Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Between October 9 and 12, 2011, Kiley and Company interviewed a representative sample of 802 New York voters, in a survey commissioned by the New York Gaming Association. A total of 702 respondents were randomly selected from an up-to-date computer file of voters in the state. In addition, 100 voters were contacted on their cell phones. County quotas were employed to ensure the sample population accurately reflects the entire New York electorate.
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y
Regional Breakdowns
Northern Suburbs 10% New York City 38% Long Island 16%
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y
Party
38
26 36
Democrats Republicans Other
48 26 26 44 30 10 16 72
Income
Under $75K
Gender
Men
47 53
Women
Age
Under 35 35 to 49 50 to 64 65+
22 27 31
Race
White African-American Latino Asian
15
9 3 26 19 39 44
4
20
Education
High school/less Some college College grads
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y
Have visited
NY racetrack casino
22 28 49
NY Indian-run casino
Out-of-state casino
None of above
Q02,05
36
NYC
Right 40
Wrong 50 48 63
54
Suburbs
Upstate
39
29
Looking ahead to the next year or so, do you feel more optimistic that the state is headed for better times or more concerned that the state is headed for tougher times?
Better Tougher 67 67
29 68
NYC
Suburbs Upstate
30
29 27
69
Q03
59
All Voters
Positive 70
Negative
24
NYC Suburbs
72 71 68
20 22 30
17 11
Upstate
Excellent
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y
Good
Not so good
Poor
Remainder not sure
NYGA STATEWIDE VOTER SURVEY, OCTOBER 2011
Q04
NYC 49 8 17
Suburbs 43 25 13
Upstate 41 22 13
Taxes
Public education Health care State budget cutbacks
18
14 11 9
11
13 1
10
5 3
12
7 4
The environment
Q06
Clear Majority Support For Enhanced Casino Gambling At The States Racetracks
There are currently five Indian-run casinos operating in Upstate New York, and there is limited electronic gaming permitted at nine racetrack casinos located throughout the state. The state constitution prohibits any other type of casino gambling. There is a proposal to amend the constitution to permit the addition of table games and slot machines at the nine existing racetrack sites, making them full-fledged casinos. Would you support or oppose this proposal to allow enhanced casino gambling at the nine existing racetracks in the state?
55
Support Oppose
44 33 38
39
NYC
48
Suburbs
Upstate
60
57
6
Support
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y
Oppose
Undecided
NYGA STATEWIDE VOTER SURVEY, OCTOBER 2011
Q07
Most Voters Oppose A Broader Expansion Of Casino Gambling, Beyond The Existing Racetrack Sites
There is an alternative proposal that would amend the constitution to lift all restrictions on casino gaming and allow casinos anywhere in the state, not just at the nine existing racetrack sites. Would you support or oppose this proposal to allow a broader expansion of casino gambling beyond the nine existing racetrack sites?
58
Support Oppose 62 60
38
NYC
Suburbs Upstate
33
35 45
51
4
Support
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y
Oppose
Undecided
NYGA STATEWIDE VOTER SURVEY, OCTOBER 2011
Q08,10-12,17
Strongest Reasons For Supporting Our Proposal: Spend Gambling $ In NY; More Revenue For The State
% Very convincing New Yorkers currently spend more than $3 billion at casinos in Connecticut, Atlantic City and elsewhere. This proposal would keep a lot more of that money right here in New York, where it can boost our own economy, instead of other states. Unlike Indian-run casinos, which will provide no revenue to the state this year, the racetrack casinos currently provide over $600 million a year in revenue to New York. This proposal would increase that amount by at least another $250 million a year. The nine existing racetracks are already major employers in their local areas. With this proposal they will provide more jobs, more revenue and more business activity to benefit their regional economies. Almost half of all the money racetrack casinos provide to the state is dedicated to public education. This proposal would help bolster state funding for local schools by another $100 million, at a time when our schools are struggling with budget cutbacks. % Total convincing
44
61
39
58
36
56
35
50
Allowing full-fledged gambling at existing racetracks would create over 20,000 new jobs at a time when the state is in desperate need of them.
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y
31
51
10
Q18-21
The special interests behind casino gambling proposals like this one always exaggerate the new jobs and revenue that their projects will create. We cant rely on casinos and slot machines to solve our economic problems.
41
58
Casino gambling is very damaging to families and communities, because it almost always leads to increases in crime, gambling addiction and other social problems. We dont need any more of these problems in New York State. This proposal is just a sweetheart deal for the existing racetracks in the state. The best way to increase revenues and other benefits for the state is to open up the process and let all interested companies compete for a limited number of casino licenses.
32
44
21
41
If this proposal passes there would be a total of 14 full-fledged, Las Vegasstyle casinos in New York, with some clustered too close together in certain upstate areas. Thats just too many.
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y
21
36
11
Q22
Following Balanced, Pro/Con Statements, Nearly Three-In-Five Express Support For Our Proposal
Supporters say this proposal would provide significant financial benefits to the state including $100 million more for New York schools and be a welcome source of new jobs. They say New Yorkers are already spending billions every year on casino gaming, but mostly in neighboring states. This proposal is a reasonable way to keep more of that money here in New York, by allowing for limited enhancement of gambling only at those sites that are already licensed by the state. Opponents say the costs of this proposal outweigh the benefits. Enhancing casino gambling in New York State will lead to more of the same social problems already associated with gambling, including crime and addiction, which hurts families and communities and provides few real benefits. The state should find better ways to boost the economy than by allowing more legalized gambling in New York.
Total support
Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose
58 35 23 14 27 40
Remainder not sure
NYGA STATEWIDE VOTER SURVEY, OCTOBER 2011
Total oppose
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y
12
Q22
All voters
58
40
All voters
58
40
54 63 59
45 35 39
Party Democrats Independents Republicans Income Under $75K $75K to $150K $150K + Race White African-American Latino Religion Catholic (White) Jewish Protestant, other Christian Other, none
58 58 59
41 40 39
62 55
37 44
57 67 59
43 32 40
60 64 56 51
40 36 41 46
60 56 54
39 44 44
58 58 63
41 40 36
65 66 52 53
33 34 47 44
13
Q23,24
63
NYC
66
66 58
27
Suburbs Upstate
31
10
Note: In response to another question, voters say the broader expansion plan would lead to more social problems, by a 59% to 20% margin.
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y
14
Q25,26
62
NYC
Suburbs Upstate
Racetrack casinos
Indian-run facilities 27 19
24
57
69 63
24
14
Note: After hearing that Indian casinos have stopped paying a portion of their revenue to the state, a 70%-to-16% margin of voters say they prefer the nineracetrack plan to an Indian-only option.
K I L E Y & C O MP A N Y NYGA STATEWIDE VOTER SURVEY, OCTOBER 2011
15