Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of the writer's knowledge no representation of scrupulouscare in the jointing of the long fingers;
this mark has yet been published, and the same high degree of etmpcatement,the result of
a sketch of it is therefore given here % using a white enamel of thick consistency, pro-
On account of some want of clearness in ducing a surface in tangible relief; and there is a
the mark this must be regarded only as similar quality of colour in the delicate blue of the
an approximate rendering; it is shown robe. The subject is said to be taken from an
about twice the size of the original. There is no anonymous German engraving. The back is
reason to doubt that the initials, stamped in the covered with a brownish translucent enamel
copper like those of certain well-known Limoges differing slightly from the clear flux which coats
artists, are those of the enameller, and the task of the reverse of the first two pieces. This specimen
suggesting a name to fit them offers an opportunity is also in the Victoriaand AlbertMuseum(No. 4750-
for speculation among the recorded names of I86o), and measures To cm. by 8 cm.
enamellers of the period. The enamels evidently Another example apparentlyby the same master,
date from somewhere about the year 1530. Their marked with what is probably the same stamp
dimensions are (A) 8*5cm. by 7 cm.; (B) 8*7cm. ("poin5on I C couronne"), was in the Spitzer
by 6'9 cm. collection, a plaque mounted as a pax, representing
Another little plaque, representinga bust of the the Adoration of the Magi.2 I have not succeeded
Virgin on a blue ground with MAmonogramsand in tracing the present whereabouts of this piece,
details in gold [PLATE, C] is figured as showing which makes a fourth item in the group of works
many of the same qualities as the two pieces just by yet another master whose identity is concealed
described. It is of about the same date and may from us under the initials I C. Fortunately for
probably be attributed to the same hand. There those who occupy themselves with the problems
is the same laborious execution, outlining every of Limoges enamels, his work is entirely distinct
detail with a timid line of exceptional and unvary- in style from that of any later master who owned
ing thinness (lines apparentlythicker are only the the same initials.
result of the union of two or more); the same 2 Spitzercollection. Sale Catalogue,Paris, I893, lot 579, pl. xvi.
221
Notes on Italian Medals
of course, is only the fashion of the time; but I a very interesting medal of the same person is,
am inclined to regard the medal as of North apparently, unpublished [PLATE, C]. Unfortu-
Italian, probably Lombard origin, and as having nately it only exists, so far as I know, in a I6th-
been made during Cominato's regency ratherthan century lead casting, which has but ill withstood
afterwards,when lie would probably have added " the wreckful siege of battering days ". Never-
to his name some indication of his position as theless, if it is a wreck, it is easy to see that the
papal or imperial orator. original was a beautiful thing. It is in Mr.
Maurice Rosenheim's collection, and measures
ROBERTO DA SANSEVERINO. 91 mm. in diameter. On the obverse are the
A medal of the celebrated condottiere who confronted busts of Roberto and his wife, Lucrezia
played an important part in the militaryhistory of of Siena. Lucrezia has suffered severely; the
Italy, from the time of Francesco Sforza until his ugly mass on her cheek-partly perhaps repre-
death in 1487, has long been known.4 It is illus- senting curls, but also partly mere accretion due
trated in the PLATE, B, from a specimen (not a to bad casting-and the injury to her lips and
first-rate casting, but old) in the British Museum. nose take away most of her charm. Nevertheless,
The portrait,which represents him at a consider- the group is very attractive, and the bust of
able age, wearing a chain, has no little dignity. Roberto, which has come better out of the wars,
The inscriptiondescribeshim as Robertusde Sancto is fine. The posing and the whole spirit of the
Severino Kagonensis Italiae Capitaneus generalis.5 composition suggest Ferrareseinfluence; but it is
The reverse design is less distinguished-a some- difficult to make a definite conjecture. One name
what too dainty Victory, in fluttering dress, trips which has been put forward, Sperandio, we may
along, carrying a wreath and holding up her skirt promptly reject; the work is without either his
with her left hand. The workmanship has some force or his coarseness. The attribution was
Florentine affinities,although it does not by any doubtless suggested by the superficialresemblance
means belong to the neighbourhood of Niccolo to his medal with the confronted busts of Ercole I
Fiorentino. The portrait is that of an old man, and his duchess Eleonora.
and as Roberto is called Captain General of Italy, On the reverse-and this is the proof that we
it was doubtless made after his breach with have only a i6th-century casting before us-is a
Lodovico il Moro in 1481; from that time onward reproduction of an oval plaquette with Hercules
he might, as being usually in the employ of Venice shooting at the centaur Nessus, who carries off
or the Pope, or both, perhaps claim the title which Deianira on his back to the left. In the right
the medallist gives him. The only Florentine background is a river-god seated, leaning on his
medallist of the time whose style this piece recalls urn, from which flows the stream which separates
is Adriano Fiorentino. It has not his lettering; it Hercules from the centaur. The original plaquette
has not the ugly border of large pearls which he was by Giovanni Bernardi (born I496), and the
usually, though not invariably, employs; it has Berlin specimen (here reproduced [PLATE,D]) is
not his ungainly composition; but the treatment actually signed IO.6 Of the signature no trace
of the bust, with the prominent shoulder, recalls remains on the reverse of our medal.
one of his mannerisms; and on the reverse we The plaquette has an interest of its own. It
have-as on the Pontano medals, if they are his- seems that it was inspired by the picture, or by a
a single figure, in a rather empty field, with a drawing for the picture, by Antonio Pollaiuolo,
short, widely spaced inscription. Though one representing the same subject. The picture is
may hesitate to attribute it definitely to him-he now at New Haven, in the Jarves collection.7 It,
is a shadowy and puzzling enough figure already-- or some drawing for it, or a variation of it,
it seems that it is in his neighbourhood, before he inspired Diirer with an idea for a Herculesslaying
left Florence for Naples, that we should look for the Stymiphalian Birds. In Bernardi's plaquette
the author of this piece. the composition is naturally much compressed,
If this medal has long been known, anotherand and many details altered; Deianira rides astride,
4 Armand, II, 61, 12.
and the centaur's attitude is slightly different,
5" Ragonensis " is puzzling. It can hardly be a mistake for since he turns his back to the spectator, instead
" Aragonensis ", even if that could be used as a synonym for of his front as in the picture. Also Bernardi has
"Neapolitanus", which I doubt. Nor do I know of any con- 6
nexion with either Ragona in Calabria or Ragogna in the Berlin, I223, Molinier, 331.
Veneto which would explain it. Mr. W. H. Woodward, how- 7Burlington Magazine, March I906, p. 53; M. Cruttwell,
ever, suggests that it may refer to Regnano, a fortified hill-town Antonio Pollainolo, p. 78, with P1. x. The date of the painting
near San Severino in the Marche. appears to be about 1467.
222
? i
- :-
i: : : r:
. .
is
>,,C
-::
! a ? ?; ;-
a4
ff~~~?
I.