Professional Documents
Culture Documents
post-election budget
In the Minister's message for the launch of Melbourne 2030, Peter Batchelor stated:
"Not surprisingly, in the consultation process for Melbourne 2030, transport emerged
as a dominant theme. It also proved to be the feature Melburnians liked most and
least about their city." 1
A few years later, Treasurer John Brumby's post-election budget (representing the
same political party), has allocated a dismal amount for the improvement of our
public transport system—and it is not beginning this year, but sometime in 2009. A
newspaper article published in May this year claims that, "In a tacit acknowledgement
that the extent of overcrowding on Melbourne's trains has taken the Government by
surprise, Mr Brumby has also brought forward the purchase of 10 trains and the
training of 22 drivers." 2
Links between social exclusion and access to public transport have been well
established. The Brotherhood of St Laurence has produced valuable research on this
topic, the following paragraph reflects this concern: "Throughout the focus group
discussions, transport was constantly identified as essential in terms of accessing
many of the things identified as key elements of a decent standard of living, as some
of the comments already cited illustrate. Lack of adequate transport was also seen as
a constant problem that caused many to miss out on a decent life".3
Compared to other
developed cities in the
world Melbourne’s public
transport is substandard in
its connectivity at all levels:
to the city centre, within
and across other
neighbourhoods, to culture
and services.4
Page | 1
Stockholm, stations located in areas with high levels of migrant populations, display
artworks incorporating various languages and meaningful designs, while in Santiago,
the stations also provide space for transient and permanent exhibitions.5
It is true that Melbourne has a low-density population, and this situation adds to our
environmental problem. However, as demonstrated in the following comparison by
the PTUA (Public Transport Users Association), Melbourne has a higher population
density as compared to Vancouver and similar to that of Toronto—both cities with
much better public transport systems that are cheaper than ours. Conversely, density
is another issue that we must address and public transport should assist in this
regard.
Cities (in that order): Melbourne (Keysborough), Toronto (New York), and Vancouver
(Surrey). 6
• Distance from the city: 25k, 25k, 30k
• Population density per hectare: 32, 34, 11
• Bus service frequency (peak, in minutes): 60min, 2.5min, 15min
• Bus service frequency (off-peak, in minutes): 60min, 6min, 15min
• Evening: no service, 7.5 min, 15 min.
• Fare (bus+ train): $9.2, $3, $6.
Our governments, State and Federal, have not yet understood the importance of
public transport in relation to environmental issues, health and the liveability of our
city. Public transport should act as a network of interconnections to link the
Page | 2
Melbourne CBD and the majority of Melbournians who live in suburbs and the
periphery.
In sum, we have the required population and density to justify a real public transport
system. If poorer countries can have efficient, reliable, clean and modern public
transport systems, we, with a constant budget surplus can afford all that and more. If
cities with 2,000 years of urban heritage can build metros (underground), our 200
year-old cities can also retrofit a metro and other forms of collective transportation.
Beatriz C. Maturana
Architects for Peace, July 2007
References
1. Refer to: Melbourne 2030, Minister's messages: Sustainable transport.
http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/melbourne2030online/content/introduction/01c_transport.html
2. Austin, Paul. Brumby's big spending spree. The Age, May 2, 2007. Available from
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/brumbys-big-spending-
spree/2007/05/01/1177788141341.html?s_cid=rss_age
3. For a community perspective on the current state of our transport system, my colleague Kally Vakras
pointed me to a recent article on The Age, April 27, 2007. "Commuters tired of playing squash".
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2007/04/26/1177459880045.html
7. Miller, Royce. Council backs people-friendly transport tunnels. The Age, June 15, 2007 [cited June 16
2007]. Available from http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/council-backs-peoplefriendly-transport-
tunnels/2007/06/14/1181414466876.html
Images:
• First image: Exhibition space in the underground displaying artefacts found during excavation
works in a Metro station, Santiago, Chile.
• Second image: Artwork mural in a Metro station, Stockholm, Sweden
Reference
Maturana, Beatriz C. "Public Transport, a Shamble and a Missed Opportunity in the State Post-Election
Budget." Architects for Peace, no. July (2007), http://archpeace2.blogspot.com/2007/07/public-transport-
shamble-and-missed.html.
Page | 3