Professional Documents
Culture Documents
March 9, 2011
March 9, 2011 2
Tysons & Reston TOD Area Densities
(Millions of GSF)
100.0 96.0
Other Non-Res Office Residential
6.6
DENSITY 90.0
82.4
Tysons maximum allowable density in 2030 is
80.0 74.4
82.4 MM GSF across four station TOD areas 10.8
comprising 1,800+ acres. GMU’s High Reston TOD Forecast 6.6
70.0 64.1 44.7
Reston has three TOD study areas (actually 2- 60.0 56.5 8.5
1/2) covering 1,600+ acres.
7.9
45.0 35.0
50.0
Tysons total density, mix, and intensity are
largely based on GMU’s high 2030 residential 40.0
30.3
and employment forecasts for the area. 31.8 28.3
• Even DPZ’s “Scenario A” would 30.0 4.9
substantially exceed GMU’s maximum 44.7
expectation for Reston TOD areas. 20.0
21.0 32.8
26.6 25.3
Should Reston follow the Tysons example and 10.0 20.3
March 9, 2011 3
Tysons & Reston TOD Areas
Mix of Uses (%)
Other Non-Res Office Residential
MIX OF USES 100%
7%
9%
13% 15% 14% 13%
Tysons longer term goal mix goal is 65% non- 90%
residential construction, a goal it is permitted to
exceed in the next 20 years. 80%
47%
We have spoken of “balance” in residential and 70% 47%
non-residential development in Reston TOD areas, 47%
55% 50%
60%
which certainly doesn’t exist now.
• The GMU high forecast would see a 60:40 50%
66%
non-residential to residential spatial
allocation, the mid-range forecast is even 40%
more distorted.
• Scenario A and the sub-committee reports 30%
would come closer to spatial balance, but at 44% 47%
20% 39%
36%
higher permitted development levels. 32%
10% 19%
How can we achieve better balance in
development without permitting unrealistically 0%
high levels of development? Tysons Reston GMU Mid GMU High Scenario A Reston
Corner TOD 2010 Forecast Forecast 2030 TOD Areas
2030 2030 2030 (RTF)
March 9, 2011 4
Tysons & Reston TOD Areas
Residential & Employee Populations
162,200
• Residential population in the Reston TOD 137K
171,600
areas quintupling in the coming decades.
131,351
Neither the Task Force nor the County have
118,000
92K
studied the public infrastructure required to
110,133
accommodate this increased intensity in
Reston over any timeframe.
79,800
• Infrastructure planning, including phasing
and implementation, were an integral
59,600
feature of the Tysons study effort.
44,333
43,764
33,733
11,800
27,067
Following the Tysons example, the RTF and
County need to understand and plan for
Tysons Reston TOD GMU Mid GMU High Scenario A RTF Sub-
needed public infrastructure before finalizing Corner 2010 Forecast Forecast 2030 Comm
the RTF Phase I Comprehensive Plan changes. 2030 2030 2030 Reports
March 9, 2011 5