BETH DIN ZEDEK KEDUSHAS LEVI 21 Rita A venue Monsey, NY 10952
April 7, '08
This is to stat.;:: that Mr. Israel Meir Kin has deposited a Get at our beth din, on behalf of Lonna Kin his wife. He hM thus removed on behalf of his wife all religious bat'ri,er'$ within his power and control.
From: 3239361565
Page: 5/9 Date: 5/3/200912:03:14 PM
From: 3239361565
Page: 111 Date: 3/10/200912:11:51 PM
.",." W'aft "'"" • .," ,..".
THE UNION OF ORTHODOX RASBIS OF THE UNITeD STATES AND CANAOA 235 EAST BROADWAY
NEW YORK, N.Y.10D02
it'll.
From: 3239361565
Page: 6/9
Date: 5/3/200912:03:15 PM
RAD1J.lNICAL COURT EVEN HAMISHlPOT P,O •. Box 745 Mm:n'l~·N.V.109li2
1"1Y 11, 11'" OD'D~n1:l~
.1.j itlj~
Feb.28~2005
Mrs. L. Kin 10 Jay Ct. Monsey NY
Please be advised that Mr. M. Kin does not agree to appear in front of the Beis Din Agudas Ha(aoorum. His choice is a Beis Din of Zablo V'Zablo. When the two patties can't agree on a selection of a Beis Din, one may select the fomm of Zablo, Please inform us as to your reply to this matter.
Be advised that Mr. Kin protests YOW' forcing him to appear in the civil courts, and the fact that he refuses to appear in. front of Agudas harobonim does not give you a Heter (permissionjaecording f.o Jewish Law to take him to eivil courts. ITl the future, if and when this mstter appears before a Beis Din, h~ will hold you accountable for expenses incurred to him as a result
Additionally, be advised that in no way can you obtain a Get from the civil courts, and eventually if you desire a Jewish Getj you will need to a.ppE:lU' in front of a. Beds Din.
You may leave a message at the above telephone numbers.
I am, wrf,titlg this letter because Mr. M, Kin advised me thnt he is being accused of violating the gag order j ssued by the court.
Please be advised that as Mr. M. Kin was seeking invclvment of the Beth Din with :regard. to his marriage difficultks prior to the courts gag order, and in the course of those dealings, he has advised me sometime in the begining of March 2005 that he: h~ belen issued a gag order not to discuss any matter regarding any custndy issues with any Rabbis, J asked him to show me pl"oof of same, to which he has submitted the transcript of the court proceedings. At no time or occasion did he discuss with me or My other Rabbi in our Rabbinical Court [after aeking them] any d10ltails or episodes regadlng those children, oraly or in written forth. It is 3 prohibition of Jewish Law to discuss any imformation ex parte. I therefore state that Beth Oin'l3 involvement was only to arrange a session. with the parties, which is Obligatory according to Jewish Law. Should you wish to talk to me in person, I will be available on Friday morning the 1 st of April
to appear in your courtroom upon short notice,
Respectfully,
"..
rtJtV }) ~~JlI
Rabbi Moshe Gobioff
Dayan
From: 3239361565
Page: 9/9
Date: 5/3/200912:03:16 PM
2 Chesbvan 6767 (Oct. 21.i 2006)
To \1\f1101'1i It May Concern:
\f\le tile undtiiJrsigned RabMnini AI-e aW8r0') of the. f:iilcts of the Dhlo:-ce prcceedlnqs involvillg Mr
8,Mrs Kfn.
Here are thE~ facts:
.. Mrs Kin began diltOl-ce pmG6edings in The Sl.Ipl-e(l"'te court on Dec 2004. il'The circumstances behind the divorce are not the ·~@lIit of Mt" K.in
",Mrs K.in was called to 1110~ Bais Din EW)Il j·-larniSIIDot 311(1 hed refused to appear in front o·f this BElie Din but
"illstead chose 10 proceed to the F~rni!y COI.Jl"l: and obtain an Order Of Protection whicli specifically
prol"] ib lted
"'MI- l<:infl"om reveali\1£j certain p~rtinent facts to Ftabbonim Linder tile pen9fty of j.:lili:ime, The Bais Din Even
~1'8mishoot wrole her ~ lett®r ,,:mel re:questeclller 1-8n')Ov;..")I of such an order since it is halanhBcally forbidden
~to prevent a persNl from speakillg freelll in front d a Bf:tis Din .
.,Mrs I<in d,id not remove til is order 81le! in facl' filer) pmceedings in The Family Court to punish Mr I<in for
~havilig spoken to tile 88is Din ,~S0.irLlI! 1/iI:,~S eventl.lally written by the above Bali'S Din for th~ tack of appearance
"'8S well as for preventing ~,Jjl- Kin to eXprE\8S himsdf :::-eely ill front of ANY 8als Dill.
lIl!\tlrs I<ill then prC1ceeded to contact Ral1his ill 8rooklYil to force Mr Kin to gl\1e her a Ge.t. She used unscrupolous
~lI1ethods,w!lic..h lncluded: iSSl..d';)Q a fi"aur.iulr",nl seirl.'v;;;:ll'ranging fa:- a demonstration in fmnl' of MI' l<il1'8 emplovrnent
which ultiIl18tE:ll~1 casted him 11i5 job, pE~ti:-;Ol'lillg the. Supreme Court (0 dismiss the entire CBB0. after dragging him
to COIJft 'rol- 21 months.and filJl1g fals0 atl:~HTlpteri kirlnsppil1g charf16S.
The above 'facts are all I/NiFiable, and I,e 1185 tl113 documents to prove thern.Unfortunately,Mrs Kill's continued
narrassment of Mr Kin had been o\lerwh",1 miri~\, 2111("1 force.d Ilim I'() relocate to another state 1:0 avoid tlre(fe i"6isntless
punislling acts ,and to provide parnasa tor his childr~.::Il(amPlZinglv her "former 11usli8nd also hac! to flep. to avoid til is
type of persecutiOn.)i\ddition~Jljy,on Mo1.2.ei Rosh H::'Isi1an8,Mi" l<in had made E fair ane! sub~~tantiClI offer to end
this matter C)uid<1\f.Tliis offel- W38 mC"ll"~ than fair on I'i.s part,and even inciu(jed a Get. Mrs Kin 11Ad refusedthls offer.
\J\!fE! r:he, ImC\er~,ignetJ,therE:'fol-e pmcl~lrn that 1\1l1" Me.:i;- h-:il1 has already trie.d tQ his best aL')ilil'y to
i)l-ing this !Tretter .
r~\ to an end,Bnd it was MI·s Kin tl'.ilt has CCinlil~:)~rJi:rJ cl81ay tilE Dil/Cll-ce iii the. Supl-el1le CourU'!: is our
.. ,I 3' hope. tl'let Mrs Kin
~7' /'tf\\o,WW come to h~r ?8IlS:3S 8nd end i::·tis matter ill :;! i'i!",::' A!le) 1~1';~IlI:.~cJ1!icl\ way,
( '-"I r " "1 i\
. r· I !<,J/:'J:ir-i.i\,;:··': :,:/' .~.",.l/ 1'\ _. r "'