Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Konsep Kajian Tindakan 2
Konsep Kajian Tindakan 2
KAJIAN TINDAKAN
1
• PLAN
• ACT
• OBSERVE
• REFLECT
• And then
• PLAN
(Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R.)
2
• Action Research is a process through which
teachers collaborate in evaluating their
practice jointly…raise awareness of their
personal theory…articulate a shared
conception of values…try out new strategies
to render the values expressed in their
practice more consistent with the
educational values they espouse…record
their work in a form that is readily
available to and understandable by other
teachers…and thus develop a shared theory
of teaching by researching practice.
John Elliott. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change.
Philadelphia: Open University Press/Milton Keynes.
3
Based on the following assumptions:
4
Action Research involves problem posing, not
just problem solving. It does not start from
a view of problems as pathologies. It is
motivated by a quest to improve and
understand the world by changing it and
learning how to improve it from the effects
of the changes made.
5
Problem implies that there is
something wrong, when what is
meant in action research terms
is that “a problem is a
definition of a need for change
and describes how certain
issues can be addressed”
(Cunningham 1993:75)
6
DEFINISI KAJIAN Ebbut (1985)
TINDAKAN
Mc Niff (1988)
DEFINISI,
KONSEP DAN
CIRI-CIRI Kemmis & Mc Taggart (1988)
KAJIAN
TINDAKAN
7
Mengintegrasikan
Untuk menambahbaik pengajaran dengan
keberkesanan amalan penyelidikan
Jurang antara yg
diingini dengan
amalan(Performance
Gap) KENAPA
KAJIAN
Wahana untuk TINDAKAN?
Pembangunan
Profesionalisme
10
EBBUT (1985)
“ Kajian tindakan merupakan suatu
pengkajian yang sistematik oleh
sekumpulan pengamal terhadap usaha-
usaha untuk mengubah dan memperbaiki
amalan pendidikan melalui tindakan
praktis mereka sendiri serta refleksi
terhadap kesan atau akibat tindakan
tersebut”.
11
MCNIFF (1988)
“Kajian tindakan sebagai satu pendekatan
untuk memperbaiki atau meningkatkan
kualiti pendidikan melalui perubahan
dengan menggalakkan guru-guru menjadi
lebih sedar tentang amalan mereka sendiri,
menjadi kritis terhadap amalan-amalan
tersebut dan bersedia untuk mengubahnya.
Ianya melibatkan guru dalam inkuiri yang
dijalankan oleh mereka serta melibatkan
guru-guru lain secara bersama”.
12
KEMMIS DAN MCTAGGART
(1988)
“ Kajian tindakan merupakan satu bentuk
inkuiri refleksi kendiri yang dilakukan
secara kolektif, dilakukan oleh peserta yang
berada dalam sesuatu situasi sosial bagi
tujuan meningkatkan kerasionalan dan
keadilan amalan-amalan kemasyarakatan
dan pendidikan mereka sendiri, di samping
meningkatkan kefahaman mereka tentang
amalan itu serta situasi di mana amalan itu
dilakukan”.
13
DONALD SCHON
14
DONALD SCHON
15
CHRIS DAY
16
BRIDGET SOMEKH
17
JOHN ELLIOT
18
JOHN ELLIOTT
19
• Action research is “problem sensing and problem
focused” (Hart & Bond, 1995:52)
• And the researcher is involved in an immediate and
direct way with the problem situation
• The intentions which underlie action are directed to a
future state in which the ‘real; comes closer to the ‘
ideal’
• Geer (1990: 49) states that the gap between the ideal
and the actual that policy problems emerge
• Those involved committed to the change because of
their own involvement in planning for their future
(Susman & Evered, 1978;Eden & Huxman, 1993)
20
• “AR is “about taking action in the real world
and a close examination of the effects of the
action taken, thus it always involves
intervention”.
21
• Carr & Kemmis (1986:162) action research is “ a
spiral of cycles” – not linear, and does not follow a
series of stages.
• Dynamic process with research, action and
evaluation interact in a way
• Elliot (1991) says that action, research and enquiry
are not separate, sometimes indistinguishable,
perhaps one of the strands more dominant
• Action research and evaluation research closely
related (Lathlean & Farnish, 1984; Patton, 1990)
• Without evaluation not possible to assess the
progress or redefine the problem
• May involve quantitative evaluation in infer cause
and effect or qualitative evaluation
22
JENIS-JENIS KAJIAN TINDAKAN
• Lewin (1944)
– Experimental, Empirical, Diagnostic, Participative
• Halsey (1972)
– Political AR, Social Science AR
• Chamberlain (1988)
– Partnership model, Supportive model, Separatist model
• Holter & Schwartz-Barcott (1993)
– Technical collaborative, Mutual collaborative,
Enhancement
• Hart & Bond (1995)
– Experimental, organisational, profesionalising,
empowering
23