Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.emeraldinsight.com/0951-354X.htm
IJEM
24,6 Early career teachers’ quit
intentions: implications
for teacher education
478
Mohan Raju Pamu
University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify what job-related, individual, and
profession-related variables cause the intention to quit teaching among the early career teachers,
especially teachers of Ethiopia.
Design/methodology/approach – Quit intentions were measured adapting the scale developed by
Mueller and Lawler, and 11 profession-related and person-related job variables were measured by
author-developed and literature-derived scale items on a five-point Likert scale, along with five status
variables. Data were analyzed from a sample of 308 early career teachers belonging to secondary and
preparatory schools of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Findings – An alarming 53 per cent sample expressed high quit intention whereas only 13 per cent
teachers showed low quit intentions. Choice satisfaction (accounting 44 per cent variance), availability
of other job opportunities (23 per cent variance), perceived status (15 per cent variance), and
self-accountability (13 per cent variance) emerged as predictor variables. None of the five status
variables emerged as significant predictors. Commitment to teaching profession was not a significant
predictor, suggesting the two concepts independent of each other.
Research limitations/implications – Providing freedom of choice at entry level to teaching
profession coupled with enhancing rigour in pre-service education was suggested as major steps
required for decreasing high-level quit intentions.
Practical implications – Education policy needs to be such that for preparation of teachers of
secondary and preparatory level, pre-service teacher education students should have attained maturity
of adulthood with a minimum academic attainment of a post-undergraduate level or a post-graduate
level. This is to enable early career teachers to handle adolescence-level school students by being
equipped with better skills learned during pre-service teacher education.
Originality/value – The results are pertinent not only to Ethiopia but also to any less developed or a
developing country, where “catch them early” policy is followed for pre-service education and where
less rigorous pre-service education exists.
Keywords Teachers, Ethiopia, Job satisfaction, Employee turnover, Career development
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
Most organizations and governments not only strive to implement strategies for
attracting personnel but also strive to make more value of existing employees and
attempt to reduce turnover. Most of the models explaining withdrawal intentions
assume a sequence from the work environment, through affective reaction to the
International Journal of Educational job/profession, to the decision to remain, or to leave the job/profession. Early defectors
Management from the teaching profession were found to be staggering somewhere around 30 per cent
Vol. 24 No. 6, 2010
pp. 478-491 among the new entrants, and by the time their fifth year passed, another 20-30 per cent
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited defected in other countries (Mark and Anderson, 1985; Schlechty and Vance, 1983). The
0951-354X
DOI 10.1108/09513541011067665 purpose of this paper is to identify what job-related, individual, and profession-related
variables cause the intention to quit teaching, especially among the early career teachers Teachers’ quit
of Ethiopia. intentions
Occupational choice may be the result of an individual’s deliberately planned and
purposeful rationalizations or people with certain personality traits are attracted
towards particular occupations or that people chose teaching primarily because of the
extrinsic motivations or of social pressures (Holland, 1973). Others (Blau and Duncan,
1967) argue that career choice is the outcome of combined influences exerted by personal 479
aspirations and one’s character together with situational and social constraints.
Furthermore, many young people, being at the most idealistic stage in their lives, are
motivated by the desire or the ideal to serve to the community. Another group to whom
teaching appeals are those students who develop special interests and proficiency in
favorite subjects and come to regard teaching as a career which could offer the best
opportunities of fostering such interests. This aspect of career choice has great
significance in a restricted occupational environment. Farrugia (1986) and many
researchers argued that teachers’ career choice is determined by a combination of
personal and social forces, which may be both intrinsic and extrinsic to pedagogical
commitment.
Quit intentions are understood in organizational behaviour research through
variables as diverse as demographic characteristics, pecuniary conditions, and
non-pecuniary psychological and organizational conditions. Results pertaining to
demographic characteristics have shown consistent negative relationship of age and
tenure with quit intentions, whereas mixed results seem to have been shown for other
demographic characteristics.
An individual’s quit intentions can be described as a psychological response to
specific organizational conditions which fall on a continuum of organizational
withdrawal behaviours ranging from daydreaming to the thought of quitting; the
intention to search for job elsewhere; the intention to quit, the physical act of turnover
(Kraut, 1975; Mobley et al., 1978); and behaviours such as absenteeism, tardiness, and
actual turnover (Griffeth et al., 2000; Vandenberg and Nelson, 1999; Lachman and
Aranya, 1986; Baysinger and Mobley, 1983; Cotton and Tuttle, 1986; Mowday et al.,
1982). Many empirical studies confirm the important role of organizational
commitment in the process of turnover (Lin and Chen, 2004; Susskind et al., 2000;
van Breukelen et al., 2004). These studies generally indicate that an individual’s
turnover intentions are negatively related to job satisfaction and organizational
commitment. Employees who are highly committed to their organization are less likely
to leave than employees who are relatively uncommitted (Joiner et al., 2004; Near,
1989). However, the relationship between career commitment and continuance
commitment has been found to be negative and indicates an inconsistency between the
theoretical and the empirical levels. A recent meta-analysis by Lee et al. (2000) reported
a weak negative correlation between these constructs.
Withdrawal intention from the occupation develops over a longer period of time as
compared to the withdrawal intention from an organization, mainly because it is an
easier decision to leave an organization than to leave an occupation (Blau, 2000).
It should be noted that studies have concentrated on employee withdrawal intentions
for an organization, despite the acknowledged importance of distinction between
withdrawal intentions such as leaving an organization and occupation (Blau, 2000;
Blau and Boal, 1989; Cohen, 1993). Withdrawal intentions from an occupation may be
IJEM predicted from career or occupational commitment. Meyer et al. (1993) reported that
24,6 occupational commitment accounted for the variation in the intention to leave the
occupation more than organizational commitment did.
Nevertheless, human resource specialists often treat turnover intentions as the most
direct precursor of turnover behaviour. Steel and Ovalle (1984) observed that turnover
intent was correlated with actual turnover at r ¼ 0.50 across cumulative studies.
480 A more recent meta-analysis found that the magnitude of the relationship was 0.45
(Griffeth et al., 2000). Allen and Meyer (1990) argue that the intention to leave the
organization is negatively related to all the three components of organizational
commitment. Nevertheless, Kalbers and Fogarty (1995) did not find the relation
between the commitment and the intention to leave. The association between intent
and actual quitting is, of course, far from perfect – some intentions do not materialize
and some resignations are impulsive (Mobley, 1982).
discrimination, item-total correlation, and reliability. The result of the item analysis
enabled to identify the best items measuring a variable and to decide on the variable’s
inclusion in the final data analysis. A number of variables were found to have
unacceptable reliability, even though the item-total correlations were high.
On the basis of obtained reliabilities, six variables that had shown unacceptable
reliability were dropped from further analysis of the data from the initial list of
17 variables. The dropped variables were perceived challenge, perceived advancement,
interest in the profession, external expectations, inner direction, and job satisfaction.
The final data analysis was done with 11 independent variables listed in Table I.
3. Results
The results are presented below by description of the sample on the background
characteristics followed by description of the sample on the study variables.
Correlation of the independent variables with quit intention is also presented followed
by analysis of predictor variables on the quit intention.
The sample of 308 early career teachers on their status information revealed no
significant differences among the respective categories on all five status variables.
The distribution of the early career teachers on their quit intentions was found to be
negatively skewed. Higher score indicated higher the intention to leave the teaching
profession. A large number of teachers were willing to “defect” from teaching profession
if there is a chance. Data also revealed that teachers’ quit intension progressively
increased as their teaching experience progressed from year 1 to year 5.
An attempt was made to categorize the quit intention into low, medium, and high
intention as the quit intention could be measured on a five-point Likert-type scale.
A score 8 and below was considered “low” intention whereas a score 16 and above was
considered “high” intention. The data revealed that of 308 early career teachers,
164 teachers (53 per cent) were considered to have high quit intentions where as only
42 teachers (13 per cent) expressed low quit intentions.
The quit intentions of early career teachers’ frequencies by status variables are
presented in Tables II-IV.
IJEM When a comparison was made between low quit intention and high quit intention
24,6 teachers in relation to their gender, of 164 high quit intention teachers 141 were males.
In other words, of 249 male teachers of this study, 141 were found to be having high
intention to leave the profession, given the chance. Of 180 teachers with graduate
qualification, 145 teachers were with high quit intention. The proportion was similar
with teachers with different years of experience.
484 The description of the study variables (both independent variables and dependent
variable) on their mean and SD is presented in Table V.
The 11 study variables that were found having an acceptable reliability were included
in the analysis, and most of the variables were found to have negative relationship with
quit intentions (Table VI), as expected from organizational research. Of these, three
variables showed non-significant correlation with quit intention.
The results of stepwise multiple regression analysis to identify significant
conditions/variables contributing to the early career teachers’ quit intentions
1 2 3 4 5 Total n (%)
Table IV.
Quit intention by years Low intention 13 6 12 9 2 42 (13)
of service High intention 38 23 28 39 36 164 (53)
Items Mean SD
The multiple correlation of these four variables with quit intention was found to be 0.66,
indicating that these four significant predictors had accounted for 43 per cent of variance
in quit intention. Hence, it could be considered from the amount of multiple correlation
that the selected predictors together were very important predictors. From the results of
the stepwise regression analysis, the individual contribution of variables is evident from
Table VIII, in the form of beta values. The choice satisfaction emerged as the first
significant variable predicting quit intentions accounting for 43 per cent of the variance
(beta value) independently to quit intention. The perceived other job opportunities had
23 per cent of variance, followed by perceived status (15.3 per cent) and
self-accountability (12.9 per cent) variance that are unique to quit intention.
Variable r
Discussion
The results indicate that 53 per cent of early career teachers had high quit intentions,
whereas only 13 per cent teachers indicated low quit intention. This could be considered
to be an alarming proportion within early career teachers. The early career teachers,
because of their younger age, coupled with idealism would be viewed generally to show
more stay intention. This also prevails because of their other non-commitments in their
life, such as less family responsibilities, less children responsibilities, and other
refraining factors that are usually attributable to more experienced teachers. The
another reason that could be interpreted is that though there is low “investments”
in the career, there are lack of anchoring points in the profession that could hold them.
These anchoring points could be job satisfaction, more conducive environment in the
schools, social support by the senior teachers, or lack of mentors within the professional
environment.
It could also be due to the fact that these early career teachers did not develop a sense
of identity as a teacher. Identity as a teacher would develop as a result of the pre-service
training programme and continue during the early career positive school experiences.
The high percentage of high quit intentions puts a question mark on teacher education
programme itself. It is the rigour in teacher education, the professional image/
professional values imparted during teacher education programme enable the early
career teacher to commit for teaching and stay in teaching. The author’s informal
discussion with some of the faculty members in teacher education programme reveals
that the rigour in teaching practice practicum calls for revisiting the existing ground
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients coefficients
Step B Std error b t Sig.
Conclusions
Teacher quit intensions have been a concern to planners and administrators because
these quit intentions may ultimately result in actual quitting of the profession, which
could result in waste of resources incurred on training generation of teachers. It is of
concern because it could result in lack of interest or tardiness to fulfill the professional
teaching responsibilities in an effective manner, where knowledge development and
human resource developments are crucial for an underdeveloped nation. Making
teaching as an attractive career and retaining the early career teachers is a larger
responsibility of the powers that be, where choice-based admission policy and
developing “teacher identity” through rigour in teacher education programmes could
be immediate and tangible measures.
References
Adams, G.J. (1996), “Using a Cox regression model to examine voluntary teacher turnover”,
Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 64, pp. 267-85. 489
Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P. (1990), “The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance
and normative commitment to the organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology,
Vol. 63, pp. 1-18.
Baysinger, B.D. and Mobley, W.H. (1983), “Employee turnover: individual and organizational
analyses”, in Rowland, K.M. and Ferris, G.R. (Eds), Research in Personnel and Human
Resources Management, Vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 269-319.
Blau, G. (2000), “Job, organizational, professional context antecedents as predictors of intent for
inter-role work transitions”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 56, pp. 330-445.
Blau, G. and Boal, K.B. (1989), “Using job involvement and organisational commitment
interactively to predict turnover”, Journal of Management, Vol. 15, pp. 115-27.
Blau, P.M. and Duncan, O.D. (1967), The American Occupational Structure, Wiley, New York, NY.
Bredson, P.V., Fruth, M.J. and Kasten, K.L. (1983), “Organizational incentive and secondary
school teaching”, Journal of Research and Development in Education, Vol. 16, pp. 52-6.
Carmeli, A. and Gefen, D. (2005), “The relationship between work commitment models and
employee withdrawal intentions”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 20 No. 2,
pp. 63-86.
Cohen, A. (1993), “Work commitment in relation to withdrawal intentions and union
effectiveness”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 26, pp. 75-90.
Cotton, J. and Tuttle, J. (1986), “Employee turnover: a meta-analysis and review with implications
for research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, pp. 55-70.
Denscombe, M. (1985), Classroom Control: A Sociological Perspective, Allen & Unwin, London.
Dowrkin, A.G. (1980), “The changing demography of public school teachers: some applications
for faculty turnover in urban areas”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 65-73.
Falch, T. and Strom, B. (2005), “Teacher turnover and non-pecuniary factors”, Economics of
Education Review, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 611-31.
Farrugia, C. (1986), “Career-choice and sources of occupational satisfaction and frustration
among teachers in Malta”, Comparative Education, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 221-31.
Gaede, O. (1978), “Reality shock: a problem among first year teachers”, The Clearinghouse,
Vol. 41, pp. 405-9.
Griffeth, R.W., Hom, P.W. and Gaertner, S. (2000), “A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates
of employee turnover: update, moderator test, and research implications for the next
millennium”, Journal of Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 463-88.
Griffin, G.A., Barnes, S., Hughes, R., O’Neil, S., Defino, M.E. and Hukill, A. (1983), Clinical
Preservice Teacher Education: Final Report to the National Institute of Education,
University of Texas, Austin.
Grissmer, D. and Kirby, S. (1987), Teacher Attrition: The Uphill Climb to Staff the Nation’s Public
Schools, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Holland, J.I. (1973), Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers, Prentice-Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, NJ.
IJEM Joiner, T.A., Bartram, T. and Garreffa, T. (2004), “The effects of mentoring on perceived career
success, commitment and turnover intentions”, Journal of American Academy of Business,
24,6 Vol. 5 Nos 1/2, pp. 164-70.
Kalbers, L.P. and Fogarty, T.J. (1995), “Professionalism and its consequences: a study of internal
auditors”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 64-86.
Kam-cheung, W. and Kwok-kai, L. (1995), “Teacher turnover and turnover intentions in
490 Hong Kong aided secondary schools”, Educational Research Journal, Vol. 10 No. 1,
pp. 36-46.
Kasten, K.L. (1984), “The efficacy of institutionally dispensed rewards in elementary school
teaching”, Journal of Research and Development in Education, Vol. 17, pp. 1-13.
Kraut, A.I. (1975), “Predicting turnover of employees from measured job attitudes”,
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 233-43.
Lachman, R. and Aranya, N. (1986), “Job attitudes and turnover intentions among professionals
in different work settings”, Organizational Studies, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 279-93.
Lachman, R. and Diamant, E. (1987), “Withdrawal and restraining factors in teachers’ turnover
intentions”, Journal of Occupational Behaviour, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 219-32.
Lee, K., Carswell, J.J. and Allen, N. (2000), “A meta-analytic review of occupational commitment:
relations with person- and work-related variables”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85
No. 5, pp. 799-811.
Lin, C.P. and Chen, M.F. (2004), “Career commitment as a moderator of the relationships among
procedural justice, perceived organizational support, organizational commitment, and
turnover intentions”, Asia Pacific Management Review, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 519-38.
McLaughlin, M.W., Pfiefer, R.S., Swanson-Owens, D. and Yee, S. (1985), “Why teachers won’t
teach”, Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 67, pp. 420-5.
Mark, J.H. and Anderson, B.D. (1985), “Teacher survival rates in St Louis, 1969-1982”, American
Educational Research Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 413-21.
Merenda, P.F. (2006), “An overview of adapting educational and psychological assessment
instruments: past and present”, Psychological Reports, Vol. 99, pp. 307-14.
Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J. and Smith, C.A. (1993), “Commitment to organizations and occupations:
extension and test of a three-component conceptualization”, Journal of Applied Psychology,
Vol. 78, pp. 538-51.
Mobley, W.H. (1982), Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences, and Control, Addison-Wesley,
Reading, MA.
Mobley, W.H., Horner, S.O. and Hollingsworth, A.T. (1978), “An evaluation of precursors of
hospital employee turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 63 No. 4, pp. 408-14.
Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.M. and Steers, R.M. (1982), Employee-organizational Linkage:
The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover, Academic Press,
New York, NY.
Mueller, C.W. and Lawler, E.J. (1999), “Commitment to organizational units: some basic
principles and preliminary findings”, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 62 No. 4, pp. 325-46.
Near, J.P. (1989), “Organizational commitment among Japanese and US workers”, Organization
Studies, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 281-300.
Price, J.L. and Mueller, C.W. (1981), “A causal model of turnover for nurses”, Academy of
Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 543-65.
Rosenholtz, S.J. (1989), “Workplace conditions that affect teacher quality and commitment: Teachers’ quit
implications for teacher induction programs”, The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 89 No. 4,
pp. 420-39. intentions
Schlechty, P.C. and Vance, V.S. (1983), “Recruitment, selection, and retention: the shape of the
teaching force”, The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 83, pp. 469-87.
Sizemore, B., Brossard, C.A. and Harrigan, B. (1986), An Abashing Anomaly: The High Achieving
Predominantly Black Elementary School, Macon University Press, Washington, DC. 491
Smart, J.C. (1990), “A causal model of faculty turnover intentions”, Research in Higher Education,
Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 405-24.
Smith, T.M. and Ingersoll, R.M. (2004), “What are the effects of induction and mentoring on
beginning teacher turnover?”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 41 No. 3,
pp. 681-714.
Steel, R.P. and Ovalle, N.K. (1984), “A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship
between behavioral intentions and employee turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology,
Vol. 69 No. 4, pp. 673-86.
Susskind, A.M., Borchgrevink, C.P., Kacmar, K.M. and Brymer, R.A. (2000), “Customer service
employees’ behavioral intentions and attitudes: an examination of construct validity and
a path model”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 53-77.
van Breukelen, W., van der Vlist, R. and Steensma, H. (2004), “Voluntary employee turnover:
combining variables from the traditional turnover literature with the theory of planned
behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25 No. 7, pp. 893-914.
Vandenberg, R.J. and Nelson, J.B. (1999), “Disaggregating the motives underlying turnover
intentions: when do intentions predict turnover behavior”, Human Relations, Vol. 52 No. 10,
pp. 1313-36.
Corresponding author
Mohan Raju Pamu can be contacted at: rajupm30@gmail.com