Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PHYS0811 Ps
PHYS0811 Ps
FIRST TIMERS
SCHOOL
AGO MEDICAL & EDUCATIONAL
CENTER-BICOL CHRISTIAN COLL.OF
MED
ANGELES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
REPEATERS
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
%
%
%
PASSED FAILED TOTAL
PASSED FAILED TOTAL
PASSED FAILED TOTAL
PASSED
PASSED
PASSED
3
75.00%
17
24
29.17%
10
18
28
35.71%
12
75.00%
40.00%
11
17
64.71%
ATENEO DE ZAMBOANGA
0.00%
33.33%
33.33%
100.00%
0.00%
100.00%
88.89%
0.00%
10
80.00%
39
43
90.70%
83.33%
44
49
89.80%
50
50
100.00%
0.00%
50
50
100.00%
10
10
100.00%
75.00%
13
14
92.86%
42
46
91.30%
25.00%
44
10
54
81.48%
61
11
72
84.72%
14
19
73.68%
75
16
91
82.42%
12
20
32
37.50%
34
40
15.00%
18
54
72
25.00%
111
115
96.52%
13
10
23
56.52%
124
14
138
89.86%
100.00%
25.00%
50.00%
100.00%
0.00%
50.00%
10
19
47.37%
16
26
42
38.10%
25
36
61
40.98%
100.00%
11
14
25
44.00%
14
14
28
50.00%
25.00%
11
11
0.00%
14
15
6.67%
100.00%
22
31
29.03%
15
22
37
40.54%
35
37
94.59%
0.00%
35
37
94.59%
19
13
32
59.38%
52
104
156
33.33%
71
117
188
37.77%
114
116
98.28%
100.00%
116
118
98.31%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
14
15
93.33%
11
17
35.29%
20
12
32
62.50%
49
53
92.45%
0.00%
49
54
90.74%
44
44
100.00%
33.33%
45
47
95.74%
33
14
47
70.21%
13
12
25
52.00%
46
26
72
63.89%
SILLIMAN UNIVERSITY
SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITYCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN
PHILIPPINES-VIGAN
UNIVERSITY OF PERPETUAL HELP
SYSTEM DALTA-LAS PINAS
UNIVERSITY OF PERPETUAL HELP
SYSTEM-LAGUNA
100.00%
0.00%
100.00%
66.67%
18
22
18.18%
10
21
31
32.26%
85.71%
0.00%
10
60.00%
14
35.71%
24
32
25.00%
13
33
46
28.26%
75.00%
23
28
17.86%
24
32
25.00%
FIRST TIMERS
SCHOOL
REPEATERS
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
%
%
%
PASSED FAILED TOTAL
PASSED FAILED TOTAL
PASSED FAILED TOTAL
PASSED
PASSED
PASSED
11
14
78.57%
100.00%
12
15
80.00%
370
370
100.00%
50.00%
371
372
99.73%
88
89
98.88%
12
75.00%
97
101
96.04%
0.00%
100.00%
100.00%
144
144
100.00%
0.00%
144
144
100.00%
0.00%
33.33%
33.33%
11
27.27%
37
45
17.78%
11
45
56
19.64%
61
64
95.31%
0.00%
61
64
95.31%
21
21
100.00%
0.00%
21
22
95.45%
NOTHING FOLLOWS---------------------------Any discrepancy in the performance of schools listed above is entirely unintentional on the part of
the Professional Regulation Commission but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees
themselves in the application forms. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.