Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
45Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Dell Lawsuit

Dell Lawsuit

Ratings: (0)|Views: 16,874 |Likes:
Published by mkrigsman
Lawsuit document describing alleged Dell efforts to hide faulty computers from customers.
Lawsuit document describing alleged Dell efforts to hide faulty computers from customers.

More info:

Published by: mkrigsman on Jun 29, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/24/2011

pdf

text

original

 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINAWESTERN DIVISIONNo 5:07-CV-426ADVANCED INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES,INC.Plaintiff,v.DELL, INC. and DELL FINANCIALSERVICES, INCDefendants.)))))))))
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW INOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTDELL’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Darren T. Kaplan (Admitted
Pro Hac Vice
) A. Bikash Roy, # 28382Chitwood, Harley, Harnes, LLP Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc.185 Great Neck Road, Suite 340 421 Maiden LaneGreat Neck, NY 11021 Fayetteville, NC 28301Tel: (516) 773-6090 Tel: (910) 321-1365Fax: (516) 706-0497 Fax: 910-321-1392GA State Bar No. 172670
Case 5:07-cv-00426-H Document 240 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 34
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
 
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW..........................................................................................II.
 
DELL IS NOT ENTITLED TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT BECAUSE DELL HASFAILED TO DEMONSTRATE THE ABSENCE OF GENUINE ISSUES OFMATERIAL FACT.........................................................................................................................III.
 
DELL IS NOT ENTITLED TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ANY LEGAL GROUNDBECAUSE DELL EITHER MISSTATES THE LAW OR FAILS TO INVOKE THE LAWAPPLICABLE ON THE FACTS OF THE CASE.........................................................................(a)
 
Dell’s argument that North Carolina’s “economic loss rule” bars AIT’s claims of fraudand under the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act misstates the law of NorthCarolina.(b)
 
Dell’s argument that the Uniform Commercial Code Limits AIT’s recovery of consequential damages for breach of limited warranties pursuant to warranty disclaimersmisstates the applicable law.(c)
 
Dell is not entitled to partial summary judgment on AIT’s UDTPA claims.IV.
 
DAMAGES.....................................................................................................................................(a) Plaintiff Has Sufficient Evidence To Support Its Claim for Damages for Breach of Contract Under Texas Law ..............................................................................................(b) Plaintiff Has Sufficient Evidence To Support Its Claim for Damages for Fraud and UnfairTrade Practices Under North Carolina Law.......................................................................(a)
 
The Briggs, Macomber, and Roberts Affidavits Set Forth Sufficient Evidence For A JuryTo Return A Verdict of Damages to AITV.
 
CONCLUSION...............................................................................................................................
i
 
Case 5:07-cv-00426-H Document 240 Filed 05/28/10 Page 2 of 34
 
 TABLE OF AUTHORITIESCASES
 
 Ada Liss Group (2003) v. Sara Lee Corp.
,No. 1:06CV610, 2009 WL 3241821 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2009)...............................................14
 Balderson-Berger Equip. Co. v. Blount 
,653 S.W.2d 902 (Tex. App. 1981) .............................................................................................16
 Bernard v. Cent. Carolina Truck Sales, Inc.
,68 N.C. App. 228, 314 S.E.2d 582 (N.C. App. 1984)................................................................24
 Bowen v. Bank 
,209 N.C. 140, 183 S.E. 266 (1936).............................................................................................25
 Bower v. Metro. Transit Auth. of Harris County
,No. 01-06-00553, 2007 WL 1299803 (Tex. App. May 3, 2007)................................................23
 Brecheisen v. James
,No. 07-01-0236, 2002 WL 31778667 (Tex. App. Dec 12, 2002)...............................................23
 Bussian v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
,411 F. Supp. 2d 614 (M.D.N.C. 2006).......................................................................................12
 Butcher v. DaimlerChrysler Co.
, LLC,No. 1:08cv207, 2008 WL 2953472 (M.D.N.C. July 29, 2008)..................................................12
 Byrd Motor Lines, Inc. v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.
,63 N.C. App. 292 (1983)............................................................................................................16
 Byrd's Lawn & Landscaping, Inc. v. Smith
,142 N.C. App. 371, 378 542 S.E.2d (N.C. App. 2001)..............................................................25
C.A. May Marine Supply Co. v. Brunswick Corp.
,649 F.2d (5th Cir. 1981).............................................................................................................23
Club Car Inc. v. Dow Chem. Co.
,06-CVS-15530, 2007 WL 2570088 (Mecklenberg County Sup. Ct. May 3, 2007)...................14
Coker v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
,01-CVS-1264, 2004 WL 32676 (Rowan County Sup. Ct. Jan. 5, 2004)....................................13
Coker v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
,172 N.C. App. 386 (2005) .........................................................................................................13
Curtis B. Pearson Music Co. v. Everitt 
,No. 08-1933, 2010 WL 707700 (4th Cir. Mar. 2, 2010).............................................................15
ii
 
Case 5:07-cv-00426-H Document 240 Filed 05/28/10 Page 3 of 34

Activity (45)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
mdalauddin1951 liked this
mdalauddin1951 liked this
sparklym liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->