Defendants were appointed by plaintiffs as directors of Kop Holdings and Kop Football. The Court finds that it has personal jurisdiction over the parties and jurisdiction is proper in this Court. Based on the allegations in the verified Petition and the arguments of counsel, The Court finds Defendant broughton is a director.
Defendants were appointed by plaintiffs as directors of Kop Holdings and Kop Football. The Court finds that it has personal jurisdiction over the parties and jurisdiction is proper in this Court. Based on the allegations in the verified Petition and the arguments of counsel, The Court finds Defendant broughton is a director.
Defendants were appointed by plaintiffs as directors of Kop Holdings and Kop Football. The Court finds that it has personal jurisdiction over the parties and jurisdiction is proper in this Court. Based on the allegations in the verified Petition and the arguments of counsel, The Court finds Defendant broughton is a director.