FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
A
DVERTISE.COM
, I
NC
.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
No. 10-55069v.D.C. No.
2:09-cv-05983-AOL A
DVERTISING
, I
NC
., FKAVBF-CWPlatform-A, Inc.; AOL I
NC
.,
Defendants-Appellees.
A
DVERTISE.COM
, I
NC
.,No. 10-55071
Plaintiff-Appellant,
D.C. No.v.2:09-cv-07374-
AOL A
DVERTISING
, I
NC
., FKAVBF-CWPlatform-A, Inc.; AOL I
NC
.,OPINION
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the Central District of CaliforniaValerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, PresidingArgued and SubmittedMay 6, 2010—Pasadena, CaliforniaFiled August 3, 2010Before: Betty B. Fletcher and Richard A. Paez,Circuit Judges, and David A. Ezra, District Judge.*
*The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for theDistrict of Hawaii, sitting by designation.
11163
Opinion by Judge B. Fletcher
11164A
DVERTISE.COM
v. AOL A
DVERTISING
COUNSEL
Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Blake J. Lawit, Sarah J. Givan, HowardRice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, San Francisco, Cal-ifornia; and Andrew Selesnick, Todd Stitt, Torin A. Dorros,Brett A. Garner, Michelman & Robinson LLP, Encino, Cali-fornia, for the appellant.Lee J. Eulgen, Lawrence E. James, Jr., Hillary I. Schroeder,Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Karin G.Pagnanelli, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, Los Angeles,California; and Kannon K. Shanmugam, Christopher R. Hart,Allison B. Jones, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington,D.C., for the appellees.
11166A
DVERTISE.COM
v. AOL A
DVERTISING
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Advertise.com, Inc. v. AOL Advertising, Inc. (9th Cir.) (Aug 3, 2010)
9th Circuit reverses district court's grant of an injunction in favor of AOL, finding that advertising.com is likely generic for internet advertising services.
1.7K
Reads
9
Readcasts
2
Embed Views
More From This User
Notes
Load more
