Niversity of otre Dame du Lac invited the President of the u.s. To be its Commencement speaker. Some of the President's policies are contrary to the fundamental teachings of the Catholic church. Clients were arrested on a charge of trespass as defined under Indiana law.
Original Description:
Original Title
Thomas More Society's Settlement Agreement with Notre Dame regarding Arrested Pro-Life Activists
Niversity of otre Dame du Lac invited the President of the u.s. To be its Commencement speaker. Some of the President's policies are contrary to the fundamental teachings of the Catholic church. Clients were arrested on a charge of trespass as defined under Indiana law.
Niversity of otre Dame du Lac invited the President of the u.s. To be its Commencement speaker. Some of the President's policies are contrary to the fundamental teachings of the Catholic church. Clients were arrested on a charge of trespass as defined under Indiana law.
AGREEMENT NOT TO SUE
This Agreement Not to Sue (“Agreement”) is entered into by and among the
University of Notre Dame du Lac (“University”), and those individuals from the list
lient” and
attached as Exhibit “A” who have executed this Agreement (individually
collectively “Clients”) (University and Clients are collectively the “Parties”). The Clients
were included as part of a Notice of Tort Claim (“NTC”), tendered to the University by
Attorney Thomas Dixon (“Clients’ Counsel”) on behalf of the Clients.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. In 2009, the University invited the President of the United States to be its
Commencement speaker.
B. Clients expressed concerns about this invitation because some of the
President's policies are contrary to the fundamental teachings of the
Catholic Chureh,
C. Based upon their sincerely held beliefs, Clients felt an obligation to visit
the Campus of the University (“Campus”) from on or about May 1, 2009
until May 17, 2009, the date of Commencement.
D. The University has certai
Campus (“Protest Policies”
policies relative to protests conducted on its
‘The Clients conducted certain activities on Campus which the University
believed violated its Protest Policies.
F. Asa result, Cliemts were arrested on a charge of trespass as defined under
Indiana law and criminal charges of trespass as a Class A Misdemeanor
were brought in the St. Joseph County, Indiana Superior Court by the
Prosecuting Attorney of St. Joseph County (“Prosecutor”).
G. During the course of discovery in the criminal proceedings,
representatives from the University were subpoenaed to testify, and the
University was represented by its General Counsel's Office and outside
counsel (collectively “Counsel for University”) during those proceedings.
H. During the course of these discovery proceedings, Counsel for University
and Clients’ Counsel have discussed the prospects of reconciliation1. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a basis for reconciliation
before God and a continuing dialogue between the University and Clients.
J. Clients are pro-life activists, who were arrested while engaged in prayerful
demonstrations in support of their cause. They are all deeply committed
Christians and almost all are Roman Catholics. No damage to person or
property arose out of their aetions.
K. University is a leading Catholic Institution of Higher Learning and is
actively involved in pro-life advocacy and ministry, Many of the
University’s highest ranking officers, directors, and faculty, along with
hundreds of students have committed to regularly attending the March for
Life in Washington D.C. alongside several of the Clients. Further, the
University is engaged in many other pro-life initiatives, both on Campus,
and throughout its expansive Alumni Association network,
L. While it is not within the University’s power to dismiss the pendin;
criminal charges, it is the University’s position that reconciliation with its
brothers and sisters in the faith will be much better promoted and
accomplished through settlements of disagreements, than. through
litigation. Clients share this belief and wish to engage this dialogue with
the University as well.
M. No further activities by Clients have occurred since May, 2009, either on
Campus or throughout the State of Indiana which would cause any one of
them to be either arrested or cause the University to enforce the No
Trespass Notices which were issued to Clients.
N. _ Itis the sincere wish of the University and Clients to use this Agreement
as the foundation for working together in their common beliefs and
activities in support of the sanctity of human life.
0. This Agreement should not be construed as an admission of any liability
or wrongdoing by any of the Parties.
Wherefore, based upon the mutual promises and stipulations , the Parties agree as
follows:
1. Statement _of Facts. The Statement of Facts are incorporated into the
operative provisions of this Agreement as if fully set out herein.
2. Stipulations _of University. The University agrees to:
(@) Cancel and rescind all No Trespass Notices which were issued to
Clients. Accordingly, Clients are weleome to visit the University’s
‘Campus for all purposes afforded to the general public,(b)
d)
Communicate to the Prosecutor its support for dismissing with
prejudice all criminal charges pending against Clients from the
May, 2009 arrests which occurred on or adjacent to Campus under
Consolidated Cause No. 71D01-0905-CM-03246.
Counsel for the Parties have approved for publication on or after
the Effective Date two (2) Press Releases to be distributed
contemporaneously to the public. A copy of the Press Releases
are attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit “B-1" (the
“University Release”) and Exhibit “B-2” (the “Thomas More
Society Release” collectively “Press Releases”).
Undertake such other reasonable actions which are necessary in
order to implement the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Stipulations of Clients. The Clients shall individually or collectively:
(a)
(e)
@
Refrain forever from instituting, pressing, collecting, or in any way
acting or proceeding upon any and all claims, judgments, debts,
causes of action, suits and proceedings of any kind, in the civil
Jaw, or in equity, which they individually or collectively ever had,
now have, or may have against the University, United States of
America, State of Indiana, St. Joseph County, and the City of
South Bend, their officers, employees, or their legal
representatives, agents, successors, or assigns arising out of the
May, 2009 arrests, and described in the NTC.
When visiting Campus, Clients shall follow all rules, regulations,
and policies of the University, required of the general public.
Counsel for the Parties have approved for publication on or after
the Effective Date two (2) Press Releases to be distributed
contemporaneously to the public. A copy of the Press Releases
are attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit “B-1” (the
“University Release”) and Exhibit “B-2” (the “Thomas More
Society Release” collectively “Press Releases”)
Undertake such other reasonable actions which are necessary in
order to implement the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Mutual Stipulations .
(a)
In the spirit of reconciliation and a continuing dialogue, no Party to
this Agreement, (or his or her Counsel) shall disparage or criticize
this Agreement, nor shall any Counsel for the Parties make any(b)
Effective Date of
comment which is inconsistent with the spirit of this Agreement.
However, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the University
or Clients from criticizing or conducting lawful activities off
Campus which protest against or criticize policies or actions
which conflict with the doctrines of the Catholic faith regarding
the sanctity of life
In no event shall the Parties make any public comment regarding
this Agreement until after its Effective Date.
Agreement,
@
(b)
This Agreement shall become final and binding only at such time
as the Prosecutor dismisses with prejudice (“Dismissal”) the
pending charges against Clients found in Consolidated Cause No.
711D01-090S-CM-03246 pending in the St, Joseph County Superior
Court, In the event this Dismissal fails to occur before the
expiration of the Initial Tolling Agreement reflected in Section
5(b) below, or the expiration of any subsequent Tolling Agreement
entered into between or among the Parties, this Agreement shall be
void and the obligations of the Parties hereunder shall no longer be
binding upon such Parties.
Recognizing the large number of Clients involved in this
Agreement, and the intent of the Parties to have as many of the
Clients as possible the opportunity to be a Party to this Agreement,
the Parties hereby agree to toll any statute of limitations regarding
the exercise of any civil remedies to and including June 1, 2011
(“Initial Tolling Agreement”), A further purpose of this Initial
Tolling Agreement is to permit the Prosecuting Attorney to fully
evaluate the communication between the University and the
Prosecuting Attorney contemplated under Section 2(b) of this
Agreement. Notwithstanding the Initial Tolling Agreement, the
Parties shall endeavor to finalize this Agreement at the earliest
possible date understanding the Effective Date will be determined
by the decision of the Prosecuting Attorney
Miscellaneous. The following general terms are made a part of this
Agreement:
(a)
(b)
‘This Agreement shall bind, and inure to the benefit of, the Parties
and their heirs, personal and legal representatives, and successors
and assigns.
This Agreement shall be interpreted by the laws of the State of
Indiana, including, but not limited to, Indiana Trial Rule 408 and