending the operative Un Pan, he aly eevant‘Auckland ‘Transport velopment contl is Height ~ fOm within 50m of residential or 20n beyond thi (60 loate ‘ay fom any resident, The projects need to: 1. Contem sutabity ofthe proposed st fra we-tree storey lehwelght prefabricated asking suc 2. Intate procurement fr, ane award, a deslgn and construct canvact. Gen that the fur the ral ne may be elected south of Papakura, should be note thal thee Ise preference for any structure to be emcurabe, so that thes the potent be relecsted at some point in the ute 3. Arange the nocessary conser and permits 4 5, ‘Commasion the POR extension In dion, the appevod Board resolution nots at “Once the proposed additional PR capacty is dolvered 2 nominal charge wil be re Inreduced fo cover the marginal operating, maintenance, an secur cost. Tho level a the Charge wilde clscussed ard agreed with te Papakura Local Board, who are expected o be “supportive, and wil be monitored fo ensure that thas no dtmental fet on uleaton” In order o achiev the Board resolution, the projet wl need o work wih a number f stakeholders {0 determine te lool of charge: whthor this levied across all PR spaces at Papakura oy ust he ‘ew capacty beitg added and, the mechansm for payment. The Board hes noted that ‘commuricatens ine aspect othe project wil be prtclar'y port. 6 Stakeholders STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT Seat Projet Sponsor AT Me Specs operational requronens a6 tay relate 16 public ‘serene Spucies operation! requiem 8 Fane ‘Speco lvl of hang an paymant meson Popo ea Boars opresente Wows of me commu, ha pene ano PageAuckland Ss STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT Naa Pott nang paer Nz Poice correo jes Manaper_ for Papahur | Enauinginerdeerdencion baton the imo pros we Seley: camry and aet Con | manage ond on pel oncore's sere 7 Interfaces The agrood TOR for Park and Ree management and develope canbe found 20 anaes a Re 207 4 ox Fiowe 3 rom be TOR sunmarses the rls andresponsbies of AT dopartents: Park and Ride artes and spots as Sigeponel emt Pages‘Auckland Transport “The primary infofaces within AT lo finalise the Projet Mandate for projet handover from Seategy are: AT Meto's role as project sponsrient, confiming the proect scope and ‘peratira ifr train srvces and new bus serves. * Intasructre Divisions role in project delivery, In alton the folowing interfaces are considered important otis eject + Propeny and Pang ~ Ste sulaily, contents and pets, ngaoing KR lease + Procurenan ~Assaséng mart deveoping Pocirement Pian: deebpig ané rng EP avrg contact + Commune ~Ensring that AT ops any reduction of hrs. {AT Franc ~ Nanogng capex wen 1617 furdng envelope agg wih pte uaa bares, spcting vel of har ae peymant mech + Lesa does Senses ising wi Papare Loa Board 8 Constraints ‘Experience in New Zeatand wih these types of prefabricated parking sucess ited an [AT nas no experte inthe el t's mporian tat AT recovers independent vio fe ensure {hat ary solulonshosen ft fx purpose and cost eectve. lis iertore osommended thet the project engage the servcet of specialist engineering coneutant forthe RFP evelopment end evaluation Adena iss tat have been ented include: “+ Urban design: Profabcatod parking stuctures ae typical functond by the natu, ‘This may resut n requests fo sere te aructure wh pring or onde apace ‘The Untiry Plan recommendations on PAR state 2 "rovce approprias screening onthe fa¢ace of sny bung eo vehicles are ‘Bt vail rom the public rears ¢ Proves an atracivemieroce this inces TP Haitaning active foniage Bough seevng andi an intresting ‘appearance ‘+ Teale: No ratte modeling has boon completes fortis ste 1 Ste condions J gectec: Whi prefabreatod stuciures do not normally require ‘raion funda, they do equre a sold platform and ground coors, Some (g2otech information is avalale fom KiwRal, Howove, te exnt of this and ‘Stabity has not been investigated ‘+ KewiRa lease Erecting @ stucture requires approval of Kia. “his has not yet boon soup ‘+ Tao Papakura Ral Staion Softy, socurty and manual cketcontols roec = taaked wih éetverng enhanced gating of Papakura ston during 17/8. Ths may Impact ion the design and locaton of any PrP extension, 9 Project Roles The Project Tear i proposed io comps:fiucktend ROLE NAME Projet Spenser ‘hrs organ ‘Serio Super Hash Sh Senor ears Ton Raberthaw, Reymond Sil & Soot Ee Projet Manger boa Hons Peer Pati Sut Propeny Operations Seon Coot Cer poe iewnimenbes [TEC 10 Relevant Documentation + Park and Rid Posty Sts: Papa presenas to and approved bye closed Bord session 28 July 206: ‘ 11 Timing and Cost Estimated ring for compton of major acti i flow: Procurement 3 months ~SepiOetNov 2016 Design and rae assessment 2 months -NowDec 2016 Manufacture and Ship: 2 months ~ Madr 2017 + Resource consent: 2-3 months ~ DecilanFeb 2017 ‘Assombly:1 month~ May 201712 13 Transport == ‘+ Commissioning: June 2017 The costs can be summarised in he table below PHASE sscosts |counce |nzta | Esrimare | BUDGET |SuBsioy | AccURAcY ‘APPROVED | APPROVED ‘DESIGN AND son sam rec stare ConsteucT ‘BASED UPON PREWARREY ENGAGEMENT wine PorewnaL SUPPUER PRovecr cosr-wHoLe | MANTENANCE crore” ESTIMATED AT Sskor GAPITAL cost x | "Note also that Papakura Local Board hes agreed in rnp to cntbusng ve to $800,000 of Local Board funding, subject to AT providing cetals of what the funding il be spectcaly ses for, and formal confirmation by the Local Board. The project wil need 1 female thi in prnaple commitment Quality Expectations ‘The PoR fact detvered needs to comply with minimum standards and design pines cuties in Aucklana Transpo’s ATCOP/Trangpot esi Maral Project Tolerances The Project Manager be requed trae an exception repo + Project outun costs re projected to be mare than 5% over budget, ‘Commision is expected tobe later than 20 June 2017. ‘+ The numberof atonal bas able tobe Dui es than 85% ofthe 30 bay target +The acy cannot comply with any of AT's minum standards and design pencils.