Constitution Act, 1982

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and
democratic society.
3. Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in
an election of members of the House of Commons
2. Everyone has the following fundamental
or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for
freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and
membership therein.
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion
and expression, including freedom of the press 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security
and other media of communication; (c) freedom of the person and the right not to be deprived
of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of thereof except in accordance with the principles of
association. fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

The Federal Government enacted the Constitution Act, 1982 guaranteeing every individual
of Canada Charter Rights and Freedoms where it is ultimately their responsibility to structure a legal
system with competent irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to administer and enforce
the Law consistent with and conducive to the Constitution whereas the individual is the most precious
commodity and the very backbone of the Constitution where each individual is responsible to conform
and abide by the spirit of the Constitution, the supreme Law of Canada which recognizes the supremacy
of God establishing the spirit to be that of a moral society where it is incumbent upon each individual to
respect the equal rights of every individual in Canada.
The concept couldn’t be simpler; after all we are all human beings with the same needs to sustain life.

Do not do to others Do unto others

What you do not want done to yourself As you would have them do unto you

Recompense injury with justice, and recompense kindness with kindness

Credence must be given to that which is least likely to be mistaken by man

That’s it, too simple, eh? That’s the spirit of the Law and yet the administers and enforcers don’t get it

WHY?
Because they are human beings, that’s WHY. Ignorant human beings who refuse to grow up

Bully, gang like mentality, a phenomenon which takes over when people get together in numbers.

Members of the Law Society of Upper Canada and associates are behind it all.
The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Robert Nicholson is a major player

Ultimately the Prime Minister Stephen Harper is responsible and must be held accountable.
1
 How can such a miscarriage of justice be allowed to exist in a democracy where God is supreme?

I have presented evidence collected over 2 ½ years and the obvious analysis of it to the RCMP who have
to date November 27 2007 not been able to get their heads together as they have been caught up by the
befuddlement of circumstance as have we all.

When the obvious is not obvious there is something obviously wrong which happens to be the obvious.

The following is my analysis of the evidence and unbiased observation of the government personnel who
are mandated to administer and enforce the Law in Canada.
The story is true as are the facts which are to be found by clicking on link
http://guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms.googlegroups.com/web/Mad
%20Glad%20mostly%20Sad%20WHY.doc

This document is a digest of my quest for justice as per common sense and that defined as my guaranteed
right as a Canadian individual as provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms where many
obvious questions surfaced per circumstance providing obvious reason to investigate WHY I was not
getting the justice that belonged to me as per the guarantee granted me by the Federal Government in
1982.

The more I queried the more there was to query until eventually it became abundantly obvious the
government personnel at all levels of government didn’t give a damn about my individual guaranteed
Charter rights which culminated into one humungous WHY?

Sure, I was nobody special and far from it and a whole lot more annoying to the government
personnel because I refused to accept their indifferent attitude to my guaranteed rights.

Upon conversation and correspondence with various members of the York Regional Police fraud unit I
became aware that what has happened to me has happened over and over again to many others so much
so that the police have used their experience to determine what evidence and circumstance meets the
“threshold” to be able to proceed before the courts.

I found it somewhat discerning that two detectives I met with, Sgt. Fred Kerr and Cpl. George Rorke
stated that they could take similar evidence to a judge and one time a warrant will be granted and another
time denied and yet they didn’t bother taking my evidence for a warrant. They mentioned how often they
were frustrated by the courts and the immediate thought comes to mind as to why they are frustrated?
Are they just too ignorant to investigate the evidence to a proper conclusion or is it a problem with the
judge?
They also informed me I could take the matter to civil court but my lawyer would be negligent if he
didn’t inform me the odds of being reimbursed for my losses are slim.
Obviously if they felt they couldn’t get a warrant with many years experience dealing with the law my
chances was slim and foolish to throw good money after bad.

But wait a minute, what happened to my guarantee? My right not to be deprived. My equal right
to justice
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination
based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

I can not even begin to imagine where the evidence I provided was lacking because every base was
covered. What was this arbitrary “threshold”? Nobody would respond to me.

2
I persistently wrote the YRP until Insp. Michael Flemming agreed to meet with me where he remained
steadfast with the original decision but agreed with me that it didn’t make sense but that’s “How it is”
He offered that’s the first thing they learn when they become cops that the law has nothing to do with
common sense which I agreed at the time but after an analysis of all the evidence using common sense I
have come to know for fact that it is not the Law that has nothing to do with common sense but the
administers and enforcers of it who are estranged from reality.

Nobody wanted to give me a written report though as to why the YRP wouldn’t investigate but through
persistence of written requests for a response I received one from Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge who
responded January 10 2006 using that word “threshold” again. See Lawyer File # 9 pages 19 & 20

I have written a prodigious number of times since requesting some answers to obvious questions such as
the meaning of the term “threshold” in reference to my situation which fell short to commence
proceedings and other obvious questions referenced above to no avail.

I never heard from them again until September 6 2006 when Phil Moreau of the Standards Branch of the
YRP phoned and talked for an hour discussing the Black Book dated September 1 2006 which I had
faxed Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge on September 5 2006.
I wrote Phil Moreau immediately after he hung up recapping our conversation but he never responded

On October 10 2006 Karen Knoakes # 440 Executive Officer of Public Complaints responded with
typical inane rhetoric I have come to know which does not address the issues or answer my questions and
then directed me to the Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services should I not be satisfied with her
response.

I had 30 days from October 14 2006 the day I received it to do so but thought it a futile venture
presuming they would not address the issues or answer the questions either but after meeting with
Sergeant Randy Craig OPP Anti-Rackets on November 14 2006 and his decline to take a preponderance
of evidence I brought him for the OPP to review and some of the comments he made I realized I was into
one humongous government conspiracy. See Lawyer File # 8.

When I got home that day I decided to assemble the evidence to present to the Ontario Civilian
Commission on Police Services which I drove town to deliver the following day November 15 2006 with
just one day to spare to make the deadline of 30 days.

They did as expected routinely acknowledging they had reviewed the evidence without addressing it or
answering any of the obvious questions and cited me section so and so and the file is accordingly closed.
See Lawyer File # 10

All 15 Lawyer Files and others can be found on my web site http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-
law-society including the 2 Part Toronto Sun document which irrefutably proves the crimes were
committed and the various government agencies and departments and YRP were involved in the
conspiracy.

The evidence speaks for itself.

Of course it has yet to have the chance to speak to a legitimate capable investigative authority which acts
FFF with integrity conviction and fortitude consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights.
I have to admit the evidence doesn’t irrefutably prove the YRP and Commission are in on the conspiracy
but they are consistent with it and most certainly are inept to enforce the Law, the Constitution.

3
They are however persistently stubborn and ignorant as I have come to know the majority of government
personnel to be having spent 40 years in Legal Surveying beginning 10 years with the province and
ending with 14 years with the City of Toronto Property Management Surveys where I had joined them in
May 1990 leaving my manager position of a survey company in the private sector.

Government personnel tend to learn through observation and hand me downs acquiesced through time
generation to generation where they are reluctant to change not having full grasp as to what they are
actually intended to achieve. In matters of Law they can be huge pains in the asses as they can not relate
to anything other than “ this is how we’ve always done it” and they can at anytime produce a number of
well respected personnel to affirm their position.

In general I stood alone against them, me and the law that is which makes a decidedly huge difference
which I came to know early in my career.

I have no doubt the majority wanted to do what was right, they just didn’t know what was right and felt
comfort in numbers all believing they must be right because they have always done it this way or that.
It is somewhat exacerbating at times but you get use to their ignorance and eventually the word gets
around that I was right. I would never sign the notes unless I had investigated all the evidence thoroughly
and knew for a fact my final decision was consistent with the laws and every property owner got
precisely what they were entitled to by law.

I have had quite an extensive career and met all types and there was even the odd fool supervisor who
would tell me to change my notes and move a couple of survey stakes even after I pointed out a few
oversights. Just plain stubborn but after I realized he was not receptive to reasoning I would say okay
then you are the boss, and write a note in my report that so and so instructed me to do so and so against
my advice and demand he sign it. Always like the arrogant spoiled useless whatever they are off in a huff
and a puff and leave it my way, the right way according to law, common sense and according to the way
it was originally intended with everyone getting precisely what they bought and paid for.

So it’s not my first time at bat with such ignorance surrounding me but I must confess never has there
been so many against me but in the bye and bye it is the Law that counts and I am only the messenger.

Even though the incidences occurred in Ontario and the government personnel cited Ontario law which
they have come accustomed to and support each other in using them, they themselves are breaking the
Law, the supreme law of Canada where every individual is equal in all matters before and under the law
where
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

So inadvertently, through stubbornness, ignorance, incompetence and unwillingness to study the Law
or heed my writings have remained steadfast exactly where the conspirators wanted them adverse to the
spirit of the Law, the spirit of God and the spirit of the intended moral society to the benefit of the
immoral and the conspirators detrimental to the moral majority and their guaranteed Charter rights.

There is no readily available statistics for the numbers of victims caused by their ineptness to administer
and enforce the laws of Ontario consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed
rights nor is their any evidence of common sense being utilized by the various levels of administration
and enforcement as the evidence attests.

There is very convincing evidence of what I have come to know and stated of the government personnel.

4
 Common Sense Evolution

Please give your heads a shake, read carefully every word and think for God’s sake.

It is the immoral that is the enemy of the moral society promised by the Constitution
The guy without the evidence against him is definitely the good guy in any given case presented to you.

Ask yourselves how anyone can be expected to abide by the Law if it doesn’t make sense?

On page 1 I have copied some excerpts from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. What
is there that doesn’t make sense?

If the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada are not required to give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and these people administer and enforce the Law what are
the chances of an individual getting justice in their courts? Where’s the sense?

How can they be allowed to administer and enforce the Law inconsistently and adverse to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights? Where’s the sense?

If the Prime Minister is the legal representative of the people in the Constitution of Canada would
he not be obliged to ensure the government personnel are up to the challenge of administering and
enforcing the Law consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights
and Freedoms in respect of the people who elected him to represent them?

Who has more power than he and assuredly he has the eyes and ears of the media to do whatever it
takes to eradicate the government conspiracy against the people?

So having been provided the evidence why would he not use his authority for the people unless he
was in on the conspiracy?

Why would he enact the Federal Accountability Act if he didn’t know the government personnel
were irresponsible and unaccountable whereas all government personnel are responsible to do
their jobs as well as any person in the private sector?

Why wouldn’t they be held even more responsible and accountable when they are financed by the
people to do a most serious job which their lives, safety and well being are dependent on?

What chance does the individual have of accessing his individual guaranteed Charter rights when
the whole damn government doesn’t give a damn about the individual unless he finds a way to
organize the people in support?

Why should the individual need do anything other than submit his claim that his rights have been
compromised along with the evidence? After all he was guaranteed not to be deprived, Right?

What in hell kind of people are they who side with the immoral against the intended moral society?

Why wouldn’t the government be required to demonstrate due diligence to putting a modus
operandi in place consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights?

5
Why do you suppose lawyers and politicians are low on the trust list and do you see any reason at
all they should be trusted?

Who in the Federal Government is responsible to back the guarantee of the individual’s Charter
rights If not the Prime Minister who appoints the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of
Canada?

The Prime Minister appointed Mary Dawson as Commissioner of Ethics and Conflict of Interest
and Louis Theoret as Federal Ombudsman of Victims of Crime and Stockwell Day as Minister of
Public Safety and Vic Toews as President of the Treasury…formerly Minister of Justice. Right?

I am thinking he has great influence in the government goings on….Doncha Think?

Why does the government frown on whistleblowers who are only trying to help?

Why is it that when one party accuses another of wrong doings the party retorts with the wrong
doings of the accusor when they were in power?

Why is this allowed to go on and on?

Why is it all about politics and not the well being of the Canadian people?

Why do I get responses from the police “that this is just how it is”?

I know how it is and am complaining “How it is” is not “How it is supposed to be” by the Charter

Obviously I could go on for hours asking questions but it is my deliberate intent to get you, the
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP and the RCMP Commissioner in the spirit
due the seriousness of the occasion.

You do see the very serious nature of the issues don’t you?

You at the very least see the necessity to appear as if you see the serious nature don’t you?

You do understand how important even the lowliest of us consider our individual guaranteed
Charter Rights and Freedoms?

You do understand common sense and its importance relative to the Law and how important the
necessity of a modus operandi adept to the support of the individuals Charter Rights and
Freedoms.

You do understand the significance of evidence and the necessity of a competent legal system
consistent with the Constitution and conducive to the justice of an individual’s guaranteed Charter
Rights.

You do see that it is the Federal Government who enacted the Constitution Act, 1982 and it their
responsibility to back the guarantee having accepted financial benefit to do so making it binding?

You do know they are responsible for their assigns. Right?

6
You do know there is only one legitimate way to deal with the issues, don’t you?

You do know how serious I take this and will do so until my eventuality?

You do know the time is well over due to make things right, consistent with the Law and a moral
society. Right?

Well all that remains is to wait and see.

Why not use the time in the right attitude doing your job to make things right consistent with the
Law, the spirit of God and the people of a moral society?

The people just want to live the life they are entitled to and it is the responsibility of the police to
see that they get it.

The Law is not complicated when common sense is applied where God is supreme

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

Everyone knows the meaning of these words except thieves and lawyers who set out ambiguous laws
beneficial to the immoral minority which they argue out in court for the lawyers benefit all at the expense
of the tax payer to the detriment of the victims and a moral society.

The government personnel has been structured and financed by the people to efficiently and cost
effectively provide the necessities of a moral society whereas immorality is a blight and it is priority one
to the guarantee of the Charter to structure a system attentive to the eradication of immoral inclination
where it is incumbent upon the government personnel to ensure staff is irreproachable to that endeavor.

This is fundamental to the Law where every individual is guaranteed equal Rights and Freedoms as
provided by the Federal Government in the Charter and they must be held responsible and accountable to
back the guarantee.

It is the responsibility of every individual to understand and obey the Law of the country and I reiterate
there can be no words clearer to define the Law than the words of Jesus who was most informed of the
aspirations attributed to God where the supreme law of Canada recognizes the supremacy of God..

Confucius

Shall I teach you what knowledge is? When you know a thing, to hold that you know it; and when
you do not know a thing, to allow that you do not know it. This is knowledge.

Do not do to others
C o n fu c iu s
What you do not want done to yourself
5 5 1 B– 4C7 9 B C
Recompense injury with justice, recompense kindness with kindness

7
 “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

You do not have to be religious to understand in fact one is more likely to understand if they are not a
religious fanatic for the message is clear and true to a moral society where often is the case religious
fanatics are prepared to follow the leader into war precisely contrary to the ideology.

“The people may be made to follow a course of action, but they may not be made to understand it”

“Learning without thought is labor lost, thought without learning is perilous”

The Obvious needs tending to

You can get to the east by going west but the shortest route is how the crow flies point to point

The members of the Law Society of Upper Canada are not required to give a damn about the individual’s
guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms and they are only obliged to vigorously advance the interests of
their clients.

How in hell can these people serve a moral society governed by the Constitution the supreme Law of
Canada which recognizes the supremacy of God where the federal Government has guaranteed
every individual equality in all matters before and under the Law as provided by the Charter.

It is incomprehensible that the police allow such absurdity of adversity to the Constitution and the
promised moral society which is the Federal government’s responsibility is to back the guarantee made to
every individual of Canada.

Every initiative must be directed to replace the incompetent irresponsible arrogant government personnel
with the prerequisite competent responsible personnel consistent with and conducive to the support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights which is FUNDAMENTAL to the foundation of the Constitution
and what Canadians stand for.

Idiotacracy must be immediately replaced Idealacracy

Where due diligence in sane format is mandatory to the serious nature of the Idealogy

The present Federal Government personnel are in Conflict of Interest to administer and enforce the Law
consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms.

8
Under the Federal Accountability Act, 2006 Mary Dawson has been appointed Commissioner of Ethics and
Conflict of Interest and has been mandated with the responsibility to address relative complaints and as a citizen of
Canada I hereby file a complaint with the Commissioner against the Federal Government personnel referenced
within my writings and published on my web site http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-
charter-of-rights-and-freedoms who by their actions documented therein are in conflict of interest of the moral
society guaranteed by the Constitution (Document).

The irrefutable evidence published on my web site http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

Ultimately the responsibility to back the guarantee of the Charter is with the Federal Government and I have
provided the evidence to the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
Canada and the Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day who have declined to act responsibly in appropriate
manner consistent with the Constitution and in fact have demonstrated their persistence in continuity of inane
rhetoric conducive to a government conspired against the people in Conflict of Interest of the foundation of
Canada, the Constitution and the well being of every individual guaranteed Charter rights.

Commissioner Mary Dawson

Commissioner of Ethics and Conflict of Interest
Federal Government.

I hereby request you study my complaints addressed in the aforesaid web sites and take appropriate action to bring
the pertinent government personnel on side with the law whereas a PUBLIC INQUIRY
is mandatory given the befuddlement of circumstance.

Your immediate attention is required

Thank you

Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher

PS

Should you have any difficulty accessing the evidence from the web sites or should you require further evidence or
understanding pleas do not hesitate to contact me at franklyone@hotmail.com

The face of justice must be identified and made to face justice in pursuant of justice for all

It is presumed the Commissioner is a person of integrity who acts in compliance with the Law where
ethics is mandatory and Conflict of Interest not tolerable.

“He who is sincere hits what is right, and apprehends without the exercise of thought”

Commissioner Mary Dawson I charge you with the responsibility to uphold your responsibility as is
reality to address the reality of the evidence and your actions will attest to the reality you respect your
responsibility to which you will be held accountable for.

Do not put off until tomorrow that which is demanded of you today lest when tomorrow becomes today
with reality unchanged your next tomorrow will find you facing the consequences of yesterday.

BelleG@parl.gc.ca;info@ohrc.on.ca; webadmin@justice.gc.ca
Gisele Bellehumeur: Commission Conflict of Interest and Ethics