Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Epic FTC Facebook Complaint

Epic FTC Facebook Complaint

|Views: 93|Likes:
Published by lbrty4all9227
EPIC, CFPHR compliant to the FTC regarding Facebook
EPIC, CFPHR compliant to the FTC regarding Facebook

More info:

Categories:Types, Letters
Published by: lbrty4all9227 on Feb 17, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





 COMPLAINT In the Matter of Facebook, Inc.May 5, 2010 1
Before theFederal Trade CommissionWashington, DC
In the Matter of ))Facebook, Inc. )) ____________________________________)
Complaint, Request for Investigation, Injunction, and Other Relief 
This complaint concerns material changes to privacy settings made by Facebook, thelargest social network service in the United States, that adversely impact the users of the service. Facebook now discloses personal information to the public that Facebook users previously restricted. Facebook now discloses personal information to third parties that Facebook users previously did not make available. These changes violateuser expectations, diminish user privacy, and contradict Facebook’s ownrepresentations. These business practices are Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices,subject to review by the Federal Trade Commission (the “Commission”) under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.2.
The following business practices are unfair and deceptive under Section 5 of theFederal Trade Commission Act: Facebook disclosed users’ personal information toMicrosoft, Yelp, and Pandora without first obtaining users’ consent; Facebook disclosed users’ information—including details concerning employment history,education, location, hometown, film preferences, music preferences, and reading preferences—to which users previously restricted access; and Facebook disclosedinformation to the public even when users elect to make that information available tofriends only.”3.
These business practices impact more than 115 million users of the social networkingsite who fall within the jurisdiction of the United States Federal Trade Commission.
 Facebook, Statistics
, http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics (last visited May 5, 2010);
 see also
InsideFacebook, Eric Eldon,
Web Measurement Firms Show Higher Facebook U.S. and World Growth for March 2010
,May 4, 2010, http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/05/04/web-measurement-firms-show-higher-facebook-us-and-world-growth-for-march-2010/ (last visited May 5, 2010).
 COMPLAINT In the Matter of Facebook, Inc.May 5, 2010 24.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, the Bill of Rights Defense Committee,the Center for Digital Democracy, the Center for Financial Privacy and HumanRights, the Center for Media and Democracy, the Consumer Federation of America,the Consumer Task Force for Automotive Issues, Consumer Watchdog, the Foolproof Initiative, Patient Privacy Rights, Privacy Activism, Privacy Journal, the PrivacyRights Clearing House, the United States Bill of Rights Foundation, and U.S. PIRG(hereinafter “Petitioners”) urge the Commission to investigate Facebook, determinewhether the company has in fact engaged in unfair and/or deceptive trade practices,require Facebook to restore privacy settings that were previously available as detailed below, require Facebook to give users meaningful control over personal information,and seek other appropriate injunctive and compensatory relief.
 COMPLAINT In the Matter of Facebook, Inc.May 5, 2010 3II.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) is a not-for-profit researchcenter based in Washington, D.C. EPIC focuses on emerging privacy and civilliberties issues and is a leading consumer advocate before the Federal TradeCommission. Among its other activities, EPIC first brought the Commission’sattention to the privacy risks of online advertising.
In 2004, EPIC filed a complaintwith the FTC regarding the deceptive practices of data broker firm Choicepoint,calling the Commission’s attention to “data products circumvent[ing] the FCRA,giving businesses, private investigators, and law enforcement access to data that previously had been subjected to Fair Information Practices.”
As a result of the EPICcomplaint, the FTC fined Choicepoint $15 million.
EPIC initiated the complaint tothe FTC regarding Microsoft Passport.
The Commission subsequently requiredMicrosoft to implement a comprehensive information security program for Passportand similar services.
EPIC also filed a complaint with the FTC regarding themarketing of amateur spyware,
which resulted in the issuance of a permanentinjunction barring sales of CyberSpy’s “stalker spyware,” over-the-counter surveillance technology sold for individuals to spy on other individuals.
 In the Matter of DoubleClick 
, Complaint and Request for Injunction, Request for Investigation and for Other Relief, before the Federal Trade Commission (Feb. 10, 2000),
available at 
 In the Matter of Choicepoint 
, Request for Investigation and for Other Relief, before the Federal Trade Commission(Dec. 16, 2004),
available at 
Federal Trade Commission,
ChoicePoint Settles Data Security Breach Charges; to Pay $10 Million in Civil  Penalties, $5 Million for Consumer Redress,
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/01/choicepoint.shtm (last visited Dec. 13,2009).
 In the Matter of Microsoft Corporation
, Complaint and Request for Injunction, Request for Investigation and for Other Relief, before the Federal Trade Commission (July 26, 2001),
available at 
 In the Matter of Microsoft Corporation,
File No. 012 3240, Docket No. C-4069 (Aug. 2002), available athttp://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0123240/0123240.shtm. See also Fed. Trade Comm’n, “Microsoft Settles FTCCharges Alleging False Security and Privacy Promises” (Aug. 2002) (“The proposed consent order prohibits anymisrepresentation of information practices in connection with Passport and other similar services. It also requiresMicrosoft to implement and maintain a comprehensive information security program. In addition, Microsoft musthave its security program certified as meeting or exceeding the standards in the consent order by an independent professional every two years.”),
available at 
 In the Matter of Awarenesstech.com, et al.,
Complaint and Request for Injunction, Request for Investigation andfor Other relief, before the Federal Trade Commission,
available at 
 FTC v. Cyberspy Software
, No. 6:08-cv-1872 (D. Fla. Nov. 6, 2008) (unpublished order),
available at 

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->