Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
51Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
2010-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States - referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California

2010-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States - referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California

Ratings:
(0)
|Views: 2,422|Likes:
10-10-02 Human Rights Alert's report pertaining to corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and law enforcement in Los Angeles County, California, was noted by the United Nations Los Angeles, October 2 - Human Rights Alert (NGO), a young organization, with no resources at all, got a mention and a reference in the report staff report of the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations, [1] as part of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States. Page 8: HRAlert referred to corruption in the courts and the legal profession, and discrimination of US law enforcement in California. 69 Notes: 69 HRAlert, pages 1-5. See submission for cases cited. The evidence provided by Human Rights Alert pertained to large-scale false imprisonment at the criminal courts, and real estate fraud in collusion with large financial institutions and law-firms at the civil courts. The HRC report reference was somewhat cryptic regarding "discrimination of US law enforcement in California." It pertained to allegations in the Human Rights Alert report of discrimination by law enforcement against Los Angeles County, California, for at least two decades, through refusal of US law enforcement to address overwhelming evidence of racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Discrimination against a region of the country is a violation of Human Rights, in and of itself. The Human Rights Alert report to the United Nations provided evidence of such discrimination through conduct of KENNETH KAISER -FBI Assistant Director for Criminal Investigations, and KENNETH MELSON - former Director of US Department of Justice Office of US Attorneys. The report also provided evidence of patronizing of the conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court by the United States courts - National Tribunals for Protection of Rights pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - from the US District Court, Central District of California, through the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, to the Supreme Court of the United States. Much larger organizations, and even Joint Reports of consortia of organizations got no mention at all. The HRC report was issued as part of the UPR process, established by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 2006. In April 2010, over 100 organizations filed reports as "stakeholders" as part of the review process. In August 2010 the US State Department filed its response. Albeit, the State Department report simply ignored the reports of stakeholders and the HRC staff, and was largely self-congratulatory. Review session regarding Human Rights in the United States is scheduled for November 5, 2010 in Geneva. Human Rights Alert (NGO) is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system. LINKS [1] 10-01-10 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
10-10-02 Human Rights Alert's report pertaining to corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and law enforcement in Los Angeles County, California, was noted by the United Nations Los Angeles, October 2 - Human Rights Alert (NGO), a young organization, with no resources at all, got a mention and a reference in the report staff report of the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations, [1] as part of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States. Page 8: HRAlert referred to corruption in the courts and the legal profession, and discrimination of US law enforcement in California. 69 Notes: 69 HRAlert, pages 1-5. See submission for cases cited. The evidence provided by Human Rights Alert pertained to large-scale false imprisonment at the criminal courts, and real estate fraud in collusion with large financial institutions and law-firms at the civil courts. The HRC report reference was somewhat cryptic regarding "discrimination of US law enforcement in California." It pertained to allegations in the Human Rights Alert report of discrimination by law enforcement against Los Angeles County, California, for at least two decades, through refusal of US law enforcement to address overwhelming evidence of racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Discrimination against a region of the country is a violation of Human Rights, in and of itself. The Human Rights Alert report to the United Nations provided evidence of such discrimination through conduct of KENNETH KAISER -FBI Assistant Director for Criminal Investigations, and KENNETH MELSON - former Director of US Department of Justice Office of US Attorneys. The report also provided evidence of patronizing of the conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court by the United States courts - National Tribunals for Protection of Rights pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - from the US District Court, Central District of California, through the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, to the Supreme Court of the United States. Much larger organizations, and even Joint Reports of consortia of organizations got no mention at all. The HRC report was issued as part of the UPR process, established by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 2006. In April 2010, over 100 organizations filed reports as "stakeholders" as part of the review process. In August 2010 the US State Department filed its response. Albeit, the State Department report simply ignored the reports of stakeholders and the HRC staff, and was largely self-congratulatory. Review session regarding Human Rights in the United States is scheduled for November 5, 2010 in Geneva. Human Rights Alert (NGO) is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system. LINKS [1] 10-01-10 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

More info:

Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Oct 02, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/24/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Human Rights Alert 
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.netBlog:
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
 Scribd: 
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
 
10-01-10 United Nations Human Rights Council: Records for the 2010Review of Human Rights in the United States
1) Order of Review
for the Ninth Session of the UPR Working Group (1-12 November 2010)
…………….. 12) Tentative Timetable
for the Ninth Session of the UPR Working Group (1-12 November 2010)
…………….. 23) Summary of Stakeholders’ Reports
Summary prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights inaccordance with paragraph 15 (c) of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution5/1
……………..
3
 
4) Staff Report
Compilation prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights inaccordance with paragraph 15 (b) of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution5/1
……
………..
23
 
5) Human Rights Alert (NGO) Report
As it appears on the HRC web site
……………..
41
 
6) Appendix of Human Rights Alert (NGO) Report
As it appears on the HRC web site
……………..
50
 
Of note, Human Rights Alert (NGO), an young organization, with no resources at all,got a mention and reference in the report, where much larger organizations, and evenJoint Reports of consortiums of organizations got no mention at all:Page 8:
HRAlert referred to corruption in the courts and the legal profession, and discrimination of US law enforcement in California.
69
 
Notes:
69
HRAlert, pages 1-5. See submission for cases cited.
 
 
ORDER OF REVIEW FOR THE NINTH SESSION OFTHE UPR WORKING GROUP(1-12 November 2010)
1. Liberia2. Malawi3. Mongolia4. Panama5. Maldives6. Andorra7. Bulgaria8. Honduras9. United States of America10. Marshall Islands11. Croatia12. Jamaica13. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya14. Micronesia15. Lebanon16. Mauritania
 
TENTATIVE TIMETABLE FOR THE NINTH SESSION OF THE UPR WORKING GROUP(1-12 NOVEMBER 2010)
 First week
Monday 1 NovemberTuesday 2 NovemberWednesday 3 NovemberThursday 4 NovemberFriday 5 NovemberMorning
10.00-13.00
Review of Liberia
10.00-13.00
Review of Mongolia
9.00 – 12.00
Review of Maldives
9.00 – 12.00
Review of Bulgaria
9.00 – 12.00
Review of the UnitedStates of America
12.00 – 12.30
Adoption of the reporton Liberia
12.00 – 12.30
Adoption of thereport on Mongolia
12.00 – 12.30
Adoption of the reporton Maldives
Afternoon
15.00-18.00
Review of Malawi
15.00-18.00
Review of Panama
14.30-17.30
Review of Andorra
14.30-17.30
Review of Honduras
14.30-17.30
Review of MarshallIslands
17.30-18.00
Adoption of the reporton Malawi
17.30-18.00
Adoption of thereport on Panama
17.30-18.00
Adoption of the reporton Andorra
Second week
Monday 8 NovemberTuesday 9 NovemberWednesday 10 NovemberThursday 11 NovemberFriday 12 NovemberMorning
9.00 – 12.00
Review of Croatia
9.00 – 12.00
Review of LibyanArab Jamahiriya
9.00 – 12.00
Review of Lebanon
12.00 – 12.30
Adoption of thereport onBulgaria
12.00 – 12.30
Adoption of thereport on theUnited States of America
12.00 – 12.30
Adoption of the reporton Croatia
Afternoon
14.30-17.30
Review of Jamaica
14.30-17.30
Review of Micronesia
14.30-17.30
Review of Mauritania
15.00-15.30
Adoption of the reporton Libyan ArabJamahiriya
15.30-16.00
Adoption of the reporton Micronesia
17.30-18.00
Adoption of thereport onHonduras
17.30-18.00
Adoption of thereport onMarshall Islands
17.30-18.00
Adoption of the reporton Jamaica
16.00-16.30
Adoption of the reporton Lebanon
16.30-17.00
Adoption of the reporton Mauritania

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->