Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
...injuring not with the Sword, but with the slogan and smile.

...injuring not with the Sword, but with the slogan and smile.

Ratings: (0)|Views: 61|Likes:
Published by sconnerat
Image is courtesy of www.whitehouse.gov.

What a difference a Day makes! Usurper 'failed to qualify' by not honouring this Citizen's humble request. Pursuant to Amendment XX, Mr. Biden became our President on January 20, 2009. Any and all official acts performed by self-admitted ineligible (see "OBAMA Confession") are considered VOID AB INITIO, under Law.

neither the Constitutional authority to sign any Bill into Law, nor to nominate a Justice, nor to negotiate a Treaty, nor to issue a Pardon. In fact, he may have no statutory authority to reside in this country, whatsoever; for if he be a foreigner, never Naturalized, without papers, there may be a violation of Immigration Law. However, that issue can be left to others. This case concerns only reparations for the Principal Sum of $4.90, which I spent as a result of fulfilling a Patriotic duty to mail a Second Request. The fact that Defendant is not Commander in Chief is pertinent to this Small Claim, because in order to properly file it, I must sign, under penalty of perjury, attesting to the fact that Defendant is not in the military service of the United States. As a result of his tacit Admission of ineligibility, Mr. Obama, who certainly portrays himself to be President, has verily Declared, to one and to all, that he is not only ineligible to such esteemed Office, but also that he is a charlatan, and a usurper of the kind most vile, injuring not with the Sword, but with the slogan and smile. He has instilled false hope in the hearts and minds of men. Being not President, he has no immunity from this civil lawsuit, and he must respond to any subpoena, summons, or writ issued by this Court. He has unlawfully seized power, knowing full well that he is ineligible; in fact, under the British Nationality Act of 1948, he remains a British subject, having never renounced his born allegiance, acquired via his father, to the United Kingdom. The specter of allowing and supporting a British President was an anathema to the Founding Fathers, and in particular to the first Chief Justice of the United States, John Jay, who believed the insertion of the words “natural born” to be of tremendous import, as stated in his July 25, 1787 letter to Gen. George Washington, the presiding Officer of the Constitutional Convention, in Philadelphia. “Permit me to hint,” wrote Jay, “whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the Administration of our national Govt., and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the Am. Army shall not be given to nor devolve on any but a natural born Citizen.” The phrase was added, without discussion or debate, to the Constitution for the United States of America, to wit., (with a majority of this Section omitted, for brevity):

Article. II. Section. 1.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

In sum, a true and proper response to my letter of November 11, 2008 WOULD HAVE NEGATED the duty (therefore cost) to mail the Second Request – the February 26, 2009 Letter of Redress. Mr. Obama could have simply responded that my doubt was, indeed, warranted, that he was not a natural born citizen, and that he was ineligible to the Office of President of the United States. ON THESE PREMISES DO I BASE MY CLAIM.


_________________________________

William Spencer Connerat 111
Image is courtesy of www.whitehouse.gov.

What a difference a Day makes! Usurper 'failed to qualify' by not honouring this Citizen's humble request. Pursuant to Amendment XX, Mr. Biden became our President on January 20, 2009. Any and all official acts performed by self-admitted ineligible (see "OBAMA Confession") are considered VOID AB INITIO, under Law.

neither the Constitutional authority to sign any Bill into Law, nor to nominate a Justice, nor to negotiate a Treaty, nor to issue a Pardon. In fact, he may have no statutory authority to reside in this country, whatsoever; for if he be a foreigner, never Naturalized, without papers, there may be a violation of Immigration Law. However, that issue can be left to others. This case concerns only reparations for the Principal Sum of $4.90, which I spent as a result of fulfilling a Patriotic duty to mail a Second Request. The fact that Defendant is not Commander in Chief is pertinent to this Small Claim, because in order to properly file it, I must sign, under penalty of perjury, attesting to the fact that Defendant is not in the military service of the United States. As a result of his tacit Admission of ineligibility, Mr. Obama, who certainly portrays himself to be President, has verily Declared, to one and to all, that he is not only ineligible to such esteemed Office, but also that he is a charlatan, and a usurper of the kind most vile, injuring not with the Sword, but with the slogan and smile. He has instilled false hope in the hearts and minds of men. Being not President, he has no immunity from this civil lawsuit, and he must respond to any subpoena, summons, or writ issued by this Court. He has unlawfully seized power, knowing full well that he is ineligible; in fact, under the British Nationality Act of 1948, he remains a British subject, having never renounced his born allegiance, acquired via his father, to the United Kingdom. The specter of allowing and supporting a British President was an anathema to the Founding Fathers, and in particular to the first Chief Justice of the United States, John Jay, who believed the insertion of the words “natural born” to be of tremendous import, as stated in his July 25, 1787 letter to Gen. George Washington, the presiding Officer of the Constitutional Convention, in Philadelphia. “Permit me to hint,” wrote Jay, “whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the Administration of our national Govt., and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the Am. Army shall not be given to nor devolve on any but a natural born Citizen.” The phrase was added, without discussion or debate, to the Constitution for the United States of America, to wit., (with a majority of this Section omitted, for brevity):

Article. II. Section. 1.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

In sum, a true and proper response to my letter of November 11, 2008 WOULD HAVE NEGATED the duty (therefore cost) to mail the Second Request – the February 26, 2009 Letter of Redress. Mr. Obama could have simply responded that my doubt was, indeed, warranted, that he was not a natural born citizen, and that he was ineligible to the Office of President of the United States. ON THESE PREMISES DO I BASE MY CLAIM.


_________________________________

William Spencer Connerat 111

More info:

Published by: sconnerat on Feb 02, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/03/2011

pdf

text

original

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->