Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Dm Guidelines 2007

Dm Guidelines 2007

Ratings: (0)|Views: 17|Likes:
Published by Danielle

More info:

Published by: Danielle on Feb 20, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





ENDOCRINE PRACTICE Vol 13 (Suppl 1) May/June 2007 3
AACE Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force
Helena W. Rodbard, MD, FACP, MACE
Medical Director, Endocrine and Metabolic ConsultantsPast President, American Association of Clinical EndocrinologistsPast President, American College of EndocrinologyRockville, Maryland
Task Force Members
Lawrence Blonde, MD, FACP, FACE
Director, Ochsner Diabetes Clinical Research Unit; Section on Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolic DiseasesAssociate Residency Program Director, Department of Internal Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
Susan S. Braithwaite, MD, FACP, FACE
Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Division of Endocrinology, Chapel Hill, NC
Elise M. Brett, MD, FACE
Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Bone Disease; Mount Sinai School of MedicineNew York, New York
Rhoda H. Cobin, MD, MACE
Clinical Professor of Medicine; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Bone Disease; Mount Sinai School of MedicineImmediate Past President, American College of EndocrinologyPast President, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, New York, New York
Yehuda Handelsman, MD, FACP, FACE
Medical Director, Metabolic Institute of America
Senior Scientic Consultant, Metabolic Endocrine Education Foundation, Tarzana, California
Richard Hellman, MD, FACP, FACE
Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine,President, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, North Kansas City, Missouri
Paul S. Jellinger, MD, MACE
Professor of Medicine and Voluntary Faculty, University of Miami School of Medicine,Past President, American College of EndocrinologyPast President, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Hollywood, Florida
Lois G. Jovanovic, MD, FACE
CEO & Chief Scientic Ofcer, Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Adjunct Professor Biomolecular Science and Engineering,
University of California-Santa BarbaraClinical Professor of Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Santa Barbara, CA
Philip Levy, MD, FACE
Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine,
Past President, American College of Endocrinology,
Phoenix, Arizona
Jeffrey I. Mechanick, MD, FACP, FACE, FACN
Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine and Director of Metabolic Support; Division of Endocrinology,Diabetes, and Bone Disease; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
Farhad Zangeneh, MD, FACP, FACE
Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DCEndocrine, Diabetes and Osteoporosis Clinic (EDOC), Sterling, Virginia
 Medical Writer 
Christopher G. Parkin, MS
Lewis E. Braverman, MD; Samuel Dagogo-Jack, MD, FACE; Vivian A. Fonseca, MD, FACE;
Martin M. Grajower, MD, FACP, FACE; Virginia A. LiVolsi, MD; Fernando Ovalle, MD, FACE;
Herbert I. Rettinger, MD, FACE; Talla P. Shankar, MD, FACE; Joseph J. Torre, MD, FACP, FACE; Dace L. Trence, MD, FACE
We would like to recognize Elliot Sternthal, MD, FACE, and Joseph Vassalotti, MD, for their review of these guidelines and thoughtful comments.
AACE Diabetes Mellitus Guidelines,
 Endocr Pract.
2007;13(Suppl 1) 2007
1. INTRODUCTION1.1. Forward
launched the rst in a series of conferences to address theimportant and growing epidemic of diabetes mellitus inthe United States and worldwide. The position statementsand recommendations resulting from these conferences
intensive inpatient and outpatient management of diabetesmellitus (1,2).
Other consensus conferences have addressedthe need for improved patient safety and early identicationand treatment of the insulin resistance syndrome, a precursorfor diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (3,4).
1.2. Specifc Mission and Methods
Given the complex and diverse nature of diabetesmanagement, evidence-based clinical practice guidelinesare vital to a clinician’s ability to effectively treat thisdisease. The purpose of the recommendations herein isto provide clinicians with clear and accessible guidelinesto care for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To facilitate ease of use and to enhance clinical utility, this clinical practiceguideline is organized by topic; each topic section contains:(a) a general overview of information necessary to interpretthe specic recommendations; (b) a succinct executivesummary of graded recommendations based on clinical
AACE Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force
evidence and various subjective factors; and (c) evidencebase and clinical considerations that include detaileddiscussion of the supportive clinical evidence and specicsubjective factors (5). Ratings of the clinical evidencederived from each reference are noted next to the citationsat the end of each topic section. Target audiences for thisclinical practice guideline include: (a) endocrinologists; (b)cardiologists; (c) physicians who specialize in caring forpatients with diabetes mellitus or who encounter patientswith diabetes mellitus in their practice; and (d) other healthcare practitioners who wish to learn about diabetes care inthe context of endocrinology, metabolism, and nutrition.The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists(AACE) Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Practice GuidelinesTask Force is composed of endocrinologists who are expertsand practitioners in the eld of diabetes. The task forcemembers spend more than 50% of their practice in the areaof diabetes, and they are active members of AACE. Eachcontributor has published in the eld of diabetes and is activein one or more of the main medical societies committed todiabetes care in the United States and internationally.Task force members reviewed selected reports andstudies and rated the clinical evidence from these sources.A summary of the methods used to prepare these guidelinesis presented in Figure 1.1. A separate panel composed of AACE members with expertise in diabetes reviewed thecompiled report. Final recommendations included in thisclinical practice guideline represent a consensus among thetask force members and have been approved by reviewers,the AACE Publications and Executive Committees, and theAACE Board of Directors. Comments and recommendationsregarding physician-patient communication are based onexpert judgment of task force members.The available scientic literature cited in theseguidelines was reviewed and evaluated for strength of evidence based on 4 level-of-evidence (LOE) categoriesdescribed in Table 1.1. The evidence categories wereadapted from the American Association of ClinicalEndocrinologists Protocol for the Standardized Productionof Clinical Practice Guidelines (5). References with clinicalevidence are accompanied by a LOE assignment followingcitation in the reference list. References were obtained byperforming a computerized search of the literature usingPubMed and other search engines; scanning incoming
= American Association of ClinicalEndocrinologists;
= condence interval;
gestational diabetes mellitus;
= high-density lipoprotein cholesterol;
= low-density lipoprotein cholesterol;
= neutral protamine Hagedorn;
= type 1 diabetes mellitus;
= type 2 diabetesmellitus;
= very low-density lipoproteincholesterol
ENDOCRINE PRACTICE Vol 13 (Suppl 1) May/June 2007
 Material printed in
 Endocrine Practice
is protected by copyright. No part of this publication may be copied, down-loaded, reproduced, altered, stored, transferred, or incorporated in any other work, in any form or by any meanswithout prior written permission from American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Permission may be obtained at the following link: http://www.aace.com/pub/request_permission.php.
AACE Guidelines
 AACE Diabetes Mellitus Guidelines,
 Endocr Pract.
2007;13(Suppl 1) 2007
 journals in the medical library; and reviewing references
in publications relevant to diabetes including reviewarticles, leading textbooks, and syllabi from national andinternational meetings.
 LOE 1
data are dened as conclusive results fromprospective, randomized controlled trials that have largesubject populations representative of the target populationand results that are easily generalized to the targetpopulation (5). LOE 1 data also include results from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, results from
multicenter trials, and “all or none” evidence.
 LOE 2
include conclusive results from individual randomizedcontrolled trials that have limited subject numbers or
target population representation.
 LOE 3
data include all
other conclusive clinical ndings from nonrandomized
studies, studies without controls, and nonexperimental orobservational studies (eg, well-documented case reports).Although LOE 3 data may be predicated on sound theory,these data require interpretation and, by themselves, arenot compelling.
 LOE 4
data are dened as information
based solely on experience or expert opinion and are not
necessarily substantiated by any conclusive scientic data.
Frequently, only LOE 4 data are available.When possible, clinical recommendations put forth inthis clinical practice guideline have been assigned a letter
grade (A-D) based on the level of scientic substantiation
(Table 1.2). However, when task force members determined
that clinical judgment regarding a recommendationoutweighed study ndings or a recommendation lackedsupporting studies, they assigned the nal grade based on
their extensive clinical experience and expertise in diabetesmanagement. An
grade is the strongest recommendation,and a
grade is the weakest recommendation. These
recommendations include subjective components such as:(a) judgment regarding whether results from a particular
study are conclusive; (b) the relative weighing of positiveand negative conclusive study results; (c) assignment of evidence rating when certain study methodologies are
controversial; (d) the impact of risk-benet analysis; (e) the
impact of cost-effectiveness; (f) assessment of geographicaldifferences in practice standards and availability of certaintechnologies; (g) assessment of ethnic, racial, and geneticdifferences in pathophysiology; (h) incorporation of patientpreferences; and (i) incorporation of physician preferences.Criticism that purely evidence-based clinical practice
guidelines do not reect real life because subjective inputis stied or precluded is addressed to some extent by the
AACE methodology for developing the guidelines. When
the task force members judged that subjective factorsinuenced the grade of a recommendation to an extent
that outweighed the available best evidence, this logic wasexplicitly described in the detailed discussion that followseach topic section’s executive summary. Thus, the processof developing evidence-based recommendations and the
incorporation of subjective components are transparent to
the reader.These methods, nevertheless, have the following
shortcomings: (a) reliance on some subjective measures,
which compromises reproducibility; (b) dependence on thebest available evidence, even if only one study is used toformulate a recommendation grade; and (c) dependenceon task force primary authors to perform a comprehensiveliterature search. Multiple levels of review by both AACE-credentialed and non–AACE-credentialed experts fromacademia and clinical practice backgrounds serve to addressthese predicted shortcomings.
AACE Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force is created andinstructions for guideline development are distributed
Topics are assigned to task force members
Medical literature is searched
Primary writing is completed
Levels of scientific substantiation for clinical evidence are assigned
Specific recommendations based on grading system are developed
General review of guidelines is completed by task force members
Guidelines are revised by task force chairperson
Guidelines are reviewed by selected AACE members and a special reviewer
Guidelines are revised by task force chairperson
Final review is completed by AACE Publications Committee and Board of Directors
Guidelines are revised by task force chairperson
Final draft of the guidelines is submitted
Figure 1.1.
Methods used to prepare the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) MedicalGuidelines for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->