PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS Prof. Elizabeth Aguiling- Pangalangan First Semester, SY 2005-2006 Referen c e books: Tolentino, Vol.

1, Civil Code and Sempio-Div, The Family Code of the Philippines

CO URSE O UTL I N E AN D SYL L AB US OF READI N GS

introduction A . B a c k g r o u n d o n P h i l o s o p h y o f t h e C i v i l C o d e *Agabin, The Philosophy of the Civil Code, 66 PLJ 1 (1991) B. Intersection of Modern Constitutional Developments and Traditional Family Law 1. Provisions of the 1987 Constitution Sec. 12 and 14, Art. 11 Sec. 1, Art. I H Art. X\'! 2. Overview of Due Process and Equai Protection Cases Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438
11.

Civil Personality A. Concept and Classes of Persons Arts. 37, 40-47 S pc 12, Art 11, Constitutitun Cases: Geluz v. CA, 2 SCRA 801 (1961) People v. Tirol, 102 SCRA 558 Joaquin v. Navarro, 93 Phil 257 A. Capacity to Act and Restrictions Thereon Presumption of Capacity Standard Oil Co. v. Arenas, 19 Phil 363 2. Restrictions Arts. 6, 38-39, Civil Code a. Minority RA 6809

i. Effect on Contracts Arts. 1327, 1390 (1), 1403 (3), 1397, 1399, 1489, 1426-27, 1489, Civil Code Cases: Mercado v. Expiritu, 37 PHil. 21 15 Bambalan v. Maramba, 51 Phii. 4i 7 Branganza v- Villa Abrille 105 Phil. 456 Shields v. Gross, 58 NY 2d 338 J. Effe-,t on Marriage Art. 5 and 35, Family Code Moe v. Dinkins, 533 F. SUPP. 623 iii. Effect on Crimes Arts. 12, 48 2, 68 RPC
79

b. Insanity i. E f f e ct o n Co n t r a ct s Arts. 1327, 1328, 1399, Civil Code i. Effect on Crimes Art. * 112, R P_ C lases: Carilln v. Olaojaco, 46 Phil. 9511 U.S. v. Vaquilar, 27 Phil. 88 Dumaguin v. Reynolds, 10 Phil. 306 ii. C. Effect on Marriage Art. 45 and 47, FC

State of being deaf-mute Arts. 1327, 807, 820, Civil Code Cases: People v. Sasota, 52 Phil. 281 Director of Lands v. Abelardo, 54 Phil. 381

C. Prodigality Art 92 (2), Rules, of Court Case: Martinez v. Martinez. 1 Phil. 182 C. Civil Interdiction Art. 34, RPC Arts. 54 & 123, Civil Code Arts. 11.2, 13.5 RPC D. Family Relations A rts. 37 & 87, Family Code Arts. 1109 & 1490, Civil Code

G. Alienage Sec. 2, 7, 8, 11, Art. 12 Sec. 4, Art. 14, Sec 11; Art 16 Constitution H. Absence Arts. 39U, 391 Civil Code Art. 124, FC Married Women Art. 2259, Civil Code Rule 3, Sec, 4. Rules of Court Ill. Marriage A. Definition and Nature of Marriage Art. 1, Family Code Sec. 1-4, Art. XV, Constitution Breach of Promise to Marry - Arts. 19-21, 2176 Civil Code Cases: ,Nassmerv. Velez, 12 SCRA 648 Tranianco v. CA, 18 SCRA 994
De Jesus v. Syquia., 58 Phil. 866 -

B. Marriage Models 1. Traditional Marriage *Galbraith, "Economics and the Public Purpose" (1973) (photocopy) Case: Graham v. Graham, 33 F. Stipp 936 - -i k,,ui i - c-t-,t 1. Challen es to the raditional Marriage Model
g T

Chafe, "Looking Backward in Order to Lock Forward" (1976) (photocopy) a. The Changing Status of Women Dunn v. Palermo, 522 S.W. 2d 679 b. By Private Contract: When Valid? When Void? In Re Santiago, 70 Phil 66 -j Selanova v. Mendoza, 64 SCRA 69 i
1
,,

,,A-

A,I

C. Requisites of Mar , riage Arts. 2-3, Family I. Essential Requisites

, "

,, ,

I. u, , j a 1

, , C, ;3 pi ~~ P 'j ; I I I ~ ~ : ~, -i i 1 d

I" I i I a 1 t_.: /1 PIL;,ii;qje)-

UPI[ 21 Docember PGOO ;Air:, Kkio LoAd. 1 0 W(j,

,

_JJ;! C o d e ( ) ; i

opc ,.jiiw,,j up

110uplIands

Ari3. 4, 45(3) F,,iiiiii.y, Gode W o e V , S wo lq u 5 ; P h i l b u

A j[hori[y of ScLinnLing Officer Ai A n 10. M, ?2 Family Code [Meet of absence of authority Alt 4, 35(2) 10 i 3, Civil Coda Case: flahrm v. Dan QgWy 250 SCTA 12D ArqQ3 v. Occhmo, AT-0 11, 2002

Ari ~ -3. W305: y

9-34 Fan ii1y Code; PD065( iW

1 j L) I i c v Ij S C RA 2, 1 5 7 a More I I V. A4we~~ 010 8 C R , A 120 People V. Dorromcu, 133 !SCR/\ 10G `So guisabal v. 106 SCRA (31'
J

i l

T w o

) a

n r

w e

Aii~ 0"

(1:;. Gclensorly

Ads. 3 G, 3, 21, Cases:

29, 22.11

12 1-11;1!. 7",3 I 1,1(11 idujic; V. L;e [ cu; i.

klet;jo vi.
P

r( 66

Ali. 220 U Civil I of t; y e I i'l tid"d V. CA, 2~qq

d ,- , J a c o b V .
,

oi G 'i 11 t

Ni;(rW ,,tY;0Ij f L,,;C,(,jC C)

'

A, S C k/ i I t (IQ

I ..,<.601,101,10

9 mopimo

V-s.

"Jid

`J-dII';1

35 t . 4, 15 - 4 1 , 44 Arts. 390-391, CC
Pei VS "I A A:j

C o d e. 8 5

, 7 l uu y w ick -Atenfk (-ere

fraj

V. I'vilul Idoza, Foiel 1 : 1110 F)arnS, 122 SCrA 525 I v. Sct ii-)ic) -Dy, 14'1)) ~11 1 - R/% ~~19 Tone, 11) ~~ 1 SCRA - 1l Q1 f A_ ~ 01-11iantos, V . - I ' I / k
V. :713

, - Nt

e 2.4A - ,, ~A , Terre VS I-cry, -1s (~14~A!UJW

user',

Cilia V~

IT

1-loijaJ.]~m~--;c.)
v. Gant cro 203'

v.

A c! ~A i 'J' 47 (1991)

o ile

G. Art. 36 . (Read annotations in Semplo-Diy, i g vs Coln 0 )*;pw4 ) lon(JI-cul- oil The Family Code of the t j 1 if , ' JOYA a L e d n Philippines) C-4. A414, -1401.1.! Santos v. Bedla-Santos 2,10 SCRA 20 Rep. v. Molina, 268 ) SCRA '198 (1997)
e fl

e44, Me-

Domingo v. CA, 226 SCRA 672 I o, 3 -v. C " I io a , 302 324 2002) v. CA, 230 "GRil,
"24 Eflects of Nullity Arts. 50-541
f;La ftvVft, fir

Case: Ninal v. Badayong, 028 SCRA 122 (21000) 7 )!,D Marriages Grounds for Annulment Puts. 45-13. Family (1060 AIL 344, I\JJC Cnsps: !'\' n t i i ) I j i I a I -, v. T- I i o i -; o 'J 1-3 0 0 17 p-LI C ~ , 'I t V . B LJ G( ~ Z ~ 1 , S ' U r ,, q -/ L: Aquino V. Du I LO, 1091'111121 / \ 11 ,-~ y a V. owl, , 3n ~ C 1 ?is, kiAlZ v. Alieliza, 40 O.G. 19u3 2

wu:Icl- V. Ca;ii.-we';, 109 Phii. 2713 ; 'j ye W h e n a l e , 3 Abc-,crit.

S V. Idol

L;

64 Phil. il. 1.79

49,-"',) - 5,!, Family C (),Jc

1, Giv'ii Code J, Civil cc J c,

4. juri_3i.iichuii

,~/,

~! ~ ;,

II

A. Grounds Art. 56, Family Code Art. 97, Civil Code Wes: People v. Zapata and Dundee, 3 3 6 Milk wjl(,i NO oz v. Barrios, CA 51 OG 5247 C U M = w Pwiaramh I N S O M 0 2 US v K I M = 4 NO 110 ; i A Lapuz Sy v. SC!,A 117 D u l a Cruz, Dela Cruz, 22 ",CNA

. 4

,,

An. 56 P p qAe V . 3 u n s a n u , 59 ITH. 73 Ouunii, , o v-. Rorenuiclv% 107 Phil 35 Snogent v. S a r y n k 114 A. 428 V. " , ,'wnhaj, 102 Phil. 108 M a n v. M a n 2 Al - 1 E. I . 4f33 Gi;l0, ,--' V. i'AP~j&-yurig, '100 PM. (32'j Mak k v. ; Yoxedes, 1 (Y - j ph ii ',769
c l ~ r m l a
.

11

.,

5,74A)
W a s :

Oc t,ipc) v. Florunciarw, ('01 V. N - 1,1camU, 13 SGRA 222

~ , , u p i a

v. Vanwn l i, i(3 '6CR/'\ 'I

-

CHIOS:

U,,; ka 'Jima v. V ;! I Li rec 1, 11 1 F'u, ! !. I i i - 's-Luciano,

p

low& of (Wiro:

Loa n
V,

Ar

i-amily C~)dc (hitjwarico Co-1c) and I i i d, I i ik f /1, C I

1 GOSO: La Oe v. La Rua, 304 VVE. 2d 31,-'

DEteri i iining the Best interest of the Cl JIJ L Gender and Tender Years PreSUPiDUC;,-1 Cases: Ex We Devine, WO Go. 2d 686 Cc.rvaiit:,s v. Fujir,,ido, 169 SCRA -WS

ENdo" %o CA.
Colis V. caiLi.ir,

Parental Unfitris:,; Cases: F:]( Iman v. Feldioarl, 358 NY3 2d 501

-

Y E,arll.05 13 V. C,/"\,
A

53 GI /10/

b. the Chil ds PlAuPWO CObC C,,,,, 250 Pere v.

G UI (j :jj

d i, !, C,

311 A.

C.

1 ,

p Uon

(,m ct a 1 ; r-, r :jji

;ip Child Fununons in the pl lofoi~opy) k ) ;, r i r dW i ld H aVy ( C X, p q

il"i L !Gi 'Clt 10 , 9'` ,

357

Civil Cude, Ail. 2G ~=C

Farr L m I i v. I

OLIki

V .

I)ilk'), I 'JJ SCIII/\ 1,30 406

1, v.

I- lorr itev.CA3,i!)SCRA59~ -Cla!,J!a.k.jReJo (-c;o,360 Muslim Divorces Code of Muslim Personal Laws
2.

Case: Yasin v. Sharia District Ct, 241 SCRA GOG 11. De I-a(;to Separation Art. 10U, 127, 239, 242, 246, 24
1

_ C a , s eI : P e r e z v . G C A I T ( ' 5 5 5 6 1 J-- and Obligations Oumeon I-IL!Slj,')il(l and Wife

1. 0

Emersoii, Falk, Froodinan, Tli~~ Lqual f=ights Arnuidiner.-L A Constitutional Basis for Equal Rights f)i 'V.Iumell, 80 Yale L.J. 872; 936-954 (1971) hode, Justice and Gender, Ch. 1 Natural Rights arid Natural
(19901)

Col iAl)itaJUn, mutual love and ro,',.pect Art. 247, Revised Penal Code N-L 68, Family Co(,Ie-. Art. 34, civil Code [-;A 3353 (Anti Rap,-, Law)
IRA (.Y,'I3.'C' (Ai;;ti-VN,VC)

f\,J ~~ ra v. 1 11 j i Li g, 291 :;C[ V\ 451 G" J: ilizi calllp():3 Rucf4,1, 35 Phil. 2 , 52 Warren V. S L I tE,, 25 5 G a. i 5 1, 3 (i E. 2 d 2 ;'--1)],J1 V. City of I-o;rhjUtoii, 59,1') F- Suijp. Ib,"! Thl 1
V. 1, ,

Li!Jorta, 64 Wi' :A)' 474 NlY 2d 5(;i'

v .

2d

Ij

cosvi:

I-ei ,.I i~ivu,- v. 17 'jCi%A 6411 v Villanueva, 54 PI iL 92 v. ';,3ntiLtqo, 53 Phil. 952 i\ t i!,a n o v. (.-, 1 i uU i E i ij, 3c i ij, '110 3 F'I i i 1. 255 AM Rosario v. Dal Flusahu, 45 n?G 612W I'Jutu.jI I i 21t) and Supporll, /,i Its. L TO, FC corn:)_-ired with Ail. 11, CC 199200, PC
t i i, e .,. Ll;; G U i I e, 157 Nob c, b 2_!,3, 1) 9

N.'vv.

2(133(3 ['day() v. Lauren, 12 [-IAN. 453

U. Management of the Household

Art. 71, FC compared with Art. 115, CC E. Exercise of profession Alt. f3, 11C compared with Art. 1 17, (,3C PA 7192 jVu"inn A Development and NaUmuMbIlAng an') Case: V. Wino's, 93 wall) 13)

K Use of Surname Art. 370, 373, 377, 378 Civil Code;

ases:

oilva v. PeioY,
YHs&

'110 Phil 57

162 GCRA 66 v. Sharra Emstd.t supra

G. F~elicf. from Cuuil,;

Art. 72

Perez v. 1--lere.T, '109 Phil. 057 U Arroyo v. Vasquez, 42 Phil. 5,1 V11 Pif-verty Relations Between Spouses X Genes! PmAhn-s Ark, 14-81, Fan illy Code Gas(,,: Collector v. Fisher, il 0 Phil. ~XGq
f',

f)(mritir)n-, 1. lzeq WROS lul donam):

i i-, i n o v. o lo n i,--) n, 105 Phil Solk v. Ra r i -o s r), 57; Phil. c, N.1:11..-,c) V. , , C R A 3'3,1 D (-) n ~ i t i c) n r rr r. r i i t 11) t-, c JF ;I ;m ~ P. -,; o, f, , ~ i in fill-! l-'r I nfr

VL0 I1)or,_1I:c)n
C ,-I : ( ; 9 ..

-arew) v. Diron, 45 OG 1). 2iii't -i v. Cervantes, _)biien_ rvantos, 38 SCRA 28 Wading v. jCommercial Union, 381-hil. 164 I R lW , - 0 1 5 Si I M j ) , J I V . C A : 3 0 3 S ( C " w, c ry n; A I.) s i c. o n-, rn u ri M Prnvisinn- - Ark.
Is AP G, -,ujo,~ Upon the rl f , , ~ j 1 ;in( I Dispcsit;~oi of the fol Ownership Pissoli it'O,! Arts. 9.f+-10i L i r , ilid at!4.) P. A- 'i
I

I.

On:-i:; v J-willo, 50 Phil. 73`1 W n . ric Dpi'.- v. Dchzo, 6~-~ C r! D.

-

.ordi ic

ril I

a r t i l e r - l . i r o f G a in s - Arts. 105 rl y - .!'..r

G,%-n, -ral

V.

o. V.
v . 1,i -li , - (, 1),

2n i

'A

Oil V.
IZ,

1 2 4 ,(31 ?,/\ -:i 'I i I in I I I 1-'Va V. 'I A..;,

-,

r All. I 1:~' FC
c a s w

(,, 'astillo V . I - (' rn n'-'O v.

(A~

11

102

1 ?, t 11 e n in rc, i -n t i i: P0. .1"'0' !-(-, c: v. Forlt!o, '12

,

c. Charge-3 upon the CPG Arts. 121 A 2C Cases: me n-,iL 3' Javier v . 0 . ;, ~, 3,1 P; C, Perez v. Lx:tin, 2'.") F) R P %,,. hd i 1, 1G1 ", (-, 1 CLl3tiUj V. PvlorelnG, Lj eon Surety v. AWN Investment v. Ching 28R ECKA "0, Codos v. lWardo (No 19, 2noj , 7, 1

i. A(!iriiiistr,-itionof the C,FIC, M 124025 CasesFelipe v. Heirs of Maximo ~n, 120 Tinitiq,n v. Tinifigati, 100 !7GR'% ;iI9 Chiang v CA, 2!.1 ', C 372 R d i m v , Lopez (Januart %, 2002) la. (101-41-1! wlo V. Camnia (J -ant-mi y 23, 1 iisolulion of "he Art-,-. 1 -)6-120
Aldc
, I

r!

Liquidation ofAsm-, ANA WWI C N ao !. :', 'rlk1- v- C',1 1 (-,f

-:

!:op--imticn of Pm pHy and Niniddroku 4 Q con " Umm

Wwai 1 nT,y,f

MY

cosun:

134AW

of
kLim-iino,
'103

Icc
1
I

rd,
708

v.

nil.

o v,
G I , , L ".

J)

I`

,j

In m T b m k i y -A Conju , r-ii bpr imus Nman, ld 13C,04 321' A j-"A

;Arid lji,;,30111:r,il

AKY QW42
T SON N O woi

o,, Oi:

'-!";i P[

Ai!.

J,,

f;rt-3. 143-110 G. Pi opury Regimes uf Unkm Without Marriage Ads. 147-148 ".
11 7

'I'l l.

Cases: iLv v. orres, V. sc , 9 A 306 'Ida. de Uo I I " Ua ra V. 31 SOFA , - , L a , . i n V. Uiiaui: io ; 47 C)(.714216 \/'al(-I,.!s -v. [ JG 260 CCRA 221 ( I W;(!ao Caiiiio v. 1.(,c Caiho, 351
CIL',

AMILY i\viulohers t- I a 1-amily i. Hatufo- /Ws. 149-151, GC 1 S u p p u l - Arts. 195- 208, CN, iii. FuoHrals -."ois. 305-31(), GC uc-vchpllwrilt Gofp. V. Criy

lh n u k m a
V.
i u

V . C A , A l S C R A 1 5 6 ;z

v. ru, v.

,,,; (,,

(-!,'A 2 1 :,209 , G RA 34

Art~7

ran-illy I!onli 52-1 J2 EskiloGv. 1, 1"NI. 9,,7 F, r, -y y c j, 155 S C! --' , / +,

i;:

uomw: 1"i"' V2'," I. I ij' l u 11.

ryL7A. 2f]

T!"I G~wli'-! l =enlily Lay: "Do flew Repioductive Techniciut.-3 Coe :-anJiy':' Surrogate Modierhood: Tlw , Loral Fhonan Issues (1988). Im;,ugrrid Legitimacy Ail.
166-171
aiid

89 Phil 165 jdo v. -'~,2 SCPA 31a-` i k.li.;~idadjrj v. CA, 100 S(;1-U\ Gliu.:i keno G i i p v. TAG, leb 4,'cl CaUz , ;;)at Ui n v. '166 ,(-:RA 151 Republic j, LaWdur, 305 URP, 438 (1099) v. -Hock), 19*1 76) ! PeO[)I(', V. 1 Uh;Ppad, 235 WRA 463 (1914) v. Ct', 229 3C7RA 463 Dj;! , ain de Aparic:io v. i,50 sc PA
Nlclo! V. D. i)i,')c4 of

iJ-'-~7)

1- low to prove h1i;Aio; i /\i t. -1 7'2; !,Ldes 12. ) '13U, Ai Civil coclo
uasw

Coli"-"Lamino %. U-J,3, ',-(T,'A Lim v. CA, 65 1fu 1-1-;ir s uf . I lairs ~GIP, A 250 U v. CA, 'I V, ;;;C:1;,,:\ matoiugui V. CA, 20;j 'ic"'A 6T5 De 110 35()
J ., j j u t r o 1,

Art. if-4

l~e:)uLlic; '/. o As is t,-.

of H I i.--lt;01 I Plool (,, f u n NL 175 Louterio v. CA, 1 U1 7 RA Uyguai igGo v. CA 116 t%34 Rodriguez T CA, 2115 SCRA -150 (1!.)i.15) Arueg(-) v. CA, 2.54 3CRA7 H ',,I l'-O."'ll J i s v. CA, 230 S -CRil, /1`,..r; i'.dl'-,',c,m,,j -. 232 f -jG;%A 145

T 176 RA 9V55
A

n;'

David v. CA, 250 SCIO (1f ';J5) People v. Man ioyan, 246 100; U\ C !6 (19)5) mossk--.;g eld "/. 300 11...; (-,! ~/-\ 46,1 ( ! ~ ") Rep v. Abeiddl,-j, 302 S,,,' [,A 3t)8 Gonzales v. CA, 2z,'S C (7 R .-J U 6) Republic v. Ourn iui;-j 300 133 ( I Gan V. 17,OYL7:s (iv!ay ~-'8' 2t)(12)) Tollou v. c"'. (Feb. 1, ',T(12) D. Ckilcirc, I H7 cow,,,: Dc Los OMS I DO= 10 VIA Ramkun v (.Awuq dT 110 ;',1,5,)
1
W',,

nrid ,n 4)1,1-nettling Rtdos (117:R) l l-'Pxily Code imovisions Jul):1 a 2 CH L J I I C IRID'.;O I Li h(A 1 Of tf;0' 5UpVUI.O I',

16 ol)

14

I M io /\I.

ii a.

Lidoolkle I-C

C'i3 In I ~:: Adup liu i of [-(,'wii i Villa, 2 1 HNA '39 V. GA Eol)lles' 2Ub Republic V. Tolcdwlo & cll-)v(~' ')3 F'le;.ubliu v. ivlillu,-, "')(.)G 133 ul Aduptiori Pi Cases: v. Uawp-s, '-)2
V.

Tlil ius

v . P l e l u n , " ll ' )

(3,15-

L3. Pm-Adcylion Lind AJojpL'i,)ii Pioce,,ii;iC) C. Consent Necessaryfor Adoption Art. 138 Ca3es: Duncan v. CFI, 69 SCRA e'_Oul G;,.mg v. Clavano, 206 SC-r-. ; 1218 ( i'jUL't'! 0. o. Arts. 189-190, t=ai Wily Codf), Ai t. ;;GO Civil Co Cases: Tai i iargo v. CA, 200 SCIPA 513 SayGojj V. C,A' 205 CI~Crl/\ Johnston v. Hepub:k, I '-`IHA 1040 Republic v. Wong, 209 SCI'.A 1 -T; Republic v. CA & Carwito, '4.55 Republic v. Hert-lawleZ', 2J3 SCI';~ t L.
Re3cission

o!!Ij

I F) %e"Jiliallion of Siloul'atai Ulil i.: C. Inter Couliiry doption

80, L) alld iL; !RI-11,
Ijjuc. Cumuiiiii,ii il , , ul

un

!k),;

till reli Lm('

n

11. Adoption Is-Readings: 'Ziegler, llltlioiial A, *Baithlulet, ,,,Iy Bo,,

'lie
i0l.01

1''te!est of [he ChildPolitics

(1)"

L, 1) I J 1 1: ', G1-- P A; ~ L N I Provisions ,Arts. 20c) ;'15, F(, RA ")W2 ll,,-ii(2iiL 'V*Vullaw Act) Cases: &jn~tos v CA 242 S(3P/\,jW (ILW15) SubMaWq and Speck! Parvibal Authority

cdsm P~,h uc V.

I,[ iNli Ites, 41 :?CPA An iod g i a V. CA, I C") SCI )''15 St. [,,Iary's Academy v. Cm-pitairos, Vanuil v. BeIrries,356 SCRA 707 (2001) Effects of Parental Authority Arts. 220-22G Cases: Cabanas v. Flilapil, 5,B SCRA. 94 Lihi v. TAC, N4 SGRA 316 Li!id'aiji v. C, ,N ,, 2 , 12 725 Moe v. Silvans, 309 SCRA 3G2 11 U95;
U

Suspension or Termination of Parental Aultlro;i(v Arts. 225-233, FC Sec 5-10, 27-28, 31-c, IRA 7610 (Anti-Child Ak,!~e /V;[) Cases: CI qua v. Cabangbang, 27 SCRA T91i Abiera v. Orin, 8 Phil. '1193 Codes v. Castillo, 41 1"hit. 4G(3

E Surnamr; Procedure Ads. 249-252 136-1 (Fan uly Courts A(,,t,,.)f K)97) MAIN of Pamntsc a l m

Sii.,a v. CA Lind Gonzales, X15 L,'C[',A UO'd ;Uh: i mum Putres of Children Ai E 375-376, Civil Co(](--.
i,,
~ . 1 4( o X 2 1

1, par . 1 , 2

1 3 ,

1,

-11 ~,il/

0 1

r_

V. 14' 1' 'd uu Edmucl C. Clara County0"10. Fdf!ion() I /B Cal. PpIr. Gr.W

e. v

I hu Did