Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AT
Ask for
er Harvestins for Domestic Water Sum'Lv . in Develonina Countrie. 8.D A T# iterature Survev by: Kent Keller Published by: US Agency Water and 1611 North Arlington, for International Development Sanitation for Health Project Kent Stree,t, Room 1002 VA 22209 USA
Available from: US Agency fur International Development Water and Sanitation for Health Project 1611 North Kent Street, Room 1002 Arlington, VA 22209 USA
Reproduction of this microfiche document in any form is subject to the same restrictions as those of the original document.
RAINWATER HARVESTING FOR DC!i;ESTIC GlATEP SUPPLY IN DEVELOPIMG COUF!TP.IES: A LITERATUPE SURVEY
Drawing
from
White
et al,
1972,
bY Permission
RAINWATER HARVESTING FOR DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A LITERATURE SURVEY ABSTRACT Interest in developing locally needs. of water ages. in rainwater countries harvesting has grown with efforts @RWH") for interest water supply *
in supporting human
organized RWH is
way of
increas,ing
self-help promising
containers,
approach.
The literature
reviewed;
publications
most useful
designers Feasibility
and implementors and costs are given. technologies used for for (for US$
assessment Construction is
of selected
catchment existing
catchment, part
day could
be provided at a cost
Africa,
effective
covers storage
or modifying into
traditional
construction
of new buildings,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1. 2. INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW 2.1 2.2 2.3 3. The range Implications of rainwater of type catchment of use for technique choice of technique community 7 8 < Page 1 4 4 5
Rooftopcatchment for household and small water supply in developing countries review and annotated bibliography
Literature 3.1
Broad concerns and basic constraints in rainwater catchment 3.1.1 rainfall patterns 3.1.2 needs 3.1.3 costs and comparisons with alternatives 3.1.4 maintenance and public health 3.1.5 publications and how to obtain them Catchment technologies 3.2.1 surfaces and materials 3.2.2 guttering systems 3.2.3 diverting "foul flush" 3.2.4 publications and how to obtain Storage 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 3.3.5 3.3.6
: 9 9 12 16
3.2
them
3.3
'
technologies or "tanks" general considerations household tanks tanks for use with larger roofs tanks for use with surface catchments table: costs of materials, cost/m3 of water storage publications and how to obtain them describing planning and construction of rooftop catchment and storage techniques data to design a rooftop catchment designs system 68 68 3: 78
4.
Technical notes a few promising 4 l 4. T 4.2 Using costs 4.2.1 4.2.2 rainfall
(continued)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.3
Building water tanks 4.3.1 cement plaster jar, 0.25 m3 4.3.2 ferrocement tank, 10 m3 4.3.3 the Ghala Tank, 2.3 m3
5.
REFERENCES
-l-
RAINWATER HARVESTING FOR DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY IN DEVELOPING COTTNTRIES: A LITERATURE SURVEY 1. Introduction Effective rainwater for is harvesting thousands a rapid (RWH") techniques of years in have been of the
in many areas
increase assistance
as development
groups
attention basic
to small-scale,
locally-implemented
human needs. This high for level of interest of water is should not be surprising. RWH presents the basis; quantity it all As a numof water
an option
development It
resources,
ber of advantages. available require to import building or other the builds focus
a way to increase
of resources, involved
in planning with
RWH planning
community skills
organization
upon local
in construction,
consumption, are combined RWH systems in southern plan fiber, mortar, area
* an existing
wood and
and cement
be built 4.)
US$ 80 (assuming
* see section
-2self-help of water a family's the dry labor)**. per day for This system would provide several gallons improving a part of
water
storage
be planned or health
such as a school be developed costs. RWH may be the only ground and surface for
a relatively
availability
of
supplies
be developed
great
potential
recently
of an international Answers
of development lie
to this
question
in the
have tended
tendency hand,
Successful
clearly
**assuming a cement price of US$ 5.00 and less than 10% of total expenditures for sand and gravel. See section -4.2..
-3on local building considerations: styles, materials, for climate, participation of users,
and skills. the historical requiring international lack of interest neither the in RWR imported assistance
reason systems
development
up to provide. of RWR, however, the interest are precisely the and with con-
which committed
acheiveable for
While will
benefits-people
at the
to survey
by reviewing value
and idenand
published
accounts
of greatest
An additional
objective
to identify and
applicable in the
catchment survey.
_.--___
-4-
2.
-the
like
any
of
water
supply
--
is
hydrologic interrupt
diverting rainwater
of
streams water
pumping is
up from as water
harvesting, is
the
falls. in make
supply
would to
seem to
regions briefly
where
any kind
of use directly
held only
and evaporates,
returning
water like
in
the
sunlight
is
source and it
but, collected
also and
sunlight, until
relatively in useful
stored
of water
harvesting
approaches
spectrum soil
and a considerable in ancient to provide 30 to diverted can hold Israel water 3,000
agriculture.
off
(Davis, volume of
a considerable
from flow
down the
branches.
-5-
rainwater
harvesting from
as "the
process for
precipitation In practice, 1)
watersheds
most RWH schemes can be understood a 'surface -or "catchment" of reservoir for for
components: a flow
collecting receiving
the water
from the catchment ways of analysis. surface Often to the between a buried often faces classifying Systems employed: RWH systems elevation systems tank)
type
artificial
sheet catchments"
catechments"
or "roof it is
catchment the
surface.
Sometimes water
surface
of stored
or,
alternatively, in tanks,
may collect
untreated
of roof.
of Techniques and domestic the applications use vs. suggests agricultural certain that use) techuses-of water, required are and not
techniques (e.g. of
indicate
-large
call
less surface
a concern. the
ground
obvious
choice.
important,
any of a wide
variety
of physical
and chemical
easily
applied will
over often
large be chosen
expanses
of
may be considered.
Tanks
without
covers
to reduce for
use should
be cleaner for
Roofs
are an'obvious
choice
a catchment
them from many of the sources catchments. the Tanks distribution some kind built built
ground buildings
surface
considerations and
dictate can be
which
support
thesame
uncovered
in
or
will with
be true,
report
describe
catchments et al.,
Nyberg,
in the
way of
available.
But where
suitable at
roofing,
public
flush
and tanks
systems
do not involve
the all-out
systems improve
cdcchment a time.
requiring
cash
outlay,
one at
-7-
2.3
Rooftop Catchments for Developing Countries This report, developing rather, for low-cost to then, will
Household
and Small
Community
Water Supply
in
focus
on rooftop
which will
have not
been be
and considered
potential
applica-
supply. capital are and listed relevant lack of access to many kinds which of are water
In addition modern industrial prevalent supply a. in option: tropical coming often b. soils capacity water
conditions, to
some of
many developing
countries,
RWH as a local-level
and
subtropical torrential
seasons; evaporation
rainfall rates,
of soil recharge
to:absorb 1962);
groundoften too
satisfactory
groundwater power,
available
expensive
imported
waterborne
infectious
diseases
wherever
water
is
in the open. with corresponding public nutrition works. deficits; lack of experience
in organizing
for
community
-8-
3.
LITERATURE REVIEW AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 3.1 Broad Concerns 3.1.1 Rainfall is Rainfall random and Basic ;datcerns mand even sporadic (Grove, 10% of there Grove in that the rainy is in occurrance. 1978) notes in This that only for is especially Africa as a 10 Constraints in Rainwater Harvesting
in
climatic will
regimes; be within
averagfe
about
4 of any in
this moderate
given East
of
at
(1978) area
contend a week".
lasting periods
Thus, length.
seasons,
may be dry
of considerable
by nearby
bodies
of water,
the
month or year
can beexpected
to depart
statistics. supplies of relatively rainfall of totals simple from clean simple water rainwater during rainy catchment periods having may be of near-
At a minimum,
an addition high
In areas with household advance and high in use in over water storage would (and dry (see
some kind
using table.
groundwater
polluted
by interaction
investments
capacity, be available
water during
be provided of dry
periods Larger
investments available
possibly
as well)
throughout areas
periods, sectionn
although "Using 4. I,
be impracticably
in many rural
Data to Design
a RWH System").
Needs of achievable local water would is water improvements needs. It in could water available during through RWH must there In be is such into could
against that
be that quality,
wet months,
adequate
in quantity,
by channeling be made if
containers; for
the dry months. of it their could needs may also differ with health and that other investing those point rainwater may be of of
be that not
would
be preferable.
people,
hand,
to water water.
point
in cleaner
alternatives the costs need and to calculate benefits the costs in light of a of of
RWH system, of
related
feasibility
supply supply
Discussion scope
techniques
observations
(19721
construction
and financing
higher,
simple
a per
for
US $7 per al (1972)
point to
dispersion
and aridity
climate
each
raise
the
-lO-
costs from
of
water
supply
of costs areas"
is
dispersed
environments regimes
(page
of standpipes
some areas
and Pacey
and
Grover
(1971)
have in
each
made
conditions
which
simple
RWH systems
comparison
be relatively organzing
systems) water
capital amounts;
for
supply
organizational
infrastructure
to arrange
of community
settlement impervious
patterns roofing
in use. of simple of materials, and storag prices parts RWH systems skills, over cash, other and/or
In a particular alternatives financial structures which tures help must for labor). will
situation also
advantage
assistance. (such
as roofs) to
remaining
report, for
discussions storage
costs
cost
estimates
and catchment
technologies
-ll-
in
the
following can
sections,
and using
rough the
materials guidelines
cost in
estimates section 4.
for It
a is
system
be calculated
though,
observations: in building "tank" quality. gravel, will rooftop catchment systems report)
a. most
be used in this
does not
("chickenwire"). tanks, as measured vary from in widely. in materials cost tanks per included saltor more Africa cubic in
under
US $ !.00/m3 1975)
a proposed
Mali for
(Cluff, rooftop
to US $30.00/m3 in Eastern
manufactured et al,
tanks
catchment
(White c. as tanks
increase
in volume, tanks
their will
ratio tend
of wall
and cover
area
decreases.
Thus larger
to have lower
materials
m3 of capacity. d. however, cost large tanks built smaller .). built for with costs cement mortar and a variety (1982) of other with tanks manufactured built with or locally imported materials may
available
materials
of US $8.00.15.00/m3
in developing
-12-
3.14
Maintenance of
and Public
Health of course, is to keep the the quality requires system of the attention to the to working water to user: the
The objective (collecting provided each of contact tank, is the with residence Rooftop which the can tank
as possible. which
goals the
transmit surface,
atmosphere of
some kind
channel
and delivery. collect to dust, the vegetable cause the from will matter, rapid water the not and bird sediment stored in droppings buildup the roof during which on tank. to the heavy "washes" stored the tank.
channels in
tank,
bottom,
(used
frequently is
so that
beginning
tank,
and subsequently
allowing
built the
hundreds to the
from the
is propped When the This of the out strategy, into sheet). roof
first the
is moved into to
over
break
down, of the
household
aware hanging
because on this
washed simple is to
must
be brought tanks it
when
smaller
downspouts,
position
or uncover
after
the roof
cover
-13-
arrangements or downpipe
which to the
require tank.
of
to
include valves"
outflow after
cleaned,
"roofwashers", devices
in all
first
collected
require roof
cheaper.
Techniques in
are described
more detail
gravel
and charcoal
are
often (e.g. a
cisterns show
VITA, cover,
usually
concrete cleaning.
box
atop
the
cover prevent
inspection grains.
dangerous
Because of this
"foul
the sand
effectiveness
invest than
available in filters.
resources
flush"
of the gutter,
tank and
itself
will
factor
reaches
-14-
bring
mosquito near
quality out
need (1980)
scrubbed. bleach
suggests
soda,
and chlorine
solutions
agents. as it or tap
material the
can be used to remove new charge and well inside of water. drained. surface.
clean
after of
of the substantial
A pump,if
requirements
maintenance
of its
requirements rooftop
of
ground
surface
systems
systems.
devices
sometimes and to al
sedimentation 1980)
of the
catchment
Nyberg,
Ground by fencing
surface and
damage (1971)
human
Grover surface,
catchment
keep in floors
such traffic
be expensive grain
many areas.
Maikano
aild Nyberg in
traditional be fenced
surfaces
Botswana
inexpensively,
possibly
to a
of
ground
surface of
serve
some degree
organization systems
is required.
By contrast,
maintenance
of household
rooftop
requires
no such commitments.
-15-
considerations catchment,
frequent
cc nunity require
organization
household
syst--,ns
a correspondingly
of organization. 3. Rooftop catchment su aces have the advantage traffic which causes of not being vulnerable
contamination
and damage to
catchments, or device for keeping the "foul flush" out of the tank
particular
and downpipes
needs
periodic
cleaning.
Its
design
should
take
this
fact
account.
-163.1.5 Publications and how to obtain them +++ 1974, More Water for book, National USA. this overview Topics: and soil and others. gravel in Ionides is runoff divided agria free Arid Lands: mention name
Relations/NAS, and Research of the Foreigh affiliation Washington, after reducing dislcusses U.S., as well hillsides and section
154 pages,
group
when requesting
copy from
BOSTIC (JH215), 2101 Constituion Still culture, trickle babwe, useful reuse irrigation,
Academy of Sciences,
and provocative "water supply" selecting of water, harvesting rainwter of the from
in print, conservation".
in two halves,
"sand-sausage"
G.W., with
L.E.,
(?),
devoted information
to domestic contact
a USDA handbook,
For further
Hofkes, 18,
E.H.,
ed.,
1981,
Small
Community request
Technical
Paper
no. 2280
IRC/WHO, book,
413 pages,
a free
HM RIJSWIJK,
The Netherlands. document contains on technology a 12.page as a source Bibliography is currently of small section rainwater &!#&%t& community is supply storage water that well supply the best systems". short
which
probably
of an underground
the
+++here, as in sections 3.2.4 and 3.3.6, been taken from Darrow and Pam (1976)
has
ITDG, in preparation, techniques available workers. scope will The manual quently is us to believe as a~ until that cover is planned with Write Berkshire late it
manual supply."
but the consistens be well-researched be on low-cost of water wherever In order personnel and failures." at: for use by project
ITDG publications to a broad small communities workers information objective to share Section,
and useful
and agricultural
possible, to achieve
in the field.
be willing Research
(p ersonal Kingdom.
communication,
to Ms. Cullis
Road, Reading,
White, University
G.F.,
D.J., Press,
A.U.,
1972,
Drawers
of Water: from
Domestic
Water Supply
in East Africa,
306 pages,
11030 S. Langley,
assemb?ed overview tc a broad and their patterns for range varying strategies.
in the
formuof
of basic studied
the range
environments relevant
planners,
and insights
-183.2 Catchment 3.2.1 Surfaces Roofing be an attractive This section technologies and materials. materials.In option outlines impervious many areas , existing where with rooftop clearly rainwater suitable catchment surfaces developments might are rare. in
roofs
some of the most Frb.nising roofing for developing of choice galvanized "zincpan", sheet is
of recent
low-cost,
countries. for metal etc.) light impervious sheet roofs (various tile,
, "galvanized", sheet.
, fired in weight, it is
bestos"
other
alternatives; areas
unavailable Tile
rooftop
catchment
most other
asbestos
in weight, (Hofkes,
bu'
sheet,
tically roofing
asbestos
sur3.3.6)
with question
and that
the
is potable surfaces).
from
see section
materials
and techniques,
emphasizing technology.
potnetial
of a traditional questioned;
thatch
as a breeding
insects
-19The fabrication is an example catchment Fibre cal-level terltion entries per 50-kg a materials Parry (1981)) of rain-shedding shingles materials from coconut which might fit tree well trunks in a rooftop
system. reinforced fabrication (UNIDO, in section bag, cost 1978; cement ("FRC") corrugated countries, I.T. Building that sisal sheets, and processes considerable Workshop; price see of US$5 for for loat-
3.2.4).
in many developing
reporting
pioneering
work on small-scale
technologies for FRC sheet, says that "By comparison with the conventional alternatives, if production labour costs are counted, fibre cement roofing components generally turn out to be: 1) Between one-third and one-quarter the cost of asbestos cement roofing sheets and requiring a similar roof structure. 2) Slightly more expensive than locally-produced traditional clay tiles but requiring a mcuh simpler and cheaper roof structure. 3) About three-quarters the cost of galvanized corrugated iron sheets and requiring similar or slightly more expensive roof structures. 4) About the same cost as medium quality traditional thatch where materilas have to be bought commercially by house builders, but with a similar roof structure. If made and supplied on a selfhelp basis with labour costs not counted, the FRC roofing products would frequently work out as the cheapest roofing of all." Parry also emphasizes for the importance of proper tools and adequate (made under training carefully after
in the methods controlled four years. A variety placed hull nology manually fibers
successful
manufacture. exposure
conditions)
in natural
show no deterioration
of natural
fibers,
which
are usually
mixed with
("ijuk")
Institute,
(Anshori another
Jausal, alternative.
bamboo culm is
forming
of waste
fiber
into
boards' being
which
are then in
,
soaked
investigated
India.
_- -...
_.
-.
-2oNAS (1974; an overview roofing see Roofing in Developing technologies. Countries Development feasibility , section 3.2.4) provides low-cost catchment
of new roofing
is one of the
broad-scale
schemes in developing
Grover
(1971, tecnologies:
a useful
list
of the range
catchment
Clearing
sloping
surfaces
of vegetation
vegetation treatments,
management
by changing
such as smoothing
and compacting
soil
by the
e. surface-binding f. -9. Wiih little sibilities searched its Covering Covering the the
and
emphasis space
on rooftop surface
this
devote
to ground kinds
of investigations
and widely-re-
alternative of runoff in
in ground
catchment
is,
diversion fill
et al which
advantage
(ratio
of collected about
to rainfall) (Lauritzen,
A variety
of materials
and treatments
can improve
efficiency
of ground-
-21surface 4 acteristics catchments. for Myers (1974, for the page 3) provides aprons...: must be nontoxic should to man and animals. a list of "desirable char-
materials from
catchment structure
1. Runoff
of the structure
should
have high
resistance because
damage and should or physical 4. The structure should wind, growth, be able occasional insects,
not deteriorate
processes
need not have great to resist animal birds, used should permit
or intense flow
of water,
and construc-
should
be simple
and inexpensive," to meet others) drawback is also Paraffin Parafive years salts, of ex-
specifications. butyl
expense;
(Lauritzen
treatments
tested.
expectancy 1982).
is at least
to a sandy
(Eshenaur, surfaces
Application
seepage
on catchment but
and in reservoir
Cluff,
relatively
short-lived
Sprayed
see section
a dark
co loring
to water
be eliminated
by spraying
-22one of a variety catchment for of treatmnnts. a community rainwtaer Grover (1971) proposed scheme in such a sprayed Kenya. for research into asphalt
harvesting
of Arizona,
U.S.A.,
catchments, for
although
catchments
agricultural there
approaches being investigated I ,I "gravel earth sodium treated", phalt-plastic-asphalt-chipcoat" cribed, however, methods. The organization in section underground catchment floors clay 3.3.4) tanks, project Christian suggests Maikano in Botswana surfaces. the treatments
"compacted
covered
exensive using
be adapted
application
labor-intensive
as catchment
These floors
a mixture for
project
is monitoring
collected
and pathogen
Institute
for
Rural
Water,
1982c
(draft)
by permission
-23-
3.2.2
Guttering
systems
effective
guttering stored
accounts.
less
challenging
and its
is usually
a relatively ignored
guttering
in published
accounts
How big
Size
of local runoff
ground
area metal
recorded
12 x 18 m area half
of roof
or half
heaviest
In general,
probably
from most roofs. gutters securely them posithe edges water important.
A greater
SO that
hanging
tioned of the
Ensuring
adequate
the
entire
system, is
does not
or attract
mosquitoes,
Mnufactured
metal
gutters.
Aluminum
or galvanized
sheet
metal
gutter-
,...
-24-
is
the
technology
in developed
countries. metal
The straps or
and hung with the upper in the U.S. / m (galvanized unless coated part
of the
gutter's qut.
and into
cost
about
quality another
Hardware would
joining
a building unavailability
6 m long
$30 (1982,
or complete
to eliminate of developing
manufactured countries.
McDowell
(1976,
It is noticed that, in many areas, houses will have a short lenqth of roughly fashioned guttering fixed under the eaves just above the door, and that water from this will be collected in an old oil drum or other container. It seems that this type of device is used more for the purpose of preventing water from running in through the doorway of the hut than ds a serious approach to water collection. However, the existence of this "technology" could provide the link point for development of simple but effective roof catchment systems." McDowell "P-shaped edge-to-edge. also reports on the use of,split bamboo culms with together to leak joints removed, angles "V" might be and
gutters This
Institute
for
Rural
Water,
1982
(draft),
-25-
Joining (Institute
Gutters for
by permission)
sealed
with
tar, 3.2.4)
pitch,
or some local good ideas sheet similar hanging and tied below).
gum. for
Institute joining
for sections
Rural
WAter (1982;
provides
Water
also
wrapped of roof
around supports
in roof
or to the ends
INstitute
for
Rural
Water,
1982b
(draft),
by permission
-26-
3.2.3
Diverting
the
"foul
flush"
importance a roof
for out
dirty
above
Ilidwest which
to the tank
appropriate
Usually
in cost areas. it
these
will
approach posi-
in the
like
split
beneath with
or local
a flexible
can be moved in
(see figure
below).
INstitute
for
Rural
Water,
1982
(draft),
by
PermiSSiOn
-27-
of moving in developing
consistently of the
of rainfall simple
under
to leave roof is
of water small
position routines
the downpipe
Both
may be objectiona
point
of standing
of choice
built
into
metal
downpipes they
va Ives, be expensive
metal
to devise but
made of other
more functional
Institute
for
Rural
Water,
1982b
(draft),
by permisssion
-28-
Automatic commercially
systems. only in
roof but
cleaning they
devices
One simple
automatic
device
(Midwest fills
Afte rthe
roofwasher the
up with is
foul
tank.
A screen
usually
container of debris
keep our
and other
on the water
Service
(1979)
the
overflow
to the
tank.
Oil
or fuel
tins,
Service every
area. to hold is
sources first
Dooley,
20 minutes
with
device pour
vigorously
droppings
so that
instead
of settling crossways,
receptacle. to inhibit
a baffle action,
mounted and/or
a vertical
screen
dividing
-2%
UNEP (1979) by permission Institute (draft) for Rural by permission Water, 1982
downpipe a drain
side
from
tank
inlet
side so that
(see they
figures
above).
Roofwashers after
must have
and removable
cover
can be cleaned
each rain.
More complicated attention downpipe. with zontal a large pin and stronger Reported inflow (see figure
"automatic" structures
foul with
flush
devices
tend for
to require mounting in
funnels"
two compartments,
on a hori-
At the the
star$
water
pours
from
gutter
through
to be quite
UNEP (1979) by permission
volume
of foul
flush.
Mounting
-3opins would also have to be quite of foul strong. flush This options particular device is but unlikely it is an
in most places,
3.2.4
Publications
them
ed.,
1974,
no. ARS-W-22,
Request Center,
Rangeland
of 40 papers technical is It
harvesting. development of
Much of the material agriculture. ov developments "Engineering zona' (Cluff, 1974, (Dedrick,
is quite
and most of it
surface
of water
harvesting
at the University
pages 27-39)
pages 175-191).
Hall, Vol.
N.,
1981,
"Has Thatch
Post from
Technology
Publications,
WCZE 8HN, United 'Thatch by.modern the rising is currently sheet price thatch a concise highlighting roofs
of favour of modern
almsot building
It tiles.
is veing
However,
become more and more costly to process them, The author, on the of thatch
information
summary of thatch
"prefabricated" catchment.
No mention
Milton
Keynes,
Kingdom.
-31-
Institute request
for from
Rural the
1982,
Development D.C.,
Washington, of simple
20523 USA. catchment disposal, several systems, of which (RWS.l.P.5), Cistern" from the discussion are roofing ABout 4
A good overview and gutter with pages of text, permission Request CAtchments" "Constructing
and maintenance.
the remainder
figures,
Catchments (RWS.5.C.l~),
a Household
I.T. for
Building Honduras
Materials
Workshop, Fibre
of CorOperating Manual
rugated Workshop,
19 pages, Estate,
Materials
Road, Larley,
West Midlands,
864 7DD, United Describes, sheetmaking (1981, suit below). for for local techniques as a namual
and with
excellent the
the
outlined
Modifications
circumstances
in Honduras
the assistance
of groups
-32-
I.T. ceived
equipment first
roof
sheets
tiles,
an experienced
Roofing give
Countries: Office
Research of the
for Foreign
New Technologies, when requestSecretary, D.C. 20418, materials National USA. relying
57 pages,
or institutional Avenue,
copy from BOSTIC (JH215), 2101 Constitution of the and/or in India. range
of possible
low-cost Includes
new techniques.
appendices
on low-cost
J.P.M., Fibre
1981, 1981,
Made from
Reinforced TEchnology
Cement","Appropriate Publications
London,
2,September Intermediate
8HN, United A sumnary cement outcome ing but which Manufacturing countries The author of about in April with but sheets: the
Kingdom. of the I.T. for Building Materials Workshop findinys on fibre-reinforced "The final system involvsheet roofing tile." in developing are outlined. rate seven countries are made of the new as on a combined
sheeting of the is
components.
development
coverage scale
of a one metre
implementation
on a small Workshop,
Building
FRC sheets
made at the
a month by several Cost and roof materials; time will tell cost the
requirements
advantages point
where
can be considered
materials or rural
because
to be produced
labour-intensively,
scale,
in virtually
-333.3 Storage 3.3.1 As has is the long usually most been the difficult Technologies General noted or "Tanks"
considerations in other sections, part of so that must not the simple it water storage facility and at the or "tank"
satisfactorily be structurally
period.
leak; it (if
to support out
and it buried)
sunshine,
As far is usually
are
concerned, and
the
tank
is
also
the
focus requiring
of the
system;
it and
distribution
point,
cleaning
functions. storage for this needs and performs reason that this well section is the key to is
addresses It report. by their individual larger etc; surface groups methods, with the is
system. of this
on tanks
Tanks can be categorized 1. 2. tanks tanks centers, 3. Within with its each tanks of used used with with
into
three
catchments. there are many djfferent costs, needed 4), and labor (see kinds of tanks, each Each on using about
these
materials capacity
of these rainfall
technical into
a RWH system,
section
enters
-34-
of
tank
to
build. in the
designs section
as
on costs
and the technical comments about The tank's of families--is design. will build for This
on section of tanks
4 on costs will
Here,
a few general
design
be made. household source determinant consultation or source of tank with growing prospect construction note: the out of for for a group and who
an individual single
sizing people of
genuine In
success. irrigating
comments gardens
open
in Botswana,
and Pacey
(1974)
"In any community where a tank programme is contempleted, it would seem important to enquire into the 'felt needs' of the people. To which category of water use do they give highest priority? a) drinking water: for home or school use? b) washing water c) water for gardens: again, at home or at school? water for school gardens would be given the In most parts of southern Africa, lowest priority." Whether deserves to build an above-ground Watt tank (1978) or notes, an excavated (underground) tank
considerable
thought.
"Storing water in tanks built on the surface has many disadvantages when compared Besides avoiding the need for with storage tanks excavated into the ground. laborious excavation which is almost impossible in some hard dry soils, the tanks can be observed for leaks and easily repaired by trowelling a layer of In addition, although the stored water mortar onto the inside of the empty tank. of polluted material falling is likely to become hotter in the sun, the risks into the tanks are reduced. Water stored above ground can flow out under its own weight whereas it has to be pumped out of a ground tank." The main supports with advantage the tank walls. of lining This wall underground tanks, on the it other possible hand, to is build that the earth tanks
deeper
thinner
materials of structural
and used
to make
leakproof
reinforcement.
-35-
Underground
tanks 3.3.3,
require
a pump.
Figures block
Section
(below)
of
water
storage
capacity
than smaller
tanks, though,
Constructing fewer
require Large
tools,
cash
flat
walls or groups
Maikano
Nyberg, will
smaller larger
of smaller
be chosen
in preference
to a single
kinds
of
tanks and
demand other
different tanks
standards mortar
of
workmanships will
plaster
made with,olean
in proper
proportions,
properly
framework. perform
A prototype satisfactorily;
on or experience of or
sought.
underground masonry.
tanks Cairncross
must
be built
if
be built
by an experienced
builder
indeed,
-3E-
be involved). 1974) emphasizes "unskilled a long life 3.3.2 Recycled, can be used to edge of roofing. out about labor".
Individual
Water Supply
Systems
(Office workmanship
of
Water
Programs/EPA,
of high-quality plastering,
and curing
are all
which
leak. individual household rooftops of locally-available or use of front sim ply steel of this they dripping petrol containers off drums the with These with in
flowing al (1973)
White in
dscribe
West Africa
report).
pottery
of about devised
in Thailand
parts hulls
of southeast
Asia
(McDowell,
used as a jar-shaped says that the Java. Watt * is for author jars
onto which
is plastered. up to
(1976) method; in
can be constructed
with
3 m3 using
models, storing
A great (1975)
reports
of US $0.50
per 0.25
cement. of this lacking Watt's type are apparently tend made in the to crack size range wall of 0.15-0.5 meets the m3, base.
reinforcement instructions
4 for
on making
a 0.25
a'.
-37-
cement
jar
plastered
basket
reports
of
this
method
for
Liberia. ("chickenwire")
A hole, is mortar.
shape
walls
which
plastered "mold".
with
cement
of its
earthen
plastered
in Burundi, is to
Swaziland, granary
Zambia.
a cement
or concrete
"In Kenya, the basket frame is made from sticks cut from woody shrub which grows throughout the country. the frame is made from In Rwanda and Burundi, bamboo, presumably provided that the material is strong, the basket could be made from any number of shrubs or sticks which can be woven into basket form. The basket is constructed on the ground by weaving the sticks into round shapes. The actual shape does not seem very important, but it is recommended that the bottom be omitted so that the sides can bond with the base" (UNICEF, Eastern Africa Regional Office, 1982).
-3%
tanks with
by reinforcing
the
frame
The more
and has a capacity bag, (rural gravel Zaire, and outlet (1981). a "Ghala"
materials be built
costs for
sand,
of this notes
could
on construction Regional
-3%
ring steel
tank. forms,
Relying these
on thin tanks
unreinforced
concrete by the
rings,
poured
Thai Ministry
have galvanized
forms.
could
a tank skilled to
suggests high-quality
of the
then
be transported
by truck
placement
foundations. Grover Population Corps, (personal communication) Association similar reports that the Thai Ministry of Health with into the the
Peace for
reinforcement. tanks. is applied steel These tanks by hand to are built using a techniques mesh. the in "True" tanks distribute occur which cement
a reinfocing for
wire in
has much more Still through materials Tank walls Thus walls (Briscoe
the principle
reinforcement than called ---.-..-.. __ _ is the same: metal reinforcing preventing the cracking (Office of
described loads
strands that
would
in unreinforced 1973).
the
Foreign
Secretary/NAS, of water
2 m depths than
concrete require
notes
ferrocement
walls
cement than
concrete
In his Their
handbook
for
field
workers 3.3.6
(Watt, below),
1978,
Ferrocement
Water Tanks
and
Construction,
see section
Watt notes:
of this material over other tank construction mat"The main advantages... are its cheapness and easy working erials, such as galvanized corrugated iron, using the minimum of expensive materials, equipment and skills. it is, in addiSome of the tanks described in the manual have been inconstant on, very durable. use for over 25 years with only a few instances of failure--due in the main to poor workmanship in construction." Watt income sand, goes on to rural water, say that ferrocement 1) they simple only techniques use are particularly available suited materials for low-
areas
because
commonly
2) only after
skills
ar needed:
"...untrained
make satisfactory tanks can help Clearly can be taught done at the
3) users required. is
in construction;
4) only of
ferrocement Early
that
it was
development Hlekweni,
techniques
Center,
Bulawayo,
Zimbabwe.
Roy Henson of the Center tion the of Asian 210 9 m3 tanks Institute
training in
craftsmen
and construc1974). At
Matabeleland
field
workers
fromn
developing field
craftsmen
AIT-trained
Central
ferrocement tanks.
reinforce
Java techniques
(Pompe et al,
tanks
built
In the first of
attached directly or
framework this
trowelled 1980)
framework of
and Gopalaratnam,
against
a sheet
-41-
Java
i
i
-42-
tied
temporarily 1981;
the al,
inside 1982).
of
the
framework
wall
to
act vertical
as a
form" are
(Winarto, continuous
from the
through
the wall
cured m3 tank
can be type
moved on makeshift with integral floor 1980). second netting form Farrar
and cover
at US $33.00
(Thailand;
Sharma and
of
rods
is
inner 1978;
mortar
Water Tanks and Their A Review", are place. first than the installed Materials type steel netting because rod price section 3.3.6).
but
less
Assuming
a cement
US $7.14 (his
500kg
bag, steps
wire
described for
by Watt about
construction Similar
$150.00. Center,
tanks cost
of $62.50
Training
Hlekweni,
(1973,
1974). money spent and netting on materials are wound. pitpit, for Calvert or the cylin Idrical and l3i nning wildcane for
which mats
New Hebrides. of to
made of to If
sections plaster
corrugated a uniform
sheet thickness
roof
consistently
-a3-
FIGURE 9 A paste of mortar is forced into the layers of mesh by hand . . . (Smith Kampempool, Applied Scientific Research Corporation of Thailand)
FIGURE 10 . . . or trowel. The mortar is dry enough to remain in place when applied; a formwork is not needed. (Noel D. Vietmeyer. National Academy of Sciences)
Foreign
Secretary/NAS,
1973
.---.
-44-
sheeting $50.00
costs plus
US $2.20 of
per
"3, iron,
this
kind
of
form
for
costs cost
angle
some areas,
portable to be
of tanks
considered.
In New Zealand, using in the factory Foreign method floor, to similar tanks farms in
tanks
are manufactured
by Watt.
With a welded
capacities and
trucks) 1973).
Secretary/NAS, "Tin"
Manufactured used for of southern costs point $112.00 capacity which climate, salt-laden
metal
tanks.
These
tanks that
have
been
report their
most
foreigners
homes.
of these of
depending of
on distance
Zimbabwe); $39.00
White
(1973) Africa
that
East
The corrugated than (1977) fail 5 years report after rooftops type other earth thick. are
these
tanks then
a damp in the
even
galvanized. of
atmosphere 3.3.3
4 years.
tanks.
basically
an tank
underground walls,
structural ferrocement
strength lining
by the
meaning A further
be made only
a centimeter
-45-
advantage
of
these
tanks
is
that
their
construction aboveground
requires ferrocement
the
steel
see "Low Cost Water Tanks in the design m3. complete First with
3.3.6)
in diameter or "footing"
a circular trench is
foundation
from'the center
earthen with
of the
of cement
rod After is
dome, and two 0.6 dome cures, 2 layers walls. about digging of wire
design
suitable public
"collecting
roof
of a large
building."
crack and
Maikano
Nyberg
in Botswana. storage of bin Ethiopia suitable (Office for of storing the in Storage sides reinforced water Foreign develBins", sloping with
Sharma et
Review pits,
shape
a narrow
surface, floor.
plaster is needed,
of the depths
pit. of
been installed of 4 m,
Metal or
Concrete Lid
Foreign
Secretary/MAS.
1973
Storaga Chamkr
Herd core
type
will
affect
smoothness sides
walls
ease
with
and Binning
soil.
(1979) major
successfully
province
of Ethiopia. dogon granaries (1978), Existing lined manner are already with with with ferrocument an interesting granaries, with pioneered by Hans
of traditional
and 2.6
m in in the
reinforced
Traditional houses
adobe. spouts
adjacent
equipped
to drain
rains.
way to Clearly
13 m3. trouble
can begin
to erode
-47-
Buried
buried
brick
tanks. to hold
have
mortar loads
compressive the to is
but
lask
lower
of walls if
where
the
tend turn,
buckle the
outward
enough. burying)
fact, type
buying are
this
of tank: tanks
the
supported
Brick
and masonry
when covered
properly in to
above-ground
tanks,
a basement
tanks water to to
however. ground to
and
surface If a
human traffic
A pump, in
maintenance variety
problems. of shapes and sizes incorporated surface of of (and circular weakness wall is into hence possible. a building. less material) tanks cracks (Maikano section tanks Rectangular Circular per tanks are easy
A wide to design
tanks storage
meets the
and Feachem,
see that
Small stone
more than
-48-
of brick new or
tanks Wright
in use, (1956)
probably
because
up with
or bricks
and mortar
In Sou thern Africa, 'I . ..the occasional large buildings in rural areas--schools, churches, halls, etc .--can provide a water supply to the community on about the same scale as that from 'beehive' tanks (45-90 m3, see section 3.3.4 below, ed.) . ..Four or five 9,000 liter tanks would be needed for many school buildings, though a more usual method of providing this capacity is to build a single large The difficulty is that tank walls built in this way are tank of concrete blocks. ill-suited to resist the sideways pressure of the water* so concrete block tanks are usually built in shallow excavations with piled earth used to buttress the sides. (The figure) illustrates a tank of this kind, showing how the tap may be placed so that water can be drawn off by gravity flow."
Farrar
and Pacey,
1974 by permission
and
Pacey,
1974, In this
see
"Catchment
Tanks
in
Southern of this
A Review", in Ghana of
said this
(1973). tanks
(1973) of storage)
be one of the
we have seen documented. Many of the provision made of varies for cisterns rooftop block size built catchment plastered into and with the basements is of residences required in Bermuda, codes, where are
mortar.
cisterns 50 m3 to
of the Solar
dwelling,
most fall
within
the
of
Sands, the
personal
strongest
readily
buildings discus-
of stone These
section used
concrete
widely they
in the developed "cisterns" ranging is to probably cracking effectively and from the
:In the United built 50 m3. material and its out into
are usually
frequently
10 m3 to strongest
storage.
so as to of of
in the
methods,
are
and scarce
rural
countries.
-5o-
This in
type
of
tank
or
widely
documented
in
literature (1958)
on rural a cistern
(1959)
manhol& dirty
a rain. area
sources of the
guidelines of farming
matching in
cistern the
roof
simple and at
location:
be higher
evenly (see
setting
Water Resources tites, filter. detailed matching year's rainfall proportions, (Village
procedures
roof family
a full
supply to plan
using
See the
4 on using
a rooftop
catchment
system. (Office ,of Water in Programs/EPA, presents 1974), the text in Salvato (1973; Plan
published
Health which
Service
1950,
to an appear
and VITA
Henderson 3.3.6)
Water System,
extension
programs
useful use
color of
downpipe,
noting
that
-51-
quickly system
They
suggest, flush
instead, devices,
an
"roofwasher"
Cisterns of cistern
(1980) by users
is
a in
useful Indiana,
pros
and cons
as seen the
a popular
audience.
The users
emphasize
system, potential
discussing problems
alternatives. catchment
relates
in industrialized countries: "'Rainfall itself carries dust and even chemicals. Near Highways, there is probably a sigrificant lead content in the air. Downwind from industrial plants, there will be a problem with pollution. You need to be site-specific with cisterns."' Also cistern lkiters the mentioned walls: are cleaning vinegar is the to to the solutions for yearly water; scrubbing 1 kg baking seen which a tank, of the insides in against it can the is water of 8
of water. of
we have stored in
addition with as it
interact water
chloroform. or iodine
A chlorinator solution
pumped to Other
house,
instead.
sources
recommend periodic
for
popular
journal.
Dooley it
also every
cistern
with
cisterns
reinforced to build
at about
US $1,000 in rural
in most situations
of developing
concrete when
tanks large
is
included
here tanks
elements into
of
rectangular in which
public is the
buildings. wall
one wall
a cistern
of a building
Fig. 3-27. A cistern suitable for a boscment. The foundation wall sewos as one 01 more sides of the cistern, the other walls being constructed of concrete. Note that the cistern is entirely enclosed to keep out dust and rodents and that a leaf catcher ana strainer is provided on the down spout. Entrance to the cistern for cleaning and repairs may be through a trap doori 05 shown. or through a special door in the side between hvo floor sills as shown in the insert.
-53-
3.3.4 As noted
surface
catchments surfaces, for ground irrigation, in level catchment stockwatering, developing supply not countries, because of systems or
on catchment harvest
primarily
rainwater In
agricultural systems
purpose. will
catchment
domestic
reduced
organization to
and cash
of rooftop of
systems,
to mention catchment
problems surfaces.
related
acquisition
of land
and protection
ground-level
tanks
used
with
ground
surface in
catchment
represent of using
practice, surface
established depressions.
storage use or
some of might in be
rooftop another,
instead, rooftop
used
overflow
combination
catchment
tank.
Farrar
and Pacey,
1974 by pemisssion
-54-
One particularly threshing Developing in diameter, gular, their should short where the but wall floors
scheme
involves
tanks
used
with
traditional in
Water Supply
2 m deep, tanks
water.
The first to
been
recommended storage is
for
be less length of
PVC pipe
settling curb
in
A brick
around for
tank
surface
water
of lengths
trunk
or precast over to
These covers of
seems to excavation
method cement
Inside nett
mortar
plaster
pegged to the
approach
seems to be
of Calvert
and Binning
walls
cement
a 25 m3 tank,
cement,
(Botswana,
provide
for require
people
Maikano the
and
"The cistern
cleaning
beginning
Platering
of the tank
and cover
noticed."
-55Most widely is, without doubt, (Ionides known of the pilot et al, recent community for rainwater harvesting water to irrigate were lined plastic tubing schemes in Africa school with gardens
project 1969).
providing
Large
excavations (thin
about
sand to one part liner). also filled used with the lining the rushing through
of cement
"sand-sausage" which of an
low-cost
sand
A technical
problem
with
withstand
seemed to
be rodents
the
the
sand-sausage
tanks
were
very
low:
Farrar
US $75.00
a 45 m3 tank
(1973),
not like
outside. with
may be reducing
tanks
peoples' 'tatchment
capacity
manual
(Farrar 3.3.6).
1974;
see
design, (water
using is
the
drawn water
beehive-shaped
wells),
promise
domestic
efforts: "The performance of the 'beehive' tanks that have been built has generally been satisfactory, and from a technical point of view, we would regard this type of catchment tank as a highly attractive approach to the water supply problems of semi-arid areas."
-56-
Farrar built
also
give
a brief in brick
"Water
by the
dug to about
so that cylinder
needed. for
estimate (1973,
of the
cost
9 m3 of storage
Zimbabwe).
Farrar
and Pacey
(1974)
by permission
-5/-
the
use
of
synthetic or "hafirs"
aspha 1t,
plastic,
and
rubber
liners
to
excavations during
name for
where water the hafirs sheet. tion for Grover on an island rubber proposed sheet. early with Their
in the
60's.
Thorsky in
capacities reports
the
experimental is given.
and no indication
implementa-
excavated
into
with
This
promising m3) to
3 similar
of a ground coral of
on another
proposed material,
a floating level.
sheet
reducing
negligible
of butyl tanks
in Kenya) 1970)
US $18,000 catchment
including
pumps. to cost
asphalt
---sprayed
was expected
$15,000. (1975) points to out that evaporation during the of 2-3 ma/year dry season, to the in Mali causes existing constructing would reduce provide thousand to reduce
"mares" to
disappear
embankments the
reservoirs storage
surface/volume capacity
of the
meet the
domestic
needs
proposed its
with cost
capital
earthmoving reservoirs)
mare to the
(1975,
Mali).
tank
systems
but Cluff
used precipitacosts in
and labor
i s provocative.
a tabular 3.3.
summary of most of the materials are care listed in sequence materials from smalDifferences in local prices
in section
of documentation however,
when making
comparisons.
(e.g.-12, cost/m3
of storage
tank
options
(e.g.
2 below)
tanks. built with similar methods, but greatly to meet different in cost "in (compare the field"). costs of
standards
, may vary
at a university, tanks
materials
requirements
of tanks
..-~
,,.-
TANK (C: cover, P: pump, G: gutters) 1. 0.17 m3 steel drum, East AFrica (White et al, 1972) 2. 0.25 m3 cement mortar jar, Thailand (Watt, 1975) 3. 0.3 m3 pottery jar, Thailand (Watt, 1975) 4. 1.2 m3 ferrocement tank (Sharma (Cl 'r Thailand and Gopalaratnam, 1980) 5. 1.4 m3 "tin" tank, East Africa (White et al, 1972) 6. 2.3 m3 plastered "Ghala" basket, East Africa (UNICEF, 1982) 7. 7.0 m3 cast concrete ring tank (C), Thailand (Watt, 1978 b) 8. 9 m3 ferrocement tank (C,G) Zimbabwe (Farrar and Pacey, 1974) 9. 9.0 m3 galvanized corrugated iron tank, Zimbabwe (Farrar and Pacey, 1974) 10. 10 m3 ferrocement (C) (Watt, 1978) tank
I?ATERIALS
manufactured
cement mortar, concrete purchased locally cement, sand & gravel, steel mesh & rod manufactured
0.50
2.00
(1974)
5.00 33
16.70 28
(1973) (1980)
39-84
28-60
(1969)
cement: sand & gravel cement. sand & gravel cement, sand 6 gravel, steel netting and wire manufactured
42*(est)
18
(1982)
40(l)
5.70
(1977)
62.50(l)
6.90
(1973)
112
12.50
(1973)
150*(estj
13
(1982)
+ author's ficrure unless indicated otherwise ++ my calculations, not those of authors * assumes US$ 7.14 (Zaire, 1981) per 50 kg bag of cement: other materials estimated. See text (1) excluding costs of metal forms
TANK (C: cover, P: pump, G: gutters) 11. 15-20 m3 underground ferrocement (C), New Hebrides (Calvert and Binning, 1977) 25 m3 underground ferrocement tank, Botswana (C?) Maikano and Nyberg, 1980) 36 m3 buried reinforced concrete cistern (C,P?) USA (Dooley, 1978) 45 m3 "sand-sausage" open tank, Botswana (Farrar and Pacey, 1974) 71 m3 partially buried concrete block tank (C, and G) r Ghana (Farrar Pacey, 1974) 2,300 m3 butyl-lined tank (C,P), Kenya (Grover, 1971; proposed only) 80,000 m3 NaCl-lined earth reservoir system, Mali (Cluff, 1975; proposed only)
cement, sand & gravel, steel netting and rod cement, steel netting, PVC pipe cement, sand & gravel, steel rod, materials for forms cement, sand, plastic tubing cement, concrete sand, block
250
12.
135
5.40
(1980)
13.
1000
27.50
(1978)
14.
75
1.67
(1973)
15.
260
3.70
(1973)
16.
18,000
(2)
7.83
(1970)
17.
under 1.00
(1974)
catchment
surface,
-61-
3.3.6
Publications
them
--
S., the
and Ross
Feachem, Institute,
R.,
1978,
Small of
book, Tropical
78 pages, Medicine,
London London
School WCIE
Street
(Gower Street),
Kingdom. on building water, Z-page text watrer section gives small-scale treatment, on building for and In and
presentation Discussions
of
basic
include
and distribution.
guidelines cleaning
outlets,
construction than
and Binning, 3 pages, for the Ltd., fabrication the cover, sdoil in
in the 4, no.
Pacific 3,
Islands", November
Technology Air
issue
Speeded Post,
Intermediate Kingdom.
Technology
9th King
'Catchment Technology
Tanks Report
Africa:
Africa
Fieldwork
13 pages, request
;-62-
Farrar from
and Pacey 74 (cant) Paul Sherlock, critical surface OXFAM, 274 Banbury description catchment designs Road, Oxford OX2 7DZ United Kingdom. "sandtanks, and
An excellent sausage"
ground
combinations give
of these
in Swaziland, cost
construction requirements
sound
ferrocement
catchment
system
or project
in Africa
should
try
E.E.,
G.W.,
1973,
Planning
book,
156 pages,
Materials,
Engineering
installations drawings
in the
pictures,
construction
Water
L.,
1980,
"Rainwater
Catchment
paper, of a a free
in the
Water Supply
in Developing 5-12
Workshop
in Zomba, Malawi,
copy of the
International
Development
Research
Box 8500,
Ottawa,
-6%
for
section
and cattle,
farmers than
and begin
rainy
season covers
are emphasized. and more are under end of 1980". 1973, your
"Today,
the
pilot
has about is
underground
construction.
hoped to
Ferrocement: institutional
Applications affiliation
91 pages,
International
of the
Secretary, O.C.20418,
Academy of Sciences, A basic sidely book on the refer& for roofing, diagrams
Avenue,
Washington,
literature storage
Chapters
steps,
van Kerkvoorden,
R.,
Applications in Journal of
Ferrocement, &from
12, no.
a reprint Asian
or xeroxed Institute
copy at of
International
Ferrocement
Center,
-640
Bibliography
and access
information
for
section
"Storage
Techniques"
Thailand. which plans to construct hundreds water of 5 m3 and 10 ,3 supply system rainwater per built
of various
including
showing
construction
10 m3
Sharma, art
V.S., pages
1979,
Review
on Ferrocement
Storage 1979.
135-150
or Xerox
Ferrocement Bangkok,
Center,
Institute
Technology, Describes structures field the silo water. India, -tested "Thailo", lined
techniques in different
which
reinforced give
of a 9.5 m3 underground
plastered
Regional water",
1982,
basket
magazine, 9 king
Intermediate Also
Technology
Publications,
Kingdom.
available
from UNICEF,
East African
-65-
Bibliography
and access
information
for
section
"Storage
Techniques"
Office, activities
Nairobi,
Kenya. of the (like Karen Appropriate those described Technology by Watt, pit 1975,
background jars
outside
Nairobi.
Cement mortar
will
length
above the
collected for
in an old
development from
roof
catchment huts,
systems."
And, by using
"Collection a polythene
guttering to give
involvement
in village
Using
book,
$5.95
from
Volunteers
in
Assistance,
of VITA's
Technology
a conventional drawings
of 10 m3 or more,
including
and a "roofwasher".
-66-
Bibliography
and access
information
for
section
"Storage
Techniques"
The book as a whole of a small -Watt, t 2.95 S.B., from water 1978, supply.
is
good basic
reading
for
anyone
consideriong
construction
Ferrocement
book, Street,
Intermediate Kingdom.
Technology
considering publication
a rooftop listed
system,
this
of materials for
over
Also small
describes jars
basic
including 4),
note
without storage
in Mali,
a 40 mS roofed built
makeshift
in
required to plan
for
each design,
a rooftop
catchment
section S.B.,
"Rainwater
Storage
article, 1978,
in
Technology
magazine, from
t 0.75
issue 9
Publications,
Kingdom.
-67-
Bibliography
and access
information
for
section
"Storage
Techniques"
Describes cast in
of tanks cylindrical
ureinforced
rings,
be expensive. supervision
suggests
be cast
under
and trucked
to location
assembly. 1981, "Rainwater Collection Tanks Constructed of Ferrocement, International on Self-Help 3, July Information Basis",
pages 247-253 in Journal &f J.zop&e a reprint or xeroxed copyffrom Institute of Technology, adaptation Java. with
1981.
p/G& JZ.mjwAn+Yzf
Thailand. methods for
Ask
Center,
An account availabilities
of the
of rural 9 m3 tank
forms.
Some pictures; in
be attempted
1978).
of steel here
rod)
reinforcement
(Pompe et al,
-68-
notes
describing
planning
and construction
of promising
roof=
data factors
the design
of a rainwater rainfall
patterns; is
catchment;
and d. the amount of water The first of these least factors about.
consumption.
between
rains,
combination
of the other
in a rainwater This
catchment then,
section,
about:
a. area
of rainfall of storage;
b. volume
In rich
an amount that for
to design periods.
to provide
amount is
In developing
hand, second
concerns place
to concerns with
In these
to start materials,
to work out
section
VITA (1977,
and modified from Watt (1978, and Hardenbergh and Rodie (1960,
-69-
those
resources
in such a way as to come closest We will take this latter approach data during
to a target in this varies storms, section. widely. and how much and
consumption. data.
of detail
of rainfall falls
we would the
separates
storage it;
storage to occur.
would
enough water
be expected hard
detailed
to get. totals.
can be reseveral
In many places The next area. average impossible (We noted fall best
it
to find out
totals. your
to find useful
are
less
totalling
average, monthly
year, the
of Africa.
deviations
This water
planned
using
about
two thirds
Resources, to give
average
rainfall
be multiplied
by 2/3
minimum rainfall.
that
actual
whether
you use month-by-month to try to get part data information (van over
rainfall which
totals
or average
important years.
Here is (for
of a table crillected
showing
monthly
averages
Am Timan,
.Figuring in a tank, is
runoff. related
of r'unoff, area
available
for
stor,age surface. of a
horizontal
(As we work this building resources used for this area for
example,
we will surface.
a catchment
seems to be a sensib le use of ex isting used in the sizes by the example could equally well be
as shown in the
Watt (1978) by
perinission
-71-
Let's
assume that
the ground
area
covered
is could
30 m* (the
area
of from
building).
be collected
= =
area 30 m*
x x for
x x
0.9* 0.9. of rainfall average total. R; using R. The amount of water for water needs during in stordry Using a yearly monthly
Runoff average
give a yearly
minimum estimate Using age should periods. of 20 liters needs during runoff
to plan
storage
as possible a family
example, per
of water
a dry
x 20 l./day
30 days
This
to supply
water,
a storage period.
tank
would
have to
contain
3 m3 at the would
A tank
containing minimum
provide
not all,
of the family's
method
If
monthly
runoff
periods an exafile
(above).
to calculate
runoff
The rain-
fall
data
available
average
-72each of these minimum runoff, for October by the roof the product rainfall area gives monthly average runoff. Here is table Then, to get a
is multiplied in October,
(average
above,
X X
z/3
0.9
30 m* 0.55
0.0305
2/3
0.9
m3. for figure each month. 1, with These minimum the below runoff totals are
performed graph,
left
makes the
procedures
step
is
runoff--that
is,
sum of all
which
the year.
For October,
example,
-73of the runoff line totals of the for the months of August, September, and October. runoff ("minimum"
following
graph
we have multiplied
each monthly
/ / / /
the for
line these
for is
with
rainfall
totals At
cumulative
runoff
a tank
collected
year's step
with
cumulative 20 I. 20 1. x
of five, will
suming 5 x
family
1. or 3 m3; at the end of two months a total line of 6 m3, and so on. graph above, until This figure
will
3 m3 for
dashed cumulative
on the runoff
line
October,
-74above it after this that. rate This shows that the 30 m* roof cannot provide enough water
to support
of consumption. can the 30 m* roof line (the dashed provide? line with We can determine dots, figure graph, equals for cumulative and faster increases 2) this
a second the
is meets
line
at the end of the year Thus cumulative faster levels off than
(on this
consumption consumption
increases line
August
increases again
from
October
to June.
consumption, of storage from the required roof, to provide can also this rate of consumption, from from the graph. the runoff line 2, and
runoff is the
volume
greatest
vertical
consumption about
to the
(distance
6 m3),
vertical consumption
3 m3). hold
So a tank runoff
which from
about to'
enough indicated
by the dash-dot
rises
liters) of a
9 liters
Water tend
rationing
water
on a graph instead
tend
cumulative
in figure
3 (below)
-75-
consumption is rate
line
(3);
using
for
calculating is
storage
volume the
needed to provide
seasons.
described
in this could
section
is a useful
tool
for
making system.
an It
be provided of Watt
by a proposed (1978,
however,
in his to be of
of system enough
to allow
these
to give
a rough
size".
-764.2 4.2.1 Costs of construction quantities for 4 tanks the materials and listed in inputs table for construction Using this of kind of
tanks
discussed
3.3.5. determine
information, cost-based
local
prices about
costs
judgements
of different plastered
"Trade-offs"
are evident:
example,
and little
section
guidelines a variety
of cement
needed to build
4.2.1
(continued)
Materials
quantities
for
4 tanks
-77-
;lf
: 0.5 m3 : 16 m2
-. 6..o:.
Cement mortar plastered basket with foundation (no cover) (after UMICEF, 1982) 2.3 m3
plus:
straight
wire,
use of forms
Reinforced cement mortar plastered underground tank (after Maikano and Nyberg, 1980) 20 m3
: 12 bags i ;2m;2
tank
: 13 bags : 1 m3 : 1.4 m3
plus:
rod, material
-78-
4.2.2
Calculating
costs
of materials
discussion
on figuring
rough catch-
some of the amin materials The procedures an idea of whether the costs questions are simple, materials against into
of roof
the
account: for
delivery, Here is
of labor,
a summary of the
computations
cost of cement (for concrete) cost of cement (for mortar) cost of roofing material (sheet)
rice
f3-ag
"ikzis%F .
X
f!g
;;-;
zaked
out
that
would
here,
example.
concerns about
cost
how to think
a given
1. Figure
the
volume
of concrete
needed.
floor
which
will
be 7.5 cm thick,
area
= =
**
6.2 m*
volume
area
X X
thickness
0.075 Ill
the
mixed self-
floors,
and cured
information,
we can figure
bags of cement
volume of concrete
&Crete x
7 bus iiXconcrete
3. Figure example,
the
cost,
using
the
price
of a bag of cement
in your
area.
For
cost
# of bags
x x
price $7.14
1981)
* determined u%theoncrete calculator", VITA (1973). You many decide to use a lower porportion of cement. The "concrete calculator" shows how to adjust the volumes of the other materials.
--
-8O-
Mortar
for
floors, of mortar
walls, needed.
and roofs
1. Figure mortar,
For a floor
2.5 m in diameter,
area
=
=
rr2 4.9 m2
volume
X X
thickness 0.05 m
= =
tank
with
walls
2 m high,
plastered
with
a total
of
area
2hr
(height)
15.7 m2
volume
thickness 0.04 m
= =
So the 0.88
total
volume
needed,
for
walls
and floor,
is 0.25
m3 + 0.63
m3
m3.
2. Figure mixed
the 1:3,
needed
volume
recommended
waterproof
check with
opinions
inexperienced).
-81-
bags of cement
'
$kikSar
' bags.
i!iLEE%ar
3. Figure area.
the cost
of the
cement,
using
the
price
of a bag of cement
in your
For example,
in Zaire,
cos t
= = =
&of 8.8
bags bags
cost
per bag
$62.83.
-82-
metal
sheet)
the area of roof to be covered with the metal sheet. for overhang, and consider where gutters will be A building 8 m long with a hung, when making measurements. pitched roof might have 2 roof surfaces of equal area: total area = = = 2 ( length 2 ('8 m 48 m2 x width) x3m)
2. Using sheet
using
the
price
of metal
= =
area 48 m2 $105.60
X x
price zz.20
This is only a rough figure, of the individual sheets and fit the roof surface. Also, to shed water properly'. This of sheet needed, and the cost,
because it ignores the size how much they must be cut to the sheets must overlap a little means that the actual area may be 15-20s more.
If gutters are to be made with the sheet material, this may increase the cost again. Sometimes sections can be made with pieces cut gutter and hangin g straps the sheets are fit to the roof.
of when
section above
is
for
three 3.3.2.
in section
involved skills
be able that
information designs
We do not mean to imply household a relatively 4.2.1). mented. ternatives. Each of the which is a mixture with out tanks rooftop great They are, See section
a more complete
described
in this
section
is It
of sand and cement the cleanest of the mortar a small choice concrete where available mixture
or making a better
from
-84-
mixtures
tanks (measured
and jars
contain
propor-
ranging
by volume).
are easier
to plaster jars
surfaces
of smaller
containers, when curing. Sand for but with should ceeding ginning. Clean thoroughly cement/sand is too "dry" sand with it
a 1:3 cement:sand
mixture
strong
mortar lots
should of fine
A range
sizes causes
to flake be gathered
off.
Sand and any other any work strats. and read through
before tanks,
each of the
instructions
water mixed
should together
they
in the
the water
While
a mix that
to apply, water
as possible half
to obtain of the
a workable cement,
an amount
is
the volume
sparingly. Do not mix more mortar l/2 hour! After properly about this than can be applied of time, to the tank begins or jar to set in about and cannot
amount 1978).
mortar
be applied
(Watt,
for
the
and
of a heavy a range
ideally sand,
contains gravel
of sizes, or the
m ust
be clean,
be weak.
-85Concrete 1:2:3 as little to 1:3:6. water used for foundations of the can be mixed proportions in proportions , concrete place. the should ranging from
Regardless as possible
and mixed
in a clean
Containers
figure
proportions to estimate
and concrete
of a shovel
with;
result
Technology
Handbook
(VITA,
1973;
3.3.6) with
includes concrete.
section
on selecting
mixes,
preparing,
4.3.1
0.25 Unlike
plaster water It
jar containers in this section, fibers this jar is built The mortar (like bur-
of mortar.
contains which is
heavy
a mor-
instructions cement:sand
mention should
He says strength.
back to the
discussion
above. instructions m3, Watt says than are for that construction with of a small jar which
people
in less
two days.
lids,
and taps,
method.
Subsituting
-86-
lime
for
has also
been tried.
MATERIALS:
(less
than
this
should
be required)
burlap, sand,
cloth",
or other
strong to fill
sacking
material
husks,
or sawdust
the sacking
TOOLS:
needle
and thread,
or other
tool
for for
sewing
the
measuring
STEPS IN CONSTRUCTION REQUIRING SPECIAL CARE: Making sure that the material used to fill the sacking (step 2.4) is heavy enough to keep its shape during plastering. It is a good idea to try filling the sack on the ground before beginning contruction. Making the until you allow you Mixing the especially Curing the Do not make the mortar for applying to the mounl mortar. are actually ready to begin (step 2.8). This should to work with a "dry" mortar mixture for maximum strength. cement and sand well, before adding the water, is important. new jar (step 2.10).
-87-
2.1 Place two pieces of gunn y cloth ihessian sacking) 125cm by 1lOcm together and mark out. Sew the two pieces together along the curved lines leaving the top and bottom open.
** copied
from Watt,
1978, by permission,
ITDG
- --. --.-
_ __._
.-- ---
--.. .--_
L9
-AeM %l u! apew uaaq aney Al!=deD (slie6 0001 xoJdde) saJl11 mop 01 dn lo Slodpue Puel!eql u! ssa33ns leaJ6 qi!~ pasn uaaq sey ahbwy3al s!ql WamJ 2 aeal le JOT laaqs ?/lseld JO Su!yses dwep Jabun AiqeJalaJd spu!M 6urA~p pue lqt+p4ns~o 4no Je! aifi aJn3 AJJnJS luawa3 e Yl!M paJu!ed aq us/e plffoqs Je.l ayl~o apisu! aql :Jeuow qllM asaql 13aJJog pue SKJalap Aue Joi Je! aql y3aq3 apew uaaq sey Jel i1q1 Jai/e S~OY PZ 6es +a pue 6eq Aum6 aql lo sauawo2 aql aAokau 01-z W390 lnoqe
-6uwado ayl dn pf!ng JelJow 40 JaAe} eJlxa ue ql!~ dn l/.il!nq aq plnoqs sleds ulql JO yeaM Aue .-lieu e u! 6u!ysnd Aq ssauy?~ql 104 JaAel Jeuow ayl-+aqD raAel is~g aql se Jauuew awes aya u! ~135-0 ~0 JaAel puo3as aqi Jalseld 6-t
JeUoW lse3aJd JO poOM 40 apPw aq ue3 s$y -Je!aql $0 6u.wado ayl JOT Pinow e ayeW 01 y3es aql jo doi ayl uo ~U!J Je/ngJ!a e asel,.j
L-Z
--
-9o4.3.2. Ferrocement The following Ferrocement This tank tank, 10 m3 and instructions Construction on years versions for have been copied (see section 3.3.6). with the confrom
description
is based,
struction
in Thailand
more information
on ferrocement
Chapter Seven
**
**
copied
from Watt,
1978,
by permission,
ITLG.
Bu!ssed
ayl Joolj j
pa)Z@Ja
s!
yue]
ayi
JOB
PauapJeq yuw
alaJc)uor, oz.@ j
sy!
uaqM
NOIKEIS SSOWJ
jo uo!iepuno
-. . . . . h) 3 2 I 3 la zr
-.
.(ozQ~
llnd lyuel ad!d u~woz
II!M
e se 13e 01 ad!d ayl ayl 40 ~0014 ayl .pua 40 yl6ual (awnlo/\ Aq apyslno
aas) il!nq uaaq sey yuel aql y6noJqi papeaiyi aAoqe ~301 Wa!OJd ad!d a41 uo de1 e L#M
ayl Jal4e y6noJql s! aJ!M 40 aDaid i! ieyl JaieM 0s patin (aals aloq
e s! . 2
UJJO)
#dl
a ----
- .-
Yll!lr
w 1 e lsea s! uogepuno4 alaJzuo3 yei ayi Japun qels uo!iepuno4 laAeJEi:pues:luawa3) p:z: 1 40
allUeLuS!p
01 afipann mo jlnd
x!w
ayl :s!ql 40 do1 uo p!el alaJzuo:, 40 Jane1 wag-~ e pue uo!le -Ae3xa aql JaAo AluaAa piei s! laAeJ6 pue pues 40 Jane1 w30 1 t/ I!osdol ays as001 ay$ aqi $hOJql le paJeal3 mop palene3xa u! w8.e pue yuel eaJe a41 Jeln3J!3 ~04 v paJ!nbaJ s! JalauJe!p
NV-Id
61 %Ij -
UOJ!
paS!UltA~ffi
pJ,EdklJJO~
yuea Ewol
ayew
03 y~tmw~oj
p,epueJg
81 *ti!j
~JoMw104 l! lnq lIn3!44!p IOU S! 4OOJ JelJOW u! paq!map sAeM aq1 u! Il!nq aq
-u!aJ
40 slas
elixa 01
JeiJOw
saJ!nbal JaideqD
pa3Jo4,
ayi aqi
pue olu!
Mol)laho ue se 13e 0) yuel aqi 40 do1 a41 le ll!nq s! ad!duMop Jalaweip ~138 40 416~31 wa-~z -luaua JO JeiJow Aue 40 paueal:, 40 Jeai3 palyl &Me padd!JiS
Ileum tf
A(q6noJoql
e Ala/\!leuJailv pas!uenle6
-UOJ!
al6ue
40 syl6ual
uo
s! L
pailoddns
yuei ayl POkl
6ulyaaqs
ww~o
40 slaays
aq ol ap!.su!
ino Gu!(lnd Aq pue slloq Gu!ploy aq~ S! YJOMWJO4 aql OS JO Aep e Jal4t, e ql!~ puo3as Aq
aq1
.sAqp pue paJaho3 s! yuei 01 pa.Y\olle s! JaieM luawa3 73!ql aqi pue 40 awnloh palu!ed yuea p3aa/du!o;, A quel ayi ~0 iimiloq Ilews e yuei aql s! yuel aql ayl ZZ*fi!j 40
uaAas
uapooM JelJow
s! a3e4Jns JaA03
e
e 01 SaJ!M
01 UO seq .s!ql
WOJ~
e ya!~
pUeS:lUaWa3)
40 JaAel
SUO!le6nJJO:,
Sap!AOJd UO!le6nJJO3
UO SaJ!M
dol ac(l 01 uoge6nJJoD lSJ!4 aql JO4 UO!lr?6nJJO3 6?1!~01104 siuawa3Jo4u!aJ aql punoM s!. Jaiawe!p
yD,ea u! aJ!M y3ea U! saJ!/v\ ayl ayi ~0~4 aJ!M ~~04 wwljz
le aseq dooq
01
~u!~Jo~u~aJ uo pu!~
l,yS!j
aas)
ino
paddm
pue
aloy
aqi
iUaUJa3JopJ!aJ dOOH
aq uc3 juaw!pas ay - aiep laiel e ie pamal aq Molle II!M s!yi !alpp!w ai(l LIP uo!ssaJdap iv\o([eqs say y301q syuci ~00;4 iou asaqi aqi Uo JelJow ~a:Jow aqr a41 aJo4ag adtd 41
s aJ!M u~P!43
paua44!ls dn
saop pue
plnom
pmo4~!aJun
ayl
e olu!
ll!nq sllem aqi pue ~0014 a41 qiyvi uogmn! aya pue yuei 40 JO014 aql OluO p!U( lX3U S! JelJOW 40 JaAel y3!L/i W35 uapoom leu!4
-JO3
apew
s!
e ql!M dn
pails!u!g JelJOW
pue
ap!su! pauapleq
at.g seq
oluo s!yl
pallahn.olj.
uayM
qsaw wt.Ug~ e seU EiU!l;au at41 -9~uo4 aqi ssauyyqi a@u!z e 01 11 pUt7nJe paddeJM pal!0 sJ!p p!6!J pue iuaw& Cl ~3~4 paLlalL@ aaJl paueal3
aJe
puo3as ayl
e Allua!3!44ns II!4 c:
ql!M
pa!alseld
si yuel
ayl
E? ap!AOJd
Srj6paM
pUE!
--
-93-
Materials required for lOm3 tank wti.? galvanised iron roof 600 kg. Cement 200m Plain wire 2.5mm diameter 16m Chicken mesh lm wide lm Water pipe 20mm bore 1 No. Water tap 20cm of 8cm dia. iron or Overflow pipe concrete pipe Gaivanised iron sheet and angle iron for roof 1 .0m3 Sand 0.5m3 Gravel
54
4.3.3
tank
a sturdy the
for
holding be used of to
grain. make
tanks
from 1982
an (see
3.3.6):* as 7,500
authors
can be built
tanks which
of about
liters.
5Ocm
100 cm
**
Regional
Office,
1982;
enough small rocks step 1 below. 2 m of water with 90m elbow tap to fit
to build
the foundations. cm in
See
diameter,
th_e water
ghala-type 1).
basket,
without
base
mixing board or pad, and containers proportions of mortar and concrete shovel pipe and trowel. threader.
STEPS IN CONSTRUCTION REQUIRING SPECIAL CARE: --Compacting to support (step 1). the foundation until it the weight of concrete, is solid enough tank, and water
---
I'dry18 enough that it will not fall Mixing mortar off the overhang of the inside of the basket, yet wet enough that it can be worked into the weave of If you the basket walls (steps 6 and 7 below). make a small quantity of mortar and try can, it to the basket before beginning w.W w construction. Plastering the inside of the leak-proof to give a strong, dation (step 7). Curing: constructed keeping the walls tank strengthens, bottom of the basket bond to the foundamp while before it the newly is used.
---
---
1. Lay the
about
a circle 2).
---
2. Spread a mixture of soil, sand and gravel over the rocks and stamp or pound down to a 1.5 cm thickness (fig. 2). 3. Prepare concrete as described above. Use proportions 1:2:4, cement:sand:gravel (measured by volume). This concrete is to be laid on the foundation; making the mix with about 20 1. of cement should yield enough concrete for a layer about 7.5 cm thick. 4. Spread about l/3 of the concrete on the foundation. Place the water pipe and tap in the wet concrete as shown in fig. 2. 5. Spread the remaining concrete on the foundation. Imnediately place the basket in the into the center and work its lower part concrete. Work some of the concrete up against the basket wall (fig. 2) to make sure the basket is firmly anchored. 6. After the described cement:sand concrete is set, prepare mortar as proportions 1:3, above. Use (measured by volume).
---
---
---
---
---
7. Apply
the mortar by hand or with a trowel to the inside of the basket walls, starting from the bottom of the basket. This layer of mortar Use a little should be about 1.25 cm thick. extra mortar where the bottom of the basket meets the concrete of the foundation; fill and smooth this area so that the bond will be strong.
---
8. While the first layer of mortar is stiffening, prepare mortar for the second layer. Use proportions 1:2, cement:sand (measured by volume). Apply to the inside of the basket and smooth into a layer about 1.25 cm thick with a trowel. Then apply any remaining mortar to the outside This may help protect the oriof the basket. ginal basket materials and will help strengthen the tank.
-97GHALA TANK (cont.) --9. As soon as the second layer of mortar sets, cover the tank with wet sacks or cloths. (These covers should be kept wet for about a It is much easier to keep the covers week. damp for proper curing if the tank can be shaded from the sun.) After about 12 hours, fill the tank about 114 full with water; this keeps the inside damp.
---
a lid. A concrete lid can be poured into a 3 to 5 cm deep circular hold in the soil, carefully cut to match the diameter of the opening at the top of the tank (fig. 3). Line the hole with sand so that the lid can be pulled out easily; using soil or some other material, carefully make mounds in the hole for air and water holes. A handle can also be placed in the concretp as it See the details of figs. 3 and 4. stiffens. The authors of TECHNOLOGY note that or other materials. the lids article in APPROPRIATE can be made out of wood should be
lO.Make
However the lid is made, its holes screened to keep out mosquitoes and dirt.
for collecting
water
-gg-
5. REFERENCES+
1967, "Butyl
pages 8-9.
Rain
Traps",
Arizona
Engineer
and Scientist,
May 1967,
and Treatment Community Use", Water and Sanitation USAID, Washington, D.C., 34 pages.
Devices Suitable for Home and for Health Project OTD 50,
Bulletin No. 10, The *CAIRNCKOSS, S., and FEACHEM, R., 1978, Small Water Supplies, Ross Institute of Tropical Hygiene, London, 78 pages. (see section 3.3.6). *CALVERT, R.C., and BINNING, R.!., 1977, "Low Cost Water Tanks in the Pacific App;opi-rate l'echnoloqy, London, Vol.4, Islands (New Hebrides)", Nov. 1977. (see section 3.3.6 CLUFF, C.B., no.3,
Potential report,
*CLUFF,
B.C.,
*Commission
Aspects of Water Harvesting Research at the 1974, "Engineering Proceedings of the Water Harvesting University of Arizona", Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, March 26-28 1914, Agricultural Research Service/USDA report No. ARS-W-22, Washln&on, D.C., pages 27-39. (see section 3.2.4) on International Relations NAS, 1974, More Water for Arid Lands: Promising Technologies and Research Opportunities, National ACadenly ot Sciences, Washington, D.C., 154 pages (see section 3.1.5). and Guzzlers",
CURRIER, W.F., 1973, "Water Harvesting by Trick Tanks, Rain Traps Water-Animal Relations Symposium, Twin Falls, Idaho. DARROW, K., DARROW, K., DAVIES, W.J.,
1981, Appropriate and PAM, R., 1976, revised Volume I. - Volunteers in,Asia Press. Stanford,
Technology Source KELLER, K., and PAM, R., 1981, Appropriate Volume II, Volunteers in Asia Press, Sanford, 496 pages.
1963, "Use of roman-type cisterns and small dams for rainwater storage in the highlands of the base valley of the Medjerda," unpublished report, USAID/Tunis, 5 pages.
DEDRICK, A.R., 1974, "Storage Systems for Harvested Water", Proceedin s of the "d---Water Harvesting Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, Marci' --1914 Agricultural Research Service/USDA report No. ARS-W-22, %&ngton, D.C., pages 175-191. (see section 3.2.4) DOOLEY, L.K., Organic 1978, "Rainwater Cisterns", Pennsylvania, May 1978, pages 141-146. Gardening ' and Farming, Emmaus,
*Items
marked with
an asterisk unalphabetized
are
reviewed references
in the listed
section
noted section.
+ see additional,
at end of this
-lQOELLSPERMAN, L.M., Asphalt Membrane Test Lining for Hafirs", 1962, "Buried to the Governmr:nt of the Republic of Sudan, USAID/United States Department of the Interior, 23 pages.
report
*FARRAR, D.M.,
1974, "Catchment Tanks in Southern and PACEY, A.J., Africa Fieldwork and Technology Field Report Review", Oxford. (see section 3.3.6)
FEACHEM, R.,
BURNS, E., CAIRNCROSS, S., CRONIN, A., CROSS, P., CURTIS, D., KHAN, M.K., LAMB, D., and SOUTHALL,H., 1978, Water, Health and Development: an Interdisciplinary Evaluation, Tri-Med Books Ltd., London, 260 pages. 1975, Proceedings of the Water Harvesting Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, March 26-28, 1974, Agricultural Research Service/USDA report No. ARS-W-22, Washington, D.C., 323 pages (see section 3.2.4). Corrugated Roofing Vol.11, No. 2, April Panels",
of Ferrocement,
Bangkok,
1978, Africa,
Oxford
337 pages.
Technological Syustems in Water and Grain Storage", The Application of Technology in Developing Countries, Interdisciplinary programs Seminar Series August - December 19/6, Office of Arid Lands Studies, Tucson, pages 21-35.
HARDENBERGH, W.A., and RODIE, E.B., 1960, Water Supply and Waste Disposal, International Textbook Company, Scranton, Penn., 513 pages. "Heaven's Water: in Rural Places, Cisterns Gath ' the Rain, 1980, Rodale's Shelter, Emmaus, Pennsylvania, Apri.1 1980, pages 34-37. New
for an Individual *HENDERSON, G.E., JONES, E.E., and SMITH, G.W., 1973, Planning Instructional Water S stem, American Association for Vocational -hens, Georgia, 156 pages. (see section 3.3.6). Technical *HOFKES, E.H., ed., 1981, Small Community Water Supplies, International Reference Centre for Community Water Supply 3.1.5). Sanitation, The Hague, 413 pages (see section Paper No. 18, and U.S., and UPTON,
*IONIDES, M.G.,
M London,
MOODY, P.R.,
Thornton,
1969, The Introduction of Rainwater Catchment Tanks and MicroI$gation to Botswana, Intermediate Technology Development Group,
*Institute
Operating, and Maintaining Roof for Rural Water, 1982, "Constructing, Water for the World technical note No. RWS.I.C.4, USAID, Catchments", approximately 10 pages (see section 3.2.4). "Evaluating Rainfall for Rural Water,1982b, World technical note No. RWS.l.P.5,/8 pages Catchments", Water for the
Institute
USAID,
-lOl*I.T.
Building and Installation of Corrugated Materials Workshop, "Production Roof Sheets made fro? Fibre Reinforced Cement: Basic Operating Manual for Honduras and Guatemala", report/A,I.D. contract 522-T-430, Intermediate Technology Development Group, London, 19 pages (see section 3.2.4). Report on Experimental 1981, "Interim Programme", United Nations Development Bangkok, 6 pages plus annexes, Report: Rainfall", Family Rain Water Storage Programme/World Health Organization Environmental Health THA/76/004. Crops and Soils, August -
KUKIELKA, B.J.
LAURITZEN, C.W., 1967, "Rain Traps of Steel", Utah Science, Vo1.28, No. 3, September 1967, 3 pages.
Salt
Vol.111, LINDBLAD, C., and DRUBEN, L., 1976, small Farm Grain Storage, in Technical Assistance, Washington, D.C., 148 pages.
MADDOCKS, D., 1975, "An Introduction Appropriate Technology, to Methods yo1.2, No.3, of Rainwater pages 24-25. Collection
*MAIKANO, G.J.,
and NYBERG, L., 1980, "Rainwater Catchment in Botswana", Rural Water Supply in Developing Countries: Proceedings of a Workshop on Training Held in Zomba, Malawi, 5-12 August 1980, International Development Research Center, 1980, Ottawa, pages 13-l/ (see section 3.3.6).
*MCDOWELL, J., ed., 1976, Village Technology in Eastern Africa: a Regional Seminar on Simple Technology for the Rural Family, UNICEF Last Africa Regional Office, Nairobi, 60 pages (see section X3.6).
Water Systems
Handbook,
Iowa State
University, Land
Precipitation", Hydrometry,
MYERS, L.E., 1974, "Water harvesting 2000 B.C. to 1974 A.D.", Proceedings of the Water harvesting Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, March 26-28' 1914 Agricultural Research Service/USDA report No. ARS-W-22, Wishingion, D.C., pages l-7. NATIONAL PHYSICS INSTITUTE (LFN/LIPI), ("Ferrocement Water Container"), Indonesia, 5 pages.
1980 (?),
National
*NAS, 1974, Roofing in Developing Countries: research for new technologies, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 57 pages (see section 3.2.4).
-102OFFICE OF WATER PROGRAMS/EPA, 1974, Manual of Individual Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, PAMA, R.P.,
LEE, S., and VIETMEYER, N.D., 1976, Ferrocement, a Versatile Its Increasing Use in Asia, International Construction Material: Gocement Information Center, Bangkok, 108 pages.
PARKER, R.N.,
1973, article
by Dalton, Kingdom. G.E.,
*POMPE, C.,
VAN KERKVOORDEN,R., and SISWOYO, H., 1982, "Ferrocement Applications Journal of Ferrocement, in the West Java Rural Water Supply Project", January 1982, pages 51-61 (see section 3.3.6). Bangkok, Vol. lfbNo.1,
REE, W.O.,
1976, "Rooftop Runoff for Water Supply", USDA Report ARS-Si'L33, Washington, D.C.,
Sanitation,
Agricultural 10 pages.
Research
Service/
1958, Environmental SALVATO, J.A., pages 88-91. SHARMA, P.C., *SHARMA, P.C.,
John Wiley
and Sons,
Water Tank, and GOPALARATNAM, V.S., 1980, Ferrocement Ferrocement Information Center, Bangkok, 37 pages. PAMA, R.P., VALLS, J., art Review on Ferrocement London, Vol.9 No.3, July
and GOPALARATNAM, V.S., 1979, "State-of-theGrain Storage Bins", Journal of Ferrocement, 1979, pages 135-150. (see secton 3.3.6).
THORSKY, G.N., 1961, "Test Linings fqr Hafirs", report to the Government of the Cooperation Administration/ Republic of the Sudan, International United States Department of the Interior, 35 pages. UNEP, 1979, "Rain and Storm Water Harvesting for Additional Water Supply in Rural Expert Group Meeting 30 October - 2 November 1979, Nairobi, Areas", United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, 23 pages. Regional Office, 1982, "From Kenya - how to Make Plastered tanks for storing water", Appropriate Technolosv, London, No.4, March 1982, pages 7-8. (see section 3.3.6). Shjeets and Other Purposes", Forum on Approprite Industrial 20-30 November 1978, 57 pages. Water
"Sisal Fibre Concrete for Roofing background paper for International Technology, New Delhi/Anand, India,
VIETMEYER, KAMPEMPOOL, NUTALAYA, DESATHIEN, and PATARAGETVIT, 1976, "'Thailo' Ferrocement Rice Bin", Applied Scientific Research Corp. of . ThailaFd,.Ban$kok, 10 pages.
1973, Village
Washington,
Assistance,
in Technical 3.3.6).
1977, Using Water Resources, Volunteers in Technical Assistance, Washington, D.C., 143 pages (see section 3.3.6)
-103WAGNER, E.G., and LANOIX, J.N., 1969, Communities, World Health Water Supply Organization, for Rural Areas and Small Geneva, 340 pages.
for WATER ENGINEERING GROUP, 982, Short Course: Water Supply and Sanitation Developing Countries, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, approximately 400 pages. WATT, Simon, *WATT, Simon,
Appropriate
Technology
1978 b, "Rainwater
1977, "Wire-Reinforced
Technology, London,
1978, Ferrocement Water Tanks and Their Construction, Technology Publications, London, 1978, 118 pages. (see
BRADLEY, D.J., and WHITE, A;U., 1972, Drawers of Water: Domestic Water Use in East Africa, University of Chicago Press, 306 pages (see section 3 1.5) Eolle&ion Tanks Constructed on Self-Help Basis:, *WINARTO, 1981, "Rainwater Journal of Ferrocement, Bangkok, Vol.11 No.3, July 1981, pages 247-253. (see section 3.3.6). WRIGHT, F.Bo,
1956, Rural
New York,
and Sanitation,
John Wiley
and Sons,
additional
1966, "RAin Traps for Intercepting and LAURITZEN, C.W., and THAYEK, A.A., Agriculture Information Bulletin Storing Water for Livestock", no. 307, Agricultural Research Service/USDA, Washington, D.C., 9 pages
Institute for Rural Water, World technical
1982c,
note
'Designing Roof Catchments", Water no. RWSl.D.4, USAID, about 8 pages by Chemical Soil Treatment--a report, School of Engineering,
for literaUniv-
the
ESHENAUR, W., 1982, "Water Harvesting ture review", unpublished ersity of Minnesota HALL, N., .,
a Future?", Appropriate Technology, London, (see section 3.2.4) December 1981, pages 7-9
PARRY,J.P.M.,
1981, "Development and Testing of RPaf Cladding Materials Made from Fibre Reinforced cement", Appropriate Technology, London, Vol 8, No. 2, September 1981, pages 20-23